PC 2019-01-15_09a James Way Trail Addition
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SHERIDAN BOHLKEN, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR
BY: MATTHEW DOWNING, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001; RECOMMENDATION
FOR ADOPTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO AN ADOPTED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING THE 2019 JAMES WAY
HABITAT TRAIL ADDITION PROJECT; APPLICANT – CENTRAL
COAST CONCERNED MOUNTAIN BIKERS
DATE: JANUARY 15, 2019
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
An approved project would provide an additional 3/4 mile to the exsting trail system im
the James Way Habitat (the “Habitat”).
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
Construction of the proposed trail addition would be completed by community
volunteers, donating their time, labor, and the minimal materials necessary to be utilized
during trail construction. Trail maintenance is also largely completed by volunteers,
under the supervision of Public Works Department personnel at irregular intervals.
Impacts to financial and personnel resources are anticipated to be minimal.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending the
City Council adopt a Resolution: 1) Adopting an Addendum to an adopted Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND); and 2) Approving the 2019 James Way Habitat Trail
Addition Project (the “Project”).
BACKGROUND:
The Habitat is an important community amenity that provides for native habitat
protection and an opportunity for recreational activities such as hiking, mountain biking,
and wildlife viewing. The Habitat is made up of two separate lots, totaling 75.02 acres of
open space. The property is zoned Planned Development 1.2 (PD-1.2) with a
Conservation/Open Space land use designation. Current improvements include a
functioning windmill, solid waste receptacles, drainage facilities and ponds, a pedestrian
bridge, split rail fencing and approximately two and a half (2.5) miles of trails for hiking,
walking, and riding, both mountain bikes and horses. In 2017, the City Council, with
recommendations from the Planning Commission and former Parks & Recreation
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 2
Commission, approved an approximately 3/4-mile trail extension on the western end of
the Habitat. That portion of the trail was constructed during the 2017/18 winter season
while the ground was naturally soft enough to do the trail construction work.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Project Description
The proposed Project will extend the existing trail by an additional 3/4 mile and will allow
for all forms of uses; including but not limited to mountain bikes (Attachment 1 and
Image 1 below). The trail will extend up the hillside across the drainage channel from
the trail that connects to Via Las Aguilas, through the open space, and back to the main
trail near the La Canada trailhead. Additionally, near the trail’s return toward La Canada,
the trail is proposed to extend through the open space and connect to Rancho Parkway.
The proposed trail will be approximately three to four feet in width, similar to the width of
the existing hillside trails, and built by volunteers that have experience in both trail
construction and trail maintenance. Trail construction is expected to occur over eight
(8) weeks, depending on volunteer resources and weather conditions. The new trail will
be constructed with hand tools, will be fit to the surrounding landscape in the field as
much as possible, and the natural appearance of the trail corridor will be maintained
while limiting the use of imported materials. The new trail will remove vegetation and
soil as needed to create a walkable surface. Soil will be removed from inside of the trail
to the outside of the trail and compacted in place.
Image 1: Proposed Project
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 3
General Plan
The General Plan designates the Habitat property as Planned Development with a
Conservation/Open Space land use designation. The Project is consistent with the
following objectives of the City’s Conservation and Open Space (C/OS) and Parks and
Recreation (PR) Elements of the General Plan:
C/OS3: Plan for a well-maintained system of footpaths and non-vehicular trails
that provide access to areas of non-urban environment.
PR4: A network of recreational trails, bicycle lanes and bikeways should be
established for use by local residents and visitors to the Arroyo Grande Valley.
The Project is also consistent with several objectives of the Bicycle and Trails Master
Plan, including to promote land use development that enhances pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity for commuting and recreation use and, where appropriate, partner bicycle
paths with flood control projects, utilities access, air quality improvements and open
space/stream restoration projects.
An update to the PR element is currently underway. During the update a survey was
administered asking respondents to prioritize different recreational opportunities in the
City. Out of 215 responses, 133 respondents (61.88%) ranked implementation of more
trails and bike paths within the City as High Priority. This was the highest priority of all
responses, which included the replacement of play equipment, construction of a
recreation center, expansion of parks for leisure, expansion of parks for sports, and
providing more recreation classes and activities. While the PR update has not been
adopted, the Project would go toward addressing an identified need and desire of the
community.
Open-Space Agreement
The underlying Open-Space Agreement granting an open-space easement to the City
of Arroyo Grande contains language restricting certain uses of the subject property. The
document provides exceptions for City-approved trails and stipulates that the “general
topography of the landscape shall be maintained in its present conditions and no
grading, grazing, excavation, or topographic changes shall be made except by the joint
approval of owner and City”; however, it makes exceptions for the construction of public
pathways. As such, the proposed trail expansion is consistent and compatible with the
underlying agreement. It should be noted, subsequently to the acceptance of the
Agreement, that the current landowner is the City as ownership of the property was
transferred when the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3052 on September 13,
1994.
Neighborhood Outreach
Several neighbors in the 100 block of Refugio Place have contacted the City citing the
preliminary trial markers and inquiring about the proposal. The City has met with
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 4
residents of that area, and received correspondence from others, to identify concerns
and clarify the proposed project. In general, concerns expressed have included:
• Residential safety, security, and privacy;
• Expanding opportunities for illegal camping;
• Lack of parking in the residential neighborhood;
• Fire hazards;
• Dogs running without restraints.
