PC R 92-1379�04
RESOLUTION tVO. 92-1379
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING
CONDITIUNAL USE PEI�IVIIT CASE NO. 92-503 TO
CHANGE THE USE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL
BUILDING, AT 145 BRIDGE STREET APPLIED TOR BY
RALPI3 AND J�AN �3USH; ADOPTING A NEGATIV�
DECLARATION AND INSTRUCTING THE SECl2ETARY
TO FILE A NOTIC� OF D�T�RMINATIUN.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered
Conditional LTse Permit Case No. 92-503, filed by Ralph and Jean Bush, to change the use of
an existing commercial building from a warehouse to retail commercial uses and storage; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on August 18, 1992 on
this application in accordance with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that a Negative Declaration
can be adopted, and instructs the Secretary to file a Notice of Determination; and
WHERFAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
Condition�tl Use Permit
1. The proposed use is permitted within the subject district pursuant to the
provisions of Section 9-03.050 and complies with all the applicable provisions of
this ordinance, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo grande General Plan, and
the development policies and standards of the city.
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in
which it is located because the proposed use is allowed in the Village Commercial
District.
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of proposed use because adequate
parking is provided.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure public health and safety.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public ]lealth, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity.
Department of Fish and Game Rec�uired Findings of Exemption
1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section
15063 of the Guidelines of the california Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 92-503.
2. Based on the initial study, a negative declaration was drafted for review by the
public and review and approval by the Planning Commission.
3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering
the record as a whole the Planning Commission adopted the negative declaration
and found that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife
depends as a result of development of this project.
Resolution No. 92-92-1379
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 92-503
R�lph and Jean Bush
August 18, 1992 � �
Page Two �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Arroyo Grande hereby approves said conditional use permit, subject to the above findings and
standard conditions of the City and those listed below:
General Conditions
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to
the Planning Commission at the meeting of August 18, 1992 and marked "Exhibit
A".
3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said
approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, �or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required
by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion,
parficipate at its own expense in the defense of any action but such participation
shall not relieve the applicant of his/her obligations under this condition.
4. All construction. shall utilize fixtures and designs which minimize water usage.
Such fixtures and designs shall include, but are not limited to, low flow shower
heads, water saving toilets, instant water heaters or hot water recirculating
systems, drip irrigation with drought tolerant landscaping and etcetera. All
fixtures and designs shall be installed prior to occupancy.
5. A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project.
The following mitigations shall be implemented as conditions of approval and
shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or other responsible
agency. The applicant sh�ll be responsible for verific�tion in writing by the
monitoring department or agency that the mitigation me�sures have been
implemented. �
Planning Depai�t.ment Conditions
6. Development shall conform with the VC-D-2.4 zoning requirements unless
otherwise approved.
7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 9-13 of the Development
Code.
8. Use of this building shall be limited to the existing office with the remainder of
the building being used for storage. Conversion of the entire structure to office
or retail uses shall require that an amended Conditional Use Permit application
to be filed.
Public Works Dep�rtment Conditions
9. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or a business license, the aPplicant
shall replace the southerly half of the southerly driveway for the project.
Fire Depai�tment Conditions
10. At such a time as a request is made for construction of any new structure within
20 feet of the proposed office and storage area, whether on the property or on an
adjacent property, the owner of the oftice and storage area shall be required to
reconstruct tile garage to meet fire separation requirements. Any exterior
modifications to the building shall be subject to architectural review pursuant to
the city codes in effect at that time.
2�5
206
Resolution No. 92-1379
Couditional Use Permit C�se No. 92-503
Ralpli and Jean Bush
August 18, 1992
P�ge Three
On motion of Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Souza, and on the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Souza, Moore and Acting Chairman Soto
NOES: None �
ABSENT: Commissioner Carr and Chairman Brandy
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of August, 1992.
ATT�ST:
�u � � "
�����
Mona L. Prelesnik, Commission Clerk
John �ot ctin hairman �