Agenda Packet 2001-05-22CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Michael A. Lady
Tony M. Ferrara
Thomas A. Runels
Jim Dickens
Sandy Lubin
Mayor �
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
���
cYiSG�i2CLPi
Steven Adams
Timothy J. Carmel
Ketly Wetmore
NOTICE OF
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday
MAY 22, 2001
6:15 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
City Manager
City Attorney
Director, Administrative Services
2. PUBLIC COMMENT on Special Meeting Agenda Items.
Members of the public wishing to address the Council on any item described in this
Notice may do so when recognized by the Presiding Officer.
K?
GiTY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
a.
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT pursuant to Government Code Section 54957:
Title: Assistant City Engineer
�
5.
b. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government
Code Section 54957:
Titl.e: City Manager
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION:
Announcement of reportable action from closed session, if any.
_ � Ii111:��I►��I���M
c:closedsession.agenda.052201.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Michael A. Lady
Tony M. Ferrara
Thomas A. Runels
Jim Dickens
Sandy Lubin
Mayor �
Mayor Pro Terr�
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
�C� �/
, -
„ „-
Steven Adams City Manager
Timothy J. Carmel City Attorney
Kelly Wetmore Director, Administrative Services
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2001
7:00 P.M. .
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL
3. FLAG SALUTE
4.
5.
5.a.
5.b.
6.
6a.
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIURDA
ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB
INVOCATION PASTOR ROBERT UNDERWOOD
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH,
ARROYO GRANDE
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
Proclamation - Public Works Week
Proclamation — Nan Fowler "Small Business Advocate of the Year"
AGENDA REVIEW
Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only
and all further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 2
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS:
Persons in the audience may discuss business not scheduled on this agenda
regarding any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Council
will listen to all communication; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, will
not take any action on items that are not on the agenda.
Upon completing your comments:
♦ You may be directed to staff for assistance;
♦ A Council Member may indicate an interest in discussing your issue
with you subsequent to the Council meeting;
♦ The Council may direct staff to research the issue and subsequently
report back to the Council (generally in the form of a memorandum or
staff report); or
♦ No action is required or taken.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a
group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Any Council Member
may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit
discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City Council may
approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Approve the listing of cash disbursements for the period
May 1, 2001 through May 15, 2001.
8.b. Cash Flow Analysis/Approval of Interfund Advance from the Water Facilitv
Fund (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Receive and file April 2001 Cash Report and approve
the interfund advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other
funds as of April 30, 2001.
8.c. Fiscal Year 2000-01 Appropriation Limit (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution establishing the appropriation limit
from tax proceeds for Fiscal Year 2001-02.
8.d. Rejection of Claims Against Citv (WETMORE)
Recommended Action: Reject claims submitted by R. Harris; F. Wolf; and Ride-
On Transportation.
8.e. Aparoval of Minutes (WETMORE/DAVIS)
Recommended Action: Approve minutes as submitted for the Special City
Council Meeting of May 8, 2001; Regular City Council Meeting of May 8, 2001;
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting of April 30, 2001; and Regular City
Council Meeting of April 24, 2001.
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 3
8. CONSENT AGENDA (continuedL
8.f. Temaorarv Use Permit Case No. 01-010: Authorization to Close Citv
Streets. Use Citv Proaertv, and Waive Fees for the "Arroyo Valley Car Sho"
on Saturday, July 28, 2001 (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution authorizing the closure of City streets
and the use of City property; and authorize the waiver of permit and police
services fees.
8.g. Professional Services Agreement for Interim Community Develooment
Director Services (ADAMS)
Recommended Action: Approve Agreement with Kerry McCants to provide
professional services as Interim Community Development Director through
October 5, 2001.
8.h. Acceptance of Improvements for Parcel Map AG 99-0246 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution accepting improvements, offers of
dedication, and easements within Parcel Map 99-0246 located at 1047 Maple
Street.
8.i. Authorization to Solicit Bids - Huasna Road Pavement Overlay. Project No.
PW-2001-3 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: 1) Find that the capital improvement project is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301(c) and direct the
Administrative Services Director to file a Notice of Exemption; and 2) Approve the
construction plans and specifications and authorize the Public Works Department
to solicit public construction bids for the project.
8.j. Disadvantaged Enterprises Program (DBE) for FFY 2001-02 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: 1) Approve the submittal of the FFY 2001-02 DBE
Program with "proposed" Overall Annual DBE Goal to Caltrans by June 1, 2001;
2) Direct the Director of Administrative Services to publish a public notice in
accordance with Section XIV of the Program; and 3) Direct staff to retum to the
Council with a summary of public comments and approval to submit the FFY
2001-02 DBE Program with "established" Overall Annual DBE Goal to Caltrans
by September 1, 2001.
8.k. Communications Site Lease Agreements with Cox PCS Assets. LLC for FY
2001/02 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute two (2)
Lease Agreements for use of approximately 288 square feet of property located
at Reservoir #2 and 288 square feet of property located at Reservoir #4 as well
as space on the water tank.
8.1. Award of Audit Service Contract (SNODGRASS)
[COUNCIURDA]
Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor/Chair to enter into a three-year
agreement, with three one-year extensions based upon satisfactory performance,
with the firm of Moss, Levy & Hartzheim, Certified Public Accountants.
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 4
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. Lot Line Adiustment Case No. 01-004 to Adjust Two Residential Lots at 823
and 841 Los Ciervos Street - Tract 1834. Apalied for by Greg Slowinski
(MCCANTS)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution conditionally approving Lot Line
Adjustment Case No. 01-004 subject to the conditions of approval.
9.b. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005 to Construct a Medical Office and
Sur4erv Center and Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001 to Reconfigure
Six Lots into Four: 880 Oak Park Blvd: Applicant: Russ Sheppel (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: 1) Adopt Resolution adopting a mitigated negative
declaration, instructing the Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of
Determination, and approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005; and 2)
Adopt Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001, located at
880 Oak Park Blvd.
9.c. Urban Water Management Plan Update (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution approving the Urban Water
Management Plan Update.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
10.a. Voter Aaaroval of Major Land Use and General Plan Changes (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: Discuss concept of requiring voter approval and/or a 4/5
vote of the City Council for General Plan amendments and major land use
changes and provide direction to staff.
10.b. Broadcasting City Council Meetings on Cable TV (ADAMS)
Recommended Action: Receive information and provide direction to staff.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Authorization to Waive Application Fees for the Lighthouse Christian
School Cherry Sale (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: Consider request from Lighthouse Christian School to
waive the fees for a Temporary Use Permit to conduct a cherry sale.
11.b. Time Extension Case No. 01-001 for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 98-
570; Quarterdeck Restaurant Expansion: 1500 W. Branch Street (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution approving a one-year time extension
for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 98-570.
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 5
11. NEW BUSINESS (continued):
11.c. Third Quarter Bud4et Report (SNODGRASS)
(COUNCIURDA]
Recommended Action: 1) Approve detailed budget adjustments and
recommendations as shown on Schedule B; 2) Approve Schedules A through E
included in the Third Quarter Budget Status Report; and 3) Approve(Deny)
donation request from Ocean View Elementary School.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
This item gives the Mayor and Council Members the opportunity to present
reports to the other members regarding committees, commissions, boards, or
special projects on which they may be participating.
(a) MAYOR MICHAEL A. LADY:
(1) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD)
(2) Other
(b) MAYOR PRO TEM TONY M. FERRARA:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
(2) Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
(3) Long-Range Planning Committee
(4) Other
(c) COUNCIL MEMBER THOMAS A. RUNELS:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC)
(3) Other
(d) COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS:
(1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo
Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA)
(2) Community Recreation Center Subcommittee
(3) Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC)
(4) South County Youth Coalition
(5) Other
(e) COUNCIL MEMBER SANDY LUBIN:
(1) South County Area Transit (SCAT)
(2) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC)
(3) Other
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 6
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by a Council Member who would
like to receive feedback, direct staff to prepare information, and/or request a
formal agenda report be prepared and the item placed on a future agenda. No
formal action can be taken.
(a) None.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by the City Manager in order to
receive feedback and/or request direction from the Council. No formal action can
be taken.
(a) None.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Manager.
17. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA SUMMARY — MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 7
* * * * * * *
Copies of the staff reports or other written materials relating to each item of business
referred to on this agenda are on file with the Director of Administrative Services and are
available for public inspection and reproduction at cost. If you have questions regarding
any agenda item, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-
5414.
* * * * * * *
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in a City meeting, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at
the number listed above at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable
arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* * * * * * *
Note: This agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time
set for the meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions, or
call the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-5414 for more information.
www.arroyogrande.o�
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE — ABBREVIATIONS revised 08/04J00
AB
ADA
AG
A(3MC
AGPOA
APN
APCB
APCD
ARC
ASCE
ASD
AWWA
BD
CA
CC
CCC
CCCSIF
CD
CDBG
CE
CEC
CEQA
CIP
CIWMP
CM
CMC
CMP
COC
CPI
CUP
DARE
DC
DEA
E.C.
EDD
EDU
EIR
EIS
EOC
EVC
FAU
FD
FDAA
FEMA
FID
FPPC
FTA
FY
t3.C.
(iC
GF
CiP
GPA
HCD
HOP
HUD
I
ISTEA
JPA
Aqricuftural Preserve
nsse�,ay s�u
Americans with Disabilities Act
General Agricufture
Arroyo Grende Municipal Code
Arroyo Grande Pdice Offlcers' Association
Assessor's Parr.ei Number
Ai� Pdlution Control Boarci
Air Pollution Control District
Archftectural Review Committee
Ame�ican Sociery Civil Engineers
AdministraUve Services Departrnent
American Water Works Association
Building Divlsion
Clry Attomey
Ciry Council
Califomia Conservation Corps
Central Coast Cities Self-Insurance Fund
Community Development
Commu�lty Development Block Grant
Clrculadon Element
Califomia Energy Commission
CaUfomia Environmentel �uality Act
Capltel Improvement Program
Cal'rfomia lnte�rated Waste Management Plan
Ciry Managers Office
Califomia Men's Cdony
Con�astion Management Plan
Certificate of Compliance
Consumer Price Index
Conditio�al Use Permit
Drug Abuse R�istance Education
Development Code
Drup Enforcement Administration
Election Code
Economic Development Department
Equivalent Dwelling Unit
F�vironmeMal Impact Report
Environmental Impact Statement
Econornlc Opportunity Commission
Ecorwmlc Vltality Corporation
Federal Ald Urban
Fire Division
Federal Disaster Assistance Administration
Federal Emeryency Manaqement Agency
Financial Services Departrnent
Fai� Politiccal Practices Commission
Federal Transit Administration
Fiscal Year
Govemment Code
(3eneral Commerc�al
(3eneral Fund
(3eneral Plan
General Plan Amendment
Califomia Departrnent of Housing and Community
Development
Hame Oocupancy Permit
Housiny and Urban Development Dept.
Industrial and Business Parlc
Intermodal Surface Transportation
Joint Powers Authority
LAFCO
LOCC
LLA
LUE
MER
MF
MFA
MHP
O
OCSD
OSCE
PC
PD
PF
PPR
PRD
PRE-APP
PSHHC
PSP
PUD
PW
RDA
RE
RFP
RFGI
RH
RHNP
RR
RS
RTA
RWQCB
SAC
SB
SCAT
SEIU
SF
SLO
SLOCOG
SLOHA
SLONTF
SLORTA
SLOWRAC
SR
SSLOCOWA
SSLOCSD
SRRE
SWRCD
TPM
1T
TTAC
TUP
UBC
UFC
USA
VAR
VC
VCB
VSR
ZONE 3
Local Agency Fortnation Commission
League of Califomfe Cities
Lot Line AdjustrneM
Land Use Element
Lot Merger
CondomiNum/Townhouse
Apflrtrnents
Mobile Home Parks
Office Professional
Oceano Communiry SeMces District
Open Space and Conservation Element
Pianninp Commission
Police DepaAment
Public!(�uasl Public
Plot Plan Review
Parks & RecreaUon Departrnera
Pre-applicatlwi
Peoples' Self-Help Housinp Corp.
Planned Sipn Propram
Planned Unit Development
Public Worlcs DeparUner►t
Redevelopmer�t Ayency
Reside�tial Estate
Request for Proposals
Request for �ualiNcations
Hillslde ResiderN�al
Reyional Housinp Needs Plan
Rural Residentiel
Suburban Residentlal
Reversion to Acreays
Reyionel Water �uelfty Co�trol Board
Staff Advisory Commlttee
Senate Biil
South Counry Area Transft
Service Employe� Irnemational Union
Sinple Family
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo Courwil � (3overtments
San Luis OWspo Hot�sk�p Aufhorily
San Luis Obispo Narootics Task Face
San Luis Obispo Repionel Tra�it Authority
San Luis Obispo County Weter Resources Advisory
Committee
Senior Housinq
South San Luls Obispo CouMy Water Association
South San Lu1s Obispo Counly Sanitation DisMct
Source ReducUon 3 Recydirq Elernent
State Water Resou►ces Control BoarcJ
TentatNe Paroei Mep
Tentative Tract Map
Transportation TechNcal Advisory Committee
Temporary Use Pemiit
Unfform BuGdinp Code
Unifortn Fire Code
Unde�round Servbe Alert
Variance
VUlaye Commerdal
SLO CouMy Visitors & Conference Bureau
Vlew Shed Review
San Luls Obispo County Flood Control and Water
Conservatlon District — Zone 3(Lopez Project)
�
HONORARY PROCI�U�IATI 5.a.
OH R�Ca�M��f�G
HATIONAI, PuB1,IC WORI�S III��K
1NAY Z0 • MAY Z7 2001
,
WHEREAS,
community
lives; and
public works services provided in our
are an integral part of our citizens' everyday
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed
citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works
systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and
highways, public buildings, and solid waste collection; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends
on these facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their
planning, design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and
skill of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff
public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude
and understanding of the importance of the work they per.form.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Michael A.
Lady, Mayor of the City of Arroyo Grande, on behalf of the
City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 20�'
through May 27�' as "NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" in
the City of Arroyo Grande and call upon all citizens and civic
organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues
involved in providing our public works and to recognize the
contributions which public works officials make every day to
our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the Seal of the City of Arroyo
Grande to be affixed this 22"d day of May, 2001.
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
��Q � . .
c1a a
� �to eco t�i
� �
9� 9
Na o
�
� �a1er
� '
N
r
5.b.
WHEREAS, Nan Fowler is the perfect example of an ideal advocate for small business,
and especially sincere in promoting equal opportunity for women in business; and
WHEREAS, Nan operates a small business, Nan's Pre-Owned Books, and her 15 years
of experience has given her insight and common sense as to what makes a successful
business. Nan develops a logical, level headed strategy in her pursuit of fairness in
the legislative arena pertaining to business issues, and has mentored several other
small business owners in the community; and
WHEREAS, Nan is very generous with her time in serving her community, and she has
served on the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors for four years,
including a term � as Chair of the Board. She is a cheerleader for the Chamber of
Commerce, aiways enthusiastic and a joy to be around; and
WHEREAS, Nan has made a positive difference in Arroyo Grande, as well as in the
neighboring communities and throughout the County. Her leadership was largely
responsible for accomplishing a change in the name of Grand Avenue to East and West
Grand Avenue in order to eliminate duplication of addresses to make the area more
user friendly for customers and visitors. She has also been active in the process for
developing a master plan for the East Grand Ave�ue corridor; and
WHEREAS, on the local level of governmental issues, Na� is very conscientious in
rr�onitoring all Commissions and City Council agendas. She testifies and speaks out on
issues that affect business, and is able to speak first hand on how specific actions
would affect smali local businesses.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Michael A. Lady, Mayor of the City of
Arroyo Grande, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby honor and congratulate Nan
Fowler for being chosen "Small Business Advocate of the Year". '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused the Seai of the City of Arroyo Grande to
be affixed this 22"d day of May, 2001.
MICHAEI A. LADY, MAYOR
8.a.
/, PRROr
° ��
� INCORPOAATED �
V O
T
� JULY /0. 1911 *
c4 ��FORN� P
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISO
CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION
MAY 22, 2001
I'
�
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period May 1— May 15, 2001.
FUNDING:
There is a$642,416.56 fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments.
ATTACHMENTS:
ATTACHMENT 1— Cash Disbursement Listing
ATTACHMENT 2— May 4, 2001 Accounts Payable Check Register
ATTACHMENT 3— May 4, 2001 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks
ATTACHMENT 4— May 11, 2001 Accounts Payable Check Register
ATTACHMENTI
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS
For the Period of May 1 Through May 15, 2001
May 22, 2001
Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for
the period May 1 to May 15, 2001. Shown are cash disbursements by week of occurrence
and type of payment.
May 4, 2001
Accounts Payable Cks 100495-100575
Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks
May 11, 2001
Accounts Payable Cks 100592-100733
Less Payroll Cks included in Attachment 3
Two Week Total
2
3
4
169,048.42
265,973.17
435,021.59
406,654.17
(199,259.20)
207,394.97
•: � . .�
CITY OFARROYO GRANDE
INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS
EDEN COMPUTER SYSTEM
GINERAL FUND (010�
Citti Government (Fund 010)
4001 - City Council
4002 - Administrative Services
4003 - City Attorney
4101 - City Manager
4102 - Printing/ Duplicating
4120 - Financial Services
4121 - Taxes/ Insurance/ Bonds
4130 - Community Development
4131 - Community Building (CDBG)
4140 - Management Information System
4145 - Non Departmental
Public Sa�ty (Fund 010)
4201 - Police
4211 - Fire
4212 - Building & Safety
Public Works (Fund 010)
4301 - Public Works-Admin & Engineering
4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance
4304 - Street Lighting
4305 - Automotive Shop
Parks & Recreation (Fund 010)
4420 - Parks
4421 - Recreation
4422 - General Recreation
4423 - Pre-School Program
4424 - Recreation-Special Programs
4425 - Children in Motion
4426 - Five Cities Youth Basketball
4430 - Soto Sport Complex
4213 - Government Buildings
4460 - Parkway Maintenance
SPEQAL REVINUE FUNDS
Pazk Development Fee Fund (Fund 213)
4550 - Park Development Fee
Traffic Signal Fund (Fund 222)
4501 - Traffic Fund
Transportation Fund (Fund 225)
4553 - Public Transit System
Construction Tax Fund (Fund 230)
4556 - Construction Tax
Police Grant Funds
4201 - Law Enforcement Equip. (Fd 272)
4202 - 5tate AB3229 Cops Grant (Fd 271)
4203 - Federal Universal Hiring (Fd 274)
4208 - Federal Local taw Enforcmt (FD 279)
Redevelopment Agency ( Fund 284)
4103 - Redevelopment Administration
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Fund (Fund 612)
4610 - Sewer Maintenance
Water Fund (Fund 640)
4710 - Water Administration
4711 - Water Production
4712 - Water Distribution
Lopez Administration (Fund 641)
4750 - Lopez Administration
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (Fund 350�
5501-5599 - Park Projects
5601-5699 - Streets Projects
5701�799 - Drainage Projects
5801-5899 - Water/Sewer/Street Projects
5901-5999 - Water Projects
Dept Index for Comefl.xls
ATTACHMENT 2
VOUQ�tfi2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100495 O5/04/Ol 102311 CLIFF ADELHELM B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-ADELHELM 010.4424.5352
100496 OS/04/O1 101972 LYNN AINSWORTH REF.PRE-PAID CARD-AZNSWORTH 010.0000.4602
100497 OS/04/Ol 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP GOGGLES/CUTTING BLADES 640.4712.5273
100498 OS/04/O1 004914 APEX SHARPENING WORKS CHAIN SAW/EXTRA CHAINS Q10.4211.5273
100499 OS/04/Ol 102050 AVAYA,INC. PHONE MAINT 010.4145.5403
100500 OS/04/O1 009554 BARNICK WINDOW COVERING WINDOW BLINDS-CSO OFFICE 010.4201.5504
100501 OS/04/O1 102278 MICAH BENEVEDO B/BALL LGE.SCORER-BENEVEDO 010.4424.5352
100502 OS/04/O1 013026 BRISCO MILL & LU[�IDER AIR RATCHET/PUNCH 220.4303.5273
100502 OS/04/01 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUhIDER AIR RATCHET/PUNCH 220.4303.5613
100503 OS/04/O1 099245 CITY OF BUELLTON REGIS-WETMORE CC MEETING 010.4002.5501
100504 OS/04/01 101431 BURDINE PRINTING PRINTING-CITY NEWSLETTER 010.4002.5504
100505 OSj04/O1 101619 ROB BURT B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-ROB BURT 010.4424.5352
100506 O5/04/O1 102350 BILLY CAMP REF.PARKING CITE#D12187 010.0000.4203
100507 OS/04/O1 100622 CASTLE ROCK DEVELOPMENT REF.BUILDING FEE-791 LOS CIERV 010.0000.4181
100507 O5/04/O1 100622 CASTLE ROCK DEVELOPMENT REF.ELECT.FEE-791 LOS CIERVOS 010.0000.4183
100508 OS/04/O1 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET REPL.FRONT SEAT/SVC-PW16 220.4303.5601
100509 OS/04/O1 101528 COMPUTERLAND COLOR LASER PRINTER 010.4140.6101
100510 OS/04/O1 025428 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL WOUND TIMERS 010.4420.5605
100511 OS/04/O1 101638 TYLER COON S/BALL LEAGUE SCORER-COON 010.4424.5352
100512 O5/04/O1 101716 JIM DECECCO S/BALL LEAGUE UMP-DECECCO 010.4424.5352
100513 O5/04/O1 030584 DEBI DYKZEUL S/BALL SCORER-DYKZEUL 010.4424.5352
100514 OS/04/O1 102351 EAR PLUGS USA CUSTOM EAR PIECES FOR SRT 010.4201.5606
100515 OS/04/O1 102349 BRENT ESTES,L.M.F.T. DIVERSION COUNSELING 010.4201.5303
100516 OS/04/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES NOTICE 88613 010.4002.5301
100517 OS/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALIT'Y FLEET CARE REPR-PW34 640.4712.5601
100517 O5/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 971 BULBS/SVCS/BATTERY TEST 010.4201.5601
100517 O5/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE MISC.REPRS.SVCS PD FLEET 010.4201.5601
100517 OS/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 902 WIPERS/AIR BAG WARNING LIT 010.4201.5601
100517 OS/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 981 PERFORM SELF TEST 010.4201.5601
ITEM
AMOUNT
48.00
37.25
111.67
889.01
28.16
227.16
22.50
67.73
30.32
25.00
3,576.88
96.00
5.00
34.00
8.00
443.95
3,282.76
32.66
37.50
48.00
30.00
1,013.00
440.00
176.00
256.82
214.46
1,111.19
324.40
51.61
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
48.00
37.25
111.67
889.01
28.16
227.16
22.50
98.05
25.00
3,576.88
96.00
5.00
42.00
443.95
3,282.76
32.66
37.50
48.00
30.00
1,013.00
440.00
176.00
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CF�CK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NCTMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER
100517 OS/04/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE REPL.BATTERY ASSEhffiLY 010.4201.5601
100518 OS/04/O1 102320 JOSH GOTTLIEB S/BALL LEAGUE UMPIRE-GOTTLIEB 010.4424.5352
100519 OS/04/O1 038200 GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS GFOA DUES 1/02 010.4120.5503
100519 OS/04/01 038200 GOV'T FZNANCE OFFICERS GOV.ACCTING,AUDITING & REPORTI 010.4120.5501
100520 OS/04/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH DOG OBEDIENCE CLASS-2 ADTL 010.4424.5351
100521 05/04/O1 102348 MONICA GUERRERO REIMB.PHYSICAL/SHOT-GUERRERO 010.4421.5315
100522 OS/04/O1 102330 H-S PRECISION,INC. MAGAZINES .308 010.4201.5272
100523 OS/04/O1 101086 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613
100523 O5/04/O1 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613
100523 OS/04/O1 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613
100524 OS/04/O1 100348 JAMIE HEINZE B/BALL LGE.SCORER-HEINZE 010.4424.5352
100525 OS/04/01 102260 BRYCEN IKEDA B/BALL LGE.SCORER-IKEDA 010.4424.5352
100526 OS/04/O1 044496 INFORMATION SERVICES MIS SUPPORT 010.4140.5303
100527 OS/04/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-DISASTER TRAINING 010.4001.5501
100527 OS/04/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY KITCHEN SUPPLIES 010.4211.5255
100527 OS/04/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-DZSASTER TRAINING 010.4001.5501
100528 O5/04/O1 048438 KEY TERMITE & PEST CONT QUARTLEY PEST CONTROL SVCS. 010.4201.5604
100529 OS/04/O1 102352 LESS GAUSS,INC. 2 CLARIFIER/WRAPS 010.4140.5607
100530 OS/04/Ol 102261 KIMBERLY MP.RSALEK B/BALL LGE.SCORER-MP,RSALEK 010.4424.5352
100531 OS/04/O1 101252 MCI WORLDCOM FD CALLING CARDS 010.4211.5403
100532 OS/04/O1 056706 MID STATE CONCRETE PROD MANHOLE FRAME/COVER 612.4610.5610
100533 OS/04/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE BRAKES/SVCS-PW29 220.4303.5601
100533 OS/04/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE FENDER BOLTS/ROTATE/LUBE/OIL 010.4201.5601
100533 OS/04/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/WIPER BLP.DES 010.4420.5601
100533 OS/04/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER-PD 901 010.4201.5601
100533 OS/04/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE FILTER/TRANS.FLUSHED-PW34 640.4712.5601
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE ELECT.WALL PLATES 010.4213.5604
100535 05/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BULBS 010.4213.5604
100535 OS/04/01 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC.HAND TOOLS 220.4303.5273
100535 O5/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HEX BUSHING 640.4712.5610
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE CLIPS 010.4213.5604
100535 O5/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE KRAZYGLUE 640.4712.5603
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE CR:HARDWARE 010.4213.5604
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE PLUMB.SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
ITEM
AMOUNT
126.11
16.00
150.00
107.00
17.20
17.60
406.00
134.15
198.25
200.24
22.50
22.50
252.00
7.72
26.94
3.89
40.00
149.90
22.50
3.59
349.38
334.75
110.12
55.50
65.65
188.96
9.21
9.92
119.44
2.13
1.52
1.81
1.52-
4.70
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,084.59
16.00
257.00
17.20
17.60
406.00
532.64
22.50
22.50
252.00
38.55
40.00
149.90
22.50
3.59
349.38
754.98
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 3
OS/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCF�R/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUhBER DATE NUNIDER NAME
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 O5/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/01 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100535 OS/04/01 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 O5/04/Ol 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100535 OS/04/Ol 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 O5/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100535 OS/04/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100536 O5/04/01 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS
100537 OS/04/O1 102262 KATHRYN MONTGOMERY
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PLUMB.SUPPLIES
CR:PLUI+ID.SUPPLIES
MISC.SUPPLIES
CR:MISC.HARDWARE
VALVE/CONN.WIRE/PVC ADAPTER
MOWER STARTER CORD
HARDWARE
NIPPLES/PLIERS
REDI MIX/PAINTBRUSHES
NIPPLES/ELBOWS/PRIMER
PAINT/PAINTING SUPPLIES
MISC.TOOLS
SANDPAPER
MISC.HARDWARE
MISC.HARDWARE
AF�F� BATTERIES
ACCOUNT
Ni1MBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
100538 OS/04/O1 058890 RICHP.RD MUNOZ
010.4420.5603
010.4420.5605
640.4712.5273
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
220.4303.5603
220.4303.5613
010.4420.5605
220.4303.5613
010.4420.5605
220.4303.5613
220.4303.5273
220.4303.5613
220.4303.5613
220.4303.5613
640.4712.5255
OFFICE SUPPLIES 284.4103.5201
B/BALL LGE.SCORER-MONTGOMERY 010.4424.5352
S/BALL LEAGUE UMPIRE-MUNOZ 010.4424.5352
100539 O5/04/O1 059124 MUSTANG TREE CARE TRIM TREES-BEHIND LEISURE GRDN 220.4303.5303
100540 OS/04/O1 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. SPRING/ROPE-PW106
100541 OS/04/O1 102044 NOSSAMAN,GUTHNER,KNOX & PROF.SVCS-S.M.VLY WATER
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL MIS DATA LINE 473-0379
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL L/DIST.FAX 473-0386
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2174
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL FAX 473-2198
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL DATA LINE 021-2713
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5100
100542 OS/04/O1, 063960 PACIFIC BELL DATA LINE 473-5141
100542 O5/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 481-6944
100542 OS/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 271-7480
100542 05/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 267-8633
100542 O5/04/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PAY PAONE 489-9867
100543 OS/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 OS/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 O5/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 OS/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 OS/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 OS/04/O1 064194 PACIFZC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 O5/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
100543 O5/04/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC
220.4303.5601
640.4710.5575
010.4140.5303
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010:4304.5402
010.4304.5402
010.4304.5402
640.4712.5402
640.4711.5402
612.4610.5402
010.4145.5401
217.4460.5355
13.24
9.39-
14.96
1.42
70.40
3.41
7.69
46.79
24.27
19.46
85.71
12.58
6.73
21.39
42.78
4.06
44.26
22.50
64.00
375.00
27.95
3,401.18
91.86
22.81
35.37
55.34
295.53
656.59
230.83
224.77
64.61
97.08
53.78
267.29
12,398.06
1,141.66
192.08
2,504.96
757.18
4,628.28
7.29
100594 OS/04/O1 101598 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILZTY HOOKUP-BEHIND CC 010.4213.5303 922.80
512.71
44.26
22.50
64.00
375.00
27.95
3,401.18
1,828.57
21,696.80
922.80
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
O5/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
Cf�CK CF�CK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NOMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100545 OS/04/O1 102288 PACIFIC SOIL STABILIZAT EROSION MATTING 220.4303.5613
100546 OS/04/O1 063570 PB LOADER MFG. CO. Y STRAINER 220.4303.5603
100547 OS/04/Oi 065520 PEPSI-COLA LOS ANGELES COKE 010.4422.5258
100548 OS/04/O1 066562 PRYOR INDUSTRIES,INC. CABINET-BLDG 010.4213.5303
100549 OS/04/O1 100686 PURCHASE POWER POSTAGE FOR METER 010.4201.5201
100550 OS/04/01 071682 GREG ROSE S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-ROSE 010.4424.5352
100551 OS/04/O1 100200 RRM DESIGN GROUP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ADMIN 350.5512.7501
100551 O5/04/O1 100200 RRM DESIGN GROUP PROF.SVCS-RANCHO GRANDE PK 350.5512.7501
100552 OS/04/O1 102347 S& S HOMES OF THE REF.PARK DEV.FEES-BERRY GARDEN 213.0000.4515
100553 OS/04/O1 102331 SAN MIGUELITO INDUSTRIE 20'USED STORAGE CONTAINER 010.4201.5605
100554 OS/04/O1 102346 CITY OF SANTA MP,RIA TACTICAL PATROL REGIS-4 OFFICE 010.4201.5501
100555 O5/04/O1 077024 ANN SARMIENTO S/BALL SCORER-SARMZENTO 010.4424.5352
100556 OS/04/Ol 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE/DIESEL 010.4201.5608
100557 OS/04/O1 101621 TOM SHIFFRP.R B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-SHIFFRP.R 010.4424.5352
100558 OS/04/O1 082290 LYNN STEINER ESSAY TEST-CID CP.BRIALES 010.4201.5303
100559 OS/04/O1 082328 STERLING COhID7UNICATIONS SERVICE AGREEMENT-APRIL 2001 010.4201.5606
100559 OS/04/O1 082328 STERLING COP4�1[TNICATIONS 962 WIRED LIGHT BAR/RP.DIO/LIGH 010.4201.5601
100559 OS/04/Ol 082328 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS MICROPHONES FOR RADIOS 010.4201.5606
100559 OS/04/O1 082328 STERLING CONIlKUNICATIONS MT1000 HICAP RAPID RATE BATTER 010.4201.5606
100559 05/04/O1 082328 STERLING CONA7[JNICATIONS MINITOR BATTERY 010.4420.5605
100560 OS/04/O1 102171 STRONG PLANNING SVCS,IN O.PAYMENT MILEAGE(.35 VS .325) 010.4130.5318
100560 OS/04/O1 102171 STRONG PIJINNING SVCS,IN REIhffi.MILEAGE/960 �.325 010.4130.5318
100560 OS/04/O1 102171 STRONG PLANNING SVCS,IN REIMB.MILEAGE/1400 �.325 010.4130.5318
100561 OS/04/O1 102342 TENNANT SALES TIRE ASSEhIDLY/REPR.KIT 220.4303.5603
100561 O5/04/O1 102342 TENNANT SALES TIRE ASSY 220.4303.5603
100562 OS/04/O1 084708 RICK TERBORCH SPECIAL INVEST FUND-TERBORCH 010.4201.5303
100563 OS/04/O1 102318 DENNIS THURMAN S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-THURMAN 010.4424.5352
100564 OS/04/O1 102244 TITAN INDUSTRIAL ZIP LOCK BAGS 010.4201.5255
100565 OS/04/O1 102353 KAMI TRASK REF.PARKING CITE #15777 010.0000.4203
100566 OS/04/O1 085904 TRAVELERS EQUIP FLOATER452N7313660 010.4145.5579
ITEM
AMOUNT
55.90
144.81
109.20
505.74
615.00
32.00
1,037.50
23,097.20
88,392.50
1,765.50
475.00
52.50
1,442.83
96.00
50.00
995.00
142.89
738.30
518.95
10.70
35.00-
312.00
455.00
159.43
114.49
500.00
96.00
19.58
20.00
689.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
55.90
144.81
109.20
505.74
615.00
32.00
24,134.70
88,392.50
1,765.50
475.00
52.50
1,442.83
96.00
50.00
2,405.84
732.00
273.92
500.00
96.00
19.58
20.00
689.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CF�CK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100567 OS/04/O1 086736 DOTTIE TRULOCK DOG OHEDIENCE CLASSES 010.4424.5351
100568 O5/04/O1 102304 ULTIMATE OFFICE SHIPPING-CONA7UNICATIONS MANUAL 010.4201.5606
100569 O5/04/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-PARK VIEW 010.4420.5605
100569 O5/04/O1 068084 UNITED GREEN MP.RK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-TRUCK STOP 010.4420.5605
100569 OS/04/O1 086084 UNITED GREEN MP.RK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-PARK VIEW 010.4420.5605
100569 OS/04/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-TRUCK STOP 010.4420.5605
100569 O5/04/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-PARKVIEW 010.4420.5605
100569 O5/04/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MP.RK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS-PARKVIEW 010.4420.5605
100570 OS/04/O1 087672 UNITED RENTAI,S RENT-HIGA WEED MOWER 010.4420.5605
100571 O5/04/O1 102178 US OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5201
100572 OS/04/O1 087574 USI,INC. LAMINATION POUCHES 010.4201.5201
100573 O5/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PKS SUPER 010.4421.5602
100573 O5/04/O1 102007 \7ERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CHAVEZ 010.4430.5605
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-F.CHIEF 010.4211.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-ENG.1 010.4211.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-DIV.CHIEF 010.4211.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PATROL CARS 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-P&R DIRECTOR 010.4421.5602
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 O5/04/O1 102007 \/ERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/01 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100573 OS/04/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD 010.4201.5403
100574 OS/04/Ol 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE TIRES-PW29 220.4303.5601
100574 OS/04/O1 090460 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/ROTATE 010.4201.5601
100574 OS/04/Ol 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE LLJBE/OIL/ROTATE/FILTER 010.4201.5601
100574 O5/04/O1 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/TIRES 010.4201.5601
100575 OS/04/O1 092274 STEVE WHZTNEY REIMB.OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4211.5201
100575 OS/04/O1 092274 STEVE WHITNEY REIMB.POSTAGE-WHITNEY 010.4211.5201
ITEM
AMOUNT
105.60
16.99
31.16
24.61
12.84
2.30
27.30
51.20
72.41
57.75
161.25
15.46
24.62
18.47
22.58
16.84
299.12
36.54
124.79
21.43
15.88
18.93
15.88
28.60
18.93
102.20
66.96
47.22
152.31
19.28
17.50
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
105.60
16.99
149.41
72.41
57.75
161.25
678.27
368.69
36.78
TOTAL CHECKS 169,048.42
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 6
OS/02/O1 08:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
FUND TITLE
O10 GENERAL FUND
213 PARKS DEVELOPMENT FUND
217 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
220 STREETS FUND
284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND
350 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
612 SEWER FUND
640 WATER FUND
AMOUNT
45,899.49
86,392.50
7.29
2,713.17
44.26
24,134.70
1,106.56
6,750.45
TOTAL 169,048.42
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD 4/13/01 TO 4/26/01
5/4/01
FUND 010
FUND 220
FUND 284
FUND 612
FUND 640
236,827.35
9,485.35
4,703.76
4,245.57
10,711.14
265,973.17
Salaries Full time
Salaries Part-Time
Salaries Over-Time
Holiday Pay
Sick Pay
Annual Leave Pay
Vacation Buyback
Sick Leave Buyback
Vacation Pay
Comp Pay
Annual Leave Pay
PERS Retirement
Social Security
PARS Retirement
State Disability Ins.
