R 3019
..
RESOLUTION NO. 3019
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM
CASE NO. 93-112, FOR RUSSELSIIEPPEL AT 880 OAK PARK
BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered an application
by Russel Sheppel for a Planned Sign Program at 880 Oak Park Boulevard, in the Planned
Development (PD 1.1) District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this planned sign program is consistent with
the General Plan; and
-- WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is categorically exempt per
CEQA Guidelines Section 15311; and
WHEREAS, the Architectural Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission have both
reviewed said application and recommended approval of the Planned Sign Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the
following circumstances exist:
1. The proposed signs are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the
Arroyo Grande General Plan. The proposed signs balance the need for identification of
businesses with the rural small town character of the community.
2. The proposed signs conform to applicable development standards and provisions of the
Development Code and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
3. The physical location or placement of the signs are compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and do not pose a safety risk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves said Planned Sign Program, subject to the following conditions of approval:
General Conditions
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are
applicable to this project.
2. This application shall automatically expire on March 8, 1996 unless a building permit is
issued and substantial construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion,
or a final inspection is conducted. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval,
the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City
Council at the meeting of March 8, 1994 and marked "Exhibit B".
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at hislher sole expense any action brought against the
City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the
alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,
officers, or employers, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City, its agents,
officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City
may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action
but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition.
Resolution No. 30 1 9
Planned Sign Program Case No. 93-112
Russel Sheppel
March 8, 1994
Page 2
Architectural Advisory Committee Conditions
5. The applicant shall delete the two center tenant signs on the Oak Park Boulevard frontage.
6. Each tenant shall only be allowed one sign.
7. All approved tenant sign frames shall be installed.
8. No logos shall be allowed on tenant signs. Only dark bronze letters may be used.
Planning Department Conditions
9. At least 265 square feet of landscaping shall be provided around the base of the monument
sign prior to final inspection of the sign or lighting for the sign.
Public Works Department Conditions
10. The monument sign shall be set back three feet (3 ') behind the road right of way.
Building Department Conditions
11. The applicant shall apply for necessary permits, pay fees, and call for inspections for any
lighting associated with the signs.
On motion of Council Member Souza, seconded by Council Member Burke , and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
A YES: Council Members Souza, Burke, Brandy and Mayor Gallagher
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Moots
A TIEST:
'17~a.~
NANCY A. / VIS, CITY CLERK
CITY A TIORNEY
Resolution No. 3019
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, NANCY A. DAVIS, city Clerk of the city of Arroyo Grande,
county of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify,
under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution No. 3019 is
a true, full and correct copy of said Resolution passed and adopted
i at a regular meeting of the Arroyo Grande city council on the 8th
day of March, 1994.
-- .-
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the city of Arroyo Grande
affixed this 15th day of March , 1994.
.
~a.~
NANCY A. AVIS, CITY CLERK
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE