PC R 95-1504RESOLUT'ION NO. 95-1504
A RI;SOLUTION OT' TI1L PLANNING COMMISSION O� TIIE
CI'I'Y Or ARROYO GRANUE R�COMMENDING TIIAT TIIE
C�TY COUNCIL RCPCAi,'T[lE �:XISTING'TITLI; G, CIIAP'I'�R
5 OF T[IE MUNICIPAL CODE I:NTITLED "IIOUSE TRAILT'RS"
IN 1TS �N't'1R�TY AND AUOP'I' A NEW TITLE 6 CIIAPTI;R 5,
ENTITLED "I2CCR�ATIONAL V�IIICLES"
I �_
WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered amending Title 6, Chapter 5 of lhe
Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande; and
WIIERCAS, the City of Arroyo Grande has found that it is necessary and cJesirable to regulate
the use, parking and storage of recceational vehicles; and •
WII�RrAS, duly noticed public hearings were held on the proposed amendment on May 17,
1994 and April 18, 1995 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard;
and
�Vt1CREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information and public
testi►nony presented at the public hearings and in the proposed documents and staff reports; and
WIIEREAS, the proposed amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CGQI\), per Section 1 15061 of the CLQA Guidelines; and
WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation, and public hearing
that the following circumstances exist:
1. The proposed amendment is necessary and desirable to conform with the provisions of State
Law.
2. The proposed amendment is necessary and desirable to protect the public health, safety and
welfare, through the regulation of the use, parking and storage of recreational vehicles.
3. The proposed amendment is necessary and desirable to protect property values and investments.
NOW, T(IrRI:I�ORE, (3I; IT RisSOLVf:D by the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo
Grande to reco►nmencl to the City Council, repeal of the existing Title 6, Chapter 5 of the Municipal
Code, entitled "House Trailers" and adoption of a new Title 6, Chapter 5 entitled "Recreational
Vehicles", with the following condition:
l. Section 6-5.08 item (c) sl�all be deleted.
2. Modifications of Section 6-5.03 (a) and (b) to indicate a 5 foot setback only.
3. Section 6-5.05 sliall be mociified to add screening as a potential condition of approval and
eliminate it in finding number (2).
On motion by Commissioner Deviny, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and on the following roll call
vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners
NOIs'S: None
Ai�SENT: Commissioners
Tappan, Carr, Deviny, Beck and Chairperson Keen
Soto and Hatcl�ett
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of April, 1995.
ATTES'I':
\� %
Nancy Brown 'ommission Clerk
m �' i�
Johi een, Chair r on