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Vision Insurance
Life Insurance
Long Term Disability
Uniform Allowance
Car Allowance
Council Expense
Employee Assistance
Uniform Allowance
Motor Pay
Total:
142,090.82
28,803.48
9,489.87
5,148.39
3,051.63
12,098.19
2,438.80
4,374.44
15,407.30
14,698.79
228.97
651.50
21,634.86
3,657.21
781.42
542.50
400.00
375.00
100.00
265',973.17
ATTACHMfiNT 4
VOUCFIl2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NOhIDER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
383 OS/03/O1 101556 DIANE SHEELEY ICSC MEETING-SHEELEY 284.4103.5501
364 O5/03/O1 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REINID.4j26/O1 Pj.2 011.0000.1015
385 OS/03/O1 102355 COMPAQ COMPVfER CORP PRESARIO 1800 SERIES COMPUTER 272.4201.6101
386 OS/04/O1 100224 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE POSTAGE-CITY NEWSLETTER 010.4002.5504
387 OS/07/O1 100138 JANET HUWALDT TRAVEL ADVANCE-HUWALDT 010.4120.5501
386 O5/07/O1 004252 CAROL ANDERSON TRA�7EL ADVANCE-ANDERSON 010.4120.5501
100592 OS/11/O1 102354 ABS DELIVERY SYSTEMS,IN DELIVERY CHARGES 010.4201.5324
100593 O5/11/O1 000898 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONS PRE-EMPLOY DRUG TEST 010.4213.5315
100594 OS/11/O1 102311 CLIFF ADELHELM B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-ADELHELM 010.4424.5352
100595 OS/11/O1 100882 ADVANCE MARKING SYSTEMS NAME TAGS 010.4211.5324
100596 O5/11/O1 102356 ADVANCED POLICE SOFTWAR TACTICAL INCIDENT SOFTWARE 272.4201.6101
100597 05/11/O1 102360 SHIREEN ALFARO REF.C/B.DEPOSIT-ALFARO 010.0000.2206
100598 O5/11/Ol 003042 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT SVCS DUMP BIN 010.4213.5303
100599 OS/11/O1 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-4/14 220.4303.5303
100599 O5/11/O1 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHP.RT SVCS-4/21 220.4303.5303
100600 OS/11/O1 004680 STEVE ANDREWS HOSTAGE NEGOTICATIONS 010.4201.5501
100601 OS/11/O1 005772 ARROYO GRANDE COPM�I. HOS PRE-EMPLOY PFiYSICAL 010.4425.5315
100602 OS/11/O1 006006 ARROYO GRANDE FLOWER SH FLORAL ARRANGE-WETMORE 010.4001.5504
100602 OS/11/Ol 006006 ARROYO GRANDE FLOWER SH FLOWERS-WEYAND/BOYD/MILTON 010.4201.5504
100603 OS/11/O1 007332 AUSTIN'S PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO-LUBIN C10.4001.5201
100604 OS/11/O1 008385 R. BAKER,INC. INSTL.CULVERT PIPE 220.4303.5303
100605 O5/11/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC 981 SCOPE ENG/REPL.STARTER 010.4201.5601
100605 OS/11/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC REPR.FORK LIFT 220.4303.5603
100605 05/11/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC REPR.FORK LIFT 640.4712.5603
100605 O5/11/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC REPR.FORK LIFT 010.4420.5603
100605 O5/11/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC R/R FUEL TANK P-28 010.4420.5601
100606 OS/11/O1 010412 ALBERT BEATTIE REIMB.TUITION-BEATTIE 010.4201.5502
100607 05/11/O1 102278 MICAH BENEVEDO B/BALL LGE.SCORER-BENEVEDO 010.4424.5352
100608 O5/11/01 012168 BOXX EXPRESS UPS SHIPPING-MP.RCH 010.4201.5201
ITEM
AMOUNT
160.00
199,259.20
1,959.17
996.82
204.38
50.00
51.00
45.00
48.00
98.01
1,295.00
250.00
1,125.00
703.20
562.56
268.00
118.00
53.50
139.10
33.71
5,783.00
229.48
95.11
95.11
95.10
76.99
665.00
22.50
168.83
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
160.00
199,259.20
1,959.17
996.82
204.38
50.00
51.00
45.00
48.00
98.01
1,295.00
250.00
1,125.00
1,265.76
268.00
118.00
192.60
33.71
5,783.00
591.79
665.00
22.50
168.83
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER
100609 OS/11/Ol 102259 CHESSIE BREHM B/BALL LGE.SCORER-BREHM 010.4424.5352
100610 OS/11/O1 101074 JOY BREHM B/BALL LGE.OFFZCIAL-J.BREHM 010.4424.5352
100611 OS/11/Ol 101705 MICHELLE BRIGHT REF.PARK DEPOSIT-BRIGHT 010.0000.4354
100612 OS/11/01 013026 HRISCO MILL & LUNIDER PAINT/PAINTING SUPPLIES 220.4303.5613
100612 O5/11/O1 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER SCREWS/SHELF SUPPORT/LU[�ER 010.4201.5604
100612 OS/11/O1 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUNIDER DINII�R/PLUGS/EDGING BRACKET 010.4201.5604
100612 O5/11/O1 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER BULB/DUST PAN 640.4712.5604
100613 05/11/Ol 013806 BURKE AND PACE OF AG PLASTIC CEMENT 612.4610.5610
100614 OS/11/O1 101619 ROB BURT B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-ROB BURT 010.4424.5352
100615 O5/11/O1 021940 C.COAST TAXI CAB SERVIC TAXI SVCS-APRIL 15-30 225.4553.5507
100616 OS/11/O1 102366 CA.ST.DEPT.JUSTICE 2000 ASSAULT WEAPON ID GUIDES 010.4201.5255
100617 OS/11/O1 102365 CALBO CLASS 1 MEMBERSHIP-SCHMIDT 010.4212.5503
100618 O5/11/O1 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI CHALK LINE BOX 220.4303.5273
100618 05/11/O1 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI BOTTS DOTS/BROOM/SHOVELS 220.4303.5613
100618 OS/11/O1 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI BOTTS DOTS/BROOM/SHOVELS 220.4303.5273
100619 OS/11/O1 100803 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATR REGIS-JOHNSON/BASIC MOTORCYCLE 010.4201.5501
100620 OS/11/Ol 101739 LUKE CAYWOOD B/BALL LGE.SCORER-CAYWOOD 010.4424.5352
100621 O5/11/O1 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY ADA GRAB BAR HAND DRYER/MIRROR 250.4800.8004
100621 05/11/O1 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY ADA R/R SIGNS 250.4800.8004
100621 OS/11/O1 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY BUILDING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
100621 OS/11/O1 021916 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY BUILDING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
100621 O5/11/O1 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY HUILDING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
100622 OS/11/Ol 022632 CHAPARRAL MAINT/COPY USEAGE 010.4421.5602
100623 OS/11/O1 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY AVOCADO 010.4420.5308
100623 O5/11/Ol 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY CHINESE ELM 010.4420.5605
100623 OS/11/O1 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY RONSTAR 010.4420.5605
100624 OS/11/O1 023322 CFII2ISTIANSON CHEVROLET 923 PERFORMANCE CHECK/BATTERY 010.4201.5601
100624 OS/11/O1 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET 901 REPL.THROTTLE CP,BLE/TRANS 010.4201.5601
100625 O5/11/O1 024102 COAST GRAPHIC SUPPLY SPRIAL BINDERS/CLEANER SHEETS 010.4102.5255
100626 O5/11/O1 102263 MARCUS CONAWAY B/BALL LGE.SCORER-CONAWAY 010.4424.5352
100626 05/11/O1 102263 MP.RCUS CONAWAY B/BALL LGE.SCORER-CONAWAY 010.4424.5352
100627 O5/11/O1 101638 TYLER COON S/BALL LEAGUE SCORER-COON 010.4424.5352
ITEM
AMOUNT
22.50
48.00
25.00
30.61
18.94
83.52
13.35
9.31
96.00
1,401.75
20.00
215.00
48.32
88.15
155.96
1,777.60
22.50
1,181.28
87.31
134.93
47.08
505.68
88.00
148.56
52.27
85.59
84.50
568.46
69.56
22.50
45.00
37.50
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
22.50
48.00
25.00
146.42
9.31
96.00
1,401.75
20.00
215.00
292.43
1,777.60
22.50
1,956.28
88.00
286.42
652.96
69.56
67.50
37.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
O5/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUhIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100628 OS/11/O1 101551 SHAWN COSGROVE BASIC SWAT-COSGROVE 010.4201.5501
100629 OS/11/O1 026208 CREDIT BUREAU REPORTS, CREDIT CHECKS 010.4201.5303
100630 OS/11/O1 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO SNAP RINGE/HEARING PROTECTION 010.4211.5601
100631 OS/11/O1 027924 D.A.R.E.AMERICA UhIDRELLAS/PINSTRIPE JERSEY 010.4201.5504
100632 OS/11/O1 028548 DAYSTAR INDUSTRIES STREET SWEEPING 612.4610.5303
100633 OS/11/O1 101969 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIA COPIER LEASE REF#93791 010.4421.5602
100634 OS/11/O1 028644 WENDY DEATON CRITICAL INCIDENT DEBRIEFING 010.4201.5303
100635 05/11/O1 101716 JIM DECECCO S/BALL LEAGUE UMP-DECECCO 010.4424.5352
100636 05/11/O1 100808 DHS-WTOC RENEWAL WATER TREAT CERT-MARSALEK 640.4710.5503
100637 OS/11/O1 029484 DIESELRO INC. REPL.A/C BELT/ALTERNATOR 010.4211.5601
100638 OS/11/O1 030584 DEBI DYKZEUL S/BALL SCORER-DYKZEUL 010.4424.5352
100639 OS/11/O1 101924 J.A. FISCHER,INC. GASOLINE 010.0000.1202
100640 05/11/O1 100691 FI\7E CITIES-TIMES PUBLIC HEARING #88688 010.4130.5301
100640 OS/11/O1 100691 FIAE CITIES-TIMES PUBLIC HEARING#88689 010.4130.5301
100640 O5/11/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES PUBLIC HEARING#88690 010.4130.5301
100641 O5/11/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 931 REPL.HEADLIGHT SWITCH 010.4201.5601
100641 OS/11/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 982 ELECT.TRANS DIAGNOSIS 010.4201.5601
100641 OS/11/O1 101662 FORD QUALITY FLEET CARE 961 RESECURE DOOR TRIM PANEL 010.4201.5601
100642 O5/11/O1 035840 FRAZEE PAINT & WALLCOVE FILTERS-PUMP 220.4303.5603
100643 OS/11/Ol 102361 MARIANA FUERTE REF.PARK DEPOSIT-FUERTE 010.0000.4354
100644 OS/11/O1 102319 DAN FURLONG B/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-FURLONG 010.4424.5352
100644 O5/11/Ol 102319 DAN FURLONG B/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-FURLONG 010.4424.5352
100645 OS/11/Ol 102362 ANDREA GARZA REF.PARK DEPOSIT-GARZA 010.0000.4354
100646 OS/11/01 102320 JOSH GOTTLIEB HALF PAYMENT-INTERNSHIP 010.4421.5303
100646 05/11/O1 102320 JOSH GOTTLIEB S/BALL LEAGUE UMPZRE-GOTTLIEB 010.4424.5352
100647 OS/11/O1 038376 GRAND AVPO PARTS OIL 010.4420.5601
100648 OS/11/O1 102368 GARY HAGERTY REF.PARK DEPOSIT-HAGERTY 010.0000.4354
100649 OS/11/O1 102280 CHUCK HP,RE B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-HP,RE 010.4424.5352
100649 OS/11/Ol 102280 CHUCK HP,RE B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-HP.RE 010.4424.5352
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,804.80
14.00
27.18
59.08
5,981.49
141.25
240.00
80.00
120.00
361.94
7.50
14,009.45
54.00
54.00
55.50
14G.66
108.68
378.24
85.09
25.00
48.00
46.00
25.00
350.00
32.00
22.98
25.00
48.00
48.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,804.80
14.00
27.18
59.08
5,981.49
141.25
240.00
80.00
120.00
361.94
7.50
14,009.45
163.50
633.78
85.09
zs.00
96.00
25.00
382.00
22.98
25.00
96.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
O5/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE N[7MBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER
100650 OS/11/O1 100348 JAMIE HEINZE B/BALL LGE.SCORER-HEINZE 010.4424.5352
100651 O5/11/O1 042158 BOB HICKS TURF EQUIPMEN MOWER PARTS 010.4420.5603
100652 OS/11/O1 102316 CASEY AIDLE REIhID.FF 11 CERT FEE-HIDLE 010.4211.5501
100653 O5/11/O1 102260 HRYCEN IKEDA B/BALL LGE.SCORER-IKEDA 010.4424.5352
100654 OS/11/O1 102257 INT'L FOOTPRINTERS ASSO MAJOR SPONSORSHIP-COPS N KIDS 010.4201.5504
100655 OS/11/Ol 044630 INT'L TRAINING RESOURCE BASIC SWAT REGIS-S.COSGROVE 010.4201.5501
100656 OS/11/O1 045162 INTL CONF OF BUILDING 0 ICBO DUES-FIBICH 010.4212.5503
100657 O5/11/O1 045708 INTOXIMETERS, INC. DRYGAS 010.4201.5255
100658 OS/il/Ol 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 010.4420.5303
100658 OS/11/O1 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 217.4460.5356
100659 OS/11/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY DISASTER TRAINING SUPPLIES 010.4001.5501
100659 OS/11/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SODAS-CMC CREW 220.4303.5613
100660 OS/11/O1 046332 J P TOOL REPAIR DRILL SWITCH 010.4420.5273
100661 OS/11/O1 046410 J.W.ENTERPRISES TOILET RENTAL 220.4303.5552
100662 OS/11/O1 100087 HOLLY JARRATT JAZZERCISE CLASSES 010.4424.5351
100663 OS/11/O1 047268 JOHNSON,ROBERTS & ASSOC PHQ REPORTS 010.4201.5303
100664 OS/11/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES SNACK SUPPLIES REIMB-JONES 010.4425.5259
100664 O5/11/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhID.SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255
100664 O5/11/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhID.TRAVEL-JONES 010.4425.5303
100665 OS/11/O1 052280 LIMBERG EYE SURGERY RX SAFETY GLASSES-SAHAGUN 612.4610.5255
100665 OS/11/O1 052280 LIhIDERG EYE SURGERY RX SAFETY GLASSES-FULLER 612.4610.5255
100665 OS/11/O1 052280 LIhIDERG EYE SURGERY RX SAFETY GLASSES-SCHMIDT 640.4712.5255
100665 OS/11/O1 052280 LINIDERG EYE SURGERY RX GLASSES-MP.RTINS 220.4303.5255
100665 O5/11/O1 052280 LIMBERG EYE SURGERY RX GLASSES-ELLIOTT 220.4303.5255
100666 OS/11/O1 100985 DOUG LINTNER B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-LINTNER 010.4424.5352
100666 O5/11/O1 100985 DOUG LINTNER S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-LINTNER 010.4424.5352
100666 O5/11/O1 100985 DOUG LINTNER B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-LINTNER 010.4424.5352
100666 OS/11/O1 100985 DOUG LINTNER S/BALL LEGALTE OFFICIAL-LINTNER 010.4424.5352
100667 OS/11/O1 102370 LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMA ELDER ABUSE REGIS-STEARNS 010.4201.5501
100668 OS/11/O1 052806 E.C. LOOMIS & SON FEED STRAW-BEHIND K-MART 010.4420.5605
100668 OS/11/O1 052806 E.C. LOOMIS & SON FEED K-9 SUPPLIES 010.4201.5322
100669 O5/11/O1 102261 KIMBERLY MP.RSALEK B/BALL LGE.SCORER-MARSALEK 010.4424.5352
ITEM
AMOUNT
22.50
37.36
30.00
22.50
250.00
600.00
90.00
172.81
380.0�
120.00
45.71
10.64
32.96
91.70
335.82
17.76
101.76
47.82
39.04
350.00
248.00
246.00
250.00
188.00
144.00
32.00
48.00
32.00
40.00
25.64
49.00
22.50
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
22.50
37.36
30.00
22.50
250.00
600.00
90.00
172.81
500.00
56.35
32.96
91.70
335.82
17.76
188.62
1,284.00
256.00
40.00
74.64
22.50
VOUCHI2E2
OS/09/O1 08:24
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUNffiER NAME
100670 OS/11/O1 102367 JOANNE MAURER
100671 p5/11/Ol 102086 MEDSTOP URGENT CARE
100671 OS/11/O1 102086 MEDSTOP URGENT CARE
100671 OS/11/O1 102086 MEDSTOP URGENT CARE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REF.PARK DEPOSIT-MAURER
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
PHYSICAL-DOOLEY
PHYSICAL-KRUSE
100672 OS/11/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA GASOLINE
100672 OS/11/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA 4MM 150M DDS-4 TAPES
100672 OS/11/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA TRAINING EXPENSES
100672 O5/11/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA INSIGNIAS
100672 O5/11/Ol 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA ORAL BOARD LUNCH
100672 OS/11/01 056626 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA CDOA EXPENSES
100673 OS/11/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE 982 LUBE/OIL/FILTER/BOLTS
100673 05/11/01 056394 MIDAS M[JFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER
100673 OS/11/O1 056394 MIDAS MIJFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER
100673 OS/11/O1 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER-PW24
100674 OS/11/01 056940 MIER BROS
100674 OS/11/O1 056940 MIER BROS
100675 O5/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 05709b MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 05/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE
100675 05/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 O5/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 OS/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 O5/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
100675 O5/11/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
ROCK
ROCK
DUP.KEYS
SPRAY PAINT
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
FURN.LEG TIP/PCV CAP
PLATE MENDER/BP,R HOLDER/CLIPS
MISC.HP.RDWARE
STAPLES/SNAPBLD KNZFE
TOOL BOX
PAINTING SUPPLZES
PVC ELBOWS/COVERS
WTHPRF COVERS
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PAINTING SUPPLIES
DUP.KEYS
100676 OS/11/Ol 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
100676 O5/11/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
100676 05/11/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
100676 OS/11/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/il/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/Ol 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 O5/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE iINIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
100677 OS/11/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
010.0000.4354
010.4211.5315
010.4211.5315
010.4211.5315
010.4201.5608
010.4140.5607
010.4201.5501
010.4201.5255
010.4201.5501
010.4201.5501
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
640.4712.5601
220.4303.5613
220.4303.5613
010.4211.5255
010.4211_5255
010.4211.5255
010.4211.5601
010.4211.5601
010.4211.5601
010.4201.5605
010.4211.5601
220.4303.5613
010.4420.5605
010.4420.5605
010.4211.5601
640.4712.5603
010.4201.5604
010.4101.5201
284.4103.5201
010.4130.5201
010.4130.5201
010.4213.5303
010.4213.5303
220.4303.5143
640.4712.5143
612.4610.5143
010.4420.5143
010.4213.5303
010.4102.5255
010.4213.5303
PAGE 5
ITEM CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
25.00 25.00
2,051.00
236.00
236.00 2,523.00
32.20
218.91
647.00
61.40
52.90
191.86 1,204.27
52.29
25.69
39.15
87.10 204.23
205.44
68.48
1.27
3.20
22.77
1.37
20.04
.64
32.42
16.03
45.92
27.33
7.47
14.69
65.21
4.24
78.55
13.69
31.82
13.59-
110.48
41.88
100.96
63.72
34.52
109.79
41.31
5.30
118.81
273.92
262.60
110.47
626.77
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NOhIDER DATE NOMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER
100678 O5/11/O1 057272 MIKE MITCHELL S/HALL LEAGUE UMPIRE-MITCHELL 010.4424.5352
100679 O5/11/O1 102262 KATHRYN MONTGOMERY B/BALL LGE.SCORER-MONTGOMERY 010.4424.5352
100680 OS/11/.01 058890 RICHARD MUNOZ S/BALL LEAGUE UMPIRE-MUNOZ 010.4424.5352
100661 OS/11/O1 102364 VIKKI MURRAY REF.PARK DEPOSIT-MURRAY 010.0000.4354
100682 OS/11/Ol 100095 NAPA AUTO PARTS V-BELT 010.4211.5601
100683 O5/11/O1 060294 NAT'L EMBLEM,INC. SRT PATCHES 010.4201.5255
100684 OS/11/O1 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. REPR.WEED EATER 010.4420.5603
100684 OS/11/O1 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. CLEAN/ADNST WEED-EATER 010.4420.5603
100684 O5/11/O1 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. R/R SEALS/BOOT/COIL-WEED EATER 010.4420.5603
100684 OS/11/O1 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. REPR.EDGER 010.4420.5603
100685 OS/11/O1 101750 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5255
100685 O5/11/O1 101750 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4120.5201
100685 OS/11/O1 101750 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5201
100685 O5/11/O1 101750 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5201
100686 05/11/O1 062322 ONE HOUR PHOTO PLUS PRINTS/DEV 220.4303.5255
100686 05/11/O1 062322 ONE HOUR PHOTO PLUS PRINTS/DEV 010.4130.5201
100687 OS/11/O1 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORAGE RACKS/WORK CENTER 010.4201.5605
100688 OS/11/O1 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402
100689 OS/il/O1 064258 PAGING NETWORK OF LA PAGING SVCS-APRIL 010.4421.5602
100690 OS/11/O1 102371 PARMA PARMA CONF 010.4101.5501
100691 OS/11/O1 100548 VERONICA PEREZ S/BALL LGE.SCORER-PEREZ 010.4424.5352
100692 OS/11/O1 066534 CITY OF PISMO BEACH NEGOTIATIONS TRAINING 010.4145.5501
100692 OS/11/O1 066534 CITY OF PISMO BEACH NEGOTIATIONS TRAINING 010.4001.5501
100693 OS/11/O1 102358 ROBERT PRESTON REF.WTR DEP-828 QUAIL CT 640.0000.2302
100693 O5/11/O1 102358 ROBERT PRESTON CLOSING BILL-828 QUAIL CT 640.0000.4751
100693 OS/11/O1 102358 ROBERT PRESTON PREVIOUS BALANCE-828 QUAIL CT 640.0000.4751
100694 O5/11/O1 102359 RANCHO GRANDE HOA REF.C/B.DEP-R.G.HOA 010.0000.2206
100694 OS/11/O1 102359 RANCHO GRANDE HOA BLDG.SUPER-R.G.HOA 010.0000.4355
100695 O5/11/O1 071682 GREG ROSE S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-ROSE 010.4424.5352
100695 OS/11/O1 071682 GREG ROSE B/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-ROSE 010.4424.5352
100696 OS/11/O1 101700 KRISTY RUIZ REF.PARK DEPOSIT-RUIZ 010.0000.4354
100697 O5/11/O1 101136 S.C.A.C.E.O. SCACEO DUES-CROCKETT 010.4130.5503
ITEM
AMOUNT
32.00
22.50
32.00
25.00
18.77
301.00
10.00
80.35
192.15
38.61
106.99
295.26
25.64
138.40
23.14
29.91
363.75
45.86
110.23
40.00
15.00
150.00
150.00
180.00
6.13-
61.32-
250.00
78.00-
32.00
48.00
25.00
40.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
32.00
22.50
32.00
25.00
18.77
301.00
321.11
566.31
53.05
363.75
45.86
110.23
40.00
15.00
300.00
112.55
172.00
80.00
25.00
40.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
OS/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
1VOMBER DATE NUNIBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100698 O5/11/O1 099082 SAN JOSE STATE UNIV. REGIS-STEVE ANDREWS/HOSTAGE 010.4201.5501
100699 OS/11/Ol 100192 SAN LUIS MAILING SVC UTILITY BILLING MAILING-APRIL 640.4710.5201
100700 O5/11/O1 077024 ANN SARMIENTO S/BALL SCORER-SARMIENTO 010.4424.5352
100701 OS/11/01 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE/DIESEL 010.4212.5608
100701 OS/11/O1 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE 010.4201.5608
100702 O5/11/Ol 101621 TOM SHIFFRAR B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-SHIFFRAR 010.4424.5352
100703 OS/11/O1 102046 RICHP.RD SLP.DE & ASSOC PROF.SVCS-S.M.VLY WATER 640.4710.5575
100704 OS/11/O1 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.EIdGINEERS 99/00 LOPEZ COSTS 641.4750.5612
100704 OS/11/O1 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS 99/00 LOPEZ COSTS 641.4750.5612
100704 OS/11/O1 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS 99/00 LOPEZ COSTS 641.4')50.5612
100705 O5/11/Ol 074684 SLO CNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS DUES-SLO CNTY FIRE CHIEFS 010.4211.5503
100705 OS/11/O1 074684 SLO CNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS DUES-CAL CHIEFS 010.4211.5503
100705 OS/11/Ol 074684 SLO CNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS SLO CNTY TRAINING OFFICERS 010.4211.5503
100706 OS/11/O1 073660 SLOCO DATA, INC. POSTAGE DEPOSIT-WEED ABATE 010.4211.5599
100707 OS/11/O1 100304 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605
100707 05/11/Ol 100304 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605
100708 OS/11/O1 102264 STEVEN SORENSON B/BALL LGE.SCORER-SORENSON 010.4424.5352
100708 O5/11/O1 102264 STEVEN SORENSON B/BALL LGE.SCORER-SORENSON 010.4424.5352
100709 OS/11/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY ALT/GM 010.4211.5601
100709 OS/il/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY ALT 010.4211.5601
100709 OS/11/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY STOP & TAIL LIGHT 010.4211.5601
100710 OS/11/O1 081200 JEFF SOUZA REIMB.EARPIECE SYSTEM 010.4201.5606
100710 O5/11/O1 081200 JEFF SOUZA REIMB.MICROPHONE-SOUZA 010.4201.5606
100711 OS/11/O1 081432 BOB SPEAR S/BALL LEAGUE UMPZRE-SPEAR 010.4424.5352
100712 OS/11/O1 082212 RANDY STEFFAN REIMB.MEETING SUPPLIES-STEFFAN 010.4211.5501
100713 OS/11/O1 082328 STERLING COl�A7[JNICATIONS MTX BELT CLIP 010.4211.5603
100713 OS/11/O1 082328 STERLING COhII�7UNICATIONS USED RADIO/CHARGER CRADLE 010.4201.5606
100713 OS/11/O1 082328 STERLING COI�A�IUNICATIONS REPR.BATTERY SHORT/LAMP 010.4201.5603
100713 OS/11/O1 082328 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS REPL.RADAR SOFTWARE 010.4201.5603
100714 OS/11/Ol 082836 STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY PLUMBING SUPPLIES 640.4712.5610
100715 OS/11/O1 084084 TAYLOR'S TUNE-UP SHOP 931 STARTER/BATTERY 010.4201.5601
100716 OS/11/O1 102369 ROY OR MP,RTY THOMAS REF.L/SCAPE BOND-THOMAS 010.0000.2210
ITEM
AMOUNT
242.00
833.25
82.50
78.27
1,575.62
96.00
1,351.31
186,237.00
166,237.00-
132,996.00
50.00
150.00
25.00
1,000.00
73.27
73.27
45.00
22.50
211.12
182.90
22.96
90.27
74.00
32.00
40.96
76.24
362.73
150.74
172.00
12.59
283.76
1,200.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
242.00
833.25
82.50
1,653.89
96.00
1,351.31
132,996.00
225.00
1,000.00
146.54
67.50
416.98
164.27
32.00
40.96
761.71
12.59
283.76
1,200.00
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
05/09/Ol 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
VOUCHER/
Q�IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE IJ�7MBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
100717 O5/11/O1 102316 DENNIS THURMAN S/BALL LEAGIIE OFFICIAL-THURMAN 010.4424.5352
100718 OS/il/O1 102244 TITAN INDUSTRIAL BATTERIES 010.4201.5255
100719 O5/11/O1 085644 TOSTE GRP.DING & PAVING TACK OIL 220.4303.5613
100720 OS/11/O1 086034 TRI-CITY DISPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303
100720 OS/11/O1 086034 TRI-CITY DISPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303
100721 O5/11/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MP.RK,INC. SPRINKLER REPAZRS 010.4420.5605
100721 O5/11/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKI,ER PARTS 010.4420.5605
100722 OS/11/O1 087672 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL-PRESSURE WASHER 220.4303.5552
100723 O5/11/O1 088424 URBAN FUTURES INC. URBAN FUTURES PROF.SVCS 284.4103.5303
100724 05/11/O1 102363 ERICA VASQUEZ REF.PARK DEPOSIT-VASQUEZ 010.0000.4354
100725 O5/11/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CM 010.4101.5403
100725 OS/11/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-STREETS/PW DIR/EXT 010.4301.5403
100725 OS/11/O1 102007 t7ER2ZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-STREETS/PW DIR/EXT 010.4301.5403
100725 OS/11/O1 102007 \7ERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-STREETS/PW DIR/EXT 220.4303.5403
100726 OS/11/O1 101111 ANTHONY VIOLA REF.L/SCAPE BOND-525 DOS CERRO O10.U000.2210
100727 O5/11/O1 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE 982 MOUNT/BALANCE TIRES 010.4201.5601
100727 OS/11/O1 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE 961 LUBE/OIL/FILTER/TIRES 010.4201.5601
100728 OS/11/O1 009282 WEST GROUP RENEW SUB-BARCLAYS TITLE 19 010.4211.5503
100729 OS/11/O1 100431 WILLP,RD PAPER CO PAPER/ENVELOPES 010.4102.5255
100729 OS/11/O1 100431 WILLP.RD PAPER CO PAPER 010.4102.5255
100729 OS/11/O1 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER/NCR/TEXT 010.4102.5255
100730 OS/11/O1 092586 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COM MARCH SIGNAL MAINT 010.4304.5303
100731 OS/11/Ol 093210 WORKRITE NOMEX SHIRT 010.4211.5272
100732 OS/11/Ol 102162 WULFING'S BACKGROUND & BACKGROUND INVEST/TRAVEL EXP 010.4201.5303
100732 OS/11/O1 102162 WULFING'S BACKGROUND & BACKGROUND INVEST/REPORT 010.4201.5303
100732 OS/11/O1 102162 WULFING'S BACKGROUND & PRE-EMPLOY POLY 010.4201.5303
100733 O5/11/O1 093522 XEROX CORPORATION MAINT.COPIER 010.4301.5602
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AMOUNT
32.00
42.78
150.00
380.21
145.96
17.16
19.47
49.93
479.19
25.00
31.74
39.99
39.99
129.03
1,200.00
25.00
318.77
77.00
590.36
200.63
499.10
1,212.75
77.14
238.26
450.00
135.00
123.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
32.00
42.78
150.00
526.17
36.63
49.93
479.19
25.00
240.75
1,200.00
343.77
77.00
1,290.09
1,212.75
77.14
823.26
123.00
406,654.17
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 9
OS/09/O1 08:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 11
Yf i1��
O10
O11
217
220
225
250
272
284
612
640
641
TITLE
GENERAL FUND
PAYROLL CLEARING FUND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
STREETS FUND
TRANSPORTATION FUND
CDBG GRANT FUND
CA LAW ENFORCMT TCHNLGY EQUIP.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND
SEWER FUND
WATER FUND
LOPEZ FUND
TOTAL
: uf�'I�Ii1�Ma
49,210.83
199,259.20
120.00
8,865.24
1,401.75
1,268.59
3,254.17
652.88
6,623.32
3,002.19
132,996.00
406,654.17
8.b.
/pRRO y�
/�� c �
� 1NCORPORATEO 9Z MEMORANDUM
V ` T
* JUIr 10. 1911 *
c4 ��FORN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICE
SUBJECT: CASH FLOW ANALYSIS/APPROVAL OF INTERFUND ADVANC S
FROM THE WATER FACILITY FUND
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
• Accept the April cash report,
• Approve the interfund advance of $633,389 from the Water Facility Fund to
cover cash deficits in other funds as of April 30, 2001.
FUNDING:
No outside funding is required.
Attachment
A— Cash Balance/Interfund Advance Report
Attachment A
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH BALANCE / INTERFUND ADVANCE REPORT
At April 30, 2001
Fund
O10
210
212
213
214
215
217
220
222
223
224
225
226
230
231
232
241
271
272
274
2'77
278
279
284
285
350
612
634
640
641
642
751
760
General Fund
Fire Protection Impact Fees
Police Protection Impact Fees
Park Development
Park Improvement
Recreation Community Center
Landscape Maintenance
Street (Gas T�) Fund
Traffic Signalization
Traffic Circulation
Transportation Facility Impact
Transportation
Water Neutralization Impact
Construction Tax
Drainage Facility
In-Lieu Affordable Housing
Lopez Facility Fund
State COPS Block Grant Fund
Calif. Law Enf. Technology Grant
Federal Universal Hiring Grant
98-99 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant
99-00 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant
00-01 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant
Redevelopment Agency
Redevelopment Set Aside
Capital Projects
SewerFund
Sewer Facility
Water Fund
Lopez
Water Facility
Downtown Parking
Sanitation District Fund
Total City Wide Cash
Balance at
1,721,759
46,340
6,265
528,395
24,898
1,439
28,418
82,557
510,399
448,074
1,732,114
32,373
141,941
235,360
13,602
239,934
571,045
51,308
114,834
(11,355)
106
7,231
8,810
(266,211)
22,470
(355,823)
22,157
96,737
2,423,094
609,810
1,600,516
36,295
83,608
10,808,500
Recommended
Advances
11,355
266,211
355,823
(633,389)
0
'Tf� ABOVE LISTING ARE TI� CASH BALANCES SHOWN IN TI� GENERAL LEDGER
OF TI� CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS OF APRIL 30, 2001.
� �
nda K.Snodgras
Director of Financial Services
Revised
Balance
1,721,759
46, 340
6,265
528,395
24, 898
1,439
28,418
82, 557
510,399
448,074
1,732,114
32,373
141,941
235,360
13,602
239,934
571,045
51,308
114,834
0
106
7,231
8,810
0
22,470
0
22,157
96,737
1,789,705
609,810
1,600,516
36,295
83,608
10,808,500
� pRROy� �■C■
° ��
� INCOAPORATEO �
� ° MEMORANDUM
� ,,�Y ,o. ,a„ ,�
c � ° ��FORN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICE
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing the
appropriation limit from tax proceeds for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
FUNDING:
There is no fiscal impact with the adoption of the attached Resolution.
DISCUSSION:
Annually, the City is required to calculate the expenditure appropriation limit from tax
proceeds to determine compliance with Propositions 4(Gann Initiative) and
111(Spending Limitation Act of 1990). This calculation is based on the previous year's
appropriation limit ($11,563,602) multiplied by the per capita personal income
percentage increase (7.82%) and multiplied again by the population percentage change
(1.49%). The State Department of Finance provides both the population change and
the per capita personal income change for the previous fiscal year. The City is
responsible for dividing Citywide revenues between tax and non-tax revenue, and
applying the formula to the cumulative appropriation limit. For Fiscal Year 2001-2002
the appropriation limit has been calculated to be $12,653,647.
This calculation means that the City cannot receive more than $12,653,647 in tax based
revenues in Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The estimated tax-based revenues for Fiscal Year
2001-2002 have been calculated to be $7,701,385, over $4 million less than the
appropriation limit. Therefore, the City is in compliance with Article XIIIB of the
California Constitution.
Attachments:
A. Calculation of Appropriation Limit From Tax Proceeds
B. Categorization of Estimated Revenue
_ _ __ _ _ __
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A TAX PROCEEDS
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2001-2002
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that the
Fiscal Year 2001-02 expenditure appropriation limit from tax proceeds is
$12,653,647, in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution
(Prop.4, SB1352).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this year's calculation is to include the
percentage change in California per capita personal income, rather than the
percentage change in the local assessment roll due to the addition of non-
residential new construction, as the price factor.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of May 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY C�ERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ST EN ADAMS, C iVIANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Q
H
Z
W
�
2
U
�
Q
�
Q
U
O
�
�
z�
� N
� h q
� � O
O
O � N
O o �
� �
� � U
� w
w
O � O
� �
� �
U O
�
�
�
U
�
U
N
0
�
M
�
�
�
,--�
N
�
�
O
�
69
I I
0
0
�
+ �
0
o �
�
N
00
�
�
N
�
�
�
�,
O
�
�
�
on
�
U
� �
�
� �
° o U .
o •� � o
° Q., o �
� o � o
w° a�.
� � � ,o
� � o �
� }' *� >
o � a, �
0
� -� � U
�`" �' 'o.
o Q. �
i-. '�:.� U
� � �
� � a
rn
�'
0
�
W
0
0
+
�
�
N
�
d'
�
�
0
0
�
� � 00
� � � � �
M M
�D vj N N vj
� � �
�
a�
�
� �
U o ° o �
� o o U
0
.�
�
Q..
0
a
0
.�
�
0
�
0
.�
>
�
0
U
�
�
�o
M
�
�D
N
�--i
bR
N
O
�
�
0
0
N
�
W
�
�
�
�I
�
w
�
�
O
F
�
�+.
�
a
�
d
�
00
M
�--I
O
�
�
b�4
y ~
� �
�a
>z
; O
� E
� �
>
�
,
�
a �
� �
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CATEGORIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02
Revenue Sources
Taxes
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Sales Tax-Safety
Transient Occupancy Tax
Business License Tax
Other Taxes
Proceeds
From Taxes
2,240,800
3,000,000
300,000
52,500
290,400
Licenses and Peirnits
Building Dept. Pemzits
Other Licenses and Permits
Fines
M.V. Code Fines
Local Ordinance/Parking
Use of Pr�ertv
Rent
NSF Fees/Cr.Bur.Coll.
Aid From Other Gov't A e� ncies
M. V. License Fees
Homeowners Prop.Tax Relief
P.O.S.T. Reimb.
Other Subventions
P.D.Officer Grant/Sharing
Other Grants
Gas Tax
Streets Revenues
941,200
10,600
343,900
268,050
Charges For Current Services
Community Development Fees
Safety Impact Fees
Recreation Program Fees
Sewer Utility Billings
Park Development Fees
Landscape District Assessment
Traffic Signai Assessment
Traffic Circulation.Assessment
Transportation Facility Impact
Water Neutralization Impact Fees
In-lieu Affordable Housing
Other Current Services
ATTACHMENT B
Non Proceeds
From Taxes
99,000
276,650
55,560
80,700
30,000
84,200
900
35,300
54,700
149,300
183,774
127,750
5,200
546,600
515,100
100,000
5,900
24,000
59,600
55,400
63,100
80,000
158,100
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CATEGORIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02
Revenue So urces
Charues For Current Services
Sewer Facility Charges
Hydrant Water
Water Utility Billings
Meter Installations
Lopez Water Avail.Charges
Lopez Utility Biliings
Water Distrib/Main Charges
Taxi Coupon Sales
Assessments-Parking District
Other Revenue
Sales of Properiy
Expenditure Recovery
Miscellaneous
Other Revenue
Total Revenue, Not Including Interest
Interest Percentage
Interest % Applied
Total Revenue, Including Interest
Grand Total Budget City Revenue
Proceeds
From Taxes
7,447,450
54.77%
253,935
7,701,385
Non Proceeds
From Taxes
29,000
9,200
1,523,000
11,500
157,800
1,294,400
31,700
20,000
9,300
2,350
38,350
3,000
230,100
6,150,534
45.23%
209,715
6,360,249
14,061,634
/� PRROY
° ��
� INCOHPORATEp 9
V D
T
� .nxr �o. �e>> ,
c4 ��FORN� P
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,�,�
REJECTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST CITY
MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council reject the attached Claims for Damages against the
City filed by Robert Harris, 1611 Chilton, Arroyo Grande; Fred Wolf, 1113 Ritchie Road,
Grover Beach; and Ride-On Transportation, 1160 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo.
FUNDING:
None.
DISCUSSION:
The City's insurance administrators have reviewed the above-referenced claims and
recommend they be rejected.
Attachments:
1. R. Harris Claim
2. F. Wolf Claim
3. Ride-On Transportation Claim
8.d.
�1--�
, , C: � � �CW1-e,�a-l...o. � � J�
� .Q� C(ty of Arroyo Grande AttaChmerlt 1
, �",� `. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
D��rQG��� (���TO PERSON UR PROPERTY
� � u r A^ �tECEf YED
File with:
CITY CLERK�S OFFICE
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
..,lTy ,;r x;;,�CYO �':; :� �,...-
RESERVE FOR FI IN STAMP �""
Claim No. � '�`► 2s �� i� 35
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for death, injury to person or personal proper'ty must be filed
not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year
after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
3. Read entire claim form before filing. �
4. See page 2 for diaqram upon which to locate place of accident.
5. This claim form must be signed on Page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details.
SIGN EACH SHEET.
TO: (Name of City) I Date of Birth
City of Arroyo Grande , CA of Claimant
Name of Claimant
Robert (Bob) Harris
Occupation of Clai
retired
H���d��r�
Arroyo Grande, Ca <
Business Address of Clai.
n/a
City/State
4�2 0
nt City/State
Home Telephone Number
$a5 ��89-7375
Business Telephone Number
n/a
Give address and telephone number to
which you desire notices or communica-
tio s to be sent regarding this claim:
Ar�ro o CA 4�20
When dj,d �AM�GE or.ZNJURY occur? Names of any City.employees
Date � U Time 1 3.m. involved in INJURY or DAMAGE
If claim is for Equitable
Indemnity, give date claimant ri�a
served with that complaint:
Date:
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur7 Describe fully, and locate on diagram on
reverse side of this sheet. Where appropriate, give street names and
address and measurements from landmarks:
The damage was done to the entire fence, back,yard and game room
of 1611 Chilton, Arroyo Grande.
Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred.
The d�.mage occurred because the water from the rains of Mar. 5, O1
jumped the city's berm (curb) at the intersection of Cierra Dr.
and Hillcrest, Arroyo Grande.
Why do you claim the City is responsible?
"� After numerous requests to the city by homeowners that the
berm be reinforced, it was not done and consequently the damage.
pescribe in detail each INJURY or DAMAGE
�he deluge of water early a.m, of Mar. 5, O1 came over
down fence-line of 159'�niltonand 1610 Sierra exposing
ground utilities, blowing out new block retainer wall
t�r�o feet of mud completely over backyard and into game
SEE PAGE 2(OVER) TEiIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
Claimant's Social
Security Number
berm,
all under-
a,nd dumping
room.
The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim,
is computed as follows:
Damage incurred to date (exact): Estimated prospective damages
as far as known:
Damage to property......$�Q Future expenses for medical
Expenses for medical and hospital care.....$
and hospital care.......$ Future loss of
Loss of earnings........$ earnings..... ......$
S��a���s for 7 9 � Other prospective special
.S damages ...............$
General Prospective general
Total damages incurred 3 �� 7 damages ...............$
to date .............. $� Total estimate prospective
damaqes..... .. ....$
Total amount claimed as of date o€
presentation of this claim.......,$ 3,µ�7
Was damage and/or in��r� �in sti ted by polioe�'Ub11C WOY'KS C311E'.(�__�g'�
If so, what City: A y`G�ran`�e
Were paramedics or ambulance called?
If so, name City or ambulance
If injured, state date, time, name and address of doctor of your first
visit ------ - - — - ---
WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons
unow�r��$ t ��� , ��� ormation A�� r p c �611Chilton,AG Dhnnn 489-7375
�
res
res
��••• '"-`���`�' VGY�,TGL,yi11C7.1i �i'U1��`'f'��
DOCTORS and FiOSPITALS:
Hospital Address Phone
Doctor Address Phone
Doctor Address Phone
READ CAREFULLY
For a11 accident claime place on following diaqram names of streets,
including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of 8ccid�t►t by "X"
and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City
Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City Vehicle when
you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself or your vehiale when you
first saw City vehicle; location of City Vehicle at time of accident by "A-
1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by
"B-1" and the point of impact by "X."
NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper
diagram signed by claimant. S�e attached map insert
SIDE WALI(
cune
cuno
PnRKwnv
S�OIwnLK
7
Siqnature of Claimant or person Typed Name: Date:
f� ' on beh iving Robert (Bob ) Harris 3/29/Ol
la onsh p o i t:
�
N TE: IMS MUST B FILED W.iTFi CITY CLERK (Gov. Code Sec. 915a).
Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code Sec. 72).
5n���
_ _ _
. , .
STATUS REPORT #2
May 9, 2001
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Attention: Steven Adams, City Administrator
RE: My Principal : City of Arroyo Grande
DOI : 3/OS/O 1
Claimant : Robert Harris
My File No. : A10271-5
Dear Mr. Adams:
�/�� = f�.fl
y�
� � eas� ��ru eess �
���
PREVIEW:
The claimant alleges that his property was damaged due to flooding.
GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIItEMENTS
A. Action Bv Public Entity:
I recommend that the City forward a standard rejection letter to the following claimant:
Robert Hams
1611 Chilton
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Please send a copy of this letter to me to document this file.
B. Statute Of Limitations:
The statute of limitations will expire six months from the rejection.
- CARL WARREN & CO.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT • CLAIMS ADJUSTERS
P.O. Box 1052 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1052
Phone: (805) 544-7963 • Fax: (805) 544-1068
R�CE(4'E�
�'� �' r K r� :�:��
Ne�ct Repo� �e�1tn��1�,�0�i�= �=
a� ���r o � r-�� �: 4z
City of Arroyo Grande
Steven Adams
May 9, 2001
Page Two (A10271-5�
CLAIMANT VERSION
The claimant claims that his home and backyard were flooded because of the failure to
maintain the road above his property. He claims that the berm or curb was insui�cient to
divert water away from the adjoining properties. The water jumped the curb, rushed
across the properry above his home and damaged his property. The water washed away a
retaining wall and flooded the rear portion of his home.
CITY REPORT
A memorandum from Public Works Supervisor, Randy Robinson, indicates that on the
day of the loss, a resident, whose home is located on the roaa above the claimant's
property, contacted the city to provide sandbags. Because of the large storm, the city had
numerous demands for sandbags. The city was not able to provide the sandbags as
quickly as the resident requested. The resident chose to pick up the sandba�s himself. The
sandbags were placed near the driveway where the water had jumped the asphalt berm
located at 1610 Sierra Dr.
City records did not reveal complaints of flooding on the adjacent property prior to this
incident.
The storm and the change of terrain contributed to the flooding. It was not because of
lack of maintenance to city property.
LIABILITY
The City of Arroyo Grande is not responsible for this loss. A site investigation
determined that a home was recently constructed above the claimant's property. The
claimant had owned this property and sold it to his son. The claimant stated that he was
not involved in the construction of the home. The claimant indicated that the drain inlet,
located at the end of the driveway of this new home, was clogged. This area filed with
water to a point where the water then flowed into the claimant's property. The claimant
had granted his son an easement across his property for this drain. The 4" drain pipe exits
into the street located in front of the claimant's home.
The proximate cause of this loss was the inordinate amount of rainfall and the drain that
was clogged above the claimant's property.
City of Arroyo Grande
Steven Adams
May 9, 2001 �
Pa�e Three fA10271-5)
CLAIM STATUS•
Claim
Status
Reserves
LPD- Harris, Robert
COMMENT•
Open
$3450.00 Loss
$1000.00 Expense
I am placing my file on diary for June 18, 2001 awaiting receipt of requested copy of the
rejection letter.
Very truly yours,
Cazl Warren & Company
l
Keith Swanson, LPCS, CCLA
�
I,.' .
. ... ....
T �4 , �,
} ( , � `'i4 f � j y � <
;� 2 j',. Y i � )�
1 :
�
L 7 L r '
�;', A
�
� _� 1 y ��r
��.��. :1�� . . , .., a .�-�.
L } � `
i . ': � . i ' , ;
:� . l . " :..a.
y y k
� � y
1 � 1 A f .h�^,� ���
( r � 5 � r � i:� h
' a `
M S ` tf
E � b
�J `� 1 1 f ��. � •. t J
� � t � n
4
.4�� � �1;.��
����� � _ t i ) + �
. S!4&l� � . Y Y�
ua�0 r -.
#} u �..
��' j'� � .. " 1f ,. � x t �
y �,
���� ��' �3r4� ;
; ..! I t ;:Y. Y
, , . . � . . .{�v���`i+� f��F ! mCi'�:i� y �
h 5 ' -.'._ i : A' .'
� � '. y C` � � : t$ �
� � L, � � �
'��S' ('� �� 4 - F "� ,,,� 7:
1 7 +� `
f� , � ; b �, � �4
. , x..� .... . o... ,. . � . . ... _, ... � . . . r..:. . .�� t.,. _ u �: Jw _ ,
1 �
:� �.k F � 1 , ��
:. � �� z ; y ; J. _;
�A� '`� �� ���
: 3�
v
� ;�11� @X��4�15, w�G � �'�� +f�i> $� ��;�,
�V�t�'1�'il°t�� � �.� ���'�- , " �> �:
�_ h � y � .
�. �:: '�. � .:. �. �� '�� �; � �.
ti�w_iMn .s�tlsii� `rlf �� .]�Nsnis��i4'i ��' i�,v��i�e�"K
� �' F t � � d j �;'m � � x `�1
i 3` � r �� � � � _ - L . �.�'.
z{:` � t�
f ; ' 3 i. ' ' ", 4
�� � tir " t.. '1
,�,; ti, � � Jt -> �: '
i � a �
� ' � y
/y �� !ry ���` �
��#' � , � 'r1 �����i�1� +iM�i���7, e t'�!r�r 9 T i 1 .,
�� " � �. F:'`; � � �
�t i? i�
y Y:, � � ' f d
' - e
k � n ..� �'�� _ r P '�,
h"4. y { t . �� '�� �. . �, i .
I .. � } [
z ` ,�1��' � �l�C �+(,��l��5 " � F
� `� ;������ ��t �A ,
� ? > 5 . A , A
�1 X: A � ��. �� �..�' h
lk � • � ' Y��.�� Y 4, ry x�' '�`l�.
�.
�
r k, t y
_ � �,
��� � � � t F � �
�y T t
z " s
*� C
�. �. '� Z* � � r .
,qv ' r! 2 � � 1 . r S�•
!
���; � ,� F,, � i i , � r 11 ._ p � �� t•! '"� .� }?'� q e 8 �� �� L �.
� y .. f Y F , � � . �. .°S� � .
�� b'�`' t . .`l . 4�1T j t �,"�s µ S tY 7 . ' "° .
��`.,.e.rka.��i . `� .j;� .. _. ..,.. ?... ._ ,. .. . ..� `_ ......, " `' _.�r'. .s�.:.. . ;��'�.�', , . .�,.,�rw '".. `�..� _;?
� y,,
, ', f
�
C = ��`� �4orne�
�.r f (.��i,rV�-`� �-��,
l t.�� � � � � 6 �(t-s �ir.
�{.��.)o�
File with:
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Attachment 2
- P,ECCIYED
�'iT, ► !`,.�. �+ � AC? '"
ti� t,�1r��Y0 �: �.,;�, ,._
RESERVE FOR FI IN STAMP
Clafm xo. [j ��t,�� ' 2 Pi l 3� 39
1. Claims for death, injury to person or personal property must be filed
not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2-)
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year
after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
3. Read entire claim form before filing.
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident.
5. This claim form must be signed on Page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details.
SIGN EACH SHEET.
T � - � �� a��� �R���� I oftClaimantth �q /� $13�p
Name of Claimant
�'��D t�J-Ol�'r
Occupation of Claimant.
l�Tl tz-�D
Home Address of Claimant City/State Home Telephone Number
l(( 3�,l,TC4 l C tz D., C� �� ���, �- - o$ S9
''� SPE�fl
l�`P?.12 •
3 5 n.�r�N
- 6RI�K-���
u � ° �"i-+-c-
Business Address of Claimant City/State I Business Telephone Number
ca a3�
Give address ana tetepnone numper co
which you desire notices or communica-
tions to be sent regarding thie claim:
�p�S ,��D � {.�o � � ,�S AsoV E
Claimant's Social
Security Number
5��--52-�5�
When di D GE or INJURY occur?
Date � Time �0: SO I� Il.(
If claim is for Equitable
Indemnity, give date claimant
served with that complaint:
Date:
Names of any City.employees
involved in ZNJURY or DAMAGE
NOt�1C
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur7 Desoribe fully, and locate on diagra�
revezse side of this sheet. Where appropriate, give street names and
address and measurements from landmarks:
TUS Noc�1-I oF BFaSCO I�t1 ���2 J���s ��1.D
OF' �(� C'�-► �.9 p��L- ItJ ,�,�FZ o`l� G RAI�DE� C/4 .
on
i..�AO� E
Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY�occurred.
D2.�.� l 1J C� �SC" f� PP 2��-P�}-t, t.� �'8 R�Sc� Rm P� D ► NT�R.-
�Z o �1, 1 ��s5 � � V' G—fz �p U�� � {.�9 D T�}v � .
�- . I ��� D L-8V D G��K�I iJ G� R-� lul. � IJ D E Cf� Q.
Why do you claim the City is responsible?
i 1J�o P R.mP��.�{ ! l �4 �►`1 r.� �D.
�o�f�+o� t �"�r�1 G-r2o c� � �.1 f� �� �6V��KP��- iI��KS .
� R-C�pa RJC� fi �0O1.�N� `fi� �'T�l �•r'a .Q�,j . �IVD �('Ct/ }-�L.L.
� �.'1 �P 12�v O I`4 . IT W�t�S 1�-�'P� l R,FsD fv� 2:�-P�A_ . —
Describe in detail each INJURY or DAMAGE
�� (-I-T �mr�`r (�3-�E� L �c �..1 � N'�' : TI R� S��4f� .
�4X c.� ��-f�c�� ,
SEE PAGE 2(OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
City of Arroyo Grande
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of thie claim,
is computed as follows:
Damage incurred to date (exact): Estimated prospective damages
� �,��� as far as known:
�� ��,�,� Damage to property......$ Future expenses for medical
Expenses for medical and hospital care.....$
$lla.�.'(l and hospital care. . . . . . . $ Future loss of
L oss of earnings........$ earnings..... ......$
Special damages for Other prospective special
....... ...............$ damaqes.. ....... ...$
General�damages.........$ Prospective general
Total damages incurred damages ...............$ .
to date ...............$ Total estimate prospective
d amages..... .. ....$
Total amount claimed as of date of
presentation of this claim........$
Was damage and/or injury investigated by poliae? ��O t2�.'�D 'T'� C.tYN { J�IL
If so, what City: �E.�1a 6R�4NDE CA
Were paramedias or ambulance called?
If so, name City or ambulance
If injured, state date, time, name and address of doctor of your ffrst
visit
WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons
known to have information:
Name Address Phone
Name Address Phone
Name Address Phone
DOC'TORS and HOSPITALS:
Hospital Address Phone
Doctor. Address Phone
Doctor Address Phone
READ CAREFULLY
For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets,
including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of gccid�ht by "X"
and by showing house numbers or distances to street corttArs. Zf City
Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City Vehicle when
you first saw it,' and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you
first saw City vehicle; location of City Vehicle at time of accident by "A-
1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by
"B-1" and the point of impact by "X."
NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper
diaqram signed by claimant.
cune
7
,
Siqnature of Claimant or person
filinq on behalf giving
Yelationship to Claimant:
SiOI•wnLK
�
Typed Name:
�R�n W b �.r'
Date:
, o � c�a�c-�.
��
�
d � 1�.� ��-,
NOTE: CLAIMS MUST BE FILED W.LTH CITY CLERK (Gov. Code Sec. 915a).
Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code Sec. 72).
�
Q' �fl
� �
� �
/Y`� �;��T.p. �..
� y �
,� �. a�
SIOC WnIK
E� CA�.�.� �.► o R� ��
�
g
N
�
@�tsc.-o
����
����
,�7--�� � � �
�✓
--�-�----_--_._._-
FECE�vE� , �,��
Next RePo�����u�����1�:�:k; �
STATUS REPORT #2 �� F� � f�� r�_� �' � z
May 9, 2001
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Crrande, CA 93420
Attention: Steven Adams, City Administrator
RE: My Principal : City of Arroyo Grande
DOI : 3/29/O 1
Claimant : Fred Wolf
My File No. : A10262-S
Dear Mr. Adams:
PREVIEW:
The claimant alleges that a pothole damaged his vehicle.
GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIltEMENTS
A. Action By Public Entit�
I recommend that the City forward a standard rejection letter to the following claimant:
Fred Wolf
1113 Ritchie Rd.
Grover Beach A 93433
Please send a copy of this letter to me to document this file.
B. Statute Of Limitations:
The statute of limitations will expire six months from the rejection.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT • CLAIMS ADJUSTERS
P.O. Box 1052 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1052
Phone: (805) 544-7963 • Fax: (805) 544-1068
City of Arroyo Grande
Steven Adams
May 9, 2001
Pa e�, Two �A10262-5)
CLAIMANT VERSION
The claimant claims that the city failed to maintain roadway. He claims that his vehicle
was damaged by pothole in street.
CITY REPORT
A memorandum from Public Works Supervisor, Randy Robinson, states that the defect in
the road was a depression that was reported to the city on March 29, 2001. A crew was
dispatched to apply a layer of cold mix as a temporary repair. This was not an actual
pothole but a depression. He felt that the claimant might have been exceedin� the posted
speed limit of 35MPH to cause the damage the claimant asserts.
LIABILITY
The City of Arroyo Grande is not responsible for this loss. The claimant himself admits
that he was aware of the depression in the road. He never reported it to the city until it
damaged his car. The claimant was on notice of the depression in the roadway. The city
responded prudently when it was notified of the problem.
CLAIM STATLTS:
Claim
Status Reserves
LPD- Wolf, Fred Open $320.00 Loss
$500.00 Expense
City of Arroyo Grande
Steven Adams
May 9, 2001
Pa e Three A10262-51
COMMENT:
I am placing my file on diary for June 30, 2001 awaiting the requested copy of the
rejection letter.
Very truly yours,
Carl W en & Company
ith Swanson, LPCS, CCLA
� �
�,�'�', s,��,,,� ��, , '� ,.'
< ,
,� "``� � � "' � � �,�'�
d��ti� �... p _
�w�. ����t�������
'. ,. .
� ,�
�t. ,,,_
f � � ` � � x 6 ��� h.��
- s... y . ='k.r:
� s ' f. ` z a y`-
,
'v � � � y i 3
� � f ,
S h
����, � #' a µ i
t ' ' � � �. - � � i:' f 4 � � �
� � j� �x y � � /':�� 3 � � � ,� � r ,
���I�'�K�' ._�_�4.����A"^�'^ .t 'Y 1 x � ry, y �}�_
j' � r
� ��'�� ��✓.n�� { .a
�
y . . \
- t -`' -' �. � .' .�� �� 4 ���Z
..,, a. ... il ^ h:� . _ . . . , . . _ . � i�. . . , . ..� ._ � . _ . . . .. �-. f ��4.'
T �'.� � � �
h � ' �
���
{ � y �� �
�k�-��T�,����� tFle{'c��n� ;��',�
��:�;��►�2; �pQ�i� �j�
� :� ,<<
� � ` � � ''� r
� , ;;
_; �
� ��.Y t . ^.h , ic _ . .� < . . � . . . . .
D�
t�t� ���r� �,�r
f f ^
1
A
t�
�� ��
��r�����
_ -�:�
f
}
� 4 }
F , ^ ? y �
. � ; ` �I _ 4 ;
[ ' F � b � - }� ��' k
�� * � � l � { f � � ��*�
� ; �
' � 4 �
Y !
