Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2016-06-28_10b Urban Water Management Plan Update Attachment 1Final Draft
2015 Urban Water Management Plan
for the
City of Arroyo Grande
Prepared by
6/22/2016
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Arroyo Grande Table of Contents
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iv
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ v
List of Terms and Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... vi
1 Introduction and overview................................................................................................................. 1-1
2 Plan Preparation ................................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Coordination .............................................................................................................................. 2-2
2.2 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation ........................................................................ 2-4
2.3 Relationship of the UWMP to Other Planning Efforts ............................................................... 2-4
2.4 Data Sources .............................................................................................................................. 2-5
3 System Description ............................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1 Service Area Description and Boundaries .................................................................................. 3-1
3.2 Service Area Climate .................................................................................................................. 3-4
3.3 Service Area Population and Demographics .............................................................................. 3-5
4 System Demands ................................................................................................................................ 4-1
4.1 Baselines and Targets ................................................................................................................ 4-1
4.1.1 Baseline Water Use ........................................................................................................ 4-1
4.1.2 Target Water Use ........................................................................................................... 4-3
4.1.3 Minimum Water Use Reduction Requirement .............................................................. 4-5
4.1.4 Summary of Baseline and Target Water Use ................................................................. 4-5
4.2 Water Demands ......................................................................................................................... 4-7
4.2.1 Low-Income Demands ................................................................................................... 4-9
4.2.2 Sales to Other Water Agencies .................................................................................... 4-10
4.2.3 Additional Water Uses and Losses ............................................................................... 4-10
4.2.4 Total Water Use ........................................................................................................... 4-10
4.3 Wholesale Water Demand ....................................................................................................... 4-11
4.4 Water Use Reduction Plan ....................................................................................................... 4-11
5 System Supplies ................................................................................................................................. 5-1
5.1 Water Supply Sources ................................................................................................................ 5-1
5.1.1 Water Supply Facilities ................................................................................................... 5-1
City of Arroyo Grande Table of Contents
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
ii
5.1.2 Current and Projected Water Sources ........................................................................... 5-1
5.2 Groundwater .............................................................................................................................. 5-4
5.2.1 Pismo Formation ............................................................................................................ 5-4
5.2.2 Santa Maria Groundwater Basin .................................................................................... 5-4
5.2.3 Groundwater Management Plan ................................................................................... 5-7
5.2.4 Groundwater Levels and Historical Trends .................................................................... 5-9
5.2.5 Groundwater Overdraft ............................................................................................... 5-10
5.2.6 Existing and Projected Groundwater Pumping ............................................................ 5-10
5.3 Transfer Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 5-11
5.4 Desalinated Water Opportunities ............................................................................................ 5-12
5.5 Recycled Water Opportunities ................................................................................................. 5-12
5.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities ................................................................................. 5-12
5.5.2 Wastewater Flow Projections ...................................................................................... 5-13
5.5.3 Water Recycling Facilities ............................................................................................ 5-13
5.5.4 Regional Recycled Water Opportunities ...................................................................... 5-15
5.6 Future Water Projects .............................................................................................................. 5-19
5.6.1 Lopez Reservoir Spillway Raising ................................................................................. 5-19
5.6.2 Supplemental State Project Water via the Coastal Branch and Lopez Pipelines ......... 5-20
5.6.3 Additional Stormwater Reclamation ............................................................................ 5-20
5.6.4 PG&E Desalinated Water ............................................................................................. 5-22
6 Water Supply Reliability ..................................................................................................................... 6-1
6.1 Supply Reliability by Source ....................................................................................................... 6-1
6.1.1 Lopez Reservoir .............................................................................................................. 6-1
6.1.2 Groundwater .................................................................................................................. 6-2
6.2 Supply Reliability - Historic and Future Conditions .................................................................... 6-2
6.2.1 Basis of Water Year Data ............................................................................................... 6-3
6.2.2 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand ........................................................................ 6-4
6.2.3 Projected Single Dry Year Supply/Demand .................................................................... 6-4
6.2.4 Projected Multiple Dry Year Supply/Demand ................................................................ 6-5
6.2.5 Projected Minimum Three Year Supply ......................................................................... 6-5
6.2.6 Resource Maximization and Import Minimization ........................................................ 6-6
City of Arroyo Grande Table of Contents
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
iii
6.2.7 Factors Affecting Supply Reliability ................................................................................ 6-6
7 Water Shortage Contingency Planning .............................................................................................. 7-1
7.1 Stages of Action and Reduction Objectives ............................................................................... 7-1
7.2 Actions during a Catastrophic Interruption ............................................................................... 7-3
7.3 Mandatory Prohibitions on Water Wasting ............................................................................... 7-5
7.4 Consumption Reduction Methods in Most Restrictive Stage .................................................... 7-5
7.5 Excessive Use Penalties .............................................................................................................. 7-5
7.6 Revenue and Expenditure Impacts/Measures to Overcome Impacts ....................................... 7-6
7.7 Water Conservation Ordinance ................................................................................................. 7-6
7.8 Reduction Measuring Mechanism ............................................................................................. 7-7
8 Demand Management Measures ...................................................................................................... 8-1
8.1 Demand management measures (DMMs) Implemented or Planned to be Implemented ....... 8-1
8.1.1 DMM – Water Waste Prevention .................................................................................. 8-1
8.1.2 DMM – Metering ........................................................................................................... 8-2
8.1.3 DMM – Conservation Pricing ......................................................................................... 8-2
8.1.4 DMM – Public Information Programs ............................................................................ 8-4
8.1.5 DMM – Water Loss Control............................................................................................ 8-4
8.1.6 DMM – Conservation Coordinator and Staffing Support .............................................. 8-5
8.2 Other Demand Management Measures .................................................................................... 8-5
8.2.1 Water Conservation Incentive Programs ....................................................................... 8-5
9 References ......................................................................................................................................... 9-1
Appendix A. DWR Checklist........................................................................................................................... A
Appendix B. Notification and Outreach Materials ........................................................................................ B
Appendix C. Letter of Adoption .................................................................................................................... C
Appendix D. BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE AND TARGET WATER USE TM – REVISED DRAFT ... D
Appendix E. AWWA Water Loss Audit .......................................................................................................... E
Appendix F. Selected Figures from the NCMA 2015 Annual Monitoring Report ......................................... F
Appendix G. SMGB Judgment and Gentlemen’s AGreement ...................................................................... G
Appendix H. Water Conservation Ordinance ................................................................................................H
City of Arroyo Grande List of Tables
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. DWR Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 2-1
Table 2-2. Summary of Changes in the UWMP Act Since 2010 ................................................................. 2-1
Table 2-3. Agency Coordination ................................................................................................................. 2-2
Table 3-1. Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in the City of Arroyo Grande, Jan.-June ........................ 3-4
Table 3-2. Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in the City of Arroyo Grande, July-Dec & Annual ......... 3-4
Table 3-3. Projected Annual Compounding Growth Rates in the City of Arroyo Grande ......................... 3-5
Table 3-4. Projected Annual Population Growth in the City of Arroyo Grande......................................... 3-5
Table 4-1. Base Daily Per Capita Water Use – 10-year range .................................................................... 4-2
Table 4-2. Base Daily Per Capita Water Use - 5 year range ....................................................................... 4-2
Table 4-3. Daily Per Capita Water Use Target ............................................................................................ 4-5
Table 4-4. Baseline, Compliance, Interim Target, and Target Per Capita Water Use ................................ 4-6
Table 4-5. 2010 Water Deliveries, afy ........................................................................................................ 4-7
Table 4-6. 2015 Water Deliveries, afy ........................................................................................................ 4-8
Table 4-7. 2020 Water Deliveries, afy ........................................................................................................ 4-8
Table 4-8. 2025 & 2030 Water Deliveries, afy ........................................................................................... 4-9
Table 4-9. 2035 Deliveries, afy ................................................................................................................... 4-9
Table 4-10. Low-Income Water Deliveries, afy ........................................................................................ 4-10
Table 4-11. Sales to Other Water Agencies, afy ...................................................................................... 4-10
Table 4-12. Non-Revenue Water, afy....................................................................................................... 4-10
Table 4-13. Total Water Use, afy ............................................................................................................. 4-11
Table 4-14. Retail Agency Demand Projections Provided to Wholesale Suppliers.................................. 4-11
Table 5-1. Current and Projected Water Supplies ..................................................................................... 5-2
Table 5-2. Current and Projected Wholesale Water Supplies ................................................................... 5-2
Table 5-3. SMGB Division of Safe Yield ...................................................................................................... 5-3
Table 5-4. Lopez Treatment and Distribution System Contract Entitlements ........................................... 5-3
Table 5-5. Zone 3 Extended Drought Emergency Supply Options ............................................................ 5-8
Table 5-6. Historic Groundwater Pumping .............................................................................................. 5-11
Table 5-7. Projected Groundwater Pumping ........................................................................................... 5-11
Table 5-8. Wastewater Flow Projections ................................................................................................. 5-13
Table 5-9. Potential Recycled Water Use, afy .......................................................................................... 5-17
Table 5-10. 2010 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projected for 2015 and Actual 2015 Recycled Water Use,
afy............................................................................................................................................................. 5-18
Table 5-11. Projected Recycled Water Use, afy ....................................................................................... 5-18
Table 5-12. Lopez Reservoir Spillway Raise Capacities and Yields ........................................................... 5-19
Table 6-1. Initial Prescribed Municipal Diversion Reduction Strategy Under the LRRP ............................ 6-1
Table 6-2. Initial Prescribed Downstream Release Reduction Strategy Under the LRRP .......................... 6-2
Table 6-3. Basis of Water Year Data........................................................................................................... 6-3
Table 6-4. Historical and Projected Water Supply Conditions ................................................................... 6-3
Table 6-5. Supply and Demand – Normal Year .......................................................................................... 6-4
Table 6-6. Supply and Demand Comparisons – Single Dry Year ................................................................ 6-4
City of Arroyo Grande List of Figures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
v
Table 6-7. Supply and Demand Comparison - Multiple Dry Year Events .................................................. 6-5
Table 6-8. Three-Year Minimum Supply .................................................................................................... 6-5
Table 6-9 Factors Affecting Water Supply Reliability ................................................................................. 6-6
Table 7-1. Water Shortage Contingency - Rationing Stages ...................................................................... 7-1
Table 7-2. Water Shortage Contingency - Mandatory Prohibitions .......................................................... 7-5
Table 7-3. Water Shortage Contingency - Penalties and Charges ............................................................. 7-6
Table 8-1. Demand Management Measures ............................................................................................. 8-1
Table 8-2. Single Family Rate Structure ..................................................................................................... 8-3
Table 8-3. Multi-family Rate Structure ...................................................................................................... 8-3
Table 8-4. Non-residential Water Rates..................................................................................................... 8-3
Table 8-5. Base Fees for Meter Size ........................................................................................................... 8-3
Table 8-6. Cash for Grass Program Summary ............................................................................................ 8-5
Table 8-7. Water Efficient Washer Rebate Program Summary ................................................................. 8-6
Table 8-8. Smart Irrigation Controller and Sensor Program Summary ...................................................... 8-6
Table 8-9. 2004-2016 Plumbing Retrofit Summary ................................................................................... 8-6
Table 8-10. 2004-2016 Plumbing Replacements Summary by Plumbing Hardware Type ........................ 8-7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1. Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................. 3-2
Figure 3-2. Service Area Map ..................................................................................................................... 3-3
Figure 3-3. City General Plan Land Use ...................................................................................................... 3-7
Figure 3-4. City Zoning Map ....................................................................................................................... 3-8
Figure 4-1. Historic Gross Water Use and Per Capita Water Use .............................................................. 4-3
Figure 4-2. Historical, Baseline, Targets, and Projected GPCDs ................................................................. 4-7
Figure 5-1. SMGB Boundaries and Management Areas (28) ..................................................................... 5-6
Figure 5-2. SSLOCSD and Pismo Beach WWTFs and Outfall .................................................................... 5-14
Figure 5-3. Stormwater Basins and Retention Systems ........................................................................... 5-21
City of Arroyo Grande List of Terms and Acronyms
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
vi
LIST OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS
Acronym/Term Definition
(#) Reference/source citation # that can be looked up in Section 9
af acre feet
afy acre feet per year
ATF Advanced Treatment Facility
AWWA American Water Works Association
BMP Best Management Practice
CCWA Central Coast Water Authority
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CII Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional
CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System
CUWCC California Urban Water Conservation Council
CWC California Water Code
DDW California Division of Drinking Water
DMM Demand Management Measure
DWR California Department of Water Resources
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ETo evapotranspiration rate
FAT Full Advanced Treatment
GHG Green House Gas
GIS Geographical Information System
gpcd gallons per capita per day
GPM gallons per minute
HCF Hundred Cubic Feet
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HECW High efficiency clothes washer
HET High efficiency toilet
IRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
ITP Independent Technical Panel
LUE Land Use Element
LRRP Low Reservoir Response Plan
mgd million gallons per day
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MSL mean sea level
NCMA Northern Cities Management Area
NRW non-revenue water
OCSD Oceano Community Services District
RGSP Regional Groundwater Sustainability Project
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment
RWFPS Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
SB7 Guidebook Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water
Use
City of Arroyo Grande List of Terms and Acronyms
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
vii
Acronym/Term Definition
SB7 Senate Bill x 7-7
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
SMGB Santa Maria Valley Groundwater Basin
SOI Sphere of Influence
SSLOCSD South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
SWP California State Water Project
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
UWMP Act Urban Water Management Planning Act
UWMP
Guidebook
Guidebook to Assist Water Suppliers in the Preparation of a 2010 Urban Water
Management Plan
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements
WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan
WSPDP Water Supply, Production and Delivery Plan
WTP Water treatment plant
WWTF Wastewater treatment facility
WWTP wastewater treatment plant
Zone 3 San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 3
City of Arroyo Grande 1. Introduction and overview
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
1-1
1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The California Water Code requires urban water suppliers within the state to prepare and adopt Urban
Water Management Plans (UWMPs) for submission to the California Department of Water Resources
(DWR). The UWMPs, which are required to be filed every five years, must satisfy the requirements of
the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act) of 1983 including amendments that have been
made to the UWMP Act and other applicable regulations. The UWMP Act requires urban water suppliers
servicing 3,000 or more connections, or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet (af) of water annually, to
prepare an UWMP.
The purpose of the UWMP is for water suppliers to evaluate their long-term resource planning and
establish management measures to ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and
future demands. The UWMP provides a framework to help water suppliers maintain efficient use of
urban water supplies, continue to promote conservation programs and policies, ensure that sufficient
water supplies are available for future beneficial use, and provide a mechanism for response during
water drought conditions.
The UWMP is a valuable planning tool used for multiple purposes including:
Serves as a valuable resource to the community and other interested parties regarding water
supply and demand, conservation and other water related information
Meets a statutory requirement of the California Water Code
Provides a key source of information for Water Supply Assessments (WSAs) and Written
Verifications of Water Supply
Supports regional long-range planning documents including City and County General Plans
Provides a standardized methodology for water utilities to assess their water resource needs
and availability
Serves as a critical component of developing Integrated Regional Water Management Plans
(IRWMPs)
Provides a resource for regional involvement in the California Water Plan
This plan, which was prepared in compliance with the California Water Code, and as set forth in the
2015 guidelines and format established by the DWR, constitutes the City of Arroyo Grande’s (City) 2015
UWMP.
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-1
2 PLAN PREPARATION
This plan was prepared based on guidance from DWR’s Guidebook to Assist Water Suppliers in the
Preparation of a 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP Guidebook) (1), DWR Urban Water
Management Plans Public Workshops and Webinars, Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and
Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use (SB7 Guidebook) (2), and the 2015 DWR Review Sheet Checklist
(Appendix A).
The 2015 UWMPs must be submitted to DWR by the water purveyors by July 1, 2016. Usually, UWMPs
are due on December 31 of years ending in ‘0’ and ‘5’, but a six-month extension has been granted for
submittal of the 2015 UWMPs. The draft 2015 UWMP Guidebook became available in November 2015
and was finalized in February 2016. DWR’s 2015 UWMP schedule is summarized in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1. DWR Schedule
Date Event/Task
November, 2015 Draft Guidebook released
December , 2015 Workshops
January, 2016 Final Draft Guidebook released
March, 2016 Final Guidebook, materials and tools released
July, 2016 UWMPs due to DWR
A DWR Review Sheet checklist is provided in Appendix A as a reference for the various sections within
this UWMP that address the requirements of the UWMP Act. Table 2-2 summarizes changes to the
UWMP Act since 2010 that have been addressed in this UWMP.
Table 2-2. Summary of Changes in the UWMP Act Since 2010
Change
CWC Section Legislative Bill Summary
Demand
Management
Measures
10631 (f)(1) and
(2)
AB 2067, 2014 Requires water suppliers to provide narratives
describing their water demand management
measures, as provided. Requires retail water
suppliers to address the nature and extent of
each water demand management measure
implemented over the past 5 years and describe
the water demand management measures that
the supplier plans to implement to achieve its
water use targets.
Submittal
Date
10621 (d) AB 2067, 2014 Requires each urban water supplier to submit its
2015 plan to the Department of Water Resources
by July 1, 2016.
Electronic
Submittal
10644 (a) (2) SB 1420, 2014 Requires the plan, or amendments to the plan, to
be submitted electronically including any
standardized forms, tables, or displays specified
by the department.
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-2
Change
CWC Section Legislative Bill Summary
Standardized
Forms
10644 (a) (2) SB 1420, 2014 Requires the plan, or amendments to the plan, to
include any standardized forms, tables, or displays
specified by the department.
Water Loss 10631 (e) (1) (J)
and (e) (3) (A) and
(B)
SB 1420, 2014 Requires a plan to quantify and report on
distribution system water loss.
Estimating
Future
Water Savings
10631 (e) (4) SB 1420, 2014 Provides for water use projections to display and
account for the water savings estimated to result
from adopted codes, standards, ordinances, or
transportation and land use plans, when that
information is available and applicable to an
urban water supplier.
Voluntary
Reporting
of Energy
Intensity
10631.2 (a) and (b) SB 1036, 2014 Provides for an urban water supplier to include
certain energy related information, including, but
not limited to, an estimate of the amount of
energy used to extract or divert water supplies.
Defining
Water
Features
10632 AB 2409, 2010 Requires urban water suppliers to analyze and
define water features that are artificially supplied
with water, including ponds, lakes, waterfalls, and
fountains, separately from swimming pools and
spas.
2.1 COORDINATION
To prepare this UWMP, the City coordinated with multiple neighboring and stakeholder agencies. The
coordination efforts were conducted to: 1) inform the agencies of the City’s efforts and activities; 2)
gather high quality data for use in developing this UWMP; and 3) coordinate planning activities with
other related regional plans and initiatives. The coordination activities conducted by the City are
summarized in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3. Agency Coordination
Agency/
Organization
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
in
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
e
p
l
a
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
e
d
on
t
h
e
d
r
a
f
t
At
t
e
n
d
e
d
pu
b
l
i
c
me
e
t
i
n
g
s
Wa
s
co
n
t
a
c
t
e
d
f
o
r
as
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Wa
s
s
e
n
t
a
co
p
y
o
f
t
h
e
dr
a
f
t
p
l
a
n
Wa
s
s
e
n
t
a
no
t
i
c
e
of
in
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
ad
o
p
t
Avila Beach
Community
Services District
X
Avila Valley
Mutual Water
Company
X
California
Department of
Water
Resources
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-3
Agency/
Organization
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
in
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
e
p
l
a
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
e
d
on
t
h
e
d
r
a
f
t
At
t
e
n
d
e
d
pu
b
l
i
c
me
e
t
i
n
g
s
Wa
s
co
n
t
a
c
t
e
d
f
o
r
as
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Wa
s
s
e
n
t
a
co
p
y
o
f
t
h
e
dr
a
f
t
p
l
a
n
Wa
s
s
e
n
t
a
no
t
i
c
e
of
in
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
ad
o
p
t
California State
Library
City of Grover
Beach
X
City Pismo
Beach
X
County of San
Luis Obispo
X X
County Service
Area 12
X
Nipomo Mesa
Management
Area Technical
Group
X
Northern Cities
Management
Area Technical
Group
X
Oceano
Community
Services District
X
Port San Luis
Harbor District
X
San Luis Obispo
Council of
Governments
X
San Luis Obispo
County Flood
Control and
Water
Conservation
District Zone 3
X X
San Miguelito
Mutual Water
Company
X
South San Luis
Obispo County
Sanitation
District
X
Table to be updated upon completion of each notification.
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-4
2.2 PLAN ADOPTION, SUBMITTAL, AND IMPLEMENTATION
To fulfill the requirements of Water Code Section 10621(c), the City sent letters of notification of
preparation of the 2015 UWMP to all neighboring cities and San Luis Obispo County 60 days prior to the
public hearing. Copies of the 60-day notification letters are attached as Appendix B.
To fulfill the requirements of Water Code Section 10642 of the UWMP Act, the City made the draft 2015
UWMP available for public review and held a public hearing on June 28, 2016. The public review hearing
was noticed on June 14, 2016 and the hearing notice is attached in Appendix B. In addition, the City
maintained a copy of the draft UWMP in its office prior to the public hearing.
The Final 2015 UWMP was formally adopted by the City Council on June 28, 2016. A copy of the
Adoption Resolution is included in Appendix C. A copy of the Final 2015 UWMP was sent to the
California State Library, DWR (electronically using the WUEdata reporting tool), and other appropriate
agencies within 30 days of adoption. The City will make the 2015 UWMP available for public review in
its offices during normal hours no later than 30 days after the adoption of the plan by the City Council
and filing with DWR.
The implementation of this plan shall be carried out as described unless significant changes occur
between the adoption of this plan and the 2020 plan. If such significant changes do occur, the City will
amend and readopt the plan as required by the California Water Code.
2.3 RELATIONSHIP OF THE UWMP TO OTHER PLANNING EFFORTS
The City has identified the need to obtain additional water to maintain a reliable supply portfolio. The
Water Supply Alternatives Study was prepared in August 2004 to identify one or more short,
intermediate, and long term supply alternatives that meet the City’s objectives for water quantity,
quality, and reliability (3). The Water Supply Alternatives Study report was followed by other related
water supply reports including the following:
- Water Recycling Update Report, January 2009 (4)
- South San Luis Obispo County Desalination Funding Study , October 2008 (5)
- Supplemental Water Supply Study Nacimiento Pipeline Extension (6)
- Capacity Evaluation of the Lopez Pipeline for Delivery of Additional State Water Project Supplies
to the Northern Cities Technical Memorandum (7)
- Memorandum: Lopez Reservoir Expansion- Spillway Raise Project Advisory Group
Recommendations, January 2009
- Lopez Lake Spillway Raise Project Report, February 2013 (8)
- San Luis Obispo County Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan (9)
- Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study for the City of Pismo Beach (10)
- Diablo Canyon Power Plant Desalination Hydraulic Feasibility Analysis FINAL DRAFT – DCPP
DESALINATION PIPELINE FEASIBILITY STUDY Technical Memorandum (11)
- Water Balance Study for the Northern Cities Area, April 2007 (12)
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-5
The City Council reviewed the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
(IRWMP), of which the City is a participant, on August 6, 2014 at its public meeting. The City is
coordinating the preparation of the UWMP with this regional water planning effort. The UWMP serves
as a critical component for developing the IRWMP and maintains consistency with the goals and policies
of the IRWMP. The IRWMP provides an opportunity for the City to apply for state funding for planning
or implementation of projects and enhances integration with regional, countywide, and statewide water
resources planning strategies and policies.
Through its involvement in the Northern Cities Management Area (NCMA), the City has reviewed and
provided input on the County’s Master Water Report (13), including demand and supply projections
developed prior to this UWMP.
The City is beginning an update of the Agriculture, Conservation and Open Space Element of the General
Plan, which will include goals and policies for the City’s water resources. The UWMP will provide
information and background for this planning process.
The City updated the Housing Element of its General Plan in early 2016. This UWMP is consistent with
the information provided in the Housing Element.
The City’s Wastewater System and Water System Master Plans were updated in 2013. This UWMP is
prepared in concurrence with the master planning efforts and reflects consistent demand and supply
data and methodologies.
2.4 DATA SOURCES
This UWMP was prepared by compiling data from a variety of sources, including federal, state, and local
government agencies, which are cited in Section 9. Documents concerning water management in the
City and surrounding areas were used and are shown below:
Information used to complete this report was compiled from a variety of sources, including:
• Arroyo Grande Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Agreement (see Appendix G)
• Arroyo Grande Urban Water Management Plan 2005 Update, September 2010
• Arroyo Grande Urban Water Management Plan 2010 Update, June 2012
• Arroyo Grande Water Supply Alternatives, August 24, 2004 (3)
• Capacity Evaluation of the Lopez Pipeline (7)
• City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Housing Element (14)
• City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Element (15)
• City of Arroyo Grande Staff
• City of Arroyo Grande Water Conservation and Emergency Water Shortage Restrictions, February
2015 (see Appendix H)
• City of Arroyo Grande Water System Master Plan, December 2012 (16)
• 2015 Urban Water Management Plans Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers, March 2016 (17)
City of Arroyo Grande 2. Plan Preparation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
2-6
• Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use, February
2016 (18)
• Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan (19)
• Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan Technical Memorandum (20)
• Regional Housing Needs Plan (21)
• San Luis Obispo County 2040 Population, Housing & Employment Forecast (22)
• San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 3 Urban Water
Management Plan 2010 Update (23)
• San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report (13)
• San Luis Obispo County 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (24)
• Supplemental Water Supply Study Nacimiento Pipeline Extension (6)
• Water and Wastewater Financial Plan and Rate Study (25)
• Water Balance Study for the Northern Cities Area (26)
• Water Recycling Update Report (4)
• South San Luis Obispo County Desalination Funding Study , October 2008 (5)
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-1
3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
3.1 SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION AND BOUNDARIES
The City is located in the southern portion of San Luis Obispo County along the banks of the Arroyo
Grande Creek. The Pacific Ocean lies approximately 1.5 miles to the west. The City is bordered by the
City of Grover Beach to the west, the communities of Oceano and Halcyon to the southwest, Pismo
Beach to the northwest and unincorporated portions of the County of San Luis Obispo to the north,
northeast, and southeast (see Figure 3-1). The City, a general law entity, currently incorporates 5.87
square miles of land with primarily residential and agricultural land uses. The City’s distinctive character
derives from its traditional ties to agriculture, physical diversity, unique village, small town atmosphere,
and rural settings. The current (2015) population of the City is 17,731 based on California Department of
Finance data; however, the City currently serves water to a population of 17,636 residents. The City’s
water service area population includes residents of 9 water service connections outside of City limits
and excludes residents of 138 connections served by Oceano Community Service District (OCSD) in an
area located in the southwest portion of the City limits (see Figure 3-2). All 6,605 connections to the
City’s water system are metered, and there are no agricultural or industrial connections.
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-2
Figure 3-1. Vicinity Map
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-3
Figure 3-2. Service Area Map
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-4
3.2 SERVICE AREA CLIMATE
The climate of the City has a Mediterranean coastal climate with mild, dry summers and cool, wet
winters. The annual precipitation is 16.14 inches, with the majority of the rain occurring during the
months of January through March. Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 outline the climate characteristics for the
City area based on average historical climate data. The normal year evapotranspiration rate (Eto) for the
City is approximately 52 inches. The average annual temperature is 58 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). The City
has mild weather year-round, with typically warm daytime temperatures and cool nighttime
temperatures. The City does not have extreme seasonal variations, though the area is subject to normal
weather fluctuations often experienced in marine environments.
Table 3-1. Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in the City of Arroyo Grande, Jan.-June
January February March April May June
Standard Average
Evapotranspiration (ETo),
in1
2.21 2.5 3.8 5.08 5.7 6.19
Average Rainfall, in2 3.43 3.52 2.57 1.01 0.30 0.05
Average Temperature, °F3 52.94 54.4 55.21 56.86 58.17 60.32
1Data from California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), Station 202 in Nipomo, (period of record is from
January 2007 through June 2015) http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/UserControls/Reports/MonthlyReportViewer.aspx
2Average rainfall data from SLO County Public Works Volunteer Precipitation Gauge Station (AG Corp Yard #177.1)
www.slocountywater.org/weather (years 1976 -2015)
3Data from Western Regional Climate Center, Station: Station: 046943 Pismo Beach (period of record 1949 to 2015).
http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA.html
Table 3-2. Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in the City of Arroyo Grande, July-Dec & Annual
July August Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual
Standard Average ETo, in1 6.43 6.09 4.87 4.09 2.89 2.28 52.13
Average Rainfall, in2 0.05 0.00 0.09 0.74 1.61 2.71 16.08
Average Temperature, °F 3 61.28 62.09 62.48 61.15 57.55 53.7 57.8
1Data from California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), Station 202 in Nipomo, (period of record is from
January 2007 through June 2015) http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/cimis/data.jsp
2Average rainfall data from SLO County Public Works Volunteer Precipitation Gauge Station (AG Corp Yard #177.1)
www.slocountywater.org/weather (years 1976 -2015)
3Data from Western Regional Climate Center, Station: Station: 046943 Pismo Beach (period of record 1949 to 2015).
http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA.html
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-5
3.3 SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The City is largely built-out and is expected to experience only modest growth over the next 20 years.
The build-out population, defined as the maximum population that can occur considering the zoning and
land use designations in the current General Plan, is established at 20,000 persons. The build-out
population may increase if an annexation of approximately 185 acres of land and subsequent
development were to occur on a portion of land that lies southeast of the City within the City’s Sphere
of Influence. The land use development policies within the City are established in the City’s General
Plan, principally by the Land Use Element (LUE) (15). The last comprehensive update to the General Plan
occurred in October 2001, with the Housing Element updated in 2016.
The City’s population within City Limits was 17,252 in 2010 according to the 2010 U.S. Census and
17,731 by the end of 2015 according to the California Department of Finance. The City does not serve
water to the entire population within its City Limits. The OCSD serves a portion of the population in the
southwestern part of the City. The City also serves some customers outside of the City Limits. To meet
the requirements of Senate Bill x 7-7 (SB7), an estimate of the service area population was calculated in
the Base Daily Per Capita Water Use and Target Water Use Technical Memorandum attached as
Appendix D. Based on the methodology described in Appendix D, the service area population in 2010
was 16,908.
The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) projects population for the City through 2040 in
its San Luis Obispo County 2040 Population, Housing & Employment Forecast (22). The service area
population projections are based on annual growth rates calculated from the mid growth scenario
population projections from SLOCOG’s report (see Table 3-3). The annual growth rates are applied to
the 2015 service area population to yield the projected service area populations shown in Table 3-4.
Table 3-3. Projected Annual Compounding Growth Rates in the City of Arroyo Grande
2016-2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
Growth Rates1 0.99% 0.57% 0.69% 0.67%
1 Growth rates were calculated from SLOCOG population projection data, mid-range (22).
Table 3-4. Projected Annual Population Growth in the City of Arroyo Grande
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Service Area Population 16,908 17,636 18,524 19,054 19,716 20,000
City Population 17,252 17,731 18,624 19,157 19,822 20,000
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-6
Existing land uses are shown on Figure 3-3 and existing zoning districts within the City are shown in
Figure 3-4 below. Historically, most of the City’s residential growth has occurred on large lots and at low
densities. However, it is anticipated that future growth will be redistributed to the City’s mixed-use and
higher density residential areas. Based on project submittals over the past two years, as well as
projected development, the recent and foreseeable trend for new residential development is in the
form of higher density, mixed use infill and redevelopment, clustered subdivision, small-lot planned unit
development and condominiums.
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-7
Figure 3-3. City General Plan Land Use
City of Arroyo Grande 3. System Description
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
3-8
Figure 3-4. City Zoning Map
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-1
4 SYSTEM DEMANDS
4.1 BASELINES AND TARGETS
Senate Bill x 7-7 (SB7), also known as the Water Conservation Bill of 2009 (SB7), which was incorporated
into the UWMP Act in 2009, requires that all water suppliers to increase water use efficiency with the
overall goal to decrease per-capita water consumption within the state by 20 percent by the year 2020.
SB7 required DWR to develop certain criteria, methods, and standard reporting forms through a public
process that could be used by water suppliers to establish their baseline water use and determine their
water conservation targets. SB7 and the SB7 Guidebook specify methodologies for determining the
baseline water demand, 2015 interim urban water use target and the 2020 urban water use target for
the City as described in the following sections.
4.1.1 Baseline Water Use
The first step in developing the baseline water use for the City is determining the applicable range of
years to calculate the baseline average. The UWMP Act stipulates an agency may use either a 10 or 15-
year average to determine their baseline. If 10 percent of total urban retail water deliveries in 2008
were from recycled water, then the agency can use a 15-year average baseline if it chooses. The City
does not currently have the infrastructure or treatment ability in place to recycle water, and therefore
has not utilized recycled water in the past. For this reason, a 10-year average was used for baseline
determination. The UWMP Act requires the use of a continuous 10-year range with the end of the range
ending between December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2010 to determine the baseline. As shown in
Table 4-1, the City’s selected 10-year base period begins in year 1999 and ends in year 2008. In addition
to the 10-year baseline, a 5-year baseline is also calculated, which is used to establish the minimum
criteria for the City’s use reduction targets. The UWMP Act requires the use of a continuous 5-year
range with the end of the range ending between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2010 to
determine the baseline. As shown in Table 4-2, the City’s selected 5-year base period begins in year
2003 and ends in year 2007. The City’s historical gross water use and per capita water use for the period
of 1995 through 2015 are shown in Figure 4-1.
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-2
Table 4-1. Base Daily Per Capita Water Use – 10-year range
Calendar
Year
Distribution System
Population
Daily System Gross
Water Use (mgd)
Annual Daily Per
Capita Water Use
(gpcd)
10 year
running
average
1995 14,951 2.3 157
1996 15,062 2.5 166
1997 15,173 2.8 182
1998 15,284 2.5 162
1999 15,396 2.8 184
2000 15,507 3.0 195
2001 15,647 2.9 188
2002 15,787 3.1 198
2003 15,927 3.1 197
2004 16,067 3.2 200 183
2005 16,208 3.0 188 186
2006 16,348 3.0 182 187
2007 16,488 3.2 194 189
2008 16,628 3.1 189 191
2009 16,768 2.9 173 190
2010 16,908 2.6 156 187
Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 191
Table 4-2. Base Daily Per Capita Water Use - 5 year range
Calendar
Year
Distribution System
Population
Daily System Gross
Water Use (mgd)
Annual Daily Per
Capita Water Use
(gpcd)
5 year running
average
2003 15,927 3.1 197
2004 16,067 3.2 200
2005 16,208 3.0 188
2006 16,348 3.0 182
2007 16,488 3.2 194 192
2008 16,628 3.1 189 190
2009 16,768 2.9 173 185
2010 16,908 2.6 156 179
Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 192
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-3
Figure 4-1. Historic Gross Water Use and Per Capita Water Use
4.1.2 Target Water Use
DWR provided four different methods to establish water conservation targets. These four methods are
summarized in the following sections.
4.1.2.1 Method 1 - Baseline Reduction Method
The Method 1 2020 water conservation target is defined as a 20 percent reduction of average per-capita
from the 10-year continuous baseline period. Based on the baseline daily per capita use of 191 gallons
per capita per day (gpcd) determined previously, the target use for Method 1 is 153 gpcd. The 2015
interim water use target is simply the midpoint of the baseline and the 2020 water conservation target,
or 172 gpcd for Method 1 in the City’s case.
4.1.2.2 Method 2 - Efficiency Standard Method
The 2020 water conservation target of this method is determined by calculating efficiency standards for
indoor use separately from outdoor use for residential sectors, and an overall reduction of 10 percent
for commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) sectors. The aggregated total of the efficiency standards
in each area is then used to create a conservation target.
Very few agencies within the State have the data necessary to determine a target water use using
Method 2. It is not feasible for the City to use this methodology since the City lacks the detailed
landscaped area estimates to calculate the landscaped area water use.
4.1.2.3 Method 3 - Hydrologic Region Method
This method uses the ten regional urban water use targets for the state. Based on the water supplier’s
location within these regions, a static water use conservation target for 2020 is assigned.
157 166 182
162
184 195 188 198 197 200 188 182 194 189 173 156 153 157 160
141
113
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
19
9
5
19
9
6
19
9
7
19
9
8
19
9
9
20
0
0
20
0
1
20
0
2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
20
1
0
20
1
1
20
1
2
20
1
3
20
1
4
20
1
5
Av
e
r
a
g
e
P
e
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
W
a
t
e
r
U
s
e
(
g
p
c
d
)
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Gross Water Use (afy)Average Per Capita Water Use (gpcd)
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-4
Urban water use targets (2020 conservation goals) for the hydrologic regions in California is included in
the UWMP Guidebook. To determine the target using Method 3, 95 percent of the region-specific
conservation goal is calculated. Based on a 2020 target of 123 gpcd for the Central Coast region, the
City’s Method 3 target is 117 gpcd for 2020. The City’s 2015 interim water use target for Method 3 is
then calculated to be 120 gpcd.
4.1.2.4 Method 4 - BMP Based Method
Method 4 identifies water savings obtained through identified practices and subtracts them from the
baseline daily per capita water use value identified for the water supplier. The water savings identified
that can be used to reduce the baseline daily per capita water use value include:
• Indoor residential use savings;
• Commercial, industrial, and institutional savings;
• Landscape and water loss savings; and
• Metered savings.
The Method 4 per capita water use target was calculated using the City’s 10-year baseline period (1999
to 2008). A discussion of each of the savings components and the subsequent calculated savings
specifically for the City is included below.
• Indoor Residential Savings. Since indoor and outdoor water use is delivered through a single
meter, an assumption of 70 gpcd has been provided by DWR for standard residential indoor water
use. To determine indoor residential savings potential, the draft provisional method outlines two
methodologies. First, a best management practices (BMP) calculator has been developed to sum
the savings for four conservation elements including single and multi-family residential housing
toilets, residential washers, and showerheads. The City will use what has been termed the
“default option” to determine these savings. Based on the provisional method, this default value
is 15 gpcd.
• Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Savings. Baseline CII water use can be established for
the City based on data provided in the City’s DWR Public Water Systems Statistics Sheet for years
1999 to 2008. Based on this data, the baseline per capita CII water use is 21.8 gpcd. The draft
provisional method estimates a default value for CII savings of 10 percent. The CII water savings
are therefore 2.1 gpcd.
• Landscape and Water Loss Savings. The landscape and water loss water use is determined by
subtracting the default indoor water use of 70 gpcd and CII water use of 21.8 gpcd from the
calculated years’ 1999 to 2008 baseline per capita use. Based on a 1999 to 2008 baseline per
capita water use of 191.5 gpcd, the landscape and water loss use is 100.1 gpcd. The draft
provisional method estimates a default value for landscape and water loss savings of 21.6
percent. The landscape and water loss savings are therefore 21.6 gpcd.
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-5
• Metered Savings. Metered savings are considered in addition to the savings attributed to the
three sectors previously discussed. Because the City was fully metered in the midpoint year of
2003 (based on the methodology established by DWR) and no unmetered deliveries occurred, the
unmetered per capita use was zero gpcd. Therefore, no savings from metering was calculated.
The City’s 2020 target water use is calculated as the baseline water use minus the total savings
(residential indoor, CII, landscape, and water loss, and meter savings). In the City’s case, the total water
savings accounts for 38.8 gpcd, which equates to a 2020 target water use of 152.7 gpcd in 2020, and a
corresponding interim water use target for Method 4 of 172.1 gpcd in 2015.
4.1.3 Minimum Water Use Reduction Requirement
The final step in determining the applicability of the water use target for the City is to confirm the water
use targets meet the minimum reduction requirements as defined by DWR. To confirm the chosen 2020
per capita target, the 5-year average baseline previously determined Table 4-2 is used. The chosen
target (calculated using one of the four methods described above) must be less than 95 percent of the 5-
year baseline. In order to meet this minimum criteria, the City’s 2020 target per capita water use must
be less than or equal to 183 gpcd.
4.1.4 Summary of Baseline and Target Water Use
Based on the 2020 water use targets calculated using the four methodologies described previously, the
urban water use target for the City is 153.2 gpcd. Using the 10-year baseline of 192 gpcd, the 2015
interim water use target is 172 gpcd. This target was determined using Method 1. According to the DWR
guidelines, this target is valid since it is less than the minimum 5-year baseline target confirmation
criteria of 183 gpcd.
The baseline water use, target per capita use determined based on the four methods, and the
compliance, selected target and interim target are summarized in Table 4-3 and Table 4-4.
Table 4-3. Daily Per Capita Water Use Target
Calculation Method Water Use Target (gpcd)
Method 1: 80% of Baseline Per Capita Water Use 153.2
Method 2: Performance Standards Not calculated
Method 3: 95% of Regional Target 117.0
Method 4: DWR Approach 152.7
Selected Urban Water Use Target 153.2
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-6
Table 4-4. Baseline, Compliance, Interim Target, and Target Per Capita Water Use
Parameter Water Use (gpcd)
Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 191
2015 Daily Per Capita Water Use 113
2015 Interim Urban Water Use Target 172
2020 Urban Water Use Target 153
Since 1996, the City’s per capita water use has varied. As shown in Figure 4-1, the City’s per capita water
use in 2011, 2014 and 2015 was below the 2020 target. The declining trend in per capita water use from
2007 through 2015 is attributed to a combination of factors such as economic conditions, prolonged
drought conditions, and State mandated conservation regulations. It is assumed that these factors have
resulted in subsequent physical (e.g., turf replacement, water fixture replacement, etc.) and behavioral
changes (e.g., irrigating less or quicker showers due to various media conservation campaigns and
materials) in customer demand patterns associated with effective conservation programs. While
physical conservation related changes result in essentially permanent demand reductions, behavioral
changes may not yield permanent demand reductions. State mandated emergency water conservation
regulations may have a short-term impact on demand reductions during drought conditions, but it is
assumed that there will be a rebound to average demands due to customers’ behavioral changes over
the long-term. By nature, the State mandated emergency regulations are temporary, but SB7
requirements are long-term. Therefore, for the purposes of projecting long-term water use, it is
assumed that the 2020 gpcd will be approximately equal to the three-year historical average gpcd from
2013-2015, or 138 gpcd. The interim years between 2016 and 2019 were calculated through linear
interpolation between the 2020 and 2015 water use. Lastly, the years following 2020 were assumed to
stay the same through buildout. The assumed future 138 gpcd was applied to population projections
shown in Table 3-4 to project demands from 2020 through 2035. Figure 4-2 displays the baseline and
targets as well as historical and projected per capita water use.
Based on Governor Brown’s Executive Order B-37-16, revised baselines, targets and/or water use
reduction methodologies could be required in 2017. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB),
DWR, California Public Utilities Commission and the California Energy Commission will be developing an
action plan to implement the Executive Order during 2016. It is anticipated that the implementation of
the action plan will require legislative action to enact any new requirements. Depending on the outcome
of the process, the City will respond accordingly to make any adjustments necessary to meet new
requirements.
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-7
Figure 4-2. Historical, Baseline, Targets, and Projected GPCDs
4.2 WATER DEMANDS
The following tables (Table 4-5, Table 4-6, Table 4-7, Table 4-8, Table 4-9) show the past, current, and
projected water deliveries for the City based on historical and projected population (Table 3-4) and per
capita water use (Figure 4-1).
Table 4-5. 2010 Water Deliveries, afy
2010
Metered Not Metered Total
Water use sectors # of
Connections Volume # of
Connections Volume Volume
Single family 5,801 2,031 0 0 2,031
Multi-family 107 278 0 0 278
Commercial 398 278 0 0 278
Industrial 0 0 0 0 0
Institutional/
governmental
49 84 0 0 84
Landscape 118 111 0 0 111
Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 6,473 2,782 0 0 2,782
191
172
153
2013-2015
Average= 138 gpcd
138
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
19
9
6
19
9
8
20
0
0
20
0
2
20
0
4
20
0
6
20
0
8
20
1
0
20
1
2
20
1
4
20
1
6
20
1
8
20
2
0
20
2
2
20
2
4
20
2
6
20
2
8
20
3
0
20
3
2
20
3
4
Wa
t
e
r
U
s
e
(
G
a
l
l
o
n
s
/
C
a
p
i
t
a
/
D
a
y
)
Baseline 2015 Interim Target 2020 Target
Projected Use Historical Use
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-8
Table 4-6. 2015 Water Deliveries, afy
2015
Metered Not Metered Total
Water use
sectors
# of
Connections Volume # of
Connections Volume Volume
Single family 5,907 1,517 0 0 1,517
Multi-family 109 190 0 0 190
Commercial 413 178 0 0 178
Industrial 0 0 0 0 0
Institutional/
governmental
51 53 0 0 53
Landscape 125 169 0 0 169
Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 6,605 2,106 0 0 2,106
Table 4-7. 2020 Water Deliveries, afy
2020
Metered Not Metered Total
Water use
sectors # of Connections Volume # of
Connections Volume Volume
Single family 6,205 1,957 0 0 1,957
Multi-family 114 245 0 0 245
Commercial 434 230 0 0 230
Industrial 0 0 0 0 0
Institutional/
governmental
53 69 0 0 69
Landscape 131 217 0 0 217
Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total 6,938 2,718 0 0 2,718
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-9
Table 4-8. 2025 & 2030 Water Deliveries, afy
2025 2030
Metered Metered
Water use
sectors # of Connections Volume # of Connections Volume
Single family 6,382 2,013 6,604 2,083
Multi-family 118 252 122 261
Commercial 446 236 462 245
Industrial 0 0 0 0
Institutional/
governmental
55 71 57 73
Landscape 135 224 140 231
Agriculture 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0
Total 7,136 2,796 7,384 2,893
Table 4-9. 2035 Deliveries, afy
2035
Metered
Water use sectors # of Connections Volume
Single family 6,828 2,113
Multi-family 126 264
Commercial 478 248
Industrial 0 0
Institutional/ governmental 59 74
Landscape 144 235
Agriculture 0 0
Other 0 0
Total 7,635 2,934
4.2.1 Low-Income Demands
Changes to the California Water Code section 10631.1 since 2005 require demand projections to include
projected water use for single-family and multi-family residential housing needed for lower income
households. Low-income households are defined as households making less than 80% of statewide
median household income. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) determines the housing
needs in each jurisdiction over the planning period. SLCOG’s current RHNA planning period is from
January 1, 2014, through June 30, 2019. For this planning period, ninety-eight (98) new low-income units
are projected to be needed in the City by 2019 (21). Assuming the average water usage factor per
connection in each respective year, the projected demand for the low-income residential units is shown
in Table 4-10. The low-income deliveries projections are included in the City’s total projected water
deliveries shown in Table 4-5 through Table 4-9.
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-10
Table 4-10. Low-Income Water Deliveries, afy
Low-income Water
Demands 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Residential 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.0
Cumulative Total 7.2 14.3 21.4 28.5 35.6 42.6
4.2.2 Sales to Other Water Agencies
Although the City has emergency connections with Pismo Beach and Grover Beach to deliver water in
emergencies, the City does not have any contracts to sell water to other agencies as a wholesaler.
Additionally, the City does not plan to sell water to other agencies in the future. Table 4-11 shows the
historical, current, and projected amounts of water provided to other agencies.
Table 4-11. Sales to Other Water Agencies, afy
Water distributed 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
4.2.3 Additional Water Uses and Losses
Table 4-12 shows the past, current and projected amount of non-revenue water (NRW) for the City.
NRW is defined as the water losses plus authorized unbilled (metered and unmetered) water
consumption.
The City used the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Free Water Audit Software in 2015 to
perform a water audit of the City for the one calendar year period of 2015 (Appendix E). NRW is
projected to be approximately 5.2% of production going forward (2016-2035) based on the average
NRW percentage for 2011-2015. Table 4-12 shows the historical and projected NRW for the City.
Table 4-12. Non-Revenue Water, afy
Water use 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Non-revenue water
(NRW)
173 133 150 154 159 161
Total 173 133 150 154 159 161
4.2.4 Total Water Use
Table 4-13 shows the past, current, and projected total water use for the City. Total water use includes
water delivered to customers, water sold to other agencies, and non-revenue water.
City of Arroyo Grande 4. System Demands
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
4-11
Table 4-13. Total Water Use, afy
Water Use 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Total water deliveries 2,782 2,106 2,718 2,796 2,893 2,934
Sales to other water agencies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-revenue water (NRW) 173 133 150 154 159 161
Total 2,956 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
4.3 WHOLESALE WATER DEMAND
The City receives wholesale water from the Lopez Project, managed by the San Luis Obispo County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District Zone 3 (Zone 3) and temporarily received wholesale water from
OCSD until 2012. The available supply from the Lopez Project and OCSD is discussed in Section 5 of this
UWMP. The projected wholesale water demands for Zone 3 are shown Table 4-14.
Table 4-14. Retail Agency Demand Projections Provided to Wholesale Suppliers
Wholesaler Contracted
Volume
(afy)
Water Use (afy)
2020 2025 2030 2035
Lopez Project 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
Total 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
4.4 WATER USE REDUCTION PLAN
This City is committed to taking appropriate steps to reduce its water consumption to meet its 2020
target of 153 gpcd. In fact, conservation measures enacted by the City have already caused per capita
consumption to drop below the 2020 target. As the City continues to implement water conservation
measures and encourage water conservation practices within its customer base, the City will likely be
able to continue to surpass its 2020 per capita water use target.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-1
5 SYSTEM SUPPLIES
5.1 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
This section describes the existing and projected water supply sources for the City. The City has a variety
of water sources including groundwater, local surface water, and storm water captured for groundwater
recharge, irrigation and construction water. The City has completed multiple studies of potential
supplemental water supply sources including an extension of the Nacimiento Pipeline, desalination,
recycled water, and State Water Project water. These studies and other potential supply sources are
discussed further in Sections 5.3 through 5.6.
5.1.1 Water Supply Facilities
The City delivers both surface water and groundwater through its pressurized distribution system. The
distribution system is composed of 88 miles of distribution mains, six storage reservoirs, six pumping
stations, and 6,605 service connections. The City’s well system consists of eight wells, chloramination
facilities, and an in-line static mixer for blending of well and surface water. Well No. 9 and No. 10 extract
water from the Pismo Formation located outside of the NCMA boundary. Raw water from Well No. 9
and 10 receive treatment prior to entering into the system for iron/manganese and hydrogen sulfide.
The City receives water from the Lopez Project, which includes the Lopez Reservoir, the Lopez Terminal
Reservoir, the Lopez Water Treatment Plant and the Lopez Pipeline. All City potable water is treated to
meet drinking water standards, regardless of the source of supply. Wastewater treatment is conducted
by the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) at their Regional Treatment Facility
located in Oceano as discussed in Section 5.5.1.
5.1.2 Current and Projected Water Sources
The City’s current and projected water supply sources are summarized in Table 5-1. The City’s projected
water supply sources include local groundwater (Section 5.2) and the Lopez Project (Section 5.1.2.2).
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-2
Table 5-1. Current and Projected Water Supplies
Water Supply Sources Projected Water Supply (afy)
Water Source
Wholesale
Supplied Volume 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Lopez Project Yes 2,061 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
Groundwater-Santa
Maria Valley
Groundwater Basin
No 1,323 1,323 1,323 1,323 1,323
Groundwater-Pismo
Formation 1 No 160 200 200 200 200
Transfers In No 0 0 0 0 0
Exchanges In No 0 0 0 0 0
Recycled Water No 0 0 0 0 0
Desalinated Water No 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,544 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813
1 Assumes 80 afy of groundwater from Well No. 9, 80 afy from Well No. 10, and 40 afy from Well No. 11 will be available as a
reliable source of supply from 2016 through 2030.
Table 5-2. Current and Projected Wholesale Water Supplies
Wholesale Sources Contracted
Volume (afy)
Projected Water Supply (afy)
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Lopez Project 1 2,290 2,061 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
Total 2,290 2,061 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
1 Normal contract amount was reduced by 10% in 2015 due to low reservoir levels, but the City utilized surplus water as
described in Section 5.1.2.2.
In the event of an emergency or need for stand-by water, the City has an emergency connection with
the Cities of Pismo Beach and Grover Beach.
5.1.2.1 Groundwater
The City currently extracts groundwater from the Arroyo Grande Plain of the Tri-Cities Mesa Subbasin
(Subbasin) of the Santa Maria Valley Groundwater Basin (SMGB) and the Pismo Formation, which is
separate from the SMGB. The SMGB is an adjudicated basin as described in further detail in Section 5.2.
The City has an allocation of 1,323 afy of groundwater from the SMGB Sub-basin based on the Santa
Maria Valley Water Conservation District vs. City of Santa Maria, et al. Case No. 770214 Judgment After
Trial (Judgment) for the SMGB. Table 5-3 shows the parties and uses that are entitled to a portion of the
safe yield of the SMGB.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-3
Table 5-3. SMGB Division of Safe Yield
Allocated Use Allocation
Applied Irrigation 4,970
Subsurface Flow to Ocean 200
City of Arroyo Grande1 1,323
City of Grover Beach1 1,407
City of Pismo Beach 700
Oceano CSD 900
TOTAL 9,500
1 Per the Groundwater Management Agreement, the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach have increased their
entitlements by to 121 AFY and 209 AFY respectively based on the conversion of irrigated agricultural lands to urban use.
5.1.2.2 Lopez Project
The Lopez Project, which is operated by San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District (District) Zone 3 (Zone 3), is considered a very reliable source of water supply. The reservoir’s
total capacity is 51,990 af with a storage capacity of 49,200 af. The annual safe yield of the reservoir is
8,730 afy with 4,530 afy apportioned to contract agencies and the remaining 4,200 afy reserved for
downstream releases to maintain environmental and agricultural flows downstream. In years when less
water is required to be released downstream in the Arroyo Grande Creek, additional water (known as
surplus water) may be available to the Zone 3 member agencies, which include the Cities of Arroyo
Grande, Grover Beach, Pismo Beach, the OCSD and County Service Area 12 (CSA 12).
Storage at the end of 2015 was 13,847 af, or 28%, of total storage capacity. From the 4,530 afy of
entitlements, the Lopez Project provides a contractual supply of 2,290 afy to the City, except for years
when reservoir storage is below 15,000 af, such as 2015. More details about the reliability of the Lopez
Project are described in Section 6.1.1 Table 5-4 shows the contracted entitlements for municipal users of
the Lopez Project.
Table 5-4. Lopez Treatment and Distribution System Contract Entitlements
Water Contractor Lopez WTP Water Supply Annual Entitlement (AFY)
Arroyo Grande 2,290
Oceano CSD 303
Grover Beach 800
Pismo Beach 896
CSA 12 Total 61
Avila Valley MWC Subtotal 12
San Miguelito MWC Subtotal 0
Avila Beach CSD Subtotal 68
Port San Luis Subtotal 100
Other CSA 12 Customers Subtotal 61
TOTAL 4,530
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-4
5.2 GROUNDWATER
This section describes the Pismo Formation and SMGB, two sources of groundwater, that underlie the
City.
5.2.1 Pismo Formation
The Pismo Formation is a distinct deep aquifer at the northeastern section of the City, identified in
water wells along Oak Park Boulevard on the south, at Paseo Ladera Lane to the west, and along James
Way to the east. Currently, the City pumps groundwater from Well No. 9 and Well No. 10, which are
capable of extracting approximately 90 afy each if operated 100% of the time, but are assumed to
extract 80 afy each assuming required operational downtime. Both wells receive treatment for iron,
manganese and hydrogen sulfide prior to discharge into the system. Well No. 11 is assumed to be
operational by the end of 2016. Well No. 11 is capable of extracting approximately 45 afy if operated
100% of the time, but is assumed to extract 40 afy assuming required operational downtime. Water
supply from the Pismo Formation is not subject to the Judgment of the SMGB. The Pismo Formation is
not adjudicated and has not been identified as over drafted or projected to be over drafted by DWR. In
2003, Cleath & Associates completed a groundwater source assessment for the Oak Park area, which
covers the same aquifer as the Pismo Formation. The groundwater yield for the Oak Park area was
estimated to be approximately 540 afy (27). The City exercises an appropriative right to put the water
supply from the Pismo Formation to reasonable and beneficial use. The City’s appropriative right allows
it to pump available groundwater surplus to the needs of all existing overlying rights in the basin.
5.2.2 Santa Maria Groundwater Basin
The SMGB (DWR Bulletin 118 basin Number 3-12) underlies the Santa Maria Valley in the coastal portion
of northern Santa Barbara and southern San Luis Obispo Counties. The SMGB also underlies Nipomo and
Tri-Cities Mesa, Arroyo Grande Plain, and Arroyo Grande and Pismo Creek Valleys, of which the City
draws from the Tri-Cities Mesa portion of the SMGB. The SMGB is bounded by the San Luis and Santa
Lucia Ranges on the north, the San Rafael Mountains on the east, and Solomon Hills and San Antonio
Creek Valley Groundwater Basin on the south, and the Pacific Ocean on the west. The SMGB is
approximately 288 square miles (184,000 acres). The SMGB was adjudicated in 2008 and a map of the
SMGB is included in Figure 5-1 and Appendix F.
Groundwater is found in alluvium, sand dunes, and the Orcutt, Paso Robles, Pismo, and Careaga
formations. Groundwater is unconfined throughout most of the SMGB except in the coastal portion
where it is confined. Specific yield of sediments in the SMGB ranges from 3 to 21 percent, with a mean
specific yield of approximately 12 percent for parts of the SMGB in San Luis Obispo County.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-5
Natural recharge in the basin comes from seepage losses from major streams, percolation of rainfall,
and subsurface flow. Percolation of flow in Pismo Creek provides recharge for the northern portion of
the SMGB. Percolation of flow in Arroyo Grande Creek and other tributary flows to the creek provide
recharge for the Tri-Cities Mesa, Arroyo Grande Plain, and Arroyo Grande Valley portions of the SMGB.
Incidental recharge results from deep percolation of urban and agricultural return water and septic tank
effluent. Some subsurface flow comes from consolidated rocks surrounding the SMGB and from the
neighboring San Antonia Creek Valley Groundwater Basin. A 2007 Water Balance Study of the Northern
Cities Management Area (described below) estimated a total average annual recharge of 8,535 afy, and
an average annual groundwater production of 5,569 afy between 1986 and 2004.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-6
Figure 5-1. SMGB Boundaries and Management Areas (28)
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-7
5.2.3 Groundwater Management Plan
A formal groundwater management plan has not been prepared for the City or the SMGB. However, the
SMGB, the basin in which the City has most of its groundwater production capacity, is adjudicated and
pumping within the NCMA portions of the SMGB is managed based on the 2002 Management
Agreement (Management Agreement), which was incorporated into the SMGB Judgment. A copy of the
Judgment and Management Agreement are provided in Appendix G.
As a requirement of the Judgment, the City participates in a Northern Cities Technical Group (NCMA TG),
which is comprised of staff from each of the NCMA agencies, responsible for managing groundwater
resources of the NCMA portions of the SMGB. The NCMA TG and its member agencies have established
six objectives for ongoing NCMA groundwater management, including:
• Share groundwater resources and manage pumping,
• Monitor supply and demand, and share information,
• Manage groundwater levels and prevent seawater intrusion,
• Protect groundwater quality,
• Manage cooperatively,
• Encourage water conservation.
The NCMA agencies are required by the Judgment to prepare and submit annual reports for the
monitoring program, which include collection and analysis of data pertaining to the water supply and
demand of the region, including land and water uses in the SMGB, supply sources, and groundwater
conditions.
5.2.3.1 Zone 3 Extended Drought Emergency Supply Options Evaluation
In late 2015 and early 2016, the Zone 3 member agencies and the District collaborated to identify,
evaluate and develop recommendations for emergency water supply options that could be
implemented in the event that current drought continued for an extended period. These agencies are
continuing to monitor drought conditions and plan for the implementation of these emergency
measures, should they become necessary. The emergency supply options evaluated by Zone 3 member
agencies and the District are outlined in Table 5-5.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-8
Table 5-5. Zone 3 Extended Drought Emergency Supply Options
Cloud Seeding Investigate opportunities to utilize cloud seeding to enhance rainfall within the
Lopez Watershed. This could involve cooperative agreement with Santa Barbara
County.
SWP
Maximization
Maximize importation of District State Water Project (SWP) supplies, including
subcontractor and “Excess Entitlement” supplies.
Unsubscribed
Nacimiento
Investigate transfer/exchange opportunities to obtain unsubscribed Nacimiento
water for the Zone 3 agencies (i.e. exchange agreements with the City of San Luis
Obispo and the Chorro Valley pipeline SWP subcontractors).
Water Market
Purchases
Investigate opportunities to obtain additional imported water and deliver it to the
Zone 3 agencies through the SWP infrastructure (e.g. Exchange agreements with
San Joaquin/Sacramento Valley farmers, Water broker consultation, Groundwater
Banking Exchange Agreements, etc.).
Morro Bay Desal Investigate opportunities to obtain SWP water from Morro Bay by providing
incentives for Morro Bay to fully utilize its desalination plant capacity.
Land Fallowing Evaluate potential agreements with local agriculture representatives to offer
financial incentives to fallow land within the Arroyo Grande and Cienega Valleys
and make that water available for municipal use.
Lopez Reservoir
Minimum Pool
Investigate feasibility of extracting water from Lopez Reservoir below the 4,000
AF minimum pool level. This may require utilization of emergency pumps to
deliver the water to the Lopez Water Treatment Plant.
Enchanced
Conservation
Evaluate opportunities for enhanced water conservation by the Zone 3 agencies
beyond the Governor’s Mandatory Water Conservation Order (e.g. water
rationing, no outdoor watering, agriculture water restrictions, etc.) to preserve
additional water.
Diablo Desal Utilize excess capacity from the Diablo Power Plant’s Desalination Facility to
supply water to the Zone 3 agencies through a connection to the Lopez Pipeline.
Nacimiento/CMC
Intertie
Complete design of pipeline that would connect the Nacimiento Pipeline to the
California Men’s Colony (CMC) Water Treatment Plant. Investigate opportunities
for Zone 3 agencies to purchase Nacimiento Water and utilize exchange
agreements and existing infrastructure to deliver additional water to Zone 3
through the Coastal Branch pipeline.
Emergency IPR Investigate opportunities to develop an Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) Groundwater
Recharge System, under emergency permits, to provide a supplemental supply
for the Zone 3 Agencies.
Emergency Desal Investigate opportunities to develop a desalination facility, under emergency
permits, to provide a supplemental supply for the Zone 3 Agencies.
Price Canyon
Produced Water
Investigation into opportunities to recover and utilize produced water from
ongoing oil operations in Price Canyon.
Upper Lopez
Wells
Investigate potential water storage in aquifers upstream of Lopez Reservoir and
evaluate opportunities to obtain this water supply.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-9
5.2.4 Groundwater Levels and Historical Trends
The Northern Cities conduct groundwater monitoring in the NCMA, which represents the northernmost
portion of the SMGB. The NCMA groundwater monitoring program utilizes collected data from three
primary sources: (1) groundwater elevation data collected by San Luis Obispo County, and (2) water
quality and elevation data collected by the NCMA from a network of sentry wells. Selected figures from
the NCMA 2015 Annual Monitoring Report are included in Appendix F for reference, including a
boundary map of the NCMA, historic annual precipitation, groundwater elevation contours, and
selected hydrographs of NCMA monitoring wells.
The NCMA monitoring program includes quarterly measurement of water elevations and continuous
monitoring, via water level transducers, of the clustered sentry wells located along the coastal portion of
the NCMA. Currently, there are 16 wells that are monitored quarterly for water level and water quality.
Six of the monitored wells have transducers that collect water level, total dissolved solids (TDS) and
temperature data at four-minute intervals. The data collected by the NCMA monitoring program and
the County’s groundwater level monitoring program provide essential information for tracking critical
groundwater elevation changes. As shown by the hydrographs in Appendix F-Figure 11, the sentry wells
provide a long history of groundwater elevations. Measured water elevations in these wells reflect the
net effect of changing groundwater recharge and discharge conditions in the primary production
aquifer.
Averaging the groundwater elevations from the three deep sentry wells provides a single, representative
index, called the deep well index, for tracking the status and apparent health of the basin. Previous
groundwater studies and NCMA Monitoring Annual Reports have suggested a deep well index value of
7.5 feet above mean sea level (MSL) as a threshold, below which the basin is at risk for sea water
intrusion. When water levels drop below 7.5 ft, the NCMA agencies attempt to limit groundwater
pumping to reduce the risk of seawater intrusion. Historical variation of this index is represented by the
average deep sentry well elevations shown in Appendix F-Figure 12. Appendix F-Figure 12 shows the
impact of three years of drought (2007-2009) followed by recovery of the index values in subsequent
years as rainfall increased and groundwater production declined.
Between April 2015 and October 2015, the deep well index remained significantly below the index
trigger value. In October 2015, the deep well index began to rise and since mid-December has been
above the trigger value (Appendix F-Figure 12). In 2008, the lowest measured groundwater elevation in
an individual well was approximately ten feet below MSL. As described in the Northern Cities 2008
Annual Report, groundwater below MSL indicates a potential for seawater intrusion into fresh
groundwater supplies. The area with lowest groundwater elevations encompasses municipal well fields,
and represents a relatively broad and shallow pumping trough exacerbated by drought conditions.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-10
Hydrographs produced through the sentry well monitoring program indicate that groundwater
elevations have historically varied above and below about 20 feet above MSL. Historical hydrographs
show that groundwater elevations recover to levels similar to 2006 (a wet water year) and significantly
decline during dry years like 2013. These groundwater level decreases and recovery cycles illustrate the
relationship between times of the drought and increased pumping, and times of recovery with increased
rainfall and decreased pumping. The last three years of very low rainfall (2013-2015) has resulted in
water levels throughout the area declining 10 to 20 feet.
5.2.5 Groundwater Overdraft
Overdraft is the condition of a groundwater basin in which the amount of water withdrawn by pumping
exceeds the amount of water that recharges the basin. By definition, overdraft is not a measure of
annual fluctuations in groundwater storage volume. Rather, overdraft is a measure of the long-term
trend associated with annual fluctuations. Overdraft is characterized by groundwater levels that decline
over a period of years and never fully recover, even in wet years (29).
DWR’s Bulletin 160-98 has identified the Central Coast Hydrologic Region to be in a state of overdraft.
However, DWR also states that overdraft in this region is expected to decline as supply sources shift
from groundwater to imported SWP surface water (30). As described in Section 5.2.3, a primary concern
for the City and for the SMGB in general is saltwater intrusion from the coastal zone into fresh
groundwater supply.
Total groundwater pumping in the NCMA (urban, agriculture, and rural domestic) was 3,656.47 af in
2015, which is 38.5% of the calculated 9,500 afy safe yield of the NCMA portion of the basin. However,
even with the reduced pumping, water elevations throughout the area declined by several feet, with
some areas finishing the year with water elevations below sea level. Typically, when pumping is less
than the safe yield, the remaining volume of groundwater results in increased groundwater in storage,
which is then manifested by rising water levels. The current condition, with groundwater pumping at
38.5% of the safe yield and declining water elevations, illustrates the impacts of the ongoing severe
drought that has significantly reduced recharge.
5.2.6 Existing and Projected Groundwater Pumping
This section quantifies the historical and projected groundwater pumping by the City in Table 5-6 and
Table 5-7. The 2008 Annual Monitoring Report for the NCMA indicated that drought conditions and
subsequent increased groundwater pumping were causing groundwater elevations to drop below MSL,
increasing the risk for and potentially causing seawater intrusion into groundwater aquifers. Since 2008,
the City and surrounding municipalities that also rely on groundwater began an aggressive water
monitoring program to identify the extent of seawater intrusion and track its progress. In addition, the
City and other NCMA agencies have implemented aggressive water conservation programs and initiated
efforts to maximize utilization of their surface water supplies to alleviate stress on groundwater supply.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-11
Projected groundwater pumping includes groundwater pumped to serve City customers. The projected
volumes in Table 5-7 assume that groundwater use within the NCMA will be equal to the remainder of
demand not met by all other available sources of supply. The City expects to utilize groundwater to
supplement Lopez Project water during peak demand periods, but intends to minimize usage when
possible to protect the resource.
Table 5-6. Historic Groundwater Pumping
Basin Name Metered or
Unmetered
Historic Pumping Rates (afy)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
SMGB (Tri-Cities
Mesa Subbasin) Metered 211 180 268 51 43
Pismo Formation Metered 138 150 120 69 44
Total Groundwater Pumped 349 330 388 121 87
Groundwater as Percent of Total
Water Supply 12% 11% 12% 4% 4%
Table 5-7. Projected Groundwater Pumping
Basin Name Projected Pumping Rates (afy)
2020 2025 2030 2035
SMGB (Tri-Cities Mesa
Subbasin)
377 459 562 606
Pismo Formation 200 200 200 200
Total Groundwater
Pumped
577 659 762 806
Groundwater as Percent of
Total Water Supply1
20% 22% 25% 26%
1 Groundwater use will vary depending upon availability of the other supply sources, the status of the SMGB Deep Well
Index and the condition of the Pismo Formation.
5.3 TRANSFER OPPORTUNITIES
The City currently does not transfer or exchange water with its neighboring water suppliers. However,
the City historically purchased water from OCSD, and has studied multiple alternatives for transfers and
exchanges, which are described in Section 5.6.
In August 2005, the City entered into a two-year agreement with the OCSD to provide 100 afy. The City
never purchased water under this agreement. In January 2009, the City renewed the contract with OCSD
for a 5-year period. The City purchased 100 afy for a period of 5 years. The agreement has expired and is
not expected to be renewed.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-12
The City is currently evaluating opportunities to obtain additional water to meet demands during
extended drought periods. These supplies could include State Water Project (SWP) water or desalinated
water. At this point, the City does not have specific volumes identified for these potential transfer
opportunities.
5.4 DESALINATED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
In January 2006 and 2008, studies of desalination opportunities (5) were prepared to evaluate the
feasibility of obtaining an additional 750 afy of potable water for the City from seawater desalination.
The 2008 report was prepared with the assumption that two neighboring water agencies, the City of
Grover Beach and the OCSD, would collaborate to determine if a seawater desalination plant would suit
the supplemental water needs of each community. The City decided not to pursue desalination at that
time.
In 2015, San Luis Obispo County in coordination with PG&E performed an assessment of the feasibility
to deliver desalinated water from the Diablo Canyon Power Plant near Avila Beach, California, to the
current agencies connected to the Lopez Pipeline. Preliminary estimates indicate that between 500 afy
to 1,300 afy could be delivered from the project. Next steps include refining the cost estimates,
additional coordination with PG&E, obtaining the required permits, developing an Environmental Impact
Report, and further optimizing the conveyance infrastructure through additional evaluation of pipeline
diameter, pumping requirements, pressure class upgrade requirements and pipeline layout in order to
reduce pipeline and conveyance infrastructure costs as the project progresses. In March 2016, the
County authorized a budget of approximately $900,000 to allow staff to continue with the
environmental permitting and stakeholder outreach components of the project.
5.5 RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
The UWMP Act requires that the UWMP address the opportunities for development of recycled water,
including the description of existing recycled water applications, quantities of wastewater currently
being treated to recycled water standards, limitations on the use of available recycled water, an
estimate of projected recycled water use, the feasibility of projected uses, and practices to encourage
the use of recycled water.
5.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities
The South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) collects, treats, and disposes of
wastewater for the communities of Arroyo Grande, Oceano, and Grover Beach. The total population
served by the SSLOCSD is approximately 38,424 persons, producing an average daily flow of 2.6 million
gallons of wastewater per day (mgd) that is discharged through a shared outfall in addition to 1.1 mgd of
flow from the City of Pismo Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) (9). Wastewater influent is
first passed through an in-channel screen to remove large debris. After debris removal, wastewater
flows through two clarifiers and then into a single fixed film reactor for secondary treatment.
Wastewater effluent from the fixed film reactor then flows to secondary clarification to remove any
sloughed off bacterial film. Finally, the treated wastewater is disinfected with sodium hypochlorite
before being discharged to the Ocean.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-13
5.5.2 Wastewater Flow Projections
A little less than half of the total flows received at the plant, excluding flows from the Pismo Beach
WWTP, were from the City. The future average annual wastewater flow was determined by multiplying
the projected population by the average observed unit per capita wastewater generation rate, which is
57 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) (31). The resulting average annual historical flow and flow
projections are summarized in Table 5-8.
Table 5-8. Wastewater Flow Projections
Type of Wastewater 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Wastewater collected & treated in
service area(1)
1,080 1,127 1,184 1,217 1,260 1,278
Volume that meets recycled water
standard (2)
1,080 1,127 1,184 1,217 1,260 1,278
1 Assumes 57 gallons per capita per day based on the City’s 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan estimations
and population estimates based on Census and SLOCOG data.
2 SSLOCSD currently produces secondary treated water that could be treated to “Disinfected Secondary-23
Recycled Water” standards as defined by Title 22. However, all secondary treated effluent was discharged
through the ocean outfall.
5.5.3 Water Recycling Facilities
SSLOCSD currently treats its effluent to a secondary level, but could treat to a Disinfected Secondary-23
treatment level, as defined by California Code of Regulations Title 22 requirements. Figure 5-2 shows the
locations of the Pismo Beach WWTF and the SSLOCSD WWTF.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-14
Figure 5-2. SSLOCSD and Pismo Beach WWTFs and Outfall
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-15
5.5.4 Regional Recycled Water Opportunities
As described previously, the City of Pismo Beach currently discharges treated effluent through a pipeline
that conveys the wastewater to the SSLOCSD WWTP, where effluent from both plants is discharged to
the ocean through a shared outfall (Figure 5-2). The City of Pismo Beach is evaluating a Full Advanced
Treatment (FAT) facility, known as the Regional Groundwater Sustainability Project (RGSP), that could be
located at its existing WWTP or at an offsite location located somewhere along its effluent pipeline.
Development of an offsite FAT facility would provide significant opportunity for a regional recycled
water facility that could treat wastewater from both the City and the SSLOCSD WWTP. Analysis
completed by the District, estimated that a regional facility could potentially provide up to 2,390 AFY of
additional water supply for groundwater recharge through development of a regional FAT facility (9).
SSLOCSD is also evaluating potential opportunities to develop an additional advanced treatment
infrastructure that would allow it to produce water for agriculture irrigation or groundwater recharge.
Development of an offsite FAT facility would provide significant opportunity for a regional recycled
water facility that could treat wastewater from both the City of Pismo Beach and the SSLOCSD WWTP.
On June 23, 2015, the Arroyo Grande City Council voted to direct City staff to collaborate and participate
with the City of Pismo Beach on the Pismo Beach RGSP.
The City is currently considering a recycled water program and plans to pursue recycled water in the
future. The following recycled water studies have been completed with the goal of identifying potential
recycled water projects, which would benefit the City:
- Water Recycling Progress Report, Prepared for South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District,
Prepared by John L. Wallace & Associates, February 2001
- Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan- South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation
District WWTP Technical Memorandum, Prepared by the Wallace Group, June 2010 (32)
- Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan- City of Pismo Beach WWTP Technical
Memorandum, Prepared by the Wallace Group, June 2010 (33)
- Water Recycling Update report, Prepared for South San Luis Obispo Sanitation District, Prepared
by the Wallace Group, January 2009 (4)
- San Luis Obispo County Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan, Prepared by Cannon, November
2014 (9)
- Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study for the City of Pismo Beach , Prepared by Water
Systems Consulting, Inc., April 2016 (10)
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-16
5.5.4.1 South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) Opportunities
The SSLOCSD and the City are currently partnering on a Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
(RWFPS) to evaluate potential opportunities to upgrade SSLOCSD’s wastewater treatment process to
provide water for agriculture irrigation or groundwater recharge. To assist in funding the RWFPS, the
SSLOCSD and the City pursued and received a Water Recycled Facilities Planning Grant from the SWRCB.
The RWFPS will evaluate construction of upgrades at its existing WWTP or an offsite advanced
treatment facility, co-located with Pismo Beach. According to the Regional Recycled Water Study, a
combined advanced treatment facility could possibly provide 2,400 AFY of advanced purified water to
recharge the groundwater basin (9).
5.5.4.2 City of Pismo Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant Opportunities
The City of Pismo Beach UWMP states that the City of Pismo Beach is “currently completing a
preliminary design for a Full Advanced Treatment (FAT) facility that will allow it and potential regional
partners to inject advanced purified water into the groundwater basin. This project will provide
additional recharge for the basin and provide a drought-proof source of supply for the region” (34). The
City of Pismo Beach plans to upgrade its WWTP to provide an anticipated recycled water supply of 645
afy (34). This supply is an estimate and has not been finalized, but provides an idea of the amount of
recycled water that could be available. The City of Pismo Beach UWMP describes that the recycled water
not used for groundwater recharge could be used for other purposes located along the conveyance
system. If the City of Pismo Beach were to produce excess recycled water, the City could utilize the
recycled water for irrigation demand, and/or work with interested NCMA agencies to apply the recycled
water for groundwater recharge within the NCMA.
5.5.4.3 Summary of Potential and Projected Recycled Water Uses and Quantities
Table 5-9 provides a summary of potential recycled water including estimated demand discussed in the
June 2010 SSLOCSD WWTP Technical Memorandum (19) as well as an estimated groundwater recharge
potential identified in the City of Pismo Beach Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study (10). Potential
tertiary treated recycled water from SSLOCSD is assumed to equal the amount of tertiary recycled water
demand from customer use types that can accept recycled water. It is assumed that a portion of the
recoverable groundwater recharge volume identified in the City of Pismo Beach 2015 UWMP could be
potentially utilized by the City and other SMGB purveyors.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-17
Table 5-9. Potential Recycled Water Use, afy
User type Description 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Agricultural irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Landscape irrigation Tertiary 247 247 247 247 247
Commercial irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Golf course irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Wildlife habitat N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Wetlands N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Industrial reuse N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Groundwater recharge FAT 645 645 645 645 645
Seawater barrier N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Geothermal/Energy N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Indirect potable reuse N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Total 892 892 892 892 892
1 Assumes a maximum amount of recycled water from SSLOCSD based on average annual demands from 2007-2009 for
potable water from customer use types that can accept recycled water.
2 Assumes a portion of the groundwater recharge volume identified in the City of Pismo Beach 2015 UWMP could be
potentially utilized by the City and other SMGB purveyors. These values are 100% of the anticipated yield from a recycled
water upgrade to the Pismo Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City of Pismo Beach's goal is to develop a regional
recycled water project that could share the recycled water with regional partners and potentially utilize additional flows
from the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District’s (SSLOCSD) wastewater treatment plant. If a regional project is
implemented, the volume of recycled water available could increase or decrease depending upon interagency agreements
and water availability from the SSLOCSD facility among other factors.
Although there are opportunities for recycled water use in the future, a specific recycled water project
has not been selected or analyzed in enough detail to provide a quantifiable projected supply estimate
for the City at the time of the preparation of this UWMP. The 2010 UWMP didn’t project any potential
recycled water use for 2015 as shown in Table 5-10 and Table 5-11 shows the City’s projected recycled
water use through 2035.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-18
Table 5-10. 2010 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projected for 2015 and Actual 2015 Recycled Water Use,
afy
Use Type 2010 Projection for 2015 2015 Actual Use
Agricultural irrigation 0 0
Landscape irrigation 0 0
Commercial irrigation 0 0
Golf course irrigation 0 0
Wildlife habitat 0 0
Wetlands 0 0
Industrial reuse 0 0
Groundwater recharge 0 0
Seawater barrier 0 0
Geothermal/Energy 0 0
Indirect potable reuse 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 5-11. Projected Recycled Water Use, afy
User type Description 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Agricultural irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Landscape irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Golf course irrigation N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Wildlife habitat N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Wetlands N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Industrial reuse N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Groundwater recharge N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Seawater barrier N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Geothermal/Energy N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Indirect potable reuse N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-19
5.6 FUTURE WATER PROJECTS
5.6.1 Lopez Reservoir Spillway Raising
In 2008/2009, the contract agencies of the Lopez Project conducted a study and evaluation to consider
raising the spillway elevation of Lopez Reservoir, as a means of increasing safe yield in the reservoir and
thus increasing water supply entitlements to the contract agencies. By raising the spillway a few feet,
the overall capacity of the reservoir increases significantly. The increased capacity will correlate to a
greater entitlement of the water supply that can be distributed to the City and the surrounding contract
agencies. The project study examines raising the spillway of Lopez Dam by 3 to 5 feet. This would
increase gross reservoir storage capacity by a maximum of 2,850-4,750 acre-feet. Annual average yield is
estimated to be increased from 671 to 1,371 acre-feet. However, based on evaluation of historic
drought years (1986-1996), the average yield disbursed over 11 years would provide an estimated safe
yield from 259-432 afy (23). The 2009 study was updated in 2013. The updated study evaluated multiple
new ranges of dam height increases and constraints scenarios. The resulting estimated additional yields
are shown in Table 5-12.
Table 5-12. Lopez Reservoir Spillway Raise Capacities and Yields
Spillway Gate Height (ft) No Constraint Additional Yield
(AFY)
All Constraints Additional Yield
(AFY)
0 0 0
2 854 64
4 1,486 66
6 1,966 66
8 2,386 66
10 2,677 66
12 2,904 66
1 Ranges are based on different scenarios analyzed for multiple spillway gate heights. Source: (8)
The results of the study indicated that additional water yielded from this project would cost
approximately $1,250 per acre-foot. Due to significant regulatory and environmental challenges (i.e.
development of a Habitat Conservation Plan for Arroyo Grande Creek and obtaining an amended water
rights permit for Lopez Reservoir) the Zone 3 agencies are not currently pursuing this project.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-20
5.6.2 Supplemental State Project Water via the Coastal Branch and Lopez Pipelines
The District completed a hydraulic study to determine if additional capacity exists in the Central Coast
Water Authority (CCWA) State Water Pipeline for supplemental water deliveries to CCWA subscribers,
including Contract Agencies (served via the Lopez Pipeline). The hydraulic study modeled the entire
CCWA pipeline delivery system, plus the Lopez pipeline. The results of this study identified significant
excess capacity in portions of the pipeline and the results are being used as a starting point for the
District and CCWA to enter into discussions to consider utilization of the District’s excess SWP
entitlement. Expanding delivery options for the District’s excess entitlement could provide an
opportunity for the City to obtain a supplemental supply source.
5.6.3 Additional Stormwater Reclamation
The City operates and maintains a network of stormwater infiltration, detention and retention basins
throughout its service area as shown in Figure 5-3. This stormwater collection system captures or
retards runoff mainly for flood control and pollution prevention purposes, but it also recharges the
groundwater basin with water that would otherwise ultimately runoff to the Pacific Ocean.
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-21
Figure 5-3. Stormwater Basins and Retention Systems
City of Arroyo Grande 5. System Supplies
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
5-22
5.6.4 PG&E Desalinated Water
As discussed in Section 5.4, San Luis Obispo County, in coordination with PG&E, is performing an
assessment of the feasibility to deliver desalinated water from the Diablo Canyon Power Plant near Avila
Beach, California, to various agencies connected to the Lopez Pipeline. Preliminary estimates indicate
that between 500 afy to 1,300 afy could be delivered from the project. Next steps include refining the
cost estimates, additional coordination with PG&E, obtaining the required permits, developing an
Environmental Impact Report, and further optimizing the conveyance infrastructure through additional
evaluation of pipeline diameter, pumping requirements, pressure class upgrade requirements and
pipeline layout in order to reduce pipeline and conveyance infrastructure costs as the project
progresses.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-1
6 WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY
6.1 SUPPLY RELIABILITY BY SOURCE
The relative reduction in available supplies during dry water years is variable, and depends on the
projected reductions from each specific water source.
6.1.1 Lopez Reservoir
The supply reliability of the City’s surface water allocation from the Lopez Project is determined by local
hydrologic conditions and is governed by the contracts between the District and the Zone 3 member
agencies. According to the 2015 UWMP for Zone 3, the Lopez Reservoir is a very reliable source of
water with an annual safe yield of 8,730 afy. The Low Reservoir Response Plan (LRRP) was adopted in
December 2014 and enacted in April 2015 when storage reached below 20,000 af. The enactment of
Stage 2 of the LRRP resulted in approximately a 10% decrease in municipal diversions and downstream
releases as shown in Table 6-1 and Table 6-2. The Zone 3 2015 UWMP projects that municipal
entitlements will remain constant at 4,530 afy through 2035 under normal conditions, and that it will be
able to supply all contracted agencies with their requested allocations in full during single dry years and
multiple dry years until the fourth dry year (23). For planning purposes, it is assumed that water supply
from the Lopez Reservoir during dry water years will meet the City’s full allocation of 2,290 afy except in
the third year of multiple dry years.
Table 6-1. Initial Prescribed Municipal Diversion Reduction Strategy Under the LRRP
Amount of Water In Storage
(AF)
Municipal Diversion Reduction Municipal Diversion (AFY)1
20,000 0% 4,530
15,000 10% 4,077
10,000 20% 3,624
5,000 35%2 2,941
4,000 100% 0
1 The actual amount of water diverted may vary as agencies extend the delivery of their Lopez Entitlement.
2 The 35% reduction provides sufficient water to supply 55 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) for the estimated population of
the Zone 3 agencies (47,696 in 2010 per the 2010 Zone 3 UWMP). 55 GPCD is the target residential indoor water usage
standard used in California Department of Water Resource’s 2010 UWMP Method 4 Guidelines.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-2
Table 6-2. Initial Prescribed Downstream Release Reduction Strategy Under the LRRP
Amount of Water In Storage
(af)
Downstream Release
Reduction
Downstream Releases (afy)1
20,000 9.5% 3,800
15,000 9.5% 3,800
10,000 75.6% 1,026
5,000 92.9% 300
4,000 100.0% 0
1 These downstream releases represent the maximum amount of water that can be released. Actual releases may be less if
releases can be reduced while still meeting the needs of the agricultural stakeholders and addressing the environmental
requirements. (35)
6.1.1.1 Surplus Water from the Lopez Project
Historically, the City and other contracted agencies have received surplus water from Lopez depending
upon yearly requirements for downstream release. The District monitors the potential for surplus water
availability consistent with the water supply agreement. For planning purposes, surplus water is not
included as a reliable supply. The LRRP includes provisions for the Zone 3 agencies to extend the
delivery of their Lopez water supplies while the LRRP is in effect. This in essence allows the Zone 3
agencies to carry over their unused Lopez supplies, minus evaporation, when under the LRRP.
6.1.2 Groundwater
The City’s right to pump groundwater from the SMGB is defined within the Judgment After Trial
(Judgment) (Appendix G), which states that the Northern Cities (Arroyo Grande included) have a
paramount right to withdraw 4,000 afy (excluding agriculture conversion credits) from the Northern
Cities Area of the SMGB. The City is entitled to 1,323 afy of this total, as indicated in the Management
Agreement with other water purveyors in the Northern Cities Area (see Appendix G & Section 5.2). The
Judgment also states that the court may exercise its equity powers in the condition that the SMGB
becomes over drafted. However, there is no current language in the Judgment that stipulates the
amount that supply allocations may be reduced. Therefore, for planning purposes, it will be assumed
that the City may have its full allocation of groundwater available even in dry water years.
With recent detections of groundwater elevations below sea level and subsequent threat of seawater
intrusion, the City realizes the importance of maintaining its groundwater supplies and following a
sustainable pumping plan. Therefore, the City considers and will continue to consider minimizing its
impact to groundwater resources, especially during dry years or drought conditions.
Table 6-3 describes historical supply conditions basis of year data and Table 6-4 shows supplies during
normal and dry water years.
6.2 SUPPLY RELIABILITY - HISTORIC AND FUTURE CONDITIONS
This section considers the City’s water supply reliability during three climate-related water scenarios:
normal water year, single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. These scenarios are defined as
follows:
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-3
Normal Year: The normal year is a year or an averaged range of years in the historical sequence that
most closely represents average rainfall and associated reservoir recharge and groundwater recharge
levels and patterns. It is defined as the year closest to the mean rainfall from 1984 through 2015.
Single Dry Year: This single dry year represents the single year with the lowest rainfall and the
associated historical annual yield.
Multiple Dry Years: This is defined as the three (or more) consecutive years with the minimum available
supply. Water systems are more vulnerable to these droughts of long duration because they deplete
water storage reserves in local and state reservoirs and in groundwater basins. The supply quantities for
this condition are derived from the minimum of historical three-year running average rainfall and
associated reservoir recharge and groundwater recharge levels and patterns.
6.2.1 Basis of Water Year Data
Historical rainfall data available from City were examined to establish a basis of water year for normal,
single dry, and multiple dry years. As shown in Table 6-3, for the purposes of this report, the year 1992 is
classified as a “normal” year, the year 2013 is classified as a “single dry” year, and the years 2013 to
2015 are classified as “multiple dry” years based on the data provided in the Zone 3 2015 UWMP and
adjustments for the City's calendar years with the lowest historical allocations.
Table 6-3. Basis of Water Year Data
Supply Source 1
Average/
Normal
Year
Single Dry
Year Multiple Dry Years
Groundwater 1992 2013 2013 2014 2015 N/A
Lopez Project 1991/92 2013/14 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
1 Based on Lopez Dam Rainfall data (36) adjusted for the City's calendar years with the lowest historical allocations.
Table 6-4. Historical and Projected Water Supply Conditions
Supply Source Average/ Normal
Year (1992)
Single Dry Year
(2013)
Multiple Dry Years
2013 2014 2015
Groundwater 1 1,523 1,523 1,523 1,523 1,523
Lopez Project 2 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,061
Total 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,584
Percent of Normal 100% 100% 100% 94%
1 Groundwater supplies are based on the City's allocation from the Management Agreement plus 200 afy from the Pismo
Formation. In 2015, the supply available from the Pismo Formation was 160 afy, but it is assumed that the supply available
from 2020-2035 will be 200 afy.
2 Lopez Project supplies are based on the data provided in the Zone 3 2015 UWMP adjusted for the City's calendar years
with the lowest historical allocations.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-4
6.2.2 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand
The normal year water demands through 2035 are estimated based on the per capita water use targets
summarized in Section 4.1 and populations presented in Section 3.3. The projected normal water year
water supply and demand projections are provided in Table 6-5. The available supplies during a normal
year represent 100 percent of the available supplies discussed in Section 5.
Table 6-5. Supply and Demand – Normal Year
Supply/Demand Condition Projected Supply/Demand (afy)
2015 1 2020 2025 2030 2035
Supply Totals 3,544 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813
Demand Totals 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
Supply and Demand Difference 1,305 946 864 761 717
Difference as Percent of Supply 37% 25% 23% 20% 19%
Difference as Percent of Demand 58% 33% 29% 25% 23%
1 Based on actual Pismo Formation production and reduced available supply including a 10% reduction from LRRP for the
Lopez Project supply.
6.2.3 Projected Single Dry Year Supply/Demand
The projected single dry year water demands through 2035 are equivalent to normal year supply and
demand projections, assuming that supply and demand do not change as a result of dry conditions. The
anticipated supply decrease during a single dry year, compared to a normal year, is based on the actual
water supply from 2014. As shown in Table 6-6, the City’s supplies are consistently above projected
demands even during single-dry year conditions.
Table 6-6. Supply and Demand Comparisons – Single Dry Year
Supply/Demand Condition Projected Supply/Demand (afy)
2015 1 2020 2025 2030 2035
Supply Totals 3,544 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813
Demand Totals 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
Supply and Demand Difference 1,305 946 864 761 717
Difference as Percent of Supply 37% 25% 23% 20% 19%
Difference as Percent of Demand 58% 33% 29% 25% 23%
1 Based on actual Pismo Formation production and reduced available supply including a 10% reduction from LRRP for the
Lopez Project supply.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-5
6.2.4 Projected Multiple Dry Year Supply/Demand
The projected multiple dry year water demands through 2035 are equivalent to normal year supply and
demand projections with the exception of Year 3, assuming that supply and demand do not change as a
result of dry conditions. The anticipated supply decrease during multiple dry years, compared to a
normal year, is based on the actual water supply from 2013 through 2015. As shown in Table 6-7, the
City’s supplies are consistently above projected demands even during multiple-dry year conditions.
Table 6-7. Supply and Demand Comparison - Multiple Dry Year Events
Supply/Demand Condition Projected Supply/Demand (afy)
2015 1 2020 2025 2030 2035
Year 1
Supply Totals 3,544 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813
Demand Totals 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
Supply and Demand Difference 1,305 946 864 761 717
Year 2
Supply Totals 3,544 3,813 3,813 3,813 3,813
Demand Totals 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
Supply and Demand Difference 1,305 946 864 761 717
Year 3
Supply Totals(1) 3,544 3,584 3,584 3,584 3,584
Demand Totals 2,239 2,867 2,949 3,052 3,096
Supply and Demand Difference 1,305 717 635 532 488
1 Based on actual Pismo Formation production and reduced available supply including a 10% reduction from LRRP for the
Lopez Project supply.
6.2.5 Projected Minimum Three Year Supply
The projected three-year minimum supply for 2016-2018 is based on the historically lowest allocations
for the Lopez Project and the lowest production year for SMGB from 2001-2015, as shown in Table 6-8.
Table 6-8. Three-Year Minimum Supply
Supply Source Multiple Dry Years1
2016 2017 2018
Groundwater 43 43 43
Lopez Reservoir 2,061 2,061 2,0612
Total 2,104 2,104 2,104
1 Based on lowest historical production from 2001-2015, which occurred in 2015, and the lowest Lopez Project
allocation with a 10% allocation reduction in 2015.
2At the time of preparation of this UWMP, the City was taking a voluntary 20% reduction in their Lopez
Reservoir supply, but it that reduction is not used for planning purposes in this UWMP.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-6
6.2.6 Resource Maximization and Import Minimization
The City is currently not utilizing any imported supplies. The City is also working with regional partners
to evaluate potential supplemental supplies to bolster reliability of local supplies. These projects include
recycled water, desalination, enhanced surface water capture and are described in Sections 5.5 and 5.6.
Additionally, the City is evaluating the possibility to obtain SWP water to assist in bolstering its water
supply portfolio in drought periods. The City is in the process of placing a measure on the Fall 2016
ballot that will let the City’s customers vote to authorize the emergency purchase of State water. A
previous ballot measure passed in 1990 requires a public vote before the City can consider the purchase
State water.
The City will also continue to emphasize water conservation to help reduce reliability on its existing
water supplies. Additional information regarding the City’s water conservation efforts is available in
Section 8.
6.2.7 Factors Affecting Supply Reliability
There are a variety of factors that can impact water supply reliability. The City has relied on surface
water and groundwater sources for the past 45-year period. Some factors that affect supply reliability
are legal and climatic as shown in Table 6-9. The legal factors include the adjudication of the Santa Maria
Groundwater Basin and the contractual obligations of the Lopez Reservoir Project. Some environmental
factors include the Endangered Species Act incidental take authorization requirements for steelhead and
red-legged frogs downstream from the Lopez Reservoir. For more information, see Section 6.2.7.2.
Some climatic factors include extended drought conditions that could affect availability of Lopez
Reservoir water, and Santa Maria Groundwater Basin water.
The conjunctive use of the groundwater basins and surface water supplies provides an effective
management strategy, which increases the overall reliability of all the resources to meet current and
future water demands. Based on the information available at this time, it is calculated that the City
currently has a safe yield estimate of 3,584 afy. A breakdown of this value, along with a 20-year
projected safe yield estimate can be found in Table 6-4.
Factors impacting the City’s supply sources are indicated as appropriate in Table 6-9. A brief discussion
on each of these factors is provided below.
Table 6-9 Factors Affecting Water Supply Reliability
Water Supply
Sources Legal Environmental Water Quality Climatic
Lopez Project X X X
Groundwater X X X
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-7
A fundamental factor that affects water supply reliability is the hydraulic capacity of the City’s
production and distribution system facilities (e.g., groundwater wells, treatment facilities, transmission
mains). However, as the City continues to grow it will construct the additional supply and distribution
system facilities necessary to accommodate the increased water demands associated with this growth.
For this reason, the physical capacity of the City’s supply facilities is assumed to not be a limiting factor
affecting the reliability of the City’s supply in the future, and is not listed in Table 6-9.