Residential Safety, Security, and Privacy
During the initial meeting with the neighborhood, residential safety, security, and privacy
were issues identified since the Design Manual for Los Robles de Rancho Grande does
not allow for lot perimeter or extensive boundary fencing between building setback lines
and property lines. Several neighbors cited recent car burglaries and illegal entries into
crawlspaces as highlighting this concern. Trail sized private property signs were
identified as a potential solution to the trail’s close proximity to residences; however,
residents did not believe this option would be effective against the concern. Instead, an
alternative connection to Rancho Parkway was discussed (Attachment 2 and Image 2
below). This connection was conceptually identified in order to place the proposed trail
further from the backyards of the 100 block of Refugio Place than the bypassed section
of trail would be. While the general location of the alternate section was more supported
by the residents than the original proposal, some of the neighbors remained in
opposition to any trail segment in this area of the Habitat. Discussions regarding the
alternate location with the applicant were well received. Although the preferred location
remains the same, the applicant was agreeable to the relocated trail if it could be fit to
the natural terrain consistently as the original proposal. The applicant indicated that they
would not build the trail connection if the construction became too difficult or the
maintenance responsibilities too great. In that instance, the connection to Rancho
Parkway would be abandoned. This is an alternative for the Planning Commission to
consider as well if the primary portion of the proposed trail is agreeable but the
connection to Rancho Parkway ultimately is not.
Space Intentionally Blank
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 5
Image 2: Potential Alternate Trail Alignment
Expanding Opportunities for Illegal Camping
There are instances of illegal camping in the Habitat. When the City is made aware of
these encampments, Public Works Department personnel handles the removal of the
encampment, including the cataloging and storage of belonging as required by State
Law. Residents have expressed concern that even without trails, these encampments
exist and could become worse with the additional trail. However, studies have shown
and the City has experienced that establishment and use of trails in areas such as this
removes the feeling of seclusion that the remote location provides to the illegal
campers. Therefore, they tend not to continue to locate there. While this is not a rule, as
there have been instances of blatant illegal camping in the Habitat, it has been the case
on average. One (1) neighborhood resident has indicated that while the trail’s
placement may discourage camping in the immediate vicinity, those that do camp
illegally may locate closer to residences on Refugio Place.
Lack of Parking in the Residential Neighborhood
Residents on Refugio Place have expressed concern regarding the limited street
parking in their neighborhood being utilized by hikers accessing the Rancho Parkway
trailhead, as there is no parking on Rancho Parkway itself. While there is the potential
for this to occur, it is not believed to be likely given the parking opportunities at other
trailheads on James Way, including the large amount of street parking on La Canada. It
is anticipated that this trailhead would be utilized by residents in the Rancho Grande
area more than those traveling by car to the Habitat. However, additional information
could be included on the trail kiosks within the Habitat encouraging users to park away
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 6
from residences or utilize the parking lot at Rancho Grande Park, which is
approximately ¼ mile from the Rancho Parkway trailhead.
Fire Hazards
Fire hazards in the Habitat have been identified by the neighbors as a result of dead
trees and unmaintained vegetation. Fuel reduction projects have been completed in the
Habitat in the past, typically utilizing personnel from the California Conservation Corps
and grant funding to complete the fuel reductions. While the installation of the trail would
not directly increase the fire hazards in the wildland urban interface, residents have
indicated that access to this area of the Habitat increases the opportunity for illegal
campers and troublemakers to inadvertently start fires. The issue of illegal camping has
been addressed above but the potential for intentional or unintentional fire ignition
remains, as it does in the remainder of the Habitat’s trail system. The Five Cities Fire
Authority has indicated that the additional trail would assist firefighters in making access
to remote areas of the Habitat where fires may occur even if the trail were not in place,
making their efforts more efficient in the event a fire occurs.
Loose Dogs
One (1) resident has expressed concern that dogs will be let loose in close proximity to
the homes on Refugio Place. Dogs are required to be on leash in the Habitat and signs
are included on the trail system indicating this requirement. While compliance cannot be
guaranteed on the proposed trail segment, it remains a potential as it does in the
remainder of the Habitat’s trail system.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Commission’s consideration:
1. Adopt the attached Resolution recommending the City Council adopt the
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the Project as
proposed;
2. Modify and adopt the attached Resolution recommending the City Council adopt
the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the Project
with the alternate connection to Rancho Parkway;
3. Modify and adopt the attached Resolution recommending the City Council adopt
the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the Project
with no connection to Rancho Parkway; or
4. Do not adopt the attached Resolution and provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Adding additional trail opportunities enhances the Habitat and is consistent with the
City’s General Plan. Additionally, the mitigation measures will protect both biological
and cultural resources during trail construction.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF STAFF PROJECT 19-001
JANUARY 15, 2019
PAGE 7
DISADVANTAGES:
Segments of the project are proposed in close proximity to Rancho Grande residences.
While resulting issues associated with the proposal can be addressed, some issues,
including privacy, may not be able to be eliminated completely.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council adopted
an MND for the 2017 trail addition. The MND identified two areas of environmental
impacts that were necessary to mitigate, including Biological Resources and Cultural
Resources. Although located in a different area of the Habitat, the Biologist who
provided evaluations for the 2017 project has indicated that the MND and mitigation
measures are appropriate and applicable for the proposed Project. Accordingly, an
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to document that the
Project would not result in a measureable increase in environmental impacts over what
was previously analyzed in the MND, nor would they substantially reduce or change the
conclusions in the previous MND (Attachment 3).
