HomeMy WebLinkAboutR 2026-028RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 25-004 FOR A
PROPOSED MURAL AT 227 EAST BRANCH STREET
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the proposed mural at 201
East Branch Street (the “Project”) at its meeting on December 15, 2025, and
recommended denial of the Project in accordance with the City’s Public Art Guidelines
and Public Art Donation Program (“Guidelines”); and
WHEREAS, the applicant for the proposed mural is Village Creative, which operates a s
a business that offers lessons in music, art, sewing, and photography; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2026, the City Council considered approval of Architectural
Review 25-005 at a duly noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Project and the applicable environmental
determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State
CEQA Guidelines, and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 for minor alteration s to existing structures; and
WHEREAS, all prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
that:
1. Recitals. All recitals above are true and correct and hereby incorporated into
reference.
2. CEQA. The proposed mural is categorically exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under the Class 1 exemption, which applies
to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor
alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical
features where the project involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former
use. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15301.) The City further finds that no exceptions
to the Class 1 exemption apply.
3. Architectural Review Findings:
1. The proposal is consistent with the architectural guidelines of the city, or
guidelines prepared for the area in which the project is located;
The proposal to paint a wall mural on a painted brick wall is consistent with all
applicable architectural guidelines for the project. Painted wall murals are
appropriate for this location due to the historical use of painted wall signs
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 2
directly onto brick buildings. The colors and the content of the mural are
consistent with all relevant guidelines, including the City’s Design Guidelines
and Standards for the Historic Character Overlay District (D-2.4).
2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande general
plan and this title;
The Project as proposed is consistent with the City’s General Plan, specifically
the Economic Development Element, which emphasizes the implementation of
public art.
3. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
project;
The Project will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the general public
due to being designed with materials that are intended for use on outdoor walls.
Further, the applicant will be required to implement appropriate safety
measures for pedestrians while the work is occurring , which will mitigate any
potential safety issues during installation.
4. The general appearance of the proposal is in keeping with the character of the
neighborhood;
The Project is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts to surrounding uses,
existing artwork, or design elements in the vicinity. The scale and composition
are compatible with the pedestrian-oriented character of the area, and the
subject matter is consistent with the broader visual context of the Village. The
mural is expected to contribute positively to the visual interest of the public
realm without overwhelming or detracting from adjacent development or design
features.
5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of
the city;
The approval of this artwork will not have any detrimental effect on the
harmonious development of the City due to being consistent with the adopted
guidelines for public art. Further, the installation of public art in the Village
supports the City’s Economic Development goals related to public realm
enhancements and placemaking.
6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the
neighborhood.
The Project will not impair the desirability of the neighborhood due to being
consistent with the adopted guidelines for public art. Further, the installation of
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 3
public art in an area designed for pedestrian activity increases the visual
intrigue and creates a sense of community that will promote further investment
in the neighborhood.
4. Public Art Selection Criteria Findings:
1. Evaluation of artistic excellence, examining:
a. The artist’s qualifications, including: education, training, experience,
body of work, recognition of the artist, and the consistency of the artist’s
qualifications with the stated goals of the project;
b. The artist’s record of previous collaboration with other agencies,
organizations, artists, fabricators, or installers to achieve a successful
result in implementing the proposed project;
c. The artist’s experience working in the public realm;
d. To the extent applicable, the artist’s previous proven successful
experience in creating, producing or otherwise implementing projects
similar to the one proposed;
e. The original nature of the proposed concept;
f. The inherent artistic quality and aesthetic merit of the work;
The submitted artwork was designed by Canned Pineapple Co., a studio based
in Nashville, Tennessee, that specializes in murals and large-scale artwork.
The artist has completed multiple installations within the Central Coast region,
including in public and high-visibility settings at Cal Poly and Duncan Alley. The
studio has an established portfolio of large-scale mural projects comparable in
scope and method to the proposed installation. Their previous work
demonstrates experience in designing, coordinating, and implementing public -
realm projects, including collaborations with property owners, agencies, and
installation teams. The submitted materials indicate a history of producing
original designs and concepts tailored to specific sites.
2. Appropriateness of scale, form, material, content and design relative to the
immediate neighborhood and environment; no mural shall be approved if the
mural, as proposed, would create an objective risk to public health, safety, or
welfare (e.g. a mural near a roadway would be rejected for the use of reflective
materials, like mirrors, which could cause a distraction to drivers). Scale is
defined as the relative size of a building element in relation to other forms and
the human body. Form is the shape or configuration of the artwork;
The mural would not create a risk to the health, safety, or welfare of the general
public. The mural does not include reflective or hazardous materials. In terms
of scale, the mural is proportionate to both the building façade and the
surrounding environment. The proposal is sized to be clearly visible and
engaging for both pedestrians and vehicles, including those idling at the
prominent intersection of E. Branch and Mason Streets. The dimensions are
appropriate for the viewing distance and speed of passersby, ensuring visibility
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 4
without overwhelming the architectural context. The content is community-
oriented, making it suitable for a public-facing location. The simplistic design is
legible and avoids creating visual clutter.
3. Appropriateness of proposed materials in regards to structural and surface
integrity. Materials should be considered in the context of ability to deter against
vandalism, withstand weathering, and maintain the intended design;
The mural is proposed to be hand-painted using durable exterior latex paint, a
material commonly used in public art installations due to its long -term
performance and relatively low maintenance needs.
4. Ease of maintenance and longevity of the proposed materials;
The artist and property owner proposed the use of durable exterior latex paint
based on the artist’s proven success with these materials in completing similar
projects. Exterior latex paint is suitable for outdoor murals due to its resistance
to weathering. Additionally, the selected materials can be easily cleaned,
touched up, or refreshed if needed.
5. Appropriateness of the proposed method of installation of the artwork with
consideration given to the safety and structural factors involved in installation;
The proposed use of paint on the painted-brick exterior of the building is
appropriate and would not negatively impact the structural integrity of the
building. Installation of the proposed mural would likely require a temporary
sidewalk closure and rerouting of pedestrians, which would be assessed
through an encroachment permit.
6. Location, considering the intended audience for the proposal, whether the
public will be a captive audience or whether a person would need to take
affirmative steps to view the project. Consideration shall be given to whether
the mural would be in an area typically accessed or viewable by minors;
The proposed location is situated at a highly visible intersection along Mason
Street at E. Branch Street, making it readily visible to both vehicular and
pedestrian traffic. The intended audience is members of the general public who
encounter the mural in the course of their daily activities, rather than individuals
who must take affirmative steps to seek it out. Given that the site is an area
commonly accessed by a broad cross-section of the community, including
minors, the content of the mural was intentionally designed to be appropriate
for all ages.
7. A mural shall not be approved if it includes:
a. Copyrighted work without permission of the holder of the copyright.
b. Obscene materials.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 5
c. Defamatory content.
d. Fighting words or advocates imminent lawless action.
e. Content, including but not limited to, words, symbols, signs, trademarks, or
references to products or services provided on the premises. Such content
meets the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code (AGMC) definition for signage, as
regulated by AGMC Chapter 16.60;
The mural does not include words, logos, symbols, or direct references to
products or services offered on the premises. While the imagery depicts
general creative activities such as music, visual art, and photography, these
themes are broadly interpretive and are not unique to the services offered by
the business. The intent and composition of the artwork are community -
oriented and symbolic in nature, and the imagery is not presented in a manner
that functions as advertising or signage, as defined by the Mu nicipal Code. The
mural is designed to be viewed as public art independent of the continued
presence of the business and is not dependent on the identification of any
specific service or program.
8. Public Art proposed in the D-2.4 Historic Character Overlay District is also
subject to the following criteria:
a. An identified relationship to the social, cultural and historical identity of the
area;
b. An identified relationship to the site's existing architectural features;
c. The nature of the site's surrounding neighborhood and potential impact of
the public art project on residents, businesses, and existing works of art or
design elements within the site's vicinity.
The proposed mural reflects themes of artistic expression, including music,
visual arts, and craftsmanship. These themes are consistent with the Village’s
identity as a pedestrian-oriented district with an established history of creative
and cultural activity. The artwork reinforces, rather than conflicts with, the
area’s cultural character by depicting community-based creative engagement.
The use of painted brick as a canvas is consistent with historic precedent for
painted wall graphics within commercial and mixed-use buildings in the area
and maintains the underlying architectural form and materials of the structure.
The mural is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts to surrounding uses,
existing artwork, or design elements in the vicinity. The scale, composition, and
subject matter are compatible with the pedestrian character of the area and are
expected to enhance visual interest within the public realm without introducing
visual clutter or inconsistency with nearby development.
5. Severability. If any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
resolution or the document in the record in support of this resolution is determined
by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, unconstitutional
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 6
or otherwise void, that determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining
sections, divisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases of this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves the project as described and shown in Exhibit “A” attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference with the above findings, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
On a motion by Council Member Maraviglia, seconded by Council Member Guthrie, and
by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES: Council Member Maraviglia, Guthrie, and Mayor Ray Russom
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members Loe, and Secrest
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 12th day of May 2026.
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MATTHEW DOWNING, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ISAAC ROSEN, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028
PAGE 7
VILLAGE CREATIVE
Exhibit A
VILLAGE CREATIVE
OPTION A
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, JESSICA MATSON, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached
Resolution No. 2026-028 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande on the 12th day of May, 2026.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 15th day
of May, 2026.
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK