CC 2014-06-24_09.a. Proposed City Charter on November BallotMEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER,
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON
THE BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR
CONSIDERATION BY QUALIFIED VOTERS
DATE: JUNE 24, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council: 1) adopt a Resolution ordering the submission to
the qualified voters of the City a measure relating to the adoption of a City Charter at
the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2014, as called
by Resolution No. 4596; 2) adopt a Resolution setting priorities for filing a written
argument regarding a City measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an
impartial analysis; 3) adopt a Resolution providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments
for City measures submitted at municipal elections; 4) approve the argument to be
submitted in favor of the measure; and 5) appropriate $5,000 from the General Fund
unappropriated fund balance for election and public education costs.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The cost of placing the measure on the November ballot is estimated to be
approximately $3,000. It is recommended that an additional $5,000 be appropriated
for costs related to preparing, printing and distributing public educations materials. If
successful and if the recently adopted statute known as SB7, which is now codified
as Labor Code Section 1782 (Chapter 794, Statutes of 2013) is ultimately
invalidated, it is estimated that the measure could result in savings of $50,000 to
$200,000 annually.
Public education activities will require a substantial amount of staff time. However, it
was identified in the City's major citywide goals for FY 2013-14.
BACKGROUND:
In California, there are two types of cities-general law cities and charter cities. The
authority of a general law city is derived from the powers granted to it by the general
laws adopted by the State Legislature and from the police power granted to it by the
State Constitution. A charter city derives its powers directly from the State
Item 9.a. - Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIED VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGE2
Constitution, subject to enactments of the legislature on matters of statewide
concern. Charter cities maintain authority over matters determined to be municipal
affairs.
A charter is a set of bylaws, which acts as a local constitution for the city. Pursuant
to State Law, a charter may only be adopted, amended or repealed by a majority vote
of the City's residents (reference Government Code Sections 34450 et seq.). The
City of Arroyo Grande is currently a general law city. There are over 120 charter
cities in California, which amounts to more than 25%.
This will be the fifth public hearing held to discuss placing a city charter on the ballot
beginning in 2012. In 2013, a Citizens Advisory Committee was appointed to
increase public input and develop recommendations on the charter, as well as
whether to proceed with the process. Seven committee meetings were held. All
meetings were open to the public, publicly noticed, and a number of individuals
attended the meetings and provided input.
The purpose of the makeup of the committee was to provide a broad range of
community representation. As a result, the City Charter Advisory Committee
included the following individuals and representation:
Judith Bean
Tom Goss
Patricia Hardy
Vard Ikeda
Kirk Scott
Randy Steiger
Bob Lund
Zachary Hall
Andrea Montes
Duke Sterling
John Keen
Chamber of Commerce Representative
Arroyo Grande in Bloom Representative
Rotary/Kiwanis Representative
Agriculture Representative
South County Historical Society Representative
Village Improvement Association Representative
Mayor Ferrara Appointee
Council Member Guthrie Appointee
Council Member Costello Appointee
Council Member Brown Appointee
Former Council Member Ray Appointee
The City Charter Advisory Committee recommended the City Council proceed to
place a measure on the November 4, 2014 ballot to consider the proposed City
Charter as drafted. The recommendations were presented to the Council at the
January 14, 2014 meeting. The Council made minor modifications and directed staff
to proceed with the process by scheduling the second public hearing, which was held
on April 8, 2014 following distribution of a public education mailer to all residents and
businesses in the City.
Two additional minor modifications were made to the draft Charter at that meeting.
First, language in the Elections provisions of the Charter (Section 205) was modified
Item 9.a. - Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIED VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGE 3
to clarify that while the Council may use a mail-in ballot or electronic voting systems
for special elections, the Charter can only be amended by a vote of the people at a
Statewide General Election. Second, Prevailing Wage provisions (Section 302) were
modified to clarify that criteria and guidelines for determining when payment of
prevailing wages will apply would be established by Council by ordinance. Once
again, these provisions would only apply if Labor Code Section 1782 (Chapter 794,
Statutes of 2013) is invalidated by the courts. Both of these changes have been
made to the final proposed Charter.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Purpose
The California Constitution vests charter cities with authority over municipal affairs,
significantly strengthening their home rule. There is no precise definition of the term
"municipal affair." Whether a given activity is a municipal affair over which a charter
city has sovereignty or a statewide concern over which the legislature has authority is
a question of law.
A charter city has many options when considering how to handle municipal affairs.
Activities which the courts have determined are municipal affairs include, but are not
limited to, the following:
1. Construction and maintenance contracting;
2. Land use;
3. City finances; and
4. City government structure.
By adopting a charter, the City will have far greater flexibility in the operations of its
municipal government, which, if properly utilized, can translate to greater efficiency,
effectiveness and innovation.
Process
Government Code Section 34458(b) requires that two public hearings be held prior to
' placing a city charter measure on the ballot. Two required public hearings were held
during the original effort. However, given the change in the process, changes to the
recommended City Charter, and the time that has lapsed since it was last discussed,
staff recommended the process start again. Both of the required public hearings
have been held, which were on January 14 and April 8, 2014. SB 311 (Chapter 184,
Statutes of 2013), which was recently approved by the State Legislature and signed
by the Governor, amended Government Code Sections 34457 and 34458 and now
requires any proposed city charter to be placed on the ballot of a statewide general
election.
Item 9.a. - Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIED VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGE4
A number of actions have been prepared for Council consideration. These include
adopting a Resolution placing the measure on the ballot, a Resolution setting
priorities for filing written arguments regarding the measure and directing the City
Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis, a Resolution providing for the filing of
rebuttal arguments, and approving the argument in favor of the measure.
Prevailing Wage
The most significant item involving the charter is the issue of prevailing wage
requirements. A number of representatives from various labor union organizations
spoke at City Charter Advisory Committee meetings and at the City Council public
hearings in opposition to any provisions modifying State prevailing wage
requirements. The proposed City Charter would not prohibit or preclude
requirements to pay prevailing wage on public works projects. It would simply
provide the City Council the authority to make that determination rather than the
State Legislature.
The purpose of providing increased flexibility to the City on prevailing wage
requirements is to ensure projects are constructed in the most cost effective manner.
The proposed language would enable the City Council to establish guidelines
whereby prevailing wage requirements could be applied when determined to be in
the best interest of the City and also waived when determined to be more cost
efficient for other projects.
SB 7
On July 2, 2012, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in State Building
and Constructions Trades Councils of California, AFL -CIO v. City of Vista. The
court held that locally funded public works projects performed by chartered cities are
municipal affairs under the California Constitution and, as a result, the wages paid to
workers on charter city projects are not subject to California's prevailing wage law.
Shortly following the ruling, the State legislature proposed and later approved SB 7,
now Labor Code Section 1782 (Chapter 794, Statutes of 2013). The law prohibits a
charter city from receiving or using State funding or financial assistance for a
construction project if the city has a voter-approved charter provision or ordinance
that authorizes a contractor to not comply with State prevailing wage requirements on
local construction projects funded by (non-State) city funds. The bill is now being
contested in court (City of El Centro v. Lanier). Due to its inconsistency with the City
of Vista ruling, the City Attorney's Office review concluded that it is likely to be
invalidated. However, it could take several years before the constitutionality of SB 7
is finally decided by the courts. Therefore, language has been provided in the
proposed City Charter provisions regarding prevailing wage so that they will take
effect only if SB 7 is found to be invalid by the courts.
Item 9.a. - Page 4
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIED VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGES
Public Works Contracts
The City Charter Advisory Committee determined there are benefits of utilizing the
State Public Works Contract Code to avoid the need by the City to entirely establish
its own policies and procedures. As a result, rather than exempting the City from the
entire State Public Works Contract Code, they instead recommended language that
would authorize the City to establish its own standards, procedures, rules or
regulations for those areas where staff identified it could result in significant
improvements. These areas include the ability to establish the City's own criteria for
determining award of public works contract bids, to accept gifts and donations of
material or labor, and to use in-house staff or coordinate with other public agencies to
construct public works projects. These changes would better enable the City to reject
bids from contractors with a history of low quality work, more easily accept work
provided by local contractors at reduced rates as part of community project efforts,
and to construct small scale projects more efficiently.
City Council Salaries
A common concern of city charter measures and a claim made in a mailer to Arroyo
Grande residents by opponents to the City Charter is that it would enable council
members to raise their own pay. This is due partly to the fact that the City of Bell
used their city charter to help carry out their salary increase abuses. The proposed
City Charter addresses this through Section 204, which states that the salary of the
Mayor and Council Members shall continue to be set pursuant to the State law
applicable to general law cities. Therefore, there will be no change.
Tax Increases
Another concern stemming from abuses in the City of Bell is the ability of charter
cities to increase taxes. This is also addressed in the proposed City Charter in
Section 102, which specifies that the City Charter does not provide any authority for
new or increased taxes beyond that provided to general law cities.
Public Education
It is proposed to distribute an additional informational flyer that will be produced in-
house by staff. Staff will also be available to speak to service clubs and community
groups and information will be placed in the City newsletter, website and cable
television channel.
Ballot Question
Staff researched the wording of a number of ballot questions used by other
jurisdictions. The recommended language is as follows:
Shall the charter be adopted making the City of Arroyo Grande a charter city so that
the laws of the City of Arroyo Grande shall prevail over state law with respect to
municipal affairs?
Item 9.a. - Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIEp VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGES
Staff felt this language is descriptive, accurate and impartial. Other common
variations that are alternatives include the following:
• Shall the proposed City charter of the City of Arroyo Grande be adopted?
• Shall the City of Arroyo Grande become a charter city by adopting a
charter to give it full home-rule powers under the State Constitution?
• Shall the City of Arroyo Grande be changed from a general law city to a
charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution
No. __ of the Arroyo Grande City Council?
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:
1. Approve staff's recommendations;
2. Modify the ballot question;
3. Modify the ballot argument;
4. Delay placing the Charter on the ballot until court rulings involving SB 7 are
completed;
5. Direct staff to remove the prevailing wage section from the proposed City
Charter and proceed to place it on the ballot;
6. Direct staff to remove the prevailing wage section and propose it as a separate
measure on the ballot or on the ballot at a subsequent election;
7. Make other changes to the draft City Charter and direct staff to proceed;
8. Direct staff to take no further action on the charter measure; or
9. Provide staff other direction.
ADVANTAGES:
Adopting the proposed City Charter would increase the City's autonomy from the
State; may enable the City to reduce the costs of capital and other improvements in
the future; would increase the City's ability to award bids only to competent
contractors; and would increase the ability to utilize in-house staff, volunteers and
contractors donating work on projects. Proceeding at this time may enable the City
Council to adopt its own guidelines on when to require prevailing wage rates, subject
to a final court ruling that SB 7 is invalid.
DISADVANTAGES:
There are costs and staff time associated with placing a city charter measure on the
ballot and educating the public. There will likely be strong organized opposition from
labor union organizations based on prior feedback. In addition, it will be challenging
to educate the public on the benefits of becoming a charter city.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
Item 9.a. - Page 6
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PLACING A PROPOSED CITY CHARTER ON THE
BALLOT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 ELECTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY
QUALIFIED VOTERS
JUNE 24, 2014
PAGE 7
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 34458 and 6066, the City Council held two
(2) noticed public hearings on January 14, 2014 and April 8, 2014 to consider the
proposed Charter and the content of the proposed Charter. A notice of public
hearing for this meeting to consider the proposed Charter was published in The
Tribune on Friday, May 30, 2014. No written public comments have been received.
Attachment:
1 . Proposed City Charter
2. Proposed Ballot Argument
Item 9.a. - Page 7
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS
OF THE CITY A MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF A CITY
CHARTER AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2014, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4596
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election on November 4, 2014 has been called by
Resolution No.4596 adopted on June 10, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also desires to submit to the voters at the election a question
relating to the adoption of a City Charter.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
does resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order submitted
to the voters at the General Municipal Election the following question:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
MEASURE Yes -
Shall the charter be adopted making the City of Arroyo No Grande a charter city so that the laws of the City of
Arroyo Grande shall prevail over state law with respect
to municipal affairs?
SECTION 2. That the full text of the proposed Charter to be submitted to the voters is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 4. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held
and conducted as provided by State law for holding municipal elections.
SECTION 5. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the
election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution
and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
On motion of Council Member _____ , seconded by Council Member ____ , and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this_ day of ___ , 2014.
Item 9.a. - Page 8
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE2
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
-___ _j
Item 9.a. - Page 9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE SETTING PRIORITIES FOR
FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO
PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Arroyo Grande,
California, on November 4, 2014, at which there will be submitted to the voters the
following measure:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
MEASURE Yes
Shall the charter be adopted making the City of
Arroyo Grande a charter city so that the laws of
the City of Arroyo Grande shall prevail over No
state law with respect to municipal affairs?
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council, being the legislative body of the City of Arroyo
Grande, hereby authorizes ALL members of the City Council, to file a written argument
in favor of the City measure not exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed
names and signatures of the authors submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter
3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California. The argument may be
changed or withdrawn until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no
arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed names
and signatures of the authors submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be
accompanied by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the Office of the City
Attorney are affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the
measure not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on the existing
law and the operation of the measure. If the measure affects the organization or
salaries of the office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial
analysis. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the
filing of primary arguments.
Item 9.a. - Page 10
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and
on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this __ day of June, 2014.
Item 9.a. - Page 11
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE3
TONYFERRARA,MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Item 9.a. - Page 12
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE
FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the
City Council by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for City measures submitted at municipal elections.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande as follows:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, when the City Elections Official has selected the arguments for and against
the measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the City Elections
Official shall send a copy of an argument in favor of the measure to the authors of any
argument against the measure, and a copy of an argument against the measure to the
authors of any argument in favor of the measure, immediately upon receiving the
arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a City measure
may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or may authorize
in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the rebuttal argument.
A rebuttal argument may not be signed by more than five authors.
The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at
least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing
direct arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of
Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments.
Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to
rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments
for City measures are repealed.
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be held
on November 4, 2014, and shall then be repealed.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the. passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
Item 9.a. - Page 13
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE2
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
_____ , and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this_ day of June, 2014.
Item 9.a. - Page 14
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
TONYFERRARA,MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Item 9.a. - Page 15
ATTACHMENT 1
CHARTER OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
ARTICLE I. MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS
ARTICLE II. FORM OF GOVERNMENT
ARTICLE Ill. CONTRACTS, PUBLIC FINANCING AND FRANCHISES
ARTICLE IV. REVENUE RETENTION
ARTICLE V. GENERAL LAWS
ARTICLE VI. INTERPRETATION
PREAMBLE
DRAFT
WE THE PEOPLE of the City of Arroyo Grande declare our intent to restore our
community to the historic principles of self-governance inherent in the doctrine of home-
rule. Sincerely committed to the belief that local government has the closest affinity to
the people governed, and firm in the conviction that the economic and fiscal
independence of our local government will promote the health, safety and welfare of all
the citizens of this City and better preserve its small town character and agricultural
heritage, we do hereby exercise the express right granted by the Constitution of the
State of California to enact and adopt this Charter for the City of Arroyo Grande.
ARTICLE I. MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS
Section 100. Municipal Affairs. The City shall have full power and authority to adopt,
make, exercise and enforce all legislation, laws, and regulations and to take all actions
relating to municipal affairs, without limitation, which may be lawfully adopted, made,
exercised, taken or enforced under the Constitution of the State of California. Without
limiting in any manner the foregoing power and authority, each of the powers, rights,
and responsibilities described in this Charter is hereby declared to be a municipal affair,
the performance of which is unique to the benefit and welfare of the citizens of the City
of Arroyo Grande.
Section 101. Incorporation and Succession. The City of Arroyo Grande, in the
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, shall continue to be a municipal
corporation under its present name City of Arroyo Grande. The boundaries of the City of
Arroyo Grande shall continue as now established until changed in the manrier
authorized by law. The City of Arroyo Grande shall remain vested with and shall
continue to own, have, possess, control and enjoy all property, rights of property and
rights of action of every nature and description owned, had, possessed, controlled or
enjoyed by it at the time this Charter takes effect, and is hereby declared to be the
successor of same. It shall be subject to all debts, obligations and liabilities, which exist
against the municipality at the time this Charter takes effect. All lawful ordinances,
1
Item 9.a. - Page 16
DRAFT
resolutions, rules and regulations, or portions thereof, in force at the time this Charter
takes effect and not in conflict with or inconsistent herewith, are hereby continued in
force until the same have been duly repealed, amended, changed or superseded by .
proper authority.
Section 102. No Increased Power to Tax. This Charter shall not be interpreted as
giving the City greater authority to raise the level of taxes or to create new taxes beyond
the powers granted to general law cities nor to exempt the City from any procedures for
raising the level of taxes or for creating new taxes required by the law applicable to
general law cities.
Section 103. Zoning and General Plan Consistency. Zoning shall continue to be to
be consistent with the City's General Plan, pursuant to requirements of the State law
applicable to general law cities.
ARTICLE II. FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Section 200. Form of Government. The City shall continue to be governed under this
Charter by a "Council-Manager" form of government. The City Council will establish the
policy of the City and the City Manager will carry out that policy.
Section 201. Elected Officials. The elective officers of the City of Arroyo Grande shall
be a Mayor and four Council members each of whom, including the Mayor, shall have
the right to vote on all questions coming before the Council. The minimum qualifications
for these offices shall be as provided by law for general law cities and any vacancy in
office shall be filled in the manner provided by that law. The Mayor shall be elected at
the general municipal election from the City at large. The Council members shall be
elected at the general municipal election from the City at large, two being selected
biennially. The term of the Mayor shall be two years and the terms of the Council
members shall be four years.
Section 203. Mayor. Powers and Duties. The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the
City Council. As presiding officer of the Council the Mayor will faithfully communicate
the will of the Council majority to the administrative officers in matters of policy. The
Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes.
Section 204. Council Member Compensation. The salary of the Mayor and Council
Members shall continue to be set pursuant to the State law applicable to general law
cities.
Section 205. Elections. The City Council may approve by ordinance use of a mail-in
ballot or other electronic voting systems for special elections, except that this Charter
shall only be amended by a vote of the people at a Statewide General Election. All
elections shall be held in accordance with all other provisions of the law applicable to
general law cities.
2
Item 9.a. - Page 17
DRAFT
ARTICLE Ill. CONTRACTS, PUBLIC FINANCING AND FRANCHISES
Section 300. Economic and Community Development. The City shall encourage,
support, and promote economic and community development and preserve and
enhance the small-town and historic character of Arroyo Grande.
Section 301. Public Works Contracts. Th'e City shall follow the provisions of the
California Public Contract Code and its standards, procedures, rules or regulations
relating to the bidding, award and performance of any public works contract, except that
the City shall have the power to establish by ordinance alternative standards,
procedures, rules or regulations for public projects in the following areas:
(i) The City Council may, by ordinance, establish criteria for determining the
award of public works contracts to the lowest responsible and most
reliable bidder on any project, as well as other aspects of bidding, award
and performance of any public works contract that it deems to be in the
best interests of the City.
(ii) The City shall have the power to accept gifts and donations, including
donations of material and labor, in the construction of any public works
project.
(iii) The City shall have the power to perform any work of improvement by use
of its own forces and is not required to contract for the construction of
works of public improvement.
(iv) The City may also contract with other public agencies for the construction
of works of public improvement
Section 302. Prevailing Wage. The City Council shall establish by Ordinance criteria
and guidelines for determining when payment of prevailing wages will apply to any
contract. Prevailing wages shall also apply if:
(i) the prevailing wage is legally required, and constitutionally permitted, to be
imposed;
(ii) required by Federal or State grants pursuant to Federal or State law;
(iii) the City Council does not consider the project to be a municipal affair.
Section 303. Purchasing. The City shall have the power to establish standards,
procedures, rules or regulations related to the purchasing of goods, property, or
services, including, but not limited to, the establishment of local preferences.
Section 304. Public Financing. The City shall have the power to establish standards,
procedures, rules or regulations related to any public financing.
Section 305. Utility Franchises. The City shall have the power to adopt any ordinance
providing for the acquisition, development, or operation by the City of any utility, or to
adopt any ordinance providing for the granting of a franchise to any utility not owned by
the City which proposes to use or is using City streets, highways or other rights-of-way.
3
Item 9.a. - Page 18
DRAFT
Section 306. Supporting Volunteers in Arroyo Grande
The City seeks to support volunteers in creating a higher quality of life for Arroyo
Grande citizens and declares itself exempt from any State laws or regulations that
would make it more difficult or expensive for volunteers in any community project,
whether funded with City revenues or not.
Section 307. Section 302 and Labor Code Section 1782
Neither Section 302, nor any subsequently adopted ordinance, shall be interpreted or
applied in any manner that would authorize any contractor to avoid compliance with the
requirements of Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of the California Labor Code,
commencing with Section 1770, relating to the payment of prevailing wages on public
works projects. Section 302 shall only be operative during such time that a court of
competent jurisdiction enjoins the operation of Labor Code Section 1782 (Chapter 794,
Statutes of 2013, also referred to as SB7), or a final decision has been rendered by a
court of competent jurisdiction that Labor Code Section 1782 is invalid and
unenforceable. After such a final decision has been rendered invalidating Labor Code
1782, this Section 307 shall no longer be operative and may be deleted from this
Charter.
ARTICLE IV. REVENUE RETENTION
Section 400. Reductions Prohibited. Any revenues raised and collected by the City
shall not be subject to subtraction, retention, attachment, withdrawal or any other form
of involuntary reduction by any other level of government.
Section 401. Mandates Limited. No person, whether elected or appointed, acting on
behalf of the City, shall be required to perform any function which is mandated by any
other level of government, unless and until funds sufficient for the performance of such
function are provided by said mandating authority.
ARTICLE V. GENERAL LAWS
Section 500. General Law Powers. In addition to the power and authority granted by
the terms of this Charter and the Constitution of the State of California, the City shall
have the power and authority to adopt, make, exercise and enforce all legislation, laws
and regulations and to take all actions and to exercise any and all rights, powers, and
privileges heretofore or hereafter established, granted or prescribed by any law of the
State of California or by any other lawful authority. In the event of any conflict between
the provisions of this Charter and the provisions of the general laws of the State of
California, the provisions of this Charter shall control.
ARTICLE VI. INTERPRETATION
Section 600. Construction and Interpretation. The language contained in this Charter
is intended to be permissive rather than conclusive or limiting and shall be liberally and
4
Item 9.a. - Page 19
DRAFT
broadly construed in favor of the exercise by the City of its power to govern with respect
to any matter which is a municipal affair.
Section 601. Severability. If any provision of this Charter should be held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
ARTICLE VII. AMENDMENTS
Section 700. Amendments. Any proposal for the amendment, revision, or repeal of
this Charter or any portion thereof may be proposed by majority vote of the City Council
or by initiative by the People of the City of Arroyo Grande. No such proposal shall be
effective until approved by a majority vote of the voters voting at an election on the
question and until filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California. In the event
of any conflict between this section and Article XI, § 3 of the California Constitution, as
may be amended, the latter shall govern.
Authentication
And
Certification
Authenticated and certified to be a true copy by Mayor ____ and City Clerk __
Date of Municipal Election: ATTEST:
Mayor City Clerk
5
Item 9.a. - Page 20
ATTACHMENT 2
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE __
We, not the State, should decide what is in the best interest of our community. Your
YES vote on Measure to approve a city charter will help increase local control
and the principles of home rule and self governance. It will enable the City Council, not
the State Legislature, to make decisions on issues that have been determined by the
State Constitution and courts to be "municipal affairs".
Each year, the State takes over $800,000 from our City to balance their budget and
fund their own programs. They impose unfunded programs, infringe upon municipal
affairs, and restrict contracting procedures that reduce the City's ability to utilize your
tax dollars in the most cost efficient manner. It's imperative that we gain more control
over our municipal affairs-and a Charter is the way Arroyo Grande can do that.
Do not be misled. Voting YES on Measure will not change any other laws or
ordinances and can only be modified by a public vote. Voting YES on Measure __
will not increase taxes or provide any additional authority to do so. Voting YES on
Measure will not increase compensation for Council Members or provide any
additional authority to do so.
The proposed Charter was developed through an extensive public process to erisure it
reflects the interests of the community. A Citizens' Advisory Committee of appointed
representatives from the community at large developed recommendations after holding
seven public meetings. The City Council then approved placing the proposed City
Charter on the ballot following a process that involved five public hearings.
Please join us in taking charge of our destiny by restoring local control over municipal
affairs and enabling the City to operate as efficiently as possible. Join us in voting YES
on Measure ----
Tony Ferrara, Mayor Jim Guthrie, Mayor Pro Tern
Joe Costello, Council Member Tim Brown, Council Member
Kristen Barneich, Council Member
Item 9.a. - Page 21
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item 9.a. - Page 22