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
Public notice is not required for this item. However, a courtesy notice was mailed to all
property owners within 300’ of the Habitat advising them of the Planning Commission
meeting. The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance
with Government Code Section 54954.2. Several comments have been received
regarding the project (Attachment 4).
Attachment:
1. Proposed James Way Habitat Trail Addition
2. Alternate James Way Habitat Trail Segment
3. Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration
4. Public Comment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
AN ADDENDUM TO THE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVE THE 2019 JAMES WAY HABITAT
TRAIL ADDITION PROJECT (STAFF PROJECT 19-001); APPLIED FOR
BY CENTRAL COAST CONCERNED MOUNTAIN BIKERS
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1994 the Arroyo Grande City Council adopted
Resolution No. 3052, accepting a fee-simple offer of dedication for property known as
the James Way Habitat (the “Habitat”); and
WHEREAS , hiking trails have been added to provide recreational opportunities to the
community; and
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4816, adopting
a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving the 2017 James Way Habitat Trail
Addition Project (Staff Project 17-008); and
WHEREAS, Central Coast Concerned Mountain Bikers have proposed an additional
3/4-mile trail segment in the Habitat; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo
Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has reviewed the
Addendum to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS , the Planning Commission has reviewed the project at its regularly scheduled
meeting on January 15, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby recommends the City Council approve the Addendum to the
Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration as set forth in Exhibit “B”, on file in the Community
Development Department, and recommends the City Council approve the 2019 James
Way Habitat Trail Addition Project as set forth in Exhibit “C”, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, subject to the mitigation measures as included in the
previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On a motion by Commissioner _________, seconded by Commissioner __________, and
by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 15th day of January, 2019.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
_______________________________________
GLENN MARTIN
CHAIR
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
PATRICK HOLUB
SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________________ TERESA MCCLISH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
EXHIBIT “A”
MITIGATION MEASURES
2019 JAMES WAY HABITAT TRAIL ADDITION PROJECT
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval and
shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency. The
applicant shall be responsible for verification in writing by the monitoring
department or agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Biological Resources
MM IV-1: A qualified biologist shall perform a special-status plant survey in the Project
area before any work activities begin. All project activities shall avoid any special-status
plant species that are found during the preconstruction survey. Before any Project
activities commence, all trail workers shall attend biological orientation training, provided
by a qualified biologist that covers the avoidance of any special-status plant species.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: Prior to construction
MM IV-2: The Project site shall be surveyed before construction for Wells’ Manzanita. If
any Wells’ Manzanita are found within the Project site, the plants will be avoided. Before
any Project activities commence, all trail workers shall attend biological orientation
training, provided by a qualified biologist that covers the avoidance of Wells’ Manzanita.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: Prior to construction
MM IV-3: Prior to any Project activities, a qualified biologist shall survey disturbance
areas and relocate any silvery legless lizards and/or coast horned lizards found, to a
safe area outside of the Project area. Surveys shall include raking of leaf litter and sand
where habitats exist. A qualified biologist shall be present at all times during ground
disturbing Project activities to recover any silvery legless lizards and coast horned
lizards that may be found. Before any Project activities commence, all trail workers
shall attend biological orientation training, provided by a qualified biologist that covers
the avoidance of any special-status animal species that may occur or that were found in
the Project area.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: Prior to and during construction
MM IV-4: If the Project is to be completed during the nesting bird season, which is
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
typically between the middle of February to the end of August, a nesting bird survey by
a qualified biologist shall be performed in the Project area before any work activities
commence. If any nesting birds are found, an appropriate and highly visible buffer shall
be established around the nest until the nest is no longer occupied. In addition, a
qualified biologist shall do a preconstruction survey for badgers and their dens and for
bats. If a badger den is located, a buffer shall be established around the den. If any bats
are located, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be
initiated.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: Prior to construction
MM IV-5: Where possible, project activities shall occur outside of 1.5 times the dripline
for any oak tree. In areas where this is not possible due the high density of oaks, project
activities will not expose any oak tree roots and only the minimum amount of vegetation
needed for trail construction shall be removed. Only hand tools shall be used for trail
construction. Before any Project activities commence, all trail workers shall attend
biological orientation training, provided by a qualified biologist, that covers oak tree
avoidance, if possible, and oak tree mitigations.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: Prior to and during construction
Cultural Resources
MM V-1: If a potentially significant cultural resource is encountered during surface
earthwork activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the find shall
cease until a qualified archaeologist determines whether the uncovered resource
requires further study. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction
shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR)
forms and evaluated for significance in terms of California Environmental Quality Act
criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of,
but are not limited to, stone, bone, glass, ceramic, wood, or shell artifacts; fossils; or
features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the resource is
determined significant under CEQA, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and
implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan that will capture
those categories of data for which the site is significant. The archaeologist shall also
perform appropriate technical analysis, prepare a comprehensive report, and file it with
the appropriate Information Center and provide for the permanent curation of the
recovered materials.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: During construction
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
MM V-2: If human remains are encountered during earth-disturbing activities, all work in
the adjacent area shall stop immediately and the San Luis Obispo County Coroner’s
office shall be notified. If the remains are determined to be Native American in origin,
the Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified and will identify the Most
Likely Descendent, who will be consulted for recommendations for treatment of the
discovered remains.
Responsible Party: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Monitoring Agency: City of Arroyo Grande – Public Works
Timing: During construction
ADDENDUM TO THE JAMES WAY
HABITAT TRAIL ADDITION PROJECT
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Staff Project 19-001
Addition of Approximately ¾ Mile of Trails to the Existing Trail System
James Way Habitat
January 2019
EXHIBIT "B"
Copy on file in the Community
Development Department
RANCH O
P KWY
VIA
P
O
C
ALACANADAJENNYPLJAMES
WY
REFUGIOP L
R OS E M A R Y LNANDRE
D RVIABAN D OL ERO
EAST F ORK
MEAD OW
C
REEK
0.2mile-130 ft elevationgain
0.3mile -85ftelev a t ion gai n
Drainag
eAccessPathTo La Canadatrailhead0.3 6 mi le -1 0 fteleva tio n gain
Upper James
Trailhead
La Canada
Trailhead
Lower Loop Trails
Upper Loop Trails
James Way Oak Habitat Area
James Way Oak Habitat & Wildlife Preserve
Proposed Trail Map µ0 50 100 150 200Feet
Proposed Trail
CREATED BY: CAMILLA KARAMANLIS - PROGRAM ANALYST 12-6-2018
EXHIBIT "C"
RANCH O
P KWY
VIA
P
O
C
ALACANADAJENNYPLJAMES
WY
REFUGIOP L
R OS E M A R Y LNANDRE
D RVIABAN D OL ERO
EAST F ORK
MEAD OW
C
REEK
0.2mile-130 ft elevationgain
0.3mile -85ftelev a t ion gai n
Drainag
eAccessPathTo La Canadatrailhead0.3 6 mi le -1 0 fteleva tio n gain
Upper James
Trailhead
La Canada
Trailhead
Lower Loop Trails
Upper Loop Trails
James Way Oak Habitat Area
James Way Oak Habitat & Wildlife Preserve
Proposed Trail Map µ0 50 100 150 200Feet
Proposed Trail
CREATED BY: CAMILLA KARAMANLIS - PROGRAM ANALYST 12-6-2018
ATTACHMENT 1
RANCH O
P KWY
VIA
P
O
C
ALACANADAJENNYPLJAMES
WY
REFUGIOP L
R OS E M A R Y LNANDRE
D RVIABAN D OL ERO
EAST F ORK
MEAD OW
C
REEK
0.2mile-130 ft elevationgain
0.3mile -85ftelev a t ion gai n
Drainag
eAccessPathTo La Canadatrailhead0.3 6 mi le -1 0 fteleva tio n gain
Upper James
Trailhead
La Canada
Trailhead
Lower Loop Trails
Upper Loop Trails
Proposed Trail
Potential Alternate Segment
James Way Oak Habitat Area
James Way Oak Habitat & Wildlife Preserve
Proposed Trail Map - Potential Alternate Segment µ0 50 100 150 200Feet
CREATED BY: CAMILLA KARAMANLIS - PROGRAM ANALYST 12-6-2018
ATTACHMENT 2
ADDENDUM TO THE JAMES WAY
HABITAT TRAIL ADDITION PROJECT
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Staff Project 19-001
Addition of Approximately ¾ Mile of Trails to the Existing Trail System
James Way Habitat
January 2019
ATTACHMENT 3
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 3 of 10
Table of Contents:
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4
1.1 Lead Agency ........................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2 Purpose of this Addendum ................................................................................................................. 4
1.3 CEQA Framework for Addendum ........................................................................................................ 4
1.4 Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................................. 5
2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 5
2.4 Other Required Public Agency Approvals ........................................................................................... 6
2.5 Related Projects .................................................................................................................................. 6
3.0 Environmental Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Determination ..................................................................................................................................... 9
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DECEMBER 2018
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 18-003
Page 4 of 10
1.0 Introduction
This environmental document is an Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
for the James Way Habitat Trail Addition Project, adopted in September 2017 by the City of Arroyo
Grande. Since adoption of the MND, a subsequent proposal to add an additional ¾ mile section of trails
has been proposed, thus requiring further environmental analysis. The Proposed Project and the
resulting changes are addressed in this Addendum. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the MND
continues to serve as the appropriate document addressing the environmental impacts of these
improvements pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
1.1 Lead Agency
The lead agency is the public agency with primary approval authority over the Proposed Project. In
accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15051(b)(1), "the lead agency will normally be an agency with
general governmental powers, such as a city or county, rather than an agency with a single or limited
purpose." The lead agency for the Proposed Project is the City of Arroyo Grande. The contact person for
the lead agency is:
Matthew Downing, AICP
Planning Manager
City of Arroyo Grande
300 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5424
1.2 Purpose of this Addendum
The purpose of this Addendum is to evaluate whether the Proposed Project as currently proposed would
result in any new or substantially greater significant effects or require any new mitigation measures not
identified in the MND for the Approved Project. This Addendum, together with the MND, will be used
by the City when considering approval of the Proposed Project.
1.3 CEQA Framework for Addendum
When a Proposed Project is changed or there are changes in environmental setting, a determination
must be made by the Lead Agency as to whether an Addendum or Subsequent MND is required. CEQA
Guidelines §15162 and 15164 sets forth criteria to assess which environmental document is appropriate.
The criteria for determining whether an Addendum or Subsequent MND is prepared are outlined below.
If the criteria below are true, then an Addendum is the appropriate document:
No new significant impacts will result from the project or from new mitigation measures;
No substantial increase in the severity of environmental impact will occur; or
No new feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would reduce impacts previously
found not feasible have, in fact, been found to be feasible.
Based upon the information provided in Section 3.0 of this document, the changes to the Approved
Project will not result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of impacts
previously identified in the MND, and there are no previously infeasible alternatives that are now
feasible. None of the other factors set forth in §15162(a)(3) are present. Therefore, an Addendum is
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 5 of 10
appropriate, and this Addendum has been prepared to address the environmental effects of the
Proposed Project.
1.4 Summary of Findings
This Addendum addresses the environmental effects associated only with enhancements to the
Approved Project in the MND that have occurred since adoption of the MND. The conclusions of the
analysis in this Addendum remain consistent with those made in the MND. No new significant impacts
will result, and no substantial increase in severity of impacts will result from those previously identified
in the MND.
2.0 Project Description
2.1 Location
The Proposed Project is located in the James Way Habitat (the “Habitat), which is approximately 75.02
acres of open space along James Way and a portion of Rancho Parkway. The Habitat is currently zoned
as Planned Development 1.2 with a Conservation/Open Space land use designation. Surrounding land
uses consist largely of residential uses and the City’s vehicular circulation system.
Topography in the Project vicinity is extremely varied and includes areas of steep terrain. Vegetation in
the Project consists primarily of oak woodland.
2.2 Background
The Habitat property is made up of two separate lots, totaling 75.02 acres of open space. The property is
zoned Planned Development 1.2 (PD-1.2) with a Conservation/Open Space land use designation. Current
improvements include a functioning windmill, solid waste receptacles, drainage facilities and ponds, a
pedestrian bridge, split rail fencing and approximately two and a half (2.5) miles of trails for hiking,
walking, and riding. In 2017, the City Council, with recommendations from the Planning Commission and
former Parks & Recreation Commission, approved an approximately ¾ mile trail extension on the
western end of the Habitat. That portion of the trail was constructed during the 2017/18 winter season
while the ground was naturally soft enough to do the trail construction work
Since adoption of the MND, additional trail segments have been proposed that would add
approximately ¾ mile of trails to the Habitat, requiring evaluation for consistency with the MND.
2.3 Project Description
The Proposed Project will extend the existing trail by an additional 3/4 mile and will allow for all forms of
uses; including but not limited to mountain bikes. The trail will extend up the hillside across the drainage
channel from the trail that connects to Via Las Aguilas, through the open space, and back to the main
trail near the La Canada trailhead. Additionally, near the trail’s return toward La Canada, the trail is
proposed to extend through the open space and connect to Rancho Parkway. The proposed trail will be
approximately three to four feet in width, similar to the width of the existing hillside trails, and built by
volunteers that have experience in both trail construction and trail maintenance. Trail construction is
expected to occur over eight (8) weeks, depending on volunteer resources and weather conditions. The
new trail will be constructed with hand tools, will be fit to the surrounding landscape in the field as
much as possible, and the natural appearance of the trail corridor will be maintained while limiting the
use of imported materials. The new trail will remove vegetation and soil as needed to create a walkable
surface. Soil will be removed from inside of the trail to the outside of the trail and compacted in place.
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 6 of 10
2.4 Other Required Public Agency Approvals
None.
2.5 Related Projects
Staff Project 17-008
3.0 Environmental Analysis
As explained in Section 1.3, this comparative analysis has been undertaken pursuant to the provisions of
CEQA Guidelines §15162 and §15164 to provide the City with the factual basis for determining whether
any changes in the project, any changes in circumstances, or any new information since the MND was
adopted require additional environmental review or preparation of a Subsequent MND. As described in
Section 2.0, additional trail segments have been proposed since adoption of the MND. Because of this,
new analysis for impacts within the project area is provided in this Addendum. The environmental
analysis provided in the MND remains current and applicable to the Proposed Project in areas
unaffected by the Proposed Project for the environmental topics, as listed below:
Aesthetics: The Proposed Project is located in the James Way Habitat, which provides open
space for pedestrian recreation uses and habitats for plant and animal species. The project site
is within Coast Live Oak, California Annual and Perennial Grassland and California Sage Brush
habitats. There are no anthropomorphic impacts on the project site except for the existing
Preserve trail. The project site is located on a northern facing hill and is minimally visible from
roadways and would not alter any scenic vistas or scenic resources. The Proposed Project will
not require mitigation for aesthetic resources.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Aesthetics.
Agricultural Resources: The project site is not designated or zoned for agriculture use, has not
been used for agricultural production and is not near to land zoned agriculture. The site does
not contain prime soils according to the California Department of Conservation’s Important
Farmland Map of San Luis Obispo County. The Proposed Project would not result in additional
impacts to agriculture. No new mitigation measures are required for the Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Agricultural Resources
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Existing conditions for air quality and Greenhouse
Gas Emissions in the City of Arroyo Grande are described in detail in the County’s 2001 Clean Air
Plan. The Clean Air Plan is a comprehensive planning document designed to reduce emissions
from traditional industrial and commercial sources, as well as from motor vehicle use. The
purpose of the County’s Clean Air Plan is to address the attainment and maintenance of state
and federal ambient air quality standards by following a comprehensive set of emission control
measures within the Plan. Based on information available, it is not expected that baseline
conditions have changed significantly since the 2001 plan was completed. The Proposed Project
would not result in impacts to air quality or Greenhouse Gas Emissions. No new mitigation
measures are required for the Proposed Project.
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 7 of 10
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Emissions.
Biological Resources: The Proposed Project is within Coast Live Oak, California Annual and
Perennial Grassland, and California Sage Brush habitats which may contain special status plants
and animals. The vegetation communities are mostly native species with an understory of
nonnative grasses. There is the potential for fourteen special status plant species to occur on the
Property and four have been observed on the Property: Hoover’s bent grass (Agrostis hooveri),
Kellogg’s horkelia (Horkelia cuneata ssp. sericea), Michael’s rein orchid (Piperia michaelii), and
Wells’ manzanita (Arctostaphylos wellsii). In addition, federally endangered Pismo Clarkia
(Clarkia speciosa ssp. Immaculate) is documented across the street from the Project site (CNDDB
2017). There is the potential for trail construction activities to impact nesting birds similar to the
Approved Project. Coast Live oak trees are a protected species within the City of Arroyo Grande
(Chapter 12.16 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code) and therefore trail construction activities
near Coast Live oak trees requires mitigation. According to the Biologist consulted for the
Approved Project, the extent and intensity of activities under the Proposed Project would not
vary substantially relative to that evaluated in the MND, and the mitigation measures prescribed
in the MND would still be applicable and necessary to reduce the significance of impacts under
the Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed pro ject
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Biological Resources.
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources: The earliest inhabitants of Arroyo Grande Valley were
the northern or Obispeno Chumash Indians. Given the long history of the Chumash occupying
this region, many archaeological sites have been identified within the City limits. Isolated
archaeological materials could still be present given the extensive history of Chumash Indians
inhabiting this area. As a precaution, if cultural resources are encountered during the
construction process, development activities at the site shall cease until a qualified
archaeologist has been employed to view and assess the discovery and prepare a mitigation
plan. According to the specialist consulted for the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would
not result in changes to the impacts to cultural or tribal cultural resources (including
historic/other resources on the site) during construction, and would not be materially different
than impacts identified under the MND.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Cultural and Tribal Cultural
Resources.
Geology/Soils: The project site is elevated, sloping up from James Way to the south from
approximately 56 feet above mean sea level to approximately 270 feet above mean sea level.
The project site is mostly Briones-Tierra complex with 15 to 50 percent slopes (loamy sand
underlain by weathered bedrock). The Proposed Project would not result in any geophysical
impacts, as previously identified in the MND. While the location of the Proposed Project is
different than the Approved Project, this change does not represent a substantial deviation from
that evaluated in the MND, and the conclusions of the MND remain valid.
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 8 of 10
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Geology and Soils.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials: The project site is not known to contain hazards or
hazardous materials, nor are these located in the immediate vicinity of the project site The
Proposed Project would not increase risks related to hazards or hazardous materials relative to
the project evaluated in the MND. No new mitigation measures are required for the Proposed
Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Hazards and Hazardous
Materials.
Hydrology/Water Quality: The James Way Habitat contains a small tributary; however, the area
of trail expansion work is not located adjacent to any waterways, and the project would not
have any impacts to groundwater supplies, drainage patterns, or water quality. No new
mitigation measures are required for the Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Hydrology and Water Quality.
Land Use/Planning: The land use designation of the project site is Conservation/Open Space.
The purpose of this designation is to provide open space for wildlife habitats and pedestrian
trails The Proposed Project would not require additional entitlements, permits, and/or other
approvals as the Approved Project. The MND did not identify any impacts to land use/planning;
therefore, mitigation was not required. No new mitigation measures are required for the
Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Land Use and Planning.
Mineral Resources: The Proposed Project would not result in additional impacts to mineral
resources because the project site is not located within an area of known mineral resources,
either of regional or local value; therefore, the MND did not identify any impacts to mineral
resources and mitigation was not required. No new mitigation measures are required for the
Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Mineral Resources.
Noise: Noise exposure throughout the City is primarily caused by automobile traffic on surface
streets and US Highway 101, with intermittent noise generated by agricultural operations and
construction activities. The site is surrounded primarily by residential uses which are sensitive
to noise outside of work day hours. The building of the trail will be completed using only hand
tools. No excessive noise is expected from project construction or from pedestrians using the
trail. No new impacts are identified and no new mitigation measures are required for the
Proposed Project.
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 9 of 10
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Noise.
Population/Housing: The project site is an oak habitat and wildlife preserve. The proposed
project is a trail that will have no impacts to population growth or to any housing related issues ,
and no new mitigation measures are required for the Proposed Project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Population and Housing.
Recreation: Both the Recreation Services Department and Public Works Department oversee
recreational activities throughout the City and manages the City’s various parks and open space
areas. The project will not impact any existing park or other recreational resource and is not
expected to create additional demand for recreational facilities. The Proposed Project would not
result in additional impacts to recreation and would only serve to provide benefits to recreation
opportunities in the City. As such, no new mitigation measures are required for the proposed
project.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to recreation.
Transportation/Traffic: The project site is located near James Way which provides off street
parking for trail access. The proposed project will not cause a substantial increase in traffic, a
change in traffic patterns, an increase hazards, or conflict with adopted transportation policies,
plans or programs as the additional trail segment would likely result in minimal additional trips
to the Habitat.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Transportation/Traffic.
Utilities and Public Services: No utilities are needed for the Proposed Project, as they were not
needed for the Approved Project. Therefore, the conclusions made regarding impacts to Utilities
and Public Services in the MND are representative of the Proposed Project and no mitigation
measures are required.
Therefore, with regard to the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines §15162, the proposed project
would not result in any new significant impacts with respect to Utilities and Public Services.
Mandatory Findings of Significance: The potential impacts of the Proposed Project with regard
to biological and cultural/tribal cultural resources would be comparable to the Approved Project
evaluated in the MND. As impacts under the Proposed Project would be similar to the project
evaluated in the MND, impacts have already been evaluated and appropriately mitigated and no
additional mitigation measures are required.
3.1 Determination
Based on the information provided above, the Proposed Project would not result in a measurable
increase in environmental impacts over what was previously analyzed in the MND, nor would they
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JANUARY 2019
STAFF PROJECT 19-001
Page 10 of 10
substantially reduce or change the conclusions in the previous MND. The applicant will be incorporating
all required environmental mitigation measures into the project.
Based upon the evidence included in the above analysis, the Proposed Project as described in Section
2.0 would not result in a substantial change in the conclusions and analysis included in the MND, a
subsequent or supplemental MND is not considered necessary, and the MND addendum is appropriate.
1
Matt Downing
From:Patty OLear
Sent:Thursday, December 27, 2018 12:05 PM
To:Matt Downing
Subject:Proposed trail in Oak Preserve
Subject: Proposed trail in Oak Preserve
Mr. Downing,
Please let my email serve as a statement of great opposition to the proposed new trail in the the
Oak Preserve. I see many issues involved with this proposed location around our homes
beginning with fire danger, erosion, privacy, home invasion, overnight “guests” and campfires in
the oak reserve, etc.
As the second homeowner to build and live in this development of Los Robles de Rancho
Grande Phase 2, for over 23 years I have experienced a great deal within this location. I have
reported and witnessed nearby fires to the homes from within the preserve; watching strangers
sleep behind my home and destroy the environment by using the area as their toilet; using house
hose bibs to gather water and clean; makeshift encampments for numerous individuals and
campfires; stolen yard and lawn utensils; unauthorized people wandering between properties and
around the homes day and night; thefts to vehicles; property; attempted robbery and burglaries;
and more atrocities.
A fire in this area could be disastrous to this whole community surrounding the oak preserve
within this valley! We’ve seen enough homes destroyed in the State of California.
We already have enough to deal with without a trail leading to our homes from another direction
to increase the crimes and bombardment we already have been under.
Patty O’Lear
Sent from my iPhone
ATTACHMENT 4
1
Matt Downing
From:elisandro yorba
Sent:Wednesday, January 02, 2019 11:54 AM
To:Keith Storton
Cc:Matt Downing; Sheridan Bohlken; McBeth Steve & Myra; O'Lear Patty;
cory.bauer@ Bauer; Yorba Kathleen
Subject:Trail - Proposal behind Refugio Pl.
Attachments:emaillogo_190eb98f-3dbf-4ac8-
a0d6-5f778ed0ba4d1111111111111111111111111111111111.png; James Way Oak Habitat
- Proposed Trail Map 2018-12-17pdf.pdf; Trail - Mountain Bike Jump Area
2018-12-20.JPG.pdf; James Way - Access to encampment- Photo 2018-12-17.JPG.pdf; Trail
- Mountain Bike Jump Area 2018-12-20.JPG.pdf; Location of proposed_trail - 130
Refugio.pdf; James Way Oak Habitat - Proposed Trail Map 2018-12-17pdf.pdf
Keith Storton - AG City Council,
Thanks for the call today.
I have included with this email an email exchange between Matthew Downing and me.
Also, included is:
a map of the proposed new trail provided by Matthew Downing; and
a photo of how close the trail comes to my property line with access to my backyard.
On a separate matter I have also included a photos of the two encampments there were discovered after
Matthew's visit on 12/17/18.
Both encampments were reported to Public Works, however the one dated 12/17/18 is still there. Also there is a
photo of the access point for the 12/17/18 encampment.
Eli Yorba
O. 805.
C. 805.
F. 805.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Matt Downing
Subject: RE: Trail - Proposal behind 130 Refugio Pl. and new sitings
Date: December 20, 2018 4:37:30 PM PST
2
To: 'elisandro yorba' Sheridan Bohlken
Cc: McBeth Steve & Myra Yorba Kathleen
O'Lear Patty
"cory.bauer@ <cory.bauer@
Hi Eli:
Thank you for the information and for pointing them out on the maps. Looks like you have already taken
care of reporting it to Public Works. Unfortunately we do not have personnel available to walk through
the Habitat searching for encampments as you suggested. We rely on the community to report these
issues (it is that “Community of Volunteers” I mentioned during our meeting!). There is no regular
reporting to the City Council, but we do keep statistics in case we need to in the future, especially as this
is an evolving issue statewide.
The last thing I will say is that if it wasn’t for that trail being there, and for people walking on it (such as
yourself), the encampments would go completely unnoticed. As demonstrated by the one near your
home, they are there regardless of the trails.
I will be off next week. Have great holidays and we will see each other in 2019!
[see attached file: emaillogo_190eb98f-3dbf-4ac8-a0d6-
5f778ed0ba4d1111111111111111111111111111111111.png] Matt Downing, AICP
Planning Manager
Community Development, City of Arroyo Grande
Tel: 805‐473‐5424 | www.arroyogrande.org
300 E. Branch St | Arroyo Grande | CA | 93420
City Hall Business Hours: M‐Th 8:00 am ‐ 5:00 pm; Closed Fridays
The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in error, please
advise the sender by reply email or phone and delete the message. Please note that email correspondence with the
City of Arroyo Grande, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore
may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt by law.
From: elisandro yorba
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 1:41 PM
To: Matt Downing Sheridan Bohlken
Cc: McBeth Steve & Myra ; Yorba Kathleen ; O'Lear Patty
; cory.bauer
Subject: Trail ‐ Proposal behind 130 Refugio Pl. and new sitings
Matthew,
Thanks for your help below regarding the encampment behind 120, 130, & 140 Refugio Pl.
While walking the trails today another encampment was discovered along the trail not far from
where the trails starts behind K-Mart (see photo).
This new siting has been reported to Public Works.
I have included a map of the encampments seen to date.
3
Perhaps someone from the City needs to walk the trails every few days.
Other than Public Works are these encampment events being reported by you to the City
Council?
The encampment issue is making the proposal of new trails difficult to support.
I have also include Sheridan Bohlken on this email. Not sure whether she got a photo of the
camper behind 120, 130, & 140 Refugio Pl.
Eli Yorba
O.
C.
F.
On Dec 19, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Matt Downing wrote:
Hello Eli:
I notified the Police Chief about the encampment. He forwarded the information to the
Public Works Director, as Public Works is responsible for posting, documenting,
inventorying and storing personal belongings under the specific protocol for removal. I
do not have a timeline on those activities but they are really good about getting out and
initiating the process.
Please keep me updated on that front and we will do the same on the trails.
<emaillogo_190eb98f-3dbf-4ac8-a0d6-
5f778ed0ba4d1111111111111111111111111111111111.png> Matt Downing, AICP
Planning Manager
Community Development, City of Arroyo Grande
Tel: 805‐473‐5424 | www.arroyogrande.org
300 E. Branch St | Arroyo Grande | CA | 93420
City Hall Business Hours: M‐Th 8:00 am ‐ 5:00 pm; Closed Fridays
The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended solely for the use
of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient
and you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email or phone and
delete the message. Please note that email correspondence with the City of Arroyo Grande, along
with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be
subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt by law.
From: elisandro yorba
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 8:50 AM
To: Matt Downing
4
Cc: McBeth Steve & Myra Yorba Kathleen
Subject: Trail ‐ Proposal behind 130 Refugio Pl.
Matthew,
Thanks for coming out on 12/17/18 to review the proposed trail behind my home.
Just a follow-up regarding the unauthorized tent camper behind my home, did you contact
the Police Captain (see attached)?
If so, what happens next to the camper?
Eli Yorba
O.
C.
F.
I I ~ James Way C?ak Habitat & Wildlife Preserve .~t Proposed Trail Map 7;--I~ m Proposed Trail <==:::) Lower Loop Trails = Upper Loop Trails James Way Oak Habitat Area o" ~ '( (J O 50 100 150 200 Feet I I I I I N W.E s
PROPOSED TRAIL MARKER
PROPERTY LINE MARKER
1
Matt Downing
From:Myra McBeth
Sent:Thursday, January 03, 2019 1:54 PM
To:kstoton@
Cc:Matt Downing
Subject:Proposed Trail in Oak Park Preserve
Mr. Stoton,
My husband and I live at Refugio Place, Arroyo Grande. Our home backs up to the Oak Park Preserve. We are not in
favor of the proposed trail the City is considering behind our home. We feel it is much too close to our home and others
in our neighborhood. There is a large lot directly behind our property line adjacent to the proposed trail that I am
concerned would be used by dog walkers. We do not want dogs running loose in that area.
Another concern is the fence along Rancho Parkway which is slowly deterioriating. It is only a matter of time and it will
be completely rotted out and on the ground.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We would appreciate hearing from you when any meeting is planned to
discuss this proposition.
Myra McBeth
Stephen McBeth
805‐
805‐
1
Matt Downing
Subject:RE: PROPOSED TRAIL IN OAK PARK PRESERVE
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:21 PM, Myra McBeth wrote:
>
> Mr Storton,
>
> My husband and I live at Refugio Place, Arroyo Grande. Our home backs up to the Oak Park Preserve. We are not
in favor of the proposed trail the City is considering behind our home. We feel it is much too close to our home and
others in our neighborhood. There is a large lot directly behind our property line adjacent to the proposed trail that I am
concerned would be used by dog walkers. We do not want dogs running loose in that area.
>
> Another concern is the fence along Rancho Parkway which is slowly deteriorating. It is only a matter of time and it will
be completely rotted out and on the ground.
>
> Thank you for your attention to this matter. We would appreciate hearing from you when any meeting is planned to
discuss this proposition.
>
> Myra McBeth
> Stephen McBeth
> 805‐
> 805‐
1
Matt Downing
From:Steve White
Sent:Monday, January 07, 2019 12:37 PM
To:Matt Downing
Subject:Proposed Trail in James Way Oak Habitat & Wildlife Preserve
Mr. Downing
I am registering my opposition to the proposed trail in the oak preserve. I am an avid hiker and use some
of the existing trails regularly, but in such a small area fail to see a need for another one. Surely the
monies could be better utilized for more pressing needs of the city. The existing trails, other than the
main one, are not maintained as it is, especially with all the poison oak around; this would just add
another trail to that list.
Also, much of the preserve consists of dying, dead and downed trees that are an extreme fire hazard; I
fail to see how adding another trail won’t contribute to the danger of illegal campers and other ne’er-do-
wells starting fires even closer to the existing houses.
Thank You
Steve White
“What we’ve got here is failure to communicate”