09.a. Substantial Conformance Review of Conditional Use Permit 14-001 1462 East Grand AvenueMEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY:
&
MATTHEW DOWNING, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT CASE NO. 14-005 AND PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CASE NO
14-001; ESTABLISHMENT OF A MICROBREWERY AND
RESTAURANT; LOCATION: 1462 E. GRAND AVENUE (FORMER
APPLEBEE'S); APPLICANT: FIGUEROA MOUNTAIN
ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; REPRESENTATIVE: TERRY BOTTENFIELD
DATE: JUNE 16,2015
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Planning Commission adopt the resolution for substantial
conformance for fa~ade treatment and sign installation with the approved plans on May
6, 2014.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
None.
BACKGROUND:
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 14-
005 & PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-001
JUNE 16,2015
PAGE 2
The subject property is zoned Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU), is part of the Arroyo Town
and Country Square (more commonly known as the Smart-and-Final Center), and
currently contains an approximately 6,300 square-foot commercial building previously
used as a restaurant (Applebee's). The Planning Commission approved the
microbrewery and restaurant with fa~ade modifications to the existing building on May
6, 2014. A building permit for the tenant improvements and faqade modifications was
issued on October 9.2014.
On May 22, 2015 an inspection of the construction site revealed potential faqade
modifications from the approved building plans. The contractor then requested that
these changes from the plans be approved. The Architectural Review Committee
reviewed the treatment and sign modifications on June 1, 201 5 and made the following
recommendations for substantial conformance with the approved treatment design:
1) The existing stone wainscot contains gray tones that complement the gray stucco
color and is acceptable to remain;
2) The new awning locations over all windows and at the height installed is
acceptable;
3) Not installing the Corten awning over the entry is acceptable;
4) Keeping the existing windows on the east and north elevations is acceptable;
5) Painting the existing electrical cabinet the same color as the adjacent metal
storage fence and adding an awning is acceptable;
6) Explore a solution for applying a weathering treatment to the installed silo;
7) Plant a vine on the screen fencing at the silo base for screening; and
8) Reduce the northern sign to the approved size of 64.92 square feet.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Proiect Description
The proposed conformance review is to assess modifications made during construction
for substantial conformance with the original approval. Revisions to the project are
comprised of architectural treatments to the existing structure. A review of the signs is
included due to an increase in square-footage of the northern wall sign from the original
approval.
Architecture
The approval included painting the existing stucco in a medium charcoal gray finish,
painting the cornice in a dark charcoal gray finish, covering the existing stone fa~ade
with weathered corrugated steel, flat Corten steel plate cladding on the tower element,
and new awnings made of weathered corrugated steel and reclaimed lumber frames.
The plans also included replacing all windows and doors. The three windows on the E.
Grand Avenue elevation were to be replaced with roll-up doors and a protruding railing
resulting in a more inviting and interactive feature for pedestrians and customers. The
north elevation was approved with four new roll up doors; the existing access doors on
the north faqade were to be relocated. The approved building plans show the existing
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 14-
005 & PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-001
JUNE 16,2015
PAGE 3
electrical panel closet doors to be 'reskinned' with corrugated metal siding and painted
to match the adjacent covered enclosed trash area.
A prominent feature of the project is a 20' tall functional grain silo seen primarily from
the south and west elevations. The silo was conceptually approved to be constructed
from weathered corrugated steel to match the remainder of the building.
The modifications to the approved plans include maintaining the existing stone on the
wainscot instead of the corrugated metal siding, maintaining existing windows, and
installing only one rolling door on the north side. The window awnings on the north and
east side are installed at the level that would have been the top of the new windows.
Now, because the existing windows are remaining, there is a gap between the window
top and the awning. On the tower entry, the awning over the door is no longer proposed
to be installed. The silo was installed as a shiny metal structure and raised above the
ground with a mesh screen instead of mounted to the ground.
Landscaping
The approval shows existing landscaping to remain with the exception of the removal of
the trellises on the south elevation which were included in the Applebee's project to
reduce building massing on the long segment of stucco. Removal of the trellises
provided a cleaner facade and the ARC determined that the additional architectural
details proposed, including siding, awnings, and silo, were adequate to add visual
interest to the building elevation.
The modification to the landscape is that the trellises are planned to remain
Siqnaqe
A Planned Sign Program was also approved for the restaurant with the following sizes:
I sign c i ,. , I I
The sign on the north elevation is the same size as the sign on East Grand Avenue
which is approximately 16 square-feet over the approved sign area. it should be noted
that if larger signs are to be allowed, the project would be required to return for
consideration at a duly noticed public hearing consistent with the original approval, due
to conditions of approval addressing sign area being included in the original resolution.
1 ! ! I
64.92 sq. R 70 sq. R. 1 80.90 sq. ft 40 sq. ft. 255.82 sq. R.
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 14-
005 & PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-001
JUNE 16,2015
PAGE 4
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Planning Commission's consideration:
* Adopt the attached Resolution finding the project modifications and additional
requirements to be in substantial conformance with Conditional Use Permit Case
No. 14-005 and Planned Sign Program Case No. 14-001;
Modify and adopt the attached Resolution finding the project modifications and
additional requirements to be in substantial conformance with Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 14-005 and Planned Sign Program Case No. 14-001;
e Do not adopt the attached Resolution, find the project modifications to not be in
substantial conformance with Conditional Use Permit Case No. 14-005 and
Planned Sign Program Case No. 14-001, and direct staff to schedule a public
hearing for the reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 14-005 and
Planned Sign Program Case No. 14-001; or
e Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Finding the project modifications with the additional requirements to be in substantial
conformance will allow the finalization of the building permit and continue moving the
project forward to completion. It will also allow flexibility to applicants and contractors to
make appropriate modifications to approved conceptual plans as projects are
constructed, without allowing for complete modification of approved projects.
DISADVANTAGES:
Providing flexibility to applicants and contractors to make modifications to approved
projects during construction can result in significant modifications without City review.
Some of these modifications may be so severe that it results in projects drastically
different than that approved or result in large expenses to applicants and contractors to
correct modifications not deemed acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Community Development Department reviewed the project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the project is
categorically exempt per Section 15301(a) of the CEQA Guidelines regarding existing
facilities.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda and staff report were posted at City Hall and on the City's website on June
12,2015. No comments have been received by staff.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Architectural Review Committee notes from the April 7, 2014 meeting
2. Resolution No. 14-2206
3. Response letter from Bottenfield construction to site inspection checklist.
4. Photo comparison
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FINDING FACADE
TREATMENTS AND SlGN INSTALATIONS IN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT CASE NO. 14-005 AND PLANNED SlGN
PROGRAM 14-001; LOCATED AT 1462 E. GRAND
AVENUE; APPLIED FOR BY FIGUEROA MOUNTAIN
ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 14-005 and
Planned Sign Program 14-001 on May 6, 2014 for a commercial building located at 1462
E. Grand Avenue; and
WHEREAS, a building permit for tenant improvements and fa~ade modifications was
issued on October 9,2014; and
WHEREAS, an inspection of the construction site revealed potential changes to the
commercial facade from that approved under the building plans on May 22,2015; and
WHEREAS, the project contractor requested the changes be approved as being in
substantial conformance with the approved plans; and
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the fa~ade and sign
modifications on June 1, 2015 and recommended the Planning Commission find the
modifications in substantial conformance with the approved plans, with recommendations
for additional requirements to ensure substantial conformance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the project entitlement in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has found and
determined that the project is exempt per Section 15301(a) (Existing Facilities) of the
CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed the
project at a regular meeting on June 16, 201 5; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the modifications with additional requirements are in substantial conformance with
Conditional Use Permit 14-005 and Planned Sign Program 14-001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby finds the modifications to the approved plans coupled with the
additional requirements (all of which are set forth below) are in substantial conformance
with the conditions of approval and required findings for Conditional Use Permit 14-005
and Planned Sign Program 14-001, as approved by Planning Commission Resolution 14-
2206 on May 6, 2014. The modifications and additional requirements consist of the
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
following:
1. Keep the existing stone wainscot, which contains gray tones that complement the
gray stucco color of the building;
2. Keep the new awning locations over all windows at the height installed;
3. Don't install the Corten awning over the entry;
4. Keep the existing windows on the east and north elevations;
5. Paint the existing electrical cabinet the same color as the adjacent metal storage
fence and add an awning;
6. Explore a solution for applying a weathering treatment to the installed silo;
7. Plant a vine on the screen fencing at the silo base for screening; and
8. Reduce the northern sign to the approved size of 64.92 square-feet.
On motion by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 16" day of June 2015.
ATTEST:
DEBBIE WElCHlNGER
SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION
AS TO CONTENT:
LAN GEORGE, CHAIR
TERESA MCCLISH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
ARC MINUTES
APRIL 7,2014
ATTACHMENT 1
2. The use of stucco covered Styrofoam not be used below eight feet /
The motion carried on a 4-0 voice vote. /
6.b. CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE MlT NO. 14-005;
LOCATION: 530 PAULDING CIRICLE, MICHAEL
NUNLEY & ASSOCIATES;
Staff Contact: Aileen Nygaard
Assistant Planner Aileen Nygaard provided the staff r port for the project. /k
The committee discussed the number of tenantshumber of signs and placement of the
sign. They concluded that its proposed would be suitable as it would be visible
to help direct the public.
Applicant Mike Nunley stat is an engineering consulting firm and they do
not generate or receive a lot of foot . He stated the lower placement of the sign is
better for visibility. He wen he design of the sign stating that it is smaller
in size due to both costs of his business (not needing to call a lot of
attention). Additionally, the e company logo.
The committee the potential of the sign setting precedence for future
signage. They it to set precedence for future signs and are okay with a
larger sign a future tenant.
a motion, seconded by Chuck Fellows, to recommend the
Director approve the project on the predication that the
precedence for future signage.
The m Ion carried on a 4-0 voice vote. p'
6.c. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 14-005 AND
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 14-001; ESTABLISHMENT OF A
MICROBREWERY AND RESTAURANT; LOCATION: 1462 EAST GRAND
AVENUE; APPLICANT: FIGUEROA MOUNTAIN ENTERTAINMENT;
REPRESENTATIVE: TED MOORE
Staff Contact: Matthew Downing
Assistant Planner Matthew Downing provided the staff report for the project.
ARC MINUTES
APRIL 7,2014
PAGE 4
Committee members asked questions regarding calculation of sign area, and
clarification on faqade modifications.
Ted Moore and David Ferdinandi, applicant representatives, were available to answer
questions from the Committee.
Committee members commented on the silo, its function, and stated they felt it brought
interest to the west side of the building. Committee members also provided support for
the project in general, stating that they were all excited to see this type of use and their
appreciation of the painting, lighting and motif. Committee members provided
discussion on the proposed signs, including intensity of illumination, size, and design.
Barbara Harmon made a motion, seconded by Chuck Fellows, to recommend the
Planning Commission approve the project with the following conditions:
1. Sign B be reduced proportionally to a total of seventy (70) square-feet using the
trapezoidal and triangular measurement technique
2. The applicant shall work with staff to ensure the lumens are in compliance with
City code
The motion carried on a 4-0 voice vote.
6.d. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 13-004;
CORPORATION YARD RENOVATION PROJECT; LOCATION: 1375 ASH
STREET (PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION YARD); APPLICANT: CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE- GEOFF ENGLISH, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Staff contact: Aileen Nygaard
Assistant Planner Aileen Nygaard provided the staff report for the project.
The committee had questions about the size of the planters and the number of trees to
be planted. Additionally, Committee Member Harmon wanted to know if the trees would
be drought tolerant.
Ron Simpson, Public Works Supervisor was present to answer questions, as was
project architect Kyle Harris.
Mr. Harris stated that unfortunately they were not able to provide natural lighting in the
men's locker room because of a lack window space.
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 14-2206
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 14-005 AND
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 14-001; LOCATED AT 1462 E.
GRAND AVENUE; APPLIED FOR BY FIGUEROA
MOUNTAIN ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed an application for Conditional Use Permit 14-005 and
Planned Sign Program 14-001 to add a microbrewery operation to the building's entitled
use as a restaurant with new signage for the new business; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes facade modifications to the existing building; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo
Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has found and
determined that the project is exempt per Section 15301(a) (Existing Facilities) of the
CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed the
project at a duly noticed public hearing on May 6, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the subject district pursuant to the
provisions of this section and complies with all the applicable provisions of
this title, the goals, and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General Plan,
and the development policies and standards of the City
The proposed use of a microbrewery and restaurant is allowed in fhe
Gateway Mixed-Use (GMUJ zoning district per Secfion 16.36.030 of the
Municipal Code and is consistent with development standards for the
GMU zoning district per Municipal Code Section 16.36.020.
2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the
district in which it is to be established or located.
The proposed use of a microbrewery and restaurant would not impair the
integrity or character of the Gafeway Mixed-Use (GMU) zoning disfn'cf, as
if is consistenf with the stated purpose of the GMU zoning district per
Municipal Code Section 16.36.020jE).
RESOLUTlON NO. 14-2206
PAGE 2
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed.
The site is suitable for the proposed microbrewery and restaurant, as the
development meets applicable develop~nent standards relating to parking,
building height, setbacks, and landscaping.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities
and services to ensure public health and safety.
There are adequate provisions for all utilities and services necessary to
ensure public health and safety, including an anticipated reducfio~? in
annual water consun~ption compared to the previous use.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the
viciniw.
The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in
fl7e vicinify as if will comply with all applicable codes and standards. The
project also includes design measures intended to further reduce potential
impacts fo nearby properfies resulting from odors associated with the
brewing process.
Planned Sign Program Findings:
1. The proposed sign is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and
programs of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, specific plan, and any
applicable design guidelines or approvals.
The proposed signage is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies,
and programs of the Arroyo Grande General Plan; if is not subject to any
additional plans or design guidelines.
2. The proposed sign conforms to applicable development standards and
provisions of this title and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety and welfare.
The proposed signage, as reviewed by the Architectoral Review
Committee, complies with all applicable development standards for
restaurants idenfified in the Municii~al Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 14-2206
PAGE 3
3. The physical location or placement of the sign is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and does not pose a safety risk.
The physical location of the signage, as mviewed by the Architectural
Review Committee, is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and
does not pose a safety risk due to being installed in accordance with all
applicable Codes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 14-005 and Planned Sign
Program 14-001, as presented to the Planning Commission on May 6,2014 and shown in
Exhibit "B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth
in full, with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Commissioner Sperow, seconded by Commissioner Goss, and by the
following roll call vote! to wit:
AYES: Sperow, Goss, Keen, Martin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Russom
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 61h day of May 2014.
ATTEST:
SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION
AS TO CONTENT:
,- .'
TE~ES~MCCLISH
COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
RESOLUTION NO. 14-2206
PAGE 4
Exhibit "A"
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 24-005
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 14-001
1462 EAST GRAND AVENUE
This approval authorizes the applicant to establish a microbrewery and restaurant in an
existing 6,344 square-foot building (formerly Applebee's) with on-site brewing and food
service.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DlVlSlON
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 14-005 and Planned Sign Program 14-001.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to
the Planning Commission at the meeting of May 6, 2014.
4. The applicant shall agree to indemnify and defend at hislher sole expense any
action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees
because of the issuance of said approval, or in any way relating to the
implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The
applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court
costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of hislher obligations under this
condition.
5. All conditions of approval shall be printed on construction plans.
6. This approval shall expire on May 6, 2016 unless a building permit is issued for the
project prior to that date.
AESTHETICS
7. Ensure that all roof-mounted equipment cannot be viewed from public areas or
from the nearby neighborhood by use of architectural features and prudent
placement of equipment subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
RESOLUTION NO. 14-2206
PAGE 5
8. All electrical panel boxes shall be installed inside the building or in a manner that is
screened from view subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
9. All public safety equipment such as double detector check valves or fire
department connections shall be screened from view but in manner that ensures
its proper use and function as approved by the Community Development Director.
10. Prior to building permit: issuance, appropriate brewery operation odor control
measures shall be included in the project, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
DEVELOPMENT CODE
11. Development shall conform to the Gateway Mixed Use zoning requirements
except as otherwise approved.
12. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter
16.60 and as approved per the Planned Sign Program Case No. 14-001.
LIGHTING
13. All lighting for the site shall be downward directed and shall not create spill or
glare to adjacent properties.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an exterior
lighting plan for Police Department approval.
BUILDING AND LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
BUILDING CODES
15. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of ail California Codes, as
adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande.
DISABLED ACCESS -
16. Provide co~nplete compliance with State and Federal disabled access
reauirements.
FIRE LANES
17. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced, per Fire Depariment guidelines
SECURITY KEY BOX
18. Prior to Occupancy, applicant must provide an approved "security key vault," per
Building and Life Safety Division and Fire Department guidelines.
RESOLUTION NO. 14-2206
PAGE 6
FIRE SPRINKLERS
19. Prior to Occupancy, all buildings must receive a 5-year Certification per NPPA
20. Provide Fire Department approved access or sprinkler-system per National Fire
Protection Association Standards.
ABANDONMENTINON-CONFORMING
21. Prior to map recordation, issuance of a grading permit or building permit,
whichever occurs first, applicant shall show proof of properly abandoning all
non-conforming items such as septic tanks, wells, underground piping and other
undesirable conditions.
OTHER APPROVALS
22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, County Health Department approval is
reouired for food service establishments.
23. Any review costs generated by outside consultants, shall be paid by the applicant.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
24. The applicant shall refresh rock in the exterior landscaping areas.
25. The applicant shaii repair the damaged curbing on the west side of the building
adjacent to the gas station parking lot.
26. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall verify the sizing
of the grease trap & interceptor.
27. The applicant shall repaint the handrail on the ADA ramp to the sidewalk on the
east side of the building.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
28. Clean all streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks at the end of the day's operations
or as directed by the Director of Community Development or the Director of
Public Works.
29. Perform construction activities during normal business hours (Monday through
Friday, 7 A.M. to 5 P,M,) for noise and inspection purposes, The developer or
contractor shall refrain from performing any work other than site maintenance
outside of these hours, unless an emergency arises or approved by the Director
of Public Works. The City may hold the deveioper or contractor responsible for
any expenses incurred by the City due to work outside of these hours.
RESOLUTlON NO. 14-2206
PAGE 7
FEES
30. Pay all required City fees at the time they are due
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COWlMlTTEE
31. Sign 6 on the East Elevation shall be reduced proportionally to measure 70
square-feet of sign area utilizing the "trapezoid and triangle" calcuiation method.
32. Staff shall confirm that the sign illumination meets the requirements of
Development Code at time of building permit issuance.
Exhibit "BB"
FIGUEROA 1vlOUNTAiN BREWERY i ME-N-EDS
1462 EAST GRAND AVENUE. ARROYO GRANDE. CA
Client information
conan John Ferdinandi
Clmvb~i Milano Rsstaurmts Int.
Address 5701 N. West Ave.
114'Ai~inum Wi Digital Vinyl Faces 1.5'Stnd.afi. Fresno, CA 9371 1
Inu~inabd clwnnel iofbn P1,om 559 432-0399
~f-?.~lumu,um wi i.~'~hd+~ iu 888 636-3373
csii 558 432-0308
Face-lit and halo illuminated channel
lensrs and router cut aliiminum
eiemenb. Leitcrs to be mounted on
contour bii&er flush mounted to iasda.
Aluminutn eiemonts niounted with 1 .S
,177 clear polycarbonate backs
.040 black aluminum returns
- 1141AlsmUiUmWII,Fsg"ddR
Numhue~iiew~~ win a~ib~~i#~y~ 3/16" white acrylic faces
atin acrylic polyurethane finish
~~S~SSSC""*~#, Endi 6Wii ,llYlCbd"~ G?d~t.dF*,,,, ,,t,er,"",e" ;G*oz'#,>,d<,,,e,,
A <w8catw"oraf,c,, c;,c",!
ihma =~irrina. iir:;.,:ds,:i~ru~rd~
*V*ir Sko :Mi,, 12 0.4 WiiN Cuooei lYire
TE: rnieguou U:I.S ej,csr d;ccaasbyms in#% 'it " andbmyr:ay zr pr, ,4ccA:#~;* 300
Ths v-uundx~runriibr ;ri~~*iuru~ andgu boo> iie ;r~g,
lJ 'lit P~rii!~oa,Jyr"",,da",.
i'0"ryc hriwrlilYiYU:idi,lii,>l~,,~lli,U~,,,,,,ii~~,"
r," 1mor3 ,h',>, 3 VO!B
Cui"ut'anriai be usctirr rg,o;,,dpr'"
Rlv0i:uIh" *"m,isr*" li,,ubiiicr~rri',;,,,:i;,rr
i] AS IS Without Change
With Changes Noted
e ':, . , IC.LUO., . , , -, . . ~p!~~l(.oi , . , , SLII.LII:FI
~ ~
Clem lnfcimation
cania~t John Ferdinandi
Cumnay Miiano Restaurants int.
~uereis 5701 N. West Ave.
Fresno, CA 9371 1
Phone 559 432-0399
F~X 888 636-3373
oil 559 432-0398
Description
Face-lit and halo iihiminated channel
letters and router cilt aluminum
eiernents. Leners to be mounted an
contour backer (lush mounted to fascia.
Alurniniim eirrnents mounted wi!h 1.5'
spacers. Sign to connect to existing
custoiner supplied 120 volt power at
Materials
177 clear poiycarbonate backs
,040 biack aluminum returns
314" biack trinl cap
t 114" aluminum
uminuii? backer
igital print with UVoverIam
ic polyurethane finish
*is For N*#i" ,"n,m".vr:m
As roqunrebh UL rDnbnd iiZtBi, A~Piur "gnri-rrtz:s,un)y
"sol toianlny cirr,nidFl,.l#"irrii".*d ,G"j Tmni'0irn.r~
Face e, m,,,,,,,
i c#,#crted ninnrnc-hun
~mewcw~s i!np Gmmdasd Ves#aii
^iir^ii S8re A*" lZ O.4 WHNCnppril"rp$m
NOTE: Thee mila nithi wire is dcllird(.v I'in hngM oiai
Prr""dY* mir, hs iarlinlinvr rad"" "om ,he slgr
lo ** %nr,honnly'"""dber - VnNags hriwrtm $?cundni~d?euia' d#ouiO-irnr$i.F
nr mom Om9 vetts
X
'pp'""ei
dare
As Is Without Change
[I W~ih Changes Noted
0379 N. Biaviley A\,e. by date 3/6/14 Figueroa Mountain Brewing Co. JWA LleNTS
p..prny "fh?l,'iS~~ri ihr. rnOray no! , . . Fresno. CA 93722 hc.-r,.:;;.:~s. srpmyod ar i:+i,r.i
. F'h: (559) 275-0100 -- ri*i0,:, ^.f-i%S W..VP" ioninrr
Fax: (559) 275-7482 file "P
E-mail deegnaa pi~~~ssl~rs~oin Arroyo Grande Figueia_Brewing_Z.South CP
Client Information
Con~ci John Ferdinarldi
Ccmpaly Milano Restaurants lnt.
~ddiers 5701 N. West Ave.
Fresna, CA 9371 1
?hone 559 432-0399
F~X 088 636-3373
mil 559 432-0398
emiiii
Description
Site Plan
@ East
@ South
@ south (watertower doul)
As Is Without Change
13 With Changes Noted
4379 N. B1aw;iy Ave. Figueroa Mountain Brewing Co. rresno. Ch 93722 ClGNS pi,: (559) 275-0700 3""
.-
Fax: (559) 275.7~282
irnaii: designefi-~I~SS~Q~SCW Arroyo Grande
ATTACHMENT 3
A Camp!ete Co~siruction Service
Aileen hiygaard
Associate Planrser
r-. ~iiy of Arroyo Grande
300 East Branch St.
Arrqo Grencie, CA 93420
Re: Project Name: Figueroa i~4ounlain Brevting Campany
Projed Address: 1462 E. Grand Avenue
Dear Mrr; Nygaard,
Ereiow piease find the responses to the cofmments from your vraik-through nil May 22, 207 5 at :iie
abwe referenced projoci.
East Elm-ation I
I
1. Corrugated metal not inetalied per plan-existing stone veneer remaining.
a. ~di~ould like to utilize existing stone veneer
2. Entry tm~er awning missing
a. Plan iridicate flat metal at entry. 'Would like to eiirninate the awning and utilize
existing light fixtures to light entry
3. Light fixtures on entry twver mounted below signage instead of above an per plan.
a. Rendering indicates iiyhts above sign, Signage is a back iite sign, No need for light
txiures above sign.
4 Windows on east e!evaTicn not replaced with new. Mcta! awning installed per plan, brii
nod in PC iiiustraiions. Awning instailed at height for new v#ind~;'~pds., but presents a large
gap above the exisiii?g windows.
a. Would like to utilize existing wirsdows on this elevation. b,wciuvniny height is consistent
with fro{-it elevatiorr height,
5. Landscape screening and screen vvaii lo be insialled by double detector check vaivo.
a. Yes, abseluteiy wit/ cornpi)/.
I. Corrugated mete! sidiiig not inetalied per pian-exlstii-sg stone veiieei' remaining
-' me veneer a. 'Nould like io utilize existirig J:: .
2. FWetai siding may be instalied below roii.up daor seat in^.
a, 't
Sanea Ciarita: 21832 Apple St. Sanla Clarwra CA 91321 Phone (661) 260.1720 Fax (661) 260,1401
'Jcntura; 872 Front St. Veniura, CA 93001 Phone (805) 648.4240 Far (805) 648.4249
A Comp!etti Construction Service
Nertb Elevation
?, Coriiigaied metal siding not installed per plan.
a. Would like tr: utilize e~:islii?l: stone veneer
2. Windv~s not repiaced with new. Roll up doors not installed.
a. VVouid ii~e to utiiize existing windows
3. 11wnin.g installed at tieigiht for new windows and provides iarge gap above existing
windovb1s,
a. Would like to request a revised awriing heighl at this elevation lo iaciiitaai sshdiing
the interior bar
4 Sign appears larger than approved
a. VVouid like lo request approvai for revised sign size
5. Awning To be installed above utility cabinet
a. Rendering indiciates nothing at lire uiility cabinet. We wEIi provide screening at the
cabinet
West Elevation
1. Silo structure sl?iny mie~ai viYn wire mesh ,fencing at base, not pa- PC plans.
a. Silo as instailed is specified on approved building plans. Fencing was provided to
avoid potential vandalize and safety issues. Mesh fencing matches fromi mesh
railing.
2. Gorri~gafed metal siding noi iinsiailed poi plan-existing stone veneer remaining,
a iii~ould like to iiliiize existing stone 've!neer
3. General Refreshing of Landscape D:pected
a, Yes, we will cisfinitely refurbish the iandscaping as needed
As per our discussion, i will try in be at the meeting oo June lSt. Thank you for your time; and
efforts on getting this completed. Please let me know if you need anything fui?her,
Perry ~ot!s&&d, Presiderrl
Sanra Ciarita: 24832 Appis St. Santa C!ariia, CA 97321 Phone (6611 260.1720 Fax (661) 2fi0.1401
Venltrra: 872 Fronr St. Ventura. CI: 93007 Phone (805) 648.4240 Fax (805) 6484249