CC 2018-03-13_12c Budget Direction - Fire and Emergency Services‘
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMES A. BERGMAN, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING
FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST
INCREASES
DATE: MARCH 13, 2018
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Review anticipated cost increases and discuss policy expectations for fire and
emergency services.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The anticipated increase in the cost of providing fire service will significantly impact the
City’s budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
1) Continue under the adopted policy to “Maintain and improve the Fire
Department’s ability to respond to emergency calls and suppress fires throughout
the City within a maximum response time of six (6) minutes… More concentrated
urban uses should be within four (4) minutes response time;”
2) Continue to support the transition to full-time firefighters and three (3) person
staffing; (Captain, Engineer, and Firefighter on each shift); and
3) Provide direction to the City Manager, as part of the current budget process
regarding the Council’s expectations for service levels and thoughts on the most
cost effective way to provide those services.
BACKGROUND:
In June 2010, the City Council approved a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA)
with the City of Grover Beach and the Oceano Community Services District (OCSD) to
form the Five Cities Fire Authority (FCFA) for the provision of joint fire services. The
FCFA became effective July 9, 2010 with staff from each of the three jurisdictions.
However, the seeds of the FCFA actually began much earlier; in 2004, the City of Arroyo
Grande entered into a joint fire services agreement with the City of Grover Beach. Under
Item 12.c. - Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 2
that agreement, the City of Arroyo Grande provided a Fire Chief and the City of Grover
Beach provided a Training Captain, which was later modified to reclassify the Captain
position to a Battalion Chief and expanded to share reserve firefighters, equipment and
eventually included the OCSD.
The FCFA was born from the concept expressed by Citygate Associates in their study of
consolidation that stand alone fire departments are “not cost effective, nor will stand alone
services have the technical depth needed in a world that grows more technical, complex
and regulated every year. While all the partners in this study are providing some level of
fire services today, if the communities were to pool their efforts, they could cost effectively
operate a full service agency, meeting everyone’s needs more effectively.”
The cost effectiveness of pooled resources was demonstrated immediately to the City of
Arroyo Grande. Prior to consolidation, in fiscal year 2009-10, the City spent $1,717,068
for the Fire Department. The following year, expenses were $1,523,729 and had
remained below $1,600,000 until the 2015-16 fiscal year. This represents well over
$600,000 in savings to the City of Arroyo Grande, not to mention the improved service
received by citizens from consistent, well-trained crews that responded to emergency
situations based on the closest resource, not bound by jurisdictional lines. The community
of the FCFA response area has benefitted from the consolidated administrative staff
(Chief, Battalion Chiefs and Administrative Support), joint purchasing efficiencies,
duplication of efforts, and perhaps most importantly consistent training standards for all
FCFA employees; maximizing the level of service delivered to Arroyo Grande over the
past eight years.
Recent difficulties in attracting and retaining reserve firefighters and the development of a
long-term strategic plan has led to anticipated cost increases to all FCFA communities.
Additionally, operational costs for a status quo service levels have also increased
significantly. Projected cost increases over 5 years associated with the FCFA strategic
plan are as follows: Arroyo Grande 40%, Grover Beach 61%, and Oceano 79%.
Projected cost increases anticipated in a status quo budget but accounting for increased
costs from labor negotiations, pension and workers compensation increases and
migration of dispatch to CAL FIRE are as follows: Arroyo Grande 18%, Grover Beach
36%, and Oceano 51%.
Item 12.c. - Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 3
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023
Arroyo Grande Strategic Plan $2,062,347 $2,269,717 $2,494,083 $2,600,173 $2,788,546 $2,880,238
Arroyo Grande Status Quo $2,062,347 $2,141,511 $2,240,899 $2,289,964 $2,371,005 $2,427,234
Grover Beach Strategic Plan $1,491,753 $1,898,937 $2,084,396 $2,172,088 $2,327,796 $2,403,587
Grover Beach Status Quo $1,491,753 $1,792,963 $1,875,116 $1,915,673 $1,982,660 $2,029,139
Oceano Strategic Plan $808,530 $1,140,476 $1,251,989 $1,304,716 $1,398,340 $1,443,911
Oceano Status Quo $808,530 $1,076,756 $1,126,153 $1,150,539 $1,190,817 $1,218,764
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
FCFA Status Quo and Strategic Plan Implementation Costs by Community
Figure 1: FCFA cost projections.
