R 2348
163
RESOU11'I~ NO. 2348
-
A RESOI/J'l'ICW OF 'mE CI'lY axJNCIL OF '!'HE
CI'lY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE
NO. 89-136, APPLIED Fat BY BRUC':E AND DIANE CASTC::W
LOCATED A'r 852 WIr..t.CJol LANE, R)R A SUBSrAtlDARD Wl' WIDTH
AND AZX)P'1'INO A M!X3.\TIVE DEX::I.MATlai.
WHmEAS, the City Council of the Ci tl of Arroyo Grande has ccnsidereci
Variance CUe No. 89-136, filed by Bn&ce and. Diane cuton, for a variance because
the min:Lrrun lot width u reqW.recl :Ln tho SClW1g ordinance cannot be met: and
HHEm:M, the City Council has held. public hearing on this application
in accordance with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the project has been found to have no significant envirOlllrental
~cts under the provisians of the Cal:i.fomia Environmental Quality Act (ca;;)A)
and a negative declaration can be adopted; and
WHEREAS, the Citl Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearinq, the following cirC\lnStance.s exist:
1. '1'here are exceptional cirC\lRltancea applying to the subject property,
including size, shape, topography, and surround.intas that do not apply
generally to other l~, bAldings or uses in the SaI'M district.
Specifically, all other lots in the neighborhood are fully developed
and the subject lot is roughly twice the size of average lots in the
subdivision.
2. '1'he granting of this variance :La necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights of the applicant.
Specifically, this variance is necessary to allow the applicants lots
wi th the same area as other property owners in the neighborhood.
3. The granting of the variance will not, under the terms and conditions
of this particular case, materially affect adversely the health or
safety of persons reaiciing or working in the neighborhood, provided
the conc1i tions of approval are irrplemented, and will not be
materially detrimental to tho pU))lic welfare or injurious to property
or ilqjarovemonta in said noigh);)orhoocl; and
4. '1'he granting of tb:i.s variance will not bit contrary to the General
Plan.
liCJf,'~, BE 1'1' RmX.VED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves said variance subject to tho standard conditions of the
City and tho:Je liatect below:
1. The applicant shall ucerta:Ln and carply with all atate, county and
city requirements, as are applicable to this project.
2. Developnent shall oc:c::ur in substantial conformance with the
informa.tiori. aubn1ttect to the City COuncil at the meeting of October
24, 1989 and marked ''Exh:Lbi t A".
)
--.- --- ____._____.__________.____._._~..___n.____._..__._________.n"""___._ ...___
164
Resolution No. 2348
On rootion by Council Member ~s, seconded by Council Member Smith, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members M:x>ts and Smi. th
NOES: Council Members Olsen
ABSOO': Council Manber Dougall and Mayor Millis
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 24th day of October 1989.
~~),~ .~
ArrrESr:
17~(j. ~
NAN~ DAVIS Clm CLmK
APPROVED AS ro FORM: .
.
CIT'l 1G\N1tGI!.R
I, NANCY A. DAVIS, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County
of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2348 is a true, full and
correct copy of said Resolution passed and adopted at a regular meeting
of said Council on the 24th day of .October, 1989.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed
this 30th day of October, 1989..
77 a. ~
CITY C~
-