The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 2013-06-11_09.b. ACUP - Telecommunications Site - AT&T MobilityX ' --`O INCORPORATED �2 V fT it JULY 10, 1911 rq <�FOR�`P MEMORANDUM • COUNCIL FROM: . - A COMMUNITY DIRECTOR =-KII.IKELLY HEFFERNON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CONSIDERATION OF ! ED CONDITIO MOBILITY NO. 13-002; LOCATION — 300 RESERVOIR ROAD; APPLICANT — 1` RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Permit telecommunication equipment located within an existing located at 300 Reservoir Road. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact is projected. I�T•�:(r7Z•1�P► I Locatio�• Council adopt the attached No. 13 -002 to update the 800 square foot lease area Item 9.b. - Page 1 r S ► . ACUP 11 MOBILITY JUNE 11, f PAGE 2 Project Description: The project site is located at 300 Reservoir Road within the Public Facility (PF) zoning district and is developed with a water tank (City Reservoir No. 1), the subject telecommunication facility and a newly constructed facility for Verizon Wireless. Surrounding the site is a Methodist Camp to the east, residential development to the north and west, and Valley View Academy School to the south. The City Council approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 05 -013 on September 12, 2006 authorizing Cingular Wireless to install telecommunication antennas on a thirty - five foot (35') tall monopine and nine (9) outdoor equipment cabinets (see Attachment 1 for Resolution No. 3952). AT &T Mobility has since taken ownership of this facility. AT &T Mobility proposes to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 05 -013 to update its telecommunication equipment on the monopine as follows: • Install six (6) new Long Term Evolution (LTE) panel antennas and twelve (12) new remote radio units (RRUs) on the existing monopine (the six existing panel antennas will remain; the new panels will be installed below the existing antennas). • Install one (1) new Argus LTE equipment cabinet and one (1) new LTE Purcell equipment cabinet on the existing concrete slab. • Install fiber transmission lines from the new equipment cabinets to the new panel antennas. • Proposed power will be provided from existing sources. The existing lease area is approximately 800 square feet in size and can accommodate the additional equipment. The future operation will, together with the existing base stations at the site, comply with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy. The branches of the existing monopine are in poor condition, do not adequately screen the antennas, and the color of the faux needles does not blend well with the surrounding pine trees. The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) considered this project on March 13, 2013. Draft conditions were provided to the applicant at the SAC meeting and updated afterwards to reflect comments. Below are the mitigation measures /conditions of approval addressing these issues: All existing branches shall be replaced with branches that extend past the antennas and with needle coloration that matches the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The project plans shall show a heavy branch count that adequately screens the antennas. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with simulated pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. • Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit pine needle and sock camouflage samples of the monopine to the Community Development Department for verification of accurate color. Plans for the existing monopine shall be submitted Item 9.b. - Page 2 CITY COUNCIL ACUP 13-002; AT&T MOBILITY JUNE 11, 2013 PAGE 3 with building plans for the proposed monopine to verify that adequate camouflage has occurred and the conditions are satisfied. ® All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be screened from public view. Any new equipment cabinets shall be gray in color to match the water tank. The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) considered the proposed project and recommended approval with the added condition to review the maintenance requirement in seven (7) years. Similar to the condition required for Verizon Wireless approved last year at the same location, the following condition has been added to the Resolution for this project: The applicant shall perform a 7 -year look back review to assess renovation needs of the monopine such as color restoration and branch repair. The review shall be submitted to the City to determine if restorative actions are necessary. The Planning Commission considered this project on May 21, 2013 and recommended approval as submitted. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: According to AT &T Mobility, the proposed project is an important addition to their central San Luis Obispo County network extension, and is specifically intended to further develop its overall plan for improved signal transmission coverage and capacity in the South County area. The improved facility will provide signal coverage for AT &T customers where weak coverage currently exists, off -load capacity coverage from other AT &T wireless facilities in the immediate region, and increase mobile telephone activities to the public. Specifically, the purpose of this facility is to provide linkage to existing AT &T facilities within the San Luis Obispo County network, allowing cell phone coverage along U.S. Highway 101 between West Branch Street and Brisco Road and to the surrounding residential neighborhood and Village Area. Currently, AT &T is experiencing mostly capacity issues within these areas. The proposed Long Term Evolution (LTE) equipment is now a standard for wireless communication of high -speed data for mobile phones, which helps to increase capacity and speed using a different radio interface. With these additional antennas, co- location with other telecommunication carriers is highly unlikely. The monopine would need to increase by twenty feet (20') or more for co- location. The attached color photosimulations show how the applicant intends to meet the mitigation measures listed above. The existing branches will be removed and replaced with a fuller branch structure. The monopine itself will not be replaced, and therefore the pole will remain in its present condition (painted brown). The additional branches will effectively conceal the pole and therefore reduce the visual concern for the existing monopine. Item 9.b. - Page 3 CITT 1 1 ACUP ' . i1 AT&T MOBILITY JUNE 11, 2013 PAGE ,' Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements: On November 27, 2001 the City Council adopted "Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Permit Submittal Requirements" (Attachment 2). Per these requirements, the applicant has submitted information regarding the technology, radio frequency exposure, collocation, visual impacts and site capacity of the proposed facility. The attached project plans and simulations provide the majority of this information. The radio frequency site compliance report is included as Attachment 3. . 0 The proposed update to the existing telecommunication facility will provide faster speed service for AT &T customers within our area. Implementation of the proposed conditions will significantly improve the overall appearance of the existing monopine. DISADVANTAGES: Staff has not identified any disadvantages associated with the recommended action. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, staff has conducted an Initial Study and prepared a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for ACUP 13 -002 (see Attachment 4). If the MND is not adopted, the proposed project cannot be approved at this time. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT: A notice of public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 300' of the project site and also published in the Tribune on Friday, May 31, 2013. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the proposed project. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for Council's consideration: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution approving ACUP 13 -002; 2. Do not adopt the attached Resolution; or 3. Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 3952 approving CUP 05 -013 2. Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Permit Submittal Requirements 3. Radio Frequency Site Compliance Report 4. Initial Study /Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Item 9.b. - Page 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 13-002, APPLIED FOR • AT l i RESERVOIR • WHEREAS, on September 12, 2006 the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande adopted Resolution No. 3952 to approve Conditional Use Permit 05 -013 for Cingular Wireless to install telecommunication antennas on a new thirty -five foot (35') tall monopine and nine (9) equipment cabinets at a site located at 300 Reservoir Road; and WHEREAS, Cingular Wireless is now known as AT &T Mobility; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2013 AT &T Mobility submitted an application to amend Conditional Use Permit 05 -013; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Committee considered this application on May 6, 2013 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on May 21, 2013 and adopted a Resolution recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Amended Conditional Use Permit 13 -002, filed by AT &T Mobility, to update its telecommunication equipment by installing six (6) new antennas below the existing antennas, twelve (12) new remote radio units (RRUs), and two (2) new equipment cabinets within the 800 square foot designated lease area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in accordance with City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration can be adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within the subject district pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.16.050 of the Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Item 9.b. - Page 5 IMN101 lyt cork rk [0 Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. In addition, the facility will operate in full compliance with all state and federal regulations including the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located. Updating the facility with new technology will not result in any material changes to the character of the immediate neighborhood or local community. 3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is proposed. The facility is not located within a predominantly residential neighborhood, and the stealth design of the structure will camouflage the antennas. 4. There are adequate provisions for public utilities and services to ensure the public health and safety. 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity. The telecommunication facility will be unstaffed, have no impact on circulation systems, and will generate no noise, odor, smoke or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves Amended Conditional Use Permit 13 -002, with the above findings and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 11th day of June 2013. Item 9.b. - Page 6 i ME 0 IT, Ul i 71--TCT: r. TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Item 9.b. - Page 7 • • • PAGE 4 - CONDITIONS OF .. • AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11 AT&T MOBILITY 300 RESERVOIR ROAD DIVISION PLANNING GENERAL CONDITIONS This approval amends Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 05 -013 to install six (6) additional antennas and twelve (12) remote radio units (RRUs) on an existing monopine and related ground equipment within an 800 square foot lease area. The property is currently developed as a public facility to store water (Reservoir No. 1) and is owned by the City. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. All conditions of approval for CUP No. 05 -013, as amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect as indicated in City Council Resolution No. 3952 approved September 12, 2006. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval and mitigation measures for Amended Conditional use Permit No. 13 -002. 4. This application shall automatically expire on 5/21/15, unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 5. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council at the meeting of 6/11/13 and marked Exhibits "B -1 through B -10 ". 6. The applicant shall agree to defend at his /her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his /her obligations under this condition. Item 9.b. - Page 8 - 7. Development shall conform to the Public Facility (PF) zoning requirements except as otherwise approved. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 8. The applicant shall perform a 7 -year look back review to assess renovation needs of the monopine such as color restoration and branch repair. The review shall be submitted to the City to determine if restorative actions are necessary. BUILDING DIVISION 9. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of all California Building and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. 10. Any review costs generated by outside consultants shall be paid by the applicant. 11. Building Permit fees shall be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 12. Building permit shall be obtained prior to installation. GENERAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 13. Site Maintenance - The developer shall be responsible during construction for cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the project site. The flushing of dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's work or as directed by the Director of Maintenance Services. 14. Zero Conflict with City's Communication - Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall perform a radio frequency study to determine possible conflicts with the City's communication system, and to develop alternatives to eliminate any such conflicts. Prior to activation of the AT &T Mobility system, the applicant shall perform a live radio test to ensure that there is no unanticipated interference with the City's radio system. If the proposed system does interfere with the operation of the City's communication system, the proposed system shall remain inactive until such time that the proposed system can be made to cause zero interference. Item 9.b. - Page 9 ;- MAW 2 a M MITIGATION MEASURES A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency. The applicant shall be responsible for verification in writing by the monitoring department or agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented. MM 1.1: Prior to issuance of building permit, all existing branches of the monopine shall be replaced with branches that extend past the antennas, and with needle coloration that matches the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The project plans shall show a heavy branch count that adequately screens the antennas. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with simulated pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. MM 1.2: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit pine needle and sock camouflage samples of the monopine to the Community Development Department for verification of accurate color. Plans for the existing monopine shall be submitted with building plans for the proposed monopine to verify that adequate camouflage has occurred and the mitigation is satisfied. M 1.3: Prior to issuance of building permit, all accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be screened from public view. Any new equipment cabinets shall be gray in color to match the water tank. MM 12.1: Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. There shall be no construction activities on Saturdays or Sundays. Equipment maintenance and servicing shall be confined to the same hours. Item 9.b. - Page 10 I DIRECTIONS FROM 12800 PARK PLAZA DRIVE, CERRITOS, CA: I • TAKE CA-21 W2.1 MI • TAKE EXIT 170 TO MERGE ONTO ILLS N 4314 • TAKE EXIT II TO MERGE ONTO IS WSANTA AN4 FWY TOWARD LOS ANGELES 93 W • SUGHT LEFT ONTO U6.101 N 135N • SUGHT FIGHT TO STAY ON US-401 N(SIGNS FOR VENTURA FWYNEWWRA) 20A MI • SLIGHT LEFT TO STAY ON U6401 N SBJ5N • TAKE EXIT 1018 FOR STATE STREET TOWARD CAUFOMA 154CACHUMA LAKE 02 MI • MERGE ONTO CAU.E REAL 03W • TURN RIGHT ONTO CA-154 W1CALIFORMA STATE ROUTE 1SUSAN MARCOS PASS RD 525 W • TURN RIGHT TO MERGE ONTO US-101 NQ2MI TAKE EXIT 187A FOR CA-2271GRANDAVE 0.1 M1 • TURN RIGHT ONTO CA -227 ME GRAND AVE 266 FT • TAKE THE IST LEFT ONTO W BRANCH ST02W • TURN RIGHT ONTO RESERVOIR ACCESS ROAD, JUST PAST VERNON STREET I DRIVING DIRECTIONS I DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24-X30•. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALLIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHTECT IN WADING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR MATERIAL ORDERS OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES THE PROJECT INVOLVES INSTALLATION OR • (6) EXISTING SI•HT. GSM/ UMTS PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING TREE POLE TO REMAIN. • IS) NEW LTE 55,42• HT. PANEL ANTENNAS, (12) NEW RRU UNITS L (2) NEW SURGE SUPPRESSORS ON EXISTING TREE POLE • (1) NEW ARGUS LTE EQUIPMENT CABINET AND(1)NEW LTE PURCELL CABINET ON EXISTING CONCRETE SUB. • FIBER TRANSMISSION LINES FROM NEW EQUIPMENT CASINETSTO NEW PANEL ANTENNAS. • POWER TO BE PROVIDED FROM EXISTING SOURCES. I PROJECT DESCRIPTION I APPLICANT/LESSEE ATLTMOBILITY 12800 PARK PLAZA DRIVE CERRITOS, CA 80703 LEASING MANAGER JOHN MERRITT - WF7 PHONE: IBM) 8580753 EMAIL JOHNMMPJTTQWFlNET.COM ZONING MANAGER TRICIAKNIGHT WA PHONE (8M) 4464221 EMMUTRICIA. WIGHTQWFINELCOM KERHYORK WFl PHONE (850) 5017757 EMML-KETMYORKOWF1NETLOM PROPERTY INFORMATION OWNER: CITY OF AflROYO GRANDE ADDRESS: 214 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE, CA B3421 CONTACT: WKE LYNN PHONE: (805) 473444D AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: NA OCCUPANCY TYPE 5-2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPEVB CURRENTZONING: CITY LAT. 35.12511'N LONG: •12058511•W A.PA.: DD7 -011-005, 007 -011 -M SITE ID GASPER: 3551316123 FACODE- 10103M ACCESSIBILITY FACILITY IS UMMANNEDAND NOT FOR HUMAN REQUIREMENTS: HABITATION, DISABLED ACCESS NOTREQUIRED I N ACCORDANCE WITH C,AUFORNA. CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 24, PART2, VOL 1, CHAPTER 118, SECTION 1103B, EXCEPTION 7. PROJECT DATA ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. • 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING GODS, TITLE 24 PART2 • 2010 CAUFORMA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TITLE 24 PART • MID CAUFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, TITLE 24 PARTS • 2010 CALL FORNIAMECHANICAL CODE, TITLE 24 PART4 • 2010CAUFORMAPWMBING CODE, TITLE 24 PARTS • 2010 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, ¶TLE24PARTS • 2010 CAUFORNIA FIRE CODE,TTLE 24 PARTS • ANSVRA -2226 • 2012 NFPA 101, UFE SAFETY CODE • 201DNFPA 72, NATIONAL FIRE ALARM CODE • 201ONFPAI3,SPIUNKLERCOOE • CITY /COUNTY ORDINANCES ARCHITECT JAMES VACCARO ARCHITECT, INC. 201 MANGELS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 04131 CONTACT. JAMES VACCARO, ALA CONTACT NUMBER: (415) SO W 670 FAX NUMBER; (415) 6034471 EMAIL' JVAC06ROQNARCHITECT COM SURVEYOR SMITHCO SURVEYING ENGINEERING PA. BOX 5IBM BAKERSFIELD, CA 83580 CONTACT GREG SMITH CONTACT NUMBER: (681) 5811217 FAX NUMBER. (fief) 5831218 PROJECTTEAM TITLE SIGNATURE ZONING LEASWG CONSTRUCTION WFl RF ENGINEER LANDLORD ATBTPMAPPROVAL ATBTRFAPPROVAL ATATCMAPPROVAL SIGNATURE BLOCK -. JAMESVACCARO g,TV. JVA ARCHITECT.INC. 415.0 &70 phone 1415.962M71 I= Wo6lvachllecl.com1vi ivacNlccl.co0 CLIENT - WWR WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. ss15eRxolwlcwcM OIIUA0,4m0]p mobility IDoOPARXPLW a1m CDiRROS,- W 1Z W O p \ N V � r p2 r 01 J z ul o U oo�; � Z O cr) �(o T w, oW n ofO �o Z 0.Q 2 roPf6XJif: m iu5sv�iAO•AOelrctoc TITLE SHEET Item 9.b. - Page -I! ® ANGLE AT COND CONDENSER FlN FINISH MDD MODULAR RE61L RESIDENT V.B. VALVE BOX I BY GO I'D CONN CONDITION CONNECT FlXT FIXTURE MSB MAINSWITCHBOARD RET RETURN VAF. VERIFYINFlELD ( CENTERUNE CONST CONSTRUCTION FLASH FLEX FLASHING FLEXIBLE MID MOUNTED REV REVISION V.T.R. VENT THROUGH ROOF ' DEGREE CONT CONTUous FLG FLOORING MTG MTG.HT. MOUNTING MOUNTING HEIGHT RFO RGTR ROOFING REGISTER VAR VENT VARIABLE 0 DIAMETER CONTH CONTRACT FLR FLOOR MTL METAL RM ROOM VERT VEMILATE VERTICAL • EQUAL CONTR CONTRACTOR FLOUR FLOURESCENT MUL MULLION RR RAILROAD VEST VESTIBULE (E) EXISTNG CDR CORRIDOR FPRF FIREPROOFQNG) MULT MULTIPLE RRU REMOTE RADIO UNIT VIN VINYL ' FEET INCH(ES) CORR CPG CORRUGATED COPING FR FRAME MUT MUNTIN b SINK VOL VOLUME 9 NUMBER CPR COPPER FT FIG FEET FOOTING N N.C. NORTH S SOUTH W WEST I PER CPT CARPET FUR FURRED NJ.C. NONCORROSIVE NOT IN CONTRACT S.A.D. SEE ARCHITECTURAL W WIDE a PERCENT CR CRUSHED FURN FURNACE NS. NONSUP S.B. DRAWINGS SPLASH BLOCK W. CAB. WALL CABINET t PLATE CSG CASING FUT FUTURE Nil. NOTTObCALE S.C. SOUDCORE W. GL WIRE GLASS 3 PLUS /MINUS CSK COUNTERSINK G.S. GRABBAR NFPA NATONALFIRE S.D. STORM DRAIN W.G. WF WATER CLOSET AB. ANCHOR BOLT CSMT CASEMENT G.C. GENERALCONTRACTOR PROTECTIONASSOCIATION S.F. SQUARE FOOT WN. WADE FLANGE WALL HYDRANT ACOUST Al ACOUSTICAL ARCHITECT LTG COATING G.F. GRANULAR FILL NO NUMBER S.F. STOREFRONT W.N. WATER HEATER ALT. /ENGINEER CTR CENTER GJ. GALVANIZED IRON NOM NOMINAL S.G. SEMIGLOSS WL WATER LANE ASSOC. ALTERNATE ASSOCIATION CU_ CY CUBIC GR GUARDRAIL NORM NORMAL S.G.D. SLIDING GLASS DOOR WR WATER - RESISTANT ABBY. ASSEMBLY D.C.A. CUBIC YARD(S) DRAINAGE G.S. GALVANIZEDSTEEL NRC NOISE REDUCTION 6N. SHOWER HEAD W.S. WEATHERSTRIPPING AUTO AUTOMATIC D.F. CONDUCTOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN G.W.B. GA GYPSUM WALLBOARD COEFFICIENT S.Y. SQUAREYARD W.T.W. WALITOWALL AVER AVERAGE OF DOUGLAS FIR GAGE D.T00. OUT TO OUT 6 SCALE WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE D.H. DOUBLE HUNG GA GAL GAUGE GALLON O.C. ON CENTER($) Sc CH SCHEDULE WWM WELDED WARE MESH SA BOTHFACES D.L DEAD LOAD GALV GALVANIZED O.D. OF.CI. OUTSIDE DIAMETER OWNER FURNISH, SEAL SECT SEALANT SECTION W/ WITH B.M. BENCHMARK D.O. DOOR OPENING GO GUARD CONTRACTOR INSTALLED SEP 6EPERATION LAID WD WITHOUT WOOD - B.O. BOTTOM OF D.SP, DRY STANDPIPE GEN GENERAL OFD1. OWNER FURNISH, SERV SERVICE WHSE WAREHOUSE B. O. BY OTHERS D.W. DRYWALL GSM GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR OWNER INSTALL SF.GL SAFETY GLASS WNDW WINDOW B.P. B.U. RASE PLATE BUILTJJP DSL DOUBLE' MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS OF.S. OUTSIDE FACE OFSTUD SH SHELF WP WATERPROOF B.U.R. BUILTJJP DEG DEGREE HOG HOT DIPPED Of OVER 6H7 SHEET WSCT WAINSCOT ROOFING DEMO DEMOLITION GALVANIZED 02 OXYGEN SHTHG SHEATHING WT WEIGHT B.W. BATT BOTH WAYS BATTERY DEPT DEPARTMENT HEX HEXAGONAL OA OVERALL SHAIR SHOWER X BY(ASIS awe) 8B BASEBOARD DET CIA DETAIL DIAMETER HOSP HOSPITAL OBS OBSOLETE SIM SIMILAR Y.P. YIELD POINT BD BOARD DIAG DIAGONAL HT HEIGHT OFF OFFICE SKL SKYLIGHT Y.S. YIELD STRENOTH BORM BEDROOM DIM DIMENSIONS) HTG HVAC HEATING HEATING,VENTIATION OH OPNG OVERHEAD OPENING 6L SOF SLAB SOFFIT YD YARD BEL BELOW Cap DISPENSER ANDAIRCONDITIOMNG OPP OPPOSITE SPC SPACER BET BETWEEN DIST DISTANCE HVY HEAVE OPPH OPPOSITE HAND SPCG SPACING BEV BEVELED DISTR DISTRIBUTED HWY HIGHWAY ORIG ORIGINAL SPEC SPECIFICATION BEY BEYOND DIV DIVIDER UJ. INSIDE DIAMETER ORN ORNAMENT. SPECS SPECIFICATIONS SITUM BITUMINOUS DN DOWN IMPR IMPREGNATE OVHG OVERHANG SPKR SPEAKER BLDG BUILDING DOC DOCUMENTS IN INCHES) OWN. OWNER FURNISHED SO SQUARE BLK BLOCK DP DAMPPROOflNG INLAND INCANDESCENT FURN. SQ. IN. SOUAREINCH BLKG BLOCKING DR DOOR INCL INCLUDE P PAGE SS STAINLESS STEEL BLVD BOULEVARD DS DOWNSPOUT INFO INFORMATION P.B. PANIC BAR ST STREET 8M BEAM DW DISHWASHER INSL INSULATION P.CP. PORTLANDCEMENT STAG STAGGERED B BOTTOM DWG DRAWING INST INSTALL PLASTER STC SOUND TRANSMISSION ERG BEARING E' EAST TNT INTERIOR PL PROPERTY UNE CUSS BRK BRICK ETOE END TO END INTERM INTERMEDIATE P,LAW PLASTIC LAMINATED STD STANDARD BRKT BRACKET EJ6. EXPANSION BOLT INV INVERT PT PRESSURE TREATED STIFF STIFFENER 05MT BASEMENT E.C. ELECTRICAL CONOUIT ISOL ISOLATE PAR PARALLEL STIR STIRRUP BTH BATHROOM E.C. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR J.B. JUNCTION BOX PART. 80. PARTICLEBOARD STL STEEL BTN BATTEN E.F. EACH FACE JAN JANITORS CLOSET PCP POUND PER CUBIC STOR STORAGE SUL BEVEL EGR EMERGENCYGENERATOR JCT JUNCTION FOOT STR STRUCTURAL C CHANNEL RECEPTACLE JNT JOINT PFD PEDESTAL SUB SUBSTITUTE C COURSE E.J. EXPANSIONJOINT JET JOIST PERF PERFORATED SUP SUPPLY C' TO C, CENTER TO CENTER EC. ELECTRICALPANEL K KIP(1,DOO USE) PERM PERMANENT SUP SUPPORT CJL CATCH BASIN EW. EACH WAY K. PL KICK PLATE PERP PERPENDICULAR SUPP SUPPLEMENT C.F.C4 CONTRACTOR FURNISW EA EACH K.D. KNOCKDOWN PH PHASE SUR SURFACE CONTRACTOR INSTALL SIPS EXTERIOR INSULATION KO. KNOCKOUT PKWY PARKWAY SUSP SUSPENDED C.G. CORNER GUARD ANO FINISH SYSTEM KIT KITCHEN PL PLATE 6USP. SUSPENDED CEILING C.I. CASTIRON EL ELEVATION KW KILOWATT PUS PLASTER CLG. C.I.P. CAST IRON PIPE EUST ELASTOMERIC L LENGTH PUT PLATFORM SW SNATCH CJ. CONSTRUCTION JOINT SUB ELBOW L LONG PLP PLATFORM SWBO SWITCHBOARD CJ. CONTROLJOINT ELEC ELECTRICAL LB. LAG BOLT PLYWD PLYWOOD 6YM SYMMETRICAL CL CENTERUNE ELEV ELEVATOR LF. LINEAR FOOT PNL PANEL SYS SYSTEM 01,F. CHAINUNKFENCE EMER EMERGENCY L.G. LEAD GLASS PM PAINT T TREAD CAP. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE EN ENCLOSURE LH. LEFT HAND PORT PORTABLE Tab TOP AND BOTTOM C.O. CLEAN OUT ENGR ENGINEER LL UVELOAD FPO POWERPROTECTION TLG TONGUEANDGROOVE C.R. COLD ROLLED ENT ENTRANCE L1.H. LONG LEG CABINET T.Y. TOWEL BAR C.R.S. COLD ROLLED STEEL SO ED UAL HORIZONTAL PREFAB PREFABRICATED T.G. TEMPERED GLASS C.T. CERAMICTILE EQUIP EQUIPMENT LLV. LONG LEG VERTICAL PREFIN PREFINISHED T.O. TOP OF C.W. COLD WATER EST ESTIMATE LP, LOWPOINT PREP PREPARATION T.O.C. TOP OF CURB C.W. CONCRETE WALK EXC EXCAVATE LRM. LIVING ROOM PROJ PROJECT T.OJA. TOP OF MASONRY CID CASED OPENING EXH EXHAUST LW.C. UGHTWEIGHT PROP PROPERTY' T.O.W. TOPOFWALL CAB CABINET EXIST EXISTING CONCRETE PEP POUNDS PER SQUARE T.P. TOPOFPAVEMENT CALK CAULK EXP EXPANSION LAD UDDER FOOT T6 TUBE MEL CEM CEMENT EXPD EXPOSED UM LAMINATE PSI POUNO SPER SQUARE TECH TECHNICAL CEM CEMENTTIOUS EXT EXTENSION UV LAVATORY INCH TELCO TELEPHONECOMPA NY CEM. EXT EXTERIOR LB POUND PT PART TEMP TEMPERATURE PUS CEMENT PLASTER EZSFO BATTERY CABINET LOC LOCATION PT POINT TEMP TEMPORARY CER CERAMIC F FACE LT LIGHT PTO PAINTED TERM TERMINATE CIR CIRCLE F. HYD. FIRE HYDRANT LTE LONGTERM EVOLUTION PVC PDLYVINYLCHLDRIDE TERR TERRACE CIR CIRCUMFERENCE F.TDF. FACE TO FACE LVR LOUVER PVMT PAVEMENT THO THREAD CLOL CLEARGLASS FA FIRE ALARM M THOUSAND PWR POWER THK THCK CL F.B. FLAT BAR M.B. MACHINE BOLT QTY QUANTI TY THR 7HRESHOLD W.GL CLEARW IREGLASS F A FLOOR DRAIN M.C. MECHANICAL R RADIUS THRU THROUGH CLG CEILING F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR RO. RETURN AIR TLT TOILET CLKG CAULKING CONNECTION M.C. STRUCTURALSHAPE R.D. RUBBER BASE TMA TOWER MOUNTED AMPLIFIER OLD CLOSET F.E. FIREEXTNGUISHER M.E. MATCH EXISTING R.D. ROOF DRAIN TRANS TRANSFORMER CLR CLEAR F.EC. FIRE EXTINGUISHER MJL MANHOLE R.H. RIGHT HAND TSTAT THERMOSTAT CUR CLEARANCE CABINET M.L. METAL LATH RJIR RIGHT HAND REVERSE TYP. TYPICAL CUR IA CLASSROOM F.F. FINISH FLOOR MACH MACHNE R.O. ROUGH OPENING U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED CMU CONCRETE F.H. FIRE HOSE MAE MASONRY R.W.C. RAIN WATER LEADER OTHERWISE MASONRYUNIT F.H. FLATHEAD MAT MATERIAL RAD RADIUS U.OR UNLESS OTHERWISE cum COUNTER F.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINET MAX MAXIMUM RD ROAD NOTED CO COMPANY F.JT. FWSHJOINT MECH MECHANICAL RE REFER UC UNDERCUT CO2 CARBON DIOXIDE F.O. FACE OF MED MEDIUM RECOMM RECOMMENDATION UG UNDERGROUND COL COLUMN F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE MEMB MEMBRANE RECP RECEPTACLE UL UNDERWRITERS COMB COMBINATION F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH MEZZ MEZZANINE RECT RECTANGLE LABORATORIES COMP COMPUTER F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY MFR MANUFACTURER REF REFERENCE INCORPORATED COMPR COMPRESSED F.O.S. FACE OF STUDS MGR MANAGER REFG REFRIGERATOR ULT ULTIMATE COMPR COMPRESSOR FAB FABRICATE MIN MINIMUM REINF REINFORCEMENT UNITS UNIVERSALMOBILE COMPT COMPARTMENT Pan FIBERBDARD MIR MIRROR REPR REPAIR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM CON CONFERENCE FD FIRE DAMPER MISC MISCELLANEOUS REPRO REPRODUCE UNEX UNEXCAVATED CONC CONCRETE FON FOUNDATION MK MARK REQ REQUIRE UNF UNFINISHED ABBREVIATIONS ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCEIMTHTHE ' CURRENTEDITONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCALGOVERMNG AUTHORITIES. NOTHNG IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT 7 E- JAMES VACCARO JA CONFORMING TO THESE CODES, °' '-'��- ^• - ^- fJVA ARCHITECT, INC. • 2010 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE VE CODE, PART I,TN 24COR. • 2010CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE(CSC),PART2,TIDE24,C.CR. (2(108 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODEAND M10 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) • 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE(CEC), PARTS, TITLE 24 GCR 415.608.3670phone 14M.9a3 71 Tar InfoHIvolchllecl .comlWww.Naclillecl.car (2008 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND 2DIO CAUFORMAAMENOMENTS) QUERY---- • - -� -- • 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE(CMC), PART4' TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2008 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) • 2010CAUFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC). PARTS, 71TLE24 C.C.R. (2008 INTERNATIONALPLUMBING CODE AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) • 2010 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART B, TITLE 24COR WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. (2008 INTERNATIONALFIRE CODE AND 2010 CALIPORNIA AMENDMENTS) ut eEnNOUG1o1BgE m:ueaB,aemu • 2010 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART12, TM.E24 C.C.R. • TITLE 18 CDR, PUBUC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHALL REGULATIONS •+..ncy, L APPLICABLE CODES mobility ROOM -ROOM NAME DDD ROOM NUMBER i ) - EARTH - xem MAKPUSA anrvE I LEeBiT05,(A m]m /-� n11 L..-- DOORTAG _ ^• ' -_ ® CRUSHED STONE/ ��/�/ GRAVEL (1 }--- 14DOWTAG �/ W SAND 6ECTONNUMBEN CE z 6ECTIREFERE ON SHEETNUMBER 1 r, 1 CONCRETE O C4 �- W p cN ' //fix -�� DFTAILREFERENCE DETAIL NUMBER r M ('Yi Q `- ��/ SHEET NUMBER •O4 PRECA6TCONCRETE `-� �/ 0 r O Q Ly ELEVATION 0 O J z of LL (D REFERENCE ELEVATION NUMBER BRICK U Q 0 0 m X SHEET NUMBER >Z0 Q Q CONCRETE (J W D' X MASONRY UNIT w W p INTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCE _X O X SHEET NUMBER O ® DIM -, SIONALUUMBER (CONTINUOUS) r 0 0 0 Z ® O `-ELEVATION NUMBER > r Z of LL WOOD BLOCKING -- Q Q D--- WALLTAG (DISCONTINUOUS) EQUIPMENTTAG V / �,� //I FINISHED V4000 /� /'^- COWMNTAO PLYWOOD REVISION NUMBER GWUM REVISION CLOUD ® STEEL REV DATE ISSUE 4jQ,Q898 -SPOT ELEVATION BATTWSUUTION 1 12=2012 BOX ZONING 2 12/1¢11012 BOY ZONING REV. X GRID REFERENCE 3 1211 TR012 BSYZONING RIGIO INSULATION 4 1/07/2013 tOOYZOMNG MATCH LINE FoAW6PRAY �MATCHUNE ��"� INSULATION aNY86HC .uuuvAOUnaAnoancT.ur, ----VPr= BREAK UNE '•''- �•'•- •'T.:�GYP3UM WALLBOARp MEE E APPLICABLE CODES, 41,-PIPE BREAK MARK `.'_•'_.,•^�,' CEMENT PIASTER e ANDWIREMESH SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS -_ -Q CENTEtLWE f ,� GLASSIGUZING aBEEr AGUeEn . ^.��•• ....... ••....•...... —PROPERTY/ LEASE LINE SYMBOLS 2 Item 9.1b. - Paae �7 T 06 ? 0O; ANTENNA CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE O , 0 } O z o m 0 O JAMES VACCARO � T•r��;. n.es > �- (L ANTENNA SECTOR ARCHflECT, WC- JVA PUN AZIMUTH RAD CENTER `i i, Ae� TMA UNIT RRU UNIT MAIN CABLE FEEDER . NO. OF Q Q ANTENNAS LENGTH PUN '�"'� t COMMENTS ALPHA Al 115.606.3670 Phone141596144711- 120• 326' -V AL. ANDREWSBNWID6566C '� 121RRUS11 16 -412 FIBER RED Ini.dj— Kt..Lmmluww.NachOecLror Y. r 2 NEW LTE ANTENNA - ALPHA A2 1 130• "'' POWERWAVE P564 S- XLH4tR (2)KRY11276'1 WA -W � RED 2 EXISTINOOSMANTENNATO REMAIN ALPHA A3 1 130• itrr'A.G.L I 12)KRY1127d) WA 320• WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. - EXISTING UMTS ANTENNA RED 2 TO REMAIN ALPHA A4 1 120• 328 W' A.G.L ANDREW SBNH- 1066660 NIA 1214RU617 15.412 FIBER RED MY �: 2 NEWLTEANTENNA BETA 01 mobility 240• MV �Wdtab WI6t f �{1I .. IDA4�6 m(iW �nY' "a•..�.:te 2 �' �9'F°��'. 2 NEWLTEANTENNA ISOMETRIC FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION u GEM AT✓V A—Tv NJ�[Wsor 1 82 / 280' 3374'A.G.L POWERWAVE P6616XLH4tR WA 330' LOF6 BLUE AAT OdAuly .smm r 0% ZONING r AAmImAT 2 r,� 1211612012 00% ZONING REV. BETA B3 1 210• 331' -2 "A -- POWERWAVEP664641-HAR (2) KEY 1127Wi WA r r DN EMs y BLUE 2 ' BS %ZONING POWERWA VEPES- IS- XLH-RR DIMENSIONS 57' WDGH 12' DEPTH BETA 04 ELEVATION 240• W O N N 0FAONT ANDREW SBNH- 1116666C WA MtenaTipHelght Antenna Toe Heght EIEVATION BLUE POWERWAVE P65- 15-XLH"RR WEIGHT ISOMETRIC SIDE DIMENSIONS r. M i 6Lbr �+kj* 07 t 1DS565C 328 -0•A.GJ. ANDREW SBNH•iD0666G ANTENNA WEIGHT 40 2166. ANDREW SBNH- 16.412 FIBER 16u A -Wryyl'v - - GAMMA C2 86.42• 0' ±32-r A.G.L. HEIGHT WIDTH (2)KRY1127617 WA �— Q U LDFS 11A EXIS71NOOSMANTENNATO ANTENNA SPECS., DEPTH J Z 2� Uj O 7.1• 2 REMAIN ANDREW SBNH- U g Am. Nff -. 1D6565C WEIGHT ANTENNA C®NFIG. GAMMA C3 1 ANTENNA WEIGHT i3r- X' A.G.L Z O I BOAS LES. 330' LDF6 RFCHECKLIST 4441 4 EXISTING ANTENNASPECIFICATIONS SNTS 3 PROPOSED LTEANTENNASPECS. 6u:�` 1 ;,; co W � T 06 ? 0O; ANTENNA CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE O , 0 } O z o m 0 O > �- (L ANTENNA SECTOR MARK AZIMUTH RAD CENTER ANTENNA MAKEI MODEL TMA UNIT RRU UNIT MAIN CABLE FEEDER COLOR CODE NO. OF Q Q ANTENNAS LENGTH RUNS COMMENTS ALPHA Al 1 120• 326' -V AL. ANDREWSBNWID6566C NIA 121RRUS11 16 -412 FIBER RED 2 NEW LTE ANTENNA - ALPHA A2 1 130• 332' -r A.G.L. POWERWAVE P564 S- XLH4tR (2)KRY11276'1 WA -W LDFS RED 2 EXISTINOOSMANTENNATO REMAIN ALPHA A3 1 130• itrr'A.G.L POWERWAVEPIS- I6- XLH4tR 12)KRY1127d) WA 320• LDF5 - EXISTING UMTS ANTENNA RED 2 TO REMAIN ALPHA A4 1 120• 328 W' A.G.L ANDREW SBNH- 1066660 NIA 1214RU617 15.412 FIBER RED 2 NEWLTEANTENNA BETA 01 1 240• 328 -0 "AAl ANOREW.11- 4.66/60 WA (2)RRU611 16.412 FIBER BLUE 2 NEWLTEANTENNA REV DATE ISSUE BETA 82 1 280' 3374'A.G.L POWERWAVE P6616XLH4tR (2)KRY1127W1 WA 330' LOF6 BLUE EXISTING GSM ANTENNA TO 1 120=12 0% ZONING 2 REMAIN 2 1211612012 00% ZONING REV. BETA B3 1 210• 331' -2 "A -- POWERWAVEP664641-HAR (2) KEY 1127Wi WA 330' LDFS BLUE 2 3 EXISTING UNITS ANTENNA 4 TO REMAIN 12/1112012 BS %ZONING 1107(!013 100 %ZONNG BETA 04 1 240• 326'4 "A.13.1- ANDREW SBNH- 1116666C WA (21.RRUS11 16m411 FIBER BLUE 2 NEWLTEANTENNA GAMMA 07 t 0• 328 -0•A.GJ. ANDREW SBNH•iD0666G NlA (2)RRUSi1 16.412 FIBER GREEN 2 mPm Gm mu iwEavurw�onlcnr6a.a NEWLTEANTENNA 11�ErmrtE - GAMMA C2 1 0' ±32-r A.G.L. POWERWAVEP6646 -XLHRR (2)KRY1127617 WA 330' LDFS GREEN EXIS71NOOSMANTENNATO ANTENNA SPECS., 2 REMAIN ANTENNA C®NFIG. GAMMA C3 1 0' i3r- X' A.G.L POWERWAVEP6646XLHRR (21KRY1127W1 WA 330' LDF6 GREEN 2 EXISTING UMETSAW NNA TO R SCHEDULE GAMMA U 1 0' 328 4"A.G.L ANDREW SBNN -i 066666 NIA 121RRUei/ 16.412 FIBER GREEN 2 6NEET xuueEA NEW LTE ANTENNA NOTE: THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE MUSTSE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ORDERINGI INSTAWNG ANY EQUIPMENT.INFORMATIONSASEDON RFDS SHEETREVISIONV0I DATED 10060012. ANTENNA CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE 2 Item 9.1b. - Page 13 "l !rr r NOTES APN: 007- 011 -025 OWNER(S): SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS APN: 007-01 -003 OWNER(S): CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY AND A COMPILATION OF AVAILABLE RECORD AND MTE INFORMATION. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE; PROPERTY LINES ARE DERIVED PROM RECORD INFORMATION. THE INTENT OF THIS DRAWING IS FOR EXAMINATION ONLY. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EASEMENTS (IF ANY) THAT APPEAR ON THIS NAP HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED SOLELY ON INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE CONDITION OF TITLE REPORT BY. )DCCXXXX TITLE COMPANY. TITLE N0. )O=X. OAIM XXXX X, 2012. WITHIN SAID TITLE REPORT THERE ARE XXXK (XX) EXCEPTIONS LISTED. XXXK (XX) OF WHICH ARE EASEMENTS AND XXXX (XX) OF WHICH CAN NOT BE PLOTTED. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (IF ANY) THAT APPEAR ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY FIELD OBSERVATION. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTIUTIES IN THE AREA. ETHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER GOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES STATE THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD RATE MAP FOR COMMUNITY NO. 080.705, PANEL NO. 1602F. DATED AUGUST 28, 200A SHOWS THAT THE LOCATION OF THIS SITE FALLS WRHIN TONE X, WHICH IS VA AREAS OF 0.29 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD;., AREAS OF 15 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WM AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN i SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1S ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE LOCATION AS SHOWN WAS DETERMINED BY DIPS OBSERVATIONS. LAT. 55117'30.4' K HAD 83 LONG. 12034'59.2' W. NAD 85 ELEV. 294.7 NAVO 85 (BASIS OF ORAW7NG) 2-- hfwm -U- Rho- - - m--t- -r RRU-d. th- nquh--t- R-t froth N FAA dr 820.790 fro i -A y ( i 20' hw4nlelly -d d Y -11-11y). Th hark -n td d-Wm (cawdlnalR -) w- vpnu-d a d -grRU, mkt,, -d mm. d-, to th- nRa-t hundredth of o *.-L ThR -U-1 daWm (hdghb) on a- pr-u-d N tq.t and d- cImRIR th-naf -red - d.lRrmin-d m thR n mars -t 0.1 hot LEGEND - - - - - -- =wex -19[ - .• -••- OWAHFAD DIIIR IRIm Ma[Iltt I➢g (101 RODRO DATA) O p- r ,/ ,/, aauxo BAVATWN m¢ POD a IAVOY]R -W-. . V POD L�•Tf�� P- OF CpwDICDIrNT cR[2 Pw J� APR.' 007- 011 -003 O THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PMMppp� =p' oni d � VICINITY MAP N.LS. SITE SZ ARROYO GRANDE . APN.• 007 -011 -021 OWNER(S): CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ANNUAL CONFERENCE SITE MAP SCALE: AT&T AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES aa1 PARItP1AUINN2 G+- OC4RVm wireless tocifflies, Inc. weRrvun -N,w_a em tlW Y. sm 4 su&veYLFff'ry EERTNc N L , ,4 PfA WXRIL10A10!XRF�➢,GAOOM 111DNR:IMpN}I2V PAXIMII•W }TM- m�uwm xr�r°.0 o¢ rwPmr w,K rRnmmAUOPam Aw u,r wr Pc nwrATm. u o- oivanaD Xnxour >xc rwrm anima or TxE AAUgrmr/oiaWmVSUmnalc Kc A- nR PRayswua a s REVISION —� L- -MN I BY IlIIE 1 PROW. 88UE �L ti 1B 12 iE Piaurr°a ra awiu'.'�ii �z � PAOwncm -an row Ta use sr rxT o4Ra Axo PA rrTU+vA. no•AOOUCnox a - -Paean °ox MOM mro. T HIMPrf 1NE XRIf1O1 PDWISmx OF THE DRAWN BY: oL DATE ARAWm 12/18/12 5MDHC0 NOB 1; BD-020 SHE NAAHE —� VN=7 HWY 101 / oRAND SITE ADDRESS 3W FEEEMM ROAD ARROYO OAAIDE, CA 9AN L LIS 08BP0 coumY SHEET TITLE SILL SURVEY E ,.A —.T. a r SHEEP C -1 Item 9.b. - Page 14 irr O APN: 007- 011 -044 �`�— —_ SEE SITE PLAN OWNER(S): CITY OF ARROYO DArE ON SHEET C -2 GRANDE 11 voDE pp1 "p jD - \ D B 007 -182 -001 CITYGRANDE ARROYO APN: 007 -181 -002 7, OWNER(S): CITY OF APM• 007 -011 -023 /�:`�•' ARROYO GRANDE OWNERS: 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS e Yw -. 7 ay O�T ORIKWAY APN: 007- 189 -008 0WNER(S): CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE m �1 VICINITY MAP N.LS. SITE SZ ARROYO GRANDE . APN.• 007 -011 -021 OWNER(S): CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ANNUAL CONFERENCE SITE MAP SCALE: AT&T AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES aa1 PARItP1AUINN2 G+- OC4RVm wireless tocifflies, Inc. weRrvun -N,w_a em tlW Y. sm 4 su&veYLFff'ry EERTNc N L , ,4 PfA WXRIL10A10!XRF�➢,GAOOM 111DNR:IMpN}I2V PAXIMII•W }TM- m�uwm xr�r°.0 o¢ rwPmr w,K rRnmmAUOPam Aw u,r wr Pc nwrATm. u o- oivanaD Xnxour >xc rwrm anima or TxE AAUgrmr/oiaWmVSUmnalc Kc A- nR PRayswua a s REVISION —� L- -MN I BY IlIIE 1 PROW. 88UE �L ti 1B 12 iE Piaurr°a ra awiu'.'�ii �z � PAOwncm -an row Ta use sr rxT o4Ra Axo PA rrTU+vA. no•AOOUCnox a - -Paean °ox MOM mro. T HIMPrf 1NE XRIf1O1 PDWISmx OF THE DRAWN BY: oL DATE ARAWm 12/18/12 5MDHC0 NOB 1; BD-020 SHE NAAHE —� VN=7 HWY 101 / oRAND SITE ADDRESS 3W FEEEMM ROAD ARROYO OAAIDE, CA 9AN L LIS 08BP0 coumY SHEET TITLE SILL SURVEY E ,.A —.T. a r SHEEP C -1 Item 9.b. - Page 14 irr lbllwiwwfilM T.BPROPOSED I ESIFF NON -EKd USIVF A M 1111E DES 1,11101• .O. P10PO.SFD IFG UTI,TTY R(XnE OES.RIPT,ON• T.B.D. YL 1.2' PANE1 ANTENNAS -722' A.G.L GROUND LEVEL - GO AG.L 291.7' A.R.S.L ELEVATION VI W SCALE: 1 - -8 ,A_ Acros 1*4 APN: 007- 011 -023 OWNER(S): 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS Cn�a. OP —nit (r@.) APN: 007 -011 -003 OWNER(S): THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ATL.i POWER/ ;'�% PANR ATAT TFLOO PANDS W' ww YONOPNE . CANE TuY _ T -umQ uelxElz (x r».) - x- I• —D.TS 0 M.) xlEx OAN TIEL APN: 007 -011 -023 OWNER(S); 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS OAK T1Qs •' +ply sl ;pa EE —_ m¢ AT &T AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES 1 OFJXY104GIO� ' µw Bless facllllles, Inc. N1K,rw,xwXR.K>zm c,wmur.wmw tJ Sg �® SuRV¢Y§1m-NG i� nu Nxxle'y uan,uxvn KRm:IM11 %11� FAZ:WDRiuIY 00lewxm cAm u¢ n¢ r r1oX 0du or nc pt� 4A't7 orcon r+m°1C1'. us�"m nACenu� m�NOwrr ,x WTnrzx eosort F n¢ pp ��5•gbG u¢wt[cvacwmvz�eumoe. VZ;. k �tLH- ...v;c xaam xa. r14�Ywua s� N rj 1- 11 11" 1K/NSfpIOET/ ON CONC WD� - {1ANE Y/ POAO EIFC YEIFA T= VAULT rV1(' /WArDA Y/LLT �qi { AlEll TAXK / POAf VALLT k PPE �wAm atoms \ CIRIGTDI CONTROL eOK P lT M EaNC PAO O• PVC PIPE { \ { a• STAID ON CONC o' OMIX PPC vtA ORA04¢ PwE A aeR P1D .T. WtLf \ � r nwn aAnwwE rtx¢ .• ww caxaElE . WATR TANK I ATL.i POWER/ ;'�% PANR ATAT TFLOO PANDS W' ww YONOPNE . CANE TuY _ T -umQ uelxElz (x r».) - x- I• —D.TS 0 M.) xlEx OAN TIEL APN: 007 -011 -023 OWNER(S); 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS OAK T1Qs •' +ply sl ;pa EE —_ m¢ AT &T AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES 1 OFJXY104GIO� ' µw Bless facllllles, Inc. N1K,rw,xwXR.K>zm c,wmur.wmw tJ Sg �® SuRV¢Y§1m-NG i� nu Nxxle'y uan,uxvn KRm:IM11 %11� FAZ:WDRiuIY 00lewxm cAm u¢ n¢ r r1oX 0du or nc pt� 4A't7 orcon r+m°1C1'. us�"m nACenu� m�NOwrr ,x WTnrzx eosort F n¢ pp ��5•gbG u¢wt[cvacwmvz�eumoe. VZ;. k �tLH- ...v;c xaam xa. r14�Ywua s� N rj REVISION 11-e7' . IUTE lkPwN rRFEIY. GIVE -LL- 7'2 le 12 i m mr ueS u � uR I y Si Xo.�0 mCTE� mM p /Nrt R Sc O M N PAWXXw l rt O 1ME DRAWN 8Y: DL CHECKED B1': (JS DUE DRAWN: 12/te/12 SYIDIGO JOB 1: BD -GOG APN: 007 -011 -021 SITE NAME OWNER(S): CALIF- PACIFIC ANNUAL A CONFERENCE 7 `J- HWY 101 / OAAM) AK 1RQ LEGEND sREAO�RESs K iQ SE 300 O ROAD — .. —..— ovwxua uwrctxQ ARROYO GRANDE- CA ® •d roW x rat aaua —A— SAN LIB OSISPO COUNTY .. POO EINL w rAw FONT 01DGYNND _ SHEET TITLE �G SFE SURVEY e SHEET rr —� SI P AN SCALE-. I'-2W C-2 Item 9.b. - Page 15 0° (E) RESERVOIR ACCESS ROAC/(E) ATLT ACCESS wF 3T eR 4 h, eN sT RF FT I SITE PLAN STREET 4 � A P N / 07- 011 - 003••` Io i �o AP N IZ 007- 011 -023 1 ,i i l _a WATERTANK (E) AT&T EQUIPMENT! ANTENNA LOCATIONI PROPOSED MODIFICATION LOCATION Ill D Z (7 Q 0<0 � C) J z Nj o U � OR Zp W 0 W 6 o o o zoo cl) of Da. ¢Q iul3NNFE V'LG,p0MO9ifLT,INC 6HEETlf11F SITE PLAN atiEerwuam p-q, 1 swe� iw 1 W Item age (E) AT&T TMA UNIT, TYP. TC BE REMOVED & REPLACED M AT &T PANELANTENNA, TYP.OF (6) TOTAL (2 PER SECTOR) TO REMAIN AR 80- (E) ASPHALT CURB— Idd M ie' M. CHAINNNK IAI• FENCE Wf BARBEOWIRE (E)AT&TGENERATOR INTERSECT PPC CABINET' (E) OAK 7REE,TYP`: 1;1 ,4�4• --- __._"___185.__, -. _ .. �. -- ,�, ��X/I _ __ -.. ... _"'•_ •_-- .___..._.-- -283- .- ..-_ -- -_... -. ...- - _____ -`_- K `t: u I (E) SO' HT. CHAINUNK 1' ¢ ?�,'�. F•. '.� i�;l . 1. • . 0. SLATS BARBED.WIR L 7K�, f 'd TYP.ATATaTEDUIPMENT 4.' LOCATION (E)ERIC850N 1108 GSM CABINETTO REMAIN ANTENNA TO REMAIN �' 7 r� (E)ERIC6SON 3108 UMi q EXISTING EQUIPMENT/ ANTENNA PLAN 415b0 .3670 Phone 1415.963.1171 Imp InIoMlmrohllecl.com Iwww.Worchlleel.cor WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. IVaxi BFANWWCIRCIE Oa1U110,UPlW� mobility cEnxttos,gnmw LU D z W N OV oQo O ff do Z LLl 00 U o - o Z O W 0OO O O } O z O o O i t -�y g 5 R m 0 u M 6� g <0 f 5g w b�QIU u IS au (E) ATLTMONOPINE SIMULATED — TREE POLE TO REMAIN (E) AT&T GSMIUMTSPANEL- T-0. ANTENNA, TYP. OF (8) TOTAL (2 PER SECTOR) (ABOVE) TO REMAIN PROPOSEOATLTTMA------- UNIT•TYP.OF(12) TOTAL(? PER SECTOR) Az (E)ASPHALTCURB / '�U1N IT aS HT. CHAINUNK FENCE W /SARBED-WIRE 82 PPCCABINET PANANTENNA;TYP. ) `TJ LJYe�th QlI OF'EL(S)TOTtl PER - 1<01 A?jm SECTOR) (SELOM 11 ^'•... F "� ^.'y� MTS /,♦BONE) ` BA `11\ pROPOSEO ATLT ftftU ' - (E)OAKTREE, 7Y`: may ZijwT(12)70TAL •a.T (7 PER SECTOR) .. 2 Al pN NjpnN1iG NOTE: • ALLNEW/ EXISTING ANTENNAS! MOUNTING COMPONENTS SHALL SE PAINTEDTO MATCH (E) TREE POLE FOUAGE L COVERED WITH FOUAGE *ANTENNA SOCKS'. • ALL NEW EXISTING ANTENNAS SHALL NOT 3 PROTRUDE BEYOND EXISTING BRANCHES S b�� iLw <� PROPOSEDAT&T `6 1 � SURGE N i' i r i (E)CONCRETESUB d ON GRADE y d 777 ' • -'(ET a'HT.CHAINUNK 7i /� FENCE WI GREEN VINYL/ • a . _ SLATS L BARBEIIW RE;, •' N. TYP.ATATLTEOUIPMENT ' •y '' LOCATION '•� - - PROPOSED AT&T LTE - ARGUS CABINET • ,. -�?. FROPOSEDATLTLTE 1 '. PURCELL CABINET (E)ERICSSON2106GSM CABINET TO REMAIN PROp05ED 12' WIDE ,j CABLE TRAY MOUNTED /� Z (E)ATLTGPS VERTICALLY ANTENNA TO REMAIN 7' (E) 114ETTONEMAIN v t CASINETTO REMAIN .1, AX cov -00 HOUSE' /BE60 Z, 7`b o ii0iME-0TK JAMFSVACCARO +2JVA ARCHffECT, INC. 715.6083670 phcnc 1415.9614471 I= iawFl Inlo6jvachilccLcom I www.IvoicNleci.cor — �u�Nr - -- WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. mee LU anaE owuno,uauio aw mobility 1u6o PAAIf ftAU Dorm c6nn�m+,aoolm w \W\ N O r / M 9 M Q 0Qo �Uo _I Z LLj o U KZo W V W CEO ZC:)0 i r Ofa Q Q 1 u,a xued v�cuno.na7rrcr.INC a K PANANTENNA;TYP. ) `TJ PROPOSED QlI OF'EL(S)TOTtl PER - ANTENNA PLAN SECTOR) (SELOM 11 _ 4 �8v ya 7 t , ir PROPOSED EQUIPMENT/ ANTENNA PLAN ii0iME-0TK JAMFSVACCARO +2JVA ARCHffECT, INC. 715.6083670 phcnc 1415.9614471 I= iawFl Inlo6jvachilccLcom I www.IvoicNleci.cor — �u�Nr - -- WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. mee LU anaE owuno,uauio aw mobility 1u6o PAAIf ftAU Dorm c6nn�m+,aoolm w \W\ N O r / M 9 M Q 0Qo �Uo _I Z LLj o U KZo W V W CEO ZC:)0 i r Ofa Q Q 1 u,a xued v�cuno.na7rrcr.INC a K # PROPOSED QlI EQUIPMENT/ ANTENNA PLAN M sNEET wutEA 4 �8v 9.b. - Page TF- ii0iME-0TK JAMFSVACCARO +2JVA ARCHffECT, INC. 715.6083670 phcnc 1415.9614471 I= iawFl Inlo6jvachilccLcom I www.IvoicNleci.cor — �u�Nr - -- WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC. mee LU anaE owuno,uauio aw mobility 1u6o PAAIf ftAU Dorm c6nn�m+,aoolm w \W\ N O r / M 9 M Q 0Qo �Uo _I Z LLj o U KZo W V W CEO ZC:)0 i r Ofa Q Q 1 u,a xued v�cuno.na7rrcr.INC a K PROPOSED EQUIPMENT/ ANTENNA PLAN M sNEET wutEA 4 �8v 9.b. - Page TF- I • • • 'INK • i ! ._ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande considered Conditional Use Permit Case No. 05 -013 on June 20, 2006 and August 15, 2006, filed by Cingular Wireless, to install telecommunication antennas on a thirty -five foot (35') tall monopine and nine (9) outdoor equipment cabinets and recommended approval of the project, including adoption of a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Conditional Use Permit Case No. 05 -013, filed by Cingular Wireless, to install telecommunication antennas on a thirty -five foot (35') tall monopine and nine (9) outdoor equipment cabinets; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in accordance with City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration can be adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The proposed use is conditionally permitted within the subject district pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.16.050 of the Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. In addition, the facility will operate in full compliance with all state and federal regulations including the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located.. The installation of the facility will not result in any material changes to the character of the immediate neighborhood or local community. Item 9.b. - Page 21 RESOLUTION NO. • PAGE 2 3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is proposed. The facility is not located within a predominantly residential neighborhood, and the stealth design of the structure will camouflage the antennas. 4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure the public health and safety. 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity. The telecommunication facility will be unstaffed, have no impact on circulation systems, and will generate no noise, odor, smoke or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. 05 -013, with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On a motion by Council Member Arnold, seconded by Council Member Dickens, and by the following roll call vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Arnold, Dickens, Costello, Guthrie, and Mayor Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 12u' day of September 2006. Item 9.b. - Page 22 RESOLUTION No. 30150, PAGE 3 • �,- ME 14% -an KELLY WEtMO--rt-=, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ P CITY CLERK 94YJAM�T&7CLITY M NAGER TIM, THY J. P6RMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Item 9.b. - Page 23 RESOLUTION NO. 1. PAGE j CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WIRELESS CINGULAR ii RESERVOIR A GENERAL COMMONS This approval authorizes the installation of telecommunication antennas on a thirty -five foot (35') tall monopine and nine (9) outdoor equipment cabinets. 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional use Permit Case No. 05 -013. 3. This application shall automatically expire one year after approval unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council at the meeting of September 12, 2006 and marked Exhibits "B -1 through B-4 ". 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's vhich the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his /her obligations under this condition. 6. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall occur on Sunday. 7. Development shall conform to the Public Facility (PF) zoning requirements except as otherwise approved. Item 9.b. - Page 24 RESOLUTION w PAGE SP lAL blT QNS 8. The facility shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other FCC required seals or signage. 9. All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be screened from public view. 10.- The applicant shall design all facilities as to allow future co- location at the site. The operator shall cooperate with any subsequent applicants for wireless communications facilities in the vicinity with regard to possible co-- location on the monopine. 11. The applicant shall obtain a lease agreement with the City prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, and shall comply with all terms of the lease agreement. 12. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of all California Building and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. 13. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced, per Police Department and Fire Department guidelines. 14. Prior to Occupancy, the applicant must provide an approved "security key vault ", per Building and Fire Department guidelines. 15. Any review costs generated by outside consultants, shall be paid by the applicant. 16. Building Permit fees, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17. Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SHIP) fee, to be based on codes and -rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with State mandate. 18. Site Maintenance - The developer shall be responsible during construction for cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the project site. The flushing of dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's work or as directed by the Director of Public Works. Item 9.b. - Page 25 RESOLUTION , PAGE 6 The following Public Works Department conditions of approval are to be complied with prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. Zero Conflict with City's C000muoic ttion - Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall perform a radio frequency study to determine possible conflicts with the City's communication system, and to develop alternatives to eliminate any such conflicts. Prior to activation of the proposed Cellular system, the applicant shall perform a live radio test to ensure that there is no unanticipated interference with the City's radio system. If the proposed system does interfere with the operation of the City's communication system, the proposed system shall remain inactive until such time that the proposed system can be made to cause zero interference. 20. The applicant shall install a multi -lock system on both access gates to the reservoir. 21. The applicant shall replace any new landscaping installed as part of the Reservoir No. 1 Replacement Project that is displaced as a result of this construction. 22. The applicant shall slope the cabinet pads to drain to the asphalt road surrounding the reservoir. 23. The applicant shall design all facilities as to allow future co- location at the site. Item 9.b. - Page 26 onstruction Phase, Emissions The project shall comply with all applicable Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulations .pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM,o) as contained in section 6.5 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading shall list the following regulations: MM 5.1: All dust control measures listed below (MM 5.2 — 5.6) shall be followed during construction of the project and shall be shown on grading and building plans. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such person(s) shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance and finished grading of the area. MM 5.2: During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed (non - potable) water shall be used whenever possible. , MM 5.3: Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. -MM 5.4: All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard' (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. MM 5.5: Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads on to streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. MM 5.6: Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried on to adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water shall be used where feasible. Item 9.b. - Page 27 RESOLUTION NO. ' M 5.7: To mitigate the diesel PM generated during the construction phase, all construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned according to manufacturer's specifications. The measures below (MM 5.8 -- 5.10) shall be clearly identified in the project bid specifications so the contractors bidding on the project can include the purchase and installation costs in their bids. MM 5.8: All off -road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, shall be fueled exclusively with California Air Resources Board (ARB) motor vehicle diesel fuel. MM 5.9: To the maximum extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment shall meet the ARB's 1996 certification standard for off -road heavy -duty diesel engines. MM 5.10: Unless otherwise approved by APCD, the developer shall install catalytic diesel particulate filters or Diesel oxidation catalyst on two (2) pieces of construction equipment involved in primary earth moving and construction activities and projected to generate the greatest emissions. APCD staff shall be included in the selection of candidate equipment along with a representative of the contractor. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande — CDD, Public Works Dept., and Building & Fire Dept. Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit and during construction MM 10.1: Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5 :00 PM Monday through Saturday. There shall be no construction activities on Sundays. Equipment maintenance and servicing shall be confined to the same hours. MM 10.2: All construction equipment utilizing internal combustion engines shall -tie required to have mufflers that are in good condition. Stationary noise sources shall be located at least 300 feet from occupied dwelling units unless noise reducing engine housing enclosures or noise screens are provided by the contractor. MM 10.3: Equipment mobilization areas, water tanks, and equipment storage areas shall be placed in a central 'location as far from existing residences as feasible. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande — CDD, Public Works Dept. Timeframe: During construction Item 9.b. - Page 28 iKESOLUTION L*AGE 9 MM 13.1: The needle coloration of the monopine shall match the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The applicant shall submit pine needle samples of the monopine for verification of accurate color. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande — CDD Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit MM 13.2: The project plans shall show simulated bark placed on the monopole from the ground to the top of the tree. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande CDD Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit MM 13.3: The project plans shall show a heavy branch count and the antennas screened with branches. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande — CDD Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit MM 13.4: The project plans shall show the equipment cabinets in a gray color to match the water tank and screened by a 6' tall chain link fence with green vinyl slats. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande -- CDD Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit MM 13.5: The applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for fast growing shrubs and trees to screen the monopine and water tank. The additional 4andscaping shall be limited to filling in the existing vegetation "gap" immediately surrounding the monopine. Tree species selected should not exceed 30' in height to avoid interference with antenna transmissions. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Committee, Community Development Dept., Parks, Recreation and Facilities Dept. and Public Works Dept. Responsible Party: Developer Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande — CDD; Parks, Recreation & Facilities Dept.; Public Works, Dept. Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit Item 9.b. - Page 29 Z x ELI MAN sm %., YU r i n WIRELESS bql' =tODdGiDawu ooawalALLto lgrWKItONDOt1w@alA®EAp$Cr10 RV@WQ 1AStoC4 kADNOOVAt04,/ANDA10'CKVM3AND OAWlA00HOf tq fOC®OVDlaOS@tO GOrCiON4 +.ae+c.eM IICf WYM.IOit, MpQ1O3tD CaK,8119A810VCATq,I INHtNAV 7o0NgR{@ DMt ba.IA"co Jul t00MAW +AtQA16DBN1 CNAK. WmO w� r-Oa tai oetau WHOP C +a Qa nO+eounawvmnAto >+aua w+oam we." w.AVC�om po^l A ,Wnvkgn lacortAcLlo Ccut SWEA 1ei ytpt T DATA AIIORICt Wiz- ----- >„xtDt tiKW.4DOC*N o x AbYDGO rA0c6NAMt t00tDlYltGIDdCN00ta I WE; )0=5 A'1 , LmAi OMM $Y. WC c,carom it r0 ,: —. 1 S.IONCROIf 1071CAMI)A At AG mtoee,orAOw A ^'7,OD+40�U 9 lirif sKu L r Item 9.b. - Page 30 -1 L MiS G M--- DMU IDOSM g F 39 __ 7 r M. y}�191�ti 0 M'M � • r 1 { Item 9.b. - Page 31 Tig Al 37 rua y.rr w I-- �l 17c"""_ Mw- It . . - age 32 ny � V G>,rata A L�� i lwi WA r� n �r L— Item 9.b. - Page 33 r i, KELLY WETMORE, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached Resolution No. 3952 is a true, , full, and correct copy of said Resolution passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande on the .12t' day of September 2006. WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 14th day of September 2006. 1P 11- 'a I PAIM �Jt �� 0 — T � — www"4RE, Item 9.b. - Page 34 I. SITING REQUIREMENTS The following requirements are intended to assist telecommunication service providers and the community in understanding the City's standards and permit process for such facilities. The goal is to balance the needs of wireless communication providers, the regulatory functions of the City, the rights guaranteed by the federal government, and the potential impacts upon the community and neighboring property owners in the design and siting of telecommunication facilities. A. General Requirements: 1. Telecommunication facilities shall avoid any unreasonable interference with views from neighboring properties. 2. No monopoles or towers shall be installed on top of an exposed ridgeline or prominent slope when alternative sites are available. 3. Telecommunication facilities shall be painted color(s) that are most compatible with their surroundings. 4. Innovative design shall be used whenever the screening potential for the site is low. For example, designing structures that are compatible with surrounding architecture, or appear as a natural environmental feature, could help mitigate the visual impact of a facility. 5. Telecommunication facilities are discouraged on any property with a Residential land use designation. 6. The City lists the placement of facilities in the following preferential order: Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 1 Item 9.b. - Page 35 a. Side -mount antenna on existing structures (buildings, water tanks, etc.) when integrated into the existing structure, completely hidden from public view or painted and blended to match existing structures; b. Within or on existing signs to be completely hidden from public view; c. Atop existing structures (buildings, water tanks, etc.) with appropriate visual /architectural screening to be completely hidden from public view; d. Alternative tower structures (or stealth structures), such as man- made trees, clock towers, flagpoles, steeples, false chimneys, etc., that camouflage or conceal the presence of antennas. e. Existing monopoles, existing electric transmission towers, and existing lattice towers; f. New locations. 7. The City encourages co- location of telecommunication facilities, but only if it results in a lesservisual impact. B. Requirements for Building Mounted Antennas: 1. Building mounted antennas and all other equipment shall be in scale and architecturally integrated with the building design in such a manner as to be visually unobtrusive. 2. Colors and materials shall match the existing building. 3. All equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. Building mounted antennas and all other equipment shall avoid any unreasonable interference with views from neighboring properties. C. Requirements for Monopoles and Towers: 1. Monopoles and towers may be considered only when the applicant reasonably demonstrates that the proposed facility cannot be placed on an existing building or structure. 2. Substantial landscaping or other screening should be provided to visually buffer any adjoining residential uses from the potential visual impacts of the facility. Landscape screening should be designed to achieve its desired appearance in a reasonable period of time. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 2 Item 9.b. - Page 36 3. For monopoles or towers proposed within 300 feet of residentially zoned property, the facility should be set back at least 50 feet or the height of the facility, whichever is greater. Otherwise, the standard setback for the applicable zoning district shall apply. II. PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Any new telecommunication facility proposed within the City of Arroyo Grande is subject to review and approval through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. The applicant shall submit the following additional items and information (unless waived by the Community Development Director based on written justification provided by the applicant) along with the standard CUP application materials. The following list of requirements will be used to check your application for completeness after it is submitted. If your application is not complete, a copy of this list, and /or the CUP checklist, will be returned to you with additional requirements noted. A. Site Information: Submit a site plan, Assessor's Parcel Map(s), or a recent aerial photo that clearly illustrates the following information: 1. The lease area of the proposed project. 2. The lease areas of all other facilities on the parcel where the proposed facility is located. 3. Property boundaries of the site and the legal lot. 4. Location of all habitable structures within 500 feet of the proposed facility with the distance from the proposed antenna facility to the closest structure clearly marked. 1. A written description of the type of technology and type of consumer services the carrier will provide to its customers. 2. An explanation of site selection (reason the site was chosen over alternative sites). 3. An explanation of the need for the proposed height, strength and direction of signal, and type of antenna proposed (i.e., panel, whip, dish). Also include a description of all accessory structures /equipment requested as a part of the proposed antenna facility. 4. Detailed engineering calculations for foundation wind loads. C. RF Exposure Information: The City of Arroyo Grande requires the same information submitted to the FCC regarding radio frequency (RF) emissions with any application to establish a new or expand an existing communication facility. If the application pertains to co- location, or to an additional facility on a parcel, a cumulative emissions report for the site is required. The City of Arroyo Grande requires the information pursuant to its responsibility, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to determine cumulative environmental impacts for all permitted projects. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 3 Item 9.b. - Page 37 r 1. Provide copies of documents submitted to the FCC, including environmental impact information, showing that the proposed facility, both individually and cumulatively (if appropriate), is in compliance with FCC adopted standards for RF emissions for the facility type (i.e., PCS, Cellular, Earth Satellite Facilities). Include a one -page summary in simple, easy to read terms, demonstrating said compliance. Co- location is defined as the coincident placement of telecommunication carriers' antennas on the same tower or antenna - mounting structure. The principal benefit from co- location is that fewer towers are needed to serve a given area, thereby reducing the overall visual impact of towers on a community. The City encourages the co- location between carriers, or the use of existing towers wherever possible to discourage the unnecessary proliferation of towers. The City also encourages the design of new towers which allow for future co- location whenever feasible. Applicants proposing to site the antenna(s) must demonstrate that reasonable efforts have been made to locate the antennas(s) on existing structures. 1. If not co- located, provide information pertaining to the feasibility of joint - use antenna facilities, and discuss the reasons why such joint use is not a viable option or alternative to a new facility site. This includes written notification of refusal of the existing structure owner to lease space on the structure. Include information on lack of existing towers in the area, topography, frequency or signal interference, line of site problems, and available land zoning restrictions as applicable. E. Visual Impact Information: The following information provides staff with criteria for determining the significance of project visual impacts for CEQA purposes. 1. Submit a preliminary environmental review with special emphasis placed upon the nature and extent of visual and aesthetic impacts. 2. Submit photo mock -ups or digital computer representations of the project site "before" and "after" installation. Physical samples of facility materials and /or a three- dimensional model may also be required. Show the proposed tower, antenna(s), equipment shelters, and any landscaping or screening proposed to lessen the visual impact of the project. 3. Submit information regarding the location of existing towers of the same, or similar design as the proposal facility, located within 10 miles of Arroyo Grande for viewing purposes. 4. If the project site is located within Y2 mile of a public road, residence, public park, public hiking trail, or private easement open to the public, or if visible from such areas, show the proposed project site from multiple vantage points. Multiple viewpoints will require an index map and key for identification. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 4 Item 9.b. - Page 38 5. Provide a sample of the proposed color of the tower in the form of a minimum one square foot paint sample, and explain the reasons why that color is best for the location proposed. 6. Describe the type of landscaping proposed to screen the facility to the maximum extent feasible, or the reasons why landscaping is not necessary or feasible. 7. Proposed communication facilities should not be sited on ridgelines or hilltops when alternative sites are available. If a ridgeline location is proposed, submit written justification to the Community Development Director. If no alternative site exists, the communications facility must be located to minimize silhouetting on the ridgeline and must blend with the surrounding environment to decrease visibility from off site. 8. At the time of permit renewal, any major modification to the existing permit, or change -out of major equipment, the permit site and existing equipment shall be reviewed for consistency with changes in technology that could substantially lessen visual impacts. If the Community Development Director determines that a change in technology would substantially lessen the visual impacts of the facility, or if they would result in a substantial benefit to the public, the permitee may be required to make those changes. 9. If there is a change of lessee, information regarding the type of technology that will be used by the new lessee shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within ten (10) days of that change. If the transfer would require any changes to the facilities approved in the original CUP, an Amended Conditional Use Permit application must be submitted. The new lessee shall use the most current technology available if it would substantially lessen visual impacts of the site, and if it would result in a substantial benefit to the public. 10. Describe if the proposed facility is intended to be a "Coverage" or "Capacity" site. F. Antenna /Site Capacity Information: 1. Submit information on the total antenna capacity for the proposed antenna tower and any other structures for the proposed project. This information may be used for future co- location of antennas from other companies. 2. There shall be a maximum of two towers per assessor's parcel or developed site. Telecommunication Facilities Siting Requirements and Checklist, November 2001 Page 5 Item 9.b. - Page 39 Latitude: N35 -7 -30.40 Longitude: W 120 -34 -59.20 Structure Type: Other Report generated date: February 7, 2013 Report by: Kevin Smith - Customer Contact: Tred Haglund AT &T ®bility, LL Ill Be Compliant Based n FCC Rules and Regulations. © 2013 Sitesafe, Inc. Arlington, VA dD X`- s::Y4$'.A efiYS� .t�3w�.i�i':'%��SStk.�b.YS+n'2w �YF'a uR,�.£ fie,` sy. r +a,.,,r.�— ,.}a*�- Ct'n,• "S'R,aa4 s+.n, :`1... *4,A .YzSr ....:4. C...i':'MfR9�f' A.., �' 4I3s. n::, 5�..., ......:,f:.iP.F >?'R��:,s�n, -i.. +�,2,.a- .,- �..w,: ��.�,.. .:; � ��.;:` ='..� -Tc 9 M PIT I- 4tF n It e. e- X AT&T Mobility, LLC 101 03908-87890-VNOI 97 - Highway I & Grand Avenue Radio Frequency (RF) Site Compliance Report 300 Reservoir Road, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 e info@sitesafe.com Item 9.b. - Page 41 �"q . . ME s i . e a.ry w r1'.7c;rn —PT i -arrce e'-x-p"t is 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................:........ ............................... REGULATORYBASIS ............................................................. ..............................3 2.1 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS .............................................. ..............................3 2.2 OSHA STATEMENT ............................................................... ............................... 4 3 SITE COMPLIANCE .............................................................. ............................... 3.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT..... ....................................... ..............................5 3.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE ............................................ ..............................5 SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES ........................................ ..............................7 5 ANALYSIS ............................................................................ ............................... 5.1 RF EMISSIONS DIAGRAM ....................................................... ..............................8 5.2 SITE MEASUREMENTS ........................................................... ............................... 10 6 SITE AUDIT ........................................................................... .............................12 6.1 SITE ACCESS PROCEDURES .................................................. ............................... 12 6.2 ANTENNA INVENTORY ......................................................... ............................... 14 6.3 SITE PICTURES ..................................................................... ............................... 17 200 N. Glebe Road o Suite 1000. Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • infoCsitesafe.com Item 9.b. -Page 42 w esafia WFI on behalf of AT &T Mobility, LLC has contracted with Sitesafe, Inc. (Sitesafe), an independent Radio Frequency (RF) regulatory and engineering consulting firm, to determine whether the proposed communications site, 101 03908- 87890- VN0197 - Highway 1 & Grand Avenue, located at 300 Reservoir Road, Arroyo Grande, CA, is in compliance with Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for RF emissions. Sitesafe's field personnel visited 101 03908-87890-VN01 97 - Highway 1 & Grand Avenue on January 29, 2013. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF environment at the site including: • site compliance determination; • photographs of the site; • diagram of the site; • inventory of the make / model of all transmitting antennas found on the site (where possible); • record of any Maximum Permissible Exposure ( "MPE ") measurements taken on the site, as applicable; and • theoretical MPE based on modeling. This report addresses exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations for all individuals, classified in two groups, "Occupational or Controlled" and "General Public or Uncontrolled." This site will be compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. During our field visit, Sitesafe documented the presence and location of signs and barriers. This document specifically addresses compliance of AT &T Mobility, LLC's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated transmitting facilities, which together constitute the RF environment at the site. If you have any questions regarding RF safety and regulatory compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Sitesafe's Customer Support Department at (703) 276- 1 100. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® info @sitesafe.com Page 2 Item 9.b. - Page 43 s' em s e 2.1 FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ( "OET Bulletin 65 "), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97 -0 1, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment ". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RFwarning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 E 100 _E E 10 w e 1 0 d 3 a. 0.1 0.01 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 3 Item 9.b. - Page 44 — Occupational — - General Public \ / 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 3 Item 9.b. - Page 44 NO Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time JE�2, Range Field Field Density IH12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) (V /m) (I3) (A/m) (mW /cm) 0.3 -3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0 -30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/0* 6 30 -300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300 -1500 -- -- f/300 6 1500- -- -- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time IE12, Range Field Field • Density IHI2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) (V /m) (H) (A/m) (mW /cm2) 0.3 -1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34 -30 824/f 2.19/f (1801f'')* 30 30 -300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300 -1500 -- -- V1500 30 1500- -- -- 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density 2.2 OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer - (1) shall furnish to.each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursudnf to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lock Out Tag Out procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or start up of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100. info @sitesafe.com Page 4 Item 9.b. - Page 45 Nsilesal�_ r 1. c o_r�i -p Ti o 0 ,_, �..e .e,,x p b_r.t = 3.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, and a thorough review of site access procedures, RF hazard signage and visible antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: This site will be compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. A detailed explanation of the 5% rule can be found in the Definition section of Appendix B. The compliance determination is based on General Public MPE levels due to theoretical modeling and /or physical measurements, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT &T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non - compliant. Measurements have also been performed to validate the assumptions used in our theoretical modeling of this site. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. 3.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on common industry practice and our understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. RF alert signage recommendations have been proposed based on existing measurements and theoretical analysis of MPE levels. Sitesafe has documented the locations of any RF signs and barriers that are required for compliance. Barriers can consist of locked doors, fencing, railing, rope, chain, paint striping or tape, combined with RF alert signage. This site will be compliant with the FCC rules and regulations. However, because AT &T Mobility, LLC is predicted to contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible exposure (MPE), should the site be subsequently deemed non- compliant for any reason, any wireless operators) who contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible energy would be jointly liable for bringing the site into compliance. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® infoGsitesafe.com Page 5 Item 9.b. - Page 46 Ositeso[e'., r �C P Sitesafe found one or more issues that led to our determination. The site will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Site Access Location No action required. AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Alpha Sector Location No action required. AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Beta Sector Location No action required. AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Gamma Sector Location No action required. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 6 Item 9.b. Page 47 M ite e � a k� a -� The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Mork: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a workers understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: ® Locked door or gate ® Alarmed door ® Locked ladder access a Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 5 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 e Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® info @sitesafe.com Page 7 Item 9.b. - Page 48 rf. c-_PMP Ji4ncea. .exp ?:r[ 5.1 RF Emissions Diagram The RF diagram(s) below display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as proscribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix B. a) Composite Exposure Levels ® Gray represents areas predicted to be at 5% of the MPE limits, or below. ® Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. ® Blue represents areas predicted to be between 100% and 500% of the MPE limits. ® Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 500% and 5000% of the MPE limits. ® Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 5000% of the MPE limits. The theoretical analysis identified the maximum predicted MPE levels to be: Maximum Theoretical General Public or Uncontrolled MPE level: 18.5% Maximum Theoretical Occupational or Controlled MPE Level: 3.7% AT&T Maximum Theoretical General Public or Uncontrolled MPE level: 18.5% AT&T Maximum Theoretical Occupational or Controlled MPE level: 3.7% General Population diagrams are specified when an area is accessible to the public; i.e. personnel that do not meet Occupational or RF Safety trained criteria,' could gain access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as Blue or above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real -time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real -time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. The key at the bottom also indicates the level or height of the modeling with respect to the main level. The origin is typically referenced to the main rooftop level, or ground level for a structure without access to the antenna level. For example: Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin RN Average from 20 feet above to 26 feet above origin The first indicates modeling at the main rooftop (or ground) level averaged over 6 feet. The second indicates modeling at a higher level (possibly a penthouse level) of 20 feet averaged over 6 feet. 260 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info @sitesafe.com Page 8 Item 9.b. - Page 49 si[esaRD i' � n. r e :e x'..P ?e. PH = # #' Penthouse at ## feet above main roof M ## Measurement ## taken during a site visit As discussed in Section 5, site measurement locations for spatial average measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF emissions diagram. While the theoretical modeling represents worst case MPE levels based on the assumption(s) detailed above, the measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels at the time of our visit, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. Additional Information in the RF Emissions Diagrams Key The RF emissions diagram provides indications of RF signage, barriers and locked doors. The table below lists the abbreviations used to indicate locked doors, signs and barriers: As discussed in Section 5, site measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF Emission diagrams. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumptions detailed-above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 9 Item 9.b. - Page 50 3 '.'r�LY roy.. 4s *b �£«�b�t�eY F y '� $''Firms. `5'./$'�, � �` ��,,'„k`db s� ' �'✓'t, 'k iv '8S� ' :c�a S 3 T ";K di,�X 3: " F may+ M j b SC i 'h Type Existing Recommended Type Existing Recommended Location Location Location Location Notice NE NR Locked Door LE LR Caution CE CR Fencing Warning WE WR Rope Chain RE RR Info Sign 1 11 E 11I R Paint Stripes Info Sian 2 12E 12R Tape Info Sign 3 13E 13R Info Sign 4 14E 14R NOC Information INOCE INOCR 10 Step Guideline 10SE 10SR As discussed in Section 5, site measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF Emission diagrams. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumptions detailed-above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 9 Item 9.b. - Page 50 RF Emissions Diagram for: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue Ground Level R SIBS Ue www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 98416 Site Name: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue slol.Yr.rurn. n.pw.tl�J/brm.e.Hr.+W rclv.Mwe WSe...'. p-a.rl Cme.. 9.d. h1 rref.iq r:evo Oml a0.1IOh inpau % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin Feet 20 0 20 40 1em9.b. -K eS�fis10.0 5000 <= X 500 <= X < 5000 100 <= X < 500 5 < =X <100 X < =5 Feet 20 0 20 40 1em9.b. -K eS�fis10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue Ground Level Detail sit-se www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 98416 Site Name: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue Co.�Yq �W. Yom, bma.&q-�r�i�e�� t-W ro�rW W b� fie. �raomM. EbPNTC V.nbn lMry -btls (m 19611M inrmio % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin Feet 5 . 00 5 10 It m9.b. -Pages P's 10.0 5000 <= X 500 <= X < 5000 100<--X<500 5r- -X <100 X < =5 Feet 5 . 00 5 10 It m9.b. -Pages P's 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue m ! m 1 — Si�--Se www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 98416 Site Name: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue tii v �•��,,. �na�mnR.Omlaa� ion innou % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 5 feet above to 11 feet above origin Feet 10 0 10 20 rid S' is 10.0 5000 <= X 500 <= X < 5000 100<=X<500 5< =X <100 X < =5 Feet 10 0 10 20 rid S' is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue Sitef'e www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 98416 Site Name: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue SLUI.TC V.nMllivvlW inrmv % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin Feet 20 0 20 40 Item 9.b. - Frar'S!�ip is 10.0 5000 <= X 500 <= X < 5000 100 <= X < 500 5 < =X <100 X <= 5 Feet 20 0 20 40 Item 9.b. - Frar'S!�ip is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue .0 SIt2SCt "e www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 98416 Site Name: Highway 1 & Grand Avenue 4.v1.TC V.n4n Uwval.b. % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 5 feet above to 11 feet above origin Feet 10 0 10 20 Orid S9 is 10.0 5000 <= X ff' 500 <= X < 5000 100<--X<500 5 < =X <100 X < —'5 Feet 10 0 10 20 Orid S9 is 10.0 ci 88 03 tb Cd O IMM- 1-13 O FR W N H d) 0 U3 C) (N C:) C) C) V V Z > v X X V aC v" cd, is =) 8 11 v 1 u C> W) C) C= to 4. Item 9.b. - Page 56 ra' 1 ZZ 65 s1.< ll EMEMM C) (N C:) C) C) C9 cd, is C:) 4 4-- of In C,3 A 4� Item 9.b. - Page 56 ra' 1 ZZ 65 s1.< ll 0-,, sitesafia r f': c q rn rs t T rq ra e �- ;eµx p & r. t. s- 5.2 Site Measurements This section provides a summary of the measurements collected at the site. Actual measurements locations at which these data points were collected are included in the RF emission diagram provided in Section 6 of this report. Two types of measurements were collected at each measurement location: maximum (peak) and spatial average. The spatial average measurement consists of a collection of ten (10) measurements within a ten (10) second time interval taken from zero (0) to six (6) feet in height. The purpose of this measurement technique is to identify the average power density over.the dimensions of a typical human body. Table 2 below contains all the measurements collected from accessible areas located at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit. Whenever possible, measurements are taken in front of the antenna in the transmitting _direction. However, because of the antenna configuration at this site, specific emissions could not be discerned from nearby facilities, and no attempt was made to determine power density levels from a specific transmitting antenna. Highest Measured Occupational Level: <1 % This value is equal to: Highest General Public Level: <5 %. M1 <1 7 <1 % M18 <1 % <1 T. M2 <1 % <1 70 M19 <1 % <1 % M3 <1 % <1 % M20 <1 % <1 % M4 <1 % <1 % M21 <1 % <1 % M5 <1 % <1 % M22 <1 % <1 % M6 <1 % <1 % M23 <1 % <1 % M7 <1 % <1 % M24 <1 % <1 % M8 <1 % <1 %. M25 <1 % <1 % M9 <1 % <1 % M26 <1 % <1 % M10 <1 % <1 % M27 <1 % <1 % M11 <1 % <1 % M28 <1 % <1 % M12 <1 % <1 % M29 <1 % <1 % M1 <1 % <1 % M30 <1 % <1 % M14 <1 % <1 % M31 <1 % <1 % M15 <1 % <1 % M32 <1 % <1 % M16 <1 % <1 % M33 <1 % <1 % M17 <1 % <1 % M34 <1 % <1 % RF meters and probes have been calibrated and used according to the .manufacturer's specifications. Measurements provide a view of the MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's site visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contributions. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info @sitesafe.com Page 10 Item 9.b. - Page 57* ,W Me a r r, 0 ri5 7i.p rice•. eMX -P.C. f"t s An RF Emission diagram has been included in section 5 of this document. All measurement locations are identified in this diagram. The locations of measurements in the RF Emission diagram can be cross referenced with Table 2 (above) to determine the actual spatial average and maximum measurement value per location. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® info @sitesafe.com Page 11 Item 9.b. - Page 58 rF. corrilfrc�. Site Audit 6.1 Site Access Procedures A site visit was conducted on January 29, 2013 at approximately 2:30 PM. The weather conditions were Cloudy with a temperature of 60 degrees. At that time, a diagram of the site was verified, obtained or produced containing the locations of all visible antennas, RF signs and access points on site. These antennas were recorded and photographed. The antenna makes) /model(s) and centerlines were verified where possible. The following information was gathered regarding site access at the facility. Site access was locked or restricted at the time of the site visit. Sitesafe field personnel used a combination lock to unlock -the gate and access the site. RF Advisory signage was posted at all site access points. Figure 1: Gate 1 with Signage 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® infoCsitesafe.com Page 12 Item 9.b. - Page 59 �U a 6.2 Antenna Inventory The Antenna Inventory shows all transmitting antennas at the site. This inventory was verified on site, and was utilized by Sitesafe to perform theoretical modeling of RF emissions. The inventory coincides with the site diagrams in this report, identifying. each antenna's location at 1 0 1 03908- 87890- VN0197 - Highway 1 & Grand Avenue. The antenna information collected includes the following information: ® Licensee or wireless operator name ® Frequency or frequency band ® Transmitter power- Effective Radiated Power. ( "ERP "), or Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power ( "EIRP ") in Watts ® Antenna manufacturer, make, model, and gain For other carriers at this site, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to carrier, their FCC license and /or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Equipment, antenna models and nominal transmit power were used for modeling, based on past experience with radio service providers. 200 N. Glebe Road ® Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 ® info @sitesafe.com Page 14 Item 9.b. - Page 61 d? (Al E u _0 a) a) O _0 0 (D (D O E 0 00 0 E > > 0 -C co M M CD C*q 04 N < E > 0 CD C 1h C3 0 0 Z Cl C, C14 CY) Cl) Cl) (1) (Y) Cl) (Y) (1) CY) (Y) Cl) Cl) ZY) ZY) Cl) bo EO a, &I CD ao bo n F, F-I F- F- F- bo bo Ol Cl OC) co 00 00 co 00 r- r- t-- r-I r, LO LO LO LO LO LO LO Ln L' LO LO U') LO uJ 10 10 a 10 10 10 10 `0 10 go co co co co co CC) co co co CC) co co co co Z= . .... 75 - 6 75 - 6 7 a) --) T) 7a5 7a C3 C3 0 0 C3 C3 C: 0 c CL CL Cl- IL CL 0- CL CL CL CL C� Cl- a- CL W tu - r tu - tE tij- 7U 1C) W C� C? U U C) u U I LO ur) LO Ln LO LO 10 LI) 10 LO -0 LO 10 V3 10 Lo 10 LO 10 LO Lr) ", LO LO -0 LO 10 LO a LO 10 LO LO 10 Ln LO 10 LO -0 Lo 10 LO 10 LO 10 n 0 cl 0 in Q cl co C/3 cc Ln ca N V) fn to co fn ca fn ca N co N 03 V7 ca V) 03 N W LU ui Lij W LU LU c3e cv- UJ Uf w W LLJ W Cl� w Ey- e in In 0 cl cl a Z Z Z Z Z c� C:) C) CD C:) (D C) 't CD C) C3 co C:) 0:) CD co cq (1) m M m N (N C14 C14 03 C14 C14 C14 04 No C) C) CD CD C) CD Ci C) Cli C:) Ci Q ol 'o 00 co Ol C) cr, `q co cq Lo "R Cl) cq LO LO C14 co LO C, 10 Cl) LI) C'4 c) 00 LO a LO LO C14 F4 CO 7 C':l C� Cl Cl) Cl) (D ol CD Ol OM M 0, 10 Cl) ol 10 Cl) "It 10 M a co 00 F, 00 co p" C) u u C) U u J '-0 70 II 7 70 -0 N (1) (t) N (L) to 1 0 1_ a 0 0 0 -0 0 -0 0 n 0 -0 0 -0 0 n 0 0 C) -a 0 C) 0 Q_ _a 0 C)_ -0 Oa Oa Oa 0 CL Oa 0 Q- o0. Oa 0 0- 0 D- o � 2 CL fl- F- 06 C-6 od 06 06 .6 Cd .6 06 F- F- H- 1 Ple 61 co M M CD C*q 04 N < E > 0 CD C 1h C3 0 0 Z Cl C, C14 $ k i �E OWN' 'u N N O m `O 0— E a a O s w a C H 'Aj .� c a 3 O a� a a O 3 N 3 N O O U a) 2 O a) 0 a O - O c > 0 o O a Z a a) c o Z) a ro o CL > C a p �cz w C � •�, aa3 Q) a O U C C a U ^ a) o O- a ,a) 0 2 O E a a a..� O c0 ova) r Z) a) a) o�'NC a >�aa) c_�- oa'a�� a m a E mac � a) O N U a) co NFU : o `o a) Q. a) P a) CD % L 3 CL t= °- a) a _ . m -0 U E > O c U ac, C a O O j 0) 0 ry a) U a) ,C D o -� E C3 a 3 O O a O � u u a) oo Z o).g E Item 9.b. - Page 63 co M M NO N E 0 e u o d) C O Q 'w o �m ° to ° a w o° 5 r- N a � o° ° O N zy: � (n (M'M can cam') Cl) co Cl) (ate') C U M M OI O ;— ;t <t n n M � co 00 00 co 00 co LO l lo lo � 10 lo LOo CD 2 " S a 00 CD of O co 00 oo co o0 10 ✓.S ; x f t z s s .E tij t7u t7u 175 w w �j iii rii r _ > ' c am 'cY N O O O O O N O U U U U U U U U U U to (n LO (n (n lo fn fn Ln Lx,) LO ON (n Lo a (n Lo fn fn LO LO LO i o 0 -o to o D to to to o -o to ol m m (n CO an m fn m (n m (n m U) co U3 cc (n c (n U II! T s w w w w w 04 w o! w rk� w 09� w Oi� w Q c 0 0 0 0 C) 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z s¢ Q Q d Q Q ¢ d d d i�f M* d o ° v 0 0 0 0 o O O O o N N G c` 3 'a C O 'o ao O o 'o m O cq O a O cq O a O o `o OR O O (a'J Lo (h Lf) 'r LO 'd' LO cl) h to zS V r a� � .� co � N t� 3. a _ , W rJ t3P oo 'o u, oo O �, (n an N N C`7 co lo (n v t 4 f s cal CD (h 0` cl ca'M N O� N N t� N co t- N U it }3.i l tt.'EsiJSt U U U U U U U U U U m a_ a a ? a a a a a a.3 a) m N m N m N a) N a)_ h o N m N � a) I0 n a) N -0 O .� Q O .Q O :Q O .Q O Q O .O o -0 0 0 O o0 oa o oa oOoa oa oa o a oa y i° �2 �2 i° i°'�° �2 �2 �2 �2 2 �.,9 w � �• (I- � ._. w � � w dS V CL dS V (I_ dS V f � w dS .__. w � o_ dS A..t . Q 64 +i ¢ ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 4 d ¢ rf i' 3. i l : lk 3 h co 00 a C), O O f t N N O m `O 0— E a a O s w a C H 'Aj .� c a 3 O a� a a O 3 N 3 N O O U a) 2 O a) 0 a O - O c > 0 o O a Z a a) c o Z) a ro o CL > C a p �cz w C � •�, aa3 Q) a O U C C a U ^ a) o O- a ,a) 0 2 O E a a a..� O c0 ova) r Z) a) a) o�'NC a >�aa) c_�- oa'a�� a m a E mac � a) O N U a) co NFU : o `o a) Q. a) P a) CD % L 3 CL t= °- a) a _ . m -0 U E > O c U ac, C a O O j 0) 0 ry a) U a) ,C D o -� E C3 a 3 O O a O � u u a) oo Z o).g E Item 9.b. - Page 63 co M M NO N E 0 e u o d) C O Q 'w o �m ° to ° a w o° 5 r- N a � o° ° O N Owl J[e s a i e rf. com*Pfiurice. ex r.t.s. A _ A Site Pictures Figure 3: AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Alpha Sector Antennas #1 through #4 Figure 4: AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Beta Sector Antennas #5 through #8 200 N. Glebe Road . Suite 1000 a Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info @sitesafe.com Page 17 Item 9.b. - Page 64 ,,.,fflx sile.. sz-a-le r -. -co mPtF�5T c e.M Figure 5: AT &T Mobility, LLC Proposed Gamma Sector Antennas #9 through #12 Figure 6: Base of Monopine with Signage 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • infoCasitesafe.com Page 18 Item 9.b. - Page 65 an s, si te s of � r F. �C0 ni P T 1. 0 41. C e. .-e x P d. f. .r S Figure 7: AT&T Mobility, LLC Equipment with Signage Figure 8: Water Tank Access Ladder 200 N.'Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sifesafe.com Item 9.b. - Page 66 Page 19 msi�esafie r F � c 0 M p T 1. -0 rY c e. ;- —Xp Figure 9: Antenna #12 Located on Light above the Electric Meter Figure 10: Tower West facing East :200 N. Glebe Road e Suite 1000 ® Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100sinfogsitesafe.com Page 20 - Item 9.b. - Page 67 l 1 w i INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobilitv) Proji "t site F I _.. i E � Amended Conditional Use Permit (ACUP) No. 13 -002 Amended Conditional Use Permit to install six (6) additional panel antennas on an existing monopine and related ground equipment within an 800 square foot lease area (AT &T mobility) 300 Reservoir Road (APN 007 - 011 -003) April 2013 Page 1 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 68 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Project: Amended Conditional Use Permit 13 -002 Lead Agency: City of Arroyo Grande Document Availability: City of Arroyo Grande Community Development Department 300 East Branch Street Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Project Description: The project involves installing six (6) panel antennas on an existing monopine and related ground equipment within an 800 square foot lease area. The property is currently developed as a public facility to store water (Reservoir No. 1) and is owned by the City. Summary Document Preparation: Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the City of Arroyo Grande (the City) has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project and finds that these documents reflect the independent judgment of the City. The City, as lead agency, also confirms that the project mitigation measures detailed in these documents are feasible and will be implemented as stated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Teresa McClish, AICP Community Development Director Kelly He ernon, 46 Associate Planner Date �1 3, e /-/ Date Page 2 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 69 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) �I�F= 11[-7• i :�1i�' Introduction..................................................................................................................... ..............................5 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ....................................................................... ..............................5 LeadAgency ................................................................................................................ ..............................5 Purpose and Document Organization ......................................................................... ..............................5 Summaryof Findings ................................................................................................... ..............................6 ProjectDescription .......................................................................................................... ..............................7 Introduction................................................................................................................. ..............................7 Background and Need for Project ............................................................................... ..............................8 Other Required Public Agency Approvals ................................................................... ..............................8 RelatedProjects .......................................................................................................... ..............................8 EnvironmentalChecklist .................................................................................................. ..............................9 ProjectInformation ..................................................................................................... ..............................9 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .............................................................. .............................10 Determination............................................................................................................ .............................10 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................ .............................11 EnvironmentalIssues ..................................................................................................... .............................12 1. Aesthetics ............................................................................................................... .............................12 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources ....................................................................... .............................13 3. Air Quality ............................................................................................................... .............................13 4. Biological Resources ............................................................................................... .............................14 5. Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. .............................15 6. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................... .............................15 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................... .............................16 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................................... .............................17 9. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................. .............................18 10. Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................... .............................19 11. Mineral Resources ................................................................................................ .............................20 12. Noise ..................................................................................................................... .............................20 13. Population and Housing ....................................................................................... .............................21 14. Public Services ...................................................................................................... .............................21 15. Recreation ............................................................................................................ .............................22 16. Transportation/ Traffic .......................................................................................... .............................22 17. Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................ .............................23 Page 3 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 70 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) MandatoryFindings of Significance ............................................................................... .............................24 Summary of Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. .............................25 References...................................................................................................................... .............................26 Page 4 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 71 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 2012 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) 1; it 1 .I 1 $ 'Ii Introduction and Regulatory Guidance The Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) has been prepared by the City of Arroyo Grande (the City) to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations (CCR) §15000 et seq. An Initial Study is conducted by a lead agency to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment [CEQA Guidelines §15063(a)]. If there is substantial evidence that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15064(a). However, if the lead agency determines that revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant mitigate the potentially significant effects to a less- than - significant level, a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared instead of an EIR [CEQA Guidelines §15070(b)]. The lead agency prepares a written statement describing the reasons a proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, why an EIR need not be prepared. This IS /MND conforms to the content requirements under CEQA Guidelines §15071. Lead Agency The lead agency is the public agency with primary approval authority over the proposed project. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15051(b)(1), "the lead agency will normally be an agency with general governmental powers, such as a city or county, rather than an agency with a single or limited purpose." The lead agency for the proposed project is the City of Arroyo Grande. The contact person for the lead agency is: Kelly Heffernon, AICP Associate Planner City of Arroyo Grande Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 (805) 473 -5420 Purpose and Document Organization The purpose of this document is to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. Mitigation measures have been identified and incorporated into the project to eliminate any potentially significant impacts or reduce them to a less- than - significant level. This document is organized as follows: • Introduction This chapter provides an introduction to the project and describes the purpose and organization of this document. ® Project Description This chapter describes the reasons for the project, scope of the project, and project objectives. Page 5 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 72 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) ® Environmental Setting, Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures This chapter identifies the significance of potential environmental impacts, explains the environmental setting for each environmental issue, and evaluates the potential impacts identified in the CEQA Environmental (Initial Study) Checklist. Mitigation measures are incorporated, where appropriate, to reduce potentially significant impacts to a less -than- significant level. ® Mandatory Findings of Significance This chapter identifies and summarizes the overall significance of any potential impacts to natural and cultural resources, cumulative impacts, and impact to humans, as identified in the Initial Study. ® Summary of Mitigation Measures This chapter summarizes the mitigation measures incorporated into the project as a result of the Initial Study. ® References This chapter identifies the references and sources used in the preparation of this IS. It also provides a list of those involved in the preparation of this document. Summary of Findings Section 3 of this document contains the Environmental (Initial Study) Checklist that identifies the potential environmental impacts (by environmental issue) and a brief discussion of each impact resulting from implementation of the proposed project. In accordance with §15064(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be prepared if the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment after the inclusion of mitigation measures in the project. Based on the available project information and the environmental analysis presented in this document, there is no substantial evidence that, after the incorporation of mitigation measures, the proposed project would have a significant effect on the environment. It is proposed that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. Page 6 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 73 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 2012 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Introduction /Project Description The City of Arroyo Grande (the City) has prepared this Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. The project site is located at 300 Reservoir Road within the Public Facility (PF) zoning district and is developed with a water tank (City Reservoir No. 1). The City is the property owner. Surrounding the site is a Methodist Camp to the east, residential development to the north and west, and Valley View Academy School to the south. AT &T Mobility proposes to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 05 -013 to update its telecommunication equipment on an existing unmanned wireless facility ( "monopine ") located at City Reservoir No. 1 as follows: • Install six (6) new Long Term Evolution (LTE) panel antennas and twelve (12) new remote radio units (RRUs) on the existing monopine (the six existing panel antennas will remain; the new panels will be installed below the existing antennas). • Install one (1) new Argus LTE equipment cabinet and one (1) new LTE Purcell equipment cabinet on the existing concrete slab. • Install fiber transmission lines from the new equipment cabinets to the new panel antennas. • Proposed power will be provided from existing sources. The existing lease area is approximately 800 square feet in size and can accommodate the additional equipment. The future operation will, together with the existing base stations at the site, comply with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy. L Page 7 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 74 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobilitv) Background and Need for Project The proposed project is an important addition to AT &T's central San Luis Obispo County network extension, and is specifically intended to further develop its overall plan for improved signal transmission coverage and capacity in the South County area. The addition of the proposed facility will provide signal coverage for AT &T customers where weak coverage currently exists, off -load capacity coverage from other AT &T wireless facilities in the immediate region, and increase mobile telephone activities to the public. Specifically, the purpose of this facility is to provide linkage to existing AT &T facilities within the San Luis Obispo County network, allowing cell phone coverage along U.S. Highway 101 between West Branch Street and Brisco Road, and to the surrounding residential neighborhood and Village Area. Currently, AT &T is experiencing mostly capacity issues within these areas. The proposed Long Term Evolution (LTE) equipment is now a standard for wireless communication of high -speed data for mobile phones. It helps to increase capacity and speed using a different radio interface. Routine maintenance of the facility would remain the same, with inspections occurring on a monthly basis during normal working hours. With these additional antennas, co- location with other telecommunication carriers is highly unlikely. The monopine would need to increase by twenty feet (20') or more. Other Required Public Agency Approvals No other public agency approvals are required for the proposed project. Related Projects Verizon Wireless was approved for a 38.5' tall monopine and related equipment at the 300 Reservoir Road location in September 2012 and is currently under construction. AT &T is concurrently processing a similar application for an existing facility at the Soto Sports Complex (1275 Ash Street, Arroyo Grande). Page 8 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 75 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 2012 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Project Information Project Title: Lead Agency Name & Address: Contact Person & Telephone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor Name & Address: General Plan Designation: Zoning: Description of Project: Surrounding Land Uses & Setting: Approval Required from Other Public Agencies: ACUP 13 -002 City of Arroyo Grande 300 East Brach Street Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner (805) 473 -5420 300 Reservoir Road, Arroyo Grande, California Tricia Knight for AT &T Mobility 123 Seacliff Drive Pismo Beach, CA 93449 Community Facility (CF) Public Facility (PF) Refer to page 7 Surrounding the site is the Methodist Camp to the east, residential development to the north and west, and a church and school to the south. The site is developed with a City domestic water tank and another monopine for AT &T Mobility. The site also includes a variety of native and non - native vegetation, including several pine and oak trees. None Page 9 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 76 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact ", as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: ® Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Land Use /Planning ❑ Population /Housing ❑ Transportation /Traffic ❑ Agricultural Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities /Service Systems Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hydrology /Water Quality ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that, although the original scope of the proposed project COULD have had a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect because revisions /mitigations to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or its functional equivalent will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment. However, at least one impact has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document, pursuant to applicable legal standards, and has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, as described in the report's attachments. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the impacts not sufficiently addressed in previous documents. ❑ I find that, although the proposed project could have had a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, pursuant to applicable standards, and have been avoided or mitigated, pursuant to an earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, all impacts have been avoided or mitigated to a less -than- significant level and no further action is required. Kelly Heffernon Date Associate Planner Page 10 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 77 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Evaluation of Environmental Impact§ 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact ", that are adequately supported by the information sources cited. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact does not apply to the project being evaluated (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on general or project- specific factors (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project- specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must consider the whole of the project - related effects, both direct and indirect, including off -site, cumulative, construction, and operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, the checklist answers must indicate whether that impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate when there is sufficient evidence that a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change may occur in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project that cannot be mitigated below a level of significance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. 4. A "Mitigated Negative Declaration" (Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures, prior to declaration of project approval, has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR (including a General Plan) or Negative Declaration [CCR, Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA, § 15063(c)(3)(D)]. References to an earlier analysis should: a) Identify the earlier analysis and state where it is available for review. b) Indicate which effects from the environmental checklist were adequately analyzed in the earlier document, pursuant to applicable legal standards, and whether these effects were adequately addressed by mitigation measures included in that analysis. c) Describe the mitigation measures in this document that were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and indicate to what extent they address site - specific conditions for this project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate references to information sources for potential impacts into the checklist or appendix (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances, biological assessments). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should include an indication of the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. A source list should be appended to this document. Sources used or individuals contacted should be listed in the source list and cited in the discussion. 8. Explanation(s) of each issue should identify: a) the criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate the significance of the impact addressed by each question and b) the mitigation measures, if any, prescribed to reduce the impact below the level of significance. Page 11 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 78 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 2012 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) 1 7U ! 1 ' -1 . . . 1. Aesthetics Environmental Setting The project site is located at the end of Reservoir Road on top of a knoll that contains a City -owned water tank surrounded by a chain link fence. Outside the fenced perimeter are a variety of pine, native and non - native trees that help to screen the water tank. The site includes a 38.5' tall monopine with related ground equipment for AT &T Mobility. The project would add a second tier of panel antennas below the existing antennas on this monopine. Discussion a -b: No impacts. c: The project site is elevated on a knoll and therefore visible from many vantage points within a quarter mile radius. The existing monopine was constructed in 2007. The branches of the monopine are in poor condition, do not completely hide the antennas and the color of the needles do not blend well with the existing pine trees on the project site. To ensure that the project blends with the existing area with reduced visual impact and superior camouflage, the following mitigation measures are required, and shall be implemented prior to issuance of building permit: MM 1.1: All existing branches of the monopine shall be replaced with branches that extend past the antennas, and with needle coloration that matches the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The project plans shall show a heavy branch count that adequately screens the antennas. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with simulated pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. MM 1.2: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit pine needle and sock camouflage samples of the monopine to the Community Development Department for verification of accurate color. Plans for the existing monopine shall be submitted with building plans for the proposed monopine to verify that adequate camouflage has occurred and the mitigation is satisfied. Page 12 of 26 Item 9.1b. - Page 79 Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Have a substantial adverse affect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and ❑ ❑ ❑ historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in ❑ ❑ ❑ the area? Discussion a -b: No impacts. c: The project site is elevated on a knoll and therefore visible from many vantage points within a quarter mile radius. The existing monopine was constructed in 2007. The branches of the monopine are in poor condition, do not completely hide the antennas and the color of the needles do not blend well with the existing pine trees on the project site. To ensure that the project blends with the existing area with reduced visual impact and superior camouflage, the following mitigation measures are required, and shall be implemented prior to issuance of building permit: MM 1.1: All existing branches of the monopine shall be replaced with branches that extend past the antennas, and with needle coloration that matches the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The project plans shall show a heavy branch count that adequately screens the antennas. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with simulated pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. MM 1.2: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit pine needle and sock camouflage samples of the monopine to the Community Development Department for verification of accurate color. Plans for the existing monopine shall be submitted with building plans for the proposed monopine to verify that adequate camouflage has occurred and the mitigation is satisfied. Page 12 of 26 Item 9.1b. - Page 79 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) MM 1.3: All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be screened from public view. Any new equipment cabinets shall be gray in color to match the water tank. 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Environmental Setting The subject property is not located adjacent to Agricultural land and therefore would have no impact to any Agricultural operations. * In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997), prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model for use in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Discussion a -e: No impacts. 3. Air Quality Environmental Setting San Luis Obispo County is in non - attainment status for ozone (03), respireable particulate matter (PM10) and vinyl chloride under the California Air Resource Board (CARB) standards. The County is in attainment status for all other applicable CARB standards. There is little to no earthmoving activities associated with the project since the facility already exists. The addition of antennas on an existing monopine and ground related equipment on a concrete pad will not create air quality impacts above the thresholds set by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No mitigation required. Page 13 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 80 Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220)g)), timberland (as defined by Public ❑ ❑ ❑ Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of ❑ ❑ 1:1 forest land to non - forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in ❑ ❑ ❑ conversion of Farmland to non - agricultural use? * In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997), prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model for use in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Discussion a -e: No impacts. 3. Air Quality Environmental Setting San Luis Obispo County is in non - attainment status for ozone (03), respireable particulate matter (PM10) and vinyl chloride under the California Air Resource Board (CARB) standards. The County is in attainment status for all other applicable CARB standards. There is little to no earthmoving activities associated with the project since the facility already exists. The addition of antennas on an existing monopine and ground related equipment on a concrete pad will not create air quality impacts above the thresholds set by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No mitigation required. Page 13 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 80 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobilitv) Discussion a -e: No impacts. 4. Biological Resources Environmental Setting The project site is developed with a water tank and a telecommunications facility for AT &T Mobility. There is a stand of Coast Live Ciak trees located east of the project site; however, no trees are proposed to be removed or impacted as a result of project development. Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable air quality plan? the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian substantially to an existing or projected air quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ violation? the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ❑ ❑ ❑ ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ number of people? Discussion a -e: No impacts. 4. Biological Resources Environmental Setting The project site is developed with a water tank and a telecommunications facility for AT &T Mobility. There is a stand of Coast Live Ciak trees located east of the project site; however, no trees are proposed to be removed or impacted as a result of project development. Page 14 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 81 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species identified as a sensitive, candidate, or special status species in ❑ ❑ ❑ local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by ❑ ❑ ❑ the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Page 14 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 81 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally Potentially protected wetlands, as defined by §404 of the Clean Less Than Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal ❑ ❑ ❑ pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, Significant hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any Impact native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or Impact with established native resident or migratory wildlife ❑ ❑ ❑ El corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? §15064.5? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation ❑ ❑ ❑ Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion a -f: No impacts. 5. Cultural Resources Environmental Setting The Arroyo Grande area in general is known to have been used by Native Americans. The project location, however, was previously graded and paved to construct City Reservoir No. 1, and the proposed project does not include any earth moving activities. Therefore, there are no anticipated impacts to cultural resources. Discussion a -c: No impacts. 6. Geology and Soils Environmental Setting The topography of the project site is flat where the water tank is located and then slopes up to the north and down to the south. The site is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain. The landslide risk and Page 15 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 82 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact with Mitigation Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, as defined in ❑ ❑ ❑ §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource, pursuant to ❑ ❑ ❑ §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ❑ ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion a -c: No impacts. 6. Geology and Soils Environmental Setting The topography of the project site is flat where the water tank is located and then slopes up to the north and down to the south. The site is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain. The landslide risk and Page 15 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 82 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) April 2013 liquefaction potential during a ground- shaking event is considered low. No active faulting is known to exist on or close to the subject property. The project is not within a known area containing serpentine or ultramafic rock or soils (i.e. low risk of naturally occurring asbestos). Discussion a -e: No impacts. 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Environmental Setting The project site is located on a knoll immediately north of the Village Area and is developed with a water tank and associated equipment. Surrounding the site is a Methodist Camp to the east, residential development to the north and west, and Valley View Academy School to the south. Page 16 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 83 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact with Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area, or based on other ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ❑ topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable, as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off -site ❑ ❑ ❑ landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-6 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal ❑ ❑ ❑ systems, where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Discussion a -e: No impacts. 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Environmental Setting The project site is located on a knoll immediately north of the Village Area and is developed with a water tank and associated equipment. Surrounding the site is a Methodist Camp to the east, residential development to the north and west, and Valley View Academy School to the south. Page 16 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 83 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Discussion a: The proposed project does not include any earth moving activities and therefore will not generate any airborne dust from construction. There will likely be some greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from the equipment and vehicles used to replace the branches and install the antennas, but insufficient to require mitigation. There are no GHG emissions anticipated from operating the telecommunication facility once the new antennas are installed. b: No impacts. 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Setting There are no known hazards or hazardous materials associated with the project site. The proposed facility will not result in conditions or circumstances contrary to the public health, safety and welfare, in that: 1) The proposed wireless communications facility will operate in full compliance with the U.S. standards for radio frequency emissions as adopted by the FCC; 2) The radio frequency emissions by the proposed facility will fall within the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum which transmits non - ionizing radio waves that are proven not to be harmful to living cells; and 3) Data currently available on the effects of electromagnetic transmissions on public health indicate there is no likelihood of negative impacts to public health and safety. Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the or indirectly, that may have a significant effect on the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ environment? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation disposal of hazardous materials? adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ ❑ greenhouse gases? environment through reasonably foreseeable upset Discussion a: The proposed project does not include any earth moving activities and therefore will not generate any airborne dust from construction. There will likely be some greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from the equipment and vehicles used to replace the branches and install the antennas, but insufficient to require mitigation. There are no GHG emissions anticipated from operating the telecommunication facility once the new antennas are installed. b: No impacts. 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Setting There are no known hazards or hazardous materials associated with the project site. The proposed facility will not result in conditions or circumstances contrary to the public health, safety and welfare, in that: 1) The proposed wireless communications facility will operate in full compliance with the U.S. standards for radio frequency emissions as adopted by the FCC; 2) The radio frequency emissions by the proposed facility will fall within the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum which transmits non - ionizing radio waves that are proven not to be harmful to living cells; and 3) Data currently available on the effects of electromagnetic transmissions on public health indicate there is no likelihood of negative impacts to public health and safety. Page 17 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 84 Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and /or accident conditions involving the release of ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous materials, substances, or waste into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Page 17 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 84 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobilitv) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of Potentially hazardous materials sites, compiled pursuant to ❑ ❑ ❑ Government Code §65962.5, and, as a result, create a Significant significant hazard to the public or environment? Significant No Impact e) Be located within an airport land use plan or, where Impact such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of Impact a public airport or public use airport? If so, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project result in a safety hazard for people residing or ❑ working in the project area? f) Be located in the vicinity of a private airstrip? If so, would the project result in a safety hazard for people ❑ ❑ ❑ residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death from wildland fires, including ❑ ❑ areas where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas ❑ or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion a- h: No impacts. 9. Hydrology and Water Quality Environmental Setting The project site is located within the incorporated City Limits of Arroyo Grande. The City provides water service, which consists of water from various sources (groundwater, Lopez Lake, etc). The project site is not located within a flood zone. The project does not require domestic water for operation of the telecommunication facility. The project site is already paved and has an existing drainage system. Page 18 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 85 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table ❑ ❑ ❑ level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through alteration of the ❑ ❑ course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial on- or off -site erosion or siltation? Page 18 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 85 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in on- or off -site flooding? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map, or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place structures that would impede or redirect flood flows within a 100 -year flood hazard area? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death from flooding, including flooding resulting from the failure of a levee or dam? j) Result in inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Discussion a -j: No impacts. 10. Land Use and Planning ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Significant ❑ ❑ ❑ Mitigation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Environmental Setting The project site is designated as Community Facility (CF) on the City's Land Use Map and Public Facility (PF) on the Zoning Map. The proposed use is consistent with the CF land use category and PF zoning district. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with the applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of any agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Discussion a -c: No impacts. Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 19 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 86 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) U Environmental Setting The project site does not contain any known mineral resources. Discussion a -b: No impacts. 12. Noise Environmental Setting The project site is located adjacent to residential development to the north and west. Existing ambient noise in the vicinity of the project site is primarily generated by vehicular traffic from U.S. Highway 101 to the west. Potentially Less Than Less Than Would the project: Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral b) Generate or expose people to excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that is or would be of value to the region and ❑ ❑ ❑ the residents of the state? ❑ ❑ ❑ without the project)? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project, in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ important mineral resource recovery site delineated ❑ ❑ ❑ on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use a public airport or public use airport? If so, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ plan? project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion a -b: No impacts. 12. Noise Environmental Setting The project site is located adjacent to residential development to the north and west. Existing ambient noise in the vicinity of the project site is primarily generated by vehicular traffic from U.S. Highway 101 to the west. Page 20 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 87 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Generate or expose people to noise levels in excess of standards established in a local general plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, state, or federal standards? b) Generate or expose people to excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne vibrations or groundborne noise levels? c) Create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project (above levels ❑ ❑ ❑ without the project)? d) Create a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project, in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ excess of noise levels existing without the project? e) Be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport? If so, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) Be in the vicinity of a private airstrip? If so, would the project expose people residing or working in the ❑ ❑ ❑ project area to excessive noise levels? Page 20 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 87 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Discussion a -c, e -f: No impacts. d: The project may generate loud noise during construction that would impact adjacent residences. This is considered a potentially significant impact that can be mitigated to a less- than - significant level with implementation of the below mitigation measures. MM 12.1: Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. There shall be no construction activities on Saturdays or Sundays. Equipment maintenance and servicing shall be confined to the same hours. 13. Population and Dousing Environmental Setting The project site is located on property zoned for public facility uses and is developed with a City -owned and operated water tank. The proposed project will not result in a need for new housing or displace existing housing. Discussion a -c: No impacts. 14. Public Services Environmental Setting Public services to the project site are readily provided by the City of Arroyo Grande. Page 21 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 88 Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes ® ❑ ❑ and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ❑ ❑ ❑ elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ❑ ❑ ❑ elsewhere? Discussion a -c: No impacts. 14. Public Services Environmental Setting Public services to the project site are readily provided by the City of Arroyo Grande. Page 21 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 88 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Discussion a: No impacts. 15. Recreation Environmental Setting The project will not affect any existing park or other recreational resource, and will not create additional demand for recreational facilities. Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Result in significant environmental impacts from regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that ❑ ® ❑ construction associated with the provision of new or occur or be accelerated? physically altered governmental facilities, or the need b) Include recreational facilities or require the for new or physically altered governmental facilities, to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or might have an adverse physical effect on the other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion a: No impacts. 15. Recreation Environmental Setting The project will not affect any existing park or other recreational resource, and will not create additional demand for recreational facilities. Discussion a -b: No impacts. 16. Transportation /Traffic Environmental Setting The project site is accessed by Reservoir Road, which specifically serves the existing water tank and telecommunication facility. Surrounding land uses are accessed by other roads. The project would generate a nominal number of vehicular trips during construction that are considered insignificant. Page 22 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 89 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that ❑ ® ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational- facilities that ❑ ❑ ❑ might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion a -b: No impacts. 16. Transportation /Traffic Environmental Setting The project site is accessed by Reservoir Road, which specifically serves the existing water tank and telecommunication facility. Surrounding land uses are accessed by other roads. The project would generate a nominal number of vehicular trips during construction that are considered insignificant. Page 22 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 89 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobilitv) Page 23 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 90 Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Cause a substantial increase in traffic, in relation to existing traffic and the capacity of the street system ❑ ❑ ❑ (i.e., a substantial increase in either the number of ❑ ❑ ❑ vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Exceed, individually or cumulatively, the level of service standards established by the county congestion ❑ ❑ ❑ management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Cause a change in air traffic patterns, including ❑ ❑ ❑ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in ❑ ❑ ❑ location, that results in substantial safety risks? d) Contain a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or a dangerous intersection) or incompatible uses (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ farm equipment) that would substantially increase hazards? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus ❑ ❑ ❑ turnouts, bicycle racks)? Discussion a -g: No impacts. 17. Utilities and Service Systems Environmental Setting The project site is located within the incorporated City Limits of Arroyo Grande. Utilities are served by both the City and other regional entities. No additional utility services are required for the project. Page 23 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 90 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment restrictions or standards of the applicable Regional Water Quality ❑ ❑ ❑ Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of ❑ ❑ ❑ existing facilities? Would the construction of these facilities cause ❑ ❑ ❑ significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ facilities? Page 23 of 26 Item 9.11b. - Page 90 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: project from existing entitlements and resources or ❑ ❑ ❑ ED are new or expanded entitlements needed? to drop below self- sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially e) Result in a determination, by the wastewater reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species; or eliminate treatment provider that serves or may serve the prehistory? b) Have the potential to achieve short -term project, that it has adequate capacity to service the ❑ ❑ ❑ project's anticipated demand, in addition to the individually limited but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively considerable" means that the provider's existing commitments? incremental effects of an individual project are ❑ ❑ ❑ significant when viewed in connection with the effects f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted and the effects of possible future projects. d) Cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste ❑ ❑ ❑ disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ ❑ ❑ regulations as they relate to solid waste? Discussion a -g: No impacts. Discussion a -d: No impacts. Page 24 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 91 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact a) Substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially ❑ ❑ ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species; or eliminate examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have the potential to achieve short -term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long -term ❑ ❑ ❑ environmental goals? c) Have possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are ❑ ❑ ❑ significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of possible future projects. d) Cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ❑ ❑ ❑ either directly or indirectly? Discussion a -d: No impacts. Page 24 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 91 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION April 2013 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) III I 1i MITI 1: 0 1 MM 1.1: Prior to issuance of building permit, all existing branches of the monopine shall be replaced with branches that extend past the antennas, and with needle coloration that matches the surrounding pine trees of the project site. The project plans shall show a heavy branch count that adequately screens the antennas. Socks made of cloth material and interwoven with simulated pine needles shall be placed over the antennas. MM 1.2: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit pine needle and sock camouflage samples of the monopine to the Community Development Department for verification of accurate color. Plans for the existing monopine shall be submitted with building plans for the proposed monopine to verify that adequate camouflage has occurred and the mitigation is satisfied. MM 1.3: Prior to issuance of building permit, all accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless facility shall be screened from public view. Any new equipment cabinets shall be gray in color to match the water tank. MM 12.1: Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. There shall be no construction activities on Saturdays or Sundays. Equipment maintenance and servicing shall be confined to the same hours. Page 25 of 26 Item 9.1b. - Page 92 INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 2012 ACUP 13 -002 (AT &T Mobility) Documents & Maps 1. Arroyo Grande General Plan 2. Arroyo Grande Municipal Code 3. Arroyo Grande Zoning Map 4. Arroyo Grande Existing Settings Report & Draft Arroyo Grande Existing Settings Report (2010) 5. Arroyo Grande Urban Water Management Plan 6. Arroyo Grande Stormwater Management Plan 7. San Luis Obispo Important Farmland Map (California Department of Conservation, 2006) 8. CEQA & Climate Change White Paper (CAPCOA, 2008) 9. Air Quality Handbook (SLO APCD, 2009) 10. Project Plans 11. Site Inspection Page 26 of 26 Item 9.b. - Page 93 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Item 9.b. - Page 94