R 3307
RESOLUTION NO. 3307
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING ITS INTEREST IN
OBTAINING REGIONAL STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT
(R~HA) F~NDS ALLOCATED TO THE CITY FOR VARIOUS
HIGHWAY, STREET, ROAD, AND BIKEWAY PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City Council of Arroyo Grande desires to seek certain Regional State
Highway. Account (RSHA) funds made available to the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments (SLOCOG) through the SurfaCe Transportation Program (STP) of the
reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act.
WHEREAS, SLOCOG requires all project requests be approved by the governing board
and submitted to SLOCOG by June 26, 1998;
WHEREAS, the City Council of Arroyo Grande is requesting that $921,300 in RSHA funds
be programmed for the projects adopted by the City Council on June 23,1998, and as
described in the attached funding applications; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of Arroyo Grande hereby establishes its commitment to
budgeting local funds in the future towards the preparation of certain Project Study Reports
(PSRs):
" .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
does hereby request that $921,300 in RSHA funds be programmed for use by the City of.
Arroyo Grande for projects of regional significance. .
On motion of Council Member Runels , seconded by Council Member.. Tolley. and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Runels, Tolley, Lady, and Mayor Dougall
NOES: None
"ABSENT: Council Member Fuller
ution was passed and adopted this 23th day of June.1998.
..
A.K. "PETE~' DOUGALL, MA OR
ATTEST:
-rl~ a. .Hn~
, NANCY A. VIS, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 3307
Page 2
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
~kw L. H~
ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER.
. APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I, NANCY A. DAVIS, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California, do" hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution
NO.3307 is a true, full and correct copy of said Resolution passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Arroyo Grande City Council on the 23rd day of June 1998.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 29th
June, . 1998. .
day of
'1l . (J. ~
NANCY~, CITY: CLERK
\
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
Don Spagnolo. Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande. CA 93421
EI Campo Road/Route 101 Project Study Report (PSR)
A.
Jurisdiction:
City of Arroyo Gr.ande
B.
Contact Person:
C.
Project Name:
D. Project Description:
Preparation of a Caltrans-approved Project Study Report which will allow for the programming of
Federal/State funds to construct an interchange on Route 101 near EI Campo Road.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHNSTP
_ Urban (local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 75.000
Total Project Cost $ 150.000
Year Source Amount
97/98 $
$
$ .75.0
$
.$
$
Source Amount
PlannIng/SeepIng
Envlionmental Anal]sls
Preliminary EngIneering
Construction Engineering
RSHA $ 50.0
Construction
$
$
$
$
$
$
Right of Way
other
Sub Total
$ 50.0
$
75.0
Year
98/99
$
$ 75.0
Total Project Cost $200.0
1. Previously Programmed" all non-local funds that have been previously programmed on this project (e.g., Tel, USHA, Prop 116, elc) If applicable.
2. Local Commitment.. all local funds that have been committed for thIs project (e.g., L TF, Generat Fund, etc). .
3. Request.. Regional or Urban SHA funding that Is being requested as part of this application.
SLOCOG
8HA/SIP Applications
Page 2 of 4
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period): .
1. Preparation of a Caltrans-approved Project Study
Report (PSR)
98/99
9198
4/99
2.
3.
H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant proiect scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Scoping Document is required for all significant projects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major Highway Projects. per State Law):
The City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments,
Caltrans District 5, Arroyo Linda Crossroads representatives, and members of the public
participated in the completion of a scoping study for an interchange on Route 101 south of Fair
Oaks Avenue. The Arroyo Grande City Council received the report at its March 12, 1998, meeting.
The purpose of the scoping study was to identify conceptual geometric designs and their potential
impacts and constraints (e.g., environmental, drainage, geologicaQ. The next step in the process
is the preparation of a PSR.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinity map and proiect map which clearly depicts project limits and other
relevant project information:
Project Map attached.
J.
Priority - Designate if more than one application has been submitted:
,
K. Threshold Requirements - Describe how the project meets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines): .
1. For STP funds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
. .
This project is for the research and planning of a public street and highway and the
administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element (1988). Section II: "The utility of the freeway <U.S.
101 > system depends on proper linkage to the rest of the circulation system."; Section IV.
Regarding Route 227: liThe possibilities suggested in the past have been (1) connection
with EI Campo at Hiahway 101........
SLOCOG
SHAjSTP Applications
Page 3 of 4
'!'rroyo Grande Circulation Element (1988). Goal C. Policy A: "The planning.....alignmen.t and
=~emeflt of the street network will reflect the pr:oposed land use pattern of the General
4. Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCC?G 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 10, SH-13 (LT): "At a location to be
determined south of the City of Arroyo Grande. including the Traffic Way interchange. up
to EI Campo Road. construct full interchange to connect the possible future realignment Df
Route 227 or new EastlWest Road". . .
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan. Chapter S. OBJ2, 2b: "Give a high priority
to funding appropriate improvements to existing streets. roads and State Highways facilities
to reduce or mitigate high accident loC'.ations or segments with high congestion."; OBJ2, 2d:
"Assure that Project Study Reports (PSR's) are prepared for all State or locally funded.
highway improvement projects to identify project purpose. limits. alternatives. scope, costs.
delivery s~hedules and funding arrangements."; OBJ3. 3c: "Assist local jurisdictions in
seclJring maximum local. regional. state and federal infrastructure improvements through
alLappropriate means ".
5. List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998):
September 23. 1997. and June 23. 1998.
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and if the project is on the
designated Federal Aid System:
Caltrans has designated Route 101 as a principal arterial and Route 101 is on the
designated Federal Aid System.
L. Priority Criteria - For Regional Projects Only. address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 pis): .
. .
According to the 1994 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Rout~ 101 has the hig.hest
existing and projected peak hour traffic volume in the county through the Five Cities and
Avila segments. The more congested Route 101 becomes and the more. the areas
continue to grow on each side of Route 101. the more dangerous it becomes for vehicles
trying to enter from and exit to EI Campo Road. The Project Study Report will identify
feasible alternatives that will improve safety for vehicle access within the area.
. .
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pis):
The existing configurCltion of Route 101 at EI Campo Road is an at-grade intersection.
Route 101 is a freeway facility for most of its length through California. Therefore,drivers
traveling on Route 101 do not expect at-grade vehicle crossings, especially through urban'
areas. In addition. Caltrans continues to eliminate traffic signals and at-grade crossings on
Route 101, so the likelihood of signalizing this intersection is next to impossible. These
issues clearly identify a need for the evaluation of alternative vehicle access in the area.
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 4 of 4
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pis):
The Project Study Report will study access improvements on Route 101 near EI Campo
Ro~d. ~ny access impr~vement will.~e an erihancementfor transi.t to service the growing
residential and commercial developments in this area. Access improve"ments identified in
the Project Study Report may also improve bicycle/pedestrian access across Route 101
connecting proposed commercial and residential uses.
4. Describe how the project mitigates' a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pis):
Vehicles are currently forced to sit idle as they wait for a break in traffic to enter Route 101
from EI Campo Road. The longer a vehicle is running, idle time included, the more
emissions it produces. In addition, improved access would enhance the area for transit
service and/or bicycles and pedestrians. The Project Study Report will identify access
improvements which will keep traffic moving, instead of sitting idle, and will allow for
enhanced alternative transportation facilities.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pis):
The best time to prepare a Project Study Report is before development occurs. The cost
to design and build major improvements, such as an interchange, is a lot less expensive
when properly planned with development, as opposed to when the area is at build-out. As
this area continues to grow, the need for improved access will only increase.. It is most co~t
effective to plan for improvements now rather than when major right-of-way acquisition will
be required. " .
Proposed funding:
General Fund
Utility Users Tax
Regional SHA funds
$ 26,100 .
$ 48,900
$ 75,000
$150,000
As part of the local funding contribution, the City of Arroyo Grande will provide contract
administration services.
Jep:232.9798(19)\Shalrack\rsha.appllcatlon.el.campo.wpdi
~
.',
~.
-"-\:1~~-21
-<t~' ~.
..( ^-...."z
-c..... ~~
~-;'/2J'r{.... .
STUDY AREA
/
."
ST
. LLO 'HWY)
. STUDY AREA
LOCATION MAP
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03 .
A.
Jurisdiction:
City of Arroyo Grande
B.
Contact Person:
C.
Project Name:
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande .
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Brisco Road/Halcyon Road/Route 101 Project Study Report (PSR)
D. Project Description:
Preparation of a Caltrans-approved Project Study Report which will allow for the programming of
Federal/State funds to improve the interchange on Route 101 at Brisco and Halcyon Roads.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHNSTP
_ Urban (local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 75.000
Total Project Cost $ 150.000.
Source Amount Year Source Amount
Plannlng/Scoplng RSHA $ 8.0 97/98 $
Environmental AnalysIs $ $
PrelimInary EngIneering $ $ 75.0
Construction EngIneering $ $
Construction $ $
Right or Way $ $
other $ $
Sub Total $ 8.0 $ 75.0 $ 75.0
Year
99/00
Total Project Cost $158.0
1. PrevIously Programmed" all non-local funds that have been previously programmed on this project (e.g., TCI, USHA, Prop 116, etc) If applicable.
2. Local Commitment.. all local runds that have been commllted ror this project (e.g., L TF, General Fund, etc). .
3. Request.. Regional or Urban SHA funding that Is being requested as part or this applicaUon.
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 2 of 4
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period):
1. Preparation of a Caltrans-approved Project Study
Report (PSR)
99/00
9199
'4/00
2.
3.
H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant proiect scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Scoping Document is required for all significant projects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major Highway Projects, per State. Law):
The City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo Council of Govemments,
Caltrans District 5, Five Cities Center representatives, and members of the public participated in
the completion ofa scoping study for improvements to the interchange on Route 101 at Brisco and
Halcyon Roads. The Arroyo Grande City Council received the report at its November 12, 1997,
meeting. The purpose of the scoping study was to identify conceptual geometric designs and their
potentiai impacts and constraints. The next step in the process is the preparation of a PSR.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinity map and proiect map which clearly depicts project limits and other
relevant project information:
Project Map attached.
J. Priority - Designate if more than one application has been submitted: 2-
K. Threshold Requirements - Describe how the project rneets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines):
1. For STP funds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
This project is for the research and planning of public streets and highways and the
administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grand~ Circulation Element (1988), Section II: "The utility of the freeway <U.S.
101 > system depends on proper linkage to the rest of the circulation system."; Section IV:
Identifies Brisco Road/Route 101 as an issue of concern and the need to widen the
underpass.
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 3 of 4
'!'rroyo Grande Circulation Elemenf(1988), Goal C, Policy A: "The planning, alignment and
lffiprovement of the street network will reflect the proposed land llse pattern of the General
.eI.an..." .
4. Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 10, SH-36: "Improve southbound
ramps at Halcyon Road, including:Jengthening, flaring the eod of the off-ramp to
aC;.ommodate additional lanes aod sIgnalize intersection "; SH-37: "Expand and improve
BriSCO Road undercrossiog to five lanes and relocate ramps ".
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 5, OBJ2, 2b: "Give a high priority
to funding..appropriate improvements to existing streets, roads and State Highways facilities
to reduce or mitigate high accident locatioos or segments with high congestiQI),"; OBJ2, 2d:
"Assure that Project Study Reports (PSB's) are prepared for all State or locally funded
. hIghway improyement projects to identify project purpose, limits, alternatives, scope, costs,
delivery scnedules and funding arrangements"; OBJ3, 3c: "Assist local jurisdictions in
s..ecuring maximum local, regional, state and federal infrast(ucture improvements through
alLappropriate means.".
5. List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998): .
September 23, 1997, and June 23, 1998.
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and if the project is on the
de~ignated Federal Aid System:
Caltrans has designated Route 101 as a principal arterial and "Route 101 is on the
designated Federal Aid System. The City's Circulation Element identifies Brisco Road as
a Minor Arterial Street.
L. Priority Criteria - For Regional Projects Only, address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pis):
According to -the 1994 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Route 101 has ~he highest
existing and' projected peak hour traffic volume in the county thrQugh the Five Cities and
Avila segments. The existing interchange configuration of Route 101 at Brisco Road and
Halcyon Road is substandard. The. more congested Route' 101 becomes, the more
dangerous it becomes for vehicles ~sing the existing interchange, especially when traffic
is already backing up onto Rout.e 101 at the Halcyon Road off-ramp. The Project Study
Report will identify feasible improvements that will improve safety for vehicles using this
interchange.
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pis):
The Brisco Road-Halcyon Road/Route 101 interchange is used by all. south county
motorists as it is the direct link to the only hospital, high school, . library, and regional.
community center in the Five Cities area. With all of these regional. destinations, the
SLOCOG
SHA/SfP Applications
Page 4 of4
exi~ting interchange exceeds acceptable capacity especially at the southbound off-ramp
dunn~ the p.m. peak hour. When vehicles exiting a freeway back up onto the freeway,
there IS no question regarding the need for improvement. This issue alone clearly identifies
a need for the evaluation of interchange improvements in the area.
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pis)::
The Project Study Report will study interchange improvements on Route 101 at Brisco and
Halcyon Roads. Any interchange improvements will be an enhancement for transit to
service the growing residential and commercial developments in this area. Interchange
improvements identified in the Project Study Report may also improve bicycle/pedestrian
access across Route 101 connecting commercial and residential uses.
4. Describe how the project mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pis):
An improved interchange would enhance the area for transit service and/or bicycles and
pedestrians. The Project Study Report will identify interchange improvements which will
keep traffic moving, instead of sitting idle and producing excess emissions (e.g., Halcyon
Road off-ramp), and will allow for enhanced alternative transportation facilities.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pis):
The best time to prepare a Project Study Report is before development occurs. However,
the Brisco Road/Halcyon Road interchange was constructed after much of the adjacent
development was already in place. As the Arroyo Grande, Oceano and Nipomo areas
continue to grow, the need for interchange improvements will only increase. There is no
more cost effective time to identify interchange improvements than the present. Delaying
improvements to the interchange can only result in an increase in costs as more
development occur$ and major right-of-way acquisition may be. required.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution of funding (15 Pts):
Route 101 in the main artery for San Luis Obispo County, accommodating both commuter
and tourist traffic. Any safety and/or capacity improvement to Route 101 would benefit the
entire County of San Luis Obispo. In addition, Halcyon Road is the major route for vehicles
from Arroyo. .Grande, Oceano, and the Nipomo Mesa to access Route 101.
7. Describe what local funding contribution is being provided - Describe .and differentiate
between in-kind seNices, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pts):
Proposed funding:
General Fund $ 75,000
Regional SHA funds $ 75.000
$150,000
As part of the local funding contribution, the City of Arroyo Grande will 'provide contract
administration services. . .
jep:232.9798(19)\shatrack\rsha.applicalion.brlsco.wpdi
.JAN
',....:JZ // ...~.., ~rrl~ ~ \ I~~'--"~:~~ l"~4~~~".J
~ ') ....~. 1.' ~ lJl
. ~ ~ ~
L U IS 08 I SPQ "AQ~( . ~<;4' ~ ~:~r ~ ,~~~ ~~- .. ",~~I,~s ~ ~ ~ )
,.. ,..., .. T.' , ,Arr N- <+-<;) '" ~i~ ~-. ~
I . { II 1/\ V '. ~ ~ i~.. ~. "lOt tIn. I ~ ~
......,......,JI. J J ...._,~ lA.~':"''''& ~"'$"" t> Ui- ~.''''
~ ~: ..., ,\0<( ,Ilv ll'l ~
~r' ~ .:. " ... ~ - ~ ...
~";~, ~<> '~~' "!ed!' ". "'/';. ~,.p,~ /~ .' '. Jk<~~\
0N~' '"' ...!i' . ;;'. ~"...,., ,.' ~../. - ~\~
~;:t2~~ ..........." .' .~ ~... e '.:'.: ~ ,'Jj n-..,~~'
~.!~ ,1. .....,,_ .,' ..rr\$ ~(>- ~.., '-I( I '_cf. ~ €I'
i) ~~ ~~/o{T, ~...~ c..~. \. ~ "'1.'< J,'/ ~ I ~
t~ ~~~~-~~6-~f.r'''''''''''' 1"~ ~~Itr., ~ ;".~~ t.. s~ ~ ~~l:ffV.
J~ s ..~... .;;;;~ j ~'i/I I ~ S~l"""""- \ ,.. -5 ~.... E ;fJ.~"tf:.'ES ~"b , ~a,. ,,'" :.to y~::J e::
\CJI~ 'f "'4 ~....,~ '" .: Ii:: 41 t ~} ~ -'i "..- ~ . ~~':!<, / -'............::; <a ...
..~~~..~lw).~~: --'- Ir:tAl.- 'eg~~#''''. ~~.<. 'T ~7/f'
. :~ ~ ~ .,/~ &~ .~.(',~ ~1.fO#J, ~~.fl -; ire; :::"{!.. r .~(~,............ ~E4-:<;. ,"-of i:f~~.
,,~-.~, ! '"" Y..""I; ~ I . ii'. ~ "lEA '. ~~~."""'" ,~/~ ~<.fr~
~ to --1---<t...........~ #0 - ~<l ~I '.y. ~..~ 'nh~O' j/0iiZ. \.i" 'oi.- ."~~';"':'(i.'D.._, ~..~ ~~'-...(
~ ......... 0' -. <Sf'J '~I ~r;IU"t;, -J.o'(r K:J '- ,- I,~.r' " ~
OO~~ ...~ ~ .w;:':;' ,i" ~ ~ rj' c,:,l, ~ >>:: "1.," ....--- ""~'"'>J ,-......a-~ .A.'/-fr'
11;.... r~ ~;1!.6~------" J~<r1O~.r-...v ;::::::: ~ ./ >...:... ~'" .. ~::. ~:r . STUDY AREA "/SJ ~:9
.:;- '~rl:l.. .. :~.,~ ,,".. .,':' ~., _~ ~~:';;'" :._~..;t4yO\ I,JI ;)f
fl., :ilia!:'':> "~l~":("":': :~~',.,j?t-"il.ir>t........~ ~~~. ~1':; ...':(Co . . .' sl ~~~~. "'~:--~1:'i";';'~ :.
CITY:::J ,,,,.,.,"-"'dO [~.,:):: ~ c' .....~. ~I"" '-, . L_L-.-..< .." ~ ~- :-. ""'l"
t;/r~.~II1S"I" i'~ ;t . J,y C::,~l :Sl~ "'..; ri::'-~~>:~" ..~. ,";"7<fl ,<-"".~~~
: I to::;/ I. ,..." t:/ l~ ~ '~: . ~ ~ ~ '-^O~. " ," ~ '. '~.\"'~ ~~ ~\ ~ ~~
I~IJ' L; '~ '~.r~! . AT ;"""" .~.:;:~:. ~ t<Xr(:::, ~101~~-~ :.~. . of;. :~r- :{~,~. ~ ~l' ~f.L
~ Ill. E.." <=. ;: a: ....... 2""l . . . II. '.~ "I -~ _r~~' IJ. @
~ --M;: c..lll ~ $l~-U~~~,,""';:-"""~I~~~.i' <l~<"~~ ~ ,..,
.. E a."!j.~= E. :: T ... 'L :.~~~. '-:!I '-!<."'a, ..... "'. ~~l'~~ t..:: )i.~~.", W~~~U lft~~"'::~
!" IS :..~.. .. A .. I.. ':'<'. .~::-;-t. ~.~~.~. ..', '. ~ ~~= ')...- ~~":"" (f--.,r ~
.. d ~ .... - ....SCI' . . .,... T. . \.. ~ ~ "
. :~" . ~t;j ~~... :.. .. . ".fJ GAAHO~ .... ~~ I .. j;' . C> -,'. v'!:~ . '-~ \ ~~. ~~;< .. ~ V '" ~
"t :l" -l:!....,... 01/.:,. .I'""!~j~ UOQ ...... - .\~9v:..'~ v.:~~:...~ :--::..: ~~.. ~~ ~r{'3-.~~i>'~
... . ',.., t; .' I.T':- 8. ~ ,~.;: ;;':'f.' ?... t--S1..:.. ~"'..:::... ~.:, :.: n~ .'{:" " >' .:- "'':'~ ~\ """""" <;;e...~ ,,-" '-1t r,'fJ:, ~.~
"" .w jOOQ.. ~ . . 'r'.' POPlAA Sf ~l:: ~r;/r. ~ ....... '. ,... "'..- \oF"- .....~..... 4
Z ~ . ...0:" . ~~~ti 1.~<02.., ~ .:~ : i~.~:! ~ 8~~:. .~...(-;::J,: ...J;t; '.-:..;. . _,~7~ .L. "ll'
TO; _. . ",' -" ;.: ;:: ., .,:, ;.,;:....:; a.... :;; -::!':..J ~7 .~ -% ; ~~t'-.::... r"~.~~~.~i..' \..~ ~ ~ :t.
