Loading...
CC 2018-10-09_12a Traffic Calming GuidelinesMEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BEAU PRYOR, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2018 SUMMARY: Information regarding the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines including a discussion of traffic calming measures in the Berry Gardens neighborhood. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There are no budget impacts resulting from this informational item. Staff resources have been impacted to various degrees over the last two years addressing traffic calming with neighborhood residents, compiling data including accident data, conducting directed enforcement, and preparing this staff report. The 2015 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study cost $11,947. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file information regarding the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines (Guidelines) and their application to the Berry Gardens Neighborhood. BACKGROUND: At the September 11, 2018 City Council meeting under Council Communications, Mayor Hill expressed concerns about traffic issues in the Berry Gardens neighborhood and requested staff place an item regarding traffic calming measures on an upcoming agenda. Council Member Brown concurred with the request. In 2014 and 2015, the Traffic Commission reviewed Neighborhood Traffic concerns in the Le Point Street at McKinley Street area. After review, the Traffic Commission directed staff to prepare Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines. In January and March of 2016, the Traffic Commission reviewed Draft Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the Guidelines. On April 12, 2016, the City Council adopted the Guidelines by Resolution No. 4718 (Attachment 1).  Staff has also received complaints regarding unsafe speeds in the Berry Gardens neighborhood. The Police Department continues periodic directed traffic enforcement in the vicinity. Item 12.a. - Page 1 RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES OCTOBER 9, 2018 PAGE 2 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The Guidelines provide educational and procedural measures to help guide the Neighborhood Traffic calming process and to elicit an understanding of the benefits and compromises of traffic calming installations. In the case of the Berry Gardens neighborhood, the City has received complaints about speeding and unsafe driving in the area over the last few years. In 2015, the City’s traffic consultant prepared a Traffic Calming Study (Study) for the neighborhood in response to a petition received in November of 2014 requesting installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street, citing cut-through traffic and speeding. The Study reviewed warrants for the additional stop sign installation and analyzed various traffic calming measures (Attachment 2). The report concluded that all study intersections were operating at acceptable levels, there were a total of two (2) accidents (both non-injury) in the previous five years, and it verified that the warrants were not met for the requested stop sign installation. Further, the Study discussed implications of various traffic calming measures ranging from sign placement to road closures. The area identified as the most viable for traffic calming measures included the stretch of South Courtland between Blackberry Avenue and East Grand Avenue, as it is wide and straight in comparison to the rest of the neighborhood. Additional speed limit signs, a radar trailer and police enforcement were recommended as starting points. Other permanent traffic calming measures identified in the Study, such as bulb-outs, medians, and speed tables may slow speeds if determined warranted in the future, but would be expensive and require additional maintenance. There was a speed limit sign placed northbound on South Courtland but not on the southbound lanes for this stretch. The Police Department has previously enforced speeds and has placed the radar trailer at the Berry Gardens neighborhood on several occasions. Currently, the Police Department is conducting directed traffic enforcement in the neighborhood and has issued 40 citations there since January 1, 2018. Due to the lack of a dedicated Traffic Officer, directed enforcement is used when Command Staff direct patrol officers to enforce stop sign and truck route violations between other calls for service. Staff is also currently updating the City’s speed surveys that will enable additional enforcement on collector and arterial streets in the vicinity, including South Courtland Street. Since the Study was completed, the People’s Self Help Housing and Trillium projects have been constructed, which may have changed traffic patterns in the area. The Guidelines provide for changing circumstances, but certification of speed surveys and an additional period of education and enforcement must be done before any traffic calming measures may be considered. On several occasions, the current and previous City Engineers have met with various residents of the neighborhood and informed them of the conclusions of the Study. The Guidelines, once approved, have been given to residents that are interested in traffic calming issues in the neighborhood. The approval process for implementation of traffic Item 12.a. - Page 2 RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES OCTOBER 9, 2018 PAGE 3 calming installations are intended to be iterative and require a degree of agreement from the neighborhood. If there are desired measures that incorporate physical changes to roadway geometry, such as speed humps, speed tables, chokers, and medians, the process requires that a petition must be provided to the City containing the names and signatures of at least 66% of the affected property owners in the project area. In the case of the Berry Gardens neighborhood, a total of 119 homes would need to sign a traffic calming plan petition. To date, the City has received correspondence from Ms. Patsy Lynch, most recently with a petition from eleven (11) residents in the Berry Gardens neighborhood citing speeding and traffic violation concerns and requesting implementation of traffic calming measures; however, no specific alternatives were included (Attachment 3). Ms. Lynch has been advised regarding the Guidelines and the City’s current enforcement efforts. It should be noted that once Staff receive a petition requesting a specific traffic calming measure, the Guidelines require Traffic Commission input, which now will be provided by the Planning Commission. In addition, according to the Guidelines, should the City Council approve a preliminary plan, a funding source would be identified which may consist of City funds, funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood, or some combination of the two. Funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood must be strictly on a volunteer basis. Staff has also heard complaints regarding truck traffic in the neighborhood. There are designated truck routes through the City, however there are no truck routes through Berry Gardens. During the directed traffic enforcement efforts in Berry Gardens there were no truck route violations observed nor warnings or citations issued. Additionally, the City’s Engineering Inspector has repeatedly addressed potential construction traffic through the neighborhood with the managers of the Trillium project. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration: 1. Receive and file; or 2. Provide direction to staff. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines 2. Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study 3. Letters from Ms. Patsy Lynch Item 12.a. - Page 3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARROYO GRANDE BY RESOLUTION NO. 4718 ON APRIL 12, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 300 East Branch Street Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 (805) 473-5420 ATTACHMENT 1 Item 12.a. - Page 4 Page 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Stop Sign Installation .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Speed Limits .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Traffic Calming Measures ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Passive Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................................ 6 Active Traffic Calming Measures .................................................................................................................................. 6 Volume Reduction Measures ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Impacts of Traffic Calming Measures............................................................................................................................ 7 Passive Traffic Calming Measures .................................................................................................................. 8 Police Enforcement ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 High-Visibility Crosswalks ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Radar Trailer, Speed Feedback Trailer ......................................................................................................................... 9 Speed Feedback Signs ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Pavement Striping ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Signed Turn Restrictions ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Truck Restrictions ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Active Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................... 12 Speed Humps .............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Speed Tables or Raised Crosswalk ............................................................................................................................ 13 Raised Intersection ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 Speed Cushion ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 Neighborhood Traffic Circles ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Mid-Block Chokers ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Medians ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Bulbouts ...................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Chicanes ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Volume Reduction Measures ........................................................................................................................ 21 Diverters ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Partial Closure ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Full Street Closure....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Guidelines for Installation or Warrants .......................................................................................................... 24 Passive Traffic Calming Measures .............................................................................................................................. 24 Active Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................................ 24 Volume Reduction Measures ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Approval and Implementation Process .......................................................................................................... 25 Item 12.a. - Page 5 Page 3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines Introduction “Traffic calming” measures are a means to respond to unacceptable motoring behavior. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) define traffic calming as: “Traffic calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non-motorized street users.” The guiding principals of the “Traffic Calming Measures” include:  The design and installation of “Traffic Calming Measures” should use sound traffic engineering principles.  The development and selection of “Traffic Calming Measures” should encourage and facilitate public involvement.  Installation of traffic calming measures should minimize diverted traffic to other local or residential collector streets.  Emergency vehicle access, including safety and response times must be considered.  Traffic calming devices must be designed to minimize adverse impacts to maintenance activities.  Only State/Federal approved regulatory and/or warning signs may be installed.  Bicycle and pedestrian travel should be enhanced through traffic calming and congestion relief. Traffic calming measures are not solutions for all:  Speeding;  Cut-through;  Congestion; or  Traffic safety concerns. Each neighborhood will have its own unique circumstances that will require an evaluation to identify appropriate traffic calming options. Residential streets are planned and designed to provide access to and from our residential neighborhoods. These facilities are neither designed nor intended for the use of non-local traffic. However, when congested conditions occur on collector and arterial roadways, local streets will often provide an attractive alternative route. It is the intent of this program to identify traffic calming measures, which can alter travel behavior to the betterment of the neighborhoods being affected. The intent here is to improve safety, encourage Item 12.a. - Page 6 Page 4 bicycle and pedestrian travel, and to positively affect a resident’s quality of life. The objectives of the local residential streets program are:  Reduce vehicular speed where appropriate  Reduce cut-through traffic  Improve safety for bicycle and pedestrian travel  Enhance the neighborhood environment Residential areas adjacent to school zone traffic patterns, volumes and needs are different than other typical residential areas. These residential areas should meet the same basic criteria for implementation, including evaluation of the potential negative impacts that can result. School zone traffic tends to be extremely peaked, occurring at the time when children are arriving at or departing from school. While the condition requiring attention is short term in nature, the impacts of the traffic calming device extend throughout the day, and continue during school holidays and vacation. Traffic calming devices must take these issues into consideration and consider the following additional objectives:  Improve the safety environment for children coming to and from school  Increase awareness of motorist to school sites  Improve safety for bicycle and pedestrian travel This document outlines some basic traffic calming measures as well as the process for implementation. It is important to note that after the community agrees upon what is the appropriate solution, those costs to implement the traffic calming work may be borne by the City, the neighborhood, or some combination of the two. This determination will be made by City Council upon plan approval. Stop Sign Installation Stop signs are valuable and effective control devices when used at the right place and under the right conditions. The intent of stop signs is to help drivers and pedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right-of-way. Federal and State guidelines are required to be met prior to an installation of a Stop Sign. These guidelines take into consideration, among other things, the probability of vehicles arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, traffic delays, and the availability of safe crossing opportunities. This analysis is called a warrant analysis. An unwarranted Stop Sign installation reduces speed in the vicinity of the Stop Sign, but drivers may accelerate to a speed faster than they drove before the Stop Sign was installed to make up for time lost. Item 12.a. - Page 7 Page 5 Stop signs are not effective for speed control. Drivers tend to ignore unwarranted Stop Signs that, in their view, are unnecessary. If drivers are required to stop for Stop Signs and rarely see any traffic on the opposing streets, drivers become impatient and tend to disregard Stop Signs that have no obvious need. Traffic generally finds the path of least resistance. If there are alternative routes to get from Point A to Point B and if these alternate routes have fewer traffic controls, drivers will take them. This may increase traffic volume on local streets. Unwarranted Stop Signs increase vehicle fuel consumption. The Stop Sign requires additional stop/start maneuvers, increasing wear and tear on vehicles. Noise pollution increases as a result of stops and acceleration due to engine noise and brakes. Speed Limits The “Basic Speed Law” means that you may never drive faster than is safe for current conditions. Other than local residential roadways where the speed limit is 25 MPH, maximum Speed Limits are posted with Speed Limit signs. Posted Speed Limits are determined by measuring the speed of vehicles that use the roadway based on ideal driving conditions. These Speed Limits are set near the 85th percentile speed of vehicles driving on the roadway. That means that 85 percent of vehicles driving on the roadway drive at or below this speed and 15 percent drive above this speed limit. Periodically, typically every five years, these Speed Limits are reevaluated and the Speed Limit adjusted to match the 85th percentile speed. Adjusting the Speed Limit does not mean that vehicles will drive faster or slower, the adjusted Speed Limit more appropriately reflects vehicle speeds. As with most laws, Speed Limits depend on the voluntary compliance of the majority of motorists. Speed Limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect or compliance of drivers. Speed Limits that are not set at the 85th percentile speeds are typically not enforceable and the court system will not enforce the ticket. Traffic Calming Measures The tools available for use in resolving neighborhood traffic problems are many and diverse in both their cost and effectiveness. This program has identified levels of traffic calming measures:  Passive Traffic Calming Measures  Active Traffic Calming Measures Item 12.a. - Page 8 SPEED LIMIT Page 6  Volume Reduction Measures Traffic calming measures may include devices that do not directly affect driver behavior and are not self-enforcing. These measures are generally included within the Passive Traffic Calming Measures. If Passive Traffic Calming Measures do not provide desired results, more restrictive measures may be warranted. More restrictive traffic calming measures, those found in the Active Measures and Volume Reduction categories, mandate driver behavior change and may be effective where Passive Traffic Control Measures have failed. While this document identifies many Traffic Calming Measures, there are other traffic calming measures that are not included. This is not intended to restrict the use of other Traffic Calming Measures. Traffic Calming is an ever evolving area. Site specific analysis should be completed at the time of Traffic Calming implementation based on the best available current practices and design guidance. Passive Traffic Calming Measures Passive Traffic Calming Measures are intended to regulate, warn, guide, inform, and educate pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. They include standard striping and signing measures, minor roadway design measures to improve visibility and safety, and enforcement by police. Passive Traffic Calming Measures are used primarily in those areas where traffic impacts have been found and traffic control and/or education has been determined to be appropriate. Some common Passive Traffic Calming Measures include:  Education  Police Enforcement  High-Visibility Crosswalks  Permanent Speed Feedback Signs  Permanent Striping  Signed Turn Restrictions  Truck Restrictions Active Traffic Calming Measures Active Traffic Calming Measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily designed to slow traffic. They are employed when the use of Passive Traffic Calming Measures cannot, or has not, effectively addressed speeding issues. Active Traffic Calming Measures may be used in conjunction with Passive Measures. Active Measures may have a limited effect on traffic volume as well. Some common Active Measures include:  Speed Humps  Speed Tables  Raised Crosswalks  Raised Intersections  Speed Cushions  Mid-Block Chokers  Medians  Bulbouts  Chicanes Volume Reduction Measures Volume Reduction Measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily designed to discourage residential street cut-through traffic. Volume reduction devices may be used by themselves or in conjunction with Passive and Active Measures. Some common Volume Reduction Measures include: Item 12.a. - Page 9 Page 7  Diverters  Partial Closure  Full Street Closure Impacts of Traffic Calming Measures Prior to installing traffic calming measures, it is important to carefully consider potential impacts. While many of the measures offer positive results, there are potential problems, which may be more significant than the original concern. This section attempts to describe some of the possible impacts of the use of speed reduction or volume reduction traffic calming tools.  Effect on Emergency Vehicle Response Times: Speed, and to a lesser extent, volume traffic calming measures have potential for negatively impacting emergency vehicle response because they physically affect speed and maneuvering. Many Active Measures may increase emergency response time. These concerns should be considered for each location where Active Measures and Volume Reduction Measures are recommended.  Traffic Diversion: Another concern is the potential for traffic calming techniques to move, rather than solve, a problem. Proposed Volume Reduction Measures should include an adequate study to evaluate traffic diversion impacts.  Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles: Some Active Measures and Volume Reduction Measures could potentially impact bus routes. South County Transit and Lucia Mar Unified School District should be consulted whenever Active Measures and Volume Reduction Measures options are considered.  Noise Impacts: The noise impact to adjacent residents resulting from vehicles braking and going over and around traffic calming devices can have an impact on the acceptability of these devices by residents.  Loss of Parking: It may be necessary to restrict or prohibit on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of certain traffic calming features. There can also be significant on-street parking impacts from many speed reduction and volume reduction options.  Liability Exposure Implications: Speed reduction and volume reduction traffic calming devices may result in varying degrees of liability exposure to the City. This exposure stems from the potential negative impact to emergency vehicle response times. It is also possible that traffic calming devices themselves could result in damage or injury if improperly used.  Increased Maintenance Costs: Street maintenance costs will increase in two areas. First, landscaping associated with such devices as neighborhood traffic circles, roundabouts, chokers and chicanes, etc., will require regular maintenance. Second, devices such as speed humps will have to be reinstalled each time a residential street is overlaid which will increase these costs. Item 12.a. - Page 10 Page 8 Passive Traffic Calming Measures Police Enforcement Police enforcement entails the presence of police to monitor speeds and issue citations. This method is used as an initial attempt to reduce speeds on streets. It is most applicable on streets with documented speeding problems and the need for quick mitigation. It can also be used during the learning period when new devices or restrictions are first implemented. For police enforcement, contact the Police Department. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Effective while officer is actually present at the location  Can be targeted to specific time periods that are deemed to be most problematic  Can be implemented on short notice  Targets violators without affecting normal traffic  It is a temporary measure  Enforcement may be limited by police availability and other policing duties  Long term financial commitment of police personnel  It is labor intensive and expensive Approximate cost: No direct additional cost to the City. High-Visibility Crosswalks A high-visibility crosswalk is a crosswalk that incorporates striped patterns, pavement lights or flashing beacons, and signing to improve the visibility of the crosswalk. This measure is most applicable on local streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation is desired. It can also be used to discourage cut-through traffic. This type of crosswalk is most appropriate near schools and recreation facilities, but typically not at signalized intersections. Item 12.a. - Page 11 Page 9 Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Slows traffic  Increases driver awareness of crosswalk  Requires minimal maintenance for striped crosswalks  May require removal of parking in the vicinity of the crosswalk  May result in significant maintenance for embedded pavement lights or advance flashing lights Approximate cost: $20,000 to $50,000 - (2016 dollars) Radar Trailer, Speed Feedback Trailer This is a mobile trailer-mounted radar display that informs drivers of their speed. This measure is applicable on any street where speeding is a problem. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Educational tool  Good public relations for neighborhoods  Effective for temporary speed reduction needs  Not self-enforcing  Duration of effectiveness is limited  May require temporary lane closures Approximate cost: No direct additional cost to the City. Item 12.a. - Page 12 Page 10 Speed Feedback Signs This is a permanent-mounted radar display that informs approaching drivers of their speed. This measure is applicable on any street where speeding is a problem. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Educational tool  Good public relations for neighborhoods  Permanent reminder of travel speed  Not self-enforcing  Duration of effectiveness is limited  Maintenance/theft Approximate cost: $4,000 to $6,000 – (2016 dollars) Pavement Striping Striping is used to create narrow lanes, which give the impression of a narrow street. This makes the motorist feel restricted, which helps reduce speeds. It is most applicable to long, wide residential streets where speeding traffic exists. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Easy to install and modify as necessary  Low cost of implementation  May not be self-enforcing  May increase the likelihood of sideswipe accidents Approximate cost: $2,500 to $15,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 13 Page 11 Signed Turn Restrictions Signs may be installed which prohibit certain movements at an intersection, e.g., “No Left Turn”. This measure is applicable on streets where cut-through traffic exists. This method can be tailored to be applicable during the most problematic times by defining a time period for the restriction. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Redirects traffic to main streets  Reduces cut-through traffic  May address time-of-day problems  Not self-enforcing  May increase trip length for some commuters  May redirect traffic to other neighborhood streets  May confuse motorists unfamiliar with time-of-day restrictions Approximate cost: $1,500 to $5,000 – (2016 dollars) Truck Restrictions Restricting the entry of trucks into residential neighborhoods can be achieved through the posting of truck restriction signs. This method is most applicable on residential streets to reduce cut-through traffic of commercial vehicles. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Redirects commercial traffic through main streets  Reduces noise and air pollution due to trucks in residential streets  Not self-enforcing Approximate cost: $500 to $2,500 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 14 Page 12 Active Traffic Calming Measures Active Traffic Calming Measures are primarily designed to lower travel speeds on the streets where they are installed. Speed Humps Speed humps are areas of pavement raised 3 inches in height over a minimum of 14 feet in length. The combination of different heights, lengths and approach ramps will affect the speed a vehicle can comfortably go over the hump. Speed humps are marked with signs and pavement markings. Speed humps are applicable on local streets where speed control is desired or where cut-through traffic is to be discouraged. Speed humps are not recommended for use on streets designated as primary response routes for emergency vehicles. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Slows traffic  Self-enforcing  Requires minimum maintenance  May increase emergency response times  May damage emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed  May increase traffic noise in the vicinity of the bump  Modern cars with active suspension may be able to traverse the bumps at increased speeds. Approximate cost: $3,500 to $5,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 15 Section A-A J_ 7' Page 13 Speed Tables or Raised Crosswalk Raised crosswalks are flat-topped speed humps, 22 feet in length, built as a pedestrian crosswalk, with vehicle ramps on the approaches. This type of crosswalk is applicable to local streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation are desired. It can be an effective safety tool near schools and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut -through traffic. Raised crosswalks are well-marked and may contain special paving or textures. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Slows traffic  Increases pedestrian visibility in the crosswalks  Requires minimal maintenance  May increase emergency response times  May damage emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed  May increase traffic noise in vicinity of crosswalk  May create drainage issues where raised crossing extends from curb to curb  May require extensive warning signs to be effective Approximate cost: $4,000 to $6,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 16 PARABOLIC -----.____ FLAT /.-PARABOLIC ~ b i b::) ==-==---=-=-. 1 "-= l \_ 3· .. _J 6 '--S' 5' ;, Page 14 Raised Intersection Like raised crosswalks, the raised intersection is a flat-topped speed hump built over the entire area of intersecting streets at curb height, creating a flat surface over the entire intersection area. Raised intersections are constructed with ramps (gentle approaches 1:40) on all vehicle approaches, using bollards to define the pedestrian zone. They are often constructed with textured materials on the flat sections and the approach ramps. These are commonly used in area-wide traffic calming installations. This type of installation is applicable to arterial and collector streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation are desired. It can be an effective safety tool near schools and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut -through traffic. Raised intersections are used in locations where loss of on-street parking would be acceptable. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Slows traffic  Increases pedestrian visibility in the crosswalks  Requires minimal maintenance  No impact on access  May increase emergency response times  May increase traffic noise in vicinity of the intersection  May create drainage issues where raised crossing extends from curb to curb Approximate cost: $25,000 to $75,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 17 Page 15 Speed Cushion Speed cushions consist of either recycled rubber or asphalt, raised about 3 inches in height. The length of the cushion is about 10 feet. The spaces between the cushions allow emergency vehicles to partially straddle the device. These devices are most effective if used in a series at 300’ to 500’ spacing or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Reduces vehicle speed  Can reduce vehicular volumes  No restrictions to on-street parking  Does not restrict access  Requires minimum maintenance  Minimal impacts to emergency response times  May increase emergency response times  Not aesthetically pleasing  May increase road maintenance costs Approximate cost: $3,500 to $5,000 for set – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 18 Page 16 Neighborhood Traffic Circles Neighborhood Traffic Circles are raised island placed in the intersection around which traffic circulates. Motorist yield to other motorists already in the intersection. Neighborhood Traffic Circles required motorist to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver. The outer ring of the circle is mountable for large vehicles. The interior of the circle may be landscaped for enhanced aesthetics. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Reduces intersection speed  Reduces mid-block speeds by 10%  Intersection collision reduction  May include planting for increased neighborhood aesthetics  May increase emergency response times  Increased difficulty of large vehicle turning movement  May result in bicycle/auto conflicts at intersections because of narrowed travel lane Approximate cost: $10,000 to $30,000 for set – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 19 Page 17 Mid-Block Chokers Chokers are raised islands in the parking zone that can be detached from the curb line to allow for drainage. Mid-Block Chokers narrow the roadway and are most applicable on wide streets with speeding and cut-through problems. Special attention is required during the design of Mid-Block Chokers to provide for bicycle access. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Speed reduction  Breaks up driver’s sight-line  Reduces pedestrian crossing  Increases pedestrian and motorist visibility  May require partial or total removal of on- street parking  Increases maintenance for areas where street sweeping equipment cannot reach between the choker and the curb line Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 20 Page 18 Medians Medians are raised islands in the center of the roadway that separate traffic directions. Medians are used on wide streets to narrow the travel lanes, interrupt sight distances down the center of the roadway, and ease pedestrian crossings. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Narrowed travel lanes can slow vehicle speeds  Shortens pedestrian crossing  Opportunity for landscaping and visual enhancements to the neighborhood  Properly placed medians can result in congestion relief and capacity increases  Congestion Relief  Long medians may interrupt emergency access and operations  May interrupt driveway access and result in U-turns at the end of medians  May require removal of parking  High cost to construct and maintain Approximate cost: $35,000 to $100,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 21 Page 19 Bulbouts Bulbouts narrow the street width, and create smaller corner radii, creating a shorter and safer pedestrian crossing and encouraging drivers to slow down. Construction of bulbouts requires altering the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Bulbouts may contain special paving or landscaping and are generally used at intersections where parking is restricted. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Pedestrian crossing distance is reduced  Narrowed roadway section may contribute to reduction of speeds  Breaks up driver’s sight-line  Opportunity for landscaping and visual enhancements to the neighborhood  May reduce visibility for cyclists who are less visible to turning and cross traffic  May require partial or total loss of parking  Could result in a minor increase on maintenance  Care should be taken to keep motorists from hitting bulbouts Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 22 Curb radius: as determined by design vehicle I t Length: at least 5 ' beyond extension of the corner property line Width: as determined by adjacent lanes Page 20 Chicanes A curved street alignment that can be designed into new developments or retrofitted in existing right- of-ways is called a chicane. The curvilinear alignment requires additional maneuvering and shortens drivers’ sight-lines, resulting in lower average speeds. This device can be applied to any street where speed control is desired, provided the street is wide enough to accommodate the curvilinear design. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  May slow traffic  Changes the look of the street, making it more aesthetically pleasing  Has minimal impact on emergency response  Involves extensive design and expensive implementation  May require partial or total removal of on-street parking  Additional maintenance for service vehicles to maneuver a curvilinear street  May have little or no impact on cut- through traffic  May require modification of drainage features and other utilities Approximate cost: $35,000 to $100,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 23 am ~ [!l] ~t) \t \ a fl\! , Page 21 Volume Reduction Measures Volume reduction traffic calming measures are primarily designed to reduce the traffic level on the streets where they are installed. Diverters Diverters are raised areas placed diagonally across a four-way intersection that restrict through movements and vehicles to turn. Diverters are most applicable to local streets where cut-through traffic is a major problem. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Reduces cut-through traffic  Channels traffic flow, thus eliminating conflicts at an intersection  Can be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles  Opportunity for landscaping and visual enhancements to the neighborhood  Can accommodate bicycle traffic through intersection  Will re-direct traffic to other local streets  Causes increased travel time for local residents  Is a permanent measure, even though problem may be limited to certain times of day  High installation costs  May require partial or total removal of parking near intersection  Needs significant warning and guiding signs Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 24 Page 22 Partial Closure A Partial closure is a physical barrier that restricts vehicles from turning into a street, while still allowing for bicycle access. The opposite lane is left open to allow vehicle exits. Two-way traffic is maintained for the rest of the block. Partial closures are applicable to local streets where cut-through traffic is a concern. It can also be a favorable traffic volume control measure. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Restricts movements into a street while maintaining full access and movement within the street block for residents  Reduces cut-through traffic  Pedestrian crossing distance is reduced through a closure island  Creates a space for street landscaping  May require partial or total removal of on- street parking  May redirect traffic to other local streets  May increase trip length for local drivers  Is in effect at all times, even if cut-through problem exists only at certain times of day Approximate cost: $10,000 to $30,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 25 Page 23 Full Street Closure A complete closure of the street blocks both lanes of travel, so that the street becomes a cul-de-sac. This device eliminates all through traffic and limits street access to local residents. This device is applicable to local streets with major cut-through concerns where an emergency vehicle response route does not exist. The closure location may be designed as a pocket park with through bicycle and pedestrian access. Positive Aspects Negative Aspects  Restricts all through traffic  Effective volume and speed control measure  Improves the aesthetic quality of the street  May re-direct traffic to other local streets  May increase trip length for local drivers  May require partial removal of on-street parking  Not applicable for designated emergency vehicle response routes  May result in difficult turnaround conditions Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars) Item 12.a. - Page 26 Page 24 Guidelines for Installation or Warrants Regardless of the traffic calming measure under consideration, a complete evaluation of the existing corridor’s signage, pedestrian facilities, on-street parking, lighting, speed and traffic volume information should be completed. Passive Traffic Calming Measures Generally, Passive Traffic Calming Measures are lower cost and may be used where analysis indicates a problem exists and an appropriate Passive Traffic Calming Measures can be installed with successful results. If it is not likely that the Passive Traffic Calming Measures will be successful or that the installed Passive Traffic Calming Measure has failed, more restrictive measures may be appropriate. Active Traffic Calming Measures The following guidelines (warrants) are recommended to govern the installation of Active Traffic Calming Measures, following analysis and study. Some or all of these guidelines may apply, depending upon the individual street characteristics. 1. The street or street segment should be a two lane residential local or collector street with continuous curb and gutter, asphalt concrete berm, or curb and gutter or may be constructed as part of the traffic calming project. 2. The street segment should be at least 500 feet long. 3. The impacts to response time for emergency service vehicles must be evaluated and determined negligible. 4. Guidelines apply only to streets with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or less. 5. The 85th percentile speed must be at least seven miles per hour above the posted speed limit. 6. The average daily traffic volume, excluding cut-through traffic, should be more than 500 vehicles per day. 7. The subject location has good visibility; 8. Vertical deflection devices should not be placed on curves. 9. Vertical deflection devices should be located at or near residential property lines and away from driveways, when possible. 10. Vertical deflection devices should be located near street lights to illuminate them for safe bike and pedestrian activity at night. 11. Spacing between vertical deflection devices should be as even as possible to produce uniform speed along an entire street. When placed in a series they should be placed between 200 and 600 feet apart. Spacing should allow at least one installation on each block. 12. Vertical deflections shall not be installed at locations with street grades in excess of 6%, except under conditions where there are very short sections with grades up to 8%-10%. 13. The installation will not result in diversion of traffic to other residential streets. Item 12.a. - Page 27 Page 25 Volume Reduction Measures The following guidelines (warrants) are recommended to govern the installation of Volume Reduction Measures following analysis and study. Some or all of these guidelines may apply, depending upon the individual street characteristics. 1. The impacts to response time for emergency service vehicles must be evaluated and determined negligible. 2. The average daily traffic volume should exceed 500 vehicles per day. 3. Cut through traffic exceeds 10% of total daily and/or peak hour traffic. Approval and Implementation Process Neighborhood traffic calming is a term used to describe a process of education, enforcement, and finally engineering. The education component typically is completed using a neighborhood meeting in which residents can share concerns and help identify the problem. Additionally, education can also include physical improvements such as speed limit signs, revised roadway striping, and speed feedback indicators such as permanently mounted signs or temporally placed trailers to better identify what drivers should be doing. After the education phase is complete, enforcement activities are typically implemented. In this phase, the drivers should now be well informed and compliance is now achieved through moneta ry penalties in the form of traffic tickets. Enforcement work is highly effective to calm traffic speeds when officers are present to enforce. Since it is not feasible to devote officers to one area for a prolonged duration, lasting results will vary. The last course of action is engineering. This phase would incorporate physical changes to roadway geometry, which might include speed humps, speed tables, chokers, and medians. The Neighborhood Traffic Calming process is designed and intended to be a “grass roots” effort. With this in mind, notification of Neighborhood Traffic Calming needs comes from the neighborhoods. 1. Neighborhood representative writes letter requesting consideration, obtaining as many neighbors’ signatures / support as available. 2. Staff receives and evaluates the request. Staff agendizes the request for a future Traffic Commission Meeting date. 3. Staff writes a letter to residents to notify them of the Traffic Commission meeting date. 4. Traffic Commission meets to evaluate the request and determine if continued processing of the requested traffic calming should be considered. If Traffic Commission determines continued processing of the request is warranted, staff will begin data collection and the review process. Item 12.a. - Page 28 Page 26 5. If the concern relates to speed, data will be collected using the Speed Feedback Trailer. This allows for data collection as well as informing motorists of current travel speeds. 6. After the Speed Feedback Trailer has obtained the data and been removed, if the data indicates the need, increased speed enforcement will be implemented. 7. If increased enforcement is implemented, additional speed data may be obtained. 8. Staff will evaluate speed and enforcement data and prepare a report to present to the Traffic Commission. 9. Staff writes a letter to residents to notify them of the Traffic Commission meeting date. 10. The Traffic Commission meets to review the data results and to determine if continued processing of traffic calming should be considered or if the actions taken have achieved desired results. 11. If the Traffic Commission determines continued processing is needed, staff will return and bring forward traffic calming alternatives. This process is iterative until a amenable plan is developed. 12. A Preferred alternative is selected by the Traffic Commission with input from the neighborhood. The requesting parties circulate a petition within the project area. This petition must be circulated by the requesting parties, and returned containing the names and Enforcement Counting Tubes Speed Feedback Trailer Staff Develops Options Traffic Commission Meets Neighborhood Provides Feedback Item 12.a. - Page 29 Page 27 signatures of at least 66 % of the affected property owners in the project area. This petition is limited to one signature per household. 13. Once Staff receives the petition, Staff will prepare a staff report for the City Council with the Traffic Commission's recommendation and notify the neighborhood of the City Council meeting date. 14. City Council reviews preliminary plan. 15. If City Council approves the preliminary plan, staff will request direction of City Council as to funding of the improvements. The funding source may be City funds, funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood, or some combination of the two. Funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood, must be strictly on a volunteer basis. 16. If the City Council approves the preliminary plan with City funding, a budget request will be prepared for consideration for the next Capital Improvement Plan budget. 17. If the budget is approved, design and construction of the improvements will be completed based upon the funding delivery timeframe. Item 12.a. - Page 30 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study Prepared for: City of Arroyo Grande Prepared by: ATTACHMENT 2 Item 12.a. - Page 31 • omni -means ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study Prepared for: City of Arroyo Grande 300 East Branch Avenue Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Prepared by: Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 242-0461 April 2015 65-1275-34 R1985RPT001.docx Item 12.a. - Page 32 Page i Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1  II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 1  III. DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................................................................................ 2  ACCIDENT DATA ............................................................................................................................................................. 2  TRAFFIC VOLUMES.......................................................................................................................................................... 3  APPROACH SPEEDS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4  SIGHT DISTANCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 4  IV. CEDAR STREET/BOYSENBERRY STREET INTERSECTION ................................................................................... 7  A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ......................................................................................................................................... 7  Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume ............................................................................................................. 7  Warrant 2: Four Hour Vehicular Volume .............................................................................................................. 7  Warrant 3:  Peak Hour .......................................................................................................................................... 8  Warrant 4:  Pedestrian Volume ............................................................................................................................ 8  Warrant 5:  School Crossing .................................................................................................................................. 8  Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ................................................................................................................. 8  Warrant 7:  Crash Experience Warrant ................................................................................................................. 8  Warrant 8: Roadway Network .............................................................................................................................. 8  Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing .................................................................................................... 8  B.MULTI‐WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ‐ GUIDANCE ......................................................................................................... 8  Criterion A: Traffic Control Signals are Justified .................................................................................................... 9  Criterion B: Accident History ................................................................................................................................. 9  Criterion C: Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................................. 9  Criterion D ........................................................................................................................................................... 10  C. MULTI‐WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS – OPTIONAL CRITERIA .......................................................................................... 10  Criterion A: Control Left‐Turn Conflicts ............................................................................................................... 10  Criterion B: Control Vehicle/ Pedestrian Conflicts ............................................................................................... 10  Criterion C: Sight Distance .................................................................................................................................. 11  Criterion D:  Intersection of Two Residential Collector Streets ........................................................................... 12  V. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING .............................................................................................................. 13  TRAFFIC CALMING OPTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 13  Basic Measures ................................................................................................................................................... 13  Intermediate Measures ....................................................................................................................................... 15  Extreme Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 18  EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ............................................................................................................... 19  IMPACTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20  Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 20  Traffic Diversion .................................................................................................................................................. 21  Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles ............................................................................................................... 21  Considerations for Other Roadway Users ........................................................................................................... 21  Noise Impacts ...................................................................................................................................................... 21  Loss of Parking .................................................................................................................................................... 21  Liability Exposure Implications ............................................................................................................................ 21  Visual Impacts and Aesthetic Concerns............................................................................................................... 21  Increased Maintenance Costs ............................................................................................................................. 21  VI. COURTLAND STREET PARTIAL OR FULL CLOSURE .......................................................................................... 22  ALTERNATIVE #1 ‐ PARTIAL CLOSURE (SOUTHBOUND LANE) ................................................................................................. 22  Item 12.a. - Page 33 Page ii Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 25  ALTERNATIVE #2 ‐ PARTIAL CLOSURE (NORTHBOUND LANE) ................................................................................................ 25  Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 27  ALTERNATIVE #3 ‐ FULL STREET CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................... 28  Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 30  VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 33  CEDAR STREET/ BOYSENBERRY STREET INTERSECTION ......................................................................................................... 33  NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING ................................................................................................................................. 33  COURTLAND STREET PARTIAL OR FULL CLOSURE ................................................................................................................. 33  LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP ..................................................................................................................................................... 1  FIGURE 2: BERRY GARDENS STREET NETWORK ......................................................................................................................... 2  FIGURE 3: EXISTING LANE GEOMETRIES .................................................................................................................................. 5  FIGURE 4: EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................................................................................................. 6  FIGURE 5: CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................... 11  FIGURE 6: STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................. 12  FIGURE 7: POTENTIAL BARRICADE LOCATIONS FOR LIMITING ACCESS ON COURTLAND STREET ......................................................... 22  FIGURE 8: ALTERNATIVE #1 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ................................................................................................................. 24  FIGURE 9: ALTERNATIVE #2 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..................................................................................................... 26  FIGURE 10: ALTERNATIVE #3 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................................... 29  FIGURE 11: FIRE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM STATION 1 ........................................................................................................ 31  FIGURE 12: FIRE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM STATION 2 ........................................................................................................ 31  FIGURE 13: POLICE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM ARROYO GRANDE POLICE DEPARTMENT .............................................................. 32  FIGURE 14: POLICE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM GROVER BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ................................................................ 32  LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................ 3  TABLE 2 EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS .................................................................................................................................... 3  TABLE 3 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ........................................................................................................................... 4  TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF EIGHT HOUR WARRANT ....................................................................................................................... 7  TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................................................................. 10  TABLE 6 EFFECTIVENESS OF BASIC MEASURES ........................................................................................................................ 19  TABLE 7 EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERMEDIATE MEASURES ............................................................................................................ 20  TABLE 8 EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTREME MEASURES ................................................................................................................... 20  TABLE 9 ALTERNATIVE #1 INTERSECTION LOS ........................................................................................................................ 23  TABLE 10 ALTERNATIVE #1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 23  TABLE 11 ALTERNATIVE #2 INTERSECTION LOS ...................................................................................................................... 27  TABLE 12 ALTERNATIVE #2 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 27  TABLE 13 ALTERNATIVE #3 INTERSECTION LOS ...................................................................................................................... 30  TABLE 14 ALTERNATIVE #3 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 30  APPENDIX 1. Accident Data 2. Traffic Volume Data 3. Resident Petition for All-Way Stop at Cedar Street/Boysenberry Street Intersection Item 12.a. - Page 34 Page 1 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx I. Introduction In November 2014, the City of Arroyo Grande received a letter and petition to install an all-way stop at the intersection of Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street, citing cut-through traffic and speeding creating potentially dangerous conditions. Growth in the area has prompted concerns from existing residents about increased traffic. An apartment/townhome complex has recently been constructed on the west side of Courtland Street north of Strawberry Avenue, and a planned 4-acre commercial development at the southwest corner of East Grand Avenue and Courtland Street is currently in the development review process. This memorandum summarizes an evaluation of traffic circulation and potential traffic calming options within the Berry Gardens neighborhood, including: 1. Evaluation of all-way stop intersection control at Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street; 2. Potential traffic calming improvements along Courtland Street between Ash Street and Strawberry Avenue; and 3. Options and evaluation of limiting access into or out of the neighborhood on Courtland Street just north of Strawberry Avenue. II. Existing Conditions Berry Gardens is a neighborhood located southeast of the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and East Grand Avenue (Figure 1), and is comprised of about 167 single family dwellings. There are four access points to this neighborhood: Seabright Avenue to the west, Cedar Street to the east, and Courtland Street to the north and south. Seabright Avenue connects to South Oak Park Boulevard, which provides access to Highway 101. Cedar Street services residential neighborhoods to the east and connects to Ash Street via Spruce Street and Cedar Street. Courtland Street is a north/ south collector street between Ash Street and Newport Avenue and provides access to East Grand Avenue north of Berry Gardens. Courtland Street is a north/south road through the neighborhood and provides connections to seven east/ west streets as depicted in Figure 2. Cranberry Street and Boysenberry Street are the other two north/ south streets in the neighborhood. At the center is Kingo Park with a small play structure and scattered picnic tables and benches. Figure 1: Vicinity Map Item 12.a. - Page 35 Page 2 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Figure 2: Berry Gardens Street Network III. Data Collection Accident Data Recent 5-year accident data was obtained from the City Police Department and Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the study area. Copies of the accident data are included in the appendix. There were two total accidents within the study area during the period: 1. November 15, 2013: A vehicle turning left onto northbound Courtland Street was hit by a vehicle travelling west on Ash Street. 2. January 24, 2015: Cyclist ran off road at the intersection of Courtland Street and Blackberry Avenue. Item 12.a. - Page 36 Page 3 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes were obtained from counts performed by Metro Traffic Data on February 26, 2015. Copies of the provided traffic count data are included in the appendix. The volumes reported for existing AM and PM peak hours are summarized in Figure 4. Regarding pedestrian and bicyclist volumes, they are summarized in Table 1 below. More detailed pedestrian and bicyclist data is included in the appendix. TABLE 1 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST VOLUMES Intersection Pedestrian Volumes Bicyclist Volumes ID No. Streets AM Peak Total PM Peak Total AM Peak Total PM Peak Total 1 Seabright Avenue & South Oak Park Boulevard 4 7 2 6 2 Cedar Street & Courtland Street 7 3 1 1 3 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street 6 12 3 3 4 East Grand Avenue & Juniper Street 5 29 11 8 5 Cedar Street & Spruce Street 8 10 0 0 Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified utilizing the existing intersection lane geometries (Figure 3) and control and the existing traffic volumes (Figure 4). Table 2 contains a summary of the existing intersection LOS conditions, with roadway LOS conditions contained in Table 3. TABLE 2 EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS # Intersection Control Type Target LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.2 C 30.6 C 2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.4 C 22.4 C 3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 15.7 C 23.5 C 4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.0 B 13.3 B 5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.7 A 9.0 A 6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.9 A 9.3 A 7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 9.1 A 9.4 A 8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.4 B 13.2 B Notes: 1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control 2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal Item 12.a. - Page 37 Page 4 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx TABLE 3 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS # Roadway Roadway Type Target LOS ADT Volume V/C LOS 1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 2,631 0.22 A 2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 2,142 0.18 A 3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 1,759 0.15 A 4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 435 0.07 A 5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 365 0.06 A 6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A 7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 94 0.02 A 8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 590 0.10 A Notes: 1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000 2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade As presented in Tables 2 and 3, all of the study intersections are currently operating at or above acceptable LOS C conditions. Approach Speeds The posted speed limit along Courtland Street is 25 mph, and the other streets in the neighborhood have a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph per CVC §22352(b)(1) for residence districts. Sight Distance Available intersection corner sight distance (CSD) and stopping sight distance (SSD) were plotted in plan view and field verified for the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. The resulting available CSD and SSD are shown on Figure 5 and Figure 6. Item 12.a. - Page 38 Item 12.a. - Page 39 - 1 2 E Grand _3 Ave ~ ,,j.,) ~ ,,j.,) ti) ti) ~ 't1 ~ ~ s::: .S4 a:s r----a:s c.. ;J s::: ~ ~ ~ ~ '-:, Pop~ar a:s 8 0 Strawberry Ave / ,,j.,) 5Cedar St ("I) riehi 4 6 t Seab A ve ' ~ .Q A ~ flJ Raspberry Ave ~ -c:i I I I I .. 8 Ash St .... Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study Existing Lane Geometries 4/1/2015 8:47 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG - 7 ~ ..., i::: (") (I) ("I) t"I- 1 ~ 3 ~t ll ~ ...__ ...__ ...__ ..- ---3 STOP -------. ir -------. I ---.. ---.. 'AST GRAND AVENUE EAST GRAND AVENUE 'AST GRAND AVENUE 4 St ~tl ~4-~ ~}-+ 4-dOlS -+ij -+ STOP iir r t SEABRIGHT A VENUE CEDAR STREET 6 7 + ~4-E-, + ~ ~ ..-~ dOlS t,j ~ ---3 STOP -+ij :::i t ~ ---.. t t,j ASH STREET Item 12.a. - Page 40 - 1 ~ ~ ~ a:s r----c.. ~ a:s 0 riehi 4 Seab A ve ' - / I 2 E Grand Ave _3 ,,j.,) ,,j.,) ti) ti) 't1 ~ ~ s::: .S4 a:s ;J s::: ~ ~ ~ '-:, Pop~ar St 8 Strawberry Ave - ,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I) 6 t ~ ~ .Q A ..., i::: ~ (") flJ Ave ~ (I) Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I- I I I .. 8 Ash St .... Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study 1 ,_N-:;-- ~~N ~g¥ L111(163) t0N~ .J i l ._268(490) r n( 117) 124(181l_J it i 296(507-+ 20( 46 7 ~ sj-U")I"") ~N-r-------.,, N~N n- 4 7 CEDAR STREET LEGEND : ~ ~ l"")~U") -r---si-~ L18(51) si--r--- .J i l ._419(630) r-27(76) 57(94l_J it i 420(755-+ 14(37 • ~ <Ol"")N ~ si-n- ~ en N~ ~-<D L15(14) O~N ~si-~ Ql"")IX) .J i l ._o~o~ ro2 Tl_J iti 0 0-+ 0 0 7 ~ ~U")~ o~N 0 <D '---CEDAR STREET 8 0 8 r---~U"l i'¥~ L12(21) I I l ._118(134) _.J + r-10(21) 26(37l _J i t i 92(160-+ 28(24 7 5'w ~U")sj- ;:;:; - ASH STREET xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4/1/2015 8:48 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG ~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~ .J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) 1:/J O(OlJ it i ~ 490(737-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~I"") ~a~ ~ ~ .... I\ ~ I'\ IE- [;j ~ ::,; ~ ~ ~ § c::, 8-:=''r0' Lo(3) ~ 000 ~ .J i l ._18(13) 1:/J ro(7) :,., ll:; 1(0l_J it i ~ 11(28-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~ ~~ ~ _,.,.,,.,., :,.;; ~ I~ '-CEDAR STREET Page 7 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx IV. Cedar Street/Boysenberry Street Intersection A. Traffic Signal Warrants The term “signal warrants” refers to the list of established criteria used by public agencies (in this instance City of Arroyo Grande) to quantitatively justify or ascertain the need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection location. The signal warrant criteria are based upon several factors including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, location of school areas etc. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD, 2012 Edition) indicates that the installation of a traffic signal should be considered if one or more of the signal warrants are met. Applicable traffic signal warrant criteria were used as a basis for evaluation of the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. Specifically, applicable warrants could be evaluated based on the collected accident data; traffic volumes; the 85th-percentile approach speeds; two- lane approach configurations on both the major and minor streets; and the urban condition applied for all applicable warrants. Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Twenty-four hour traffic volumes were measured on February 26, 2015 for the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. According to the MUTCD Section 4C.02, the eight-hour vehicular volume warrant requires significant traffic volumes on the major and minor streets, for any eight hours of an average day. See summary provided in Table 4 below. There was not one hour where this warrant was met. TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF EIGHT HOUR WARRANT Major Street Traffic Volumes (veh/hr) Minor Street Traffic Volumes (veh/hr) Hour of the Day Cedar Street (EB+WB Approaches) Boysenberry Street (NB+SB Approaches) 8-9 AM 30 7 11 AM-12 PM 24 3 1-2 PM 26 4 2-3 PM 32 5 3-4 PM 47 9 4-5 PM 37 6 5-6 PM 48 8 6-7 PM 25 4 Warrant 2: Four Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 2 requires traffic volumes for the busiest four hours to plot above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 of the MUTCD. This warrant requires higher volumes than the eight-hour vehicular volume warrant, but only over the course of four hours. Based on the data provided in Table 2, there are no hours for which the volumes meet this warrant. Item 12.a. - Page 41 Page 8 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Warrant 3: Peak Hour The peak hour warrant is only applied in unusual cases where there are facilities which attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. Based on the data provided in Table 2 noted under Warrant 1, Warrant 3 is not currently satisfied for this intersection. Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street are local roads within the Berry Gardens neighborhood, and there are no major pedestrian traffic generators in the vicinity. Pedestrian volumes for this intersection are low, with only 12 pedestrians at the intersection during the peak hour Based on the volume of Cedar Street traffic, to meet signal warrant for pedestrian crossings the MUTCD requires 107 PPH (Figure 4-C5) or 75 PPH at the 70% level (Figure 4-C6) and therefore Warrant 4 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection. Warrant 5: School Crossing There are no schools in the vicinity of this intersection; therefore Warrant 5 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection. Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System There are no adjacent traffic control signals; therefore, Warrant 6 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection. Warrant 7: Crash Experience Warrant Based on the available data, Warrant 7 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection. Warrant 8: Roadway Network This intersection is not between two major routes; therefore, Warrant 8 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection. Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing There are no adjacent rail crossings; therefore, Warrant 9 is not satisfied for the study intersection. B. Multi-Way Stop Control Analysis - Guidance The MUTCD covers all-way stop (a type of "multi-way" stop) application in Section 2B.07 Multi- Way Stop Applications: "Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal." It offers the following guidance on the application of multi-way stop control: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Item 12.a. - Page 42 Page 9 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but 3. If the 85 th-percentile approach speed of the major-street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Item 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Criterion A: Traffic Control Signals are Justified As discussed above, a traffic signal is not warranted; therefore, Criterion A does not apply. Criterion B: Accident History A review of the recent available 5-year accident information indicates that there were no reported accidents at or near the study intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. The minimum number of accidents required to meet this warrant is five within a 12 month period, the installation of a multi-way stop would not be warranted at this intersection based on accident history. Criterion C: Traffic Volumes The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) is 48 vehicles per hour for the evening peak hour. This is far less than the 300 vehicles per hour needed for any 8 hours of an average day. The speeds through this Item 12.a. - Page 43 Page 10 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx intersection are less than 40 miles per hour; therefore Criterion C.3. cannot be used. The traffic volume warrant is not met for this intersection. TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES Hour of the Day Traffic Volumes (veh/hr) Minimum Volume Warrant Warrant Met? Traffic Volumes (veh/hr) Minimum Volume Warrant Warrant Met? Major Street (Cedar Street) Minor Street (Boysenberry Street) 8-9 AM 30 300 (240) No (No) 7 200 (160) No (No) 11 AM-12 PM 24 300 (240) No (No) 3 200 (160) No (No) 1-2 PM 26 300 (240) No (No) 4 200 (160) No (No) 2-3 PM 32 300 (240) No (No) 5 200 (160) No (No) 3-4 PM 47 300 (240) No (No) 9 200 (160) No (No) 4-5 PM 37 300 (240) No (No) 6 200 (160) No (No) 5-6 PM 48 300 (240) No (No) 8 200 (160) No (No) 6-7 PM 25 300 (240) No (No) 4 200 (160) No (No) ( ) – Values or results for evaluation of Criterion D Criterion D A multi-way stop could be warranted where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are not satisfied at 80% of the minimum values and therefore Criterion D isn't satisfied. C. Multi-Way Stop Control Analysis – Optional Criteria Section 2B.07 of the MUTCD includes four other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study to determine if the installation of multi-way stop control is warranted at an intersection: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collectors (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Criterion A: Control Left-Turn Conflicts Based on a field review, left-turn conflicts do not appear to be an issue, nor were any accidents involving a left-turning vehicle reported at the study intersections during the past 5 years. Criterion B: Control Vehicle/ Pedestrian Conflicts The intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street do not experience a significant amount of pedestrian activity. No pedestrian or bicycle conflicts were reported during the 5-year period. Based on existing conditions and data, Criterion B is not satisfied. Item 12.a. - Page 44 Page 11 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Criterion C: Sight Distance The Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) Table 405.1B lists which types of sight distance are evaluated for various types of intersections. For the intersection of public streets, corner sight distance and stopping sight distance are evaluated. Corner Sight Distance Corner sight distance is the distance needed to provide 7.5 seconds for the driver on the crossroad to complete the necessary maneuver while the approaching vehicle travels at the assumed design speed of the main road. The speed limit on Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street is 25 miles per hour, requiring a minimum sight distance of 275 feet per the HDM. As shown on Figure 5, corner sight distance is available of at least 275 feet. Figure 5: Corner Sight Distance Stopping Sight Distance The available stopping sight distance on Cedar Street approaching the study intersection is greater than the distance required for a speed of 25 miles per hour (see Figure 5). Item 12.a. - Page 45 Page 12 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Figure 6: Stopping Sight Distance Criterion D: Intersection of Two Residential Collector Streets Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street are both functionally classified as local streets; therefore, Criterion D is not satisfied. Item 12.a. - Page 46 Page 13 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx V. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Potential traffic calming measures for Courtland Street between Strawberry Avenue and Ash Street were also evaluated. Berry Gardens is a residential neighborhood made up of a network of local, residential streets. Residential streets are planned and designed to provide access to and from the residential neighborhoods. These facilities are neither designed nor intended for the use of non-local traffic. When congested conditions occur on collector and arterial roadways, these local streets may provide an attractive alternative route, or “cut-through”; the geometrics of the neighborhood street system can lead to increased speeds as well. These potential problems, individually or collectively would result in a reduction in neighborhood safety for homeowners, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Although the current volumes and speeds of traffic don't appear to warrant installation of traffic calming measures at this time, it is the intent of this study to identify various traffic calming options, which may be implemented in the Berry Gardens neighborhood should conditions change or it be desired by the neighborhood and City. The objectives of installing traffic calming measures on residential streets are to: Reduce vehicular speed where appropriate Reduce cut-through traffic Promote conditions that encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel Enhance the neighborhood environment Traffic Calming Options The tools available for use in resolving traffic problems in a residential neighborhood are many and diverse in both their cost and effectiveness. This study has identified three levels of traffic calming measures: Basic Measures Intermediate Measures Extreme Measures Traffic calming measures may include devices that do not directly affect driver behavior and are not self enforcing. These measures are generally included within the “Basic Measures” category; if they fail, more restrictive measures may be warranted. The “more restrictive” traffic calming measures, those found in the “intermediate” and “extreme” categories, mandate driver behavior change and, as a result, may be effective where “basic measures” have failed. These measures generally require either/both: Obstacles to be mounted - Vertical Deflection Roadway narrowing/closures/obstacles to be circumvented - Horizontal Shift Basic Measures Basic traffic calming measures are traffic control devices and programs implemented on a day- to-day basis to regulate, warn, guide, inform, and educate pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. Item 12.a. - Page 47 Page 14 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx They include standard striping and signing measures as found in the State of California Traffic Manual, minor roadway design measures to improve visibility and safety, enforcement by police and photo-radar, and safety education programs. Basic Measures are used primarily in those areas where traffic impacts have been found not to be excessive or serious, but where traffic control and/or education has been determined to be appropriate. Some Basic Measures which could be considered for the Berry Gardens neighborhood are described in the following sections. Safety Education Programs Safety education programs are an important component of a comprehensive traffic calming program. Safety education programs include efforts to make the public more aware of their own driving behavior and the impact it has on others. Pedestrian and bicycle safety programs alert and educate pedestrians and bicyclists on road safety. Driver safety information and education on existing laws can help improve driver behavior. Police Enforcement Police enforcement entails the presence of police to monitor speeds and issue citations. This method is used as an initial attempt to reduce speeds on streets. It is most applicable on streets with documented speeding problems and the need for quick mitigation. It can also be used during the learning period when new devices or restrictions are first implemented. Radar Trailer This is a mobile trailer-mounted radar display that informs drivers of their speed. This measure is applicable on any street where speeding is a problem. Radar trailers are good educational tools, and they are good public relations for neighborhoods and effective in temporarily reducing speeds. However, they are not self- enforcing, the duration of effectiveness is limited, and they may require temporary lane closures. High-Visibility Crosswalks A high-visibility crosswalk is a crosswalk that incorporates striped patterns, pavement lights, improved signing or advance flashing beacons to improve the visibility of the crosswalk. This measure is most applicable on local streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation is desired. It can also be used to discourage cut-through traffic. This type of crosswalk is most appropriate near locations experiencing high pedestrian traffic, such as near schools, parks, and recreation facilities. Item 12.a. - Page 48 Page 15 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx These crosswalks slow traffic, increases driver awareness of crosswalk, and require minimal maintenance for striped crosswalks. In some situations, these crosswalks may require removal of parking in the vicinity and may result in significant maintenance for embedded pavement lights or advance flashing lights. Pavement Striping Striping is used to create narrow lanes, which give the impression of a narrow street. This makes the motorist feel restricted, which helps reduce speeds. Striping can be at curb end or in the middle of the street to create a median. It is most applicable to long, wide residential streets where speeding traffic exists. This measure is easy to install and modify as necessary and has a low cost of implementation. One drawback is that it may not be self-enforcing. High-Visibility Signs High-visibility signs may include larger speed limit signs on the streets to ensure visibility to motorists. This measure is a basic method aimed at slowing traffic through visual reminders of the speed limits or other regulations. It can be applied to most streets that have speeding or other problems, and it provides context for enforcement efforts. However, signs are typically not self-enforcing, and larger signs provide a negative impact on the aesthetics of the street. Truck Restrictions Restricting the entry of trucks into residential neighborhoods can be achieved through the posting of truck restriction signs. This method is most applicable on residential streets to reduce cut-through traffic of commercial vehicles. Intermediate Measures Intermediate measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily designed to slow traffic. They are employed when the use of basic measures cannot, or has not, effectively addressed speeding issues and it has been found that speeds and/or accidents exceed the thresholds identified later in this document. Intermediate measures are often used in conjunction with basic measures, and may have a limited effect on traffic volume as well. Speed Humps Speed humps are areas of pavement raised 3-4 inches in height over a minimum of 12 feet in length. The combination of different heights, lengths and approach ramps will affect the speed a vehicle can comfortably go over the hump. Speed humps are marked with signs and pavement markings. Item 12.a. - Page 49 Page 16 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Speed humps slow traffic, are self-enforcing, and require minimum maintenance. However, they may increase emergency response times, damage emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed, or increase traffic noise in the vicinity of the bump. Minor Bulbouts Minor bulbouts narrow the street width at intersections creating smaller corner radii, shorter and safer pedestrian crossing, and encouraging drivers to slow down. Bulbouts may be striped or may be curbed islands containing special paving or landscaping. Corner bulbouts are typically used adjacent to intersections where parking is restricted. Some positive aspects of minor bulbouts are that pedestrian crossing distance is reduced, narrowed roadway section may contribute to reduction of speeds, and they break up driver’s view path. Unfortunately, they may create a hazard for bicyclists who are less visible to turning vehicles and cross traffic, require partial or total removal of parking, could result in increased maintenance costs, and care must be exercised to keep motorists from hitting bulbouts. Gateway Treatments A gateway is a special entrance that reduces the width of a travel way, often through the use of islands. It is usually placed in a roadway to define the entry to a residential area and/or to narrow each direction of travel and interrupt the view path along the center of the roadway. Gateway treatments provide high visibility to motorists to notify change in roadway nature, may discourage cut- through traffic, and help slow traffic. On the other hand, they will increase need for maintenance and may necessitate removal of parking. Raised Crosswalk Raised crosswalks are flat-topped speed humps, 22 feet in length, built as a pedestrian crosswalk, with vehicle ramps on the approaches. This type of crosswalk is applicable to local streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation are desired. It can be an effective safety tool most appropriate near locations experiencing high pedestrian traffic, such as Item 12.a. - Page 50 I I I I ~--__,.,i~:-'l,p,,· ...,....,....._____,....,.....,.. Page 17 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx near schools, parks, and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut-through traffic. Raised crosswalks are well-marked and may contain special paving or textures. Raised crosswalks slow traffic, increases pedestrian visibility in the crosswalks, and require minimal maintenance. Some of the downsides are that they may increase emergency response times, damage emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed, increase traffic noise in vicinity of crosswalk, create drainage issues where raised crossing extends from curb to curb, or require extensive warning signs to be effective Mid-Block Chokers Chokers are raised islands in the parking zone that can be detached from the curb line to allow for drainage. Mid- Block chokers narrow the roadway and are most applicable on wide streets with speeding and cut-through problems. Mid-block chokers reduce speed, break up driver’s sight- line, reduce pedestrian crossing distance, and increases pedestrian and motorist visibility. However, they may require partial or total removal of on-street parking and they increase maintenance for areas where street sweeping equipment cannot reach between the choker and the curb line. Medians Medians are raised islands in the center of the roadway that separate traffic directions. Medians are used on wide streets to narrow the travel lanes, interrupt sight distances down the center of the roadway, and ease pedestrian crossings. They also offer an opportunity for landscaping and visual enhancements to the neighborhood. Medians may require removal of parking and there is a high cost to construct and maintain them. Major Bulbouts Major bulbouts narrow the street width, and create smaller corner radii, creating a shorter and safer pedestrian crossing and encouraging drivers to slow down. Construction of major bulbouts requires altering the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Major bulbouts may contain special paving or landscaping and are generally used at intersections where parking is restricted. Unfortunately, they may create a hazard for bicyclists who are less visible to turning vehicles and cross traffic, require partial or total removal of parking, could result in increased maintenance costs, and care must be exercised to keep motorists from hitting bulbouts. Item 12.a. - Page 51 ';L:J I t: _________ ., L) ~ ... ,: \,~----(. ::. .,, __ '} Page 18 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Chicanes A curved street alignment that can be designed into new developments or retrofitted in existing right-of-ways is called a chicane. The curvilinear alignment requires additional maneuvering and shortens drivers’ sight- lines, resulting in lower average speeds. This device can be applied to any street where speed control is desired, provided the street is wide enough to accommodate the curvilinear design. Extreme Measures Extreme measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily designed to discourage residential street cut-through traffic. They are used when it has been found that traffic volumes exceed established thresholds. Volume reduction devices can be used by themselves or in conjunction with basic and/or intermediate measures. Some Extreme Measures which could be considered for the Berry Gardens neighborhood are described in the following sections. Partial Closure A partial closure is a physical barrier that restricts vehicles from turning into a street, while still allowing for bicycle access. The opposite lane is left open to allow vehicle exits. Two-way traffic is maintained for the rest of the block. Partial closures are applicable to local streets where cut-through traffic is a concern. It can also be a favorable traffic volume control measure. The benefits of partial closure are that they restrict movement into a street while maintaining full access and movement within the street block for residents, reduce cut-through traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distance through a closure island, and create space for street landscaping. Drawbacks are that they may require partial or total removal of on-street parking, may redirect traffic to other local streets, may increase trip length for local drivers, and is in effect at all times, even if cut-through problem exists only at certain times of day. Full Street Closure A complete closure of the street blocks both lanes of travel, so that the street becomes a cul-de-sac. This device eliminates all through traffic and limits street access to local residents. This device is applicable to local streets with major cut-through concerns where an emergency vehicle response route does not exist. The closure location may be designed as a pocket park with through bicycle and pedestrian access. Positive aspects include restriction of all through traffic, effective volume and speed control, and provides opportunity to improve the aesthetic quality of the street. Negative aspects include re-direction Item 12.a. - Page 52 Page 19 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx of traffic to other local streets, increased trip length for local drivers, partial removal of on-street parking and may result in difficult turnaround conditions. Full closures are not applicable for designated emergency vehicle response routes. Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Measures The following tables provide general assessments of the effectiveness of some traffic calming measures under certain street conditions. TABLE 6 EFFECTIVENESS OF BASIC MEASURES Basic Measures: Reduces Speed Reduces Traffic Noise Loss of Parking Restricts Access Emergency Impacts Maint. Cost Safety Education Program Maybe Maybe No Change No No No No Low Police Enforcement Yes Maybe No Change No No No No Low Radar Application Maybe No No Change No No No No Low High-Visibility Crosswalks Maybe No No Change No No No Yes Medium/ High Pavement Striping Maybe No No Change Maybe No No Yes Low High-Visibility Signs Maybe Maybe Increase No No Yes Occasional Low Truck Restrictions No Yes Decrease No No No Occasional Low *Speed humps and crosswalks must be reinstalled each time a street is resurfaced. Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000 Item 12.a. - Page 53 Page 20 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx TABLE 7 EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERMEDIATE MEASURES Basic Measures: Reduces Speed Reduces Traffic Noise Loss of Parking Restricts Access Emergency Impacts Maint. Cost Speed Humps Yes Maybe Increase No No Yes Yes Medium Minor Bulbout Yes Maybe No Change Maybe No No Yes Medium Gateway Treatments Maybe Minimal No Change No No No Yes Medium/ High Raised Crosswalk Yes Maybe Increase Yes No Yes Yes Medium/ High Mid-Block Chokers Yes Maybe No Change Yes No Some Yes Medium Median Yes Maybe Decrease Yes Yes Yes Yes Medium/ High Major Bulbout Yes No No Change Yes No Some Yes Medium/ High Chicanes Yes Maybe No Change Yes Maybe Some Yes Medium/ High *Speed humps and crosswalks must be reinstalled each time a street is resurfaced. Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000 TABLE 8 EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTREME MEASURES Basic Measures: Reduces Speed Reduces Traffic Noise Loss of Parking Restricts Access Emergency Impacts Maint. Cost Partial Closure Maybe Yes No Change Maybe Yes Maybe Yes High Full Street Closure Maybe Yes No Change Maybe Yes Yes Yes High Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000 Impacts Prior to installing traffic calming measures, it is important to carefully consider potential impacts. While many of the measures offer positive results, there are potential problems, which may be more significant than the original concern. This section attempts to describe some of the possible impacts of the use of the aforementioned traffic calming tools. Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times Speed, and to a lesser extent, volume traffic calming measures have potential for negatively impacting emergency vehicle response because they physically affect speed and maneuvering. Many physical traffic calming techniques can significantly worsen emergency response time. The City’s Fire and Police Departments are concerned about the effect these devices have on response time. These concerns will need to be addressed for each location where traffic calming techniques are considered. Item 12.a. - Page 54 Page 21 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Traffic Diversion Another concern is the potential for traffic calming techniques to move, rather than solve, a problem. Proposals for traffic volume reductions will include an adequate traffic engineering study to evaluate traffic diversion impacts. Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles Some traffic calming options could potentially impact bus routes and utility vehicles. Service providers should be consulted. Considerations for Other Roadway Users In addition to safety concerns, traffic calming measures can often have unintended negative impacts on bicyclists, roller skaters, skate boarders, joggers, pedestrians and parked vehicles. These impacts will also need to be considered. Noise Impacts The noise impact to adjacent residents resulting from vehicles braking, going over and around traffic calming devices can have an impact on the acceptability of these devices by residents affected by them. The support of residents living immediately adjacent to locations where physical changes are proposed will be important to the success of any project. Loss of Parking It may be necessary to restrict or prohibit on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of certain traffic calming features. Liability Exposure Implications Traffic calming devices may result in varying degrees of liability exposure to the City. This exposure stems from the potential negative impact to emergency vehicle response times. Delay of emergency response could result in a civil action by an injured party from allegations that the emergency vehicle response was delayed by traffic calming devices. It is also possible that traffic calming devices themselves might allegedly result in damage or injury. Visual Impacts and Aesthetic Concerns While some traffic calming devices can have favorable aesthetic impacts, others can be unsightly. Virtually all traffic calming techniques require reflective devices, signs and striping which may negatively affect the aesthetics of a neighborhood. Increased Maintenance Costs Street maintenance costs will increase in two areas. First, landscaping associated with such devices as bulbouts, chokers and chicanes, etc., will require regular maintenance. Second, devices such as speed humps will have to be reinstalled each time a residential street is overlaid which will increase these costs. Item 12.a. - Page 55 Page 22 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx VI. Courtland Street Partial or Full Closure Three alternative traffic conditions were analyzed in this report regarding potential limited access on Courtland Street just north of Strawberry Avenue. Each of these alternatives is discussed below along with traffic redistribution assumptions associated with each alternative. Analysis only represents existing traffic conditions. Analysis for projected traffic volumes for future years or due to planned developments was outside of the scope of this report. Figure 7: Potential Barricade Locations for Limiting Access on Courtland Street Alternative #1 - Partial Closure (Southbound Lane) Alternative #1 assumes that Courtland Street is converted to a one-way northbound only facility by placing advanced signage and a barricade in the southbound lanes at the location shown in Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown on Figure 8: Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, west of Courtland Street (EBR), was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (EBR). Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, east of Courtland Street (WBL), was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (WBL). Southbound traffic from Courtland Street, north of East Grand Avenue (SBT), was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (SBT). 29 AM (70%) and 140 PM (90%) volumes were redistributed, the rest is going to the Shopping Center north of the closure. Item 12.a. - Page 56 Page 23 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour, redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the Southbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard or Ash Street For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses, and the same distribution was used. Alternative #1 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in Tables 9 and 10. TABLE 9 ALTERNATIVE #1 INTERSECTION LOS # Intersection Control Type Target LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.7 C 33.1 C 2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.0 B 20.9 C 3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 15.7 C 23.5 C 4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.1 B 15.0 B 5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.7 A 8.9 A 6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.2 A 7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 9.1 A 9.4 A 8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.3 B 13.1 B Notes: 1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control 2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal TABLE 10 ALTERNATIVE #1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS # Roadway Roadway Type Target LOS ADT Volume V/C LOS 1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 1,218 0.10 A 2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 1,207 0.10 A 3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 907 0.08 A 4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 282 0.05 A 5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 357 0.06 A 6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A 7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 115 0.02 A 8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 684 0.11 A Notes: 1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000 2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade Item 12.a. - Page 57 Item 12.a. - Page 58 - 1 ~ ~ ~ a:s r----c.. ~ a:s 0 riehi 4 Seab A ve ' - / I 2 E Grand Ave _3 ,,j.,) ,,j.,) ti) ti) 't1 ~ ~ s::: .S4 a:s ;J s::: ~ ~ ~ '-:, Pop~ar St 8 Strawberry Ave - ,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I) 6 t ~ ~ .Q A ..., i::: ~ (") flJ Ave ~ (I) Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I- I I I .. 8 Ash St .... Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study 1 ,.._-;;;-,:;-- ~c;:N ~~ L111(163) t0N~ .J i l ._268(490) r 86( 175) 124(181l_J it i 289(478 -+ 27(75 7 ~ sj-l()t') ~N-r-------.,, N~N .,.,- 4 7 ~N sj-t')~ LT} ~ -~N ~oo~ ~ <D-0 .J i l ._3 4 ~ r21 t,j 5f8l_J it i ~ 0 5-+ :::i 6(10 7 ~ ~ ~N~ o~-_.,., t,j CEDAR STREET LEGEND : n 'in' -~si--LO- L18(51) ';;f',:::.:;:::" si-r---r--- .J i l ._433(689) r-13(17) 57(94l_J it i 420(755-+ 7(8 7 ~ <Ot'lN ~ srt'l- ~ ~ N~ O.:::..~ L15(14) ~a~ 0-t'l .J i l ._ofo~ ro2 Tl_J iti 0 0-+ 0 0 7 ~ ~I()~ o~N 0 <D '---CEDAR STREET 8 !:::.:;::-~ ~?;;'~ L12(21) I I l ._118(134) _.J + r-10(21) 26(37l _J i t i 92(215-+ 28(32 7 5'w ~l()sj- ;:;:; - ASH STREET xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Alternative =11=1 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4/1/2015 8:49 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG ~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~ .J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j O(OlJ it i ~ 490(737-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~t'l ~a~ ~ ~ .... I\ ~ I'\ IE- [;j ~ ::,; ~ ~ ~ § c::, 8-:=''r0' Lo(3) ~ 000 ~ .J i l ._18(13) t,j ro(7) :,., ll:; 1(0l_J it i ~ 6(14-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~ ~~ ~ _.,.,.,., :,.;; ~ I~ '-CEDAR STREET Page 25 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to operate at or above acceptable LOS C conditions under the Alternative #1 conditions. There were no significant changes to the operating characteristics for the study intersections or study roadway segments. Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times The response time to the neighborhood may remain the same under the Alternative #1 conditions, assuming that emergency responders will travel around the southbound closure to access the neighborhood. Should evacuation of the neighborhood be necessary, evacuees may interfere with emergency responders attempting to enter the neighborhood. Alternative #2 - Partial Closure (Northbound Lane) Alternative #2 assumes that Courtland Street is converted to a one-way southbound only facility by placing advanced signage and a barricade in the northbound lanes at the location shown in Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown on Figure 9: Northbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBT), was redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard. Eastbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBR), was redistributed to Juniper Street via Spruce Street. Westbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBL), was redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard. 68 AM (90%) and 50 PM (70%) volumes were redistributed, the rest is going to the Shopping Center north of closure. Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour, redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the Northbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard via Ash Street and few via Seabright Avenue. For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses, and the same distribution was used. Alternative #2 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in Tables 11 and 12. Item 12.a. - Page 59 Item 12.a. - Page 60 - 1 ~ ~ ~ a:s r----c.. ~ a:s 0 riehi 4 Seab A ve ' - / I 2 E Grand Ave _3 ,,j.,) ,,j.,) ti) ti) 't1 ~ ~ s::: .S4 a:s ;J s::: ~ ~ ~ '-:, Pop~ar St 8 Strawberry Ave - ,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I) 6 t ~ ~ .Q A ..., i::: ~ (") flJ Ave ~ (I) Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I- I I I .. 8 Ash St .... Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study 1 ,_N-:;--~ ~ ~~N l"")~U") -r---si-~g¥ L101(155) ~ L18(51) t0N~ si--r--- .J i l ._244(472) .J i l ._419(630) r 72( 117) r-27(76) 124(181l_J it i 57(94l_J it i 296(507-+ 420(755-+ 20( 46 7 ~ 14(37 • ~ <Dt--1"") nN- ~N-~~ LO~ n- 4 ~ en N~ ~-<D L5tl O~N ~si-~ Ql"")IX) .J i l ._a o ro2 Tl_J iti 0 0-+ 0 0 7 ~ ~N~ o~N ,-.. '---CEDAR STREET 7 8 ~N 0 8 sj-1"")~ ~ r---~U"l -~N L5t} ~"'~ L1(12(1 ~ro~ ~ si-~N <D-0 Nsl-N .J i l ._a o .J i l ._129 143) r21 ~ r-10(21) t,j 10(8l_J it i ~ 7(24l_J it i 0~10-+ :::i 92(160-+ 614 7 ~ ~ 28(24 7 §Ee ~,.,.,~ n~-~-si- 0 t,j U") -N ,.,., CEDAR STREET ASH STREET LEGEND : xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Alternative =11=2 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4/1/2015 8:50 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PR J\7985\7985EX001.DWG ~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~ .J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j O(OlJ it i ~ 480(727-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~sl" ~a~ 0, ,.,., .... -N I\ ~ I'\ IE- [;j ~ ::,; ~ ~ ~ § c::, 8-:=''r0' Lan ~ 000 ~ .J i l ._8 3 t,j ro7 :,., ll:; 1(0l_J i t i ~ 11(28-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~ ~~ ~ _,.,.,,.,., :,.;; ~ I~ '-CEDAR STREET Page 27 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx TABLE 11 ALTERNATIVE #2 INTERSECTION LOS # Intersection Control Type Target LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.5 C 30.6 C 2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 21.1 C 22.5 C 3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 14.5 B 22.1 C 4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.3 B 13.4 B 5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.4 A 9.1 A 6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.2 A 7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 8.9 A 9.2 A 8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.0 B 12.9 B Notes: 1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control 2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal TABLE 12 ALTERNATIVE #2 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS # Roadway Roadway Type Target LOS ADT Volume V/C LOS 1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 1,413 0.12 A 2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 1,364 0.11 A 3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 1,370 0.11 A 4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 248 0.04 A 5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 318 0.05 A 6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A 7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 94 0.02 A 8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 862 0.14 A Notes: 1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000 2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to operate at or above acceptable LOS conditions under the Alternative #2 conditions. The LOS for the intersection of Grand Avenue and Juniper Street improved from C to B. There were no other significant changes to the operating characteristics for the study intersections or study roadway segments. Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times The response time to the neighborhood will remain the same under the Alternative #2 conditions. It could be assumed that an ambulance or other emergency responder needing to Item 12.a. - Page 61 Page 28 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx exit the neighborhood will travel around the northbound closure. Should evacuation of the neighborhood be necessary, exit routes would be limited to the three remaining points of connection. Evacuees travelling around the northbound closure may interfere with emergency responders attempting to enter the neighborhood. Alternative #3 - Full Street Closure Alternative #3 assumes that Courtland Street is closed to traffic by placing advanced signage and a barricade across both lanes at the location shown in Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown on Figure 10: (EBR) Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, west of Courtland Street, was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (EBR). (WBL) Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, east of Courtland Street, was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (WBL). (SBT) Southbound traffic from Courtland Street, north of East Grand Avenue, was redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (SBT). (NBT) Northbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard. (NBR) Eastbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was redistributed to Cedar Street and Juniper Street. (NBL) Westbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard. Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour, redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the Southbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard or Ash Street, the Northbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard via Ash Street and few via Seabright Avenue. For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses, and the same distribution was used. Alternative #3 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in Tables 13 and 14. Item 12.a. - Page 62 Item 12.a. - Page 63 - 1 ~ ~ ~ a:s r----c.. ~ a:s 0 riehi 4 Seab A ve ' - / I 2 E Grand Ave _3 ,,j.,) ,,j.,) ti) ti) 't1 ~ ~ s::: .S4 a:s ;J s::: ~ ~ ~ '-:, Pop~ar St 8 Strawberry Ave - ,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I) 6 t ~ ~ .Q A ..., i::: ~ (") flJ Ave ~ (I) Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I- I I I .. 8 Ash St .... Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study 1 ,.._-;;;-,:;-- ~c;:N n 'in' -~si-~~ L101(155) -LO- L18(51) ';;f',:::.:;:::" t0N~ si-r---r--- .J i l ._244(472) .J i l ._433(689) r 86( 176) r-13(17) 124(181l_J it i 57(94l_J it i 289(478 -+ 420(755-+ 27(75 7 ~ 7(8 7 ~ <Dr---.,., t'lN- ~N-~~ LO~ .,.,- 4 ~ ~ N~ O.:::..~ L5tl ~a~ 0-t'l .J i l ._a o ro2 Tl_J iti 0 0-+ 0 0 7 ~ ~-~ o~N r--- '---CEDAR STREET 7 8 ~N sj-t')~ L6t} ~ !:::.:;::-~ L1(12(1 -~N ~oo~ ~ N~N <D-0 -N- .J i l ._a o .J i l ._129 143) r21 ~ r-10(21) t,j 5f8l_J it i ~ 7(24l_J it i 0 5-+ :::i 92(215-+ 6(10 7 ~ ~ 28(32 7 §Ee ~.,.,~ "'~-~-si- 0 t,j I() -N .,., CEDAR STREET ASH STREET LEGEND : xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Alternative =11=3 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4/1/2015 8:50 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PR J\7985\7985EX001.DWG ~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~ .J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j O(OlJ it i ~ 480(727-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~sl" ~a~ 0, .,., .... -N I\ ~ I'\ IE- [;j ~ ::,; ~ ~ ~ § c::, 8-:=''r0' Lan ~ 000 ~ .J i l ._8 3 t,j ro7 :,., ll:; 1(0l_J i t i ~ 6(14-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~ ~~ ~ _.,.,.,., :,.;; ~ I~ '-CEDAR STREET Fi ure 10 Page 30 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx TABLE 13 ALTERNATIVE #3 INTERSECTION LOS # Intersection Control Type Target LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.9 C 33.3 C 2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.7 C 21.0 C 3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 14.5 B 22.1 C 4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.5 B 15.2 C 5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.4 A 8.7 A 6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.1 A 7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.1 A 8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 10.9 B 12.7 B Notes: 1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control 2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signals TABLE 14 ALTERNATIVE #3 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS # Roadway Roadway Type Target LOS ADT Volume V/C LOS 1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 0 0.00 A 2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 429 0.04 A 3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 518 0.04 A 4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 165 0.03 A 5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 240 0.04 A 6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A 7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 104 0.02 A 8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 956 0.16 A Notes: 1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000 2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to operate at or above acceptable LOS conditions under the Alternative #3 conditions. The LOS for the intersection of Grand Avenue and Juniper Street improved from C to B. The intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Seabright Avenue will worsen to LOS C in the PM peak hour. However, this is still an acceptable LOS. There were no other significant changes to the operating characteristics for the study intersections or study roadway segments. Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times The response time for emergency services will be increased under the Alternative #3 conditions. With a full street closure, police and fire emergency responders will have to take longer paths to reach certain parts of the neighborhood. Item 12.a. - Page 64 Page 31 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Fire There are three Five Cities Fire Authority stations within a mile and a half radius of Berry Gardens: Station 1 located near the Village of Arroyo Grande, Station 2 at the corner of 7th Street and Rockaway Avenue in Grover Beach, and Station 3 on Highway 1 and 13th Street in Oceano. Responders from Station 1 and Station 2 would be affected by a full closure of Courtland Street when responding to emergencies in the neighborhood. Figure 11 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Station 1. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.8 miles to 2.1 miles). Figure 11: Fire Response Distances from Station 1 Figure 12 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Station 2. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1 miles to 1.4 miles). Figure 12: Fire Response Distances from Station 2 Station 3 is located in Oceano on Highway 1 and 13th Street. Closing Courtland Street north of Strawberry Avenue would not affect the response time from this station. The distance would remain about two miles. Item 12.a. - Page 65 Page 32 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Police There are two local police stations: Arroyo Grande Police Department on Halcyon Road just north of Grande Avenue and Grover Beach Police Department on the corner of 7th Street and Rockaway Avenue. Responders from both police departments would be affected by a full closure of Courtland Street when responding to emergencies in the neighborhood. Figure 13 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Arroyo Grande Police Department. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1 miles to 1.4 miles). Figure 13: Police Response Distances from Arroyo Grande Police Department Figure 14 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Grover Beach Police Department. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1 miles to 1.4 miles). Figure 14: Police Response Distances from Grover Beach Police Department Item 12.a. - Page 66 Page 33 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx Hospital Responders coming from Arroyo Grande Community Hospital will not be affected by this closure, because they would most likely use the southern access point to the neighborhood. VII. Conclusion and Recommendations As presented through this report, there are various measures of traffic control and traffic calming that could be implemented in the Berry Gardens neighborhood. The analysis in this report included a all-way stop control warrant analysis for the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street, traffic calming measures on Courtland Street, and closures on Courtland Street north of Strawberry Avenue. Cedar Street/ Boysenberry Street Intersection As discussed in the all-way stop control section of this report, the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street does not meet warrants established in the MUTCD for installation of an all-way stop. Traffic volumes, accident and speed data fall significantly short of the numbers needed to meet the warrants. Therefore, installing stop signs on Cedar Street at this intersection is not recommended. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Several traffic calming measures were highlighted in this report for use on Courtland Street. There are basic, intermediate, and extreme measures which increase in cost and effectiveness. Measures to be implemented depend upon the concerns expressed by the neighborhood community and the available funds of the City. Since Courtland Street meanders through the neighborhood with stop signs at Huckleberry Avenue, Loganberry Avenue, and Ash Street, speeding was not observed in these areas. However the northern segment, from Blackberry Avenue to Grand Avenue, is wide and straight without stop signs. If speeding is a concern, new speed limit signs, a radar trailer, or police enforcement may be good starting points. Speed humps, raised crosswalks, medians, and bulbouts would also be effective in reducing speeds; these measures would be permanent and more expensive. These methods could be implemented near the entrances to the neighborhood to narrow the roads and create a sense of place and near Kingo Park to draw more attention to pedestrian activity. Other traffic calming measures could be implemented by the City at their discretion. Courtland Street Partial or Full Closure The most extreme form of traffic control brought forth in this report is road closure. Specifically, an analysis was performed for the partial and full closure of Courtland Street north of Strawberry Avenue. Limiting or restricting access on Courtland Street to and from the neighborhood has little effect on the operating conditions of the local street network, and there were no study intersection of roadways with LOS conditions below the target LOS C. From a level of service perspective, closing Courtland Street at the neighborhood boundary would not pose a significant problem. Item 12.a. - Page 67 Page 34 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx However, closing Courtland Street would break up the grid network of the City, increasing the lengths of trips for neighborhood residents and emergency responders. Traffic would be dispersed onto other minor streets such as Spruce Street and Seabright Avenue. Emergency response vehicles would be required to travel less direct routes to respond to emergencies. Response times could be increased by about 25%. The Five Cities Fire Authority and the local police departments should be consulted regarding effects of closing Courtland Street. If the City decides to implement full or partial closure, it is recommended that a temporary "trial run" be used first to gauge the community's response. Item 12.a. - Page 68 Page 35 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx APPENDIX ACCIDENT DATA TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA RESIDENT LETTER AND PETITION FOR ALL-WAY STOP Item 12.a. - Page 69 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx APPENDIX A ACCIDENT DATA Item 12.a. - Page 70 REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 175 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd ALDER ST Distance (ft)75 Direction S Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20091214 Time 1835 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20101012 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD BACKING S -- 00 CHRYS 1997 -3 N -M G 2 PRKD 998 -PARKED N -- 00 HONDA 1998 -3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ALLEN ST Distance (ft)141 Direction E Secondary Rd TRAFFIC WY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P059 Collision Date 20090524 Time 1614 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 18 M W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 MERCU 1999 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)186 Direction W Secondary Rd JASMINE PL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 67 Collision Date 20090313 Time 2206 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091120 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 20 F H HBD-UNK PROC ST W -- 00 TOYOT 2007 -1 F -M D DRVR SEVERE 20 F 1 0 D - 2 PRKD 998 -PARKED W -- 00 TOYOT 2006 -3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)10 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge Collision Date 20090825 Time 1540 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20100520 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 FORD 1996 -3 N -L G 2 DRVR 34 M W HNBD STOPPED W D 2200 DODGE 1999 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 71 I I l J -I 01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 175 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)588 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20090621 Time 2500 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20100206 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 18 F W HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2002 --N -M B Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 81 Collision Date 20090316 Time 0903 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20091120 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 37 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 FORD 1990 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD LFT TURN N -- 00 CHEVR 1998 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)123 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat 0AG Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20090411 Time 1147 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091121 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 50 F W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 SAAB 1996 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 66 F A HNBD SLOWING W -- 00 HONDA 1992 -3 N -M G PASS 78 M 3 0 G - 3 DRVR 48 M HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 SATUR 2001 -3 N -M G PASS 50 F 3 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20090428 Time 1754 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091121 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 93 M W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 OLDSM 1997 -3 E -M G 2 DRVR 19 F H HNBD LFT TURN N -- 00 FORD 1995 -3 N -M G PASS 24 M 6 0 G - PASS 2 M 5 0 Q - 3 DRVR 40 M W HNBD STOPPED S -- 00 CHRYS 2004 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P091 Collision Date 20090512 Time 1620 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 23 M O HNBD LFT TURN S -- 00 SUBAR 2005 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 21 F H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 21 F 3 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 8 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 72 ~ I -1 - I I I I I I -- T _I l -1-T 01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 175 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd FARROLL AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd HALCYON RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20090518 Time 1500 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 40 F H HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 BUICK 1995 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 30 F H HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)600 Direction W Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P076 Collision Date 20090120 Time 1530 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20090822 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 17 M W HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 CHEVR 1992 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 35 M H HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 DAEW 2001 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 35 M 1 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P053 Collision Date 20091120 Time 0928 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor R-O-W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100907 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 70 F W HNBD RGT TURN S -- 00 FORD 2005 -3 F -M G 2 PED 19 F W HNBD E N 6000 --3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ELM ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20090106 Time 0942 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20090824 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 55 F H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 MERCU 2001 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 65 M W HNBD LFT TURN E -- 00 FORD 2007 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)75 Direction W Secondary Rd ELM ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge 59 Collision Date 20090314 Time 0033 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20091117 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 998 -IMP UNK IMP UNK BACKING --- 00 ---N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 19 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 73 -j -1-T -I REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 01/01/2010 thru 01/01/2011 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 23 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)214 Direction E Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20100118 Time 1800 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20101101 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 FORD 2001 -3 E -M G DRVR COMP PN 29 F 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 39 M W HNBD STOPPED E D 2200 FORD 1999 -3 N -M G PASS 36 F 3 0 G - PASS 13 M 4 0 G - PASS 9 M 6 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20101206 Time 0839 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20111213 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 44 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 HONDA 1997 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 35 F 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 35 M W HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 SATUR 2002 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)81 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P051 Collision Date 20101213 Time 1644 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20111213 Weather1 FOG Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 29 M W HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 TOYOT 2000 -3 F -M G 2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 CHRYS 1999 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 42 F 1 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20101220 Time 1223 Day MON Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20111227 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 17 M W HNBD LFT TURN S -- 00 AUDI 2000 -3 E -M G PASS 14 M 3 0 G - 2 DRVR 55 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 TOYOT 1997 -3 N -M G PASS 49 F 3 0 G - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 74 I I I I I • I I l I -1-T I I I I I I I I I I I I From: <SWITRS@chp.ca.gov> To:<shuffman@omnimeans.com> Date: 3/20/2015 11:48 AM Subject: I-SWITRS Report Request - ID #78174 I-SWITRS has received