Loading...
CC 2016-05-24 Supplemental Item • From: Dianne Thompson • Sent: Monday, May 23,2016 11:35 AM To: Kitty Norton. - - Subject: FW: Council agenda -- communications For the Council meeting - - - • From: Otis Page [mailto:ospagejr @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 23,.2016 11:26 AM • To: Dianne Thompson - - Subject: Fwd: Council agenda -- communications Forwarded message - - From: Otis Page<ospagejr @gmail.com> Date: Mon,May 23, 2016 at 10:15 AM Subject'Council agenda-- communications To: Jim Guthrie <jguthrie @arroyogrande.org>, JIM HILL<jhi11 @arroyogrande.org>, KRISTIAN BARNEICH <kbarneich @arroyogrande.org>, Lin Hill<1jlhill @gmail.com>, TIM BROWN<tbrown @arroyogrande.org> I oppose this policy: The proposed legislative platform would allow the Mayor, or his/her designee, on behalf of the City, to sign and submit the requested communication so long as the position is consistent with the position taken by the League and/or other City-affiliated organizations and previous positions taken by the City.A copy of the communication would be provided to the full City Council and presented as an information item under City Manager Reports at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. This policy strenuously prioritizes and consequently irides the Mayor's discretion. The Mayor's performance should be subject only to approval by the citizens and should not be constrained by administrative procedures administered by the City Manager and subject to approval by the other Council members. . • Otis Page The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in error,please advise the sender by reply email or phone and• delete the message. Please note that email correspondence with the City of Arroyo Grande, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act„and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt by law. 1 • From: Dianne Thompson Sent Monday, May 23, 2016 6:25 PM To: Kitty Norton Subject: FW: Freedom of speech For the Council meeting From: pc [mailto:paddywaggon @att.net] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:42 PM To: Dianne Thompson Subject: Freedom of speech Hi Dianne, I was at the last council meeting, and I remember Ms. Barniech asking for council communication to be put on the agenda and be discussed.So imagine my surprise when I saw a resolution, when you were not directed to even write one. As a resident I expect my city manager to do what the council directs them to do. I don't expect a city manager or city attorney to go off on their own and create busy work, waste time and city resources by writing a resolution before asked. Bob McFall would have never done such a thing, and would have worked very hard to have the council discuss it among themselves and come to a conclusion, and he would have assisted in any manner he could have. I am saddened by such a move, please listen closer to what our council ask you to do in the future. Patty Welsh The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in error,please advise the sender by reply email or phone and delete the message.Please note that email correspondence with the City of Arroyo Grande, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt by law. 1