PC R 90-1317�I
RFSOLUTION N0. 903317
A RESOLUTION OF THE PI�I�IING C�MISSIpN OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO Gf2ANDC RDOQi�1�p)ING TO 17� CITY «XINCIL
R�O(�1TION OF aQNDITIC�L USE PII2MIT Q�SE NO. 89-453,
FOR LASP C�LAIVC� LIQUORS. I�OCATID ?1T 320 � BRJ�NQi
S17tEEP. C�TNID BY C�3A1tf�S DOSi�R AND ('AIZI.EM L�1N1)DCxC
Wf�S, the Planning Cormtission of the City of Arroyo Grande has
conducted the annual review of Conditional Use Permit Case No 89-453 as required
by the terms and condi,tions of saici permit; and
WF�, at said annual review, the Planning Crnmission deterniined that
the owners of Last Chance Liquors may have failed to ccxnply with the terrrB and
conditions of the project's approval and the Carmission, therefore, directed
staff to schedule a public hearing to consider revoking Conditional Use Pern�it
Case No. 89-453; and
�.5, the Planning Carmission of the City of Arroyo Grande has held
a public hearing on Condifiional Use Permit Case No 89-453 pursuant to Section 9-
4.3105 of the City of Arroyo• Grande Municipal Code to consider revoking
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 89-453; and
�3tFAS, the Planning Co�rmission finds, after due study, deliberation and
public hearing, the followi,ng circw�tances exist:
1• The owners of Last Chance Liquors, operating under Conditional Use
Permit Case No, 89-453 have violated condition of approval n�unber 9 of
.; the tern►� and conditions of the
�condition by installin si pe � t ' T�e owners violated this
9 gns without obtaining the requi.red pem►its.
2• The installation of signs without permits violates the Municipal Code
., and jeopardizes the general welfare and public interest of the camnuni.ty
(Muni.cipal Code Section 9
. 3 . Staff has repeatedly requested the owners to file a variance application
for the signs installed without permits, but the owners have refused to
file the required application. While there are no
variance' would be approved, the application would �rantees that the
Pl�ung Camiission ari opportunity to determine whether the necessary
findings could be made to allow the additional signs.
�� T�E, BE IT RFSOLVEp that the Planning Cam�issian of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby recomnend, to the City Council revocation of Conditional Use Perniit
89
on motion by Comnissioner Gallagher, seconded by Camussioner Souza, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
�: Comnissioners Moore, Gallagher, Brandy, Souza and Boggess
N�ES: Conmissioner Soto and (�airn�n Carr
��'I': None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of Deceiriber, 1990
ATTES`P ;
Mary Ellen L ' "'
eininger • Robert W. Carr
Pl�n9 Comnission C erk
Chairn►an