Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 08.a. CUP 15-002 Verizon Huebner LaneTO: FROM: BY: MEMORANDUM PLANNING COMMISSION TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR :t 1KELLY HEFFERNON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 15-002; LOCATION -HUEBNER LANE (RESERVOIR NO. 4); APPLICANT - VERIZON WIRELESS; REPRESENTATIVE -TRICIA KNIGHT DATE: JANUARY 19, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 15-002. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City· is currently negotiating a lease agreement with Verizon Wireless, which will include monthly compensation to the City and a one-time administrative fee to cover the City's transactional costs associated with the preparation and process of the lease. BACKGROUND: Location: PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 15-002; VERIZON WIRELESS JANUARY 19, 2016 PAGE2 The project site is located off of Branch Mill Road at the end of Huebner Lane within the Public Facility (PF) zoning district on property owned by the City. The site is developed with a water tank (City Reservoir No. 4). Surrounding the site is St. Barnabas Church to the west, vacant land to the south, active agricultural land to the east and residential development to the north. Currently, Sprint PCS and T-Mobile have antennas on the water tank that are either flush mounted on the side of the tank (less visible) or on top of the tank (more visible). AT&T Mobility recently decommissioned its facility at this site, which had antennas on top of the tank, and Verizon Wireless proposes to locate its facilities in place of the AT&T equipment with antennas mounted on the side of the tank. Project Description: Verizon Wireless proposes a Conditional Use Permit to install an unmanned wireless communication facility at the City's Reservoir No. 4 site with equipment placed on the north, west and south sides of the water tank. Specifically, Verizon proposes to install the following: • Nine (9) panel antennas that are flush mounted on the tank using the "Magnamount" system (attached magnetically instead of permanently to the tank); • Nine (9) Remote Radio Units (RRUs) on the tank; • Five (5) raycaps (3 on the tank and 2 within the equipment shelter); Q One (1) electrical meter; • One (1) standby generator; • Utilize existing conduit installed by AT&T; and • Utilize existing equipment shelter. Verizon intends to utilize the existing 144 square foot equipment shelter vacated by AT&T and now owned by the City (the City's communication equipment is currently in this shelter). This is an improvement from the original set of plans, now superseded, that showed a new 805 square foot prefabricated equipment shelter located roughly thirty feet (30') north of the existing shelter and required the removal of a twenty-one foot (21 ') tall spruce tree. The City will continue to house its communication equipment in the shelter, and Verizon will install an expandable metal wall to separate the two areas while providing adequate ventilation for the equipment. Verizon will also allow the City to use the proposed standby generator for emergency purposes. No trees or other vegetation removal is necessary to construct the project as proposed. Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) The SAC reviewed the proposed project on May 27, 2015 and November 18, 2015. Issues discussed included providing lease agreement language regarding justification for a large equipment shelter with associated issues (i.e. wall exceeding six feet tall and removal of an established skyline tree); utilization of decommissioned AT&T equipment; PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 15-002; VERIZON WIRELESS JANUARY 19, 2016 PAGE 3 and use of magnetic mounts to fix the antennas to the tank. The applicant revised the projects plans to reflect SAC concerns. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The proposed facility will allow greater capacity for Verizon to better handle voice calls, data mega bites and the total number of active users in the area. The primary objective of this site is to support the rapid growth of 4G (fourth generation of data technology for cellular networks) data use within the City. The 4G network also carries 911 calls and is used in support of police and fire emergency response. The future operation will, together with the existing base stations at the site, comply with the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") guidelines limiting public exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy (see Attachment 1). The project as proposed will have minimal visual impact to the surrounding area, especially since the Verizon antennas will replace the AT&T antennas at the same location (see Attachment 2 for photo simulations). However, the conditions below are intended to ensure that the project blends with the existing area with little to no visual impact: • All equipment placed on the water tank shall be painted to match the color of the tank. • The facilities shall have subdued colors and non-reflective materials, which blend with the materials and colors of the surrounding area. • The facilities shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other required seals or signage. • All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be located within a building, enclosure, or underground vault that complies with the development standards of the PF zoning district. The lease agreement will include language that Verizon will be required to pay the City for any added costs of maintenance at the site attributable to Verizon's equipment, including any costs associated with the removal and replacement of Verizon's equipment should that be necessary to perform the maintenance. It is expected that routine maintenance and inspection of the facility will occur on a monthly basis during normal working hours. The project is consistent with the City's Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Permit Submittal Requirements (Attachment 3). Architectural Review Committee (ARC): The ARC considered the project on December 7, 2015 and recommends approval of the project with no additional conditions. ADVANTAGES: The proposed project will provide City revenue, and there will be minimal visual impact. The proposed wireless communication facility would provide signal coverage for Verizon PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 15-002; VERIZON WIRELESS JANUARY 19, 2016 PAGE4 customers where weak coverage currently exists. The site will also provide off-load capacity coverage from other Verizon wireless facilities in the immediate region. DISADVANTAGES: There will be temporary impacts related to noise and truck traffic during installation of the facility. Staff has not identified any other disadvantages associated with the recommended action. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, and has determined that the project is exempt pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA guidelines. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT: A notice of public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 300' of the project site, was published in The Tribune on Friday January 8, 2016, and posted at City Hall and on the City's website on Friday, January 15, 2016. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the proposed project. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for Planning Commission consideration: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution, approving CUP 15-002; 2. Do not adopt the attached Resolution; or 3. Provide other direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Radio Frequency Study 2. Photo Simulations 3. Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Permit Submittal Requirements RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 15-002, APPLIED FOR BY VERIZON WIRELESS, LOCATED ON HUEBNER LANE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande considered Conditional Use Permit Case No. 15-002 on January 19, 2016, filed by Verizon Wireless, to install telecommunication antennas and related equipment on an existing City water tank (Reservoir No. 4) and within an existing equipment cabinet located on the west side of the water tank; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on this application in accordance with the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has determined that the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15311 regarding construction or placement of minor structures accessory to existing facilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within the subject district pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.16.050 of the Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. In addition, the facility will operate in full compliance with all state and federal regulations including the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located. The installation of the facility will not result in any material changes to the character of the immediate neighborhood or local community. 3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is proposed. The facility is not located within a predominantly residential neighborhood. 4. There are adequate prov1s1ons for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure the public health and safety. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity. The telecommunication facility will be unstaffed, have no impact on circulation systems, and will generate no noise, odor, smoke or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. 15-002, with the above findings and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On motion by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner ____ _ and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 19th day of January 2016. ATTEST: DEBBIE WEICHINGER, SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION AS TO CONTENT: TERESA MCCLISH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR LAN GEORGE CHAIR RESOLUTION NO. PAGE3 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 15-002 VERIZON WIRELESS HUEBNER LANE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION GENERAL CONDITIONS This approval authorizes the installation of an unmanned wireless communication facility at the City's Reservoir No. 4 site with equipment placed on the north, west and south sides of the water tank. 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional use Permit Case No. 15-002. 3. This application shall automatically expire on January 19, 2018, unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting of January 19, 2016 and marked Exhibits "B-1 through B-9". 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. 6. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. No construction shall occur on Saturday or Sunday. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 7. The facility shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other FCC required seals or signage. 8. To allow for adequate ventilation, the City-owned equipment shelter shall include a new expandable metal wall between the City's equipment area and Verizon's leased equipment area. The new wall must be secured (attached) on all sides of the equipment shelter. Wall specifications shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. Per the March 25, 2015 Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Report prepared for this facility by Hammett & Edison Inc., explanatory signs shall be installed at the access ladder on the tank and at the antennas. ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 10. Site Maintenance -The developer shall be responsible during construction for cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the project site. The flushing of dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's work or as directed by the Public Works Director. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 11. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to any work done in the public right-of way. 12. Zero Conflict with City's Communication: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall perform a radio frequency study to determine possible conflicts with the City's communication system, and to develop alternatives to eliminate any such conflicts. Prior to activation of the proposed Verizon Wireless system, the applicant shall perform a live radio test to ensure that there is no unanticipated interference with the City's radio system. If the proposed system does interfere with the operation of the City's communication system, the proposed system shall remain inactive until such time that the proposed system can be made to cause zero interference. BUILDING DIVISION 13. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of all California Building and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. 14. Any review costs generated by outside consultants shall be paid by the applicant. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 5 15. Building Permit fees shall be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 16. Building permit shall be obtained prior to installation. cc !:: cc :I: x LU PROJECT TEAM srre Acgu1smoN SAC WJRa.Ess, UC. 211 E.6.STCARIUOSTREETSUITE201 SANTABARBARA,CA.113101 ~ACT:JAYHICGINS l"El..EPHONE:{BOSJ637-6870 JAY .l-!IOG1NS@9ACW.CCM ARCHITECT: SACWIRELESs,UC. NESTOR POPOWYCH,AlA. 511GSAVENIDAENCINAS SUITE142-8 CARLSBAD, CA 92000 CCNTAct:CARLOSCASTiil.l..ANOS TEl..EPHONE:(760)7\l5-6211 FAX:(761l)931.oooa UTILITY COORDINATOR: SAC WtaELESS. UC. 450 DEER CANYON ROAD BUEll.TON,CA934Z7 COITTACT:KElLYMCC!nU-ON TEL.EPliONE:(B05)aeMCl39 PLANNING T£K CONSULTING INC. PERMITPROCESSINQ SERVICES 123SeACUFFCR Pl5MOBEACH.CAD34-40 CONTACT:TRlCl.l.!O<llGHT 1ELEPHONE: (OOS)Mll-4221 ~i%~ET SURVEYOR: ~EYlNODK:ll»ttRING P,0,80X011126 BAKERSflao, CA 93:!80 CONTACT:Gm;oSMml TEl.EPHONE: {861) 3113-1Z17 VERIZON WIRELESS SIGNATURE BLOCK """""""' SIGNATURE: ... ,., SITEACOUISmON: COm"mUCTloN: ""'"'" MICROWAVE: TEtCO: EQUIPMENT: PROJECf ADMINISTRATOR: WOAl:lM!NISTRATOR: \ >~ • ver1zonwireless BRANCH MILL RD PSL # 285382 581 HUEBNER LANE ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 VICINITY MAP DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM: 2785 MITCHELL DRIVE, BLDG 9 WALNUT CREEK. CA 94$18 TO: 581 HUEBNER lANE ARROYO GRAHOE. CA 9342o t. HEAD NORTI-!EAST ON LUTC!iEl.L CR TOWARD OAK GROVE RO 2. TURN RIGHT ONTO OAK OROVE RO 3, TAKETHE2NDR!GHTONTOVGW.CIOV/WEfRO .C, CONl1'11JEOtm>HIU.S1PEAVE 5. TIJRN l.EFTONTOTHEINTERSrATEllOO 6 RAMP TO SAAi JOSE 8. MERGE ONTO Ml80 S 7, TAKETl1EEXITONTOUS-101 STOWAAtllOSANGEt.E$ 8. TAKETHEfAIROAKSAVED:rT II. 'ftJRNl.EFTONTOFAIRCIAKSAVE 10. llJRNRIClHTOITTOTRAl'ACWAY 11. TAKETHE2NDu:FTONTOEOiEHRYAVE 12. TAKET1iE3RDRIOHTONTOBRANc:HMll..lRO 13. TAJ<£THE1STRIOHT0NTOHVEaNERlN PROJECT DESCRIPTION TH1S PROJECT IS A VER!ZONWIRElESS UNMANNED Ta.ECOMMUNICATION WIRELESS FAClUTY. IT WILL CONSIST OF THE FOU.O'MNG: • NEW VERIZON WlRE.E5S LEASE AREA • (1)EXISJ'INGAT&T8'.(l"X 14'..U-EQIJIPMENTSHELTERTOBEUSE FOR NEW VERIZON WlRElESS EQUIPl.IENT SHELTER • (1JEXISTINGGPSAN?ENNAS • f1l NEWvatlZON wtRa.ESS ;JOKW GENEAAC STANDBY GENERATOR W/132 GAU.ON DIESEi. iNNEWINTXt2'-0"CONCRET£PAD ECTRICAL METER W/fUSED DISaJNNECTON Ii-FRAME TO BE USE 1NW1Ra1iSS8'TAllPANELANTENNAS INWIREtESSAAHUNITS • f5) NEW VERIZON WIREt.ESS RAYCAPS • (9) NEW VERIZON WlRELESS MAGNEMOUNTS FORAMTENNA t.10UNTS PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICANT/LESSEE ,_,----271lSMITCliElLORIVe,lllOG8 WALNUT CREEK. CA 94594 OFFICE:{tl25}279-0000 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE """"""""'""' -C50 DEER CANYON ROAO 8f.ISJ.TON.CA93'21 eotrrACT:. KEl.LV MCCURNlN Te.EPHONE:: (805) 6SG-I03ll PROPER"N OWNER: OWNER: CfTY OF ARROYO GRANDE AOD~ 300EASTBRANCHst ARROYO GRANDE, CA 113420 CONTACT: SHANE TAYLOR taEPHONE: (llOS).c:n&IOO PROPERTY INFORMATION: SITE NAME: BAANCH Mtu. RO SITENUMllER: 285382 SfTE AOOllE$$: 5111 HUEBNER I.Ali£ ARRO'IOGRANDE.CAll3420 JURIBOICTION: QTY OF ARROYO GRAADE CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AAEAOFCONStRUCTION: 33'.(l"x11'.(1"•363SOFT OCCUPANCY: U TYPEOFCOmrmtJC"T10N; CURRENT ZONING: RESIOEH'l'W.. Hl\NOICAP REOUIREMENTI!: fACIUTY IS UNIAANNEOANO NOT FOR HUMAN HABfTATIOl<l. Kl.NOICAf'PE> ACCESS NOTRkQUIRED. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES WmIT'SCAUjJ)AAW!?mS)FMQT!'