Loading...
Supplemental Memo 8aTO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BY: DEBORAH WEICHINGER, ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM 8.a. — NOVEMBER 1, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15-001 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 15-001; SUBDIVISION OF ONE (1) LOT INTO FOUR (4) LOTS AND CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR (4) ONE -BEDROOM SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES; LOCATION — 1177 ASH STREET; APPLICANT — JEFFREY EMRICK DATE: OCTOBER 31, 2016 Attached is correspondence received after agenda preparation regarding the subject project. Attachment: 1. Additional correspondence Hello members of the Planning Commission, My name is Jeff Longfellow and I live at 1189 Ash St. I am writing in concern of the project being proposed at 1177 Ash St of the four 1 bedroom units. I was present at the last meeting on July 5, 2016 and heard all the concerns about the impact with parking, trash, increased traffic and architectural look. I also have the same concerns! I'm also concerned about the future of this small already highly populated block. It was stated by multiple members of the board that this block is the most congested block in all of Arroyo Grandel1 Even though this is the last non developed lot on this block, if you approve the change to this lot what is to stop the change to the other lots with a house on it being torn down and developed into multi housing. If you allow one to do it then others will follow. I feel that the lots are zoned R2 to keep from over growing, so why make a change that could drastically change the future of this already congested block. Keep it to the 2 units on the single lot and help to not make it a future nightmare. Also looking over the design of the buildings all I noticed was instead of a flat roof they changed to a pitched roof and left the stucco and steel siding and the color, not really trying to blend in with the current surroundings. The housing around here is stucco and wood siding. I don't feel there was much thought into changing the look of the buildings as 1 had heard the commissioners ask for in the last meeting. This is not an industrial area. In conclusion I am asking the planning board to not approve this item and have the developer build within the current regulations. Thank you, Jeff Longfellow U C i 11 2016 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike and Diane Bonifacio 1186 Ash st. Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission To whom it may concern; to/31/2016 Aktenti€ n Planning My name is Diane Bonifacio along with my husband Michael, we attended a Planning Commission meeting on the purposed development at 1177 Ash st. Arroyo Grande, Ca. on July 5 2ot6, at that time I/we expressed our concerns on said development, being number one was the extreme drought ( water rationing), extremely high volume of traffic on Ash street, at that time I submitted pictures of traffic on Ash street. These concerns are still concerns we have, I can understand developing said property but with 2 homes instead of 4, the properties here are zoned R2 the way I understand this not R 4 so does this mean all properties will be zoned R 4 in which case these high density dwellings will greatly impact this street even more so than it already is. We already have issues not being able to park in front of our own home, at the first Planning Commission meeting ( July 5, 2o16 ) the council stipulated there would be follow ups on these concerns but I have only seen Code enforcement a couple of times and these concerns still remain an issue. I am only looking for some kind of resolve to better this neighborhood, as it is now traffic is a major concern and the safety of residents that live on Ash street should be a consideration. I am hoping that we can all come to an agreement on this development to benefit the neighborhood and build 2 homes instead of the purposed 4. Sincerely, Mike and Diane Bonifacio s -- OCT 3 1 M3 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT