Agenda Packet 2010-04-27City Con e1*1
Tony Ferrara, Mayor /Chair
Jim Guthrie, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair
Joe Costello, Council /Board Member
Ed Arnold, Council /Board Member
Chuck Fellows, Council /Board Member
Steven Adams, City Manager
Timothy J. Carmel , City Attorney
Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 2010
7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. FLAG SALUTE
4. INVOCATION
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL /RDA
CENTRAL COAST MASONIC LODGE #237
PASTOR ROBERT BANKER
OPEN DOOR CHURCH
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.a. Honorary Proclamation Recognizing May 2010 as "Bike Month"
5.b. Mayor's Commendation Recognizing Angela Kraetsch, Administrative Services
Director
6.
6a.
Move that all ordinances presented for introduction or adoption be read in title only
and all further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY —APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present
issues, thoughts, or suggestions on matters not scheduled on this agenda.
Comments should be limited to those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the
City Council. The Brown Act restricts the Council from taking formal action on
matters not published on the agenda. In response to your comments, the Mayor or
presiding Council Member may:
♦ Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you.
♦ A Council Member may state a desire to meet with you.
♦ It may be the desire of the Council to place your issue or matter on a future
Council agenda.
Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Council:
♦ Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
♦ Your comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not directed
to individual Council members.
♦ Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or
member of the audience shall not be permitted.
8. CONSENT AGENDA:
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group.
The recommendations for each item are noted. Any member of the public who wishes
to comment on any Consent Agenda item may do so at this time. Any Council
Member may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit
discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City Council may
approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (KRAETSCH)
Recommended Action: Ratify the listing of cash disbursements for the period April
1 2010 through April 15, 2010.
8.b. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits (KRAETSCH)
Recommended Action: Receive and file the report of current investment deposits as
of March 31, 2010.
8.c. Consideration of Adoation of a Resolution to Ratifv and Confirm the Citv's
Election to Receive, and Continue to Receive, its Statutory Pass - Through
Payments from the Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Agency Under Health &
Safety Code Section 33607.5 (KRAETSCH)
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution to ratify and confirm the City's election to
receive, and continue to receive, its statutory pass- through payments from the Arroyo
Grande Redevelopment Agency under Health & Safety Code Section 33607.5.
8.d. Consideration of Approval of Minutes (WETMORE)
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of
March 29, 2010 and the Regular City Council /Redevelopment Agency Meeting of
April 13, 2010, as submitted.
AGENDA SUMMARY —APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 3
8. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd)
8.e. Consideration of First Amendment to Contract for Animal Services (ANNIBALI)
Recommended Action: Approve the First Amendment to the Contract for Animal
Services with the County of San Luis Obispo not to exceed the amount of $136,624
and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement.
8.f. Consideration of an Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for
Construction of the West Branch Resurfacing Project, PW 2008 -08. (McCLISH)
Recommended Action: 1) Award a construction contract for the West Branch Street
Resurfacing Project to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $820,764; and
2) Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders for 10% of the contract
amount, $82,076, for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project.
8.g. Consideration of an Award of Contract to Ferravanti Grading & Paving for
Construction of the Pearwood Avenue Rehabilitation Project, PW 2010 -03
(McCLISH)
Recommended Action: 1) Award a contract for the Pearwood Avenue
Rehabilitation Project to Ferravanti Grading & Paving in the amount of $98,860; and
2) Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders for 10% of the contract
amount, $9,890, for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project.
8.h. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Accepting Certain Improvements for
Conditional Use Permit No. 06 -006 in Connection with the Lucia Mar Unified
School District Stanley Avenue Project (McCLISH)
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution accepting certain improvements for
Conditional Use Permit 06 -006 located on Stanley Avenue, South of Huasna Road
and release the bond guaranteeing the improvements.
8.i. Consideration of a Resolution Rescindina the Aaaroval of the Mitiaated
Negative Declaration, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 05 -001 and Minor
Exception Case No. 05 -006 (605 Eman Court) (CARMEL)
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution Rescinding the approval of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 05 -001 and Minor
Exception Case No. 05 -006 (605 Eman Court).
8.j. Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Third Side Letter of Agreement to
the Service Employees International Union Local 620 Memorandum of
Understanding (ADAMS)
Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a Resolution approving a Third Side Letter of
Agreement to the Service Employees International Union Local 620 Memorandum of
Understanding; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
8.k. Consideration of Acceatance of Easements and Aaaroval of Conservation
Easement Aareement Between the Citv and the Countv of San Luis Obisao
(McCLISH)
Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a Resolution accepting a grant deed for the public
facility property; 2) Adopt a Resolution accepting a quitclaim deed for a portion of
Pecan Place; and 3) Approve the Conservation Easement Agreement between the
City and the County.
AGENDA SUMMARY —APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 4
8. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd)
8.1. Consideration of Revised Purchase and Sale and Improvement Agreement with
NKT Commercial for Acquisition of Property at 300 East Branch Street and Sale
and Development of City Property at 200 and 208 East Branch Street and the
Admacent Parking Area (ADAMS)
Recommended Action: Approve the revised Purchase and Sale and Improvement
Agreement with NKT Commercial
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS:
None.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
11.a. Consideration of Request for Resignation of Council Member Arnold and
Review of Recall and Replacement Process (ADAM S/CARM E L/WETM ORE)
Recommended Action: Review information and provide staff direction.
11.b. Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report for the City of
Arroyo Grande (McCLISH)
Recommended Action: Receive the presentation and Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Report.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
This item gives the Mayor and Council Members the opportunity to present reports to
the other members regarding committees, commissions, boards, or special projects
on which they may be participating.
(a) MAYOR TONY FERRARA:
(1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments /San Luis Obispo Regional
Transit Authority (SLOCOG /SLORTA)
(2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD)
(3) Brisco /Halcyon /Hwy 101 Interchange Project Subcommittee
(4) Other
AGENDA SUMMARY —APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 5
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (cont'd):
(b) MAYOR PRO TEM JIM GUTHRIE:
(1)
South County Area Transit (SCAT)
(2)
Community Action Partnership
(3)
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA)
(4)
Homeless Services Coordinating Council (HSOC)
(5)
Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC)
(6)
Tourism Committee
(7)
Other
(c) COUNCIL MEMBER JOE COSTELLO:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board
(2) Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
(3) Fire Oversight Committee
(4) Other
(d) COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD:
(1) Other
(e) COUNCIL MEMBER FELLOWS:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA)
(3) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC)
(4) Other
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by a Council Member who would like
to receive feedback, direct staff to prepare information, and /or request a formal
agenda report be prepared and the item placed on a future agenda. No formal action
can be taken.
a) Request for City Council to direct staff to submit a letter to Caltrans
requesting preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
regarding the proposed gap closure project at El Campo and Route 101
(FERRARA)
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by the City Manager in order to
receive feedback and /or request direction from the Council. No formal action can be
taken.
None.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence /Comments as presented by the City Council.
AGENDA SUMMARY —APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 6
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence /Comments as presented by the City Manager.
17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present
issues, thoughts, or suggestions. Comments should be limited to those matters that
are within the jurisdiction of the City Council. The Brown Act restricts the Council from
taking formal action on matters not published on the agenda.
18. ADJOURNMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
All staff reports or other written documentation, including any supplemental material distributed to a
majority of the City Council within 72 hours of a regular meeting, relating to each item of business on the
agenda are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the City Clerk's office, 214 E.
Branch Street, Arroyo Grande. If requested, the agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative
formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. To make a request
for disability - related modification or accommodation, contact the Legislative and Information Services
Department at 805 - 473 -5414 as soon as possible and at least 48 hours prior to the meeting date.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
This agenda was prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. Agenda reports
can be accessed and downloaded from the City's website at www.arroyogrande.orq
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
City Council /Redevelopment Agency Meetings are cablecast live and videotaped for replay on Arroyo
Grande's Government Access Channel 20. The rebroadcast schedule is published at www.slo - span.org
L I F 0RI
PROCLAIMING MAY 2010 AS
"BIKE MONTH" ,
AND MAY 17 - 21, 2010 AS
"BIKE TO WORK AND SCHOOL WEEK"
WHEREAS, , bicycle commuting is an effective means to reduce air pollution are
conserve energy and promotes the "livability" of communities by reducing traffic, noise
and congestion; and
WHEREAS, many businesses, organizations and schools encourage and reward
c ustomers, students and employees who commute by bicycle, by providing incentives
and awards, lockers and showers, and other benefits; and
WHEREAS, , bicycle transportation Is an integral part of the "'multi- modal" transportation
systems planned by federal, state, regional, and local transportation agencies; and
WHEREAS, Bike Month is a Baru Luis Obispo County -wide celebration of human
powered transportation, which encourages people of all ages and abilities to ride
bicycles to heir destinations; and
WHEREAS, Bike Month promotions such as Bike to Work and School Week, Commuter
Bike Challenge, and Safe Routes to School successfully encourages citizens to ride
their bicycles, thereby reducing vehicular emissions In the county; and
WHEREAS, "Life in the Bike Lane" Is the theme for 2010, an inclusive request to a ll
types of cyclists, whether veteran or novice, commuter or recreational rider, to enjoy
and celebrate the joys and benefits of bicycling in all its forms throughout San Luis
Obispo County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that 1, Tory Ferrara, Mayor of the City of Arroyo
Grande, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim May 2010 as "Bike Month ",
and May 17 - 21, 2010 as "Bike to Work and School Week" in the City of Arroyo Grande
and encourage all citizens to ride bicycles to their destinations and support bicycle
transportation.
IN WITNESS EES 1 HERE F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal
of the City of Arroyo Grande to be affixed this 27 day of April, 2010.
TONY FERI AI AA, MAYOR
INCORPORATED I
0
c M
JULY IQ. 1911 �
1. I F IPt
Agenda Item 5.a.
Page 1
CITY OF
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 5.a.
Page 2
� CITY
AM a
of
mayor's Commendation
Presentedto
,A ngeCa ray sc
In Recognition an.�lppreciation of Yaur Receiving �
the Government ,finance Officers .Association
'"Distinguished Budget Presentation Awardif
Th is award
is the highest form of recognition in
gcrvernmentaCbudgettong and re, presents a signi 'ant
achievement for the City of .Arroyo Grande. Thank
yaufor your commitment, dedication, and
j7rofessionarum on behag"of the City.
Datedthfs27tli clay of Ajwif2oio
P RF�O Yp
O� C 9
� INCORPORATED �Z
V' T
on ara, Mayor 'k c JULY 10, 1911
LrFOvk N
Agenda Item 5.b.
Page 1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 5.b.
Page 2
> ic�
R �
WCORPORAT -Ea
Z EN" ;
JIJLY 10. 1911
MEMORANDUM
T: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANGELA KRAETSCH, DIRECTOR O ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
BY: FRANCES R. DEAD, ACCOUNTING SUPER IS
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION F DASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION
DATE: APRIL 27, 2010
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period April 1 through April 15, 2010.
FINANCIAL. IMPACT.
There is a $859,1 88.89 fiscal impact that includes the following items:
• Accounts Payable Checks 144713 - 144981 $ 432,663.47
• Payroll Checks & Benefit Checks $ 426
BACKGROUND:
Cash disbursements are made w eekly based o the submission of all required
documents supporting the invoices submitted for payment. Prior to payment,
Administrative Services staff reviews all disbursement documents to ensure that they
meet the approval requirements adopted in the Municipal ipal Code and the City's
Purchasing Policies and Procedures Manual of February 2000.
AN O ISSUES:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required o normal and usual
operations during the period. The disbursements are accounted for in the FY 2009-10
budget.
ALTERNATI
The following alternative are provided for the Council's consideration:
Approve staff's recommendation,
0 Do not approve staff's recommend
Provide d i re t i n to staff.
Agenda Item 8.a.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
ADVANTAGES:
• The Administrative Services Department monitors payment of invoices for
accountability, accuracy and completeness using standards approved by the
Council.
• Invoices are paid in a timely manner to establish goodwill with merchants.
• Discounts are taken where applicable.
DISADVANTAGES;
No disadvantages have been identified as long as City Council confirms all
e are appropriate.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
IEW:
No environmental revie w is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
MEI TS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, April 22, 2010. The Agenda
and report were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public
comments were re
Attachments:
1. April 1- Apri115 201 g — Accounts Payable Check Fegiter
2. April , 2010 — PayroII Check & Benefit Checks Reg ter
Agenda Item 8.a.
Page 2
im
c�
c�
CL
0)
M0 M
t�
c� 00
w�
Page: 1
ATTACHMENT I
p Hist
Check History Listin
04/1912010
8:56AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Check #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Void Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
14471
04/01/2010 006393 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL
0331
03/31/201
30.00
30.00
144714
04/01/2010 007762 A C & E SUPPORT T SER ICE
AG1 - 493
03/24/2010
2,475.06
21475.00
144715
04101/2010 001259 AGP HIDED, INC
3821
03/04/2010
3,357.50
3
144716
04/0112010 006606 AH SIR BOUNCE A LOT
301
03/30/201
85.00
85.00
1 44717
04101/2010 001492 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,
142367
03/09/2010
769.24
1 42524
03122/201
43.50
752.4
1 44713
04/01/2010 005709 AMERICAN MESSAGING
ACCT #L - 24571
03/1 5/2010
11.42
11.42
144719
04/01/2010 007752 AR GRANDE CAFE
032610
03/26/2010
47.00
47.66
144720
04/01/2016 006043 ARROYO GRANDE GLASS &
993
03/2612010
360.30
300.36
1 44721
D4/01 0 005507 AT & T
030710
03/07/2016
65.85
85.65
1 44722
D 4/01/201 0 066607 AT&T
1252291
03/211261
28.50
28.56
144723
04/61/2610 006322 AT &T GLOBAL SERVICES INC
B 3 0
02126/2616
527.04
527.04
144724
04/01/2010 996133 BF GC ARCHITECTS
219991193
03/11/2616
27,288.00
27
144725
0410112010 004 150 BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
01122010
01/12/2010
478.06
478.66
1 44726
04/01/2010 009078 BLUEPRINT EXPRESS
9216
03/29/201
27.19
27-19
144727
04/01/2010 669996 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER
144229
03/22/2010
6.61
8.61
144728
04/01/2010 000096 BURTON'S FIRE, INC.
61717
03/18/2016
84.38
84.38
144729
0410112010 999164 DA C NF O F ARSON
933119
03/31/2010
65.00
65.00
144730
04/01/2010 000134 DA ST DEPT OF JUSTICE
779869
03/04/2010
4,191,96
4191.00
1 44731
04/01/2010 006905 CAL COAST INSIGNIA
2010-008
83/14/2010
424.18
424.18
144732
0410112010 007085 CALP I TLAND
90958469
03/11/2010
460.21
460.21
144733
04/01/2010 007740 GLEN CAMPBELL
032210
03/22/2010
77.50
77.60
Page: 1
im
CL
^
ice/
M0 rMIL
M
� M
V 00
ice/
ap kHi t
Check History Listing
P age:
04119/2818
8:66AM
CITY O F ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Check
Date Vender
Statue Clear/Void Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
1 44734
04/01/2010 005601 MARY CANNON
032510
03/28!2010
80.00
80.00
144735
0410112010 007757 CAPSLO
M.LEWIS MEM SHELTER
12131/2009
4,818.00
FORTY WONDERFUL
12/31/2009
984.00
EC SR HEALTH SC1N
12131/2009
732.00
TEEN ACAD. PARENTING
12131/2009
478.00
7,012.00
1 44736
04/01/2010 004548 CARM & N ACC A SHA, LLP
1 2957
04/01/2010
13,497.00
12958
04/0112010
1,558.40
15,055.40
144737
04/01/2010 000803 CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS
7314-398434
03/31/2010
187.01
187.01
144738
04/01/2010 003188 CELLULAR ONE
00603
0312912010
147.74
147.74
144730
04/01!2010 003988 CENTRAL COAST
x21703
03/22/2010
445.00
445.00
144740
04/01/2010 001090 CHARTER
022810
02128/2010
221.98
221.98
144741
04/01/2010 006039 CHEVRON & TE CARD
23817890
03/06!2010
233.48
233.45
144742
04/01/2010 000164 CHRISTIAN SON CHEVROLET
72289
0310212010
870.87
72357
0310912010
384.84
72283
03103/2010
51.16
1,306-67
144743
0410112919 007728 SCOTT CRAZE
033110
03/31/2010
30.00
30.00
144744
04/01 12010 000198 L N CURTI S & SONS
118747400
03/16/2010
1,078.63
1,076-63
144745
04/9112010 000208 J E DEW AR, INC
724798
03/16/2010
72.08
724792
03/16/2010
34.29
106.35
144748
04/01/2010 007129 T E N GE R
033110
0313112010
183.00
163.0
144747
04101/2010 001525 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,
597715
3/23/201
274.05
274.05
144748
04101/2010 000333 FIA CARD S ERVICES
3120 -0321
03/20/2010
1
3120 -8382
03/20/2010
1,173.00
3120 -6347
03/20/2010
447.22
3/20-1331
0312012010
87.82
3/20 -7845
03120/201
57.94
3120 -401
03/20/201
36-19
P
Page: 3
apCkHist
04/1912010
8:6 AM
Check History Listing
CITY OF ARROYO GRAND
Page:
Bank coda: boa
Check #
Date Vendor
statue ClearNoid Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
3/20 -9702
03/2012010
27.09
3120 -7837
03/2012010
15.19
3,074.65
144749
04/01/2010 000751 FIRE ENGINEERING IN
033110
03/31/2010
29.95
29.95
1 44750
04101/2019 000259 FOX LAMINATING COMPANY,
0309374 -IN
03/1012010
79.00
70.00
144751
0410112010 001252 GARVEY EQUIPMENT
168420
0211812010
977.56
977.66
1 44752
0410112010 007046 GENERATIONS OF
AGPD 1 -10
03/08/2010
329,
329.1
144753
0410112010 000272 GI BS INTERNATIONAL
93935N
03/15/2010
39,09
30.09
1 44754
0410112010 000499 GRAND AWARDS, INC
2454
03/1212010
58.73
2488
03118/2010
28.11
86.84
144755
0410112010 006058 R DNEY GRAY
033110
03/3112010
60.00
60.09
144755
04/01/ 002358 GREAT WESTERN ALARM
100302323101
04/011291
28.00
10030051 3101
0410112010
28.00
10030071 101
0410112010
28.00
84.00
144757
0410112010 002405 CHICK HARE
033110
0313112910
44.00
44.00
144758
0410112010 004188 E D D I E HARRIS S
0 33110
0313112910
40.00
40.00
144759
04/0112010 000963 HARRY'S RADIATOR
001240
9312612019
860.58
860.58
144760
0410'/ 003770 1D - INTL CODE COUNCIL,
1195273 - IN
03/19/2010
91.29
91.29
144751
0410112010 002820 I ND F F, INC
1617573
0311612010
110.04
1611132
0310512010
39.79
149.83
144752
0410112010 000348 J W ENTERPRISES
234102
0312512010
101.38
101.33
144763
0410112010 000413 LAW OFFICES OF JONES &
50503
02/2812010
292.50
292.50
144764
0410112910 007299 GASTON KETTING OLIVIER
033110
03/3112010
100.09
100.90
c�
144785
0410112010 004845 JOHN LAR N
83 311
03/31/2010
80.
80.00
0
-
144765
04191/2010 005511 C HRISTOPHER LINTNER
033110
0313112010
110,00
110.00
c�
144767
0410112010 909393 LUCIA MAID UNIFIED SCHOOL
190624
03105/2010
292.35
M 00
CA iD
Page: 3
Page: 4
apkHit
0 4119/2010
8: 6AM
Check History Listing
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Page: 4
Bank code: boa
Check #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Vold Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
1 00618
03/05/2910
138.45
100625
03105/2010
75.00
415.30
144758
04/9112010 000393 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL
APPLICATION FEE
03130/2010
15.00
15.00
144759
04/01 /2010 007520 STEPHANIE MASTRO
033110
03/31/2010
33.00
33.00
1 44770
04101 12010 007760 O LIVIA M ILLER
0331
03/311201
472.50
472.50
144771
0410112010 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,
K2906
0312912010
173.96
L07841
0312612010
152.22
L06535
03/16/2010
1 04.27
L06552
0311
97.84
K28738
031261201
91.32
K27640
0311 712010
86.91
L06125
0311312010
54.1
127531
03/1612010
3&01
K29054
0312912010
34.76
K27906
03/1912010
33.69
K27532
03/1612010
19.53
K2907
03/2912010
17.33
K27751
03118/2010
1 7.1 6
19874
01103/2010
16.28
K28304
03122/2010
15.29
K28268
0312212910
15.20
'28301
0312212019
14.13
K22373
9112812010
11.95
K28471
0312412010
1 0.86
K76127
01/07/2010
9.75
K28364
03/2312010
8.59
K28309
03122/2010
6.50
K25135
0212212010
5
D
X61285
0210812010
1.96
1,038.96
t�
1 44772
0410112010 000430 MIRACLE REC EQUIPMENT
896135
0311612010
543.13
643.13
CL
0
144773
0410112010 906328 NICK'S TELECOM {CUBA}
3969
03108/2010
130.00
130.00
144774
0418112010 005987 NORMAN & VAS
030310
0310312010
1
1,483.90
M 00
MiD
Page: 4
ap kH!st Check History Listing Page:
04/1912010 8: AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
C heck 0 Date Vendor status ClearNoid Date Invoice Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total
144775 04/01/2010 007202 N LLP 358534 03105/2010 1 90.19 190.19
1 44770 04/01 00 F F I C EMAX -HSBC 7091 03/0512010 139.10
Page:
709374
03/05/2010
5.42
144.58
144777
04/0112010 000481 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
194097
03/19/2010
14,940.33
311 8 - 704689
03118/2010
80.73
3/19-1 54503
03/1 9/2010
49.04
1 5,070.10
144778
0410112910 007108 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS
3042
02128/2010
501.25
501.25
144779
04/0112010 004158 PHOENIX I GROUP
022010157
03/09/2010
119.50
110.50
144780
04/0112010 000498 PITNEY BOWES, INC
7147128 -MR10
03/13/2010
55.00
56.00
144781
0410112010 000503 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS,
209871
03109/2010
151.43
209910
0311 0/2010
85.80
237.23
144782
04101/2010 000596 POSTAL CONCEPTS
5402
0112512010
49.48
00310107
0111912010
35.58
0058921
1 211112009
1 2.50
00309894
02/0912010
9.28
106.94
144783
4/01/2010 002303 PRIMARY CARE DOG & CAT
70274
02/24/2010
45.55
45.55
144784
0410112010 000520 QUINN COMPANY
PCO30185181
0311212010
632.64
03RO48102
0312312010
- 538.57
94.07
1 44788
04/01/2010 000523 R & T EMBROIDERY, INC
30259
02/23/2010
48.13
48.13
144785
04/01/2010 003031 ROBERTSON SUPPLY
8392
0311612010
397.75
8391
03/1612010
225.93
623.08
144787
0410112010 004833 STEVE ROMO ROM
033110
03/31/2010
132.00
132.00
D
144788
04/0112010 000530 GREG ROSE
033110
03131/2010
100.00
100.00
t�
144789
04/01/2010 000594 LAWRENCE RUC ER
033110
03/3112010
66.00
66.00
144790
04101/2010 093649 CHARLES D (DON) RUIZ
033110
03/31/2010
76.00
76.00
144791
04/011201 000538 S & L SAFETY PRODUCTS
428581
03118/2010
173.89
1 73.89
M 00
ft-4 0
Page:
a./ H! t
Check History Listing
Page:
04/1912010
8: AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code.
boa
C heck #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Void Da Invoice
Inv. Data
Amount Paid
Check T
144792
04/0112010 006080 MARTINA SARMIENTO
0331
03/31/2010
80.00
80.00
144793
04/0112010 003024 MARK CHAFFER
033110
0313112010
80.00
80.00
144794
04/0112010 000552 SLO COUNTY
FEB 2010
03104/2010
242.50
242.50
144795
04/0112010 000564 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS
0807102
02113/2010
2626-50
im
t�
c�
t�
M 00
000
144798 04/0112010 000098 SLO COUNTY
144797 04/0112010 007748 E SMITH
144798 0410112010 004800 TAMMY SMITH
144799 04101/2010 007753 THOMAS SMITH
144800 041011201 000598 S NAP- O N TOOLS CORP
144801 04/01/2010 007229 DONALD SNYDEF
144802 04/0112010 007749 SALV SOT
144303 04101/2010 000609 BOB SPEAR
144804 04/01/2010 007761 SPIE S CONSTRUCTION CO
144805 04101/2010 007729 CRAIG STANDLEY
144808 04/0112010 000623 SUNSET NORTH TH CAFE WASH
144807 04/0112010 003276 TASER INTERNATIONAL NAL INC
144808 04101/2010 007754 TASK FORCE TIPS IN
0807750
087 1454
0872507
0870
8808959
6871384
�
686
755
CAS E 1002 - 00809
032210
033110
040110
195201
195030
194447
033'110
0331'0
033110
PW 2009 -1
033110
21 59
511183649
1072653
02/2812010
02/28/2010
02/20/2010
02112/2010
02128/2010
02128/2010
02/01/2010
02/28/2010
0312212010
03/3112010
04/01/2010
0312412010
0311712010
02/25/2010
03131/2010
03/3112010
03/3112010
04/01/201
03/31/2010
0212812010
11/20/2009
03/09/2010
289.85
173.99
148.75
1
135.06
118.83
94.52
40.00
105.00
70.00
1,250.00
108.70
108.
90.20
40.00
20.90
1 06.00
54, 527.68
60.00
95.35
880.82
333.31
3 } 734.04
40.00
105.09
70.00
1,250.00
305.92
40.00
20.90
10.00
54,527.68
60.90
95.85
880.82
333.31
Page:
akHit Check History Listing Page: 7
04/19/2010 : 6AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Check # Date Vendor Status ClearNold Date Invoice Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total
1 44809 04/01/2010 002904 TEMPLET ON UNIFORMS 36176 03/08/2010 19474
P 7
36274
03/12/2010
8.61
203.36
144310
04/01/2010 007699 TI E R RA WEST ADVISORS 11D
FEB 2010
03/16/2010
2
2
1
04/01/2010 006054 TIMES PRESS RECORDER
030910
03/0912010
19.20
19.20
144812
04101/2010 005305 TODD ENGINEERS
46201 12 -09
01/08/2010
4
4
144313
04/01/2010 006551 UNITED STAFFING ASSOC.
068080
0312412010
1,053.20
1,053.20
144814
04/01/2010 000600 USA BLUE BOOK
115036
03/24/2010
310.41
310.4"
14481
04/01/2010 007759 DIANE VELA
032210
03/22/2010
250.00
250.00
144316
0410112010 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS
0849153425
0310412010
622.30
622.30
144817
04/01/2010 000687 1IAYN E' S TIRE, INC
247 809
03/05/2010
1 t 945.69
1,945.69
14481
04/01 /2010 007295 WEST GOVERNMENT
AB000206 777
02128/2010
180.00
180.00
144819
04/01/2010 000696 STEVE WHITNEY
258425
0312312010
262.29
262.29
144820
0410112010 000704 WITMER - TYSON IMPORTS
T7788 -A
02/22/2010
9
T7847
03/06/2010
3,000.00
T779
03/03/2010
698.13
12,841.88
144821
0410112010 004897 WOOD RODGERS INC
71913
08110/2010
7
71612
01/10/2010
146.83
7,470.83
144822
04/01/2010 007758 NATHANIEL YBARRA
030910
08!2912010
406.00
406.00
144823
04101/2010 007758 SCI ,JUAN ZHANG
032910
0312912010
38.00
35.00
144824
04/01/2010 001876 KAREN SISKO
040110
04/01/201
553.07
558.
>
144825
04/01/2010 007763 MISSION BUILDING MAINT &
3826
03/2012010
286.00
286.00
1 44826
04/0112010 005305 TODD ENGINEERS
462021-10
0210812010
5
CL
0
46202
0310212010
5,829.27
11,731.56
rok
c�
144827
04/0212010 007764 HARRIS ARCHITECTURE &
03152010
04/0212010
2,800.00
2
M 00
w iD
P 7
Page: 8
apCkHist
Check History Listing
Pag
04/19/2010
8: AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
C heck #
Date Vendor
status ClearNoid Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Ch Total
144830
04/12/2010 000548 SLOCO DATA, INC
1 540
04109/2010
2,400.00
2,4 0.00
144831
04112/2010 006 ALLIANC READY MIX, IN C
10842
03125/2010
598.95
10833
03/24/2010
524.13
1,123.08
144832
04/12/2010 007241 ANIMAL SERVICES
JAN -MAR 2010
02/18/2010
33,378.75
33
1 44833
04/1212010 006607 AT&T
1257053
03/25/201
869.12
1 257058
03/25/2010
185.32
1257055
03125/2010
88.44
1257049
03/25!2010
87.18
1 252290
03/22/2010
29.24
1
144834
0411212010 000099 BRISCO //HILL & LUMBER
144346
04/0112019
28.26
28.26
144835
0411212010 007304 BURKE, WILLIAMS &
13501
03/2512010
2
2,018.13
144838
04/12/2010 000114 DA PEACE OFFICERS ASSN
1320927
04/0112010
470.09
1 164584
01/20/2010
30.07
890.07
1 44837
04/12/2018 000803 CARQU EST AUTO PARTS
7314- 399530
04/0412010
18.97
16.97
144838
04/12/2010 000180 CHAPARRAL
315851
03/31/2010
211.51
211.51
144839
0411212810 003580 COAST RADIOLOGY
33203
02/04/2910
30.00
30.09
144840
04/12/2010 007488 COAST RI DERS
3/29/2010
03/29/2010
122.43
0313012010
93130!2010
122.43
244.86
144841
04/1212010 003570 COASTAL SAN LUIS
1
1213112009
1,089.00
1,080.90
144842
0411212010 00728 C YNDI CORNETT
041210
04/1212010
30.09
39.09
1.44843
04/121201 007548 CSG SYSTEMS I NC
63502
0 3/19/2010
1 ,312-73
63634
0312612916
504.30
1
D
c�
144844
04/12/2010 005091 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES APES
55543058
0311812010
49.23
49.23
144845
04/12/2016 006848 DNB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
399617
04/05/2010
90.09
90.09
144846
D4/12/2010 001525 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,
5985962
03/25/2010
1
1,355.03
�F
'144347
0411212019 006833 FORD M CREDIT
APRIL 23 2010
04/01/2010
11,248.97
'11,248.97
o�
Page: 8
p kH!st
Check History Listing
51 3787793001
03124/2010
Page:
04119/2010
: 6AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0411212010 007108 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS
3086
04101/2010
Bank code: boa
357.75
144858
0411212016 060563 POOR RICHARD'S HARD'S PRESS,
Check #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Vold Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
144343
04/12/2010 007772 CHRIS FOUQUET
041210
04/12/2010
30.00
30.00
144849
0411212010 060263 FRA EE INDUSTRIES INC
127665
03119/2010
1 t 6 2.53
1
144850
0411212010 000272 GIEBS INTERNATIONAL
94092
0312612010
450.61
450.61
144851
0411212010 002313 GRAINGER, INC
9213354112
03124/2010
367.29
367.29
144852
0411212010 000288 CITY OF GROVER BEACH
040310
0410312010
126.25
126.25
144853
0411212010 006644 IRON MOUNTAIN
BPR2262
0313112010
152.00
152.00
144554
04/1212010 005265 KIDZ KID LOVE SOCCER (D
HINTER 2010
0410512010
1
1,036.00
144855
0411212010 006328 NICK'S 1 "S TELECOh DBA
3999
04195/2010
75.00
75.90
144856
0411212010 000468 OFFICE DEPOT
513457505001
0312212010
6078
275.12
Page: 9
51 3787793001
03124/2010
8.35
69.13
144857
0411212010 007108 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS
3086
04101/2010
357.75
357.75
144858
0411212016 060563 POOR RICHARD'S HARD'S PRESS,
210442
03130/2010
544.34
210514
03/3112010
147.57
692.41
144350
04112/2010 000520 QUINN COMPANY
30185427
03119/2910
123.20
301 85519
03/23/2010
22.06
30185470
03/2212010
8.63
153.33
144860
04/12/2010 000523 R & T EMBROIDERY, INC
36133
01/25/2010
72.48
72.43
144551
04/1212010 002670 I ICOH LEASING G
135755
63/29!2616
157.45
157.45
144562
0411212010 000598 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP
195495
0313112010
141.36
195262
03/24/2010
133.76
275.12
144863
0411212010 000602 SOUTH SLO COUNT' SANIT
3/3112010
03/31/2010
102,295.49
102
D
144864
0411212010 007176 SPRINKLER KING INC
16943
03/12/2010
1
1
144555
04/1212010 006616 STERLING
25356
02/16/2010
365.63
25418
03123/2010
171.33
537.46
144366
0411212010 060620 STREATOR PIPE SUPPLY
5114917 .001
03/18/2010
175.74
175.74
F0
Page: 9
apDkH!st
C he c k History Listing
1 040260
03131/2010
P 10
0411912010
:5 AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
04/1212010 007059 TRAINING FOR SAFETY INC
041210
04112/2010
Bank code: boa
266.00
144871
04/1212010 007059 TRAILING FOR SAFETY INC
Check #
Date Vendor
Status ClearNoid Gate Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
144667
04/12/2010 000624 SUPERIOR QUALITY
36766
03/12/2010
239.25
239.25
144666
04/12/2010 002904 TE1I PLETON UNIFORMS
36766
04/06/2010
74.64
74.64
144869
04/12/2010 002370 TITAN INDUSTRIAL
1040152
03/24/2010
79,22
69.76
Pare: 10
1 040260
03131/2010
1 0.66
69.38
144870
04/1212010 007059 TRAINING FOR SAFETY INC
041210
04112/2010
285.00
266.00
144871
04/1212010 007059 TRAILING FOR SAFETY INC
0412
04112/2010
285.00
265.00
144872
0411212010 006551 UNITED STAFFING ASSOC.
068215
03131/2010
829.40
829.40
1 44873
04/1212010 000677 PE GY VALKO
3131/2010
03131/2010
195.20
195.20
1 44074
04/1212010 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS
0854996863
03122/2010
69.76
69.76
1 44875
04/1212010 007756 LOU ACOSTA
R fO0010'17 2
03/30/2010
144.19
144.1
1 44876
0411212010 007766 STEVEN COOPER
RfO001 0201
04/05/2010
1 4.62
1 4.62
1 44877
94/1212010 007770 ELEANOR H BES
R fO00 192921
0410712010
37.09
37.09
144878
04112/2010 007765 CONSTANCE LAMANITA
R f00O102O16
04/0512010
64.46
64.46
144879
0411 2/2010 007768 LORA SHOFFSTALL
R f0OO1020'19
04/0512010
60.01
60.01
144880
04/1212010 007767 PETER & SHERI SWEEP EY
R fO001O 01
0410512010
42.50
42.60
144881
04/12/2010 007771 HOPE WHITEHEAD
R fO00102022
0410612010
3.24
3.24
144882
0411212010 007769 G ENEVIEVE YAIADA
RfO001002 0
04/05/2010
95.69
95.59
144883
04112/2010 007773 ARROYO GRANDE HEAT CO
04071
04107/2010
5
5,000.00
144804
04112./2010 000125 CA ST DEPT O
033110
9313112010
113.05
113.05
D
t�
144885
04/12/201O 000144 VICKIE CARDOZA
04121
0411212010
184.72
184.72
c�
1 44886
04112/2010 005186 NA# PEN N OC K
040110
04/0112010
21 9.00
219.00
CL
0
144887
04114/2010 002363 INTL FOTPRINTERS ASSN
04141
04/1412010
225.00
225.00
144904
0411512010 007790 CASSIE ARNOLD
641310
0411312010
65.00
65.00
�F
N 0
Pare: 10
Page: 1'1
ap kHi t
Check History Listing
Page: 11
0411912010
8:66AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Check #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Vold Dante Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
1 44905
04/15/2910 006607 AT
1 257054
03/25/2010
1,759.46
000901257050
03/25/2010
29.47
1257943
03/2512010
15.28
000001257051
93/25/2910
14.42
1,81 8.63
144906
0411512010 091055 AVCO FIRE EXTINGUISHER
002418
94/0812010
20.09
29.09
144907
0411512010 007774 VANESSA A
040510
04/0512910
30.00
39.90
144903
04/15/2010 000055 B & T SVC STN
1 0947
031251201
2
2
144909
04/1512010 000056 BACKYARD IMPROVEMENT
2909 -994
03123/2919
43.15
2009 -000
03/18/2010
1 8.49
61.64
144910
0411 512010 000005 BRENDA BARROW
041219
04112/2010
028.36
828.36
1449
04/1512910 007775 KALI B TITA
04051
04/0512010
30.90
30.00
1
041151201 000078 BLUEPRINT EXPRESS
9271
04/0512010
345.61
9095
0311712010
45.74
391.35
144913
0411512910 000090 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER
144215
93/2212910
25.97
25.87
144914
9411512010 000090 BURTON'S FIRE, INC.
01711
93/3112010
326.31
329,31
144915
0411512019 00 123 CA ST BOARD OF
33119
03/3112019
374.17
374.17
144910
0411512010 007177 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
33110
93/3112019
52.29
52.29
1
04/1 512010 003775 CALIFORNIA J PIA
6255
04/01/2010
59.09
50.00
1 44918
04115/2010 009903 CAR QUEST EST AUT PARTS
7314 - 396274
03122/2010
47.19
7314 - 398780
04101/2010
4.74
51.93
144919
0411512019 097741 ALEJANDRA CASTILLO
040510
0410512910
70.00
70.00
144920
04/1512010 007779 SHAWNA CHAVEZ
040510
94/0512010
30.00
39.99
c�
CL
144921
04/15/2010 007728 SCOTT CRAI
041310
04/1312019
39.00
30.90
0
144922
04/1512010 090195 CRYSTAL SPRINGS HATER
14273
03/31/2010
45.70
70931
04/01/2010
29.75
00
411 -93949
04/01/2010
21.35
w�
Page: 1'1
Page: 1
ap NCH i t
0411 12010
8:66AM
Check History L i tin
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Pa 12
Bali code. boa
C heck #
Date Vendor
Statue Clear/Vold Date Invoice
Inv, Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
0313
03/3112010
10.95
107.75
144923
0411512010 007721 BRIANNE D NAH U E
040310
04/0812010
336.00
336.00
1 44924
O4/1512010 007777 SUSAN EATON
040510
04/0512010
30.00
30.00
144925
O4/1512010 007 TERRY ENDER
04131
04113/2010
143.00
1 43.00
144925
04/15/2010 001053 TONY I 1 FERRARA
041410
04114/2010
322.90
041210
04/1 212010
212-00
534.00
144927
0411512010 002209 FIRE PROTECTION
532583
04107/2010
93.75
93.75
144928
04115/2010 000202 FRANK'S L & KEY
30354
04/0912010
00.00
30294
03/23/2010
18.49
78.49
144929
0411512010 007787 ANA GARDIA
041310
04/1312010
30.00
30.00
144930
0411812010 004372 DARING TAYLOR &
10430
03131/2010
50.00
50.00
144931
04115/2010 000605 THE GAS COMPANY
4/5 - 140
0410512010
314.94
415 -
04/05/2010
78.72
4l7 - 214
04107/2010
72.08
417 - 200
04107/2010
53.88
417 -200
04/07/2010
42.55
417 -21
04107/2010
32.73
592.67
144932
0411512010 002405 CHUCK HARE
041310
04113/2010
44.00
44.00
144933
0411512010 0041 EDDIE HARRIS
041310
04/1312010
20.00
20.00
144934
04/1512010 007788 HARVEST CHURCH
041310
0411312010
30.00
30.00
144935
0411512010 008902 JESSIE S JAG NASE
031810
03/1812010
400,00
400.00
144938
04115/2010 005201 JAS PACIFIC INC
61 103402
04/0212010
5,520.00
5
D
c�
144937
0411 512010 001709 ERIK JENSEN
041410
04114/2010
130.27
186.27
CL
144933
0411 512010 003949 KERN'S PAPER
28391
03/22/2010
475.4
28502
03/3012010
326.96
28429
0311912010
280.28
1,082.67
c�
�F
Page: 1
ap kH!st Check History Listing Page:
04/19/2010 :5 AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Banc code: boa
C heck # Date Vendor Status ClearNoid Date Invoice Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total
D
t�
c�
CL
0
U3
c�
�F
144939 0411512010 007299 GAST N KETTING O
144940 0411512010 007779 ELIZABETH KEY
1 4494 1 04/15/2010 007778 BETTY KIGE
144942 0411512010 007531 CINDY KULL /IAN
1 4494 3 04/1512010 004015 DAN LAN GSTAFF
1 44944 0411512010 007780 LAA
144945 0411512010 004845 .JOHN LARS N
144940 0411512010 005511 CHRISTOPHER L1NT1E
144947 0411512010 007781 ,DOE L
144948 04/15/2010 000393 LUCIA MAR MINIFIED SCHOOL
144949 04/1512010 000393 LUCIA MAID MINIFIED SCHOOL
144950 04/1512010 007782 MAD SCIENCE O SAN LUIS
144951 04/15/2010 007520 STEPHANIE MASTF
144952 04/15/2010 004292 KATHY MENDOZA
144953 04/15/2010 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,
041310
040510
040810
040910
041410
041510
041310
041310
040510
040110
100720
100708
041210
041310
040910
L0839
K29723
K29207
2911
K2997
K29146
K2920
K29305
K29148
L08640
K2981
K29751
0411 3/2010
04105/2010
04/08/2010
04/09/2010
04114/2010
04/1 512010
04/1312010
04/1312010
04/0512010
0410112010
03129/2010
0312912010
04/12/2010
04/1312010
04/0912010
03/3012010
04/0512010
0313112010
03/29/2010
0410112010
0313012010
03/31/2010
04/01/2010
0313012010
04/01/2010
04/0612010
04/05/2010
120.00
30.00
1 50.00
951.00
295.99
150.00
140.00
90.00
220.90
500.00
484.58
117.15
552.50
33.00
90.00
104.27
60.53
50.00
43.43
29.33
28.60
25.00
23.90
22.80
1 9.55
19.44
18.48
1 20.00
30.00
1 50.00
951.00
296.99
150.00
140.00
90.00
220.00
500.00
0'1.73
552.50
33.00
90.00
Page: 13
D
c�
c�
CL
0)
c� �
�,
�0)
ap kHi t
Check History Listing
P 14
04119/2010
: 6AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Check #
Date Vendor
Statue ClearNoid Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
K28799
03126/2010
15.20
L0811
03/29/2010
14.66
K29366
04/01/2010
13.42
K29254
03/31/2010
12.14
K2859
03125/2010
9.75
L09592
04109/2010
5.96
L20234
03130/2010
4.33
K29784
04/05/2010
3.80
L09466
04/0812010
3.25
K29748
04105/2010
2.61
K29317
04/01/2010
-16.30
514.40
144954
04/1 5/2010 007783 ZOA MUSICK
040510
041051201
30.0
30.00
144955
04115/2010 007054 N COAST
32726
03125/2010
11 1 521.90
11 ,521.90
144956
04/1512019 006076 C HAR L E N E P E H
04 051
04/05/2010
30.00
30.00
144957
04/15/2010 000402 PETTY CASH
04
0411512010
152.91
152.91
144958
04115/2010 000503 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS,
210443
0313012010
671.65
210296
03/24/2010
524.61
21 0332
03/25/2010
61.99
1, 256.25
144959
04/15/2010 007789 ANTONIO R BLES
041310
04113/2010
30.00
30.00
144900
04/102010 007791 NINA R
04131
04/13/2010
105.00
105.00
144951
0411512010 007784 JESSICA RODRIGUEZ
040510
04/05/2010
280.00
280.00
144902
04115/2010 004833 STEVE ROMO ROM
041310
04/13/2010
77.00
77.00
144963
0411512010 000536 GREG ROSE
041310
0411312010
135.00
135.00
144964
04/15/2010 006021 BLAKE R S ELLEY
041310
04/1312010
110.00
110.00
144965
0411 012010 006594 LAWRENCE RU KER
041310
04/13/2010
1 32.00
132.00
144966
04115/2010 003649 CHARLES D (DON) RUIZ
041310
04113/2010
146.00
146.00
144967
0411512010 002932 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
579124
0311912010
799.50
579130
03/1912010
526.50
1
Page: 14
pCkHist
Check History Listing
Page: 1
04/1912010
8:56AM
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code. b oa
Check #
Date Vendor
Status Clear/Vold Date Invoice
Inv. Date
Amount Paid
Check Total
1 44968
4411512010 006080 MA TINA SARMI
041314
4411312414
130.00
134.44
1 44969
0411512010 003024 MARK SCHAFFER
041 310
4411312414
124.44
120.00
144970
04/1512010 007792 TIM SH F IDAN
041 310
04/1312010
34.04
80.00
144971
0411512010 007785 PHIL SIEMS
040310
4414812414
325.44
325.04
144972
0411512014 007373 FLORI S J STEDT
044516
4411512010
30.00
34.00
144973
9411512014 000553 SLO COUNTY NTY
941516
04/1512414
25.44
25.04
144974
0411512014 004860 TAMMY Y SMITH
9413
4411312414
34.44
84.04
144975
04/1512014 997229 DONALD SNYDER
041316
4411312414
244.44
244.44
144976
0411512014 007749 S ALVAD O R S
041316
4411 812414
44.60
44.44
144977
041151201 9971 S PRINKLER FLI INC
04071
0410712414
344.
344.00
144978
04/1 512014 000644 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCING
PIN 2010 -04
4411412014
2,204.84
2,204.84
144979
0411 512010 002609 WATER BOYS Y PLUMBING
04071
4410712014
3,037.38
3
144980
0411512014 047339 WOESTE ELECTRIC INC
P 112003 -46
04/1512414
1 0,265.67
14
144981
4411512414 067746 SUZANNE YORK
04051
4414512014
34.44
34.44
boa Total: 432,553.47
251 checks in this report Total Checks: 432,663.47
D
c�
c�
CL
0
U3
c�
�F
ft-4 0
Page: 15
ATTACHMENT
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD
3/19!201 - 41112010
04109110
FUND 919
380 1 295.70
5191
salaries Full time
296
FUND 220
16
5162
Salaries Part - Time - PPT
23,593.38
FUND 226
1
5103
Salaries Part -Time - TPT
14
FUND 284
1
5105
Salaries OverTime
8,947.49
FUND 285
1
5197
Salaries Standby
355.50
FUND 612
6278.52
5108
Holiday Pay
8,472.76
FUND 640
19
5109
Sick Pay
5
426
5119
Annual Leave Buyback
-
111
Vacation Buyback
1,674.34
112
Sick Leave Buyback
-
113
Vacation Pay
409.97
5114
Comp Pay
3,476.13
5115
Annual Leave Pay
991.43
5121
PERS Retirement
73,791.46
5122
Social Security
199532.48
5123
PARS Retirement
522,1
5126
State Disability Ins.
1
5127
Deferred Compensation
736.69
6131
Health Insurance
44
5132
Dental Insurance
4,811.86
6133
Vision Insurance
1,10 .68
6134
Life I nu ranee
5 34.01
5135
Long Terra Disability
-
143
Uniform Allowance
-
5144
Car Allowance
675.00
5146
Council Expense
-
147
Employee Assistance
-
143
Boot Allowance
-
1 9
Motor Pay
150.00
5150
Bi- Lingual Pay
125.96
5151
Cell Phone Allowance
327-50
426, 625.42
Agenda Item 8.a.
Page 18
OF, pAROY6
IF
4�
` I NCORPORATED
JUL ,o. 1 9 11
Of t
MEMORANDUM
T: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANGELA Ir RAETSCH, DIRECTOR F ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE t-0-1
Y: MICHELLE MAYFIELD, TREASURER 9A4
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION O STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT DEPOSITS
DATE, APRIL 27, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It Is recommended the City Council receive and file the attached report listing the c urrent
investment deposits of the City o Arroyo Grande, as of March 31 2010, as required by
Government Code Section 3b.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no funding impact to the C related to this report. However, the City does receive
interest revenue based on the interest rate of the investment(s).
BACKGROUND
This report represents the City's investments as of March 31, 201 It includes all investments
managed by the City, the investment institution, investment type, bock value, maturity date, and
rate of interest. As of March 31 the investment portfolio was in co mpliance with all Mate lavers
and the City's investment policy.
ANALYSIS O ISSUES:
The Director of Administrative Services has historically submitted to the City Council a monthly
report, providing the following information:
1. Type of investment.
2. Financial institution (bank, savings and loan, broker, etc).
3. Date of m tur*ty.
4 . Principal amount.
5 . Fate of interest.
6 . Current market value for all securi having a maturity of more than 12 months.
7 . Relationship tionship of the monthly report to the annual statement of investment policy.
Agenda Item 8.b.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT DEPOSITS
APRIL 2, 207
PAGE 2
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
Recommended Altemati e - Approve staff's recommendation to receive and file the
attached report listing the current investment deposits.
Do not approve staff's recommendation
-
Provide direction to staff
ADVANTAGES:
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City. Investments are undertaken in a
manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.
DISADVANTAGES:
Some level of risk is present in any investment transaction. Losses could be incurred due to
market price changes, technical cash flow complications such as the need to withdra w a non-
negotiable Time Certificate of Deposit early, o even the default of an issuer. To minimize such
risks, diversifications of the investment portfolio by institution and by investment instruments are
being used as much as is practical and prudent.
ENVIRONMENTAL TAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, April 22, 2010. The Agenda and
report were posted on the City's w b ite on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments were
received.
Attachments:
1. Portfolio Summary: March 31, 201
Agenda Item 8.b.
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 1
t�
c�
CL
0
t�
c� 00
CITY OF
• FP * •
kh
'r
CITY OF ARR GRANDE
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summar
March 31, 201
City o Arroyo Grande
214 E. Branch S
Arroyo Grande, CA 93430
Phone (805)473 -5400
Interest
Investments Boob Value Interest Rate Rate PY Date of Purchase Term Maturity Date ° of Portfolio
Local Agency Investment Funds 16 0.547 1.822% 96.05%
erti aces of Deposit - Banks
Golden Security Bank
90,000.00 4.40%
October 9 2908
760 October 9, 2010 0,52%
First Federal Bank of California
99,000.00 2.53
Se ptember 18 2999
731 Se ptember 21, 2011 0.57%
Redding Bank of Commerce
250,000.00 2.40
Se ptember 21, 2909
913 M 21, 2012 1.43%
First Republic bli Bark
250,000.00 3.00
November 9, 2099
30 rnos November 9, 2012 1.43%
Total Certificates of Deposit
689
3.95%
Total Investments
17,422,053.87
1 00.00
wCr
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.b.
Page 4
INCORPORATED z MEMORANDUM
DUM
l JULY 10, 1911
To: CITY COUNCIU EDEVELOPMEI T AGENCY BOARD of DIRECTORS
S
FROM: ANGELA KRAETSCH, DIRECTOR of ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICESWV----
SUBJECT: ADOPTION of A RESOLUTION To RATIFY AND CONFIRM THE CITY'S
ELECTION To RECEIVE, E, AND CONTINUE TO DECEIVE, ITS
STATUTORY PASS- THROUGH PAYMENTS FROM THE ARROYO
o o
GRANDE REDEVELOPMENT ELOPMENT GENC UNDER HEALTH & SAFETY
CODE SECTION 33607.5
DATE. APRIL 27, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council /Redevelopment edevelopment Agency Board of Directors adopt
a Resolution to ratify and confirm the City's election to receive, and continue to receive, its
statutory pass- through payments from the Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
under the Health & Safety Code Section 330..
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City receives approximately $60,000 annually in pass - through payments from the
RDA.
BACKGROUND:
OUND:
The City Council of the city of Arroyo Grande adopted ordinance No. 487 C.S. on June
17, 1997, which approved and adopted the Redevelopment lopment Plan for the Arroyo Grande
Redevelopment Project. The adoption of the Redevelopment Plan resulted in the
allocation of property tax increment from the Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Project to the
RDA for purposes of redevelopment. The Health and Safety Code Section 33607.
provides that the community (city) which has adopted the redevelopment project may elect
to receive a portion of the property tax increment received by the RDA after the amount
required to be deposited in the RDA's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund has been
deducted. The portion distributed to the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section
33607.5 is commonly referred to as the "statutory pass - through payment ;
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
The County of San Luis Obispo Auditor - Controller's office recently notified City staff that
they could not find any record of where the City of Arroyo Grande had elected to receive its
statutory pass-through payment. The County Auditor- Controller administers the
distribution of property tax increment and statutory pass - through payments and has been
distributing the City's statutory pass - through payment to the City since the adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan. City staff searched and could not locate any documentation stating
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION of A RESOLUTION To RATIFY AND CONFIRM THE CITY'S ELECTION
To DECEIVE ITS STATUTORY PASS =THF o GH PAYMENTS FROM THE RDA
APRIL 27, 201
PAGE 2
that the City had elected to receive the pass - through payments in the City 3 s records.
Although there is no requirement for the City to have adopted a resolution to obtain and
receive its statutory pass - through payment, the County Auditor - Controller has requested
that the City adopt a resolution to confirm and ratify the City's election to receive, and to
continue receiving, its statutory pass - through payment from the Arroyo Grande
Redevelopment Project.
ALTERNATIVES*
The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:
- Approve the adoption of the Resolution ratifying and confirming the City's
election to receive its statutory pass - through payments from the RDA;
- Do not approve the Resolution;
- Modify the resolution and approve,
- Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
By adopting the Resolution it will provide both the county and the city with a record that
the City has elected to receive its statutory pass - through payments.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
:
No environmental review is required for this item
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday,, April 22, 2010. The Agenda and
report were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments
were received.
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 2
RESOLUTION No.
A RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of ARROYO
o
GRANDE RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING THE CITY'S ELECTION To
RECEIVE, AND To CONTINUE RECEIVING, ITS STATUTORY SS-
THROUGH PAYMENT FROM THE ARROYO GRANDE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT To HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 33607.5
WHEREAS, the Arroyo Grande redevelopment Agency "Agency" is a public body,,
corporate and politic, organized and existing under the California Community
Redevelopment Law "CRU ) (Health & Safety code §33000 et seg.); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the CRL and ether applicable law the city council of the city
of Arroyo Grande "city council" or "city" as applicable) adopted Ordinance N o. 487
C.S. on June 17, 1997, which approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the
Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Project,, as may have been amended from time to time,
including but not limited to, pursuant to Ordinance No. 551 to extend the time limit on
receipt of tax increment by one year in compliance with State law (collectively,, the
"Redevelopment Plan" ); and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan resulted in the allocation of
property tax increment from the Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Project to the Agency
for purposes of redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, the C L, at Health and Safety code Section 33607.5 provides that the
community which has adopted the redevelopment project may elect to receive a portion
of the property tax increment received by the Agency after the amount required to be
deposited in the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund has been
deducted; and
WHEREAS, S, the portion distributed to the community pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33607.5 is commonly referred to as the "statutory pass - through payment ;ty
and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo county Auditor - controller administers the distribution
of property tax increment and statutory pass - through payments; and
WHEREAS, from and after the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, the county
Auditor - Controller has been distributing the city's statutory pass - through payment to the
City; and
WHEREAS, S, although there is no requirement for the community to have adopted a
resolution to obtain and receive its statutory pass - through payment, the county Auditor-
Controller has requested that the city adopt a resolution to confirm and ratify the city's
election to receive, and to continue receiving, its statutory pass- through payment from
the Arroyo Grande Redevelopment Project; and
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 3
RESOLUTION No.
PAGE 2
WHEREAS, all actions required to be taken by the City Council precedent to adopting
this Resolution have been taken in accordance with applicable later.
NOW, THEREFORE, E, BE IT RESOLVED ED by the City council of the City Arroyo Grande
as follows
1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
2. The City of Arroyo Grande hereby confirms and ratifies its election to receive,
and to continue receiving, the City's statutory pass - through payment, pursuant to
Health and safety Code Section 33607.5.
3. The City Cleric shall send a certified copy of this Resolution to the County
Auditor-Controller.
O motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, and on the following roll cell vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of ,
2010.
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 4
RESOLUTION N .
PAGE 3
TONY FE F AF A, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 5
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.c.
Page 6
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, MARCH 29, 2010
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ferrara called the Special City Council meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
City Council: Council Member Chuck Fellows, Council Member Ed Arnold, Council
Member Joe Costello, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Guthrie, and Mayor Tony
Ferrara were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Steven Adams, City Attorney Tim Carmel, Director of
Legislative and Information Services /City Clerk Kelly Wetmore, Director of
Administrative Services Angela Kraetsch, Director of Recreation and
Maintenance Services Doug Perrin, Chief of Police Steve Annibali, and
Community Development Director Teresa McClish.
3. FLAG SALUTE:
Mayor Ferrara led the Flag Salute.
4. CONSIDERATION OF CONTINGENCIES REGARDING REDESIGN OF SHORT STREET
AND PURCHASE AND SALE AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH NKT
COMMERCIAL FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT 300 EAST BRANCH STREET AND
SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PROPERTY AT 200 AND 208 EAST BRANCH
STREET AND THE ADJACENT PARKING AREA:
City Manager Adams presented the staff report and City Council subgroup recommendation to:
1) approve relocation of all City Hall complex staff to the 300 East Branch Street (former Farm
Credit) building; 2) direct staff to solicit proposals to lease the existing City Hall building; 3)
authorize the City Manager to execute documents to obtain debt financing of up to $1.2 million
for costs associated with acquisition of the 300 East Branch Street property through the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Community Facilities low- interest
loan program and fund debt service from Local Sales Tax funds; 4) approve funding for
proposed improvements to the 300 East Branch Street building from Local Sales Tax funds; and
further recommended the Council appoint two Council Members to work with the City Manager
on the architectural design.
Mayor Pro Tem Guthrie expressed concern as to whether a five year lease for the City Hall
building was realistic due to the costly ADA and tenant improvements that would be required
and suggested a longer lease term be considered.
Mayor Ferrara invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the
matter.
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 1
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 2
Nick Tompkins representing NKT Commercial, spoke in support of staff recommendations;
provided a history of discussions with the City concerning purchase of the property and the
original appraisal of $2.4 million; commented on the City's request for a new appraisal; stated
that the new appraisal reduced the value of the building by $380,000 which reflected the overall
decline in commercial property values; explained that he accepted the second appraisal with a
reduction in value as part of the transaction; however, he stated he could not accept a lower
valuation of the current appraisal as the alternatives for the building greatly outweigh the
benefits of such a decision; acknowledged the Council's role and how it includes difficult and
challenging decisions in light of the deteriorating economy; referred to recent criticism about the
value of the building that was set by the appraiser; stated he has never had any intention to
harm the Village or the City; offered the City a unilateral right to re- purchase the Farm Credit
building at the same price plus $80,000 or $2.1 million and that this right to re- purchase would
start in two years and run through the end of year six; stated it was difficult to predict the future
and that in the event the future does not work out as planned, if space needs are greater or
less, there will be a pre- agreed upon contract to ensure the investment of the City's money
would be returned; urged the Council to carefully consider staff's recommendations as
supported by the subcommittees and various outside consultants; and noted that NKT's
financial information was provided to the City Attorney for review.
Jolie Lucas resident of the Five Cities, spoke regarding Oceano Airport Celebration Day on
May 8 t "
Frances Askins Launa Lane, spoke in opposition of the closure of Short Street, purchase of the
building, and demolition the "malt shop ".
Dana Billing East Branch Street, spoke in opposition of the closure of Short Street and
demolition of the "malt shop ".
Gordon Bennett Allen Street, spoke in opposition to the Centennial Park project, including the
closure of Short Street; thanked the hundreds of local citizens in support of the continued use of
Short Street, and especially the many business owners who recognize the importance of
keeping Short Street open for their tenants and customers.
Shirley Gibson, Town of Halcyon, spoke regarding the many moving parts of the project which
were not considered individually on their own merit; voiced concerns regarding the new debt
incurred by the purchase of the Farm Credit building; trading away of capital assets (200 East
Branch Street, 208 East Branch Street and the 15 parking spaces); the potential closure of
Short Street; and the creation of commercial buildings that represent fake history.
Manetta Bennett Allen Street, stated that Short Street is the gateway to a historical area of the
community and it should be kept open; and she did not believe that sales tax should be used to
purchase the Farm Credit building.
Shirley Gibson Town of Halcyon, referred to the list of people that had concerns about the
potential closure of Short Street; and stated in addition to Short Street, many people are
concerned about preserving the historical character of the Village. She displayed the list of 272
names of persons who are concerned about the potential closure of Short Street and the
preservation of the historical character of the Village; and provided a few quotes from people on
the list.
Kristen Barneich Canyon Way, provided a history of the Silva family, who owned the malt shop
at 200 E. Branch Street; stated that the building can still be kept and adaptively reused even
though it is not historic, simply for the fact that it contributes to the Village's sense of place.
Gail Lightfoot Mesa Drive, referred to a recent newspaper headline concerning City budget
cuts; commented on information in the article concerning the project; stated it was not the time
for governments to borrow more money, and that it is time to pay off debts and become solvent.
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 2
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 3
Karen Williams Village business owner, spoke in opposition to the closure of Short Street and
commented that it would negatively affect her business.
Tim Moore Fair Oaks Avenue, spoke in opposition to the City Hall /Centennial Park project
stating it was too much money; stated the City should be looking at what is better for the City
and its citizens, and that streets and sidewalks in the City need to be fixed first; commented that
Centennial Park could be retained if it was located in the current gazebo park and only
donations were used; opposed the use of City funds for Centennial Park; stated that if the City
has to have new offices, the building on Station Way is bigger, cheaper and newer than the
Farm Credit building, already has fire - sprinklers, is in the boundaries of the Village, and is more
fiscally responsible; stated the other City buildings could be sold in their current states and the
money could be used toward the Station Way property. He then submitted a list of questions
from concerned citizens and taxpayers.
Ira Hughes Canyon Way, stated the City should look at the 10,000 square foot building on
Station Way to relocate the entire City Hall and Council Chambers; stated the City could then
sell the four buildings in the Village that are not ADA compliant which would enable the City to
cover the purchase of the buildings on Station Way; stated that the City could eliminate the
need for further future repairs and compliance to ADA legislation; eliminate the new parking lot
expense and the costs associated with reconfiguring Short Street; commented on past policies
to keep City offices in the same general location and stated that Station Way is considered to be
in the Village and he did not see any policy issues that could arise. He stated that the Station
Way property should be further explored, and the current City offices could then be used for
other uses to stimulate the economy.
Lynn Titus Lierly Lane, spoke in opposition to changes in the Village.
Rachel Solerno Short Street, spoke in opposition to the project; agreed with the relocation of
City Hall to another location; opposed more commercial buildings in the Village; and expressed
concern regarding parking issues around the Village.
Mike McConville East Branch Street, spoke about the local sales tax; acknowledged the City's
annual report regarding local sales tax expenditures; stated a public hearing is required every
five years to determine whether the local sales tax is still necessary; opposed the use of local
sales tax money for the proposed purchase; stated that money should be used for making the
City buildings ADA compliant; and referred to the City organization chart which places citizens
at the top.
Susan Flores East Branch Street, thanked staff for the tour of buildings and review of records;
stated she never doubted the City could get a loan; expressed concern about the use of local
sales tax; opposed the closure of Short Street; opposed debt being financed by the local sales
tax, and loss of parking; stated that the Station Way buildings are a good idea and would
increase parking; agreed with the need for an improved City Hall building; and stated that the
Farm Credit building would also need improvements and is a tight space.
Bob Lund Linda Drive, spoke in support of the project, stated the Council had done a good job
in preparing and analyzing all the facts and data concerning the project; and expressed
concerns if this project was not approved.
Greg Steinberger commended the Council and City staff for listening and incorporating the
citizens' concerns and making adjustments; stated there is a need for change to keep things
viable; stated he was an eight year resident of Arroyo Grande; and noted that since the
February 23 meeting, he had met with the developer about the potential for a new building and
restaurant on the corner of Short Street.
Mark London Launa Lane, commented that as a real estate broker and property manager, he
agreed with Council Member Fellows' review and valuation of the Farm Credit building;
commented that repair and maintenance of the current City Hall buildings has been
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 3
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 4
underfunded and put off for years; expressed concern about costs, fee credits, and necessary
improvements to the Farm Credit buildings, and stated that the current City buildings should be
fixed.
Patty Welsh Pradero Court, stated the City should look at the Station Way location; expressed
concern over loss of parking where the Farmers' Market is on Saturday; would like Short Street
to stay open; and questioned the condition of the malt shop building.
Greg Moore East Branch Street business owner, spoke in support of the project; stated it would
benefit the community overall; and believed it is better to own real estate than to lease.
Carol Pruett Short Street, provided background history of parking behind Gina's Restaurant;
noted that deficient financing pays off sometimes; stated he served on a past Blue Ribbon
Committee that studied the relocation of City Hall and that there was a piece of property that
was available for no cost to build a new building; however, when it came back to City Council,
the turnout of people opposed relocating City Hall out of its present location; and concluded he
was an advocate of buying and owning properties by some means long before you need it.
Upon hearing no further comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period.
Mayor Pro Tem Guthrie provided the following comments:
- Acknowledged that this process began over a year ago; had originally expressed concern
that acquiring the Farm Credit building for additional space would provide more space than
was needed;
- Was willing to look at relocating City staff to the Farm Credit building and selling the City
buildings for income;
- Stated it would be possible to fit all staff in the Farm Credit building; it would be tight and
allows for a little bit of growth, but not much growth;
- Was concerned that a five year lease on the current City Hall building would not work which
is why the building would need to be sold or leased for a longer period of time;
- Stated the possibility of moving City Hall out of the core of the Village would be a good
decision if it was purely a business decision versus a political one;
- Had expressed concern with the original plan due to fundamental costs associated with the
project;
- Stated that use of local sales tax was not a direction given by the public and felt there
should be another way to finance;
- Acknowledged the buildings were not kept up due to other priorities that were identified;
- Stated the original intention was to stay within the existing City Hall; however, City Hall and
the Conrad House were declared historic, and the Conrad House was found to have
significant structural issues that will be expensive to fix, which makes it impossible to stay in
the City Hall and Public Works buildings.
- Was attracted to the idea of adding new buildings to the Village without it being fake history;
referred to example of new construction on Bridge Street;
- Stated he was open to the potential of looking into the Station Way location; however, he
was prepared to move forward with the project as proposed which is relocating all staff to
the Farm Credit building;
- Commented on the question of financial solvency, and stated the City has little existing debt
and can afford this loan quite easily over 30 years, and there is no solvency issue;
- Noted that the City is spending a lot of money on fixing City streets and sidewalks and the
City is following the intention that a majority of the local sales tax is being spent on roadway
and related;
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 4
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 5
- Commented there may be a need to decide whether City Hall needs to remain in the core of
the Village or not, or if it can be moved out of the core of the Village and the entire City Hall
campus could then be reused for retail or office use;
- Stated he is prepared to go ahead with the project as recommended but is open to
discussion regarding the Station Way buildings.
Council Member Arnold provided the following comments:
- Stated he was not prepared to approve the project tonight; acknowledged a lot of good work
was done with review of the Farm Credit building;
- Expressed concern regarding recent comments made about utilization of space in the Farm
Credit building and whether it would be too small;
- Stated his reasons for relocating staff into the Farm Credit building were related to the delay
on the ADA improvements to City Hall;
- Expressed concern with the appraisals and what the City's contribution is to this project;
- Could support the project as a stand alone project;
- Said the problem was there were good intentions at the start of the process; however,
combining the projects has created confusion;
- Could support buying the Farm Credit building, but if the City was to buy property then it
should also look at the buildings on Station Way;
- Should pursue other alternatives, including Station Way; does not believe another appraisal
makes sense;
- Could support the commercial project as a stand alone project and Short Street as one way;
- Believes the Station Way location presents a better alternative for the City to have a better
building with more square footage for less money.
Council Member Costello provided the following comments:
- Supported moving forward with the project;
- Does not support selling City Hall, but does support leasing;
- Believed that staff could be moved to the Farm Credit building for a short time for several
years, but will need more counter space to serve customers;
- Does not support closing Short Street; it will be kept open under this plan;
- Have been working on expanding parking in Village to make it more pedestrian oriented;
noted that parking is not being eliminated;
- Stated the appraisal process has been fair and complete;
- Acknowledged the City's tight budget; however, the economics of the project make sense as
a way to deal with the problems of space and ADA requirements in the current building and
the shortcomings of the 200 and 208 and 214 E. Branch Street buildings;
- Stated if the project was turned down and we started over, more money will be spent from
the General Fund and the sales tax to accomplish the same goal;
- Referred to the City's capital improvement plan which includes projects to fix streets and
sidewalks, and that the City would continue to fund the plan;
- Believed that in both the long term and the short term, this is the best course of action;
- Did not think the new commercial buildings would create fake history;
- Responded to comments regarding recent efforts to pursue a grocery store in the Village
and that no one has come forward with a proposal;
- Would support the project tonight.
In response to questions from Council Member Fellows, City Manager Adams explained the
three contingencies of the approval to: 1) develop an agreement on whether or not to relocate
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 5
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 6
all the City staff in the City Hall complex buildings to the Farm Credit building; 2) to determine
whether to sell or lease City Hall or to continue to use it for City operations; and 3) to determine
the appropriate funding source or agreed upon funding for costs associated with the project. He
also noted that the redesign of Short Street is part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement which
was already approved. City Manager Adams also responded to questions regarding the cost of
the lease; monthly rent; expenses related to improvements to the Farm Credit building
(including the fire sprinklers); costs to repair the Conrad House (Public Works building); that the
City has deferred maintenance to the buildings because this planning process has been
underway since 2004; issues regarding the new appraisal as it relates to the purchase price;
that the City was not opposed to another appraisal, however, there were issues regarding cost
and timing and identifying the objective for a new appraisal. Council Member Fellows expressed
concern about potential subsidies through the waiver of in -lieu fees; commented that the cost of
a new appraisal could be worth it if the price were lower; stated a local appraiser /realtor had
questioned the values of the City properties and he requested an explanation of the value of the
parking lot. City Manager Adams explained the City would be selling the property to the
purchaser as a vacant lot and therefore, the City would be removing the parking and replacing it
with another parking lot.
Council Member Fellows expressed concerns with the financial aspects of the proposal; and did
not support the applicant's offer to give the City an option to force a re- purchase of the building
at some future date.
City Manager Adams briefly reviewed the alternatives listed in the staff report.
Council Member Fellows provided the following comments:
- Does not support forgiving $112,000 in parking in -lieu fees;
- Stated a lot of people do not want the Village enhanced by tearing down and creating new
buildings;
- Does not support tearing down buildings;
- Stated that modifying Short Street and creating Centennial Plaza is going to be expensive;
- Believed the appraisal was way off, and the City would be paying too much;
- Does not support the project.
Mayor Ferrara provided the following comments:
- Supported the project;
- Believed the Station Way location is too noisy next to the freeway; available parking does
not appear adequate, however there is no parking analysis available; may need a traffic
analysis at that location;
- Has been around long enough to remember surveys regarding the location of City Hall
which indicate City Hall should stay in the Village;
- Commented on the favorable economics of the project;
- Stated that the main goal is the economy of the Village and of the City; has supported from
the beginning anything that could be done to bring more people into the Village to get out,
walk around, and experience the charm of the Village;
- Has discussed the benefits of co- locating staff; space needs may be an issue, but will not be
known unless it is tried; if it works, the City's operation will be much more efficient and result
in better service to the community;
- Agreed that this is a complex proposal, but as a whole, it is a good project for the City;
- Clarified that Short Street is not being closed, it would be a one -way street;
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 6
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 7
- Stated that the Building and Safety building was deemed to be not historic;
- Recognized that if the project was not approved, the entire project goes away;
- Stated that more consideration needs to be made by Mr. Tompkin's offer to buy the Farm
Credit building back; that this was an ideal situation to look at a buy -back agreement in
conjunction with the lease of City Hall;
- Addressed issue of frustration with government and distrust of the State legislature; stated it
did not feel good that there was distrust at the local level;
- Referred to sentiments expressed by community members that support the project;
- Acknowledged that there has been a lot of talk about parking; stated the project would gain
parking; and noted this project was approved by the Downtown Parking Advisory Board
which is made up of business owners in the Village;
- Stated that the City's obligation towards the local sales tax has been fulfilled and will
continue to do so; referred to two street projects that are funded and in progress;
- Acknowledged the sales tax advisory measures which prioritized the funds to be used for
City projects;
- Referred to the City's Design Guidelines and Formula Business Ordinance to keep chain
stores from coming into the Village;
- Does not believe creating anything new in the Village would create fake history;
- Expressed concern about what would happen to the JJ's Market building if there is a sense
that the Village should not be changed at all;
- Believed the City can take the initiative to chart a more dynamic economic course for the
Village while still preserving its charm;
- Stated that there are 17,000 people in the City and many of them have expressed support
for the future of the Village outside of the Council meetings;
- Supported the project;
- Supported extending the City Hall lease for a longer period, maybe for 7 years, and
including a buy back provision in the agreement.
Mayor Pro Tem Jim Guthrie offered the following additional comments:
- Stated he had reviewed the pluses and minuses of the project and came up with different
answers; acknowledged there were many pieces to the project;
- Stated it has always been about the most financially feasible way to accomplish what needs
to be accomplished for a better City Hall;
- Noted it would be very expensive to fix the current City Hall and finding an alternative was
key;
- Stated he was not hearing any support from the Council to sell the buildings, so he was
prepared to support and approve the recommendations as proposed;
- Reiterated that the City Hall lease should be longer than 5 years, possibly up to 10 years to
make it feasible;
- Noted that the Council voted 4 -1 to replace the Building and Safety building in order to
facilitate the commercial project;
- Preferred that this wasn't funded from the local sales tax;
- Would have adequate facilities for City Hall; would have the economic development project
that is key; and would have ADA compliance in the City Hall project;
- Supports with instruction to staff to provide for a 10 -year lease; if more space is needed
prior to that time, the Farm Credit building can be expanded;
- As far as parking, the new parking lot may not be development concurrently; however, there
will not be a shortage of parking in the Village;
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 7
Minutes of City Council Special Meeting
March 29, 2010
Page 8
- Suggested not putting in the elevator at this time, and staying within the budget that was set
forth with the less expensive alternative.
City Manager Adams suggested a Council subcommittee to work on design and selecting an
architect. There was consensus that Council Member Arnold and Mayor Pro Tem Guthrie
would continue to serve as subcommittee members.
Action: Council Member Costello moved to adopt the City Council subgroup recommendations
to: 1) approve relocation of all City Hall complex staff to the 300 East Branch Street building; 2)
direct staff to solicit proposals to lease the City Hall building and explore a 10 year lease; 3)
authorize the City Manager to execute documents to obtain financing up to $1.2 million for costs
associated with the acquisition of 300 East Branch Street property through USDA Rural
Development Community Facilities low interest loan program and fund debt service from local
sales tax funds, and 4) approve funding for proposed improvements to the 300 East Branch
Street building from local sales tax funds with the inclusion of the offer from Nick Tompkins to
repurchase the building within 6 years at $2.1 million, contingent also with the flexibility that the
Council would make a final decision on whether to go forward with completion of the second
story and the elevator based on the proposals brought back by staff. Mayor Pro Tem Guthrie
seconded.
Brief discussion ensued with the applicant regarding the term of the lease, the proposed buy-
back agreement, and the proposed remodeling improvements in the Farm Credit building.
Council Member Arnold noted that while he would be voting against the project tonight because
he believed the Station Way location should be explored as an option, he believed the project
was good and would support it moving forward after tonight as far as selecting an architect.
Council Member Fellows reiterated that by subsidizing Mr. Tompkin's proposal, there should be
caution regarding the buy -back agreement to avoid further subsidies.
The motion passed on the following roll -call vote:
AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Ferrara
NOES: Arnold, Fellows
ABSENT: None
5. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. to the next Regular City Council Meeting on April 13,
2010.
Tony Ferrara, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk
(Approved at CC Mtg )
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 8
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING of THE CITY COU CIUREDE ELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, APRIL 1 , 201
COUNCIL L CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor /chair Ferrara called the Regular City Council/ Redevelopment Agency meeting to order at
:o 3 p.m.
2 . ROLL. CALL
City council /RDA: council /Board Members Joe Costello, chuck Fellows, Mayor Pre Tem Vice
Chair Jinn Guthrie and Mayor /chair Tony 'Ferrara were present.
Council /Board Member Ed Arnold was absent.
City Staff Present: City Manager Steven Adams, city Attorney Tim Carmel, Director of
Legislative and Information Services /City clerk Kelly Wetmore, Director of
Administrative Services Angela Kraet ch, Chief of Police Steve Annibali,
Police Commander John Hough, Director of community Development
Teresa Mccli h , and Planning Manager Jim Bergman.
3 . FLAG SALUTE
Jim Bergman, President of the Arroyo Grande Valley Kiwanis club, led the Flag Salute.
4 . INVOCATION
Mayor Ferrara delivered the invocation.
5 . SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.a. Honorary Proclamation Declaring April 2010 as "Autism Awareness Month"
Mayor Ferrara presented an Honorary Proclamation recognizing April 2010 as Autism Awareness
Month. Gary Nemeth and Shawna Whitfield accepted the Proclamation on behalf of the central
Coast Autism Spectrum center.
5 .b. Honorary Proclamation — Recognizing Apri 130, 2 010 as Arbor Day
Mayor Ferrara presented an Honorary Proclamation recognizing April 30 2010 as Arbor Day.
Recreation and Maintenance Services Director Doug Perrin accepted the Proclamation.
6 . AGENDA IEII EW
6.a. ordinances Read in Title only.
Council/Board [Member Costello moved, Mayor Pro TemNice chair Guthrie seconded, and the
motion passed unanimously that all ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title only
and all further readings be waived.
Mayor Ferrara requested the council's concurrence to take Item 12 out of order. The Council
concurred.
12. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
Mayor Ferrara read a prepared statement regarding the numerous inquiries from the citizens and
the media regarding Council Member Arnold and the impact on the city. Mayor Ferrara req uested
the Council's concurrence in placing on the April 2 #n Agenda consideration of several items: 1 A
letter from the Council to Ed Arnold asking that he resign his council seat immediately; An
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 9
Minutes: city CounciflRedevelopment Meeting Page
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
outline of the recall process applicable to recalling a Council Member for the benefit of the public;
and A process for filling a Council vacancy when the need arises. Mayor Ferrara emphasized
that this was not about Council Member Arnold's guilt or innocence, which is a separate process
that will run its own course in a court of law. council concurred with Mayor Ferrara to place this
matter on the net Agenda.
7. CITIZENS' INPUT, COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
Tim Moore, Fair Oaks Avenue, referred to comments made by the Mayor and council Members at
the (larch 29 meeting; stated he is planning on running for city Council, and the fiat thing he
would d0 if elected is to have ITT buy back the Farm Credit building; and e concern
about the negative comments made regarding the building on Station Way.
Ira Hughey Canyon Way, stated he was saddened by the decision made by the council regarding
the real estate deal with NKT; referred to the many names that were presented opposing the
project, yet it was still passed; referred to unfair accusations made about the Station way
buildings; stated that the City knew that NKT had bought the JJ's Market building; and thanked the
Arroyo Grande Kiwanis Club, Arroyo Grande High School Robotics Team, and all the volunteers
who helped repaint the Bridge Street Bridge.
Patty Welsh Pradera court, stated that she had looked at the buildings on Station Way and saw
that they were good enough for physicians and pediatricians to occupy the buildings; and thanked
Council for the actions they will consider at the next City Council meeting.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor /Chair Ferrara invited members of the public who wished to comment on any Consent
Agenda Item to do so at this time. There were no public comments received.
Action: council /Board Member Fellows moved, and Mayor Pro TemNice chair Guthrie seconded
the motion to approve consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.j., with the recommended courses of
action. The motion passed on the following roll -call vote:
AYES: Fellows, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: Arnold
8.ar. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
Action: Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period March 16, 2010 through
March 31, 2010.
8.b. Consideration of Agreement for Consultant Services. for Audit Services.
[RDAICOUNCIL]
Action: Authorized the Mayor /chair to eater into a three year consultant services
agreement with the audit firm of Moss, Levy & Hart helm, Certified Public Accountants.
8.c. Consideration of Approval of (!Minutes.
