PC R 94-1466RTSOLUTION NO. 94-146G
A RFSOLUTION OF TI�IE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TI-IE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING AMEI�IDED
TCNTATIVE PARCCL MAP CAS� NO. 92-507, LOCAT�D
AT 1101 IiUASNA ROAll, APPLIED FOR BY BOB BOW�N;
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND
INSTRUCTING T'HE S�CRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF
llETERMINATION .
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered
Amended Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 92-507 in accordance with the Development Code of
the City of Arroyo Grande; and
W�iEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent witli tl�e
General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project under the provisions
of the California Environmental Q�ality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
l. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map, design and improvements of this subdivision are
consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, plans, programs, intent, and requirements
of the General Plan map and text and the requirements of t}�e Development Code. The
General Plan designation is Residential Suburban with a maximum density of 2.5
dwelling units per acre, and the applicants are proposing a density of 1.25 units per
acres, and the lot areas, widths, and depths meet the requirements of the Development
Code.
2. This site as shown on the tentative parcel map, is pl�ysically suitable for the proposed
type and density of development because all necessary easements, parking, drainage
facilities, and setbacks can be provided.
3. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map or the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including t"ish,
wildlife or their habitat provided the mitigation measures adopted as conditions of
approval are implemented. Furthermore, payment of the new traffic mitigation fee (as
opposed to paying the old fee) will adequately mitigate project impacts on City
transportation facilities.
4. The proposed design of t}�e subdivision or proposed improvements are not likely to cause
public health problems.
5. The design of t}ie Tentative Parcel Map or tl�e type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property �
within the proposed Tentative Parcel Map or tl�at alternate easements for access or for
use will be provided, and that these alternative easernents will be substantially equivalent
to ones previously acquired by the public.
�
Resolution No. 94-1466
Amended Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 92-507
Bob Bowen
April 5, 1994
Page Two
6. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer
system will not result in violation of existing requirements a prescribed in Division 7
(commencing with Section 13000) of the California Water Code.
7. Adequate public services and facilities exist or will be provided as the result of the
proposeci Amended Tentative Parcel map.
Department of Fish a��d Ga�ne Required Findings
1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of
the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act for Amended Parcel Map
Case No. 92-507.
2. Based on the initial study, a negative declaration was prepared for review by the public
an review and approval by the Planning Commission.
3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering the
record as a whole, the Planning Commission adopted the negative declaration and found
that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually
or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a negative declaration with mitigation measures, instructs the
secretary to file a Notice of Determination and approves Amended Tentative Parcel Map Case
No. 92-507, subject to the above findings and the following conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL:
General Conditions
1. The applicant shall comply with all the conditions of approval of Tentative Parcel Map
Case No. 92-507 except as specifica(ly modified herein.
2. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers,
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding brought within the time period
provided for in Government Code Sec[ion 66499.37, against the City its agents, officers,
or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul the City's approval of this subdivision.
In order for this condition to be effective, the City must promptly notify subdivider of
any such claim, action or proceeding and must cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
3. A negative declaration has been prepared for this project. Mitigation measures are listed
as conditions of approval. Said mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions
of approval and shall be monitored by appropriate City departments and other responsible
agencies as indicated by the mitigation measures. The developer shall be responsible
for verification in writing by the monitoring department or agency that the
mitigation measures have been implemented.
Resolution No. 94-14G6
Amended Tentative Parcel Map C�se No. 92-5Q7
Bob Bowen
April 5, 1994
Page T'hree
4. This amended tentative map approval shall automatically expire on April 5, 1996 unless
the parcel map is recorded or an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9-02.140.C.
of the Development Code.
Mitigation Measures
5. (Condition of approval number 11 of Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 92-507 approved
on February 16, 1993 is deleted and replaced with tl�is condition.) Prior to recordation
of the final map, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney, whereby, the developer agrees, on behalf of himself and
his successors in interest, to pay the City a fee of Five Hundred, Thirty Eight Dollars
and Twenty Two Cents ($538.22) per residential unit, to be paid for each residential unit
prior to issuance of building permits or within five (5) years of recordation of the parcel
map, whichever comes first.
Fire Department Conditions
6. (Condition of approval number 27 of Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 92-507 approved
on February 16, 1993 is deleted and replaced with this condition.)
a. Prior to recordation to the parcel map, the applicant shall provide, to the
satisfaction of the Fire Chief, red curbing and, if required, no parking signs to
Police Department standards on the radius of the cul-de-sac.
b. If the� farthest wall of any structure exceeds 150 feet from the curb line, then
alternative means of fire protection must be implemented to the satisfaction of the
Fire Chief.
On motion by Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Deviny, and by ttie
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYFS: Commissioners Tappan, Soto, Deviny, Hatchett, and Chairman Carr
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Reilly, and Keen
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this Sth day of April, 1994.
ATTFST:
Nancy Brow , Commission Clerk
�
Robert W. Carr, Chairman