\Jl.l.S!lE!UXW CONTRACTOR SHAU. VEJUFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDtTIONS ON THE JOB SrTEANO SHALL IMMallATELV NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRrrnm OF Nl'f DISCREPANCIES BEFORE AAOCEEDINGWlTHlliEWORKORBERESPO~ FOR'fNESAME. CODE COMPLIANCE 21l13CAUFORNIAAOWNIBTRAllVECOCE • ~13 CALIFORNIA BUit.DiNG CODES 2013 CALIFORNIA El.ECTRICAL CODE 2013 CALIFORNIA FtRE CODE 21l13CAUFDRNIAMECHAHICAlCOOE 2013 CAUFQRHIA ENERGY CODE 2013CAURJRNIAOR&N BUILDING CODE SHEL.'J'eRISSTATEOFCAUFORNIA APl'ROIJEO AND INSPECTED, NOT FOR lOCAlll<tSPECTIOfll SHEET T-1 ""' C-2 ""' ""' ,., ,,. ..... .. SEP 2 3 2015 RECEIVED ] CITY OF MPO'IO Gll'ANDE C01\;U~~url!I~1)EVEl~~ ~-S·r···u:~ .,-, ro~~~~~"':~ YOIJDIQINCWRlRm\(NOA:fH& ' CENTIWJ,CAU.~NOA:TH811 • TOLLFREE:1~W~OR ~J~'.l :::::::rg Kncri:;:~~~:dlg. ~=a:~~ DESCRIPTION mt..ESHEtt SITESIJRVEY SITE SURVEY SITESl.JRVE.Y SITEPLAH& ENLARGED Pl.AH EQUIPMENT &ANTENl{.4.lAYOUT SOUlHWElIT & NORTI-!EASTELEVATIONS SOlITHEASTELEVATION EQUIPMENTELEl/ATIOHS .,. ZONING DRAWINGS REV & . ' ' & & & & & SAC WIRELESS SIGNATURE BLOCK Dtsal'UNE; SllJNl\1URE: DAT<o SITEACQUISlllON: PLANNER: CONSTRUCTlON: t.ANDlORO: Pl.ANNING SUBMITTAL I OM COY COMMEMTS I OM NEWCESION cr·N (JfU_, WIRELESS 1·1• 6llll5AVENIDADCIHAS CAA==~ j ~ -~ \.~ ' t: m ,,./'" s _J _J C\I co ('t) 2 LO J:QCO 0 Cl:'.'. C\I z =t:I: ~ <ii Ill 0.... "'~ g~ "'0 ~~ ~[ii :l ll! w {.) 55 t= % "':;;! ~ >: ~ W°' Z<i: :Su o::w WO zz ffi~ ::i t9 :r:o ~>-18 f2 0:: <{ SHEETTITl.E: TITLE SHEET T-1 NOTES: OWNER(S): CITY Of ARROYO GRANDE APN: 007-611-016 THIS DRA'MNG DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SUR\.t:Y OF ANY PARCEL Of LAND, NOR DOES IT lMPL Y OR INFER THAT A BOUNDARY SUR'tt:Y WAS PERFORMED, THIS IS A SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WITH PROPERTY ANO EASEMENTS BEING A GRAPHIC DEPJC1JON BASEi) ON JNFORMAT10N GATHERED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES OF RECORD AND AVAILABLE MONUMENTA110N. PROPERTY LINES ANO LINES OF Tm.£ WERE NEITHER IN\IESTlGATED NOR SUR~ AND SHALL BE CONSlOEREO APPROXlMATE ONLY. NO PROPERTY MONUMENTS 'n£RE SET. THE EASEMENTS (!F ANY) 1HAT APPEAR ON TH!S MAP HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED SOLELY ON INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE PRELIMINARY Tln.E REPORT BY: FIRST AMERICAN 111LE COMPANY. ORDER NO. 4201-472-4-790, DAl'tD SEPTEMBER 10. 2014. 'MTHIN SAID TITLE REPORT li-IERE ARE FOURTEEN {14) EXCEPTIONS US1ED. THREE (J) OF WHICH ARE EASEMENTS, ANO 1l1REE (3) Of WHJCH CAN NOT BE PLOTTED. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (IF ANY) THAT APPEAR ON THIS MAP HA\'E BEEN LOCATED BY FJELD Oast:RVATION. '!HE SURVEYOR MAKtS NO GUARANTEE "THAT THE UNDERGROUND UT!UllES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER !N SER\llCE OR ABANDONED. THE SIJR~R FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT TI-IE UNDERGROUND U-TIUTIES SHOV.W ARE !N THE EXACT LOCATION INDICA1ED ALTHOUGH HE DOES STA1E THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD RA1E MAP FOR COMMUNITY NO. 06079C. PANEL NO. 1602G. DATED NOVEMBER 16, 2012. SHOWS "THAT THE LOCATION OF THIS Sl1E FALLS Wll'HIN ZONE X. 'MilCH AR£ AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2'.: ANNUAL Q-IANCE FLOOOPLAlN. LEGEND ~ 1-, .-1 O'.U!HEAOPO'llERUNE PROf'ERlYBOUl<IDAAY (PERlT!lf:~ '°""'""" MAP APN: 007-621-032 OWNER(S)c HAYES / / ( \ / / / / / / / / m.oi.~~~~:u:t.;.~~~1i~ a''MOEPAV£0 ACC(SSROAO PARCELD OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~:....~.Jl~Uf ~~ .. ENT a;.c~~/:ciE OPEN SPACE EASEMENT APN: 007-403-013 OWNER(S)c VILLAGE HOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC APN: 007-611-017 OWNER{S)c ARROYO UNDA CROSSROADS OVERALL SITE MAP 1# -50' ---BRANCH-iiiii:'Ffo.-~ _ --~!'i .. 1~~~;:'{11~ EASE .. ENT /SEE SITE PLAN -"-. ON SHEET C-Z ' . I . I \_ PARCEL A OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 007-611-016 OWNER{S}c CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE s r.o oox ~1"~" !l!IXU!Sl'IUO, e>i. <i:n<a PllONE-(""1).'WJ...Ul7 f-'X-1"61):1'!}.l:?:J~ ISSUE STATUS oJog/24/14 1 I 09/29/14 10/09/14 SITTNAMECHANG( SL 12/0B/14 IDSE/UTIUT'r 4109/0J/tSI LEASE/UnLITY 5 09/10/15 RELOCATE LfASE AREA SL 10/07/15 REV. GENERATOR LEASE SL 10/07/15 REV. EQUIPMENT LEASE SL C~f' QjL., WIRELESS 5<!<1(;Avt:>!l~~U~oo:."2U. °':::/;.~/~ PROPR!ETARY INFORllAllON Tl<NOFIW.Ullle<llJllllEll!JjllfS~ IJf .-ic:s IS PllDPlllCTN!f .t. COffUJQO,L ·-~ NlrUSl:lllPl'Xl.CSUi!:Ol\IE!l'JIWj l(;lf"'1All:S10WllllN'Mllll.ESS !SSIRCll,YPRl>UIDI U) U) ~ Q) .. ~ ~IXl ~ 9 fR m ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ci ~ I'-' -~§is ;;;: :d Ql ~ ~ ~ BRANCH MILL ROAD TERMINUS HUEBNERLN ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 SAN LUlS OBISPO COUNTY SHill TITLE: SITE SURVEY C-1 ~~-APN: 007-403-013 OWNER(S): VILLAGE HOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC / PARCEL A OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 007-611-016 OWNER(S): CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE .\L / CITYSCADA_]/,'/f//i/// f / / / ,' i rT/,:j / wi~"'~!~~ 11!·•,,,', 1:: I Ii 'I.I.Ir/{,' / ANTI:NNA~4.'l"KIGI PARCELC OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION 10' 'MOE PUBUC UTILITY/ WATER TRANSMISSION & ACCESS EASEMENT 6'1'110EPAVUI ACCES5RDAO~/ c.oI:i~~~ (APPl'O><-lOCAl10"') APN: 007-611-017 OWNER(S}c ARROYO UNDA CROSSROADS ENLARGED SITE PLAN ,. -20' / I I I I ~~~ pROpOSfIJ VERIZON QfM!SfD fRFM!Sf QfSCR!P]QN• GfNfRAIDR I fASf AREA• All 11-!AT PORTION OF 1HE HEREON DESCRIBED LESSOR'S PROPERTY, MORE PARTlCULARLY DESCRIBED /J.S FOLLOWS: COMMENClNG AT THE SOUTI-IWESTERL Y MOST CORNER OF SAID LESSOR'S PROPERY, l'HENCE N 20'35'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 97.25 FffT TO THE 1RUE POINT OF BEGINNING; COURSE 1) l'l1ENCE N 14"27'CH-" W, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO POINT 'A': COURSE 2) THENCE N 75"32'56" E. A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; COURSE 3) THENCE S 14"2704" E, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; COURSE 4) THENCE s 75"32'ss· W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FtET TO ltlE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 50 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR l.£SS.. EO! !!pMfNT 1 FAS[ llR[ll• ALL THAT PORTION OF 1HE HEREON DESCRIBED LESSOR'S PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLO'NS: COMMENctNC AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT ·~:. THENCE N 16'13"32• E. A DISTANCE OF 10.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; COURSE 1) THENCE N H"32'45• W. A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET; COURSE 2) THENCE N 75"32'56• E. A DISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET: COURSE 3) THENCE S 14"32'+6• E. A DISTANCE Of 12.00 FEET: COURSE 4) THENCE S 75'32'56• W, A DISTANCE OF 8.00 fECT TO "Tl-IE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 96 SQUARE FEET. MORE OR l.£SS.. 1..EillJ:ill ~ 1··: 01 OVl:RH£11DPO\'IO!:UI<[ PROPCRTVllOONal\RY (PERll'lU:R!J'OR"!) """'""' re ltOX#l~MKl'JISF!ELO.O\'/'J:IOIJ PHONE.(°"l)~'J:\.-1217 FAX-\,,,.,1):_193..1:!1~ ~,,-------------------------------------------------------~ -~-~ I \ ~:..-..1 P.0.8. -\.g I 1;~~ " "" I I I I , 1.1.-0R""',.. -·l,.,,/; 1!:~-''" ~ I ~ I "'\, I ~ ' " ,, ---------"\ ............ _____ ------------------_·:: __ ------------------DETAIL 'A' 1·.,,10' ISSUE STATUS OIOS/24/14 1!09/29/14 Z 10/09/14 SITE NAME D-<ANG£ SL J 12/08/14 !.£ASE/UTILITY 4 I 09/03/15 ! l.£ASE/UTILITY 09/10/15 RELOC.O.TE LEASE AAfA SL 10/07/15 REV. GENERATOR l.fASE SL ~~i~ """"'~ '-JJe._, WIRELESS ~"SA\lt:]•(!DAl:~ClNA<.;.~Um:14;'!1. CARl.!IEIAD.CA!l20Cl0 °';';g:;:: PROPRIETARY INFORW.110N "!1£-IXlHrij•IDINMSSIT CE!lRMIO:St:i;Pllllf'!llCWll"•(Dtfll()<IW. llff\&QIOOQJl&IREO!HCl!'ltWO llSlrlE,AlISltl~llRilf'OS (/) (/) .SQ -~ o~ § g iR <D v ~'~ ~~ i3 u -"' to ~ ~~ m ~"' _,_. :> BRANCH MILL ROAD TERMINUS HUEBNERLN ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHEET 1TTI..E: SITE SURVEY C-2 l ESSOR"S pRoprarr I EGA! QfSCRIP]ON PER ]TI E BEPORT-R£AL PROPERTY IN 1HE CITY OF ARROYO GRMJE. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DESCRIBED .AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: TiiAT PORllON Of LOT 91 Of TI-IE MAP OF THE RANOiOS CORRAL OE PIEDRA PISMO AND Bot.SA OE Q-IEMISAL IN THE OTY OF ARROyO CRANCE. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE Of CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP FU.ED IN BOOK A. PAGE 65 OF MAPS, IN 1HE OFACE OF THE COUNTl' RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT lliE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER Of THE LANO DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO AMASA W, DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 302 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNl'Y, MARKED BY A POST SET BY A f, PARSONS IN FEBRUARY 1892, PRESEN1'LY MARKED BY AN 1 )(.!NCH DIAMETER PIPE TAGGED RCE 6923 AS SHOWN ON TI-IE MAP FILED IN BOOK 8, PACE 120 Of RECORD OF SURVE'!'S IN SAIC COUNTY RECORDERS omcs 11-tENCE NORTH 54• EAST 664.00 FEET TO A POINT, FROM 'M-llCH 1HE MOST EAS!ERlY CORNER OF SAID LANO OF DIXSON BEARS NORTH 54· EAST 5.37.30 FEET, MORE OR LESS, MARKED BY A POST ESTABLISHED BY A.F. PARSONS, IN FEBRUARY, 1892, PRESENTLY MARKED AN OlD FENCE CORNER, SAID POINT BEING 11-IE TRUE POINT OF BECINNINC. lHENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTI-l 36" EAST 240.00 FEET TO A POINT. 11-!ENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORlH 54" EAST 272.00 FEET TO A POINT. lHENCE AT RJGHT ANGLES NORTH JD WCST 240,00 FEET TO A PO!NT. lHENCE SOUlH 54· EAST 272.00 FEET TO THE lRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARC8.. B: AN EASEMENT O\'CR lHA T PORTION OF LOT 91 OF lHE MAP OF lHE RANC>!OS CORRAL OE P!EORA,. PISMO ANO BOLSA DE CHEMISAL. JN lHE CITY OF ARROYO CRANOE. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP mm IN BOOK A. PACE 65 OF MAPS IN lHE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES SPEaFlCAl.lY INCLUDING WATER TRANSMISSION LINES AND ACCESS ROADS, TOGETHER Will-I AiL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES lrlERETO BOlrl ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND LEVEL, INCLUDING lrlE RIGHT TO tt.IPROVf. REPAIR AND t.IAINTAJN SAID ROADWAY ANO WATER lRANSMISSION LINES. BEGtNN!NG AT AN ANGI.£ POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BRANCH MIU. ROAD ACCORDING TO THE DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROt.I A. W. DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 88 OF DEEDS AT PACE 485 !N SAID COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFlCE. °M'!ICH ANGLE POINT IS ON TI1E NORlHEASTERLY LINE OF lHE LAND DESCRIBED IN lrlE DEED TO AMASA W. DIXSON RECOROffi IN BOOK 15, PAGE 302 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND SAID ANGLE POINT BEING OPPOSITE lHAT POINT NOTED AS •STATION 40-22• {SIC) Wrl!CH IS ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF SAJO ROAD, ALSO FROt.I SAID ANCI.£ POINT AN 1 INC>! DIAMETER PIPE TAGCED LS 3756 BEARS NORTH 12" 45' 49' EAST 26.26 FEET DISTANT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND OF DIXSON SOUTH 36" S1' 55· EAST .31.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENtt LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 26"' 28' 04• EAST 30,88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID BRANCH t.l!U. ROAD FROM WHICH lHE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 84' 58' 42-WEST 32.49 FEET OISTANT; l'l1ENCE ALONG SAJD RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUlH 84' 55' 42• WEST .32.49 FEET TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING. PARCfi_ C AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES SPECIFlCAU.Y INCLUDING WATER TRANSt.llSSION LINES AND ACCESS ROADS TOGElHER W\11-l AiL NECESSARY APPURlENANCES THERETO BOTH ABOVE ANO BELOW GROUND LEVEL, INCLUDINC THE RIGHT TO IMPROVE. REPAIR ANO MAINTAIN SAID ROADWAY AND WATER 1RANSMISSION LINES 10 FEET WIDE OVER "TI1AT PORTION OF LOT 91 OF ll-IE MAP OF PARTS OF THE RANCHOS CORRAL OE PIEDRA. PtSt.10 ANO BOlSA OE CHEMISAt.. IN THE CITY OF ARRO'l'O GRANDE. COUNTY Of SAN WIS OB!SPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FlLEO IN BOOK A, PACE 6S OF MAPS, IN THE OFflC£ Of THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE t.IOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL V.A. DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO VERNON L FREDERICK AND 'WIFE RECORDED IN BOOK 1943, PAGE 993 OF OFflCIAl RECORDS. !N SAID COUNTY RECORDER'S OFflCE. BEING RECITED AS STAKE L NO, 1 THEREIN; lHENCE ALONG THE SOUlliWCSTERL Y LINE OF SAID PARCEL V.A. NORTH 34· 13' WEST 1496,48 FEET. MORE OR L£SS, TO THE lRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, FROM °M'll01 THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN lHE DEED TO AMASA W, DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE .302 OF DEEDS. RECORDS Of :SAJD COUNTY BEARS NOR1H 34i3' WEST 700.00 FEET DISTANT t.IARKED BY A POST ESTABLISHED BY A. f. PARSONS IN FEBRUARY, 1B92, PRESENTLY MARKED BY AN 1 J4 INCH DIAMETER PIPE TAGGED RCE li923 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FlLEO JN BOOK B, PAGE 120 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY IN SAJD COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTH 34' 13' WEST 700.00 FEET TO SAID MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND OF DIXSON; THENCE NORTH 54· EAST 664,00 FEET TO A POINT FROM 'nHICH THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LAND OF DIXSON BEARS NORTH 54• EAST 537.JO FEET, MORE OR LESS, MARKED BY A POST ESTABLISHED BY A. F. PARSONS IN FEBRUARY, 1892. PRESENTLY MARKED BY AN OLD FENCE CORNER; THENtt AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 36" EAST 10.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT RJGHT ANGt.ES SOU1H 54• WEST 654.31 FEET TO A LINE \\ot!ICH IS PARAllEL 'MTH AND DISTANT 10,00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL V.A.; THENC£ ALONG SAID PARALLE!.. LINE SOUTH 34• 13' EAST 690.31 FEET TO A POINT FROM °M'!ICH THE TRUE POINT OF 8EGINN1NG BEARS SOUTH 55· 47' WEST 10.00 FEET DISTANT; THENCE SOUlH 55' 47' WEST 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 0: AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES SPECIFICALLY !NO..UD!NG WATER TRANSt.llSSION LINES AND ACCESS ROADS, TOGETHER wtlH AiL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES THERETO BOTI-l ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND LEVEL, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO IMPROVE. REPAIR ANO MAINTAIN SAID ROADWAY AND WATER TRANSMISS10N LINES OVCR lHAT PORllON OF LOT 91 OF lHE MAP OF THE RANCHOS CORRAL DE PIEDRA. PISMO AND BOlSA DE CHEMISAL IN lHE CITY OF ARROYO CRANDE, COUNTY OF SAN LLJIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP FIL.ED 1N BOOK A, PAGE S5 Of t.IAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INQUOED 'MTHIN A STRIP OF LAND 25 FEET WIDE L'YlNG 12.50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE l.J\NO DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO AMASA W. DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 302 Of DEEDS, RECORDS OF SA!D COUNTY, MARKED BY A POST SET BY A. F. PARSONS \N FEBRUARY, 1892, PRESENTLY MARKED BY AN 1 }( INCH DIAMETER P!PE TAGGED Rtt 5923 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FlLED !N BOOK 8, PAGE 120 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY IN SAID COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFJCE; THENCE NORTH 54• EAST '478.52 FEET TO A POINT, FROM \1111101 THE MOST £ASTERl Y CORNER OF SAID LAND OF D!XSON BEARS NORlH 54· EAST 72275 FEET, MORE OR LESS, MARKED BY A POST ESTABLISHED BY A. F. PARSONS IN FEBRUARY, 1892, PRESENTLY t.IARKEO BY AN OLD FENCE CORNER, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING; 11-!ENCE SOUTH 44' 01' 08" WEST 77.44 FEET TO A POINT; THENC£ CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY l'/ITH A RADIUS Of 70,00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ar .36' os· AN ARC DISTANCE OF 107.02 FEET TO A POINT; THENtt SOUTH 43' 34' 55• EAST 44.67 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONTJNUING SOU111EASTERLY ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY W1TH A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11r 39' 57'" AN ARC D!STANtt OF 30aOS FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTI-l 18" 4S oe• EAST 95 • .3.3 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARC8. A HERE!N DESCRIBED. I fSSOR'S PROPERTI I fCA! DESCRIPTION PER III! E REPORT (CON]N!lfD)• THE SIDELINES OF THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE EXTENDED OR SHORTENED AS NECE53ARY TO TERMINAlE NORTHv.£STERLY AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID !.AND Of DIXSON AND SOUlHEASTERLY AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE Of PARCEL A 1-iEl:iEIN DESCRIBED. APN: 007-511-016 fASFMENTI PfR ]] f REpQRJ-4, AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTlLITlES AND INOOENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED t.IAY 25, 1948 IN BOOK 478, PACE 77 OF OfFIOAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR Of; THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE ANO TU..EGRAPH COt.IPANY AFFECTS; AS DESCRIBED THEREIN :: THE EXACT LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD. NOT PLOTIABLE. 6, AN UNRECORDED LEASE DATED MAY 23. 2001, EXECUTED BY CITY OF ARRO'l'O GRANDE. A t.IUN!CIPAL CORPORATION AS LESSOR ANO COX PCS ASSETS, LLC., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS lESS£E, AS DISO.OSED BY A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 20, 2001 AS JNSTRUMENT NO. 2001-044518 Of OFflC!AL RECORDS. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE LEASEHOLD ESTATE, WHETHER OR NOT SHO\'it'ol BY TI'IE PUBLIC RECORDS. -THE EXACT LOCATION OF SAID LEASE CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD. NOT PLOTTABLE. •• 9. ANY EASEt.IENTS AND/OR SER\tlTUOES AFFECTING EASEMENT PARCEL(S) B, C AND D HEREIN DESCRIBED. -ff DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE ANY EASEMENTS AND/OR SERVITUDES AFFECTlNG EASEMENT PARCEL(S) B, C. & 0. -Sl'1E~~££. SURVEYING po oox~1.,1r,aAK1:.RSf\EUJ,CA'l3.l"<! Pll0Nf.-(•"'t)J"J--1Z17 fA.>:. lh"1):19J-t.'1~ r1sSUE STATUS._, "" O.IT DESCRIPTION 0 09/24/14 PR8JMINARY 09/29/14 TlTL£REVl£W 10/09/14 SITENAMECHANGE-]SL J 12/oa/14 LEASE/UTIU'IY SL 4 09/0J/15 LEASE/UI!LIT'I' " 09/10/15 RELOCATE LEASE ARE'A I SL 10/07/15 REV. CENERATOR LEASE SL 7 10/07/15 RfY, EQUIPMENT LEASE SL ,.. ~"'i:""'\rll ... 11 '-l'U-/ WIRELESS t\<3<'5Avt:'ll~~~~~<20, ~ °'i";:[::g/~ P"" PROPRIETARY !NFORIMllON ...... nt::~l:OlfloH®IMlllS!U IJ'~r>:PlllPR(lNfl'ltlDlfllOflW. ·-~ l'ft!.&ORDISQDSIJRl'.~Olll\loll .O:Slr!ll.lllSTO~ ... lllJ!l;S ~ ISSIRCll.YPIDEmll ~ U) U) -3? Q) O> .. ' 9~ ~ CD* ~i~ 0 ~w ~w w cc :x: '-' .. § ~ ;;;: "'~ Q) ~;;: c ::>~ It. ... .... BRANCH MILL ROAD It. TERMJNUS HUEBNERLN ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 SAN LUlS OBISPO COUNTY SHEET TITl.E: SITE SURVEY C-3 ..,j "-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__..._ A \ \ SITE PLAN \ \ \ i ~ ~ .\. /APN:,,O~.~~l~i-016 ~ / ..... '~.~--• .,,,. '.~fa ~rmr"}._ .. )) ~... ~\. ~//? ,~..----& A~o,-~--ftv!Jf/ ~•.wv.ruzo'"~ /jj/V \. E;~~~~"""' " a ~ I '· \ .. r,\ .. R"7 @ NORTH 4L--~·!SCALE: ,-,.40•-0-(24.><36) (OR) 112"'•4<1'.Q"(11x17) 1 #/~;,.-L"';:::--· / _/' /7 /" ~~v7~ //~ . ,/F o ,.(" " _// ; ,/' ~ #' . \:=''"--bAO ~/.<-' ?? EXJSTINOTREES\ SKALl.NOTBE ~~~~OR © rnsn•oAm=~· , EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO·'_'.· •• ~~~=~~~ .. ,IPl.llENTLAYOUT; .. "' ~~-EXISTINC8''N10C PAVED ACCESS 'CAO /'/) '. I I !l1 \ -. I \ :~~ I I \ ~%-a._. I I ~~~:("'~Vo I I %\.. ~.,,~:,.. I ' .• ENLARGED SITE PLAN fl;) EXISTING RETAINING WALL // ,,/'~ /'@ /"",/\' ~°'""'·"'o' ,/;{%¥ 7 ;" 'CUTTER ./.,;~~ ~.j, ./ <p. / '\_ q, / ='g,,~'""' ; 4/ . NORTH @ ~G' s=,i;;-==,:~-c~=I 2 ;\11016115 C--i ._::)(../ WIPELESS 086,:iAVa<li)O.(NCl>!AS CAR:LSSAO.C\!lWOO 7Bll.7~~Al00 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THl'l..OHMATIONCONTAIN~lllNTl!IB5~101-0AAWINmll:IPROl'l<ilTAAY&CON>lllt.NTIAt. TO AH'llJSEOROl:IClOOOR:EOTl!ERTI-<ANA:llTR.(l.ATE!J TOVl:RIZONWJ~Jll!ITRjC1LYPRot<IOITCTl CJ) CJ) -92 ~ '§:: -~ ~ ---· :s _J _J N co C") ~ LO Io co 0 er'. N z :i::t:: <( _J er: (j) ((} 0... SHEET TITLE: "' = ~* ~ <3 ~if! :::l ~ w" '3 to; '= z "'~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ "' w °' z <( :'.5 () o::ui WO zz !D <( WO:: :::J C) IO ~ >-:?; 0 0:: 0:: <( SITE PLAN& ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-1 ~· \~. "" ~ \ ~~~:.!%~~T-O,---+--\---t ~~=~:;;x1ll'--0" o="owA='~'. ~·~ ~~YSHOWNFOR t:.XISTINGCURB =~~~LETAAY------.......... \ ,,,,." \ ,..,,.",,. ,,.> ,,,,...-",..,, ... --" ,,,..",,.,,...-" ... ...-=~~~~~Ru~~UND~,,......... ,// -----~~ /,,.,,. ... "" ~..o----n--------------EXlSTINGTELCO ~-:~;NECT/BREAKER BOXESONliFR/\ME >-------------EXISTINGlX EOUtPMENTPA"1ELS ONK-FRAMC WATER VALVE ra><sn<o tx1 0 >AO,rnVA>U-ol @ NORTH EQUIPMENT LAYOUT ~·1~_;1/a" .. _1_'~~-(~~~lj 1 ¥ ~ r~~~~:·~ ~t-----"~"'<·~--+--~~°'q--L52J=c, ___ ., __ _ ~-;:;,-~-~~~~----~ "ALPHA SECTOR" ~------EXISTINCJ1.7HIOHWATERTANK ~----NEWVERIZONWIREl.£SS ==~g~TOTAt..(3)PCR ~-----NIOWANTENNAM...ONEMOUNT [n'>J ~----NEWVERIZONWIRS..ES38' PANELANTENNAS,[9JTOTl'll, (3)PER.SECTORMOUNTEDON E»STINGWATERTANK "GAMMA SECTOR" \ 'J, ® . ~;~~!K\_ "BETA SECTOR" @ NORTH ANTENNA LAYOUT ~ SCALE: 112" • 1'-0" (24"36) (OR) 1/4"•1'-0"(11"'17) 2 S(~ WIRELESS li<!IZA~ENIDAENCl>IAS CARL"CIAO,CA.IJ:!OOO 700.711~,5200 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION TI-<EINHl>!l.IATIONCO>ITMllOINTHISStTOf Of<AWl•IGSJ!IP .. OP~tTARY&~HOtNTIAlTO VCR!ZONWll<[l<.55 A>/Y!JS(OROISO.O'JUREOTHl'. .. Tl<-'NASITRUATl:S TOvt:RgONWIF!o.c:;.(;1Siffic~Yl'l>Of<larrrn (/) (/) ~ Q) -~ .~ "'~ 0 lll a5 ;g ~ (} ~ ffi :::l ~ w u I~ u => "'z "~ ~~ ai _.,, s 0 _J _J N N ..,. CO w"' ~ (") z O> LO :5 (§ I 0 CO ffilli 00:::Nz~ z =t:I:: ffi~ <( _J ~(!) 0::: Cf) ro 32 co 0.... '°~ a: <( SHEET TITLE: EQUIPMENT& ANTENNA LAYOUT A-2 kEX1"'1.,,<S>00H PANl:l~BY OTHEAS {10 TYP.) EX1STIN04'1{1Gft ROD ANTENNA ---------------~~g!.lfilB..Qf~Q_B_Qtl6~~ EKISTINCl __ --_ --_ --_ --_ --____ ~_2f'~A_l!.El~w;.~~~ ,j....GROUNDl€VEL ~ELEV,u-0°A"1Sl NORTHEAST ELEVATION ~~-J;JCENTeROF.£Xl.l!.!llill.fil!~E.B_9 ___ --_ V-~GL NEWWRIZONWIRELESSll'------------1 PAHELAATENHAS,(DJttlTAL, f.!}P!RS1!CTORMDUHltDON ~ EXlSTINGWATERTANIC ""wv""'°""'""'3SRRH. -:;; {DI TOTAL, 13) PER SECTOR NEWveRIZONWIREU!SSAAVCAP, (5) TOTAL, (:$)LOCATED AT ANTENNA l£VEl.. (2) LOCATED AT fQUIPMDrr SliEl.TER 0THl'RS(10TYf'.) ElUS'TlNG4'H~ ;J;~ANlt N<WAHm<NA &(5::: ='~::V~ $~~-Rc:(£XISltNGP~El~S!_O~ --------__ -RDD~NA ~ <$> """"'"""""""y TOP Of "'1S1JNOWAWUA« E>OSTm TO°'""" \ "-"'-"-'''" "-'""'"=-\ WATER TANK $W'v7~~grNEWVER~N~P~~---~ TOP OF EXlSTlNGAT&TEQUIPMENTSHa...TER TO 81! NEW VERIZON Wl!IJ!LESS EQlllPllll!Nf SHl!l.TER EL.EV.10'-3-· A.GttOUNOl.EVl:L SOUTHWEST ELEVATION • NEWANTI!NNA &( ~:f°'°UNT ----a£V:3f.N.GLV --_ --____ --_ ~_pF~l!_Wl!laUSP~.it:'WW:f~ r ?Marr SHELTER TINGAT&TEQUI MENtSHEln:R A ~-, TOBl!N:~=WIREU!SSEQUIP ;I ~"""""""''""'"''"'" PANELAN'TEttNAS,(9)TOTAL. (J) Pl!!R 9£CTOft MOUNTED Off EXISTINGWATERTAMIC -----NEWVERIZOllWIRELE9S RRif.(Q)TOTAL.,(:l)Pat SECTOl'l ---NEWVERlZONWlllELESSAAYCAP,!St TOTAt., {3) LOCATED AT JJm!HNA.l.£VEt., (:z)lCCATEDATEQUIPMEHTSHEl.:JEl'l /EXISTlNG EQUIPMENT SHB..TER BY OTHERS ", I at'{;1~1%"V ~2'1a~t.e-~~ .. ·~~~~~~~~I 2 ~218~-~~~~~~~~>j 1 CITY COMMENTS Sdf~ WIRELESS 5aMJ.VENIDAtNC:lw.:'l ~::~ PROPRlETARY INFORMATION TimlNFCRIAAl'1!»4COflTMlaOW11<1Sst;JOf ~IS~~~El#TIALTO N«USli:Ofl=osu!!Etm<l'.R'llW<l.i.llrTR£LATI:!:> TO~Wll<fL.ES81GlmUC'Tl.YPllCt<llltn:o ~­~ ~ -~ \.~ ' t: ,-~ _J _J N 00 Ct) ~ LO Iooo 00:'.'.N z ~ ~ ~ Ill a.. m 8 ill ~'ii "'m ~~ "''"' "'w ::j ii! Wu ~ !3 ~~ ~ 0 N UJ ~ z <( ::i () o::u.i UJ Cl zz lll <( UJ 0:: ::> Cl :co 005 lO 0:: ~ SHEET TITLE: SOUTHWEST& NORTHEAST ELEVATION A-3 TOP OF EXISTl/llG AT&T EQUJPMENT Sl1El..TER TO BE NEW V?R12!0N. WIRELESS EQUIP14ENT SH£LTER w.10·-0-112" 1-.0ROUNOLEVEt. '-I' El£iT.O"-O"AM$t._ NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION NEWVERJZONW!REl..ES$11' PANELANTI!NNAS,{'ll)TOTAL. (l) PER Sl!CTOR l.«llflmU> ON 11Xl$TINGWATI!RTANIC NEW WRIZON WlRELE$S RRH, (1) TOTAL, 13) PER sa:TOR NEWVl!RlZON wtlU!LESS RAYCAP, (IS) TOTAl.., Ill LOCATI!D AT AKTalMA U:VCI., [21LOCATEllATEQlJD>MENT$HELTl!R NEWVERllONWlREl..ESll' ~ii~=~o~~~ EXISTINDWATERTANk NEW VlllUWN WIRELESS RRH, It) TOTAL, p) PER SECTOR NEWVEIUZON WIRELESS RAYCAP, {IS) TOTAl.(3)1.0CATl!t>ATANTl'!NNALEVEL. 121 LOCATED AT EQUIPMENT SHEUER: ~,:~~~~> ;;",.i',""" ""'"'"™" _J ~''HIOHROD rr.::;;.=· \ OTHERS(tOTYf'.)BV EXISTINGCAllLETAAYl """"' --\ ------~c;;g!fil.BJlE~SllliQ_fill~~ ____________ ~~o~G~EtANTEN~?iW:r~ -.1.-------""""'""""' -----··-··,-""·"·'-"'-" ~ ----~~Wl_REU!SSPAN ~~~ .-• SHELTER IPMENT I BY~-~ n EXISTINGAETAINING WAfL EXlST1NG.4'HIGHROO ~;=OY \_ -------------------~D~N~.%.?,W~~ ' . ------~~~o_!AMEL~'!rv3Wf':~ EXISllMG31.7'HIGH WATmTMIK TOPOFEXISTINGWATE"RTANK A _/ El.fV.31.rAOLV ),__ ___ ~ ____ _Jlt__--;;-----------------~~.,, ----~Et!!_ER~f$0™8~.~~~ tl£W ANTOINA. MAGNEMOUNr """ ... ;-@ ~] TOP OF EXlSllNG AT&T EQUIPIAENT SliELTER TO B.e NEWVERIZON WIRl!LESS EQUt!IMENTSUELlEt ~ r I ~-l I GROUNOLEVEl El..EV.O'..(l" l SCAU! N.T.S. 2 ~2'1s:~-~-~~·~~~~1I 1 ISSUE STATUS OESCRIFTJON SlC WIRELESS ~ ... ve.cip.o,rnciw.a ~000 MNUS110ROt5ClO:lllRtcmtr:RTI1"'N.O.SrrRflAT!:S TOVERIZCt.IWllla.l!SSISSrRICtl..VPllOHUJnED ~ .SQ @ "§ \.~ _./ ~ .....I .....I N co (") ~ lO Io co (..) 0::: N z ::t:I:: ~ ~ co Q_ ~ C> ~ ~* ~ <) "',., ow ::! ~ wu 13 5 ~~ ~ 0 N ;;!; Wm Z..: :'So a:: ui WO zz ffi~ :::>(!) :co ~ >-:g ~ a:: ..: SHEEflTTLE: NORTHWEST& SOUTHEAST ELEVATION A-4 .... -+-rEXISTING31..7'HIGHWATER TANl(IN F'RONT{SHOWN DASHED FOR CLARITY) """''°'"n'""'"""""" \ stlEl.:tl!RTOl'llitUllUZEDBY VERIZ:ONwmELESS NEWVIORIZOHIMREl..l!S$ 30KW STANDBY GENERATOR (UL142)0NS'"'1'"X10'.tr' CONC:Rlin!PAD ~CROUNOtEV!;:I '-rELEV.O'-O"AMSl ...,, --II I I 4\ l!XIS11NG3XEQUIPMENT _J PAHELSONH-l'AAME '""'"'" mco _j I DISCDNNECTIB PAflEL&__J OH H FRAME R£AKER 80XEI SOUTHEAST ELEVATION -Ir-l(EXISTING31.7'HIGHWATER TANK{PARTIAUYSHOWW fORa..AAt!Y) """"'""'"""""" _) PAHl!LSONIM'RAMI! NORTHEAST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION ~ / L, I ,--CUI~ ~ -e-Q Jj I ~· BCAt.e 1/4.••1'"4f"(2""30:) 4 (OR) 1111"•1"-0"(11><17} EXlSTINGAT&TICflYEQUIPW!NT e~ar::x?R:~DY DV'"'""'"""...,,,.. PPC MOUNTED ON SHELTERWAU. Nl!WVEruZON'NIREU!SS 1rX1r CONCRETE PAD GROUNDl.E\/El.A. ElEv.U-tY'AMSl~ I ~· ls;:e 1:~---1~; .. ,!::;1\ 3 ..I.. GROUNt>l.EVEl. '1-Ei:Ev.a-o-AMSL EXJSTINO AT&TJCllY EQUIPMENT stlEL1'£1tTOBEl1TlUZ£01l'< VER!Z<»IWIRELESS NEWVERIZONWIRB..E$8 3~STANDl1Y GENERATOR (UL142}0N!l".u"X10'.a' CONCRET'EPAD NEWYERIZONWIR£U!SS PPC MOUNTED OM 3Ka..T51:WALL HW~-===1 S'XS'CONCll:EIEPAD NORTHWEST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION -.,,. ISSUE STATUS~ ~·.':~•c: ,,-j =t~~=~ VEXISTIWGTfl.COPANEL& DISCONNECT/aRi?AKER BOJCeONHFRAME! --~-;'/:J i i bl l_I II ~ l!XISTIN03XEOUIPlllENT PANELSOUH-l'RAME TOBl!USI! I ~ SCALe 114"•1'-0.(24>;39) 2 (OR) 11r'•1""4f"(11x17) REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OY 0 41t1/14 Pl..M4NING SUBMITTAL OM """ CITY COMMENTS OM 2 Mlf1$ NEW DESIGN "' ,. SdC "" WIRELESS ,; ' ~O:SA\IO<lltl.l.fl\IClNAS ~~oou 76D.711!.S20(! ..._ .. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION~ ltlll"INf'OIUMl10NCONTM!EtllHTHl3tlhTot' ~WINOSl!l~~:~Dfl/TIA.l..TO ""'USE OR DlaCl.OlltlflE Ol'ilERTIIAMAll !f ROAlLS ~OVEAIZONWIReU!$Sla8n;JCll..YPROHl81TEt!~· I .;:; s: \.~ m ...----s ..._ ~ 9 fB m~ ~ ;:;_ :5 ill ~5 g§ ~~ ~ -+-/::::::\ -+-D PPCMOUHTEtlON BHEL"TERWALL t--llF4 ·L.kb=J EXIST1N031.7'l11GHWATER TANK(PARTJAlLYSHOWN FORCl..ARITY) ,. _J _J ~ N co ('f) ~ Wm z<( :'.)u .. ""'""""""""""'~ HEWVCUZONWIREl.EM~ !! ll'Xll' CONCIUm?PAD 'L__j t::: I/ LO Io co O~N z ::i:t: UEV.IT-O'AMSl et:'. Cl) ~ "'o""'"""'-~ ~<( _J 0:: ui LU Cl zz ID <( LU 0:: ::::> Cl IO ~ >-1:5 ~ \:m ..... Om.<:OM•a&/ DISCONNECT/S.Rl!AKEft BOXES OH H FRMm EXISTINGlXEQUIPUIONT P.a.Nl!t.SONIH'RAMI! exlSTINOAT&T/cnYEQUIPMENT SHl!lTERTO bE unuzmav """"'"'"''""" SOUTHWEST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION CD a_ ::,.v::.!:~IUUSS {UL142)0N5'.Vi:~TOR SHEETTITL""· COHCRl!TI!PAD ~ EQUIPMENT ELEVATION 0:: <( .... I~· 1=...,,,. .. , ..... ....,.,I 1..Jl A-5 {OR) 118'"•1"Q'(11x17) j ATTACHMENT 1 Verizon Wireless • Proposed Base Station (Site No. 285382 "Branch Mill Road") End of Huebner Lane • Arroyo Grande, California Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Verizon Wireless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. 285382 "Branch Mill Road") proposed to be located at End of Huebner Lane in Arroyo Grande, California, for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields. Executive Summary Verizon proposes to install directional panel antennas on the sides of the water tank located at the end of Huebner Lane in Arroyo Grande. The proposed operation will, together with the existing base stations at the site, comply with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to RF energy. Prevailing Exposure Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. A summa~ of the FCC' s exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Wireless Service Microwave (Point-to-Point) WiFi (and unlicensed uses) BRS (Broadband Radio) WCS (Wireless Communication) A WS (Advanced Wireless) PCS (Personal Communication) Cellular SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) 700MHz [most restrictive frequency range] Frequency Band 5-80 GHz 2-6 2,600MHz 2,300 2,100 1,950 870 855 700 30-300 Occupational Limit 5.00mW/cm2 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2.90 2.85 2.40 1.00 General Facility Requirements Public Limit LOO mW/cm2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.57 0.48 0.20 Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables. A HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO K7HN Page 1of4 Verizon Wireless • Proposed Base Station (Site No. 285382 "Branch Mill Road") End of Huebner Lane • Arroyo Grande, California small antenna for reception of GPS signals is also required, mounted with a clear view of the sky. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the antennas require line-of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. This means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas. Computer Modeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and Facility Description Based upon information provided by Verizon, including zoning drawings by SAC Wireless, LLC, dated March 4, 2015, it is proposed to install nine Andrew Model SBNHH-1D65C directional panel antennas on the sides of the water tank located at the end of Huebner Lane in Arroyo Grande. The antennas would be mounted with up to 9° downtilt at an effective height of about 27Yz feet above ground and would be oriented in groups of three toward 0°T, 160°T, and 260°T. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 10,760 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 4, 110 watts for A WS, 4, 110 watts for PCS, and 2,540 watts for 700 MHz service; no operation on cellular frequencies is presently proposed from this site. Presently located on the top of the tank are similar antennas for use by AT&T Mobility, Sprint, and T-Mobile. For the limited purpose of this study, the transmitting facilities of those carriers are assumed to be as follows: Operator Service Maximum ERP AT&T AWS 2,100 watts PCS 5,300 Cellular 1,600 700MHz 1,000 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FHANC!SCO Antenna Model Down tilt Andrew SBNH-1D6565A 60 Andrew SBNH-1D6565A 6 Andrew SBNH-1D6565A 6 Andrew SBNH-1D6565A 6 Height 37Yz ft 37Yz 37Yz 37Yz K7HN Page 2 of 4 Verizon Wireless • Proposed Base Station (Site No. 285382 "Branch Mill Road") End of Huebner Lane • Arroyo Grande, California Operator Service Maximum ERP Antenna Model Down tilt Height Sprint BRS 1,500 watts KMW ET-X-WM-18-65-8P 60 37Yz ft PCS 7,000 KMW ET-X-TS-70-15-62-18 6 37Yz SMR 500 KMW ET-X-TS-70-15-62-18 6 37Yz T-Mobile AWS 4,400 Ericsson AIR21 6 37Yz PCS 2,200 Ericsson AIR21 6 37Yz 700MHz 1,330 Andrew LNX-6514DS 6 37Yz Study Results For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum RF exposure level due to the proposed Verizon operation by itself is calculated to be 0.095 mW/cm2, which is 9.8% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at ground, for the simultaneous operation of all four carriers, is 11 % of the public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at the second- floor elevation of any nearby residence* is 8.7% of the public exposure limit. It should be noted that these results include several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. Recommended Mitigation Measures Due to their mounting locations, the Verizon antennas would not be accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. To prevent occupational exposures in excess of the FCC guidelines, it is recommended that appropriate RF safety training, to include review of lock-out tag-out procedures, be provided to all authorized personnel who have access to the top