NI 1= ~ f;" "'_ 1.'-, :~., :'.:'~'~-:-:~' '.- ..;)I"" ., ~.E~cr.1 '.I,'! <::>~"'/ \-&It'"''' "...... ~'/o'~"~
1m ' " .- . . AT ..,: ;.!.. .... ..:-~ - .:; lrl '.. ." '" ~~. !!~... fl' '~ -<;<~ 't~' "",-,<, ""'.....
... ::::,'p-I JoV oj":-n.' ........ =- ... ..; .... .' "J' 'b" -o.,?'v.:: T.~.~~ ~
" ~I._ l:I...;: 1>0.1 .~. wF~' SII"'C Sf .<N." .... ':":15_'.':-: ....::..... · '\-t--:=;::: ~~~~
:\"" F. ". , ~T -.,...q I. i\{;$EfO~';;'~'" U It' t; -." ,;c · i/~""~"'" "S(<"~
:>' .. '0UI"0.. .. '. o~: ._ '.. . -' --..... , ..~.. ~Y-~
t;~ w ~ "_~ _ ......,~ '.' ~"":, ~dWt.~~ FAIR;l O'la.o::s - ~ .'-"~'. o' "'. --Jg ~ ~
i .; .-~ ....~ .'" .;....:; .~M::'::";5;l, (5 x II", . ;i 9.. ~. ~:O:;Y:. ~. r ,/" ~ ~"(.
:S"I ~r ~. ~l 11':'" :'j~ ;..A 8 ~ ;l ~I ~ U CU,Uf "fl,'. If I ./
eCl '.' ~l:: -.W..l:!......... 10 .' "'~~:. ;I.- 2l .... fmllll a:::. ~ ..... #.,. '~~~ ~. '
YI '. '. .. ~ 2 :~~"J~ : ~..J}W~llf. ..cIfK' =f rc ...._1-..... ~A- .' .; \
"I~ . _ VI:; cl .. ..:u......". ~~ l~l .r M.On.... !!. g. ,.-............ R~ . .... /, \
3' K ........". ~ . J5L1,._ WfJ !.< . ~ -~ ff'~ ",' ...
~ . "a ...",- :r.t _ . ~ ~_.~. -" .. ::;.;:;{ .. ~I{ r \';'~\, 1
. "* ~~!. t~'''-..Ef ~ ~ ~a:: it ~"7\=LSf1' ":1-':1 oa..- . ~ >- ~,'. '
~_ i: ..I...........~~ U _ - ~ ~ rrf .1:1-_. -;~, w .r.;.' ... .
~ --. _ _ t< ' It!),:: a)! T "r:iT I.ao..,... ~:p\"" ::: l;.:j;- .::- - ..:. ~~ '" ~ J'"
.~~ --'_ ~<-.rl~ tf= :;::; d ::.l~...1 .. I i5'1-.J1I ~ ....1 ~ '1"/,0.""""",, ~I'''' L, ~ ,~. ....ole
O~\,..., y.j- I~ if -, ,ry- .,.:rI;.4:: ....1 """ .. .. H - - "": '. " OIV"'"""..
.'
..
. LEGEND
.- ] STUDY MEA
L BOUNDARIES
~
N.T.S.
..
STUDY-AREA
LOCATION MAP
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
Jurisdiction:
A.
B.
City of Arroyo Grande
Contact Person:
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
C.
Project Name:
Grand Avenue Reconstruction Project, Elm Street to Halcyon Road
D. Project Description:
Pavement reconstruction and spot repair of curb, gutter, sidewalks, and cross gutters where
needed along Grand Avenue between Halcyon Road and Elm Street. The existing water main will
be replaced with a 12-inch water main, new fire hydrants will be installed in areas that are currently
deficient, and all services will be replaced as well as most meters boxes. The existing sewer main
will be replaced with a 8-inch sewer main and laterals serving each property will be replaced or a
new lateral installed. Storm drain inlets and an ~xisting CMP drainage culvert will be replaced. The
project provides conduit and other facmties necessary to underground existing overhead utilities
and possibly additional conduits to accommodate future fiber optic cable.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHA/STP
Urban (local) SHA/STP .
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachm'ent A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 125,000
Total Project Cost $ 2,022,200
Source Amount Year Source Amount Year
Planning/SeepIng $ $
Environmental AnalysIs $ $
Preliminary Engl.neerlng $' $.
Construction Engineering $ $
Construction Fed Demo $ 325.0 98/99 $ 125.0 98/99
Right of Way $ $
Other $ $-
Sub Total $ 375.0 $ 1,522.2 $ 125.0
Total Project Cost $2,022.2
SLOCOG
SHA/SfP Applications
Page 2 of 4
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period):
1. DesIgn & Survey
2. Contract Bidding
98/99
10/98
2/99
98/99
2/99
4/99
4. Construction
98/99
98/99
4/99
5/99
8/99
8/99
3. Contract Administration
H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant proiect scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Scoping Document is required for all significant pr9jects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major Highway Projects, per State Law):
Reconstruction projects are not usua/ly identified through project scoping documents, they are
identified through local tracking and management systems then included in an annual budget!
capital improvement program. Attached is documentation submitted previously to SLOCOG and
Caltrans on the Highway Performance Maintenance Program (HPMS) which identifies the dire need
for reconstruction on this stretch of Grand A venue.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinity map and proiect map which clearly depicts project limits and other
relevant project information:
Project Map attached.
J. Priority - Designate if more than one application has been submitted: . -3
K. Threshold Requirements - Describe how the project meets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines):
1. For STP "tunds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
This project is for the design and construction of improvements and maintenance of a public
street and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the fore~oing purposes.
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element, Goal A, Policy B: "Maintain roadways and traffic
signals in good condition." .
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 3 of 4
4.' Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 5,OBJ3, '3c: "Assist local
Jurisdictions in securing maximum local, regional, state and federal funding for infrastmcture
improvements through all appropriate means."
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 5, OBJ2, 2b:" "Give a high priority
to funding appmpriate improvements to existing streejs, roads, and State Highways
facilities to reduce or mitigate high accident locations' or segments with high congestion."
5. - List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 199B):
September 23, 1997, and June 23, 1998.
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and jf the project is on the
designated Federal Aid System:
The City's Circulation Element classifies Grand Avenue as a Major Arterial. Caltrans'
Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) classifies Grand Avenu.e as a Minor
Arterial (16). Grand Avenue is on the designated Federal Aid System.
L. Priority Criteria - For Regional Projects Only, address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pis):
The pavement on Grand Avenue between Elm Street and Halcyon Road is in very poor
condition. Vehicles using Grand Avenue slow down sporadically when the pavement
becomes extemely poor or maneuver to the left or right to avoid potholes, etc. This type
of driver behavior can become extremely dangerous, especially on such a high volume
road.
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pis):
The pavement on Grand Avenue between Elm Street and Halcyon Road is in very poor
condition. The pavement is extremely deteriorated and passable only at reduced speeds
with considerable ride discomfort. Cracking and other defects affect' over 75% of the
roadway surface. Extensive need of reconstruction is evident.
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pis):
Grand Avenue is the main arterial used by both the local (SCAT) and regional (CCAT)
buses. Any roadway used for these purposes should be maintained in the best condition
possible to ensure a s~fe, efficient facility for the service.
SLOCOG
SHAjSfP Applications
Page 4 of 4
4. . Describe how the project mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pts):
The slowing down and speeding up of vehicles prodLlces much more emissions than
vehicles traveling at constant speeds. The reconstruction of Grand Avenue will provide a
smooth, even surface and vehicles will no longer need to slow down or weave as stated
under Item No. 1 above.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pts):
The City's approach to the Grand Avenue, Elm Street to Halcyon Road, reconstruction
project is to perform all the necessary improvements (e.g., water, sewer, drainage, and
pavement) at one time. This technique has proven to be extremely cost effective to a City
as there is only one cost for items such as traffic control and contract administration. In
addition, the pavement does not have to be reconstructed if the water and sewer services
are performed at a later time.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution offunding (15 Pis):
Grand Avenue directly services the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach, and the
communities of Oceano and the Nipomo/Arroyo Grande Mesa. The City of Arroyo Grande
will contribute all of the underground services funds and half the roadway funds in order to
service the entire Five Cities area,
7. Describe what local funding contribution is being provided - Describe and differentiate
between in-kind services, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pis):
Proposed funding:
Utility Users Tax
Sewer Facility
Water Fund
Regional SHA funds
$ 199,300
$ 792,000
$ 530,900
$ 500.000
$2,022,200
As part of the local funding contribution, the City of Arroyo Grande will provide i~-hol:lse
services to include design & survey, contract administration, and on-site inspection.
..JI ____...._.. ,.........
'>- ~
~ ~
WW
A'W z
Z-;f:. 0
4\.1l -
<60 }-
u ~
Or- ::J
,>-0 ~
ar-\
OCCL }- )\
OCr- en
4.~ Z
.p. w 0
> U
<
W V
~
U- ~
0
en
}- ~
-
~ :B
-
< -1
<<
CJ
":):- ~ -.-\ ~
W4:,..o
'3-\;:;'0
"-:I:. <::>
-z.'4.~ . o.
4:.w. . OJ ~
W -.-\ ...., I:)
O\J.1 ~
o ~
-J
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
A.
Jurisdiction:
City of Arroyo Grande
B.
Contact Person:
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
c.
Project Name:
Grand Avenue/East Branch Street/Route 227 Corridor Study
D. Project Description:
A study of Grand Avenue/East Branch Street/Route 227 in the City of Arroyo Grande from Oak
Park Boulevard to Crown Hill to update and expand the 1983 (+/-) Grand Avenue Study. This
corridor currently displays signs of unacceptable levels of service which will only get worse with
time. The study will look at on-street parking, lane striping, traffic signalization, and shall address
future traffic conditions as well as recommended improvements. This study will be developed in
accordance with the current redevelopment efforts in the downtown area and the Grand Avenue
design guidelines being proposed by the Community Development Department.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHA/STP
_ Urban (local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 40.000
Total Project Cost $ 60.000
Source Amount Year
PJannlnglScoplng RSHA $ 20.0 97/98
EnVironmental Analysis $
Preliminary Engineering $
Construction EngIneering $
Construction . $
Right of Way $
Other $
Sub Total $ 20.0 $ 0.0
Source Amount Year
$ 40.0 98/99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 40.0
-,
Total Project Cost $60.0
1. Previously Programmed" all non-local funds thaI have been previously programmed on Ihls proJecl (e.g., Tel, USHA, Prop 116. elc) If applicable.
2. local Commllmenl" all local funds thaI have been committed for this proJecl (e.g.. l TF, General Fund, elc).
3. Requesl" Rll9lonal or Urban SHA funding thaI Is being requesled as part of this applicallon.
SLOCOG
SHA/SfP Applications
Page 2 of 4
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period):
3. Corridor Study
4.
5.
6.
98/99
98/99
98/99
9/98
12/98
12/98
11/98
3/99
3/99
1. Contract Bidding
2. Contract Administration
7.
8.
9.
10.
H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant proiect scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Seeping Document is required for all significant projects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major Highway Projects, per State Law):
This project will act as a project scoping document to various future improvements on this corridor,
such as the Grand Avenue, Elm Street to Halcyon Road, reconstruction project currently budgeted
in the FY 1998/99 capital improvement program.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinity map and proiect map which clearly depicts project.limits and other
relevant project information:
N/A
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
This project is for the research and planning for the operation of a public street (and their
related public facilities for non motorized traffic), and the administrative costs necessarily
incurred in the foregoing purposes.
SLOCOG
SHAjSfP Applications
Page 3 of4
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element, 1986: 'The policies and plan proposals of the
circulation element should: ... Promote the efficient transport of goods and the safe and
effective movement of all segments of the population: Make efficient use of existing
transportation facilities......". Grand Avenue and Route 227 are also listed as issues of
concern under Section IV. Issues.
Section V, Goal A, Policy A: "Monitor the operation and perfonTIance of the street system.";
Goal A, Policy B, Program 1: "Develop a priority system for physical improvements based
on demonstrated needs according to the collected data on physical conditions. traffic
. volumes and safety reports."; Policy C: "Improve traffic capacities of streets."; Policy D:
"Improve traffic safety."; Policy 0: "Provide for truck .emergency vehicle and resort traffic.".
4. Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 5, OBJ1: "Determine existing and
proiected roadway capacity deficiencies through the year 2013 for all State Highways and
maior regional routes interconnecting communities. and determine their potential for being
addressed through other measures. with capacity expansion as a last report."
5. List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998):
September 23,1997, and June 23,1998
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and if the project is on the
designated Federal Aid System: .
The City's Circulation Element classifies Grand Avenue as a Major Arterial. Caltrans'
High,<<ay Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) classifies Grand Avenue as a Minor
Arterial (16). Grand Avenue is on the designated Federal Aid System.
East Branch Street is a state designated highway (Route 227) and is on the designated
Federal Aid System. The City's Circulation Element classifies East Branch Street as a
Minor Arterial.
L. Priority Criteria - For Regional Proiects Only. address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pts):
This corridor carries a high volume of traffic and intersections along this corridor are
frequent sites of accidents. This project will identify the causes of these accidents and
recommendations for improvement. Current safety problems may also be related to
present on-street parking conditions and numerous ingress/egress points.
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 4 of 4
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pts):
Grand Avenue services the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach, and the
communities of Oceano and the Nipomo/Arroyo Grande Mesa. East Branch Street services
the both the City of Arroyo Grande and the unincorporated areas of the County east of
Route 101. As these areas continue to grow and tourism increases, current problems being
experienced on this corridor (e.g., congestion, accidents) will also increase. Current
problems along this corridor need to be identified now so that future projects can be
constructed and/or implemented in accordance with an overall goal.
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pts):
Grand Avenue/East Branch Street/Route 277 is the main arterial used by both the local
(SCAT) and regional (CCA T) buses. This project will help maintain this corridor in such a
manner as to ensure a safe, efficient facility for the service.
4. Describe how the project mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pts):
Currently, vehicles traveling along this corridor are slowing down and speeding up due to
pavement conditions, or stopping and starting at each traffic signal due to a non-
coordinated signal phasing system. This type of vehicle movement produces much more
emissions than vehicles traveling at const~nt speeds. This projectwiU identify ways to
move vehicles in a more even flow.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pts):
This project will present an overall plan for the Grand Avenue/East Branch Street/Route 227
corrid.or. These types of plans have proven to be cost effective, especially in the
development of improvement projects. Improvement projects constructed or implemented
in accordance with a plan, are rarely required to be reconstructed due to piece meal
changes in needs and/or goals.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution offunc!ing (15 Pts):
Grand Avenue directly services the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grove.r Beach, and the
communities of Oceano and the Nipomo/Arroyo Grande Mesa. East BranCh Street services
the both the City of Arroyo Grande and the unincorporated areas of the County east of
Route 101. This project will not only provide a plan for the City of Arroyo Grande, but the
entire South County/Five Cities area.
7. Describe what local funding contribution is being provided.. Describe and differentiate
between in-kind services, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pts):
The City of Arroyo Grande will act as project manager for the study, coordinating with
SLOCOG, County and other Cities' staff. Arroyo Grande staff will prepare a. request for
proposal, coordinate consultant selection, and provide overall project management of the
project.
jep:232.9798( 19)\shatrack\rsha.application.grand.corridor.wpd
tiS
fiJ
w
~~
g
--I1-i ~ l
.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
A.
Jurisdiction:
B.
Contact Person:
City of Arroyo Grande
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
C.
Project Name:
Valley Road/Fair Oaks Avenue Pavement Rec~nstruction Project
D. Project Description:
Pavement reconstruction on Valley Road at Fair Oaks Avenue and on Fair Oaks Avenue from
Orchard Avenue to just west of Valley Road. The project will also provide. for much needed
drainage improvements at the intersection of Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
--.2L Regional SHNSTP
_ Urban (local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $358,400.
Total Project Cost $358,400
Project Category
Source Amount Year Source Amount
Planning/Seeping $ $
Environmental Analysis $ $
Preliminary Engineering . . $ $ 22.4
Construction EngIneering $ $ 28.0
Construction $ $ 308.0
Right of Way $ $
Other $ $
Sub Total $ 0.0 . $ 0.0 $ 358.4
Year
98/99
98/99
98/99
Total Project Cost $358.4
1. Previously Programmed = all non-local funds that have been previously programmed on this project (e.g., TCI, USHA. Prop 116, etc) If applicable.
2. Local Commitment = all local funds that have been committed for this project (e.g.. L TF, General Fund, etc). . . .
3. Request = Regional or Urban SHA funding that Is being requested as part of this application.
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 2 of 4
G. Milestones -" Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period): . .
1. Design & Survey
2. Contract Bidding
3. Contract Administration
98/99
98/99
98/99
'98/99
1/99
2/99
5/99
5/99
2/99
4/99
6/99
4. Construction
6/99
. H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant project scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Scoping Document is required for all significant projects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major. Highway Projects, per State Law):
. This roadway reconstruction project has been identified through the City's pavement management
system plan.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinitY-ffi8.p alJd project map which clearly depicts project "limits and other
relevant project information:
Project Map attached.
J.
. .
Priority - Designate if more than one application has been submitted:
~
K. Threshold Requirements - Describe how the project meets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines): .
1. For STP funds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
2. For $HA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility reqtiireinents:
This project is for the design anq construction of improvements and maintenance of a public
street and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes..
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local aqopted plans:
Arroyo Grande. Circulation Element, Goal A, Policy 8: "Maintain roadlJ:'ays and traffic
signals in..good condition."
4. Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 3 of 4
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 5, OBJ3, 3c: "Assist 10Gal
jurisdiction.s in seGuring maximum local, regkmal state and federal funding for in{rastruGture
improvements through all appropriat~ means."' .
SLOCOG 1994 Regional1ransportation Plan, Chapter 5, OBJ2, 2b: "Give a high priority
to funding appropriate improvements to existing streets, roads, and State Highways
facilities to redllGe or mitigata. high accident locations or s~gments with high congestion."
5. List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998): .
June 23, 1998.
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and if"the project is on the
designated Federal Aid System:
The City's Circulation Element classifies Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue as Minor
Arterial streets (the only Maj~r Arterial in the City is Grana Avenue).
I .
The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments has identified Valley Road and Fair Oaks
Avenue as routes of regional significance.
L. Priority Criteria - EoLRegkm.a.LerojeGts Only, address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Des<!ribe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pis):
The pavement on Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue is in very poor condition. Vehicles
using these facilities slow down sporadically when the pavement becomes extemely poor
or maneuver to the left or right to avoid potholes, etc. This type of driver behavior can.
become extremely dangerous, especially on such.high volume roads. In addition; the
intersection of Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue has an extremely bad drainage problem.
This intersection becomes flooded and dangerous to drivers even in light rainfall cOnditions. .
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pis):.
The pavement 'on Valley'.Road and Fair Oaks AvenUe is in veiy p~or condition. The
pavement is extremely deteriorated and passable only at reduced speeds with considerable
ride discomfort. Cracki"ng and other defects affect over 80% of the roadway surface.
Extensive need of reconstruction is evident. .
. 3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pis):
Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue are the only roadways available to both Lucia Mar
Unified School Distri<;t buses and bicyclists accessing Arroyo Grande High School. Any
roadway used for these purposes should be maintained in the best condition possible to
ensure a safe, efficient facility for both bus service and bicyclists.
SLOCOG
SHA!STP Applications
Page 4 of 4
4. Describe how the proje~t mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pis):
The slowing down and speeding up of vehicles produces much more. emissions than
vehicles traveling.at cqnstant speeds. The reconstruction of Valley Road and Fair Oaks
Avenue will provide a ~mooth, ev~n surface and vehicles will no longer need to" slow down
or weave'as stated under Item No.1 above.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pis):
If these roadways are not repaired now, they will only continue to deteriorate continue to
need more annual maintenance to keep them passable. Reconstructing the roadways now
makes the project cost effective as it will save the annual maintenance costs.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution offunding (15 Pis):
Valley Road and Fair Oaks Avenue services the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach,
and the communities of Oceano and the Nipomo/Arroyo Grande Mesa. These roadways
are the only links to the south county's high school, and are one of only two roadway links
connecting Oceano and the Nipomo/Arroyo Grande Mesa area to Route 101.
7. Describe what local funding contribution is being provided - De-scribe and differentiate
between in-kind services, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pis):
The City of Arroyo Grande will provide in-house' services to include design & survey,
contract administration, and on-site inspection. .
jep:232.9798(19)\shatrack\rsha.applicalion.Valley.FalrOaks.wpd
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
A.
Jurisdiction:
City of Arroyo.Grande
B.
Contact Person:
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 47~-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
C.
Project Name:
Bikeway Project One, Paulding Middle School Bike Lanes
D. Project Description:
Phase One -
Huasna Road: Class II bicycle lanes from eastern City limits to East Branch
Street
Myrtle Street, Garden Street, Allen Street and Traffic Way to Fair Oaks
Avenue: Class III bicycle path
Stanley Avenue: Class I bicycle path from Huasna Road to Myrtle Street
Phase Two -
Phase Three -
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHA/STP
_ Urban.(local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 111.400 *
Total Project Cost $ 334.160
Source Amount Year
PlannIng/SeepIng Prop 116 $ 9.0 97/98
Environmental Analysis $
PrelimInary EngIneering Prop 116 $ 23.7 97/98
Construction EngIneering. Prop 116 $ 26.0 97/98
Construction Prop 116 $ 164.1 97/98
Right of Way $
Other $
Sub Total $ 222.8 $ 0.0
Source Amount
.$
$
$
$
$ 111.4
$
$
Year
98/99
$ 111.4
Total ProJect Cost
1. Previously Programmed" aU non-local funds that have been previously programmed on this project (e.g., TCI, USHA, Prop 116, etc) If applicable.
2. local Commitment.. aU local funds that have been commllted for thIs project (e.g., l TF, General Fund, etc).
3. Request.. RegIonal or Urban SHA funding that Is being requested as part or this applicaUon.
$334.2
SLoeoe
SHA/SIP Applications
Page 2 of 4
*Funding Note: Phase 1- Huasna Road at Clarence Avenue is proposed to be widened at an estimated cost of $210,000.
The safest widening alternative consists of a sidewalk, a bicycle lane, and some new roadway
section. The proportionate share of the cost for the new roadway section is estimated to be
$111,400. As only the widening costs directly related to the bicycle lane and the sidewalk are
eligible for froposition 116 funding, the City Is ;equesting that the roadway's portion of $111,400.
be funded with Regional SHA funds. If Phase lis supplemented with Regional SHA funds, the
remaining Proposition 116 funds would rollover to Phases II arid 1/1.
Phase 11- Stanley Avenue to Fair Oaks Avenue, Class 1/1 bicycle path estimated cost = $6,300
Phase 1/1 - Stanley Avenue, Class I bicycle path over Arroyo Grande Creek estimated cost (excluding right-of-
way)= $120,000
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period):
1. Project Scoplngl Concept Design 97/98 6197 11/97
2. Design & Survey I Right-of-Way 98/99 11/97 6198
3. Contracl Bidding 98/99 2/99 4/99
4. Contract Admlnislration 98/99 5199 8/99
5. Construcllon (after rainy season) 98/99 5199 8/99
6.
7.
Project Map attached.
J. . Priority - Designate if more than one application has been submitted: C.
K. Threshold Requirements ~ Describe how the project meets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines):
1. For STP funds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
SLOCOG
SHA/STP Applications
Page 3 of 4
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
This project is for the research, planning, construction and improvement of a public street
and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic (bicycles), including the payment
for property taken, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing
purposes. .
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element, Section III, Alternative Travel Modes: liThe most
important effort that cQuld be undertaken to enhance bicycle trayel would be improved
maintenance and upgrading of existing roads that are used regularly by bicyclists."; "Ihe
first pciority for bike routes is connections to schools, public and private."; "Priority One
rolltes are: ...l::Iuasna Road to serye Paulding Middle SchooL.".
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element, Section V, Goal B, Policy A: "Provide for adequate aod
safe alternative access to schools, parks and shopping areas within the Cit~."; Policy C:
"Provide aod maintain adequate shoulders of City streets where biC'.ycle traffic is heavy and
there are safety concerns.".
4. Describe this project's' consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 6~ OBJ1: "Cr.eate a regional bikeway
sy..stem to provide fOL.efficient and sate transportation for bicycle commuters,"; OBJ1, 1a:
"Promote development of a cooo:lioated aod connected regional bikeway system with
emphasis on linking...gaps on the regiQOal system where bikeways do not exist."; OBJ1, 1 c:
"Pursue all mtailable fuodiog alternatives for the use or acquisition ot right-ot-ways aod
easement to be lIsed for bikeways."; OBJ2: "Provide sate travel for: both the commuter and
the recreational rider."; OBJ6: "erovide funding to local jurisdictions for bicycle facility
improvements and-,orograms."
5.. List expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998):
September 23, 1997, and June 23, 1998.
6. Identify the. project's functional classification (if applicable) and if the projectjs on the
designated Federal Aid System: .
The Ci.ty's Circulation Elem.ent classifies Huasna Road as a M~jor Arterial.
L. Priority Criteria - For. Regional Projects Only, address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; qdditioJial supporting material is encouraged):
1. . Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pis):
There are no bicycle or adequate sidewalk facilities on Huasna Road between East Branch
Street and the eastern City Iimfts. hi addition, there is no direct connection to Paulding
Middle School for students living south of Arroyo Grande Creek. This project would provide
bicycle lanes and routes, and a portion of sidewalk on Huasna Road to provide for safe
bicycle and pedestrian travel. .
SLOCOG
SHA/SIP Applications
Page 4 of4
2. Describe the demon.strated need for the project (15 Pts):
Huasna Road is the only road that connects the City and County residents living east of
East Branch Street to Paulding Middle School. Students living in this area who bicYGle to
school have no other routes available to them. Arroyo Grande, Oceano and Grover Beach
students living south of Arroyo Grande Creek have no direct connection to Paulding Middle
School and are forced to use East Branch Street which has no bicycle facilities.
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 Pts):
This project will provide safer facilities for at least three modes of transportation: bicycles,
pedestrians and vehicles.
4. Describe how the project mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pts):
Bicycle and pedestrian modes of travel produce no emissions. If adequate facilities are
provided, parents may be more apt to allow their children to bicycle and walk to school
instead of dropping them off by vehicle. This would lower existing vehicle emissions.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 Pts):
The City's approach to the Bicycle Project One project is to perform all the necessary
improvements (e.g., bicycle lanes/path, sidewalk, roadway widening) at one time. This
technique is extremely cost effective as there is only one cost for items such as design,
traffic control and contract administration.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution offunding (15 Pis):
Paulding Middle School services students from the Cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover
Beach, Oceano and the County of San Luis Obispo. Any improvements for access to the
school will be a benefit" to the entire Five Cities region.
7.
Describe what local funding contribution is being provided - Describe and differentiate
between in-kind services, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pis):
$222,760
$111.400
$334,160
As part of the local funding contribution,' the City of Arroyo Grande will provide in-house
services to include design & survey, contract administration and on-site inspection.
Proposition 116 (programmed) .
Regional SHA funds (proposed)
SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Surface Transportation Program Funding Application
Program Years 98/99 - 02/03
A.
Jurisdiction:
City of Arroyo Grande
B.
Contact Person:
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer - (805) 473-5440
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
C.
Project Name:
Branch Mill Road Bicycle Lanes
D. Project Description:
Class II bicycle lanes on each side of Branch Mill Road from East Cherry Avenue to east City limits.
E. Type of Funding Requested (check one):
-2L Regional SHNSTP
_ Urban (local) SHNSTP
F. Project Funding Summary - Fill in the project totals. (Note: see Attachment A for funding limits
and constraints):
Amount Requested: $ 136.500
Total Project Cost $ 136.500
Source Amount Year Source Amount Year
Planning/SeepIng $ $ 9.8 98/99
Environmental Analysis $ $ 4.8 98/99
Preliminary EngIneering $ $ 9.8 98/99
Construction Engineering $ $ 14.6 98/99
Construction $ $ 97.5 98/99
Right of Way $ $
Other. $ $
Sub Total $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 136.5
Total ProJect Cost $136.5
1. Previously Programmed" all non-local funds that have been previously programmed on thIs project (e.g., Tel, USHA. Prop 116, etc) If applicable.
2. local Commitment.. all local funds that have been committed for thIs project (e.g.,l TF, General Fund, etc). .
3. Request.. Regional or Urban SHA funding that Is beIng requested as part of thIs application. .
SLOCOG
SHAjSfP Applications
Page 2 of4
G. Milestones - Fill out the milestone section below (assuming the project is funded within the FY
98/99 to 02/03 period):
1. Project Scoplng/ Concept DesIgn / Right-of-Way
2. Design & Survey
3. Contract Bidding
4. Contract Administration
5. Construction
98/99
98/99
98/99
98/99
98/~9
9/98
12/98
3/99
12/98
3/99
5/99
5/99
5/99
8/99
7/99
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
H. Project Scoping Documentation - List and attach relevant proiect scoping documentation.
(Note: A Project Scoping Document is required for all significant projects; a Project Study Report
(PSR) meeting Caltrans requirements is required for all major Highway Projects, per State Law):
This project proposes project scoping and conceptual design as the first phase of the project. This
will aI/ow for any fatal flaws to be identified at the beginning of the project before proceeding into
final design 'and construction.
I. Project Map - Attach vicinity map and proiect map which clearly depicts project limits and other
relevant project information:
Project Map attached.
J. Priority - Designate if more thaM'one application has been submitted: "..
K. Threshold' Requirements - Describe how the project meets the threshold requirements listed
below (See Application Guidelines):
1. For STP funds, describe consistency with STP project eligibility requirements:
N/A
2. For SHA funds, describe consistency with SHA project eligibility requirements:
This project is for th~ research, planning, construction and improvement of a public street's
related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic (bicycles), including the payment for property
taken, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
SLOCOG
. SHA/STP Applications
Page 3 of4
3. Describe this project's consistency with Local adopted plans:
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element (1988), $ection III, Alternative Travel Modes: "The most
iroporjant effort that could be undectaken to enhance bi~cle travel would be improved
maintenance and upgrading of existing roads to at are used regularly by bic<)'clists."; liThe
first priority for bike routes is connections to schools, public and pr!vate."; "Priority three
routes are: ...Branch Mill Road...". .
Arroyo Grande Circulation Element (1988), Section V, Goal B, Policy A: "Provide for
adequate and safe alternative access to schools, parks and shopping areas within the
~."; Policy C: "Provide and maintain adequate shoulders of City streets where bicycle
traffic is heavy and there are safety concerns.".
4. Describe this project's consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan:
SLOCOG 1994 Regional Transportation Plan, Chapter 6, OBJ1: "Create a regionCiI bikeway
system to provide for efficient and safe transportation for bicycle commuters."; OBJ1, 1 a:
"Ernmote development of a coordinated and connected regional bikeway system with
emphasis on linkin9-Qaps on the regional system where bikeways do not exist."; OBJ1, 1c:
!'Pursue all available funding alternatives for the use or acquisition of right-of-ways and
easement to be used for bikeways."; OBJ2: "Provide sate travel for both the commuter and
the recreational rider."; OBJ6: "Provide funding to local judsdiq.tions. for bicycle facility .
improvements and programs."
5. Ust expected date of local government board approval (must be approved and projects
prioritized by June 26, 1998):
September 23,1997, and June 23,1998.
6. Identify the project's functional classification (if applicable) and if the project is on the
designated Federal Aid System: .
The City's Circulation Element classifies Branch Mill Road as a Collector Street.
L. Priority Criteria - For Re"gional Projects Only, address the following priority criteria (See
Attachment A; additional supporting material is encouraged):
1. Describe how the project addresses a safety/security problem (15 Pis):
There are no bicycle facilities on Branch Mill Road between East Cherry Avenue and the
eastern City limits. However, Branch Mill Road is still being used by both commuter and.
recreational bicyclists who are forced to share the travel lanes with vehicles. This project
will construct Class II bicycle lanes to provide a safe facility for both bicyclists and vehicles.
2. Describe the demonstrated need for the project (15 Pis):
Branch Mill Road is the main road that connects the County residents living east of the City"
and south of Arroyo Grande Creek to the City of Arroyo Grande and the rest of the F:ive
Cities area. There are currently no bicycle facilities available to these residents and to
recreational users who prefer to use bicycling as their mode of transportation.
SLOCOG
SHA/SIP Applications
Page 4 of 4
3. Describe how the project addresses a multimodal need (15 pts):
This project will provide safe~ facilities. for at least two modes of transportation: bicycles and
vehicles.
. 4. Describe how the project mitigates a congestion/air quality problem (15 Pts):
Bicycle travel produces no emissions. In addition, if adequate facilities are provided,
residents and recreational users may be more apt to take a bicycle ride into the Village or
out into the countryside instead of going for a car ride. This would lower the amount of
vehicle emissions currently being exp'erienced.
5. Describe the cost effectiveness of the project (15 pts):
The best time to widen any facility is before adjacent development occurs. The cost to
design and build improvements, such as bicycle lanes, is a lot less expensive when properly
planned with development, as opposed to when the area is at build-out. As this area
continues to grow, the need for safe bicycle access will only increase. It is most cost
effective to provide improvements now rather than when right-of-way acquisition may be
required.
6. Describe how the project will provide an equitable distribution of funding (15 Pts):
Branch Mill Road services both the residents of the City of Arroyo Grande and the County
of San Luis Obispo. Any bicycle improvement that provides safe travel to and from the
City/Five Cities area will be a benefit to the entire east Arroyo Grande/Huasna area.
7. Describe what local funding contribution is being provided - Describe and differentiate
between in-kind services, staff time commitments, and local funding contributions (10 Pis):
Regional SHA funds (proposed)
$136.500
$136,500
The City of Arroyo Grande will provide seeping, design, survey, contract administration and
on-site inspection services. .
. ""\...u..__.._,,
,.-
:r:.
T
LL
T
~
T
oz~
.,t::0\
o
...
o
ii::
\
(
e -..-
..
Q'<t
Cl~
i~f:i
->13
'0:11:
~~~
Ul::!5:!
-....11: ~
~~~ ~
~u_
~~~
:I R~
:c~~
t: S 4J
8"~:' :
....,-... () E"g u.
gB:E
E
~
......
E
::c::
E
~
.0
-10
E .
~..
...
ClJ
-
'"
ME
!!!.E
~i2
0-
=0
.- ..,
1<
...
"'1>'1
. .:, . ..:~ C
UiUil.OUjUjcn j,l
Ig!E~~c:.
O::ll:::J<<C:
o:t- ..'
..;~c?.;ttiliOr-c: