CC 2014-09-23_08.c. Recycled Water Planning StudyMEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN A RECYCLED WATER
FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY AND GRANT APPLICATION FOR A
SATELLITE WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY FOR THE
SOUTH SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council 1) approve participation in the preparation of a grant
application and Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study (Study) for a potential Satellite
Water Resources Recovery Facility (SWRRF) for the South San Luis County Sanitation
District (SSLOCSD); and 2) appropriate $40,877 from the Water Fund for the City’s
portion of the study and matching costs.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
It is recommended the City split the costs with the SSLOCSD. The total cost of the
study and application is anticipated to be $156,700. Each agency would pay $40,877.
The remainder of the cost would be paid by the grant provided through the State Water
Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) Water Recycling Facilities Planning Grant
Program. Staff work would need to be dedicated to the project, but water resources is a
priority goal in the City’s Critical Needs Action Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Water Recycling Funding Program (WRFP) provides grants to assist public
agencies with facilities planning studies to determine the feasibility of using recycled
water to offset the use of fresh/ potable water from the state and/ or local supplies. The
grant will cover 50 percent of the eligible costs up to a maximum of $75,000.
The SSLOCSD provides wastewater treatment services for the City, as well as the City
of Grover Beach and the Oceano Community Services District. Groundwater supply for
these member agencies may be severely impacted due to drought conditions. On June
7, 2012, a public Water Recycling Forum was held at the South County Regional
Center. In recent years, agencies have recognized that Water Recycling will be a
necessary component of meeting our future water demands in the South San Luis
Obispo County Area. Water Recycling can help to effectively manage groundwater
resources, protect water quality, and meet California Recycled Water goals.
Item 8.c. - Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN A RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES
PLANNING STUDY
SEPTEMBER 23, 2014
PAGE 2
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
At the City Council meeting of June 10, 2014, the Council directed staff to pursue grant
opportunities for recycled water projects in order to provide long term protection of the
groundwater basin. The development of a recycled water project such as the SWRRF
could be used to offset groundwater pumping or provide recharge to the groundwater
basin and improve water supply reliability for the City.
Opportunities have been identified by SSLOCSD consulting staff that include locating a
SWRRF adjacent to the Arroyo Grande trunk sewer line in the general vicinity of land
south of Arroyo Grande High School. This project would intercept effluent prior to it
entering the SSLOCSD plant within or immediately adjacent to the City and as such
would create benefits directly to the City.
Potential benefits of the satellite facility include: improved jurisdictional control; fewer
permitting obstacles due to location outside of the Coastal zone, favorable conditions for
groundwater recharge, cost savings due to minimized distance of distribution piping,
ability to discharge brine through the existing truck sewer line, assists the SSLOCSD in
meeting redundancy requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, better
overall feasibility of a SSLOCSD Recycled Water project and improved timing for
potential water bond funding opportunities. The project is conceptual at this time, but it
is generally anticipated that at 90% recovery, the project could generate approximately
500-600 acre-feet per year of water.
In order to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the SWRRF, the
SSLOCSD is engaging Water Systems Consulting (WSC) to develop the grant
application and, if successful, prepare the Study. An initial investment analysis is
included in the scope of work to determine economic feasibility first. If the project is
deemed economically viable, WSC will proceed with development of projected water
supplies and characteristics, wastewater characteristics and facilities, treatment
requirements, recycled water opportunities, legal permitting requirements, and the
recommended facilities project plan.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for the Council’s consideration:
Approve staff’s recommendations;
Do not approve staff’s recommendations;
Modify as appropriate and approve staff’s recommendations; or
Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The recommended action will allow the City of Arroyo Grande to take advantage of a
grant opportunity to leverage funding, pursue a recycled water project that would benefit
Item 8.c. - Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN A RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES
PLANNING STUDY
SEPTEMBER 23, 2014
PAGE 3
the City and the SSLOCSD, and potentially position the project for additional funding
opportunities in the future. The project is in line with long term water resource
objectives of the City.
DISADVANTAGES:
Staff believes there is little disadvantage to proceeding with the study. With regard to
any future project, there are a number of issues that will need to be resolved in order to
proceed. These include costs, coordination and approval by partner agencies,
environmental impacts, and the permitting process involved.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for the study at this time. Environmental review will
be required prior to proceeding with approval of any improvement project(s).
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, September 18, 2014. The
Agenda and report were posted on the City’s website on Friday, September 19, 2014.
No public comments were received.
Attachment:
1. Proposal from WSC, Inc.
Item 8.c. - Page 3
J
o·~wsc ;~
WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC.
8/12/2014
Shannon Sweeney
South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO COMPLETE A RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY FOR A
SATELLITE WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY FOR THE SOUTH SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
As requested, WSC has prepared the following proposal to prepare a grant application for and complete
a Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study (RWFPS) for a potential Satellite Water Resources Recovery
Facility (SWRRF) for the South San Luis County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). The pu'rpose of the RWFPS
will be to evaluate, identify a preferred alternative and develop an implementation plan for a SWWRF
within the SSLOCSD's collection system.
The SSLOCSD Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) currently lacks sufficient redundancy for its
secondary treatment system to allow for the existing trickling filter to be taken out of service for
extended maintenance or in the event of a process upset. It is envisioned that development of a SWRRF
would provide the SSLOCSD with increased upstream treatment capacity and the ability to reduce flow
-rates at the existing WWTP to accommodate maintenance activities and process upsets.
The SSLOCSD provides wastewater treatment services for the Cities of Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach and
the Oceana Community Services District (Member Agencies). The water supplies for these agencies,
specifically the Northern Cities Managemer:it Area (NCMA) of the Santa Maria Groundwater Basin, have
been significantly impacted by drought conditions over the last 10 years. The development of a SWRRF
would provide these agencies with access to a supplemental water supply that could be used to offset
groundwater pumping or recharge the groundwat~r basin and improve water supply reliability for
Southern San Luis Obispo County.
In order assist the SSLOCSD in evaluating the economic feasibility and funding the development of a
SWRRF, WSC proposes the following funding plan:
1. Develop an application for grant funding of $75,000 for a Recycled Water Facilities Planning
Study through the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Water Recycling Facilities
Planning Grant Program (FPGP).
2. Prepare the RWFPS, including an initial investment analysis to determine if the proposed
concept is economically feasible_ to implement.
3. Upon completion of the RWFPS, apply for a low interest loan through the SWRCB's Clean Water
State Revolving Fund (SRF) for planning, design, and construction of the SWRRF. Funds from this
PO Rox tfl)'i I s,111 I uis OIJl'.po, CA 93403 I Pho1lP: (805) 457-ll83·; I i:,1x: (80<>) ggg 276'] I 'vVWW.W~< -Ill<" COili
ATTACHMENT 1
Item 8.c. - Page 4
loan could be utilized to reimburse the SSLOCSD for expenses accrued during the development
of the RWFPS. This proposal does not include scope to complete the SRF funding process.
To accomplish the steps described above, WSC prepared the attached scope of work, schedule and fee
estimate for SSLOCSD review. If you have any questions please contact us at (aos) 457-8833; Jeff is at
ext. 101 and Dan is at ext. 104. You can also email us at jszytel@wsc-inc.com or dheimel@wsc-inc.com.
Sincerely,
Water Systems Consulting, Inc.
Jeffery Szytel, PE, MBA
Principal
Enclosures:
Attachment 1. Scope
Attachment 2. Fee Estimate
Attachment 3. Schedule
2
Daniel Helmel, PE
Project Manager
Item 8.c. - Page 5
Attachment 1. Scope 8/12/2014
'-: ' '
' ':, ,' •, ~ ' \ " ' -.: -: '
Item 8.c. - Page 6
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
TASK 1.0 FPGP APPLICATION ASSISTANCE
WSC will assist the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) to obtain funding from
the Water Recycling Facilities Planning Grant Program (FPGP) administered by the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for a Satellite Water Resources Recovery Facility (SWRRF) project.
This scope includes preparing, submitting and managing the FPGP application for the SWRRF project.
1.1 FPGP Application Management and Support
);--WSC will manage the SWRRF project application through the FPGP process on behalf of
SSLOCSD.
>:-WSC will participate in an initial kickoff call with the SWRCB to start the application
development process.
);--WSC will provide ongoing coordination with SSLOCSD to gather required documentation and
forms to complete and submit the FPGP application.
);--WSC will coordinate and participate in a meeting with SWRCB staff to review the FPGP
applications package.
1.2 FPGP Application Preparation
);--WSC will complete the application form and compile SSLOCSD's resolution authorizing the FPGP
grant application.
);--WSC will prepare the Plan of Study consisting of the following components:
1. A description of the recycled water service area that will be studied.
2. The potential sources of recycled water and a summary of the unit processes
currently in use at existing treatment facilities.
3. A description of the current disposal/reuse of the wastewater that is proposed to be
recycled.
4. A map of the study area showing the sources of recycled water and potential service
area(s).
5. Identification of the water and wastewater agencies having jurisdictions over the
sources of recycled water and/or the potential service area.
6. A general description of water recycling and potable water supply alternatives that
will be evaluated.
7. A description of the opportunities for stakeholder participation, for example, public
meeting with the local community members, potential recycled water users, and
other agencies that have a stake in the study.
8. A schedule with the start and completion dates of major tasks associated with the
facilities planning study.
Item 8.c. - Page 7
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
9. A list of potential problems that may cause delay in the progress of the study and
description of the proposed actions to reduce the impact of these potential
problems.
10. Identification of the entities that will be conducting the study and description of
their roles. This may include a description of proposed subcontracts with
consultants or interagency agreements with other agencies, and any force account
work.
11. Proposed budget for the study, including estimated costs of specific tasks, sources
of financing, and sources of funds for cash flow until grant reimbursement.
~ WSC will make necessary adjustments to the FPGP application package components after the
review meeting with the SWRCB to obtain approval of the Plan of Study, thus allowing the
SWRCB to issue a grant commitment.
TASK 2.0 RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
PREPARATION
2.0 lnvestment Analysis
2.0.1 Conceptual Design Criteria
~ Quantify the amount of water available for a SWRRF along the SSLOCSD trunklines from the City
of Arroyo Grande through review of SSLOCSD Hydraulic Model.
~ Define conceptual design criteria for the facility. It is anticipated that the conceptual design for
the facility will include the following:
• Capacity to treat current Average Dry Weather-Flow (ADWF)
• Advanced level of treatment suitable for groundwater recharge
• Solids conveyed downstream with membrane concentrate
~ It is assumed that the SSLOCSD will provide information on potential locations and
corresponding land acquisition costs for th~ treatment and recharge facilities.
2.0.2 Cost Estimates
~ Develop planning level cost estimates for constructing and operating a SWRRF in the SSLOCSD
collection system.
~ Utilize existing planning level cost estimates for alternative SSSLOCSD WWTP improvements to
meet the redundancy requirements for comparison with the SWRRF.
~ Utilize planning level cost estimates for supplemental water supply alternatives. Cost estimates
to be obtained from the Pismo Beach Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study.
Item 8.c. - Page 8
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
2.0.3 InvestmentAnalysis
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
~ Compare planning level cost estimates for the SWRRF against cost estimates for SSLOCSD
redundancy requirements and supplemental water supply alternatives.
· ~ Evaluate and summarize key considerations and constraints for project implementation
2.0.4 Draft Investment Analysis TM
~ Prepared draft Investment Analysis TM documenting the rest:1lts of the Investment Analysis.
I Deliverable: Draft Investment Analysis TM
2.0.5 Investment Analysis Review Meeting
~ Plan, schedule and lead a meeting with SSLOCSD staff (and key stakeholders as appropriate) to
review the results of the Investment Analysis.
Deliverable: WSC will provide agenda and meeting materials at least three (3) _working days
prior to the meeting will provide summary notes with action items within five (5) working days
following the meeting.
2.0.6 Final Investment Analysis TM
~ Prepared a final Investment Analysis TM that incorporates comments from SSLOCSD staff and
other stakeholders.
I Deliverable: Final Investment Analysis TM
2.1 Project Management
2.1.1 Project Administration
2.1.1.1 Project schedule
~ Prepare project schedule and update as-required based upon actual progress and SSLOCSD
direction. Submit revised schedules to the SSLOCSD as necessary.
2.1.1.2 Progress reports
~ Prepare progress reports to be submitted with each monthly invoice. The reports will include: 1)
summary of activities accomplished in the current month; 2) outstanding information and/or
coordination needs; and 3) schedule updates.
Deliverable: WSC will provide a preliminary project schedule at the Kickoff Meeting and will
provide updated project schedules as-needed throughout the project. WSC will provide
monthly progress reports with project invoices.
2.1.2 KickoffMeeting
~ WSC will plan, organize and facilitate a l<ickoff Meeting with SSLOCSD staff.
Item 8.c. - Page 9
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
);>-The purpose of the meeting will be to: (1) discuss the goals and objectives of the Planning Study
including the Study Parameters identified in the Plan of Study approval by the SWRCB; (2)
review the scope and schedule of the project including assumptions and proposed
methodologies; (3) identify data needs and sources; (4) define coordination requirements; (5)
set dates/times for the subsequent workshops; (6) confirm level and nature of SWRCB
involvement during the project; (7) discuss and develop strategies for stakeholder involvement;
(8) finalize the conceptual design criteria for the Investment Analysis; and (9) identify action
items and required follow-up.
);>-Budget is based on a 2-hour meeting attended by WSC's Principal, Associate Engineer I, and
Assistant Engineer.
Deliverable: WSC will provide agenda and meeting materials at least three (3) working days
prior to the meeting and will provide summary notes with action items within three (3)
working days following the meeting.
2.1.3 Workshops
2.1.3.1 Worf<shop #1: Conceptual Alternatives Development
(1) Plan, schedule and lead a workshop with SSLOCSD staff (and key stakeholders as
appropriate) to develop conceptual alternatives for the SWRRF, including customer/use
type, treatment, storage, and distribution. The workshop is anticipated to include the
following topics:
(a) Review water supplies and characteristics (Task 2.3)
(b) Review wastewater characteristics and facilities (Task 2.4)
(c) Review treatment requirements (Task 2.5)
(d) Review recycled water market/opportunities (Task 2.6)
(e) Review legal, permitting and environmental criteria (Task 2.7)
(f) Review planning and design assumptions (Task 2.8.1)
(g) Develop up to three (3) conceptual treatment alternatives
(h) Develop up to three (3) conceptual distribution alternatives
(i) Develop up to three (3) conceptual storage alternatives
(j) Develop non-recycled water alternative
(2) Budget is based on a 3-hour workshop attended by WSC's Principal, Associate Engineer
I, Assistant Engineer, and Staff Planner II.
2.1.3.2 Workshop #2: Alternatives Evaluation and Screening
(1) Coordinate a workshop with SSLOCSD staff to evaluate and screen each of the
conceptual alternatives developed in Workshop #1, and to develop/select a preferred
alternative for treatment, storage and distribution.
Item 8.c. - Page 10
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
(2) Develop screening/evaluation criteria for the conceptual alternatives, including:
(a) Cost (capital, O&M, NPV, EAC and $/AF)
(b) Water supply benefits
(c} Water quality considerations
(d) Flexibility, expandability
(e) Sequencing/phasing/schedule considerations
(f) Consistency with project goals/objectives
(3) Evaluate and compare the conceptual alternatives by applying the selected
screening/evaluation criteria
(4) Select the preferred project alternative, which may combine aspects/components of
more than one conceptual alternative
(5) Budget is based on a 3-hour workshop attended by WSC's Principal, Associate Engineer
I, Assistant Engineer, and Staff Planner II.
Deliverable: WSC will provide agenda and meeting materials at least three (3) working days
prior to each workshop and will provide summary notes with action items within three (3)
working days following the meeting.
2.1.4 Deliverable Review Meetings
2.1.4.1 Deliverable Review Meeting #1: Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
(1) Plan, schedule and lead a meeting to review the draft recycled water facilities planning
study
(2) Budget is based on a 2-hour meeting attended by WSC's Principal, Associate Engineer I,
and Assistant Engineer.
2.1.4.2 Deliverable Review Meeting #2: Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
(1) Plan, schedule and lead a meeting to review the final draft recycled water facilities
planning study
(2) Budget is based on a 2-hour meeting attended by WSC's Principal, Associate Engineer I,
and Assistant Engineer.
Deliverable: WSC will provide agenda and meeting materials at least three (3) working days
prior to the meeting and will provide notes with action items within three (3) working days
following the meeting.
2.2 Background
2.2.1 Study Area
);:-Prepare a summary of the Study Area that includes:
(1} Narrative description of the Study Area
Item 8.c. - Page 11
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
(2) Descriptive maps and diagrams showing vicinity, jurisdictional boundaries, proposed
annexation areas, regional topography/geography, gr~undwater basin boundaries,
hydrologic features, and current and projected land use.
~ The proposed Study Area shall include the current SSLOCSD service area, proposed scalping
locations along the SSLOCSD trunk lines for the City of Arroyo Grande, and the remainder of the
Northern Cities Management Area (NCMA).
2.2.2 Goals and Objectives
~ Summarize goals and objectives defined during the Kickoff Meeting.
2.3 Water Supplies and Characteristics
2.3.1 Water supply characteristics
~ Summarize current and projected water supplies for the Member agencies based on 2010 Urban
Water Management Plans (2010 UWMPs) and NCMA Technical Group (TG) Annual Reports.
~ For each water supply source, summarize:
(1) Source characteristics
(2) Capacities of existing facilities
(3) Wholesale agencies and delivery mechanisms
(4) Fixed and variable costs
(5) Management considerations including reliability
(6) Water quality considerations
2.3.2 Water Demand Characteristics
~ Summarize current and projected water demand from 2010 UWMPs and NCMA TG Annual
Reports.
2.3.3 Water Pricing
~ Summarize the current water rate structures for the MEMBER Agencies and any planned or
upcoming rate increases.
2.4 Wastewater Characteristics and Facilities
2.4.1 Existing Facilities
~ Describe existing wastewater treatment plant facilities including capacity, current flows,
description of treatment processes and design criteria. It is assumed that this information will
be readily available from previous documents.
~ Summarize the SSLOCSD's existing waste discharge requirements
~ Characterize current and projected future influent flows. It is assumed that flow projection
estimates will be available from previous studies.
~ Characterize current effluent water quality including any seasonal variation
Item 8.c. - Page 12
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
» Summarize source(s) of industrial or other problem constituents (including hlgh-TDS Infiltration)
and control measures
» Summarize current wastewater flow variations including peaking factors for maximum month
(MM), maximum day (MD), peak hour wet weather flow (PHWWF)
» Describe existing recycling including users, quantities, and contractual and pricing arrangements
(none expected)
» Summarize existing rights to use of treated effluent after discharge (none expected)
2.4.2 Future Facilities
» Outline expected future waste discharge requirements based on conversations with the
SSLOCSD staff, review of the Basin Plan, and meetings with SSLOCSD staff and the Regional
Water Quality Control Board
» Describe plans for new wastewater treatment facilities to achieve regulatory compliance
2.5 Treatment Requirements
2.5.1 Recycled Water Quality Requirements
» Describe required water qualities and/or treatment requirements for each category of potential
recycled water use
» Describe regulatory requirements for recycled water Including Title 22 unrestricted irrigation,
and groundwater recharge
~ Describe Basin Plan requirements for recycled water use
» Describe water quality related requirements of the RWQCB to protect surface or ground water
from problems resulting from recycled water
~ Describe operational and on-site requirements for recycled water (such as backflow prevention,
buffer zones, etc.)
2.6 Recycled Water Market/Opportunities
2.6.1· Update Market Analysis
» Obtain and review recent customer consumption data for potential recycled water customers
identified in the Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan
» Describe validation and market analysis methodology. For each identified user or category of
potential user, summarize type of use, expected annual use, peak use, estimated internal capital
investment required (on-site ·conversion costs), needed water cost savings, desire to use
recycled water, date of possible initial use of recycled water, present and future source(s) of
water and quality of use, quality and reliability needs and wastewater disposal methods.
Item 8.c. - Page 13
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
2.6.2 Preliminary Market Assurances
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
);> Contact a representative sample of potential future recycled water users and obtain preliminary
market assurances. It is anticipated that WSC would develop a plan to approach the top 20
potential customers (in terms of total projected recycled water use) and attempt to obtain a
preliminary assurance in the form of a letter, email or other form of correspondence. It is
assumed that the member agencies will assist in contacting and obtaining assurances from the
identified customers within their service area.
);> Develop map of proposed service area based on results of market assessment.
2. 7 Legal, Permitting and Environmental Criteria
2. 7.1 Tentative Water Recycled Requirements of RWQCB
);> Contact RWQCB to obtain preliminary requirements for development of a recycled water
treatment and distribution system.
2.7.2 Permitting Requirements
);> Identify and summarize the probable permitting requirements for implementing recycled water
projects. Utilize previously completed recycled water studies as the basis for developing the
summary of probable permitting requirements.
);> It is assumed that the SSLOCSD staff will take the lead in coordinating with the RWQCB and
obtaining approval for utilizing a SWRRF to meet the WWTP's redundancy requirements.
2.7.3 Water Rights Considerations
);> Summarize potential water rights impacts the development of the recycled water program could
have on the NCMA Agencies' water rights.
2.7.4 Environmental Documentation Requirements (CEQA)
);> Research and summarize the necessary environmental documentation requirements to
implement a recycled water program.
2.8 Project Alternatives Analysis
2.8.1 Planning and Design Assumptions
);> Develop relevant planning and design assumptions and criteria tha_t will be used when
evaluating project alternatives. These assumptions should include:
(1) Delivery and system pressure criteria
(2) Peak delivery criteria
(3) Storage criteria
(4) Cost basis: key assumptions; cost index; cost escalation and contingency factors;
discount rate; evaluation term for present worth analysis; etc.
(5) Planning period
(6) Conceptual infrastructure design criteria
Item 8.c. - Page 14
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
2.8.2 Alternatives Development -Treatment
);;>-Develop up to two (2) conceptual facility alternatives for each of the following levels of
treatment:
(1) Title 22 unrestricted irrigation
(2) Partial Reverse Osmosis
(3) Groundwater recharge (Advanced Treatment)
);;>-Each conceptual treatment alternative will include:
(1) Narrative description including summary of required unit processes and summary of
pros, cons and/or key considerations
(2) Simplified process flow diagram
(3) Conceptual location and layout
(4) Preliminary estimates of capital and O&M cost, net present value, equivalent annual
cost, and cost per acre-foot of supply
2.8.3 Alternatives Development -Distribution systems
);;>-Develop up to two (2) conceptual distribution system alternatives for each of the following
levels of treatment:
(1) Title 22 unrestricted irrigation
(2) Groundwater recharge (Advanced Treatment)
(a) Ana!Ysis of groundwater recharge distribution alternatives will be based upon
findings from the Pismo Beach Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study.
);;>-Each conceptual distribution system alternative will describe pumping and piping
improvements, and will include:
(1) Narrative description including summary of required infrastructure and summary of
pros, cons and/or key considerations
(2) Conceptual location and layout
(3) Preliminary estimates of capital and O&M cost, net present value, equivalent annual
cost, and cost per acre-foot of supply
2.8.4 Alternatives Development -Recycled Water Storage
);;>-Develop up to two (2) conceptual alternatives for recycled water system storage. Each
conceptual alternative will include:
(1) Narrative description including summary of required infrastructure and summary of
pros, cons and/or key considerations
(2) Conceptual location and layout
Item 8.c. - Page 15
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
(3) Preliminary estimates of capital and O&M cost, net present value, equivalent annual
cost, and cost per acre-foot of supply
2.8.5 Non-recycled Water Alternative
~ Review the following previously completed studies to identify a preferred non-recycled water
supply alternative:
(1) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (WSC, 2011)
(2) Lopez Lake Spillway Raise Project (Stetson 2012)
(3) Desalination Water Supply Study (Wallace 2006)
(4) SSLOCSD of Arroyo Grande Water Supply Alternative Study (Wallace 2004} _
(5) South San Luis Obispo County Desalination Funding Study (Wallace 2008)
(6) Coastal Branch Capacity Assessment (WSC 2011)
(7) Other relevant water supply studies
~ Summarize existing estimates of capital and O&M cost, net present value, equivalent annual
cost, and cost per acre-foot of the non-recycled water supply based on previously completed
studies
2.8.6 Water Conservation/Reduction Analysis
~ Summarize the MEMBER agencies' current and future plans for water conservation. WSC will
utilize 2010 UWMPs, NCMA TG reports, and other available resources as the basis for a water
conservation summary.
2.8.7 No Project Alternative
~ Evaluate the no project alternative and include in alternatives analysis.
2.8.8 Conceptual Alternatives Analysis
~ Summarize the outcome from Workshop #2 including:
(1) Screening/evaluation criteria
(2) Results from the screening/evaluation
(3) Preferred conceptual alternatives for treatment, distribution and storage
2.9 Recommended Facilities Project Plan
2.9.1 Preferred Alternative
~ Develop preliminary design criteria and refined pipeline routes for the preferred alternative
~ Prepare updated maps, figures, process flow diagram(s), and layouts to reflect the preferred
treatment, distribution and storage alternatives
~ Update cost estimates based on final c;:onfiguration and considering expected time of
construction
Item 8.c. - Page 16
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
> Prepare list of all potential users, quantity of recycled water use, peak demand and
commitments obtained to-date
> Compare reliability of the recycled water faciliti~s to the user requirements
> Summarize on-site improvements required including cost
> Prepare a schedule for the implementation of the recycled water project that includes design
and construction of the treatment plant upgrades and construction of the distribution system
infrastructure. Provide phasing considerations/recommendations in the preferred project plan.
2.10 Stakeholder Involvement
2.10.1 Stakeholder Outreach
> Conduct stakeholder meetings to coordinate project objectives, elements, etc. Document
stakeholder outreach efforts.
> Budget based on three (3) 1-hr meetings attended by WSC's Principal and Associate Engineer I.
2.10.2 Public Outreach
> Provide project updates at public meetings as requested by the SSLOCSD, including preparation
of an explanatory presentation and/or graphics presenting the analysis and/or conclusions
contained within the Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
> Document public outreach efforts.
> Budget based on two (2) 1-hr meetings attended by WSC's Principal and Associate Engineer I.
2.11 Implementation Pian
2.11.1 Coordination and Governance
> Determine needed agreements and ordinances for implementing a preferred alternative
recycled water system.
> Evaluate recycled water mandatory use ordinances and provide SSLOCSD with recommended
course of action.
> Prepare a draft user contract for connecting customers.
2.11.2 Construction Financing Plan and Revenue Program
> Prepare funding plan that outlines sources and timing of funds for design and construction.
> Summarize pricing policy recommendations for recycled water
> Evaluate costs that can be allocated to water pollution control and/or water supply reliability
> Develop criteria and annual projections for:
(1) Water prices for each user or category of users
(2) Recycled water used by each user
(3) Annual costs (required revenue) of recycling project
Item 8.c. - Page 17
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
(4) Allocation of costs to users
(5) Unit costs to serve each user or category of users
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
(6). Sensitivity analysis assuming portion of potential users fail to use recycled water
2.11.3 Detailed Schedule
~ Develop a detailed schedule for the implementation of the recycled water project that includes
design and construction, critical milestones from the financing and revenue program and on-site
customer improvements.
2.12 Prepare Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
2.12.1 Prepare Draft Recycled Water Facilities Pla~ning Study
~ Prepare draft Executive Summary and. compile draft report including title page(s),
acknowledgements, table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, draft chapters, reference list
and appendices.
[ Delivemble: Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
2.12.2 Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
~ Prepare Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study based on comments received from
the SSLOCSD and any identified stakeholders on the draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning
Study
I Deliverable: Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
2.12.3 Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
~ Prepare Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study based on comments received from the
SSLOCSD on the Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study.
Deliverable: Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Item 8.c. - Page 18
SSLOCSD
SWRRF Facilities Planning Study
Deliverable Description Format/Copies
Scope of Work
8/12/2014
Due Date
Item 8.c. - Page 19
Attachment 2. Fee Estimate 8/12/2014
', '; ' ',\'
,,1'> I " '' _,::_ :_' ~ __ .... ", >
Item 8.c. - Page 20
South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Cost Proposal
7/31/2014
Task No. Task Description .
1.0 FPGP Application Assistance
1.1 FPGP Aoolication Mana!!ement and Suooort
1.2 FPGP Application Preparation
2.0 Investment Analysis
2.0.1 Conceptual Design Criteria
2.0.2 Cost Estimates
2.0.3 Investment Analysis
2.0.4 Draft Investment Analysis TM
2.05 Investment Analysis Review Meeting
2.0.6 Rn al Investment Analysis TM
2.1 Project Management
2.1.1 Proiect Administration
2.1.2 Kickoff Meeting
2.1.3 Workshops
2.1.4 Deliverable review meetinl!S -
2.2 Background
22.1 StudvArea
2.2.2 Goals and objectives
2.3 Water Supply and Characteristics
2.3.1 Water suoolv characteristics
2.3.2 Water demand characteristics
2.4 Wastewater Characteristics and Facilities
2.4.1 Existing facilities
2.4.2 Future facilities
2.5 Treatment Requirements
·2.5.1 Recycled water quality requirements
2.6 Recycled Water Market/Opportunities
2.6.1 Update market analvs1s
2.6.2 Preliminarv market assurances
2.7 Legal, Permitting and Environmental Criteria
2.7.1 Tentative water recyclin!! reauirements of RWQCB
2.7.2 Permitting reauirements
2.73 Water lights considerations
2.7.4 Environmental documentation requirements (CEQA)
Z.8 Project Alternatives Ana Jysis
2.8.1 Planning and design assumptions
2.82 Aitemat1ves Development-Treatment
2.8.3 Alternatives Develooment -Distribution
2.84 Alternatives Develooment-Storatte
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Associate Assistant Principal Sr.Engineer Ill Engineer I Engineer
6 2 14 0
4 6
2 2 8
10 8 24 50
2 2 4
2 6 8 20
2 4
2 2 4 12
2 4 4
2 4 6
20 0 60 24
2 30
4 8 8
8 14 10
6 8 6
0 2 5 0
1 4
1 1
0 2 10 0
1 4
1 6
4 l 16 28
l 4 12
4 12 16
0 2 z 0
2 2
0 2 10 20
1 8 12
1 2 8
0 6 13 12
1 1 4
2 4 8
1 6
2 2
8 7 33 84
1 1 4
8 2 10 20
1 10 32
1 4 10
Pagel of 2
wsc
Staff Clerical/ Total Labor Total Labor Total Planner Total Fee
II Admin Hours Cost Expenses
16 2 40 $ 6,606 $ 200 $ 6,806
4 2 16 $ 2,752 $ 100 $ 2,852
12 24 $ 3,854 $ 100 $ 3,954
0 0 92 $ 13,670 $ 400 $ 14,070
8 $ 1,292 $ -$ 1,292
36 $ 5,306 $ 200 $ 5,506
6 $ 736 $ -$ 736
20 $ 2,910 $ 100 $ 3,010
10 $ 1,608 $ -$ 1,608
12 $ 1,818 $ 100 $ 1,918
8 14 126 $ 19,784 $ 600 $ 20,384
14 46 $ 6.472 $ 200 $ 6,672
20 $ 3,216 $ 100 $ 3,316
8 40 $ 6,534 $ 200 $ 6,734
20 $ 3,562 $ 100 $ 3,662
12 0 19 $ 2,824 $ 100 $ 2,924
10 15 $ 2,173 $ 100 $ 2,273
2 4 $ 651 $ -$ 651
16 0 28 $ 4,138 $ 200 $ 4,338
8 13 $ 1,911 $ 100 $ 2,011
8 15 $ 2,227 $ 100 $ 2,327
4 0 53 $ 7,335 $ 200 $ 7,535
2 19 $ 2,385 $ 100 $ 2,485
2 34 $ 4,950 $ 100 $ 5,050
8 0 12 $ 1,826 $ 100 $ 1,926
8 12 $ 1,826 $ 100 $ 1,926
42 0 74 $ 9,644 $ 300 $ 9,944
34 55 $ 7,209 $ 200 $ 7,409
8 19 $ 2,435 $ 100 $ 2,535
16 0 47 $ 6,796 $ 100 $ 6,896
2 8 $ 1,071 $ -$ 1,071
8 22 $ 2,982 $ 100 $ 3,082
2 9 $ 1,441 $ -$ 1,441
4 8 $ 1,302 $ -$ 1302
36 0 168 $ 22,591 $ 700 $ 23,291
2 8 $ 1,071 $ -$ 1,071
16 56 $ 8,462 $ 300 $ 8,762
8 51 $ 6,219 $ 200 $ 6419
2 17 $ 2,175 $ 100 $ 2,275
Item 8.c. - Page 21
South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Cost Proposal
7/31/2014
Task No. Task Description
2 8.5 Non-recvcled Water Alternative
2.8.6 Water conservat1on/reductlon analvsls
2.8.7 No oroiect alternative
2 8.8 Conceptual alternatives analysis
2.9 Recommended Facilities Project Pian
2.9.i Preferred alternative
2.10 Stakeholder Involvement
2.10.1 • Stakeholder outreach
2.10.2 Public outreach
2.11 Implementation Plan
2.11.1 Coordination and ~ovemance
2.11.2 Construction financimi olan and revenue oro~ram
2.11.3 Detailed schedule
2.12 Prepare Recycled Water Facilities Pia nning Study
2.12.1 Draft Recvcled Water Facilities Plannin!! Studv
2.12.2 Final Draft Recvcled Water Facilities Planning Study
2.12.3 Final Recvcled Water Facilities Planning Study
Column Totals!
