PC R 70-181 Z,.
.
R'ESOLUTION NO ]0-1a1 Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE ClTY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING 7j
COMM FSS I ON RECOMMENO I NG�. DEN IAL OF AN�. AMEtyDMENT T0 �
THE MUN I C 1 PAL COA� OF •THE C I TX OF ARROYO GRANDE` AS ,,,�J
PROV I D�D_ BY CHAPTfR•, 4: 20N'•{-NG,. ARTI.GL� 21, OF. SA I.D v �
CODE. .
WHEREASQ the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, Cali.forni;a has
held a public hearing on the application of Betty Prather to amend the
Code of the City of Arroyo Grande as provided by Chapter 4,. Article 21
c;i.pa:l
219
7�
said ��de�
to rezone a.11 that property described as follows from R-1 to R=G Distri'ct;,
PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 106 of the subdiv.isions of the Ran�cho Corral
de Piedra, Pismo and Bolsa de Chemisal, in the County of San Lui�s Obispo,
State of California, as per map :reco r.ded in Book A Page 65 of Ma�ps in the "
office of the county recorder of said county, and those portions of Lots 16
and 17 of the Folsom Tract, in the County of San Luis Obispo /State of
California, as per-map recorded in Book B Page 75 of Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder of said Courity, described as a whole as�follows:
Beginning at a stake set in the present North line of Grand,,.Avenue as the
same is.located, d.istant._thereon North 86 West, 348.,1 feet from stake
G,17 on the East line of- Lot 15 of said Folsom Tract, and�/being also the
southwest corner of a tract.of land'conveyed to W.illiam�Hock by deed re-
corded in book 45 page 34.of Official Records; thence�Nortfi :86 West
along the north lfne of Grand Avenue;. 336 feet; thence North 3 East
700 feet to the true point of beginning; thence conti uing North 3
East, 653.6 feet; thence South 86 East 336 feet o the northwest
corner of the land conveyed to William Hock as afor sa,id; thence South
`� West along the West line of the land descri� d in said deed,
='6�3.6 feet to the northeast corner of the land d scribed as Parcel 1
' i�i the deed to Walter L. McOsker et ux. recorde�August 8, 1950 in
Book 574 Page ll of Official Records;`thence Nprth 86 °45' West along
the north line of the-land described in said deed and.its westerly
proTongation, 336 feet to the trus point of �eginning.
WHEREAS. the Planning: Commission feels th �t the public interest and general
welfare does not requ-i=re such an am�ndment, �d
WHEREAS. the Commission report includ' g list of perso�s who testified at
the Public Hearing, surtmary of fact and indings and copies of any maps pertf-
nent to the proposal are attached and reby declared to be part of said -
Resolution. £:> �-_
NOW, TWEREFORE� BE�I:T RESOLVED hat said Planning Commission hereby recommends
deniat of the amendment as applie5l for.
On motion of Commissioner Bowl�es`, `ssconded by Commissioner St. Denis, and by �
the following roll call vote� o wit:
AYES: Commissioner Bowl`es, Nunes, St. Denis, Strother and Cha�rman
Moss
NOES: None
ABSENT: CommissLoners McMi.11en and Porter
The foregotng Resoluti�on was dopted this �lst day of December, 1970.
ATTEST:.- ` ., . .. _ �:: . . .. ' ' ..��--�-a-e�/ �j� �2 �--¢�-' -
� -��e ary a rman
REPORT 0 THE CITY COUNCtL
Subject: Pe tion to rezone ail that property as noted in Paragraph 1 above
f om R-1 to R-G District. �
Name of Applicant: Betty Prather
Public �iearings Held; 1
Numbe�of Persons appearing for 2 Against 8
Planning Commission Recommendatlon; Planning Connni'ssion recommends denial �y
a~ maJority vote,
�
+,}.:
,,-�
,'
22�2
RESOLUTION N0. 70-181 Z --
A RESOLUTI-0N OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF AN.AMENDMENT TO
THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS
PROVIDED BY CHAPTER_4 ZONING,. ARTICLE 21, OF SAID
CODE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, California has
held a public hearing on the application of Betty Prather to amend.the Municdpal
Code of the City of Arroyo Grande as provided by Chapter 4, Article 21 of said code,
to rezone all that property described as follows from R-1 to R-G District: '
PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 106 of the subdivisions of the Rancho Corral
de Piedra, Pismo and Bolsa de Chemisa.l, in the County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California,_as per map recorded in Book A Page 65 of Maps in the
office of the county recorder of said county, ar�d those portions of Lots 16
and 17 of the Folsom Tract, in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, as per map recorded in Book B Page 75 of Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder of said County,.described.as a whole as follows:
Beginning at a stake set in the present North line of Grand Avenue as tFie
same Is located, distant thereon North 86 °45' West, 348.1 feet f rom stake
G.17 on the East line of Lot 15 of said.Folsom Tract, and being also the
southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to William Hock by deed.re-
corded.in book 45 page 34 of Official Records; thence North 86 West along
... `:thenorth 1 ine of Grand Avenue; 336 feet; thence North 3 East 700;,.feet� to
the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 3 ° 15' East, 653 .6 feet;
thence South 86 East 336 feet to the northwest corner of the.land con-'
veyed to William Hock as aforesaid; thence South 3°15 West along the West
line of the land described in said deed 653 .6 feet to the northwest corner
of the land described as Parcel 1 in the deed to Walter L. McOsker et ux.
recorded�August 8, 1950 in Book 574 Page.11 of Official Records; th�ence
North 86 West along the north line of the land described in said deed-'`
and its westerly prolongation, 336 feet to the true point of beginning:'�
" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that the public Interest and general
welfare does not require such an amendment, and
�� WHEREAS, the Commission minutes including list of persons who testified at
_' the Public Hearing,. summary of fact and findings and copies of any maps pertinent
to the proposal are attached and hereby declared to be part of said Resolution.
NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Planning Commission hereby recommends
denial of the amendment as applied for, for the following.reasons; 1) Property
would be more advantageously developed as R-l:rather than multiple famiTy; and 2)
sufficient R�G zoning existing in the City.
On motion of Commissioner. Bowles, seconded by Commissioner St. Denis, and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Bowles, Nunes,.St. Uenis, Strother and Chairman Moss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Comm.issioners McMillen and Porter
The foregoin Resolution was adopted this .lst day of December, 1970.
� -
ATTE ST • ye �7� Li� ��j , ` �,—�.
� ecretary �a i rman '
REPORT.TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Pet.ition to rezone all that property as noted.in Paragraph 1 above from
R-1 to R-G District. � ,�..
Name of Applicant; Betty Prather
Public Hearings Held;, 1
Number of Persons appearing for 2. Against 8
Planning Commission Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends denial by
a majority vote.