of the water tank, including employees and contractors of the wireless carriers and of the water district. No access within 11 feet directly in front of the Verizon antennas themselves, such as might occur during maintenance work on the tank, should be allowed while the base station is in operation, unless other measures can be demonstrated to ensure that occupational protection requirements are met. Posting explanatory signs t at the access ladder on the tank and at the antennas, such that the signs would be readily visible from any angle of approach to persons who might need to work within that distance, ·would be sufficient to meet FCC-adopted guidelines. Similar measures should already be in place for the other carriers at the site; applicable keep-back distances for those carriers have not been determined as part of this study. * Located at least 350 feet away, based on photographs from Google Maps. t Signs should comply with OET-65 color, symbol, and content recommendations. Contact information should be provided (e.g., a telephone number) to arrange for access to restricted areas. The selection oflanguage(s) is not an engineering matter, and guidance from the landlord, local zoning or health authority, or appropriate professionals may be required. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO K7HN Page 3 of 4 Verizon Wireless • Proposed Base Station (Site No. 285382 "Branch Mill Road") End of Huebner Lane • Arroyo Grande, California Conclusion Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that operation of the base station proposed by Verizon Wireless at end of Huebner Lane in Arroyo Grande, California, will comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base stations. Training authorized personnel and posting explanatory signs are recommended to establish compliance with occupational exposure limits. Authorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration Nos. E-13026 and M-20676, which expire on June 30, 2015. This work has been carried out under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct. March 25, 2015 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO K7HN Page 4 of 4 FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard ANSVIEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Frequency Applicable Range (MHz) 0.3 -1.34 1.34-3.0 3.0-30 30-300 300-1,500 1,500 -100,000 1000 100 ,-., o"' ~ ..... s 10 ~ "" Q i::~ 0 t!) P-< A S 1 '-' 0.1 0.1 Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequency of emission in MHz) Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field Field Strength Field Strength Power Density (V/m) (Alm) (mW/cm2) 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 JOO 614 823.8/f 1.63 2.19/f 100 1801/ 1842/ f 823.8/f 4.89/ f 2.19/f 900/f 1801/ 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 3.54../f 1.59{/ ..Jf/106 {f 1238 f/300 j/1500 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 _/ Occupational Exposure ---.-... ~ PCS '' Cell. ~..----' FM ~ '"'" ...... _.., /'------· Public Ex osure 1 10 100 10 3 10 5 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven terrain, ifrequired to obtain more accurate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO FCC Guidelines Figure 1 RFR.CALC ™ Calculation Methodology Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposmes from all somces and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. Near Field. Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications base stations, as well as dish (apertme) antennas, typically used for microwave links. The antenna patterns are not fully formed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. F 1 h . d . S 180 0.1 x pnet . mW; 2 or a pane or w Ip antenna, power ens1ty = --x , m cm , . eBW JT x D xh d e . d. S O.lxl6x11xPnet mW 2 an ior an aperture antenna, maximum power ens1ty max = 2 , in /cm , nxh where 0Bw = half-power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts, D = distance from antenna, in meters, h = aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and rJ = apertme efficiency (unitless, typically 0.5-0.8). The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: . S 2.56x1.64x100 x RFF 2 x ERP . mW; 2 power density = 4 2 , m cm , x.rrxD where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accmate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO Methodology Figure 2 BRANCH MILL RD PSL#285382 581 HU!OBNER LN A."l_RQYO GRl\NOE. CA 93420 DISCLAIMER: THIS PHOTOSIMULATION IS INTENDED AS A GRP.PHICAL REPRESENTATION OF EXISTING ANO PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS BASED ON THE PROJECT f DRAWING PLANS. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ACTUAL. FINAL CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY )> -f ~ n :c s: m 2 -f N NOTE:' NS:V VE:RlZOt;l VVJREL~,S EQUIPME.Nf SHEL JER ANO GENERATOR WITHIN NEW~-o''x:W-!J" l.J;ASE AREA 1 PER SECTOR NEW VERIZON W1REL.ESS \ ANTEN'1AS (9) TOTAL, (31 !JEW VERIZON WlRE1~ Ji =~~W"/1 I BRANCH MILL RD PSLlf 235382 581 HUEBNER LN. ARRCYC GR.CJ..,NOE. CA. 93420 4f NEW VERIZON WIRELESS AhlTEhlNAS-{9} TOTAL. (3) PER SECTOR City of ATTACHMENT 3 ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 2001 Resolution No. 3569 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES SITING and PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS I. SITING REQUIREMENTS The following requirements are intended to assist telecommunication service providers and the community in understanding the City's standards and permit process for such facilities. The goal is to balance the needs of wireless communication providers, the regulatory functions of the City, the rights guaranteed by the federal government, and the potential impacts upon the community and neighboring property owners in the design and siting of telecommunication facilities. A. General Requirements: 1. Telecommunication facilities shall avoid any unreasonable interference with views from neighboring properties. 2. No monopoles or towers shall be installed on top of an exposed ridgeline or prominent slope when alternative sites are available. 3. Telecommunication facilities shall be painted color(s) that are most compatible with their surroundings. 4. Innovative design shall be used whenever the screening potential for the site is low. For example, designing structures that are compatible with surrounding architecture, or appear as a natural environmental feature, could help mitigate the visual impact of a facility. 5. Telecommunication facilities are discouraged on any property with a Residential land use designation. 6. The City lists the placement of facilities in the following preferential order: Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 1 a. Side-mount antenna on existing structures (buildings, water tanks, etc.) when integrated into the existing structure, completely hidden from public view or painted and blended to match existing structures; b. Within or on existing signs to be completely hidden from public view; c. Atop existing structures (buildings, water tanks, etc.) with appropriate visual/architectural screening to be completely hidden from public view; d. Alternative tower structures (or stealth structures), such as man- made trees, clock towers, flagpoles, steeples, false chimneys, etc., that camouflage or conceal the presence of antennas. e. Existing monopoles, existing electric transmission towers, and existing lattice towers; f. New locations. 7. The City encourages co-location of telecommunication facilities, but only if it results in a /esservisual impact. B. Requirements for Building Mounted Antennas: 1. Building mounted antennas and all other equipment shall be in scale and architecturally integrated with the building design in such a manner as to be visually unobtrusive. 2. Colors and materials shall match the existing building. 3. All equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. Building mounted antennas and all other equipment shall avoid any unreasonable interference with views from neighboring properties. C. Requirements for Monopoles and Towers: 1. Monopoles and towers may be considered only when the applicant reasonably demonstrates that the proposed facility cannot be placed on an existing building or structure. 