Two challenges arise from the current situation, 1) increases in either scenario may be
difficult, if not impossible, for one or more of the FCFA communities to absorb in their
upcoming budget; and 2) cost increases combined with the current FCFA cost sharing
formula increases Arroyo Grande’s costs above other fire service models.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Why is this Needed?
Decisions made in the upcoming months by the FCFA Board, the two city councils and
the OCSD Board will have lasting impacts on fire services in the region. Due to the short
time period before the start of the new fiscal year, the range of possible scenarios that
can include a budget stalemate due to the JPA requirement of a unanimous agreement
for budget decisions, and the importance of uninterrupted fire and emergency services,
it is recommended that discussion and direction is given that will assist staff in
considering options for inclusion in the upcoming proposed budget. It is hoped that if the
Council can indicate the parameters of service desired by the City, including target
response times, staffing levels, and cost expectations, staff will be adequately prepared
for all possible FCFA budget scenarios.
Item 12.c. - Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 4
Right Sizing Fire and Emergency Services, A City Manager’s Perspective
Professional guidance related to fire services should be developed by the Fire Chief in
conjunction with the FCFA Board of Directors. This is occurring. At the same time, it is
incumbent upon the Arroyo Grande City Council to ensure that the FCFA is providing
service levels that meet the expectations of the Council at a cost the City can afford.
Staff has identified six important foundational elements that may be helpful for the
Council as they formulate policies and expectation for fire services: Context, Key Goals
of Fire and Emergency Situations, Response Times, Staffing Levels, Regional
Cooperation, and Cost.
Context
Often, fire and emergency medical services discussions tend to focus solely on
emergency response and excludes other components that serve to keep the community
safe. The pyramid below is an attempt to recognize other public and private efforts
involved in keeping a community safe from fires and medical emergencies. When
viewed in this context, emergency response is seen as one component of a
multidisciplinary approach to safety and serves as one of the last components used to
manage community risk.
Figure 2: Context of fire and emergency response.
Key Goals of Fire and Emergency Situations
A basic knowledge of crucial goals of both fire and emergency medical response is
helpful when considering community needs and wants. In the most basic terms, goals of
fire and emergency medical response are as follows:
Emergency
Response
911 Phone
System
Available Health Care
Safe Road Networks
Safe Buildings
Fire Supression Systems
First Preventers
Prepared Residents
Item 12.c. - Page 4
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 5
Fire Response
Prior to arrival of emergency crews
o Prevent fires from starting
o Notify responders
o Alert and remove people from the area
o Keep small fires small
After arrival of emergency crews
o Rescue trapped people
o Keep fire contained to the room of origin
o Keep fire contained to the building of origin
o Keep fire contained to the area of origin
Emergency Medical Response
Prior to arrival of emergency crews
o Scene safety
o Bystander first aid (airway, breathing, circulation) / Hands Only CPR
o Notify responders
After arrival of emergency crews
o Basic life support
o Advanced life support
o Transport to hospital for appropriate care
Response Time
In both fire and emergency medical situations, time is a critical factor. To address this
fact, the General Plan states:
Policy S3-3 Readiness and Response
Maintain and improve the Fire Department’s ability to respond to
emergency calls and suppress fires throughout the City within a maximum
response time of six (6) minutes.
Implementation Measures:
Program S3-3.1 Prepare and work to achieve a maximum of six (6)
minutes response time goal. This maximum response time will be
based upon density of development, and the value at risk
contrasted with an acceptable level of risk. More concentrated
urban uses should be within four (4) minutes response time.
In reviewing response time maps, Fire Station 1 and the FCFA appear to meet the
policies of the General Plan.
Item 12.c. - Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 6
Map 1: Response times for Station 1
Staffing Levels
Just as time is important in fire and emergency response, so is the number of
individuals that respond to an incident, both for employee safety and to achieve basic
incident response goals.
The General Plan is silent to staffing numbers but does state:
Standard S3-3.2 Train staff and volunteer fire fighters to a level
appropriate to their position and responsibilities; provide emergency
medical care training and job-required specialized training; maintain and
enhance training materials and instruction techniques; and provide
educational incentives for all personnel.
It is staff’s opinion that a three person engine company (Captain, Engineer, and
Firefighter) provides the minimum staffing level that will allow adequate emergency
rescue activities before an entire team has assembled, with the Engineer serving to
observe the big picture and assure water flow and communication to those inside the
Item 12.c. - Page 6
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 7
hazard area. In the case of a medical emergency, this model also allows adequate
personnel for a critical patient condition. Additionally, the three person engine company
also is important for other, less well known emergency needs such as allowing for the
initial preparation of a rope rescue for a victim in the creek area.
Regional Cooperation
Communities that only staff one fire station are able to properly function due to
cooperation with neighboring, regional, and sometimes statewide fire agencies. In the
event of a major incident where multiple crews are needed, neighboring fire services
come to each other’s aid when resources are not committed to other emergencies. This
is also true when a second call is dispatched in a community. This cooperation will need
to continue for the foreseeable future, both for the City’s benefit and the benefit of our
neighboring communities.
Cost
The cost of providing fire services will always be a key consideration, but is not the only
factor. In addition to cost, other important factors such as consistency in service,
availability of resources, and efficiency of shared operations should also be considered.
It seems prudent that if all variables can be equalized, a rationale position for any
community is to seek the lowest cost of service.
Current FCFA Cost Arrangement
One of the primary goals of creating the FCFA was for all participating agencies to
realize savings through avoidance of duplication of some staffing and equipment. For
example, why should each department have a Fire Chief when the three departments
can share one? The same goes for a ladder truck or other specialized equipment. It is
important to note that savings from avoiding duplication does not apply to the need for a
fire station in each jurisdiction or the basic engine and crew needed to staff each
station. It appears that the FCFA does create efficiency savings that are estimated to be
$732,000 due to avoidance of duplication of Fire Chiefs and administrative personnel.
However, analysis indicates that the savings from consolidating efforts are not equally
realized by all participants due to the formula used to allocate costs to its members. The
current situation presents an opportunity to examine this key aspect of the FCFA. The
current cost allocation is:
25% based on the population
25% based on the proportion of assessed property value
25% based on fixed proportion - service levels at inception of JPA
25% based on proportion of service calls
Based on this formula, for Fiscal Year 2017-18, the participating communities paid:
Arroyo Grande $2,062,347
Grover Beach $1,491,753
Oceano $808,530.
Item 12.c. - Page 7
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 8
It does appear that the variables used in the formula were trying to address at least two
issues; 1) fairness to make sure that each jurisdiction only pays their share based upon
factors that create emergency calls (population, assessed property value, and
proportion of service calls); and 2) attempting to address the varying starting positions
of at least one of the member agencies (service levels at inception).
Staff did some examination and identified scholarly research into the correlates of fire
and emergency medical calls; however, none of the studies use the broad metrics
identified in the FCFA agreement. Typical correlates include both attributes of the built
environment (e.g., population density, traffic volume) and socio-economic
characteristics of the population (e.g., low income, high unemployment, high proportion
of young and old). Using these previous studies, it is difficult to make a hypothesis of
how any of the current metrics could be an accurate predictor of call generation in any
of the three communities.
Taking call data provided by the FCFA for calendar years 2015, 2016, and 2017 that is
historically presented as “total number of calls per jurisdiction” and normalizing it based
on population (calls per 1,000 population) reveals that Arroyo Grande generates the
least calls per person by a seemingly significant margin.
Table 1: Call data as historically presented for each community.
2015
Community Population Fire EMS
Hazard
Condition
Service &
Good
Intent
False
Alarm Other
Total
FCFA
Arroyo Grande 17,428 36 1125 39 410 88 N/R 1698
Grover Beach 13,144 27 778 43 161 49 N/R 1058
Oceano 7,286 17 372 44 81 10 N/R 524
2016
Arroyo Grande 17,731 20 820 29 364 61 4 1298
Grover Beach 13,397 31 872 51 242 46 1 1243
Oceano 7,286 29 620 22 190 12 4 877
2017
Arroyo Grande 17,736 29 714 51 391 67 7 1259
Grover Beach 13,438 41 936 59 383 63 4 1486
Oceano 7,286 20 713 24 232 27 5 1021
2015‐2017
Arroyo Grande 85 2659 119 1165 216 11 4255
Grover Beach 99 2586 153 786 158 5 3787
Oceano 66 1705 90 503 49 9 2422
N/R = Not Reported
Calls by Community
Item 12.c. - Page 8
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 9
Table 2: Call data normalized by population more accurately indicates call volume generation of each
community.
When using attributes shown to correlate with the generation of emergency calls
presented in scholarly research such as population density, income, etc., a connection
is more easily made with known facts about our communities (Oceano and Grover
Beach both have significantly higher population densities and slightly lower median
incomes than Arroyo Grande).
Cost Impacts to Arroyo Grande
Table 2 indicates that overall, Arroyo Grande generated the fewest calls per capita;
however, the cost impacts of the distribution formula shows Arroyo Grande paying the
most in total cost and in cost per call generated as shown in Tables 3 and 4 below.
Table 3: FCFA Total Cost Distribution 2017
2015
Community Population Fire EMS
Hazard
Condition
Service &
Good
Intent
False
Alarm Other
Total
FCFA
Arroyo Grande 17,428 2.07 64.55 2.24 23.53 5.05 N/R 97.43
Grover Beach 13,144 2.05 59.19 3.27 12.25 3.73 N/R 80.49
Oceano 7,286 2.33 51.06 6.04 11.12 1.37 N/R 71.92
2016
Arroyo Grande 17,731 1.13 46.25 1.64 20.53 3.44 0.23 73.21
Grover Beach 13,397 2.31 65.09 3.81 18.06 3.43 0.07 92.78
Oceano 7,286 3.98 85.09 3.02 26.08 1.65 0.55 120.37
2017
Arroyo Grande 17,736 1.64 40.26 2.88 22.05 3.78 0.39 70.99
Grover Beach 13,438 3.05 69.65 4.39 28.50 4.69 0.30 110.58
Oceano 7,286 2.74 97.86 3.29 31.84 3.71 0.69 140.13
2015‐2017
Arroyo Grande 4.83 151.06 6.75 66.10 12.27 0.62 241.62
Grover Beach 7.42 193.93 11.47 58.81 11.85 0.37 283.86
Oceano 9.06 234.01 12.35 69.04 6.73 1.24 332.42
Average 7.10 193.00 10.19 64.65 10.28 0.74 285.97
Numbers in bold red denotes highest value. N/R = Not Reported. Source FCFA
Calls by Community per 1,000 Population
Community Contribution
Arroyo Grande 2,062,347$
Grover Beach 1,491,753$
Oceano 808,530$
Item 12.c. - Page 9
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 10
Table 4: Cost per call generated, 2017.
One aspect that appears to be missing in the current cost allocation formula is the
recognition of the working capacity of each fire station and distribution of costs to
parcels, especially as each community reaches parity due to the implementation of the
FCFA strategic plan. In choosing to offer fire service, the number of parcels served is a
key factor in determining the feasibility of the endeavor. The smaller the number of
parcels, the more each parcel owner must pay to support the fire department and
inversely, the greater the number of parcels, the less each parcel owner must pay.
Oceano has the fewest parcels (2,444), followed by Grover Beach (4,935) and then the
City of Arroyo Grande (6,959). Since each community presumably needs the services
of a fire station and the FCFA is attempting to provide equal staffing at all stations, it
should follow that the price to provide the fire service should be substantially more
expensive per parcel in Oceano, less expensive per parcel then Grover Beach and
Arroyo Grande should have the lowest cost per parcel.
Figure 3: Visualization of affordability of per parcel costs with arbitrary need for an additional fire station for
each 7,500 parcels.
The current funding formula, as shown in the table below, equalizes the cost per parcel
between communities but with marginal savings for Arroyo Grande and significant
savings to Grover Beach and Oceano. There are many ways to rationalize the
distribution of cost, including number of fire stations per community, and number of
Community Calls Generated Per 1,000 Population Cost Per Call Generated
Arroyo Grande 71 1,638$
Grover Beach 111 1,004$
Oceano 140 792$
Item 12.c. - Page 10
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 11
personnel assigned to each community. Both of these options would tend to move
distribution toward a more even split of costs due to the similarities of staffing in the
three communities. The table also shows that an equal cost distribution among the
three communities of the FCFA would preserve the economy of scale created by the
number of parcels in Arroyo Grande.
Figure 4: Cost per parcel comparison.
Potential Alternatives Service Models
In the event that the current FCFA agreement becomes economically infeasible for the
communities, other potential service models include an In-House Fire Department,
contracting with CAL FIRE, and reorganizing a Joint Powers Authority with different
participants. Each of these possible options are discussed below and all but the CAL
FIRE scenario can be compared in Figure 5 below.
Item 12.c. - Page 11
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 12
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023
FCFA Strategic Plan $2,062,347 $2,269,717 $2,494,083 $2,600,173 $2,788,546 $2,880,238
FCFA Status Quo $2,062,347 $2,141,511 $2,240,899 $2,289,964 $2,371,005 $2,427,234
Alone (2 Command Officers)$2,217,008 $2,283,519 $2,352,024 $2,422,585 $2,495,262 $2,570,120
Alone (Four Command Officers)$2,421,208 $2,493,845 $2,568,660 $2,645,720 $2,725,091 $2,806,844
Two Communities (50/50 Partners)$2,021,058 $2,081,690 $2,144,141 $2,208,465 $2,274,719 $2,342,961
Three Communities (1/3 split)$1,454,210 $1,769,710 $1,943,489 $2,025,659 $2,171,561 $2,242,579
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
$2,200,000
$2,400,000
$2,600,000
$2,800,000
$3,000,000
Arroyo Grande Cost Scenarios
Figure 5: Multiple cost scenarios of providing fire and emergency services in Arroyo Grande.
In House Fire Department
A logical benchmark for Arroyo Grande to assess comparative value is to estimate what
it would cost to provide an in-house fire department that delivers services consistent
with the General Plan. Two scenarios are presented in Figure 5 and are built from the
current FCFA budget line items and cost assumptions. Both scenarios include station
staffing based on a 3 person engine staffed with full-time personnel. Apparatus is
replaced every 15 years. It is assumed that automatic aid and boundary drops would
continue to be the norm for neighboring jurisdictions. Although the City is not bound to
implement standards developed by outside groups such as the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) or the Insurance Services Office (ISO), they do represent very
specialized knowledge and these assumptions are an attempt to meet these standards
within a realistic budget for Arroyo Grande.
The two scenarios differ in the number of command staff. The “Two Command Officer”
scenario utilizes the Fire Chief and a Battalion Chief to share command staff duties on
all shift for calls requiring more than one company. The “Four Command Officer”
scenario includes 3 shift-based Battalion Chiefs for command operations and a Fire
Chief. The “Two Command Officer” scenario budget indicates that it would cost Arroyo
Grande (or any of our partners if they wanted to pursue this staffing level) $2.2 million
annually to provide an in-house fire department. This cost is essentially the same as the
first year of implementing the FCFA Strategic Plan. The “Four Command Officer”
scenario budget indicates that it would cost Arroyo Grande (or any of our partners if
Item 12.c. - Page 12
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 13
they wanted to pursue this staffing level) $2.6 million annually to provide an in-house
fire department at this service level. This scenario becomes essentially equal to the cost
of implementing the FCFA Strategic Plan at year 3.
CAL FIRE
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, commonly known as CAL
FIRE, does perform contract services with communities throughout California. Staff has
been informed that the process to receive an official cost estimate for fire and
emergency services is a detailed and time intensive task and is only started after a
community has issued a Request for Proposal and authorization to respond has been
granted by officials in Sacramento.
At the time of publication of this staff report, the County of San Luis Obispo is
considering a CAL FIRE proposal. The County staff report for this item is available at
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=8486
Attachment 2 presents a synopsis of proposal options for the Cayucos proposal. Option
1 of the proposal includes full-time year-round staffing of a Type 1 engine with a total of
2 firefighters per shift (6 FTE’s) with a cost at $1,513,684 per year. The real known
costs for FCFA of equivalent staffing (3 Captains and 3 Firefighters) as indicated in
Attachment 1 would be $811,500. It should be noted that the Option 1 includes other
staffing benefits like a Chief Officer and investigations that are part of the larger County
contract and presumably would not be available to Arroyo Grande.
Using only the Cayucos proposal as a guide, staff does not believe that a CAL FIRE
contract would result in a cost savings.
Two Similar Cities
Another scenario to consider is the partnership of two similar sized and funded cities.
Using the FCFA budget as a guide, two cities sharing cost equally produces a
department that is less expensive than the FCFA status quo and the FCFA strategic
plan.
Three Equal Partners
Included in Figure 5 is the cost projection for the current FCFA if costs were equally
shared due to the strategic plan creating 3 stations all equally staffed.
Conclusion
Staff believes it would be prudent for the Council to discuss and provide direction
regarding the City’s expectations for fire service, particularly staffing levels and their
associated costs, in order to evaluate whether the City should pursue modifications to
the existing JPA or an alternative way to provide fire service to the City of Arroyo
Grande, and to budget accordingly.
Item 12.c. - Page 13
CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDE POLICY AND EARLY BUDGET DIRECTION REGARDING FIRE AND
EMERGENCY SERVICES DUE TO ANTICIPATED COST INCREASES
MARCH 13, 2018
PAGE 14
ALTERNATIVES:
If a prolonged budget stalemate appears likely at the Five Cities Fire Authority,
authorize the City Manager to be prepared to provide fire service to the City of Arroyo
Grande starting July 1, 2018.
ADVANTAGES:
Providing direction will allow staff to ensure fire service is provided at a level acceptable
to the Council and to properly budget for future fire service costs.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
ATTACHMENT:
1. In-House Scenario Budget Assumptions
2. CAL FIRE Cayucos proposal synopsis
Item 12.c. - Page 14
Expenditures Annual Cost Expenditures Annual Cost
Staffing ‐ salaries & benefits Staffing ‐ salaries & benefits
Fire Chief (1)244,200$ Fire Chief (1)244,200$
Battalion Chief (1)204,200$ Battalion Chief (3)612,600$
Captain (3)484,500$ Captain (3)484,500$
Engineer (3)418,500$ Engineer (3)418,500$
Firefighter (3)327,000$ Firefighter (3)327,000$
Administrative Assistant (1)129,400$ Administrative Assistant (1) 129,400$
Subtotal 1,807,800$ Subtotal 2,216,200$
Services & Supplies Services & Supplies
Subtotal 292,333$ Subtotal 292,333$
Capital Needs Capital Needs
Subtotal 116,875$ Subtotal 116,875$
Total ‐ In House 2,217,008$ Total ‐ In House 2,625,408$
4 Command Officers
In House ‐ Any CommunityIn House ‐ Any Community
2 Command Officers
ATTACHMENT 1
Item 12.c. - Page 15
Item 12.c. - Page 16
Item 12.c. - Page 17
Item 12.c. - Page 18
Item 12.c. - Page 19
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item 12.c. - Page 20