-
-
-
-
Principal Sr.Engineer Ill Associate Assistant
Engineer I Engineer
1 2 4
2 4
1 4 10
4 4 24 20
4 4 24 20
s 0 12 8
3 6 4
2 6 4
6 10 18 26
2 4 2 4
2 4 12 16
2 2 4 6
16 16 48 68
6 6 24 28
6 6 16 24
4 4 8 16
340 I
Page2 of 2
wsc
Staff
Planner Clerical/ Total Labor Total Labor Total
Admin 'Hours Cost Expenses Total Fee
II
2 9 $ 1,229 $ -$ 1,229
4 4 $ 524 $ -$ 524
6 $ 736 $ -$ 736
2 17 $ 2,175 $ 100 $ 2,275
8 0 60 $ 8,976 $ 300 $ 9,276
8 60 $ 8,976 $ 300 $ 9,276
28 0 S3 $ 7,794 $ 200 $ 7,994
14 27 $ 4,036 $ 100 $ 4,136
14 26 $ 3,758 $ 100 $ 3,858
16 0 76 $ 11,648 $ 400 $ 12,048
8 20 $ 3,264 $ 100 $ 3,364
8 42 $ 6,104 $ 200 $ 6,304
14 $ 2,280 $ 100 $ 2,380
42 0 190 $ 28,370 $ 900 $ 29,270
18 82 $ 12,144 $ 400 $ 12,544
12 64 $ 9,674 $ 300 $ 9,974
12 44 $ 6,552 $ 200 $ 6,752
252 I 161 1038 1s2,002 i 4,100 I s 1s6,102 I
Item 8.c. - Page 22
Attachment 3. Schedule 8/12/2014
0 I A#~~Wn ~ilt,-a: ,, :_S_f J:l~~y~e :>·~·:·.:_ ·_ · ·-::_; -· _:_-:-->_ < ~.~::\. ·~-:1:=:~~Fi/.~\::·~·: ~ :.:~--:''i~~,~~:i('~ ·:;_'::~~:;:-~'.~::~~!!~~~ :~~ _"'-:~" :.'.'.'. :f: ~:~--:s~i~:i::
Item 8.c. - Page 23
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ii -
9
10
11
12
13
Task Name
•Notice to proceed
:1.0 FPGP Application Assistance
1.1 FPGP Apphcation Management and Support
1.2 FPGP Application Preparation
SWRCB Review of FPGP Apphcation
Notification of FPGP Application Approval
.2.0.1 Investment Analysis
2.0.1 Conceptual Design Criteria
2 0.2 Cost Estimates
2 0.3 Investment Analysis
2 O 4 Draft Investment Analysis TM,
SSLOCSD Review of Draft Investment Analysis TM
2 0.5 Investment Analysis Review Meeting ----14
15 --· 16
17 -18
19 --20
~-
21
2.0.6 Final Investment Analysis TM
h'ask 2.1 Project Management
i.1.1 Project Administration
2.1.2 Kickoff Meeting
2.1.3 Workshops
Workshop #1-Conceptual Alternatives Development
Workshop #2 -Alternatives Screening
2.lA Deliverable Review Meetings
ii -23
Deliverable Review Meeting #1-Draft RWFPS
Deliverable Review Meeting #2 -Final Draft RWFPS
24 •Task 2.2 Background
-~ 2.2.1 Study Area
26 , 2 2.2 Goals and Objectives
2:[' ·;rask 2.3 Water Supplies and Characteristics
28 2.3.1 Water Supply Charactenstics
29 2.3.2 Water Demand Characteristics
30 2.3.3 Water Pricing
31 'Task 2.4 Wastewater Characteristics and Facilities
2 4.1 Existing Facilities 32
33 2.4.2 Future Facilities
~ Task 2.5 Treatment Requirements
~ 2.5.1 Recycled Water Quality Requirements
36 Task 2.6 Recycled Water Market/Opportunities
37 2 6.1 Update Market Analysis
38 2 6.2 Preliminary Market Assurances
39 il'ask 2.7 Legal, Permitting and Environmental Criteria
Duration
Odays
40davs
40 days
4wks
4wks
0 days
45daY,
lwk
2wks
lwk
2wks
2wks
Odays
2wks
160davs
160 days
5 days
25days
Odays
Odays
40days
0 days
Odavs
lOdays
lOdays
10 days
lOdays
10 days
10 days
10 days
35days
25days
10days
lOdays
10days
25days
20 days
25 days
__ . __ .. 30days
!Start jFin~h
'· -
Mon 9/1/14 Mon 9/1/14
Mon9/l/l4 Fril0/24/14
Mon9/1/14 Fri 10/24/14
Mon9/l/14 Fri 9/26/14
Mon9/29/14 Fri 10/24/14
Fri 10/24/14 Fri 10/24/14
Mon 10/27 /14 Fri 12/26/14
Mon 10/27 /14 Fri 10/31/14
Mon 10/27 /14 Fn 11/7 /14
Mon 11/10/14 Fn 11/14/14
Mon 11/17 /14 Fri 11/28/14
Mon 12/1/14 Fri 12/12/14
Fri 12/12/14 Fri 12/12/14
Mon 12/15/14 Fn 12/26/14
Mon 12/29/14 Fri 8/7 /15
Mon 12/29/14 Fn 8/7 /15
Mon 12/29/14 Fn 1/2/15
Fri 2/6/15 Fri 3/13/15
Fri 2/6/15 Fn 2/6/15
Fn 3/13/15 Fri 3/13/15
Fri 6/5/15 Fri 7 /31/15
Fri 6/5/15 Fri 6/5/15
Fri 7 /31/15 Fri 7 /31/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 'Fri 2/20/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 2/6/15
Mon 2/9/15 Fn 2/20/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 2/6/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/.30/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 2/6/15
Mon 1/5/15 Fri 2/13/15
!Predecessors
1
4
5
5
5
8,9
10
11
12
13
14
14
45
46,47,48,49,50,51
64
66
17
17
17
17
17
17
32
17
17
17
Task fiiffil&f1f!lliNIT&"A§lpg'l'J1 Project Summary ..,,.....,..~,--'-'J' Inactive Milestone
Project: Schedule_SWRRF RWFPS
Date· Tue 8/12/14 '
Tue 8/12/14
Sp ht
Milestone
Summary
•
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
@nm:1 ,.:'~ mtt•J1t;&f1'1, Inactive Summary
~ Manual Task
Duration-only
Pagelof2
' I
I
I
I
1.
+10/24
•
\ --
Manual Summary Rollup wn smr -'
,,,. Manual Summary
Finish-only
c
J
•
-.. 2/6
i!ll
ilil
Ill
im--
~
ti. ---·-
Deadline
Progress
3/13
---
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' ' ! I
L -_L
~ ...
-If
Item 8.c. - Page 24
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
ID Task Name
2.7.1 Prellmlnary Recycled Water System Requirements
41 2.7.2 Permitting Requirements
42 2.7.3 Water Rights C~ns1derations
~ _ j 2.7.4 Environmental Documentation Requirements (CEci.A)
44 12.s Project Alternatives Analysis
45 -2.8.1 Planning and Design Assumptions
46 2.8.2 Alternatives Development-Treatment
47 2.8.3 Alternatwes Development -Distribution
48 2.8.4 Alternatives Development -Recycled Water Storage
49 2.8.5 Non-Recycled Water Alternative
so 2.8.6 Water Conservation/Reduction Analysis
51 2.8.7 No Project Alternative
52 2.8 8 Conceptual Alternatives Analysis
-~~ _ -'Tank 2.9 Recommended Facilities Project Plan
54 2.9.1 Preferred Alternative
55 :rask 2.10 Stakeholder Involvement
56 2.10.l Stakeholder Outreach
57 ' 2.10.2 Public Outreach
58 ~ask 2.11 Implementation Plan
59 I 2.11.1 Coordination and Governance I
60 ! 2.11.2 Construction Financing Plan and Revenue Program
61 ' 2.11.3 Detailed Schedule ~-_~ask 2.12 Prepare RWFPS
63 ! 2.12.1 Draft RWFPS ---i
64 ! SSLOCSD Review of Draft RWFPS Gs-; 2.12.2 Final Draft RWFPS GG-I SSLOCSD Review of Draft RWFPS
67 ' 2.12.3 Final RWFPS ------------
Task
Pro1ect: Schedule_SWRRF RWFPS Spht
Date: Tue 8/12/14 Milestone +
Summary
Tue 8/12/14
1ourat1on !Start /Finish
~---------j ___ --I
15 days Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/23/15
15 days Mon 1/26/15 Fn 2/13/15
20 days Mon 1/5/15 Frl 1/30/15
10 days Mon 1/5/15 Fri 1/16/15
65 days Mon 1/5/15 Fri 4/3/15
25 days Mon 1/5/15 Fri 2]6/15
25 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/13/15
25 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/13/15
25 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/13/15
20 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/6/15
20 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/6/15
20 days Mon 2/9/15 Fri 3/6/15
15 days Mon3/16/15 Fn4/3/15
20days Mon4/6/15 FriS/1/15
20days Mon4/6/15 Fri 5/1/15
20days Mon4/6/15 FriS/l/15
20 days Mon4/6/15 Fri 5/1/15
20days Mon4/6/15 Fri5/l/15
20days Mon4/6/15 FriS/1/15
20 days Mon4/6/15 Fri 5/1/15
20 days Mon4/6/15 Fn5/1/15
20 days Mon4/6/15 Fri 5/1/15
90days MonS/4/15 Fri9/4/15
3wks Mon5/4/15 Fri 5/22/15
2wks Mon5/25/15 Fn 6/5/15
3wks Mon 6/2!1/15 Fri 7/17/15
2wks Mon 7/20/15 Fri 7/31/15
2wks -~~ ~!'!:~~--F!_i_~4/~~
,Predecessors
17
40
17
17
17
19
19
19
19
45
45
20
52
52
52
52
52
52
24,27,31,34,36,39,4':
63
22FS+ 15 days
65
?~S_+ ~5 day~
.,,.. ----~ Jnactive Milestone
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Manual Task
Duration-only
Page2 of2
Manual Summary Rollup ~s '~·~,,Tl~--· ---
Manual Summary
..... _.,....,,_,_.... Finlsh~only
c
J
I
~
Deadline
Progress
Item 8.c. - Page 25
SSLOCSD SWRRF Preliminary Cost Estimates
Unit Cost Unit C-33 C-10 Assumed Units Assumed Units Source
ADWF(mgd) 0.56 0.82
PWWF(mgd) 1.67 2.45
Construction Costs
MBR $ 15,230,774 $/mgd $ 8,487,806 $ 12,457,554
AWT $ 6,000,000 $/mgd $ 3,343,680 $ 4,907,520
Land Purchase $ 200,000 $/acre $ 614,815 $ 614,815 3.07 RRWSP for Alt S3b: 8.3 acres for 2.7 MGD
Recharge Pond $ 15,000 $/acre $ 46,111 $ 46,111 3.07 RRWSP for Alt S3b: 8.3 acres for 2.7 MGD
Storage Facility $ 1,500,000 $/MG $ 835,920 $ 1,226,880
Pump Station
Contingencies/ Soft Costs
Construction Contingency 30% % of Construction and O&M $ 1,306,303 $ 1,822,370
Engineering/ Admin/CM/et
c. (Implementation Costs) 40% % of Construction and O&M $ 2,264,259 $ 3,158,776
Total $ 16,898,894 $ 24,234,026
O&MCosts
Treatment-Full AWT
(MF/RO/AOP) $ 600,000 $/mgd $ 334,368 $ 490,752
Recharge Basin $ 5,000 $/acre $ 15,370 $ 15,370 3.07 RRWSP for Alt S3b: 8.3 acres for 2. 7 MGD
Total $ 349,738 $ 506,122
Item 8.c. - Page 26
SSLOCSD SWRRF Preliminary Cost Estimates
Unit Cost Unit C-33 C-10 Assumed Units Assumed Units Source
ADWF(mgd) 0.56 0.82
PWWF(mgd) 1.67 2.45
Construction Costs
MBR $ 15,230,774 $/mgd $ 8,487,806 $ 12,457,554
AWT $ 6,000,000 $/mgd $ 3,343,680 $ 4,907,520
Land Purchase $ 200,000 $/acre $ 614,815 $ 614,815 3.07 RRWSP for Alt S3b: 8.3 acres for 2.7 MGD
Recharge Pond $ 15,000 $/acre $ 46,111 $ 46,111 3.07 RRWSP for Alt S3b: 8.3 acres for 2. 7 MGD
Storage Facility $ 1,500,000 $/MG $ 835,920 $ 1,226,880
Pump Station
Contingencies/ Soft Costs
Construction Contingency 30% % of Construction and O&M $ 1,306,303 $ 1,822,370
Engineering/ Adm in/CM/et
c. (Implementation Costs) 40% % of Construction and O&M $ 2,264,259 $ 3,158,776
Total $ 16,898,894 $ 24,234,026
O&MCosts
Treatment-Full AWT
(MF/RO/AOP) $ 600,000 $/mgd $ 334,368 $ 490,752
Recharge Basin $ 5,000 $/acre $ 15,370 $ 15,370 3.07 RRWSP for Alt 53b: 8.3 acres for 2. 7 MGD
Total $ 349,738 $ 506,122
Item 8.c. - Page 27
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item 8.c. - Page 28