2. Monopoles and towers shall only be allowed on properties zoned Public Facility. 3. Substantial landscaping or other screening should be provided to visually buffer any adjoining residential uses from the potential visual impacts of the facility. Landscape screening should be designed to achieve its desired appearance in a reasonable period of time. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 2 4. For monopoles or towers proposed within 300 feet of residentially zoned property, the facility should be set back at least 50 feet or the height of the facility, whichever is greater. Otherwise, the standard setback for the applicable zoning district shall apply. II. PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Any new telecommunication facility proposed within the City of Arroyo Grande is subject to review and approval through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. The applicant shall submit the following additional items and information (unless waived by the Community Development Director based on written justification provided by the applicant) along with the standard CUP application materials. The following list of requirements will be used to check your application for completeness after it is submitted. If your application is not complete, a copy of this list, and/or the CUP checklist, will be returned to you with additional requirements noted. A. Site Information: Submit a site plan, Assessor's Parcel Map(s), or a recent aerial photo that clearly illustrates the following information: 1 . The lease area of the proposed project. 2. The lease areas of all other facilities on the parcel where the proposed facility is located. 3. Property boundaries of the site and the legal lot. 4. Location of all habitable structures within 500 feet of the proposed facility with the distance from the proposed antenna facility to the closest structure clearly marked. B. Technology Information: 1 . A written description of the type of technology and type of consumer services the carrier will provide to its customers. 2. An explanation of site selection (reason the site was chosen over alternative sites). 3. An explanation of the need for the proposed height, strength and direction of signal, and type of antenna proposed (i.e., panel, whip, dish). Also include a description of all accessory structures/equipment requested as a part of the proposed antenna facility. 4. Detailed engineering calculations for foundation wind loads. C. RF Exposure Information: The City of Arroyo Grande requires the same information submitted to the FCC regarding radio frequency (RF) emissions with any application to establish a new or expand an existing communication facility. If the application pertains to co- location, or to an additional facility on a parcel, a cumulative emissions report for the site is required. The City of Arroyo Grande requires the information pursuant to its responsibility, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to determine cumulative environmental impacts for all permitted projects. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 3 1. Provide copies of documents submitted to the FCC, including environmental impact information, showing that the proposed facility, both individually and cumulatively (if appropriate), is in compliance with FCC adopted standards for RF emissions for the facility type (i.e., PCS, Cellular, Earth Satellite Facilities). Include a one-page summary in simple, easy to read terms, demonstrating said compliance. D. Co-Location Information: Co-location is defined as the coincident placement of telecommunication carriers' antennas on the same tower or antenna-mounting structure. The principal benefit from co-location is that fewer towers are needed to serve a given area, thereby reducing the overall visual impact of towers on a community. The City encourages the co-location between carriers, or the use of existing towers wherever possible to discourage the unnecessary proliferation of towers. The City also encourages the design of new towers which allow for future co- location whenever feasible. Applicants proposing to site the antenna(s) must demonstrate that reasonable efforts have been made to locate the antennas(s) on existing structures. 1. If not co-located, provide information pertaining to the feasibility of joint- use antenna facilities, and discuss the reasons why such joint use is not a viable option or alternative to a new facility site. This includes written notification of refusal of the existing structure owner to lease space on the structure. Include information on lack of existing towers in the area, topography, frequency or signal interference, line of site problems, and available land zoning restrictions as applicable. E. Visual Impact Information: The following information provides staff with criteria for determining the significance of project visual impacts for CEQA purposes. 1. Submit a preliminary environmental review with special emphasis placed upon the nature and extent of visual and aesthetic impacts. 2. Submit photo mock-ups or digital computer representations of the project site "before" and "after" installation. Physical samples of facility materials and/or a three-dimensional model may also be required. Show the proposed tower, antenna(s), equipment shelters, and any landscaping or screening proposed to lessen the visual impact of the project. 3. Submit information regarding the location of existing towers of the same, or similar design as the proposal facility, located within 10 miles of Arroyo Grande for viewing purposes. 4. If the project site is located within % mile of a public road, residence, public park, public hiking trail, or private easement open to the public, or if visible from such areas, show the proposed project site from multiple vantage points. Multiple viewpoints will require an index map and key for identification. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 4 5. Provide a sample of the proposed color of the tower in the form of a minimum one square foot paint sample, and explain the reasons why that color is best for the location proposed. 6. Describe the type of landscaping proposed to screen the facility to the maximum extent feasible, or the reasons why landscaping is not necessary or feasible. 7. Proposed communication facilities should not be sited on ridgelines or hilltops when alternative sites are available. If a ridgeline location is proposed, submit written justification to the Community Development Director. If no alternative site exists, the communications facility must be located to minimize silhouetting on the ridgeline and must blend with the surrounding environment to decrease visibility from off site. 8. At the time of permit renewal, any major modification to the existing permit, or change-out of major equipment, the permit site and existing equipment shall be reviewed for consistency with changes in technology that could substantially lessen visual impacts. If the Community Development Director determines that a change in technology would substantially lessen the visual impacts of the facility, or if they would result in a substantial benefit to the public, the permitee may be required to make those changes. 9. If there is a change of lessee, information regarding the type of technology that will be used by the new lessee shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within ten (10) days of that change. If the transfer would require any changes to the facilities approved in the original CUP, an Amended Conditional Use Permit application must be submitted. The new lessee shall use the most current technology available if it would substantially lessen visual impacts of the site, and if it would result in a substantial benefit to the public. 10. Describe if the proposed facility is intended to be a "Coverage" or "Capacity" site. F. Antenna/Site Capacity Information: 1. Submit information on the total antenna capacity for the proposed antenna tower and any other structures for the proposed project. This information may be used for future co-location of antennas from other companies. 2. There shall be a maximum of two towers per assessor's parcel or developed site. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 5