The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 2015-01-27 Supplemental Items r tROyO a c� INCORPORATED 9x WY•4ul'ti:iv�v) m JULY 10, 1911 * c4' P 1FOFtN� MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM 11.a. — JANUARY 27, 2015 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR THE BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; AND CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. AND BUDGET AMENDMENT DATE: JANUARY 27, 2015 Attached is material received from Chuck Fellows regarding Item 11.a. which he will refer to during the public comment period for this item. cc: City Attorney Interim City Manager City Clerk Public Review Binder E tracts 2003 Vol. a Knees in Need No.1 Gatorade E eel Parks for Science Science for Park Pre iou I ue Historic Preservation: Value Added left to right: Surfcomber Hotel, South Beach, Miami Beach; Osceola County Courthouse, Kissimmee; Fort Pierce Historic preservation. Stately Victorian houses. Gazebos on the downtown square. Few would argue the aesthetic benefits of preserving Florida's heritage, but is it worth it, economically? Yes, to the tune of$4.2 billion annually, says a team of researchers from the Center for Governmental Responsibility at the University of Florida and the Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutgers University that recently completed the state's first comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of historic preservation. "The aesthetic and quality-of-life benefits of preservation are generally acknowledged," the researchers from UF's Levin College of Law wrote in Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation in Florida. "However, doubts are often expressed about the quantifiable economic contribution of preservation." After more than a year of analyzing data and getting input from Silver Springs government and community leaders throughout the state, the researchers say those doubts should be erased. "A conservative estimate of the economic impacts of historic preservation in Florida is $4.2 billion annually," say study co-authors Timothy McLendon and JoAnn Klein. "Historic preservation produces a wonderful return for the public money invested and is one of the most efficient ways public funds can be invested. Historic preservation works." The researchers focused on several key areas relative to historic preservation -heritage tourism, historic rehabilitation , assistance programs like the Florida Main Street Program, and property values . "This report provides striking evidence that Florida's investment in the preservation and protection of historic places and the legacy of the cultures that created them is paying huge dividends ," says Florida Secretary of State Jim Smith, whose office commissioned the $75 ,000 study. Heritage Tourism For tens of thousands of years, human habitation in Florida had been overlaid -culture upon culture -from prehistoric times , through the Spanish and British colonial periods and into statehood. But the wave of new residents to the state during the 1940s and '50s threatened to simply brush away all that history in a relentless drive to build more houses, highways and strip malls. "The explosive growth in population and economic development left much of the physical evidence of our historic heritage in dust and rubble ," according to the 1973 Florida Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan. This wholesale destruction galvanized public support for historic preservation, and in 1959 St. Augustine became the first state-sponsored historic district With the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Florida Archives and History Act of 1967, historic preservation had arrived . Heritage tourism is by far the largest component of the economic impact of historic preservation, but McLendon says the various elements complement each other to the benefit of all. "Heritage tourism wouldn't be such a big component if the historic homes and districts didn 't exist in the first place," McLendon says. "There would be nothing for heritage tourists to see." In a March 2002 survey by Visit Florida, the state's official tourist promotion agency, 61 percent of the respondents said they participated in some "history-based activity" while vacationing in Florida. With more than 71 million visitors in 2000, the researchers were able to estimate $3. 72 billion in expenditures generated by heritage tourism. The researchers cite St. Augustine as a perfect example of the impact of heritage tourism. County economic development officials estimate tourism brought in $490 million in 2000. "The whole city is based on tourism, and the tourism is based on historic preservation," says David D . Birchim, senior planner for the City of St Augustine. Using accepted industry formulas, the researchers estimate that the $3. 72 billion in heritage tourism translates into 107,607 Florida jobs, including 51 ,794 in the retail sector and 30,068 in the services sector. Another component the researchers studied was historical museums, parks and sites. Of the state 's 356 museums, 183 are considered historic . These historic museums welcomed 9. 7 million visitors in 2001 . Of Florida's 156 state parks, 46 include sites on the National Register of Historic Places. More than 46 percent of the 18.1 million visitors to Florida state parks in 2001 traveled to a park that is historic or includes some historic or archaeological site within its borders. Historic Rehabilitation The Florida Division of Historical Resources currently recognizes more than 135,000 historical structures and archaeological sites in the state, with more being added every day. But there is no central gathering point for information about current building rehabilitation activity, so the researchers cross-referenced local building permit ::ic.tivity with projec.ts aw;:ircleci certitic::ites of l'!ppropriateness by lor.::il historic commissions to come up with an estimate of the extent of historic rehabilitation. The researchers defined rehabilitation as all construction work that the Census identifies as "alterations." "Historic" was defined as property that is designated as a local or national landmark, or located in a national or local historic register district. "We did not have the capability to consider properties that might be eligible for historic designation," McLendon says. "Thus we only consider properties ... actually designated as landmarks or included within historic districts -making f our rehabilitation data very conservative." I I The researchers determined that historic properties accounted for about 6.5 percent, or $350 million, of the $5.3 billion rehabilitation construction business in Florida in 2000. "This rehabilitation may be as simple as restoring a decayed older house in one of Florida's many residential historic districts, or as extensive as the adaptive reuse projects that have transformed old industrial buildings in Tampa's Ybor City to make a vibrant and exciting commercial and entertainment district," the report says. State officials estimate that 60 to 70 percent of the cost of the typical historic rehabilitation project in Florida is expended on labor, and that usually benefits local laborers, the report says. The researchers employed another innovative approach to determine whether buildings in historic districts held or appreciated in value compared to comparable buildings outside the district. Working with Geographic Information Systems researchers from the College of Design, Construction and Planning's GeoPlan Center, they assessed values for some 28,000 primarily single-family residential properties representing 18 historic districts and 25 comparison neighborhoods in eight Florida cities. "In at least 15 of the 18 cases studied, property in the historic district appreciated greater than in the non-historic comparison neighborhoods," the researchers report. ''No instance was found where historic designation depressed property values." Main Street, Fla. From Fort Walton Beach to Key West, Florida cities are taking back their downtowns with the help of the Florida Main Street Program, reversing the decline that began in the 1960s when people and their pocketbooks headed for the suburbs and the malls. "In many small communities, the main street is in a serious state of decline," according to the Florida Main Street Program web page. "Effective solutions to the problems of deteriorating building stock, loss of business, and the waning economic strength of downtown are crucial to the survival of the city itself." Historic preservation and economic development proponents argue that a revitalized downtown reflects a positive image of a community, creates job opportunities, attracts new industry and strengthens service and retail job markets, stabilizes and improves the area's tax base and protects the investment already made in downtown infrastructure, and preserves historic resources. Since its inception in 1985 , the Main Street Program has distributed a total of $4 million in grants to communities that have leveraged it into a total of $486.5 million in public/private investment The UF researchers found that Florida's Main Street Program represented a net investment of $64 million in 2001 , generating more than 3 ,200 jobs, primarily in the retail sector. More than 1,400 historic properties in all 67 Florida counties have been restored or rehabilitated since 1985 through the Historical Resources Grants-In-Aid Program of the Bureau of Historic Preservation. This program has awarded more than $212 million in grants to 2 ,751 projects which has been matched by $360 million in local funds. Pensacola offers a dramatic example of the impact these grants can have on a community. Pensacola dates back more than 450 years and has one of the oldest and most active historic preservation programs in the state . Much of the preservation effort in the downtown area has focused on the Historic Pensacola Village, composed of 20 properties constructed between 1800 and 1900. In 2000-2001 , three Historic Pensacola Village buildings received a $250 ,000 grant from the state for restoration and continued museum use. The grant applicants estimated that, once restored , these buildings would host more than 500 ,000 visitors annually. The researchers say policy makers , like the governor and legislature , need the kind of "hard" economic numbers on preservation that reports like this generate to make informed decisions about how to support historic preservation programs. "There are many demands on the public purse, and preservation is in competition for state support with other priorities, like rehabilitating highways and providing affordable housing," the report says. "Preservationists often do not have hard numbers on the economic benefits of their projects, unlike the proponents of competing investments. This is unfortnate , since historic preservation generates extensive economic benefits, actually surpassing those yielded by such alternative investments as infrastructure and new housing construction ." Timoth y M cLend on Staff Atto rn ey, Center fo r Governm ental Re sp onsi bility (352) 392-2237 mc!endon@law.ufl .edu Jo Ann Klein Director of Development and Communicati on s, Center for Governmental Resp o n sibility (352) 392-2237 klein@law.ufl.edu ARROYO INCORPORATED 7, V Itovtonc m 1k JULY 10, 1011 * c14/FORNNP MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION —AGENDA ITEM 11.a. BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE PROJECT— AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT DATE: JANUARY 27, 2015 Attached is a complete copy of Amendment No. 2 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Quincy Engineering, including Exhibits A and B, which were inadvertently omitted from the Agenda packet. c: Interim City Manager City Attorney Public Review Binder CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 This Second Amendment ("Second Amendment") to Consultant Services Agreement ("CSA") by and between the CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE("City") and QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. ("Consultant") is made and entered into the day of January 2015, based on the following facts: WHEREAS, the parties entered into a CSA dated May 22, 2012, for preliminary engineering work on the Bridge Street Bridge Improvement project; and WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the CSA was agreed to on May 27, 2014; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the CSA as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, for the good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree that the CSA is in full force and effect as amended, and subject to the new terms and conditions set forth below: 1. Section 1, entitled "TERM" shall be amended in its entirety as follows: This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until May 22, 2018 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. Exhibit B to the CSA entitled "Payment Schedule" shall be amended to reflect current billing rate sheets as specified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Scope of services shall include the additional services as specified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the CSA, as amended, shall remain in full force andeffect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this Second Amendment on the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. By: By: "Jim Hill, Mayor John Quincy, President Attest: Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk Approved As To'Form: Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney EXHIBIT A City of Arroyo Grande BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE REHABILITATION FEASIBILITY STUDY-2015 RATES QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. CONTRACT No. CONSULTANT COST RATES SUB CONSULTANT: QUINCY ENGINEERING,INC. January 13,2015 DIRECT LABOR Name Classification Range John Quincy Principal in Charge $60-$80 Mark Reno Project Manager $60-$80 Young Senior Engineer- Greg $45-$70 Bridge Project Engineer Lemon Senior Engineer- Brent $60-$80 Roadway Project Engineer Martin Pohll Senior Engineer-Bridge $55-$70 Specialist Danny Mossman Senior Engineer-Bridge $45-$70 Scott McCauley Associate Engineer-Bridge $32-$55 Andy Chou Assisstant Engineer $25-$40 Mike Sanchez Senior Engineer-Roadway $45-$70 Jim Foster Senior Engineer-QA/QC $60-$80 Craig Polglase CAD Tech Staff Office Support Staff Staff Admin INDIRECT COSTS Overhead 173.10% Fringe Benefit(Included in OH) General&Administrative(Included in OH) FEE 10%Fixed Fee OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel Costs(mileage) @ $0.56 Overnight Service(mail) @ $20.00 Graphic Presentation Boards @ $250.00 SWCA Standard Rate Schedule 2015 LABOR CATEGORIES AND BILLING RATES Principals&Project Management Staff Principal-in-Charge $263-368 Project Manager VII $127,00 Project Manager VI $116.00 Project Manager XI $182.00 Project Manager V $105.00 Project Manager X $166.00 Project Manager IV $93.00 Project Manager IX $149.00 Project Manager III $83.00 Project Manager VIII $138.00 Consulting Services Cultural Resources - Air Quality , Environmental-Resources Graphics/Media Production ' Paleontology GIS/CADD Resources Scientific Resources Technical Writing/Editing , Planning Resources Principal Investigator Subject Matter Expert $184-315 Specialist V $105.00 Specialist IV $93.00 Specialist XI $182.00 Specialist III $83.00 i Specialist X $166.00 Specialist II $71.00 Specialist IX $149.00 . Specialist I $61.00 Specialist VIII $138.00 Specialist VII ' $127.00 Technician II $49.00 Specialist VI $116.00 Technician I $39.00 Administrative Administrative VII $105.00 Administrative Ill $61.00 Administrative VI $93.00 Administrative II $49.00 Administrative V $83.00 Administrative I $39.00 Administrative IV $71.00 Direct expenses are subject to a 15%administrative markup and subcontractor expenses are subject to a 20% administrative markup These rates do not apply to depositions or testimonies at administrative hearings and trials Such activities fall under our Expert Witness rates,which vary by state A communication fee is invoiced at a rate of 3%of labor to cover miscellaneous communication expenses(le cell phones, data plans,faxes, etc) SWCA's standard Per Diem rate is$46.00 per day. 1243 Alpine Road,Suite 108 Walnut Creek,CA 94596 Phone. 925341.0017 Fax: 925.941.0018 www.wreco.com RATE SCHEDULE Hourly Rate of FY 2015 (01/01/2015^' 12/31/2015) TITLE GRADE MINIMUM MAXIMUM Principal Engineer $ 82.75 $ 91.03 Supervising Engineer $ 73.65 $ 82.75 Senior Engineer II $ 62.07 $ 73.65 Senior Engineer I $ 49.65 $ 62.07 Associate Engineer II $ 43.45 $ 49.65 Associate Engineer I $ 36.19 $ 43.45 Staff Engineer II $ 31.56 $ 36.19 Staff Engineer I $ 26.93 $ 31.56 Senior Geologist $ 49.65 $ 74.48 Associate Geologist $ 37.24 $ 49.65 Staff Geologist $ 28.96 $ 37.24 Senior Biologist $ 49.65 $ 62.07 Associate Biologist $ 37.24 $ 49.65 Staff Biologist $ 28.96 $ 37.24 Senior Technician/CADD $ 35.17 $ 43.45 Technician/CADD $ 24.08 $ 35.17 Landscape Designer $ 37.24 $ 43.45 Administrator/Clerical/Tech Editor II $ 33.10 $ 41.38 Administrator/Clerical/Tech Editor I $ 23.99 $ 33.10 • Contracted overhead rate of this Project is 127.78%;fee(profit) is 10%. • Engineers include Civil Engineers, Hydraulic Engineers and Geotechnical Engineers. • Expenses are invoiced at 110%of cost. • Unless expressly provided for within the contract, rates in all contracts are subject to increase as of 1/1/2016. • Rates for deposition and trial time are 1.5 times those shown above. • Regular Mileage is per IRS rate (currently at$0.575 per mile) or as otherwise specified in contract. 4ya A444 I Civil Engineering I Water Resources I Environmental Compliance I Geotechnical Engineering GRO FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL FEES -2014 1.0 Analysis, Consultation, and Report Preparation. Fees for Fugro professional services, including project administration, are based on the time of professional, technical, and other support personnel directly applied to the project. Personnel participating in judicial proceedings, whether it be expert or witness testimony, delivery of depositions, consultation to legal counsel, or preparation for such, will be billed at $325 per hour. Rates for overtime (other than as described below), weekend work, and emergency response will be quoted on request. PROFESSIONAL STAFF HOURLY RATE Staff Professional $ 110 Senior Staff Professional 125 Project Professional 140 Senior Project Professional 150 Senior Professional 165 Associate 185 Principal 215 Senior Principal 240 TECHNICAL AND OFFICE STAFF Field Technician/Inspector-Non-Prevailing Wage, Straight Time 95 Field Technician/Inspector-Prevailing Wage, Straight Time 105 Construction Inspector 110 Construction Services Manager 130 Engineering Assistant 110 Office Assistant 60 Word Processor/Clerical 75 Laboratory Technician 75 Technical Assistant/Illustrator 80 Illustrator II 85 CADD Operator 95 GIS Technician 95 HSE Manager 160 Overtime Rates for Technical and Office Staff: a. Saturday or over 8 hours/day during weekdays 1.3 x straight time b. Saturdays over 8 hours or Sundays/holidays 1.5 x straight time c. Swing or graveyard shift premium 1.3 x straight time Hardware/Software Interpretive Programs SMT/Fledermaus 25/hr GIS/ACAD 25/hr Finite Element/Finite Difference Packages 25/hr OTHER DIRECT CHARGES Field vehicle with sampling & logging equipment 200/day Basic staff vehicle 100/day Fee Schedule is subject to periodic revision, typically at the first of the year. LABORATORY AND SPECIALTY TESTING AND EQUIPMENT See Separate Schedules 2.0 Reimbursable Expenses. Expenses, other than salary costs, that are directly attributable to the performance of our professional services are billed either under separate fee schedules or as follows: 2.1 Transportation in personal vehicles at Internal Revenue Service rates. 2.2 Authorized travel expenses at cost plus 15 percent. 2.3 Direct project expenses, other than travel, including, but not limited to, sample shipment, subcontractors, and outside reproduction, cost plus 15 percent. 2.4 Time of external personnel retained for the project is charged at an assigned billing rate comparable to others in our company of corresponding expertise and experience. Fugro Consultants, Inc. GRO Southern California Fee Schedule 2014 ®® 3.0 Other Services. Projects may require other services, such as: field exploration, field or laboratory testing, or specialized computer services, which are not covered by this schedule. Fee schedules for other services can be provided upon request. 4.0 The above hourly rates apply for California, U.S.A. based projects. Page 2 of 5 February 2014 FCL FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. TUIBIREI 2014 FEE SCHEDULE LABORATORY AND MATERIALS TESTING ° �` CLASSIFICATION TESTS CLAY PROPERTIES &CHEMISTRY TESTS Moisture Content(ASTM D2216) . . $ 20 Double Hydrometer(ASTM D4221) $ 290 Moisture and Density(ASTM D2937) $ 30 Pinhole Dispersion(ASTM D4647) $ 270 -add for shelby tube with above tests... . .....$ 20 Crumb Test(ASTM 6572)....... . ... . ... . $ 45 Reaction with HCI(ASTM D2488). .. .... $ 10 X-Ray Diffraction . $ 300 Irregular Shape Density(USACE) $ 55 Soil Chemistry For Corrosion Plastic and Liquid Limits,wet prep, 3 point LL (pH,chloride,sulfate, resistivity)... .... .... .$ 250 (ASTM D4318) $ 150 pH(soil or water).. . .. .. .. 30 Specific Gravity(ASTM D854) .. $ 80 Organic Content(ASTM D2974)... .... . .. $ 75 EARTHWORK TESTS Sand Equivalent(ASTM D2419) . $ 95 Standard Proctor,4 points(ASTM D698) Sieve Analysis, up to 8 sieves(ASTM D422) $ 105 -4-inch mold .... .. . $ 200 -add for each additional sieve in stack. 10 6-inch mold.. . .... $ 240 -add for coarse fraction(>#4 sieve).. . ..$ 60 Modified Proctor,4 points(ASTM D1557) Percent Passing#200 Sieve(ASTM Dl140)...$ 70 -4-inch mold $ 235 Hydrometer and Sieve(ASTM D422) $ 160 -6-inch mold ........ $ 275 Processing Clay Shales(USACE) $ 75 California Impact Compaction(Cal 216).... $ 250 Tests listed above include classification Moisture-Density Check Point (ASTM D2488 or D2487) -4-inch mold $ 75 VOLUME CHANGE TESTS -6-inch mold..... .. .... .. .. . ... ...$ 100 -add for rock correction for above $ 90 Incremental Consolidation(ASTM D2435) Cement/Lime Treatment -up to 8 load increments. .. . ... . ... $ 275 -Moisture/Density Relation(ASTM D558). $ 275 -additional load increment. . $ 30 -Wet&Dry Cycles,2 spec, (ASTM D559). $ 500 Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation -Strength,w/molding, (ASTM D1633) $ 90 -to 16 ksf max(ASTM D4186) $ 425 -Est.pH for Stabilization, (ASTM D6276) . $ 200 -with intermediate rebound and reload. .. $ 500 Index Density and Unit Weight(ASTM D4253) Expansion Index(ASTM D4829/UBC 29-1) $ 235 Maximum .$ 315 Swell and Collapse Tests .. . -wet after load,4 point(ASTM D4546-A) $ 600 R-Value . . . $ 135 -Value(ASTM D2844/Cal 301) 3 $ 310 -wet after load, 1 point(ASTM D4546-B) $ 160 Treated Soil.... . ...... . . ... .. .. . . ... . $ 325 -load after wet, 1 point(ASTM D4546-C) $ 200 Aggregate Base $ 335 STATIC STRENGTH TESTS Base with Admixture $ 350 Hand Penetrometer $ 15 CBR, per point(ASTM D1883) $ 340 Hand Penetrometer e ... $ 15 Proctor Compaction with above CBR .. . $ 210 " " Surcharge for Admixture ... . . $ 50 Miniature Vane(ASTM D4648). . .. .... .. ...$ 50 Sample Preparation for Soil with PI>20 $ 55 Miniature Vane with Residual $ 55 Unconfined Compression AGGREGATE TESTS -Soil(ASTM D2166) $ 100 Sieve Analysis(ASTM C136/Ca1202) -Rock,excludes strain(ASTM D7012-C). . $ 130 -Coarse Aggregate $ 60 -Rock,with axial strain(ASTM D7012-D) $ 200 -add for samples>5000g $ 30 -add for radial strain $ 125 -Fine Aggregate $ 110 Tnaxial Compression Sand Equivalent(ASTM D2419/Cal 217). $ 95 -Unconsolidated Undrained(ASTM D2850)$ 140 Cleanness Value(ASTM C142/Cal 227) . $ 140 -add for back pressure saturation.. . . .. ..$ 85 Durability Index(ASTM C3744/Cal 229) -*Consolidated Undrained with pore pressure -Coarse Fraction $ 140 measurements,per point(ASTM D4767)...$ 440 -Fine Fraction $ 140 -*Consolidated Drained, per point(USACE)$ 650 Direct Shear,3 points, (ASTM D3080) $ 435 Specific Gravity&Absorption -add for residual strength, per point ... $ 50 -Coarse Aggregate(ASTM C127/Ca1206) $ 80 Point at door Index e residual (ASTM D5731) $ 60 %-Fine Aggregate(ASTM C128/Cal 207) . ...$ 125 *Multiply single point rate by 2 for up to 3 stages of (o Crushed D5821/Cal 205)5) fraction consolidated, drained or undrained staged triaxial tests (ASTM Elongated 205). ..(. D4791) . .. $ 100 Flat&Elongated Particles(ASTM D4791) $ 180 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTS Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate Constant Head,2-3"Dia. (ASTM D2434). .. . $ 290 (AASHTO T304) $ 200 Constant Head,6" Dia Includes remolding Moisture Content(ASTM C566) $ 60 . .... . . $ 375 Sulfate Soundness, per fraction (ASTM D2434) (ASTM C88/Cal 214) $ 125 Flexible Wall(ASTM D5084)......... . .. .... .. .. .$ 290 . .. . .. .. .. ... . . . . -add for additional effective stress. . . .$ 100 L.A.Abrasion 500 rev. (ASTM C131/Cal 211)$ 215 Percent Passing#200 Sieve(ASTM C117) ....$ 85 Unit Weight and Voids(ASTM C29/Cal 212)...$ 95 Organic Impurities(ASTM C40). . . . . $ 50 Page 3 of 5 February 2014 FCL FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. ORo 2014 FEE SCHEDULE LABORATORY AND MATERIALS TESTING ASPHALT CONCRETE TESTS Photograph of Sample. . ... .. .. . . . $ 40 Stabilometer Value(ASTM D1560/Cal 366) $ 160 Additional Copies of Photographs .. .. Cost+15% Lab Compacted Unit Weight Local Site Pick up of Bulk or AC Sample -each briquette(Cal 304/Cal 308) $ 110 -within 30-mile radius, per sample. . . . ..$ 60 -surcharge for rubberized AC $ 20 NOTES: Unit Weight of AC Cores(Cal 308) $ 65 Theoretical Max.S.G. (Cal 309)...... ... . . .. $ 150 1) Fugro Consultants,Inc.'s laboratories are accredited Extraction and Sieve(ASTM D2172/D5444) $ 315 or validated by AASHTO(R-18),Caltrans,USACE, Asphalt Content by Ignition(Cal 382) $ 150 DSA/(LEA). Calibration Curve for Ignition Test $ 300 2) The following are included at NO CHARGE: Slurry Wet Track Abrasion(ASTM D3910) $ 70 a)Visual classification,natural water content and density with all tnaxial,direct shear,volume CONCRETE, MASONRY,AND STEEL TESTS change,and hydraulic conductivity tests. b)Sample photographs for triaxial,hydraulic Concrete Compression conductivity,and PLI tests. -Each 6x12 or 4x8 Cylinder(ASTM C39) $ 30 3) Rates for other tests and test variations,including -Add for Elastic Modulus(ASTM C469) . $ 185 mix designs,can be furnished on request -Hold or Additional Test . . . .. . .. $ 30 4) Rush assignments are subject to a 25%surcharge. -Light Weight Concrete(CTM 548) $ 40 Weekend or Holiday test assignments are subject to Cylinder Molds with Lids . . . $ 8 a 50%surcharge. Compression of Core(ASTM C42) .. . .... $ 90 5) Testing for contaminated samples(EPA Level C& Shrinkage of Mortar and Concrete 3 Bars D)will be invoiced at 1.5 times listed rates. (ASTM C157) . . .. $ 440 6) Shipping or other outside costs at cost+15%. Unit Weight of Concrete Cylinders 7) Reusable thin-walled tube shipping boxes(ASTM -Air-Dried $ 30 D4220)can be provided at no cost(except for -Oven-Dried $ 40 shipping charges)for samples shipped to Fugro's Shotcrete Panel, Lab Coring&Compression Please -3 cores(ASTM C42) $ 375 8) Pase for testing. contact the laboratory prior to shipping international soils to make proper arrangements and Grout and Mortar Compression(ASTM C39) obtain our foreign soil permit. -Grout. $ 45 9) A surcharge of$1 per linear foot of test boring depth -Mortar $ 35 will be added to cover the cost of standard Composite Prism Compression(ASTM E447) engineering field supplies including sample tubes -8x8 .. Quote and caps,stakes,etc. -8x12. Quote -8x16 .. . . ....... . .... Quote CMU Block Compression(ASTM C140) Quote CMU Absorption&Moisture(ASTM C140) . .$ 95 Concrete Moisture Emission Test Kit,each $ 60 Rebar-Tensile and Bend(ASTM A-370) Quote MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY TESTS AND CHARGES Sample Remold Surcharge. $ 50 Special Processing Hourly Rates Extrude Tube Sample and Visually Classify....$ 70 Sample Tube Cutting,each cut $ 25 Sample Preparation-Non-Routine... . .... . $ 100 Steel Drum-55 Gallon with Lid . . ... . $ 80 Gas Powered Generator....... ....... .. ... ... ... $ 80 Shelby Tube with Caps. $ 45 Addition of Soil Admixtures and Curing $ 95 Capping of Strength Test $ 40 Weight of Roofing Materials(ASTM D2829).. .$ 50 Density of Sprayed Fireproofing Materials . . $ 60 Static Friction Test -Per Surface Location(ASTM C1028) . $ 375 Coring Equip/Bit Charge,per half day.... . . $ 85 Bit Charge-Difficult Materials,per half day. . $ 100 Specimen End Prep -Less than 4"Diameter, per cut. . . .. .$ 12 -4"to 8" Diameter,per cut $ 18 Special Capping of Specimen .. . . $ 40 Patch or Grout Core Hole $ 35 Page 4 of 5 February 2014 FCL FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. Gaza 2014 FEE SCHEDULE Tignz,,,=,_ Et .11011..1111 FIELD EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES FIELD INSTRUMENTATION/EQUIPMENT Mini RAE(PID/LEL/COs)Detector.. $ 150/day Baroid Drilling Fluid Test Kit $ 30/day Dynamic or Stainless Steel Penetrometer..$ 50/day Conductivity Probe(in situ) $ 55/day Brass or Stainless Steel Sample Sleeves..$ 8/each Fisher TW-6 Metal Detector $ 50/day Use of 10 Modified Cal. Sleeves..... . . ... ..$ 30/box Gas Powered 120v Generator . . $ 80/day Keyed-Alike Locks $ 25/each Peristaltic Pump ... .$ 50/day 55-gallon Drum $ 80/each Positive Displacement Pump $ 25/day Field Filter . . . $ 25/unit Temperature-pH-Conductivity Meter $ 25/day Stainless Steel Hand-Auger Sampler $ 50/day Pressure Transducer $ 75/day Teflon Tape-4"roll $ 75/roll Water Level Indicator $ 20/day Liquinox .. $ 23/bottle Water Sampling Pump... ...... . ... ..... . ..$ 200/day Tyvek... .. .. $ 15/each (Bladder Pump or Electric Submersible) Nitnle Gloves $ 20/box Well Bailer-Standard .. ... . $ 25/day Respirator Cartridges $ 10/set Well Bailer-Disposable. . . ... .... .... ..$ 15/each 2-inch Diameter Water Meter . .. ....$ 20/day Inclinometer Probe and Readout Device....$ 185/day 4-inch Diameter Water Meter . . . $ 40/day Rotary Hammer.... .. . ... . . $ 40/day Well Cap 2" . .. .. . . . . $ 22/each CPN Corp. Hydroprobe . . .. . $ 75/day Digital Camera . .. . .. ... $ 25/day Double-Ring Infiltrometer $ 75/day Field Computer .. .. . .. . ... $ 30/day Downhole Soil Samplers ... . .. ..$ 75/day Subcontracted Specialty Equipment Cost+ 15% (2%-inch California liner, SPT) Kernlevel . ... ....$ 20/day 24-Channel Seismograph.. ... .. . $ 1500/wk Instantel Mini Mate Pro4 Vibration Monitor$ 150/day Instantel Mini Mate Pro 6 Vibration Monitor$ 200/day Larsen/Davis LXT Sound Monitor $ 120/day Nuclear Gauge. $ 50/day Manometer . . .. . . $ 55/day Asphalt/Concrete Patch . Cost+15% Page 5 of 5 February 2014 FCL Page 1 of 1 Estimated Hours and Cost MAC DONALD ARCHITECTS Bridge Street Bridge City of Arroyo Grande SUBCONSULTANT Principal Project Sr. Reasearcher Total Total Designer CAD Tech Dollars Rate(loaded) $257.00 $158.50 $85.21 $65.00 Hours and fee PHASE#1-PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION/DESIGN SERVICES RESEARCH AND MEETING HAND SKETCHE PHASE#1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 $20,000 PHASE#2-FINAL PS&E ILLUMINATION AND LIGHTING PHASE#2 TOTAL 0 0 0 01 0 $5,000 TOTAL PHASE#1 8,PHASE#2 1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 $25,000 McMillan LAND SURVEYS FEE SCHEDULE (11-01-2013) FIELD: One-surveyor crew $190.00/hr. Two-surveyor crew $250.00/hr. Licensed Surveyor $180.00/hr. OFFICE: Clerical $60.00/hr. Office surveyor $150.00/hr. Licensed Surveyor $180.00/hr. There is a 2-hour minimum for all fieldwork All work is billed in full hour increments only There is a 2-hour minimum move-in and set-up charge All accounts are due and payable upon receipt of invoice All travel time is billed out at the appropriate hourly rates Initials: Date: (revised. 11-01-13) 2306 Broad Street•San Luis Obispo,California 93401 (805)541-1663•Fax(805)541-1664 PRoFessional Fee ScxeDuie errective Januasv 1,2015 Senora Forams', $165 PRmcn'al Lannscare Ascxitect 1'{5 Sums Associate Lanmscare Ascxitect 130 Associate LanDSCaPe Aacmtect 110 Psorect LanDSCaPe Ascmtect 95 Jos Captain 80 Semoa LanDSCaPe Demons 70 Lanascare Despises 60 !lummox's Systems Manaoes 90 Inronntation Systems Assistant/Gsaixic Surat 60 SuPPORx Starr 110 1 f --- The1,HLA Groupi ; =- Landscape_Architects &``,•Planners; Inc. ' lisa wise consulting, inc. planning economics natural resources SCHEDULE OF RATES Effective January 2015, Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC) staff billing rates are as follow: Principal $195.00/ hr Director $160.00 / hr Senior $147.00/ hr Associate $104.00/ hr Admin $69.00/ hr 983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 I 805.595.1345 I lisawiseconsulting.com EXHIBIT B $pOTY Scope of Work --__ } Bridge Street Bridge(49C-oi.96)over Arroyo Grande Creek RI QUINCY lot ENGINEERING BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE (49C-o196) OVER ARROYO GRANDE CREEK Quincy Engineering Inc.(QUINCY)is providing the following additional scope of work to the City of Arroyo Grande(City)for the on-going Bridge Street Bridge project. The City has requested these services based on the outcome of several public meetings and discussions with Caltrans. Feedback from numerous stakeholder groups have been unable to identify a clear preferred alternative to name in the environmental document for project approval. As a result,the City and Caltrans local assistance have agreed to identify and study two preferred alternatives(One preferred bridge replacement and one preferred bridge rehabilitation)in the environmental document. This decision has design scope and cost implications due to the level of engineering which is required to support the environmental process fora historic bridge. It is important to note that the original approved cost and scope for this project already included analysis and engineering efforts to support a bridge replacement alternative through the environmental phase. Therefore the cost and scope for this amendment is based on engineering required to support a bridge rehabilitation alternative through the environmental document. Quincy has identified cost and scope for this requested effort below: TASK 1—Design of a bridge rehabilitation Quincy will design the structureousing Load Resistance Factor Design following AASHTO LRFD Bridge alternative to support the environmental Specifications,6th Edition. For seismic design, process Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria(Version 1.7)will be QUINCY will design either a retrofit of the existing followed.Other references that Quincy will follow are historic truss(so it can support dead and reduced live Caltrans Division of Structures"Bridge Memo to loads without the use of a supplemental truss)OR Designers","Bridge Design Aids","Bridge Design design a stronger new supplemental truss to support Details"and the"Office of Specially Funded Projects the existing historical bridge. Information and Procedure Guide". For either rehabilitation alternative selected above, TASK 2—65% Plans (Unchecked Details) the abutment and pier foundations will be replaced to address seismic and scour vulnerabilities of the Quincy will prepare design plans as necessary to existing foundations which can't be rehabilitated. support the environmental process. The plan sheets will be prepared in CADD according to Quincy and QUINCY assumes that a 65%design level will be Caltrans'drafting standards. Plans will be prepared in required to support the environmental process for English units and will be consistent with Caltrans' these rehabilitation alternatives. This design level is Standard Plans. All plans will be signed by the civil necessary in order to determine what impacts a engineer(registered in the State of California)in proposed rehabilitation would have on the existing responsible charge of the design,in accordance with historical bridge status. Key design parameters such the Local Programs Manual. retrofitted member sizes,orientation, appearance and costs are required to assist our environmental team in TASK 3—Development of bridge rehabilitation preparing a Finding of Effect(FOE)which is required quantities and estimate by the section io6 process for historic bridges. Based on the results of preliminary engineering studies, Quincy will prepare a detailed estimate.The estimate impacts to the existing bridge for rehabilitation will be comprised of unit prices placed on detailed alternatives are anticipated. As a result our team quantity and check quantity calculations.Construction anticipates the need for a Memorandum of costs for the estimate will be developed using current Agreement(MOA)to identify mitigation measures to bid results from similar projects, Caltrans data base reduce that effect to complete the Section io6 information along with prices from Caltrans latest process. QUINCY will design mitigation measures to Construction Cost Manual. support the MOA prepared for and signed by Caltrans and the State Historic Preservation Officer. tl tioloping YOUR v[tio e 144.41v i 'JOUR pttOJC ct Page Ii _�CITY OF ,r-..-......-:«--.��_-.......-....,.�...-r--.�....�...7...s._.�._..__�_ __�--._.-- ...-.-...._._._�...-......�..._..s� Scope of Work I I N CV P � Q V 1 , i Bridge Street Bridge(49C-o196)over Arroyo Grande Creek ENGINEERING TASK 4—Quality Control &Constructability following NPS HAER standards. The still photography Review will include up to so views total including contextual views of the structure within its setting,side and deck As an integral part of the Quincy QC/QA Program,a views, and detail views.JRP will prepare the draft senior level engineer will review the entire draft plans report on standard 81/2"x ii."paper with scanned and estimate package for uniformity,compatibility, copies of the photographs. The draft deliverable may and constructability. also be provided electronically in PDF format. JRP will This procedure is imperative for bridge rehabilitations, incorporate all comments from reviewing agencies as retrofit details are often not standard and must be into the final report and will prepare the large format reviewed carefully to ensure that it is feasible to (4"x5")photographs produced on archival quality film assemble and install the prepared details. Quincy also and paper. The final deliverable will include two has an in-house Construction Management Group. reports on archival paper accompanied by a set of They will perform a Constructability Review of the archival prints for each, plus one set of archival plans and specifications. negatives. Additional copies of the HAER report can be provided electronically in PDF format. TASK 5—Environmental Coordination The public controversy and coordination with numerous project stakeholders surrounding this project has been higher than anticipated. As the project timeline has continued to grow additional meetings have been required in order to determine a preferred alternative. This task is for additional coordination time required to support two preferred alternatives through the environmental process. TASK 6—Historic American Engineering Record This scope was identified as(Optional)in the original scope of work since the Team did not know if this study would be required. Based on the latest project development,this technical study will now be required. JRP Historical Consulting, LLC(JRP)will record and document Bridge Street Bridge in Arroyo Grande to the requirements of the Historic American Engineering Record(HAER),the standard by which the Memorandum of Agreement between Caltrans and the State Historic Preservation Officer will stipulate for documentation as mitigation for an adverse effect caused by the project(in compliance with Section io6 of the National Historic Preservation Act). The HAER report will include archival quality photographs,along with written historical and descriptive data that will be prepared using available historic context and data from previous studies.JRP assumes that the documentation will not be sent to the National Park Service(NPS)or Library of Congress.JRP will sub-contract with William Dewey for photographic services for the documentation 4 vt 1OpinL youR w:.ipit I detI,.wrinq YOVR 11rolc-tt Page 12 • GUINCY ENGINEERING INC Project Name BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE REHABILITATION STUDY a 5 I 1 i1 ii i i 1 17 TASKS 1 1 im 111 1 l ik 2 1] _ g , 3 0 1 P JoM OM Danny Scoff 64ke Crag ma Oulncy ,Mah Rem Greg Yang. Leman Martin Sohn Mossma MsCwle• Andy Gau Smdre2 Jim Foster PdNasa Ste Slap mai ismasa 176 in, MS as Man ,75.88 147 in 112.1 Male 424 15112 115a Mtn 12040 12040 Task 1 Poston A•Mdgg raltamIIt lion AMA.to•upp.ttlio emMronmantel mom B, 6 40 80 B0, 216 0 Task 2 6S%Plan.IDndoc#.EOatee. 2 40 100 142 0 sk 0 0ev01opm.nt A be4p.nb.bikMlon eglantine.and.Mlmrt0 2 40 40 82 0 TAR 0uollry DoninIa Co MroctabkityRe2.W — - - — - - 4, 4 0 Task5 Environmental 840,Nn.tIon 40 20 B 68 0 Task 6 Hlstotic American Engin.eMg Record I 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1x0061014 Haun 0 M, 24 • 40 120 40 _ 0 100 0; 0 514 0 0 0 OTA HWRS 514 .M.8e,0,..22p05010J 08M100,44000 Quincy Engineering,Inc City of Arroyo Grande BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE REHABILITATION FEASIBILITY STUDY-AMENDMENT#2 QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. CONTRACT No. CONSULTANT COST PROPOSAL SUB CONSULTANT: QUINCY ENGINEERING,INC. January 13,2015 DIRECT LABOR Initial Hourly Name Classification Range Hours Rate Total John Quincy Principal in Charge $60-$80 0 $75 86 $0 00 Mark Reno Project Manager $60-$80 48 $75 86 $3,641 28 Young Senior Engineer- Greg $45-$70 Bridge Project Engineer 34 $59.22 $2,013.48 Lemon Senior Engineer- Brent $60-$80 Roadway Project Engineer 8 $75.86 $606.88 Martin Pohl! Senior Engineer-Bridge $55-$70 Specialist 40 $67 83 $2,713.20 Danny Mossman Senior Engineer-Bridge $45-$70 120 $52 91 $6,349.20 Scott McCauley Associate Engineer-Bridge $32-$55 40 $49 79 $1,991 60 Andy Chou Assisstant Engineer $25-$40 120 $32.64 $3,916.80 Mike Sanchez Senior Engineer-Roadway $45-$70 0 $57 12 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0 00 Jim Foster Senior Engineer-QA/QC $60-$80 4 $75.86 $303.44 Craig Polglase CAD Tech 100 $41 19 $4,119 00 Staff Office Support Staff 0 $20 40 $0.00 Staff Admin 0 $20 40 $0 00 514 Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $25,654 88 0% Anticipated Salary Increases $0.00 TOTAL-Direct Labor $25,654.88 INDIRECT COSTS Rate Total Overhead 173.10% $44,408 60 Fringe Benefit(Included in OH) 0.00% General&Administrative(Included in OH) 0.00% 173.10% TOTAL-Indirect Costs $44,408.60 FEE (10.00%) (FIXED) TOTAL-Fee $7,006.35 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Total Travel Costs 0 @ $0.56 $ - Photocopies Overnight Service 1 @ $20.00 $ 20 00 Graphic Presentation Boards 4 @ $250 00 $ 1,000 00 $1,020 00 TOTAL QUINCY COST $78,089.83 Subcontractor Costs $ 22,003.00 Total Contract $ 100,092.83 p,RROYO a c� INCORPORATED 9Z lc JULY 10, 1911 4. c14IF°Re MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM 11.a. —JANUARY 27, 2015 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR THE BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; AND CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. AND BUDGET AMENDMENT DATE: JANUARY 27, 2015 Attached is correspondence received regarding Item 11.a. that was received subsequent to agenda distribution. cc: City Attorney Interim City Manager City Clerk Public Review Binder • > !e auapoci - nog( )1unttl •4.aa4S a5pp8 uo sassauisnq/sauoIs/s4.ununn4saJ at{a. o4 36ppq ate.. ssaao o.. aldoad 4.36 04. ADM 0 ap!noJd o.. paau 3M - 36DII!n 6uNInm 0 si 36ggm!n mu .4ua!uanu03 X,aan 4! 3nnl1 04. 3nnt.1 A31.14. '>lInm 4.,UOm aldoad 'Ammo 10J. 004. s! a6p!,aq 6u!6u!ms aq1 .4.I!nga,a/pa.alndad 6u!aq s,4.! a1!t.1m a6p!aq au� .anau A,aan 36p!Jq un!J4sapad Ajn.aoduaa.i. n paau am pg.. s! �ndu! XW '>aam 4.xau 6u!4.aaua at1.� pua4.4.0 04. 2 q0 aq 4.,uom 1 XIa4.nun4.,aoJun .uo!a.nua,ao j.u! a'.14 do j. nog( >juntu I!f SIOZ 'LZ kenueC- I!aunoD k!D aLP 04 uofeluasaad a6p!a9 4aaags a6plas :321 :;aa[gns )IaadDW II!C :col Wd LO:Zi ' kenuet 'Aepuns quas Ng aualaea :woi r ' t � linda Austin, (: �� C 'Phis bridge links generations of families in south county. Please rehabilitate. There is no turning back once it is gone. Af l� Jeanne Dickey �H C) Mt). t. ",\ . Historic sites, landmarks and our heritage photos are very important to our sense of pride in our community... when we demolish rather than renovate or rehabilitate we take away a bit of our character... Johnny Odom ti !;'F ,^ !r> r`r I have lived in the 5 cities area since 1953 and this bridge has always been there, It is a very big part of Arroyo Grande history, It needs to star no matter what. Tim Storton:AI?I't?YO t:IRAN01-'. C.A, To slow down the degradation of the character of the downtown. Christopher Young(jRl_l,NlP, f I- Iistoric, beautiful, slows life down a bit, has tourist value, part of local cultural heritage, new and faster is certainly not always, better,,.. thank _you for your consideration! Chris Young Patricia Weilbacher AMR O `.) t_3,., %t, ,J) i_;, Preserving the bridge is preserving the Village of Arroyo Grande, uniqueness'. Adrian Boria M\'.i.)`i t t ..`; 41 °i ='. , CA Part of history Paula Esteban ;MIPL. l_.l, (..'A t I grew up in AG, this and the Swinging Bridge are AG icons, please rehabilitate and not destroy, Leaette Yracheta A h'. ii M' i) As a 6th generation Five Cities Resident, we need to preserve EVERYTHING possible! We are so blessed to have our Village and all the people that fight for it! Judy Pinkston v P i1',()` O Arroyo Grande is all about our history, this bridge NEEDS to be saved I � Kelly Wilke.t-soii,*..',(.,*.,E,,\N(), CA It is what makes AG what it is best thing about the village Erin Down P. N'U .[I. �A C 11, (-:A It is a wonderful piece of history. I really needs to be saved. Doesn't the Chamber still have pictures from when it appeared on Good Morning America? It's so awesome! Lawrence Nelson R NOW t, Please keep our history alive and well, Merilyn Nelson A10,1C)VO GiRANI)F. ('-Al Bridge street bridge is a part of the history of Arroyo Grande; it's unique and certainly worth saving. kari La Graff 6ROVI:R BFACI-1, CA The bridge is a wonderful piece of history and such an enjoyable site to see i would b g e very to see t d bridge o Melanie Ma►l►n A VIA P I 1A(). I X My family has been in the 5 Cities since the 40's! Maiden name: Vieira. Please preserve this bridge ,hiltits original Daniele Dishion FRF JIKO, CA Its historic!! Rebecca Conrow ARROYO ('iF!/11NT*)F*, (`-N This is not only part if our village's history, but an important part of its charm Karen Valdez HF,\C),L CA The Village wouldn't be the same without Our bridge. Please save it not only for those ,6ttil.q,th4,t'l,(iv,ei,i,6-iit for the, ge►teratrons to come.. serenairthurn Many memories with my grandma, and now with own son. Historical site of Arroyo Grande' s beginnings!! (YSN Old town won't be the same!! mike quaresnia its part of AG. Us locals who's family has been here since the late 1800's early 1900's would like our town to somewhat resemble what we've always known. Big city money conics in and changes everything. starvinetARRM*()(IRA'MIW� CIA Character of the area Adrian Wyatt ! 1 ', I; I grew up there; and would hate to see an iconic structure be torn down. Kelley Day ARROY(") GiR A N, Df,*- ('A I like to see historic landmarks preserved. Phyllis Boyei I V[i*()ASI NIV Suz Howells Your investment in AG now will yield on -going benefits. Those of its who live far away now can attest that our friends, colleagues and neighbors visit the village precisely for its commitment to preservation. P Linda Fellows 'k'101)1 C. -1 it's part ofA.G's history! So many of our historic buildings and landmarks have been torn down as "just old ". Once they are gone, they're gone. There is no going Uack, and the history and character that they take with them is also lost. New is NOT always Fetter, and sometimes it's worth the extra expense to preserve the past! Please keep the bridge! Gail Walt �X' 1'0% K), the old bridge is part of the small town charm please save it michael Hudson ' ?,o I ,% its old needs to be restored not junked it a pice of history This bridge simply must not go! It's part of what makes arroyo grande, arroyo grande! It's been in countless films over the years and been a staple of the strawberry festival. The city needs to stop Focusing on destroying and renovating the beautiful historic village and focus more on •1 bl '1' actua pro ems wit un t ie ctty. sharon mankins { ?l,i '1);1( :i:. A/ 0— w vLUPVI IVY ti �,Jtnuua ztnu woulu uu uevastating io us locals. Karen Edwards :> ` ; , r :1 011 I'( . I ` <. ~ GKAKD�.C� It's an important part of my town, ' Randy Stevenson A[��C�D[k0.C� � I xmu|d like Arroyo Onmdo retain its small town charm in the downtown and he bridge bun integral pail nfthat charm. ` ' Please preserve the historic bridge, It tile area apart as charming centers and nialls, Pleuae preserve tile past, help theAam| and keep the+rafnc ` ` very fast. You will draw tourism from folks who want something different. This quaint bistwd fit to preserve and reffirbish the existing bridge as a wonderfid historical site similar to the'Califbinia Missions, I think it is a vi. ionary action save it! , "",~y".^ Lou Anne Lockwood i ' N---_ ~^ ,. La, \ksl� (-4\'i\NDi- if thepolice station ' . b1ian-cloL ' . HISTORY ` SAM ..`'vu/`C A --`~',~r~`~'~~~'^~~~+' believe going back "' the village without that bridge would considers rehabilitation over demolition, Matthew Whi!Llese ` S.AN LU|6O0�,P0^CA ~ The Historic "Fahric"o[ our beloved Village isunder yom'ou, k/ preserve protect. ` r the history ^ and character of Arroyo Grande with so much character that rehabilitation would only add of our 'uiuuV '"=^«ao' iQ|H3[H`{� Please leave Historic AG historic! Keel) it cute! Gene Kalland !.()) (),�-)OS, ("',\ History is important even if it costs a little more. Scott Dowlan Dowlan ARROYO GiRANDE, CA John Fledgepeth I ride my bike over this historic bridge and would not like to see it gone, Michele Attebery ` %N ?';A. N 1,�1!t!: %, We love the bridge! It adds so much character and it is a part of tradition, Willian► Garris Citizens use the bridge as pedestrians and it represents and reminds us of history in the city's historic core. Keep it! 'Thanks! Sue 'Sayins "'�A '\ I A ".I:t [", 1.;\, (-, A This bridge drew my family to the town and helped to establish our habit of stopping for antiques and ice cream locally! I kate Nvels A RIM' Yu (;,RA 1:) C*.,i to four more generations, Linda Abernathy it The bridge really is one of the parts of AG history I love! Robert Marvos 1['ROYt:) 6R,,\ 0 1 :, The bridge is one of many reasons I enjoy living in arroyo grande. I would like my niece when she is old enough to enjoy seeing the bridge. I was born and raise in AG and when I come home to visit that bridge holds a flood of memories from'myyouth and teens. -The village will loose a huge piece of it's character without it! Eriou Correia I I l,, L'B.A I.: G11, � " A ARLENE ROWAN V The bridge is the best tliinCF L, for Arroyo Grande. We use it often and visitors love it, debi hL19heS NV I grew tip in Arroyo Grande and walked that bridge many times as a child. Keep the history of AG,a1ivel!!!1 Christopher Ridge 1. S i grow up in arroyo grande and have crossed that bridge many many many times-to actualiyAestroyjtjo remove even more of the historic pa would be a tragedy to not only history, but to our children as well.. Rebecca Reynolds ).AiNCASTFR. CA My husband and I have kids and grandkids who live in Arroyo Grande. We are in favor of riehabIfitation.,Qf the.� br I i dge. I believe that t I he bridge is avital component of Historical Arroyo Grande and to demolish it would be contrary to what '61i ,. ,fornia'cities are currently Promoting, :-' revitalization. The bridge is tied to heritage and recreational destinations within its surroundings'; T46 historic bridge complements.other', amenities within Arroyo Grande and may benefit in attracting tourists, while maintaining pedestrian and biking opportunities. A i in ga ri, we ai -e i favor to rehabilitate Bridge Street bridge, Chris Takier FA NiAN A, CA That bridge is a piece of history that should be preserved. I remember as a young boy, ,going ,over -that ,bric -0rtftqy- times tO.get W',Oldl AG'.froi my home. I have made sure that my kids experience it as well while visiting my home Carol Ara--onsmith 1. AN'(*.AS*T1:R A Historical value Linda Quinlan PAS�() ROM FS. A I lived in AG for many years. My grandchildren still love there and this bridge is part of their gydwing tio, Save the bridg,0 1! 1 Rita Smith P.A 1 N4 OA f, I. "A I visit my daughter in Arroyo Grande all the time and take my grandchildren for walks to the '011,igo Av or-three times 'a week.0ne of the in( charming parts Of Our walk is to walk across the bridge to the old schoolhouse and the fiireho"u-50�."We A enjo, and love that quaint bridge so inuch and it is a pail of Americana. That is what helps to make Arroyo Grande so unique ,and .sor pleasant t6waik,throtiLgh"If would be a cryim shame to demolish it and replace it with something modern. My grandkids get the biggest kick out of crossing the' bridge. Please do not demolish it. It is unique and beaUtift1l. Don't spoil your charming little village. Thank you-,'.'.,' Jordan San Filippo \V 1'_;A DFA(l 1. A Preserving history is important to me, :Laura Fmmerling ARROW) BRAND), f',,1 I think it is very important to retain what little history we have left in our city. I love living in AG. There is no good reason to remove that bridge, an important landmark for the community. rosemiary.coclit-an PISNA) 1. CA these types of bridges are rare and beautiffil. we should maintain them not destroy them Susan Testa -. , This area of AG is so beautiful and so rich in history, it would be terrible to lose that bridge. Also, a lot of people use that bridge. Brenda Like Bray i:`C:NWAV You have been trying to keep the Village of Arroyo Grande as a Historical and part of the Cultural Heritage of the Central Coast removing the Bridge would be altering what you have been trying so hard to restore. l was born and raised in AG, graduated from AGHS in 1988. Coming back home to the Five Cities Area, so much has changed, but at last going to the Villfige- it still feels like it has not changed.. Brenda Lipe Bray C'O? AVAY. Al,,, I an from the class of 1988, Born and raised in Arroyo Grande. Lived at 553 Carol PI my whole life Tlie bridge- is apart afAtroyo Grande history. Why would you change it? You have tried to preserve down town Arroyo Grande .. as Old town AG? It would be a sad loss to pCr!!!lr!!!!!r!! Lara Golden 1'1.t ,l.` A I grew up in AG and my family still lives there. Keep the historic bridge ... don't become another'cloiie strip mall town C'. Shawn Howell ;i RR(W() f.}Iti A? , I: E, Ctrl Should not destroy a Part of the backbone of our town's history if the funds are available. Would the swinging bridge be next? l bet.not. Raise the funds during the festivals and donations and maintain a legacy landmark. Roger Bakei 1.'3 Ii <1C f , f'rl It's a historical landmark in a historical town. Shauna Juarez Akf( ()Y(.) (; 1\ D1: , CA Keep the bridge! It's one of the things that keeps people coming back to our town! Kenneth Arritt Wfl* W`,`0 G!l AND[*. ; (:`A Historical bridge needs to stay F. Robert Neil Vincelette 6 1?(.)� A ;D? tC,'l The AG Swinging Bridge represents a large chapter of history for the AG Central Coast area. It should rentah) and not replaced. Julie O'Connell Vi,,, 1)VO z N"! )F CA I grew up here. You are thinking of tampering with a piece of history, HISTORY that should be marked as such. We love our old bridge and want it to stay ... SO many of us want it to stay. Please refurbish it instead of replacing it if you have to do anything. I appreciate your hearin me out. "Thank you, pew-kelley BLACH, CA Preserve History! Grew up in the area and graduated from AGHS, the historic charm ofAITOYO Grande is something I Sitilftell p"e'Opic about when'they' asked where I grew up. I hope that charm remains for me to share someday with my kids. Riclgard Waller ARR(A'C) (iIRA \D[,.:, CA Starting with my Grandfather back in '08, 4 generations of Waller's have enjoyed this bridge, I want to see generations 5 and G, at least, have the same opportunity. Debra Castilleia V Al IFIM, CA I lived on bridge street for 8 years and crossed it many of times was the only way to get to the village would hate to see it changed . Heather Holliday CA NC7ti I grew up with a lifetime of memories walking that bridge, often with a Burnardoc ice cream cone. While I no longer live there; C still come back to the bridge every time I visit. My son has walked that bridge with me, and I look forward to bringing my grand kids, That bridge IS A A.G. Please don't demolish our history. Korby Sinclaire O(T. A:NO, JoAnn Bosworth (Antonio) { ! r,;:,_ ?N_A/ I grew up in AG. going to grade schools and high school there. it would be a travesty to destroy a beautiful piece of history in Arroyo Grande. Carie Randolph GR,ANDLI, CA Maintaining the historic structures in AG is important, continues the uniqueness and small town quality and honors Our predecessors Beth Pechmann 'ARRO)"() (JRAND[--,, (..'A Valerie palorno �Cf I E A this is a historical bridge and tearing it clown would be a huge mistake. its apart of the town Katheryn Mueller Why rnust we constantly destroy our history and monuments, Hitler did the same thing and that is how he lost the war to Russia, he did not p� attention to history. So we could remember and cherish history or we could be like ? ? ? ?? L Laviano ' ,\, i;'1 ;tt;�l;t;:�hi 1 ,,. ('., Please do not destroy this Unique, historical piece of AC, Village. Stepping back in time into our Village is what brings people here and it is what the roots the people into community. Please do not homogenize our village. Robyn Cooper i',t.lR01 ;\ N K. t:.','t You can't kill the bridge! It's a huge part of AG history! 1 want to be able to bring my young children to see it in the next couple`of years. Greg Key, N.'I3'r.?i-i ( "'A I was born and raised in Arroyo Grande and the Green bridge is apiece of the village. All the people that have,t,)rown up here know tt and hav some kind on story behind. For me, it was me being a kid and taking walks with my family across it and looking down into the creek; and to wanting to walk up the beams and stand on top. Now, I get to do the same with my family.. If it's demolished; yours deinolrs11 ing'a piece a AG history. Doug Davis NItl.::�11,1 "1'l1, I was born and raised in Arroyo Grande. The swinging bridge has always held great memories for me Wither during the Harvest Festival, walking home from high school or date night in the village, the swinging bridge was always a destination, Losing the swinging bridge would detrimental to the history and character to the village of Arroyo Grande, By keeping it, it will continue to be a destination for generatlons to come! Andy Kelley d3l;RKJ*1EY, t:`; The bridge is the heart of The Village and a critical piece of our shared history to be saved! Tom Hamilton L OI,,' `v6ELI (.:A It is HISTORIC! Roy Leininger W1 +) I lived in the five City's area in the 70s and 80s. I grew up around not only the "swinging" bridge but the entire village. Demolishing the bride is taking a large piece of old town as well as the memories of so many that love it! I still come back to the coast often, and always stop in to d shops of the village to patronize the businesses there and enjoyo he surroundings... Including the bridge! Shawn Goddon t`t(:;i 1i t:), CA It's a big part of Arroyo Grande history...... Dennis Headrick Pr:)f_'. The quaint qualities of A.G. Need to be preserved, including this landmark bridge. Dean Shaw V ' '!P. r F R. 011" Local history.. It is a great attraction. Perfect spot for city events such as old car collecters .. Fran Askins ARROY() (fRANDI- CA Family has lived here several generations, this is part of our town and it is VERY historic it needs to be left looking like it is It is so beautiful please save it!! Stephanie Gornez ; A I It is a part of the history of the town of Arroyo Grande and it is interesting and full to go on. Cassidy Herbst SA N N YON I(). 'rX Crew tip in AITOYO Grande and this is one of my favorite places. It needs to be saved! terrance tracey VA,'� (.'0 V F R, old bridges are pieces of art. Save them all. Sure beats an ugly concrete bridge. Heather Boydstun f-J N(j \.I A N-A,/ I used to go on this bridge all the time as a kid and even have pies of my girls on that bridge wiled we have gone back, to visit. There's memories and history attached to it, Carolyn Hinson A R R Y0 R A N I' I A tC This bridge is the last remaining swinging bridge within the state of California, it is not only important hi isto.rical y, it also retafilisa'rehitectural importance. Sue Jeffers •ON, 'A Every time I walk on this bridge, the gentle spirit of Old Arroyo Grande with the legion s of past we' sh 5 Ao' .have strolled upon it"conle to mind, ...and I always smile grateful that my great grandchildren even now, can feel the love in thNwonderfol old i'elic..Plea8e"Oo not let it fill into disrepair or be destroyed... Janice Kelley ARROY(' (1RAN!f-)1-,(.A I love that bridge, we can't keep destroying something ,just because it's old. Joanne Crowder N I PO N-10, CA Value the paste P! Duh. Who thought of this one? The "modern" new building owners in our hisidiiric town' - vincent martel �,A rA NIA RIA, { -'A Its where I grew up... Nick A Fman N1 FIC.) �l ('A I grew up here and went to AG High and it's historic to the town so much so that people visit and 6 n come to take pictures of it while on vacation The city frivolously spends money on so many other things it wound be a shame to not save something so special as this historic bridge. Than you Leland Swenson BeCalrse (lie bridge is real history - and something new will not be a real part of who we were, Amy Collins IMC4tI JA, KS This is an important and beautiful paid; of our town's history!! Gerry Hail Kl::i:_INE, NIi 1kuQConnor;,t 1 1, 1.1i( }. .:A 1 grew up here and that bridge is part of Arroyo's history and charm! Anastasia Struthers GR(..)VL*R R( A(l.:"l 1, C'A Arin Rich Arroyo Grande is my hometown, I grew up there and to see this bridge gone will no longer put Arroyo Grande on the map Lynn Crosier (.'I-,V\,I,ARIL[.,(), CA. Maintaining our history is important for future generations!!! The bridge is very fitting with the look& feel of Old Town AG. Ma k-es absolute No SENSE lot destroy it. Come in people! Why is this even being discussed???? Sheeshl Lance Mitchell ARROYO (INANI.W., CA Trent Diaz %X, 1,." I-j I visit every year, The Village is truly beautiful and historic. Linda Smith CA The bridge is a historical part of AG and my children and I enjoyed walking, driving, biking over er it foe year It would destroy the ambience c the town. Please reconsider, Susan Hoffiiian ()f , ) A Preservatiori is important to future generations and attracts visitors to the area making it unique and reminding people of a simpler life. Remember the movie Field of Dreams? Nathan Holth X O R] } -i "!'K l : i ; r, m) The bridge is an important part of the history of Arroyo Grande. It is a unique structure of great historical value. Loretta Parral ('.'A �M B [� I A. CA important to retain some of California's history. Don't let it all be demolished -- please! Beth Pulfer NMISSION VIE,)(), 11 It's one of my family's favorite destinations and a poignant story to share ... I walked across this bridge with our then 4-month'old daughter ter all my dad, an Arroyo Grande resident, deceased for over 12 years now. Every time I traverse this bridge, it brings up a warm & sadisfyin6 memory. SAVE'rHE BRIDGE, please!!! Michelle Cruz (JIWVFI'� CA This bridge has been around since I grew up in AG and adds the historic charm we love in the Village, it would not be the same old AG witho this bridge. It also gives pedestrian access to the Paulding and AGHS students walking home from school.:,. Edward Thompson MN)NMO. C.A I like that bridge and know it. Byron Batista 1.00 A,N(JEJ ES, I was born and raised in AG. It's rich with history and tearing it down would be a terrible mistake*.': nicky holt Yk.1('(.'A VA,(A,):*,,Y1 C',\. This is important to me because my inom and dad walked on and signed there flames on the bridge and in '6'a'unts and I uncle grew up in an( still live there. when i visit i take my kids there and show them were there grandma and grandpa hung outandwereitisetopla'y -wlien i,wasa little girl, we love to come and visit it that bridge and see the initals of grandma and grandpa an4',;iunts and 6hcles 'please keep this bridge, thank you CJ Tatum i P V F' R €I! A 0 1, It's part of our history! and visitors come to see it. We can't just get rid of it. DanyaNunley AIWOY() GRM�-Df�, CA Charm ...preserving the village where i live CLARICE B PATTON ARROY() G (,AMF)[:, CA I LIVE IN THE VILLAGE, Rita Spence ORC: t.: [ 1, C;- My grandparents lived in A.C. and the bridge is part of my family history. ,Shelley Flynn C;RO U C;<1 Sharon Sutliff i E i �* ( P' It's part of the character or the village; it also helps promote traffic calming. 4 Nanci Moscardi N (P(),\40, CA My kids LOVE the bridge..... we nave lived Ill Arroyo (jrancie tor u years and this bridge has been an integral part of our lives` ,Out t boy9;fl`st toddled across this b r idge. visiting family have marveled at the bridge; and I cannot count the number of times we haVet'c� &se'd tb e, i b'd ef'i ii, got rorn park to downtown. It is 1 icon! KIMBERLY ADAMS SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA Arroyo Grande is my hometown Mark Mintz A %4 A(� I A, ("'A It's an iconic part of going to downtown AG. Removing it would impact the feel of downtown AG. As'a' �reg'ula"patron r of sh iii this area OPS including Klondike's, Rooster Creek, Doc Bernstein's and Jaffa Cafe, I would be more likely� io', take lnt"y discretionary,income (6 SLO or'stay i Santa Maria Elizabeth Wilson "I'his is an important landmark to the city of AG - can't imaging old town AG without t! We always go to the bridge anytime we're in town ' Loos McCrav N I NA,K). CA Rcv'd 1-27-15, Item 11.a Manetta Bennett