PC R 95-15251Z�SOLU'I'ION NO. 95-152�
A RESOLUTION OF T�iE PLANNING COIVIMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A
NEGAT'IVE DECLARATION, INSTRUCTING TI�E
S�CR�TARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF DET�RMINATION,
AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 94-530, TOR A GOODWILL DONOR TRAILER AT 1164
GRAND AVENUE, APPLI�D FOR BY GOODWILL
INDUST'RIES
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 94-530, filed by Goodwill Industries, for a donor trailer, in
the General Commercial Zone; and
WI��REAS, the Planning Commission t�as held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, tl�e Planning Commission has found tl�at this project is consistent with the
General Plan and the Environ��ental documents associated therewitli; and
WHEREA5, tt�e Planning Commission has reviewed tliis project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
1. The proposed use is permitted witl�in the subject district pursuant to tl�e provisions of
Section 9-03.050 of tlle Development Code, and co►nplies witl� all applicable provisions
of tl�e De�elopment Cocle, ti�e goals and objectives of ll�e Arroyo Grande General Plan,
and the development policies and standards of tlie City.
2. Tt�e proposed use will not impair tl�e integrity and cl�aracter.of tl�e district in wl�ich it is
to be located because it is a low intensity use, and as a condition of approval, an annual
review will allow correction of any problems tliat may develop. �
3. Tl�e site is suitable for tl�e type and intensity of use or developrnent tllat is proposed
because adequate setbacks are provided from adjacent uses and adequate access exists.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to
ensure tl�e public health and safety.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public healtl�, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties and improveme�ts in the vicinity.
Depai-tment of rish aiid G�me Required Findings of Exem�tioii
1. The City of Arroyo Grande l�as prepared an �initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of
the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (C.EQA), for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 94-530. '
Resolution No. 95-1525
Conditional Use Pec•u�it Case No. 94-530
Good�vill Industries
August 1, 1995
Page Two
2. Based on tl�e initial study, a negative declaration drafted for review by tlie public and
review and approval by tl�e Planning Commission.
3. , After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, anil considering the
record as a w}�ole tl�e Planning Commission adopted the negative declaration and found
that t}�ere is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually
or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game
Code or on t1�e l�abitat upon which t(�e wildlife depends as a result of developrnent of this
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, B� I1' RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Arroyo Grande l�ereby adopts a negative declaration, instructs t}�e secretary to file a Notice
of Determination; and approves said conditional use permit, subject to the standard conditions
of the City and those conditions listed below:
General Conditions
1. Tf�e applicant sliall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements
as are applicable to tl�is project. '
2. Development shall occur in substantial coiifo'rinance with the plans presented to the
Planning Cornmission at the meeting of August l, 1995 and marked "Exhibit A".
3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the
City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in
tlie alternative, to relinquisl� such approval. Tl�e applicant shall reimburse the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City,
its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of sucli
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of any such action but sucil participation shall not relieve applicant of l�is/lier obligations
under this condition.
4. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed annually as a non-public hearing at the
first Planning Commission meeting in August, unless a longer review period is approved
by the Planning Commission. Additionally, it shall be reviewed with any applications
suUsequently submitted on the site. At any of these reviews, if the Planning Commission
determines tl�at paving, parking or additional facilities are required on tlie site due to the
project, the applicant shall be responsible for meeting the requirements imposed by the
Planning Commission or the conditional use permit becomes invalid and the use ceases
operation.
5. The length of the trailer shall not exceed 22 feet. The widt}� shall not exceed eight feet.
Resolution No. 95-1525
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 94-530
Good�vill Industries
August 1, 1995
Page Tliree
Planning Depai�tnient Conditions
6. Developcnent shall conform with the GC zoning requirements, unless otherwise approved.
7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter 9-13 and will
be reviewed on an annual basis for on and off-site signs. '
Building �nd Fire Departmeut Conditions
8. There shall be no outside storage of materials.
�
10.
11.
Fire extinguishers shall be provided to Fire Department specifications (minimum
2A lOBC).
T}ie trailer shall be licensed and mobile.
No services or utilities sl�all be connected to the trailer.
Police Depat-tmeiit Conditioiis
12. The trailer sl�all close no later than dusk as determined by tl�e Police Chief or his
designated representative.
On motion of Commissior�er Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and on the following
roll call vote, to wit: �
AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Soto, Carr, Lubin and Keen
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Deviny and Beck
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this lst day of August, 1995.
ATTEST:
�
Nancy�o , Commi� on ��� JQ � een, Ch ' erson
v
PPROV�D AS TO CONTENT:
r�u� �a - IC�
Doreen L erto-Blanck, Planning Director
�
