Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2005-07-26MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, JULY 26, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor/Chair Ferrara called the Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Council/RDA: Council/Board Members Dickens, Guthrie,. Arnold, Mayor Pro TemNice Chair Costello and Mayor/Chair Ferrara were present. City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attorney. Carmel, Director of Administrative Services/City Clerk Wetmore; Chief of Police TerBorch, Director of Financial Services'. Pillow, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Spagnolo, Director of Building and Fire Fibich, Building Official Hurst, Director of Community Development Strong, Assistant Planner Foster, and Assistant Planner Bergman. 3. FLAG SALUTE Jeff Hicks, President of Arroyo Grande Rotary Club, led the Flag Salute. 4. INVOCATION Pastor Robert Banker, Open Door Church, Oceano, delivered the invocation. S. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 6. AGENDA REVIEW 6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only Council Member Dickens moved, Mayor Pro Tern Costello seconded, and the motion passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented -at the meeting shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived. 7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS None. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Council/Board Member Arnold moved, and Council/Board Member Guthrie seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.m., as recommended. The motion carried on the following roll -call vote: AYES: Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Costello, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None 8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Action: Ratified the listings of cash disbursements for the period July 1, 2005 — July. 15, 2005. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 2 8.b. Consideration of Statement of_I.nvestment Deposits. Action: Received and filed the report zf current investment deposits as of June 30, 2005. 8.c. Consideration of Approval of Minutes. Action: Approved the minutes of 'fhe Special City Council Meeting and Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting of June 14, 2005 as submitted. 8.d. Consideration of Rejection of ClWma Against City— C. Foresee. Action: Rejected claim. 8.e. Consideration of Annual Agreement with the San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau. [COUNCIL"/RDA] Action: Approved the annual Agreement with the San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau. 8.f. Consideration of Annual Agreement with the Economic Vitality Corporation of San Luis Obispo County. [COUNCIL./RDA] Action: Approved the annual Agreement with the Economic Vitality Corporation of San Luis Obispo County. 8.g. Consideration of Council Appointtnunt to the Traffic Commission. Action: Approved the recommendation of Council Member Jim Dickens to appoint Jim K. Carson to the Traffic Commission. 8.h. Consideration of Amended Cabl.ecasting Agreement with AGP Video in Order to Add Cablecasting of Planning Commission Meetings. Action: Authorized the Mayor"'-to-"erecute the proposed cablecasting Agreement.with AGP Video in order to add cablecasting- of Planning Commission meetings. 81 Consideration of Disposal of Surplus Bicycles. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3864, declaring the listed bicycles as surplus for donation to the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office to be refurbished and donated to needy children. _ 8.j. Consideration of Authorization'to. Purchase Replacement In -Car Video Systems for Police Patrol Vehicles. Action: Authorized staff to purchase seven (7) digital in -car video systems and related equipment from ICOP Digital, Inc. for' .:a total cost of $41,974.50. 8.k. Consideration of a Resolution' Consenting to a Transfer of a Pipeline Franchise Agreement From Unocal California Pipeline Company To ConocoPhillips Pipe Line Company. Action: Adopted Resolution No.- 3865 consenting to a transfer of a pipeline franchise agreement from Unocal California,;- Pipeline Company to ConocoPhillips Pipe Line Company. 8.1. Consideration of Agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Phase 2 of Let There Be Lights. Action: Approved Agreement and authorized the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City of Arroyo Grande, including payment of $39,776.00 for materials and installation. 8.m. Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Initiating Proceedings For Formation of the Parkside Village Assessment District (Tract 2310). - Action: Received the Petition requesting formation of an assessment district filed by Parkside Village, LLC, for operation.and maintenance of improvements associated with Tract 2310; adopted Resolution No. 3866 initiating proceeding for formation. of the Parkside Village Assessment District; and authorized the City Manager to enter into a - Reimbursement Agreement with the Petitioner to reimburse City for costs incurred in forming the District. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 3 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Defining and Restricting Formula Businesses in the Village. Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use/Historic Character `Design Overlay Zoning Districts (VCD and VMU D-2.4): Development Code Amendment Case No. 05-009. Director of Community Development Strong recommended the City Council open the public hearing to accept public comment and continue the item to August 9, 2005 in order to provide. additional public notice. Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing and invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. The following members of the public spoke in support of restricting formula businesses in the Village Core Downtown and. Village Mixed Use/Historic Character Design Overlay zoning districts: Linda Depenbrock, co-owner of Gina's Restaurant; Aaron O'Connor; Mike LaGross; Michael Bondello; Chuck Fellows; and Kristen Barneich. The following members of the public spoke in opposition to regulations restricting formula businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village. Mixed Use/Historic Character Design Overlay zoning districts: Heather Jensen,. Executive Director of the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce; Mike Dennis, -owner of Klondike's. Pizza;. Nan Fowler; John Gutierrez, owner. of Branch Street Deli; Val Delanev, representing Branch Street Deli, Village Grill, and Corcoran's Restaurant; and Krista Kodl, President of the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce. . No further public comments were received and Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. He encouraged all those present to attend the City Council meeting of August 9, 2005 at which time the item would be continued and a full report and presentation of the proposal would be given. Council Member Arnold moved to continue the proposed Ordinance defining and restricting formula businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use/Historic Character Design Overlay Zoning Districts (VCD and VMU D-2.4); Development Code Amendment Case No. 05-009, to the regular City.Council meeting of August 9, 2005. Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll -call vote: AYES: Arnold, Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara NOES:. None ABSENT: None 9.b. Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.04 of Title 15 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Updating Uniform Building and Related Codes. Director of Building and Fire Fibich presented the staff report and recommended the Council introduce Ordinance amending Chapter 15.04 of Title 15 of the Municipal Code updating Uniform Building- and related Codes. Director Fibich also introduced the City's new Building Official, Johnathan Hurst. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 4 Mayor Ferrara opened the public..hearing and invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter.:::No public comments were received and the Mayor closed the" public hearing. Mayor -Pro Tern Costello moved to introduce an Ordinance as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE;:CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE 15 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THOSE CERTAIN CODES KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, INCLUDING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1997 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, AND THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, WHICH SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE APPENDICES TO THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND THE'2000 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODES, AND .SUCH CODES, AS AMENDED, SHALL BE THE UNIFORM BUILDING LAWS OF THE.CITY": Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll -call vote: AYES: Costello, Arnold.; Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None = 9.c. Consideration of Development Code Amendment 05-008; Tentative Parcel Map 05- 003 and Conditional . ' Use Permit (Specific Development Plan) No. 04-009; Application — GaryWhite; Location — 1400 W. Branch Street. Assistant Planner Bergman presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt ,a mitigated Negative Declaration and introduce an Ordinance amending the zoning map to designate the subject property as Planned Development (PD1.1), and adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 05-003 and Conditional Use Permit (Specific Development Plan) Case No.. 04-009, allowing the construction of a hotel and restaurant. Staff responded to questions from Council concerning trees proposed to be removed; clarification that the project would go back to the Architectural Review Committee for final approval of colors and materials (Condition of Approval #16); whether the City could require larger street trees and whether there were provisions to require the developer to provide a bond for landscaping; proposed mitigation measures relating to water conservation; and comparative water usage between a hotel use and the previously approved office use. Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing and invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Bob Tuttle, project architect, noted that this was the third presentation of the project to the City Council and the project had been revised to address a number of issues which had previously been raised. He displayed renderings of the proposed project and reviewed revisions that had been made to the project. Steve Ross, member of the Board of Directors of the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce, stated that this project represents an excellent opportunity for the City as it would provide additional revenue to the City through transient occupancy tax and it would provide an excellent hotel and restaurant in the community. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 5 Peaav Harlan, Arroyo Grande resident, inquired what the traffic impacts would be on W. Branch Street and how the City was going to mitigate those impacts. She commented that she was glad the City was addressing the water issue. She also inquired what the impact would be to the adjoining motel. No further public comments were received and Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. Council Member Dickens responded to public comments concerning traffic impacts, noting that traffic mitigation measures had been. addressed at a previous meeting, and that a traffic signal would be required at W. Branch Street and Camino Mercado. With regard to the impact to the existing motel, he commented that from an economic standpoint, locating hotels next to each other was good. He agreed with the Chamber of Commerce's position that a hotel is a good use for this site. He expressed concerns; however, with the proposed size, scale, and intensity of use of the proposed project and stated he could not support the three-story hotel as designed. He noted that a two-story hotel at this location would be more appropriate and that if the number of units were reduced, it would help to address the water issue. He felt that the proposed negative declaration does not adequately address additional water mitigation measures for a project that would generate such a large amount of water usage. He also suggested that the project could be reconfigured and redesigned around all of the existing trees. He concluded by stating that traffic impacts would also be reduced if the size of the hotel were reduced. Council Member Arnold supported the project as proposed. He commented on a number of win win scenarios such as the generation. of additional transient occupancy tax for the City and a hotel that would benefit other businesses in the City. He stated that the proposed hotel is in an area where there are other large buildings, such as the Levitz Furniture store and the Five Cities Center. He commented that the applicant had done a good job of mitigating the loss of oak trees by moving the building, and that existing trees and proposed landscaping would help to screen the mass of the hotel. Council Member Guthrie commented on the comparisons between the previously approved office project versus the proposed hotel project as it related to size and scale and traffic impacts; supported the access from Camino Mercado instead of W. Branch Street; expressed skepticism regarding the amount projected -for transient occupancy tax revenue; however, he agreed that a hotel use would be a good addition to the City's tourism program. He commented that the pluses of the project outweighed the minuses; that moving the building back from W. Branch Street has improved some of the scale issues; commented on the water availability issue; and also stated that the project will pay impact fees for traffic that could be applied to the Brisco interchange project. He stated he could support moving forward with the project. Following additional questions regarding trees on the site, and also the timing of required traffic signalization, Mayor Pro Tern Costello stated that this site was a perfect place for a hotel and he did not find its size to be a problem: He expressed concerns about water and stated he was willing to approve this project if conditions are included requiring adequate water availability. He acknowledged that the traffic signal would improve traffic circulation; supported tree mitigation replacement measures at a 3:1 ratio; and concluded that he could support the project based on the condition of water availability and tree replacements provided at the appropriate ratio with large trees. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 6 Mayor Ferrara agreed with Mayor Pro Tern Costello with regard to adding a condition of approval regarding the acquisition of an additional water source: He commented that he was not comfortable with relying on water conservation as. a mitigation measure. He spoke about the need to consider water impacts as a whole, citywide; not on a project -by -project basis. He spoke about cumulative impacts as it relates to consumption. He suggested that prior to building permits being issued.,- the City should have confirmation from Oceano Community -Services District regarding the. purchase of additional water. He agreed that traffic impacts had been discussed at length;, spoke about the restoration of Proposition 42 funds for future capital improvements; and acknowledged that traffic signalization at Camino Mercado would be required priorto building permits being issued. He commented that while economics are important, it is not the sole factor for approving a project. He stated that the services a particular project can provide for the community should be considered and the City needs lodging and meeting facilities. He stated he had mixed feelings about the size and scale of the project. He suggested that additional window treatments be utilized on the flat pane windows. He suggested that a condition of approval be added that architectural treatment, facade, or shadow box be required on flat plane windows to add more dimension. He referred to the soil type on the site as it relates to landscaping and noted that landscaping and irrigation should be monitored closely. He noted that this was'a difficult site with its changes in elevation and stated it would be important to monitor this project 'closely to ensure the project is built as presented. He stated with additional conditions, he could support the project. Council Member Arnold moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O.F THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 05-003 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (SPECIFIC:. -DEVELOPMENT PLAN) CASE NO. 04-009, . ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF'A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT; LOCATED AT 1400 WEST BRANCH STREET, AS APPLIED. FOR BY STEPHEN COOL AND GARY WHITE", as amended to include the following conditions of approval: 1) that additional adequate water is available prior to issuance of building permits and conditioned by the approval by the City Council of a contract for Well No. 10 and an Agreement signed with Oceano Community Services District for the purchase of water; 2) that trees 5a, 6, 7, and 12 are transplanted and that mitigated trees are a minimum of 36" box with a minimum 50% of them 48" or larger; 3) that a 2 year landscape monitoring .bond (after final of the project) is provided; and 4) that the south elevation has additional window and wall. treatments. Mayor Pro Tern Costello seconded the motion. In order to clarify the motion with regard to the conditions of approval, City Attorney Carmel noted the following modifications to the Resolution: Condition of Approval #120 would be modified to add the following text: "Two Year Landscape/Tree Replacement Guarantee: 100% of the estimated cost of all landscaping improvements, including but not limited to mitigation replacement and relocated trees as determined by the Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director." Condition of Approval #124 would "be added to state: "Prior to issuance of building permits, a contract for the construction of City Well No. 10 shall be fully approved by the City and an agreement with the Oceano Community Services District for additional water supply shall be approved by the City." CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES J U LY 26, 2005 PAGE 7 Condition #23 and 25 shall be modified to state that mitigation trees shall be a minimum of 36" boxed and 50% of those shall.be 48" boxed. The motion carried on the following roll -call vote: AYES: Arnold, Costello, Guthrie., Ferrara NOES: Dickens ABSENT: None Council Member Arnold moved to introduce an Ordinance as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO DESIGNATE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 - (PD-1.1); DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 05-008, INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ARROYO -GRANDE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 WEST BRANCH STREET". Mayor Pro Tern Costello seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll -call vote: AYES: Arnold, Costello, Guthrie; Ferrara NOES:. Dickens ABSENT: None Mayor Ferrara called for a recess at 9:40 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:50 p.m. 9.d. .Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of Specific Plan Amendment 03-001; Applicant S & S Homes; Location — Southwest Corner of Courtland Street and East Grand Avenue. Mayor Ferrara declared.a conflict of interest'due to ownership of real property located within 500 feet of the subject location, and stepped down from the dais. Mayor Pro Tern Costello took over as Presiding Officer. Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a Resolution amending the Berry Gardens .Specific Plan to allow mixed -use development of Subareas 3 and 4. Staff responded to questions from Council relating to issues concerning reciprocal access and easements between Subareas 3 and 4; development standards for mixed use projects relating tomaximum building heights; zoning; water use and cumulative. water impacts; and traffic circulation and proposed improvements. Mayor Pro .Tem Costello opened the public hearing and invited comments from those in the . audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Ruth Matsumoto Dea, owner of Subarea 3, stated she was not opposed to the concept of the Specific Plan. She addressed concerns with issues affecting her property related to costs she would have to incur for Subarea 4 to proceed with their development. She stated she had questions. regarding access to utilities. She stated that there was access to utilities from her property and asked if she could access those utilities without tearing up E. Grand Avenue. She commented that she does not intend to develop her property now and asked if the Council would allow her to come back with a development proposal. She asked if a Farmer's Market would be an allowed use on her property. (staff responded that it would be an allowed use with a Conditional Use Permit). In response to another question, staff responded that there would be no CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY.269 2005 PAGE 8 bus turnout until Subarea 3 is developed. Ms. Dea reiterated her concerns with regard to issues related to the easements in the Specific Plan Amendment, as well as grading issues related to both Subareas. Jan Sanderlin, realtor, representing a potential buyer for the Dea property, asked why the City would not consider a horizontal lot line adjustment which would have resolved the issues relating to easements and utilities. John Mack, S&S Homes, acknowledged that there were three options available for the easements. He displayed elevation renderings showing a proposed project for Subarea 4 and addressed the maximum building height issue. He addressed circulation, access, and grading issues, as well as cooperative efforts S&S Homes had taken with regard to communicating and working with the adjacent property owner. He explained that they had considered, but did not support, a lot line adjustment. He referred to Government Code Section 65451 regarding easements :and reimbursements for easements within a Specific Plan. He stated that 'S&S prefers the option. establishing the fair market value of the easements and the improvements. at the time they occur. He also requested that language be incorporated into the Specific Plan that both property owners participate in maintaining the driveway improvements based on the shared use. Mr. Mack requested that both property owners be included by reference in the proposed Resolution. Further discussion ensued among Council, staff and the co -applicants regarding easements and grading issues. Ms. Dea agreed that she would consider negotiating a'slope easement with the owners of Subarea 4. No further public comments were received and Mayor Pro Tern Costello closed the public hearing. Council Member Guthrie stated there are adequate provisions to allow development of Subarea 4 and enable subsequent development of Subarea 3. He commented on the value of the easement and suggested it may be beneficial to negotiate the value of the easements when they are needed., On a maintenance agreement, he stated there should be something in place that allows Subarea 4 to recover their costs in the future. He stated that he supported the concept of a mixed use project to include 1/3 residential, 1/3 office, and 1/3 commercial and.concurred with staff on not recommending a lot line adjustment. He said there is nothing that precludes future / development on Subarea 3 and supported moving forward as proposed. Council Member Dickens acknowledged the two property owners for trying to negotiate. He also acknowledged that one property wants to move forward with a plan and that they have submitted the appropriate information for consideration. He noted that it was imperative for Subarea 3 to have easement locations identified now. He felt that establishment of easement value at the time the easements were needed was most equitable for both parties. Council Member Dickens stated he was concerned with putting together a cohesive project with, the appropriate infrastructure to accommodate the land use. He expressed concern with water and traffic. He questioned whether this is the best use for available resources. He expressed concern with cumulative water use site specific and citywide. He stated. that the original environmental impact report is insufficient. In response to a question regarding the potential for phasing the project; staff responded that phasing could be accomplished to develop the commercial area first; however, another amendment of the Specific Plan would be required at a future date._ Council Member Dickens stated that he could support the Amendment to the Specific Plan and noted that he would be looking closely at water and traffic issues when a project comes forward. . CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 9 Council Member Arnold suggested deferring the issue regarding reimbursement on easements and allowing Ms. Dea the time to negotiate the value of the slope and access easements. He acknowledged the discussion regarding phasing of the project; expressed concern about how shared parking would work; stated the City needs rental units;. stated he would not support single family detached homes in this .location; suggested conditioning the project appropriately as it relates to water availability when it comes forward; and supported the Specific Plan Amendment as presented. Mayor. Pro Tern Costello supported the Specific Plan Amendment; however, he expressed concern with water and traffic issues. He referred to the original 1998 environmental impact report as it relates to projected water demand by year for the City of Arroyo Grande and stated that the consumption figures for 2005 were estimated too low. He stated that he would look carefully at these issues when a specific project comes forward. Further discussion ensued regarding the reimbursement provisions in. the Specific Plan . as. it relates to securing easements and installation of mutually beneficial infrastructure improvements. Council Member Guthrie moved to approve the Specific Plan Amendment and adopt a Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 03-001; LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF EAST GRAND AVENUE AND COURTLAND STREET; APPLIED FOR BY S &.S HOMES", as amended to modify the Reimbursement Provision in the -Specific Plan by retaining the first paragraph, eliminating the next three. paragraphs, and adding the following paragraph as follows: "The parties agree to share in the cost of an appraisal to determine the value of the easements desired by the owners of Subarea 3 at the time such easements are needed." Mayor Pro Tern Costello seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll -call vote: . AYES: Guthrie, Costello, Arnold, Ferrara NOES: Dickens ABSENT: None Mayor Ferrara returned to the dais. 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS None. . 11. NEW BUSINESS None. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS a. MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA: (ABSENT) (1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). No report. (2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). Reviewed study on long term capital improvements to sewage treatment" plant based on anticipated growth by participating agencies; and shared photos of the chlorine contact tank, a budgeted $2 million project. (3) Other. The next meeting of the Zone 1/1A taskforce will meet on August 3, 2005. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY-26, 2005 PAGE 10 b. MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO: . (1) Zone 3 Water -Advisory Board. The creek Habitat Conservation Plan has not yet been approved; recommendations will be discussed at the next meeting. Working on preliminary design of a pipeline to deliver treated water from the well fields to the base of the dam. (2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report. (3) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No report. (4) Fire Oversight Committee. No report., (5) Other. None. C. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS: (1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). No report. (2) South County Youth Coalition. No report. (3) - Other. None.. d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE: (1) Economic"Vitality Corporation (EVC). No report. (2) Other. None. e.' COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD: (1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report. (2) California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA). Annual meeting held last week; Human Resources Manager Karen Sisko attended. . (3) County Water Resources Advisory. Committee (WRAC). No report (4) Other. None. 13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS: None. 14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS: None. 15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: None. 17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS: None. 18. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor/Chair Ferrara adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m.. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES JULY 26, 2005 PAGE 11 Tony Ferrara, NJ hair ATTEST: V4m-1- /Lq-- Kelly Wetebreetity Clerk/Agency Secretary (Approved at CC Mtg 9/13/2005)