6.2.7.1 Legal Factors
The legal factors affecting supply reliability apply to the City’s entitlement to groundwater from the Tri-
Cities Mesa Subbasin (Subbasin), within the SMGB. Since the SMGB is adjudicated, the City is entitled
only to 1,323 afy of groundwater from the Subbasin, as dictated by the Management Agreement
(Appendix G) and Judgment (Appendix G). The Judgment suggests that the allocated groundwater rights
may be decreased in the future if drought and/or overdraft conditions persist. Therefore, if groundwater
supplies are limited or reduced in this area, the City’s entitlement may be reduced.
Additionally, the District is in discussions with the SWRCB regarding obtaining an amended water rights
permit for its operation of Lopez Reservoir. The current permit only allows for “diversion to storage”
and not “direct diversion”. Currently, the Lopez Reservoir utilizes “direct diversion” as part of its normal
operations. The District is requesting a time extension on its original permit to allow it to submit its
application for an amended permit that would allow for “direct diversion”. However, an amended
permit cannot be obtained without a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), which is described in the
Environmental Factors section below.
6.2.7.2 Environmental Factors
Environmental factors affecting water supply reliability typically include concerns over protection of
ecosystems, particularly for fish and wildlife resources. To date, the City’s groundwater supply has not
been impacted by any environmental factors, and the City does not anticipate future disruption of
groundwater supply as a result of environmental factors.
Surface water from the Lopez Reservoir is a generally reliable water supply source for the City. However,
deliveries have the potential to be affected by the presence of steelhead trout and the California red-
legged frog that utilize the Arroyo Grande Creek watershed downstream of Lopez Dam, which are
considered threatened or endangered species under the Federal Endangered Species Act. The
Endangered Species Act permits non-federal entities to obtain incidental take authorization for
protected species by developing an HCP. As such, the District is developing an HCP that describes
commitments and assurances associated with the implementation of measures to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate impacts of management activities on threatened species. It is anticipated that a new
downstream release program will be proposed to the environmental regulatory agencies in the near
future. The development of an HCP and the associated approval of the updated downstream release
program is required to allow the District to obtain an amended water rights permit from the SWRCB.
City of Arroyo Grande 6. Water Supply Reliability
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
6-8
6.2.7.3 Water Quality Factors
The primary water quality factor affecting supply reliability for the City is the threat of seawater
intrusion into fresh groundwater aquifers. Under natural and historical conditions, a net outflow of
freshwater from the groundwater basin towards the ocean has kept the seawater/freshwater interface
from moving onshore. However, the NCMA monitoring event of 2009 indicated coastal groundwater
elevations that were below mean sea level (MSL) and detect water quality constituents consistent with
seawater intrusion. Affected cities (including Arroyo Grande) implemented water conservation methods
and reduced groundwater pumping, ultimately resulting in significant recovery of groundwater
elevations to above MSL in 2010 and 2011. However, in the current extended drought, the groundwater
levels in the NCMA sentry wells have dropped to levels similar to those seen in 2009 and thus created
the potential for seawater to again intrude onshore. If these conditions continue, seawater intrusion
will continue to pose a threat to the water quality of the City’s groundwater supply.
6.2.7.4 Climatic Factors
Climatic factors affecting the reliability of a given water supply system generally are a function of
seasonal precipitation and runoff characteristics. As such, limited recharge and/or drought conditions
pose threats to availability of both surface water and groundwater supplies.
When yearly precipitation is low, groundwater recharge may not be sufficient to meet safe yield
estimates. Therefore, the City’s groundwater supplies will likely be negatively affected in future drought
conditions with below-average rainfall and recharge. The Judgment (Appendix G) and Management
Agreement (Appendix G) regarding the City’s groundwater entitlement do not specify reductions in
allocations during drought conditions or decreased groundwater supply. The lack of guidance on supply
reductions indicates that the City may maintain its full groundwater allocation even during drought
conditions.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-1
7 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING
Water shortage contingency planning is a strategic planning process to prepare for and respond to
water shortages. Good planning and preparation provides the City with the tools to maintain reliable
supplies and reduce the impacts of supply interruptions due to extended drought or catastrophic supply
interruptions.
The primary goals of the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) are to restrict water use and
eliminate water waste during a declared water shortage emergency. The specific objective of the WSCP
is to educate and inform the community on short- and long-term water supply conditions and the
importance of efficient water use in order to protect public health and safety.
7.1 STAGES OF ACTION AND REDUCTION OBJECTIVES
The City’s water conservation ordinance describes two stages of mandatory concservation that may be
invoked during water supply shortages. Each stage would include a water reduction objective by
customer class which may vary based on the nature of water supply emergency. The plan is dependent
on the cause, severity, and anticipated duration of the water supply shortage. A combination of
mandatory water conservation measures would be used to reduce water usage in the event of water
shortages. Table 7-1 shows the two stages and their representative conditions and reduction objectives.
Declarations of water supply conditions would occur periodically after evaluation by the City Council at
which time they would set the level (percent reduction) of mandatory conservation required based on
the condition of the City’s water supply. The level of mandatory reductions may include up to a 50%
reduction. The respective water supply condition dictates the mandatory water conservation measures
in effect at any particular time in the City.
Table 7-1. Water Shortage Contingency - Rationing Stages
Stage Condition Reduction Objective
I – Mandatory • City Council determines it is imminent that
the city's water supply has or will become so
limited that an emergency water shortage
condition exists as far as the available water
supply being less than projected demand
Determined by the City
Council based water supply
conditions
II – Mandatory • The City Council determines that the
projected city's water supply is or will become
equal to or less than amounts that have been
determined necessary to meet basic
minimum household health and safety
requirements
Determined by the City
Council based water supply
conditions with reductions
up to 50%
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-2
The City is responsible for supplying water for the health and safety needs of the community. If it
appears that the City may be unable to supply the normal demands and requirements of the water
customers, the City Council may, by resolution, declare a water supply shortage condition. Based on the
severity of the predicted shortage, the City will take the following actions:
Stage I:
A. After holding a noticed public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Water Code Section
350 et seq., the city council may declare a stage 1 water shortage emergency based upon a
determination that there has been impacts to the city's water supply, and/or it has been determined
that it is imminent that the city's water supply has or will become so limited that an emergency water
shortage condition exists as far as the available water supply being less than projected demand
necessitating the institution of reductions in water usage based upon historical use, as further set
forth in section B.
B. Upon adoption of a stage 1 water shortage emergency resolution, all residential customers will be
assigned a baseline amount of water, based upon the amount of water used during the same billing
period of the previous year prior to the adoption of the resolution. All residential customers shall
reduce water usage by a percentage amount set forth in the resolution, which percentages may be
modified or amended by the city council as deemed necessary and appropriate. The percentage of
required conservation shall increase depending on the billing tier of the residential customers’ water
use as provided in the city's tiered water rate structure. The resolution shall include provisions for
the imposition of mandatory financial penalties if the amount of water in each tier is exceeded, which
penalties may also be modified or amended by the city council as deemed necessary and appropriate
based upon a determination of the severity of the water shortage emergency.
The following shall be used as a general framework for the resolution establishing the baseline units
for billing tiers and penalties, subject to such revisions deemed necessary in order to achieve the
desired water savings:
Residential customers in tier 0 are not required to reduce consumption. Residential customers in tier
1 shall be required to reduce consumption by the lowest percentage. Residential customers in tier 2
shall be required to reduce consumption by a larger percentage than those in tier 1. Residential
customers in tier 3 shall be required to reduce consumption by an even larger percentage than those
in tier 1 and tier 2. For example, tier 1 customers may initially be required to conserve five percent,
tier 2 customers ten (10) percent and tier 3 fifteen (15) percent. As the emergency worsens, the city
council, may by resolution, increase the percentage reduction deemed necessary in order to achieve
the projected amount of water savings established as necessary.
Stage II:
A. After holding a noticed public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Water Code Section
350 et seq., the city council may declare a stage 2 water shortage emergency based upon a
determination that the projected city's water supply is or will become equal to or less than amounts
that have been determined necessary to meet basic minimum household health and safety
requirements, and restrictions and limits through the implementation of water allocations are
necessary for continued water use that is reliable and sustainable by providing a minimum supply for
the most essential purposes for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection during the
emergency situation.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-3
B. Upon adoption of a stage 2 water shortage emergency, restrictions and limits shall be imposed
through the implementation of household allocations of water units for residential customers. All
residential customers will be allocated units of water deemed necessary for an average household
size (one unit of water is equal to one hundred (100) cubic feet or seven hundred forty-eight (748)
gallons). Any residential customer using over the assigned baseline unit amount shall be subject to a
citation and the imposition of mandatory financial penalties, which shall be set forth in the resolution
adopted by the city council and be based upon the severity of the water shortage emergency. Each
household shall be allowed twelve (12) units of water per two-month billing period (which is
equivalent to one hundred fifty (150) gallons per household per day). Households with over five to
seven people will be allowed twenty (20) units of water per two-month billing period (two hundred
fifty (250) gallons per day). Households with over seven people will be allowed twenty-eight (28)
units of water per two-month billing period (three hundred fifty (350) gallons per day). The
allocations contained herein may be adjusted by the city council by resolution.
Commercial properties and irrigation meters.
During a stage 1 water shortage emergency commercial water customers shall not be subject to
mandatory penalties for use, provided however, that commercial customers with irrigation meter
accounts shall reduce water use by such percentages specified in the resolution declaring the water
shortage emergency. During a stage 2 water shortage emergency commercial water customers shall
not use potable water for irrigation of outdoor landscaping. All commercial irrigation meters shall be
shut off and billing will be suspended. The resolution shall also establish mandatory financial
penalties for failing to meet required water use reductions.
Additional requirements and restrictions during stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency.
Upon adoption of a resolution declaring a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency the following
shall apply:
1. Commercial, industrial or irrigation meter customers shall immediately follow any directive issued or
declared by the city's water department to conduct water use audits, prepare water conservation
plans and immediately repair any identified water system leaks, including leaks attributable to faulty
pipes or fixtures. Commercial customers shall not violate any other water use restrictions intended
to preclude excessive water usage, as adopted by the city.
2. Residential customers shall not violate any water use/allocation or other water rationing regulation
implemented by resolution of the city council, including such regulations intended to preclude
excessive water usage and specifying maximum water usage limitations, as otherwise provided by
this chapter.
7.2 ACTIONS DURING A CATASTROPHIC INTERRUPTION
In the event of a sudden and catastrophic loss of water supply, the City has written an Emergency
Response Plan (ERP) to guide the City’s employees during disasters such as earthquakes, floods, wild
land fires, dam failures, and terrorism. In addition to the emergency response guidelines established
for City personnel, the Plan includes a Memorandum of Understanding between cities within San Luis
Obispo County to offer assistance as available to neighboring cities during time of disaster.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-4
The ERP contains detailed action items to the following list of events that might result in a drastic loss
in supply.
1. Structural Damage from an Explosive Device
2. Power Outage
3. Natural Event (Flood)
4. Natural Event (Winter Storm)
5. Natural Event (Hurricane/Tropical Storm)
6. Natural Event (Earthquake)
In the event of a power outage, the City’s response strategy is to first determine if the reason for the
outage is local to the plant or regional, then estimate the time to return power. This will provide the
City with the significance of the situation and will help assess the need to secure additional fuel for
generators. The treatment process would be operated to minimize the effects of the power loss. The
problem should be remedied as quickly as possible, however, if the supply cannot be returned and an
eventual loss of supply occurs, customers shall be notified of how to proceed.
The first response in the event of an earthquake is to perform a system audit to determine the extent
of damage to utilities, piping, and processes. This audit will allow the City to concentrate staff and
resources on issues that need to be addressed immediately. Additional staff will be required for
sampling, analysis, equipment repair, manual equipment and process operation, and
communication. A report of the damage will be issued to the Incident Commander followed by a list of
supplies that are necessary for repairs.
In the event of an emergency that interrupts use of a surface water source, the City will be able to
provide an average flow of 300 gallons per capita per day from the City well water.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-5
7.3 MANDATORY PROHIBITIONS ON WATER WASTING
The following water waste prohibitions are in effect at all times and will remain in effect during any
declared water shortage emergency.
Table 7-2. Water Shortage Contingency - Mandatory Prohibitions
Prohibitions Mandatory Prohibition Stage
All use of water which results in excessive gutter runoff. Stage I, II
Use of water for cleaning driveways, patios, parking lots, sidewalks,
streets, or other such uses except as necessary to protect public
health or safety.
Stage I, II
Outdoor water use for washing vehicles shall be attended and have
hand-controlled watering devices. Stage I, II
Outdoor irrigation between the hours of 10 AM and 4 PM. Stage I, II
Limited days for outdoor irrigation Stage I, II
Use of potable water for compaction or dust control purposes in
construction activities. Stage I, II
Outdoor water use for washing vehicles shall be attended and have
hand-controlled watering devices. Stage I, II
Hotel, motel or other commercial lodging establishment shall offer
their patrons the option to forego the daily laundering of towels,
sheets and linens.
Stage I, II
Emptying and refilling of swimming pools and commercial spas is
prohibited except to prevent structural damage and/or to protect
public health or safety.
Stage I, II
Restaurants or other commercial food service establishments shall
not serve water except upon the request of a patron. Stage I, II
7.4 CONSUMPTION REDUCTION METHODS IN MOST RESTRICTIVE STAGE
In order to achieve up to a 50 percent reduction in water use during a water supply emergency, the City
will consider the implementation of other measures in addition to the measures identified in this UWMP
as appropriate.
7.5 EXCESSIVE USE PENALTIES
Any violation of the conservation regulations and restrictions on water use may result in termination of
water service until the violation is corrected, and until all appropriate fees and penalties are paid in full.
Table 7-3 lists the specifics of the penalties and in what stages they may occur in addition to the water
conservation requirements contained in City Municipal Code Section 13.05 as described below.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-6
Violation of any provision of City Municipal Code Section 13.05 may result in termination of water
service until such violation is corrected, and until penalties are paid in full and will be subject to the
following administrative procedure:
1. Written notice to the alleged offender, including the furnishing of informational material and
advice where appropriate;
2. Recovery of all city staff costs, including overhead, or any second or greater offense within any
one-year period;
3. Additional civil administrative penalties for any third or greater offense within any one-year
period;
4. The right to appeal first to the utility billing adjustment committee and then to the city council.
In addition to, and completely separate from, the civil enforcement provisions of the ordinance codified
in this chapter, any person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions of this chapter shall be
guilty of a criminal misdemeanor as provided in the general penalty provisions of this code. All previous
attempts by the city to obtain compliance by the defendant may be introduced as evidence of the
offender's knowledge and willfulness.
Table 7-3. Water Shortage Contingency - Penalties and Charges
Penalty/Charge Stage When Penalty
Takes Effect
Termination of water service until violations of the water
conservation ordinance is corrected.
I, II
Criminal misdemeanor for any person who knowingly and willfully
violates the provisions in the City’s Municipal code.
I, II
7.6 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE IMPACTS/MEASURES TO OVERCOME
IMPACTS
The majority of operating costs for most water agencies are fixed rather than a function of the amount
of water sold. As a result, when significant conservation programs are undertaken, it is frequently
necessary to raise water rates because the revenue generated is based on lower total consumption
while the revenue required is basically fixed. The City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan describes that
to counteract the financial impact of conservation, the City may institute an increase in the rate
structure so that lower projected water consumption would generate a new rate based on the revenue
needed by the City’s Water Enterprise fund.
7.7 WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE
The City adopted its Water Conservation Ordinance in 2015. A copy of the City’s Municipal Code
containing the ordinance is included in Appendix H.
City of Arroyo Grande 7. Water Shortage Contingency Planning
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
7-7
7.8 REDUCTION MEASURING MECHANISM
The City’s primary mechanism of measuring water use and, subsequently, water use reduction, is
through the use of water meters. Therefore, to measure actual reductions in water use in the course of
carrying out a water supply shortage contingency plan, the City may perform water meter readings for
individual connections.
Potable water production figures are recorded daily at the City Corporation Yard. The daily data is
compiled into monthly reports and annual reports sent to the SWRCB and San Luis Obispo County. The
City also maintains copies of all reports prepared. These reports can be used to compare monthly and
annual water consumption to determine the efficiency of implemented water conservation measures. If
the City determines that the desired level of water conservation is not being reached, additional
conservation measures can be implemented with the direction of City Council.
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-1
8 DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The Demand Management Measures (DMM) section provides a comprehensive description of the water
conservation programs that the City has implemented for the past five years, is currently implementing,
and plans to implement in order to meet the 2020 urban water use reduction targets. The section of the
California Water Code (CWC) addressing DMMs was significantly modified in 2014 based on
recommendations from the Independent Technical Panel (ITP) to the legislature. The ITP was formed by
DWR to provide information and recommendations to DWR and the Legislature on new DMMs,
technologies and approaches to water use efficiency. The ITP recommended, and the legislature
enacted, streamlining the requirements from the 14 specific measures reported on in the 2010 UWMP
to six more general requirements plus an “other” category for measures agencies implemented in
addition to the required elements. The required measures are summarized in Table 8-1.
Table 8-1. Demand Management Measures
Measure
1 Water waste prevention ordinances
2 Metering
3 Conservation pricing
4 Public education and outreach
5 Programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss
6 Water conservation program coordination and staffing
7 Other demand management measures
8.1 DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES (DMMS) IMPLEMENTED OR
PLANNED TO BE IMPLEMENTED
Consistent with the requirements of the CWC, this section describes the demand measurement
measures from Table 8-1 that have been implemented in the past five years and will continued to be
implemented into the future in order to meet the City’s 2020 water use targets pursuant to Section
10608.20 of the CWC.
8.1.1 DMM – Water Waste Prevention
According to the DWR 2015 UWMP Guidebook, a water waste ordinance explicitly states the waste of
water is to be prohibited. The ordinance may prohibit specific actions that waste water, such as
excessive runoff from landscape irrigation, or use of a hose outdoors with a without a shut off nozzle.
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-2
In Chapter 13.05 of the City’s Municipal Code, water waste prohibitions listed below are in effect at all
times:
• All use of water which results in excessive gutter runoff.
• Use of water for cleaning driveways, patios, parking lots, sidewalks, streets, or other such uses
except as necessary to protect public health or safety.
• Outdoor water use for washing vehicles shall be attended and have hand-controlled watering
devices.
• Outdoor irrigation between the hours of 10 AM and 4 PM.
• Limited days for outdoor irrigation
• Use of potable water for compaction or dust control purposes in construction activities.
• Outdoor water use for washing vehicles shall be attended and have hand-controlled watering
devices.
• Hotel, motel or other commercial lodging establishment shall offer their patrons the option to
forego the daily laundering of towels, sheets and linens.
• Emptying and refilling of swimming pools and commercial spas is prohibited except to prevent
structural damage and/or to protect public health or safety.
• Restaurants or other commercial food service establishments shall not serve water except upon
the request of a patron.
8.1.2 DMM – Metering
According to the DWR 2015 UWMP Guidebook, an agency that is fully metered will state that fact in the
UWMP. If an agency is not yet full metered, it will discuss its plans for becoming fully metered in
accordance with CWC 527.
All of the City’s service connections are metered and billed based on volume of use. Meter replacements
are performed on an as-needed basis. The City will continue to require that water meters be installed on
new service connections and will perform replacements to help optimize its metering program.
8.1.3 DMM – Conservation Pricing
According to the DWR 2015 UWMP Guidebook, retail water agencies need to describe the pricing
structure that is used by the water agency. Conservation pricing sends a signal to customers regarding
their water use.
Conservation pricing is designed to discourage wasteful water habits and encourage conservation. The
City applies variable water service rate structures by customer class. Rates based on volume of use
encourage water conservation by customers.
Table 8-2 shows the water bi-monthly base rate and tiered consumption rates for a single family
customer with a unit defined as 100 cubic feet (748 gallons).
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-3
Table 8-2. Single Family Rate Structure
Units Rate
Base Fee ⅝ - $27.52
¾ - $29.53
1-18 HCF $3.42
19-36 HCF $3.76
37+ HCF $5.02
Multi-family customers pay a base rate dependent on meter size (Table 8-5) and tiered consumption
rates. Table 8-3 shows the tiered rate structure.
Table 8-3. Multi-family Rate Structure
Units Rate
1-18 HCF $3.42
19-27 HCF $3.76
28+ HCF $5.02
Non-residential customers pay a base rate dependent on meter size (Table 8-5) and a uniform rate
based on their customer classification and metered consumption. Table 8-4shows the uniform rate
structure based on the customer classification.
Table 8-4. Non-residential Water Rates
Customer Class Rate (uniform)
Business $3.57
Irrigation $3.81
Hydrant $5.72
Wheeling $1.91
Table 8-5. Base Fees for Meter Size
Meter Size Base Fee
⅝” $27.52
¾” $29.53
1” $35.55
1.5” $43.58
2” $65.55
3” $228.21
4” $288.42
6” $428.91
8” $589.46
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-4
8.1.4 DMM – Public Information Programs
In 2014, the City initiated a water conservation public education program in partnership with the City of
Pismo Beach. This effort included:
• Conducted a survey of residents to help determine a marketing strategy
• Creation and maintenance of a branded website (www.thinkh20now.com)
• Creation and maintenance of Facebook and Twitter pages for the campaign
• Water conservation pledge
• Broadcast advertising (e.g. Pandora, Regal Cinemas, Cable Channel 20)
• Business outreach
• Community outreach
• Press releases
• Event flyers
Although the campaign was scaled back in September 2015, the public education program has been well
received and proved successful, as demonstrated in the reduction in per capita water use over the past
two years. Arroyo Grande and Pismo Beach staff currently maintain the social media accounts.
The City also sponsors free water conservation education programs for public and private schools
(grades K-6). The City has contracted with Science Discovery since 2012 for this purpose. It is expected
that the City will continue to sponsor this school program.
In addition, the City presented a South County Water Symposium in August 2015, which included
presentations from local experts on water-related topics and a variety of information booths. The
Symposium was well attended with an estimated 150 participants.
Finally, the City participates in a San Luis Obispo County regional collaborative to maintain a water wise
gardening website (“GardenSoft”). This is a valuable resource to inspire and guide residents to save
water outside the home. The customized website includes local garden tours, garden galleries, various
plant lists, garden resources, water conservation tips, and watering guides. The website has been in
place since 2011.
8.1.5 DMM – Water Loss Control
The City accounts for water production and consumption and reports results to DWR each year. The City
maintains an on-going program of meter testing and replacement that tracks the age and testing
frequency of each city meter. Water for flushing operations and other maintenance procedures is also
estimated and recorded.
Between the years 2011 and 2015, NRW has averaged 5.5%. Additionally, the City repairs all water main
and service leaks upon notification or detection. The City also uses ultrasonic leak detectors to survey
water mains and services. In conjunction with this DMM, the City has an ongoing funded Capital
Improvement Program that replaces older water mains and services. The City completed the AWWA
System Water Loss spreadsheet for the calendar year 2015 and will continue to update the spreadsheet
on an annual basis (see Appendix E).
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-5
8.1.6 DMM – Conservation Coordinator and Staffing Support
The Water Conservation Coordinator role was added to an existing planning position in 2008. The
amount of time dedicated to this role has varied over the years depending on workload and priorities.
On average, approximately 25% of this full time position is allocated to managing various water
conservation programs.
Given the overlapping City department concerns and responsibilities related to the recent drought, the
City created a staff interdepartmental Drought Team to coordinate water use reduction strategies.
Efforts include adopting a Water Emergency Ordinance and declaring a Stage 1 Water Shortage
Emergency with mandatory water reductions. The Drought Team also provides monthly status reports
to the City Council on water supply and demand.
8.2 OTHER DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The City is committed to implementing cost effective programs that will increase water efficiency City-
wide. Though not required, the City has implemented the following demand management measures
during the past five years in order to increase the overall water efficiency of the City’s customers.
8.2.1 Water Conservation Incentive Programs
Given anticipated recurring drought cycles, the City’s goal has consistently been to maintain a sustaining
conservation ethic resulting in the same low level of water consumption during and after drought
conditions. To do this, the City implemented several water conservation programs that provide
relatively permanent water use reductions. The tables below summarize the success of these programs.
Table 8-6. Cash for Grass Program Summary
Year # Applications
Submitted
# Grass
Conversions
Completed
Square Footage of
Grass Removed
*Estimated
Gallons of Water
Saved per Year
2009 94 65 81,238 1,462,284
2010 24 22 21,131 380,358
2011 23 21 30,333 545,994
2012 17 13 14,348 258,264
2013 14 10 15,472 278,496
2014 137 92 119,099 2,143,782
2015 306 219 302,083 5,437,494
2016 Applications not accepted in 2016
Total:
615
442
583,704
(13.4 acres)
10,506,672
(32.2 AFY)
*Based on an average savings of 18 gallons per square foot of grass removed per year.
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-6
Table 8-7. Water Efficient Washer Rebate Program Summary
Year # Rebates Issued *Estimated Gallons of Water Saved per Year
2009 36 108,000
2010 20 60,000
2011 22 66,000
2012 15 45,000
2013 2 6,000
2014 17 51,000
2015 70 210,000
2016 Applications not accepted in 2016
Total:
182
546,000
(1.68 AFY)
*Based on an average savings of 10 gallons/load from older washers, and an estimated 300 loads per household per year
(average of 3,000 gallons per year per machine).
Table 8-8. Smart Irrigation Controller and Sensor Program Summary
Year # Smart Irrigation
Controllers Installed
Estimated Water Savings
2009 32 The standard water savings is 15%. The
number of gallons saved depends on individual
irrigation design and area.
2010 13
2011 5
2012 7
2013 2
2014 20
2015 33
Total: 112
Table 8-9. 2004-2016 Plumbing Retrofit Summary
Structure Type Number of Retrofits
Single Family Homes 2,035
Apartment Units 547
Mobile Homes 237
Motel Rooms 243
Churches 9
Public Facilities 7
Commercial Establishments 153
Total 3,231
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-7
Table 8-10. 2004-2016 Plumbing Replacements Summary by Plumbing Hardware Type
Plumbing Hardware Type Number of Replacements
Toilets 5,069
Faucet Aerators 4,134
Showerheads 1,858
Pressure Regulators 417
Estimated Water Consumption Reduction 177 afy
As can be seen in the above tables, participation in the City’s water conservation rebate programs have
been well received since 2009 when they were first implemented. Advertisement for these programs
was strong during this time, but then tapered off for the next several years. Participation increased
dramatically when the City increased the rebate amounts for the Cash for Grass and Washing Machine
Rebate Programs in 2014 (from $0.50 to $1.00 per square foot for turf removal, and from $150 to $200
per washing machine replacement). Success can also be attributed to the increased awareness about
the drought, an initial robust marketing effort, water use restrictions, and penalties for non-compliance.
The City has additionally contributed to large area irrigation retrofits for commercial, institutional and
homeowner association (HOA) water users since 2009. With the assistance of Sprinkler King, Inc., the
City has retrofitted the following properties:
• Oak Park Blvd Landscaping • Vista Del Mar HOA
• Woodland Pocket Park • Wildwood Ranch HOA
• Strother Park • Five Cities Center
• St. Patrick’s School • Kmart Center
• Sunrise Terrace Mobilehome Park • Cemetery District
• Paulding School • Rancho Grande Park
• Ocean View School
It is estimated that 17.39 AFY is saved from the Strother Park, Paulding School, Ocean View School,
Cemetery District and Rancho Grande Park irrigation retrofits (audits for determining post-project water
savings have not been completed for the other properties).
The City-owned Property Landscape Irrigation Retrofit Program has provided a comprehensive effort to
reduce water use at City parks and other landscaped areas. This program commenced in 2014 and
involves removing turf combined with retrofitting irrigation systems and installing drought tolerant
plants. It is estimated that this program generates a water savings of approximately 14 AFY.
City of Arroyo Grande 8. Demand Management Measures
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
8-8
The City’s plumbing retrofit program, established in 2004, replaces old, high water-use fixtures for
residential units built prior to 1992. All parts and labor required for the retrofit are provided free of
charge. The retrofit includes replacing the following fixtures:
• Toilets – replace with ultra low-flow 1.6 gallons per flush (as of January 1, 2014 the requirement
is 1.28 gallons per flush).
• Indoor Faucets – install aerators designed for 2.0 gallons per minute.
• Showerheads – replace with 2.5 gallons per minute.
• Pressure Regulator – inspect and adjust or install new regulator not to exceed 80 pounds per
square inch (psi).
This program is voluntary; however, in February 2005 the City Council adopted an ordinance
implementing a mandatory plumbing retrofit program upon the change of ownership of any real
property. The seller must retrofit the property’s plumbing fixtures to meet the criteria of low-water use.
As of April 1, 2016, the Plumbing Retrofit Program has completed 2,035 single-family homes, 547
apartment units, 237 mobile homes, 243 motel rooms, 9 churches, 7 public facilities, and 153
commercial establishments. A total of 5,069 toilets, 4,134 faucet aerators, 1,858 showerheads and 417
pressure regulators have been installed or replaced. The estimated water consumption reduction is 177
afy.
The City has eliminated many of the water conservation rebate programs for numerous reasons,
including reduced City funding, existing State turf removal and toilet replacement rebates, and new
regulations in the Plumbing Code and landscape irrigation requirements to provide permanent
reductions in water usage. The Plumbing Retrofit, City Landscape Irrigation, Public Education, School
Education, Water Conservation Workshops and GardenSoft Website licensing remain active programs.
City of Arroyo Grande 9. References
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
9-1
9 REFERENCES
1. California Department of Water Resources. Guidebook to Assist Water Suppliers in the Preparation of
a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan . March 2011.
2. —. Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use. February
2011.
3. City of Arroyo Grande Public Works Department. City of Arroyo Grande Water Supply Alternatives
Study. August 24, 2004.
4. Wallace Group. Water Recycling Update Report Prepared for the South San Luis Obispo County
Sanitation District. January 2009.
5. —. South San Luis Obispo County Desalination Funding Study . October 2008 .
6. —. Supplemental Water Supply Study Nacimiento Pipeline Extension City of Arroyo Grande, City of
Grover Beach, Oceano Community Services District. January 2006.
7. Water Systems Consulting, Inc. CAPACITY EVALUATION OF THE LOPEZ PIPELINE FOR DELIVERY OF
ADDITIONAL STATE WATER PROJECT SUPPLIES TO THE NORTHERN CITIES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM.
September 9, 2010.
8. Stetson Engineers, Inc. Lopez Lake Spillway Raise Project Report. February 2013.
9. Cannon. San Luis Obispo County Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan. November 2014.
10. Water Systems Consulting, Inc. Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study for the City of Pismo Beach.
April 2016.
11. Water Systems Consulting, Inc. Diablo Canyon Power Plant Desalination Hydraulic Feasibility
Analysis FINAL DRAFT – DCPP DESALINATION PIPELINE FEASIBILITY STUDY Technical Memorandum.
March 2016.
12. Todd Engineers. Water Balance Study for the Northern Cities Area. April 2007.
13. Carollo Engineers. San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report. May 2012.
14. Lisa Wise Consulting. City of Arroyo Grande Housing Element Public Review Draft. December 2015.
15. City of Arroyo Grande. Fringe and Urban Area Land Use Element. 2001.
16. City of Arroyo Grande in Association with Water Systems Consulting, Inc. Water System Master
Plan. December 2012.
City of Arroyo Grande 9. References
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
9-2
17. California Department of Water Resources. 2015 Urban Water Management Plans Guidebook for
Urban Water Suppliers. March 2016.
18. —. Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use. February
2016.
19. Steve Tanaka, PE & Valerie Huff, PE. Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan- South San
Luis Obispo County Sanitation District WWTP. s.l. : Wallace Group, June 2010.
20. City of Arroyo Grande. Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan Technical
Memorandum. April 2010.
21. San Luis Obispo Council of Governments. Regional Housing Needs Plan. June 2013.
22. Prepared for San Luis Obispo Council of Governments by AECOM Technical Services. San Luis
Obispo County 2040 Population, Housing & Employment Forecast. June 24, 2011.
23. Wallace Group. Zone 3 Urban Water Management Plan 2015 Update. s.l. : San Luis Obispo County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, June 2016.
24. San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. San Luis County 2014
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. July 2014.
25. Tuckfield & Associates. Water and Wastewater Financial Plan and Rate Study. March 2009.
26. Todd Engineers. Water Balance Study for the Northern Cities Area. April 2007.
27. Cleath & Associates. Ground Water Source Assessment Los Robles Del Mar Project Pismo Beach.
August 2003.
28. Fugro Consultants, Inc. Northern Cities Management Area 2015 Annual Montitoring Report. April
2016.
29. Resources, California Department of Water. California's Groundwater Bulletin 118 Update 2003.
October 2003.
30. —. California Water Plan Update Bulletin 160-98. November 1998.
31. City of Arroyo Grande. Wastewater System Master Plan. December 2012.
32. Wallace Group. - Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan- South San Luis Obispo County
Sanitation District WWTP Technical Memorandum. June 2010.
33. —. Recycled Water Distribution System Conceptual Plan- City of Pismo Beach WWTP Technical
Memorandum. June 2010.
34. Water Systems Consulting, Inc. City of Pismo Beach 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June
2016.
City of Arroyo Grande 9. References
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
9-3
35. 3, San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone. Low Reservoir
Response Plan. December 16, 2014.
36. Wallace Group. Draft Urban Water Management Plan Update. June 2016.
37. City of Arroyo Grande. Wastewater System Master Plan. November 13, 2001.
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
APPENDIX A. DWR CHECKLIST
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10620(b)
Every person that becomes an urban water
supplier shall adopt an urban water
management plan within one year after it
has become an urban water supplier.
Plan
Preparation Section 2.1 2.2
10620(d)(2)
Coordinate the preparation of its plan with
other appropriate agencies in the area,
including other water suppliers that share a
common source, water management
agencies, and relevant public agencies, to
the extent practicable.
Plan
Preparation
Section
2.5.2 2.1
10642
Provide supporting documentation that the
water supplier has encouraged active
involvement of diverse social, cultural, and
economic elements of the population within
the service area prior to and during the
preparation of the plan.
Plan
Preparation
Section
2.5.2 2.1
10631(a) Describe the water supplier service area. System
Description Section 3.1 3.1
10631(a) Describe the climate of the service area of
the supplier.
System
Description Section 3.3 3.2
10631(a) Provide population projections for 2020,
2025, 2030, and 2035.
System
Description Section 3.4 3.3
10631(a) Describe other demographic factors
affecting the supplier’s water management
System
Description Section 3.4 3.3
10631(a) Indicate the current population of the
service area.
System
Description and
Baselines and
Targets
Sections
3.3 and 5.4
10631(e)(1)
Quantify past, current, and projected water
use, identifying the uses among water use
sectors.
System Water
Use Section 4.2 4.2
10631(e)(3)(A)
Report the distribution system water loss
for the most recent 12-month period
available.
System Water
Use Section 4.3
4.2.3;
Appendix
E
10631.1(a)
Include projected water use needed for
lower income housing projected in the
service area of the supplier.
System Water
Use Section 4.5 4.2.1
10608.20(b) Retail suppliers shall adopt a 2020 water use
target using one of four methods.
Baselines and
Targets
Section 5.7
and App E 4.1
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10608.20(e)
Retail suppliers shall provide baseline daily
per capita water use, urban water use
target, interim urban water use target, and
compliance daily per capita water use, along
with the bases for determining those
estimates, including references to
supporting data.
Baselines and
Targets
Chapter 5
and App E 4.1
10608.22
Retail suppliers’ per capita daily water use
reduction shall be no less than 5 percent of
base daily per capita water use of the 5 year
baseline. This does not apply is the suppliers
base GPCD is at or below 100.
Baselines and
Targets
Section
5.7.2 4.1
10608.24(a) Retail suppliers shall meet their interim
target by December 31, 2015.
Baselines and
Targets
Section 5.8
and App E 4.1
1608.24(d)(2)
If the retail supplier adjusts its compliance
GPCD using weather normalization,
economic adjustment, or extraordinary
events, it shall provide the basis for, and
data supporting the adjustment.
Baselines and
Targets
Section
5.8.2 N/A
10608.36
Wholesale suppliers shall include an
assessment of present and proposed future
measures, programs, and policies to help
their retail water suppliers achieve targeted
di
Baselines and
Targets Section 5.1 N/A
10608.4
Retail suppliers shall report on their
progress in meeting their water use targets.
The data shall be reported using a
standardized form.
Baselines and
Targets
Section 5.8
and App E 4.1
10631(b)
Identify and quantify the existing and
planned sources of water available for 2015,
2020, 2025, 2030, and 2035.
System Supplies Chapter 6 0
10631(b)
Indicate whether groundwater is an existing
or planned source of water available to the
supplier.
System Supplies Section 6.2 5.2
10631(b)(1)
Indicate whether a groundwater
management plan has been adopted by the
water supplier or if there is any other
specific authorization for groundwater
management. Include a copy of the plan or
authorization.
System Supplies Section
6.2.2 5.2.3
10631(b)(2) Describe the groundwater basin. System Supplies Section
5.2
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10631(b)(2)
Indicate if the basin has been adjudicated
and include a copy of the court order or
decree and a description of the amount of
water the supplier has the legal right to
System Supplies Section
6.2.2
5.2.3;
Appendix
G
10631(b)(2)
For unadjudicated basins, indicate whether
or not the department has identified the
basin as overdrafted, or projected to
become overdrafted. Describe efforts by the
supplier to eliminate the long-term
overdraft condition.
System Supplies Section
6.2.3 5.2.5
10631(b)(3)
Provide a detailed description and analysis
of the location, amount, and sufficiency of
groundwater pumped by the urban water
supplier for the past five years
System Supplies Section
6.2.4 5.2.6
10631(b)(4)
Provide a detailed description and analysis
of the amount and location of groundwater
that is projected to be pumped.
System Supplies
Sections
5.2.6 and 6.9
10631(d)
Describe the opportunities for exchanges or
transfers of water on a short-term or long-
term basis.
System Supplies Section 6.7 5.3
10631(g)
Describe the expected future water supply
projects and programs that may be
undertaken by the water supplier to address
water supply reliability in average, single-
dry, and multiple-dry years.
System Supplies Section 6.8 5.6
10631(i) Describe desalinated water project
opportunities for long-term supply. System Supplies Section 6.6 5.4
10631(j)
Retail suppliers will include documentation
that they have provided their wholesale
supplier(s) – if any - with water use
projections from that source.
System Supplies Section
2.5.1 4.3
10631(j)
Wholesale suppliers will include
documentation that they have provided
their urban water suppliers with
identification and quantification of the
existing and planned sources of water
available from the wholesale to the urban
supplier during various water year types.
System Supplies Section
2.5.1 N/A
10633
For wastewater and recycled water,
coordinate with local water, wastewater,
groundwater, and planning agencies that
operate within the supplier's service area.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.1 5.5
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10633(a)
Describe the wastewater collection and
treatment systems in the supplier's service
area. Include quantification of the amount
of wastewater collected and treated and the
methods of wastewater disposal.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.2 5.5.1
10633(b)
Describe the quantity of treated wastewater
that meets recycled water standards, is
being discharged, and is otherwise available
for use in a recycled water project.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.2.2 5.5.1
10633(c) Describe the recycled water currently being
used in the supplier's service area.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
5.5.3 and 6.5.4
10633(d)
Describe and quantify the potential uses of
recycled water and provide a determination
of the technical and economic feasibility of
those uses.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.4 5.5.3
10633(e)
Describe the projected use of recycled
water within the supplier's service area at
the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a
description of the actual use of recycled
water in comparison to uses previously
projected.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.4 5.5.3
10633(f)
Describe the actions which may be taken to
encourage the use of recycled water and the
projected results of these actions in terms
of acre-feet of recycled water used per year.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.5 5.5.3
10633(g) Provide a plan for optimizing the use of
recycled water in the supplier's service area.
System Supplies
(Recycled
Water)
Section
6.5.5 5.5.3
10620(f)
Describe water management tools and
options to maximize resources and minimize
the need to import water from other
regions.
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.4 6.2.6
10631(c)(1)
Describe the reliability of the water supply
and vulnerability to seasonal or climatic
shortage.
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.1 6.2.7
10631(c)(1)
Provide data for an average water year, a
single dry water year, and multiple dry
water years
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.2 6.2.1
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10631(c)(2)
For any water source that may not be
available at a consistent level of use,
describe plans to supplement or replace
that source.
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.1 6.2.6
10634
Provide information on the quality of
existing sources of water available to the
supplier and the manner in which water
quality affects water management
strategies and supply reliability
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.1 6.2.7
10635(a)
Assess the water supply reliability during
normal, dry, and multiple dry water years by
comparing the total water supply sources
available to the water supplier with the total
projected water use over the next 20 years.
Water Supply
Reliability
Assessment
Section 7.3
6.2.2;
6.2.3;
6.2.4
10632(a) and
10632(a)(1)
Provide an urban water shortage
contingency analysis that specifies stages of
action and an outline of specific water
supply conditions at each stage.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.1 7
10632(a)(2)
Provide an estimate of the minimum water
supply available during each of the next
three water years based on the driest three-
year historic sequence for the agency.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.9 6.2.5
10632(a)(3)
Identify actions to be undertaken by the
urban water supplier in case of a
catastrophic interruption of water supplies.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.8 7.2
10632(a)(4)
Identify mandatory prohibitions against
specific water use practices during water
shortages.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.2 0
10632(a)(5) Specify consumption reduction methods in
the most restrictive stages.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.4 7.4
10632(a)(6) Indicated penalties or charges for excessive
use, where applicable.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.3 7.5
10632(a)(7)
Provide an analysis of the impacts of each of
the actions and conditions in the water
shortage contingency analysis on the
revenues and expenditures of the urban
water supplier, and proposed measures to
overcome those impacts.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.6 7.6
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10632(a)(8) Provide a draft water shortage contingency
resolution or ordinance.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.7
7.7;
Appendix
H
10632(a)(9)
Indicate a mechanism for determining
actual reductions in water use pursuant to
the water shortage contingency analysis.
Water Shortage
Contingency
Planning
Section 8.5 7.8
10631(f)(1)
Retail suppliers shall provide a description
of the nature and extent of each demand
management measure implemented over
the past five years. The description will
address specific measures listed in code.
Demand
Management
Measures
Sections
8 and 9.3
10631(f)(2)
Wholesale suppliers shall describe specific
demand management measures listed in
code, their distribution system asset
management program, and supplier
assistance program.
Demand
Management
Sections
N/A and 9.3
10631(j)
CUWCC members may submit their 2013-
2014 CUWCC BMP annual reports in lieu of,
or in addition to, describing the DMM
implementation in their UWMPs. This
option is only allowable if the supplier has
been found to be in full compliance with the
CUWCC MOU.
Demand
Management
Measures
Section 9.5 N/A
10608.26(a)
Retail suppliers shall conduct a public
hearing to discuss adoption,
implementation, and economic impact of
water use targets.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.3
2.2;
Appendix
B
10621(b)
Notify, at least 60 days prior to the public
hearing, any city or county within which the
supplier provides water that the urban
water supplier will be reviewing the plan
and considering amendments or changes to
the plan.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.2.1
2.2;
Appendix
B
10621(d)
Each urban water supplier shall update and
submit its 2015 plan to the department by
July 1, 2016.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Sections 2.2;
Appendix
B 10.3.1 and
10.4
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix A. DWR Checklist
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
A
CWC Section UWMP Requirement Subject Guidebook
Location
UWMP
Location
10635(b)
Provide supporting documentation that
Water Shortage Contingency Plan has been,
or will be, provided to any city or county
within which it provides water, no later than
60 days after the submission of the plan to
DWR.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.4.4
2.2;
Appendix
B
10642
Provide supporting documentation that the
urban water supplier made the plan
available for public inspection, published
notice of the public hearing, and held a
public hearing about the plan.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Sections
10.2.2,
2.2;
Appendix
B and 10.5
10642
The water supplier is to provide the time
and place of the hearing to any city or
county within which the supplier provides
water.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Sections
10.2.1
2.2;
Appendix
B
10642
Provide supporting documentation that the
plan has been adopted as prepared or
modified.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.3.1
2.2;
Appendix
B
10644(a)
Provide supporting documentation that the
urban water supplier has submitted this
UWMP to the California State Library.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.4.3
2.2;
Appendix
B
10644(a)(1)
Provide supporting documentation that the
urban water supplier has submitted this
UWMP to any city or county within which
the supplier provides water no later than 30
days after adoption.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.4.4
2.2;
Appendix
B
10644(a)(2)
The plan, or amendments to the plan,
submitted to the department shall be
submitted electronically.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Sections 2.2;
Appendix
B
10.4.1 and
10.4.2
10645
Provide supporting documentation that, not
later than 30 days after filing a copy of its
plan with the department, the supplier has
or will make the plan available for public
review during normal business hours.
Plan Adoption,
Submittal, and
Implementation
Section
10.5
2.2;
Appendix
B
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix B. Notification and Outreach Materials
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
B
APPENDIX B. NOTIFICATION AND OUTREACH MATERIALS
To be included upon completion of the Final Draft UWMP.
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix C. Letter of Adoption
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
C
APPENDIX C. LETTER OF ADOPTION
To be included upon completion of the Final UWMP.
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix D. BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE
AND TARGET WATER USE TM – REVISED DRAFT
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
D
APPENDIX D. BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE AND TARGET
WATER USE TM – REVISED DRAFT
City of Arroyo Grande 2015 Urban Water Management Plan
Baseline Daily Per capita Water Use and Target Water Use – Revised Draft
1
Date: 5/5/2016
To: Shane Taylor Phone: (805) 473-5464
City of Arroyo Grande
PO Box 550
1375 Ash Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Prepared by: Spencer Waterman
Project: City of Arroyo Grande 2015 Urban Water Management Plan
SUBJECT: BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE AND TARGET WATER USE – REVISED DRAFT
This memorandum presents the procedure used by the City of Arroyo Grande (City) to meet the requirements of
Senate Bill x 7-7 (SB7) as defined in the Water Conservation Act of 2009 and incorporated into Division 6 of the
California Water Code, commencing with Section 10608 of Part 2.55.
Background
On November 10, 2009, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill x 7-7 into law. The legislation
requires all water suppliers to achieve a reduction in per capita water use of 20% by December 31, 2020, with an
interim target of 10% reduction by December 31, 2015. The legislation requires each urban water supplier to
develop, and include in its Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), estimates of: 1) baseline daily per capita
water use; 2) daily per capita water use target; 3) daily per capita water use interim target; 4) compliance daily
per capita water use; and 5) confirmation that the target meets the minimum water use reduction requirement.
The UWMP must also include bases for determining the estimates, with references to supporting data.
However, SB 7 did not include a detailed description of the allowable methodologies for determining the
required values. Instead, it required California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to develop appropriate
methodologies and criteria, and to make them available to water suppliers no later than October 1, 2010. In
consideration of this delay, the bill extended the deadline for adoption of the 2010 UWMP to July 1, 2011.
In connection with preparation of the 2010 and 2015 UWMPs, the City hired Water Systems Consulting, Inc.
(WSC) to develop the required estimates described by SB 7. WSC applied methodologies consistent with those
described in the Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use guidebook
(Methodologies Guidebook). The procedure used to develop the required SB7 estimates includes the following
basic steps:
1. Calculate baseline water use, which is the average gross daily water use per capita, reported in gallons
per capita per day, based on gross water use and service area population for a continuous 10-year
period ending no earlier than December 31, 2004.
2. Calculate the urban water use target using one of the four methods described below
2
3. Check and confirm targets using a selected five-year running average ending no earlier than December
31, 2007 and no later than December 31, 2010.
4. Calculate the interim urban water use target (equal to the average of the baseline and confirmed urban
water use target)
5. Calculate the compliance daily per capita water use (equal to the gross daily water use per capita during
the final year of the reporting period (i.e. 2010))
DWR allows the urban water supplier to choose one of four different methods to calculate the urban water use
target in Step 2 above.
Method 1 involves calculating the target based on 80% of baseline daily per capita water use and the
interim target based on 90% of the baseline daily per capita water use.
Method 2 involves calculating the per capita daily water use by using the sum of performance standards
applied to indoor residential use, landscaped area water use, and commercial, industrial, and
institutional uses.
Method 3 calculates the water use target as 95% of the applicable state hydrologic region target as
stated in the 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan. The City’s service area is located in the Central Coast
hydrologic region number 3 as defined in the State’s 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan.
Method 4 is an approach developed by DWR to estimate water savings factors associated with
implementation of various conservation measures. The water savings factors are used to calculate water
use targets. Appendix A and Appendix B show the input and calculation spreadsheets for Method 4.
Gross Water Use
SB 7 defines gross water use as:
“The total volume of water, whether treated or untreated, entering the distribution system of an urban
retail water supplier, excluding all of the following: (1) Recycled water that is delivered within the service
area of an urban retail water supplier or its urban wholesale water supplier; (2) The net volume of water
that the urban retail water supplier places into long-term storage; (3) The volume of water the urban
retail water supplier conveys for use by another urban water supplier.; (4) The volume of water delivered
for agricultural use, except as otherwise provided in subdivision (f) of Section 10608.24.”
Groundwater and surface water are the only sources of water for the City. From 1995 through present, the City
has not stored any water long-term or sold any water to other agencies. Therefore, gross water use is calculated
as the sum of the City’s total surface water purchases and groundwater production.
Population
The first step in determining the service area population involves establishing the service area boundary and the
customers served within that boundary. WSC worked with City Staff to establish the location of customer
connections outside of City limits served by the City and connections within the City limits not served by the
City. WSC then plotted these connections as points in a map using Geographical Information Systems (GIS)
3
software. The points contain spatial data linked to a geodatabase with information about each connection.
Figure 1 shows the connections located within City limits served by Oceano Community Services District (OCSD)
and connections located outside of City limits served by the City.
4
Figure 1. City of Arroyo Grande Water Service Area
5
To estimate the total population served by the City, WSC subtracted the population within City limits served by
OCSD and added the population outside of City limits served by the City to the 2010 Census population.
Table 1. Water Service Area Population
Population Area Source 2010
Connections
2010
Population
City Limits Census n/a 17,252
Inside City Limits Served by
OCSD Water
City Staff & Land Use Element 138 1 368
2
Inside City Limits Served by
City Water
Calculation (City Limits Census Pop. minus Pop.
Served by OCSD)
n/a 16,884
Outside City Limits Served by
City Water
City Staff & Land Use Element 9 1 24 2
Total Water Service Area Calculation (Inside City Limits Pop. plus
Outside City Limits Pop.)
n/a 16,908
1 The connections were identified and provided by City Staff.
2 Assumes a persons per residential connection factor of 2.67.
City Staff estimate the service area population each year for the Department of Water Resources Public Water
System Statistics report (DWR reports). The methodology used by City staff to calculate service area population
is very similar to the methodology WSC used to develop its 2010 population estimate based on the DWR
Population Tool. City Staff historically calculated the service area population by applying 2.4 persons per
household to the number of residential connections served by OCSD in each year and subtracting that
population from the City limits population. The population estimated in the 2010 DWR report is 16,901, a
difference of 0.04% from WSC’s estimate of 16,908.
Historical Population
Because Census data is not available for interim years between 1990, 2000 and 2010, historical population is
interpolated between non-census years for each year from 1995 through 2010. Figure 2 shows the historical
population.
6
Figure 2. Historical Population
Projected Population
The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) develops population projections for San Luis Obispo
County and the cities and communities within the County. SLOCOG projects the population for the City through
2040 in its San Luis Obispo County 2040 Population, Housing & Employment Forecast (1). The projections are
based on a comprehensive study of historical population trends for California and the County, short-term and
long-term population reports, economic conditions, and consultation with planners from the County. The report
presents three growth scenarios: low, mid, and high. For the purposes of projecting population, WSC used the
mid growth scenario population projections from SLOCOG’s report to develop annual growth rates through
2035. 2015 population was calculated by applying the 2010 persons per connection factor of 2.67 to the total
number of connections in 2015. The annual growth rates are applied to the 2015 population to yield the
projected populations shown in Table 2. The build-out population, defined as the maximum population that can
occur considering the zoning and land use designations of the current General Plan, is established at 20,000
persons based on the City’s General Plan Housing Element.
Table 2. Service Area Population Projections
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Population 16,908 17,636 18,524 19,054 19,716 20,000
Annual Growth
Rate %
n/a 0.52% 0.99% 0.57% 0.69%
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Distribution System Population
7
Baseline Per Capita Water Use
WSC calculated per capita water use using gross water use values and the population estimates shown in Table
3. The annual per capita water use value was averaged across 10-year periods ranging from 1995-2004 through
2001-2010. Figure 3 shows the historical population estimates, along with the annual per capita water use for
the years 1995 through 2010.
Table 3. Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use
Calendar
Year
Distribution System
Population
Daily
System
Gross Water
Use (mgd)
Annual Daily
Per Capita
Water Use
(gpcd)
10 year
running
average
(gpcd)
1995 14,951 2.3 157
1996 15,062 2.5 166
1997 15,173 2.8 182
1998 15,284 2.5 162
1999 15,396 2.8 184
2000 15,507 3.0 195
2001 15,647 2.9 188
2002 15,787 3.1 198
2003 15,927 3.1 197
2004 16,067 3.2 200 183
2005 16,208 3.0 188 186
2006 16,348 3.0 182 187
2007 16,488 3.2 194 189
2008 16,628 3.1 189 191
2009 16,768 2.9 173 190
2010 16,908 2.6 156 187
Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use 191
8
Figure 3. Population and Historical Per Capita Water Use
Water Use Targets
The baseline daily per capita water use is used to calculate the urban water use target and the interim urban
water use target. The per capita water use target and interim target estimates are calculated using Method 1,
Method 3, and Method 4 from the Methodologies Guidebook. Method 2 was not used due to a lack of available
data. Table 4 shows the estimated daily per capita water use targets for each method analyzed.
Table 4. Daily Per Capita Water Use Targets
Calculation Method Water Use
Target
(gpcd)
Method 1: 80% of Baseline Per Capita
Water Use 153.2
Method 2: Performance Standards Not
calculated
Method 3: 95% of Regional Target 117.0
Method 4: DWR Approach 152.7
Selected Urban Water Use Target 153.2
157 166
182
162
184 195 188 198 197 200 188 182
194 189
173
156
100
150
200
250
300
350
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Av
e
r
a
g
e
P
e
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
W
a
t
e
r
U
s
e
(
g
p
c
d
)
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Distribution System Population Average Per Capita Water Use (gpcd)
9
Minimum Water Use Reduction Requirements
The selected target must be less than 95% of a selected five-year running average ending no earlier than
December 31, 2007 and ending no later than December 31, 2010 per the requirements of California Water Code
Section 10608.22. Table 5 shows the minimum water use reduction based on five-year running averages. Table
6 shows the confirmation that the selected target meets the minimum water use reduction. Table 7 shows the
final baseline, compliance, interim target, and target per capita water use. Table 8 shows the status of meeting
the interim target and target based on current compliance per capita water use. Figure 4 shows the past, current
and projected per capita water use for the City.
The projected gpcd for interim years between 2016 and 2020 was calculated uniquely. It is assumed that the low
gpcd experienced in 2015 was a result of multiple temporary factors, such as the economy, wet year hydrologic
conditions, emergency drought regulations, and others. To account for this artificially low gpcd, it is assumed
that the 2020 gpcd will be approximately 7% less than the five-year historical average gpcd from 2011-2015
based on City Staff input. The interim years between 2016 and 2020 were calculated through linear
interpolation between the 2020 and 2015 water use. Lastly, the years following 2020 were assumed to stay the
same through buildout. The values shown will be reported in the City’s 2015 UWMP.
Table 5. Minimum Water Use Reduction
Calendar
Year
Distribution System
Population
Daily System
Gross Water
Use (mgd)
Annual
Daily Per
Capita
Water
Use
(gpcd)
5 year
running
average
2003 15,927 3.1 197
2004 16,067 3.2 200
2005 16,208 3.0 188
2006 16,348 3.0 182
2007 16,488 3.2 194 192
2008 16,628 3.1 189 190
2009 16,768 2.9 173 185
2010 16,908 2.6 156 179
5-yr Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use 192
Table 6. Target Confirmation
Selected Urban Water Use Target (gpcd) 153
95% of 5-year Base Daily Per Capita Water Use (gpcd) 183
Selected Urban Water Use Target < 95% of 5-year Base GPCD Yes
Confirmed Urban Water Use Target, 2020 (gpcd) 153
10
Table 7. Baseline, Compliance, Interim Target, and Target Water Use
Parameter Water Use (gpcd)
Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use 191
2010 Daily Per Capita Water Use 113
2015 Interim Urban Water Use Target 172
2020 Urban Water Use Target 153
Table 8. Water Use Reduction Status
Water Use Reduction (on gpcd basis) % Reduction1
Achieved by 2015 40.8%
Needed to meet 2015 target -52.0%
Needed to meet 2020 target -35.1%
1 A negative % means the compliance is currently lower than the target.
Figure 4. Historical, Current, and Project Per Capita Water Use
172
153
191
7% Reduction from
2011-2015 Average=
135 gpcd
135
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
19
9
6
19
9
8
20
0
0
20
0
2
20
0
4
20
0
6
20
0
8
20
1
0
20
1
2
20
1
4
20
1
6
20
1
8
20
2
0
20
2
2
20
2
4
20
2
6
20
2
8
20
3
0
Wa
t
e
r
U
s
e
(
G
a
l
l
o
n
s
/
C
a
p
i
t
a
/
D
a
y
)
Interim Target (2015)Target (2020)Baseline
Projected Use (gpcd)Historical Use (gpcd)
11
Appendix A. User Input- Method 4
12
Appendix B. Calculator-Method 4
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix E. AWWA Water Loss Audit
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
E
APPENDIX E. AWWA WATER LOSS AUDIT
Water Audit Report for:
Reporting Year:
PLEASE CHOOSE REPORTING UNITS FROM THE INSTRUCTIONS SHEET BEFORE ENTERING DATA
Master Meter and Supply Error Adjustments
WATER SUPPLIED Pcnt: Value:
Volume from own sources:9 86.800
Water imported:9 2,152.200
Water exported:9
Enter negative % or value for under-registration
WATER SUPPLIED:2,239.000 Enter positive % or value for over-registration
.
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
Billed metered:9 2,106.300
Billed unmetered:9
Unbilled metered:9 Pcnt: Value:
Unbilled unmetered:5 27.988 1.25%
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:2,134.288
WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption)104.713
Apparent Losses Pcnt: Value:
Unauthorized consumption: 5.598 0.25%
Customer metering inaccuracies:8 0.000
Systematic data handling errors:7 5.266 0.25%
Apparent Losses:10.863
Real Losses (Current Annual Real Losses or CARL)
Real Losses = Water Losses - Apparent Losses:93.849
WATER LOSSES:104.713
NON-REVENUE WATER
NON-REVENUE WATER:132.700
= Water Losses + Unbilled Metered + Unbilled Unmetered
SYSTEM DATA
Length of mains:7 87.5
Number of active AND inactive service connections:7 6,605
Service connection density: 75
Yes
Average length of customer service line:
Average operating pressure:7 65.0
COST DATA
Total annual cost of operating water system:8 $1,328,115 $/Year
Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses):8 $3.50
Variable production cost (applied to Real Losses):8 $1,458.00 $/
WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE:
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION:
1: Water imported
2: Unauthorized consumption
3: Systematic data handling errors
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading score of 10 has been applied
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop or property line?
AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Reporting Worksheet
Default option selected for Unbilled unmetered - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed
<< Please enter system details and contact information on the Instructions tab >>
*** YOUR SCORE IS: 81 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score
Default option selected for Systematic data handling errors - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed
Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can be improved by addressing the following components:
$/100 cubic feet (ccf)
<----------- Enter grading in column 'E' and 'J' ---------->
Default option selected for unauthorized consumption - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed
?
?
?
?
?
?Click to access definition
?
?
?
?
?
?
Please enter data in the white cells below. Where available, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate your confidence in the accuracy of the input
data by grading each component (n/a or 1-10) using the drop-down list to the left of the input cell. Hover the mouse over the cell to obtain a description of the grades
?
?
?
?
?
?
(length of service line, beyond the property boundary,
that is the responsibility of the utility)
Use buttons to select
percentage of water supplied
OR
value
?Click here:
for help using option
buttons below
?
?
?
?
+
+Click to add a comment
WAS v5.0
+
+
+
+
+
+
American Water Works Association.
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Use Customer Retail Unit Cost to value real losses
?
To select the correct data grading for each input, determine the highest grade where the
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v5.0 Reporting Worksheet 1
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix F. Selected Figures from the NCMA 2015 Annual Monitoring Report
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
F
APPENDIX F. SELECTED FIGURES FROM THE NCMA 2015 ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
P a c i f i cOcean
£¤101UV1
UV1
Santa Maria ValleyManagement Area
Nipomo MesaManagement Area
NorthernCitiesManagementArea
Northern Cities Managem ent AreaProject No. 04.62150079
SANTA MARIA GROUNDWATER BASINNorthern Cities Management AreaSan Luis Obispo County, California
FIGURE 1
Ü
0 51234Miles
Legend
Northern CitiesManagement Area
Adjudication Area Boundary
Santa Maria Groundwater Basin(DWR Bulletin 118)
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap,increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity
\\V e n w e s t 1 0 \D a t a 5 \P r o j e c t s \0 4 _2 0 1 4 \0 4 _6 2 1 4 _0 1 0 5 _N C M A _2 0 1 4 A n n u a l R e p o r t \O u t p u t s \2 0 1 4 _N C M A _A n n u a l _M o n i t o r i n g _R e p o r t \m x d \F i g u r e 1 S a n t a M a r i a G r o u n d w a t e r B a s i n .m x d , 0 4 /0 1 /1 5 , t n i c e l y
AN
N
U
A
L
P
R
E
C
I
P
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
1
9
5
0
T
O
2
0
1
5
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
Sa
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Northern Cities Management Area Project No. 04.62150079
FIGURE 3
Northern Cities Management Area
Project No. 04.62150079
MONTHLY 2015 AND AVERAGE PRECIPITATION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
Northern Cities Management Area
San Luis Obispo County, California
FIGURE 5
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!APacific O c e a n
£¤101
UV1
UV1
Oceano CSD Observation Wells(Green, Blue, Silver, and Yellow)
Wells 32S/13E-30N01, N02, & N03
Wells 32S/13E-30F01, F02, & F03
Wells 32S/12E-24 B01, B02, & B03
Wells 12N/36W-36L01 & L02 Well 12N/35W-32C03
M
e
a
d
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
Arroyo Grande Creek
B e r r o s C re e k , L o s
P i s m o C r e e k
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment PCorp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS User Community
120°34'0"W
120°34'0"W
120°36'0"W
120°36'0"W
120°38'0"W
120°38'0"W
3 5 °8 '0 "N
3 5 °8 '0 "N
3 5 °6 '0 "N
3 5 °6 '0 "N
3 5 °4 '0 "N
3 5 °4 '0 "N
Northern Cities Managem ent AreaProject No. 04.62150079
LOCATION OF SENTRY WELLSNorthern Cities Management AreaSan Luis Obispo County, California FIGURE 6
Legend
!'A NCMA Sentry Wells Northern Cities Management AreaCreeks
\\V e n w e s t 1 0 \D a t a 5 \P r o j e c t s \0 4 _2 0 1 4 \0 4 _6 2 1 4 _0 1 0 5 _N C M A _2 0 1 4 A n n u a l R e p o r t \O u t p u t s \2 0 1 4 _N C M A _A n n u a l _M o n i t o r i n g _R e p o r t \m x d \F i g u r e 7 L o c a t i o n o f S e n t r y W e l l s .m x d , 0 4 /0 1 /1 5 , t n i c e l y
Ü
0 4,000 Feet1:60,000
DE
P
T
H
S
O
F
S
E
N
T
R
Y
W
E
L
L
S
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
Sa
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Northern Cities Management Area Technical Group Project No. 04.62150079
FIGURE 7
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P %P%P
%P
%P%P%P%P
%P
%P
%P
%P %P
%P
%P
%P%P%P
%P
%P
%P%P
%P%P%P
%P
%P
%P %P
%P%P%P
%P%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P%P
%P
%P%P
%P%P%P
%P
%P
%P
%P%P
%P
%P
%P
%P
%P%P %P
%P
%P%P%P%P
%P%P%P
%P%P%P%P%P%P
%P%P
%P%P
%P
%P
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
P a c i f i cOcean
£¤101
UV1
UV1
M
e
a
d
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
Arroyo Grande Creek
B e r ro s C re e k , L o s
P i s m o C r e e k
Northern Cities Managem ent AreaProject No. 04.62150079
SELECTED HYDROGRAPHSNorthern Cities Management AreaSan Luis Obispo County, California
Ü
0 1 2Miles
1 inch equals 1 mile
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USG S, Intermap,increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, M ETI, Esri
FIGURE 10
Legend
!P Se lected We ll Location s
North ern Cities Ma nage me nt Are a (NC MA)
!A Se ntry We lls
\\V e n w e s t 1 0 \D a t a 5 \P r o j e c t s \0 4 _2 0 1 4 \0 4 _6 2 1 4 _0 1 0 5 _N C M A _2 0 1 4 A n n u a l R e p o r t \O u t p u t s \2 0 1 4 _N C M A _A n n u a l _M o n i t o r i n g _R e p o r t \m x d \F i g u r e 1 1 S e l e c t e d H y d r o g r a p h s .m x d , 0 3 /1 7 /1 5 , t n i c e l y
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
P a c i f i cOcean
£¤101
UV1
UV1
M
e
a
d
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
Arroyo Grande Creek
B e r ro s C re e k , L o s
P i s m o C r e e k
Northern Cities Managem ent AreaProject No. 04.62150079
SENTRY WELL HYDROGRAPHSNorthern Cities Management AreaSan Luis Obispo County, California
Ü
0 1 2Miles
1 inch equals 1 mile
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USG S, Intermap,increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, M ETI, Esri
FIGURE 11
Legend
North ern Cities Ma nage me nt Are a (NC MA)
!A Se ntry We lls
\\V e n w e s t 1 0 \D a t a 5 \P r o j e c t s \0 4 _2 0 1 4 \0 4 _6 2 1 4 _0 1 0 5 _N C M A _2 0 1 4 A n n u a l R e p o r t \O u t p u t s \2 0 1 4 _N C M A _A n n u a l _M o n i t o r i n g _R e p o r t \m x d \F i g u r e 1 2 N C M A S e n t r y W e l l H y d r o g r a p h s .m x d , 0 3 /1 7 /1 5 , t n i c e l y
HY
D
O
G
R
A
P
H
O
F
A
V
E
R
A
G
E
D
E
E
P
SE
N
T
R
Y
W
E
L
L
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
Sa
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Northern Cities Management Area Project No. 04.62150079
FIGURE 12
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
0
4
.
6
2
1
5
0
0
7
9
MUNICIPAL WATER USE BY SOURCE Northern Cities Management Area San Luis Obispo County, California
J:
\
W
A
T
E
R
_
R
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
\
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
\
2
0
1
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
\
F
I
G
U
R
E
S
\
U
PD
A
T
E
D
F
I
G
U
R
E
S
\
F
I
G
U
R
E
2
1
M
U
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
W
A
T
E
R
U
S
E
B
Y
S
O
U
R
C
E
1
1
X
1
7
.
D
OC
X
FIGURE 23
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix G. SMGB Groundwater Management Agreement
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
G
APPENDIX G. SMGB GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
JAN 2 5 2008
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SANTA MARIA VALLEY WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
Plaintiff,
SANTA MARIA GROUNDWATER
LITIGATION
Lead Case No. 1-97-CV-770214
(CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL
PURPOSES)
VS. [Consolidated With Case Numbers:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, ET AL.. CV 784900; CV 785509; CV 785522;
CV 787150; CV 784921; CV 78551 1;
CV 785936; CV 787151; CV 784926;
Defendants. CV 785515; CV 786791; CV 787152;
1-05-CV-0364101
I I 1 San Luis Obispo County Superior I
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS AND
ACTIONS CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL
PURPOSES
Court Case Nds. 990738 and 990739
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL
This matter came on for trial in five separate phases. Following the third phase of trial,
a large number of parties entered into a written stipulation dated June 30, 2005 to resolve their 1 differences and requested that the cow approve the settlement and make its terms binding on 1
them as a part of any final judgment entered in this case. Subsequent to the execution of the
stipulation by the original settling parties, a number of additional parties have agreed to be
I I bound by the stipulation - their signatures are included in the attachments to this judgment. I
Case No. 1-97-CV-770214
Judgment After Trial
The June 30, 2005 Stipulation is attached as Exhibit "1;" and all exhibits to the
,tipulation are separately attached as Exhibits "1A" through "1H". The Stipulating Parties are
ientified on Exhibit "IA." The court approves the Stipulation, orders the Stipulating Parties
nly to comply with each and every term thereof, and incorporates the same herein as though
et forth in full. No non-stipulating party is bound in any way by the stipulation except as the
ourt may otherwise independently adopt as its independent judgment a term or terms that are
le same or similar to such term or provision of the stipulation.
As to all remaining parties, including those who failed to answer or otherwise appear,
le court heard the testimony of witnesses, considered the evidence found to be admissible by
le court, and heard the arguments of counsel. Good cause appearing, the court finds and
rders judgment as follows.
As used in this Judgment, the following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
- The groundwater basin described in the Phase I and I1 orders of the court, as
lodified, with attachments and presented in Exhibit "1B".
Defaultinn Parties - All persons or entities listed on Exhibit "3".
Imuorted Water - Water within the Basin received from the State Water Project,
riginating outside the Basin, that absent human intervention would not recharge or be used in
le Basin.
LOG Parties - All persons or entities listed on Exhibit "2:" listed under the subheading
LOG Parties".
Non-Stipulatin~ Parties - All Parties who did not sign the Stipulation, including the
)efaulting Parties and the LOG and Wineman Parties.
Pavties - All parties to the above-referenced action, including Stipulating Parties, Non-
tipulating Parties, and Defaulting Parties.
Public Water Producers - City of Santa Maria, Golden State Water Company, Rural
Vater Company, the "Northern Cities" (collectively the Cities of Arroyo Grande, Pismo
teach, and Grover Beach, and Oceano Community Services District), and the Nipomo
'ommunity Services District.
ase No. 1-97-CV-770214
~dgment After Trial
Return Flows - All water which recharges the Basin after in~tial use, through the use of
percolation ponds and others means, derived from the use and recharge of imported water
delivered through State Water Project facilities.
Stipulating Parties - All Parties who are signatories to the Stipulation.
Stipulation - The Stipulation dated June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein as Exhibit
"1," with each of its Exhibits separately identified and incorporated herein as Exhibits "1A"
through " 1 H".
Storage Space - The portion of the Basin capable of holding water for subsequent
reasonable and beneficial uses.
W~nernan Parties - All persons or entities listed on Exhibit "2," under the subheading
"Wineman Parties".
The following Exhibits are attached to this Judgment:
1. Exhibit "I, "June 30, 2005 Stipulation and the following exhibits thereto:
a. Exhibit "IA, " list identifying the Stipulating Parties and the parcels of
land bound by the Stipulation.
b. Exhibit "IB, " Phase I and I1 Orders, as modified, with attachments.
c. Exhibit "IC," map of the Basin and boundaries of the three
Management Areas.
d. Exhibit "ID," map identifying those lands as of January I, 2005: 1)
within the boundaries of a municipality or its sphere of influence, or within the process of
inclusion in its sphere of influence; or 2) within the certificated service area of a publicly
regulated utility; and a list of selected parcels that are nearby these boundaries which are
excluded from within these areas.
e. Exhibit "IE, " 2002 Settlement Agreement between the Northern Cities
and Northern Landowners.
f. Exhibit "IF," the agreement among Santa Maria, Golden State and
Guadalupe regarding Twitchell Project and the Twitchell Management Authority.
g. Exhibit "lG," the court's Order Concerning Electronic Service of
Case No. 1-9743-7702 14
Judgment After Trial
'leadings and Electronic Posting of Discovery Documents dated June 27,2000.
h. Exhibit "lH, " the form of memorandum of agreement to be recorded.
2. Exhibit "2, " List of Non-Stipulating LOG and Wineman Parties and recorded
eed numbers of property they owned at the time of trial.
3. Exhibit "3, " List of Defaulting parties.
A declaratory judgment and physical solution are hereby adjudged and decreed
s follows:
1. As of the time of trial, LOG and Wineman Parties owned the real property,
sted by assessor's parcel numbers, as presented in Exhibit 2.
2. The City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company are awarded
rescriptive rights to ground water against the non-stipulating parties, which rights shall be
leasured and enforced as described below.
3. The City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company have a right to use
le Basin for temporary storage and subsequent recapture of the Return Flows generated from
leir importation of State Water Project water, to the extent that such water adds to the supply
f water in the aquifer and if there is storage space in the aquifer for such return flows,
lcluding all other native sources of water in the aquifer. The City of Santa Maria's Return
lows represent 65 percent of the amount of imported water used by the City. Golden State
Vater Company's Return Flows represent 45 percent of the amount of imported water used by
iolden State in the basin.
4. (a) The Northern Cities have a prior and paramount right to produce 7,300 acre-
:et of water per year from the Northern Cities Area of the Basin; and (b) the Non-Stipulating
arties have no overlying, appropriative, or other right to produce any water supplies in the
Iorthern Cities Area of the Basin.
5. The Groundwater Monitoring Provisions and Management Area Monitoring
rograms contained in the Stipulation, including Sections IV(D) (All Management Areas);
'(B) (Santa Maria Management Area), VI(C) (Nipomo Mesa Management Area), and VII (1)
Vorthern Cities Management Area), inclusive, are independently adopted by the court as
ase No. I -97-CV-7702 14
~dgment After Trial
necessary to manage water production in the basin and are incorporated herein and made terms
of this Judgment. The Non-Stipulating Parties shall participate in, and be bound by. the
applicable Management Area Monitoring Program. Each Non-Stipulating Party also shall
monitor their water production, maintain records thereof, and make the data available to the
court or its designee as may be required by subsequent order of the court.
6. No Party established a pre-Stipulation priority right to any portion of that
increment of augmented groundwater supply within the Basin that derives from the Twitchell
Project's operation.
7. The court determines that there is a reasonable likelihood that drought and
overdraft conditions will occur in the Basin in the foreseeable future that will require the
exercise of the court's equity powers. The court therefore retains jurisdiction to make orders
enforcing the rights of the parties hereto in accordance with the terms of this judgment.
a. Groundwater
I. The overlying rights of the LOG and Wineman Parties shall be
adjusted by amounts lost to the City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company by
prescription. The prescriptive rights of the City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water
Company must be measured against the rights of all overlying water producers pumping in the
acquifer as a whole and not just against the LOG and Wineman Parties because adverse
pumping by the said water producers was from the aquifer as a whole and not just against the
non-stipulating parties. The City of Santa Maria established total adverse appropriation of
5100 acre feet per year and Golden State Water Company established adverse appropriation of
1900 acre feet a year, measured against all usufructuary rights within the Santa Maria Basin.
The City of Santa Maria and Goldcn State Water Company having waived the right to seek
prescription against the other stipulating parties, may only assert such rights against the non
stipulating parties in a proportionate quantity. To demonstrate the limited right acquired by
the City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company, by way of example, if the
cumulative usufructuary rights of the LOG and Wineman Parties were 1,000 acre-feet and the
cumulative usufructuary rights of all other overlying groundwater right holders within the
5
Case No. 1-97-CV-770214
Judgment After Trial
Basin were 100,000 acre-feet, the City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company
would each be entitled to enforce 1% of their total prescriptive right against the LOG and
Wineman Parties. That is, Golden State Water Company could assert a prescriptive right of
19 annual acre-feet, and the City of Santa Maria 51 annual acre-feet, cumulatively against the
LOG and Wineman Parties, each on a proportionate basis as to each LOG and Wineman
Party's individual use.
ii. The Defaulting Parties failed to appear at trial and prove any
usuhctuary water rights. The rights of the Defaulting Parties, if any, are subject to the
prescriptive rights of the City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company, as well as the
other rights of said parties as established herein.
b. Imported Water
The City of Santa Maria and Golden State Water Company shall have rights to Return
Flows in the amount provided above.
c. Northern Cities
The rights of all Parties in the Northern Cities Management Area shall be governed as
described above on page 4, lines 21 to 24.
8. The LOG and Wineman Parties have failed to sustain the burden of proof in
their action to quiet title to the quantity of their ground water rights as overlying owners. All
other LOG and Wineman party causes of action having been dismissed, judgment is hereby
entered in favor of the Public Water Producers as to the quiet title causes of action brought by
the LOG and the Wineman Parties. Legal title to said real property is vested in the Log and
Wineman Parties and was not in dispute in this action.
9. Each and every Party, their officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns,
are enjoined and restrained from exercising the rights and obligations provided through this
Judgment in a manner inconsistent with the express provisions of this Judgment.
10. Except upon further order of the court. each and every Party and its officers,
agents, employees, successors and assigns, is enjoined and restrained from transporting
groundwater to areas outside the Basin, except for those uses in existence as of the date of this
6
Case No. 1-97-CV-7702 14
Judgment After Trial
Judgment; provided, however. that groundwater may be delivered for use outside the Basin as
long as the wastewater generated by that use of water is discharged within the Basin, or
agricultural return flows resulting from that use return to the Basin.
11. Jurisdiction, power and authority over the Stipulating Parties as between one
another are governed exclusively by the Stipulation. The court retains and reserves
jurisdiction as set forth in this Paragraph over all parties hereto. The court shall make such
further or supplemental orders as may be necessary or appropriate regarding interpretation and
enforcement of all aspects of this Judgment, as well as clarifications or amendments to the
Judgment consistent with the law.
12. Any party that seeks the court's exercise of reserved jurisdiction shall file a
noticed motion with the court. Any noticed motion shall be made pursuant to the court's
Order Concerning Electronic Service of Pleadings and Electronic Posting of Discovery
Documents dated June 27,2000.
13. The court shall exercise de novo review in all proceedings. The actions or
decisions of any Party, the Monitoring Parties, the TMA, or the Management Area Engineer
shall have no heightened evidentiary weight in any proceedings before the court.
14. As long as the court's electronic filing system remains available, all court
filings shall be made pursuant to court's Order Concerning Electronic Service of Pleadings
and Electronic Posting of Discovery Documents dated June 27, 2000, or any subsequent
superseding order. If the court's electronic filing system is eliminated and not replaced, the
Parties shall promptly establish a substitute electronic filing system and abide by the same
rules as contained in the court's Order.
15. Nothing in this Judgment shall be interpreted as relieving any Party of its
responsibilities to comply with state or federal laws for the protection of water quality or the
provisions of any permits, standards, requirements, or order promulgated thereunder.
16. Each Party shall designate the name, address and e-mail address, if any, to be
used for purposes of all subsequent notices and service by a designation to be filed within
thirty days after entry of this Judgment. This designation may be changed from time to time
7
Case No. 1-97-CV-770214
Judgment After Trial
)y filing a written notice with the court. Any Party desiring to be relieved of receiving notices
nay file a waiver of notice on a form approved by the court. The court shall maintain at all
imes a current list of Parties to whom notices are to be sent and their addresses for purposes
)f service. The court shall also maintain a full current list of names, addresses, and e-mail
rddresses of all Parties or their successors, as filed herein. Copies of such lists shall be
wailable to any Person. If no designation is made, a Party's designee shall be deemed to be, in
rder of priority: i) the Party's attorney of record; ii) if the Party does not have an attorney of
ecord, the Party itself at the address specified.
17. All real property owned by the Parties within the Basin is subject to this
ludgment. The Judgment will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each Party and their
espective heirs, executors, administrators, trustees, successors, assigns, and agents. Any
)arty, or executor of a deceased party, who transfers property that is subject to this judgment
;hall notify any transferee thereof of this judgment and shall ensure that the judgment is
ecorded in the line of title of said property. This Judgment shall not bind the Parties that
:ease to own property within the Basin, and cease to use groundwater. Within sixty days
ollowing entry of this Judgment, the City of Santa Maria, in cooperation with the San Luis
Ibispo entities and Golden State, shall record in the Office of the County Reporter in Santa
3arbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, a notice of entry of Judgment.
The Clerk shall enter this Judgment.
SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.
>ate& January 25,2008
Juqge $the Superior Court
:ase No. 1-97-CV-770214
udgment After Trial
City of Arroyo Grande Appendix H. Water Conservation Ordinance
2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final Draft
H
APPENDIX H. WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 1
Chapter 13.05 ‐ WATER CONSERVATION[1]
Sections:
Footnotes:
‐‐‐ (1) ‐‐‐
Editor's note—Ord. No. 631, § 2, adopted May 10, 2011, repealed and replaced in its entirety the former
Ch. 13.05, §§ 13.05.010—13.05.070, and enacted a new Ch. 13.05 as set out herein. The former Ch.
13.05 pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. 576 §§ 2—4, 2005: Ord. 540 § 1, Exh. A
(part), 2003.
13.05.010 ‐ Water conservation measures established.
Mandatory water conservation measures are hereby established as set forth in this chapter. Please
refer to Chapter 16.84, Water Efficient Landscape Requirements, for rules and regulations regarding
landscape and irrigation, including limitations on the percentage of turf/lawn that can be placed in landscape
areas.
(Ord. No. 631, § 2, 5-10-2011; Ord. No. 633, § 3, 6-14-2011)
13.05.020 ‐ Application.
A. To the extent authorized by law, this article shall apply to all customers and property within the city
and the city's water service area.
B. The provisions of this article do not apply to uses of water necessary to protect public health and safety
or for essential health care or government services such as police, fire and other similar emergency
services.
C. The city council may adopt resolutions designed to implement the provisions of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 631, § 2, 5-10-2011)
13.05.030 ‐ Water conservation requirements.
The following water conservation requirements are effective at all times. Violations of this section shall
be considered waste and an unreasonable use of water. Penalties for noncompliance are listed in Sections
13.05.050 and 13.05.060.
A. Use of water which results in excessive gutter runoff is prohibited.
B. Outdoor Water Use—Except Irrigation.
1. No water shall be used for cleaning driveways, patios, parking lots, sidewalks, streets or other
such use except where necessary to protect the public health and safety;
2. Outdoor water use for washing vehicles shall be attended and have hand-controlled watering
devices.
C. Outdoor Irrigation.
Page 2
1. Outdoor irrigation is prohibited between the hours of ten (10) a.m. and four p.m.
2. Irrigation of private and public landscaping, turf areas and gardens is permitted at even-numbered
addresses only on Mondays and Thursdays and at odd-numbered addresses only on Tuesdays
and Fridays. No irrigation of private and public landscaping, turf areas and gardens is permitted
on Wednesdays. Irrigation is permitted at all addresses on Saturdays and Sundays however, in
all cases customers are directed to use no more water than necessary to maintain landscaping.
D. Emptying and refilling swimming pools and commercial spas is prohibited except to prevent structural
damage and/or to provide for the public health and safety. New swimming pools may be constructed,
however, they shall have a cover that conforms to the size and shape of the pool and act as an effective
barrier to evaporation. The cover must be in place during periods when use of the pool is not
reasonably expected to occur.
E. Use of potable water for soil compaction or dust control purposes in construction activities is prohibited
unless specifically approved by the city.
F. Hotel, motel or other commercial lodging establishment shall offer their patrons the option to forego
the daily laundering of towels, sheets and linens.
G. Restaurants or other commercial food service establishments shall not serve water except upon the
request of a patron.
(Ord. No. 631, § 2, 5-10-2011; Ord. No. 669, § 2, 2-24-2015)
13.05.050 ‐ Penalties for noncompliance.
A. Violation of any provision of this chapter may result in termination of water service until such violation
is corrected, and until penalties are paid in full and will be subject to the following administrative
procedure:
1. Written notice to the alleged offender, including the furnishing of informational material and advice
where appropriate;
2. Recovery of all city staff costs, including overhead, or any second or greater offense within any
one-year period;
3. Additional civil administrative penalties for any third or greater offense within any one-year period;
4. The right to appeal first to the utility billing adjustment committee and then to the city council.
(Ord. No. 631, § 2, 5-10-2011)
13.05.060 ‐ Violation—Penalty.
In addition to, and completely separate from, the civil enforcement provisions of the ordinance codified
in this chapter, any person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty
of a criminal misdemeanor as provided in the general penalty provisions of this code. All previous attempts
by the city to obtain compliance by the defendant may be introduced as evidence of the offender's
knowledge and willfulness.
(Ord. No. 631, § 2, 5-10-2011)
Page 1
13.07.020 ‐ Stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergencies defined.
A. The provisions of this chapter relating to emergency water shortage restrictions and regulations are in
addition to the water conservation requirements contained in Section 13.05.030 and shall take effect
upon adoption of a resolution by the city council as further provided in Sections 13.07.030 and
13.07.040, based upon the recommendations of city staff and its analysis of the city's water supplies
that stage 1 water shortage emergency or stage 2 water shortage emergency conditions exist, as
defined in this section. Upon adoption, such resolutions shall remain in effect for the duration of the
water shortage emergency conditions.
1. Stage 1 Water Shortage Emergency. A stage 1 water shortage emergency shall mean that there
have been impacts to the city's water supply, and/or it has been determined that it is imminent
that the city's water supply has or will become so limited that an emergency water shortage
condition exists as far as the available water supply being less than projected demand.
2. Stage 2 Water Shortage Emergency. A stage 2 water shortage emergency shall mean that that it
has been determined that the projected city's water supply is, or will become equal to or less than
amounts that have been determined necessary to meet basic minimum household health and
safety requirements, and restrictions and limits through the implementation of water allocations
are necessary for continued water use that is reliable and sustainable by providing a minimum
supply for the most essential purposes for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection
during the emergency situation.
B. During a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency, if it is deemed in the city's interest in order to
better monitor water usage, the billing period may be adjusted by city staff to provide for monthly billing,
instead of bimonthly billing.
C. Upon adoption of a resolution declaring a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency, the provisions
of this chapter and any restrictions set forth in the resolution, shall apply to all persons using or
consuming water provided by the city inside and outside of the city, regardless of whether any person
using such water has a contract for water service with the city.
D. If any other provision of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code, whether enacted prior to or subsequent
to the enactment of this chapter, is inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of
this chapter shall supersede and control for the duration of the declared water shortage emergency
set forth in the resolution of the city council.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.030 ‐ Stage 1 water shortage emergency and historical use water restrictions.
A. After holding a noticed public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Water Code Section 350
et seq., the city council may declare a stage 1 water shortage emergency based upon a determination
that there has been impacts to the city's water supply, and/or it has been determined that it is imminent
that the city's water supply has or will become so limited that an emergency water shortage condition
exists as far as the available water supply being less than projected demand necessitating the
institution of reductions in water usage based upon historical use, as further set forth in subsection B.
B. Upon adoption of a stage 1 water shortage emergency resolution, all residential customers will be
assigned a baseline amount of water, based upon the amount of water used during the same billing
period of the previous year prior to the adoption of the resolution. All residential customers shall reduce
water usage by a percentage amount set forth in the resolution, which percentages may be modified
or amended by the city council as deemed necessary and appropriate. The percentage of required
conservation shall increase depending on the billing tier of the residential customers water use as
provided in the city's tiered water rate structure. The resolution shall include provisions for the
imposition of mandatory financial penalties if the amount of water in each tier is exceeded, which
Page 2
penalties may also be modified or amended by the city council as deemed necessary and appropriate
based upon a determination of the severity of the water shortage emergency.
The following shall be used as a general framework for the resolution establishing the baseline units
for billing tiers and penalties, subject to such revisions deemed necessary in order to achieve the desired
water savings:
Residential customers in tier 1 shall be required to reduce consumption by the lowest percentage.
Residential customers in tier 2 shall be required to reduce consumption by a larger percentage than those
in tier 1. Residential customers in tier 3 shall be required to reduce consumption by an even larger
percentage than those in tier 1 and tier 2. For example, tier 1 customers may initially be required to conserve
five percent, tier 2 customers ten (10) percent and tier 3 fifteen (15) percent. As the emergency worsens,
the city council, may by resolution, increase the percentage reduction deemed necessary in order to
achieve the projected amount of water savings established as necessary.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.040 ‐ Stage 2 water shortage emergency and household allocation water restrictions.
A. After holding a noticed public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Water Code Section 350
et seq., the city council may declare a stage 2 water shortage emergency based upon a determination
that the projected city's water supply is or will become equal to or less than amounts that have been
determined necessary to meet basic minimum household health and safety requirements, and
restrictions and limits through the implementation of water allocations are necessary for continued
water use that is reliable and sustainable by providing a minimum supply for the most essential
purposes for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection during the emergency situation.
B. Upon adoption of a stage 2 water shortage emergency, restrictions and limits shall be imposed through
the implementation of household allocations of water units for residential customers. All residential
customers will be allocated units of water deemed necessary for an average household size (one unit
of water is equal to one hundred (100) cubic feet or seven hundred forty-eight (748) gallons). Any
residential customer using over the assigned baseline unit amount shall be subject to a citation and
the imposition of mandatory financial penalties, which shall be set forth in the resolution adopted by
the city council and be based upon the severity of the water shortage emergency. Each household
shall be allowed twelve (12) units of water per two month billing period (which is equivalent to one
hundred fifty (150) gallons per household per day). Households with over five to seven people will be
allowed twenty (20) units of water per two-month billing period (two hundred fifty (250) gallons per
day). Households with over seven people will be allowed twenty-eight (28) units of water per two-
month billing period (three hundred fifty (350) gallons per day). The allocations contained herein may
be adjusted by the city council by resolution.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.050 ‐ Commercial properties and irrigation meters.
During a stage 1 water shortage emergency commercial water customers shall not be subject to
mandatory penalties for use, provided however, that commercial customers with irrigation meter accounts
shall reduce water use by such percentages specified in the resolution declaring the water shortage
emergency. During a stage 2 water shortage emergency commercial water customers shall not use potable
water for irrigation of outdoor landscaping. All commercial irrigation meters shall be shut off and billing will
be suspended. The resolution shall also establish mandatory financial penalties for failing to meet required
water use reductions.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
Page 3
13.07.060 ‐ Additional requirements and restrictions during stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage
emergency.
Upon adoption of a resolution declaring a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency the following
shall apply:
1. Commercial, industrial or irrigation meter customers shall immediately follow any directive issued
or declared by the city's water department to conduct water use audits, prepare water
conservation plans and immediately repair any identified water system leaks, including leaks
attributable to faulty pipes or fixtures. Commercial customers shall not violate any other water use
restrictions intended to preclude excessive water usage, as adopted by the city.
2. Residential customers shall not violate any water use/allocation or other water rationing regulation
implemented by resolution of the city council, including such regulations intended to preclude
excessive water usage and specifying maximum water usage limitations, as otherwise provided
by this chapter.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.070 ‐ Adjustments in stage 1 reduction amounts, and other exceptions.
A. During a stage 1 water shortage emergency the director, upon application made in writing by a
customer on a form promulgated by the water department and accompanied by supporting
documentation, shall be authorized to modify the percentage of water consumption reduction that is
required by the customer, upon the customer's production of substantial evidence demonstrating the
existence of unusual circumstances, including but not limited to the household having been vacant
during a portion of the prior year billing period, resulting in the baseline water amount assigned to the
household being lower than what would normally have been experienced.
B. The percentage of reduction in water consumption during a stage 1 water shortage emergency, or the
water allotments during a stage 2 water shortage emergency may also be adjusted if the existence of
one or more of the following circumstances are shown and that are particular to that customer and
which are not generally shared by other water department customers:
1. Failure to approve the requested exception would cause a condition having an adverse effect on
the health, sanitation, fire protection, or safety of the customer.
2. Alternative restrictions to which the customer is willing to adhere are available that would achieve
the same level of demand reduction as the restriction for which an exception is being sought and
such alternative restrictions are enforceable by the water department.
3. Circumstances concerning the customer's property have changed since the implementation of
the subject restriction warranting a change in the customer's water usage allocation or required
percentage of reduction in consumption.
C. In order to qualify for an exception, a customer must first complete a self-water audit pursuant to
standards and procedures promulgated by the water department. This audit shall be made part of the
customer's exception application and water conservation measures indicated by the audit may be
incorporated as conditions of approval to an exception in addition to any other conditions of approval
imposed by the director in connection with the director's approval of the customer's exception
application.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.080 ‐ Water shortage appeals board (WSAB).
Page 4
A. Upon adoption of a resolution declaring a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency, the utility
billing adjustment committee shall be empowered to act as the water shortage appeal board (WSAB).
Thereafter, the water shortage appeal board will remain available to convene for as long as the water
shortage emergency remains in effect.
B. Any customer who considers an action taken by the director or an enforcement official under the
provisions of this chapter, including action on adjustments to stage 1 water consumption reduction
amounts, and on exception application, or the assessment of administrative penalties which have been
erroneously taken or issued, may appeal that action or penalty to the water shortage appeals board in
the following manner:
1. The appeal shall be made in writing, shall state the nature of the appeal specifying the action or
penalty that is being appealed and the basis upon which the action or penalty is alleged to be in
error. Penalty appeals shall include a copy of the bill or any applicable notice of violation;
2. An appeal, to be effective, must be received by the director not later than ten (10) business days
following the date of the notice of violation or the date that the director took the action which is
the subject of the appeal;
3. The director shall schedule the appeal for consideration by the WSAB. The WSAB shall hear the
appeal within ninety (90) days of the date of the appeal and issue its decision within thirty (30)
days of the date of the hearing;
4. In ruling on appeals, the WSAB shall strictly apply the provisions of this chapter, and shall not
impose or grant terms and conditions not authorized by this chapter.
5. Decisions of the WSAB shall be subject to appeal to the city council in accordance with the
procedures in Chapter 1.12 of this code, including the requirement that decisions be first taken
up with the city manager.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015)
13.07.090 ‐ Penalties and enforcement.
A. Penalties. The purpose of the mandatory penalties assessed pursuant to this chapter and set forth in
a resolution of the city council declaring a stage 1 or stage 2 water shortage emergency is to assure
compliance by the customer through the imposition of increasingly significant penalties so as to create
a meaningful incentive to reduce water use. In acknowledgment of the fact that the city's water is
scarce and irreplaceable commodity and that this chapter is intended to equitably distribute that
commodity among water department customers and to assure that, to the extent feasible, city water is
conserved and used only for purposes deemed necessary for public health and safety, such mandatory
penalties are not to be construed as creating a "water pricing" structure pursuant to which customers
may elect to pay for additional water at significantly higher rates.
B. A customer's repeated use of excessive water during a stage 1 or 2 water shortage emergency may
result in criminal prosecution as a misdemeanor, and may result in the installation of a flow restriction
device or disconnection of the customer's property from the city's water service system at the
customer's cost, as further set forth herein. Flow restriction devices shall not be installed on residences
that have fire sprinkler systems.
C. Misdemeanor. In addition to, and completely separate from, the civil penalties for excessive water use,
any person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions of this chapter during a stage 1 or 2
water shortage emergency shall be guilty of a criminal misdemeanor as provided in the general penalty
provisions of this code. In accordance with Section 1.16.010, such misdemeanor violations may, at
the discretion of the city attorney, be initially charged or subsequently prosecuted as an infraction. All
previous attempts by the city to obtain compliance by the defendant may be introduced as evidence
of the offender's knowledge and willfulness.
Page 5
D. Discontinuing Service. In addition to any penalties, misdemeanor criminal prosecution and the
installation of a water flow restrictor, during a stage 1 or 2 water shortage emergency the director may
disconnect a customer's water service for willful violations of mandatory restrictions and regulations in
this chapter and Chapter 13.05. Upon disconnection of water service, a written notice shall be served
upon the customer which shall state the time, place, and general description of the prohibited or
restricted activity and the method by which reconnection can be made.
E. Cost of Flow Restrictor and Disconnecting Service. A person or entity that as a result of violations of
this chapter has a flow restrictor installed or water service disconnected is responsible for payment of
charges for installing and/or removing the flow-restricting device and for disconnecting and/or
reconnecting service in accordance with the city's fee schedule then in effect. The charge for installing
and/or removing any flow restricting device must be paid before the device is removed. Nonpayment
will be subject to the same remedies as nonpayment of basic water rates.
(Ord. No. 669, § 3, 2-24-2015; Ord. No. 670, § 1, 5-26-2015)