PC R 93-1437RTSOLU'I'ION NO. 93-1437
A RESOLUTION OF T'H� I'LANNING COMMISSION OT
TH� CITY OF ARROYO GRAND� APPROVING LO'I'
MCRGEIt CASC NO. 93-510, LOCATEll AT 1014 ASII
STRE�T, APPLIED FOR BY CI�ARLES 13LANK�N
WH�R�AS, lhe Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Lot
Merger Case No. 93-510 in accordance witl� tl�e Development Code of the City of Arroyo
Grande; and �
WHER�AS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the
General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewitli; and
WH�REAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project under the provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and found that the project is categorically
exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305(a); and
WH�REAS, tl�e Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
1. Merged lots comply to t}�e amount feasible with tf�e minimu►n lot size, lot widtt�, and lot
depth requirements of tlie SF zone.
2. Adequate access and placement of easements is provided.
NOW, THCRErORE, I3E IT R�SOLV�D that the Planning Commission of the City
of Arroyo Grande hereby approves Lot Merger Case No. 93-510, subject to the above findings
and tl�e following conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS TOR APPROVAL:
Gener:�l Coi�ditions
l. Tl�e applicant sliall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements
as are applicable to tfiis project.
2. Tliis application sl�all automatically expire on October 19, 1995 unless a Notice
of Merger is filed witl� the County Recorder. Thirty (30) days prior to the
expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1)
year frorn the original date of expiration.
3. Development sl�all occur in substantial conformance wilh ll�e plans presented to tl�e
Planning Commission at the meeting of October 19, 1993 and marked "Ex}�ibit A".
Resolution No. 93-1437
Lot Merger CASe No. 93-510
Charles Bl�nken
October 19, 1993
P�ge 1 wo
4. Tl�e subdivider sl�all defend, indemnify and l�old l�armless the City, its agents, off cers,
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding brought within the time period
providecl for in Government Code Section 66499.37, against tlie City, its agents, officers,
or employees, to attack, set aside, void, or annul the City's approval of this
subdivision. In order for this condition to be effective, tlie City tnust promptly
notify subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding and must cooperate
fully in the defense tl�ereof.
Public Works Department Couditious:
5. Prior to recordation of tlle lot merger, tl�e applicant sliall construct sidewalk, curb
and gutter improvements on the property frontages. ,
- a—Z�?eY�-z-eee�a�iet�—e€-E#e--leE--�e�ge�-�he-�pp��eat�E-s43t�-��s�at3 E—�e
�evelep�er��-�e-See�i�:9-SA� ar�de�grte�����Eies-Ee-t��e�Fepe��-et�d
e�er�g-�Me�e�e�E�tges:
1��1���'�<��::�'<>'�l �i :�i�r`'�<:::'�>� aiiiir.':z�s ��:i n'�`
.....................::: �'::.::::.:;:::.:�::.:.:::.8.:.::!�.::.:. :.;:>:::::>�'.>::.: r�
On motion by Commissioner Reilly, seconded by Commissioner Deviny, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYTS: Commissioners Reilly, Deviny, Keen and Chairman Carr
NOES: None
ABS�NT: Commissioners Tappan, Soto and Hatchett
the foregoing Resolution was adopted tl�is 1911� day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
Nancy Brown, ommission Clerk
Robert W. Carr, Ct�airman
0