Action: Approved the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of March 2, 2010 and
the Regular city council / edeveIopment Agency Meeting of Ma rch 23, 2010, as submitted.
8.d. Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Tax Sharing Agreement with the County
of San Luis Obispo for Annexation of the Pearvwrod Basin Property.
Action: Adopted Resolution olution l o. 4287 as follows: "`A RESOLUTION TIN THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEOO T #A TED
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 10
Minutes: City council Redevelopment Meeting
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Page
EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TALC REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT
BETWEEN EEN THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AND COUNTY OF SAN LUIS DEISP '
8.e. consideration of second Extension of Agreement for contractor Services with SP
Maintenance Services, Inc.
Action* Approved a Second Extension f the Agreement with SP Maintenance Services for
street sweeping services.
8.f. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Accepting Easements and Improvements vements four
Parcel Map AG 05-0138 and Planned Unit Development 05-003; Located at 1
Juniper street.
Action: Adopted Resolution N . 4288 as follows: "'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING EASEMENTS AND
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP AG -0738 AND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT -003 LOCATED AT 137 JUNIPER STREET'.
8.g Consideration to Approve Construction Plans and specifications and Environmental
Determination for the Well No. 10 Phase II Project, PIN 2010-02.
Action: 1 Adopted Resolution N . 4269 as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGA TI E
DECLARATION FOR AND APPROVING THE WELL NO. 1 o, PHASE H PROJECT', and
2 Approved Well No. 10 construction plans and specifications.
8.h. Consideration of a Subcommiftee to Review the Children In Motion Program.
Action: 1 Approved formation of a Children In Motion Sub mmittee to develop and
recommend methods to rake the Children In Motion Program financially self sufficient; 2
Appointed City Council Members Costello and Fellows to serve on the Subcommittee; and
8 Authorized the city Manager to complete the formation o f the Subcommittee with one
Parks and Recreation C mmi i ner, up to sic city staff members, and at least five
members at large.
81 consideration of an Agreement for Contractor services with Lee Filson Electric for
Traffic signal Maintenance.
Action: Approved an Agreement for contractor Services with Lee Wilson Electric for traffic
signal maintenance.
8.j. consideration o critical Needs Action Plan Process.
Action: Approved the proposed critical Needs Action Plan process.
9 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. consideration of a Resolution Amending the City Master Fee schedule for the
Recreation and Maintenance services Department's Pre - school Program, Adult
Softball Leagues, Adult Basketball Leagues and Playground Program.
Recreation n and Maintenance Services Director Perrin presented the staff report and recommended
the Council adopt a Resolution amending the City Master Fee Schedule for the Recreation n and
Maintenance Services Department's Pre - School Play and Learn Program, Adult softball Leagues,
Adult Basketball Leagues and Playground Programs.
Council questions ensued regard impacts to participation In the Play and Learn program; the
purpose of the Play and Learn program; and whether the proposed increase in rates will negatively
impact the Adult Sports Programs. Director Perrin responded that since the last fee increase in
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page I I
M a : City CounciflRedevelopment Meeting Page
Tuesday, April 9 ., 20 1
2008, there had been no drop in participation in the Play and Learn program, w hich is a
preparatory program for children prior to entering Kindergarten; and he stated that while there had
been a decrease in participation in the adult basketball program, there had been an increase in
adult softball tears, and that the proposed fee increases for the adult sports programs would
remain in line with ghat other cities are currently charging.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing, and upon hearing no comments, he closed the public
hearing.
Council comments included support for the increase of fees in all the programs; concern about
potential impacts to participation; that the playground fees would be in lime with the Children in
Motion program; that the fee increase for adult sport programs is reasonable; a suggestion that the
fees be increased annually based on changes in the consumer price index (CPI); and general
support for all parks and recreation programs which are valuable to the community.
Action: Council Member Costello moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION of
THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING THE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE LE FOR THE RECREATION ADD MAINTENANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRE-
SCHOOL, ADULT SOFTBALL, ADULT BASKETBALL AND PLAYGROUND PROGRAMS,
Council Member Fellows seconded, and the motion passed on the following roll call vote:
A YES: Costello, Fellows, Guthrie, Ferrara
NOES: [done
ABSENT: Arnold
9.b. Consideration of Adoption of an ordinance Approving Development Agreement 09-
0 2; 5 Cities Community Services Foundation.
Planning Manager Bergman presented the staff report and recommended the council adopt an
Ordinance approving Development Agreement 0-002 to construct a multi - purpose recreation
center on a property located at the corner of W. Branch Street and old Ranch Toad.
In response to questions from Council regarding the proposed waiver of fees related to
construction of the project, City Manager Adams explained that the waiver of fees has been
recommended because the project is a joint project between the City and the Foundation, the
project would be a public facility, and it wound be funded entirely by private donations. With regard
to transportation impacts, he explained the current funding plan for the Brisco interchange project
which is already accounted for in the City's budget.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Allen Buck, Project Coordinator representing 5 Cities Community services Foundation, commented
on escalating construction costs and spoke in support of the proposed Development Agreement.
Ed Pelt rnan, Larchmont Drive, inquired about who manage the Center and whether the City would
have any input; and whether any ground rules would be set now for when the project was built at
some point in the future.
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 12
Minutes: City C unc l Rede elo meat Meeting Page
Tuesday, April 13, 2070
City Manager Adams responded that City has the first right of refusal to operate the facility, and
that if it turned out not to be financially feasible, the City would still be involved in establishing
guidelines for operation of the center.
City Attorney Carmel stated that this would be a long terra operating agreement with provisions in
place that could not be modified without mutual consent from both parties.
Upon hearing no further comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council comments included support for approving the Development Agreement as proposed;
acknowledgement of the work done on the project to date; acknowledgement of the Foundation's
ongoing fundraising efforts; that waiver of the fees would not affect the city's other capital projects;
that development impact fee calculations did not include this project; and acknowledgement that
the City is a partner in this project.
Action: Council Member Fellows moved to adopt an ordinance as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL DP THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
PMENT
AGREEMENT -002 TO CONSTRICT A MULTI-PURPOSE RECREATION CENTER ON
PROPERTY LOCATED A T THE CORNER OF WEST BRANCH STREET ADD OLD RANCH
ROAD" Mayor Fero Tern Guthrie seconded and the motion passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Fellows, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: Arnold
g.c. Extension of Interim Urgency ordinance Establishing up to an Additional Three
Month Moratorium on the Approval of De velopment Projects.
City Manager Adams presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt an Interim
Urgency Ordinance extending the temporary moratorium on the approval of development projects
for up to an additional three months.
Council questions included whether the refurbishments that were done on the sentry wells
improved the readings on seawater intrusion. City Manager Adams responded that the last two
tests show no intrusion.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
M ike McConville, East Branch Street, questioned if the moratorium included the City Hall project or
any other projects by ITT Commercial.
City Manager Adams responded that the moratorium does not impact projects in progress prior to
adoption of the Interim Urgency Ordinance, nor does it apply to multi- family projects.
Upon hearing no further comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 13
Minutes: City CouncillRedevelopment Meeting Page
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Council comments ensued in support of extending the temporary moratorium on the approval of
development projects for up to are additional three months, and acknowledgment of the city's
efforts in meeting the water resource strategies.
Action: Council Member Costello moved to adopt an Interim Urgency ordinance as follows: ` "ASV
INTERIM [URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of ARROYO
GRANDE E CTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL DF DEVELOPMENT
PROTECTS, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. Mayor Pre TemNice chair Guthrie
seconded and the motion passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Fellows, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: Arnold
10. CONTINUED BUSIN ITEMS
Done.
11. NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
11.a. consideration of Agreement with Tierra West Advisors to Prepare a Feasibility
Analysis on Redevelopment Project Options at 1221 East Grand Avenue.
[RDAICOUNCIL]
City Manager /Executive Director Adams presented the staff report and recommended the
Council/Board: 1 Approve an Agreement with Tierra West Advisors to prepare a feasibility analysis
on redevelopment project options at 1221 East Grand Avenue; and 2 Identify city revenue
generation as a top priority for any proposed redevelopment projects at this site.
Council /Board questions ensued regarding whether Tierra Vilest would look at all options regarding
types of uses and feasibility; and if Tierra Wet would be prepared to present their findings at the
end of the -8 week process.
Mayor /chair Ferrara invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard o n the
matter, and upon hearing none, he closed the public comment period.
Council/Board comments ensued regarding support for the feasibility analysis; that the
opportunities for redevelopment at this location are good; emphasis that moving forward with the
analysis does not bind the council on any project; that it was appropriate to utilize a third party for
the analysis; and reference to the E. Grand Avenue study which resulted in the creation of a
Master Plan and corridor for this segment of the city.
Action: Council /Board Member Costello moved to: 1 Approve an Agreement with Tierra West
Advisors to prepare a feasibility analysis on redevelopment project options at 1 221 East Grand
Avenue; and 2 Identify city revenue generation as a top priority for any proposed redevelopment
project at this site. Mayor Pro Tern ice Chair Guthrie seconded, and the motion passed on the
following roll call vote:
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 14
Minutes: City Counc 111 edevelopment Meeting
Tuesday, April 13, 2090
AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Fellows, Ferrara
NOES: lone
ABSENT. Arnold
12. CITY COUNCIL. MEMBER ITEMS
Done.
13. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
Done.
14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
Page
15. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Adams gage an update on the progress of affordable housing projects in the City.
16. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Jeff Auerbach, oak Park Community Group, commented on Agenda Item 8.g. and stated the Oak
Park Community Group sent a letter on March 9 th and wanted to thank the Council for approving
one of the suggested conditions for the Well Igo. 10 project. He requested the City consider the
additional condition that was requested that the City would publish, in advance, an annual
notification of maximum AFY pumping limits that will not push the Oak Park a quifer into overdraft.
Mayor Ferrara stated that since Council had already taken action on the stern, he would request
that Community Development Director M Cll h follow up with Mr. Auerbach on the matter.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor /Chair Ferrara adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
Tony Ferrara, Mayor/Chair
ATTEST.
Melly Wetmore, re, City Clerk/ Agency Secretary
(Approved at CC Mtg )
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 15
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
OW R
WCOfMRATIE
imy :o. toll MEMORANDUM
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN N. ANNlBALI, CHIEF OF POL10E1'
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL
SERVICES
DATE: APRIL 2 , 2010
RECOMMENDATION:
It Is recommended the City Council approve the First Amendment to the contract for
Animal Services "First Amendment" with the County of San Luis Obispo not to exceed the
amount of $136,624 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This First Amendment will provide for the twelve month extension beyond the expiration
date of June 30, 2009 at a cost of $135,624. A total of $137,000 in the General Fund is
budgeted in FY 2009 -10 for animal services, which will cover the cost.
BACKGROUND"
ND"
On July 1, 2006, the City Council approved and executed a contract with the County of
San Luis Obispo to provide animal services within the city's boundaries. The agreement
expired on June 30, 2009. The county health Agency is currently assigned oversight of
the Animal Services Division. The County Health Agency and Administrative staff, working
with representatives of the of cities, including Chief Annibali, are currently performing an
animal services study. The study includes identifying specific animal services provided to
the city, data collection elements and allocation and fee setting methodology with the
intent that the cities will gain a clearer understanding of the rate setting process. Approval
of the drat amendment Will extend the agreement for the twelve months to allow the
completion of the study.
Council approved a three month extension on ,,duly 29, 2009 at the request of the County.
However, that extension was never approved by the Board of Supervisors due to sme
cities failing to complete the amendment extending the contract. Therefore, this extension
will supersede the three month proposal approved by Council on July 29, 2009.
It is anticipated that the cost for animal services provided to the city of Arroyo Grande will
decrease in the FY 2010 - 11 based on the results of the animal services study and new
rate methodology.
Agenda Item 8.e.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
ANALYSIS of ISSUES.
The animal services study is nearly complete and has been successfully embraced by both
the county and participating cities. The agreement to pursue the study was partly in
response to concerns identified by the City regarding past and future proposed cost
increases. The County has agreed to maintain current coats until the study is completed.
It is anticipated that the study wiU be completed within the contract extension period and
will provide a clearer understanding of the rate setting formulas. The County has provided
this First Amendment to the Contract for Animal Services in order to continue to provide
animal services in the City during the study period. Staff recommends that council
approve this First Amendment in order to provide continuity in animal services during the
study period.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the council's consideration:
Approve staff s recommendation to amend the contract with the County of
San Luis Obispo;
Do not approve staff's recommendation and direct staff to seek alternatives
for animal services;
Provide Direction to staff`
ADVANTAGES;
Approval of the First Amendment to the contract for Animal Services will enable the City to
provide continuity in animal services during the comprehensive study period.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
N environmental revie w is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The public impacted by the proposal is the Arroyo Grand Police Depa rtrment' service
population. The public has been made aware of the proposal before Council by a posting
of the Agenda in the front of City Hall on Thursday, ,duly 23, 2009 and public notice posted
on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public input has been received to date.
ATTACHMENTS
1. First Amendment to contract for animal services
Agenda Item 8.e.
Page 2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
This F IRST AMENDMENT is entered into between the Coin of Sari Luis Obis .
` "County") � Obisp �]ub�le entity �I� � Stat
of California (hereafter referred t as County and the City f Arroyo Grande,, (hereafter � referred t as
6c
it .
WHEREAS, on July L 2006, the County executed a contract with the City o roAde
� animal services within its
boundaries by the County's Division of Animal Services; and
W]H REAS, the contract expires on June 3 0, 2089; and
WHEREAS, Health Agency and Administrative staff, working with a co ntingent of i re
• s ; t are currently
performing n Animal Services study which includes identifying specific animal scrvic rovided t
�
collection elements o the City, data
allocation and fee setting methodology, with the intent that the Cities will gain a clearer
understanding of the rate setting proces and
WHEREAS,, AS, County and City wish to extend the contract for are additional twelve months beyond the expiration y � anon date and
desire to amend the contract to reflect the extended term.
NOW THEREFORE:
I. The following line shall be added to the original Attachment A to include the twelve month extens
Ju 1, 2089 to .d une 38, 2810 S136,62
2. The following paragraph shall be added to the Section labeled TERM AND RENEWAL and the Con tact is hereby
amended with the following language added:
The term of this Contract is hereby ext ended to June 30, 20 1 o, unless terminated earlier by mutual a greement of the
parties. The Health Agency Director shall have authority to act pursuant to this h.
� �p
All other terms and conditions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representative to execute this �s Renewal of
Contract.
Executed as of the date set forth herein.
CO NTRACTOR:
City o f Arroyo Grande
By:
Mayor of the City of Arroyo Grande
ATTEST:
By:
Cleric for the City of Arroyo Grande .
Date
Date
Agenda Item 8.e.
Page 3
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
Warren Jensen
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel Date
COUNTY:
Bruce Gibson
Board of Supervisors
By:
Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
Julie Rodewald
Clerk-Recorder
By:
Cleric and Ex. Officio Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors
Date
Date
Agenda Item 8.e.
Page 4
R
INCORPORATE
MEMORANDUM
JULY 10. 12il
1F
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TER ESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Y: MICE LINT, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION F AN AWARD OF CONTRACT TO GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION COMP N FOR CONSTRICTION OF THE WEST
BRANCH STREET RESURFACING PROJECT, P II 200&
DATE:' APRIL 2 , 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council.
1. award a contract for the lest Branch Street Resurfacing Project to Granite
Construction Company in the amount of $820,764;
2. authorize the City Manager to approve change orders for 10% of the contract
amount, $82,076, for unanticipated Bests during the construction, phase of the
project (total construction costs = $820,764 + $82,076 = $902,840).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The amended Capital Impr vement Program budget included $1131,014 for the Vilest
Branch street Resurfacing Project, of which $1,,011,769 is slated for construction costs
and $ for construction contingencies. The budget includes $525,000 in American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (AR RA) funds. The remaining funding sources
are from the Local Sales Tax ($473,000) and the Severer Fund ($90,900).
BACKGROUND:
UND.
The project scope of work includes the resurfacing of Vilest Branch Street, between Oak
Park Boulevard and East Grand Avenue, construction of sewer improvements to serve
the future Police Station and the Arroyo Grande Recreation Center and construction of
storm drain improvements at the intersection of Vilest Branch Street and Vernon Street.
O December 8, 2009, Council approved the construction plans and specifications,
determined the project to be categorically exempt in accordance with CE QA Guidelines
Section 15301(c),, and directed staff to solicit construction bids following receipt of
authorization from Caltrans.
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION of AN AWARD of CONTRACT To GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION of THE WEST BRANCH STREET
RESURFACING PROTECT, PW 2008 -8
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
On March 2, 2010, ten bids were opened for the West Branch Resurfacing Project. O
March 2T, 2010, staff received a letter from one of the bidders alleging inconsistencies
in the bid documentation that dictates the City's decision process for contract award.
On March 23, 2010, on the advice of the City Attorney, Council rejected all of the
construction bids, directed staff~ to correct the discrepancies in the bid documentation
and subsequently readvertisd the project to solicit new construction bids.
The City Attorney reviewed the contract award language in the project specifications to
correct the bid documentation inconsistencies as follows:
"The ""lowest bid shall be the lowest bid amount on the base contract. In the case of
alternate bids, the City shall state the amount of funding mailable prior to the
opening of the first bid, and the "lowest bid" shall be the lowest total of the bid
amounts on the base contract and those additive alternates taken in sequential order
from the list of alerae bids. The lowest bid below or equal to the available funds
with the maximum number of additive alternates shall be considered the lover bid. "
Three additive alternates in the March 2, 2010 bid proposal dealt with the option of
performing the grinding and paving operations at night. Although the contractor pays a
premium to have the asphalt plants work at night and must pay overtime to their
workers, the work can be performed in less time as they do not have to constantly
adjust the traffic control to accommodate the businesses, shoppers and commuters.
Nearly all of the bids received on (March 2, 2010 showed that the work could be
performed at the same price or cheaper than performing the work during normal
daytime hours. Thus, staff incorporated the night time grinding and paving operations
into the base bid. The base bid and additive alternates were listed as follows:
Base Bid Asphalt Overlay — East Grand to Brisco
licrosurfacing — Brisco to Camino Mercado
Asphalt Overlay — Camino Mercado to Oak Park
Alternate A Perform Asphalt Overlay of Camino (Mercado Segment
Alternate B Asphalt Concrete O verlay in Lieu of Microsurfa ing between Brisco
Road and Camino Mercado
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
O April 15, 2010, sic bids were opened for the West Branch Street Resurfacing urfacing Project
(see Attachment No. 1). Staff established a baseline amount of $1,000,000 as the
award criteria. The lowest responsible bid that is below the threshold amount was
received from Granite Construction Company in the amount of $820,764 (Base Bid of
$767 + Alternate "A„ of $53,509 = $820,764). It should be noted that Granite
Construction Company would also be the low bidder based solely on the Base Bid or by
combining the Base Bid with the total of both alternates.
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 2
CITE COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION of AN AWARD ARD of CONTRACT To GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION STRUCTION F THE WEST BRANCH STREET
RESURFACING CING PROJECT, P II2008 8
APRIL, 2010
PAGE 3
Staff recommends an award of contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount
of $820,764 for construction of the Base Bid and Alternate "A vork is expected to
begin in May 20 10 and complete by the end of September 2010.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Award a construction contract to Granite construction Company for the Base Bid
and Alternate "A" ;
2. Award a construction contract to Granite Construction Company for the Base Bid,
Alternate "A" and Alternate "B ";
3. Do not award a construction contract for the project at this time;
4. Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The Pavement Management Program evaluates the city's street inventory and identifies
preventative maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Each street is inspected and
rated in accordance with an established criteria. used on this information, a Pavement
Condition Index (PC[) is established for each street segment, ranking from o to 100,
with "o" being a street in need of major reconstruction and a 100" being a new or well -
maintained street. The general goal is to bring every street up to at least a "fig" rating
which would then enable less expensive maintenance procedures (such as slurry
sealing) to be performed.
West Branch street is a major collector street in the City's circulation system and has
been steadily deteriorating. The Pavement Management Program currently lists West
Branch street with a Pavement condition Index (PCI) of "24". Performing an asphalt
concrete overlay will provide a stronger and more durable roadway section that will
extend the life of the pavement and reduce the need for 'maintenance. Likewise, the
performance of a microsurfacing application between Brisco Road and Camino
Mercado will also require less maintenance. Delaying maintenance for West Branch
Street will only increase deterioration, resulting in much more expensive repair
procedures in the future.
Staff did not include Alternate B in the recommendation for contract award. Alternate B
provides for an asphalt concrete overlay in lieu of microsurfacing between Brisco Road
and Camino Mercado. The roadway in this segment is actually in good condition, but is
starting to experience the effects of aging, such as shrinkage cracks and minor
it alligat ring ". This segment has exceeded the standard b to 7 year membrane
recommendation, but is still a viable candidate for a microsurfacing application. The
performance of an asphalt overlay, although obviously the best application, is not
necessary as a 'maintenance technique. The City's Pavement Management Plan
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION ERATIOI of AN AWARD of CONTRACT To GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION of THE WEST BRANCH STREET
RESURFACING PROJECT, PW 2008 8
APRIL 27,2010
PAGE
recommends that an asphalt concrete overlay on an arterial street receive a
microsurface maintenance within 7 gears. This correlates with the schedule for
performing the regular 7 year circle for the application of mi rosurfa ing applications.
Thus, the Pavement Managem ent Plan would require a mi crosurfacing application over
the entire length of West Branch Street 7 gears following completion of this project.
The bid prices received were well below the Engineer's Estimate. The savings will
enable funds to be redirected towards other resurfacing projects for El Camino Deal, the
streets surrounding Arroyo Grande High School (Orchard street, West Cherry Avenue,
Pilgrim street and Arroyo Avenue) as well as Myrtle Street, Pecan Place, South Alpine,
a nd/or imp to short Street.
DISADVANTAGES:
The specified mix for the microsurfa ing operations uses a black aggregate (rock) that
tends to Keep its color much longer than asphalt overlay aggregate. Thus, the asphalt
oveda r segments will turn gray after several months whereas the rni rosurfa ing
segments will retain their color for years. Therefore, the roadway segments will not
match in color as has occurred following the James Way project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The project is categorically exempt from CE QA pursuant to Guidelines Section
1 301 .
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda was posted on Thursday, April 22, 2010. The agenda and staff reports
were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments were
received as of the time of preparation of this report.
Attachment:
1. Bid Tabulations
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 4
pJXR
A . •
W OAP PIATED
C, imy 10, leis BID OPENING LOG SHEET
JF0 CITY of ARROYO GRANDE
DEADLINE: April 15, 2010, 2:00 p.m.
West Branch Street Resurfacing
SUBMIT-TED Y: TOTAL ALT.
Burke Corporation $889,205.00 $83,940.00
San Luis Obispo, CA
So Construction, Inc.
$859
San Luis Obispo, CA
CalPortiand Construction
$758,386.50
Santa Maria, CA
Granite Construction Company
$787 , 1 255.00
Santa Barbara, CA
Paprch Construction, Inc.
$778,783.84
Pismo Be CA
California Coastal Development
$846,359.00
Santa Maria, CA
$69,559.00
$71,114-00
$53,509-00 $'138,888.00
$84,801.00 $190,259-00
$58,280.30 $1719158.00
ATTACHMENT 1
ALT. R
$215
$204,048.00
$198
Kelly Wetrhorq, City Clerk
: Director of Community Development
Assistant City Engineer
City Manager
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 5
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.f.
Page 6
R
INCORPORATED
\JULY ,a. ,e, t *
c`
MEMORANDUM
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY: MIKE LINT , ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION of AN AWARD of CONTRACT To FERRA AI TI
GRADING & PAVING FOR CONSTRUCTION of THE PEAR1 OOD
AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, PW 2010-03
DATE: APRIL 27, 2010
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. award a contract for the Pear rood Avenue Rehabilitation Project to Ferravanti
Grading & Paving in the amount of $98,860# and
2. authorize the Cit y Manager to approve change orders for 10% of the contract
amount, $9,890, for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the
project (total construction costs = $98,889 + $9,899 = $108,750).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The capital Improvement Program budget includes approximately $146,809 for the
Pearwood Avenue Rehabilitation project. The Engineer's Estimate is - $125,990, not
including testing, inspection or contract administration.
BACKGROUND:
On Mauch 9, 201 g, council approved the construction plans and specifications for the
Pear good Avenue rehabilitation Project and determined that the project was
categorically exempt from CE QA pursuant to Section 15891 (c).
The Pavement Management Master Plan recommends a PCI (Pavement Condition
Index) of 75 (out of a possible score of 1 9 ) for Cit y streets. The Pet for Pearwood
Avenue is 51, which qualifies the roadway to receive the asphalt concrete overlay
treatment. Based on a geotechnical analysis and recommendations, staff designed the
project for a to inch asphalt concrete overlay.
Agenda Item 8.g.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION ATIOI of AN AWARD of CONTRACT ACT To FER AVANTI GRADING
PAVING FOR CONSTRUCTION of THE PEAR WOOD AVENUE REHABILITATION
PROJECT, PW 201 0=03
PFIL2, 2010
PAGE 2
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
On April 6,, 2010, twelve bids were opened for the Pearwood Avenue Rehabilitation
Project. The lowest responsive bid, from Ferravanti Grading & Paging, was in the
amount of $98,860. Staff has determined the bid to be responsive and recommends the
award of a construction contract to Ferraanti Grading & Paving.
The contract time is 30 calendar days. Work is expected to begin in early May and
complete by raid -June.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Approve staffs recommendations to award a construction contract to the lowest
responsive bidder;
2. Do not award a construction contract for the project at this tire or
3. Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The bid price of $98,860 is well belo w the Engineer's Estimate of $125,000.
Pearwood Avenue was constructed in 19 and has had little roadway maintenance
since that time. Prolonging the application of the asphalt overlay at this time will only
result in having to perform more expensive repairs to the roadway in the future.
DISADVANTAGES:
TAGES:
The only disadvantage would be if funding was committed that would not be available
for a higher priority project, but staff does not believe this will occur given the priority of
this project and other projects under gray.
ENVIRONMENTAL TAL F E IEW:
The project is categorically exempt from CE QA pursuant to Guidelines Section
15301 c.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda was posted on Thursday, April 22, 2010. The agenda and staff reports
were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments were
received as of the time of preparation of this report.
Attachment:
1. Bid Tabulations
Agenda Item 8.g.
Page 2
RO Attachment I
INCORPORATED
BID OPENING LOG SHEET
'r 10, lei CITY of ARROYO GRANDE
DEADLINE: April 6, 2010, 2:00 p.m.
Pearw od Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
SUBMITTED BY: TOTAL
Hardy & Harper $147,566.25
Santa Aria, CA
Toste Grading & Paving
Grover Beach, CA
Papi h Construction
Pismo Beach, CA
Jayson Fisher
Arroyo Grande, CA
Rockwood General Contractors
Niporro, CA
Ferravanti Paving
Paso Robles, CA
Brough Construction, Inc.
Arroyo Grander CA
a lPortland Construction
Banta Maria, CA
R Burke Corporation
San Luis Obispo, CA
Granite Construction
Banta Barbara, CA
Souza Construction
San Luis Obispo, CA
Michael Frederick Paving Corporation
Atascadero, CA
Kelly Wetfno ICity Clerk
c: Director of Community Development
Assistant City Engineer
City Manager
$103
$128,230.3'
$114,379.50
$119
$98,860.00
$111,943.75
$104
1 09,360.00
104,747.00
$116
$126
Agenda Item 8.g.
Page 3
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.g.
Page 4
INCORPORATED
t? nt
JULY M 1911
0 q MEMORAND
F
TO: CITY COUNCIL
40 �
FROM: TER ESA IIIIccLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
i
BY: LES EVANS, PROJECT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. -006 IN CONNECTION WITH THE LUCIA MAR MINIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT STANLEY AVENUE PROJECT
DATE: APRIL 27, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting certain. improvements
for Conditional Use Permit -006 located on Stanley Avenue, south of Huasna Road and
release the bond guaranteeing the improvements.
FUNDING:
There are Minor financial impacts in that maintenance of the grater and drainage
facilities will be funded from City maintenance funds in future years. Ho wever, the
District has agreed to continue to maintain the pavement and wal on Stanley
Avenue. Lucia Mar Unified School District will provide a one-year warranty bend
insuring any defects that may appear in the improvements.
BACKGROUND:
O n October 3, 2006 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted a
Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 6 -0 for the development of an Operation
and Maintenance Facility associated with the Lucia Mar Unified School District.
After the Planning Commission's decision, the applicant filed an appeal and met with
staff in an effort to reconfigure the project to reduce costs of improvements that are
generally associated with private developments and not those of special districts. The
primary proposed change involves Stanley Avenue, which was previously dedicated to
the City, but the City nearer accepted maintenance since the roadway is not built to City
standard The conditions recommended to the Planning Commission assumed
upgrading the street to City standards in order to obtain City acceptance. However, the
District agreed to continue assuming responsibility for maintenance of the roadway in
order to eliminate costly upgrades.
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 06 -006
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
The City council upheld the appeal and approved Conditional Use Permit N. o -ooh
on November 28, 2006 subject to conditions of approval. The conditions included
requirements from the Community Development Department, Building and Fire,
Recreation and Maintenance Services, and Public Works Department.
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
As a condition of the conditional Use Permit, the applicant was required to provide
certain public improvements. It was agreed that the District would not request the city
to maintain improvements to Stanley Avenue.
Improveme to Stanley Avenue:
Construct new asphalt pavement from intersection of Branch Street and Stanley
Avenue to deed end.
Construct decomposed granite pedestrian path from Branch street intersection to
dead end, one side only.
Construct speed table with crosswalk adjacent to Transportation Yard /basketball
oou rts.
Other Improvements:
Install landscaping.
Upgrade the existing fire hydrant to City standards.
Install a backflo w prevention device on the water service.
0 Install a commercial fire sprinkler system per city standards.
Upgrade the existing drainage structure and discharge pipe at the end of Stanley
Avenue by:
0 Installing a filter system consisting of a bio- filtration swale, fossil filter, or
similar improvement; and
0 constructing improvements necessary to correct any existing or future
conditions causing erosion to the creek bank.
All improvements have been completed and inspected.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Accept the improvements and release the bonds;
2. Do not accept the improvements or release the bond; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES,
By accepting the public improvements the City will have o wnership and control of
certain facilities in the public right-of-way and within dedicated easements.
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS ENTS FOR CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT NO. 06-006
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 3
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AID COMMENTS:
The agenda for this meeting was posted at City Hall on Thursday, April 22, 2010 and
the agenda and staff report ware posted en the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010.
As of the writing of this staff report, no public c omment had been received.
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 3
RESOLUTION No.
RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL CIL of THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING CERTAIN
I
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL AL USE PERMIT No.
06-006; LOCATED ON STANLEY AVENUE SOUTH of
HUASN ROAD; APPLICANT: LUCIA MAR UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, S, the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No. 06-006; located on
Stanley Avenue South of Huasna load on November 2, Zoo; and
WHEREAS, EAS, the project was conditioned to construct certain public improvements; and
WHEREAS, EAS, the developer has constructed the improvements required by the
conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 06-006; and
WHEREAS, staff has inspected the improvements and finds they are constructed in
accordance with the approved plans for the project; and
WHEREAS, EAS, the developer has provided the 10% warranty security as required by the
conditions of approval, to be released at the conclusion of the one -year warranty period,
provided the improvements are still in satisfactory condition.
NOW, THEREFORE, E, BE IT RESOLVED E that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande does hereby accept the following improvements for Conditional Use Permit No.
06-006:
1. Fire Hydrant
2. 18" drainage culvert pipe and inlet and outlet structures.
3. Rip rap outfall into creeks.
O motion of Council Member Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , and by the following roll call Grote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of April 2010.
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
TONY FER AI A, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMO E, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
EF
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY . CA MEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 5
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.h.
Page 6
ft 0
GN
WCORPORATED
r�
JMY 1 01 l MEMORANDUM
1F
To: CITY COUNCIL
Y: TIMOTHY J. CA MEL, CITY ATTOI NE
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION of A RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE APPROVAL
OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE E DECLARATION, VESTING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE No. -001 AND MINOR
EXCEPTION CASE No. -006 (605 EMAN COURT
DATE: APRIL 2, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution rescinding the
approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Case No.
05 -001 and Minor Exception Case No. 05-006 (695 Er nan Court).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
O n June 7, 2099, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 09 -2085 approving
a Mitigated Negative De Nesting Tentative Parcel M N. 05 -991 and Minor
E No. o -ooh authorizing a three lot re subdivision of ar 1.28 acre
parcel, and minor deviation from the wall height and lot depth requirement {the
91 project"). on July 17, 2009, an appeal of the Planning Commission action in approving
the project was filed by Chris Diedri hsen, who resides at 582 Newman Drive, located
adjacent to the project site. The appeal was originally scheduled for c onsideration by
the City Council on August 2, 2009. on August 2, 2009, City staff received a
co m m ent lette fro Atto Babak Naficy exp conce regarding
environmental issues related to the project. At the August 25, 2010 meeting,
c on s ideration of the project was continued to ar date uncertain by the Council, pending
recirculation of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS/MND . The
IS/MND was recirculated and reprised to include comments and recommended
mitigation measures from two 2 ) commenting agencies. The City Council next
considered the project at a duly noticed public hearing on December 8,, 2009, at which
time the matter was continued to the meeting of February 9, 2010, pending additional
project referrals to the National oceanic and Atmospheric Admini and the
Northern Chum ash Tribal Council. on February 9, 201 the Council adopte
Resolution No. 4251, denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's
approval of the project.
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION N of A RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE APPROVAL of THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
CASE No. -001 AND MINOR EXCEPTION CASE No. -006 (605 EMAN COURT)
APRIL 27, 2010
PACE 2
On March 26, 2010, a Petition for Writ of Mandate (the "lawsuit" ) was filed by the
appellant challenging the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other
project approvals. O or about April 2 2010, the City tendered its defense of the lawsuit
to DeBlauw Builders, Inc. "DBI" per the project conditions of approval. O or about
April 8 , 2010, a letter was received from Attorney, John Belsher (copy attached ) on
behalf of DBI requesting that the City rescind its approval of the subject entitlements as
result of "the overall economic climate, the cost of meeting the conditions of approval,
and the cost defending the Petition."
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
The applicant and the City strongly believe that the subject lawsuit is without merit.
However, for the reasons stated above, the applicant has requested that the City take
all necessary action to rescind the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
all project entitlements.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Adopt the Resolution Vacating, Setting Aside and Rescinding cinding the Approval of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, V esting Tentative Parcel Map Case No. -001
and Minor Exception Case No. 05-006 g Er an Court).
2. Modify and adopt the Resolution Vacating, Setting Aside and Rescinding the
Approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, V esting Tentative Pa rcel Map
Case No. 05-001 and Minor Exception Case No. 05-006 (605 Erman Court).
3. Provide direction to staff.
A DVANTAGES:
Although the applicant is required by the project conditions of approval to defend and
hold the City harmless in the litigation, inevitably, there is some City staff time and
resources associated with monitoring and defending the subject lawsuit that are not
recoverable. Adoption of the Resolution will rescind all project approvals and stop the
lawsuit from proceeding.
DISADVANTAGES:
Staff can identify no disadvantages to adopting the Resolution.
ENVIRONMENTAL ONMENTAL I E IEI :
There is no environmental review required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, April 15, 2010. The Agenda
and report were posted on the City's rrebsite on Friday, April 16, 2010.
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE APPROVAL OF THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP
CASE NO. 001 AND MINOR EXCEPTION CASE NO. -006 (605 EMAN COURT
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 3
At hment:
1 . letter dated April 8 , 2010 from John Belcher, o behalf of De leu w Builders,, Ire c.
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 3
RESOLUTION No.
RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of ARROYO
o o
GRANDE VACATING, SETTING ASIDE AND RESCINDING THE
APPROVAL of A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAMATION,
VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE No. 05x001 AND
MINOR EXCEPTION CASE No. 05. (605 ELAN COURT)
T
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande,
after a duly noticed public hearing, adopted resolution 09 -2085 approving a Mitigated
Negative Declaration, Nesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 05-001 and Minor Exception
Case No. 0 -008 (collectively the "project ", applied for by Delauw Builders, Inc.
CDBI"); and
WHEREAS, EAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision was filed by Chris
Diedrihsen on July 17, 2003; and
WHEREAS, S, on August 2 , 2009, at a duly noticed public hearing the City Council
considered the appeal; and
WHEREAS, EAS, consideration of the appeal was continued to a date uncertain by the City
Council, pending recirculation of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration;
and
WHEREAS, after recirculation and revision of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the project was re- noticed and rescheduled for consideration by the
Council on December 8, 2009, at which time the project was continued to February g,
2010, pending additional project referrals; and
WHEREAS, on February g, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4251
denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of the project,
and
IfHE EAS, on March 28, 2010 a Petition for Writ of Mandate was filed by the appellant
challenging the project approvals (the "lawsuit"); and
WHEREAS, E S, on April 8, 2010, a letter was received from the legal representative of [CBI
requesting that the City rescind its approval of the project as a result of the overall
economic climate, the cost of meeting the project conditions of approval and the cost of
defending the lawsuit.
Noll, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, that the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Nesting Tentative
Panel Map Case No. 05-001 and Minor Exception Case No. 05-006 is hereby vacated,
set aside, and rescinded.
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 5
RESOLUTION N .
PAGE
E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution Flo. 4251 is hereby repealed in its
enti rety.
On motion of Council Member
and by the following roll call Grote, to grit:
, seconded by Council Member ,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this
day of 2010.
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE
TONY F E RFRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN DAIS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARM E L, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.i.
Page 7
FROM BEL HER & BE KER 805 -542 -9849
(THU) APR 8 201 0 1 T. 1 No. 6820429692 P 1
ATTACHMENT 1
John W. Belcher
Howard M. Becker
Steven P. Roberts
Gregory A. Connell
Ell BE
Belsher,Becker&Roberts
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
43.2 Marsh Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 934
April 8, 2010
Timothy J. Carmel
CARMEL & C ACCASHA LLP
Post Off ice Box 15729
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
ply: 805 - 542 -9900
fax: 80 5 - 54 2- 994
info@bbrlawfirm.com
www.bbrla f1rm- orn
VIA FAX 885- 548 -801
RE: Vesting Map 05-001 & Minor Exception -008 DeBlam Project)
Dear Mr. Carmel:
This firm represents the DeBlauw family interests, who are the applicants and owners for
the above - referenced project.
I am advised that my client and the City have been served with a petition for writ of
mandate, brought by a neighborhood association and Chris Diedrichsen, who lures adjacent to the
project (the "Petition"). I have not read the Petition nor evaluated its claims in any way. The
decision of my client set forth herein is independent of the possible merit of any such claims.
Due to the overall economic climate, the cost of meeting the conditions of approval and the
cost of defending the Petition, my client will take no action to implement the DeBlauw Project and
hereby requests the City rescind the. approvals of the referenced entitlements, including
certification, approval or findings as to any related CE QA document or determination.
We request that you advise the Petitioners' attorney of this request and inform him that no
legal defense or counter-attack on his client is planned or anticipated, unless the Petitioners'
#torney Insists on moving forward in the face of this notice and incurs additional fees after this
notice in which case his efforts and request for fees will be rigorously opposed).
My client and I appreciate yo efforts on behalf of the City.
Sincerely,
BELSHER, BECKER & ROBERTS
T
Joh Bel Sher
J11Bab
cc: Duane DeBlauw
R Q o n "s Files%De BIauw F mil l arme1 04 08 10.wpd
Agenda Item 8.1i.
Page 8
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
k
16. INCORPORATED
ti
y 10 loll MEMORANDUM
F
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER 4 1K
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION of A RESOLUTION APPROVING A THIRD SIDE
LETTER of AGREEMENT To THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 620 MEMORANDUM of
UNDERSTANDING
DATE: APRIL 2, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
:
It is recommended the City Council: 1 adopt a Resolution approving a Third Side Letter
of Agreement to the Service Employees International Union Local 620 SEIU
Memorandum of Understanding OU); and 2 authorize the City Manager to execute
the Agreement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Approval of the side Letter of Agreement will result in a savings of approximately
$75,000 to the City in FY 2010-11.
BACKGROUND:
D:
One of the strategies to address the revenue shortfall in FY 2010-11 recommended b
staff was to negotiate additional concessions from the City's labor unions in order to
reduce personnel costs. The existing MOU with SEIU is due to expire on .June 30,
2010.
As a result, the City Manager has been involved in discussions with representatives
from each of the labor organizations for several months. Agreement has been reached
with SEIU for modifications to their existing Il OU and the amendments were approved
by the Union's membership.
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
The existing MOU with SEW originally provided for a % salary increase in FY 2009 -10.
Through a Side Letter of Agreement approved last year, the full increase was delayed
until June 2, 2010.
Due to the projected budget shortfall in FY 2010-11, staff has negotiated an additional
Side Letter of Agreement to further delay % of the % increase until ,June 23, 2011.
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SECOND SIDE LETTER OF
AGREEMENT TO THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL
620 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
APRIL 27, 2090
PAGE 2
In exchange, the City is ensuring the SEW that there will be no additional layoffs
through the next fiscal year. However, the City has maintained the right to layoff a child
care coordinator position if the current efforts to redu costs and/or increase revenue
of the Children In Motion program are unsuccessful.
The Side Letter of Agreement also includes an escape clause that will enable the City to
enact additional layoffs if revenues fall below a specified level. If such layoffs become
necessary, the City will agree to amply therm first to part - time employees performing
similar responsibilities to that of full -time employees, subject to proposed layoffs.
Lastly, the Side Letter of Agreement provides for additional incentive pay to
maintenance staff for water treatment and distribution certifications. This will assist the
City in its efforts to increase training and flexibility of maintenance workers and help to
address pay inequities of grater maintenance workers when compared to other
jurisdictions in the County.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Third Side Letter of
Agreement with SEIU;
- Direct staff to renegotiate the terms of the Agreement;
Do not ap prove the Agreement; or
- Provide staff other direction.
ADVANTAGES
The terms of the Side Leger of Agreement will provide savings necessary to balance the
FY 2010 -11 Annual Budget. An additional goal of the proposal has been to avoid full
negotiations of a new MOU in order to resolve budget and labor relations issues as
soon as possible. This will better enable the City to maintain positive morale and focus
on important challenges facing the organization.
DISADVANTAGES
Terms of the Side Letter of Agreement will restrict the City's ability to enact additional
layoffs in FY 2010 -11 until reductions in revenue reach a specified level.
ENVIRONMENTAL ONMENTAL F E IE If:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda was posted in front of City lull on Thursday, April 22, 2010 and on the
City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments were received.
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 2
RESOLUTION No.
A RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of
ARROYO OYO GRANDE APPROVING 1NG A THIRD SIDE LETTER of
AGREEMENT To THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION LOCAL 620 MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande "City" deems it in the
best interest of the City to approve a third side letter of agreement amending the
Service Employees International Union Local 620 current Memorandum of
Understanding, which includes modifications to salaries and benefits, as
hereinafter provided.
NOW, THEREFORE, E, E IT RESOLVED E by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande that:
1. An amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding "I I I " with the
Service Employees International Union Local 620 "SEIU" is hereby
approved, a copy of said amendment entitled "Third Side Letter of
Agreement, Modification to Memorandum of Understanding" is attached
hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. This Resolution shall become effective as f March 1, 2010.
On motion of Council Member
Council Member
vote, to wit:
AYES.
NOES.
ABSENT.
seconded by
and on the following roll call
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2o1 g.
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
TONY FER AF A, MAYOR
ATTEST.
KELLY 11 ETMO E, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
T:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED TO AS FORA,
TIMOTHY J, CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 4
Exhibit "A"
THIRD SIDE LETTER of AGREEMENT
MODIFICATION To MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING
For valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the City o Arroyo Grande ( "City") and the Service Employees
International Union "SEW" do hereby agree to modify the current Memorandum
of Understanding "MOU" between the City and SEIU as follows:
1. Article 1 shall be amended to extend the term of the Memorandum of
Understanding through June 30, 2011.
2. Article 7.H shall be amended to delay ° of the 5% "Cost of Living
Adjustment" (COLA) for all represented classifications effective on June
25 2010 to instead have % be effective on June 23, 2011 and 1% shall
remain effective on June 25, 2010 as shorn in Attachments 1 and 2 of
this Agreement. If the final results of the City's financial audit for FY 2009-
1 o identify revenues in excess of $100,000 over original budgeted
amounts for the Street Fund and General Fund, exclusive of Local sales
Tax, the MOU may be reopened for the purpose of discussing and
considering accelerating the effective date of a portion of, or entire, COLA
amount.
I Article 7.1 shall be amended to read as follows
1. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS
If a COLA i.,provided to any other labor group in FY 2009 -10
greater than 1% or earlier than June 2, 2010 or in Fly 2010 -11
greater than % for management or Fire, 4.5% for AGP A sworn,
or 5 .5% for AGP A non - sworn, or earlier than June 23, 2011,
increases for all employees represented by Union will be adjusted
to be equal to the timing and/or greatest percentage amount of
those increases. This provision shall not apply to inequity
adjustments for individual classifications that are deemed
necessary due to salary compaction issues with other
classifications.
4. Article 9 shall be amended to add the following:
Water Treatment and Distribution Certification Pay
Effective June 2 2010, employees in classifications of
Maintenance a 11 rker I, II, and III, Water services Worker, Public
Works and Pans Lead Person, Sports Facility Coordinator, and
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 5
Public Works and Parks Super shall receive special pay of 1 %
of their base salary for each Water Treatment O perator Certification
from the California Department of Public Health T1 through T3
received and maintained and eater Distribution Operator
Certification D1 through D4 received and maintained up to a
maximum of % for employees permanently assigned to the Water
Services Section and 2% for employees assigned to other
maintenance operations. Employees shall receive special pay for
each certification obtained only as long as each individual
certification is maintained. Employees may receive up to a total
maximum of 7.5% for Educational Pay and Water Treatment and
Distribution Certification Pay when combined. Employees shall not
receive both Educational Pay and Water Treatment and Distribution
Certification Pay for the same education completed. In such case
that education completed to obtain later Treatment and
Distribution Certifications qualify an employee to receive
Educational Pay, the employee shall receive whichever is highest
between the two special pay amounts.
5. Article 10 shall be amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE 10. MEDICAL INSURANCE
ANCE
10.1 Medical Insurance Benefits
A. The base medical plan shall be defined as the Health Maintenance
Organization HM program available to the City. If availability of
an HMO to the City is discontinued by the :medical plan provider,
the base plan will become the basic PPO plan available to the City
by the existing :medical plan provider.
B. The City will maintain health benefits through CaIPE S for calendar
year 2010.
10.2 Cafeteria Plan
A. Effective January 1, 2009, the City shall contribute an equal amount
towards the cost of medical coverage under the Public Employee's
Medical and Hospital Care Act PEIIHCA for both active
employees and retirees. The City's contribution toward coverage
x under PEMHCA shall be the minimum contribution amount
established by CalPE S on are annual basis. Effective January 1,
2010, the City's contribution under PE IHCA shall be $105.00.
B. Effective January 1, 2009, employees participating in the City's full
flex cafeteria plan shall receive a flak dollar allowance to purchase
group health coverage for :medical, dental and vision under the
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 6
City's Cafeteria Plan. For the period of January 1, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, the flex dollar allowance shall be $550.26 with
respect to an employee enrolled for self alone, $1,008.74 for an
employee enrolled for self and one family member, and $1 t 291.27
for any employee enrolled for self and two or more family members.
bers.
C. For the period of January 1, 2011 through dune 20, 2011, the flex
dollar allowance shall be the amount in effect on December 31,
2010 plus 75% of any increase to the medical premiums for the
base plan and 100% of any increase to the dental and vision
insurance premiums.
D. A portion of the flex dollar allowance ($105.00 for 2010) is identified
as the City's contribution towards PE MCA. This amount will be
adjusted on an annual basis as the PEI IHCA minimum contribution
increases. Remaining flex dollars rust be used by employees to
participate in the City's health plans. Employees who waive
medical coverage under the Cafeteria Plan because he /she
provided the City with written proof that medical insurance
coverage is in force through coverage provided by another source
consistent with any rules or restrictions on the City by the medical
plan provider, can take flex dollars for the amount provided to
employees enrolled for self alone (taxable income), deposit it into
their 457 plan, or use it to purchase voluntary products. No
remaining flex dollars may be redeemed.
6. Article 11 shall be amended to make New Year's Eve a full day paid
holiday rather than a Y day paid holiday.
7. Article 1 shall be amended to eliminate Section 14.5 Furloughs
8. Article 24 shall be amended to replace the language added by the Side
Letter of Agreement effective June 9, 2009 to instead read as follo ors
A layoff of one Public Works Inspector position shall take effect on duly 1,
2009. An additional layoff of one Child Care Coordinator position may
take effect on or after July '1, 2010 if deemed necessary by the City
Council. The parties agree there shall be no additional loss of filled
positions due to layoff represented by SEW Local 620 between the
effective date of this Side Letter of Agreement and June 30, 2011 unless
at any time during that period the City's FY 2009 -10 or Fly 2010 -11
General Fund Ending Fund Balance is projected to be reduced by 30 or
more from the Fly 2008 -09 actual General Fund Ending Fund Balance due
to action by State, County or Federal Government, an economic downturn
in the local economy, the impacts of a catastrophic event or natural
disaster, or any other unforeseen events outside the control of the City; or
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 7
in the event the City's FY 2009-10 or FY 2010-11 General Fund revenues,
excluding transfers, are projected to be reduced ° or more from the
budgeted amounts for that year due to action by State, County or Federal
Government, an economic downturn in the local e the impacts of
a catastrophic event or natural disaster, or any other unforeseen events
outside the control of the City.
If any of these conditions occur, the Union shall be granted an opportunity
to meet and consult with the City to discuss proposed alternatives to
address the budget shortfall. If, in the judgment of the City, It becomes
necessary to make a reduction in force not possible through attrition
between the effective date of this Side Letter of Agreement and ,dune 30,
2011, temporary and permanent part - time employees will be subject to
layoff prior to permanent full - time employees within the same division or
department performing similar duties or tasks.
For Local 620,
Employees International
Arroyo Grande Chapter
Service
Union,
For City of Arroyo Grande
Date
Date
Agenda Item 8.j.
Page 8
R
A. INCORPORATED
MEMORANDUM
is JULY 10, 1911 ,
41
1 F Vt
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERESA I CCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Y: LES EANS, PROJECT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION of ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS TS AI D
APPROVAL OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY NTY of SAN LIT OBISP
DATE: APRIL 27, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council: 1 adopt a Resolution accepting a grant deed
for the public facility property; 2 adopt a Resolution accepting a quitclaim deed for a
portion of Pecan Place; and 3 approve the Conservation Easement Agreement
between the City and the County.
FINANCIAL IMPACT.
There will be some minor maintenance costs associated with the maintenance of the
portion of Pecan Place proposed to be accepted by the City. Additionally, there are
historical drainage deficiencies that ultimately will have to be addressed by the City. An
engineering study will be required for design and cost consideration.
The City will also be required to fund the costs for upkeep and maintenance of the
easement area, including trail maintenance, weed abatement, trimming of vegetation
and removal of trash and debris. These costs are unknown, but could amount to
several thousand dollars each year. The City currently maintains the portion of the
easement area that includes the decomposed granite pathway over the existing sewer
easement.
As discussed at the City Council meeting of February 23, 2010, the estimated total cost
for the pro posed Pol Station project is $6.2 million, which is proposed to be funded
from a bond measure on the June 8, 2010 ballot. Debt service would be paid from a
combination of special property tax assessment and local sales tax funds. Under the
USDA program, the Federal government would be the purchaser of the bonds. By also
refinancing the 2003 Fire Station bonds, the annual tax rate for property owners will not
be increased as a result of the bond measure under the proposal.
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 27, 201
ACCEPTANCE of EASEMEi TS AND oPEI SPACE AGREEMENT
PAG E 2
BACKGROUND:
On June 23, 2009 the City and the County entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding the acquisition of property at the northwest corner of Vilest
Branch Street and rodeo Drive to accommodate a new police station. One of the
provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding is that the County will deed the
property to the City upon final approval by the city of the County's General Plan
Amendment F e- zoning application, The County's General Plan Amendment/ e- zoning
application was approved by the City Council on October 2, 2003.
The Memorandum of Understanding also included a provision that the City would
accept into its road system a portion of Pecan Place o wned by the County, but located
within the City, that serves as access for several residential properties with the City.
The final action by the City to comply with this provision is acceptance of a quitclaim
deed for that portion of Pecan Place.
Finally,, the Memorandum um of Understanding included the establishment of a perpetual
Conservation Easement encumbering approximately 6.58 acres to be dedicated to the
City by the County.
The City approved a conditional use permit for the Police Station Building on February
23, 2010. The detailed building plans will go back to the Council for design review.
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
Three actions are recommended for consideration by the City Council. First, a
resolution is attached to adept a grant deed for the public facility property; secondly, a
resolution is attached . to accept a quitclaim deed for a portion of Pecan Place; and
lastly, a agreement is attached for the approval of the Conservation Easement
Agreement between the City and the County. once the City Council approves these
documents, the San Luis Obispo Board of Supervisor's can take action. The item is
scheduled for the Board of Supervisor's meeting on M ay 25 t 2310,
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Adopt the attached Resolutions accepting the grant deed and quitclaim deed and
approve and accept the Conservation Easement Agreement;
2. Do not adopt the attached Resolutions;
ns;
3. Provide direction to staff
ADVANTAGES:
Approval of the project will fulfill the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
between the City and the County by concluding the property acquisition for the Public
Safety Facility.
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 27, 201
ACCEPTANCE of EASEMENTS ANI OPEN SPACE AG EEMENT
PAGE 3
DISADVANTAGES:
Staff has not identified any disadvantages of approving the Resolutions.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act CE A , the Communit
Development Department completed a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the General Plea Amendment and re- zoning proposal that was adopted
by the Council on October 27, 2010. Additionally, a mitigated negative declaration was
prepared for the Police station building that was adopted by the City Council on
February 23, 2010. A Notice of Exemption for Pecan Place is attached.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda for this meeting was posted at City Hall on Thursday, April 22, 2010 and
the agenda and staff report were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010.
As of the writing of this staff report, no public comment had been received.
Attachments:
1. Conservation Easement Agreement between the City and County
2. Notice of Exemption
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROPERTY
LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED AREA OF THE
CITY OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
(APN 087- 011 -046)
WHEREAS, The City of Arroyo Grande and the County of San Luis Obispo have
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the acquisition of property for
the new Arroyo Grande Public Safety Facility;
WHEREAS, EAS, the Memorandum of Understand includes a provision that the County
will deed the necessary Public Safety Facility land (APN 00 7-011-046) to the City upon
final approval by City of County's General Plan Amend ment re oning application as
described in the Memorandum of Understanding;
WHEREAS,, the County's General Plan Amend r ent re oning application was approved
by the Arroyo Grande City Council on October 2, 2010 which action is final;
WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding the
City has prepared a Grant Deed, and has otherwise satisfied the requirements of the
Memorandum of Understanding; and
NOW, THEREFORE, E, E IT RESOLVED ED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, does hereby accept the attached Grant Deed for the Public Facility property
APB 007-011-046) described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference, and authorizes the Mayor to execute a Certificate of Acceptance.
On motion of Council Member
and by the following roll call Grote, to it:
, seconded by Council Member
AYES:
TOES.
ABSENT.
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this
day of 2010.
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 4
RESOLUTION N.
PAGE
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST.
KELLY WETM RE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY ,J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 5
RECORDING REQUESTED
BY WHEN RECORDED
REUTRI To.
City of Arroyo Grande
Attn: city Clerk
Po Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Exhibit "A",
FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY
GRANT DEED
{NO RECORDING FEE -- EXEMPTS
For valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the County of San Luis
Obispo, a political subdivision of the State of California "County") grants to the City of Arroyo
Grande, a municipal corporation of the State of California "City" the real property in the city of
Arroyo Grande, California A.P.N. 007-011-046), as more particularly described in attached
Exhibit "A ", incorporated into this Grant Deed.
.
Dated as of , 201 .
GRANTOR:
County of San Luis Obispo,
a political subdivision of the State of California
By:
Name.
Its:
State of California
County of
Frank R. Mecham
Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors
On , 2010 before rye, , Notary Public, personally
appeared who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the
same in his /her /their authorized capacities and that his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
{SEAL}
Agenda Item 8.1k.
Page 6
Exhibit "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY F ARROYO GRANDE POLICE STATION
File no: 0232.09010-00 0 April 22, 2919
That portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Neap AG -87 -203 In the City of Arroyo Grande, County
of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the neap filed in Book 44 of Parcel
[Daps at Page 96 in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Luis Obispo County
lying westerly of the westerly right of gray lire of that 64 foot wide road labeled Oak
Country Road on said map and presently know as Rodeo Drive.
Containing 1.47 acres more or less.
The above - described parcel of land is graphically shown on Exhibit "E" attached
hereto and rude a part hereof.
End Description '
T. .
No. 6192
Exp. 3131112
'.
F C
Joseph T. Morris P.L.S. 6192 dated. 4/22/2010
License expires 8181112
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 7
0 14
of�S
5 H
PO �,� � Z M �zo
N Jo
Ncy sr
SCALE
0 50 700 200
7 INCH = 100 FEET
N
P0R�1E� 3.
p �d�IP
EXHIBIT B ,JOB . 232-910-
61 C LARI ON C OU RT P ITT1 1 PAS EL 3 44 /PM D WG : EXHIBIT.
M LUIS OBI PO, C 9UO I CITY O ARROYO GRANDE DRAWN WN BY. M
F � COUNTY NTY F SAN LEAS OBISPO, CA D TE
WALLACE GROUP
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 8
RESOLUTION No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING A QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR THAT PORTION OF PECAN PLACE WITHIN THE
INCORPORATED AREA OF THE CITY OWNED BY THE
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (APN Q77- 192 -018)
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande "City" and the County of San Luis Obispo have
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated ,dune 23, 2009, regarding the
acquisition of property for the new Arroyo Grande Public Safety Facility; and
WHEREAS, EAS, the Memorandum of Understanding includes a provision that the City will
accept that portion of Pecan Place owned by the County, located within the
incorporated area of the City of Arroyo Grande that (APN 077-192-018), which serves
as ingress and egress to several residential properties in the City; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding the
County has prepared a Quitclaim Deed, and has otherwise satisfied the requirements of
the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the procedures to be followed and
notification of the residents of property served by Pecan Place;
NOW, THEREFORE, E, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 806 of the California Streets and
Highways Code, does hereby accept the attached Quitclaim Deed described in Exhibit
"A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, for that portion of Pecan
Place within the incorporated area of Arroyo Grand that is currently owned by the
County (APN 0- 192 -918), accepts that portion of Pecan Place into the City
maintained road system, and authorizes the mayor to execute a Certificate of
Acceptance.
On motion of Council Member
and by the following roll call Grote, to wit:
, seconded by Council Member
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this
day of 2010.
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMO E, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADMITS, CITY IIAIEF
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 10
Ex hibit "'
R ECORDING REQUESTED
BY AND WHEN
RECORDED DED ETU N To.
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
County of San Luis Obispo
1055 Monterey Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93
FOR RECORDER'S EI 'S USE ONL
QUITCLAIM DEED
COUNTY BUSINESS--FREE. THIS DOCUMENT PRESENTED FOR RECORDIN
DIN
PURSUANT To GOVT. CODE SECTION 27883,
FOR A V ALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
COUNTY OF SAN LIT O ISPO, a political subdivision of the State of
California, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim to CITY of ARROY
GRANDE, a municipal corporation of the State of California, any and all
interest it has in reel property located in the incorporated area City of Arroyo
Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, Assessor Parcel No.
077-192-018, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this day of April, 2010.
COUNTY of SAN LUIS o ISPO: ATTEST:
Chairperson of the hoard of Sup ervisors Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
� p
APPROVED ED As To FORM AND LEGAL
Approved by the Board of Supervisors this EFFECT:
WARREN EN I . JENSEN
day of , 201 0.
County counsel
Assistant County Counsel
Date:
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 11
On , before me, Deputy County
Clerk-Recorder, county of San Luis Obispo, State of California, personally appeared
,. who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that ire /she executed the sane in his /her authorized capacity, and that by his/her
signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon of which the person acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under Penalty of Perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
JULIE L. RO E WALD, county Clerk-
Recor and Esc- officio Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors
Deputy County Clerk-Recorder
(SEAL)
Page 2
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 12
Exhibit "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PECAN PLACE, CITY F ARROYO Y GRANDE
APN: 077-192-018
File no: 0232.09010 - (0060) April 22, 2010
The easterly 20 feet of the southerly 247.8 feet of Lot 15 Block 2 of the wrap of the Fair
Oaks Tract in the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California
according to the wrap filed in Book 3 of Maps at Page 82 in the Office of the County
Recorder of said San Luis Obispo County and described in the Deed with Document
Number 36919 recorded July 28, 1 977 in Book 1 998, Page 814 of Official Records, ords, in
the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
End Description r N N D
T.
N. 6192
Exp. W31112
Joseph T. Morris P.L.S. 8192 dated: 41221201
License expires 3131112
Agenda Item 8.1k.
Page 13
ATTACHMENT 1
RECORDING REQUESTED
BY AND WHEN RECORDED
RETURN TO:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisor
County of San Luis Obispo
1055 Monterey Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY
COUNTY 8 USI NE -- FREE. TH15 DOW ME T PRESE I TED FOR R ECO RD I NG PU RSUA T TO G O T. CODE
SECTION 27383.
CONSERVATION ATIOI EASEMENT AGREEMENT
T
This Conservation Easement Agreement ( "Agreement"), is made and entered
Into this day of , 2010 by and between the County of San Luis
Obispo, a political subdivision of the state of California, hereinafter celled "County 11 , and
the CITY F ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation of the state of California,
hereinafter called "City ".
IT lESSETH
WHEREAS, EAS, County and City have entered Into a Memorandum of Understanding
regarding acquisition of certain real property for the new City of Arroyo Grande Public
Safety Facility that Included County's agreement to establish and dedicate to City a
perpetual conservation easement of approximately 6.58 acres over a portion of the real
property owned by the County and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached
hereto (the "subject Property").
WHEREAS, the conservation easement is located on the subject Property and
between Vilest Branch street, Rodeo Drive and Mercedes Lane (portions of APN's 007-
011-040 and 007-111-046), as more particularly described in Exhibit E attached hereto
( "Conservation Easement ",
WHEREAS, the Conservation Easement has certain natural resources and
natural scenic beauty including an unnamed creek, detention basin, trail and wildlife
habitat area: and
WHEREAS, both County and City desire to preserve and conserve for the public
benefit the natural resources and scenic beauty of the Conservation Easement; and
WHEREAS, the County has offered to dedicate this conservation easement to
preserve the site's natural resources and scenic beauty by restricting County's and
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 14
City's use of and activities on that portion of the Subject Property containing the
Conservation Easement through the imposition of a perpetual conservation easement
with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW THEREFORE, E, in consideration of the above recitals, and in further
consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and the conditions herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as f ollows:
County hereby grants to City, a conservation easement (the "conservation
Easement" ) over that portion of the subject Property as shorn on Exhibit A
and as further described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein
(the "Easement Area"). The Conservation Easement granted herein conveys
to City an estate and interest in the Easement Area. The purpose of the
Conservation Easement is to preserve,, protect and sustain the natural
resources and scenic beauty, and to otherwise restrict the Easement Area as
hereinafter set forth.
2. The restrictions hereby imposed upon the use of the Easement Area by
County and city and the acts which County and City shall refrain from doing
upon the Easement Area are, and shall be, as follows:
a. No residential dwellings may be constructed or placed in the Easement
Area.
b. No commercial signs, billboards, or similar structures or devices or
advertising of any kind or nature may be located on or in the Easement
Area.
c. No extraction of surface or subsurface natural resources may be allowed
in the Easement Area,
d. No filling, dumping, excavating, draining, dredging, raining, removing,
exploring for or extracting minerals, loam, gravel, soil, rock, sand or other
Material on or below the surface of the Easement Area, or granting or
authorizing surface entry for any of these purposes.
e. No altering the surface or general topographer of the Easement Area,
including building roads, paging or otherwise covering the Easement Area
with concrete, asphalt, or any other impervious material.
f. No removing, destroying,, or cutting trees, shrubs or other vegetation,
except as required for: i fire protection, fire breaks and removal of fire
hazardous material; (ii) maintenance of existing foot trails or roads; (iii)
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 15
prevention or treatment of disease and similar protective measures; or iv
utility line clearance.
g. No use of motorized vehicles, including off -road vehicles, e as
needed for maintenance or construction within the Easement Area as
allowed in this Agreement,
h. No planting, introduction or dispersal of non - native or exotic plant or
animal species.
i. No permitting a general right of access to the Easement Area except the
right of the public to access the existing trail located within the Easement
Area and along its vest border.
�. alone of the restrictions stated in Paragraph
activities necessary for the installation ai
drainage improvements or utilities on, and
provided that said installation shall be appr
impacts to the Easement Area, such
unreasonably withheld.
2 shall be interpreted to prohibit
id subsequent maintenance of
r, or above the Easement Area,
ved by the city with respect to
approval which shall not be
4 . The Easement Area may not be subdivided for the purpose of development.
b. The grant of easement contained in this Agreement shall be effective when it
has been accepted by the City council for the City and by resolution of the
County Board of supervisors, and it shall remain in effect in perpetuity unless
abandoned or otherwise terminated by the County and the City or Its
successors or assigns.
6 . The City shall be solely responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of the
Easement Area,, including but not limited to geed abatement, trimming of all
vegetation, removal of trash and debris, all trail maintenance and monitoring
of illegal trespass activities.
7 . The terms and conditions contained herein shall be binding on the city and
County, and their heirs, successors and assigns.
8 . city shall be responsible for any special assessments assessed to the
Subject Property as a result of this Agreement.
g. other than as specified herein, this Agreement is not intended to impose any
legal or other responsibility on the City, or in any way affect any e
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 16
obligation of the County as owner of the Subject Property, including the
Easement Area.
10. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall limit or affect any easements that
are of record and that have been heretofore granted by County on, over,
under, or across the Su bject Property or any portion thereof.
11. Any time the Subject Property, or any portion thereof, including the Easement
Area, or any interest in either of them, is transferred by the County to any
third party, the County shall notify the City in writing at feast 30 days prior to
such transfer, and the document of conveyance shall expressly incorporate
by reference this Agreement. Any document conveying a lease of the Subject
Property or of the Easement Area shall expressly incorporate by reference
this Agreement. Failure of the County to do so shall not impair the validity of
this Agreement or limit its enforceability in any way.
12. This Agreement may be amended only with the written consent of the County
and City. Any such amendment shall be consistent with the purposes of this
Ag reement.
13. This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of California, resolving
any ambiguities and questions of the validity of specific provisions so as to
give ma imum effect to its conservation purposes. References to authorities
in this Agreement shall be to the statute, rule, regulation, ordinance or other
legal provision that is in effect at the time this Agreement becomes effective.
14. No provision of this Agreement shall constitute governmental approval of any
improvements, construction or other activities which may be permitted under
this Agreement. The Easement created by this Agreement pursuant to Civil
Code Section 815.1 shall run with the land in perpetuity. Every provision of
this Agreement that applies to the County or City shall also apply to their
respective agents, heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and all other
successors as their interests may appear. No merger of titre, estate or
interest shall be deemed effected by any previous, contemporaneous, or
subsequent deed, grant, or assignment of an interest or estate in the Subject
Property or any portion thereof, to City, or its successors or assigns, it being
the express intent of the parties that this Easement not be extinguished by, or
merged into, or any other interest or estate in the Subject Property now or
hereafter held by City or its successors or assigns.
15. cit shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County,, its officers and
employees from any and all claims and demands, costs, expenses,
D
udgments, attorney fees or liabilities that may be asserted by any person or
entity that arise out of or in connection with the ants or omissions relating to
the performance of any obligation or duty required of the City under this
Agreement. The obligation to indemnify shall extend to all such claims and
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 17
losses, every when such claims or losses arise from the comparative
negligence of the County, its officers and employees. However, this
indemnity will net extend to any claims or losses arising out of the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the County, its officers and employees.
16. Any notices to County and City required by this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be personally delivered or sent by first class mail, to the following
addresses, unless a party has been notified by the other of a change of
address:
To County:
County General services Agency
Attn: Real pro perty Manager
1 087 Santa Rosa St.
San Luis Obispo, CA 98408
To City:
City Manager
City of Arroyo Grande
214 East Branch h street
Arrow Grande, CA 98420
17. If any tern, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
remainder of the agreement shell remain in full force and effect and shall in
no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated.
18. City and County intend and consent to the recordation of this Agreement in
the office of the County Recorder order of the County of San Luis Obispo,, and such
recordation shall serve as constructive notice of the obligations contained
herein to be performed by the parties.
19. As attested by the signature of its Mayor affixed hereto, in exchange for
consideration, the City hereby accepts without reservation the rights and
responsibilities conveyed by this Agreement.
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /NOTHING FURTHER BEYOND PHIS POINT EXCEPT SIGNATURES / / / / / / / / ///
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 18
IN ITI SS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this document on the
der and year first written above.
COUNTY of SAN LUIS OBISPO:
B:
Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors
Approved by the Board of Supervi this
day of _ , 2010.
ATTEST.
CITY of ARROYO GRANDE:
By .
Tony Ferrara, Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore.. City Clerk
APPROVED AS To FORM:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS To FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
WARREN R. EN
County Counsel
Timothy J. CarmeI City Attorney
Date:
By:
Assistant County Counsel
APPROVED E AS TO CONTENT:
T:
Date:
Steven Adams, City Manager
Date:
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 19
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO)
On , before me, I Deputy County Clerk-
Recorder,, County of San Luis Obispo, Mate of California, personally appeared
,, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who a name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her
authorized capacity, and that by his /hey signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon of
which the person acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under Penalty of Perjury under the Taws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNIESS my hand and official seal.
JULIE L. RODEWALD, County Clerk-
Recorder and Esc- Officio Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors
LM
Deputy County Clerk - Recorder
(SEAL)
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 20
ULJ EXHIBIT
' RD'
Lore c
141 I MB /73
t tc=
SCALE : 1 "_ 1 50'
PARCEL 3
M1 6
co
.
Is
E XHIBIT A
PORTION PARCEL 2,44/PM/9
PORTION LOT C, 14/MB 7
L2 4 3 TP B 1T f F ARROYO GRA 1DE
P ' COUNTY OF : Al LUIS OB ISP O , CA
JOB A
812 CLARION COURT s
SAN LUIS OBtSPO, A834Q1 � ►
T 905 544 -4011
F W5 W -4294
WALLACE GROUP www.wallacagmup.us 07
ARc FI W
X
v
U
Q Q
vs,
cj
1
I o A
�te ooe ooe
loo�
ol
'
�.�
. >
PARCEL 2
M6
LEGEND
■ -FD 6"X6" CONCRETE WITH BRASS
PITH CHC MONUMENT PER R 1 & R
0 —FD 5 " REAR RCE 31581 PER R 7
—FD "X " CONCRETE WITH BRASS
PITH CHC MONUMENT PER R
P C —POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
TP B —TRUE POINT O BEGINNIN
R I —! PM
2 — 1P I
DING: EX HIBIT A
DRAWN BY .' MAC
DATE:1911
SCALE l '
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 21
Exhibit ""
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
File no: 0232.09010 -00 (0060) April 20, 2010
Portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map AG-87-203 in the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San
Luis Obispo, State of California according to the reap filed in Book 44 of Parcel Maps at
Page 96 in the office of the County Recorder of said San Luis Obispo County, and a portion
of Lot C of Tract No. 1390 in the City of Arroyo G rande, County of Sari Luis Obispo, State of
California according to the reap filed in Beek 14 of Maps at Page 73 in the office of the
County Recorder of said San Luis Obispo County, said portions more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at a found 6 inch by 6 inch concrete CHC monument marking an angle point in
the southerly boundary line of said Parcel Map also being on the northerly right of way line of
J.S. Highway 101 at the westerly terminus of course labeled N. 69 °56'40" W. 293.23' as
shown on said Parcel Map and bearing south 66 °59'18" east 708.48 feet L1 , N. 66 °59'20"
W record per 44/PM/96), from a found 6 inch by 6 inch concrete CHC monument marking an
angle point in the said southerly line as shown on the map filed in Book 21 of Parcel Maps at
Page 20 in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Luis Obispo County;
Thence leaving said southerly line north 8 °23'10" east 122.42 feet L2, to a point on the
northerly right of way line of West Brand Street at the westerly terminus of course labeled
N. 76 W. 483.71' as shown on first said Parcel Map and being marked by a 8 inch
rebar and cap RCE 31681;
Thence along said right of way line south 6 0 32'16" east 79.41 feet L3, to the corner
common to said Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map, and being marked by a 8/8 inch
rebar and cap RCE 31 581 and the True Point of Beginning;
Thence leaving said right of way line and along the common line of said Parcels 2 and 3
north 12 0 64'24' } east 108.45 feet L4;
Thence continuing along said common line north 16 0 69'19" west 148.28 feet (L5),
Thence continuing along said common line north 23 °43'01 east 179.38 feet (1-6);
Thence continuing along said common line north 10 °47'46" east 230.99 feet L;
Thence continuing along said common line north 14 °33'51" east 238.98 feet (L8), to the
corner common to said Parcels 2 and 3 and also being on the southerly line of said Lot ;
Thence north °53'43" east 261.00 feet 0, to a point in the southerly right of way line of
that 52 foot wide street shown as oak Country Drive on the map of said Tract No. 1390 and
presently know as Rodeo Drive, said point being the beginning of ,a non - tangent curve
concave to the north having a radius of 726.00 feet and to which beginning a _radial line
bears south 2 °27'16" east;
Thence northeasterly along said right of gray line 233.86 feet through a central angle of
13 °26'24" 1 ;
M
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 22
Thence leaving said right of way line south 14 °51'31" east 87.90 feet L1 ;
Thence south 1' west 1 32.95 feet L11
Thence south 53 °23'27" east 51.28 feet L 12 )
Thence north 48 east 243.44 feet L13;
Thence north 4 *27'48'! east 58.09 feet L14, to a point in the southwesterly right of way line
of that 82 foot wide street shown as Oak Fridge Drive on said reap and presently know as
Mercedes Lane, said point being the beginning of a non- tangent curve concave to the
southwest having a radius of 274.00 feet and to which beginning a radial lime beam north
64' east;
Thence southeasterly along said right of way line 51.09 feet through a central angle of
1 g °41'02" (C2), to the most northerly corner of the "X Drainage Easement as shown on said
map;
Thence along the northwesterly line of said of said "A' Drainage Easement south 40 ' 0 38 , 45 99
west 89.28 feet (L1 5 ;
Thence continuing along said northwesterly line and the northwesterly line of the Tree
Preservation & "B Drainage Easement as shown on said map south 59°05'18" west 173.55
feet (L1 6 ;
Thence continuing along said northwesterly line of the Tree Preservation & "B" Drainage
Easement south 51' west 203.61 feet (L17), to the most westerly corner of said
easement, also being a point in the northerly line of said Parcel 2;
Thence leaving said northerly line south 14 *38'51" west 239.06 feet L18 ;
Thence south 10 °47'45" west 230.99 feet L 19);
Thence south 23 °43'01 " west 179.38 feet (L20);
Thence south 16' east 1 43.23 feet (L21);
Thence south 12 °54'24" west. 64.57 feet (L22), to a point in the said northerly right of way
line of Vilest Branch Street;
Thence along said northerly right of way line north 7 °32'16" west 211.85 feet L23, to the
True Point of Beginning.
Containing 8.53 acres more or less.
The above- described parcel of land is graphically shown on Exhibit "A" and Tabulated on
Exhibit B continued attached hereto and made a part hereof.
End Description
Joseph T. Morris P.L.S. 6192 dated: 4119/2010
vAND 80.
,
. 6192
x. 3131112
B-2
F c A0 .
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 23
TAB ULATION
LINE TABU
LINE #
LENGTH
DIRECTION
L l
703.43'
865° 59' 93 "E
L2
122.42'
N73 ° 23 10"
L3
79.41"
576 32' 16 '*
L4
103.45'
N 12" 54'24 "
L_5
143.23'
N 16 ° 5 ' 1 "
L6
179.38"
N23 ° 43'0 ?'"E
L7
236.99'
N10° 47'46"
L8
233.93'
N14 33' 5 9 "E
L9
261.00'
N5° 53 '43"E
L0
37.90'
S14 ° "E
L 9 1
132.95'
S 1 G 36'38 "11
L 12
51.
S53 23 2 7" E
L 13
243. 44'
N48 4
L 14
56.09'
N64 ° 27' 46 "
L 95
69.26'
540 ' "II
L 16
173.65'
S59 05'
L 9 7
203.61
S 5 1'* 14' 33"
L 18
239.06'
5 94 ° 33'5 1 "
L 19
230.99'
B 10 4 7' 46" W
L20
79.36+
S23 43' 9 '*
L21
943.23"
596 59' 19 "E
L22
64
S 12 0 54'24"W
L23
219.35'
N 76 0 32' 16 '# W
CURVE TABLE
CURIE #
LENGTH
RADIUS I
DELTA
l
233.
726.00
? 3 °L 6'24 "
2
51. 09'
274.
10 °41'02"
EX T. JOB #. 232-910-060
612 CLAR COURT PORTION PARCEL 9 4 4/PM/96 D WG: EXHIBIT B
�
SAN LUIS OBI PO, CA 9 401 PORTION LOT S, 141M B/73 D RAWN BY: MM
T 805 544 -4011 CITY R GRANDE DA TE .- 4119120 10
F 805 544-4294
.11«,. S LU BP, B -3
WALLACE GROUP
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 24
ATTACH
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: Office of Planning and Research From:
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 9581
OR
County Clerk of the Board of Supervisor
County of San Luis Obispo
1144 Monterey Street, Suite C
Sari Luis Obispo, CA 93408
[:] MINISTERIAL (Section 15208)
F EMERGENCY (Section 15269)
C of Arroyo Grande
P. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION PER CEQA GUIDELINES - Section 15301 of the
CE QA Guidelines determine � that the operation of existing facilities are exernpt
from CE GA review.
SIG NATURE:
DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING:
TITLE: doMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTO
DATE: 1.4-N � I _
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 25
Tl
to advise that the City of Arroyo Grande City Council approved the above-
described project and made the following determinations:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.k.
Page 26
Pk
INCOAP AATED
,. UL V 10, 1911
MEMORANDUM
ANDU
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGE
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION F REVISED ISED PURCHASE AND SALE AND
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ITT COMMERCIAL FOR
ACQUISITION F PROPERTY TY AT 300 EAST BRANCH STREET AND
SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PROPERTY TY AT 200 AND 208
EAST BLANCH STREET AND THE ADJACENT PARKING AREA
DATE: APRIL 2. 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council approve the revised Purchase and Sale and
Improvement Agreement with I KT Commercial.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The net total cost to acquire the 300 East Branch Street building is $1 ,'146,000 under
the terms o f the Agreement. This is proposed to be funded from a $1.2 million loan
through a USDA Community Facilities low- interest financing program. To make the
improvements necessary to the 300 East Branch Street building, the total cost
estimate is approximately $250,000 to $350,000.
At the February 23, 2010 meeting, the City Council approved a Purchase and Sale
and Improvement ent Agreement with I KT Commercial for acquisition of property at 300
East Branch Street and sale and development of City property at 200 and 20 East
Branch Street and the adjacent parking lot. Conditions were identified that involved
resolving the following three issues:
0 Feasibility of relocating pll City Full complex staff into the former Farm Credit
building;
0 Whether to lease sell o utilize the existing City Fall building for operations; and
0 Funding source for the cost of property acquisition and improvements.
Staff was directed to work with a subgroup of the City Council, composed of Mayor
Pro Term Guthrie and Council Member Arnold, to develop recommendations.
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF REVISED PURCHASE AND SALE AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH NKT COMMERCIAL FAR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT
300 EAST BRANCH STREET AND SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY
PROPERTY AT 200 AND 208 EAST BRANCH STREET AND THE ADJACENT
PARKING AREA
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
Recommendations mr endations were presented and approved at a Special City Council Meeting
on March h 29, 2010.
The following decisions were agreed upon:
0 All City Hall complex staff will be relocated to the former Farm Credit building;
The City will solicit proposals to lease the existing City Hall building; and
The property acquisition and debt service will be funded through a combination
of local sales tax, water and sewer funds as originally proposed.
Additionally, NKT offered the following new provision:
NKT agrees to repurchase the 30 East Branch Street property from the City for
2.'1 million at any time between 2 and 6 years, if requested by the City.
ANALYSIS SIS of ISSUES:
It is necessary for the City Council to approve revisions to the agreement in order to
implement the terms approved at the March 29, 2010 meeting requiring NKT
Commercial to purchase the ,property from the City in the future if requested. The
proposed language is as follows:
If, at anytime between two 2 years and sic years after the Effective Date of
this Agreement, City, in its sole discretion, determines that continued ownership
of Parcel 2 is no longer in the City's best interests, ITT shall repurchase Parcel
2 for TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS $2,100,000.60,
the "Repurchase Price" payable within one hundred and eighty days (1180 days)
of NKT's receipt of City's written notification electing to invoke this provision.
City agrees not to remove any tenant improvements that have become fixtures
prior to conveying building to NIT if repurchased by NIT hereunder. In order to
assure NKTrs repurchase of Parcel 2, NIT shall, no later than two 2 years
from the Effective Date, execute a $600,000 Trust Deed in favor of the City and
secured as a fiat priority lien against a panel of real property owned by ITT
with value and equity equal to $600,000-00 or greater
Non - substantive modifications were also made to address cleanup language.
Remaining blanks were filled in, required milestone dates were extended due to the
time delays in approving the project, and definition clarifications were added. Terms
of the lease with the City were modified to extend the period of rent at no cost to the
City through September 30, 2010. This represents an additional three months of rent
at no cost to the City beyond what was previously negotiated. Provisions were
modified to eliminate any liability requiring the City to address existing legal
deficiencies of the buildings at 200 and 208 East Branch Street. Lastly, since escrow
will not close until building permits are issued and fees are paid, the changes enable
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION ATI F REVISED PURCHASE AND SALE AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH NAT COMMERCIAL FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT
300 EAST BRANCH STREET AND SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY
PROPERTY TY AT 200 AND 208 EAST BRANCH STREET AND THE ADJACENT
T
PARKING AREA
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 3
NKT Commercial t add fees to the purchase prices, which would have no impact on
the City.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for consideration:
0 Approve the revisions to the Agreement;
0 Request NKT Commercial to consider alternate terms;
0 Do not approve the revisions, which would leave out the requirement of NKT
D mmer ial to repurchase the property; or
• Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The offer of NKT Commercial t repurchase the 300 East Branch Street property will
better ensure the City will not be negatively affected if it is determined at some time in
the future that the building does not meet the City's needs in a cost effective 'manner.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act CEA, the CEA Guidelines and the City o Arroyo Grande Mules and
Procedures for Implementation of CE A. An initial study was prepared and based on
this analysis and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and noticed for
public review o October 6, 2009. The City Council adopted the Litigated Negative
Declaration at the February 23, 2 010 Meeting.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was pasted in front of City Hail on Thursday, April 22, 2010 and on the
City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No comments were received.
Attachments:
1. Revised Purchase and Sale and Improvement Agreement with NKT
Commercial
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 3
le
ATTACHMENT T I
PURGE AND SALE AND IMPROVEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AND IMPROVEMENT
("Agreement") is entered into as of (the "Effective Date" ) between
The City of Arroyo Grande, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the state of
California (the "City) and NKT Commercial, LLC, a California limited liability company
("NKT"). The City and NIT are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties ".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, The City is the owner of that certain real property located in Arroyo Grande,
California PIT: 007- 492 -004);
WHEREAS, NKT is the owner of that certain real property located in Arroyo Grande California
(APN: 007 - 493 -019) more particularly described in Exhibit B attached to and incorporated into
this Agreement (collectively, `Parcel 2" ) (Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "Property ");
WHEREAS, NIT desires to purchase a portion of APN 007- 492 -004 more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated into this Agreement (collectively, "Parcel
I") from City and City desires to sell Parcel l to NKT subject to the purchase and sale and
development terms and conditions contained herein;
WHEREAS, the City desires to Purchase Parcel 2 from NIT and NKT desires to sell Parcel 2
subject to the purchase and sale terms and conditions contained herein;
NOW, , T REFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the Parties and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto
agree as follows:
SECTION 1.
Purchase and Safe.
Subject to the terms and conditions in this Agreement, The City agrees to sell and NIT agrees
to purchase Parcel 1; and NKT agrees to sell and the City agrees to purchase Parcel 2.
SECTION 2.
Purchase Price.
Except as otherwise provided in Section 2c below, the purchase price to be paid by the City to
NIT for Parcel 2 shall be TWO MILLION TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,020,000.00) (the
"Parcel 2 Purchase Price" and the purchase price to be paid by NKT to the City for Parcel I shall be
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 4
EIGHT" HUNDRED FORTY NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($849.,000.00) (the "Parcel 1 Purchase
Price ").
a) Parcel 1:
i Within five ) days following the execution of this Agreement by all parties, NIT
shall deposit with First American Title Company "Escrow Holder" the sung of
$1,000.00 ("Deposit"); and
(ii) On or before the Close of Escrow, ITT shall deposit the balance of the Parcel 1
Purchase Price with Escrow Holder.
(b) Parcel 2:
(i) within five ) days following the execution of this Agreement by all parties, the City
shall deposit with First American Title Company ("Escrow Holder ") the sum of
$1,000.00 "Deposit "); and
( ii) O or before the Close of Escrow, the City shall deposit the balance of the Parcel 2
Purchase Price of with Escrow Holder.
(iii) If, at anytime between two 2 years and six years after the Effective Date of this
Agreement, City, in its sole discretion, determines that continued ownership of Parcel
is no longer in the City's best interests, NIT shall repurchase Parcel 2 for TWO
MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,100,000.00,,, the
"Repurchase Price ") payable within one hundred and eighty days (180 days) of
NI T's receipt of City's written notification electing to invoke this provision. City
agrees not to remove any tenant improvements that have become fixtures prior to
conveying building to NKT if repurchased by NKT hereunder. In order to assure
NKT's repurchase of Parcel 2, ITT shall, no later than two 2 years from the
Effective Date, execute a $608,000 Trust Deed in favor of the City and secured as a
first priority lien against a parcelof real property owned by NIT with value and
equity equal to $600,000.00 or greater
e) If the City requires the final design of the Improvements as defined in Section 11 below) to
maintain all or a substantial portion of the front fa ade of the existing structure at 200 East Branch Street,
given increased construction costs, the loss of developable space and corresponding estimated loss i
future revenue directly attributable to the retention of a portion of or all of said front facade, the Parcel 1
Purchase Price shall be decreased by an amount not less than SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR
HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT DOLLARS ($77,498.00) nor more than EIGHTY TWO THOUSAND
EIGHT HUNDRED AND ONE DOLLARS ($82,801.00), with the exact amount to be determined by the
Parties.
d) As further consideration under this Agreement, City shall modify and restrict Short Street
between East Branch Street and Mohan Alley (hereinafter "Short Property" ) to provide for one -way
ingress only. City shall, in City's discretion, prior to the Closing, provide NIT with either 1) the right to
purchase an exclusive easement for outdoor restaurant seating use in a portion of the Short Property with
a term of sixty gears for a purchase price of TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($22,400.00); or, 2 the right to purchase a fee simple interest in a portion of the Short
Property for a purchase price of TENT- EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS ($28,000.00). Upon
selection, the corresponding purchase price shall be added to the Parcel 1 Purchase Price and be deposited
by NKT in the Escrow described in Section 4 below, and distributed in accordance therewith. Any
N
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 5
exclusive easement or fee simple interest shall grant to NIT the right to utilize approximately five
hundred (500) square feet of the Short Property for outside restaurant seating.
STILT
Conditions Precedent.
( a) Conditions Precedent to Closing. Each Party's obligation to purchase the Property from the other
Party is subject to the following conditions precedent "Conditions Precedent ":
(i Title Pli Title to the Property shall be conveyed by a good and sufficient Grant
Deed subject to no exceptions other than 1 the lien of local real property taxes and
assessments not yet due or payable, and all exceptions to title set forth in a
preliminary report (the "Preliminary Report"), issued by the Fiat American Title
Company (the "Title Company"), hereinafter, 1 and _shall be collectively
referred to s the 'Conditions of Title ". Title Company shall provide the Parties with
the Preliminary Report within three days of the Effective Date. If either buyer
Party objects to any exceptions to title stated in the Preliminary Deport by written
notice specifically listing the exception(s) (the "Objection Notice" ) , and delivered to
the other s Party within fifteen 1 days after receipt of the Preliminary Report
the seller Party shall use reasonable efforts to clear title to the property of such
exceptions. If the exceptions objected to cannot be removed and/or otherwise
eliminated as title exceptions within ten 1 days after the seller Party' receipt of the
Objection Notice, this Agreement shall be terminated and any money deposited by any
party hereunder shall be returned. Delivery of title in accordance with the foregoing
shall he evidenced by the issuance by the Title Company, of its standard ALTA
owner's policy of title insurance, together with such endorsements reasonably
required, in the amount of the Purchase Price, shoving title to the Real Property
vested in the buyer party and subject only to the Conditions of Title. Either Party may
instead obtain an Extended ALTA Owners title insurance policy, however such
Party shall be solely responsible for the difference in cost between the extended
coverage policy and the standard ALTA owner's policy provided for hereunder; and,
ii Obligations The performance by each Party of every covenant, condition,
agreement, and promise to be p by that Party pursuant to this Agreement
and the related documents executed or to be executed by the Parties.
(iii) Representations. That all representations and warranties in this Agreement and the
related documents executed or to he executed are truthful and accurate.
(iv) Parcel l Division: Prior to the conveyance of Parcel l to ITT, the City shall legally
divide the sane so that there are two legal and marketable parcels, consisting of. 1
a parcel of land improved solely by the existing Public Works building and related
improvements, said lot being configured in a fashion acceptable to ITT, such
acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld; and, a parcel o f land improved by
the existing Building Department building, parting lot and related improvements
said lot also be configured in a fashion acceptable to NKT, such acceptance not to
be unreasonably withheld, and further being first approved by the City, and all other
necessary governmental agencies having ,jurisdiction over the sane, for use and
development as contemplated herein and as further described in Section 11 below.
3
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 6
City shall take all necessary steps, as determined by City, to ensure the lot line of
said Building Department building parcel abuts the additional approximately 500
square foot area more particularly described in Section 2d above.
( v) Entitlement Process: NKT shall provide full architectural, site, floor, and
landscaping plans for the improvement of Parcel I by _June 1. 01 . Once a
Conditional Use Permit "CUP" is issued and obtained by City, ITT shall submit
comprehensive plans and specifications for the Improvements to the City within two
2 months. ITT shall pay to the City EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($$0,000.00) in parking in -lieu fees with respect to the division and development of
Parcel 1 as herein contemplated. NKT skull be responsible for all building and
development fees in the normal course of business. However all such building and
development fees, exclusive of parking in -lieu, school district, and South County
Sanitary District fees, shall not exceed an aggregate total of ONE flUNDRED AND
SIXTY-EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS 168,000). Payment of said fees shall be
made prior to issuance of building permits. City shall issue approval of building
permits prior to closing. At NKT's option, the above fees may be added to the
Parcel I Purchase Price and paid as a part thereof upon close of escrow.
vi Lease o Parcel 2: Under that certain lease executed March 1 , 2003, (the "Parcel 2
Lease" ) NIT leased Parcel 2 to City. The terms of said lease are hereby modified
to eliminate the rent due NIT thereunder between lurch 1, 2010 and September
, 2 010.. Except as herein modified, and until the close of escrow, or the expiration
of the term of such lease, the Parcel Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
b Failure of Conditions Precedent. If any of the Conditions Precedent have not been fulfillcd within
the applicable time periods the Party for whom said condition protects or provides a benefit nay:
i Waive and Close. Waive the condition or disapproval and transfer the Property and
close Escrow in accordance with this Agreement, without adjustment or abatement of
the Purchase Price; or
ii Cure and Close: Cure the failure of condition or representation and reduce the
Purchase Price by an amount equal to the cost of cure; or
(iii) Terminate. Terminate this Agreement by written notice to Escrow Agent.
SECTION
Escrow & Closing.
4
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 7
Escrow: An escrow ("Escrow"') for each transaction contemplated herein, (the sale of
Parcel 1 and the sale of parcel 2 are separate and distinct transactions for purposes of this section), shall
be opened with First American Title Company ("Escrow Agent" within five days from the Effective
Date o f this Agreement. The Parties shall deliver signed instructions to escrow within ten 1 days of the
Effective Date of this Agreement. Except for a final determination regarding what amount of funds will
ultimately be transferred between the Parties upon Closing, the instructions shall not modify or amend
this Agreement; provided, however, that the Parties shall execute any additional instructions requested by
Escrow in a manner consistent with the Agreement. All amounts deposited with the Title Company are to
be held in Escrow in an interest- hearing account with interest credited to the depositing Party. [finless the
Parties otherwise mutually agree in writing to an extension, the Escrow shall close and the Property shall
be transferred, and the Purchase Price paid within thirty days of the date that all conditions
precedent are fully satisfied o otherwise waived "Closing ".
(b 1031 Exchange NIT shall have the right to structure either and/or both transfers
contemplated under this agreement as part of a forward o r reverse exchange (including, if necessary, the
use of an intermediary) with the result that such transfers or exchange shall conform to the requirements
of Section 1031 of the Internal revenue Cod of 1386, a s amended (the " 11RC ". City hereby agrees to
reasonably cooperate with the NIT to complete such exchange(s) as requested (including the assignment
of this Agreement to a Qualified Intermediary as that term is defined in the IC, provided that: a any
additional costs incurred by City solely as a result of structuring the transaction as an exchange shall be
borne by the NI T; b such exchange shall not result in any substantial delay in closing the transaction;
and c City shall be required to take title to any property other than the Parcel 2. This Agreement is not
subject to r conditioned upon either party's ability to consummate an exchange. The responsibility of
City for reviewing exchange documents proposed by the NIT shall be limited to determining whether the
terns and conditions of such exchange documents are such that they are in compliance with the foregoing
provisions. NIT shall be responsible for baking all determinations as to the legal sufficiency or other
consideration, including but not limited to tax considerations, relating to such exchange documents. In
cooperating in any exchange transaction arranged b y NKT, City shall not in any event be responsible for,
or in any way warrant, the tax consequences of the exchange transaction.
SECTION
Closing Deposits.
a Before the Closing, the Parties shall deposit with Escrow Agent the following documents and funds:
( i) Nonforign Affidavit. The original Nonforeign Affidavits;
( ii) Escrow Instructions. The Escrow Instructions for each escrow required hereunder;
(iii) Additional Documents. Any other documents or funds required to close Escrow in
accordance with this Agreement.
(iv) The balance of the Purchase Price due and owing.
S
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 8
S 6.
Closing Costs.
Each Party shall pay an equal % share of the Escrow Closing costs. Each Party shall
otherwise be liable for complying with their respective obligations hereunder.
SECTION
Pro - rations.
Liability for real property taxes, assessments, insurance premiums shall be prorated between the
parties as of the date of the Closing of each Escrow.
SECTION
Warranties.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, for purposes of this Section 8,
"Property" shall be utilized to refer to Parcel 1 when applying this Section to the City and Parcel 2 when
applying this Section to 1KT. The Parties warrant and represent that, to the best of their knowledge
without legal inquiry, as of the Effective Date of this Agreement and as of the Closing:
(a) To the best of both Parties' knowledge, and except as otherwise previously disclosed by the City,
there are no other physical, structural, or mechanical defects or violations of any laws or regulations
applicable to the Property.
( b) That the documents delivered pursuant to this Agreement will be all of the relevant documents that
each Party is aware of pertaining to the condition and operation of the Property, will be true copies, and
will be in full force, without default by any party and without any right of offset, except as disclosed in
writing at the time of delivery.
( c) That there are not pending any special assessments or condemnation actions with respect to the
Property or any part of the Property, nor has either Party any knowledge of any special assessments or
condemnation actions being contemplated.
d That all water, sewer, gas, electric, telephone, and drainage facilities and all other utilities required
by law and for the normal operation of the Property are installed across public property or valid
easements to the property lines of the Property, are all connected with valid permits, and are adequate to
service the property and to permit full compliance with all requirements of law.
( e) The Parties are not a "foreign person's within the meaning of section 1445(f)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1354, as amended, and that the Parties furnish, if necessary, prior to Closing, an
affidavit confirming the same.
f That there are no hazardous Substances known to exist on the Property, and that:
i No Property owner has knowledge of buried or partially buried underground storage
tanks on the Property.
riii
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 9
ii No Property owner is aware of and has not received any notice, warning, notice of
violation, administrative complaint, judicial complaint, o any other formal or
informal notice alleging that conditions on the Property are or have been in violation
of any Environmental Law, or informing the Party that the Property is subject to
investigation or inquiry regarding Hazardous Substances on the Property or the
potential violation of a.ny Environmental Law.
(iii) There is no monitoring program required by the Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") o any similar State agency concerning the Property.
iv To the best of each Property owner's knowledge, no toxic or hazardous chemicals,
waste, or substances of any kind have ever been spilled, disposed of, or stored on,
under, or at the Property, whether by accident, burying, drainage, or storage in
containers, tanks, holding areas, or by other means.
(v) No Property owner is aware of the Property ever being used as a dump or a landfill.
(vi) The Parties have disclosed all information, records, and studies in connection with
the Property concerning Hazardous Substances. Hazardous Substance as used herein
shall mean any toxic or hazardous materials o any other substance which constitutes,
or is regulated as, a hazardous, extremely hazardous, toxic, extremely toxic or
similarly dangerous material, substance or waste under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended,
U.S.C.A. § §9601 et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976,
U . S . C.A. §§6901 et seq., or the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20.
The continued accuracy in all respects of the Parties' representations and warranties shall be a
condition precedent to any obligation to close Escrow. All representations and warranties contained in
this Agreement shall be deemed remade as of the date of Closing and shall survive the Closing. If any of
the representations and warranties are not correct at the time made or as of the Closing, this Agreement
may be terminated by the non - breaching Party.
SECTION
Indemnification.
( a) ITT agrees to indemnify and hold the City free and harmless from any losses, damages, costs,
o expenses (including attorney fees) resulting from any inaccuracy in or the breach of any representation
or warranty of N T and any breach o r default by NKT under any of I I T's covenants or agreements
under this Agreement.
b The City agrees to indemnify and hold ITT free and harmless from any losses, damages, costs,
or expenses (including attorney fees) resulting from any inaccuracy in or the breach of any representation
or warranty of the City and any breach or default by the City under any of the City's covenants or
agreements under this Agreement.
7
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 10
SEC'T'ION 1
Covenants.
The Parties agree as follows:
( a ) Payment of All Obligations The owner of each Parcel constituting the Property shall have
discharged all liens including, but not limited to, mechanics' and materialmen's liens arising from labor
and materials furnished to their respective Parcel prior to the Close of Escrow.
(b Litigation A Party shall immediately notify the other Party of any lawsuits, condemnation
proceedings, rezoning, or other governmental order o action, or any threat thereof, known which might
affect their respective Parcel of the Pr o r any interest therein.
SECTION 11
Parcel 1 Maintenance and Development Requirements
nt
As a condition precedent to the purchase of Parcel 2, the City requires that IKT agree to the
following maintenance and development requirements (the "Requirements" ) for Parcel 1:
a Following the Closing, the structure currently located at 208 Fast Branch Street (the "Public
Works building ", having been designated as Local Historic Resource, shall be maintained and
upgraded consistent with City village Design Guidelines and Municipal Code Provisions regarding
Locally Designated Historic Resources.
(b) Following the Closing, on that portion o Parcel 1 currently consisting of a parking lot, betwcen
200 Fast Branch Street and 248 East Branch Street and the structure at 200 East Branch Street, ITT shall
construct a one -story retail commercial structure up to a maximum of 5,800 square feet with store fronts
on both Fast Branch and Short Street (the "Improvements"). Additionally, at the corner o f East Branch
and Short Street, NKT shall include the necessary specifications for restaurant use. The Requirements
shall include the following:
ITT shall provide full architectural, site, floor, and landscaping plans and apply
for a CUP for the improvement of Parcel 1 by June 1, 2010.
ii, City agrees that NKT's CUP has been accepted as complete for processing and
will be expeditiously processed by City.
iii. Once a CLIP is issued by City, ITT shall submit comprehensive plans and
specifications for the Improvements to the City within forty -five days.
i. Upon approval and issuance of necessary permits by the City and all other
governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the sane and within 60 days
following the Closing, NKT shall begin construction of the Improvements.
. Upon commencement of construction, NKT shall submit any additional plans,
specifications and other necessary documents, if any, allowing the City to process
the Condominium Permit application. City agrees to use due diligence and to
reasonably cooperate in expeditiously processing and assisting ITT with its
Condominium Permit application. Final processing and approval of the
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page I I
Condominium Permit application is not a prerequisite to commencement f
construction of the Improvements.
vi. Upon commencement the construction, ITT shall use reasonable diligence so
as to complete all Improvements no later than nine months following the
commencement of construction under Section I I a iv .
vii. I KT shall pay to the City EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($80,800.00) in
parking in -lieu fees with respect to the division and development of Parcel 1 as
herein provided at Section aiv.
viii. Any and all parking spaces constructed as part of the Improvements shall be
designated as `Public Parking ".
ix. NIT shall be responsible for all building and development fees in the normal
course o f business following the Closing. However all such building and
development fees, exclusive of parking in -lieu, school district, and South County
Sanitary District fees, shall not exceed a total of ONE H1J_NDRED AND SIXTY-
EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS $ 1 68,080).
(c) Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent provided by law, ITT will indemnify, defend and hold
harmless (without limit as to amount) City and its elected officials, officers, employees and agents in their
official capacity (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnities"), and any o them, from and against
all loss, all risk of loss and all damage (including expense) sustained or incurred because of or by reason
of any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, judgments and executions for damages of any and every
kind and by whomever and wherever made or obtained, allegedly caused by, arising out of or relating in
any manner to NI T's construction of Improvements to Parcel I and/or the exclusive easement following
the Closing.
(d Insurance ITT shall obtain, at its expense, comprehensive general liability insurance for the
Improvements of Panel I naming Indemnities as additional named insureds with aggregate limits of not
less than Two Million Dollars ($2,008,808) for bodily injury and death and property damage, including
coverage for contractual liability and products and completed operations purchased by NIT from an
insurance company duly licensed to engage in the business of issuing such insurance in the State, with
current Best's Ivey Dating of not less than -VII, such insurance to be evidenced by an endorsement
which so provides and delivered to the City Clerk prior to the issuance of any building permit for the
development of the Parcel I .
SECTION 1
Due Process.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be in conflict with the responsibilities of the City to adhere to
general clue process requirements and other responsibilities as defined in Federal, State, or local law,
statute, regulati o r participating parties' policies and procedures.
F
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 12
SECTION 1
Assignment.
Prior to the Closing, neither warty may assign its rights hereunder without the express written
consent of the other Party.
SECTION 1
Successors and Assigns.
Without waiver of the provisions of Section 13, all of the rights, benefits, duties, liabilities, and
obligations of the Parties shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, their respective successors and
assigns.
SECTION 1
Notices.
All notices to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and mailed postage prepaid by
certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by personal delivery to the address indicated
belo w or at other places designated by ITT and the City in a written notice given to the other. Notices
shall be deemed served four days after the date of mailing or upon personal delivery.
If to NRT: NIT Commercial, LLC
Attu:
684 Higuera Street, Suite
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
If to the City: City of Arroyo Grande
Attn: Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk
P. 0. Box 550 Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
With copy to: Timothy J. Carmel
CAR TEL & NACC S1 A LLP
PO Box 1 729
Sari Luis Obispo, CA 930
SECTION 1
Construction.
The title and headings of the Sections in this Agreement are intended solely for reference and do
not modify, explain, or construe any provision of this Agreement. All references to sections, recitals, and
the preamble shall, unless otherwise stated, refer to the Sections, Recitals, and Preamble of this
Agreement. In construing this Agreement, the singular form shall include the plural and vice versa. This
Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by one of the Parties, but rather as if both
Parties have prepared the agreement.
10
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 13
SECTION ION 1 f
Integration.
This Agreement, all attached exhibits, and all related documents referred to in this Agreement,
constitute the entire agreement between the Parties. There are no oral or part agreements which are not
expressly set forth in this Agreement and the related documents being executed in connection with this
Agreement. This Agreement may not be modified, ed, a. ended, or otherwise charged except by a writing
executed by the party to be charged.
SECTION 1
Third -Party Rights.
Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person, other than
the Parties and their respective successors and assigns, any rights or remedies.
SECTION 1
Severability.
If any terra or provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder o f this
Agreement shall not be affected.
SECTION
Waivers.
No waiver or breach of any provision shall be med a waiver of any other provision, and no
waiver shall be valid unless it is in writing and executed by the waiving party. No extension of time for
performance f any obligation or act shall be deemed an extension of time for any other obligation o act.
SECTION 21
Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The execution of
this Agreement shall be deemed to have occurred, and this Agreement shall be enforceable and effective,
only upon the complete execution of this Agreement by bath Parties.
11
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 14
SEC'T'ION 22
Survival.
All representations and warranties contained herein, and all indemnities, shall survive the
Closing.
SECTION 23
Incorporation of Exhibits.
All attached exhibits are incorporated in this Agreement b y reference .
SEC'T'ION
Authority of parties.
All persons executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrant that they have the authority to
execute this Agreement on behalf of that party.
SECTION 25,
Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with California law.
SECTION 2.
Recitals.
The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 27.
Further Assurances.
Each party agrees to do any other acts and to execute, acknowledge, and deliver any documents
requested to carry out the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
Whereas the Parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first written above.
12
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 15
CITY:
NIT Commercial LLC:
STEVEN ADAMS, City Manager NICHOLAS T MPKI S
ATTEST
Its Managing Member
er
Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk
APPROVED AS To FORS AND LEGAL
EFFECT:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, City Attorney
1
Agenda Item 8.1.
Page 16
0 PRROYO
INCORPORATED
q Z.. 3
4( NW C q< IF ORI ° . MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL /• j /
FROM: TIM CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY N�
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING AGENDA ITEM 8.1. -
CONSIDERATION OF REVISED PURCHASE AND SALE AND
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH NKT COMMERCIAL FOR
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT 300 EAST BRANCH STREET AND
SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PROPERTY AT 200 AND 208 EAST
BRANCH STREET AND THE ADJACENT PARKING AREA
DATE: APRIL 27, 2010
Section 4(b) of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Improvement (page 8 of the
Agenda Packet, page 5 of subject agreement) contains an omission at line 9. Attached is
a replacement page with the added word underlined.
(a) Escrow: An escrow ( "Escrow ") for each transaction contemplated herein, (the sale of
Parcel 1 and the sale of Parcel 2 are separate and distinct transactions for purposes of this section), shall
be opened with First American Title Company ( "Escrow Agent ") within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. The Parties shall deliver signed instructions to escrow within ten (10) days of the
Effective Date of this Agreement. Except for a final determination regarding what amount of funds will
ultimately be transferred between the Parties upon Closing, the instructions shall not modify or amend
this Agreement; provided, however, that the Parties shall execute any additional instructions requested by
Escrow in a manner consistent with the Agreement. All amounts deposited with the Title Company are to
be held in Escrow in an interest - bearing account with interest credited to the depositing Party. Unless the
Parties otherwise mutually agree in writing to an extension, the Escrow shall close and the Property shall
be transferred, and the Purchase Price paid within thirty (30 ) days of the date that all conditions
precedent are fully satisfied or otherwise waived ( "Closing ").
(b) 1031 Exchange. NKT shall have the right to structure either and/or both transfers
contemplated under this agreement as part of a forward or reverse exchange (including, if necessary, the
use of an intermediary) with the result that such transfers or exchange shall conform to the requirements
of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "IRC "). City hereby agrees to
reasonably cooperate with the NKT to complete such exchange(s) as requested (including the assignment
of this Agreement to a Qualified Intermediary as that term is defined in the IRC), provided that: (a) any
additional costs incurred by City solely as a result of structuring the transaction as an exchange shall be
borne by the NKT; (b) such exchange shall not result in any substantial delay in closing the transaction;
and (c) City shall not be required to take title to any property other than the Parcel 2. This Agreement is
not subject to or conditioned upon either party's ability to consummate an exchange. The responsibility
of City for reviewing exchange documents proposed by the NKT shall be limited to determining whether
the terms and conditions of such exchange documents are such that they are in compliance with the
foregoing provisions. NKT shall be responsible for making all determinations as to the legal sufficiency
or other consideration, including but not limited to tax considerations, relating to such exchange
documents. In cooperating in any exchange transaction arranged by NKT, City shall not in any event be
responsible for, or in any way warrant, the tax consequences of the exchange transaction.
SECTION 5
Closing Deposits.
(a) Before the Closing, the Parties shall deposit with Escrow Agent the following documents and funds:
(i) Nonforeign Affidavit. The original Nonforeign Affidavits;
(ii) Escrow Instructions. The Escrow Instructions for each escrow required hereunder;
(iii) Additional Documents. Any other documents or funds required to close Escrow in
accordance with this Agreement.
(iv) The balance of the Purchase Price due and owing.
5
INCORPOAATED
JMY 10. ,all MEMORANDUM
-1 44FOR
T; CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGED
TIM CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
E
KELLY WEMORE, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION F# REQUEST FOR RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL
MEMBER ARNOLD AND REVIEW F RECALL AND
REPLACEMENT PROCESS
DATE: APRIL 27, 201
RECOMMENDATION:
N:
It is recommended the City Council review information and provide staff direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no cost impact from this item. However, if the City Council calls for a special
election, the projected cost to the City is estimated to be Less than $2,000 if combined
with the regular November election. The cost would likely exceed $50,000 if a
special stand alone election was required.
ACKGFOiJD:
At the April 13, 2010 meeting, Mayor Ferrara requested, and the City Council
concurred, to plane on the net Council meeting agenda for discussion and
consideration of the following:
1 A letter from the Council to Council Member Arnold asking that he resign his
Council wart immediately;
2 An outline of the recall process applicable to recalling a Council member, for the
benefit of the public; and
3 A process for filling a Council vacancy when the need arises.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Letter to Council Member Arnold
draft Letter from the Council to Council Member Arnold for City Council
consideration is attached. The letter was drafted to emphasize the key points
highlighted by Mayor Ferrara in his comments.
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER
ARNOLD AND REVIEW OF RECALL AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 2
R e c al l Pr
Recall is the power of the voters to remove elected officials before their terms expire.
The recall process is set forth and clearly outlined in the California Elections Code.
There must be a certain number of proponents in order to initiate a recall petition. In
Arroyo Grande, a minimum r f 20 proponents is required, which is equal to the
number o signatures required to be filed on the nomination paper of the official
sought to be re All of the required proponents of a recall must be registered
voters o f the City.
The following outline for the recall of a local elected official is a condensed summary
of the process which is contained in the secretary of state's "Procedure for Recalling
State and Local Officials ". Copies of this document are available in the City Clerk's
Office. It should be emphasized that this is an overvie w and summary and that each
of these steps contain additional, specific statutory instructions and timelin for
compliance:
1. Notice of Intention
a. Requires s a minimum of 20 proponents; must be registered voters;
b. Includes a statement, not exceeding 200 words, o f the reasons for the
proposed recall.
2. Service a of Notice
a. A copy of Notice shall be seared on the officer sought to be recalled;
b. Within 7 days of serving the Notice, the original shall be filed, along with an
affidavit of the time and manner of service, with the City Clerk.
3. Publication of Notice
a. A copy of the Notice shall be published at the proponents' expense, once
in a newspaper o f general circulation within the City.
4. Answer to Notice
a. Within 7 days of the filing of the Notice, the officer sought to be recalled
may file with the City Clerk, an answer in not more than 200 words, to the
statement within the Notice;
. If an answer is filed, the Clerk shall, within 7 days after the filing of the
Notice, also serve a copy of the Answer o n one of the proponents.
5. Format and Filing of Proposed Petition
a. The Secretary of state petition format shall be provided to the proponents
by the City Clerk;
b. Within 10 days after filing of the answer to the Notice, or if no answer is
filed, within 10 days after the exp iration of the -day period, the proponents
shall file two blank copies of the petition with the City Clerk.
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION of REQUEST FOR RESIGNATION TIOI of COUNCIL MEMBER
ARNOLD AND REVIEW of RECALL AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
APRIL 2, 201
PACE 3
c. The City Clerk s hall ascertain if the proposed form and wording of the
petition meet the requirements of the California Elections Code.
d. Proponents shall also file, at this time, proof of publication of the Notice.
e. The City Clerk shall, within 10 days of receiving the blank copies of the
petition, notify the proponents in writing of her findings. The proponents
then have 10 days to fix any errors and resubmit the petition. This
process will continue until there are no errors in the petition format. The
petition cannot be circulated until the format is approved by the City Clerk.
f. Only registered voters of Arroyo Grande are qualified to circulate or sign a
recall petition.
6. Circulation of Recall Petition
aw. Circulators of the Petition shall be registered voters in Arroyo Grande.
b. The proponents have 120 days from the date of final approval of the
petition format to gather signatures and file the Petition with the City Clerk.
. The number of qualified signatures required in order to qualify a recall for
the ballot will be 20% of the registered voters in Arroyo Grande. The
number of registered voters shall be calculated as of the time of the last
report of registration by the County Clerk/Recorder to the Secretary of
State. As of this date, the number of qualified signatures required is 2,187
( the County Clerk/Recorder reported 10,935 registered voters to the
Secretary of State). There will be additional reports submitted to the
Secretary of State in the corning months that may change this number.
7. Filing and Examination of Petition
a. The Petition small be filed with the City Clerk; all sections of the Petition
shall be filed at the same time.
b. The City Clerk has 30 days, eluding Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, to
examine and verify the signatures on the Petition. If the City Clerk's
examination shows that the number of valid signatures is equal to or
greater than the required number, the City Clerk shall certify the Petition to
be sufficient.
. If the number of valid signatures is less than the required number, the City
Clerk shall certify the Petition to be insufficient.
8. Submission to Governing Bod
a. If the petition has been determined to be sufficient, the City Clerk shall
submit her certificate as to the sufficiency of the Petition to the City Council
at its next regular meeting.
b. within 14 days after the meeting at which the City Council received the
certificate of sufficiency, the City Council shall issue an order stating that
an election shall be held to determine whether or not the officer named in
the Petition shall be recalled.
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER
ARNOLD AND REVIEW OF RECALL AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 4
. If the City Council fails to issue the order within 14 days, the County Clerk
shall issue the order o f election.
d. The election shall be held not less than 88, nor more than 125 days after
the issuance of the election order.
g. Nomination f Candidates to Succeed recalled Officers
a. Nominations of candidates to succeed the recalled officer shall be made in
the manner prescribed for nominating a candidate to that office in a regular
election.
b. Nomination papers shall be filed not less than 75 days prior to the date of
the election and not before the day the order o f the election is issued by
the City Council.
g. Election
a. The ballot will include the Ballet Measure, "Shall [NAME] be recalled from
the office of [NAME F OFFICE]'?" Voters will Grote "yes" or "no."
b. lender the Ballot Measure will be listed the names of the candidates
nom i n ated t succeed the officer sought to be recal led .
. If one -half o more o f the votes at a recall election are "N ", the officer
sought to be recalled shall continue in office.
d. If a majority of the votes on a recall proposal are "Yes", the officer sought
to be recalled shall be removed from office upon the qualification of his or
her successor.
e. if at a recall election an officer is recalled, the candidate receiving the
highest number of votes for the office shall be declared elected for the
unexpired terra of the recalled officer.
As noted above, the Elections Code restricts the dates when a recall election can be
held once the Council has called for an election. The Code requires that the election
must be consolidated if another election is to be held during that time. This year, the
City has a scheduled General Municipal Election on November 2, 2010. In June, as
in past years, the City will be requesting that the County Board of Supervisors
consolidate the City's General Municipal Election with the November 2, 201
Statewide General Election. Following the Election, the County then bills the City for
its errata share of the costs, resulting in a considerable reduction in election costs to
the City.
Depending on a potential recall process and when the Council calls for a recall
election, it could be consolidated with the November Election. However, depending
on timelines, it could potentially result in the City having to conduct a standalone
election on another date just prior to or after the November election, at a substantially
higher cost. In this case, the County Elections Division would not be able to conduct
a special election for the City in such close proximity to the November Statewide
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER
ARNOLD AND REVIEW OF RECALL AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 5
General Election, and the City would have to contract for election supplies, services,
and consultation to conduct its own election.
Process for Filling Vacanc
Under current State law (Government Cade Section 36512 (b)(1) }, within thirty (30)
days from the commencement of a Council vacancy, the Council shall either fill the
vacancy by appointment or call a special election to fill the vacancy. The person
appointed or elected to dill the vacancy holds office for the unexpired term of the
former incumbent.
Alternatively, pursuant to Government Code Section 36512 the City may enact a
new ordinance that would codify one of the following procedures: 1 require that a
special election be called immediately; 2 require that a special election be held to fill
a City Council vacancy when petitions bearing a specified number o f verified
signatures are filed; o 3 require that a person be appointed to fill a vacancy on the
City Council to hold office only until the date of a special election which shall
immediately be called to fill the remainder of the term.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternative are provided for the Council's consideration:
Approve and send the proposed letter to Council Member Ed Arnold;
Do not approve and send the proposed letter to Council Member Ed Arnold; or
- Provide direction to staff
ADVANTAGES:
Resignation would help eliminate the negative impact of this issue on the City's staff
resources, ability to address other important business, and overall reputation and
public trust. The advantage of appointing a person to fill the Council vacancy is that it
will allow the City to 'maintain a fire member Council with a minimum of delay and
without the expense of an election, enabling the City to continue to function and tend
to current critical 'natters. The advantage of an election is that the voters will choose
the representative directly. The advantage of adopting an ordinance pursuant to
Government Code Section 36512(c)(3) is that it would establish a procedure to be
followed when future vacancies occur. It would also avoid having a four person
council until a special election is held since it provides for an interim appointment,
under w hich the person appointed only holds office until the special election.
DISADVANTAGES:
Resignation would result in a vacancy requiring the steps outlined above. The
disadvantage of calling for a special election is that them will be a four member
Council for the period of time, from the effective date of the vacancy until a successor
is duly sworn into office. The disadvantage of appointing a Council Member is that
the voters will not choose the representative directly. The disadvantage of adopting
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST UEST F F RESIGNATION I F COUNCIL MEMBER
ARNOLD LD AND REVIEW F RECALL AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
APRIL 27, 201
PACE 6
an ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 36512(c)(3) is that it will
unnecessarily limit future City Councils, who will have to go through the cumbersome
process of repealing the ordinance if they want to fill a vacancy using a different
method than provided for in the ordinance. Additionally, there will be delays
associated with preparation of the ordinance, two (2) required readings and a thirty
(30) day waiting period before the ordinance becomes effective.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
IMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City (--fall on Thursday, April 22, 2010 and on the
City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No comments were received.
Attachment(s):
1. Draft letter from City Council to Council Member Arnold
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 6
f r (. / f * /
OFFICE of the MAYOR
April 27, 2010
Ed Arnold
City of Arroyo Grande Council Member
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 33420
Dear Council Member Arnold:
P.O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
--
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Phone: (805) 473 -5404
FAX: (805) 473 -0386
E -Mail: agcity@arroyogrande.org
In order to serge the best interests of the City at this time, the Council formally requests that you
immediately resign from your Council seat. This request and your resignation is no reflection on
our 3 uilt or innocence of the pending criminal charges. The City Council fully understands that
y ou are p resumed to be innocent until proven otherwise and respects the integrity of the judicial
process, as well as your right to defend yourself. You are faced with very serious c harges that
will no doubt require much of your attention and focus for the foreseeable future.
However, eleted public office is an honor and privilege with the sole purpose of serving the
community. For the City to effectively address the needs of the community, it requires not only
a substantial time commitment, but maintaining the public's absolute trust. There is no question
that the nature of the allegations and the activities involved in your defense will negatively
impact your ability to effective! y carry out the responsibilities of your position as a member of
this Council.
Your current situation has a clear detrimental effect on the reputation and credibility of the City,
diverts scarce p ersonnel resources from urgent responsibilities, and is a distraction from our
critical! y important efforts which are focused on addressing community needs and issues. It
also raises a number of questions and concerns regarding compliance with the City's Ethics
policies and g uidelines and other policies and regulations, as well as appropriate remedies.
Please reflect on the heavy burden you carry as a public servant and do what is in the best
interest of the City of Arroyo Grande. This Council respectfully requests and urges you to please
resign immediately so the City an avoid these problems and focus its full attention on meeting
y
the needs of its citizens.
Sincerely,
Arroyo Grande Mayor and City Council Members
Tony Ferrara
Mayor
Jim Guthrie
Mayor Pro Tern
Joe Costello
Council Member
Chuck Fellows
Council M ember
Agenda Item 11.a.
Page 7
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item II.a.
Page 8
INCORPORATED
JULY 10, 11111
C%,a 1.1 oft % MEMORANDUM
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TER ESA II cCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
F
Y: , KELLY HEFFEF N I , ASSOCIATE PLAN EF
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION N F GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Y
REPORT F T FOR THE CITY of ARROYO GRANDE
DATE: APRIL 2 , 201
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council receive the presentation and Greenhouse Gas Inventor
Report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT;
There is no direct fiscal impact of the completion of the Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report.
The costs of the preparation of the inventory were covered through a contract with the APCD.
There will be future costs for preparing the Climate Action Plan and to undertake efforts to
reduce both community-wide and municipal GHG emissions. At this tire, staff if pursuing
potential funding sources for the net steps and will return for further discussions and
recommendations for funding these future efforts.
BACKGROUND:
l June 200 5, Governor sch ar enegger issued an Executive order establishing greenhouse
gas emission targets for the entire state as follows:
2010, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels;
• By 2020, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1 990 levels;
2050, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 0% below 1990 levels.
To support these reduction targets, the California legislature adopted the California Global
Marring Solutions Act of 2006, also known as AB 32.
In late 2008, the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District's Board approved a contract
with PI IC a consulting firm) to provide technical assistance to the cities of Arroyo Grande,
Atascadero, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Paso Nobles, Pismo Beach, and San Luis Obispo to
complete greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventories. In exchange for receipt of technical
services from the APCD and PMC, in March 2009, the City Council adopted a resolution to join
ICLEI -Local Governments for Sustainabllity ICLEI and to authorize the preparation of a
greenhouse gas emissions baseline inventory. The City is membership in ICLEI has provided
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
GREENHOUSE CAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
APRIL 27, 201
PACE
access to technical resources, including software that has been used in the preparation of a
baseline greenhouse gas emissions inventory.
When joining ICLEI, the City was asked to commit to a five -step process. The process involves
the following milestones:
1. Conduct a baseline emissions inventory and forecast
2. Ado an emissions reduction target for the forecast year
3. Develop a Local Action Plan
4. Implement policies and measures
5. Monitor and verify results
ANALYSIS of ISSUES:
What are Greenhouse Gases and what impact do they have?
Greenhouse gases GHG are those that capture the heat of the Sun in the lower atmosphere
of the Earth — this heat capture process is called "the greenhouse effect ". This effect is
essential to maintaining the surface temperature of the Earth and making it habitable for luring
bergs. Some of the gases occur naturally in the environment, while others are either created
or increased by human activities. Examples of naturally- occurring GHGs include carbon
dioxide, methane, nitrous vide, and ozone. Human- generated greenhouse gases are created
by a variety of industrial processes and include hydroflurocarbons, perflourocarbons, and
sulfur hexaflouride. The level of concentration of GHG 's in the Earth's atmosphere has been
increasing and this increase is believed to be resulting in the unarming of the Earth's surface
leading to shifts in climate that are impacting various areas in different, but concerning ways.
Communit _wid a GHG Inventory Results
ult
The GHG Inventory ("Inventory") is provided in Attachment 1. The community of Arroyo
Grande emitted approximately 96,549 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (C 02e) in the
baseline year Zoo. A shown in. Figure 1, the transportation sector was by far the largest
contributor to emissions (57.0%), producing approximately 55,030 metric tons of C 2e in
2005. Emissions from the residential sector were the net largest contributor (24.6%),
producing approximately 23,778 metric tons of CO2e. The commercial and industrial sectors
accounted for a combined 12.3% of the total. Emissions from solid waste comprised 6.0% of
the total, and emissions from other sources such as agricultural equipment corn prised 0.1 %-
The majority of emissions from the transportation sector were the result of gasoline
consumption in private vehicles traveling on local roads, US 101, and state highways. GHG
figures from the waste sector are the estimated future emissions that will result from the
decomposition of waste generated by city residents and businesses in the base year 2005,
with a weighted average methane capture factor of 60.0%.
Municipal Operations GHG Invento[y. Results
City government operations and facilities produced approximately 994 metric tons of
greenhouse gas emissions in 2005. A displayed in Figure 2, this represents approximately
1.0% of total community -wide emissions in the city. City government emissions result from
waste, energy consumption from water and wastewater facilities, buildings, streetlights and
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
G REENHOUSE USE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
T RY
APRIL 27, 201
PAGE 3
other facilities, fuel consumption by the vehicle and employee commutes, and miscellaneous
equipment. Fuel consumption by the City vehicle fleet was the largest contributor to the city's
emissions ( 34.6%), producing 344 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (refer to Figure 3).
The second largest contributor ( 25.5%) was from fuel consumption by city employees during
their commute to and from work.
Transport@
57.0%
.1%
esidential 24.6%
el /
Industrial 12.3%
Community.
99.0%
.. - idpall.Wn
Figure 1: Community GHG Emissions by Figure : City Government Portion of
Sector Community-wide H Emissions
City government operations emissions are a subset of the total community-wide emissions a
outlined above. However, similar to the way in which businesses and factories perform their
on facility -scale GHG Inventories, this Inventory analyzes city emissions separately to
identify cost - saving and emissions- reducing strategies in the future. The methodology for
estimating emissions from local government operations is guided specifically by the Local
Government Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol developed by the California Air Resources
Board, ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability, and the California Climate Registry.
pl
Commut
25.5%
ehide
Fleet
94.6%
Streetiirts
& Traffic
Signals
15.7'1
�1ater Delivery 2.9%
, Fact ities
0.4%
'N'SIMIIC1 we Ste 0.8%
Other 1.2%
_buildings
Faciii#ies
18.9%
Figure 3: city Government Emissions by sector
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 3
Waste 6.0%
CITY COUNCIL
GREENHOUSE USE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Y
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 4
Conclusion and het steams
This City government operations and community -wide Inventory captures the major sources of
greenhouse gases caused by activities within the City per standard practice. However, it is
important to note that some likely emission sources were not included in the Inventory either
because of privacy laws, lack of data, or a lack of reasonable methodology for calculating
emissions. It is estimated that these sources net included in the inventory comprise less than
° of total emissions in the city. It is likely that as greenhouse gas inventories become more
common,, methodology and accessibility to data will improve.
The sources that could not be included due to privacy laws, lack of data availability, and/or a
reasonable methodology include the following:
• Refrigerants from City government o perations facilities and vehicles;
• Freight and passenger trains;
Sewage and water treatment for the community -at- large;
0 Propane, wind or solar energy consumed by the community-at-large; and
0 Recreational off -road equipment and vehicles.
These limitations are explained further in the document.
If consumption trends continue the pattern observed in 2005, emissions will reach 116,556
metric tons of CO2e by 2020, or a 20.7% increase over 2005 baseline levels, By 2025
emissions will reach 124,303 metric tons of CO2e, or a 28.7% increase over 2005 baseline
levels. This growth, shogun in Figure 4, is due to projected increases in households, population,
and jobs within the City.
125,000
100,000
t
F 75,000
fE } EE }
} F
k
50,000
25,000
}
0 .
}
■ Other
1
l {
. o"t' wart i
Transportation
■ Commercial Industrial
Residential
f
Figure : 2420 and 2025 city of Arroyo Grande Business -as -usual GHG Emissions
Forecast
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 4
2005 2020 2025
CITY CODICIL
GREENHOUSE CAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
APRIL 27, 2010
PAGE 5
With this information the City can make an informed determination of a reduction target.
Conformance with the State of California's recommended reduction of 5% below present
levels by 2020 would result in a 35-7.0% reduction below the city's business -as -usual
emissions. By 2025 the reduction would increase to 48 .7% below business -as -usual (Figure
5.
130s,000 .............. v.vY v . v.v.... ....................... v wvvwvY "." ....v. ..:................... v .
11 0,000 .... ...... .. ..... .. ...... .. .. I
90,0 .v..tt.....{...:..n.....n
Business -as -usual
forecast 116,556
metric tons Co
by 2020; 124.303
metric tons cope
by 2025
2005 baseline
levels =
96,549 metric
tons CO
15% below 2605
baseline levels =
82,687 metric
tons CO2e b
:. 2626; pursuing
:. 0% reduclion by
70,000 2058 = 77,239
metric tons Cote
2005 2020 2025 by 2025
Actual
Reduction
34,490
metric tons
(35.7%) by
2020; 47,064
metric tons
(48.7% ) b
2025 below
business- -
usual
Figure : Business-As-Usual Forecast In Relation To state - Recommended 15% Reduction
Target
It is likely that the city's emissions are already below the business-as-usual forecast due to
sustainability efforts Initiated by the City since 2005.
As the City 'roves forward to the next milestones in the process, including designation of
emission reduction targets and development of a Climate Action Plan, the City should identify
and quantify the emission reduction, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and water
conservation benefits that have already been implemented since 2005. Examples of types of
improvements in place or programmed for the near future include:
• Adoption of a Green Corridor tax incentive program (2009)
• Implementation of Water Conservation programs including:
o Turf removal financial incentives (2009)
o Plumbing Retrofit Program to provide free low -flog toilets and indoor plumbing
fixtures on -going since 2004)
o Free irrigation controllers and sensors on -going since 2009)
o Mandatory conservation measures (2008)
o Free Irrigation audits (ongoing since 2009)
o Sustainable Landscape Seminar Series
• Recycled grater study
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
GREENHOUSE CAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
APRIL 27, 201
PACE
Solar and grind poorer facility study
0 Public private project to install compressed natural gas and biodiesel fueling facilities
Investigating conversion of city fleet to CNG, electric and bio diesel vehicles
Retrofit of City buildings to increase energy efficiency
Plan to install solar powered public electric vehicle recharging stations
Support of SLO Green Build programs
Police Department vehicles equipped with bicycles and bike racks to supplement patrol
Development of a bikeway plan
Expansion of the park- and -ride lot
Purchase and installation of bike racks and lockers
Workplace Bike Sharing Program
The position of the League of California Cities on A B 32 is to suspend the requirements of the
laver (and of SB 35) until the economy recovers. The issue is scheduled for discussion at the
April 22 -23, 2010 League Board of Directors Meeting.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are offered for Council's consideration:
- receive the presentation and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report.
- Provide alternate direction to staff. continue review of the project. Direction should be
given to staff regarding desired information or needed revisions to the report.
ADVANTAGES:
Conducting a greenhouse gas emissions inventory is a first step in developing a local climate
action plan. Local governments can inventory the emissions from their operations in order to
track their performance and ensure that their actions reduce GHG emissions. Complete,
consistent and accurate measurement enables local governments to assess their risks and
opportunities, track their progress, and create a strategy to reduce emissions in a quantifiable
and transparent way.
DISADVANTAGES:
There will be unknown costs associated with developing and implementing programs to reduce
GHG emissions,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, April 22, 2010. The Agenda and
report were posted on the City's website on Friday, April 23, 2010. No public comments were
received.
Attachments:
1. City of Arroyo Grande Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report
2 Power Point Presentation to City Council
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 6
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Community -Wide and Government Operations
2005 Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Prepared for:
AIR POLLUTION
10 (,'0[;N1Y (,,)F SAN WN ()1131161'01
CO NTROL, DIST
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Prepared b y.-
pr � rana ���� DS7r � rv � l � eJl �� I �� b � 1, � NV � 14 � { i �y 9 Ylll! �1 jyY1�Vrkl�l ll,YPd%�Nll�frldf
860 WALNUT STREET, SUITE B
SAN Luis OBISPO, CA 93401 -2725
April 2010
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 7
Credits and Acknowledgements
Report prepared by PMC for the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District on behalf
of the City of Arroyo Grande.
I ;J i� 1 0 .0 , =r" a 0
Tammy Seale, Project Manager
Jaime Hill, Associate Planner
Jillian Rich, Associate Planner
Scott Kaiser, Assistant Planner
Chad Endicott, Planning Intern
Air Pollution Control District
Larry Allen, Air Pollution Control Officer
Aeron Arlin Genet, Planning and Outreach
Manager
Melissa Guise, Air Quality Specialist
Dean Carlson, Air Quality Engineer
City of Arroyo Grande
Teresa McClish, Director,
Community Development
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner,
Community Development
Kelly Wetmore, City Clerk
Tricia Meyers, Accounts Payable,
Finance Department
Glenda Boner, City Yard Office Assistant,
Public Works
County of San Luis Obispo
Janice Campbell, Agriculture Department
IWMA
Peter Cron, Analyst
PG&E
John Bohman, Green Communities and
Innovator Pilots
Southern California Gas Company
Colby Morrow, Environmental Affairs
Program Manager, Customer Programs
ICLEI — Local Governments for
Sustainability
California Air Resources Board
Tom Scheffelin, Analyst, Transportation
Analysis Section
Jon Taylor P.E., Manager, Transportation
Analysis Section
Waste Solutions, Inc,
Tom Martin
City of Arroyo Grande === Waage
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary ................................................................................ ..............................1
1 Introduction
...................................................................................... ...............................
7
1.1
Purpose of a GHG Inventory ..................................................... ..............................7
1.2
Climate Change - Legislative Background ............................... ...............................
9
1.3
The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign ............................ .............................12
1.4
Local Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation Activities .. .............................13
2. Community and Government Operations Inventory Methodology .... .............................16
2.1
Baseline and Forecast Years ................................................... .............................16
2.2
The Two Inventories: Community -Wide and City Government Operations ...........16
2.3
Data Collection and Methodology ............................................ .............................18
2.4
Data Sources ........................................................................... .............................19
2.5
Data Limitations ..................................................................... ...............................
21
2.6
Clean Air and Climate Protection Software 2009 ................... ...............................
23
3. Community GHG Inventory Results ............................................... ...............................
24
3.1
Community -Wide Emissions by Scope ..................................... .............................24
3.2
All Scope Emissions by Sector ................................................. .............................26
3.3
Transportation ........................................................................ ...............................
28
3.4
The Built Environment (Residential, Commercial, Industrial) .... .............................29
3.5
Waste ....................................................................................... .............................31
3.6
Other- Off-Road Agricultural Equipment ................................. ...............................
33
3.7
Community Emissions by Source ........................................... ...............................
34
3.8
Per Capita Emissions ............................................................. ...............................
36
4. City Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory Results ... ...............................
37
4.1
City Government Operations Inventory Results ..................... ...............................
37
4.2
Building Sector ......................................................................... .............................38
4.3
Vehicle and Transit Fleet ....................................................... ...............................
39
4.4
Employee Commute ................................................................. .............................40
4.5
Streetlights and Traffic Signals ................................................. .............................42
4.6
Water and Sewage ................................................................. ...............................
42
City of Arroyo Grande
U"s
4.7 Waste ..................................................................................... ............................... 42
4.8 Other — Miscellaneous Equipment ......................................... ............................... 42
4.9 City Emissions by Source ...................................................... ............................... 42
5. Forecast ......................................................................................... ............................... 44
6. Conclusion and Next Steps .............................................................. .............................46
List of Tables
Table 2 -1:
Data Sources For Community Analysis, 2005 ............... ...............................
20
Table 2 -2:
Data Sources For City Government Operations Analysis, 2005 ..................
21
Table 3 -1:
Emission Sources Included in 2005 Community Inventory By Scope and
Sector ............................................................................ ...............................
25
Table 3 -2:
Community GHG Emissions per Sector per Scope (Metric Tons of CO2e) ..
26
Table 3 -3:
Community GHG Emissions by Sector (Metric Tons of CO2e) ....................
27
Table 3 -4:
Transportation GHG Emissions by Road Type .............. ...............................
28
Table 3 -5:
Transportation GHG Emissions by Fuel Source ............ ...............................
29
Table 3 -6:
Residential GHG Emissions Sources ............................ ...............................
31
Table 3 -7:
Commercial /Industrial GHG Emissions Sources ............ ...............................
31
Table 3 -8:
Waste GHG Emissions by Waste Type ......................... ...............................
33
Table 3 -9:
Community GHG Emissions by Source ......................... ...............................
35
Table 4 -1:
2005 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector ....................
38
Table 4 -2:
Building Sector GHG Emissions by Source, 2005 ......... ...............................
39
Table 4 -3:
Days of City Employee Travel by Commute Mode ........ ...............................
40
Table 4 -4:
Employee Commute VMT by Vehicle and Fuel Type ...... .............................41
Table 4 -5:
City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Source ............................
43
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
List of Figures
Figure ES -1:
Community GHG Emissions by Sector ............................ ............................... 2
Figure ES -3:
City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector . ...............................
3
Figure ES -2:
City Government Portion of Community -Wide GHG Emissions ......................
3
Figure ES -4:
2020 and 2025 City of Arroyo Grande Business -As -Usual GHG Emissions
Forecast.......................................................................... ...............................
5
Figure ES -5:
Business -As -Usual Forecast in Relation to State - Recommended Reduction
Targets............................................................................ ...............................
6
Figure 1 -1:
The Greenhouse Gas Effect ............................................. ..............................7
Figure 1 -2:
California Climate Change GHG Emissions and Targets .............................11
Figure 1 -3:
The ICLEI Five - Milestone Process .................................. .............................13
Figure 2 -1:
The Relationship Between Community -Wide and City Government
Inventories....................................................................... .............................17
Figure 2 -2:
GHG Emissions Scopes .................................................. .............................19
Figure 3 -1:
2005 Community GHG Emissions by Scope ................. ...............................
25
Figure 3 -2:
2005 Community GHG Emissions by Sector ................. ...............................
27
Figure 3 -3:
Community GHG Emissions by Fuel Type .................... ...............................
28
Figure 3 -4:
Built Environment GHG Emissions by Sector .................. .............................30
Figure 3 -5:
Built Environment GHG Emissions by Source ............... ...............................
30
Figure 3 -6:
Residential GHG Emissions by Source ......................... ...............................
30
Figure 3 -7:
Commercial/ Industrial GHG Emissions by Source ........ ...............................
30
Figure 3 -8:
Waste GHG Emissions by Type .................................... ...............................
32
Figure 3 -9:
Community GHG Emissions by Source ........................... .............................35
Figure 4 -1:
City Government Operations Contribution to Community -Wide GHG
Emissions...................................................................... ...............................
37
Figure 4 -2:
City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector .............................
37
Figure 4 -3:
Building GHG Emissions by Sector ............................... ...............................
38
Figure 4 -4:
Vehicle Fleet Fuel Consumption per Year by Type ........ ...............................
39
Figure 4 -5:
City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Source ............................
43
Figure 5 -1:
2020 and 2025 Business -As -Usual Projected Growth in Community -Wide
Emissions...................................................................... ...............................
44
Figure 6 -1:
GHG Forecast in Relation to Reduction Targets ............ .............................47
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
FAns �1:4 I P L61:4_Z-1
Appendix A: CACP2009 Detailed Report for Community -Wide Emissions, 2005
Appendix B: CACP2009 Detailed Report for City Government Operations Emissions, 2005
Appendix C: Detailed Methodology for Community -Wide Inventory
Appendix D: Detailed Methodology for City Government Operations Inventory
Appendix E: City Employee Commute Survey, 2009
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b. I
-sZ
Executive Summary
Climate change is quickly becoming a high priority among
policymakers and residents alike. In March 2009, the City
Council made a commitment to evaluating Arroyo Grande's
contribution to global climate change through the development of
a Community -Wide and City Government Operations Baseline
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory (Inventory). This
Inventory identifies the major sources of greenhouse gas
emissions within the city' and provides a baseline against which
future progress can be measured. This Inventory includes two
components: (1) a community -wide analysis and (2) a City
government operations analysis. It is important to note that the
City government operations inventory is a subset of the
community inventory, meaning that all City government
operations emissions are included in the commercial /industrial,
transportation, waste, or "other" categories of the community -
wide inventory. The City government operations inventory should
not be added to the community analysis; rather it should be
looked at as a slice of the complete picture. Specifically, this
Inventory does the following:
• Calculates GHGs from community -wide 2 activities,
including City government operations, within the City's
jurisdictional boundary in calendar year 2005;
• Identifies the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions
from community -wide sources and City government
operations;
• Provides City decision - makers and the community with adequate information to inform
policy decisions; and
1 In this report, the term "city" refers to the area inside the jurisdictional boundary of the City of Arroyo
Grande, whereas "City government" refers to those activities which are under the operational control of
City agencies.
2 "Community- wide" or "community" refers to all activities within the city (as defined above), including
those from businesses, industrial processes, residents, vehicles, and City government operations.
City of Arroyo Grande
age
• Forecasts how emissions will grow in the community if no behavioral changes are made.
The 2005 community -wide and City government operations baseline GHG Inventory represents
a key step in the City of Arroyo Grande's efforts to improve air quality, enhance sustainability,
and ensure the safety and comfort of its residents for generations to come. In addition, this
Inventory allows the City to quantitatively track and take credit for its numerous efforts related to
energy efficiency and the mitigation of global climate change.
COMMUNITY -WIDE GHG INVENTORY RESULTS
The community of Arroyo Grande emitted approximately 96,549 metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalent (CO in the baseline year 2005. As shown in Figure ES -1, the transportation sector
was by far the largest contributor to emissions (57.0 %), producing approximately 55,030 metric
tons of CO in 2005. Emissions from the
residential sector were the next largest
contributor (24.6 %), producing approximately FIGURE ES-1: COMMUNITY
23,778 metric tons of CO The commercial F TUT I A A I .
and industrial sectors accounted for a combined
12.3% of the total. Emissions from solid waste
comprised 6.0% of the total, and emissions from finport
other sources such as agricultural equipment 5.0
comprised 0.1%.
The majority of emissions from the
transportation sector were the result of gasoline
consumption in private vehicles traveling on
local roads, US 101, and state highways. GHG
figures from the waste sector are the estimated
future emissions that will result from the
decomposition of waste generated by city
residents and businesses in the base year 2005,
with a weighted average methane capture factor
of 60.0 %.
W
r M. FE : .
NIn
3 In 2005, the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District reported methane capture rates for Chicago
Grade, Cold Canyon, and the Paso Robles Municipal Landfill. The methane recovery factors of the
landfills are based on the system operations at that time.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page
Waste 6.
CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS GHG INVENTORY RESULTS
City government operations and facilities produced approximately 994 metric tons of
greenhouse gas emissions in 2005. As displayed in Figure ES -2, this represents approximately
1.0% of total community -wide emissions in the city. City government emissions result from
waste, energy consumption from water and wastewater facilities, buildings, streetlights and
other facilities, fuel consumption by the vehicle and employee commutes, and miscellaneous
equipment. Fuel consumption by the City vehicle fleet was the largest contributor to the City's
emissions (34.6 %), producing 344 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (refer to Figure ES-
3). The second largest contributor (25.5 %) was from fuel consumption by City employees during
their commute to and from work.
Emp
1c paw 1, .0% Commute
Streetlights
251.5 — Signals
15.7%
" 'O — Waste l wate r Facilities
0.4
�oIidWa 0.8
Other 1.2%
Vehicle `�-,,,_Buildin
City government operations emissions are a subset of the total community -wide emissions as
outlined above. However, similar to the way in which businesses and factories perform their own
facility -scale GHG Inventories, this Inventory analyzes City emissions separately to identify cost -
saving and emissions - reducing strategies in the future. The methodology for estimating
emissions from local government operations is guided specifically by the Local Government
Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol developed by the California Air Resources Board, ICLEI —
Local Governments for Sustainability, and the California Climate Registry.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
DATA LIMITATIONS
This Community -Wide and City Government Operations Baseline
GHG Emissions Inventory captures the major sources of
greenhouse gases caused by activities within the City per
standard practice. However, it is important to note that some
likely emission sources were not included in the Inventory either
because of privacy laws, lack of data, or a lack of reasonable
methodology for calculating emissions. It is estimated that the
sources not included in the Inventory comprise less than 5.0% of
total emissions in the City. It is likely that as greenhouse gas
inventories become more common, methodology and
accessibility to data will improve.
The sources that could not be included due to privacy laws, lack
of data availability, and /or a reasonable methodology include the
following:
• Refrigerants from City government operations facilities
and vehicles;
• Propane, wind, or solar energy consumed by the
community -at- large; and
• Recreational off -road equipment and vehicles.
These limitations are explained on page 21 of this document.
FORECAST AND NEXT STEPS
If consumption trends continue the pattern observed in 2005 emissions will reach 116,556
metric tons of CO by 2020, or a 20.7% increase over 2005 baseline levels. By 2025,
emissions will reach 124,303 metric tons of CO or a 28.7% increase over 2005 baseline
levels.
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page
MMM
E!
M
In flier
Walt
Trans r tatiot'
wi o wi" r er ci l I r) tr trial
w Residential
With this information the City can make an informed determination of a reduction target.
Conformance with the State of California's recommended reduction of 15% below present levels
by 2020 would result in a 35.7% reduction below the City's business -as -usual emissions. By
2025 the reduction would increase to 54.6% below business -as -usual (Figure ES -5).
4 AB 32 Scoping Plan, page 27 states that CARB encourages local governments to "move toward
establishing similar goals for community emissions that parallel the State commitment to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 15 percent from current levels by 2020."
http
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
2005 2020 202
130,000
110000
90 . P 000
Business -as -usual
forecast 116,556
metric tons CO
by 2020; 124,303
metric tons CO
by 2025
2005 baseline
levels =
96,549 metric tons
CO by 2025
15% below 2005
baseline levels =
82,067 metric
tons CO by
2020; pursuing
80% reduction by
2050 = 77,239
metric tons CO
by 2025
Actual
Reduction =
34,490
metric tons
(35.7 %) by
2020; 47,064
metric tons
(48.7 %) by
2025 below
business -as-
usual
70,000 1 __ _ __ _ _ __
2020
2025
It is likely that the City's emissions are already below the business -as -usual forecast due to
sustainability efforts initiated by the City since 2005. A summary of these efforts is on page 14.
• - • City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
age
1. Introduction
In March 2009, the City Council adopted a resolution to join
ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and to
authorize the preparation of a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
baseline inventory. In committing to the project, the City of Arroyo
Grande embarked on an ongoing, coordinated effort to reduce
the GHG emissions, to improve air quality, and to reduce costs.
This section introduces the Inventory, defines key terms used
throughout the Inventory, and provides an overview of climate
change science and regulation in California.
1.1 PURPOSE OF A GHG INVENTORY
This Inventory represents completion of the first step in the City's climate protection process. As
advised by ICLEI, quantifying recent -year emissions is essential to establish: (1) a baseline
against which to measure future emission levels, and (2) an understanding of where the highest
percentages of emissions are coming from, and, therefore, the greatest opportunities for
emissions reductions. This Inventory presents estimates of greenhouse gas emissions in 2005
resulting from the community as a whole.
Climate Change — Scientific
Background
Scientific consensus holds that the world's
population is releasing greenhouse gases
faster than the earth's natural systems can
absorb them. These gases are released as
byproducts of fossil fuel combustion, waste
disposal, energy use, land -use changes,
and other human activities. This release of
gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO
methane (CH and nitrous oxide (N
creates a blanket around the earth that
allows light to pass through but traps heat at
the surface preventing its escape into space
(Figure 1 -1). Known as the greenhouse
effect, models show that this phenomenon
could lead to a 2 ° F to 10 ° F temperature
increase over the next 100 years. The
City of Arroyo Grande Rage
Source: Tufts University
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that most of the warming observed
over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.
Although used interchangeably, there is a difference between the terms "climate change" and
"global warming." According to the State, climate change refers to "any long -term change in
average climate conditions in a place or region, whether due to natural causes or as a result of
human activity . Global warming, on the other hand, is an average increase in the temperature
of the atmosphere caused by increased greenhouse gas emissions from human activities. The
use of the term climate change is becoming more prevalent because it encompasses all
changes to the climate, not just temperature. Additionally, the term climate change conveys
temporality, implying that climate change can be slowed with the efforts of local, regional, state,
national, and world entities.
Changes in the earth's temperature will have impacts for residents and businesses in the City of
Arroyo Grande. Some of the major impacts to the Central Coast expected to occur include the
following, separated by sector.8, g
• Coastline: The San Luis Obispo County coastline could face inundation as a result of
sea level rise and global warming. As temperatures rise, the ocean waters rise as well
due to thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers and snowpack. The state's 2009
Climate Change Impacts Assessment (the 2009 Scenarios Project) estimates that sea
levels will rise by 12 to 18 inches by 2050 and 21 to 55 inches by 2100. This level of sea
rise has the potential to negatively affect groundwater salination as well as the size and
attractiveness of local beaches, which could affect property values and the tourism
industry in the County;
• Reduced Water Supply: The 2009 Scenarios Project estimates a decrease in
precipitation of 12 - 35% by 2050. Higher temperatures are also expected to increase
5 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group I. 2007.
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers.
6 California Natural Resources Agency. 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy Discussion Draft.
August 2009.
7 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change website. http : / /www.epa.gov /climatechange /,
accessed August 5, 2009.
8 California Climate Change Center. Our Changing Climate: Assessing the Risks to California (2006),
www.climatechange.ca.gov
9 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). Proposed CEQA Guideline Amendments for
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. April 2009.
• - : City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
age
evaporation and make for a generally drier climate. In addition, more precipitation will fall
as rain rather than snow, which will cause snow to melt earlier in the year and not in the
warmer, drier months when water is in higher demand;
• Agriculture: Climate change could cause a shift in the type and location of agriculture in
the area. As saltwater intrudes into coastal aquifers and groundwater resources
decrease, it is possible that some crops will be forced out of the area, which affects the
local economy and food supply. Water supplies to agriculture may be 20 -23% below
demand targets between 2020 and 2050;
• Public Health: Climate change could potentially threaten the health of residents of Arroyo
Grande. Heat waves are expected to have a major impact on public health, as will
decreasing air quality and an increase in mosquito- breeding and mosquito -borne
diseases. There is also expected to be an increase in allergenic plant pollen and an
increase in the frequency of wildfires. The elderly, young and other vulnerable
populations will need assistance as they will not have the resources to deal with the
costs and adapt to the expected changes.
Although one city cannot resolve the issue of global climate change, local governments can
make a positive impact through cumulative local action. Cities and counties have the ability to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions through effective land use and transportation planning, wise
waste management, and the efficient use of energy. The City can achieve multiple benefits
including lower energy bills, improved air quality, economic development, reduced emissions,
and better quality of life through:
• Increased energy efficiency in City facilities and vehicle fleet;
• Sustainable purchasing and waste reduction efforts;
• Sustainable land use and transportation planning; and
• Efficient management of water resources.
This Inventory serves as a baseline measurement for implementing and tracking the
effectiveness of these efforts.
1.2 CLIMATE CHANGE - LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND
California continues to be a leader in addressing climate change in the United States and in the
world. In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger issued a landmark Executive Order
City of Arroyo Grande
age
establishing progressive greenhouse gas emissions targets for the entire state. Executive Order
(EO) S -3 -05 establishes the following goals:
• By 2010, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels;
• By 2020, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels;
• By 2050, reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80% below 1990 levels.
To support these reduction targets, the California legislature adopted the California Global
Warming Solutions Act of 2006, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32. The law requires the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop regulatory and market mechanisms that will
reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 as shown in Figure 1 -2 below. To
achieve this goal, CARB developed a set of early action measures in 2007 for priority
implementation in 2010. These early action measures became part of the AB 32 implementation
plan, or Scoping Plan, approved in December 2008. The Scoping Plan identifies a variety of
GHG reduction activities including direct regulations, monetary and non - monetary incentives,
voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms such as a cap- and - trade, and an implementation
fee regulation to fund the program. The Scoping Plan also identifies local governments as
"essential partners" and calls for cities and counties to adopt GHG reduction targets consistent
with AB 32.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page
700
600
500
O ..
r
.v m 400
}, �>
Cr
w
0 300
_o v
2 200
100
0
-174 MMTCO Reduction
1990 Emission Baseline
80% Reduction
-341 MMTCO
1990 2000 2010 2020 2050
Year
Although EO S -3 -05 and SB 97 have made California a national leader in climate change policy,
there is much more to come. The California legislature passed numerous bills in recent years
concerning energy use, land use, transportation, and other climate change topics. These bills
10 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). Proposed CEQA Guideline Amendments for
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. April 2009.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
will result in the guidance and funding necessary for local governments to move forward with
climate action efforts.
At the same time, the State is working to form regional approaches to reducing greenhouse gas
emissions in response to the passage of Senate Bill 375 (SB 375). SB 375 aims to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by linking transportation funding to land use planning. It also
requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations, including the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments, to include a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in their Regional
Transportation Plans (RTPs) for reducing suburban sprawl. The bill also creates incentives for
implementation of sustainable communities strategies and sustainable transportation plans.
Additional efforts are under way to affect the overall transportation sector by mandating fewer
emissions from vehicles, including Assembly Bill 1493 signed into law in 2002, which requires
carmakers to reduce emissions from new passenger cars and light trucks beginning in 2009.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved the new emissions standards in
June 2009.
The State is also preparing for climate change resiliency in order to adapt to the inevitable
effects of climate change. In November 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive
Order S -13 -08 which asked the Natural Resources Agency to identify how state agencies can
respond to rising temperature, changing precipitation patterns, sea level rise, and extreme
natural events. The order requires the Natural Resources Agency to develop a Climate
Adaptation Strategy (CAS) to analyze climate change impacts to the state and recommend
strategies to manage those threats. The Natural Resources Agency released a discussion draft
of the CAS in August 2009.
The scale and pace at which the State of California is addressing this issue necessitates that
local governments accelerate efforts to combat climate change.
1.3 THE CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION CAMPAIGN
By adopting a resolution to join ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability, the City of Arroyo
Grande is now part of an international movement of local governments. More than 1,000 local
governments, including over 500 in the United States, have joined ICLEI's Cities for Climate
Protection (CCP) campaign.
The CCP campaign provides a framework for local communities to identify and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, organized along five milestones as represented in Figure 1 -3
below:
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page
��L ea d e rs h ��i P
rIAX
g oo,
I 'jeSt&j'7", "I
[nmentor
�41 ' '11
1
Esta
This report represents the completion of the first CCP milestone, and provides a foundation for
future work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the City of Arroyo Grande.
1.4 LOCAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Many of the air pollution programs already in place throughout San Luis Obispo County reduce
ozone - forming pollutants and toxic emissions, but they also have ancillary benefits and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. The County, cities, and the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
implement rules and regulations, clean fuels programs, CEQA mitigation measures, grants, the
Transportation Choices Program, pollution prevention activities, energy efficiency and
conservation measures, water conservation programs, partnerships, and general public
outreach that directly or indirectly address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
The APCD Board approved the first report or plan to address climate change in the county. The
plan, viii .! ! ! iii.! iii i� N in ��i �n� �0�s�Ob��s u n t (2005), identifies the
following seven actions that could be implemented to specifically address greenhouse gases
(GHG) at the local level:
1) Prepare a countywide inventory of greenhouse gas emissions;
2) Target a percentage of mitigation grant funds for greenhouse gas emission reductions;
3) Evaluate and quantify the GHG reduction benefits from existing district programs;
4) Develop public education and outreach campaigns on climate change;
5) Encourage and provide support for local governments to join the Cities for Climate
Protection program;
6) Develop partnership with Cal Poly for addressing climate change; and
7) Join the California Climate Registry and encourage local industry participation.
As of November 2008, the APCD has initiated, promoted, or supported all of the implementation
actions to address climate change and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the County.
The APCD joined the California Climate Registry and conducted its greenhouse gas emissions
inventory in the fall of 2008. The APCD facilitates regular meetings of Climate Change
Stakeholders, a local group of city and county representatives that shares resources to address
climate change. To encourage and support local greenhouse gas emissions inventories, the
APCD is providing technical assistance to all of the incorporated cities to assist or perform GHG
government operations and community -wide emissions inventories, similar to this Inventory, for
all of the incorporated cities in San Luis Obispo County.
The APCD also coordinates the Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5). C5 is a partnership of
public /private entities whose goal is to promote the use of alternative fuels vehicles (AFV) on the
Central Coast. By working with area fleet operators, C5 sponsors training seminars, public
events and grant funding workshops related to use of alternative fuels.
The City of Arroyo Grande has been pursuing energy efficiencies through such measures as:
• Adoption of a Green Corridor tax incentive program (2009)
• Implementation of Water Conservation programs including:
• - - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
age
o Turf removal financial incentives (2009)
O Plumbing Retrofit Program to provide free low -flow toilets and indoor plumbing
fixtures (on -going since 2004)
O Free irrigation controllers and sensors (on -going since 2009)
o Mandatory conservation measures (2008)
o Free Irrigation audits (ongoing since 2009)
O Sustainable Landscape Seminar Series
• Recycled water study
• Solar and /or wind power facility study
• Public — private project to install compressed natural gas and biodiesel fueling facilities
• Investigating conversion of City fleet to CNG, electric and bio diesel vehicles
• Retrofit of City buildings to increase energy efficiency
• Plan to install solar powered public electric vehicle recharging stations
• Support of SLO Green Build programs
• Police Department vehicles equipped with bicycles and bike racks to supplement patrol
with bicycle patrol
• Development of a bikeway plan
• Expansion of the park- and -ride lot
• Purchase and installation of bike racks and lockers
• Workplace Bike Sharing Program
City of Arroyo Grande
age
2. Community and Government Operations Inventory
Methodology
The first step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to identify baseline levels and
sources of emissions in the city. This information can later inform the selection of a reduction
target and possible reduction measures to be included in a climate action plan.
This section outlines the methodology used to calculate the community and City government
operations inventories, including the difference between the two inventories, and the data
collection process, data sources, GHG emission scopes, data limitations, and means of
calculation.
2.1 BASELINE AND FORECAST YEARS
The year 2005 was selected as the baseline year for the Inventory due to the availability of
reliable data and consistency with other cities in San Luis Obispo County. The State of
California uses 1990 as a reference year to remain consistent with the Kyoto Protocol, and also
because it has well -kept records of transportation trends and energy consumption in that year.
However, cities and counties throughout California typically elect to use 2005 or 2006 as a
baseline year because of the more reliable recordkeeping from those years and because of the
large amount of growth that has occurred since 1990.
This Inventory uses a forecast year of 2020 to be consistent with the State of California GHG
Inventory 12 forecast year and AB 32 target, both of which reference 2020. In addition, it is likely
that any forecast beyond 2020 would have a significant margin of error because of unknown
population growth rates and new technology. The business -as -usual forecast has also been
extended to 2025 in consideration of the City's General Plan Horizon.
F • A =1 0 1 ILGI ;J! I
This Inventory is separated into two sections, community -wide and City government operations.
�Pe ir ICI, .......... I P ........... i m , the City has completed an assessment of activities throughout the
community and a more detailed analysis of City government operations including streetlights,
11 In this report, the term "city" refers to the incorporated area (the jurisdictional boundary of the City of
Arroyo Grande), whereas "City" refers to those activities that are under the operational control of City
agencies. "Community- wide" or "community" refers to all activities within the city (as defined above),
including those from businesses, industrial processes, residents, vehicles, and City government
operations.
12 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory, http / /www.arb.ca.gov /cc /inventory /inventory.htm
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
-sZ
building energy use, fleet vehicles, and more. The City government operations inventory was
conducted consistent with the N........... r Government iii n r t y developed b the
.........
California Air Resources Board (CARB), ICLEI, The Climate Registry, and the California Climate
Action Registry (CCAR).
It is important to note that the City government operations inventory is a subset of the
community inventory, meaning that all City government operations are included in the
commercial /industrial, transportation, waste, or "other" categories of the community -wide
inventory. The City's government operations inventory should not be added to the community
analysis; rather it should be looked at as a slice of the complete picture as illustrated in Figure
2 -1. Although City operations are a small contributor to the community's overall emissions
levels, an inventory allows the City to track its individual facilities and vehicles and to evaluate
the effectiveness of its emissions reduction efforts at a more detailed level.
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
Once completed, these inventories provide the basis for policy development, the quantification
of emissions reductions associated with proposed measures, the creation of an emissions
forecast, and the establishment of an informed emissions reduction target.
2.3 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY
Creating the community and City government operations emissions inventories required the
collection of information from a variety of sources. Sources for community data included the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG &E), the Southern California Gas Company, Caltrans,
and the California Integrated Waste Management Board. City government operations data
sources included PG &E, the Southern California Gas Company, South County Sanitary District,
and documentation from multiple City departments including planning, public works, fleet
maintenance, accounts receivable and more. Data from the year 2005 were used in both
inventories, with the following exceptions:
• A subset of waste data by type was not available for 2005, therefore this study utilizes a
California statewide waste characterization study conducted in 2003 -2004;
• City employee commuting trips were calculated using an employee survey conducted in
2009;
• Complete City vehicle fleet data was not available for 2005, therefore this study utilized
2007, the first full calendar year for which data was available; and
• Propane, wind and solar power used in the community.
For community activities and City operations, emissions sources are categorized by scope.
Scopes help us identify where emissions originate from and what entity retains regulatory
control and the ability to implement efficiency measures. The scopes are illustrated in Figure
2 -2 and defined as follows:
• Scope 1. Direct emissions sources located within the community, mostly from the
combustion of fuels. Examples of Scope 1 sources include use of fuels such as gasoline
and natural gas.
• Scope 2. Indirect emissions that result because of activities within the community,
limited to electricity, district heating, steam and cooling consumption. An example of a
Scope 2 source is purchased electricity used within the community. These emissions
should be included in the community -wide analysis, as they are the result of the
community's electricity consumption.
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page ju
• Scope 3. All other indirect emissions that occur as a result of activity within the
community. Examples of Scope 3 emissions include methane emissions from solid
waste generated within the community which decomposes at landfills either inside or
outside of the community.
Appendices A and B of this report separate the community and City government operations
emissions by scope. Each sector is labeled with a 1, 2, or 3 that corresponds to the scopes
above.
2.4 DATA SOURCES
The data used to complete this Inventory came from multiple sources, as summarized in Tables
2 -1 and 2 -2. Utility providers supplied electricity and natural gas consumption data associated
with commercial, industrial, residential, and City government buildings in 2005. Vehicle miles
traveled (VMT) information was obtained from the 2005 Highway Performance Maintenance
System (HPMS) developed by Caltrans and refined with County Geographic Information System
(GIS) data. These data sources are further explained in the sector - specific discussions of this
document.
City of Arroyo Grande
age
Source: NZBCSD (2002), The Challenge of GHG Emissions: the "why" and "how" of accounting and reporting for GHG
emissions: An Industry Guide, New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development, Auckland
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
-sZ
•]�
It is important to note that calculating community -wide greenhouse gas emissions with precision
is a complicated task. The ICLEI Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP2009) software relies
on numerous assumptions and is limited by the quantity and quality of available data. Because
of these limitations it is useful to think of any specific number generated by the model as an
approximation of reality, rather than an exact value. The city's actual 2005 greenhouse gas
emissions are likely to be slightly greater than what are reported in this document due to three
main factors: (1) data limitations, (2) privacy laws, and 3) a lack of a reasonable methodology to
collect or model emissions data. The following paragraphs highlight emissions that cannot be
included in a GHG Inventory under current science and policy direction or due to lack of reliable
data.
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
Data Limitations
Lack of available data prevented the calculation of emissions from community -wide off -road
vehicles and equipment, propane use and City government operations refrigerants. For off -road
vehicles and equipment emissions the iiif rniii iiir ur r 2007
software provides emissions from a range of activities; however, these numbers are aggregated
for the entire San Luis Obispo County area, including incorporated, unincorporated, and state or
federally owned land.
Lack of data availability also prevents the calculation of emissions from rp opane (liquefied ............
petroleum gas, or LPG) created within the city's boundaries. Propane is basically an
unregulated fuel in California (except for storage and safety issues which are regulated).
Because it is an unregulated commodity, no data is collected by the state on propane sales or
usage. Another sector that was excluded from the inventory is City government operations
refrigerants.
The City of Arroyo Grande made a best effort to gather data on the amount of refrigerants
consumed by fleet vehicles, HVAC systems, and City government operations facilities; however
City records were not suited to this purpose. It is recommended that the City look into amending
its record keeping so that the amount of refrigerants purchased and consumed within a year is
recorded.
Privacy Laws
This Inventory does not separately analyze site -level emissions from specific sources such as
refineries or large industrial emitters. The emissions from industrial energy consumption and
related transportation are included under the commercial /industrial category, but will not be
analyzed independently as part of this Inventory for two reasons:
1) State privacy laws prevent us from obtaining site -level energy consumption data from
utility providers. Notably the California Public Utilities Commission 15/15 rule, 13 prevents
us from analyzing industrial emissions separately from commercial emissions.
2) It is the responsibility of the emitter, whether it is a large refinery or household, to
perform its energy audit and subsequent reduction process. Efforts to require site -level
energy audits and greenhouse gas emissions reporting are being continually expanded
13 Commercial and Industrial Electricity and Natural Gas were combined into one section due to the
California 15/15 rule. The 15/15 rule was adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission in the
Direct Access Proceeding (CPUC Decision 97 -10 -031) to protect customer confidentiality.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
and required by the California Climate Action Registry, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and California Air Resources Board.
Lack of a reasonable methodology
A lack of a reasonable methodology for calculating carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide
prevents estimation of lifecycle emissions for the community. Lifecycle emissions are emissions
associated with the production and disposal of items consumed by a community. For instance, a
lifecycle assessment would estimate the emissions associated with the planning, production,
delivery, and disposal of each car currently in the city. In contrast, this analysis only captures
how much that car drives within the city.
Despite these limitations, the Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP2009) software 14 and
ICLEI methodology provide the best - available snapshot of the city's greenhouse gas emissions.
Additionally, the CACP2009 tool is utilized to promote consistency among municipalities
throughout the country and the world. Sector - specific data limitations or methodological issues
are explained thoroughly in Appendices C and D.
However, it is important to note that the emissions identified in this report are primarily
greenhouse gases that the community has directly caused and has the ability to reduce through
implementation of conservation actions, a Climate Action Plan, or corresponding efforts.
2.6 CLEAN AIR AND CLIMATE PROTECTION SOFTWARE 2009
The City government operations and community -wide inventories use the Clean Air and Climate
Protection (CACP2009) software package developed by ICLEI in partnership with the National
Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) and Torrie Smith Associates. This software
calculates emissions resulting from energy consumption, vehicle miles traveled, and waste
generation. The CACP2009 software calculates emissions using specific factors (or coefficients)
according to the type of fuel used.
CACP2009 aggregates and reports the three main greenhouse gas emissions (CO CH and
N and converts them to equivalent carbon dioxide units, or CO Equalizing the three main
greenhouse gas emissions as CO allows for the consideration of different greenhouse gases
in comparable terms. For example, methane (CH is 21 times more powerful than carbon
14 The Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP2009) software 2009 was developed by the State and
Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators and the Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials
(SAPPA/ALAPCO), the International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI), and Torrie Smith
Associates.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
dioxide on a per weight basis in its capacity to trap heat, so the CACP2009 software converts
one metric ton of methane emissions to 21 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents.
The emissions coefficients and quantification method employed by the CACP2009 software are
consistent with national and international inventory standards established by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines for the
Preparation of National Inventories) and the U.S. Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Guidelines (EIA form 1605).
3. Community GHG Inventory Results
The City of Arroyo Grande contains primarily residential and commercial land uses. In the 2005
baseline year, there were approximately 16,330 people, 7,940 jobs, and 6,665 households in
the City. 16 The following section provides an overview of the emissions caused by activities
within the jurisdictional boundary of the city and analyzes the emissions in terms of scope,
sector, source, and population.
3.1 COMMUNITY -WIDE EMISSIONS BY SCOPE
Although there are countless items that can be included in a
community -wide emissions inventory, as discussed in Chapter 2,
this Inventory includes Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 sources
from the following sectors, consistent with the ICLEI protocol:
• Residential
• Commercial / Industrial
• Transportation
• Waste
• Other - Off -Road Agricultural Equipment Emissions.
Table 3 -1 summarizes the scopes of each sector in this analysis.
15 The potency of a given gas in heating the atmosphere is defined as its Global Warming Potential, or
GWP. For more information on GWP see: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group I, Chapter 2,
Section 2.10.
16 Population and job data calculated from the ERA Report prepared for the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments, July 2006 revision. Household data calculated through 2000 U.S. census data.
• - - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page
Including all sectors and scopes, the
community emitted approximately 96,549
metric tons of CO in 2005. As shown in
Figure 3 -1 and Table 3 -2, the majority of
community GHG emissions were Scope 1
(74.5 %), with Scope 2 (19.4 %) and Scope 3
Scope 1 (6.1 %) constituting the remainder.
7.
The largest portion of Scope 1 emissions
came from the transportation sector (refer to
scope 2 Table 3 -2 and Figure 3 -1). These emissions
19.4% ,, ll�� lii�� qualify as Scope 1 because they involve the
direct combustion of fuel within the
jurisdictional boundary of the city. The
second largest source of Scope 1 emissions
was residential natural gas use. Residential
uses also generated the largest percentage of Scope 2 emissions. Emissions from waste
operations account for the majority of Scope 3 emissions, with inventoried off -road emissions
contributing a minor portion.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
3.2 ALL SCOPE EMISSIONS BY SECTOR
As noted above, the community emitted approximately 96,549 metric tons of CO in calendar
year 2005. In addition to analyzing the data by scope, it can also be aggregated by sector. As
depicted in Figure 3 -2 and Table 3 -3 below, the transportation sector was the largest emitter
(57.0 %) in 2005. Emissions from the residential sector were the next largest contributor
(24.6 %), while the commercial and industrial sectors accounted for a combined 12.3% of the
total. Emissions from solid waste comprised 6.0% of the total, and emissions from other sources
such as agricultural equipment comprised 0.1% of the total. The majority of emissions from the
transportation sector were the result of gasoline consumption in private vehicles traveling on
local roads, US 101, and state highways. GHG emissions from the waste sector are the
estimated future emissions that will result from the decomposition of waste generated by city
residents and businesses in the base year 2005, with a weighted average methane capture
factor of 60.0 %.
17 The "other" category includes emissions from off -road agricultural equipment. This source is
categorized as `other' to correspond with the ICLEI CACP2009 software.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
-sZ
,ig
MW
Industrial 12.3%
18 The "other" cate includes emissions from off -road a e This source is
cate as 'other' to correspond with the ICLEI CACP2009 software.
Cit of Arro Grande
- "0
X" = M. I M I
3.3 TRANSPORTATION
As with the majority of California
municipalities,' travel by on -road motorized
vehicle constitutes the greatest percentage of
greenhouse gas emissions in the city (57.0 %).
The Inventory does not include trains or off -road
recreational vehicles as there is no feasible
methodology for calculating emissions from
these sources as part of a community -wide
inventory. The majority of the emissions in the
transportation sector came from travel on local
roads (75.7 %) in the city (Table 3 -4).
Approximately 24.3% of the greenhouse gas
emissions in the transportation sector resulted
from highway travel. Of the total emissions in
the transportation sector, an estimated 84.4%
was due to gasoline consumption, with the
remaining 15.6% coming from diesel use (see
Figure 3 -3 and Table 3 -5).
19 For a list of California cities and counties that have developed GHG Inventories, refer to the California
Office of Planning and Research's website: http / /www.opr.ca.gov
City of Arroyo Grande
M.''
Agenda Item II.b.
Page
These emissions result from the gasoline and diesel consumption of vehicles traveling within the
city, including those that are just passing through. As a result, it is likely that the City does not
have jurisdictional control to reduce the transportation emissions from the majority of this sector.
However ICLEI and state protocol require that these emissions be included in a local inventory
in order to capture all emissions within the area and calculate their effect on the local
community. The Inventories for all San Luis Obispo cities and the county use this methodology
for consistency and to avoid double- counting of transportation emissions.
This analysis of highway transportation emissions assumes constant levels of travel along all
highways in the county. The Caltrans data includes aggregated vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
along highways for the entire county, including incorporated and unincorporated areas. This
data was allocated to municipal jurisdictions using the proportion of highway miles in the city
and other incorporated and unincorporated areas; traffic counts were not used to measure
actual traffic levels at specific locations. This could mean that the community -wide
transportation emissions are slightly inflated or understated; however, there is currently no
feasible methodology to calculate emissions for individual jurisdictions with traffic data levels.
Further discussion of the transportation sector methodology is included in Appendix C.
3.4 THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL,
INDUSTRIAL)
With all scopes aggregated, 37.0% of total community -wide emissions in the year 2005 came
from the "built environment." The built environment comprises residential, commercial, and
industrial natural gas and electricity consumption. This analysis does not include emissions from
other types of energy such as propane, solar, and wind due to lack of reliable sales,
construction, or consumption data. The commercial and industrial sectors are combined in this
Inventory due to the mandatory aggregating of commercial and industrial data by PG &E
previously referenced.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
In 2005, nearly 70% of emissions from the built environment were from the residential sector,
with the remaining 30% resulting from the commercial /industrial sectors (see Figure 3 -4). All of
the emissions calculated from the built environment were the result of local natural gas
consumption (Scope 1) and local consumption of electricity generated outside of the city (Scope
2). Overall, electricity consumption caused the majority of emissions from the built environment
in 2005, as shown in Figure 3 -5.
��� d Ili pll IIIIII Indus I li!! I
330
Natural Gas
48
S _
�a
Approximately 37.2% of emissions in the residential sector resulted from combustion of natural
gas for heating and cooking (see Figure 3 -6 and Table 3 -6), while 68.1% of emissions in the
commercial /industrial sector came from natural gas usage (see Figure 3 -7 and Table 3 -7).
�a
I W - -
Natural Gas Electricity
37 32
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
-sZ
It is useful to consider the causes behind significant variations in data when developing policies
and programs to reduce emissions from each sector. For example, the policies that would aim
to reduce emissions from the commercial /industrial sector may differ from those aiming to
reduce emissions from the residential sector based upon the information above (and in the
figures and tables below). In this regard, this Inventory provides valuable insight into policy
development strategies.
3.5 WASTE
Solid waste disposed of at managed landfills was responsible for 6% of total emissions for the
community. The CACP2009 software calculates methane generation from waste sent to landfills
in 2005 and accounts for the reported methane recovery factors among the two utilized landfills
(Cold Canyon and Chicago Grade), which each had a methane capture rate of 60% in 2005.
Cold Canyon Landfill accepted approximately 98% of the community's solid waste, while
approximately 2% went to Chicago Grade. The methane recovery factors of the landfills are well
documented by the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District based on the system
operations at that time. For more information, please see detailed methodology in Appendix C.
Waste emissions are considered Scope 3 emissions because they are not generated in the
base year, but will result from the decomposition of waste generated in 2005 over the full 100 -
year+ cycle of its decomposition. In 2005, the community sent approximately 20,245 tons of
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
waste to landfills, including recycled materials used for cover. The 2004 California Statewide
Waste Characterization Study provides standard waste composition for the State of California.
Identifying the different types of waste in the general mix is necessary because during
decomposition various materials generate methane within the anaerobic environment of landfills
at differing rates. Carbonaceous materials such as paper and wood would actually sequester 21
the methane released in managed landfills, thereby offsetting some or all of the emissions from
food and plant waste. However, GHG sequestration at the landfills has been set to zero, based
on guidance in the Local Government Operations Protocol, which recommends eliminating the
effect of landfill sequestration for both government operations inventories and community
inventories, to be consistent with the principle that local government operations and community
inventories should not account for emissions sinks. Figure 3 -8 and Table 3 -8 show the
estimated percentage of emissions coming from the various types of organic, methanogenic
waste.
Oi
&ME=
20 http- / /www.ciwmb.ca.gov/ Publications /defauIt.asp ?pubid =1097
21 Sequestration involves the storage of carbon dioxide in a solid material through biological or physical
processes.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
Off -road agricultural equipment including tractors, mowers, balers, combines, tillers, and other
equipment produced approximately 0.1% of emissions in 2005, or 73 metric tons CO This
calculation was performed using the California Air Resources Board OFFROAD2007 model and
input into the "other" category in CACP2009. The OFFROAD model generates emission
inventories by equipment type, accounting for age within a given year (2005).
The OFFROAD software has the ability to calculate emissions from other types of off -road
vehicles such as recreational vehicles, motor boats, and more. However, since data is
aggregated by county, this information is only usable if it can be divided by jurisdiction within the
county in a reasonable manner. As a reminder, this emissions inventory is a snapshot of
emissions caused by activities within the city in the year 2005. Therefore, absent a methodology
for estimating the portion of off -road vehicles driven or used within various jurisdictions,
OFFROAD data cannot be allocated to different jurisdictions. As current practice and
methodology stands, population data is not an acceptable measure of emissions per jurisdiction.
To complete the analysis of impacts associated with agriculture activities, the Inventory
allocated total agricultural emissions by the percentage of agricultural and open space land
contained in each jurisdiction. For consistency, county agriculture and crop GIS data from 2007
was utilized to determine acreage within each jurisdiction. The city held a very minor part of
agricultural land (0.11%) and therefore only a small portion associated off -road agricultural
equipment emissions.
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
In addition to viewing emissions by sector and by scope, policy and program development can
benefit from an analysis of emissions according to their raw fuel or waste source. Figure 3 -9
and Table 3 -9 below demonstrate that more than 48.0% of all community emissions come from
the consumption of gasoline on local roads and highways. Electricity (19.4 %) and natural gas
(17.6 %) consumption from the built environment are the next most significant figures, with the
remainder coming from diesel fuel, off -road equipment, and various waste products.
• - - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
-!Z
am
Hum
�v
30,000
Cit of Arro Grande
- "0
ElectrIcIt Natural Gas Gasoline Diiesel Of od,''W'ast,e Pa r Plant DebrUs Wood
E ne nt Products Text'I'les
3.8 PER CAPITA EMISSIONS
Simply dividing total community greenhouse gas
emissions by city population in 2005 (16,330) yields a
result of 5.91 metric tons CO per capita .22 It is
important to understand that this number is not the
same as the carbon footprint of the average individual
living in the City of Arroyo Grande and that the per
capita emissions number for the city is not directly
comparable to every per capita number produced by
other emissions studies because of differences in
emissions inventory methods. For general comparison,
in 2005 emissions in California were estimated to be
13.6 metric tons CO per capita, and 23.5 metric tons
Co per capita in the U.S.
22 Population in 2005 derived from the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Long Range Socio-
Economic Projections (Year 2025); July 2006 Revision.
23 Year 2005 tonnes of CO per capita estimate derived by dividing the total emissions reported in the
California greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000 -2005 prepared by the California Air Resource Board by the
2005 California Population Profile prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau.
24 Year 2005 tonnes of CO per capita estimate compiled by the World Resources Institute (WRI)
Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (registration required to access data).
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
4. City Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory
Results
The City of Arroyo Grande government is comprised of nine departments: Administrative
Services, Building and Fire, City Managers offices, Community Development, Legislative and
Information Services /City Clerk, Parks, Recreation and Facilities, Police, and Public Works.
This Inventory accounts for the 105 people employed by the City and City -owned and /or -
operated buildings and facilities in 2005.
This chapter reviews the results of the City government operations inventory by sector, including
employee commuting emissions.
4A CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS INVENTORY RESULTS
City government operations and facilities produced approximately 994 metric tons of
greenhouse gas emissions in 2005. As displayed in Figure 4 -1, this represents approximately
1.0% of total community -wide emissions. City government emissions result from waste, energy
consumption from water and wastewater facilities, buildings, streetlights and other facilities, fuel
consumption by the vehicle fleet and employee commutes, and miscellaneous equipment. The
vehicle fleet was by far the largest contributor to the City's emissions (34.6 %) with 344 metric
tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The second largest contributor (25.5 %) was from the
employee commute. (Refer to Figure 4 -2 and Table 4 -1 below.)
E mployee
licial 1.0% C omm u t e -� Streetlight
& TrIi c
Signal
'Water (Delivery 2.9
," , - Was tewater Facilities
0.4
,_Siolid Wa ste 01.8
Other 1.2
City of Arroyo Grande
-sZ
As mentioned in the Introduction, these emissions are a subset of the community emissions
inventory discussed in Chapter 3. The City's government operations emissions are separately
analyzed in this section in a manner that is similar to the way in which industry or business
would produce a facility -scale greenhouse gas audit. The Local Government Greenhouse Gas
Inventory Protocol developed by the California Air Resources Board, The Climate Registry, the
California Climate Action Registry, and ICLEI guides the methodology for estimating emissions
from local government operations. Local government emissions reporting is deemed significant
in order to establish local governments as climate leaders in the community so that they can
lead by example and pave the way for energy efficiency improvements.
4.2 BUILDING SECTOR
The building sector includes greenhouse gas
emissions from energy consumption in facilities
owned and operated by a municipality. This
inventory calculates electricity and natural gas
consumption in City -owned and - operated
facilities. The facilities included in this analysis
include City Hall, Police and Fire stations, City Natural Gas
Hall, Public Works Yard, the Community and 33.5
Recreation Centers, sports facilities, parks, and
numerous other facilities. Streetlights and traffic
signals, and facilities associated with the
conveyance of water are analyzed separately.
As depicted in Figure 4 -3 and Table 4 -2, the
majority of emissions resulted from electricity
consumption (66.5 %).
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page ou
These emissions and associated consumption data will be useful in determining significant
sources of energy consumption from City facilities. The determination will allow the City to
designate priority facilities for energy efficiency retrofits and conservation outreach.
4.3 VEHICLE AND TRANSIT FLEET
City -owned and - operated vehicles emitted approximately 344 metric tons of CO or 34.6% of
total City government emissions. This sector includes gasoline and diesel consumption from all
departments in the City operating vehicles, including the Fire and Police departments, Parks
and Recreation, and Community Development. This estimate is based on 2007 data, the
earliest calendar year for which complete data is available. No significant changes in the vehicle
fleet or operating practices occurred during this time interval.
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
4.4 EMPLOYEE COMMUTE
This sector estimates greenhouse gas emissions from City employees traveling to and from
work in 2005. The estimate is based on a June 2009 online survey conducted by the City, a
blank version of which is included as Appendix F. Approximately 55 employees responded to
the survey with usable information, meaning that all essential questions were answered, for an
approximate a 62% response rate, the results of which were applied to the City employment
total for 2005.
The online survey found that most City employees travel to and from work by car. Employees
were asked how many days of the week they travel by each commute mode, including driving
alone (which includes motorcycles), carpooling, vanpooling, public transit, bicycling, walking,
telecommuting, and other. The results show that employees get to and from 86% of their
workdays by personal vehicle. The second most popular mode of transportation was walking or
biking with a combined (7.7 %), followed by carpooling with 3.5% of the total.
These figures for commute mode were combined with each respondent's travel distance to
work, car model (if any), and fuel type (if any). The results show vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
annually per vehicle type and fuel type (see Table 4 -4). These VMT numbers were then
adjusted for the total employee population in 2005 and entered into the CACP2009 software to
obtain CO
Driving patterns were assumed to be constant for the purposes of this study; therefore, the 2009
sample was applied directly to the 2005 employee population. Only one modification to the
• - - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
sample data was made in order to account for the large increase in hybrid car sales between
2005 and 2009. The proportion of hybrid to traditional vehicles was roughly two - thirds less in
2005 than in 2009, according to state sales data.
The 2009 survey results, adjusted for 2005 employee totals, resulted in an estimated 253 metric
tons CO in 2005 from commuter travel to and from work. This figure comprises approximately
25.5% of total greenhouse gas emissions released from City government operations. The
calculation does not include employee business travel or travel during lunchtime hours.
Employee business travel is usually included in a City government GHG Inventory per protocol;
however, we could not include it in this baseline analysis due to data limitations. The City
maintains financial records of when employees travel by air or vehicle to conferences and other
events; however, it does not keep records of business travel destinations. As such, this
Inventory could not accurately account for GHG emissions from employee business travel. A
minor adjustment to City record - keeping would allow the data to be included in the next City
government operations GHG inventory.
25 www.hybridcars.com
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
4.5 STREETLIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
The electricity consumed by City streetlights and traffic signals in calendar year 2005 resulted in
approximately 156 metric tons of CO or approximately 15.7% of total City government
emissions. This Inventory accounts for approximately 34 streetlights and traffic signals.
Cam•
In 2005, electricity consumption from water and wastewater facilities in the City emitted
approximately 33 metric tons of CO or 3.3% of total emissions. This category includes energy
use at the numerous lift stations, pumps and wells that are necessary to convey water to serve
all city residents as well as municipal irrigation systems.
4.7 WASTE
Similar to the Community -Wide analysis, waste produced by City facilities was calculated using
the methane commitment method. The CACP2009 calculates the methane expected to be
released from this landfilled waste over the course of its lifetime. In 2005, City facilities sent a
total of 22.9 tons of waste to landfills, producing 8 metric tons of CO or 0.8% of total
emissions. Unlike other sectors analyzed, the emissions from waste disposed of in 2005 will
occur over multiple years as the waste breaks down over time.
4.8 OTHER — MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
The "other" category encompasses emissions from miscellaneous equipment such as general
service equipment and equipment used at park facilities. This equipment resulted in 12 metric
tons of carbon dioxide, and less than 1.2% of total emissions.
Emissions from miscellaneous City equipment were analyzed outside of the CACP2009
software using the California Air Resources Board protocol for inventorying local GHGs.
Emissions were then put into the CACP2009 software in the "other" category, which allows for
direct inputs when CACP2009 automation is not feasible.
4.9 CITY EMISSIONS BY SOURCE
It can also be helpful to view overall City government emissions by source. As shown in Table
4 -5 and Figure 4 -5, the majority of emissions are from gasoline (52.0 %) consumed by the
vehicle fleet and employee commute, electricity (31.6 %) consumption in City -owned buildings,
streetlights, and water /sewage facilities, and diesel (8.0 %), also consumed by the vehicle fleet
and employee commute. Natural gas, solid waste and miscellaneous equipment contributed in
decreasing amounts to the remaining 8.4% of the overall City greenhouse gas emissions.
• - - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b.
Page
550
500
450
400
w
N
0
N 350
0
. 300
a.+
250
200
150
100
50
Electricity Natural Gas Gasoline Diesel Solid Waste Other
City of Arroyo Grande ==
5. Forecast
The emissions forecast for the City of Arroyo Grande represents a business -as -usual prediction
of how community -wide GHG levels will change over time if consumption trends and behavior
continue as they did in 2005. These predictions are based on the community inventory results
included in this report and statistics on job, household, and population growth from the City. The
analysis (refer to Figure 5 -1) shows that if behavior and consumption trends continue as
business -as- usual, emissions will reach 116,556 metric tons of CO by 2020, or a 20.7%
increase over 2005 baseline levels. By 2025 emissions will reach 124,303 metric tons of CO
or a 28.7% increase over 2005 baseline levels.
The forecast does not quantify emissions reductions from state or federal activities including AB
32, the renewable portfolio standard, and SB 375. Additionally, it does not take into account
reduction activities already under way or completed since 2005, the results of which likely put
the community's emissions on a track well below the business -as -usual linear projection.
Forecasts were performed by applying household, job, and population growth rates to 2005
community -wide greenhouse gas emissions levels. Baseline data and estimated growth were
obtained from a long -range projections report developed by the San Luis Obispo Council of
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page bb
Governments in 2006, as revised in May 2009. The "mid- range" cases for population, job, and
household growth were used in this forecast estimation.
City government operations emissions are not separately analyzed as part of this forecast due
to a lack of reasonable growth indicators for the City government sector. However, an increase
in emissions is not expected for existing facilities and operations in the City government
operations sector. If anything, the City expects that emissions within the scope of the 2005 City
government operations inventory will decrease because of energy efficiency improvements,
fleet upgrades, and the consolidation of Fire and Police Services with adjacent jurisdictions. At
the same time, it is likely the City will have to expand services and infrastructure to
accommodate the expected growth in the region, which could add new sources of emissions to
the City government operations inventory that did not exist in 2005.
City of Arroyo Grande
-!Z
6. Conclusion and Next Steps
The City of Arroyo Grande has made a formal commitment to
reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. This report lays the
groundwork for those efforts by estimating baseline emission
levels against which future progress can be demonstrated.
This analysis found that the community was responsible for
emitting 96,549 metric tons of CO in the base year 2005, with
the transportation sector contributing the most (57.0 %) to this
total. As a component of the community -wide analysis, City
government operations produced 944 metric tons of CO or
1.0% of the total. In addition to establishing the baseline for
tracking progress over time, this report serves to identify the
major sources of city emissions, and therefore the greatest
opportunities for emissions reductions. In this regard, the
emissions inventory ought to inform the focus of the City's
Climate Action Plan. If no action is taken, this report found that
business -as -usual emissions will likely rise by 20.7% by 2020
and 28.7% by 2025.
It is important to note that in order to remain consistent with
greenhouse gas reduction methodology, all future quantifications
OT reduction activities must be subtracted from this business -as-
usual line. Not doing so would be assuming that emissions
remain at constant 2005 levels while reduction activities are under way. In reality, the City's
climate action efforts will be working against a rising emissions level due to job, population, and
household growth. Figure 6 -1 below shows the business -as -usual emissions forecast in relation
to 2005 baseline levels and the 15% reduction below 2005 levels recommended by the
California Attorney General and Air Resources Board. 26
The difference between the business -as -usual forecast and the reduction targets is actually
35.7% in 2020 and 54.6% in 2025, which makes the State's recommended reduction goal
challenging, but still feasible. As noted in the Forecast section of this report, it is likely that the
26 The ,,,,,,,,,,,;; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Climate ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i . o iii n w ,,, n Document prepared by the Air Resources Board calls for
reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by cutting approximately 30 percent from business -as-
usual emission levels projected for 2020, or about 15 percent from today's levels.
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item 11.b.
Page bts
City's sustainability efforts have already caused emissions to fall below the business -as -usual
linear projection line, thus making the 34,490 metric tons CO reduction by 2020 achievable.
130,000
110000
90 . F 000
Business -as -usual
forecast 116,556
metric tons CO
by 2020; 124,303
metric tons CO
by 2025
2005 baseline
levels =
96,549 metric
tons CO
15% below 2005
baseline levels =
82,067 metric
tons CO by
2020; pursuing
80% reduction by
2050 = 77,239
metric tons CO
by 2025
Actual
Reduction =
34,490
metric tons
(35.7 %) by
2020; 47
metric tons
(48.7 %) by
2025 below
business -as-
usual
70,000 1 __ _ __ _ _ __
2020
2025
As the City moves forward to the next milestones in the process, including designation of
emissions reduction targets and development of a Climate Action Plan, the City should identify
and quantify the emissions reduction benefits of projects that have already been implemented
since 2005, as well as the emissions reduction benefits of existing General Plan policies. The
benefits of both existing strategies can be tallied against the baseline established in this report
to determine the appropriate set of strategies that will deliver the City to its chosen emissions
reduction goal.
City of Arroyo Grande
age
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 60
APPENDIX A:
CACP DETAILED REPORT FOR COMMUNITY-
WIDE EMISSIONS,, 2005
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 62
10/8/2009
Communit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 1
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu)
Residential
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I SoCal Gas Compan - Residential
Natural Gas 14,815 279 1,647 14,936 15.5 279,214
Subtotal I SoCal Gas Compar 14,815 279 1,647 14,936 15.5 279,214
Source:
1. Southern California Gas Co. data provided b Colb Morrow, Air Qualit Mana Customer Pro Environmental Affairs; office: 559.324.0109
or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com.
Notes:
1. Conversion of 1 MCF= 10 therms was used.
2. Default Fuel CO2 Set.
3. CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas - RCI Avera Set
2 PG&E Residential Electricit
Electricit 8,769 197 520 8,841 9.2 134,931
Subtotal 2 PG&E Residential E 8,769 197 520 8,841 9.2 134,931
Source:
1. All PG&E data was provided b John Bohman, Pacific Gas and Electric Compan Green Communities and Innovator Pilots; 415-973-0040 or
jzbx@PGE.com.
Notes:
1. The "PG&E California" electricit coefficient set is based on the 2005 PG&E eCO2 emission factor of 0.489 lbs/kWh of delivered electricit This
emissions factor is certified b the California Climate Action Re Criteria air pollutant emission factors for electricit are derived from the NERC
Re 13-Western S Coordinatin Council/CNV Avera Grid.
Subtotal Residential 23,584 476 2,167 23,777 24.6 414,144
Commercial
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I SoCal Gas Compan - Commercial
Natural Gas 3,754 71 417 3,785 3.9 70,748
Subtotal I SoCal Gas Compar 3,754 71 417 3,785 3.9 70,748
Source:
1. Southern California Gas Co. data provided b Colb Morrow, Air Qualit Mana Customer Pro Environmental Affairs; office: 559.324.0109
or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com.
Notes:
1. Conversion of 1 MCF= 10 therms was used.
2. Default Fuel CO2 Set.
3. CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas - RCI Avera Set
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 63
10/8/2009
Communit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 2
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu)
2 PG&E Commercial + Industrial Electricit
Electricit 8,039 181 477 8,105 8.4 123,693
Subtotal 2 PG&E Commercial 8,039 181 477 8,105 8.4 123,693
Source:
1. All PG&E data was provided b John Bohman, Pacific Gas and Electric Compan Green Communities and Innovator Pilots; 415-973-0040 or
jzbx@PGE.com.
Notes:
1. The "PG&E California" electricit coefficient set is based on the 2005 PG&E eCO2 emission factor of 0.489 lbs/kWh of delivered electricit This
emissions factor is certified b the California Climate Action Re Criteria air pollutant emission factors for electricit are derived from the NERC
Re 13-Western S Coordinatin Council/CNV Avera Grid.
2. Commercial and Industrial electricit are combined due to the 15/15 Rule, which was adopted b the CPUC in the Direct Access Proceedin
(CPUC Decision 97-10-031) to protect customer confidentialit The 15/15 rule re that an a information provided b the Utilities
must be made up of at least 15 customers and a sin customer'
Subtotal Commercial
111793 252 894 11,889 12.3 194,441
Industrial
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I SoCal Gas Compan - Industrial
Natural Gas 9 0 1 9 0.0 177
Subtotal I SoCal Gas Compar 9 0 1 9 0.0 177
Source:
1. Southern California Gas Co. data provided b Colb Morrow, Air Qualit Mana Customer Pro Environmental Affairs; office: 559.324.0109
or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com.
Notes:
1. Conversion of 1 MCF= 10 therms was used.
2. Default Fuel CO2 Set.
3. CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas - RCI Avera Set
Subtotal Industrial 9 0 1 9 0.0 177
Transportation
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I Communit On-Road VMT
Diesel 6,483 19 922 6,508 6.7 88,919
Gasoline 34,125 2,577 10,353 35,141 36.4 502,283
Subtotal I Communit On-Roa 40,607 2,596 11,275 41,649 43.1 591,202
Source:
1. Emissions factors for g as and diesel per vehicle class provided b EMFAC 2007 v2.3 run b Tom Scheffelin, California Air
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 64
10/8/2009
Communit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 3
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu)
Resources Board Plannin and Technical Support Division, T scheffe garb. ca. g ov. Manipulated b Jaime Hill, PMC,
jhillgPMCworld.com to convert EMFAC vehicle classes to those used in CACP.
Notes:
1. Diesel Heav Dut Vehicles includes Transit Buses, based on a wei avera of Trucks representin 98.7% of the cate
and Transit Buses representin 3.3%.
2. Gasoline Passen Vehicles includes Motorc based on a wei avera of Passen Vehicles representin 98.7% of the
cate and Motorc representin 1.3%.
I Communit State Hi VMT
Diesel 2,083 6 296 2,091 2.2 28,569
Gasoline 10,964 828 3,326 11,290 11.7 161,380
Subtotal I Communit State H 13,047 834 3,623 13,381 13.9 189,949
Source:
1. Emissions factors for g as and diesel per vehicle class provided b EMFAC 2007 v2.3 run b Tom Scheffelin, California Air
Resources Board Plannin and Technical Support Division, T scheffe garb. ca. g ov. Manipulated b Jaime Hill, PMC,
jhillgPMCworld.com to convert EMFAC vehicle classes to those used in CACP.
2. Hi road se derived from San Luis Obispo Count GIS shapefiles for roads and political boundaries, provided b
Bobb Jo Close, Mappin S Specialist at the Count of San Luis Obispo. Manipulated b John DeMartino, PMC,
jdemartinogPMCworld.com.
Notes:
1. Diesel Heav Dut Vehicles includes Transit Buses, based on a wei avera of Trucks representin 98.7% of the cate
and Transit Buses representin 3.3%.
2. Gasoline Passen Vehicles includes Motorc based on a wei avera of Passen Vehicles representin 98.7% of the
cate and Motorc representin 1.3%.
3. Hi maintained miles differ sli from HPMS data. It is likel that the Count GIS 123shapefile is more detailed than
Caltrans fi 2. The Cit hi VMT was calculated b usin GIS to find the portion of hi road se in
unincorporated Count land and multipl it b total Count hi VMT.
Subtotal Transportation
53,654 3,430 14,898 55,030 57.0 781,151
Waste
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
3 Communit Solid Waste - Cold Can Disposal Method - Mana Landfill
Paper Products 0 0 153,378
3,221 3.3
Food Waste 0 0 60,152
1,263 1.3
Plant Debris 0 0 16,141
339 0.4
Wood or Textiles 0 0 45,042
946 1.0
Subtotal 3 Communit Solid W 0 0 2741713 5,769 6.0
Source:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 65
10/8/2009
Communit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 4
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu)
1. Total waste tonna for the Cit in 2005 provided b the 2005 Disposal Q uarterl y Reports prepared b San Luis Obispo Count
Inte Waste Mana Authorit on 6/17/05, 9/27/05, 12/27/05 and 3/6/06, provided b Peter Cron, perongiwma.com.
2. Percenta of waste share b t for landfill tonna provided b CIWMB 2004 Statewide Waste Characterization Stud
http://www.ciwmb.ca.
Notes:
1. Waste T data not collected b landfill. State avera waste characterization data is used for residential, commercial and self
haul waste.
2. Chica Grade landfill reports a methane recover factor of 60%. Chica Grade total g as g enerated = 157.47 mmcf/ Total g as
transferred = 94.48 mmcf/
3. Cold Can landfill reports a methane recover factor of 60%. Cold Can total g as g enerated = 700 mmcf/ Total g as
transferred = 400 mmcf/
Subtotal Waste 0 0 2741713 5,769 6.0
Other
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
3 A Emissions
Carbon Dioxide 73 0 0 73 0.1
Methane 0 0 15 0 0.0
Nitrous Oxide 0 1 0 0 0.0
Subtotal 3 A Emissic 73 1 15 73 0.1
Source:
1. CO2 CH4 and N20 emissions calculated usin the California Air Resources Board OFFROAD2007 modelin tool.
2. The portion of a land per jurisdiction in SLO Count calculated b John DeMartino, PMC,
j demartmo ( & I
.PMCworld.com <ma* Ito: J demartmo(a PMCworldxom> usin Count GIS shape files.
Notes:
1. OFFROAD a off-road a e emissions for the entire count Emissions were separated b jurisdiction
based on the proportion of a land per jurisdiction. This anal was completed sin GIS shapefiles of land use patterns
in the count
2. OFFROAD includes the followin a e 2-wheel tractors, a mowers, a tractors, balers,
combines, h power units, other a e spra swathers and tillers.
Subtotal Other 73 1 15 73 0.1
Total 89,113 4,159 292,688 96,549 100.0 1,389,914
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 66
APPENDIX B:
CACP DETAILED REPORT FOR CITY
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS,
2005
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 68
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 1
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
Buildin and Facilities
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I & 2 Police Station
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 2,233
Natural Gas 9 0 1 9 0.9 171 2,088
Subtotal 1& 2 Police Station 9 0 1 9 0.9 175 4,321
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Police Station SoCal Gas Account Number:093-015-0800-9, PG&E Account Number: 8532998230.
I & 2 1375 Cit Yard
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 88
Natural Gas 9 0 1 9 1.0 178 2,233
Subtotal I & 2 1375 Cit Yard 9 0 1 10 1.0 178 2,320
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Cit Yard SoCal Gas Account Number: 120-416-0700-8, PG&E Account Number: 8532998130 10-4321-251.
I & 2 Buildin Department
Electricit 2 0 0 2 0.2 27 1,356
Natural Gas 2 0 0 2 0.2 35 527
Subtotal 1& 2 Buildin Depart, 4 0 0 4 0.4 62 1,882
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Buildin Department SoCal Gas Account Number: 178-814-9100-9, PG&E Account Number: 8532998285 10-4311-251.
I & 2 Communit Center
Electricit 3 0 0 3 0.3 52 2,352
Natural Gas 5 0 1 5 0.5 100 1,457
Subtotal 1& 2 Communit Cer 9 0 1 9 0.9 152 3,810
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 69
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 2
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
1. Communit Center SoCal Gas Account Number: 145-014-3900-5, PG&E Account Number: 8532998250 10-4311-251.
I & 2 Communit Development
Electricit 8 0 0 8 0.8 122 5,181
Natural Gas 2 0 0 2 0.2 45 640
Subtotal I & 2 Communit DeL 10 0 1 10 1.0 167 5,822
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa ( tme y ers @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5436
Notes:
1. Communit Development SoCal Gas Account Number: 191-414-9100-1, PG&E Account Number: 8532998270.
I & 2 Council Chambers
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 88
Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 130
Subtotal 1& 2 Council Chambi 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 218
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa ( tme y ers @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5436
Notes:
1. Council Chambers SoCal Gas Account Number: 193-514-9100-6, PG&E Account Number: 8532998265.
I & 2 Fire Department
Electricit 18 0 1 19 1.9 284 12,429
Natural Gas 23 0 3 23 2.3 426 5,840
Subtotal I & 2 Fire Departmen 41 1 4 41 4.2 710 18,269
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa ( tme y ers @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5436
Notes:
1. Fire Department SoCal Gas Account Number: 037-914-3800-9 PG&E Account Number: 8532998029.
I & 2 Police Substation
Electricit 34 1 2 34 3.4 517 19,728
Natural Gas 1 0 0 1 0.1 18 350
Subtotal I & 2 Police Substati( 35 1 2 35 3.5 535 20,078
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa ( tme y ers @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5436
Notes:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 70
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 3
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (MMBtu)
1. Police SubStation SoCal Gas Account Number: 107-647-4842-11 PG&E Account Number: 8532998160.
I & 2 Public Works
Electricit 3 0 0 3 0.3 40 1,836
Natural Gas 1 0 0 1 0.1 18 333
Subtotal 1& 2 Public Works 4 0 0 4 0.4 58 2,168
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Public Works Department SoCal Gas Account Number: 187-214-9100-1, PG&E Account Number: 8532998280.
1350 S ELM ST PARK
Natural Gas 10 0 1 10 1.0 182 2,657
Subtotal 1350 S ELM ST PAF 10 0 1 10 1.0 182 2,657
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Elm St. Park SoCal Gas Account Number:01 1-216-0600-6.
I The Quarterdeck Restaurant
Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 133
Subtotal I The Quarterdeck R( 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 133
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Quarterdeck Restaurant SoCal Gas Account Number:076-115-2400-5.
2 1501 Huckleberr Ave.
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 183
Subtotal 2 1501 Huckleberr A 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 183
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item 11.b.
Pa 71
12/7/2009 Pa 4
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
CO N 2 0
CH 4
E CO
Ener
Cost
(tonnes (k
(k
(tonnes)
(MMBtu)
1. PG&E Account Number: 7812966675.
2 Loomis Tank Centers
Electricit 5 0
0
5
0.5
80
3,648
Subtotal 2 Loomis Tank Cente 5 0
0
5
0.5
80
3,648
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Loomis PG&E Account Number: 8532998260 10-4311-251-215.
2 Parks Department Festivals
Electricit 1 0
0
1
0.1
9
509
Subtotal 2 Parks Department f 1 0
0
1
0.1
9
509
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Parks Department Festivals PG&E Account Number: 8532998310.
2 Public Works Yard
Electricit 9 0
1
9
0.9
138
6,138
Subtotal 2 Public Works Yard 9 0
1
9
0.9
138
6,138
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Public Works Yard PG&E Account Number: 8532998120.
2 Radio Repeater
Electricit 0 0
0
0
0.0
7
414
Subtotal 2 Radio Repeater 0 0
0
0
0.0
7
414
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Radio Repeater PG&E Account Number: 8532998020 10-4200-251.
2 Recreation Center
Electricit 7 0
0
7
0.7
113
5,159
Subtotal 2 Recreation Center 7 0
0
7
0.7
113
5,159
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 72
12/7/2009
Pa 5
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (MMBtu)
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Recreation Center PG&E Account Number: 8532998105.
2 Restroorns
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 297
Subtotal 2 Restroorns 0 0 0
0
0.0
5
297
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Restrooms PG&E Account Number: 8532998360 10-4320-251.
2 Soto Sports 2
Electricit 0 0 0
0
0.0
1
123
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports 2 0 0 0
0
0.0
1
123
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports 2 PG&E Account Number: 8532998140 10-4321-251
2 Soto Sports 3
Electricit 33 1 2
33
3.4
509
16,969
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports 3 33 1 2
33
3.4
509
16,969
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports 3 PG&E Account Number: 8532998145 10-4321-251
2 Soto Sports 4
Electricit 0 0 0
0
0.0
0
88
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports 4 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 88
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports 4 PG&E Account Number: 8532998130 10-4321-251.
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 73
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 6
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
2 Soto Sports Complex I
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 5,912
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports COM 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 5,912
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports Complex 1 PG&E Account Number: 8532998100 10-4321-251.
2 Soto Sports Restrooms
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 75
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports Restro( 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 75
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports Restroom PG&E Account Number: 8532998150 10-4320-251
2 Soto Sports Timer
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 10
Subtotal 2 Soto Sports Timer 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 10
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Soto Sports Timer PG&E Account Number: 8532998220 10-4320-251
Subtotal Buildin and Facilities 187 4 14 188 18.9 3,087 101,203
Streetli & Traffic Si
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
2 Street Li
Electricit 128 3 8 129 13.0 1,966 209,529
Subtotal 2 Street Li 128 3 8 129 13.0 1,966 209,529
Source:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Street Li PG&E ID #s: 8892110005 10-4312-2521 1940974026, 1940974028, 6208387003, 2350444653, 1903183645, 1940974002,
194097400411940974008,1940974014,1940974016,1940974022,190979002.190979004.
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 74
12/7/2009 Pa 7
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (MMBtu)
2 Traffic Controls
Electricit 27 1 2 27 2.7 416 18,287
Subtotal 2 Traffic Controls 27 1 2 27 2.7 416 18,287
Source:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Traffic Si PG&E ID #s: 6547744005, 7812966675, 2350444005, 8532998015 10-4312-252, 8532998135 W/SPRC ST 10-4321-251,
8532998025 10-4320-25, 8532998045 10-4312-252, 8532998050, 8532998055, 8532998075, 8532998165, 8532998170, 8532998195 10-4312-252,
8532998215 10-4312-252, 8532998235 10-4312-252, 8532998245, 8532998315, 8532998335 010-4304-5402, 8532998200 10-4312-2521
8532998035 10-4312-252.
Subtotal Streetli & Traffic Si 155 3 9 156 15.7
2,382
227,816
Water Deliver Facilities
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
2 Irri
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0
4
3,065
Subtotal 2 Irri 0 0 0 0 0.0
4
3,065
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Irri PG&E Account Numbers: 8532998330 10-4320-251, 8532998265, 8532998070, 8532998370 10-4320-251, 8532998300 10-4320-251,
8532998295 10-4320-251, 8532998210 10-4320-251, 8532998155, 8532998068 10-4320-251, 8532998030 10-4320-251.
2. Irri totals include all irri includin sprinklers and irri controls.
2 Res #3
Electricit 0 0 0 0 0.0
0
273
Subtotal 2 Res #3 0 0 0 0 0.0
0
273
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Res #3 PG&E Account Number: 8532998375 300'S/0 PLMA 40-4412-252.
2 Water Pumps
Electricit 21 0 1 22 2.2
331
506,096
Subtotal 2 Water Pumps 21 0 1 22 2.2
331
506,096
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 75
12/7/2009
Pa 8
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
1. Water Pump PG&E Account Numbers: 8532998340 WTR DEP 40-4412-252, 8532998325, 8532998175, 8532998115 40-4411-252, 8532998110
10-4321-251, 8532998095 REC DEPT 10-4320-251, 8532998090 40-4411-252, 8532998060 40-4411-252.
2 Well Station #3
Electricit 2 0 0 2 0.2 34 56,160
Subtotal 2 Well Station #3 2 0 0
2 0.2
34
56,160
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Well Station #3 PG&E Account Number: 8532998085 40-4411-252.
2 Well Station #5
Electricit 4 0 0
4 0.4
65
111,920
Subtotal 2 Well Station #5 4 0 0
4 0.4
65
111,920
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Well Station #5 PG&E Account Number: 8532998125 40-4411-252.
2 Well Station #9
Electricit 1 0 0
1 0.1
13
30,222
Subtotal 2 Well Station #9 1 0 0
1 0.1
13
30,222
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Well Station #5 PG&E Account Number: 8532998040 40-4411-252.
Subtotal Water Deliver Facilities 29 1 2 29 2.9 448 707,736
Wastewater Facilities
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
2 Lift Stations
Electricit 2 0 0 2 0.2 29 67,345
Subtotal 2 Lift Stations 2 0 0 2 0.2 29 67,345
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 76
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 9
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
1. Lift Station PG&E Account Numbers: 85329980320 12-4400-252 LIFT ST#4, 2998345 12-4400-252-LFT.STA.#3, 8532998135 W/SPRC ST 10-
4321-251 OF-LT-PRT.
2 Sewer Lift Stations
Electricit 2 0 0 2 0.2 36 94,641
Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Stations 2 0 0 2 0.2 36 94,641
Sources:
1. All records were provided b Finance Department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
Notes:
1. Sewer Lift Station PG&E Account Numbers: 8532998190 10-4400-252-SWR.STA.#1, 8532998250 12-4400-252 SWR LFT #5, 8532998080 FIN
DEP 12-4400-252-SWR.LFT.#6.
Subtotal Wastewater Facilities 4 0 0 4 0.4 65 161,986
Solid Waste Facilities
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
3 Cit Operations Generated Waste
Carbon Dioxide 8 0 0 8 0.8 0 4,768
Subtotal 3 Cit Operations Gel 8 0 0 8 0.8 0 4,768
Sources:
1. All records were provided b finance department.
2. Tricia Me Accounts Pa (tme (805-473-5420 ext. 5436)
3. Referrin to Cold Can and South Count Sanitar landfills with a recover factor of 609/0.
Notes:
1. Waste t data not collected b Cold Can and South Count Sanitar landfills. State avera waste characterization data was used for
residential, commercial and self haul waste.
2. Weeekl cubic y ard collection data was converted to tonna at the rate of 325 lbs per cubic y ard.
Subtotal Solid Waste Facilities 8 0 0 8 0.8 0 4,768
Vehicle Fleet
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I Buildin Department
Gasoline 5 0 0 5 0.5 70 447
Subtotal I Buildin Departmen 5 0 0 5 0.5 70 447
Sources:
1. All records were provided b the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk (kwetmore@arro (805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416). Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
( (805-473-5460 ext. 5460)
Notes:
1. Buildin Department fleet. All of the fleet are li trucks.
2. Due to the ver limited amount of fleet data for the Cit in 2005, 2007 is used as the prox y ear. There were no si chan in this time
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 77
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 10
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) M
0 =20 ON
I Fire Department
Diesel 28 0 0 28 2.8 384 8,284
Gasoline 13 1 1 13 1.4 194 4,637
Subtotal I Fire Department 41 1 1 41 4.2 579 12,921
Sources:
1. All records were provided b the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk (kwetmore@arro (805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416). Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
( (805-473-5460 ext. 5460)
Notes:
1. Fire Department fleet. Most all of the fleet vehicles are diesel heav dut trucks and fire en except for one diesel li truck.
2. Due to the ver limited amount of fleet data for the Cit in 2005, 2007 is used as the prox y ear. Therefore all vehicles (one heav dut truck)
that were made in 2005 to 2007 are placed in the 2005 cate There were no si chan in this time period.
I Parks Department
Diesel 15 0 0 15 1.5 209 2,590
Gasoline 32 2 1 32 3.2 464 19,425
Subtotal I Parks Department 47 2 1 47 4.8 673 22,015
Sources:
1. All records were provided b the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk ( kwetmore @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416 Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
(g boner @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5460 ext. 5460
Notes:
1. Parks department fleet. Almost all vehicles run on unleaded g asoline except one diesel li truck.
2. Due to the ver limited amount of fleet data for the Cit in 2005, 2007 is used as the prox y ear. Therefore all vehicles ( one heav dut truck and
one li truck that were made in 2005 to 2007 are placed in the 2005 cate There were no si chan in this time period.
3. Parks Department off-hi e use. There are three documented off-hi e uses that use diesel: P -11, P-4 and P-405.
I Police Department
Diesel 4 0 0 4 0.4 49 30
Gasoline 136 3 4 138 13.8 2,007 49,924
Subtotal I Police Department 140 3 4 141 14.2 2,057 49,954
Sources:
1. All records were provided b the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk ( kwetmore @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416 Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
(g boner @ arro y o g rande.or g) ( 805-473-5460 ext. 5460
Notes:
1. Police Department fleet. All vehicles run on unleaded g asoline.
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 78
12/7/2009
Pa 11
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
CO N 2 0 CH 4 E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) M
2. Due to the ver limited amount of fleet data for the Cit in 2005, 2007 is used as the prox y ear. Therefore all vehicles that were made in 2005
to 2007 are placed in the 2005 cate There were no si chan in this time period.
I Public Works Fleet
Diesel 31 0 0 31 3.1 423 11,433
Gasoline 77 4 3 78 7.9 1,132 30,168
Subtotal I Public Works Fleet 108 4 3 109 11.0 1,555 41,601
Sources:
1. All records were provided b the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk (kwetmore@arro (805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416). Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
( (805-473-5460 ext. 5460)
Notes:
1. Public Works fleet. Since CACP software inventor y ears for vehicle fleet start at 1985, all vehicles (one li truck and one heav dut truck),
that were made before 1985 are lo in as 1985.
2. Due to the ver limited amount of fleet data for the Cit in 2005, 2007 is used as the prox y ear. Therefore all vehicles (li trucks and heav
dut trucks) that were made in 2005 to 2007 are placed in the 2005 cate There were no si chan in this time period.
3. Public Works off-hi e use. There are ten documented off-hi e uses that use diesel: PW-1, PW-9, PW-12, PW-38,
PW-55, PW-1 11, PW-243, PW-249, PW-282, and PW-398.
Subtotal Vehicle Fleet 340 10 10 344 34.5 4,933 126,937
Emplo Commute
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
3 Emplo Commute
Diesel 2 0 0 2 0.2 29 0
Gasoline 242 18 144 251 25.2 3,567 0
Subtotal 3 Emplo Commut( 244 18 144 253 25.4 3,596 0
Sources:
1. Emplo commute surve conducted in September 2009 and adjusted for 2005 emplo fi Surve data manipulated b Jaime
Hill, jhill@pmcworld.com.
2. 2005 and 2009 Cit emplo fi obtained from Kell Heffernon, Associate Planner, kheffernon@arro
3. H fuel econom of a 2005 To Prius, www.fueleconom
Notes:
1. 55 Cit emplo successfull responded to the online surve or on paper, meanin that all essential entries were g iven.
2. Surve responses were adjusted for the 2005 emplo population, assumin constant distribution of g asoline/diesel consumption b
vehicle t The population of h cars was decreased b 2/3, based on California sales records found at www.h
3. For more detailed information on the methodolo used in this sector, please see the appendices.
Subtotal Emplo Commute
244 18 144 253 25.4
3,596 0
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
A Item I I.b.
Pa 79
12/7/2009
Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005
Detailed Report
Pa 12
CO N 2 0 CH E CO Ener Cost
(tonnes (k (k (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($)
Other Process Fu
San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA
I Off Road E
Carbon Dioxide 12 0 0 12 1.2
Methane 0 0 1 0 0.0
Nitrous Oxide 0 0 0 0 0.0
Subtotal I Off Road E 12 0 1 12 1.2
Sources:
1. 2007 Vehicle Fleet/E data in the form of monthl fuel purchase receipts and vehicle/e make, model, and y ear received from
the Cit Clerk and the Cit Yard.
2. Kell Wetmore, Cit Clerk (kwetmore@arro (805-473-5420 ext. 5414/5416). Glenda Boner, Cit Yard Office Assistant
( (805-473-5460 ext. 5460)
3. Raw data in g allons of fuel used, and converted to CO2e based on the followin Emissions factors (from Table G.9 and G.12 of CARB Local
Government Operations Protocol, September 2008).
4. Diesel = 10.15 k CO2, 0.26 g rams N20 and 0.58 g rams CH4 per g allon
5. Vehicle fleet/e data manipulated b Jaime Hill (805-250-7973, jhill@PMCWorld.com).
Notes:
1. All off road e used b the Public Works, Parks, and Fire Departments.
2. Due to lack of complete 2005 data, the first full calendar y ear for which data was available was 2007.
3. Total of 1,175.30 g allons diesel = 11,929.3 k CO2, 305.58 g rams N20 and 681.67 g rams CH4.
Subtotal Other Process Fu 12 0 1 12 1.2
Total 980 36 181 995 100.0
This report has been g enerated for San Luis Obsipo APCD, CA usin ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software.
14,511 1,330,445
A Item I I.b.
Pa 80
APPENDIX C:
DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR
COMMUNITY -WIDE INVENTORY
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 82
Detailed Methodology for Community -Wide Inventory
The following is a detailed explanation of data sources and methodology for calculating
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in each sector of the community -wide analysis. The purpose
of this appendix is to provide transparency to this Inventory, outline data limitations, and give
guidance for future City inventories to maintain methodological consistency.
ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS
Note: We attempted to collect energy production /consumption data besides that from natural
gas and electricity such as propane, solar, and wind; however the data was not available at the
level of detail necessary to meet the protocol for this inventory.
Residential
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG &E) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas
Co.) provided residential electricity and natural gas consumption data. Specifically, data was
provided by:
• John Bohman, Analyst with PG &E Green Communities and Innovator Pilots
Ozbx@pge.com)
• Colby Morrow, Southern California Gas Company &San Diego Gas and Electric
Company Air Quality Manager, Customer Programs Environmental Affairs
(clmorrow @semprautilities.com)
The raw data received from PG &E and SoCal Gas Co. is summarized in the table below. This
raw data was input into the CACP2009 software in kWh and therms. CACP2009 Average Grid
Electricity, RCI Average, and Fuel CO coefficient sets were amended per PG &E and state
guidance (see "electricity and natural gas coefficients" section).
City of Arroyo Grande a"#-
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 83
Commercial / Industrial
Commercial and industrial electricity were combined into one section by PG &E due to the
California 15/15 Rule. The 15/15 Rule was adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) in the Direct Access Proceeding (CPUC Decision 97 -10 -031) to protect customer
confidentiality. The 15/15 Rule requires that any aggregated information provided by the utilities
must be made up of at least 15 customers. A single customer's load must be less than 15% of
an assigned category. If the number of customers in the complied data is below 15, or if a single
customer's load is more than 15% of the total data, categories must be combined before the
information is released. The rule further requires that if the 15/15 Rule is triggered for a second
time after the data has been screened already using the 15/15 Rule, the customer must be
dropped from the information provided.
As a result, PG &E aggregated commercial and industrial energy consumption in Arroyo Grande
into one report, whereas SoCal Gas Co. separated commercial and industrial gas usage (shown
in the chart below) into two reports. It would have been misleading to present an "Industrial"
category for only natural gas emissions; therefore, the SoCal Gas Co. emissions were
aggregated with commercial as well.
Data for this sector was provided by:
1. John Bohman, Analyst with PG &E Green Communities and Innovator Pilots
Ozbx@pge.com)
2. Colby Morrow, Southern California Gas Company &San Diego Gas and Electric
Company Air Quality Manager, Customer Programs Environmental Affairs
(clmorrow @semprautilities.com)
Raw data received from these sources is reflected in the table below. CACP2009 Average Grid
Electricity, RCI Average, and Fuel CO Coefficient Sets were amended to reflect California
standards (see "electricity and natural gas coefficients" section).
• - City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 84
Electricity and Natural Gas Coefficients
Electricity and natural gas coefficients are defaulted to national averages in the CACP2009
software. To make the Inventory more accurate and representative of the city's real impact on
climate change, tailored coefficient sets for California were obtained. Sources and coefficient
values are summarized in the table below.
City of Arroyo Grande ' . • -
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 85
Community On -Road VMT
Community on -road vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are miles traveled on locally maintained roads
within the City of Arroyo Grande. State roads, highways, and interstate routes are not included
in this calculation. Local VMT data was obtained from the Caltrans Highway Performance
Maintenance System (HPMS) 2005 Report. The raw data obtained from this report is reflected
in the table below.
• - - City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 86
The rural and urban daily vehicle miles of travel (DVMT) were then converted to annual VMT by
multiplying by 365 days /year. The HPMS DVMT average includes decreased travel on
weekends, which means this methodology is appropriate.
- 1 - I
City of Arroyo Grande a" • -
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 87
Highway VMT
Highway vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are miles traveled on state highways within the City of
Arroyo Grande. This includes both trips originating and ending in Arroyo Grande, as well as thru
traffic. Highway VMT is also provided in the Caltrans HPMS report; however, it is aggregated by
county rather than by city. As such, we calculated the city's VMT by determining the portion of
total highway road segments within the incorporated area. This calculation was done using
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to `clip' a map of highway roads in San Luis Obispo
County by jurisdictional boundary. The analysis concluded that 1.21% of total state and federal
highways and roads are included in the city. Using this as an indicator of VMT, we concluded
that approximately 23.75 million VMT occurred in the city in 2005. This methodology of
distributing VMT by road segment length is supported by ICLEI; however, it does assume
constant levels of traffic along all roads within the county. The levels of traffic along each road
segment in each jurisdiction are unavailable, therefore this methodology is the best available at
this time.
This analysis includes the following highways (SR =state route):
• US 101 • SR 41 • SR 166
• SR 1 • SR 46 • SR 227
• SIR 33 • SIR 58
• - City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 88
Transportation Coefficients
By default, the CACP2009 software uses a national average distribution of vehicles by type
(passenger vehicle, light truck, heavy truck, etc), national average fuel economies per vehicle
type (miles per gallon), and national average emissions coefficients. In order to provide an
accurate assessment of the emissions within the city, we obtained county- specific emissions
data from the California Air Resources Board EMissions FACtors (EMFAC) software. The
EMFAC2007 model calculates emission rates from all motor vehicles, such as passenger cars
and heavy -duty trucks, operating on highways, freeways and local roads in California. In the
EMFAC model, the emission rates are multiplied with vehicle activity data provided by the
regional transportation agencies to calculate the statewide or regional emission inventories.
The EMFAC analysis was performed by the California Air Resources Board for San Luis Obispo
County. Specifically, the data was provided by:
• Tom Scheffelin, California Air Resources Board Planning and Technical Support Division
(Tscheffe@arb.ca.gov)
This data was then manipulated to fit the format of CACP2009, which uses different vehicle
classification categories than EMFAC. For instance, CACP2009 defines "heavy duty trucks" as
trucks with a gross vehicle weight of over 8,000 pounds, which includes EMFAC classifications
for Light Heavy -Duty Trucks (LHDT) 1, LDHT 2, Medium Heavy -Duty Trucks (MHDT), and
Heavy Heavy -Duty Trucks (HHDT). Additionally, CACP2009 does not include categories for
transit buses or motorcycles. To account for these vehicle types the fuel efficiency for the Diesel
Heavy Duty Vehicles was manipulated to include Transit Buses, based on a weighted average
of Trucks representing 98.7% of the category and Transit Buses representing 3.3 %. Similarly,
the emission factors for Gasoline Passenger Cars was manipulated to include Motorcycles,
based on a weighted average of Passenger Vehicles representing 98.7% of the category and
Motorcycles representing 1.3 %. For simplicity in re- running this analysis for future Inventories,
City of Arroyo Grande ' . • -
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 89
tailored coefficients and VMT distributions were only applied to five vehicle types, which
included the following EMFAC vehicle classifications:
1) Heavy Truck: LHDT1, LHDT2, HHDT, OB, MHDT
2) Light Truck /SUV /Pickup: MDT
3) Passenger Vehicle: Passenger Car, LDT1, LDT2
4) Transit Bus: Urban Bus (UB), School Bus (SB)
5) Motorcycle: Motorcycle (MC)
For each of the five vehicle classes above, a weighted average was calculated using the
EMFAC coefficients and their portion of total vehicle miles traveled.
WASTE
The methane commitment method embedded in CACP2009 is based on the EPA's Waste
Reduction Model (WARM) model for calculating life cycle emissions from waste generated
within the jurisdictional boundary of the city in 2005. The analysis does not use the waste -in-
place method, which calculates emissions from all waste generated in 2005 and all waste
already existing in the landfill before the baseline year.
The waste sector only takes into account the waste sent to landfills from city residents,
businesses, and institutions. It does not calculate emissions from the total amount of waste sent
to county landfills (Paso Robles, Cold Canyon, and Chicago Grade) in 2005 since those landfills
accept waste from the unincorporated county and incorporated cities.
Solid waste tonnage data per jurisdiction was provided by:
• "2005 Disposal Report" by quarter, prepared by the San Luis Obispo Integrated Waste
Management Board on 3/6/06. Document provided by Peter Cron, San Luis Obispo
County Integrated Waste Management Authority (peron @iwma.com).
Since the composition of waste sent to landfill in 2005 is unknown for the city, the following
statewide average waste composition study was utilized:
• - City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 90
• CIWMB 2004 Statewide Waste Characterization Study,
http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Publications/defauIt.asp?pubid=1 097.
The waste characterization study's distribution of waste by type was then converted into the five
categories included in the CACP2009 software, which resulted in the following waste
characterization:
• Paper products: 20.5% • Wood /textiles: 19.2%
• Food waste: 12.0% • All other waste: 39.0%
• Plant debris: 9.3%
The CACP2009 software does not have the ability to assign an individual methane recovery
factor to each landfill; therefore, we took a weighted average (60 %) based on the portion of
waste in each landfill. The methane recovery factors of the landfills are well documented by the
San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District based on the system operations at that time. Table
8 includes the methane recovery factors for the Chicago Grade and Cold Canyon landfills.
Other — Off -Road Agricultural Equipment
Off -road agricultural equipment emissions were calculated using the OFFROAD2007 modeling
software developed by the California Air Resources Board. The tool calculates total emissions
City of Arroyo Grande ' . • - •
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 91
per off -road category per emission type (CH N CO etc) for the entire county, including
incorporated and unincorporated areas.
To separate the aggregate 2005 emissions outputs for off -road agricultural equipment in the
city, we used agriculture and crop GIS shape files provided by San Luis Obispo County. These
shape files were clipped with the jurisdictional boundaries within the county by PMC to yield the
following results:
The OFFROAD software calculates emissions from other sources of off -road equipment as well,
including recreational vehicles and watercrafts, however these emissions were not included
because there was no feasible methodology for separating these emissions per jurisdiction
within the county. Population is proven to not be an accurate indicator of consumption rates. To
remain consistent with protocol and practice, emissions must be separated in a spatial manner,
similar to how highway emissions are determined by road segment length within each
jurisdiction. It should also be noted that many location- sources of off -road emissions, such as
recreational vehicle emissions, occur in state parks or beaches outside of the jurisdiction of
each city or the county.
• - City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 92
2020 AND 2025 FORECAST
The 2020 and 2025 forecasts calculate business -as -usual growth based on population, job, and
household growth rates. Employment and population baseline data was obtained from the San
Luis Obispo Council of Governments report, "Long Range Socio- Economic Projections (Year
2030)" prepared by Economic Research Associates (ERA) in May 2006, Revised July 2006.
Employment and population projections were obtained from the May 2009 revision. Mid -range
estimates of growth were used in both instances (Figures ES -5 and 6 -1). It should be noted that
these forecasts do not take into consideration any planned or actual efficiency or conservation
measures after 2005. For example, the State Renewable Energy portfolio has advanced
significantly since 2005, but the forecast calculates 2020 energy emissions by assuming
constant emissions factors.
City of Arroyo Grande ' . • -
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 93
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 94
APPENDIX D:
DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR CITY
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS INVENTORY
Agenda Item II.b.
Page 96
Detailed Methodology for Government Operations GHG
Emissions Inventory
The detailed methodology for government operations is much less complex than the
community -wide methodology explanation. Since the government operations GHG emissions
inventory is a facility -scale study, data records are much more reliable and consistent. In
addition, the Local Government Operations Protocol provides us a verified guide for calculating
emissions in each sector.
BUILDING
The building sector includes all emissions from natural gas and electricity consumed in City -
owned and - operated facilities. The kWh of electricity and therms of natural gas were then
entered into the CACP2009 software where they were converted to CO For a complete list of
buildings included in this sector, please see the detailed CACP2009 report in Appendix B.
The building sector used the PG &E verified Average Grid Electricity Set and the CEC Emission
Factor for Natural Gas RCI Average Set, as defined in Appendix C. The analysis did not use
the PG &E natural gas coefficient for the fuel CO set because natural gas comes entirely from
the Southern California Gas Company.
VEHICLE FLEET
The vehicle fleet sector includes gasoline and diesel vehicles from the following City
departments:
• Building • Police
• Fire • Public Works
• Parks
Gasoline and diesel consumption for calendar year 2007was obtained from fuel usage billing
reports provided by the City Clerk and City Yard. Specific sources of data within each
organization are outlined in the notes of Appendix B.
For the vehicle fleet, we used the County EMFAC coefficients for gasoline and diesel described
in Appendix C. These are weighted averages per multiple vehicle types in San Luis Obispo
County.
City of Arroyo Grande
age
EMPLOYEE COMMUTE
Employees were surveyed in September 2009 using an online survey instrument. The
questions, attached as Appendix E, asked employees about their current commuting patterns.
Of those questions, we used the following for our analysis:
• What is your approximate one -way distance to work (in miles)? Please indicate the most
direct distance to work, discounting midway destinations that would be taken whether or
not you drove to work each day (i.e. dropping off children at school).
• Please indicate the type of transportation you take to work each day in your average
work week. Please note that there are two types of carpooling.
O Drive alone
O Carpool with fellow City
employees
O Carpool with drivers not
employed by the City
O Vanpool
• What type of vehicle do you drive?
• What type of fuel does your vehicle use?
O Public transit
O Motorcycle
O Bicycle
O Walk
O Telecommute
O Other
• If you carpool with fellow City employees, how many City employees ride with you? If
you carpool with a different number each day, please indicate the average.
Approximately 55 employees responded to the survey with usable information, meaning that all
essential questions were answered. Answers with mileage left blank or with highly inconsistent
data (example: saying they walked three days to work, biked two, and drove five) were omitted.
In addition, if a respondent did not describe their "other" category of transportation, the entry
was omitted.
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page uts
To perform this analysis, we took the following steps:
1) Separate entries by what type of vehicle they own and operate (compact, mid -size car,
full -size car, small truck, medium -small truck, large truck, motorcycle or "don't drive ").
Within each new group, separate the entries by diesel, gasoline or hybrid.
2) For each group of entries with the same vehicle type and technology, multiply the
number of miles to work by 2 (to get round -trip estimate) and then by the number of
"drive alone" days for each entry. Multiply the number of miles to work by the number of
"`carpool" days (half of the `drive alone' emissions). Note: If a respondent entered that
they motorcycle to work, but own a car as well, the motorcycle miles were moved to the
motorcycle category. Adjust for hybrids (see below).
3) Add all miles per vehicle type and technology and multiply by 52.18 work weeks /year.
4) Calculate the multiplier to adjust survey response data to the entire 2005 employee
population. In 2005, there were 105 employees. This number, divided by the 55 survey
entries, gives us our multiplier of 1.909.
5) Multiply the mileage per vehicle per technology type by the multiplier.
6) Divide the number of hybrid miles by 3 and add the difference to the "passenger car"
category. This is to account for the large increase in hybrid sales between 2005 and
2009. (Source: Hybridcars.com sales statistics.)
7) Manipulate the vehicle classes to fit the CACP2009 software categories.
8) Enter final miles into the CACP2009 software per vehicle type and fuel.
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page
The CACP2009 software does not provide a method of calculating emissions from hybrid cars.
As a result, these emissions were divided by 2.20 based on the difference between average fuel
economy of a 2005 Toyota Prius and the average fuel economy included in the 2005 SLO
EMFAC data and then entered into the CACP2009 software under passenger vehicle (Source:
www.fueleconomy.gov).
STREETLIGHTS
The City's Finance Department provided billing information for the electricity used to operate
City streetlights and traffic signals. The total kWh were entered into the CACP2009 software
using the verified PG &E Average Grid Electricity Set outlined in Appendix C.
WATER/ SEWAGE
This sector calculates emissions from energy consumption at City -owned and operated
wastewater facilities. It does not calculate the total emissions from all water used or treated for
the community. Doing so would be including emissions that are accounted for in another
jurisdiction, which would cause double- counting. The City is largely not involved with the
movement and treatment of water for its residents and businesses, which is why this sector
appears insignificant. The City- operated facilities provide for a small part of the collection,
treatment, disposal, and movement of water and wastewater within the city. This number does
City of Arroyo Grande
"0
not represent the total emissions from water and wastewater treatment, largely because the City
is relies upon the South SLO County Sanitary District, a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), which
manages water treatment for a number of communities.
The Finance Department provided the electricity consumption for each of the water facilities
outlined in Appendix B. These totals were entered into the CACP2009 software with the PG &E
Average Grid Electricity Set outlined in Appendix C.
WASTE
South County Sanitary District reported solid waste tonnage produced by City operations. The
City produced 4,160 tons of waste in 2005 that was sent to managed landfills. The waste
composition was unknown for the County; therefore, the California averages provided by the
2004 California Integrated Waste Management Board Waste Characterization Report were
used. A weighted average methane recovery factor of 60% was used in this analysis, as
outlined in Appendix C.
OTHER
The other sector includes miscellaneous equipment used by Public Works, Parks and the Fire
Department. Equipment included in these sectors is outlined in the detailed CACP2009 report
notes in Appendix B. There is no automated calculation included in CACP2009 for these
sources of emissions; therefore calculations were made outside of CACP2009 and entered into
the "other" category.
Data was given in gallons of fuel used per equipment type. Conversion factors of gallons to kg
CO and grams N and CH were obtained from Table G.9 and G.12 of the California Local
Government Operations Protocol (September 2008).
• Small /large utility (gasoline) = 8.81 kg CO 0.22 g N and 0.50 g CI-14/gallon fuel;
• Other large utility (diesel) = 10.15 kg CO 0.26 g N and 0.58 g CI-1 fuel.
City of Arroyo Grande
Agenda Item II.b.
Page
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 102
APPENDIX E:
CITY EMPLOYEE COMMUTE SURVEY, 2009
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 104
City Employee Commute Survey, 2009
1) What is your approximate one -way distance to work (in miles)? Please indicate the most
direct distance to work, discounting midway destinations that would be taken whether or
not you drove to work each day (i.e. dropping off children at school).
2) Please indicate the type of transportation you take to work each day in your average work
week. Please note that there are two types of carpooling.
Drive alone
Carpool with fellow City employees
Carpool with other drivers not
employed by the City
Vanpool
Public transit
Motorcycle
Bicycle
Walk
Telecommute
Other
3) What type of vehicle do you drive?
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
1:1
1:1
1:1
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
1:1
1:1
1:1
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
1:1
1:1
1:1
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
Ej Compact /Sub - Compact car (Civic, Corolla, Focus, Neon, Cavalier, Jetta or similar)
Ej Mid -size car (Accord, Camry, Passat, Monte Carlo, Sable, Sebring or similar)
Ej Full -size car (Impala, Intrepid, Taurus, Crown Victoria, Bonneville, Town Car or similar)
E:1 Small Truck /SUV /Pickup (RAV4, Chev S10, Pickup (4 cylinder), PT Cruiser or similar)
Ej Medium -Small Truck /SUV /Pickup (Minivan, Sonoma Pickup Truck or similar)
Ej Medium -Large Truck /SUV /Pickup (Durango, Safari Cargo Van, Ford F150 or similar)
Ej Large Truck /SUV /Pickup (Suburban, Expedition, Navigator, Ford E250/350/450 or similar)
Ej Motorcycle
E:1 I don't drive alone or drive a carpool
City of Arroyo Grande
"s
4) What type of fuel does your vehicle from question 3 use?
Gasoline
Diesel
Biodiesel
Hybrid
Electric
don't drive to work or drive a carpool
Other (Specify):
5) If you carpool or vanpool with fellow City employees, home may City employees ride with you? If
you carpool with a different number each day, please indicate the average. If "`not applicable
please enter 99 0 ".
Enter # of people:
• - City of Arroyo Grande Agenda Item I I .b. I
"s
C ity o f Arroyo
Grande
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory
Ap 2, 2010
Background
• Legislative History
Executive order S-3-
-By 2 020 reduce greenhouse gas emissions
to 1990 levels
-By 2 080 reduce greenhouse gas emission
by 80% from 1 990 levels
— Assembly BNII : T he California Global
Warming Solutions Act
ATTACHMENT 2
Overview
Background
Findings
Forecast
a Text steps
Background
IEI - Milestone Process
.................................
Ca mr0imm
L k
Invan
firni� sane
ids :�bhsh Tarvrt
. _
bi1,- M' =ai R M. A
Propr #ss Acton PL.n
fMvWR!erN Ctkrpa,.
1
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 107
Forecast & Deduction Targets
MOM
4dhw r...t
I Li,554
WAMtrrbWU
CD * 3010;
ILCIfOA
M3m
Mobt OV&
■ 3 N0
yybim
77 trk
Arroyo
►Wwadero
G
� IO20;
ii�tl m.OYt
(;road*
(2005 pop.
is% b lk V 100:5
fn/ 7102 �
6N4NM X1 1
m [4,■ b4
b @Ww
zM Pwyy*y
WN nbptw wu bF
=1 77,]4
"40"
2006 2 = M20
(mm pap.
Forecasts
Forecast
125.0W
1 aa,OW
Findings
cit of
Chy of
city or
C ity I)f
courdy of
Arroyo
Arroyo
►Wwadero
G
PMW
SLO
(;road*
(2005 pop.
Bch
Rani
(unWworp.)
16.369}
(MM pal)
{2M pap•
(mm pap.
( 1
(methe tans
pop.
20,040}
13,100)
27.W
Per Capita
82"W a
95,548
176,234
44,019
155,105
1.SM,163
(MT CO2c)
0}
2020 aAU
116.556
227,847
49,001
199.349
1,893,184
FOtecag
20,7% T
29-2%1
19%j
29.8 T
26%1
(MT c02e)
2020wth
6207
449,799
34.966
131,840
1,280.239
45% 1 from
35,7%1
44,2%1
34.5561
44.6%1
401% 1
Bawkm
BAU
BAU
BAU
SAU
BAU
(MT CO2e}
Forecast
125.0W
1 aa,OW
Findings
Next Steps
1 Set emission reduction targets
2 . C emissions re ductions from
City programs and policies in place
since 2005.
3 . Develop Climate Action Plan to
ach reduction targets.
z
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 108
city of
city Of
City of
Arroyo
At umadero
Pismo Beach
Grande
(2005 pop. 8,844)
(2005 pop.
{2005 PGP,
2 5,940)
)
16.369}
Total Emissions
(methe tans
64,677
96,549
176,234
O
Per Capita
Emissions
7.48
5.90
6.79
(metric tons
0}
Next Steps
1 Set emission reduction targets
2 . C emissions re ductions from
City programs and policies in place
since 2005.
3 . Develop Climate Action Plan to
ach reduction targets.
z
Agenda Item 11.b.
Page 108