PC R 95-1534RESOLUTION NO. 95-1534
A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING PLANNED
SIGN PROGRAM CASE NO. 94-114A, AMENDMENT �2,
APPLIED FOR BY JIM FRED�NBERG, AT 525 TRAFFIC
WAY
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered an
application by Jim Fredenberg, for an amended Planned Sign Program at 525 Traffic Way in
the Highway Commercial, HC-D-2.11 Zone; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this planned sign program is
consistent with the General Plan and the Environmental Documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is
categorically exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15311(a); and
WHER�AS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, t}ie follvwing circumstances exist:
1. The proposed signs are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of
the Arroyo Grande General Plan and any applicable design guidelines. The goals of the
General Plan are to encourage economic vitality and business activity, protect
investments while preserving the environment and character of the City because said
signs are important to the success of this and similar businesses but are not out of scale
or character with other signs in this zone and vicinity. The design of the signs is
consistent with the design guidelines for the D-2.11 district.
2. The proposed signs conform to applicable development standards and provisions of the
Development Code except as approved by Variance Case No. 94-186 Amendment �12 and
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
3. The physical location or placement of the signs are compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and do not pose a safety risk. �
NOW, TI BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Com�nission of the City
of Anoyo Grande hereby approves said Planned Sign Program, subject to the following
conditions of approval:
Gener�l Condit�o�is
l. The applicant sliall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements
as are applicable to this project.
2. This application shall automatically expire on November 7, 1997 unless the signs are
installed. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may
apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the
Planning Commission at the meeting of November 7, 1995 and marked "Exhibit A".
Resolution No. 95-1534
Planned Sign Program
Jim Fredenberg
November 7, 1995
Page Two
Case No. 94-114a Amendment #2
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the
City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in
the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City,
its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations
under this condition.
5. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit
Case No. 94-524 and Planned Sign Program Case No. 94-114a.
Architectural Advisory Committee Conditions
6. All sign edges shall be sealed and finished.
Building Department Conditions
7. The applicant shall apply for necessary building permits, submit plans, and pay necessary
fees prior to starting construction of lhe signs. �
Community Development Department Conditions
8. Prior to installation of the new signs, all banners, flags, pennants, signs of a temporary
or miscellaneous character, and signs not conforming to the planned sign program shall
be removed.
On motion by Commissioner Lubin, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lubin, Beck, Soto, Deviny, Tappan, and Keen
NOFS: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Carr
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of November, 1995.
AT'TFST:
J
�uei e Breese, Commission Clerk
AS TO CONTENT:
Doreen
Jo��'�een, C ' erson
Community Development Director