and processed your Collision Report 8 request for the following criteria: Report Type: SWITRS Reports Jurisdiction: Arroyo Grande Location: Arroyo Grande:San Luis Obispo Reporting Period: 01/01/2011 - 01/01/2012 Include Collisions on: Private Property, Highway The Selection criteria did not generate any report. California Highway Patrol Support Services Section iswitrs@chp.ca.gov (916) 843-4230 Item 12.a. - Page 75 REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 01/01/2012 thru 12/31/2012 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 1 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd HALCYON RD Distance (ft)65 Direction W Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge Collision Date 20120805 Time 1140 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20121009 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 76 M W HNBD UNS TURN E A 0100 FORD 1992 -3 N -P G 2 DRVR 44 M W HNBD STOPPED E J 4800 DODGE 2008 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 76 REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)491 Direction W Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0105 Collision Date 20130803 Time 0736 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141022 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 44 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 HONDA 2001 -3 N -L B 2 PRKD 998 -null -A 0700 MAZDA 2006 ------ Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ASH ST 1172 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130521 Time 1733 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140904 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 998 -null -A 0100 ------- 2 PRKD 998 -null W A 0100 NISSA 2007 ------ Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)252 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20131101 Time 0041 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141209 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 30 F W HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0100 BMW 2002 -3 A 22107 -L B Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20131115 Time 1841 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141208 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 18 M O HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 NISSA 2008 -3 N -L G PASS 16 F 3 0 L G 2 DRVR 39 M H HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 SATUR 1999 -3 N -L G 3 DRVR 37 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2014 -3 N -L G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 77 I I l I 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd CEDAR ST Distance (ft)112 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130711 Time 1623 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006 Weather1 Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Cond1 Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting Ped Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 998 -null --- 00 ------- 2 PRKD 998 -HNBD PARKED E D 2200 FORD 2012 -3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd CHILTON ST Distance (ft)250 Direction E Secondary Rd OAK PARK BL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20130924 Time 2500 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141030 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 PRKD 998 -PARKED E A 0100 FORD 2012 --N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd DODSON WY Distance (ft)78 Direction E Secondary Rd S HALCYON RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130626 Time 0954 Day WED Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140306 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 72 F O HNBD PROC ST N D 2200 TOYOT 2000 -3 A 22107 -M G DRVR COMP PN 72 F 1 0 M G PASS COMP PN 58 F 3 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)500 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130110 Time 1009 Day THU Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140124 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 68 F W DRUG OPPOS LN E A 0100 -2009 -3 A 21658 -L G 2 DRVR 36 M W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 FORD 2000 -3 N -M G PASS COMP PN 24 M 3 0 M G 3 PRKD 998 -PARKED W A 0800 HONDA 2011 -3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)150 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130924 Time 1304 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141031 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT FNCT Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 66 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 ACURA 2012 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 43 M W HNBD PROC ST E I 1100 FREIG 2007 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 5 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 78 -j ! T l - J l ~ 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)175 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 8 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20131201 Time 1614 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141231 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 65 F W HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0100 CHEVR 2005 -3 A 22350 -M G PASS 45 M 3 0 M G 2 DRVR 64 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 TOYOT 2006 -3 N -M G PASS 24 M 3 0 M G PASS 21 M 4 0 M G PASS 23 M 6 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BELL ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130312 Time 1650 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140804 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 64 M W HNBD RGT TURN E D 2200 DODGE 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 63 F 3 0 M G 2 DRVR 70 M W HNBD PROC ST E C 0200 OTHER 2011 -3 N -P W Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)113 Direction W Secondary Rd BRANCH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20130531 Time 1000 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22100A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150115 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 64 F W HNBD RGT TURN E A 0100 HONDA 2007 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 54 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)110 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20131031 Time 1306 Day THU Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141121 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 62 F H HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 CHRYS 2003 -3 A 21802 -M G 2 DRVR 62 M W HNBD PROC ST E G 2622 -1996 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130102 Time 0854 Day WED Primary Collision Factor R-O-W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140117 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 79 M W HNBD LFT TURN S A 0700 FORD 1999 -3 N -M G 2 PED 76 M W HNBD N N 6000 --3 N ---PED OTH VIS 76 M 0 0 P - Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 6 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 79 I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I - -1-T 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)30 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20130222 Time 1900 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140719 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 52 M W HNBD CHANG LN W D 2200 CHEVR 1965 -3 K -M G 2 DRVR 47 M A HNBD SLOWING W A 0100 MAZDA 1996 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 47 M 1 0 M G PASS 17 F 3 0 M G PASS 44 F 0 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130329 Time 1510 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140805 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 18 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 CHEVR 2005 -3 N -M G PASS 18 M 3 0 M G PASS 1 F 4 0 P Q 2 DRVR 87 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 CADIL 2007 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1100 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge 1300850 Collision Date 20130521 Time 1125 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140827 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 67 F H HNBD PROC ST E E 2236 CHEVR 2006 -3 F -M G PASS 70 M 3 0 M G 2 DRVR 26 M H HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 TOYOT 2002 -3 N -M G 3 DRVR 45 M W HNBD RGT TURN N D 2200 FORD 2001 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1200 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20130329 Time 0949 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140804 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA 2006 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 25 M H HNBD SLOWING E D 2200 CHEVR 2012 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1500 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P071 Collision Date 20130428 Time 1015 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 21208B Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140813 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F BICY 19 M W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 7 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 80 - I I I I ! T I l _, I T I I -I -I 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd N BRISCO RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd RT 101 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1210 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140930 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 998 F IMP UNK IMP UNK LFT TURN N -- 00 CADIL 2013 ------ 2 DRVR 23 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 HYUND 2008 -3 --M G PASS 23 F 3 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd N COURTLAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1559 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 31 M H HNBD SLOWING S D 2200 CHEVR 2004 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 61 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2013 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd N COURTLAND AV Distance (ft)25 Direction N Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1600 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 31 M H HNBD LFT TURN S D 2200 CHEVR 2004 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 61 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2013 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd N HALCYON RD Distance (ft)140 Direction S Secondary Rd BENNETT NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20130712 Time 0918 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 23 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0700 SUBAR 2012 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 43 M H HNBD SLOWING N E 2235 FORD 1992 -3 N -M G PASS 26 M 3 3 -- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd N HALCYON RD Distance (ft)19 Direction S Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20131021 Time 1640 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140421 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 40 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 LEXUS 1999 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 40 F 1 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 22 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 81 - I -1-T I T T 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd RANCHO PKWY Distance (ft)94 Direction N Secondary Rd WEST BRANCH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 3 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130311 Time 1346 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140805 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 20 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 CHEVR 2001 -3 N -G - 2 DRVR 27 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2005 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd RODEO DR Distance (ft)35 Direction N Secondary Rd JAMES WY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 4 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130905 Time 1504 Day THU Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141030 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 25 M W HBD-UI LFT TURN N A 0700 JEEP 2012 -3 A 22350 -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd RT 227 Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd HUASNA RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P010 Collision Date 20131111 Time 0005 Day MON Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141212 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 59 F W HBD-UI LFT TURN N A 0700 TOYOT 2011 -3 A 22107 -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd RUTH ANN WY Distance (ft)365 Direction N Secondary Rd BRIGHTON AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130128 Time 1713 Day MON Primary Collision Factor OTHER IMPROP DRV Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140624 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 44 F W HNBD OTHER S A 0700 CHEVR 2002 -3 O -M B DRVR OTH VIS 9 M 2 1 M B PASS 13 M 6 0 P G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd S COURTLAND Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BLACKBERRY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20130124 Time 2500 Day THU Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140117 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 BICY 57 M W PHYS RAN OFF RD S L 0400 --3 M ---BICY COMP PN 57 M 1 0 P W Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 27 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 82 -j - - f f I r r 01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 196 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd SOUTH HALCYON RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd SOUTH HALCYON NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20131120 Time 1520 Day WED Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141208 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 48 F 1 0 M G 2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -L E DRVR COMP PN 59 F 1 0 L E Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd SOUTH OAK PARK BL Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd CHILTON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130627 Time 1539 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150115 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 998 -null S A 0100 PONTI ------ 2 DRVR 26 F W null S I 2000 OTHER 2008 ------ Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd SPRUCE ST Distance (ft)129 Direction N Secondary Rd ASH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20130406 Time 1500 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140813 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 PRKD 998 -PARKED S A 0100 MITSU 2003 --N --- 2F DRVR 17 M H HNBD BACKING S A 0700 TOYOT 1993 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd SPRUCE ST Distance (ft)435 Direction S Secondary Rd CEDAR ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130129 Time 1028 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140626 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 78 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0800 GMC 1992 -3 M -M G 2 PRKD 998 -PARKING S D 2200 NISSA 2002 -3 N --- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd STAGECOACH RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd GULARTE RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130910 Time 1142 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140411 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F BICY 57 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S L 0400 --3 M ---BICY SEVERE 57 M 0 0 P W Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 32 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 83 ! T I I r T REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 90 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ELM ST PARK NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20140605 Time 2045 Day THU Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140819 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run FELONY Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action NOT IN RD Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 PED 34 F W HNBD E N 6000 --2 A 21950 ---PED COMP PN 34 F 9 3 -- 2F DRVR 998 -ENT TRAF --- 00 ------- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)235 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20140226 Time 1359 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150129 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 87 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 TOYOT 2001 -3 N -L G 2 DRVR 74 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 CHRYS 2002 -3 N -M G PASS 18 F 3 0 M G 3 DRVR 46 M O HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2008 -3 N -M G 4 DRVR 16 M O HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 SCION 2014 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd BRANCH MILL RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd 700 BRANCH MILL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140228 Time 0506 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150129 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 DRVR 998 -IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST -A 0100 BMW 1997 -3 N -M B Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd BRANCH MILL RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd NEWSOM NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 6 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140512 Time 0630 Day MON Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140806 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 35 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 FORD 2001 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 30 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA 1995 -3 N -M G DRVR OTH VIS 30 M 1 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 84 I I l I -1-T I - l 01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 90 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)10 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P067 Collision Date 20140313 Time 0825 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150220 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 TOYOT 2008 -3 E -M G 2 DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 HYUND 2003 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)335 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140320 Time 1300 Day THU Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140717 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 23 F W HNBD ENT TRAF S A 0100 VOLKS 2003 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 23 F 1 3 -- 2 DRVR 79 F W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 DODGE 2006 -3 N -M G PASS 998 M 3 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)27 Direction W Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20140405 Time 1330 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150306 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 19 F H HNBD CHANG LN E A 0100 HONDA 2005 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 39 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 FORD 2012 -3 N -L G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)400 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20140414 Time 1435 Day MON Primary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21202A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140724 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F BICY 58 F W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N ---BICY COMP PN 58 F 1 0 P - 2 DRVR 24 F W HNBD RGT TURN W A 0100 VOLKS 2001 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140917 Time 1845 Day WED Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141210 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 24 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 CHRYS 2002 -3 F -M G PASS COMP PN 24 M 3 0 M G PASS 26 M 6 0 M G PASS 2 M 4 0 M Q 2 DRVR 66 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 CHEVR 1999 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 3 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 85 -j I t I I l J f I _, 01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 90 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)30 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140321 Time 1405 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140718 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2006 -1 F -M G PASS 998 F 3 0 M G 2 DRVR 25 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 HONDA 2008 -2 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0115 Collision Date 20140126 Time 1319 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140726 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With MV ON OTHER RD Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 57 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 SUBAR 2006 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 58 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 BMW 1995 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 58 M 1 0 M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20140306 Time 1455 Day THU Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150220 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 30 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK MERGING E A 0100 FORD 1997 -3 N -M B 2 DRVR 55 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0800 FORD 2006 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)119 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0115 Collision Date 20140621 Time 1937 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 22517 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140820 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 66 M W HNBD PARKED E A 0100 CHRYS 2004 -3 N -M H 2 BICY 47 M W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N ---BICY OTH VIS 47 M 1 1 P V Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140130 Time 0954 Day THU Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150203 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD LFT TURN S D 2200 FORD 2009 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 40 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 NISSA 2002 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 4 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 86 I I T I -1-T -1-T ~ 01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015 Report Run On: 03/20/2015 Total Count: 90 Include State Highways cases Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20140314 Time 1627 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140728 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 49 M W HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2005 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd HALCYON RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BENNETT NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P053 Collision Date 20140108 Time 1315 Day WED Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150127 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 16 M O HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 TOYOT 2014 -3 F -M G PASS 16 F 3 0 M G 2 DRVR 56 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 HONDA 2006 -3 N -L G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd HUASNA RD Distance (ft)70 Direction E Secondary Rd CLARENCE AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20140331 Time 1721 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150227 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F BICY 15 M W HNBD CHANG LN E L 0400 --3 E ---BICY OTH VIS 15 M 1 1 P W 2 DRVR 50 M HNBD PROC ST E I 1100 MERCE 2012 -3 N -M G Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd LE POINT ST Distance (ft)230 Direction E Secondary Rd CROWN TER NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20141028 Time 0719 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22100A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150106 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1F DRVR 72 F W HNBD U-TURN E A 0700 TOYOT 2004 -3 N -M G 2 DRVR 50 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 SCION 2005 -3 N -G -PASS OTH VIS 20 F 3 0 L G PASS COMP PN 17 F 6 0 P H Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Primary Rd LEANNA DR Distance (ft)35 Direction W Secondary Rd VALLEY RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 9 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20140331 Time 0430 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150219 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int 1 PRKD 998 -PARKED -A 0100 FORD 2004 --N --- 2F DRVR 998 -null --- 00 ------- Party Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected Victim Info Page 10 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 87 ~ I r T I I I T I - I I I I I I ~ Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx APPENDIX B TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Item 12.a. - Page 88 Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 35.120968° -120.609163° Sunny and Clear Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 3 70 23 2 15 28 7 2 14 44 5 4 6 37 19 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 4 89 24 1 25 23 14 1 19 55 5 3 7 31 19 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 4 117 27 1 14 22 17 0 29 60 1 2 15 37 31 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 6115 3 233221 5 1236 2 4 147638 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 8 81 16 2 22 45 9 2 29 49 7 4 15 55 21 2 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5 91 32 8 23 62 9 2 34 76 6 5 11 54 30 6 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 8 7537 4 304110 1 3179 4 9 228733 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 6 7938 1 295210 4 3092 3 7 247227 1 SouthboundNorthbound WestboundEastbound TOTAL 43 663 212 22 181 305 97 17 198 491 33 38 114 449 218 27 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 13 56 25 4 30 76 64 2 79 76 6 5 39 117 57 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 12 61 30 2 56 83 34 4 47 116 11 3 34 113 32 3 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 9 73 34 4 44 111 46 7 42 126 15 3 25 120 34 5 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 15 72 27 4 47 91 45 1 43 109 10 4 26 126 34 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 7 52 34 2 62 106 41 2 46 107 11 1 31 130 51 5 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 58 31 1 51 114 53 2 50 115 10 3 35 114 44 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 13 55 26 0 50 108 54 1 25 104 5 5 19 117 38 2 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 13 47 31 1 37 88 45 2 43 115 16 1 40 131 25 3 TOTAL 97 474 238 18 377 777 382 21 375 868 84 25 249 968 315 24 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 27 326 123 15 104 200 38 9 124 296 20 25 72 268 111 14 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 46 255 126 11 204 422 185 12 181 457 46 11 117 490 163 14 Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.925 3.7% PM 185 422 204 0.93 PM 0.975 1.8% AM 38 200 104 0.91 PHF 0.934 0.88 Oak Park Boulevard AM PM 181 124 111 163 457 296 268 490 46 20 72 117 PM AM Grand AvenueGrand Avenue PM AM PHF 0.794 0.908 PHF 0.93 27 326 123 AM 0.92 46 255 126 PM Page 1 of 3Oak Park Boulevard Item 12.a. - Page 89 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard 35.120968° San Luis Obispo -120.609163° 9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000001000000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0011000100000001 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0200000010000020 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0111000600020000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000001000003 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0204000100000000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0002000400020011 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0002000300030000 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds TOTAL 052110001512070035 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0117001210020104 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0101000300000002 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0101000500020002 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0011100310000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0111000200020001 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0003010302041100 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0013020100000101 E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002020712030000 TOTAL 04419151263401313010 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0208000801050014 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 02261101312081103 S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 425 PM0116 PM Peak Total 11 30 AM 0008 ds <>34 AM PM Oak Park Boulevard PeAM PM 10 10 21 01 00 01 PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue PM AM Peds <> 58 Peds <8020AM 13022PM Oak Park Boulevard Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 90 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Oak Park Boulevard Grand Avenue Sunny and Clear CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE161 Seconds Signal COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns. Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 91 --a. • J J ~ . . ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~~ dOlS @------ North STOP --~ ,tt,1r,,, , .. 0 -,~, "'C .. , Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER 35.120850° -120.606655° Sunny and Clear Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 613027917682224832 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 13411184514900635634 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 114607363131010617534 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 118119290138445810175 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 155528291137623610854 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 11 15 3 2 16 2 9 1 12 107 1 7 3 94 8 5 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 12 8 2 3 35 7 11 4 16 106 3 9 10 105 1 4 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 11 6 5 1 12 4 15 3 16 131 8 4 8 112 4 7 Northbound WestboundEastboundSouthbound TOTAL 9051361097317314947632042416993435 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 14 12 5 1 29 14 27 1 30 184 10 1 19 139 16 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 17 8 7 0 39 16 30 0 26 205 8 4 19 173 11 5 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 14 11 6 3 32 18 35 2 18 175 12 5 19 153 12 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 19 8 6 1 40 12 25 2 29 175 9 2 16 152 16 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 14 8 5 0 34 21 23 0 21 200 8 1 22 152 12 2 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 13 5 0 33 17 28 0 33 176 14 0 14 179 6 4 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 16 7 4 1 31 17 19 2 18 168 10 1 22 134 11 3 Eastbound WestboundNorthboundSouthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 16 13 5 0 20 11 11 0 19 134 9 0 10 105 11 0 TOTAL 125 80 43 6 258 126 198 7 194 1417 80 14 141 1187 95 18 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 49 34 15 8 71 15 44 9 57 420 14 23 27 419 18 20 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 64 35 24 4 145 67 113 4 94 755 37 12 76 630 51 10 Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.891 5.1% PM 113 67 145 0.956 PM 0.935 1.4% AM 44 15 71 0.613 PHF 0.927 0.792 Courtland Street AM PM 94 57 18 51 755 420 419 630 37 14 27 76 PM AM Grand AvenueGrand Avenue PM AM PHF 0.935 0.932 PHF 0.845 49 34 15 AM 0.932 64 35 24 PM Page 1 of 3Courtland Street Item 12.a. - Page 92 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street 35.120850° San Luis Obispo -120.606655° 9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000100000000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0002000101030100 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0101001202001101 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000010000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0001001001010000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000020200 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000001010000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds TOTAL 0104002405081401 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0102000305081300 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000001312032001 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000100400020300 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000001100010200 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000303020300 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0100000001000201 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0002000103160100 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0001000100010400 TOTAL 02051021611412331802 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0001001002040200 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 00001021115082801 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 55 PM2010 PM Peak Total 19 20 AM 1001 ds <>10 AM PM Courtland Street PeAM PM 10 00 52 28 00 02 PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue PM AM Peds <> 48 Peds <0000AM 11000PM Courtland Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 93 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Avenue Sunny and Clear Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Courtland Street CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE Signal COMMENTS Eastbound and westbound approaches have protected left turns. Northbound and southbound left turns are permitted. 98 Seconds Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 94 Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Ave @ Juniper St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear 35.120708° -120.604064° Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 507000000643153200 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5050000001252536501 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3020000001201359402 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 4030000009270614204 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 70410000010043910402 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5050000001274239301 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 30300000012842511003 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 401000000135103413305 Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound TOTAL 36030100000891351940773018 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 50400000019192414601 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 70900000017984619203 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 607000000177111315400 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4080000001781401016705 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 707000000203143419605 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 504000000199133714200 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 50200000014891614102 Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 205000000139141313101 TOTAL 410460000001414 92 15 43 1269 0 17 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 19013100000490221021440011 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 2403100000073747823709013 Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.875 2.2% PM 0 0 0 ##### PM 0.911 1.3% AM 0 0 0 ##### PHF 0.903 0.883 AM PM 00 00 737 490 440 709 47 22 21 23 PM AM Grand AvenueGrand Avenue PM AM PHF 0.841 0.915 PHF 0.727 19 0 13 AM 0.859 24 0 31 PM Page 1 of 3Juniper Street Item 12.a. - Page 95 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Ave @ Juniper St 35.120708° San Luis Obispo -120.604064° Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000402000200 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000002000002 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0001000101000000 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000101000200 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000101000000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000103001000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000202000200 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000002000001 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds TOTAL 000100010014001603 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0002001300100101 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0005000502000001 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001000601000101 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000601000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0001000200000300 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0011000100000100 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0002000000000101 E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0001000000000000 TOTAL 001140012304100704 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000408001201 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 00080001904000402 S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 11 5 PM0008 PM Peak Total 8 29 AM 0000 ds <>21 AM PM 0 PeAM PM 00 00 48 24 00 10 PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue PM AM Peds <> 00 Peds <4000AM 19000PM Juniper Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Grand Ave @ Juniper St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Juniper Street Grand Avenue Clear CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A One-Way Stop COMMENTS Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 97 --@------------~~~=~ North STOP y Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear 35.116907° -120.609455° Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 085112271030100050 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 092103280010000030 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 2114030472021101330 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2125144532230002040 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2108025400010200150 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0117140510112100361 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 2119335452141001130 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 180202421140000020 Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound TOTAL 984091721333851945048311 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1824061000000102120 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0930031001041011040 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0873131040231202020 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 21012261073010002161 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 2923061122320101040 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 09712111194221101071 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 21012371084030200360 Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 177407890141001020 TOTAL 8 730 19 8 49 839 14 8 19 4 7 1 10 5 33 2 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 64695131418944933035181 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 63918730446135814044232 Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.929 2.5% PM 13 446 30 0.912 PM 0.961 1.5% AM 4 189 14 0.877 PHF 0.65 0.75 Oak Park Blvd AM PM 8 9 18 23 13 54 43 34 PM AM Seabright AveSeabright Ave PM AM PHF 0.722 0.861 PHF 0.938 6 469 5 AM 0.964 6 391 8 PM Page 1 of 2Oak Park Blvd Item 12.a. - Page 98 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave 35.116907° San Luis Obispo -120.609455° Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000010000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000100000000001 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000010000010000 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1100000000000001 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000001 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000010001 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000020000 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds TOTAL 1100110000050004 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000020003 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000000000001 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0100000000040100 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0201000000000100 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000010000000102 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000010000010002 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000001 E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000020000 TOTAL 0301020000090309 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 1100000000010003 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0201020000010205 S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 24 PM0201 PM Peak Total 6 7 AM 0000 ds <>53 AM PM Oak Park Blvd PeAM PM 00 00 00 02 00 00 PM AM <>Seabright Ave Seabright Ave PM AM Peds <> 11 Peds <0110AM 0020PM Oak Park Blvd Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 99 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Oak Park Blvd Seabright Ave Clear CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A Two-Way Stop COMMENTS Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 100 -----@------&. North ~ , t f ""C - Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER 35.117133° -120.606558° Courtland St @ Cedar St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0600050000000050 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0910150000000030 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 017000110000000030 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0900180000000050 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 02121170000000010 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 01400170000000040 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 01600370000000070 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 09003130000000030 Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound TOTAL 010131106300000000310 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 025004280000001080 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 015005260000001040 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 018115310000000070 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 015003270000001060 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 017005281000000010 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 06106300000001040 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0192012441000000030 Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 019005240000001030 TOTAL 0134414523820000050360 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0602183400000000150 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 057302612920000020140 Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.902 0.8% PM 2 129 26 0.689 PM 0.719 0.0% AM 03480.656 PHF ##### ##### Courtland Street AM PM 0 0 15 14 00 00 00 02 PM AM Cedar Street PM AM PHF 0.536 0.571 PHF 0.674 0 60 2 AM 0.714 0 57 3 PM Page 1 of 3Courtland Street Item 12.a. - Page 101 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Courtland St @ Cedar St 35.117133° San Luis Obispo -120.606558° Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000010000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000010100000003 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000001 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000200010000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000010000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0010000000010000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000020000 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds TOTAL 0011010300060005 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0101000000010001 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0100010000030003 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0003000300010000 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000000010000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0100000000000000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000010000 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000010000 TOTAL 0305010300080004 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0010000200050000 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0101000000020000 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 17 PM0001 PM Peak Total 1 3 AM 0000 ds <>00 AM PM Courtland Street PeAM PM 00 00 00 00 00 00 PM AM <>0 Cedar Street PM AM Peds <> 52 Peds <2001AM 0010PM Courtland Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 102 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ -... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Cedar Street Clear Courtland St @ Cedar St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Courtland Street CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE One-Way Stop COMMENTS N/A Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 103 a. ~ ~ >- @----____ North t Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Cedar St @ Boysenberry St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear 35.117195° -120.604855° Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000100002000400 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0120200002000000 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000100001001610 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000002001100 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0120000001000200 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0110000011000700 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1000000006000500 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0100000003000400 Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound TOTAL 145040001180022910 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000101007100300 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0100000002101400 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0010100002001600 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000100004002210 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0100210006001210 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 10200000010002610 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0100000008002300 Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000001001400 TOTAL 1330511004020103030 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 133000001110001800 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 122031000280071330 Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.771 0.0% PM0130.333 PM 0.682 0.0% AM 0 0 0 ##### PHF 0.7 0.5 Boysenberry Street AM PM 01 03 28 11 18 13 00 07 PM AM Cedar StreetCedar Street PM AM PHF 0.643 0.639 PHF 0.583 1 3 3 AM 0.417 1 2 2 PM Page 1 of 3Boysenberry Street Item 12.a. - Page 104 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Cedar St @ Boysenberry St 35.117195° San Luis Obispo -120.604855° Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000002 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000100000001 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000001 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000010010000001 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000000010010 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds TOTAL 0001010110010016 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000200000100 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0200000100010200 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001002010030001 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0200010300000002 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100000000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0001000000040001 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000010002 TOTAL 0402012710090306 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0001010110010013 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0201010400040003 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 36 PM0101 PM Peak Total 3 12 AM 0101 ds <>33 AM PM Boysenberry Street PeAM PM 01 10 00 00 00 00 PM AM <>Cedar Street Cedar Street PM AM Peds <> 14 Peds <1000AM 4020PM Boysenberry Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 105 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Cedar Street Clear Cedar St @ Boysenberry St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Boysenberry Street CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE Two-way Stop COMMENTS N/A Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 106 + ➔ dOlS @-=----------=-~~ North STOP T Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Spruce St @ Cedar St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear 35.117256° -120.603474° Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 2400001000000100 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 1921230020300000 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3400012050200110 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 3010080110100000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0300030020201121 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4600064020101100 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4500012011001000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0300141010400000 Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound TOTAL 1734313261011411303431 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1800074023300100 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0310163000000110 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 4900192012001100 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 12000103122100100 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0801074022600110 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 2600165034700110 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 1310081003401000 Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 23001102001200200 TOTAL 11422146324110172302830 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 10131001861100602331 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 725012321418101401420 Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.720 2.8% PM 14 32 2 0.923 PM 0.826 1.7% AM 61800.6 PHF 0.571 0.571 Spruce Street AM PM 810 3 2 10 0 3 4 14 6 2 1 PM AM Cedar StreetCedar Street PM AM PHF 0.5 0.875 PHF 0.6 10 13 1 AM 0.615 7 25 0 PM Page 1 of 3Spruce Street Item 12.a. - Page 107 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Spruce St @ Cedar St 35.117256° San Luis Obispo -120.603474° Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000000001 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000004 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000100000003 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000100000000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000002 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000001000000001 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds TOTAL 00010012000000012 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000100000000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000010000000000 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000004 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100000002 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0003000000000000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000000 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002000000010003 TOTAL 0005110100010009 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000200000006 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0003000100000006 Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 08 PM0003 PM Peak Total 0 10 AM 0000 ds <>66 AM PM Spruce Street PeAM PM 00 00 00 00 00 00 PM AM <>Cedar Street Cedar Street PM AM Peds <> 00 Peds <2000AM 1000PM Spruce Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 108 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Cedar Street Clear Spruce St @ Cedar St San Luis Obispo Thursday, February 26, 2015 Spruce Street CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE All-Way Stop COMMENTS N/A Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 109 .:,.,., l • dOlS @----------------North Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Ash Street @ Courtland Street San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 35.114735° -120.607012° Sunny and Clear Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0010213082460121410 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000613043712162320 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 306021602449123321 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 306010604212132850 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 602060604208153001 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1223130706239022962 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 9160647010246123333 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 423070406255012630 SouthboundNorthbound WestboundEastbound TOTAL 37 5 27 1 33 7 42 0 44 218 57 5 33 216 22 7 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 32509220073041233101 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 02118621083650127112 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 41321631605359072690 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 6210721708399054760 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 011012319012323162710 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 300015118012543033450 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 301014018015360003371 Eastbound WestboundNorthboundSouthbound 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 10209516133921131120 TOTAL 20 8 14 3 90 22 145 1 70 301 35 3 25 258 61 4 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 31 5 14 1 22 4 24 0 26 92 28 2 10 118 12 6 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 13 4 5 2 50 9 70 0 37 160 24 1 21 134 21 0 Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.869 2.3% PM 70 9 50 0.921 PM 0.919 0.5% AM 24 4 22 0.735 PHF 0.801 0.913 Courtland Street AM PM 37 26 12 21 160 92 118 134 24 28 10 21 PM AM Ash StreetAsh Street PM AM PHF 0.921 0.759 PHF 0.735 31 5 14 AM 0.611 13 4 5 PM Page 1 of 3Courtland Street Item 12.a. - Page 110 ~ Metro]affic Data Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I -.__________.___ ._I I I+ .--------------j . ~.......-------- -i-----+--------... @ ... North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___ Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Omni-Means, Ltd. 800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Ash Street @ Courtland Street 35.114735° San Luis Obispo -120.607012° 9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000403020000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000402002002 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0001000001010002 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000011010000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0002100000010110 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000010200 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000100010001 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000210000001 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds TOTAL 00041001127072316 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0001000300000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000102010100 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001100000000011 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100010000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0002000101030000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0002000224000004 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0001001700000201 E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002001600000001 TOTAL 00091022127050317 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0003100310030312 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0005100425040015 S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 611 PM0015 PM Peak Total 9 18 AM 0013 ds <>52 AM PM Courtland Street PeAM PM 21 11 50 30 00 00 PM AM <>Ash Street Ash Street PM AM Peds <> 34 Peds <3000AM 4000PM Courtland Street Page 2 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---_____, I I I I I -+I ' I+ .......--------j ~ --... @ ... ~ - North ,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+-- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Turning Movement Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd. www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LOCATION N/S STREET COUNTY E/W STREET COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Ash Street @ Courtland Street San Luis Obispo Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Courtland Street Ash Street Sunny and Clear CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A Two-Way Stop COMMENTS Page 3 of 3 Item 12.a. - Page 112 a. -- J J 4 JJl,ii ~!-· dOlS @------ North STOP -::~ Tttr 1r,,, ---"'tJ -◄, Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Courtland Street North of Strawb erry Ave 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.118862° -120.606865° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 01203 11013 6 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 20002 01001 3 3:00 AM 00101 00000 1 4:00 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Totals Northbound Southbound 2 4:00 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 222814 10023 17 6:00 AM 4 7 15 17 43 132814 57 7:00 AM 17 21 25 21 84 4 9 14 14 41 125 8:00 AM 33 27 25 24 109 11 15 16 11 53 162 9:00 AM 20 17 11 16 64 9 12101142 106 10:00 AM 15 27 15 15 72 14 12 21 14 61 133 11:00 AM 30 14 20 20 84 17 21 33 23 94 178 12:00 PM 27 20 21 17 85 24 26 29 26 105 190 1:00 PM 27 19 18 16 80 31 19 21 22 93 173 2:00 PM 21 21 22 32 96 21 25 25 34 105 201 3:00 PM 26 29 20 33 108 40 29 39 31 139 247 4:00 PM 30 23 21 24 98 41 37 38 41 157 255 5:00 PM 20 24 25 23 92 40 55 52 43 190 282 6:00 PM 22 17 13 18 70 40 19 20 27 106 176 7:00 PM 18 14 9 11 52 21 19 23 19 82 134 8:00 PM 1187632 25 18 15 12 70 102 9:00 PM 436821 11 6 2 10 29 50 10:00 PM 11215 855220 25 11:00 PM 00000 10135 5 1218 1413Total46.3%53.7% AM% 30.1% AM Peak 178 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.84 PM% 69.9% PM Peak 284 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.90 Total 2631 200 Thursday - 2/26/15 Northbound Southbound 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 # of vehicles0 20 40 60 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 113 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Courtland Street Between Huckleberry Ave and Cedar St 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.117303° -120.606697° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 10012 22015 7 1:00 AM 00000 10001 1 2:00 AM 00000 01001 1 3:00 AM 00011 00000 1 4:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hourly Totals Northbound Southbound 2 4:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 22138 01023 11 6:00 AM 4781736 13149 45 7:00 AM 11 12 20 14 57 5611931 88 8:00 AM 22 18 23 12 75 8 8 10 16 42 117 9:00 AM 16 15 7 10 48 7791235 83 10:00 AM 11 16 12 10 49 6 11141445 94 11:00 AM 18 16 15 11 60 19 15 26 24 84 144 12:00 PM 25 16 19 13 73 22 24 19 24 89 162 1:00 PM 19 15 11 14 59 20 24 16 20 80 139 2:00 PM 14 19 10 20 63 17 25 18 24 84 147 3:00 PM 23 28 21 17 89 25 29 33 24 111 200 4:00 PM 33 19 25 21 98 32 31 36 30 129 227 5:00 PM 18 10 22 22 72 33 36 56 29 154 226 6:00 PM 24 15 16 15 70 37 19 18 19 93 163 7:00 PM 15 15 7 8 45 17 14 20 15 66 111 8:00 PM 8117 329 14 22 12 8 56 85 9:00 PM 4421020 764724 44 10:00 PM 30216 742518 24 11:00 PM 2001012 01179 21 973 1169Total45.4%54.6% AM% 27.7% AM Peak 144 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.88 PM% 72.3% PM Peak 227 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.87 Total 2142 180 Thursday - 2/26/15 Northbound Southbound 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 # of vehicles0 20 40 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 114 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Courtland Street Between Mentone Ave and Jasmine Pl 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.114940° -120.607012° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 00224 02103 7 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 00000 10102 2 3:00 AM 00123 00011 4 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 Hourly Totals Northbound Southbound 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 5:00 AM 00011 10012 3 6:00 AM 2411118 243817 35 7:00 AM 2761328 5 7 17 10 39 67 8:00 AM 10 11 12 9 42 11 9 12 11 43 85 9:00 AM 679931 5591029 60 10:00 AM 10 15 9 5 39 8 11121344 83 11:00 AM 21 13 11 15 60 17 15 30 19 81 141 12:00 PM 11 18 10 12 51 23 24 24 13 84 135 1:00 PM 19 10 10 12 51 20 16 14 13 63 114 2:00 PM 13 11 12 20 56 16 23 20 30 89 145 3:00 PM 22 25 12 25 84 23 19 28 28 98 182 4:00 PM 26 17 17 14 74 24 28 23 20 95 169 5:00 PM 15 17 20 13 65 27 34 35 31 127 192 6:00 PM 15 13 12 17 57 32 17 14 11 74 131 7:00 PM 1747533 18 13 12 8 51 84 8:00 PM 1184427 11 11 11 3 36 63 9:00 PM 345517 753621 38 10:00 PM 12003 524213 16 11:00 PM 00000 10001 1 745 1014Total42.4%57.6% AM% 27.8% AM Peak 141 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 72.2% PM Peak 197 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.90 Total 1759 140 Thursday - 2/26/15 Northbound Southbound 60 80 100 120 140 # of vehicles0 20 40 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 115 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Cedar Street East of Boysenberry Street 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.117219° -120.604501° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 10001 00000 1 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 00011 00101 2 3:00 AM 00000 00000 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Totals Eastbound Westbound 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 00000 00022 2 6:00 AM 01102 21429 11 7:00 AM 362213 408214 27 8:00 AM 326314 275418 32 9:00 AM 343111 532414 25 10:00 AM 13105 03115 10 11:00 AM 40138 225817 25 12:00 PM 332311 554115 26 1:00 PM 124512 453315 27 2:00 PM 243413 246719 32 3:00 PM 646420 796931 51 4:00 PM 824519 357520 39 5:00 PM 8128 129 495523 52 6:00 PM 631414 235313 27 7:00 PM 422210 42039 19 8:00 PM 02406 11406 12 9:00 PM 20204 00101 5 10:00 PM 11002 30216 8 11:00 PM 00101 00011 2 196 239Total45.1%54.9% AM% 31.0% AM Peak 35 8:15 am to 9:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.80 PM% 69.0% PM Peak 56 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.67 Total 435 35 Thursday - 2/26/15 Eastbound Westbound 15 20 25 30 35 # of vehicles0 5 10 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 116 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Cedar St West of Boysenberry St 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.117219° -120.605204° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 00000 00000 0 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 00011 00011 2 3:00 AM 00000 00000 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Totals Eastbound Westbound 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 00000 00123 3 6:00 AM 00101 21328 9 7:00 AM 22127 406111 18 8:00 AM 126312 276419 31 9:00 AM 23218 622414 22 10:00 AM 13217 03216 13 11:00 AM 40127 223512 19 12:00 PM 03238 453113 21 1:00 PM 224311 223310 21 2:00 PM 333413 326617 30 3:00 PM 445316 456520 36 4:00 PM 832417 446216 33 5:00 PM 6108 125 273416 41 6:00 PM 631212 325212 24 7:00 PM 322310 32038 18 8:00 PM 22307 11406 13 9:00 PM 20103 00101 4 10:00 PM 01001 20114 5 11:00 PM 00101 00011 2 167 198Total45.8%54.2% AM% 32.1% AM Peak 36 8:15 am to 9:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.75 PM% 67.9% PM Peak 42 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.62 Total 365 30 Thursday - 2/26/15 Eastbound Westbound 10 15 20 25 30 # of vehicles0 5 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 117 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Boysenberry Street North of Cedar Street 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.117452° -120.604837° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 00000 00000 0 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 00011 00011 2 3:00 AM 00000 00000 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Totals Northbound Southbound 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 00011 00101 2 6:00 AM 00000 11002 2 7:00 AM 01102 12104 6 8:00 AM 12014 00000 4 9:00 AM 00000 10102 2 10:00 AM 12104 02103 7 11:00 AM 11226 00011 7 12:00 PM 00101 10001 2 1:00 PM 22105 00011 6 2:00 PM 13105 00101 6 3:00 PM 32229 20013 12 4:00 PM 01012 20114 6 5:00 PM 21104 30003 7 6:00 PM 01102 10023 5 7:00 PM 00000 00101 1 8:00 PM 10102 10113 5 9:00 PM 00000 00000 0 10:00 PM 10001 10001 2 11:00 PM 00000 00000 0 49 35Total58.3%41.7% AM% 38.1% AM Peak 7 10:15 am to 11:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.44 PM% 61.9% PM Peak 12 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.60 Total 84 10 Thursday - 2/26/15 Northbound Southbound 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 # of vehicles0 1 2 3 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 118 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Boysenberry Street South of Cedar Street 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.116942° -120.604877° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 10001 00000 1 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 00011 00101 2 3:00 AM 00000 00000 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals Northbound Southbound 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 00011 00000 1 6:00 AM 00000 10102 2 7:00 AM 03003 00112 5 8:00 AM 32117 00000 7 9:00 AM 11002 01001 3 10:00 AM 11103 01113 6 11:00 AM 11002 00011 3 12:00 PM 20103 10102 5 1:00 PM 10113 21003 6 2:00 PM 22004 10012 6 3:00 PM 01326 03047 13 4:00 PM 01102 12126 8 5:00 PM 13105 22217 12 6:00 PM 00101 00011 2 7:00 PM 10001 10113 4 8:00 PM 01102 21014 6 9:00 PM 00101 00000 1 10:00 PM 00000 00101 1 11:00 PM 00000 00000 0 48 46Total51.1%48.9% AM% 31.9% AM Peak 8 7:15 am to 8:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.67 PM% 68.1% PM Peak 14 3:15 pm to 4:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.58 Total 94 8 Thursday - 2/26/15 Northbound Southbound 3 4 5 6 7 8 # of vehicles0 1 2 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 119 ---- Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd. 669 Pacific Street, Suite A 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401 24 Hour Count Report 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.metrotrafficdata.com STREET LATITUDE SEGMENT LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER OS Seabright Ave East of Oak Park Blvd 2/26/2015 Sunny and clear 35.116907° -120.609455° NUMBER OF LANES Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 12:00 AM 04004 00101 5 1:00 AM 00000 00000 0 2:00 AM 24006 00101 7 3:00 AM 00000 00000 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Totals Eastbound Westbound 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 01012 00134 6 6:00 AM 00235 113510 15 7:00 AM 341513 537621 34 8:00 AM 539421 695222 43 9:00 AM 322411 523414 25 10:00 AM 370616 432413 29 11:00 AM 716620 12159 29 12:00 PM 543618 329620 38 1:00 PM 668424 324312 36 2:00 PM 263516 126817 33 3:00 PM 1268733 563418 51 4:00 PM 1047829 554923 52 5:00 PM 91391243 589325 68 6:00 PM 446418 626216 34 7:00 PM 662317 453315 32 8:00 PM 537520 340512 32 9:00 PM 20002 21227 9 10:00 PM 23005 20103 8 11:00 PM 11002 10012 4 325 265Total55.1%44.9% AM% 32.7% AM Peak 48 7:45 am to 8:45 am AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 67.3% PM Peak 70 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.83 Total 590 50 Thursday - 2/26/15 Eastbound Westbound 1 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 # of vehicles0 5 10 15 Time Period Item 12.a. - Page 120 ---- Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx APPENDIX C RESIDENT LETTER AND PETITION FOR ALL-WAY STOP Item 12.a. - Page 121 Item 12.a. - Page 122 Dear Mayor Ferrara, My wife and I are residents of the Berry Gardens neighborhood in Arroyo Grande. We, and many others, are deeply concerned about the safety of our children and neighbors. We reside at the corner of Boysenberry St and Cedar St. This area has a large number of young children who cross the street regularly to play with one another, and several neighbors who must cross Cedar St to get their mail. We have noticed a high concentration of traffic that speed down Cedar St, as a short-cut between Spruce St and Courtland St, making it unsafe for walkers and bikers to cross. We have even had police stop to tell us that they felt it was unsafe for the children to cross Cedar St. because of the speeding cars. More often than not, these drivers will speed down Cedar and through the intersection of Boysenberry going between 35 and 50 mph with no regard for the numerous pedestrians and bikers in the area. At night, sometimes they can be heard revving their engines as they carelessly blast by. This is a tragedy waiting to happen. The problem is continuing to grow worse, and we, along with 50+ families in our immediate area, are submitting our petition to respectfully request that the city install stop signs at the critical intersection of Boysenberry St and Cedar St. to slow the traffic. It is our responsibility to make sure our streets are safe for ALL of our neighbors; driving, biking, and walking. Sincerely, Jason and Breanna Walsh 175 Boysenberry St 805-369-1893 s:- :z. 0 ..c::. ' (.-,) ~ \I:) ... ..,:-- r.:r: -< 0 -,, ::0 :;::,rn ::OC'i ::orn o--<< 08 c::, ::0 J:>' ...,. 0 rn Item 12.a. - Page 123 I . -. , ·, ._. _; ~ . '.,·:; . I • ' Petition to Install a 4-way Stop at Cedar and Boysenoerry . _ RECEIVED Cl I Y OF .4RROYO GRANDE 14 NOV '""3 AM 9: 45 I agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the intersection of ·Cedar arid Boysenberry. · Address ~~~i.t:i!#-~~=----l71¥iJJaca~dS-J., l A~ , 9.JII..JO l7t-5 l!is..1.f \'" L, . .,-a s:1, AG 5 <11.11 t/ , 2ss cu a.v-s b ~ ; 't J-n . l40{-., Bluekr'"c) JA-.,,e 1 A 6'.,q3y,20 \ ~ ~ve-~er,,(\AVE!.,..,...~..f Av:v, ~~4 2-0 \~ ~,'3si:~/ifr,, °t3y20 ; ;?-~ ~,f\ t'.WY~6½~~ y<f)o r2 ~ y ~ v-5J.-T l\l? , "i '> y2...n 145 egd~r 6-I. A,&. 1.>~/i?v! tt.{1,,---z, ', u4v (t ~-6, tf>~, l ':-{ ::l3 ~ . .&f A, G Orr 3 l/ '2 ~ l'tdl c!edAAL <2; Cf J 1/.1-0 , ' z.c;S !Aey~ A:{; .· q3 yio · 1.z& 0 Sac;}_ Sf, 1 A Cr. 2:3Uo , ,~ ~ '{ Gf2l c..___. :.:;+ . l"1:0 93 C/21) 5 t> q3i1-2_6 '13 !/ ; Item 12.a. - Page 124 0 ' • . . ".:::. ,.,:' '' ,-. : I C\ . ; . . . . . · Petition to Install a 4-way Stop at Cedar and Boysenberry ·. l agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the intersection of Cedar an·d Boysenberry. · Item 12.a. - Page 125 Petition to Install a 4-way Stop ·at Cedar and Boysenberry ' I agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the inten;ection of Cedar and BoyseMberry. · · Name Address 1 j c;rs S .AB LJ ;;z. T 0 2 gti)v_4= . . Lj iJ v /c,(o l 4 I B Bl1+ckt?ELµ..y AV-; A: _<:9. 3 CAP-Lo> 4rBu/<7b ; i a 1 JrH VJ Ct'-' ..l., Tu/\ l½:Q'\ MC Cs, I J(?).:iA:-N 6 C,141rvArJ Ci'B.1QMN · 7 . . J/ ✓j . · \ ., . · ' / H-eJ en \ :-4:f!h.,~~ .. U;J:"";0i'l:fv1, ~k.orrnao) 8 g 10 · 11 · 12 ... 13 14 15 19, 17 18 fg 2d ·21 22 23 24 25 .. .. /! // // // 14-f / Rt(: s; f ~'--,,.'Y:J (ov.e f>:s. ,c, C lJ 7 i~c'c)~\\;,r::1-'1' A-Y. . .M·-2 ATTACHMENT 3 Item 12.a. - Page 126 Patsy Lynch 1 SOO Strawberry Ave Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 To: Jim Garing, Interim City Engineer Attachment Requesting consideration to implement traffic calming on Courtland, between Huckleberry and Grande Ave. This letter is following two previous letters sent on 12/1/2016, and 2/12/2017 .regarding traffic issues. As requested I contacted as many of the area residents available and discussed all the concerns listed below. Atuitched is the list of resident's signatures. Coming from Ash the two stop signs, one at Loganberry Ave and the other at Huckleberry Ave, these help control the traffic around Kingo Park, although there ls a problem that many vehicles do not make a complete stop. Traffic traveling East and West on Courtland ignore the residential speed limit of 25 :from Grande Ave to the Huckleberry stop sign. .'.!, The traffic on Courtland has increased in frequency and speed, it is obvious Courtland is used as a short cut by non-local residents. There are three time periods that are affected, 6am-9:30am, 11am-2pm; 3:30pm -9pm+. 3. *Pavement joint on Courtland adjacent to our living room northside and neighbors bedroom southside of Courtland. *NOTE: Received letter dated 9/26/2017 with a list of street repairs~ Prqject PW 2017-04, includes repairing the pavement joint on Courtland. Please take our concerns into account, keeping neighborhood sa(!, quieter by implementing traffic calming measures on Courtland, Oat-~~~1- PatsyLynch cc: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development Item 12.a. - Page 127 Item 12.a. - Page 128 Patsy Lynch 1500 Strawberry Ave Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 To: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development Re: Traffic Concerns February 17, 2017 We submitted a letter on December 1, 2016 regarding our traffic concerns, we have not received a response, we did receive a call from Ken Sage, traffic commission on December 9, 2016 stating he was meeting with all concerned, to date we have not heard any more. As stated in or first letter the traffic on Courtland is increasing and the speed limit is exceeding the posted speed limit for a residential area. As stated in the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines memorandum dated April 12, 2016 authored by Matt Hom, Ci:ty Engineer, "Residential streets are planned to provide access to and from residential neighborhoods not intended for use of non-local traffic". There are three daily time periods that are affected, approximately 6am -9:30am, 11am -2pm, 3:30pm -9pm which leaves little time of quiet. It appears one cause for the Courtland traffic, is the signal on Oak Park Blvd. and Grande Ave is slow causing drivers to avoid that area. Police have been contacted on several occasions, we are appreciative of their response but has not been effective, speeding drivers need to be stopped, possibly issuance of tickets. We understand they cannot be present at all hours but selecting a peak period to observe traffic would help. Please take our concerns into account, and keep our neighborhood safe by implementing Traffic Calming measures on Courtland Ave. Cc: Jim Hill, Mayor Cc: Traffic Commission Cc: Steven Annibali, Chief of Police Item 12.a. - Page 129 Patsy Lynch 1500 Strawberry Ave. Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 805-994-7059 To: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development RE: Traffic Concerns December 1, 2016 husband and I have recently relocated from the northern California area to the wonderful City of Arroyo Grande. We really love the area and being dose to the beach and other areas of interest. However, we are very concerned with the amount of traffic that is building on Courtland Avenue that seems to be increasing in both frequency and volume. Our concerns primarily lie with the lack of compliance to the posted speed limit as we are very dose to schools and a children's park two blocks away. We have contacted and spoke with several individuals and agencies, yet no real solution or measures have been put into place. I have read the Memorandum that recently was discussed concerning the implementation of Traffic Calming Guidelines that was issues on April lin of this year. It specifically addresses the same concerns we are dealing with in our neighborhood, people are diverting their drives down Courtland to avoid the more congested Oak Park Boulevard commute, but it is at the expense of safety. The posted speed limit is being violated excessively. There was a radar trailer here for a day or two, and patrol officers for about the same time, but as the equipment was removed, traffic continues to be heavy and speeding the norm. I am hoping that with your assistance, our concerns will be addressed. We live directly adjacent to concrete tiles on Courtland that are very loud when cars cross them, the volume can be very annoying to people with houses dose to Courtland. They are currently building new homes on the corner of Grand and Courtland, and I truly believe that the safety issue will increase as families move in and children will be more prevalent in the area with the school nearby. As it states in the memorandum, the advantages of such measures will benefit the area and there are no disadvantages of this process. Please take our concerns into account, and keep our neighborhood safe by implementing traffic calming measures on Courtland Ave. Cc: Jim Mayor I :;,_jq, , .,,,..,..f,,,... Cc: Ken Sage, Traffic Commissioner (!JJ.,,LJ1.<..f.L' 1 • ~ w/ 6 CA.th.A) Cc: Steven Annibali, Chief of Police THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Item 12.a. - Page 130