��..�' r C �1��� � ��� � � � l )
���?�' ������'!� :'�!'1�C� , � 'r
ti � ' � ` ��
s - y ' � �;
IYf � 1 l ' ( �iFl) �f��j�+*� f � � Y _
6is �xfgY {��� ��. -
1 � � � � t '�
� ` � .�� � t .' 4 ��
7:, �.
� i `� `� �( ��� � � t 4 5 �:
i r r '.1�,��1��'`���� # t r r k �� ��
� � '�� .�.�x
' " � �.! b 1 4 �
` -.0 ,+. � 'y � Y tt
RV H ..1 r `
� � � > l > r _
` `
l
` �� F � � � � ;
lf+� /.• 1, F ." .`� �� -�� 7 i k '. fi i S . �
�,„ 4➢1i 3 � 2� r �` �.�� 1 � r� �`L' �+ r ,'4i
� � {
1. , + » ,
: % f�� � t y� Y t��
:; . `�S � y � -�� 't`� 1 .-. '' � '' k S F �
. . � �- E l �t? Y e>�,^C Y 1 � ?� li. t S
f , � .��, � � � t, � ,:�
'�f
' µ'� x. •.., . .... ,. ..-.t ...... > :;r;."f. �c.,..� :w..:.h.:.�,. :.w,.i.4e"�i.��� _. „ .,:�'.....
MRR. 6.2061 5�42PM RRROYO GRRhDE CITY �
C � ��� u � Clty of Arroya Grande
����'''"�� M FOA DAMAGE3
� r � � , .�,� r `, �,'., � PR �PERTY
��� �� � �
�
NO. 436 P, 2/.� � / �
�� � r ,
M� ���7'�"
�cd�. -�n 7�v�:
F�ie ��tK: +� �. �� I fi�PR - G��� 1 I� 5� asss�.ma Fox s��n 5�3 -�d�S
CITY CL&L�K�S PIC� Cla i m No.
21a EeSt Btnr�ch Street
AYYOyo Gralzde, CA 93420 .
Attachment 3
TNsmttae*rioxs
1. Clnims tor death, injury to per�o� ar poreonal property must be tiled
not leter than oix montha nPtar the occ�errenca. �cov. Cvda ssc. 911.2�
2. Ciaime Pcr damage5 to zen2 property must be file8 not later tban i year
aPtet the OCC1lrrenae. �Gov. Code 9eC. 911.2)
3. ltead entire alain� lorm AeFore lilitlg.
A. 6�e page 2 for 8iagram upon ahiah tc locate place oi acaiden�.
5. TAis clai�a torm mr�►ot be 6ign�fl on Page 2 at bottom.
6. Attaah separate st�aets, if nece�sazy, to give fuli �tetails.
SIGN LACH SftRET.
T0: (Name of Ci
�J
xama oP �laim
� .
Home A88ress of
Businass �►ddree
�
�y,
� � �afl �R' �.��' ��DZ, ��N�yf�
Give addresa s,nd t�olep,llone number to
vhiah you deeire naticas or com�auniaa-
tione to De eent seqorfling thi� ala.im:
Wheri �3d D�►MAGE or
tP c!L$im ie ior Squitsble
Indemnity, givs dato cla3riwnt
eerved wi�eh that eomplafRt: '
Oate:
o! Claimant
�o ( -8 5►
�.laimaht�s sxial
Securi.ty rlumloer
o� ariy, Cit,y s�ampioyeea
ved in IN.7IIRY or aAt�AGE
N01��
piA,ar� 4id DAMA6E or INJtlRY occur? Oe�cs3be �u].ly, ar�d 2ocate on dlagtpA{{ orl
re�erse side cf tlfis sheet. Where sppropriate, give 6tres� name� ead
address an8 taeasurem�nts lroa� landmarks:
.5��, �Ne�De�� `��. n�� a��acl���
�
Ueacribo in detail ho�r tt►e DAHAGE or tNJpRY ocouzred.
�' ���C�� a ►� o � � �l�l�� �Zo A�� Q ��t C�D - c��r��'1kJ�i
{_ � �
�us , �Bu� �� !1 � �u asl-o I�
WAy do you ciaim the City is reeponsible2
I �o Iea.� ua �-e.r r�• c:� C e M r ro ..,. � s� d �� t o a ul c ,� 1, � e.l. S a � t�
�
o.+� �icl�� cl �,
5.+4� V�o( w
Desaribe in aa�aii each INJVRY oz pA!(AGE '
SEK PAGE 2(OVSRI THIS CLAIM ?[OST HE SI6NL"D CN R8V8RSE SIDE .
: `;
h1qR. 5.2001 5�42PM ARRQYO GRAf�IDE CITY . No .436
The amount claim�d� as oP t�e d�ta oP presentat�on of thie clail�,
ia computed aa follovs:
pamaqe ineurred to dote �exaat� Est�,mated pz�vspeotive da�naqes
ss iar a� knoNn:
Dasna4e to preperty......$�•✓�'� Futw�o axpensee tor m�dical
Expenses �or medica]. at�d hospitai cnre. ....�
and hnspitni cere.......� Futura ],oas ot
Loss o! earnings........5 earninqs...... ......-$
Special dam�� _!c�, � g �� �ag psrosl�ective apeaf aL
l�dlll/.;`G---. os.....�.... -S
�eneral�damages.........5..� Prospeetive generai�
Totel damages inourzed damag9s ...............$
to 'date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total esti.�rvate proapec�iv�
clamages_.. ..... ..$
Total at�our�t �laitned a8 oZ eate o! �
pzesente�tion ot tltis ela3m,.......$
Wns da�aage andjo; in
If �o, �thnt Ci�Y�_.r_.
were paramedics or a
Z� 60, nsme city or
Ii in7ttred, eta�a da
viai �b
� .
sw��x
P.3i3
po�tx
tQiTldBS8F.5 �o D]�iAGE or ZN�URY: List ail persons and addre8sea o£ persofle
��6���'� n�a�.. _....-_._- ----•-
READ CARE$ULLY
For all accldottt claims plave on Pollowirtq diagram narae� of etreets,
�lnclu6iag Rorth� Eesb, South, and West; indieata place e� r�eoidbnt by �RX"
anfl by showinq hons� numDers ot distances to ��reet cornoxa. I! city �
vehicle waa invalved, d�signnte by ietter "A" location o! City Vehio�s rfhen
ynu first saw it� at►d by "8" locaticsa o! youa�sax� or your variicla vhQn you
i irst eaur cit�► vehicle; location ot c3ty v�hiole at tin� of acaidot�t by hA-
1" and location og yvurcalf ve yvur vehicle �t the time ot the eacident by
��g aed the pol,nt oP impnct by ^R.'�
NO�I�B: I! diagrams belov do ne� !i� tha situation� a�tach h�ro�o a prepar
diagram signed by claimant.
. /
signsture o� ClellAettt or person
�ilinq on behaif qiviriq
rel.a�:xonehip to Cla3�nant: •
,�,t�4. r s�-..�y'-
P��
�
a
d
0
�
�uRP
Typed. Name : Dt►te :
117�R K �_' 51��'��.. 'S� G -o/
NdTE: CI,7��HS 1�fT�ST BS FIUEp �CITtI CITY CLERK (GOV. Code SeC. 9158) .
presenta�iOh of a lalse e].a�,m ia a telony (Pen. Code Sec. 7�).
.�GL�
�,
DocTORS �n� �QSPiTAt�s:
Hosp3�tal �►a dress P �one �
Doet�ar�� —Addreae Phorie
Dockor_ �dress �hone
RIDE-0N TRANSPORTATIQN:1160 MARSH ST.,SUITE 108
�AN lU1S OBISPQ, CA., 93401 (80� 541-$747
�sa - .�.
` F�
DATE: �J -� - G l 1NCIDENT: oa� ep}�
RIDER: � 2t�`� � 1�e �o�-r� BY : _���, 1 M G e
tie �cte � e
�
GONTRIBUTIl�iG FACTaORS !
��
DRNER ! STAFF
1 , l .l
�
er
-�---
�wv� i ���Enrr r-o�ow-uP V . �� � ��e � f�� - � r� � �o �� �,�s
S�iVi3 COPIES TO OPERqTIpNS i�AqNqGER AND DIRECTpR
E11El�i'TS`.
w-ere rvc� �tv�►���r�cJ�.
� _
, .
O ,
April 27, 2001
�;�c�►�j��
; ( ► ��` t� < <"� `:. ; � i' Q .. , .';' . � Next Report Due: June 15, 2001
�, �� � 3 � ��T�I�S REPORT #2
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Attention: Steven Adams, City Administrator
RE: My Principal : City of Arroyo Grande
DOI : 3/OS/O1
Claimant : Ride On Transportation
My File No. : A102835
Dear Mr. Adams:
PREVIEW:
The claimant alleges that a sinkhole caused damage to their bus.
GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIREMENTS
A. Action By Public Entitv:
I recommend that the City forward a standard rejection letter to the following claimant:
Ride-On Transportation
1160 Marsh St. #107
San Luis Obispo CA 93401
Please send a copy of this letter to me to document this file.
B. Statute Of Limitations:
The statute of limitations will expire six months from the rejection.
� � � M���
�
� ��t
� �
CARL WARREN & CO.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT • CLAIMS ADJUSTERS
P.O. Box 1052 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1052
Phone: (805) 544-7963 • Fax: (805) 544-1068
City of Arroyo Grande
Steven Adams
Apri127, 2001
Page Two (A10283-5)
CITY REPORT
The city records indicated that the area where the sinkhole appeared was due to a broken
storm drainpipe. On the day of this incident the area experienced heavy rainfall.
Cor�sequently, the large amount of water entered the void in the pipe and eroded the
surrounding soil. The soil erosion subsequently undermined the street that caused the
sinkhole. The pipe was an older corrugated steel pipe. Forty-five feet of the pipe was
replaced with new plastic pipe. There were no prior problems with this pipe before it
failed.
LIABILITY
The city is not responsible for this loss. The event was unforeseeable. There was no
prior notice of this condition. The city acted responsible by repairing the pie in a timely
manner.
CLAIM STATUS:
Claim
Status
Reserves
LPD- Ride On Transportation
COMMENT:
Open
$13,100.00 Loss
$1000.00 Expense
The claimant was advised to turn this matter over to their insurance carrier. The claimant
has done this. The insurance carrier, CNA, has contacted the city and this office
regaxding the damage to the bus. CNA claims that their insured is Cerebral Palsy. Ride-
On is an additional named insured. CNA's purpose of their call was to put the
responsible party on notice of the forthcoming subrogation claim. This subrogation claim
must be made against the City of Arroyo Grande.
I am placing my file on diary for June 15, 2001 awaiting receipt of requested rejection
letter.
Very truly yours,
Caxl Warren & Company
Keith Swanson, LPCS, CCLA
��� � 1 � 6� � �� ^� x ` y '`"'i
a � r ' "� ` � �.' �.'.
,� r � E _' ? , �;. ,- � � .
� r � i , ,
� .�f f>; 7�.$+� sr fa . r
,* r? "
�� < Y ���, �
.,.��;.: r _,.._.. . .. , . . _ .. . � . ._ . i�:".'I
��a�'�lQi'14►47RF;�'VCil� , � � t �ti � r
d, r- s n
i 1,� � �., ` � a
�* ° .
r
y,
h � � � �
a.���� � r ' n r � ,�� t 4�
% 7 h - 1 .� '� �, c 1 .: y�r�
�`�� �. .
m. ,� ° i�.
� + P� ������� ! j F Yj' t M
fl� �:. �, ��� f ? ,
�'
��*'� ��•��� ��� _ r;
�`� ��p4r �►, ��4Q� > �
�, � � � ,
� '�� t � '= , � :. 1 � -,,;.
. �., . < _ r. ,� `. � - ° '
; �>-�— —, � _.. . -� , . . .', s� .�.r': - ,»'�v� � , .,._:''�.;
x. . .. . ._,
� r — * :: , 'y ,
����.;� , — :'ts
. ; ,
. �i���_ _' �" '
- , l, i .,�"� i .i�,�
.�a.� . ..� .._ . , ._ _ :. � _ .. . � _. � � r� . �. . �
M . � > , '.'Yj' } .- � a ..�,-..,
� Y
� �
�}� - r - � i s.
.� �� �� i ` . � ' . �[. ; , � ' � �3.` ;�.
�� �� �6A � � ��
�,��� �3i�i�F� `Tli3l11�!Si�� r �"'i'�'a , �� �' p �.�'+ e
? n k�� A � '�[�7i .� �
�
���'1 �r „�!��'t�pH[ �r �t���' � fl� �!'A' ��"
� ���� ; f �.� ,� bl :-.
�
.. .. . .�i . �. r_:... _a.. �<.�a , a ....H ,... �.k �.':T�... �.� <.
...F 2 S � � - > ,':'+ �:,;
�r,
v . y � ..." 4 .
� � � �'i
; �a. � � '�":6
s ', " 7
�j + -'� +,'; - -
,_ ,
C �
,. .�; ' r _ - _
��. � . ., 1',, � ' 1� .
't 4 ��� �' d ' 1 S t 41��.
� , ��dl�it��V� &�e��� ,
�'� � ' ,, < ���� y ��� � , Y
f�� ' ti � �
k t �
�, � � � ��� _ � «
an �''4`.: 4l ���� �' � � �. � ' i r
. �� � �!1v,��� i�V � � f , �
� 0 . +d 4 V _ i
r Y
�,< s s i
l r � ������� �Q " � �
{ F S
s J
y , k
1 1�- �1 - i� � 1'�" i
,- 4 � .,
/'�: ( ( i
1, ' ' `t� -� ,'.;,
�• � - *' .�'r ,
� r �� � t � ? �" y x � ` '� 3 r 9 L � ��, f.�
*'�.^� � � � } .�..` y 3 �* � .�" �'A 4
� y7 9_ � S X' k( .{, Y,
� ��*"""'Y' "}�.���"�rs'�..���� ,a y �� �� �.yy` $ � t i X T �.
8.e.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Lady called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara, Council
Members Runels, Dickens and Lubin, City Manager Adams, and City Attorney Carmel were
present.
1. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
2. CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Lady announced that the Council was going to meet in closed session to discuss the
following matters:
a. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Govemment Code
Section 54957.6:
Agency Negotiators: Steven Adams, City Manager
Unrepresented Employees: Management and Part-time Employees
b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION:
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54956.9 (b) in-
volving one (1) potential case.
c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION:
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Govemment Code Section
54956.9 (b) involving one (1) potential case.
3. CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Mayor Lady announced that there was no reportable action from the closed session.
4. ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 P.M. to the regular City Council meeting of May 8,
2001.
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lady cailed the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City Council: Council Members Runels, Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara, and
Mayor Lady were present. Council Member Dickens was absent.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams; City Attorney Carmel; Director of
Administrative Services Wetmore; Recreation Supervisor Perrin,
Director of Public Works Spagnolo; Director of Financial Services
Snodgrass; Director of Building and Fire Fibich; and Chief of Police
TerBorch.
3. FLAG SALUTE
Mark Miller, representing Boy Scout Troop 432, ted the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Pastor Robert Banker, Open Door Church, delivered the invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only
Council Member Runels moved, Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall
be read in title only and all further reading be waived.
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Mike Liebo, 273 Canyon Way, spoke about the "Destination Imagination" program and
introduced a group of students from Ocean View School who had placed first place in
competition at the State level. He stated that Judkins and Ocean View Schools would
represent California in the National competition at Knoxville, Tennessee in May.
Following a brief presentation of "Destination Imagination", Mr. Liebo requested the
Council consider a donation to the group to assist with travel expenses.
Jonni Biaggini, Executive Director of the San Luis Obispo County Visitors & Conference
Bureau, spoke about the tourism industry and announced it was National Tourism
Week. She presented the Council with a framed poster to hang at City Hall.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2007
PAGE 2
Phil Kolbo, 550 Via Vaquero, spoke about his project located on Camino Mercado and
requested guidance and action regarding the current development impact fee structure
that was implemented in March 2000. He spoke about the impact of the new fee
structure on his small development which increases the fees for his project by 50%. He
stated his project was approved and in the pipeline before the new fees took effect and
requested that the Council look into the fairness of grandfathering the previous fee
structure for his project.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Lubin moved and Council Member Runels seconded the motion to
approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.i., with the recommended courses of
action:
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
Action: Approved the listing of cash disbursements for the period April 16, 2001
through April 30, 2001.
8.b. Statement of Investment Deposits.
Action: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of April
30, 2001.
8.c. Minutes of Special Joint City Councils/Board Meeting of March 26, 2001.
Action: Approved minutes as submitted.
8.d. Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission.
Action: Approved 1) Mayor Lady's appointment of Bruce Lewis to the Parks and
Recreation Commission; and 2) Council Member Dickens' appointment of
Pamela lanneo to the Parks antl Recreation Commission.
8.e. Landmark Tree Designation - 406 Golden West Place.
Action: Approved Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation and
adopted Resolution No. 3516 designating Landmark Tree #01-63 located at 406
Golden West Place.
8.f. Scenic Creekside Walk Through the Historic Village of Arroyo Grande,
Phase II, Progress Payment No. 4.
Action: Authorized progress payment in the amount of $41,986.39 to R. Simons
Company, Inc.
S.g. Resolution Opposing National Fire Protection Association (N.F.P.A.)
Standard 1710.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3517 opposing N.F.P.A. Standard 1710.
8.h. Proposed Stop Signs on West Cherry Avenue at Orchard Street.
Action: Approved Traffic Commission's recommendation to adopt Resolution No.
3518 approving stop signs on West Cherry Avenue at Orchard Street.
8.i. State Declared Disaster - March 2001 Winter Storms.
Action: 1) Adopted Resolution No. 3522 identifying individuals authorized to
execute Office of Emergency Services (OES) documents for the purpose of
obtaining financial assistance; and 2) Appropriate $50,000 of the City's Urban
State Highway Account (USHA) funds for the 25% local contribution to remove
and replace the damaged sidewalk on Rodeo Drive.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 3
AYES: Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9. PUBLIC HEARING:
9.a. Application for Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Grover
Beach Taxi ("GBT")
Director of Administrative Services Wetmore highlighted the staff report. She explained
that an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity was received
from Leland and Amy Simpson to operate a taxicab service called Grover Beach Taxi
within the City limits of Arroyo Grande. She stated the Council must conduct a public
hearing and determine if there is a public need or convenience that requires another
taxicab service in the City.
Mayor Lady opened the Public Hearing.
Dutch De Groot, Five Cities Taxi, spoke in opposition to approving an additional taxicab
company.
Jeff Goldenberg, Beach Cities Cab, spoke in opposition to approving an additional
taxicab company. -
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the Public Hearing.
Council Member Dickens inquired abQUt the status of the two previous taxicab
companies that had received approval. Director Wetmore responded that the finro
taxicab companies had met all the conditions of approval and had been issued and
were currently approved to operate in the City.
Council comments and discussion included allowing opportunity for competition in an
open and fair market; enforcing #he City's economic development strategy; and the
difficulty in determining whether there was a necessity for an additional taxicab service.
Council Member Lubin moved to adopt a Resolution granting a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity to Five Cities Taxi Service for the operation of a taxicab
senrice within the City limits contingent upon full and total compliance with all conditions
and requirements of Title 5, Chapter 10 "Taxicabs" of the Arroyo Grande Municipal
Code. Council Member Runels seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote,
to wit:
AYES: Lubin, Runels, Ferrara, Lad�r
NOES: Dickens
ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 4
There being 4 AYES and 1 NO, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
10.a. Request for Speed Reduction on Huasna Road.
Director of Public Works Spagnolo presented the staff report. Staff recomrnended the
Council adopt a Resolution amending the City's speed survey to reduce the speed limit
on Huasna Road from 45 miles per hour (mph) to 40 mph.
Council Member Lubin asked whether staff had met with the Court's Traffic
Commissioner and whether the City would be creating a speed trap. Chief TerBorch
responded that staff had not met with the Traffic Commission, however, had spoken
with the District Attorney and a Judge regarding the issue.
Council Member Runels commented that when Huasna Road was smoothed out and
repaved, cars would increase their speed. Due to the proximity of the park and
residential neighborhoods, he supported a 5-mph reduction in the speed limit
Mayor Lady opened up the item for public comments.
Victor Verze, 950 Huasna, spoke in support of the reduction in the speed limit to 40 mph
and expressed a desire to see it further reduced to 35 mph in the future.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady brought the item back to Council for
consideration.
Council and staff discussion ensued regarding the speed survey; pending legislation
regarding new criteria for traffic surveys; issues relating to the enforcement of the speed
limit; and the potential for reducing the speed limit further in the future based on new
data.
Council Member Dickens moved to adopt a Resolution amending the City's speed
survey to reduce the speed limit on Huasna Road from 45 miles per hour (mph) to 40
mph. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara seconded the motion. Further discussion ensued
regarding the validity of the speed survey should a speed citation be rejected in court.
On the following roll-call vote, to wit: ..
AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Runels, Lubin, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 5
10.b. Resolution Establishing a Standard Schedule for Development Impact
Fees.
City Manager Adams presented the staff report. He explained that in March, the City
Council approved a new fee structure to more accurately identify land use categories in
calculating the traffic facilities fees. He stated staff was requested to further modify the
development impact fee tables so they were all consistent with the format utilized for the
traffic facilities fees. He explained the tables had been modified but the fees had not
been increased. Staff recommended the Council adopt a Resolution establishing a
standard schedule for development impact fees.
Council Member Runels asked for clarification regarding the fee for the cemetery land
use category. City Manager Adams explained that the fee would be charged only if a
new cemetery was constructed in the City or the existing one was expanded.
Council Member Dickens asked if Mr. Kolbo's earlier public comments regarding
development impact fees could be addressed at this time. City Manager Adams stated
the Council could raise the issue and ask staff to provide direction regarding the matter;
however, the Council could not take any action with respect to Mr. Kolbo's request as it
was not listed on the Agenda.
Council Member Runels moved to adopt a Resolution establishing a standard schedule
for development impact fees.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara referred to projects in general that were approved and in the
pipeline prior to the adoption of the new fee schedule and asked for clarification on
whether or not there was interest in discussing the issue at a future date.
City Manager Adams clarified that there were approximately five or six projects that had
received approval but had not been issued a building permit. He explained that fees are
calculated at the time the building permit is issued. He further explained the appeal
process that was available to the applicant.
Following further discussion, there was consensus to direct staff to place on a future
agenda consideration of a policy to apply the prior development impact fees to projects
that received approval before the new fees went into effect in April 2000, but had not yet
received building permits.
Council Member Runels moved to adopt a Resolution establishing a standard schedule
for development impact fees. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the
following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Runels, Lubin, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 6
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Modification to California Public Employees' Retirement System Contract.
Financial Services Director Snodgrass presented the staff report. She explained that as
a result of side-bar negotiations with the Arroyo Grande Police Officer Association, an
agreement had been reached to increase CaIPERS retirement benefits from 2% at age
50 plan to the 3% at age 55 plan for police officer employees, effective January 1, 2002.
Mayor Lady opened up the item for public comment, and upon hearing none brought the
item back to the Council for consideration.
Council Member Dickens moved to introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending
the contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System. Council Member
Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Lubin, Runels, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
Council Member Dickens moved to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf
of the City a Resolution of Intention to amend the contract with the Califomia Public
Retirement System. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following
roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Lubin, Runels, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
Council Member Dickens moved to approve the Side Letter of Agreement amending the
existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Arroyo Grande Police Officers
Association (AGPOA). Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the
following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Lubin, Runels, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 7
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
a. MAYOR MICHAEL LADY
(1) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). 1) Held
election of officers and was reelected as Chair; 2) Reported on status of
grant from APCD regarding the proposal for the cogeneration project; 3)
Barbara Mann from OCSD was elected as Speciaf District representative;
and 4) Conducted 2001-02 budget hearings.
(2) Other. 1) Arroyo Grande hosted the Mayor's Meeting on Friday, March
30�'; and 2) Participated in meeting with Assembly Member Maldonado and
Supenrisor Achadjian to receive information and discuss potential funding
mechanisms for the EI Campo interchange.
b. MAYOR PRO TEM TONY M. FERRARA
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report.
Next meeting is May 9, 2001.
(2) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No report. Next meeting is May
23, 2001.
(3) Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC). No report. Encouraged future
discussion on the future of this Committee.
(4) Other. 1) Will be attending the League's Channel Counties Division meeting
in Santa Barbara; and 2) Will be attending a meeting with Supervisor
Achadjian to discuss the condition of The Pike and potential funding
available for resurfacing the road.
c. COUNCIL MEMBER THOMAS A. RUNELS
(1) Zone 3 Advisory Board. The first phase of the Lopez Dam remediation
project will begin soon; all permits have been received.
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report.
(3) Other. 1) Attended the SSLOCSD meeting as the altemate; 2) Meeting was
held on formalization of . the gentlemen's agreement for the Santa Maria
Valley water rights case.
d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS
(1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional
Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). Distributed "Regional Housing
Needs Determination" handout to Council Members and recommended that
City staff be involved in the issue and provide a briefing to the City Council
on the regional housing needs assessment process that is being mandated
by the State.
(2) Community Recreation Center Subcommittee. Website being created;
members of the subcommittee will be at the Strawberry Festival to hand out
informational flyers; Cal. Poly class not able to take on the next stage of the
project; however, they m.ay be able to commit to a summer project.
(3) Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC). Reported on Homeless
Awareness Week; will be attending the Homeless Walk from the Shelter to
the Prado Day Center.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 8
(4) South County Youth Coalition. 24-hour Relay to be held at Arroyo Grande
High School on May 19�' and 20�'.
(5) Other. Will be attending the EVC Annual Breakfast on May 18"' to accept
recognition for the award the City received at the CALED Conference..
e. COUNCIL MEMBER SANDY LUBIN
(1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). 1) Board approved an increase of the
pickup charge from $2 #o : $3 for the senior taxi program; the Board also
approved raising the price of a 10-ride card to $40; 2) Approved relocation
of bus transfer station from Ramona Avenue in Grover Beach to the Train
Station; and 3) Reported that a Lopez Lake Shuttle Program would be
available this summer for youth.
(2) Economic Vitality Corporation. Met April 25"'. EVC received Statewide
recognition; CEO Dave Spaur to meet with the City Managers to ensure that
scope of work expectations are being accomplished; and EVC staff would
be recommending a continuation of the City's $5,000 commitment in next
year's budget.
(3) Other. None.
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
a. Consideration of additional potential transient occupancy revenue options. (Ferrara)
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara spoke about' a tourism assessment charge that the City of
Sacramento adopted by Ordinance establishing the Sacramento Tourism Business
Improvement District. He stated this was not considered transient occupancy tax. He
said this was an idea for generating additional revenue to be used for marketing
purposes and asked if the Council was interested in pursuing the issue. Following
discussion, staff was requested to research and report back on what would be required
to institute a tourism assessment on hotel/motel bills as has been done in Sacramento.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Lady inquired whether the draft General Plan documents would be placed on the
City's website. Staff responded the materials would be available on the website.
Council Member Runels requested clarification on the status of a number of parcels in
the area between East Cherry and Myrtle Street that had requested rezoning and
whether they should be further addressed in the General Plan Update process. City
Manager Adams replied he would look into the matter and provide a status repo,� to
CounciL
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara reported he had been approached at the Soto Sports Complex
during the Five Cities Girls Softball Tournament regarding the lack of recycling bins. He
requested staff determine if recycling bins were provided at the City's ball fields and
parks and to provide containers at the sites if it was not currently being done.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 8, 2001
PAGE 9
In response to an inquiry from Council Member Lubin, staff was asked to identify what
recycling requirements are currently in place for apartment buildings and whether any
improvements should be made to the program regarding this issue.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara announced that there would be a statewide energy
conservation exercise at 10:30 a.m. on May 24 to prepare for Stage 3 alerts. He
recommended that the City participate.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Adams asked for clarification on the request for funding from "Destination
Imagination" and asked whether there was a consensus of the Council to add this to a
future agenda. There was consensus of the Council to consider the request at a later
date.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lady adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m.
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 30, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lady called the Adjourned City Council meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City Council:
City Staff Present:
Council Members Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara,
and Mayor Lady were present.
City Manager Adams;
Administrative Services
Director McCants.
3. FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Lady led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
None.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
None.
City Attorney Carmel; Director of
Wetmore; Community Development
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only
Council Member Runels moved, Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall
be read in title only and all further reading be waived.
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
Kirk Scott, Arroyo Grande resident and Vice-Chair of the Long Range Planning
Committee (LRPC), spoke about the General Plan Update process in general and
stated that the General Plan is supposed to be a reflection of what the people want their
City to look like in the future. He stated that the LRPC relied heavily upon the results of
the citizens survey that was conducted as part of the General Plan Update in order to
apply the views of the citizenry to each of the areas that were considered. He stated
that the LRPC recommendations were a reflection of the will of the people and
encouraged the Council to continue to listen to the people in the community and not to
the few of those with special interests.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 2
Larry Turner, 323 Noguera Place, spoke regarding drainage provisions of the General
Plan as it relates to the Noguera Neighborhood and submitted a letter for the record
requesting that no action be taken on the City's proposed plan unless it completely and
finally solves the 100-year storm requirement.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
10.a. None.
10.b. 2001 General Plan Update and EIR Public Review Draft (continued from the
April 24, 2001 regular meeting).
7. Village Mixed-Use Boundaries and Uses
Consultant Strong gave an overview of each subarea within the Village and provided
alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Tim Brown, 125 Allen; Ed Dorfman, 285
La Cresta; Linda Osty, 309 E. Cherry; John Hayashi, representing the Arroyo Grande
Japanese Welfare Association; Earl Paulding, 232 La Cresta; Milton Hayes; Michael
Thomas, 267 E. Cherry; Vern Frederick; Jan Scott, 520 Via Vaquero; Dennis Allen, 690
Heritage Lane; Kaz Ikeda, representing the Arroyo Grande Japanese Welfare
Association; Cindy Fear, 317 E. Cherry; Tom Murray, rural Arroyo Grande; Susan K.,
235 E. Cherry; Nick Alter, 354 Corbett Canyon Road; Chuck Fellow, Arroyo Grande
resident; Kirk Scott, 520 Via Vaquero; Ella Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road; Otis Page,
606 Myrtle; Jim Guthrie, 514 Starlight; and Gary Kobara, 2595 Gracia Way.
The Council unanimously concurred that the 2-acre portion southeast of Traffic Way
and Cherry Avenue be classified as Mixed Use (MU). There was majority consensus of
the Council that the 10-acre adjoining property be retained as Agriculture; and the 5-
acre hillside property would be reclassified from Agriculture to Single Family
Residential, Low Density, with Conservation/Open Space combining designation.
Additionally, the Council concurred that the Village Core would exclude existing Single
Family Residential areas to the west, north and east, and that Traffic Way south of
Poole Street would be classified Mixed Use rather than Village Core.
Mayor Lady called a recess at 9:30 p.m, and reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 3
8. Frederick's and Williams' Properties inside and southeast of City limits and
SO/
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Mike Frederick, President of ALC
Management Corporation; Tim Brown, 125 Allen; Nick Alter, 354 Corbett Canyon Road;
Alice Reinheimer, Gularte Road; Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest Drive; Otis Page, 606
Myrtle; and Kirk Scott, 620 Via Vaquero.
Council Members unanimously agreed with the Consultant and the LRPC
recommendation that the 2001 General Plan Update draft land use map propose the
Frederick/ALC property be classified Specific Plan and Specific Plan Reserve without
underlying land uses prescribed, and include the William's property as Specific Plan
Reserve when added to the proposed Urban Reserve Line and Sphere of Influence.
9. Valley Road Agriculture
Mayor Lady and Council Member Runels declared a potential conflict of interest
due to ownership of property and business and stepped down from the dais.
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were John Taylor, Valley Road; Kirk Scott,
620 Via Vaquero; Tim Brown, 125 Allen; Ella Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road; Nick Alter,
354 Corbett Canyon Road; Tom Murray, rural Arroyo Grande; Jane Line, rural Arroyo
Grande; and John Runels, Miller Way.
There was Council consensus that the 2001 draft General Plan Update propose that
this surrounded Agriculture area be shown on the Urban Land Use Map as County
Agriculture but not be included within the City's Sphere of Influence and Urban Reserve
Line.
10. Farroll Avenue
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Jim McGillis, representing the Nipomo
Incorporation Committee; Kirk Scott, 620 Via Vaquero; and Charles Okui, representing
the Sakamotos.
There was Council consensus that the 2001 draft Generaf Plan Land Use Map propose
Single Family Residential Low Medium Density Planned Development to encourage
cluster residential, 2.5 du/ac. Planned Development, including possible expansion of
Soto Sports Complex or public park and ponding basin potential.
_____
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 4
11. East Grand Avenue Mixed Use Corridor Boundaries.
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
There were no public comments.
There was Council consensus that the draft 2001 General Plan Update propose East
Grand Avenue as a Mixed Use corridor without requiring Specific Plans and including
institutional and residential uses as well as commercial and office uses with the Mixed
Use subareas known as Gateway, Midway, and Highway. The Single Family
Residentiaf developments north and south of the Mixed Use corridor would generally
remain SFR-MD rather than Multiple Family or Mixed Use.
12. EI Camino Rea/.
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments included Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest Drive.
There was Council consensus that the draft 2001 General Plan Update propose the
entire EI Camino Real frontage as Mixed Use including residential, office, commercial,
and industrial uses. Only the cemetary would be classified Community Facility on this
Mixed Use corridor.
In summary, Consultant Strong reported that in addition to the Land Use Element Map,
the 2001 General Plan Update would include Circulation, Housing, Noise, Safety,
Economic Development, Parks and Recreation, and Agricultural, Conservation and
Open Space Element policies and proposals. He explained that most of the Elements
are graphically included on the Urban Land Use Element Map; however, some changes
involve other maps. He also indicated that the current Project Study Reports (PSRs)
study area boundaries would be shown on the map. Consultant Strong stated that the
draft documents would be ready for public review on May 15, 2001.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
11.a. San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
Memorandum of Agreement Regarding Membership on the IWMA Board.
Community Development Director McCants presented the staff report. Staff
recommended the Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the
Memorandum of Agreement.
Council Member Runels moved to approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the
Memorandum of Agreement. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on
the following roll-call vote, to wit:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 5
AYES: Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Ferrara, and Mayor Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
None.
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
None.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
City Manager Adams stated the City Engineer has received Parcel Map AG 98-548,
owned by Dr. Robert Anderson. The subject parcel is located on the southwest corner
of Station Way and Fair Oaks Avenue between Station Way and State Highway 101.
This is a split of one parcel of 90,911 square feet in size into two separate lots of 48,012
and 42,899 square feet in size. This parcel map is incorporated with the construction of
finro new commercial buildings as part of the previously approved CUP 98-565. Unless
appealed, the Final Map will be approved or disapproved by the City Engineer within ten
days following the date of this agenda.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Dickens reported he had attended a workshop at the Califomia
Economic Development Conference and he distributed material to the Council entitled
"Creative Tourism Strategies", which specifically addresses strategies for rural
communities.
Council Member Runels referred to the small parcels on Myrtle Street and East Cherry
Avenue and inquired why these areas were not included in the discussions regarding
the General Plan Update. City Manager Adams responded that prior City Council
direction was provided that those parcels remain as agriculture.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
None.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lady adjourned
Meeting of May 8, 2001.
the meeting at 12:00 p.m. to the next Regular City Council
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 6
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lady called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City Council: Council Members Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara,
and Mayor Lady were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams; City Attorney Carmel; City Clerk Davis;
Director of Financial Services Snodgrass; Director of Public Works
Spagnolo; Director of Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Hernandez;
Community Development Director McCants; Associate Planner
Heffernon, and Chief of Police TerBorch.
3. FLAG SAWTE
Bill Weitkamp of the Arroyo Grande Valley Kiwanis Club led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Pastor James Wickstrom, Berean Bible Church, Arroyo Grande, delivered the
I nvocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.a. Proclamation - "Arbor Day"
Dan Hernandez, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Facilities, accepted the
proclamation declaring April 27, 2001 as "Arbor Day."
5.b. Proclamation -"National Small Business Week"
John Riedel, on behalf of the Central Cost Development Association, accepted the
proclamation declaring May 6-12, 2001 as "National Small Business Week."
6. AGENDA REVIEW
None.
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only
Council Member Dickens moved, Council Member Runels seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall
be read in title only and all further reading be waived.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 2
7. CITIZENS' INPUT, COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
Wayne Frisby, 291 Canyon Way, asked if the Council knew if PG&E would continue
routine tree maintenance and if not, did the City plan to take over routine tree
maintenance. Mayor Lady directed staff to look into the matter and respond to Mr.
Frisby.
Richard Venable, 849 Mesa Drive, spoke about AB35 relating to firearm licensing and
stated he hoped the City Council and police Chief would oppose the bill.
Don Ritter, representing Castlerock Development, spoke about the grading operations
occurring at the Highlands project off of James Way. He assured the Council that
efforts were being made to move the dirt and clean the site. He addressed the slope
areas that would be required to be landscaped by the private property owner within six
months. Council Member Lubin urged Mr. Ritter to work with the Homeowners
Association to complete landscaping of the homes in an expedient manner.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Lubin moved and Council Member Runels seconded the motion to
approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.d., with the recommended courses of
action:
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
� Action: Approved the listing of cash disbursements for the period April 1, 2001
through April 15, 2001.
8.b. Cash Flow Analysis/Approval of InterFund Advance from the Water Facility
Fund.
Action: Received and filed March 2001 Cash Report and approve the interfund
advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other funds as of
March 31, 2001.
8.c. Minutes of City Council Meeting of April 10, 2001.
Action: Approved minutes as submitted.
8.d. Participation in the California Law Enforcement Equipment Purchase
(CLEEP) Program.
Action: Approved expenditure of $113,000 as authorized by the State for
acquisition of enhanced technology and other equipment under the FY 2000-01
CLEEP Program.
AYES: Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 3
9. PUBLIC HEARING
9.a. Planned Sign Program 01-001; Applicant - Ray Bunnell, Casa Grande Inn;
Location - 850 Oak Park Blvd.
Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report. She explained that in 1998, the
City Council approved a Planned Sign Program for the Inn; however, due to various
circumstances, a building permit was never issued and the Planned Sign Program
expired. She stated the proposed signage was identical to what was previously
approved except for the pole sign, which is 1 foot taller and 13 square feet larger. She
further explained that the existing signs are considered legal non-conforming as they
were approved prior to the most recent revisions to the Sign Ordinance. Since the
applicant was not proposing any additional signs, the nonconforming signs are allowed
to remain nonconforming and the pole sign could be increased in size without a
variance. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on April 17 and
recommended the City Gouncil approve the Planned Sign Program as submitted.
Mayor Lady opened the public hearing, and upon hearing no comments closed the
public hearing.
Following Council comments in support of the Planned Sign Program, Mayor Pro Tem
Ferrara moved to adopt a Resolution approving Planned Sign Program Case No. 01-
001 for the Best Western Casa Grande Inn, applied for by Ray Bunnell, located at 850
Oak Park Blvd. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll
call vote, to wit:
AYES: Ferrara, Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9.b. Operating Fee Update.
Financial Services Director Snodgrass presented the staff report and said most City
costs have increased in the year since the Council set operating fees, where
appropriate, at 100 percent of , cost. She recommended using the
Consumer Price Index percentage of 3.8 percent for increasing City fees, rather than
doing another operating fee study. She also discussed three Fire fees that are currently
not being charged because of lack of sufficient staff and specified recreation fees for
non-residents.
Mayor Lady opened the public hearing.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 4
Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest Drive, noticed on the Agenda that funds were borrowed
from the water fund to cover cash deficits in other funds. Director Snodgrass explained
that interfund borrowing is necessary because of the timing of certain funds.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing.
Following Council comments in support of updating the operating fees, Council Member
Dickens moved to adopt a Resolution revising operating fees in the Fire, Building,
Community Development, Engineering, and Recreation Departments by the January
CPI of 3.8%. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara seconded the motion, and on the following roll-
call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Runels, Lubin, and Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9.c. Establishment of Non-Resident Fees for Parks and Recreation Programs
and Services.
Director of Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Hernandez presented the staff report. The
Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the creation of non-resident fees
associated with use of the Soto Sports Complex, Pre-School Programs, and Contract
Classes and adopt a Resolution establishing such non-resident fees.
Mayor Lady opened the public hearing..
The following members of the public spoke in opposition to the establishment and
charging of non-resident fees:
Rich Neufeld, 932 Charles, Grover Beach
Randall Cooper, Pismo Beach, representing the Babe Ruth Baseball League
Ella Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road. Arroyo Grande
Kathy Bucknum, 526 Leanna Drive, Arroyo Grande
Joe Steed, 641 S. Elm Street, Arroyo Grande, representing AYSO
Mike Cleary, 2445 Mustang Drive, Arroyo Grande
Gee Gee Soto, Arroyo Grande
Karen Jones, 1663 Ramona Avenue, Grover Beach
Kaz Ikeda, 2290 Branch Mill Road, Arroyo Grande
Glen Martin, Arroyo Grande, representing Five Cities Softball
Jim McGillis, Arroyo Grande
Dee Santos, 850 Atlantic City Avenue, Grover Beach
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 5
Mike Titus, 404 Lierly, Arroyo Grande, supported the Council's efforts to reduce the
subsidies to non-resident users. He also suggested the possibility of creating an
Assessment District to raise funds for parks and recreation.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing.
Council Members discussed the creation of non-resident fees associated with the use of
Soto Sports Complex, Pre-School Programs, and Contract Classes. They agreed that
although there is a need for financial help in maintaining the parks and programs, they
would continue the portion of this agenda item related to establishing non-resident fees
for various youth organizations. Council suggestions for increasing non-residential
financial assistance included: 1) Seeking regional help through cooperative agreements
from other cities, service districts, etc.; 2) Contacting the Third and Fourth Supervisorial
District Offices for assistance; 3) Establishing non-resident fees for adult sports and
non-sport programs; 4) Setting up a program whereby participants could work "Service
Hours" on maintenance; and 5) Holding discussions throughout the South County on
the matter.
After further discussion, Council Members decided to implement a non-resident fee of
20 percent over current fees related to Play and Learn and Kindergarten in Training
Programs, and implement a non-resident fee of $5.00 per registered class for youth
classes offered by the City. It was moved by Council Member Dickens and seconded
by Council Member Lubin to adopt a Resolution as amended establishing non-resident
fees for pre-school and contract classes, and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Lubin, Runels,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Ferrara, and Lady
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
Mayor Lady called a 10-minute recess at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at
9:30 p.m.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
10.a. Screening of the Bale and Pallet Storage Area at Trader Joe's.
Associate Planner Kelly Heffernon stated Council had previously directed staff to
contact Trader Joe's in the Five Cities Center about installing screening of the bale and
pallet storage area. She said Trader Joe's is agreeable to installing the screening
material but would like the City to specify the preferred material. She gave examples of
materials that could be used for the screening.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 6
Council Members discussed the matter and it was moved by Council Member Runels,
and seconded by Council Member Lubin to have staff propose the Council's position to
use DECORA Pattern with Sandstone Frame glass blocks to enclose the arch, and on
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Runels, Lubin, Dickens, Ferrara, and Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES AND 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
10.b. 2001 General Plan Update and EIR Public Review Draft.
Community Development Director Kerry McCants stated staff was requesting the
Council authorize the distribution of the public review draft of the 2001 General Plan
Update, EIR, and Land Use Map. He said the focus of tonight's discussion would be
the draft Land Use Map and some areas of potential controversy on which staff wanted
to validate the direction of the Council before distribution of the draft documents to the
public. He said this was a very preliminary stage in the process; there would be a 45-
day period of review required by the California Environmental Quality Act; there would
be subsequent Planning Commission hearings, and then there would be City Council
action.
Rob Strong, General Plan Update and EIR Consultant, said the Long Range Planning
Committee met four times to discuss the General Plan Update and Draft Environmental
Impact Report. He said the Committee focused on 12 Land Use Study Areas, which
would be clarified or classified differently than shown on the 1990 adopted General Plan
or the Envicom Corporation Draft Land Use Policy Map dated March 20, 2000. He said
staff would present four-color maps graphically showing:
1. The adopted 1990 General Plan Land Use Map;
2. The 2000 Draft Land Use Policy Map proposed by Envicom;
3. The 2001 Draft Urban Land Use Element Map recommendations of Strong
Planning Services presented to the LRPC, and
4. The 2001 Distribution Draft recommendations of the LRPC, for public review and
comment.
1. Oak Park Acres at James Way
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
There was no public comment.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 7
Council Members agreed with the Consultant and the LRPC recommendation for
alternative "c."- Utilize the Community Facility classification reflecting existing
institutional uses.
2. Rancho Grande — Noyes Road
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Otis Page, 606 Myrtle Street; Ella
Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road; Dave Coker, representing Castlerock Development, and
Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest Drive.
Council Member Dickens and Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara chose alternative "b."- Classify as
Conservation/Open Space and enable one house on each existing parcel or allow
consideration of 1 du/5 ac. or 10 ac., implying 5 to 10 houses with PD approval.
On a majority consensus, Council Members Lubin and Runels and Mayor Lady agreed
to an amended alternative "d."- Classify as SFR-LD-PD to enable consideration of a
low-density single-family residential planned development not to exceed 1 du/1.5 acres
enabling up to 35 units.
3. Rancho Grande — La Canada
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Ella Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road, and
Don Ritter of Castlerock Development.
Council Members Runels and Lubin preferred an amended "d."- Classify as SFR-LD-PD
at 1 du/1.5 ac. or 1 du/ac. enabling consideration of a planned development of 17 units,
depending on PD and subdivision approval.
On a majority consensus, Council Member Dickens, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara and Mayor
Lady agreed with alternative "b."- Classify as Conservation/Open Space-PD and allow 1
du/5 ac. enabling 1 to 5 units subject to planned development approval.
4. Royal Oaks Estates
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
Members of the public making comments were Don McHaney, one of the owners of the
Royal Oaks Subdivision; Carl Alfano, property owner; Richard DeBlauw, 744 Alta Vista
Lane; Stephanie Painter, 541 Mesa View Drive, and Tim Brown, 125 Allen.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 8
Council Member Dickens and Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara preferred "b."-Classify as C/OS-
PD and allow 1 house per parcel or 1 du/5 ac. enabling 3 or more units depending on
whether the tree preservation agreement area is included in the PD.
On a majority consensus, Council Members Runels and Lubin and Mayor Lady agreed
with an amended alternative "d."- Classify as SFR-LD-PD and C/OS at 1 du/1.5 ac. and
limited to a maximum of 20 dwellings. The vegetated hillside and creek area would be
subject to a tree preservation easement agreement.
5. Printr, Noyes and Oak Park Road Northern Sphere of Influence
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
There was no public comment.
Council Members unanimously concurred with the Consultant and the LRPC
recommendation that the 2001 General Plan Update exclude this area except the small
60-acre portion fronting on Highway 227 which would remain within the URL & SOI to
enable possible annexation, subject to Single-Family Residential, Low Density, Planned
Development.
6. Camino Mercado
Consultant Strong gave an overview of the area and provided alternatives.
There was no public comment.
Council Members unanir�ously concurred with the Consultant and the LRPC
recommendation that the 2001 General Plan Update propose Mixed-Use/Planned
Development as a more appropriate designation enabling residential, office and/or
commercial or other MU-PD proposals. The cemetery would be classified as
Community Facility.
AT THE HOUR_OF 12:00 A.M., IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RUNELS
AND SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER LUBIN TO CONTINUE THIS MEETING TO
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON MONDAY. APRIL 30. 2001, 7:00 P M TO
CONTINUE WITH THE REMAINING ITEMS OF BUSINESS.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lady adjourned the meeting at 12:00 a.m. to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on
Monday, April 30, 2001, 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 24, 2001
PAGE 9
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Davis, City Clerk
� pRROy� �.f■
° ��
� INCORPOFATED 9
� v
m
� �Y 10,191 � MEMORANDUM
c � 9 ��FORN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KERRY McCANTS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY: TERESA MCCLISH, ASSOCIATE PLANNER '�'�'�
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NO. 01-010; AUTHORIZATION TO CLOSE
CITY STREETS, USE CITY PROPERTY, AND WAIVE FEES FOR THE
"ARROYO VALLEY CAR SHO" ON SATURDAY, JULY 28, 2001
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council consider the request from the Arroyo Valley Car
Club and adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the closure of City streets and
the use of City property; and if the Council so chooses, authorize the waiver of
permit and police services fees.
FUNDING:
Loss of reimbursement for Auxiliary Police Services (approximately 5985) and
Temporary Permit Fee ($101).
DISCUSSION:
On April 16, 2001 the Arroyo Valley Car Club submitted letters and an application
for a temporary use permit for the annual "Arroyo Valley Car Sho" scheduled for
Saturday July 28, 2001 (Attachment 1). The City has approved temporary use
permits for the Arroyo Valley Car Sho in previous years. The descriptions of the
areas to be used are as follows:
1. Closure of Olohan Alley; Bridge Street; Nelson Street between Bridge
and Mason Streets; Short Street between Branch Street and Olohan
Alley; City Hall parking lot; and, the lawns on Nelson Street between
Short and Mason Streets from 6:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. on Saturday
July 28, 2001 for the purpose of holding the car show.
2. Closure of Mason Street between East Branch to Nelson Streets from
6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. on Saturday, July 28, 2001 for the purpose
of holding the car show registration.
On April 24, 2001, Mr. Derrill Pilkin.gton, representing the Arroyo Valley Car Club,
met with the Staff Advisory Committee (SAC1 to discuss the requirements for the
Arroyo Valley Car Club
May 22, 2001
Page 2 of 2
event (Attachment 2). The SAC discussed issues related to coordinating Police and
Fire support, restrooms and the special event banner. These items are addressed in
the conditions of approval for the temporary use permit (reference Exhibit "A" of
the attached Resolution). Temporary use permits authorizing street closures will
only be issued upon the approval of the City Council.
In addition to the request to close City streets and use City property, the applicant
has submitted a letter requesting the City waive fees for police services
(Attachment 3). Due to the size and location of the event, the Police Department
traditionally utilizes a foot-beat team composed of two (2) police officers for
security purposes. Since East Branch Street is not blocked off, police officers for
intersection control are not necessary. While the event does not usually produce a
large number of incidents, the police units are beneficial in handling potentially
unruly situations and in keeping illegal alcohol consumption to a minimum. The
City displays the DARE unit and other emergency vehicles during the event.
Since 1991, (except for 1997 when there was no car show) the City Council has
waived the Auxiliary Police Services fees for the event. This has been done on the
basis that the Arroyo Valley Car Club is a community based non-profit organization
which places the majority of the funds it raises through the car show back into the
community through donations to other non-profit organizations. Many of these
donations go to youth oriented groups.
The potential loss of offsetting revenue is approximately 5985. However, the
event is budgeted in the Police Department's Overtime Budget. Additionally, since
the City Council has waived this fee in the past, the Auxiliary Police Services costs
for the event have not been included in the Police Department's Cost Recovery
revenue estimates. Therefore, should the City Council continue the practice of
waiving the fee, there will be no negative impact to estimated cost recovery
revenues.
Lastly, the applicant has requested a refund of the Temporary Use Permit Fee of
5101 for the event (Attachment 4). As stated above, more money can be donated
to local charities if this fee can be waived.
Attachments: 1) Letter requesting street closure, Arroyo Valley Car Club
2) SAC meeting minutes 4/24/01
3) Letter requesting fee waiver for police protection, Arroyo
Valley Car Club
4) Letter requesting refund of the Temporary Use Permit fee
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NO.
01-010; AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF CITY STREETS, USE
OF CITY PROPERTY AND WAIVER OF FEES FOR THE ARROYO
VALLEY CAR SHO TO BE HELD SATURDAY JULY 28, 2001
WHEREAS, organizers of the Arroyo Valley Car Sho have requested ciosure of
certain City streets and the use of City property as outlined below, for its annual
car show to be held on July 28, 2001; and
WHEREAS, organizers of the Arroyo Valley Car Sho have requested that the City
waive the fees for auxiliary police services and the Temporary Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, members of the Arroyo Valley Car Club will be responsible for traffic
control and cleanup.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande does hereby resolve as follows:
1. That Olohan Alley; Bridge Street; Nelson Street between Bridge and
Mason Streets; Short Street between Branch Street and Olohan Alley;
City Hall parking lot; and, the lawns on Nelson Street between Short
and Mason Streets shall be closed from 6:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. on
Saturday July 28, 2001 for the purpose of holding the "Arroyo Valley
Car Sho" ("Car Sho"); and
2. That Mason Street, between East Branch to Nelson Streets, shall be
closed from 6:30 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. on Saturday, July 28, 2001 for
the purpose of holding the Car Show registration; and
3. That the Arroyo Valley Car Club will adhere to certain requirements
and conditions set forth by the Public Works, Police, and Building and
Fire Departments regarding security and traffic control and all other
applicable conditions of a Temporary Use Permit to be issued by the
City as set forth in Exhibit "A"; and
4. That fees for auxiliary police services for the Arroyo Valley Car Sho to
be held on Saturday July 28, 2001 are waived.
5. The fee for the Temporary Use Permit for the Arroyo Valley Car Sho to
be held on Saturday July 28, 2001 is waived.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 22" day of May, 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
��i��'��1
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTACHMENT I
ARROYO VALLEY CAR CLUB
P.O. Box 1037
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Mr. Kerry McCants
Community Development Director
City of Arroyo Grande
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Dear Mr. McCants,
April 16, 2001
The Arroyo Valley Car Club has presented a Peoples Choice Car Show in the Village of Arroyo
Grande every year except 1997, since 1989. This event has been very popular with both car
enthusiasts and the local merchants. We have tried to keep it low key and no-commercial and
have imposed a limit of 300 entries to assure that it would stay that way. The participants have
come from all over California and a few from other states. They tell us that they enjoy the show
and their visits to Arroyo Grande. They are especially generous in their praise for the beautiful
and friendly atmosphere.
In past years we have awarded approximately 150 trophies, many of which were donated by our
local merchants. The continuing success of the show and the dedication and hard work of our
members have allowed us to donate more than $30,000 to local youth and senior citizen activities
since 1989. We incorporated as a non-profit organization so that we could continue this worthy
endeavor.
It is our desire to continue this annual event this summer. Therefore, we request your approval for
the Eleventh Annual Arroyo Grande Car Sho to be held the weekend of July 28�'. We also request
permission to close Olohan Alley, Bridge Street from Branch Street to Traffic Way, Nelson Street
from Bridge Street to Mason Street, Short Street from Grand to Nelson Street, the City Hall
parking lot and the park at the corner of Nelson and Mason Streets. We also request permission to
close Mason Street between Branch Street and Nelson Street from 6:30 AM to 10:30 AM for the
purpose of registration of entrants.
We will place a notice in the local newspaper-advising residents of the street closures. Barricades
wi11 also be posted with ctosure dates and times. We will provide the necessary portable toilet
facilities and trash receptacles as well as clean up during and after the show. The club canies a
$1,000,000 insurance policy for this event.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you in the near
firture.
Sincerely,
�t/ lE�
Warren J k
Presiden Arroyo Valley Car Club
805 474-9816
�G���VE�
�1�K 3 A ��o�
C �?.�f, � Jj_ �- J f l.= ��.�.�'!i'tr�vE
a
CQ;��'::F;': C=='v =:.��t� DEPT.
SAC Meeting Notes
April 24, 2001
Page 5
G. 1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Case Number:
4. Proposal:
5: Location:
6. Staff Contact:
ATTACHMENT 2
Arroyo Grande Car Club
Warren Jacks/Darrell Pilkington
Temporary Use Permit Case No. 01-010
The applicant is requesting a Temporary Use Permit for the 11 `
Annual Arroyo Grande Car Club show to be held the weekend of
July 28, 2001.
Olohan Alley, Bridge Street from Branch to Traffic Way,
Nelson Street from Bridge to Mason Street, Short Street
from Grand to Nelson Street, the City Hall parking lot and
the park at the corner of Nelson and Mason Streets. The
applicant is also requesting permission to close Mason
Street between Branch Street and Nelson Street.
Teresa McClish
Teresa McClish, Associate Planner, asked the SAC if there were any changes they wanted to
make to the previous year's Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval. The SAC discussed
the permit and did not make any changes. ,
Mr. Olds and Mr. Pilkington discussed the installation of the banner cables and the hanging of
the banner. Mr. Olds stated that the City was waiting for the encroachment permit from Cal
Trans and an additional Cal Trans permit is required for the Car Show banner.
H. 1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Case Number:
4. Proposal:
City of Arroyo
Teresa McClisl
�ode Amendment Case No. 01-001
Code Amendment to require setbacks from all
City eeks.
5. Location: C' wide
6. Staff Contact: eresa McClish
Teresa McClish, Associate anner, explained that this was a proposed Development Code
amendment to change S ction 9-14.060 "Creek Dedications". Ms. McClish stated that
currently the language i luded Arroyo Grande Creek and its tributaries, and the proposal is to
include all creeks in Ar oyo Grande, including tributaries to Meadow Creek.
Ms. McClish
goes through
setback shou
purposes of
Also, staff v
determina 'on
Ms.
�tate that the two issues were to name Meadow Creek and its tributaries, which
Tr ct 1998, and through the PD 1.1 next to the Sheppel project, whether the
e 25 feet, and whether the purpose of the setback, which is currently for the
ood control, open space, or riparian habitat protection should be more specific.
�anted to discuss if the language requiring a certified biologist to make the
of riparian habitat protection should be left in place.
�lish stated that she was in contact with the water board for setbacks specific to
corridor protection and with Rob Strong, the General Plan consultant, so that any
made will be consistent with the new General Plan.
Th SAC discussed the different aspects of this issue and how best to establish what the
s backs should be. Ms. McClish stated that possibly the best way to decide would be to have
s aff decide on the distance of the setbacks depending on the purpose of the setback.
was discussed that when projects come before the SAC, Public Works would look at the
ATTACHMENT 3
ARROYO VALLEY CAR CLUB ,� ; „ �, _r`�r �; �; _,.1 � , , . , � -
P.O. Box 1037 _ �T : �: r;;,� ('� �_ ., ,,... _
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 Q� (� �;� ��: t� �
Mr. Steve Adams
City Manager
City of Arroyo Grande
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
April 16, 2001
Dear Mr. Adams,
This letter is to ask the city of Arroyo Grande to please consider dropping the charges for
police protection at the AVCC Car Show on July 28, 2001.
AVCC is a non profit organization, and the money we collect from this show goes back
to local area charities. Some of these charities include Meals on Wheels, Boy Scouts,
D.A.R.E., South County Senior Center, Boys and Girls Club, Arroyo Grande High
School, and many, many more. If we have to pay this fee for police protection, there will
be less to give back to our community. In the past this fee has been suspended. We hope
the city will allow the AVCC Car Show to go on without having this extra expense.
This would allow those less fortunate in our city to benefit from the proceeds of the car
show and not just those who participate.
Thank you very much for your help in this matter. If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to call me. r
Sincerely,
Warre�
President Arroyo Valley Car Club
805 474-9816
� �
C : �o r►�.rv•- �tl, rec;
4�aa�at
ATTACHMENT 4
;�i�''�' ��' A�ROY� C�,,..���;�:.:
Arro o Valle Car Club � fi���
y y OI �1AY t 8 �� 8 ,�
P.O. Box 1037
Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93421
City of Arroyo Grande
To whom it may concern,
This letter is to ask if the city please consider dropping the charges
of $101.00 for fees to the Arroyo Valley Car Club to hold it's
annual car show on July 28 2001.
AVCC is a non profit organization, and the money we collect from
the car show goes back to local area charities. We hope that the
city would allow the AVCC Car Show to go on without having this
extra expense.
Thank you very much for your help in this matter. If you have any
questions, please don't hesita.te to cali at any time.
Sincerely,
Warren Jacks, Pres AVCC
Hm# 489-9816
__ ____
o � pRRo►►�c s.g.
� INCONPOAATED Z
V �
T
� .�. ,o, ,e,� ,� MEMORANDUM
c � t �FOR�� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGERC%"�°
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KERRY MCCANTS
FOR INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SERVICES
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve agreement with Kerry McCants to provide professional services as Interim
Community Development Director through October 5, 2001.
FUNDING:
The proposed agreement is at a rate of $52.53 per hour. This rate was determined
based upon the existing overall cost of salary and benefits for this position. Therefore,
there will be no budget impact from the agreement.
DISCUSSION:
The retirement of Kerry McCants, the Community Development Director, will be
effective May 25, 2001. The recruitment process is under way, but the position is not
projected to be filled until October 2001. Given the importance of this position, the
vacancy could have a significant impact on the operations of the organization. The
resignation of the Department's Administrative Secretary and upcoming maternity leave
of an Associate Planner may further impact the Department's ability to maintain ongoing
work tasks and assignments. In addition, there are a number of high priority projects
under way that would be disrupted with a change in personnel at this time.
As a result, Mr. McCants has agreed to continue serving as the Community
Development Director on a temporary contract basis until a replacement has been
hired. The Agreement is proposed to be effective until October 5, 2001, which,
hopefully, will enable an overlap of one week with the new director for an orientation
period.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve agreement;
- Amend and approve agreement;
CITY COUNCIL
INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AGREEMENT
MAY 22, 2001
PAG E 2
Deny agreement;
Provide staff direction.
Attachments:
Agreement
paRO
� cf
�
� �"' o,t91 * EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
c4 ��FORN� P
This Employment Agreement is entered into this 29 day of May, 2001 befinreen
the CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, State of California (hereinafter referred to as
"CITY"), and KERRY MCCANTS, a temporary employee (hereinafter referred to as
"EMPLOYEE")
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, CITY has need for a Community Development Director; and
WHEREAS, EMPLOYEE represents that he is qualified to perform the services
required by this Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, EMPLOYEE desires to accept temporary employment as an Interim
Community Development Director, pursuant to the terms and conditions herein set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. EMPLOYEE shall be employed by CITY as an
Interim Community Development Director (temporary position). EMPLOYEE
agrees to devote as much time as is reasonably necessary to effectively
perform the services required pursuant to Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
2. COMPENSATION. EMPLOYEE shall be compensated as follows:
a. EMPLOYEE shall be paid at the base rate of $52.53 per hour for all
hours worked within the term of the Agreement. Any hours worked
over forty (40) hours per week shall be compensated at the rate of
one and one-half (11/2) times the regular hourly rate of pay.
b. EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to no other compensation or benefits.
3. TERM OF EMPLOYMENT. Employment shall commence on May 29, 2001,
1
and shall terminate on October 5, 2001, unless terminated earlier as provided herein.
Termination of the Agreement may be effectuated by the City Manager or his designee
without the need for action, approval or ratification by the City Council. Employment
may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties.
4. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT FOR CONVENIENCE. Either party has
an absolute right to terminate this employment at any time by giving to the other party
fifteen (15) days written notice of such termination, specifying the effective date of such
termination. Termination shall have no effect upon the rights and obligations of the
parties arising out of any transaction occurring prior to the effective date of such
termination. EMPLOYEE shall be paid for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the
effective date of such termination.
EMPLOYEE agrees that the notice provisions of this paragraph shall limit the
liability of CITY in the event that a termination action taken by CITY pursuant to
Paragraph 5 is subsequently found to be improper.
5. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT FOR CAUSE. If EMPLOYEE fails to
perform his duties to the satisfaction of CITY, or if EMPLOYEE fails to fulfill in a timely
and professional manner his obligations or if EMPLOYEE shall violate any of the terms
or provisions of this Agreement, or EMPLOYEE has a physical or mental incapacity that
precludes EMPLOYEE from performing the duties, or if EMPLOYEE fails to exercise
good behavior either during or outside of working hours which is of such a nature that it
causes discredit to CITY, or impairs his ability to perform these duties, the CITY shall
have the right to terminate employment effective immediately upon CITY's giving written
notice thereof to EMPLOYEE. Termination shall have no effect upon the rights and
obligations of the parties arising out of any transaction occurring prior to the effective
date of such termination. EMPLOYEE shall be paid for all work satisfactorily completed
prior to the effective date of such termination.
6. NON-ASSIGNMENT OF WORK. This Agreement is intended to secure the
individual services of EMPLOYEE and thus EMPLOYEE shall not assign, transfer,
delegate, or sublet this work, or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of
�
CITY, and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or sublet without CITY's prior
written consent shall be considered null and void.
7. COVENANT. This Employment Agreement has been executed and delivered
in the State of California, and the validity, enforceability and interpretation of any
clauses of this offer shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of
California. All duties and obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable
in the City of Arroyo Grande and the County of San Luis Obispo shall be that venue for
any action, or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of connection with or by
reason of this offer.
8. ENFORCEABILITY. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this offer
is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the
remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no
way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby.
9. NONDISCRIMINATION. There shall be no discrimination against any person
employed pursuant to this Agreement in any manner forbidden by law.
10. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. EMPLOYEE agrees that, during the term of
this Agreement, he will not maintain any financial interest or engage in any other
employment, occupation, work, endeavor, or association, whether compensated for or
not, that would in any way conflict with, or impair EMPLOYEE's ability to perform, the
duties described in this offer.
11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATION. This Employment
Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties hereto. This Employment
Agreement supersedes all previous offers, agreements, negotiations, or
understandings, whether written or oral, befinreen the parties. EMPLOYEE shall be
entitled to no other benefits than those specified herein, and EMPLOYEE acknowledges
that no representation, inducements of promises not contained in this Agreement have
been made to EMPLOYEE to induce EMPLOYEE to enter into this Agreement. No
3
changes, amendments, or alteration hereto shall be effective unless in writing and
signed by both parties. EMPLOYEE specifically acknowledges that in entering into and
executing this Agreement, EMPLOYEE relies solely upon the provisions contained in
this Agreement and no others.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and EMPLOYEE have executed this
Employment Agreement on the day and year first set forth above.
EMPLOYEE:
Kerry McCants
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE:
:
4
Steven Adams
City Manager
SCOPE OF SERVICES
EXHIBIT A
Staff Hours: Average 40 hours per week
Office Coverage: Minimum Monday through Friday
Board/Commission/Council Meetings: Attend as required
5
__ __ _ _.
�pRRO y�\
° ��
� INCORPORATED �
V O
m
* JUIY 10, 1911 *
c4 ��FORN� P
TO:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
8.h.
DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 99-0246,
1047 MAPLE STREET
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council adopt a Resolution accepting improvements, offers of
dedication, and easements within Parcel Map 99-0246, DeBlauw Builders development at
1047 Maple Street.
FUNDING:
There is no immediate fiscal impact. Maintenance of these facilities will be funded from
Public Works maintenance funds in future years.
DISCUSSION:
Parcel Map 99-0246 is located on the south side of Maple Street near Walnut Street, as
shown on the attached Location Map. Final Parcel Map AG 99-0246 was approved on
August 25, 2000, and was subsequently recorded on September 8, 2000. An offer to
dedicate street right of way for a portion of Maple Street, an easement for street trees, and
easements for Public Utilities were provided for on the recorded map.
The required improvements have been constructed and the developer is required to
warranty the improvements for a period of one year following acceptance of the
improvements. Staff has inspected the improvements and recommends that the Council
accept the offers of dedication, and the improvements.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendation;
- Do not approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachment: Location Map of Parcel 99-0246
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION,
OFFERS OF EASEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
PARCEL AG 99-0246
WHEREAS, Parcel Map AG 99-0246 was approved on August 25, 2000, and was
subsequently recorded on September 8, 2000; and,
WHEREAS, offers to dedicate right of way and easements to the public were provided on
Final Parcel Map AG 99-0246; and,
WHEREAS, the developer, DeBlauw Builders, has constructed the improvements required
by the conditions of approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
does hereby accept the public improvements constructed for Parcel Map 99-0246, and
accepts the following offers of dedication and public easements, as shown on Final Parcel
Map AG 99-0246, recorded September 8, 2000 in book 55 of maps, at page 12 in the office
of the Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California:
1. Street Right of Way for Maple Street;
2. Street Tree Easements;
3. Public Utility Easements.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
�
��,
:<<
��
W
�
U ,
�
O
F-
F-
O
Z
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
V
0
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.
.
.
o � p�ROyoc 8■1■
�
� INCORVOAA7ED 9 Z
c� T MEMORANDUM
� .x,�Y ,o. ,.,, *
c4 ��FOR�� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS -
HUASNA ROAD PAVEMENT OVERLAY, PROJECT NO. PW-2001-3
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
A. find that the Huasna Road Pavement Overlay capitai improvement project is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301(c) and direct the
Administrative Services Director to file a Notice of Exemption; and,
B. approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Huasna Road Pavement
Overlay project.
FUNDING:
The City received $237,725 from the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
District in lieu of paving a portion of Huasna Road within the City as mitigation for the
Lopez Dam seismic retrofit project.
DISCUSSION:
The scope of the �Huasna Road Pavement Overlay project includes grinding the existing
pavement along the curb line, applying a leveling course and a finishing course of asphalt
concrete pavement, and the placement of new pavement delineation.
The replacement of antiquated sewer and water services is being performed by City crews
in advance of the proposed project.
The contract time for this project has been estimated at 30 working days. Work is
expected to begin in July 2001 and be completed by the end of August 2001 as shown in
the attached project schedule.
ALTERNATIVES
The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration:
� Approve staff's recommendations;
• Do not approve staff's recommendations;
• Modify as appropriate and approve staff s recommendations; or
• Provide direction to staff.
Attachments: Notice of Exemption
Schedule
Notice of Exemption
To: � Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
0 County Clerk
County of San Luis Obis�o
Counri Government Center
San Luis Obisao CA 93408
From: (Public Agency) _ Ciri of Anovo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Anovo Grande CA 93421
Project Title: Huasna Road Qverlav Proiect , Proiect No. PW-2001-3
Project Location - Specific: _In the Ciri of Arrovo Grande alone Huasna Road from East Branch Street to East Ciri Limits
Project Location - City: Arrovo Grande Project Location - County: San Luis Obisoo
Description of ProjeCt: Grindine of the existine aavement installation of a asahalt concrete �avement overlav and nlacement of
pavement delineation.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Ciri of Arrovo Grande - Public Works Denartment
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Project Out Project:
Exempt Status: (check one)
� Ministerial (Section 12080(b)(1); 15268);
� Declared Emergency (Sea 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
� Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
0 Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Section 15301 (c)
� Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reasons Why Project Is Exempt: Proiect consists of maintenance and renair of existine streets which does not include removal
of anv scenic resource.
Lead Agency
Contact Person: Don SaaQnolo, Director of Public Works
If filed by Applicant:
1. Attach a certified document of exemption finding.
Area Code/Telephone/Extension: (805) 473-5440
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Signature: Date: Title:
� Signed by Lead Agency
� Signed by Applicant
� Date received for filing at OPR:
_.___
____..._ __ _ _ ____��
Revised October 1989
C.,itc� o��rroc�o �rande
Tentative Project Schedule
For
Huasna Road Pavement Overlay
(City Project No. PW-2001-3)
• Authorization to Solicit Bids (at City Council meeting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 2001
1 S' Notice to Bidders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 25, 2001
2n Notice to Bidders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 1, 2001
Pre-Bid Conference/Job Walk (Thursday 2:00 p.m. City Council Chambers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 14, 2001
B1d Opening (Tuesday, 2:00 p.m. City Council Chambers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �". . . . Jutle 26, 2001
Award of Bid (at City Council meeting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 10, 2001
Notice of Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 11, 2001
Notice to Proceed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 23, 2001
Contract Completion (30 working days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 31, 2001
- _. __ _ -- ____ J
o � pitRQ1►�
� INCORPORATEO i
V �
�
� ,N,�. ,o. ,s„ ,�
c9 l�FORN� P
TO:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
8.j.
DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
SUBJECT: DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM (DBE) FOR
FFY 2001/02
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
A. approve the submittal of the FFY 2001/02 DBE Program with "proposed" Overall
Annual DBE Goal to Caltrans by June 1, 2001;
B. direct the Director of Administrative Services to publish a public notice in the local
media in accordance with Section XIV. of the Program; and,
C. direct staff to return to the Council with a summary of public comments and
approval to submit the FFY 2001/02 DBE Program with "established" Overall
Annual DBE Goal to Caltrans by September 1, 2001.
FUNDING:
It is anticipated that the
City in FFY 2001/02:
following Federal-aid highway funds will be expended for the
Bridge Street Bridge Replacement (design) - Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program (HBRR) funds in the amount of $37,500; and,
Traffic Way Bridge Barrier Rail Replacement (all phases of work) - Highway
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR) funds in the amount of
$122,900; and,
Rodeo Drive Sidewalk Repair (construction) - Federal Highway Administration-
Emergency Relief (FHWA-ER) funds in the amount of $118,400.
DISCUSSION:
The DBE Program requires that the City take all necessary and reasonable steps to
ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award
and performance of any Federal-Aid contract.
Each year the City is required to adopt a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
Program for projects utilizing Federal-aid highway funds.
CITY COUNCIL
DISADVANTAGED ENTERPRISE PROGRAM (DBE) FOR FFY 2001/02
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE TWO
The regulations require each local agency to establish their own overall annual DBE
goal based on a methodology with demonstrable evidence of local market conditions
and designed to ultimately attain a goal that is rationally related to the relative
availability of DBEs in the local agencies' market. The attached Program utilizies the
"bidders list" methodology which essentially determines the number of DBEs that have
bid or quoted on the City's Department of Transportation (DOT)-assisted contracts in
the previous year.
Based on the "bidders list" methodology outlined in Section XIV. of the Program, it was
determined that the City established a 9% overall annual DBE goal for FFY 2001/02.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendations;
- Do not approve staff's recommendations;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staffs recommendations;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments
1. Letter to Caltrans with "proposed" Overall Annual DBE Goal
2. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program for FFY 2001/02
3. Public Notice for "proposed" Overall Annual DBE Goal
jep:232.0001(19)\01.02 DBE\StaffReportDBE.wpd
(City of Arroyo Grande Letterhead)
May 23, 2001
Mr. Jerald T. Gibbs, Local Assistance Engineer
Caltrans District 5
50 Higuera Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Subject: Proposed Annual Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal
Information for FFY 2001/02
Dear Mr. Gibbs:
The amount of overall goal, methodology, breakout of estimated race-neutral and
race-conscious participation, and any DBE program updates are presented herein in
accordance with Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 26, and as described in
the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
The City of Arroyo Grande submits our annual overall goal information (and any needed
updates of our DBE program) for your review and comment. We propose an annual
overall DBE goal of 9% for the Federal Fiscal Year 2001 /02, beginning on October 1, 2001
and ending on September 30, 2002.
Methodoloav
The "Utilizing the Bidders List" methodology was used to determine the City of Arroyo
Grande's overall goal for Federal fiscal Year FY 2001/02.
The City of Arroyo Grande elected to utilize the following methodology in establishing the
City of Arroyo Grande's Base Figure of relative DBE availability for FFY 2001/02.
For the Numerator.• DBE Firms in Citv of Arroyo Grande's Bidders List
For the Denominator.� All Firms in City of Arroyo Grande's Bidders List
The City of Arroyo Grande calculated its weighted Base Figure by first determining the
number of ready, willing and able DBEs in its FY 2000/01 Bidders List by work category,
and dividing the number of DBEs by the total number of firms in the same work category.
Through this method, the City of Arroyo Grande can measure availability by the number
of firms that have directly participated in, or attempted to participate in, City of Arroyo
Grande's DOT-assisted contracting in FY 2000/01.
Mr. Jerald T. Gibbs
May 23, 2001
Page 2
Application of this formula yields the following baseline information:
Number of Ready, Willing and Able DBE's = BASE FIGURE
Number of All Ready, �lling and Able Firms
The Base Figure resulting from this calculation was determined to be 9%. The Base
Figure was not adjusted for FFY 2001/02.
Breakout of Estimated Race-Neutral and Race-Conscious Participation
Of the overall annual 9% goal for DBE participation, the City of Arroyo Grande projects
meeting 4% of the goal utilizing race-neutral methods, including making efforts to assure
that bidding and contract requirements facilitate participation by DBEs and other small
businesses; unbundling large contracts to make them more accessible to small
businesses; encouraging prime contractors to subcontract portions of the work that they
might otherwise perform themselves; and providing technical assistance, and othersupport
services to facilitate consideration of DBEs and other small businesses. The remaining
5% of the goal is anticipated to be accomplished through race-conscience measures,
which includes establishing contract specific goals on contracts with contracting
possibilities, when needed, to meet the City's overall annual DBE goal.
DBE Proaram Updates
N/A.
Public Participation Process
The City of Arroyo Grande is entering into the public participation process. Proof of
publication along with a summary of public comments received will be forwarded to your
office no later than September 1, 2001.
Please contact me at (805) 473-5440 orJill Peterson, Consultant Senior Engineer, at (805)
544-4011 if you have any questions regarding this information.
Sincerely,
Don Spagnolo, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
c: Jill Peterson, JLWA
- Draft -
City of Arroyo Grande
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program
for FFY 2001/02
City of Arroyo Grande
Public Works Department
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
(805) 473-5440
May 2001
" This Program is in accordance with Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 26
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM
I. Definitions of Terms
The terms used in this program have the meanings defined in 49 CFR §26.5.
II. Objectives/Policy Statement (§§26.1, 26.23)
The City of Arroyo Grande has established a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
program in accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT),
49 CFR Part 26. The City of Arroyo Grande has received Federal financial assistance
from the DOT, and as a condition of receiving this assistance, the City of Arroyo Grande
will sign an assurance that it will comply with 49 CFR Part 26.
It is the policy of the City of Arroyo Grande to ensure that DBEs, as defined in part 26,
have an equal opportunity to receive and participate in DOT-assisted contracts. It is also
our policy:
• To ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted
contracts;
• To create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for DOT-assisted
contracts,
• To ensure that the DBE Program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable
law;
• To ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 CFR Part 26 eligibility standards are
permitted to participate as DBEs;
• To help remove barriers to the participation of DBEs in DOT-assisted contracts; and
� To assist the development of firms that can compete successfully in the market
place outside the DBE Program.
The Director of Public Works has been delegated as the DBE Liaison Officer. In that
capacity, the Director of Public Works is responsible for implementing all aspects of the
DBE program. Implementation of the DBE program is accorded the same priority as
compliance with all other legal obligations incurred by the City of Arroyo Grande in its
financial assistance agreements with the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans).
The City of Arroyo Grande has disseminated this policy statement to the Arroyo Grande
City Council and all the components of our organization. We have distributed this
statement to DBE and non-DBE business communities that perform work for us on
DOT-assisted contracts by publishing this statement in general circulation,
minority-focused and trade association publications.
City of Arroyo Grande . p�ft _
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 1 May 2001
III. Nondiscrimination (§26.7)
The City of Arroyo Grande will never exclude any person from participation in, deny any
person the benefits of, or otherwise discriminate against anyone in connection with the
award and performance of any contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26 on the basis of race,
color, sex, or national origin.
In administering its DBE program, the City of Arroyo Grande will not, directly or through
contractual or other arrangements, use criteria or methods of administration that have the
effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the DBE
program with respect to individuals of a particular race, color, sex, or national origin.
IV. DBE Program Updates (§26.21)
The City of Arroyo Grande will continue to carry out this program until the City of Arroyo
Grande has established a new goal setting methodology or until significant changes to this
DBE Program are adopted. The City of Arroyo Grande will provide to Caltrans a proposed
overall goal and goal setting methodology and other program updates by June 1 of every
year.
V. Quotas (§26.43)
The City of Arroyo Grande will not use quotas or set asides in any way in the
administration of this DBE program.
VI. DBE Liaison Officer (DBELO) (§26.45)
The City of Arroyo Grande has designated the following individual as the DBE Liaison
Officer:
Mr. Don Spagnolo, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
(805) 473-5440
dspagnolo@arroyogrande.org
In that capacity, Mr. Spagnolo is responsible for implementing all aspects of the DBE
program and ensuring that the City of Arroyo Grande complies with all provisions of 49
CFR Part 26. This is available on the Internet at: osdbuweb.dot.gov/main.cfm. Mr.
Spagnolo has direct, independent access to the City Manager concerning DBE program
matters. The DBELO has a staff of finro support personnel who will devote a portion of his/
her time to the program. An organization chart displaying the DBELO's position in the
organization is found in Attachment A to this program.
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 2 May 2001
The DBELO is responsible for developing, implementing and monitoring the DBE program,
in coordination other appropriate officials. Duties and responsibilities include the
following:
1. Gathers and reports statistical data and other information as required.
2. Reviews third party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with this
program.
3. Works with all departments to set overall annual goals.
4. Ensures that bid notices and requests for praposals are available to DBEs in a
timely manner.
5. Identifies contracts and procurements so that DBE goals are included in
solicitations (both race-neutral methods and contract specific goals) and monitors
results.
6. Analyzes the City of Arroyo Grande's progress toward goal attainment and identifies
ways to improve progress.
7. Participates in pre-bid meetings.
8. Advises the CEO/governing body on DBE matters and achievement.
9. Chairs the DBE Advisory Committee.
10. Participates with the legal counsel and project director to determine contractor
compliance with good faith efforts.
11. Provides DBEs with information and assistance in preparing bids, obtaining bonding
and insurance.
12. Plans and participates in DBE training seminars.
13. Provides outreach to DBEs and community organizations to advise them of
opportunities.
VII. Federal Financial Assistance Agreement Assurance (§26.13)
The City of Arroyo Grande will sign the following assurance, applicable to all
FHWA-assisted contracts and their administration as part of the program supplement
agreement for each project:
The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the
award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE
Program orthe requirements of 49 CFR part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps under 49 CFR part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and
administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE Program, as required by
49 CFR part 26 and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement.
Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall
be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure
to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for
under part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18
U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et
seq.).
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 3 May 2001
VIII. DBE Financial Institutions
It is the policy of the City of Arroyo Grande to investigate the full extent of services offered
by financial institutions owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged
individuals in the community, to make reasonable efforts to use these institutions, and to
encourage prime contractors on DOT-assisted contracts to make use of these institutions.
Information on the availability of such institutions can be obtained from the DBE Liaison
Officer. The Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program may offer assistance
to the DBE Liaison Officer.
IX. Directory (§26.31)
The City of Arroyo Grande will refer interested persons to the DBE directory available from
the Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program website at:
www.dot. ca.gov/hq/be�
X. Overconcentration (§26.33)
The City of Arroyo Grande has not identified any types of work in DOT-assisted contracts
that have a overconcentration of DBE participation. If in the future the City of Arroyo
Grande identifies the need to address overconcentration, measures for addressing
overconcentration will be submitted to the DLAE for approval.
XI. Business Development Programs (§26.35)
The City of Arroyo Grande does not have a business development or mentor-protege
program. If the City of Arroyo Grande identifies the need for such a program in the future,
the rationale for adopting such a program and a comprehensive description of it will be
submitted to the DLAE for approval.
XII. Required Contract Clauses (§§26.13, 26.29)
Contract Assurance
The City of Arroyo Grande ensures that the following clause is placed in every
DOT-assisted contract and subcontract:
The contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted
contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach
of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 4 May 2001
as recipient deems appropriate.
Prompt Payment
The City of Arroyo Grande ensures that the following clauses or equivalent will be included
in each DOT-assisted prime contract:
Satisfactory PerFormance
The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for
satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 10 days from the receipt of each
payment the prime contractor receives from the City of Arroyo Grande. Any delay or
postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good
cause following written approval of the City of Arroyo Grande. This clause applies to both
DBE and non-DBE subcontractors
Release of Retainaae
The prime contractor agrees further to release retainage payments to each subcontractor
within 30 days after the subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or
postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good
cause following written approval of the City of Arroyo Grande. This clause applies to both.
DBE and non-DBE subcontractors.
XIII. Monitoring and Enforcement Mechanisms (§26.37)
The City of Arroyo Grande will assign a Resident Engineer (RE) or Contract Manager to
monitor and track actual DBE participation through contractor and subcontractor reports
of payments in accordance with the following:
After Contract Award
After the contract award the City of Arroyo Grande will review the award documents for the
portion of items each DBE and first tier subcontractor will be performing and the dollar
value of that work. With these documents the RE/Contract Manager will be able to
determine the work to be performed by the DBEs or subcontractors listed.
Preconstruction Conference
A preconstruction conference will be scheduled between the RE and the contractor or their
representative to discuss the work each DBE subcontractor will perform.
Before work can begin on a subcontract, the local agency will require the contractor to
submit a completed "Subcontracting Request," Exhibit 16-B of the LAPM or equivalent.
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 5 May 2001
When the RE receives the compieted form it will be checked for agreement of the first tier
subcontractors and DBEs. The RE will not approve the request when it identifies someone
other than the DBE or first tier subcontractor listed in the previously completed "Local
Agency Bidder DBE Information," Exhibit 15-G. The "Subcontracting Request" will not be
approved until any discrepancies are resolved. If an issue cannot be resolved at that time,
or there is some other concern, the RE will require the contractor to eliminate the
subcontractor in question before signing the subcontracting request. A change in the DBE
or first tier subcontractor may be addressed during a substitution process at a later date.
Suppliers, vendors, or manufacturers listed on the "Local Agency Bidder DBE Information"
will be compared to those listed in the completed Exhibit 16-I of the LAPM or equivalent.
Differences must be resolved by either making corrections or requesting a substitution.
Substitutions will be subject to the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act (FPA).
Local agencies will require contractors to adhere to the provisions within Subletting and
Subcontracting Fair Practices Act (State Law) Sections 4100-4144. FPA requires the
contractor to list all subcontractors in excess of one half of one percent (0.5%) of the
contractor's total bid or $10,000, whichever is greater. The statute is designed to prevent
bid shopping by contractors. The FPA explains that a contractor may not substitute a
subcontractor listed in the original bid except with the approval of the awarding authority.
The RE will give the contractor a blank Exhibit 17-F, "Final Report Utilization of
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, First Tier Subcontractors" and will explain to them
that the document will be required at the end of the project, for which payment can be
withheld, in conformance with the contract.
Construction Contract Monitorina
The RE will ensure that the RE's staff (inspectors) know what items of work each DBE is
responsible for performing. Inspectors will notify the RE immediately of apparent
violations.
When a firm other than the listed DBE subcontractor is found performing the work, the RE
will notify the contractor of the apparent discrepancy and potential loss of payment. Based
on the contractor's response, the RE will take appropriate action: The DBE Liaison Officer
will perform a preliminary investigation to identify any potential issues related to the DBE
subcontractor performing a commercially useful function. Any substantive issues will be
forwarded to the Caltrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. If the contractor
fails to adequately explain why there is a discrepancy, payment for the work will be
withheld and a letter will be sent to the contractor referencing the applicable specification
violation and the required withholding of payment.
If the contract requires the submittal of a monthly truck document, the contractor will be
required to submit documentation to the RE showing the owner's name; California Highway
Patrol CA number; and the DBE certification number of the owner of the truck for each
truck used during that month for which DBE participation will be claimed. The trucks will
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 6 May 2001
be listed by California Highway Patrol CA number in the daily diary or on a separate piece
of paper for documentation. The numbers are checked by inspectors regularly to confirm
compliance.
Providing evidence of DBE. payment is the responsibility of the contractor.
Substitution
When a DBE substitution is requested, the RE/Contract Manager will request a letter from
the contractor explaining why substitution is needed. The RE/Contract Manager must
review the letter to be sure names and addresses are shown, dollar values are included,
and reason for the request is explained. If the RE/Contract Manager agrees to the
substitution, the RE/Contract Manager will notify, in writing, the DBE subcontractor
regarding the proposed substitution and procedure for written objection from the DBE
subcontractor in accordance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act.
If the contractor is not meeting the contract goal with this substitution, the contractor must
provide the required good faith effort to the RE/Contract Manager for local agency
consideration.
If there is any doubt in the RE/Contract Manager's mind regarding the requested
substitution, the RE/Contract Manager may contact the DLAE for assistance and direction.
Record Keepina and Final Report Utilization of Disadvantaaed Business Enterarises
The contractor shall maintain records showing the name and address of each first-tier
subcontractor. The records shall also show:
1. The name and business address, regardless of tier, of every DBE subcontractor,
DBE vendor of materials and DBE trucking company.
2. The date of payment and the total dollar figure paid to each of the ficros.
3. The DBE prime contractor shall also show the date of work perFormed by their own
forces along with the corresponding dollar value of the work claimed toward DBE
goals.
When a contract has been completed the contractor will provide a summary of the records
stated above. The DBE utilization information will be documented on Exhibit 17-F and will
be submitted to the DLAE attached to the Report of Expenditures. The RE will compare
the completed Exhibit 17-F to the contractor's completed Exhibit 15-G and, if applicable,
to the completed Exhibit 16-B. The DBEs shown on the completed Exhibit 17-F should be
the same as those originally listed unless an authorized substitution was allowed, or the
contractor used more DBEs and they were added. The dollar amount should reflect any
changes made in planned work done by the DBE. The contractor will be required to
explain in writing why the names of the subcontractors, the work items or dollar figures are
different from what was originally shown on the completed Exhibit 15-G when:
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 7 May 2009
There have been no changes made by the RE.
The contractor has not provided a sufficient explanation in the comments section
of the completed Exhibit 17-F.
The explanation will be attached to the completed Exhibit 17-F for submittal. The RE will
file this in the project records.
The local agency's Liaison Officer will keep track of the DBE certification status on the
Internet at www.dot.ca.aov/hq/be� and keep the RE informed of changes that affect the
contract. The RE will require the contractor to act in accordance with existing contractual
commitments regardless of decertification.
The DLAE will use the PS&E checklist to monitor the City of Arroyo Grande's commitment
to require bidders list information to be submitted to the City of Arroyo Grande from the
awarded prime and subcontractors as a means to develop a bidders list. This monitoring
will only take place if the bidders list information is required to be submitted as stipulated
in the special provisions.
The City of Arroyo Grande will bring to the attention of the DOT through the DLAE any
false, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct in connection with the program, so tha# DOT can
take the steps (e.g., referral to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, referral
to the DOT Inspector General, action under suspension and debarment or Program Fraud
and Civil Penalties rules) provided in §26.109. The City of Arroyo Grande also will
consider similar action under our own legal authorities, including responsibility
determinations in future contracts.
XIV. Overall Goals (§26.45)
Amount of Goal
The City of Arroyo Grande's overall goal for the Federal fiscal year FY 2001/02 is the
following: 9% of the Federal financial assistance in FHWA-assisted contracts. This overall
goal is broken down into 5% race-conscious and 4% race-neutral components.
Methodoloav
The "Utilizing the Bidders LisY' methodotogy was used to determine the City of Arroyo
Grande's overall goal for Federal fiscal Year FY 2001/02.
DOT-Assisted Contractinq Proaram for FYY 2001/02
The following represents the City of Arroyo Grande's projected FHWA funded
contracts and expenditures by work category and corresponding North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) for FFY 2001/02:
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 8 May 2001
2. Goal-methodoloqv
Step l: Determination of a Base Figure (49 CFR 26.45)
The City of Arroyo Grande elected to utilize the following methodology in
establishing the City of Arroyo Grande's Base Figure of relative DBE availability for
FFY 2001/02.
For the Numerator.� DBE Firms in City of Arroyo Grande's Bidders List
For the Denominator.• Al/ Firms in City of Arroyo Grande's Bidders List
The City of Arroyo Grande will calculate its weighted Base Figure by first
determining the number of ready, willing and able DBEs in its FY 2000/01 Bidders
List by work category, and dividing the number of DBEs by the total number of firms
in the same work category. Through this method, the City of Arroyo Grande can
measure availability by the number of firms that have directly participated in, or
attempted to participate in, City of Arroyo Grande's DOT-assisted contracting in FY
2000/01.
Application of this formula yields the following baseline information:
Number of Ready. Willing and Able DBE's = BASE FIGURE
Number of All Ready, �lling and Able Firms
The Base Figure resulting from this calculation is as follows:
Base Figure =.22(DBEs in 541330�+. 36(DBEs in 234120�+. 42(DBEs in 234110)
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 9 May 2001
Base Figure =
Base Figure =
Base Figure =
Base Figure =
Firms in 541330
! .2210) +
l (0)
[ .22(0) +
f 0 +
[ .093 ] x 100
Step ll: Adjusting the Base Figure
Firms in 234120
.36 0 + •42(2) 1
(�) ( �
.25(0)
0
= 9%
+ .42(.22) ]
Firms in 234110
+ .093 ] x 100
The Base Figure was not adjusted for FFY 2001/02.
Breakout of Estimated Race-Neutral and Race-Conscious Participation
Of the overall annual 9% goal for DBE participation, the City of Arroyo Grande projects
meeting 4% of the goal utilizing race-neutral methods, including making efforts to assure
that bidding and contract requirements facilitate participation by DBEs and other small
businesses; unbundling large contracts to make them more accessible to small
businesses; encouraging prime contractors to subcontract portions of the work that they
might otherwise perform themselves; and providing technical assistance, and othersupport
services to facilitate consideration of DBEs and other small businesses. The remaining
5% of the goal is anticipated to be accomplished through race-conscience measures,
which includes establishing contract specific goals on contracts with contracting
possibilities, when needed, to meet the City's overall annual DBE goal.
Process
Starting with the Federal fiscal year 2002, the amount of overall goal, the method to
calculate the goal, and the breakout of estimated race-neutral and race-conscious
participation will be required annually by June 1 in advance of the Federal fiscal year
beginning October 1 for FHWA-assisted contracts. Submittals will be to the Caltrans'
DLAE. An exception to this will be if FTA or FAA recipients are required by FTA or FAA
to submit the annual information to them or a designee by another date. FHWA recipients
will follow this process:
Once the DLAE has responded with preliminary comments and the comments have been
incorporated into the draft overall goal information, the City of Arroyo Grande will publish
a notice of the proposed overall goal, informing the public that the proposed goal and its
rationale are available for inspection during normal business hours at the City of Arroyo
Grande's principal office for 30 days following the date of the notice, and informing the
public that City of Arroyo Grande comments will be accepted on the goals for 45 days
following the date of the notice. Advertisements in newspapers, minority focus media, trade
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 10 May 2001
publications, and websites will be the normal media to accomplish this effort. The notice
will include addresses to which comments may be sent and addresses (including offices
and websites) where the proposal may be reviewed.
The overall goal resubmission to the Caltrans DLAE, will include a summary of information
and comments received during this public participation process and City of Arroyo
Grande's responses. This will be due by September 1 to the Caltrans DLAE. The DLAE
will have a month to make a final review so the City of Arroyo Grande may begin using the
overall goal on October 1 of each year.
If there is a design build please refer to Appendix 6 of this DBE Program.
XV. Contract Goals (§26.51)
The City of Arroyo Grande will use contract goals to meet any portion of the overall goal
the City of Arroyo Grande does not project being able to meet by the use of race-neutral
means. Contract goals are established so that, over the period to which the overall goal
applies, they will cumulatively result in meeting any portion of the overall goal that is not
projected to be met through the use af race-neutral means.
Contract goals will be established only on those DOT-assisted contracts that have
subcontracting possibilities. Contract goals need not be established on every such
contract, and the size of contract goals will be adapted to the circumstances of each such
contract (e.g., type and location of work, availability of DBEs to perform the particular type
of work). The contract work items will be compared with eligible DBE contractors willing
to work on the project. A determination will also be made to decide which items are likely
to be performed by the prime contractor and which ones are likely to be performed by the
subcontractor(s). The goal will then be incorporated into the contract documents.
Contract goals will be expressed as a percentage of the total amount of a DOT-assisted
contract.
XVI. Transit Vehicle Manufacturers (§26.49)
If DOT-assisted contracts will include transit vehicle procurements, the City of Arroyo
Grande will require each transit vehicle manufacturer, as a condition of being authorized
to bid or propose on transit vehicle procurements, to certify that it has complied with the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, Section 49. The City of Arroyo Grande will direct the
transit vehicle manufacturer to the subject requirements located on the Internet at:
http://osdbuweb.dot.aov/prog rams/dbe/dbe. htm.
XVII. Good Faith Efforts (§26.53)
Information to be Submitted
The City of Arroyo Grande treats bidders'/offerors' compliance with good faith effort
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 11 May 2001
__ _ _
_ __
requirements as a matter of responsiveness. A responsive proposal is meeting all the
requirements of the advertisement and solicitation.
Each solicitation for which a contract goal has been established will require the
bidders/offerors to submit the following information to:
City of Arroyo Grande
Attn: Director of Administrative Services
P.O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
no later than 4:00 p.m. on or before the fourth day, not including Saturdays, Sundays and
legal holidays, following bid opening:
1. The names and addresses of known DBE firms that will participate in the contract;
2. A description of the work that each DBE will perForm;
3. The dollar amount of the participation of each DBE firm participation;
4. Written and signed documentation of commitment to use a DBE subcontractor
whose participation it submits to meet a contract goal;
5. Written and signed confirmation from the DBE that it is participating in the contract
as provided in the prime contractor's commitment; and
6. If the contract goal is not met, evidence of good faith efforts.
Demonstration of Good Faith Efforts
The obligation of the bidder/offeror is to make good faith efforts. The bidder/offeror can
demonstrate that it has done so either by meeting the contract goal or documenting good
faith efforts. Examples of good faith efforts are found in Appendix A to part 26 which is
attached.
The following personnel are responsible for determining whether a bidder/offeror who has
not met the contract goal has documented sufficient good faith efforts to be regarded as
responsive: The City of Arroyo Grande Director of Public Works.
The City of Arroyo Grande will ensure that all information is complete and accurate and
adequately documents the bidder/offeror's good faith efforts before a commitment to the
performance of the contract by the bidder/offeror is made.
Administrative Reconsideration
Within 10 days of being informed by the City of Arroyo Grande that it is not responsive
because it has not documented sufficient good faith efforts, a bidder/offeror may request
administrative reconsideration. Bidder/offerors should make this request in writing to the
following reconsideration official:
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 12 May 2001
Mr. Steven Adams, City Manager
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
(805) 473-5404
The reconsideration official will not have played any role in the original determination that
the bidder/offeror did not make document sufficient good faith efforts.
As part of this reconsideration, the bidder/offeror will have the opportunity to provide
written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or
made adequate good faith efforts to do so. The bidder/offeror will have the opportunity to
meet in person with the reconsideration official to discuss the issue of whether it met the
goal or made adequate good faith efforts to do. The City of Arroyo Grande will send the
bidder/offeror a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that
the bidder did or did not meet the goal or make adequate good faith efforts to do so. The
result of the reconsideration process is not administratively appealable to Caltrans, FHWA
or the DOT.
Good Faith Efforts when a DBE is Replaced on a Contract
The City of Arroyo Grande will require a contractor to make good faith efforts to replace
a DBE that is terminated or has otherwise failed to complete its work on a contract with
another certified DBE, to the extent needed to meet the contract goal. The prime
contractor is required to notify the RE immediately of the DBE's inability or unwillingness
to perform and provide reasonable documentation.
In this situation, the prime contractor will be required to obtain City of Arroyo Grande prior
approval of the substitute DBE and to provide copies of new or amended subcontracts, or
documentation of good faith efforts. If the contractor fails or refuses to comply in the time
specified, the City of Arroyo Grande contracting office will issue an order stopping all or
part of payment/work until satisfactory action has been taken. If the contractor still fails
to comply, the contracting officer may issue a termination for default proceeding.
VXIII. Counting DBE Participation (§26.55)
The City of Arroyo Grande will count DBE participation toward overall and contract goals
as provided in the contract specifications for the prime contractor, subcontractor, joint
venture partner with prime or subcontractor, or vendor of material or supplies. See the
Caltrans' Sample Boiler Plate Contract Documents previously mentioned. Also, refer to
XI, A. "After Contract Award."
XIX. Certification (§26.83(a))
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 13 May 2001
The City of Arroyo Grande ensures that only DBE firms currently certified on the Caltrans'
directory will participate as DBEs in our program.
XX. Information Collection and Reporting
Bidders List
The City of Arroyo Grande will create and maintain a bidders list, consisting of information
about all DBE and non-DBE firms that bid or quote on its DOT-assisted contracts. The
bidders list will include the name, address, DBE/non-DBE status, age, and annual gross
receipts of firms.
M.onitoring Payments to DBEs
Prime contractors are required to maintain records and documents of payments to DBEs
for three years following the perFormance of the contract. These records will be made
available for inspection upon request by any authorized representative of the City of
Arroyo Grande, Caltrans, or FHWA. This reporting requirement also extends to any
certified DBE subcontractor.
Payments to DBE subcontractors will be reviewed by the City of Arroyo Grande to ensure
that the actual amount paid to DBE subcontractors equals or exceeds the dollar amounts
stated in the schedule of DBE participation.
Reportinc,�to Caltrans
The City of Arroyo Grande's final utilization of DBE participation will be reported to the
DLAE using Exhibit 17-F of the Caltrans' LAPM.
Confidentialitv
The City of Arroyo Grande will safeguard from disclosure to third parties information that
may reasonably be regarded as confidential business information, consistentwith Federal,
state, and local laws.
This Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program is approved by:
Steven Adams
Date
City of Arroyo Grande - Draft -
DBE Program for FFY 2001/02 Page 14 May 2001
City Manager
This Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program is accepted by:
Jerald T. Gibbs
Caltrans District 5
Local Assistance Engineer
Date
ATTACHMENT A
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
THE ELECTORS
MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
Steven Adams
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don Spagno/o, P. E.
Director/City Engineer/DBELO
- Vacant -
Associate Civil Engineer/
DBE Support Staff
Jill E. Peterson
Sr. Consultant Engineer/
DBE Support Staff
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/09 Attachment A- Page 1 December 2000
APPENDIX A TO PART 26
GUIDANCE CONCERNING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
When, as a recipient, you establish a contract goal on a DOT-assisted contract, a
bidder must, in order to be responsible and/or responsive, make good faith efforts
to meet the goal. The bidder can meet this requirement in either of two ways. First,
the bidder can meet the goal, documenting commitments for participation by DBE
firms sufficient for this purpose. Second, even if it doesn't meet the goal, the bidder
can document adequate good faith efforts. This means that the bidder must show
that it took all necessary and reasonable steps to achieve a DBE goal or other
requirement of this part which, by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness to the
objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation, even
if they were not fully successful.
In any situation in which you have established a contract goal, part 26 requires you
to use the good faith efforts mechanism of this part. As a recipient, it is up to you
to make a fair and reasonable judgment whether a bidder that did not meet the goal
made adequate good faith efforts. It is important for you to consider the quality,
quantity, and intensity of the different kinds of efforts that the bidder has made. The
efforts employed by the bidder should be those that one could reasonably expect
a bidder to take if the bidder were actively and aggressively trying to obtain DBE
participation sufficient to meet the DBE contract goal. Mere ro forma efforts are
not good faith efforts to meet the DBE contract requirements. We emphasize,
however, that your determination concerning the sufficiency of the firm's good faith
efforts is a judgment call: meeting quantitative formulas is not required.
III. The Department also strongly cautions you against requiring that a bidder meet a
contract goal (i.e., obtain a specified amount of DBE participation) in order to be
awarded a contract, even though the bidder makes an adequate good faith efforts
showing. This rule specifically prohibits you from ignoring bona fide good faith
efforts.
IV. The following is a list of types of actions which you should consider as part of the
bidder's good faith efforts to obtain DBE participation. It is not intended to be a
mandatory checklist, nor is it intended to be exclusive or exhaustive. Other factors
or types of efforts may be relevant in appropriate cases.
A. Soliciting through all reasonable and available means (e.g. attendance ai
pre-bid meetings, advertising and/or written notices) the interest of all
certified DBEs who have the capability to perForm the work of the contract.
The bidder must solicit this interest within sufficient time to allow the DBEs
to respond to the solicitation. The bidder must determine with certainty if the
DBEs are interested by taking appropriate steps to follow up initial
solicitations.
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/09 Appendix A- Page 9 December 2000
B. Selecting portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase
the likelihood that the DBE goals will be achieved. This includes, where
appropriate, breaking out contract work items into economically feasible
units to facilitate DBE participation, even when the prime contractor might
otherwise prefer to perForm these work items with its own forces.
C. Providing interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans,
specifications, and requirements of the contract in a timely manner to assist
them in responding to a solicitation.
D. (1) Negotiating in good faith with interested DBEs. It is the bidder's
responsibility to make a portion of the work available to DBE subcontractors
and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or material needs
consistent with the available DBE subcontractors and suppliers, so as to
facilitate DBE participation. Evidence of such negotiation includes the
names, addresses, and telephone numbers of DBEs that were considered;
a description of the information provided regarding the plans and
specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and evidence as to
why additional agreements could not be reached for DBEs to perform the
work.
(2) A bidder using good business judgment would consider a.number of
factors in negotiating with subcontractors, including DBE subcontractors,
and would take a firm's price and capabilities as well as contract goals into
consideration. However, the fact that there may be some additional costs
involved in fiinding and using DBEs is not in itself sufficient reason for a
bidder's failure to meet the contract DBE goal, as long as such costs are
reasonable. Also, the ability or desire of a prime contractor to perform the
work of a contract with its own organization does not relieve the bidder of the
responsibility to make good faith efforts. Prime contractors are not, however,
required to accept higher quotes from DBEs if the price difference is
excessive or unreasonable.
E. Not rejecting DBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a
thorough investigation of their capabilities. The contractor's standing within
its industry, membership in specific groups, organizations, or associations
and political or social affiliations (for example union vs. non-union employee
status) are not legitimate causes for the rejection or non-solicitation of bids
in the contractor's efforts to meet the project goal.
F. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit,
or insurance as required by the recipient or contractor.
G. . Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment,
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01 Appendix A Page 2 Decembe� 2000
supplies, materials, or related assistance or services.
H. Effectively using the services of available minority/women community
organizations; minority/women contractors' groups; local, state, and Federal
minority/women business assistance offices; and other organizations as
allowed on a case-by-case basis to provide assistance in the recruitment
and placement of DBEs.
V. In determining whether a bidder has made good faith efforts, you may take into
account the performance of other bidders in meeting the contract. For example,
when the apparent successful bidder fails to meet the contract goal,.but others meet
it, you may reasonably raise the question of whether, with additional reasonable
efforts, the apparent successful bidder could have met the goal. If the apparent
successful bidder fails to meet the goal, but meets or exceeds the average DBE
participation obtained by other bidders, you may view this, in conjunction with other
factors, as evidence of the apparent successful� bidder having made good faith
efforts.
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01 Appendix A- Page 3 December 2000
APPENDIX B
TO BE USED FOR DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS
The following are hereby incorporated into the Agency's Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) Program:
II. Objectives /Policy Statement (§§26.1, 26.23)
At the end of the first paragraph, add the following:
The Agency recognizes that certain modifications are necessary to adapf the program for
use in connection with design-build contracts, and has therefore established certain
procedures applicable to design-build DBE contracts under the DBE Program. Public
Contract Code Section 4909 requires subcontractors to be identi�ed by the prime
contractor for the subletting or subcontracting of any portion of the work in excess of
one-half of 1 percent of the prime contractor's total bid. Exceptions are only in the cases
of public emergency or necessity, and then only after a finding reduced to writing as a
public record of the awarding authority setting forth the facts constituting the emergency
or necessity. The written public record of the awarding authority/Agency as to either
emergency or necessity is attached hereto (See Appendix C for sample).
XIII. Monitoring and Enforcement Mechanisms (§26.37)
At the end of the first paragraph below "After Contract Award", add the following
paragraph:
After Design-Build Contract Award
As described in the Section entitled "GOOD FAITH EFFORTS" below, each proposer for
an Agency design-build contract will be required to submit a DBE Performance Plan as
part of a responsive proposal. Fol/owing award of a design-build contract and during both
the design and construction portions of the project, the design-build contractor will be
required to submit documentation, in the form of progress reports described below, to show
that the design-build contractor is meeting the contract goal for the project, or if the goa/
is not being met, the design-build contractor must submit satisfactory evidence that it has
made good faith efforts, in accordance with that Section, to meet the goa/. Evidence of
good faith efforts, as described in 49 CFR Part 26 Section 26.5349 and Appendix A, will
be monitored by the Agency throughout the duration of the design-build project.
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01 Appendix B- Page 1 December 2000
_--
At the end of the first paragraph below "Preconstruction Conference", add the following
sentence:
The contractor will promptly provide the Agency with the information nequired by the form
entitled "LocalAgency DBE lnformation"upon selection of any DBE orothersubcontractor
not previously identified by the design-build contractor. During the course of the contract,
differences must be exp/ained and resolved by either making corrections or requesting a
substitution.
At the end of the fourth paragraph below "Construction Contract Monitorina", add the
following paragraph:
The contractor wil/ provide DBE Progress Reports to the Agency with each invoice and will
provide an annual report on or before August 1 of each year of the design-build contract.
Each report must a/so include a narrative summary stating whether the contractor is on
target with respect to the DBE goal set forth in the design-build contract, whether the goal
has been exceeded (stating the amount of the excess), or whetherthe contractoris behind
target (stating the amount of the deficit).
XVII. Good Faith Efforts (§26.53)
At the end of the third paragraph below "Information to be Submitted", add the following
items:
7. A DBE Performance Plan containing a detailed description of the design-build
contractor's planned methodology forachieving the DBE goal stated in the contract,
including a description of the good faith efforts the design-build contractor intends
to undertake to achieve that goal.
8. A design-build proposa/ must also include an affidavit that the proposer will either
attain the DBE goals for the design-build contract or will exercise good faith efforts
to do so.
At the end of the first paragraph below "Demonstration of Good Faith Efforts", add the
following sentence:
If it is a design-build contract, each contractor proposing will be required to submit DBE
Performance Plan as part of a responsive proposal and good faith efforts.
This Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program for design-build contracts is approved
ay:
Steven Adams Date
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01 Appendix B- Page 2 December 2000
City Manager
This Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program for design-build contracts is accepted
by:
Jerald T. Gibbs
Caltrans District 5
Local Assistance Engineer
Date
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01 Appendix B- Page 3 December 2000
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
REGARDING NECESSITY OR EMERGENCY FOR
SUBSEQUENT SUBCONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION AND
SELECTION FOR DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS (REQUIRED
BY PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 4109 ENTITLED
"PUBLIC EMERGENCY GROUNDS FOR CHANGE")
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
EXPLANATION OF PUBLIC NECESSITY OR EMERGENCY:
FACTS CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY OR EMERGENCY:
FINDINGS:
RESOLUTION FOR SUBSEQUENT IDENTIFICATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS:
ADOPTION OF PROCEDURE TO BE USED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR
FOR SUBSEQUENT IDENTIFICATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS:
CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
1
2
3.
MOTION MADE AND DATE
VOTING RESULTS
SIGNATURES:
(a) (Secretary)
(b) (Chairperson)
City of Arroyo Grande
DBE Program for FFY 2000/01
Appendix C- Page 1 December 2000
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Arroyo Grande has established an Overall
Annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal, applicable to contracting opportunities
scheduled to be awarded during the period of October 1, 2001 through September 30,
2002. The City of Arroyo Grande's proposed Overall Annual Goal and its rationale were
developed in response to U.S. Department of Transportation's New Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise Program Final Rule (49 CFR Part 26) and are available for inspection
for thirty (30) days following the date of this Notice, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Pacific
Daylight Time, Monday through Friday, at our principal place of business located at:
City of Arroyo Grande
Office of Administrative Services
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, California 93420
Phone: (805) 473-5400
Web Address: www.arroyogrande.org
Comments will be accepted on the Goal for forty-five (45) days from the date of this Notice.
Comments can be forwarded to the City of Arroyo Grande at the above stated address or
to Jerald T. Gibbs, District Local Assistance Engineer, Caltrans District 5, 50 Higuera
Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401.
Dated at , California, this day of , 2001
/s/
8.k.
� �n�.vnrvnw � tu =
u � MEMORANDUM
i� ,x�ir ,o. ,o,� , F
c4 ��FOR�� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
�
SUBJECT: COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENTS WITH COX PCS
ASSETS, LLC
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute finro (2)
Communications Site Lease Agreements befinreen the City and Cox PCS Assets, LLC for
use of approximately finro hundred eighty-eight (288) square feet of property located at
Reservoir #2 and two hundred eighty-eight (288) square feet of property located at
Reservoir #4 as well as space on the water tank.
FUNDING:
Cox PCS Assets, LLC will pay the City a fee of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) per month
per lease Agreement. Rent is increased each year by an amount equal to two and six
tenths percent (2.6%) of the rent for the previous year. Additionally, Cox PCS Assets, LLC
will pay a one-time administrative review fee of two thousand dollars $2,000. The General
Fund will receive a total of $38,000 for the first year.
DfSCUSSION:
Recently, the City received an inquiry from Cox PCS Assets, LLC expressing interest in
leasing portions of the Reservoir #2 and Reservoir #4 properties for communications facility
sites. After extensive negotiations, the parties drafted the attached Communications Site
Lease Agreements for an approximate two hundred eighty-eight (288) square foot portion
of Reservoir #2 and approximately two hundred eighty-eight (288) square foot portion of
Reservoir #4 properties as well as space on the water tank. The term of the Agreements
are for five (5) years with three (3) five (5)-year extensions. Cox PCS Assets, LLC will pay
rent of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) per month, per Agreement. Subsequently, rent will
be increased each year by an amount equal to two and six tenths percent (2.6%) of the
rent for the previous year.
Additionally, staff has negotiated a one-time administrative fee of finro thousand dollars
($2,000) as compensation for Lease preparation and review.
Prior to any improvement of the Lease sites, Cox PCS Assets, LLC will be required to
obtain Conditional Use Permits and all other necessary permits for its proposed facilities.
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE TWO
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
— Approve staff's recommendation;
— Do not approve staff's recommendation;
— Modify as appropriate and approve staffs recommendation;
— Provide direction to staff.
Attachments — Cox PCS Assets, LLC Site Lease Agreement (Reservoir #2)
Cox PCS Assets, LLC Site Lease Agreement (Reservoir #4)
., ,...�,,�.,�.. .w_,_. .��.,�......._
Attachment 1
COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT (GROUND)
This Communications Site LeaseAgreement (Ground) ("Agreement") is entered intothis
day of , 2001, befinreen COX PCS ASSETS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("Lessee"), and CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed
under the laws of the State of Califomia ("Lessor").
For good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged; the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PREMISES.
Lessor is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Land") located in the City of Arroyo Grande,
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, commonly known as Reservoir 2. The Land
is more particularly described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee
and Lessee leases from Lessor, approximately 288 square feet of the Land and all access
and utility easements, if any, (the "Premises") described in Exhibit B annexed hereto.
2. USE.
The Premises may be used by Lessee for reasonable activities in connection with the
provision of communications services. Lessee shafl, at Lessee's sole cost and expense,
make application for and obtain all licenses, permits and any and all other necessary
approvals that may be required for Lessee `s intended use of the Premises. Lessee is aware
that Lessee must obtain a conditional use permitfrom the City of Arroyo Grande and comply
with conditions imposed thereon as a condition precedent to occupancy of the Premises.
3. TESTS AND CONSTRUCTION.
Lessee shall have the right at any time, following the full execution of this Agreement, to
enter upon the Land for the purposes of making appropriate engineering and boundary
surveys, inspections, soil test borings, structural strength analysis, and other reasonably
necessary tests (collectively, "Tests"). Lessee shall comply with the repair provisions of
Paragraph 15 below during and after all Tests and related work.
4. TEwH.
The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee
obtains a conditional use permit as specified in Paragraph 2 above ("Commencement Date")
and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date (the "Term") unless
otherwise terminated as provided in Paragraph 10. Lessee shall have the right to extend the
Term for three (3) successive five (5) year periods (The "Renewal Terms") on the same terms
and conditions as set forth herein. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for each
successive Renewal Term unless Lessee notfies Lessor of its intention not to renew prior to
commencement of the succeeding Renewal Term.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN1lSouthem Califomia�SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communicadons.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 1 of 9
5. RENT.
(a) Withinfifteen (15) business days ofthe Commencement Date, and on the first day
of each month thereafter, Lessee shall pay to Lessor as rent Fifteen Hundred Dollars
($1,500.00) per month ("Rent"). Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the end
of the Term or Renewal Term shali be prorated. Rent shall be payable to Lessor at City of
Arroyo Grande, P.O. Box 550, 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA 93421; Attention:
Financial Services Director.
(b) Rent shall be increased on each anniversary of the Commencement Date by an
amount equal to finro and six tenths percent (2.6%) of the Rent for the previous year during the
initial Term and all Renewal Terms.
(c) Rent payments made after the fifteenth (15 day of any month will be considered
delinquent, and shall accrue interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum on that
delinquent amount until Lessee's account is paid to current. If the fifteenth (15 day of the
month is on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, then Lessee has until the next business day for the
payment to be received by Lessor.
(d) Within thirty (30) days of the full execution of this Agreement, Lessee shall pay to
Lessor as additional consideration a one time administrative fee of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) for City transactional costs associated with preparation and processing of this
Agreement.
s. FACILITIES; UTILITIES; ACCESS.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions herein, Lessee has the right to erect,
maintain, install, remove, replace, modify and operate on the Premises radio communications
facilities, including utility lines, transmission lines, air conditioned equipment shelter(s),
electronic equipment, cable, wiring, fixtures, radio transmitting and receiving antennas,
supporting equipment, back-up power sources (including generators and fuel storage tanks)
and structures thereto ("Lessee Facilities"). In connection therewith, Lessee has the right to
do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Lessee's business
operations and to install transmission lines connecting the antennas to the transmitters and
receivers. All of Lessee's construction and installation work shall be performed at Lessee's
sole cost and expense and in a good workmanlike manner. Except as otherwise specified
herein, title to the Lessee Facilities shall be held by Lessee. All of the Lessee Facilities shall
remain Lessee's personal property and are not fixtures. Lessee shall remove all the Lessee
Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or earlier termination of this
Agreement; provided, Lessee repairs any damage to the Premises caused by such removal.
Should Lessee fail to remove the Lessee Facilities from the Land within thirty (30) days of the
expiration or ea�lier termination of this Agreement, Lessor may remove and store the Lessee
Facilities at Lessee's sole cost and expense. If Lessee does not claim the Lessee Facilities,
and provided that Lessor has given Lessee any third party financing entity sixty (60) days prior
written notice, the Lessee Facilities shall be deemed abandoned. Lessee shall post a Twenty-
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIIV'I1Southem California�SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 2 of 9
Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) surety bond for removal of the Lessee Facilities. The
aforementioned surety bond shall be in effect for the initial five (5) year term and all renewal
terms of this Agreement. Lessee agrees to increase the amount of the bond for each
Renewal Term in the same proportion that rent increases in said Renewal Term. Lessee may,
replace, substitute, upgrade and expand its equipment, cables and antennas which comprise
the Lessee Facilities for the purpose of repairing, replacing, exchanging or upgrading the
communications capabilities of the Lessee Facilities, with prior notice to Lessor, but without
the requirement of prior approval, so long as equipment, cables or antennas remain within the
original physical parameters of the Premises. However, should Lessee desire to expand or
improve any of Lessor's existing structures or facilities located on the Land outside of the
Premises, it shall obtain Lessor's prior written consent. Any such expansion or improvement
ofLessor's existing structures orfacilities shall be deemed a part of Lessor's property, subject
to Lessee's right of use of the expansion or improvement during the term of this Agreement.
(b) Lessee shall pay for the electricity and all other utility services it consumes or uses
in its operations, and any electrical upgrade, if necessary, shall be at Lessee's sole cost and
expense. Lessee shall have the right to draw electricity and other utilities from the existing
utilities on the Land or if necessary, install a meter from any utility company that will provide
service to the Land (including a standby power generator for Lessee's exclusive use) and cost
of such meter and of installation, maintenance and repair thereof will be paid by Lessee.
Lessor will cooperate with Lessee in Lessee's efforts to obtain utilities from any location
provided by Lessor or the servicing utility.
(c) Lessee, Lessees employees, agents, subcontractors, lenders and invitees shall
have access to the Premises without notice to Lessor twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7)
days a week, at no charge. During the Term of the Agreement, Lessor grants to Lessee, and
its agents, employees, contractors, guests and invitees, a non-exclusive right and easement
for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across that portion of the Land described in
Exhibit B.
(d) Lessor shall maintain all access roadways from the nearest public roadway to the
Premises in a manner sufficient to allow pedestrian and vehicular access at all times under
normal weather conditions. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such
roadways, at its expense, except for any damage caused by Lessee's use of such roadways.
7. INTERFERENCE.
(a) Lessee shall construct, repair and operate the Lessee Facilities in such a manner
thatwill not cause interterence to Lessor including, but not limited to, Lessor's re-broadcaster
#or its fire, police and other public safety departments, and other lessees or licensees of the
Land. All operations by Lessee shall be in compliance with all Federal Communications
Commission (FCC") requirements and all applicable laws.
(b) Subsequent to the installation of the Lessee Facilities, Lessor shall not permit
itself, its lessees or licensees to install new equipment on the Land or property contiguous
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN11Southern CalifomiaVSI�SN-45-XC-098(D)\PCS Communications.AGRMT.l.wpd
April I1, 2001
Page 3 of 9
�...._. _�..M.,..,..._......�.�
thereto owned or controlled by Lessor, if such equipment will cause interference with Lessee's
operations. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor. In the event
interterence occurs, Lessor agrees to take all reasonable steps necessary to eliminate such
interference, in a reasonable time period. Nofinrithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in
the event Lessor fails to comply with this paragraph, Lessee's sole remedy is to terminate this
Agreement.
8, Taxes.
If personal property taxes are assessed, Lessee shall pay any portion of such taxes
which are attributable to the Lessee Facilities. Except as provided immediately below,
Lessor shall pay all real property taxes attributable to the Land. Lessee shall reimburse
Lessor for any increases in real property taxes which are assessed as a result of Lessee's
improvement to the Land. As a condition of Lessee's obligation to pay such increases,
Lessor shall first provide to Lessee the documentation from the taxing authority indicating the
increase is due to Lessee's improvements.
9. WAIVER OF LESSOR'S LIEN RIGHTS; SUBORDINATION/NON-DISTURBANCE.
(a) Lessor waives any lien rights it may have conceming the Lessee Facilities which
are deemed Lessee's personal property and not fixtures, and Lessee has the right to remove
the same at any time without Lessor's consent.
(b) Lessor acknowledges that Lessee has entered into a financing arrangement
including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of the
Lessee Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity (and may in the future enter
into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities). In connection therewith,
Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral; (ii) disclaiming any interest in the
Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise, and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from
execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment, or distress for any Rent due or to become due
and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings.
10. TERMINATION.
This Agreement may be terminated on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i)
by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default
is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default, provided that the grace
period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice; (ii) by Lessee if it does
notobtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary forthe construction and
operation of the Lessee Facilities; or (iii) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy and utilize
the Premises due to an action of the FCC, including without limitation, a take back of channels
or change in frequencies; or (v) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not
appropriate for its operations for economic or technological reasons, including, without
limitation, signal interFerence. Should this Agreement be terminated pursuant to this
Paragraph 10, Lessee shall pay the Rent due up to the effective date of termination.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN'I�Southem Califomia�.SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 4 of 9
11 . DESTRUCTION OR CONDEMNATION.
If the Premises or Lessee Facilities are damaged, destroyed, condemned or transferred
in lieu of condemnation, Lessee may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of such
damage, destruction, condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation, by giving notice to
Lessor no more than forty-five (45) days following the date of such damage, destruction,
condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation.
12. INSURANCE.
Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Premises
and on the Lessee Facilities, comprehensive or commercial general liability insurance, as well
as automobile liability insurance, with a combined single limit of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against
all liability of Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, lenders and
invites arising out of or in connection with Lessee's use of the Premises and pertormance
hereunder, all as provided for herein. Lessor shall be named as an additional insured on
Lessee's policy. Lessee shall also have in full force and effect during the term of the
Agreement workers' compensation insurance in amounts required by law. Lessee shall
provide to Lessor a certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this
paragraph prior to entering the Land. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, canceled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Lessor.
13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING.
Lessee may assign this Agreement or sublet the Premises or any portion thereof to any
entity, subject to Lessor's prior written consent and the assignee assuming all of Lessee's
obligations herein. Under any such assignment or subletting, Lessee shall not be relieved of
any future pertormance, liabilities, or obligations under this Agreement. Lessor may assign
this Agreement upon written notice to Lessee, subject to the assignee assuming all of
Lessor's obligations herein, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Paragraph 9
(°Waiver of Lessor's Lien") above. This Agreement shall run with the property and shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal
representatives, heirs and permitted assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or
otherwise transfer without notice or consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing
entity, or agent on behalf of �any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for
borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds,
debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations underorwith respect to letters
of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing section, Lessee may assign this Agreement to its affiliates
without Lessor's consent. "Affiliate" as used herein shall mean any entity that is directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with Lessee or any party which
acquires substantially all of the assets of Lessee.
G:\CLIENTSUSBVSPRIN71Southem California�SI�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 5 of 9
14 . WARRANTY OF TiTLE AND QUIET ENJOYMENT.
Lessor warrants that: (i) Lessor owns the Land in fee simple and has rights. of access
thereof and the Land is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions, except as
disclosed by the public records: (ii) Lessor has full right to make and perform this Agreement;
(iii) Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the Rent and
observing and pertorming all of the terms, covenant and conditions on Lessee's part to be
observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises; (iv) the
person(s) signing this Agreement has the authority to sign; and (v) except in emergencies,
Lessor shall not have unsupervised access to the Premises or to the Lessee Facilities.
15 . REPAIRS.
Lessee shall be required to make any repairs to the Premises or Land necessitated by
reason of Lessee's action or inaction, including, but not limited to, Lessee's tests and/or
Lessee's construction, use, operation and maintenance of the Lessee Facilities. Except as
setforth in Paragraph 6(a) above, upon expiration ortermination hereof, Lessee shall restore
the Premises to substantially the condition in which it existed upon execution hereof,
reasonable wear and tear and damage by fire or other casualty loss. Lessor will maintain and
repair all portions of the Lessor's structure(s) to which the Lessee Facilities are immediately
attached or mounted, in proper operating and reasonably safe condition.
16. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose or permit the use,
generation, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land
in violation of any law or regulations. To the best of Lessor's knowledge without investigation,
Lessor represents, warrants, and agrees (1) that neither Lessor nor, to the best of Lessor's
knowledge without investigation, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of,
or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (defined
below) on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that
Lessor will not, and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any
Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation.
Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and the
other's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims
and/or costs (including reasonable attomeys' fees and costs) arising from any breach of any
representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this
paragraph, "Hazardous Material" shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, asbestos,
any substance known by the state in which the Land is located to cause cancer and/or
reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical or waste that is identified as hazardous,
toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state o� local law or regulation. This paragraph
shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN'I1Southem Califomia�SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 6 of 9
17 . LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY.
(a) Lessee shall exonerate, hold harmless, indemnify, and defend Lessor and its
directors, officers and employees from and against any and all suits, actions, judgments, legal
or administrative proceedings, arbitrations, claims, demands, causes of action, damages,
liabilities, interest, attorneys' fees, fines, penalties, losses, costs and expenses of whatsoever
kind or nature (collectively, "Claims") to the extent caused by: 1) operations or pertormance
under this Agreement by Lessee or its officers, directors, employees, contractors,
subcontractors, lenders or agents, including, without limitation, the use, occupancy or
enjoyment of the Premises by Lessee or any work, activity or other things allowed or suffered
by Lessee or its directors, officer, employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders or agents,
invitees or lenders; or 2) any injury to or the death of any person or any damage to property,
to the extent such injury, death or damage arises out of or is attributable to or results from the
negligent acts or omissions or intentional misconduct of Lessee or its directors, officers,
employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders or agents, including, without limitation, the
use, occupancy o� enjoyment of the Premises by Lessee or any work, activity or other things
allowed or suffered by Lessee or its directors, officers, employees, contractors,
subcontractors, lenders or agents on the Premises. This indemnity does not apply to any
Claims arising from the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Lessor, its agents or
employees. Neither the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement nor completion of
the acts to be performed under this Agreement shall release Lessee from its obligation to
indemnify, as to any Claim, so long as the event upon which the Claim is predicated shall have
occurred prior to the effective date of any such expiration or earlier termination or completion
and arose out of or was in any way connected with performance or operations under this
Agreement by Lessee, its directors, officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders
or agents or any one of them.
18. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between
the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements conceming the
subject matter contained herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and
executed by both parties.
(b) ff any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to any
party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other
than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each
provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
(c) All of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding on and inure
to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN'I1Southem Califomia�SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 7 of 9
(d) Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or
registered mail, retum receipt requested, or reliable overnight courier to the address of the
respective parties set forth below.
LESSOR:
City Manager
City of AROyo Grande
P. O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
LESSEE:
Cox PCS Assets, L.L.C.
4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Attn: Property Specialist-San Luis Obispo
County/SN-45-XC-098(D)
With Copy to:
Sprint Law Department
6391 Sprint Parkway
Mailstop: KSOPHT0101-Z2020
Overland Park, KS 66251-2020
Attn: Sprint PCS Real Estate Attomey
Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by
written notice to the other party. All notices hereunder shall be deemed received upon actual
receipt.
(e) This Agreement shall be govemed by the laws of the State of Califomia.
(fl Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement in the form annexed
hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in the official records of the County where the
Land is located. In the event the Land is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Lessor
agrees to obtain and fumish to Lessee a non-disturbance and attomment instrument for each
such mortgage or deed of trust.
(g) Lessee, at its sole cost, may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Land,
Lessor shall cooperate by executing documentation required by the title insurance company.
(h) h any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required,
requested or otherwise to be given under this Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably
delay or withhold its approval or consent.
(i) All Riders and Exhibits annexed hereto form material parts of this Agreement.
(j) This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each ofwhich shall
be deemed as original.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN71Southem Califomia\STI�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communicallons.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 8 of 9
_._�..�._._.,�_�. _� �._ ,. _...,��__�.____.__...
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.
LESSOR: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, LESSEE: COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a
a municipal corporation of the State of Delaware limited liability company
California
B y' By�—
MICHAEL A. LADY, MByOP KELLY GAMBLE Regional
Director of Site Development
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, Director of
Administrative Services/Dep. City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, City Attomey
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN'I1Southem Califomia�.SN�SN-45-XC-098(D)�PCS Communications.AGRMT.I.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT A
� ., . ;,,
to the Agreement dated , 2001, by and between CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of
California, as Lessor, and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., as Lessee.
The Land is described or depicted as follows:
[Legal Description Attached Consisting of 1 Page(s)]
and otherwise known as APN: 077-061-016 in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of
Califomia.
APN: 077-061-016
8%HIBIT A '- - .
DFSC[�IPTION:
PARCI iL 1:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 106 OF PARTS OF THE RANCHOS CORRAL DE PIEDRA, P1SM0 AND BOLSA
DE CI��AMISAL, SUBDIVIDED BY IAS. T. STRATTON, C.E., SEPTEMBER 1873, iN THE CITY OF
ARRO'YO GRANDE, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP
FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED
AS FO�.LOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN LOT 106 OF THE SUBDMSION OF RANCHO CORRAL DE PIEDRA, SAID
POINT OF BEGINNING BEING LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIIyN1NG AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 46 AS SHOWN ON MAP ENTTfLED
"TRAC:T NO. 46, A SUBDiVISION OF A PART OF LOTS A, B, C, 22 AND 23 OF THE TOWN OF GROVER
AND t� PART OF LOT 106 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO CORRAL DE PIEDRA ETC." EILED FOR
RECO�tD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
IN Mq P BOOK 5 AT PAGE 64, AI�fD RUNNING �HENCE NORTH 3 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 218.84
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°34'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 495.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNIIVG; THENCE RUNNING FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH 86 EAST,
400.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 3°25'3Q" EAST, 200.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH
86°34';30" WEST, 400 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 3 WEST. 200.00 FEET TO THE TRUE
POIN7' OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 1.84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING A PORTION OF SAID
LOT 1�)6 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO CORRAL DE PIEDRA ETC.
PARCj;L 2:
EASEIyIENTS OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADWAYS AND PIPE L1NES AND FOR ANY AND ALL OTHER
PURP(;)SES NECESSARY AND INCIDENTAL TO THE MAINTENANCE. AND OPERATION OF A
RESERVOIR ON THE HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. SAID RIGHTS OF WAY TO
COVE�2 AND EFFECT THE FOLLOWIIVG REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE
OF CqLIFORNIA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT:
A) BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 46, SAID POINT BEING
LOCATED NORTH 3 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 218.84 FEET FROM THE MOST
SOUTHERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 46 AS SHOWN ON MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 46� A
SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS A, B, C, 22 AND 23 OF THE TQWN OF GROVER AND A
PART OF LOT 106 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO CORRAL DE PIEDRA ETC." FII,ED FOR
RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, IN MAP BOOK 5 AT PAGE 64, AND RUIVNING THENCE SOUTH 86
EAST, 495.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY;
THENCE NORTH 3°25'30" EAST. 20 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 86°34'30" WEST,
464.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SA1D TRACT IVO. 46; THENCE SOUTH
60°29' WEST, 36.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
to the Agreement dated , 2001, by and befinreen CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of
California, as Lessor, and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., as Lessee.
The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows:
[Site Description Attached Consisting of 2 Page(s)]
Notes:
1. This Exhibit may be replaced by a land sunrey of the Premises once it is received by
Lessee.
2. Setback of the Premises from the Land's boundaries shall be the distance required by
the applicable governmental authorities.
3. Width of access road shall be the width required by the applicable govemmental
authorities, including police and fire departments.
__ _ _ _ __
-� � `���,
E�IBIT B
� `. � �',
� ,
� `. .
, , �
, •, .� \ �,
� �� � '�
,
f :� �
, . ,
, ; � �
� r �, �,
---.�. � � ,� � ,•�
� � . �� ��
t� � �
,� � \ �
; � �. ��
, � � ,� .
� I `. \ `.
� � � ��
�. .
�' i �� ��
�� � i � \ �
� �
I ' `� a ��
� � � A �
I j ���� ��
I
1 I 1 �� `�
� ; �\` ,\ �\` _
' 1 \ \
I
1 � `�� \ \�
��� �' � � ` \
1 � � �� \\\
1 � � ' �` ,\ �`
' a
w �. •,
, � '�, `,
�.� �
�� �
„ �
I'
���� '.
�� \
��
�,
',
��
I � ��.
; ,1
r� .
.�i � �
� �
i �
I;
,���
�
��
f ' `�''
. ..., h ----
F � .... .
Iy��'�
� ��
, �
;� � ;
� f �;; ��,� ;
�
'��, : �
r; ��'., � ;
k,� )1; :
'�� ` �`�:.�y' �' �. � , � , • l'� �
.'
/\
�r
�
�
�
�
� li
� , ' �i��i ,�
� � _�� R � � ��,� ��� I � P
�� �
:�
, z
F� �•� � � � 1 � �H
ll ~ ��� I
�
0
�
O
2
Z
G)
0
;
w
\
a
��
a
��n
'� �
ss
"a-
�� ��
�� �
s
�� � �
�
Y �
;'*
i i, 1 .r r , � .
.r n \� J ;
❑ :u
�i i.C. � . ' -
u� , : �
i• : � � i '
�'
, �y: ����' p ` \'' , �, �' .
� i
' .�
�� � \.i :i `� ���T ' .
� � .' �
� ``� :�
�' .� ` .
i t .
�
�
�
' 'I . � ���•( �:�a!
� 4
1 .���, `��`
, � .
1 ,1 �
1 '
� i ' �� f
i � �
� r
! ' i
i
. �� .j� � '� �. i
., .
� � ��,x:� ��
.,
. � ,,_ .:�. -..
. ;��; .r : -�� .
:;: ;� � -�
�a�� � / .
r �'�,� \
� :'\
�
i .
i
� - ' � I�; :
� . .
. i �, .
i • � •
- . •
��;��-
�
�
``�
�'��
•.,
� � gw
� �'�
Z�
f�
N $��
P
� � O
1' +�
�
�
' I
,, ' • �
, �� j
���
.� 1
'� '
' � !
1;
�
��
��
i
� � a s a ��
a
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
To the Agreement dated , 2001, by and between CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a
municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of Califomia, as Lessor, and
COX PCS ASSETS, LLC, as Lessee.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Attn: Property Specialist - San Luis Obispo
County/SN-45-XC-098(D)
SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE
� • i• � • i__ _ \
THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of , 2001,
by and befinreen CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation of the State of Califomia
("Lessor") and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ("Lessee").
WITNESSETH:
That Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor a portion of that
certain real property (the "Property") in the State of Califomia, County of San Luis Obispo (APN:
007-611-016), a legal description of which is shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, under the terms and conditions of the unrecorded Communications Site Lease
Agreement by and between Lessor and Lessee dated , 2001 and
incorporated herein by reference (the "Agreement") for an initial term of five (5) years, and three
(3) subsequent optional extension terms of five (5) years each, pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement. The Agreement provides for grant of an easement for rights of access to the Property
and to electrical and telephone facilities serving the Property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum as of the day and year first
above written.
Lessee: COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C.,
a Delaware limited liability company
By:.
Lessor: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a
municipal corporation
By:
Kelly Gamble
Its: Regional Director of Site Development Michael A. Lady
Its: Mayor
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ATTACHED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this _ day of , 2001, before me, , a
Notary Public in and for said State and County, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal
Notary Public in and for said State and County
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
O n this _ day of , 2001, before me, , a Notary
Public in and for said State and County, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal
Notary Public in and for said State and County
EXHIBIT A
TO
MEMORANDUM OFAGREEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S PROPERTY
Cox Site Name: Arrovo Grande Reservoir #2 Site Number: SN-45-XC-098(D)
Description of Lessor's Property:
The real property situated in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of Califomia (APN: 077-061-016), and
particularly described as follows:
[Legal Description Attached Consisting of 2 Page(s)]
Lessor Initials
Lessee Initials
E%HIBIT A
DESCRiF�TION:
PARCEI� t :
THAT P(►RTION OF LOT 106 OI' PARTS OP TFIE RANCHOS CORRAL DE PIEDRA, PISMO AND BOI.SA
DE CHAMISAL, SUBDIVIDED BY ]AS. T. STRATTON, C.E_, SEP1'EMBER 1873, 1N THE CITY OF
ARROY(� GRANA6, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBiSPO, STATE OF CALIFORfYIA, qCCORDING TO MAP
FiLfiD r(JR RECOYtD IN THE OFFICE OF 'THL COUNTY RECOI2DL-R aF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED
AS FOLI,OWS:
BEGINN��NG AT A POIN7 IN LOT 106 OF THB SUBDIVISION OI= RANCHO CORRAL DE PIEDRA; SAID
POINT C�F BEGiNN1NG BEING LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINN�NG AT 7'H� MOST SOUTkI�RLY COItNER OF TRACT NO_ 46 AS SHOWN ON MAP ENTI?LED
"TRACT NO. 4G, A SUBD�VISION OF A PART OF LOTS A, B, C, 22 AND 23 OF THE TOWN OF GROVER
nND A rrART OF LOT I06 OF THE SUBDIVISlON Or RANCFIO CORRAL DE PIEDRA ETC.' FrLEb FOR
R�CORL� IN TH.� OFFICE OF TtiE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY� CALIFORNIA�
IN MAl' �300K S A'f PAGL• 64, AND RUNN[NG THENCE NORT[i 3°22'30" EAS�', A DISTANCE OF 218.84
FEET; T[iENCE SOUTH 86°34'3U" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 495_50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINN�NG; THENCE 1tUNNING FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SOU'TT� 86°34'30' EAST,
400.00 F�'sET TO A POJNT: THENCE NORTFI 3°25'30' EAST, 200.00 FEET TO A POINT; THL-NCE NORTIi
86°3a�3q" WEST, a00 rLET TO A POJ.N'r: rHENCE SOUTH 3°25'30" WEST, 200.00 FEET �O 7�EtE TRUE
POINT C��F BEGiNNING. CONTAINING 1.84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING A PORTION OF SAID
LOT 106 Or 1'HL- SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO CORI2AL D� PIEDRA ETC.
PARCEL 2:
EASEMFTVTS OVER TI3E FOLLOWING DCSCRIBED REAL PROP.�RTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION,
OPERAT ION AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADWAYS AND PIPfi L1NES AND 1=0R ANY AND ALL OTHER
PURPOS�S NECESSARY ANA INCIDFNTAL TO TI�E MAINTENANCE. AND OPERATION OF A
RBSERV�IR ON THE H£1tEINBEFORE DESCRIHED REAL PROPEttTY. SAID RIGHTS OF WAY TO
COV�R AND EFFECT THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE
OF CAL,�FORNIA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO W'lT:
A) �3EGINNING AT A PO1N'1 ON TFIE EASTERI.Y LINE OF TRACT N0. 46 , SAID PO1NT BEING
�,OCA7ED NORTH 3°2Z'30' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 218.84 FEET FROM THE MOST
:�OUTHERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 46 AS SHOWN ON MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 46, A
:�UBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS A, B, C. 22 ANll 23 OF THE TOWN OF GROVER AND A
�'ART OF LOT 106 OF x'HE SUBDIVISION OF RANCIIO CORRAL DE PIEDRA EfC.'�F1LED FOR
�t�CORD 1N THfi OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY� STATE
�, )F CALIFORNIA, IN MAP BOOK S AT PAGE G4, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 86'34'30'
,iAST, 495.50 FEET TO THC SOUTHW�ST CORN�R OF ABOVE DESCR[BED PROPERTY;
I-1LNCE NORTIi 3°25'30" EAST. 2() �EET TO A POINT; THEIVCE NORTH 86°34'30" WEST,
� 64.64 FEET TO A POIIVT ON THL- EASTERLY LINL OF SAID TRACT NO. 46; THENCZ SOUTH
i.:A°29' WLST, 36.'I8 FL-L•T TO THE POINT OF BEGxNNING.
(CONTiTfUF.D N�XT PAGE)
B) L�EGiNNJNG AT A POINT I.N LOT 106 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCI-CO CORRAL llE PIEDRA,
�yAtU PO1NT BEGiNN1NG BL'1NG LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
F;EGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTI�ERLY C01tN�R OF TRaCT NO. a6 aS SHOwN ON MAP
F.NTITLED 'TRACT NO. 46, A SUBDIVISION OF A f'ART OF LOTS A, B, C, 22 AND 23 OF THE
'�'OWN Or GROVER /�ND A PART OF LOT 106 OF TJiE SUBDIVISION OF R.ANCHO CORRAL DE
F�IEI�RA. ETC_', FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER Of SAN
I.UIS O�1SP0 COUNTY, STATE aF CAUFO1tNIA. IN MAP [300K S AT PAOE 64, AND RUNNING
'�'HENCE NORTH 3°22'30" EAST, A UISTANCE ON 218.84 FEET'; TH�NCE SOUTH 86°34'30"
T;AS'C, A DISTANCE OF 895.50 FFET TO THE TRUE POINT Or IIEGINNING; THENCE FROM
:�AID TRUE POiNT Or BEGINNING SOUTH 86°34'30" L'AST, 100.00 FEETTO A POtNT; THENCE
1JORTH 3°25'30" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENC� NORTH 8G°34'30' WEST, 100.00
1�EET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 3°25'30' WES'f, 20.00 FE�T TO THB ?RUE POINT Or
ltEGiNNING AND IIEJ.NG A PART OF LOT 106 OF SAIA SUBDIVISION OF RANCIiO CORRAL
1)E PIEDRA �"t'C.
�
�._.. �...�.� �..��, .._....
Attachment 2
COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT (GROUND)
This Communications Site LeaseAgreement (Ground) ("Agreement") is entered intothis
day of , 2001, befinreen COX PCS ASSETS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("Lessee"), and CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed
under the laws of the State of Califomia ("Lessor").
For good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PREMISES.
Lessor is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Land") located in the City of Arroyo Grande,
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, commonly known as Reservoir 4. The Land
is more particularly described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee
and Lessee leases from Lessor, approximately 12' x 24' square feet of the Land and all
access and utility easements, if any, (the °Premises") described in Exhibit B annexed hereto.
2. USE.
The Premises may be used by Lessee for reasonable activities in connection with the
provision of communications services. Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole cost and expense,
make application for and obtain all licenses, permits and any and all other necessary
approvals that may be required for Lessee `s intended use of the Premises. Lessee is aware
that Lessee must obtain a conditional use permitfrom the City ofArroyo Grande and comply
with conditions imposed thereon as a condition precedent to occupancy of the Premises.
3. TESTS AND CONSTRUCTION.
Lessee shall have the right at any time, following the full execution of this Agreement, to
enter upon the Land for the purposes of making appropriate engineering and boundary
surveys, inspections, soil test borings, structural strength analysis, and other reasonably
necessary tests (collectively, "Tests°). Lessee shall comply with the repair provisions af
Paragraph 15 below during and after all Tests and related work.
4. Tewin.
The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee
obtains a conditional use permit as specified in Paragraph 2 above ("Commencement Date°)
and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date (the "Term") unless
othervvise terminated as provided in Paragraph 10. Lessee shall have the right to extend the
Term for three (3) successive five (5) year periods (The °Renewal Terms") on the same terms
and conditions as set forth herein. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for each
successive Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor of its intention not to renew prior to
commencement of the succeeding Renewal Term.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�.SPRIN71Southem Califomia\SI�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 1 of 9
5. RENT.
(a) Withinfifteen (15) business days ofthe Commencement Date, and on thefirstday
of each month thereafter, Lessee shall pay to Lessor as rent Fifteen Hundred Dollars
($1,500.00) per month ("RenY'). Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the end
of the Term or Renewal Term shall be prorated. Rent shall be payable to Lessor at City of
Arroyo Grande, P.O. Box 550, 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA 93421; Attention:
Financial Services Director.
(b) Rent shall be increased on each anniversary of the Commencement Date by an
amount equal to finro and six tenths percent (2.6%) of the Rent for the previous year during the
initial Term and all Renewal Terms.
(c) Rent payments made after the fifteenth (15t") day of any month will be considered
delinquent, and shall accn.�e interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum on that
delinquent amount until Lessee's account is paid to current. If the fifteenth (15 day of the
month is on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, then Lessee has until the next business day for the
payment to be received by Lessor.
(d) Within thirty (30) days of the full execution of this Agreement, Lessee shall pay to
Lessor as additional consideration a one time administrative fee of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) for City transactional costs associated with preparation and processing of this
Agreement.
6. FACILITIES; UTILITIES; ACCESS.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions herein, Lessee has the right to erect,
maintain, install, remove, replace, modify and operate on the Premises radio communications
facilities, including utility lines, transmission lines, air conditioned equipment shelter(s),
electronic equipment, cable, wiring, fixtures, radio transmitting and receiving antennas,
supporting equipment, back-up power sources (including generators and fuel storage tanks)
and structures thereto ("Lessee Facilities"). In connection therewith, Lessee has the right to
do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Lessee's business
operations and to install transmission lines connecting the antennas to the transmitters and
receivers. All of Lessee's construction and installation work shall be pertormed at Lessee's
sole cost and expense and in a good workmanlike manner. Except as otherwise specifled
herein, title to the Lessee Facilities shall be held by Lessee. All of the Lessee Facilities shall
remain Lessee's personal property and are not fixtures. Lessee shall remove all the Lessee
Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or earlier termination of this
Agreement; provided, Lessee repairs any damage to the Premises caused by such removal.
Should Lessee fail to remove the Lessee Facilities from the Land within thirty (30) days of the
expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, Lessor may remove and store the Lessee
Facilities at Lessee's sole cost and expense. If Lessee does not claim the Lessee Facilities,
and provided that Lessor has given Lessee any third party financing entity sixty (60) days prior
written notice, the Lessee Facilities shall be deemed abandoned. Lessee shall post a Twenty-
G:\CLIENTSUSB\SPRIN71Southem Califomia\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 2 of 9
Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) surety bond for removal of the Lessee Facilities. The
aforementioned surety bond shall be in effect for the initial five (5) year term and all renewal
terms of this Agreement. Lessee agrees to increase the amount of the bond for each
RenewalTerm in the same proportion that rent increases in said Renewal Term. Lessee may,
replace, substitute, upgrade and expand its equipment, cables and antennas which comprise
the Lessee Facilities for the purpose of repairing, replacing, exchanging or upgrading the
communications capabilities of the Lessee Facilities, with prior notice to Lessor, but without
the requirement of prior approval, so long as equipment, cables or antennas remain within the
original physical parameters of the Premises. However, should Lessee desire to expand or
improve any of Lessor's existing structures or facilities located on the Land outside of the
Premises, it shall obtain Lessor's prior written consent. Any such expansion or improvement
of Lessor's existing structures orfacilities shall be deemed a part of Lessor's property, subject
to Lessee's right of use of the expansion or improvement during the term of this Agreement.
(b) Lessee shall pay for the electrieity and all other utility services it consumes or uses
in its operations, and any electrical upgrade, if necessary, shall be at Lessee `s sole cost and
expense. Lessee shall have the right to draw electricity and other utilities from the existing
utilities on the Land or if necessary, install a meter from any utility company that will provide
service to the Land (including a standby power generator for Lessee's exclusive use) and cost
of such meter and of installation, maintenance and repair thereof will be paid by Lessee.
Lessor will cooperate with Lessee in Lessee's efforts to obtain utilities from any location
provided by Lessor or the servicing utility.
(c) Lessee, Lessees employees, agents, subcontractors, lenders and invitees shall
have access to the Premises without notice to Lessor finrenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7)
days a week, at no charge. During the Term of the Agreement, Lessor grants to Lessee, and
its agents, employees, contractors, guests and invitees, a non-exclusive right and easement
for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across that portion of the Land described in
Exhibit B.
(d) Lessor shall maintain alt access roadways from the nearest public roadway to the
Premises in a manner sufficient to allow pedestrian and vehicular access at all times under
normal weather conditions. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such
roadways, at its expense, except for any damage caused by Lessee's use of such roadways.
7. INTERFERENCE.
(a) Lessee shall construct, repair and operate the Lessee Facilities in such a manner
thatwill not cause interFerence to Lessor including, but not limited to, Lessor's re-broadcaster
for its fire, police and other public safety departments, and other lessees or licensees of the
Land. All operations by Lessee shall be in compliance with all Federal Communications
Commission (FCC") requirements and all applicable laws.
(b) Subsequent to the installation of the Lessee Facilities, Lessor shall not permit
itself, its lessees or licensees to install new equipment on the Land or property contiguous
G:\CLIENTSVSBGSPRIN71Southem California\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
Aprit 11, 2001
Page 3 of 9
thereto owned or controlled by Lessor, ifsuch equipmentwill cause interterence with Lessee's
operations. Such interterence shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor. In the event
interterence occurs, Lessor agrees to take� all reasonable steps necessary to eliminate such
interference, in a reasonable time period. Nofinrithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in
the event Lessorfails to comply with this paragraph, Lessee's sole remedy is to terminate this
Agreement.
8. TaxES.
IF personat property taxes are assessed, Lessee shall pay any portion of such taxes
which are attributable to the Lessee Facilities. Except as provided immediately below,
Lessor shall pay all real property taxes attributable to the Land. Lessee shall reimburse
Lessor for any increases in real property taxes which are assessed as a result of Lessee's
improvement to the Land. As a condition of Lessee's obligation to pay such increases,
Lessor shall first provide to Lessee the documentation from the taxing authority indicating the
increase is due to Lessee's improvements.
9. WAIVER OF LESSOR'S LIEN RIGHTS; SUBORDINATION/NON-DISTURBANCE.
(a) Lessor waives any lien rights it may have conceming the Lessee Facilities which
are deemed Lessee's personal property and not fixtures, and Lessee has the right to remove
the same at any time without Lessor's consent.
(b) Lessor acknowledges that Lessee has entered into a financing arrangement
including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of the
Lessee Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity (and may in the future enter
into additionalfinancing arrangements with otherfinancing entities). In connection therewith,
Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral; (ii) disclaiming any interest in the
Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise, and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt ftom
execution, foreclosure, sale, levy, attachment, or distress for any Rent due or to become due
and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings.
10. TERMINATION.
This Agreement may be terminated on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i)
by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default
is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default, provided that the grace
period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice; (ii) by Lessee if it does
notobtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary for the construction and
operation of the Lessee Facilities; or (iii) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy and utilize
the Premises due to an action of the FCC, including without limitation, a take back of channels
or change in frequencies; or (v) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not
appropriate for its operations for economic or technological reasons, including, without
limitation, signal interference. Should this Agreement be terminated pursuant to this
Paragraph 10, Lessee shall pay the Rent due up to the effective date of termination.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRIN71Southem Califomia\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT.3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 4 of 9
11 . DESTRUCTION OR CONDEMNATION.
Ifthe Premises or Lessee Facilities are damaged, destroyed, condemned ortransferred
in lieu ofcondemnation, Lessee may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of such
damage, destruction, condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation, by giving notice to
Lessor no more than forty-five (45) days following the date of such damage, destruction,
condemnation or transfer in lieu of condemnation.
12. INSURANCE.
Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Premises
and on the Lessee Facilities, comprehensive or commercial general liability insurance, as well
as automobile liability insurance, with a combined single limit of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence. Such insurance shall insure, on an occurrence basis, against
all liability of Lessee, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, lenders and
invites arising out of or in connection with Lessee's use of the Premises and performance
hereunder, all as provided for herein. Lessor shall be named as an additional insu�ed on
Lessee's policy. Lessee shall also have in full force and effect during the term of the
Agreement workers' compensation insurance in amounts required by law. Lessee shall
provide to Lessor a certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this
paragraph prior to entering the Land. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, canceled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Lessor.
13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING.
Lessee may assign this Agreement or sublet the Premises or any portion thereof to any
entity, subject to Lessor's prior written consent and the assignee assuming all of Lessee's
obligations herein. Under any such assignment or subletting, Lessee shall not be relieved of
any future pertormance, liabilities, or obligations under this Agreement. Lessor may assign
this Agreement upon written notice to Lessee, subject to the assignee assuming all of
Lessor's obligations herein, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Paragraph 9
("Waiver of Lessor's Lien") above. This Agreement shall run with the property and shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal
representatives, heirs and permitted assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or
otherwise transfer without notice or consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing
entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Lessee (i) has obligations for
borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds,
debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations underorwith respect to letters
of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof.
Nofinrithstanding the foregoing section, Lessee may assign this Agreement to its affiliates
without Lessor's consent. "Affiliate" as used herein shall mean any entity that is directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with Lessee or any party which
acquires substantially all of the assets of Lessee.
G:\CLIENTSUSBGSPRINT�Southem California\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
Aprit 11, 2001
Page 5 of 9
14 . WARRANTY OF TITLE AND QUIET ENJOYMENT.
Lessor warrants that: (i) Lessor owns the Land in fee simple and has rights of access
thereof and the Land is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions, except as
disclosed by the public records: (ii) Lessor has full right to make and perform this Agreement;
(iii) Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the Rent and
observing and performing all of the terms, covenant and conditions on Lessee's part to be
observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises; (iv) the
person(s) signing this Agreement has the authority to sign; and (v) except in emergencies,
Lessor shall not have unsupervised access to the Premises or to the Lessee Facilities.
15 . REPAIRS.
Lessee shall be required to make any repairs to the Premises or Land necessitated by
reason of Lessee's action or inaction, including, but not limited to, Lessee's tests and/or
Lessee's construction, use, operation and maintenance of the Lessee Facilities. Except as
setforth in Paragraph 6(a) above, upon expiration or termination hereof, Lessee shall restore
the Premises to substantially the condition in which it existed upon execution hereof,
reasonable wear and tear and damage by fire or other casualty loss. Lessorwill maintain and
repair all portions of the Lessor's structure(s) to which the Lessee Facilities are immediately
attached or mounted, in proper operating and reasonably safe condition.
'I6. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose or permit the use,
generation, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land
in violation of any law or regulations. To the best of Lessor's knowledge without investigation,
Lessor represents, warrants, and agrees (1) that neither Lessor nor, to the best of Lessor's
knowledge without investigation, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of,
or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material (defined
below) on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that
Lessor will not, and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any
Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation.
Lessor and Lessee each agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other and the
other's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims
and/or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) arising from any breach of any
representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. As used in this
paragraph, "Hazardous Material" shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, asbestos,
any substance known by the state in which the Land is located to cause cancer and/or
reproductive toxicity, and/or any substance, chemical orwaste that is identified as hazardous,
toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. This paragraph
shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
G:\CLIENTSUSB\SPRINT�Southem Califomia\SIV�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 6 of 9
17. LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY.
(a) Lessee shall exonerate, hold haRnless, indemnify, and defend Lessor and its
directors, officers and employees from and against any and all suits, actions, judgments, legal
or administrative proceedings, arbitrations, claims, demands, causes of action, damages,
liabilities, interest, attorneys' fees, fines, penalties, losses, costs and expenses of whatsoever
kind or nature (collectively, "Claims") to the extent caused by: 1) operations or pertormance
under this Agreement by Lessee or its officers, directors, employees, contractors,
subcontractors, lenders or agents, including, without limitation, the use, occupancy or
enjoyment of the Premises by Lessee or any work, activity or other things allowed or suffered
by Lessee or its directors, officer, employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders or agents,
invitees or lenders; or 2) any injury to or the death of any person or any damage to property,
to the extent such injury, death or damage arises out of or is attributable to or results from the
negligent acts or omissions or intentional misconduct of Lessee or its directors, officers,
employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders or agents, including, without limitation, the
use, occupancy or enjoyment of the Premises by Lessee or any work, activity or other things
allowed or suffered by Lessee or its directors, officers, employees, contractors,
subcontractors, lenders or agents on the Premises. This indemnity does not apply to any
Claims arising from the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Lessor, its agents or
employees. Neither the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement nor completion of
the acts to be performed under this Agreement shall release Lessee from its obligation to
indemnify, as to any Claim, so long as the event upon which the Claim is predicated shall have
occurred prior to the effective date of any such expiration or earlier termination or completion
and arose out of or was in any way connected with performance or operations under this
Agreement by Lessee, its directors, officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, lenders
or agents or any one of them.
18. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding befinreen
the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements conceming the
subject matter contained herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and
executed by both parties.
(b) IFany provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to any
party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other
than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each
provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
(c) All of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding on and inure
to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties.
G:\CLIENTSUSB�SPRINT�Southem Califomia\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT.3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 7 of 9
(d) Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or
registered mail, retum receipt requested, or reliable overnight courier to the address of the
respective parties set forth below.
LESSOR:
City Manager
City of Arroyo G�ande
P. O. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
LESSEE:
Cox PCS Assets, L.L.C.
4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Attn: Property Specialist-San Luis Obispo
County/SN-45-XC-070(E)
With Copy to:
Sprint Law Department
6391 Sprint Parkway
Mailstop: KSOPHT0101-Z2020
Overland Park, KS 66251-2020
Attn: Sprint PCS Real Estate Attomey
Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by
written notice to the other party. All notices hereunder shall be deemed received upon actual
receipt.
(e) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Califomia.
(fl Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement in the form annexed
hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in the official records of the County where the
Land is located. In the event the Land is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Lessor
agrees to obtain and fumish to Lessee a non-disturbance and attomment instrument for each
such mortgage or deed of trust.
(g) Lessee, at its sole cost, may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Land,
Lessor shall cooperate by executing documentation required by the title insurance company.
(h) h any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required,
requested or otherwise to be given under this Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably
delay or withhold its approval or consent.
(i) All Riders and Exhibits annexed hereto form material parts of this Agreement.
(j) This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each ofwhich shall
be deemed as original.
G:\CLIENTSUSB\SPRIN71Southern Califomia\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 8 of 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.
LESSOR: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, LESSEE: COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a
a municipal corporation of the State of Delaware limited liability company
California
By: g
MICHAEL A. LADY Mayor KELLY GAMBLE Regional
Director of Site Development
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE Director of
Administrative Services/Dep. City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, City Attorney
G:\CLIENTSUSB\SPRIN'[1Southern Califomia\SN�SN-45-XC-070(E)\Cox PCS Communications.AGRMT3.wpd
April 11, 2001
Page 9 of 9
EXHIBITA
DESCRIPTION OF LAND
to the Agreement dated , 2001, by and befinreen CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of
California, as Lessor, and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., as Lessee.
The Land is described or depicted as follows:
[Legal Description Attached Consisting of 1 Page(s)]
and otherwise known as APN: 007-611-016 in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California.
APN: 007-611-016
E%N.�BIT A
DESCRII'TION:
THAT Pt )R'TION OF LOT 92 OI= TI3E MAP OF THE RANCHOS CORRAL DE PZEDRA�AiSMO AND BOISA
D.E CHEMISAL, IN TH� C1TY OF ARROYO GRAND�, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS ODISPO� STATE Or
CALIrO�LNIA, AS PER MAP FILED INT BOOK A, PAGE 65 OF MAPS, IN 'fHE OFFICE OF TH� COUNTY
RECORI�ER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOws:
BEGINN�NG AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNLR OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO
AMASA �W, DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 15� PAGE 302 OF DEEDS� RBCORDS OF SATD COUN?Y.
MARK •) BY A POST SET BY A F. PARSONS tN FEBRUARY 1892, P�tESENTT,Y MARKED BY AN 1 1/4
iNCH D AMETER P1PE TAGGED RC� 6923 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP rILED IN IIOOK 8, PAGE 120 OF
RL•COR ► OF SURVEYS IN SAID COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE.
TH�NCI i NORTH 54° EAST 664.00 FFET TO A POINT, FROM WHICH THE MOST EASfERLY CORNER
OF SA1�j LAIYD OF DIXSON BL-ARS NORTH 54° EAST 537.30 FEET, MORE OR LESS, MARKED BY A
POST EyTABLISHED BY A.F. PARSONS, IN FEBRUARY, 1892, PRESENTLY MARKED AN OLD FENCE
CORNEI,[, SAiD POINT BEING THE TRUE PO1NT Or BEGINNING.
THENCIi AT R(GHT ANGL�S SOUTH 36° EAST 240.00 PELT TO A POINT.
THENCIi A'T RIGHT ANGLLS NORTH 54° EAST 2�2.00 FELT TO A POINT.
THBIVCIi AT RCGHT qNGLL•S NORTH 36° WEST 240.00 FLET TO A POINT.
THENCIi SOUTH 54° EAST 272.00 FEET 7'O THE TRl1� PO1NT Or �3�GINNING.
EXHIBIT B
� ; • • • • � �,
to the Agreement dated , 2001, by and between CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of
California, as Lessor, and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., as Lessee.
The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows:
[Site Description Attached Consisting of 2 Page(s)]
Notes:
This Exhibit may be replaced by a land survey of the Premises once it is received by
Lessee.
2. Setback of the Premises from the Land's boundaries shall be the distance required by
the applicable governmental authorities.
3. Width of access road shall be the width required by the applicable govemmental
authorities, including police and fire departments.
E�
�
'� �
i
v.� r. N'�.r
Y �
C�� E
R 2ya
� � i
��� d
�� d
�� � ��
o �
�
✓
• � q �'.��` � � �
a�; � �\�.
��\` �
i �� �
9 ���
Q � ``� �
� ��
Rs �' �~
� � rn
� n'
� T f e
� Z
� S m L
N D�p
: ���
' `;
��
p � �;`�y
_ 1i #�� z �
� � s�
�� i �°�
�ii ~
�
i ��
�'! ��''I°�
f ,���
i � �z
�!
��
�i�
O
�
OV
�
° z_
z
�
\
N
�
0
r;
���
N
� �fl
�� �; �
�t� 8
8r�� �
�
��
L ��
n �
�3$
s�
�� ���
.
g �.
�
rB � "
�� � � '�.-�.
�
� `�-��
a� ���� _� �
, �.. --�
s' � �
v ��� �
� � ' �,�
EXHIBIT C
To the Agreement dated , 2001, by and between CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a
FORM OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of California, as Lessor, and
COX PCS ASSETS, LLC, as Lessee.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Attn: Property Specialist - San Luis Obispo
County/SN-45-XC-070(E)
SPA CE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
� ► � u � �� �
THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of , 2001,
by and befinreen CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation of the State of Califomia
("Lessor") and COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ("Lessee").
WITNESSETH:
That Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor a portion of that
certain real property (the "Property") in the State of Califomia, County of San Luis Obispo (APN:
007-611-016), a legal description of which is shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, under the terms and conditions of the unrecorded Communications Site Lease
Agreement by and befinreen Lessor and Lessee dated , 2001 and
incorporated herein by reference (the "Agreement") for an initial term of five (5) years, and three
(3) subsequent optional extension terms of five (5) years each, pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement. The Agreement provides for grant of an easement for rights of access to the Property
and to electrical and telephone facilities serving the Property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum as of the day and year first
above written.
Lessee: COX PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., Lessor: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, a
a Delaware limited liability company municipal corporation
By: g
Kelly Gamble _
Its: Regional Director of Site Development Michael A. Lady
Its: Mayor
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ATTACHED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this _ day of , 2001, before me, , a
Notary Public in and for said State and County, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/heNtheir signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal
Notary Public in and for said State and County
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
O n this _ day of , 2001, before me, , a Notary
Public in and for said State and County, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/heNtheir signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal
Notary Public in and for said State and County
EXHIBIT A
TO
MEMORANDUM OFAGREEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S PROPERTY
Cox Slte Name: Arrovo Grande Reservoir #4 Stte Number: SN-45-XC-070(E1
Description of Lessor's Property:
The real property situated in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of Califomia (APN: 007-611-016) and
particularly described as follows:
[Legal Description Attached Consisting of 1 Page(s)]
Lessor Initials
Lessee Initials
_ __ _
ExexsiT n
DfiSCR1P'�'ION:
THqT AO�ZTION OP LOT 91 OF TH� MAP 01= 1'HE RANCHOS CORRAL D� 1�IEARA�'CSMO AND BOLSA
DF. CI��IEb�ISAL, [N 1'I-IE C1TY OF ARROYO GitANDE, COUNTY OF SAN LU1S OB1SP0, STATE OF
CA�.TFOR�VIA, AS PER MAP P1LL-D T.N BOOK A, PAG� 65 01= MAPS, IN THB OFFICE OF TIi� COUNTY
RECORDIiR OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOT.LOWS:
BEGINNII��G AT TI�E MOST SOUTHERLY CORNLR OF THE LAND DESCRIBED iN THfi DBED 7'O
AMASA 1r�. DIXSON RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 302 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID C�UNTY,
MARKED BY A POST SET BY A f. YARSONS [N FEBRUARY 1892, PRESENTLY MARKfiD BY AN 1 1/4
INCH DI,4MEfER PrpB TAGGL•D RC� 6923 AS SIdOwN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 120 OF
RL•CORD �F SURVEYS IN SAiD COUNTY RECORDLRS OFFICE.
THL-NCE �10RTFI 54° FAST 664.00 PEET TO A POINT, FROM WHICH TI-IE MOST EASTERLY CORNER
OF SAID �,AND OF DIXSON I3�ARS NORTH 54 ° EAST 537.30 FEL'T, MORE OR LESS, MARKED BY A
POST ES1 ABLISH�D BY A.F. PARSONS, IN �EBRUARY, 1892, PRESENTI.Y MARKED AN OLD FENCE
CORNER, SAID POI.NT BE1NG TIiE TRUE POIN'r OP IIEGINNING.
"fHENCE ,AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 36° EAST 240.00 FEET TO A POINT.
THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH 54° EAST 272.00 rEET TO A POINT.
THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLLS NORTH 36° WEST 240.00 FEET TO A POINT,
THENCE 50UTH 54° EAS1' 2'12.00 FEET TO THL= TRUE FOINT OF BEGINNING.
8.1.
� pRROy��
� INCORPORATE Z
� - a
�
* ,,�Y ,o. ,s„ ,�
c4 ��FORN� P
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: AWARD OF AUDIT SERVICE CONTRACT
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council/Agency Board authorize the Mayor/Chair to enter into
a three-year consultant services agreement, with three one-year extensions based upon
satisfactory performance, with the firm of Moss, Levy & Hartzheim, Certified Public
Accountants. Said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Attorney.
FUNDING:
Audit services are budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Annual Budget at $17,800 for the City
audit and $2,500 for the Redevelopment Agency audit.
DISCUSSION:
Municipalities and businesses hire auditors to produce annua► financial statements and to
conduct evaluations of the entity's internal control. The auditor is responsible for
determining that the financial statements do not include material errors and do not
misrepresent the City's financial condition. In the evaluation of internal control the auditor
appraises procedures that could allow collusion, theft, or fraud. For the last five years the
City has used the audit firm of Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP (VTD) to conduct the City
and Redevelopment Agency audit. The City has been satisfied with the Firm's
performance, their responsiveness, and the audit document. However, staff felt that a
fresh look at the City's financial figures and internal controls could be warranted.
On April 4, 2001 the Financial Services Department issued a request for audit proposals to
eight certified public accounting firms. Five proposals were received and opened on April
27 The five proposals were as follows:
Firm
Paul Moe, CPA
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim
Glenn, Burdette, Phillips & Bryson
VTD
Terry E. Krieg, CPA
FY 2000-01
$13, 500
14, 950
18, 000
19,455
24,200
FY 2001-02
$13, 500
15, 450
18, 540
20,205
19,200
FY 2002-03
$13,500
15, 950
19,096
21,178
24,200
AWARD OF AUDIT SERVICES CONTRACT
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 2
Price was not the most important factor in evaluating the five proposals. City staff looked
for a firm that had extensive experience in auditing cities, was willing to submit the City's
internal control to extensive scrutiny, had obtained extensive training in the Government
Accounting Standards Board Pronouncement 34 (GASB 34), and expressed willingness to
assist the City in carrying out this Pronouncement.
The proposal submitted by Moss, Levy & Hartzheim meets these criteria. The firm
conducts the annual audits for twenty-nine cities, including Atascadero and Paso Robles.
The proposal specifies the approximate number of transactions that will be tested, the
documents to be reviewed, and the items to be confirmed with outside sources. The firm
is educated on the GASB 34 requirements and is currently conducting a conversion to the
GASB 34 format. Favorable comments were also received from current clients of Moss,
Levy, & Hartzheim during a background check.
Though all five firms are well qualified staff recommends the City/Agency contract with the
firm of Moss, Levy, & Hartzheim to conduct the City and Redevelopment Agency audits
during the next three years, with three one-year extensions based upon satisfactory
performance.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:
- Approve staff recommendations and contract with Moss, Levy, & Hartzheim;
- Deny staff recommendations and contract with one of the other four firms;
- Modify staff recommendations and approve;
- Provide direction to staff.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
For Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03
With an Option For Fiscal Years 2003-04, 2004-OS and 2005-06
Submitted By:
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim
802 E. Main Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
(805)925-2579
Submitted On:
Apri127, 2001
Contact Person:
Ron A. Levy, CPA
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter Transmittal ..............................................................................................................................................................................1
Detailed Audit Proposal:
Independence .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Licenseto Practice in California ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
FirmQualifications and Experience ................................................................................................................................................ 3
Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience ...................................................................................................... 4
Resources ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Similar Engagements with Other Governmental Entities ............................................................................................................... 5
Specific Approach ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Identi fication of Anticipated Potential Audit Problems .................................................................................................................. 8
T�tal Maximum Price ................ .................................................................................................................................................... 9
Appendices:
Appendix A- Peer Quality Review Report ................................................................................................................................... 10
Appendix - Resumes ................................................................................................................................................................ 11
APPendix — References ............................................................................................................................................................. 16
Appendix D- Current and/or Recently Completed Governmental Audits .................................................................................... 17
Appeudix E— Schedule of Professional Fees and Expenses ......................................................................................................... 19
� ,
PARTNERS:
ROBERT M. MOSS, C.P.A.'
RONALD A. LEW, C.PA.'
CRAIG A. HARTZHEIM, C.PA.`
'DENOTES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Ms. Lynda Snodgrass
Director of Financial Services
City of Arroyo Grande
214 E. Branch St.
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
802 EAST MAIN
SANTA MARIA, CA 93454
PHONE: (805) 925-2579
FAX: (80.5) 925-2147
We are pleased to respond to the City of Anoyo Grande's Request far Proposal for independent auditing services. We have prepared
our proposal to address each specificarion included in the City of Arroyo Grande's Request for Proposal.
After 50 years in public accounting and more than 25 years of performing local governmental audits, it is extremely gratifying to witness
the continued growth of Moss, Levy & Hartzheim. The fum has evolved from a one-person operation to a regional public accounting
firm with offices in Beverly Hills, Santa Maria, Sacramento and Tustin and clients throughout the State of California, as well as thirty-
one other states. We and the entire staff are pleased with not only the continuing development of the firm but also the progress and
economic health of our clients. We understand that governmental accounting is a specialized industry with its own accounting standards
and requirements and that is why we strive to constantly improve the quality of our professional services. This degree of dedicarion
coupled with our ability to inform our clients of any new accounting and auditing issues is paramount to our success.
We feel that our size is such that we are large enough to provide a broad spectrum of services and experience backed by an in-house
training program, professional development courses and an extensive professional library, yet not so lazge as to become impersonal and
rigid. Our informal style allows us to be flexible enough to complete our audits in a timely manner that is the most convenient for each
client. Also, this style allows us to be more accessible to our clients when our clients have quesrions or concerns.
It is our understanding that we will be responsible for expressing an opinion on the City of Arroyo Grande's general-purpose financial
statements in confornuty with generally accepted accounring principles. We will also be responsible for expressing an opinion on the
fair presentarion of the City's combining, individual fund and account group statements and schedules in relation to the general-purpose
financial statements taken as a whole. In addition to those procedures deemed necessary to express our opinion on the general purpose
financial statements, we understand that we will also be responsible for performing certain limited procedures involving supplementary
information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Our audits would be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States; Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of State, Local
Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations; and Guidelines for ComplianceAudits of California RedevelopmentAgencies issued by the
State Controller, Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. As part of performing our audits in accordance with these standards, we
understand that we will be required to audit the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.
It is our understanding that we will be responsible for issuing the following reports: an independent auditor's report on the general
purpose fmancial statements; auditor's report on compliance and on internal control over fmancial reporting based on an audit of
financial statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards; an auditor's report on compliance with
requirements applicable to each major program and internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and a
report on the internal control structure based on the Auditors' understanding of the internal control structure and assessment of conlrol
risk.
It is also our understanding that we will be responsible for issuing a report on the fair presentation of the City of Arroyo Grande's
Redevelopment Agency issuing a report on the City's Transportation Development Act financial statements, perform agreed upon
procedures on the City's GANN limit and issue a report thereon and Single Audit Act work.
OFFICES: BEVERLY HILLS • SANTA Iv�ARIA • SACRAMENTO • TUSTIN
MOSS, LEVY & HARTZHEIM
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
MEMBER AMERICAN INSfITUfE OF C.PA.'s • CALIFORNIA SOCIEN OF C.PA.'s • CALIFORNIA SOCIEN OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS • CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS
If convenient for the City's staff, the approximate target dates for an audit would be as follows:
(1) Preliminary audit entrance conference with staff — May 23
(2) Interim field work - week of June 14
(3) Year-end field work - week of October 1
(4) Exit conference with staff — October 17
(5) Draft of Management Letter — October 30
(6) Issue other audit reports and final management letter - November 15 (or within three days of the City's final approval)
(7) Council presentation — Open
P�Iinimal assistance of the City's staff is required during the course of the audit, however, we do ask that the City provide the following:
cooperarion in answering questions, requested confirmarions, bank reconciliations, a general ledger and other miscellaneous items.
Also, with City approval, our audit team can pull and file appropriate supporting documents, which includes invoices. We feel this
approach minimizes the disruption of the City routine.
The percentage of the audit work we expect to accomplish in each month is shown below:
June July August September October Total
30°/u 5% 5°/u 10°/a 50% 100°/u
This proposal is a firm and irrevocab:e offer unril June 27, 2001.
Thank you for your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact the authorized representative listed below with any questions,
prublems, or concerns.
Ron A. Levy, CPA
Partner
802 E. Main Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454
(805)925-2579
Sincerely,
Ron A. Levy, A
2
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
I1�DEFEIVD,�.�VC.�
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim is independent of the City of Anoyo Grande and its component units as defined by generally accepted auditing
standards and the U.S. General Accounting Office's Governmental Auditing Standards (1994).
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim has not entered into a professional relationship involving the City of Arroyo Grande or its component units in
thelastthree years.
LICEIY,SE �Q FRAG'TICE I1� C�1�I�QR��A
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim is a properly licensed certified public accounting firm in the State of California, license # 5863. All certified
public accountants engaged in the audit of the City are licensed to practice in the State of Califomia and have received at least die
minimum number of governmental continuing professional education hours required by the State Board of Accountancy to perform a
governmental audit.
�'IR14�1 �U.�LI�`IC.�1 T�01YS AND .E��'ERIE��'E
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim is a minority owned regional fum that perforn�s audits of govemmental entities from the Oregon border to the
Mexican border. The fum currently employs 29 professionals and has annual gross revenues between 2 and 2.5 million dollars. The
firm has four offices in California: Beverly Hills, Santa Maria, Sacramento and Tustin.
The audit work wrill be completed by staff from our Santa Maria office.
The Santa Maria office is currently staffed by five certified public accountants (three partners and two managers). In addition, the fircn
employs three senior accountants and four staff accountants.
The City of Arroyo Grande w•ill have one partner and one altemate partner assigned to the audit at all times. In addition, one manager,
one senior accountant and two or three staff accountants will be assigned on a full-time basis to the audit from the Santa Maria office.
The City of Arroyo Grande will also have a computer specialist assigned to the audit on a full-time basis. This individual assists the
audit team in documenting the computer system internal control shucture.
Our fum has never been the object of any disciplinary action from any federal or state regulatory body or professional organizarion, nor
is there any disciplinary action pending.
Please see Appendix A- Peer Quality Review Report for a copy of our firm's most recent quality review report, which includes a review
of local govemmental engagements.
PAR T1VER, �`UI'ER 1 I� 141�D STAFF Q�A�I1�'I�A �'If,�.1�5 �911�� �Xl��l�l�.1 ��'�
It is the firm's policy to have our parfiers and audit manager involved in the managing funcrion of our governmental audits. Having
both the partner and audit manager involved in the engagement allows the City to receive immediate response to questions about
accounting and audit topics, concerns and findings.
It is expected that Mr. Ron Levy would be the partner in charge of the City's audit. Mr. Lery would have primary responsibility for the
audit. Mr. Levy would also be responsible for assisting in the preparation of the City's CAFR. Mr. Lery has assisted numerous cities
and has prepared award winning CAFRs. Mr. Levy will also be responsible for addressing any City questions or concerns that arise
during the year. It is the firm's policy to have a partner on site for a maj ority of the field work. This policy enables the partner to become
acquainted with the City's daily operations and key personnel.
Mr. Craig Hartzheim will be the altemate partner assigned to the audit. As alternate partner, it is his responsibility to be familiar with
the City, its staff, the audit, and any special problem areas of the City in the event that Mr. Lery is unavailable. Mr. Hartzheim has
assisted numerous cities and prepared award winning CAFRs. Mr. Hartzheim has also assisted cities in preparing the state controller's
reports.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAII.ED AUDIT PROPOSAL
FARTN.LR� SIIPERVISQRYANDS'Tf4FF�L�'�,�..TF'IC�9TIQ�.S�'.r�f.�.����Rl,�.11�C.E conti�ued
Ms. Toni Joksch will be the manager assigned to the audit. As manager, Ms. Joksch will oversee the day to day operations of the audit
and will review all audit areas. Ms. Joksch will be at the City for 100% of the fieldwork. Ms. Joksch is a planning committee member
for the Govemmental Accounting Conference held by the Califomia CPA Education Foundation. She also performs in house training for
governmental auditing staff members and is in charge of keeping the firm updated on aspects of governmental accounting and auditing
issues.
Mr. Paul Niedermuller will be the senior accountant assigned to the audit. As senior accountant, it will be Mr. Niedermuller's
responsibility to oversee the staff accountants, do preliminary reviews of audit sections, and to perform more difficult audit sections.
Mr. David Ortiz will be the computer specialist assigned to the audit. Mr. Ortiz has extensive laiowledge in auditing EDP functions. Mr.
Ortiz will also perform the statistical sampling procedures for the audit. Also, he will document and test the internal control shucture of
the computer systems.
Please see Appendix B- Resumes for each individual's resume.
In addition to the supervisory staff listed above, two or tl staff accountants will be assigned to the audit. All staff accountants have
degrees frorn accredited colleges or wuversities, have received in-house govemmental�audit tranung and at present have at least one year
of governmental auditing experience. All staff accountants will be duectly supervised by the senior accountant and/or manager assigned
to the audit at all times. All parmers, managers and staff inembers have worked on nurnerous govemmental engagements together.
Consistently working together �vill provide the City with a knowledgeable and efricient audit team.
The fimi wiil maintain staff continuity on the engagement throughout tlie term of the contract, barring any terminations, illnesses or
other �nforeseen cucumstances. At the request of the City, any Moss, Levy and Hartzheim employee assigned to the audit can be
removed and replaced by another qualified eniployee. Moss, Le�ry & Hartzheim has an advantage in that there is relatively low tumover
in employees as can be seen on individual resumes and therefore, the firm will not use the City as a training gruund for its employees.
RESQURG'L.S
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim will be able to provide the City with qualified, trained staff in light of current obligations. The audit work
would be conducted with staff from the Santa Maria office, however, if necessary, we are able to utilize staff from the other three
offices, although that contingency is not anticipated. If at any time you are not satisfied with a member of the audit team, that member
can be replaced with another qualified staff inember.
Members of our staff attend various conferences and seminars throughout the year. All of our CPA's must complete the required
number of continuing professional education hours. We also conduct in-house training for all staff inembers in order to ensure that you
will receive the best possible service.
SIMILAR EIVGAGEMENTS WI�'H QTH.�R GU��.R1�.�kIE1VT.�A.� ��TITI,L�S
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim has an extensive background in auditing cities with over twenty-seven years of experience in this specialized
field. We currently perform twenty-nine city audits and numerous other governmental audits.
Please see Appendix C- References for a list of similar local government�l clients performed from the local office.
Please see Appendix D- Current and/or recently completed Governmental Auclits for a list of governmental audit clients.
4
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
SI1I�TII�R .ENGAGEMENTS T�IT� QTH,�R GQ�.�R1�1k1�1�T'�� .E,�T'.l?'I�S -continued
Recent local auditing experiences include the following:
CSMFO and GFOA Award Programs
The firm currently audits the following nine ciries that participate in both the CSMFO and GFOA Award Progran�s.
(Each city has received both awards.)
City of Bellflower
City of Campbell
City of Scotts Valley
City of Brawley
City of Whittier
City of Paso Robles
City of Sonoma
City of Lathrop
City of Watsonville
OMB Circular A-133
We have performed compliance audits in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133,
Audits of State, Local GovErnments and �Vonprofit Organizations, for each of our municipal clients.
3. 5pecial Districts
Currently our fum audits sixty-three special districts including recreation districts, utility districts, cemetery districts,
community services dish�icts, s�.ivtary districts, water districts, fire districts, an ambulance services district and an auport
district.
4. Redevelopment Agencies
We have performed audits of thirteen redevelopment agencies. Each redevelopment agency audit is conducted in
accordance with Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies issued by the State
Controller, Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs and Section 33080.1(a) of the Health and Safety Code and Title
2.5, Chapter 6 of the Califomia Administrative Code.
State Controller's Report and Street Report
We have prepared State Controller's reports and street reports for numerous cities, redevelopment agencies and special
districts. We feel this experience allows us to help assist our clients in their preparation of the state controller's reports
or prepare the reports as a separate engagement for our clients.
6. Joint Powers Authorities
We have recently audited the following joint powers authorities (JPAs):
Santa Barbara Water Purveyors Joint Powers Agency
Data Processing Joint Powers Agency
Santa Barbara County Special Education Local Plan Area
Joint Powers Agency
In addition to the three joint powers agencies listed above, the vast majority of our governmental clients are members of
j oint powers agencies. As such, our firm has experience in reviewing JPA statements and disclosing the appropriate JPA
information in the financial statements for each governmental client.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
SIIIIII�AR ENGAGE11�E1VTS WITH OTHEI� Gr(,�T�,�R.N111'.�1�TAL� .E�T'ITI.L�S- canti�:ued
7. Federal and State Grant Programs and the Single Audit
Each of our municipal clients, the majority of our special district clients, and all of our school district clients receive
federal and state grants which require compliance audits. Some of our most commonly audited federal programs are as
follows:
Municipal Major Programs:
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG)
Federal Emergency Management Act Funds (FEMA)
Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
Urban Mass Transportation Act Funds (LTMTA)
Economic Development Grants (EDA)
Other Common Municipal Programs:
COPS Fast grants
COPS More grants
Asset Seizure funds
Retired Senior Volunt�er Program
Other Major Programs:
Senior Nutrition Programs
Child Nutrition Programs
Title I
Title VI
Migrant Education
Vocational Education
Special Education
Franchise Audits
The firm has assisted several cities in reviewing franchise fmancial statements as part of reviewing franchise requests for
rate increases. In addition, the fum has performed�ansient occupancy audits for five cities and has performed various
audits of operaring lease charges (such as use of a ewage treahnent plant based on percentage of use by our client and
actual expenses as recorded by the treahnent plant operator).
�P.�EGI�'IG,�iT�'I�.�T ,�.F.P'IZU� GH
The main extent of our work would be what is required to enable us to express an opinion on the fmancial statements in accordance
with:
1. AICPA Industry Audit Guide for State and Local Governmental Units
2. AICPA Audit Standards
3. National Committee on Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting (Amended) Publicution
4. Laws of the State of Califomia
5. Requirements of Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-133, Audits of State and Local Governments and
Nonprofit Organizations
6. GAO Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Activities and Functions, the Guidelines for Financial and
Con:pliance Audits of Federally Assistc�d Programs
7. Our firm's own additional standards and procedures
The audit will be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
.S'F.EG.I.F'IC'AI�DIT �F.�R4ACH— continuerl
The primary purpose of the audit is to express an opinion on the fmancial statements, and such an audit is subject to the inherent risk that
material errors or fraud may exist and not be detected by us. If conditions are discovered which lead to the belief that material errors,
defalcations, fraud may exist, or if any other circumstances are encountered that require extended services, we will promptly advise the
City.
Our audit �pproach would begin when it is convenient for City staff. We estimate this to be around May or June to perfonn interim
work. During May or June each year, the partner or manager of the fum will contact the Finance Department personnel. The puipose of
this contact will be to discuss the scope and timing of the annual audit, to review any accounting issues lmown at that time and to address
any City personnel's concerns about the impending audit. We will also discuss with you any matters that may impact our audit
procedures or your financial reporting. Also, we will discuss with you any assistance the City may need with the yeaz-end closing.
For our first year of engagement, we will utilize the prior year's financial statements, the current year budget and our lrnowledge of your
systems to deternrine materiality for the different audit sections. Each year, we will select a sample of transactions to deternune to what
extent the systems are functioning as described to us. The extent of our sample size will depend upon our assessment of the intemal
control structure. 'The selection of transactions for testing will be made using a combination of random, systematic and haphazard
sampling techniques. We will identify the strength of the systems upon which we can rely in planning our substantive tests. Our intemal
cont� ol review will meet all the requirements of AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55, Considerarion of the Internal Control
Structure in a Financial Stateinent Awdit, as amended by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 78.
It is estimated that the sampling size for transacrion testing for compliance with systems as actually implemented ��ould be as follows:
I. 25/40/60 disbursement items, including automatic and manual checks
�I. 25/40/60 payroll checks
III. 25/40/60 receipt items, including but not limited to urility billings, business licenses, recreation
programs, buildin� fees, francluse fees, and oQier miscellaneous receipts
We will also review the foliowi.ng documents in order to determine compliance �vith laws and regulations:
(a) Minutes of the governing body with special attention to: indications of new revenue sources, including federal and state
grants; expenditure authorizations and related appropriations, including any special or restrictive provisions; appropriarion
transfers; authorization for bank or other debt incurred; awards to successful bidders; authorization for new leases entered
into; changes in licenses, fines or fees; authorization for fund balances designations or reservarions; and authorization for
significant new employees hired
(b) New agreements and amendments to new agreements including but not limited to: grant agreements; debt and lease
agreements; labor agreements; joint venture agreements; and other miscellaneous agreements
(c) Administrative Code
(d) Inveshnent Policy
Our year-end fieldwork would begin after the City has closed its books which we estunate to be the fust week of October. The year-end
audit work will begin with an analytical review of all significant balance sheet and revenues and expenditures/expense accounts for each
fund group, which includes a comparison of prior year fmancial statements and current year budget to the year-end trial balance. The
primary objective of the year-end audit work is to audit the fmal numbers that will appear in the City's CAFR.
We will also perform procedures such as:
(a) Confumarions by positive and negative circularizations including but not limited to all cash and inveshnent accounts;
selected receivable and revenue balances; all bonds, loans, notes payable and capital leases; all notes receivable; all
insurance carriers; all legal firn�s employed on City business; and other miscellaneous confirmations as deemed
necessary
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
SPECIFaTC ATJ.�IT .�IP.�RO.� GH— co�rinued
(b) Physical verifications and observations
(c) Analysis and review of evidential material
(d) Interviews and investigative efforts
(e) Electronic data processing testing for computer and software reliability
(� Numerous other procedures
During the entire engagement, our audit team will be determining the risk assessment of federal programs to be audited in compliance
with OMB A-133. We will perform tests of: general requirements; specific requirements; claims for advances and reimbursements; and
amounts claimed or used for matching in compliance with the Single Audit Act. Also we will obtain an understanding of the intemal
control structure of each program tested. The compliance audit will be made in accordance with generally accepted audiring standards
and the GAO Standards forAudits of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions, and the GAO Guide[ines for
Financial and Compliance Audits of Federally Assisted Pr•ograms.
As part of our audit engagements we issue our clients management letters if we note certain observations or recommendations that we
feel need to be disclosed. Oiu firm's philosophy regarding the management letter is that the management letter is to help management
improve its intemal control and accounting procedures and not to criticize the management in charge. This is why we present our
management letters to management in draft form for open discussion prior to issuing.
The firm uses PPC audit programs, checklists and questionnaires in conjunction with client specific audit program procedures. In
addition to our PPC checklists, the lirm uses GFOA and CSMFO �ward Program Reviewer's Checklists as an additional guide for
CAFRs.
The Governmental Accounting, Audrting and Financial Reporting (GAAFR), issued by the Government Finance Officers Association
(the "Blue 13ook") and other GFOA publications are often used as additional tools when preparing the financial statements of our
governmental clients. The firni has aud ases its extensive library of current AICPA, GFOA, and GASB publications and
pronouncements.
IDENT`IFICATION ��'ANTI�II'�.A7'�I.� �f�►�'�1YT��1L t4 �III�'1°�RC���L�`.�S
Our firm has already taken a proactive approach to the implementation of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) No.
34 pronouncement. The pronouncement affects each of our clients in a different manner. Some of our clients will need consultation on
establishing internal controls for their new fixed asset tracking system. While others will need our advice on the pros and cons of
different fmancial statement presentation methods allowed under the pronouncement. We feel our informal and flexible style helps us
deal with the different issues our clients face with the implementation of GASB 34. We have attended seminars, conferences and have
performed extensive research on GASB 34 implementarion. The firm is currently working closely with one of our clients on a
conversion to GASB 34 financial statements. In working closely with the City in regards to the implementation, we feel the transition to
GASB 34 financial statements will be a rewarding challenge.
We do not anticipate any additional problems with the audit except for items listed in past management representation letters. In the
event of a problem, the City Attorney, City Manager and the Finance Director will be unmediately notified in writing of any fraud, other
illegal acts or indications of illegal acts found during the course of our work. All other discrepancies or wealaiesses in the internal
control system will be communicated to management through discussion, the management recommendation letter and/or if it is a
reportable condition, as part of the single audit report.
The City of Arroyo Grande will be informed of: the auditor's responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards; significant
accounting policies; management judgments and accounting estimates; significant audit adjustments; other information in documents
containing audited financial statements; disagreements with management; management consultation with other accountants; major issues
discussed with management prior to retention; and difficulties encountered in perfornung the audit.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DETAILED AUDIT PROPOSAL
T(�TAL 1I1AXI.t�1U1�I FRIC,�
All out of pocket expenses are included in the fee and no additional costs will be passed on to the City. The City is however, expected
to provide adequate working space, access to a copier, fax machine, and telephone. We will provide all other supplies, material and
equipment including notebook computers, adding machines and paper.
Tl�e maximum audit fee for the fiscal audits are as follows:
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
City's Fiscal Audit, including Single Audit $ 12,950 $ 13,350 $ 13,750
Redevelopment Agency Audit
Totals
Option for an addirional three years is as follows:
2,000 2,100 2,200
$ 14,950 $ 15,450 $ 15,950
2003-04 2004-OS 2005-06
City's Fiscal Audit, includin� Single Audit $ 14,150 $ 14,550 $ 14,950
Redevelopment Agency P.udit
Totals
2,300 2,400 2,500
$ 16,450 $ 16,950 $ 17,�+50
Please see Appendix E— Schedule of Professional Fees and Expenses for level of staff and number of anticipated hours.
Special audit work as requested by the City would be performed at the stated discounted hourly rates. However, no extended services
will be performed unless they are authorized in the contractual agreement, or in an amendment to the agreement.
Partner
Manager
Senior Accountant/Supervisory Staff
Staff Accountant
Clerical
Computer Specialist
Respectfully submitted,
MOSS, LEVY & HARTZHEIM
on A. Levy PA
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim is an Equal Opportunity Employer
E
$
$
$
$
$
$
100
70
55
35
20
50
P
S
Jess�e C. P�,,ell, CP�
POWELL & SPAFFORD, LLP Paf��c� D. Spa{{o�, Cp�
CERTIFIEG PU[3LIC �CCCUhTANTS a,�"�
a���ca+x�srir��re cf
CERT�IEG [��uC.�CCCKr.La� � �
To the Partners
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim
Certified Public Accountants
We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Moss,
Levy & Hartzheim (the firm) in effect for the yeaz ended December 3 l, 1999. A system of quality
control encompasses the.firm's organizational structure and the policies adopted and procedures
established to provide it with reasonable assurance of complying with professional standards. The
elements of quality control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standazds issued by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The design of the system and
compliance with it are the responsibility of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the design of the system, and the firm's compliance with the system ba.sed on our review.
Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review Board of the
AICPA. In performing our review, we obtained an understanding of the system ofquality control for
the firm's accounting and auditing practice. In addition, we tested compliance with the firm's quality
control policies and procedures t� tlie extent we considered appropriate. These tests cavered the
applicati�n af the firm's policies and proc�dures on selected engagemeiits. Because our review was
based on selective tests, it would not necessaril}� �isclose all weaknesses in the system of quality
control or all instances of lack of compli2nce with it.
Because there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control,
departures from the system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of a
system of quality control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or because of the degree of compliance with
the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Moss, Levy
& Hartzheim in effect for the year ended December 31, 1999, has been designed to meet the
requirements �f the quality control standards for an accounting and auditing practice established by
the AICPA and was complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable
assurance of complying with professional standards.
August 8, 2000 h' � ��pr�
664 W dirc� Cour� • San Gerno�ino, CA 92410 • p�. Qox 8847 • Red�ands, CA 92375
, Te�ep��ene 90�3-885-TT21 • Fax 909-885-7541
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX B - RESLTMES
RONA. LET�Y, CP�I - PART��R
• California licensed CPA with 25 years of audit experience with governmental entities.
• Partner in charge of all governmental audits, currently including 29 municipal audits, 18 school district audits, and 63
special district audits.
• Has assisted governmental clients with year-end closings, key position interviews, preparation of award winning CAFRs
and preparation of State Controller's Reports.
• Has met or exceeded all continuing education requirements, including recent courses in:
2000 Gover•nmental and School District Conference
1999 Governmental Accounting Conference
1998 Governmental Accounting Conference
Compliance Auditing, Audit Sampling and Concluding the Audit
Audits nfState and Local Governments
Governmental Accounting Update
The Single Audit Act �
The 1998 School D:strict Conference
Auditor's Reports on Audits of Local Governments
Planning a Governmental Audit Engagement
Com��!iance Auditing, Subrecepient Program Specific Audits and Concluding the Single .4udit
Background information, P� Flanning Activities and Issues of Financial Statements
in a Single Audit
Single Audit und Sampling Considerations for a Governmental Audit Engagement and Special
Considerations in a Schoul District Audit
Governmental Audit Pre-Engagement Activities, Concluding the Audit and Auditor's Report
• Member of the following:
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
California Society of Certified Public Accountants
Califomia Association of School Business Officials
Kiwanis Club
• A Bachelor of Science degree from Oregon State University conferred in 1977.
• Taught accounting courses at a branch of LaVerne College and Chapman College.
• Knowledgeable about all areas of tax law.
11
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX B - RESUMES
CRAI� HART2HEII�I, CFA - P�tRT�ER (ALr�n�vAT��
• California licensed CPA with 14 years of audit experience with govemmental entiries.
• Alternate partner for all governmental audits, currently including 29 municipal audits, 18 school district audits, and 22
special districts.
• Has met or exceeded all continuing educarion requirements, including recent courses in the following:
2000 Governmental and School District Conference
1998 Governmental Accounting Conference
Preparing Governmental Accounting Statements
Preparing Governmental Financial Statements
The New Yellow Book
Planning, Sampling, Internal Control, Compliance & Subrecipient Considerations
During Single Audits & t'rogram Specifc Audits
Concluding the.4udit, Reporting, Follow-up, & bidirect Cost Considerations
During Single Aaidits
Cost Allocations and Indirect Costs
FEMA Compliance
A Yiew of What Happened in Orange County
• A Bachelor of Science degree in �ccounting from Marquette University conferred in 1982.
• Member of the following:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Califomia Society of Certified Public Accountants
California Association of School Business Officials
• Knowledgeable about all areas of tax law.
12
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX B - RESUMES
TQ,Il�I JQ.�T�SGH, GI'A - tY1ANAG.E1�
• California licensed CPA with 8 years of audit experience with governmental enriries.
• Manager for over 30 governmental and non profit audits.
• Helped develop and update in-house Govemmental audit training manual.
• A member of the 2000 Govemmental and School District Conference Planning Committee and the 2001 School District
Conference Planning Comrnittee.
• Has assisted governmental clients with year end closings, key position interviews, preparation of
award winning CAFRs and prepararion of State Controller's Reports.
• Has met or exceeded all continuing education requuements, including recent courses in the following:
200U Governmental and Sch�ol Districl Conference
1999 School District Conference .
1998 School District Conference
Planning a G�verrimental Audit Engngement
Auditor's Report on Audits of Local Governments and Special Considerations in
a School District Audit
Plmining, Sumpling, Internal Control, Cvmpliance & SubrecipiFnt
Conside�•atior.s During Single Audits & Program Specific.4u�lits
Cnmpliance A���iting for Non Profit Organizations
At�dit Samp[ing in u Non Profit Organizatiort Audit Engagement
Tax considerations in At�dits of Non Profit Org=anizations
Governmental Accounting Concepts
2000 Non profit Conference
1999 Non profit Conference
1998 Non profit Conference
Governmental Assets, Liabilities, Revenue ancl Expenditures
Fund Types and Account Groups and Service Efforts
Single Audit
Fraud Investigations
• Graduated with honors from the University of LaVerne. A Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting was conferred.
• Member of California Society of Certified Public Accountants
13
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX B - RESLJMES
P.�1 U� .lY�.�.�D.ER..1l�'LI.�I�ER -- S.E��QR f1 �CQ U1�TA1�7'
• Expected to receive CPA certificate in November, 2001.
• Four years audit experience with governmental and non-profit entities.
• Senior Auditor for 10 municipal audits.
• A Bachelor of Science degree in Business Adminish�ation with an emphasis in Accounting from California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo.
14
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX B - RESUMES
DA YZI� QRTI� -- �OhIFLTT.�R ,�P.��'IALIST'
• Expected to receive CPA certificate in November, 2001.
• Eight years audit experience with governmental and commercial entities.
• Computer specialist for 10 municipal audits, 8 sc�zool district audits and 14 special district audits.
• Extensive lrnowledge of database systems, nerivorking and accounting software.
• A Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administrarion with an emphasis in Accounting from Califomia Polytechnic
State University, San Luis Obispo.
• Expected to receive CCNA (Cisco Certified Network Associate) in November, 2001.
15
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX C - REFERENCES
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
Audit of general purpose fmancial statements,
Redevelopment Agency and Single Audit Report
1997-Present
Ron A. Levy, CPA
450 Audit Hours
Contact: Mike Compton, (805) 237-3996
Received CSMFO Certificates of Achievement in Financial
CITY OF WATSONVILLE
Audit of general purpose financial statements,
Redevelopment Agency and Single Audit Report
2000-Present .
Ron A. Lery, CPA
650 Audit Hours
Contact: WilliamP. Havs, (831) 728-6034
CITY OF SAN MARIA
Audit of general purpose finaricial statements, Redevelopment Agency, Single Audit Report and
Santa I�4aria Public Financing Authority; we also reviewed the City's GANN limit.
1970-1997
Ron A. Levy, CPA
600 Audit hours
Contact: Michael Cox, (805) 925-0951
16
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX D- CURRENT AND/OR RECENTLY COMPLETED GOVERNMENTAL AUDITS
CITIES
}3eaumont
Bellflower
B ishop
Brawley
Calimesa
Campbell
Gonzales
Greenfield
Grover Beach
Holtville
Iting
I,akeport
I,athrop
Mammoth Lakes
Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
Rocklin
Santa Maria
Scotts Valley
Seaside
Soledad
Sonoma
South Lake Tahoe
Turlock
Waterford
Watsonville
Whittier
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
FINANCI.�L AUDITS
Grover Beacl
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Pla�ming
CounciI:
Local Transportation Fund
State Transit Assistance Fund
South County/San Luis Obispo Transit
Mariposa County, CA
Transponation Agency for Monterey County
SERVICES DISTRICTS
Cuyama CSD
Eastern Sierra CSD
El Dorado Hills CSD
Groveland CSD
Heritage Ranch CSD
Lake Don Pedro CSD
Mission Hills CSD
Nice CSD
Rossmoor CSD
Twain Harte CSD
Vandenberg Village CSD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES
Atascadero
Beaumont
Bellflower
Grover Beach
Holtville
King
Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
Santa Maria
Soledad
Scotts Valley
Watsonville
Whittier
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
Represented the following cities in the audit
of hotel "bed tax" records:
Santa Maria
Pismo Beach .
Bellflower
South Lake Tahoe
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Bellflower Santa Maria
Gonzales Waterford
RECREATION DISTRICTS
Arden Park Recreation District
Conejo Valley Recreation and Park District
Cuyama Recreation District
Fair Oaks Recreation and Park District
Fulton El-Camino Recreation and Park District
Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority
Orangevale Recreation and Park District
Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District
Rancho Simi Park and Recrearion District
San Andreas Recreation and Park District
Southeate Recrearion and Park District
AIRPORT DISTRICT
Santa Maria Public A' ort District
17
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX D- CURRENT AND/OR RECENTLY COMPLETED GOVERNMENTAL AUDITS
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Ballard School District
Blochman Union School District
Cayucos Elementary School District
Coast Unified School District
Cold Spring School District
Goleta Union School District
Heber Elementary School District
King City Union School District
Lennox School District
Los Olivos School District
Magnolia Union School District
Montecito Union School District
Mulberry Elementary School District
Orcutt Union School District
Pleasant Valley School District
San Ardo Elementary School District
San Miguei School District
Santa Maria High School Districl
Santa Maria-Boiuta School District
Shand�n Llnihed School District
Solvang Elementary School District
GRANTS AND AID PROGRAMS
Allan Hancock Community College Student
Financial Aid Programs
CEMETERY DISTRICTS
Cemetery District
Arroyo Grande Cemetery District
Atascadero Cemetery District
Lower Lake Cemetery District
Middleton Cemetery District
Raikoad Flat Cemetery District
San Andreas Cemetery District
San Miguel Cemetery District
Shandon Cemetery District
West Foint Cemetery District
A1ITBULANCE SERVICES DISTRICT
Cambria Community Healthcare District
SANITATIOl� DISTRICTS
Cayucos Sanitary District
Murphy Sanitary District
San Andreas Sanitary District
Montecito Sanitary District
Carpinteria Sanitary District
WATER DISTRICTS
FIRE DISTRICTS
Altaville - Melones Fire Protection District
Cayucos Fire Protection District
Copperopolis Fire Protection District
Jenny Lind Fire Protection District
Mokelumne Fire Protection District
Muiphy Fire Protection District
San Andreas Fire Protection Dish�ict
San Miguel Fire Protection District
West Point Fire Protection District
Calaveras County WD
Callayomi County WD
Carmichael WD
Coming WD
Florin County WD
Mammoth Community WD
Mount Knocti WD
Paso Robles Mutual WD
Santa Barbara Water Purveyors
San Juan WD
Thomas Creek WD
Westside WD
18
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
APPENDIX E- SCHEDULE OF PROFESSIONAL FEES AND EXP�NSES
Schedule of Professional Fees and Expenses
for the Audit of 2000-01 Financial Statements
Supporting Schedule for the City of Arroyo Grande
Standard Quoted
Hourly Hourly
Hours Rate Rate Total
Partners 30 120 100 $ 3,000
Managers 50 90 70 3,500
Supervisory Staff 60 70 55 3,000
Staff 100 50 35 3,500
Other (specify):
Clerical
Computer Specialists
20
25
60
2b
50
400
S�:btotal
Out-of-pockFt expenses:
I�Zeals and Lodging
31
Transportation
Other (specify):
Total all-inclusive maximum price for 2000-01 audit
Note: The rate quoted should not be presented as a general percentage of the standard hourly rate or
as a gross deduction from the total all-inclusive maximum price.
Note: All out of pocket expenses are included in the fee and no additional costs will be passed on to
the City of Arroyo Grande.
1,550
14,950
N/A
N/A
N/A
$ 14,950
19
9.a.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will
hold a Public Hearing on the following item:
Case Number:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Representative:
Environmental
Determination:
Lot Line Adjustment 01-004
Greg Slowinski
823 and 841 Los Ciervos Street
The applicant has requested a Lot Line Adjustment to
adjust the lot line befinreen two (2) existing residential lots.
Greg Slowinski
Categorically Exempt
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Community Development
Department has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt per Section
15305 of the CEQA Guide�ines.
Any person affected or concerned by this application may submit written comments to the
Department of Administrative Services before the City Council hearing, or appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the proposal. Any person interested in the proposal can
contact the Community Development Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande,
California, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday.
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY
THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING
DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO
THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE
BODY FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing:
Place of Hearing:
Tuesday, May 22, 2001 at 7:00 p.m.
Arroyo Grande Ci.ty Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street �
Arroyo Grande, Califomia 93420
��
G��Guo�-e--
Kelly et ore, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1T, Friday, May 11, 2001
/pRROYO
� G'
� INCORPORATE Z
V T
� JULV 10. 1911 *
c4��FORN�P MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KERRY MCCANTS --""
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY: TERESA MCCLISH, ASSOCIATE PLANNER�
SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 01-004 TO ADJUST TWO
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AT 823 AND 841 LOS CIERVOS STREET -
TRACT 1834, APPLIED FOR BY GREG SLOWINSKI
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution conditionally
approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The project site is approximately 1.3 acres in size and consists of two residential
lots. The purpose of the lot line adjustment is to adjust the size of Lot 26 increasing
the distance between the residence and the eastern property line.
The properties are located on the western edge of Tract 1834, Rancho Grande - the
Highlands Phase 4(Attachment 1). Lot 26 abuts a 33-foot easement for sewer,
storm drain and access purposes which would remain unaffected by the proposed
Lot Line Adjustment. Lot 26 will increase by 1,650.79 square feet along the
southeastern boundary. The site slopes steeply from Lot 26 to Lot 27 from the
proposed boundary line. Lot 26 and Lot 27 are developed with newly constructed
single-family residences.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed lot line adjustment would reconfigure the two (2) lots as follows:
EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOT SIZES
The Rancho Grande Planned Development requires that all development be
substantially as shown on the Master Conceptual Plan and conform to the conditions
City Council Staff Report
Lot Line Adjustment No. 01-004
May 22, 2001
Page 2
of approval for the subdivision (Tract 1834). Maximum building size for residences in
the Highlands is determined by a formula according to lot size. The existing
residences do not exceed the maximum building size allowed with the adjusted lot
size.
Setbacks set forth in the Conditions of Approval for Tract 1834 include specific
distances for lots on Los Ciervos Street. The side yard setback must be 10% of the
width of the lot but in no case are they required to exceed ten feet. The side yard
setbacks for the adjusted lots still exceed these requirements.
The Staff Advisory Committee reviewed the lot line adjustment on April 24, 2001
(Attachment 2). Staff did not have any issues with the proposal. As adjusted, the
lots meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and the Planned
Development. Because the site is located in the Planned Development District, the
City Council must approve the Lot Line Adjustment. On May 15, 2001, the Planning
Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve
the Lot Line Adjustment (Attachment 3).
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A public notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed
project, and a public notice was placed in the Times-Press-Recorder. Staff has not
received any written comments to date.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Arroyo Grande Rules and
Procedures for Implementation of CEQA. Based on the review, staff has determined
that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15305 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Attachments:
Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004
Exhibit "A": Conditions of Approval
Exhibit "B": Lot Line Adjustment
1. Site Location Map
2. April 24, 2001 SAC Meeting Notes
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-1791
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO. 01-004 FOR TWO (2) LOTS, LOCATED AT 841
AND 823 LOS CIERVOS STREET, APPLIED FOR BY GREG
SLOWINSKI
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004 for two (2)
lots located at 841 and 823 Los Ciervos Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a public
hearing on Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004 in accordance with City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with
the City's General Plan and Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed this project under the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project
is Categorically Exempt under Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information presented
at the public hearing, the staff report and other information and documents that are
part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing,
that the following circumstances exist:
The proposed Lot Line Adjustment does not:
1. Create any new lots.
2. Include any lots or parcels created illegally.
3. Impair any existing access or create a need for access to any adjacent lots or
parcels.
4. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving
adjacent lots or parcels.
5. Constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configurations due to existing
environmental conditions or current zoning development standards.
6. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for
any new improvements.
7. Create a nonconforming lot in the development district, in which it exists, except
as allowed in Section 9-10.100 of the Development Code.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande approves Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004 with the above findings and
subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", and in conformance to Exhibit
"B" both of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
, seconded by Council Member , and
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 22nd day of May 2001.
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 3
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 01-004
823 and 841 Los Ciervos Street (T-1834 Lots 26 and 27)
GREG SLOWINSKI
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes:
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. This application shall automatically expire on May 15, 2003 unless the
Certificate for Lot Line Adjustment, in conformance with Exhibit "B", is
recorded or an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9-02.140.C. of the
Development Code.
3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action
brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees
because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the
implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval.
The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for
any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.
The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant
of his/her obligations under this condition.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the time they are due.
2. Recording - The Lot Line Adjustment shall be finalized by recording
Certificates of Compliance or a Lot Line Adjustment Map, and by subsequent
deed transfers.
PRIOR TO RECORDING THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:
3. Preliminary Title Report - A current preliminary title report shall be submitted
to the Director of Public Works prior to checking the final documents.
4. Tax Certificate - In accordance with Section 9-15.130 of the Development
Code, the applicant shall furnish a certificate from the tax collector's office
indicating that there are no unpaid taxes or special assessments against the
property.
��C�f l � l T "� „
��
��
O
� b �si
� 7
ATTACHMENT I
�
�o
W
F-
N
�
a
�� .
...�
N ...
... -. ...Ry���.
. I w- �
� ��
a �
-k
� �,
�' o
� ^
�
SAC Meeting Notes
April.24, 2001
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 2 DRAFT
��,..e4,..,r,��„n�.��...�..,.
The SAC did not have any c�„o,�rp.��s:M°�1�:'"Mc�l'ish explained to the applicant that the project would
go before the PI '�mission on May 15, 2001. Because the project is in a PD Zone it will also
have to ard by the City Council.
C. 1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Case Number:
4. Proposal:
5. Location:
6. Staff Contact:
Greg Slowinski
Greg Slowinski
Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004
The applicant is requesting to adjust a lot line between two
(2) residential lots.
841 Los Ciervos - Lot 26 and 27
Teresa McClish
Teresa McClish, Associate Planner, stated that the applicant, Mr. Slowenski was requesting a lot line
adjustment because his house sits very near to the lot line and he wanted to have more yard space.
Ms. McClish stated that the lots would remain conforming, it would not effect any easements, and the
access would remain the same.
Rodger Olds, Public Works Department, stated that he had no problem with the project. Ms. McClish
asked about the issue of "toe to bluff" with this lot and Mr. Olds and Mr. Schmidt stated that it did not
apply in this case.
D. 1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Case Number:
4. Proposal:
5. Location:
6. Staff Contact:
Russell Sheppel
Kim Hatch, Pults and ,
Planned Sign Program
The applicant is pr�,pe
Professional PI� a:'�
880 Oak P���c'Blvd.
Kelly H�f��rnon
�o. 01-002
signage for installation for the Oak Park
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, ,�."'ated that this was a revised Planned Sign Program for the Oak
Park Medical Plaza. Ms. Heffern stated that there was an existing monument sign that was going to
change location along James y, and it should be placed close to the entrance. The plans show 3
directory signs and only tw are allowed. The square footage of the directory signs is all right. Ms.
Heffernon explained that e applicant was allowed one wall sign, per business, per frontage.
Ms. Heffernon aske r. Hatch to please put the summary of all the square footage of the signs on the
legend for the pla . There were no details for the Sheppel office building sign. Ms. Heffernon asked
for this so that e could calculate it into the sign program.
Larry Sch ' t, Building Department, stated that the applicant would need a permit if there were any
electrical the signs. They also needed to have handicapped signage to announce that the site was
handica ed accessible. Mr. Schmidt stated that it did not have to be incorporated into the sign
progra but it might be easier to do so.
Ro er Olds, Public Works Department, stated that if there were any flood lights they should be
p ted down so there did not shine in the eyes of the passing motorists. If moving of the monument
s' n causes any damage to the sidewalk the applicant will have to pay the City. Also, if moving the
ign requires equipment or work being done to be in the City right-of-way, the applicant will need an
encroachment permit.
Ms. Heffernon asked that the revisions are made to the plans and then, if everything has been turned
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-1791
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO. 01-004 FOR TWO (2) LOTS, LOCATED AT
841 AND 823 LOS CIERVOS STREET, APPLIED FOR BY
GREG SLOWINSKI
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed for a Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 0't-004 for
two (2) lots located at 841 and 823 Los Ciervos Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a
public hearing on Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-004 in acco�dance with City
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with
the City's General Plan and Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project under the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined
that the project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15305 of the CEQA
Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing that the lots were legally created and the following findings exist:
Findings Reaarding Lot Line Adjustment
The Planning Commission h�s approved or conditionally approved a Lot Line
Adjustment that does not:
1. Create any new lots.
2. Include any lots or parcels created illegally.
3. Impair any existing access or create a need for access to any adjacent lots or
parcels.
4. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving
adjacent lots or parcels.
5. Constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configurations due to existing
environmental conditions or current zoning development standards.
Resolution No. 01-1791
Lot Line Adjustment 01-004
May 15, 2001
Page 2 of 2
6. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for
any new improvements.
7. Create a nonconforming lot in the development district, in which it exists,
except as allowed in Section 9-10.100 of the Development Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande recommends that the City Council approve Lot Line Adjustment
Case No. 01-004 with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Commissioner
following roll call vote, to wit:
, seconded by Commissioner
, and by the
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 15th day of May 2001.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Fryer, Commission Clerk
AS TO CONTENT:
Kerry McCants
Community Development Director
Joseph M. Costello, Chair
9.b.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE OF P�IBLIC HEARING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a
Public Hearing on the following project:
Case No.: Conditional Use Permit 01-005, Lot Line Adjustment 01-001
Applicant: Russ Sheppel
Location: 880 Oak Park Blvd.
Environmental
Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration
Representative: Kim Hatch, Pults and Associates
Project Description: The City Council will consider a Conditional Use Permit to construct
a 25,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. The
proposed Lot Line Adjustment is to reconfigure the six (6) existing
lots into four (4).
In compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the Community Development
Department has prepared a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration on the above project. The
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review at the Community Development
Department. If the City Council does not feel that a Negative Declaration is appropriate, project
approval will not be considered.
Any person affected or concerned by this application may submit written comments to the
Administrative Services Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard
in support of or opposition to the project and the environmental impacts at the time of the
hearing. Any person interested in the proposals can contact the Community Development
Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business
hours (8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P:M.), Monday through Friday.
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE
ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS
NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR
PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR
ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR WHICH THE
NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing:
Place of Hearing:
Tuesday, May 22, 2001 at 7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, California 93420
��.��.
Kelly etm re, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1T, Friday, May 11, 2001
/pRROy\
� .� � �
O INCORPORATED \
V T
* JULY 10, 1911 ,*
c4 � � F ORN�
TO:
FROM:
BY:
MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL
KERRY McCANTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
�J
� �� KELLY HEFFERNON
� ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 01-005 TO
CONSTRUCT A MEDICAL OFFICE AND SURGERY CENTER AND
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 01-001 RECONFIGURE SIX
LOTS INTO FOUR; 880 OAK PARK BOULEVARD; RUSS
SHEPPEL
DATE:
MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the Council:
1. Adopt a Resolution adopting a mitigated negative declaration, instructing
the Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of Determination,
and approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005; and
2. Adopt a Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001,
located at 880 Oak Park Boulevard.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission considered the proposed project on May 1, 2001. After
discussing issues related to traffic impacts, noise, and parking, the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project to the City Council
(reference Attachment 2 for Planning Commission meeting minutes). Staff has
amended the conditions of approval relating to these issues per Planning
Commission direction.
Project Description
The project site is located on the southeast corner of James Way and Oak Park
Boulevard in the Highway Service (H-S) District of the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development (PD 1.1). The 3.74-acre site is identified as the Oak Park
Professional Plaza (the Plaza), which is developed with a medical office building
City Council
CUP 01-005; LLA 01-001
May 22, 2001
Page 2 of 4
(Sheppel 1), and another medical office building is currently under construction
(Sheppel 2). Also approved for development on this site is a health club facility
(Kennedy Club Fitness). The applicant is proposing to develop the remaining
property with a 25,000 square foot medical office and surgery center and related
parking (Sheppel 3).
As part of the previous approval for the Plaza, a Master Plan was developed that
established a shared access, parking and drainage easement agreement. This
easement agreement encumbers four of the six original parcels. A new easement
agreement is proposed that will connect all of the final developed parcels. A lot
line adjustment is also proposed that will reconfigure and reduce the six (6) existing
parcels into four (4). The two tables below summarize the project specifications as
they compare to Development Code requirements.
PD 1.1 (H-S) AND DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
Parking Setbacks Height Lot Floor Landscaping
(see Master Coverage Area
Plan parking Ratio
analysis
be%w1
Development Front: 3 ft.
COde 100 spaces Side: none 35 ft. 50% max. 0.5 5.0% min.
Requirements Rear: none max. max.
Proposed Front: 70 ft.
148 spaces W. Side: 15 ft. 32 ft. to 15% 0.32 17.5%
E. Side: 140 ft. top of
Rear: 12 ft. tower
(from ave.
grade)
�AK PARK PROFESSIONAL PLAZA MASTER PLAN PARKING ANALYSIS
# Of Spaces Required # Of Spaces Proposed
(1 s ace er 250 s.f, of f/oor areal
Sheppel 1 17,56o s.f.1 30 20
Sheppel 2(11,335 s.f.) 45 30
Kennedy 1�9,00o s.f.l 76 57
Sub-tota/ 151 107
Net Difference 151-107 = 44 spaces short
Sheppel 3 125,000 s.f.) 100 148
Total for Master Plan 251 255
Total Difference 255 — 251 = 4 spaces ovei
City Council
CUP 01-005; LLA 01-001
May 22, 2001
Page 3 of 4
DISCUSSION:
Lot Line Adiustment
The proposed lot line adjustment would reconfigure the six (6) lots as follows:
EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOT SIZES
Existing Proposed
Parcel 1: 0.42 acres t 0.41 acres t
Parcel 2: 0.57 acres ± 0.56 acres t
Parcel 3: 0.59 acres ± 1.86 acres t
Parcel 4: 0.93 acres ± 0.91 acres t
Parcel 5: 0.51 acres t n/a
Parcel 6: 0.71 acres ± n/a t
Total: 3.73 acres ± 3.74 acres t
The minimum lot size in the H-S District is 10,000 square feet, or 0.23 acres. All of the
proposed lots exceed the 100-foot minimum lot width requirement.
Traffic Impacts
The traffic analysis prepared for the project (Penfield & Smith, dated April 16, 2001
and amended May 1, 2001) anticipates that the project will generate a total of 903
daily trips, with 92 trips in the PM peak hour (reference Attachment A of the Initial
Study for a copy of the traffic analysis). The report concludes that based on the
existing traffic volumes, the five study intersections will continue to operate at LOS C
or better with the added project traffic. The report further concludes that under the
cumulative conditions, the study area intersections would continue to operate at LOS
C or better, assuming the Camino Mercado/West Branch Street intersection is
signalized.
Based on this analysis, traffic impacts are considered to be less than significant, and
recommended mitigation includes payment of the project's proportional share of the
City's traffic transportation facilities and signalization fees. It was also determined
that the project could have a peak parking demand of 103 spaces. The current
project site plan provides for 142 shared spaces and will therefore meet the
anticipated parking demand.
Impacts to Biological Resources
Because the project site is located adjacent to Meadow Creek, a Biological
Resources Assessment was prepared (Morro Group, dated January 31, 2001) that
evaluated potential impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species known to exist on
or near the project area. The report recommends specific mitigation measures for
protection of sensitive resources within the creek corridor, which have been included
in the Negative Declaration and incorporated into the conditions of approval.
City Council
CUP 01-005; LLA 01-001
May 22, 2001
Page 4 of 4
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was completed for the project, and circulated for
public comment. The comment period ended on May 1, 2001. No comments were
received. The Final Mitigated Negative Declaration is included as Attachment 7.
CONCLUSION:
The project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations for the site.
The project has received favorable review by the SAC, ARC, and Planning
Commission, and would provide a well-designed facility in an important and visible
location.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:
1. Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt resolutions;
2. Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the
resolutions; or
3. Take tentative action to deny the project application and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution for City Council action.
If the Council selects alternative 3, staff will return with the appropriate
resolution/or resolutions at a later meeting.
Attachments:
Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005
Exhibit "A": Conditions of Approval
Exhibits "B1 — B10": Project Plans
Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001
Exhibit "A": Conditions of Approval
Exhibit "B": Lot Line Adjustment
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 1, 2001
3. City Council Meeting Minutes of April 10, 2001 (Pre-Application)
4. SAC Meeting Notes of February 21, 2001
5. ARC Meeting Notes of March 5, 2001
6. ARC Meeting Notes of April 2, 2001, 2000
7. Initial Study and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Attachment A: Traffic Analysis dated April 16, 2001
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, INSTRUCTING THE DIRECTOR OF
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TO FILE A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT CASE NO. 01-005, LOCATED AT 880 OAK PARK
BOULEVARD, APPLIED FOR BY RUSSELL SHEPPEL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Conditional
Use Permit Case No. 01-005, filed by Russell Sheppel, to construct a 25,000 square
foot medical office and surgery center; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General
Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA►, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has
determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration can be adopted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the Highway Service (H-S) District of the
Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) pursuant to Section 9-03.050
of the Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the
Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General
Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City.
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in
which it is to be established or located because the proposed use is similar to
surrounding uses.
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed because all the necessary easements, circulation, parking and
setbacks would be provided.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure the public health and safety.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity
because the proposed project would not create adverse environmental impacts.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
Architectural Review Findings:
1. The proposal is consistent with the "General Architectural Review Guidelines"
for the City of Arroyo Grande.
2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande
General Plan, and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code.
3. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
project.
4. The general appearance of the proposed building is consistent with the
character of the neighborhood because the size and design are consistent with
other buildings in the vicinity.
5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of
the City.
6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the
neighborhood.
Required CEQA Findings:
1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section
15063 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005.
2. Based on the initial study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for
public review. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related
materials is located at City Hall in the Community Development Department.
3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and
considering the record as a whole, the City Council adopts a negative
declaration and finds that there is no substantial evidence of any significant
adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as
defined by Section 71 1.2 of the Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon
which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this project. Further,
the Council finds that said Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's
independent judgment and analysis.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration, instructs the Director of
Administrative Services to file a Notice of Determination, and approves Conditional
Use Permit Case No. 01-005, with the above findings and subject to the conditions
as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
I �:/:1 I -3 � il/_�il
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 01-005
Russell Sheppel
880 Oak Park Boulevard
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes the construction of a 25,000 square foot medical of#ice and
surgery center.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 01-005.
3. This application shall automatically expire on May 22, 2003 unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of
expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented
to the City Council at the meeting of May 22, 2001 and marked Exhibits "B1
— B10".
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
DEVELOPMENT CODE
6. Development shall conform to the Highway Service (H-S) zoning requirements
of the Oak Parks Planned Development except as otherwise approved.
7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter 9-
13.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 6
8. Setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratios shall be as shown on the
development plans except as specifically modified by these conditions.
9. All parking spaces adjacent to a wall, fence, or property line shall have a
minimum width of 1 1 feet.
NOISE
10. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday and between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturday or
Sunday.
LIGHTING
11. All lighting for the site shall be downward directed and shall not create spill or
glare to adjacent properties.
WATER
12. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water
usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, low flow shower
heads, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating
systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final
occupancy.
SOLID WASTE
13. Solid waste pick-up location as identified is acceptable.
14. Trash enclosures shall be reserved exclusively for dumpster and recycling
container storage. Miscellaneous tires, auto parts, boxes, bins, racks, etc.,
will not be allowed within the enclosure.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
15. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect subject to review and approval by the Community Development
Department and Parks and Recreation Department. The landscaping plan shall
include the following:
a. Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail;
b. The use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical
equipment;
c. The required landscaping and improvements. This includes:
1. Deep root planters shall be included in areas where trees are within
five #eet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs;
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 7
2. Water conservation practices including the use of low flow heads,
drip irrigation, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plants and mulches
shall be incorporated into the landscaping plan; and
3. An automated irrigation system.
16. All walls, including screening and retaining walls, shall be compatible with the
approved architecture and Development Code Standards, subject to the review
and approval of the Community Development Director.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
17. Development shall comply with Development Code Sections 9-10.070,
"Fences, Walls and Hedges"; 9-10.080, "Lighting"; 9-10.110, "Performance
Standards"; and 9-10.120 "Screening Requirements".
18. Prior to paint or stucco color coat being applied to the building, the applicant
shall paint a test patch on the building including all colors. The remainder of
the building may not be painted until inspected by the Community
Development Department or Building and Fire Department to verify that colors
are consistent with the approved color board. A 48-hour notice is required for
this inspection.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
19. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical
equipment, whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be
screened from public view with materials architecturally compatible with the
main structure.
20. On the final Landscape Plan, the Chinese Elm trees shall be replaced with
London Plane trees. All trees shall be 15-gallon or large.r.
21. All electrical panel boxes shall be installed inside the building.
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance 431 C.S., the
Community Tree Ordinance.
23. Linear root barriers shall be used at the front of the project to protect the
sidewalks.
24. All street front trees shall be 24-inch box.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 8
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
25. The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for Police Department
approval.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
26. The applicant shall install a burglary alarm system per Police Department
guidelines, and pay the Police Department alarm permit application fee.
27. The applicant shall post handicapped parking, per Police Department
requirements.
BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENT
28. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State
Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by
the City of Arroyo Grande.
29. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced, per Police Department and Fire
Department guidelines.
30. The project shall have a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute for a duration of
4 hours.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
31. The applicant shall post designated fire lanes, per Section 22500.1 of the
California Vehicle Code.
32. The applicant must provide an approved "security key vault" per Building and
Fire Department guidelines.
33. The building must be fully sprinklered per Building and Fire guidelines.
34. The applicant shall install an opticom traffic signal pre-emption device at one
of the three signalized intersections on Oak Park Boulevard at the direction of
the Building and Fire Department Director.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 9
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
35. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the time they are due.
(For your information, the "Procedure for Protesting Fees, Dedications,
Reservations or Exactions" is provided below).
PROCEDURE FOR PROTESTING FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR
EXACTIONS:
(A)Any party may protest the imposition of any fees, dedications, reservations,
or other exactions imposed on a development project, for the purpose of
defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the
development project by meeting both of the following requirements:
(1) Tendering any required payment in full or providing satisfactory evidence
of arrangements to pay the fee when due or ensure performance of the
conditions necessary to meet the requirements of the imposition.
(2) Serving written notice on the City Council, which notice shall contain
all of the following information:
(a) A statement that the required payment is tendered or will be
tendered when due, or that any conditions which have been
imposed are provided for or satisfied, under protest.
(b) A statement informing the City Council of the factual elements
of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis for the
protest.
(B) A protest filed pursuant to subdivision (A) shall be filed at the time of the
approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after
the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other
exactions to be imposed on a development project.
(C) Any party who files a protest pursuant to subdivision (A) may file an action
to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the imposition of the fees,
dedications reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development
project by a local agency within 180 days after the delivery of the notice.
(D) Approval or conditional approval of a development occurs, for the purposes
of this section, when the tentative map, tentative parcel map, or parcel map
is approved or conditionally approved or when the parcel map is recorded if a
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 10
tentative map or tentative parcel map is not required.
(E) The imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions occurs,
for the purposes of this section, when they are imposed or levied on a
specific development.
36. Site maintenance - The developer shall be responsible during construction for
cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the
project site. The flushing of dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer
facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's
work or as directed by the Director of Public Works or the Community
Development Director.
37. Encroachment Permit - The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining an
encroachment permit for all work within a public right of way.
38. Grading - All grading shall be done in accordance with the City Grading
Ordinance.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
39. Improvements required - All project improvements shall be designed and the
plans approved in accordance with the City of Arroyo Grande Standard Drawings
and Specifications, except as may be modified by these conditions of approval.
The following improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the Public Works Department:
a. Grading, drainage and erosion control.
b. Street paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk.
c. Striping and signage plan for James Way.
d. Public utilities.
e. Water and sewer.
40. Site Plan Requirements - The site plan shall include the following:
a. The location and size of all water, sewer and storm water facilities within
the project site and abutting streets or alleys.
b. Location, quantity and size of all sewer laterals.
c. The location, size and orientation of all trash enclosures.
d. All parcel lines and easements related to the property.
e. The location and dimension of all paved areas.
f. The location of all public or private utilities.
_ __
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 11
41. Lot Line Adjustment - A building permit shall not be issued until documents
have been recorded to finalize Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001.
42. Reciprocal easements - Private easements shall be recorded (or shown to
exist) for all reciprocal easements as depicted in the revised Master Plan for the
Oak Park Professional Plaza as approved by the City Council on July 13, 1999.
43. Drainage design — The applicant shall submit an engineering study regarding
flooding related to the project site. The study shall be prepared for the approval
by the Director of Public Works. Any portions of the site subject to flooding from
a 100-year storm shall be shown on the recorded map or other recorded
document, and shall be noted as a building restriction.
44. Drainage impacts — The proposed parking lots shall be designed as storm
water detention basins to decrease peak flow to Meadow Creek. The design
shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
45. Waterline - The waterline shall be raised where new fill results in cover that
exceeds 5 feet. The public water easement shall be 15-feet wide.
46. Parking lot design — The parking lot shall be designed as follows:
a. The cross slope on parking lot driving lanes shall not exceed 5 percent.
b. The main parking lot entrance path shall be designed to handle trash truck
loads (TI = 5.0).
c. The driveway entrance shall be constructed with curb returns, cross-
concrete and spandrels.
d. The parking lot spaces shall utilize double line striping
47. Inspection agreement - Prior to approval of any improvement plans, the
applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for inspection of the
required improvements.
48. Soils report - A preliminary soils report shall be prepared by a registered civil
engineer and supported by adequate test borings. All earthwork design and
grading shall be performed in accordance with the approved soils report.
49. Adjacent structures - The grading plan design shall include measures to
protect the adjacent structures from damage due to the construction.
50. Landscape approvals - Landscape and irrigation plans are required within the
public right of way, and shall be approved by the Community Development and
Parks and Recreation Departments, and Public Works Department.
51. Utility company review - All public improvement plans shall be submitted to the
public utility companies for review and comment. Utility comments shall be
forwarded to the Director of Public Works for approval.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 12
52. Plan submittals - Upon approval of the improvement plans, the applicant shall
provide a reproducible mylar set and 3 sets of prints of the improvements for
inspection purposes. Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the� applicant
shall provide reproducible mylars, and 2 sets of prints of the approved record
drawings (as builts), and electronic (e.g. Autocad) files where available.
53. Recorded documents - All easements, abandonments, or similar documents to
be recorded as a document separate from a map, shall be prepared by the
applicant on 8'/Z' x11" City standard forms, and shall include legal descriptions,
sketches, closure calculations, and a current preliminary title report. The
applicant shall be responsible for all required fees, including any additional
required City processing fees.
54. Traffic Signal Design — All plans related to the traffic signal at Camino Mercado
and West Branch Street shall be completed, and approval by the City and
Caltrans shall be obtained.
55. Fee reimbursement — The developer shall implement the design and installation
of the Camino Mercado — West Branch Street signalization improvements, as
described in Mitigation Measure No. 81. The City will reimburse the developer
for the design and construction costs for the signalization improvements, if such
funds become available for the improvement project, and to the extent that such
costs exceed the developer's responsibility to pay traffic signalization fees. The
improvements that are included in the reimbursement are the signal installation,
related signage and striping, and island modification. The widening of West
Branch Street is not included. Should other projects in the deve/opment review
process be conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the same /ocation, the first
projecf fo obtain a building permit shall be required to construct fhe tra�c signal
and enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City.
56. Reimbursement Agreement — Prior to signal plan approval, the developer shall
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City. The reimbursement
agreement shall include the method to determine the amount of reimbursement.
Requirements will be set forth in the reimbursement agreement to ensure that
the installation of the signal, and execution of the signal contract, is consistent
with projects paid for by local public funds.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
57. Signal Timing - The applicant shall be responsible for developing a coordinated
signal timing for the signalized intersections of Oak Park Blvd. and West
Branch St., and Oak Park Blvd. and EI Camino Real, installing any necessary
equipment, and reprogram the existing signals to run off of the new
coordinated timing. The applicant shall coordinate with Caltrans and City
forces.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 13
58. Improvement bonding - All project improvements shall be constructed prior to
occupancy, except for non-essential improvements, which may be guaranteed
by an agreement, and financial securities as provided for in Section 9-15.070 of
the Development Code.
59. Concrete repairs — Cracked or broken concrete sidewalks on the property shall
be repaired.
60. Road repairs and Restriping - James Way shall be repaired to a structural
section capable of supporting a TI = 6.0 across the property frontage and to the
center of the street. James Way shall also be restriped to accommodate the
new driveway entrance, as required by the director of Public Works.
61. Onsite private fire lines - Private onsite fire sprinkler lines shall be connected to
the public water system with a backflow prevention assembly. The backflow
assembly shall be painted green. Fire department connections shall be painted
red and located per the Fire Department requirements.
62. Onsite public fire lines — The on-site water system, which supplies water to fire
hydrants, shall be a public facility. This will require public improvement plans
and dedication of a 15-foot wide easement.
63. Water-sewer crossings - All sewer mains or laterals crossing or parallel to
public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with California State
Health Agency standards.
64. Water meters - Water meters shall be located in the public sidewalk or as
approved by the Director of Public Works. Separate meters may be used for
irrigation.
65. Sewer Connection — The onsite sewer system shall be private and shall
connect to the public sewer system in a single location. Sewer laterals larger
than 4 inches shall connect to the public system at a manhole.
66. Undergrounding of utilities - All new public utilities shall be installed as
underground facilities. All existing overhead public utilities shall be placed
underground, including all overhead wires and service poles onsite, along the
frontage and within 6 feet of side and rear yard lines.
67. Utilities operational - All public utilities shall be operational.
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 14
MITIGATION MEASURES
A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project.
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval
and shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency.
The applicant shall be responsible for verification in writing by the monitoring
department or agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Mitigation Measures:
68. To address specific conditions concerning grading, utility trenches,
foundations, retaining walls and drainage, the contractor or builder shall
adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the Geotechnical Engineering
report by Earth Systems Pacific dated January 29, 2001.
69. Construction operations, especially grading operations, shall be confined as
much as possible to the dry season, in order to avoid erosion of disturbed
soils.
70. Permanent soil control measures identified in the landscape plans shall be
implemented as soon as possible following completion of soil disturbing
activities.
71. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than
one month after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native
grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.
For Mitigation Measures No. 68-71:
Monitoring: Review of grading plans and site inspections
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
72. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in
water demand created by the project by either:
Implement an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and
designs that minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted
to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed
individual water program shall be submitted to the City for approval
prior to implementation; or, pay an in lieu fee.
Monitoring: Review of individual water program or
payment of the in lieu fee
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 15
73. All new construction shaU utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water
usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets,
instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving
designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
Monitoring: Review of building plans
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
74. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including
the use of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the
greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be
minimized.
Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
75. The applicant shall provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that
increased run-off can be accommodated by existing facilities and/or provide
on-site retention basins to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Monitoring: Review of grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
76. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all
areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site.
At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the late�
morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds
15 miles per hour.
77. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated
with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
78. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered
or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard Iminimum vertical distance
between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section
23114. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this
source by 7 — 14%1.
79. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto
streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measure has
the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 40 — 70%).
80. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto
adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 16
where feasible. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions
from this source by 25 - 60%).
For Mitigation Measures No. 76-80:
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site
inspections
Responsible Depts: Public Works, Building & Fire Departments
shall inspect plans and spot check in the field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading, permit and
during construction
81. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Camino Mercado
and West Branch Street. The applicant and the City shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement providing that the City shall reimburse the applicant
the difference in costs between the signal installation and the project's
Signalization Impact fee. The applicant may be reimbursed for those costs to
the extent that signalization impact fees are available and programmed for this
project. Should other projects in the deve%pment review process be
conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the same location, the first p�oject
to obtain a building permit shall be required to construct the traffic signal and
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install one traffic signal.
The traffic signal shall be operational.
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
82. The applicant shall pay the City's Transportation Facilities Impact fee prior to
issuance of building permit.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fees
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
83. Prior to site construction, on-site focused surveys for Pismo clarkia and San
Luis mariposa lily shall be conducted during their respective flowering
periods. If these species are found during the surveys, site work shall not
proceed without direction from the CDFG.
84. A qualified biological monitor shall be retained to periodically review
implementation of agency conditions of approval. The frequency of such
monitoring will be determined by the reviewing agencies and specified within
agency-issued conditions of approval.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 17
85. Private and construction vehicle traffic shall be limited to those areas away
from the eastern edge of the Sheppel property to reduce the likelihood of bank
failure and subsequent sedimentation to Meadow Creek.
86. Siltation/sedimentation control measures shall be implemented along the entire
eastern property boundary prior to site construction. Such control measures
shall include sediment fences and/or hay bales placed into the hinge of the
bank of Meadow Creek. Erosion/sediment control barricades shall be placed
around the perimeter of each construction zone with the potential to drain to
Meadow Creek.
87. To reduce surface water runoff and sedimentation into Meadow Creek, site
earthwork shall be limited to those months within the established dry season
(April 15 through October 15) unless otherwise approved by the Director of
Public Works.
88. Soil shall not be stockpiled in areas located near the eastern property margin
adjacent to Meadow Creek, or in areas that have potential to drain to Meadow
Creek. Stockpiled soil should be properly covered at all times to avoid wind
and water erosion, and consequent siltation to Meadow Creek.
89. No heavy equipment shall be allowed within the Meadow Creek corridor.
Construction necessary within the Meadow Creek corridor near the bank hinge
shall be performed from the top of the bank and not from within the Creek
corridor.
For Mitigation Measures No. 83-89:
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site
inspections
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
90. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained, functional
mufflers to limit noise.
91. All construction activities shall comply with the time limits specified by the
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.
92. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at
portions of the site bordering developed areas should occur during the middle
of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring noise
sensitive uses.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 18
For Mitigation Measures No. 90-92:
Monitoring:
Responsible Department:
Timeframe:
Notes shall be placed on the construction
plans referencing the above measures.
Public Works Department �
During construction
EXHIBIT B1
� �_v���
►�
� � � F � �� �� �� �
� � � � �� �� �� ,
����
:
�
>
�
�
0
8
� � � � $ i � � £ �
� � � c
s
o s
FO � F���� � �i � g � a ��6Q��'��� �
�� � b��� � � � � ��>�����,. t
����� ����� � �s �' �g
T ���
p �" m
z
��� � �� ��#���� ��� _��� �
�� � t ` : ' [ '� �`� ���� s
��i i �� �t�1. � � ` m
i �r t
4
�
��� � � ���p:�� 6 �`�
�� � � �;��$i �� ��[
g
� ;
. �
� �
� .
� r . �c
�
�
�
7�
70
0
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
rn
\ '
�
�
�
�
0
�
rn
�
�
_
r
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
rn
�
�
rn
�
D
�
1
�
r
�
A
�
0
z
#::�E'_ »= � ' x
m
_ � y$���� �� � o
T _
s t2 $ �g �`� r K
� � ���
�
_
�
a
� � (�, m ��� ��;:� j
� � i � � r �� ��"� �}(i}};j ��3
�^ �� z'�° 3 q 4 F � � �
9 � � � ,�; w = 1•���� �t��
a� {��
EXHIBIT B2
�S� 8�o�"E� 2E ?
��� �gs� �� �
2� ,��a� �3 �
�� ���� �� �
� �� ���� �'�
� ��� ��
I �� ���� ��
� �� � �� ��
I
��� � ° �i���i �
� � y .��
4���. ."
r- - ���
�f_��� y
4� , ; ����
��
�� '
r''
�� , . -
��
3
a
�
��
����� �
������
�P�
��
:�� a
��'���
�i
������
������
��� ��� a� €������
��� ��� � a � ��
. _; ��
��
��� ��� � �����
�_ � ��$ �
�g�j �� ��� �
�
�� � � _
� E � �
�� �� �
�
�
z
�
�
m
z
-�
rn
A
e
T
������ I
Ys���� ��
' � iC . Y� �i
_ �i
vi
#���� �I
Y Y X : 7 ��
i
� N N i
�
' � � �
>�
�i�� �
�
_ k V � I
� �
.,a .rsr..�.iw-��r. , coR.. ia�a�.
___—_ s.wswx��iw _______—_____._—_—
JAMG9 WhY
� � � � i
3 �,�� � �.
� £ �; �
� . . �'
�����M��
Y� 8 g� g o�
" � � . Y � � ���.
Q�
������ ��!
Y Y � . �
� N N �
� $ '� �i��� r .
c� 9�x ��Tt �
p9� ��n € L �f
p � s 9 ������ ��. .
� �x � �
�
GHURGH
EXHIBIT B3
� � i .�
a ' '
n a .. ��� � ¢ ' _ � � ��� ��m r�i.�i i��
J '� �b� y �_[! �i � . ..
� � f � ��R ��� �� �! �
� � •� SttHllt � �.�. a' �980Ctatt9
EXHIBIT B4
� � . � k � � ����*� ���
..�
. � � � .. � � Y �� � s �� 6 �� r}` ''~ ' ��
� �
N � x � ��� ��� ���r� ���.
� •t �� i= Sfeven D. ,l.LA. � Asaociates
EXHIBIT B5
O
>
�
1
�
a
�
.�
r
<
n
�o
Q<
Q rn
�
Q�
r
N
N �
o rn
�
r
D
7
tA
c
r
C1
z
�
W
N
_
�
rn
r
O
�
�
n
.1AMES WAY
_
�
-_ �G__ I� /�__! ' .-_- C
� � � � � � � � t�`it i'
a �`' � � � �e �o� t��T}�3 �z
:. � �` �� �� ��m � ��� � � ��m �1 �
�" F .. � � � r � ���a� �a
�� �
EXHIBIT B6
0
0
�
�
�
P
m
a
V
m
�
O
V
a
a
a
a
� � � e "� � a t�`�� r
� v�' � � � �� m m P�iTI ;`�
� � °� � �� f�: � gaQ �,4�; ��1;��� ��
� � �F SS�z ,� g �i �m� ��� _!�
�r R" s��Fl�� ��
EXHIBiT B7
: -�
>
:�
�
N
� r
' O
�
ou �
�. � k
Ro Z
V
V
V ,
Q
Q
� u
� �
Q �
�1 W
T �
� m
R �
V
� �
� � ''.
W
: -�
>o
,�
Q�
o �
�
� O
s
W w �U
N�r
�'" D
:, � z
�m
�o
N
a
� �ux�un,�?�?�??
�IIBa111Lo$: im�e
�pN1111M 's�'-"
IIWWW :—� —�
!�!�!.
I�niii�mim
�ii
�:u.�:i F�2x
�iiEiiii iiiii
�iii�u .uni"e
S �
$ d �
a j g '"� o
i y
4
�
�
�� �
�� S
�
�
���
�
!
�
�
� :���� �� .
�a� � y ��iT��/ i�[
3Y �r�'� +��i�+� ���
�g' =�m �l }f�f ��
R� � i � ��+ ��
F�t�d
EXHIBIT B8
� � � � e � � � �.������ ��
� g p; py �� f�� � S �� C � m ? �§
� `'.4 �� � �� m g� �4n9 FI�f��� ��
� S � g ''� � m �
.,� ii� �#
t
EXHiBIT B9
�
� �
N
N
0
c
-�
I
�
r
rn
<
D
�
0
2
rn
f
�
�
rn
r
rn
<
D
�
0
z
$ � � 3 ��g'� rY
. 4 g �i � 2 r� �e
q� ���'e �: � � R E�Q w S ' �� i�(��i! ��
Q �, ' �� . ��m � x a �m� '�++��� ��
�',., � � �_ � a��, i �a
f�t�:� '
EXHIBIT B10
-- -- i
�
1
, � i
°x '
'
.
N
ir .
' i, � �
. _�
i� � . ; >,� p �
� �
Y, � , �:
i � 8 , ,
� I � r � `
I �nnu �
:�9_
i � n .. H
n v . u w ..
RR ��a ag� �_ :'C�°:" o�3N
ti �� � �~ ~ �!�'��p�� ��
DY' ^2 �t� �i�0 0� �'��� C^ � f
3 ��� �� Z� � � � � �
� •: : _��
� v �R �^� �� Y; ��;
^ 1 � � V � �~�n�R ��i
R �^ ���� a' � e°�
� o. �Y ■����R �`�1�
� o �
� �: �� gR �R�R ° g= �
� g� =� �� g�:��� �5�
� �� � ° ���oa� N�
� � i
�
z
n
�
�
1
z
0
�
`s:ri
������g�
* � �
� �f � � � �� �� � �
� �
�
Y:� Y X Y F "�
X X " � � X X
� � �°
e �
`" t�i �" a
�� �r r 1
�,����� �
n
�� �� �a � �� �
R I
X X c � %i�
�
�
�
����
�
h 7 S 9 f�
���
� �i E ' i �
i M s � c
.: � } s.
.�� ��� g
� : x .i
A ��.
• M C n H
.. � C � u • �
� n � � F F ~
� r��
� ���
�
1i1"T #
�O� � �4e`� ��f
�� ; t
f t:1.' ��
�� ' t'� � �r.
u rt�et� ��
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO. 01-001, LOCATED AT 880 OAK PARK
BOULEVARD, APPLIED FOR BY RUSSELL SHEPPEL
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed for a Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001 in
conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005 to reconfigure six (6) lots
into four (4), located at 880 Oak Park Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a public hearing on
Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001 in accordance with City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the City's
General Plan and Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project under the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is
Categorically Exempt under Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing
that the lots were legally created and the following findings exist:
Findings Reqardinca Lot Line Adiustment
The City Council has approved or conditionally approved a Lot Line Adjustment that
does not:
1. Create any new lots.
2. Include any lots or parcels created illegally.
3. Impair any existing access or create a need for access to any adjacent lots or
parcels.
4. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving
adjacent lots or parcels.
5. Constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configurations due to existing
environmental conditions or current zoning development standards.
6. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for
any new improvements.
7. Create a nonconforming lot in the development district, in which it exists, except
as allowed in Section 9-10.100 of the Development Code.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 01-001 with the above
findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 01-001
Russell Sheppel
880 Oak Park Boulevard
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes the reconfiguration of six (6) existing lots into four (4) lots.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Lot Line
Adjustment No. 01-001.
3. This application shall automatically expire on May 22, 2003 unless the Lot Line
Adjustment is finalized. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval,
the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date
of expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented
to the City Council at the meeting of May 22, 2001 and marked Exhibit "B".
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
DEVELOPMENT CODE
6. Development shall conform to the Highway Service (H-S) zoning requirements
of the Oak Parks Planned Development except as otherwise approved.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
7. The developer shall comply with Development Code Chapter 9-04, "Land
Divisions".
8. The developer shall comply with Development Code Chapter 9-14,
"Dedications, Fees and Reservations."
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
9. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the time they are
due.
10. Recording - The Lot Line Adjustment shall be finalized by recording a Lot Line
Adjustment Parcel Map, and by subsequent deed transfers.
11. Encroachment Permits - The applicant shall be responsible for obfiaining an
encroachment permit for all work within a public right of way.
PRIOR TO RECORDING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PARCEL MAP:
12. Preliminary Title Report - A current preliminary title report shall be submitted
to the Director of Public Works prior to checking the final documents.
13. Tax Certificate - In accordance with Section 9-15.130 of the Development
Code, the applicant shall furnish a certificate from the tax collector's office
indicating that there are no unpaid taxes or special assessments against the
property.
14. Sewer easement - The location of the existing sewer line shall be verified by
survey. If determined necessary by the Director of Public Works, the existing
sewer easernent shall be relocated to conform. All public sewer easements
shall be widened from 10' to 15'.
15. Water easement - All existing easements for public waterlines shall be
widened from 10' to 15'.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
19. Certificate of Compliance - A Lot Line Adjustment Parcel Map shall be
recorded with all pertinent conditions of approval satisfied.
p � F �W
�N�N
0
�
� �'
>
N
��
I:y�
0�2
��
m�i�i
�
W
�
n
O
n
O
� O
r� g
�g
h p
��
N ^
W g
h
w
M M h� N M
w x w
x�����
�MM '�f^
p 6 O� C C M M M
M
y : y
� � � ! q �f � t , a � O
� Q
� R4G �
u `�59 w p � Ci �C
O
V •.• wi K M1 K 1 � :: R: "t �
� ������ � ����
N
WOO4444 �444
�
�
Q
�
4�
Z
�OA
�� Z
y�W
V;
y C xO
`� N
V
26
3
�� � � e � r �
Y r .r w �'" � � �
V
'w � � l ! T� • � _ �� �.�i i �'l�� �$ �
..i � � � �
r `r 'r r tt�a$ °' a ,a .a � �ga� ; � °
`s � �x �� a ���r ; g� a�,
Z= � : s��r� � ����� �a`� � &
Y � � . a a ��. � _
� y y � � h" �� � a w'�` p h'�' � � � � �^ �r y
�� y� k i��� ir � ° Z� :=Z : Z�c� •� Z bl
i s� � � ���� tt� �: �a$ Y�: �^ ���� �a � `
0 0� o �� �; �; �sg ��g �� ���� a; �� �
0000 O� O O O O 0 O �4 � �
�
�
�°
�_
W
�� A
�
N�
�
y �o
V�
�
��
V�
N C
EXHIBIT B
♦
r
O
b�
��
�t
h
��
��
�� W
�
0
�o
�,,+ k�
$ h
��Wh
2p a
Q �t'�fa � � f ��U^
��qA f:�l�y�'N
b� O�y`b
M '� k �N"`
h D
�wi�. kci
z
a
0
w
3
a
U
E
�z
x ° o
E �, U
w O
�
� Q v��i
U
� � z �
� E" W �
� � � ~�
W 6 ' �
A
z a w
3 z a
�' 3 a
o��
Q O
'�"
�
a
a
a
w
�
�
E�"
U
N �
." I I I I I I ��
O p �d .0�'tt� w .0� (r.!! .v I I I �
I , -- �� ��� 6 ti � I
a I I I�� �� °��' I
q I L ,r�srr . _�r.r�ri N
� � � I � I' n r� R � ..carr �, �
��� _ � � � I I I
VI A �� ��I� � N � �
y � ,� ii ii �' I� *' � ,
I tl � � I � I � � � �` r w � ' u � � �I I
i
��i, � � �; �; �� � f: �� y d ��� ,
� I ►►�►� � �_ � �I°
I . -- —�►�� ► � ; � ^�� � � �
� i� z�—aa—�.. t _�_�. I.��
: —, � . : � I
I — — — $ — — � —�— I �� 4
� � �
I R� --_Lioffi� ,.� __ I d_„«« i �� �
_ � ��t � — � ,-t �.r.r- S O
�
I I � �a�` � �'-• � ---•aox � -� _ _ , I
� � y.• Itff,iLtlA �`' - J =
1 ' I � — ��
� � � � -- — — — — � �— ^ � I
I I A ' ' : o ^ ` � � � �
.`� ', R� ��� N� - y�� ��� �
�� � NO s
�� � . .
I I8 u� � � ~ I �� . � � i
$ � oc � I � I �u offio�
I �� I � $ . or.� �B� � I
I �� ', �� �� aa � I � ,
i , ; d ��` .rr i .rs
.. I I f' I �� I 4 �� I �� I I
1 �
1 �
I �
I I �;' � �� �� ( � ..
— — � 1� � ' I I � I
—� � J.tr� i i � � T� �T+� _ _ rnr I
.tarx ..rt��r� n — � '�� 1C, i
.! YM S3iYV! � � �
ti
- - - ib'
_ ' ' _ ' b _ _ _
K
�
•�.
...
�� �� i �
y
'�
�7������ , �� �~
�m�� .�b�*�.��
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
MAY 1, 2001
PAGE 3
ATTACHMENT 2
II. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 01-005 AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 01-
001; LOCATION - 880 OAK PARK BLVD.; APPLICANT - RUSS SHEPPEL;
REPRESENTATIVE - KIM HATCH, PULTS AND ASSOCIATES
Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon, presented the staff report stating that the project site
is located on the corner of James Way and Oak Park Boulevard in the Oak Park
Professional Plaza. The entire plaza property is about 3.7 acres in size and is developed
with a medical office building. Currently under construction on the property is another
medical office building, and approved for development is the Kennedy Club Fitness Center.
The applicant is proposing to develop the remaining 1.8 acres with a split-level, 25,000
square foot medical office and surgery center with related parking.
As part of the previous approval for the Plaza, a Mas#er Plan was developed that
established a shared access, parking and drainage easement agreement. A new easement
agreement is proposed that will connect all of the final developed parcels and provide more
than adequate parking. Also proposed is a lot line adjustment that would reconfigure the 6
existing lots into 4, to better reflect development on the property.
The proposed structure has three levels, with the third level containing an elevator tower
element. The building will be set into the existing topography, allowing grade entries on both
levels 1 and 2 similar to the other Sheppel buildings. Because of the sloping topography, the
proposed structure will be lower in height than the other buildings on the site. The building
design and materials are also consistent with the other Sheppel buildings, including plaster
walls, hip roofs, metal canopies and wall tiles for accent.
The proposed project meets all relevant Development Standards for the Highway Service
District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development. This includes height requirements,
parking, setbacks, lot coverage and landscaping.
As part of the environmental review process, a traffic study was prepared which concluded
that the Level of Service on surrounding intersections would remain at an acceptable level
with the addition of traffic from the proposed development. This analysis was based on the
assumption that the Camino Mercado/West Branch Street intersection would be signalized.
Given that a signal is warranted at this intersection, the project is conditioned to install the
signal subject to reimbursement from the City up to the amount of the project's signalization
impact fee.
This condition is contingent upon other projects in the review process that have a similar
requirement. Essentially, the first project to obtain a building permit that has this condition,
such as the Camino Mercado office project, shall be required to construct the traffic signal and
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City.
Condition no. 54 further requires the timing of the signals along Oak Park Boulevard to be
coordinated prior to issuance of building permit. Staff suggests that this condition be modified
to state "prior to occupancy" because of the time necessary to obtain Caltrans approval.
A biological study was also conducted as part of the environmental review process to
evaluate potential impacts to biological resources associated with Meadow Creek.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
MAY 1, 2001
PAGE 4
Suggested mitigation measures from the report have been included in the conditions of
approval. Condition no. 85 should be modified to state that the frequency of monitoring
"will be determined by the reviewing agencies and specified� within agency-issued
conditions of approval." The other reviewing agencies include California Department of
Fish and Game, Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Army Corps of Engineers,
which all have different monitoring requirements depending on their specific areas of
concern.
One final suggested modification is to condition no. 34. For clarification purposes, this
condition should state, "The applicant shall install an opticom traffic signal pre-emption device
at one of the three signalized intersections on Oak Park Boulevard at the direction of the
Building and Fire Department Director."
The Planning Commission discussed the project with regards to traffic, parking and ingress
and egress. Chair Costello was concerned that the development outside of the City limits
was not included in the traffic study.
Chair Costello opened the public hearing.
Kim Hatch, Pults and Associates, made a brief presentation to the Planning Commission
and discussed some of the issues raised by the Cornmission. With regards to a question
from Commissioner Fowler concerning the lack of any entry to the project from Oak Park
Blvd., Mr. Hatch explained that the topography of the site did not permit ingress and
egress from Oak Park. Mr. Hatch also explained how the parking ratios were arrived at
with regards to the Kennedy Health Club.
Commissioner Brown, Mr. Hatch, and Ms. Heffernon discussed how any biological issues
with the site would be managed during the construction pe�iod.
Carrie Randolph, 1310 Sierra Drive, spoke to the Planning Commission stating that she had
concerns about the traffic that would be generated with this project.
Rav Bunnell, owner of the adjacent property (Casa Grande Inn) stated that, because the
construction site was so close to his motel, he would prefer that any construction not
commence until 8:00 A.M.
Steve Orosz, Penfield and Smith, and the Planning Commission discussed the results of the
traffic study prepared by Mr. Orosz. Chair Costello requested that Mr. Orosz explain how
the data that was gathered was translated into the final numbers for the �eport.
Russell Sheppel, applicant, spoke briefly to the Commission, explaining his project, and his
desire to build a medical/surgical for the community.
Carol Landsman, Landscape Architect, spoke to the Planning Commission and stated that
the landscape materials that were being use had been chosen carefully because of the
proximity of Meadow Creek. They had also used materials that would allow water
conservation. She was concerned because one of the tree types that had been proposed,
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
MAY 1, 2001
PAGE 5
a type of Elm tree, had been changed by the ARC to a London Piane tree. The London
Plane is a deciduous tree, whereas the type of Elm that was originally proposed was an
evergreen and can be planted closely together to create a canopy effect.
After a brief discussion, Mr. McCants suggested that this issue be referred to the Parks,
Recreation and Facilities Director, Dan Hernandez, for a final determination on the type of
tree that should be used.
Chair Costello closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt•
RESOLUTION NO. 01-1786
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
INSTRUCT THE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TO
FILE A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION, AND APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 01-005, LOCATED AT
880 OAK PARK BOULEVARD, APPLIED FOR BY RUSSELL
SHEPPEL
includinq Exhibit A with modifications. Commissioner Guthrie seconded the motion. The
motion was aaproved with the following roll call vote:
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Brown
YES Commissioner Fowler
YES Commissioner Guthrie
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Chair Costello
Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE
NO. 01-001, LOCATED AT 880 OAK PARK BOULEVARD,
APPLIED FOR BY RUSSELL SHEPPEL
including Exhibit A. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. The motion was aaproved
by the following roll call vote:
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
MAY 1, 2001
PAGE 6
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Brown
YES Commissioner Fowler
YES Commissioner Guthrie
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Chair Costello
ITEM. III. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
NONE
DRAFT
ITEM. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
The Planning Commission discussed a possible date to hold a joint meeting with the ARC.
It was decided that staff should try to set up the meeting in late June or July.
ITEM. V. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENT
The Planning Commission discussed the upcoming review of the General Plan draft
documents and the public hearing sessions that will be held. The Commission decided that
they would prefer to hold two meetings in a row in order to finish the review and not have
to come back after a week
ITEM. VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIREGTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP
REPORTS
ITEM. VII. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Commissioner Keen, seconded by Commissioner Brown, the meeting was
adjourned at 9:50 p.m. to the next scheduled meeting on March 6, 2001.
Kathleen Fryer, Commission Clerk
AS TO CONTENT:
Kerry McCants
Community Development Director
John Keen, Vice-Chair
C1TY COUNCIL MINUTES
APR1L 10, 2001
PAGE 3
None.
ATTACHMENT 3
11.a. Authorizatl�qn to Waive Application Fees and Use City Property for the
March of Dirrl�s Walk America on Saturday, May 5, 2001.
Community Developme Director McCants presented the staff report. Staff
recommended the Counc adopt a Resolution authorizing the waiver of permit
application fees and use of ity property for the 15�'. Annual March of Dimes Walk
America to be held on May 5, 2 1. .
Mayor Lady opened up the item for p lic comment.
Pete Dougall, 801 � Mesa Drive and C munity Director for the March of Dimes
WalkAmerica, spoke on behalf of the prop al and stated he was available to answer
questions.
Council Member Runels asked how many people
Mr. Dougall responded about 450.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady brought
for consideration.
ted in the event last year.
issue back to the Council
Council Member Lubin moved to adopt a Resolution authorizing e waiver of permit
application fees and use of City property for the 15�' Annual Mar of Dimes Walk
America to be held on May 5, 2001. Council Member Runels seconded e motion, and
on the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Lubin, Runels, Ferrara, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: Dickens
There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to b
11.b. Pre Application Review Case No. 00-010 to Construct a Medical Office and
Surgery Center; 800 Oak Park Blvd; Russ Sheppell �
Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report. She stated the applicant was
requesting feedback on a proposed project to be located on the corner of James Way
and Oak Park Boulevard in the Oak Park Professional Plaza. She stated the entire
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 10, 2001
PAGE 4
plaza property is about 3.7 acres in size and the applicant is proposing to develop the
remaining 1.8 acres with a split-level, 25,000 square foot medical office and surgery
center with related parking. She staCed fhe proposed project meets all relevant
Development Standards for the Highway Service District of the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development, including height requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscaping.
Associate Planner Heffernon responded to questions from Council regarding the
progress of the other two buildings on the site; and explained the concept of the
proposed elevator tower.
Mayor Lady opened up the item for public comment.
Kim Hatch, Pultz & Associates, representing the applicant, spoke regarding the potential
for a group of doctors to locate in a similar facility to be located across the street in
Pismo Beach; the desire for moving the project forward for Council to preview in order
to meet requirements for tenant leasing commitments; the construction currently under
way on Building 1; clarification that the building permits were close to being pulled for
Building 2; and clarification regarding height limits for the proposed elevator tower.
Council Member Dickens arrived and took his place at the dais at 7:28 p.m.
Ray Bunnell, Casa Grande Inn, spoke in support of the project. He expressed concern
regarding the existing easements through the property and said he wanted to ensure
that they were maintained. ,
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady brought the issue back to Council for
consideration. �
Further Council discussion and comments included whether or not there were any other
surgery centers located in the South County; the importance of securing potential tenant
leases for the medical office; the capacity of the surgery center; that the proposed
parking is more than adequate; the proposed project is consistent with the existing
development and completes the master plan for the Plaza; and that they would like to
see the project applications processed in a timely manner.
Council Member Lubin announced that as a precautionary measure, he would have 10
step down due to a potential conflict of interest involving possible tenants of the project.
There was unanimous support of the •Council regarding the project as proposed. No
action was taken on this item.
Council Member Lubin returned to the dais.
12. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
None.
SAC Meeting Notes
February 21, 2001
Page 5
ATTACHMENT 4
to sh the relocation of the existing City water and gas lines. Mr. Taylor stated that he was very
pleased to t e that the "monopine" pole looked so good.
Larry Schmidt, Building D ment, stated that the project would require a soils report.
The applicant and the SAC discussed ossibility of installing a pole that is higher, possibly 80 feet,
if another cellular company wanted to co-loca d use the same pole.
Ms. Heffernon told the applicant that the Architectural Rev Committee would review the project on
March 5, 2001.
Terry Fibich, Fire Department, asked where the City's communications would b ated on the pole?
Mr. Chiu stated that the City would have priority location.
E. 1. Applicant: Russell Sheppell
2. Representative: Kim Hatch, Pults and Associates
3. Case Number: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005; Lot Line Adjustment 01-
001
4. Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a 25,000 square foot
Medical-Surgical facility.
5. Location: 880 Oak Park Blvd.
6. Staff Contact: Kelly Heffernon
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, stated that the SAC had reviewed a pre-application on this project
three months ago. The project was a 25,000 square foot Medical-Surgical faciJity. The applicant has
acquired the "back" parcel, closest to the creek for parking. Ms. Heffernon stated that this was a
"Master Plan" area with shared parking and access.
Ms. Heffernon told Mr. Hatch that the plans showed building heights of 40 feet and the City's height
limit in this PD zone was only 35 feet and if the applicant wanted to pursue this height, a variance
would be needed.
Mr. Hatch asked Ms. Heffernon to explain the criteria for measuring building height.
Ms. Heffernon stated that it was measured from the average grade of the property. Ms. Heffernon
stated that staff would need a"perspective of the building" so it could be determined where the
average grade was. She asked if any occupancy was proposed in the "towers" of the building or were
they only decorative?
Mr. Hatch stated that occupancy was proposed in these towers. He said that this would also be used
for the elevator height and access to the mechanical equipment on the roof.
Ms. Heffernon stated that there would not be an issue if this were for elevator height
Ms. Heffernon stated that the applicant would have to submit plans for the Lot Line Adjustment
application. She stated she wanted the plans to show existing lot lines and proposed lot lines; existing
square footage and proposed square footage.
Larry Schmidt, Building Department, stated that:
• The emergency access easement must remain.
• The curb cut must also remain.
SAC Meeting Notes
February 21, 2001
Page 6
Rodger Olds, Public Works Department, stated that: '
• The applicant needs to add the offsite topography along the east and south boundaries to the
plans.
• Keep the lots lower so that the retaining wall would not have to be so high.
• Island in parking lot has to be cut out to allow proper access.
• Ten percent cross slope is not acceptable, a five percent cross slope is the maximum allowed.
• The parking lot dimensions require a 2-foot overhang and landscaping.
• There are no utility poles on the site that need to be placed underground.
• Has the 40-foot private road easement that is still shown on the plans been abandoned?
• Public Works needs the information for the Lot Line Adjustment.
• The grading is going to add about 2 feet of fill over the sewer line. The City will need a 15-foot
wide easement for the sewer and water lines to allow room for repair if necessary.
• If the fill increases the depth of the water line beyond five feet, the water line will have to be
raised.
• General improvement requirements will have to be done.
• Parking lot entrance will have to be designed to handle a Trash Truck (TI = 5.0) and
proper curb returns, cross-concrete and spandrels.
• The parking lot will need double striping. .
• Repair cracking of street and sidewalks along James Way for the total of property frontage
• James Way needs to be re-striped to allow for new turn lanes.
• The existing driveway ramp is proposed to be closed, and the new driveway lines up
existing church driveway across the street. This will provide an opportunity to us
dedicated left turn lanes for the opposing driveways.
have the
with the
: shared
• The applicant shall submit an engineering study regarding flooding related to the project. Any
portions of the site subject to flooding from a 100-year storm shall be shown on the recorded map
or other recorded document, and shall be noted as a building restriction.
Shane Taylor, Public Works Department stated that there are serious problems in this area with
downstream drainage. The SAC and Mr. Hatch discussed this problem.
There was a discussion of the proposed parking and whether it was over or under "parked". Staff
discussed the parking requirements that were necessary for a medical/surgical office complex and felt
that the project was not "over parked". �
Dan Hernandez, Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director stated that:
• No Oleander to be planted.
• Deep root barriers for all planters within six feet of curb.
• On the landscape plan the PC has been mislabeled as PA.
• The number of plants must be shown on the landscape plans.
Larry Schmidt, Building Department stated that:
• The fire flows need to be 1500 gallon per minute for 4 hours.
• Knox Box �
• Discussed the circulation in the parking lot with regards to fire access. The outside turning radius
should be 55 degrees and the inside 35 degrees.
111. Written Communications/Staff Comments - None
IV. Adjournment — 11:45 p.m.
Notes
ARC Meeting
March 5, 2001
Page7of8
With the follo all vote:
AYES 4
NOES: 0
PRESENT: 4
ATTACHMENT 5
F. Russ Sheppel, Conditional Use Permit 01-001 for a Medical Office and
Surgery Center, located at 880 Oak Park Blvd.
Kelly Heffernon said the applicant is proposing to develop the remaining
property of an already approved Master Plan, with a 25,000 square foot
medical office and surgery center with related parking. The project is
located on James Way and Oak Park Blvd., in the Oak Park Health Plaza.
Kim Hatch, Representative from Pults and Associates, displayed color
boards and site plans and described in detail the key elements of the
project. The intent was to break up the massing of this building so as to
resemble the massing of the smaller Sheppel building that is up hill from it.
The ARC discussed at length the grade, the building height, and the
drainage to nearby wetlands of this site.
Kim Hatch said that Fish & Game had been informed of the filter system
for the drainage and he described how it worked. He said it was checked
annually and evaluated and if needed the sand in the filter replaced. He
also said that there is a system on site to retain water and keep the flow at
the existing historical low rate.
Committee Members agreed that the landscape plan was inadequate and
had errors. The following were ARC comments and suggestions for the
landscaping:
1. Mix the Liquidamber with several other trees. There is also a
"Carnival" Liquidamber, which would provide a different calor from
the purple Liquidamber.
2. Have some trees of substance such as Coast Redwoods instead of
the small Australian Willow, and maybe limit the number of Coast
Live Oaks because they take a long time to reach any stature.
3. Have fewer exotic plants. Palms are not natural to the area and
undesirable, especially along the drainage basin where there is a
natural wetland. It would be preferable to see native darker green
foliage.
4. The Committee decided they would like to see a corrected landscape
plan at the next ARC meeting of April 2, 2001.
Notes
ARC Meeting
March 5, 2001
Page 8 of 8
Chet Kielan asked about the tile/slate for the entry court to the building?
Mr. Hatch said green slate is being used for the Sheppel No. 2 building
entryway, and something similar might be used. A more natural material
unique to this building is being sought, but has not yet been found.
Warren Hoaa said he liked the fact that the Sheppel buildings each kept
the same basic profile and massing, but each design had been tweaked a
little. He suggested the slate should be checked so as to accent the
building and at the same time be harmonious with rest of the site, but not
colored to be all exactly the same.
The Committee decided that they would also like to see the slate detail at
the next Committee meeting.
Committee Member Hodges made a motion, seconded by Committee
Member Fellows, to recommend approval of this project as submitted to
the Planning Commission contingent on seeing a landscape plan, and
materials for the front entry facade, at the next ARC meeting.
With the following roll call vote:
AYES 4
NOES: 0
PRESENT: 4
IV. Written Communications/Staff Comments
None
V. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.m. The next meeting is scheduled
for Monday April 2, 2001.
ATTACHMENT 6
DRAFT
NOTES
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC)
MONDAY, APRIL 2, 2001
The meeting of City of Arroyo Grande Architectural Review Committee was
called to order at 3:1 m.
Roll Call: Present were Com ' ee Members, Warren Hoag, Chair, Chet Kielan,
Vice Chair, Chuck Fellows, and new ommittee Member Melanie Hodges. Jamie
Ohler was absent. Also present were taff inembers, Kerry McCants, Kelly
Heffernon, Teresa McClish, and Lyn Reardon-S '
� Approval of Notes: The notes for the meeting of March , 001 were unanimously
approved as submitted.
I - Oral Communications
None
II. Projects
A. Russ Sheppel, Conditional Use Permit 01-005, 880 Oak Park Blvd.
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, said the applicant is returning to the
Committee for review of the revised landscape plans and to show materials
for the front entry facade. In the PD zone the City requires the landscaping
to be at least 5% of the site and the applicant has dedicated 17.5% of this
site to landscaping.
Kim Hatch, Pults & Associates, showed the Committee a sample of the slate
chosen for the front entry fa�ade. The gold/green, gauged (all uniform and
ground), natural slate, was chosen because of the green �color and because
the gold would reflect the gold accents they are using in the gold covered
canopy over the tiled entry area. The slate will probably be in 12" squares
and will be treated with a coating that will give them more luster. On the
other buildings he had used the same material, but the color was more of a
uniform green.
Chuck Fellows said he liked the changes on the landscape plans a lot,
especially the Coast Redwoods, but thought that the previous plans had
shown Sycamore (London Plane) trees where they were now showing
Chinese Elms. The London Plane trees would be preferable because they
have more of a spread than the Chinese Elm.
Kim Hatch said he had not instructed the landscape architect to change
those specific trees, but only to make the changes requested by the ARC.
Notes
ARC Meeting
April 2, 2001
Page 2 of 7
DRAFT
He would let the landscape architect know their preference and if there were
an overriding reason for the change he would let the ARC know.
The ARC made the following comments:
1. They liked the Coast Redwoods because they gave more of a native
color along the riparian area.
2. They would like the 15 Chinese Elm replaced with London Plane trees.
3. The choices of shrubs and vines, natives and near natives are very
good.
Committee Member Ohler made a motion, seconded by Committee Member
Hodges to recommend approval to the Planning Commission of the landscape
plans and the slate for the entry, with a condition to replace the 15 Chinese
Elm trees with London Plane trees.
With the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
PRESENT: 5
The fol%wing agenda items were taken out of order because the Committee was
ahead of schedule:
II . ISCUSSION ITEM - Agenda for the joint ARC/Planning Commission Meeting:
Ke McCants suggested that the changes to the City's Design Guidelines for
Histori istricts be an item for discussion. He distributed copies of suggestions
from the eserve the Village " committee, for changes to the City's Design
Guidelines for ' toric Districts that the City had recently received.
The ARC agreed that discussion on changes to the City's Design Guidelines
for Historic Districts coul e the main item for the agenda. In addition, they
could explore other ideas for her joint meetings and how often the meetings
should be held.
B. Casa Grande Inn, Planned Sign Program 1-001, 850 Oak Park Blvd.
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, said t Planning Commission and the
City Council originally approved the Planned Sig Program approximately two
years ago and because of circumstances, the app tion has expired. The
four proposed signs are basically the same as the ones reviously approved.
There is a pole sign, a monument sign, and two wall signs. The pole sign is
roughly two feet taller than the present sign to accommo e the Best
Western corporate logo.
/, aRROr
� o � �
INCORPORATE i
V m
* JULY 10. t9ii *
c4 ��FOttN� P
ATTACHMENT 7
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
INITIAL STUDY AND
DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Project Title:
2. Lead Agency Name & Address:
3. Contact Person & Phone #:
4. Project Location:
5. Project Sponsor's Name & pddress:
6. General Plan Designation:
7. Zoning:
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 01-005
Lot Line Adjustment 01-001
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550/214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner
(805) 473-5420
880 Oak Park Boulevard (Oak Park Professional Plaza)
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Russ Sheppel
930 Camille Ln.
Alamo, CA 94507
Oak Park Acres Planned Development #140 C.S.
P.D. 1.1, H-S (Highway Services)
8. Project Description:
The proposed project is to construct a 25,000 square foot medical office and surgery center near the
southeast corner of Oak Park Boulevard and James Way in the Oak Park Professional Plaza. The Plaza is
currently developed with a 7,560 sq. ft. medical office building and another 11,335 sq. ft. office building
is under construction. An approved 19,000 sq. ft. � health club is also planned for the site. The
development will require grading, street improvements, and utility construction to serve the commercial
project. The Lot Line Adjustment is to reconfigure six (6) lots into four (4) to better define and maintain
common easements for parking, access and drainage.
9. Other Agencies whose approval is required (and permits and/or licenses needed):
CA Dept. of Fish and Game; Army Corps of Engineers.
-1-
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
X
I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the
effect is a"potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated". An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addr ss d
/ ��/ 0/
Signat Date
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a"POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT" or "POTENTIALLY IS SIGNIFICANT UNLESS
MITIGATED", as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑ Land Use and Planning
❑ Population and Housing
■ Geophysical
■ Water
■ Air Quality
■ Transportation/Circulation
■ Biological Resources
❑ Energy and Mineral Resources
❑ Hazards
■ Noise
❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
O Public Services
� Utilities and Service Systems
0 Aesthetics
❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Recreation
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required fo� all answers except No lmpact" answeis that are adequately supported by the
informaiion sources a/ead agency cites in ihe parentheses fol%wing each quesiion. A"No Impact" question is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved
(e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone►. A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project
specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive �eceptors to pollutants, based on a
project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as
project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operations impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or is the lead agency lacks
information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentia►ly Significant Impact" entries when ihe
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect
from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation
measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII,
"Earlier Analyses", may be cross referenced.l
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c113)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section
XVII at the end of the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts le.g.,
general plans, zoning ordinances). A Source List should be attached and other sources used or individuals should be cited in the
discussion.
-2-
Potentia/ty
Potentia//y Signi�cant Less Than
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): SigniFcant Un/ess Significant No
/mpact Mitigated /mpact /mpact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(source #�s): 1,2,3,4) X
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies �
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
(source #Is): 1,6,7) X
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
usesl? Isource #(s): 9, 111 X
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (source #(s): 2,4,11) X
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections? (source #(s): 1,5,9) X
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?
(source #Is): 9,10)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(sou�ce #Is1: 9,10,11)
III. GEOPHYSICAL: Wou/d the proposa/ resu/t in or expose
peop/e to pofentia/ impacts invo/ving:
a) Seismicity: fault rupture? (source #Is►: 5,6)
b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction?
(source #(s1: 5,6)
c) Seismicity: seiche or tsunami? (source #Is►: 5,6)
d) Landslides or mudslides? (source #Is1: 5,6)
e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soils
conditions from excavation, grading or fill?
(source �Is►: 10)
f) Subsidence of land? (source #(s): 5,6)
g) Expansive soils? (source #Is1: 5,6)
h) Unique geologic or physical features? (source #Is1:
5, 6,10,11)
IV. WATER: Wou/d the proposa/ resu/t in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (source #Is1: 10)
b) Exposure to people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (source #(s1: 8)
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality Ie.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? (source #(s1: 9)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-3-
Potentia//y
Potentia//y Signi�cant Less Than
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Signifcant Unless Significant No
/mpact Mitigated /mpact /mpact
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (source #Isl: 9, 10) � X
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? Isource #Isl: 9, 10)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(source #Is): 9, 10)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(source #Is1: 9, 10►
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (source #Is1: 9,10)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies? (source #(sl: 6)
V. AIR aUALITY: Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
(source #Is1: 7, 13)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (source #(s):
10, 11)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (source #Is►: 9)
d) Create objectionable odors? (source #(s1: 9,10)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the p�oposal
resu/i in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (source
#(s1: 13)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipmentl? (source �Isl: 9, 10)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby sites?
(source #(s1: 9, 10)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (source
#(s): 3, 9, 10)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (source
#(s): 9, 10)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
(source #Is1: 9, 10)
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal �esult in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (source #Is1: 6)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage treesl?
(source #Is): 10, 11 �
c) Locally desig�ated natural communities (e.g., oak forest,
coastal habitatl? (source #Is1: 10, 11 �
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-4-
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pool�?
(source #Is): 9, 11)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
(source #(s): 11)
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.•
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
(source #Is1: 1, 6)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (source #Isl: 9, 10)
IX. HAZARDS. Wou/d the p�oposa/ involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiationt (source #(s►: 9)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (source #(s): 9, 10)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? (source #Is1: 9, 10)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (source #Is): 9,10,11)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (source #Is1: 10, 11)
X. NOISE. Would ihe proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (source #Is): 1, 9)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(source #(s): 9, 10)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Wou/d the proposal have an effect
upon, or resu/t in a need for new or altered governmeni
services in any of the fol%wing areas:
a) Fire Protection? (source #Is1: 6)
b) Police Protection? (source #Is►: 6)
c) Schools? (source #(sl: 6)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Isource #Isl: 6)
e) Other governmental services? (source #Is): 6)
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the p�oposal
result in a need for new sysiems, or substantial alterations
to the fol%wing utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (source #(s1: 9, 10)
b) Communications systems? (source #(s1: 9, 10)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (source #Is1: 6)
d) Storm water drainage? (source #Is): 6)
e) Solid waste disposal? (source #(s): 6)
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would ihe proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
(source #Is►: 1, 10, 11)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
. X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-5-
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
(source #(s1: 9, 10, 111
c) Create light or glare? (source #Is1: 9,10)
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would ihe proposal:
a) Disturb paleontologicai resources? (source #(s►: 6, 11)
b) Disturb archaeological resources (source #Isl: 6, 11)
c) Affect historical resources? (source #Is): 6, 11)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (source #(s):
11)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (source #Is1: 10, 11 �
XV. RECREATION. Would ihe proposal.•
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks
or other recreational facilities? (source #Is1: 1, 3)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
(source #Is1: 1, 5)
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife'species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or oiher CEQA process, one or more effects have
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(cl(3)ID). In this case, a discussion
should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed by earlier documents.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated",
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
��
SOURCE LIST:
1. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan
2. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Map
3. City of Arroyo Grande Development Code
4. City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Map
5. City of Arroyo Grande Existing Setting and Community Issues Report
6. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan EIR
7. Air Pollution Control District Clean Air Plan
8. FEMA - Flood Insurance Rate Map
9. Project Description
10. Project Plans
11. Site Inspection
12. Ordinance 431 C. S.
13. Institute of Traffic Engineers Triq Generation Manual
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The project site is located on the southeast corner of James Way and Oak Park Boulevard in the Highway
Service (H-S) District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1). The 3.74-acre site is
identified as the Oak Park Professional Plaza, which is currently developed with a medical office building
(Sheppel 1), and approved for development of a health club building (Kennedy Club Fitness) and another
medical office building (Sheppel 2). The project site is west of and adjacent to Willow Creek.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project evaluated by this initial study is to develop the remaining 1.8 acres of the Plaza property with
a 25,000 square foot medical office and surgery center and related parking (Sheppel 31. The proposed
structure has three levels that will be set into the existing topography, allowing at grade entries to both
levels 1 and 2. Because of the sloping topography, Sheppel building No. 3 will be lower in height than
the other buildings on the site.
Access to the site will be provided at an existing driveway off of James Way, just east of Oak Park
Boulevard. Parking would be provided on site with the construction of 142 on-site parking spaces in
addition to 108 existing parking spaces for the Oak Park Health Plaza. The project site is subject to an
easement agreement for access, parking, circulation and drainage with adjacent parcels, and a new
easement agreement is proposed that will connect all of the final developed parcels. On-site drainage will
be accomplished by a drainage system that will convey runoff from both on-site and off-site sources.
The project will be served by a public water system, and thus will have no direct or indirect impact on
groundwater resources.
EXPLANATIONS TO INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST:
111. GEOPHYSICAL
The project site has been the subject of previous grading activities. Other than standard construction
grading and necessary design-specified soil compaction, the proposed project would not involve any
substantial topographical changes.
Impacts from geologic hazards are potentially significant if the proposed development could result in
substantially increased erosion, landslides, soil creep, mudslides or unstable slopes. In addition,
impacts are considered significant when people or structures would be exposed to major geologic
hazards upon project implementation.
-7-
A Geotechnical Engineering Investigation has been prepared for the project (Earth Systems Pacific,
January 29, 2001). The study includes an analysis of the following site concerns: differential
settlement, expansive nature of the soil, potential for subsurface seepage, and continued erosion of
the basin slope. The study concludes that the impacts will be avoided or minimized by
implementation of recommended mitigation measures.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated
Mitigation Measures:
1. To address specific conditions concerning grading, utility trenches, foundations,
retaining walls and drainage, the contractor or builder shall adhere to the mitigation
measures identified in the Geotechnical Engineering report by Earth Systems Pacific
dated January 29, 2001.
2. Construction operations, especially grading operations, shall be confined as much as
possible to the dry season, in order to avoid erosion of disturbed soils.
3. Permanent soil control measures identified in the landscape plans shall be implemented
as soon as possible following completion of soil disturbing activities.
4. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month
after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered
until vegetation is established.
Monitoring: Review of grading plans and site inspections
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
Based on the General Plan and review of the Alquist-Priolo Zone Fault maps,� the proposed project is
not located on a known earthquake fault subject to rupture. The proposed project will be subject to
the effects of periodic seismic events in the region, including ground shaking. However, exposure of
people to these events can be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk by following Uniform Building
Code development standards.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant
IV. WATER
Development of the proposed project would require water for both commercial use and landscape
irrigation. The water consumption by this project would further reduce the City's supply of available
water. This impact could be mitigated using water-conserving designs, fixtures and landscaping.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
5. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water
demand created by the project by either:
Implement an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and designs that
minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of Public
Works for review and approval. The proposed individual water program shall be
submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation; or,
�
Pay an in lieu fee.
Monitoring:
Responsible Department:
Timeframe:
Review of individual water program or payment of the in
lieu fee
Public Works Department
Prior to issuance of building permit
6. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage.
Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets, instant water
heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures
shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
Monitoring: Review of building plans
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
7. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including the use
of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the greatest extent
possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized.
Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans
Responsible Department: Parks and Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
DRAINAGE
Development of the site will increase impervious surfaces, which in turn will change absorption rates
and increase the amount of runoff. The project site is located in the Meadow Creek Watershed.
Drainage from this area generally flows to the south. The project site is primarily located in Zone C,
with a small section of the southeasterly border in Zone B, as shown on the Federal Emergency
Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. Detailed drainage calculations would be reviewed
as part of the plan check process.
Analysis of Significance
Mitigation Measure:
Potentially significant unless mitigated.
8. The applicant shall. provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that increased run-
off can be accommodated by existing facilities and/or provide on-site retention basins
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Monitoring: Review of grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
The proposed project will not significantly change the quantity of ground water through direct
additions or withdrawals, since the project description does not include improvements that would
change ground water through these methods. The rate of flow or quality of groundwater is also not
anticipated to change as a result of this project.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant
�
V. AIR aUALITY
In addition to the vehicle trips generated by the project, construction activities would generate dust,
which could cause potentially significant environmental impacts.
In San Luis Obispo County, ozone and PM10 are the pollutants of primary concern, since state
health-based standards for those are exceeded in portions of the county in most years. For this
reason, San Luis Obispo County is considered to be in non-attainment of the state standards for both
ozone and PM 10. The major sources of PM 10 include mineral quarries, grading, demolition,
agricultural tilling; road dust and vehicle exhaust.
Grading and construction of the project would occur over a period of months. Short-term impacts
related to dust generation from site preparation and grading could result in dust generation that could
affect adjacent properties. Conditions placed on the project would reduce short-term dust
generation during construction of the project to less than significant levels.
Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining
dust on the site. The dust control measures listed below shall be followed during construction of
the project, and shall be shown on grading and building plans.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated
Mitigation Measures:
9. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas
of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a
minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 �miles per hour.
10. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with
soil binders to prevent dust generation.
11. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should
maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of
load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114 (This measure has the
potential to reduce PM 10 emissions from this source by 7-14%).
12. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads only streets, or
wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measure has the potential to
• reduce PM10 emissions from this source by 40-70%1.
13. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried only adjacent
paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible.
(This measure has the potential to reduce PM10 emissions from this source by 25-
60%).
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site inspections
Responsible Department: The Public Works and Building and Fire Departments shall
inspect plans, and the Community Development
Department shall spot check in the field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
-10-
A traffic study was conducted in connection with the project (Penfield & Smith, January 31, 2001).
The project is expected to generate 903 daily trips and 92 PM peak hour trips. Air quality impacts
from the project would not exceed acceptable thresholds, and no significant air quality impact would
be present.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
A traffic analysis was conducted to estimate the traffic impact for the project and assign the
project trips to the local street system (Penfield and Smith, dated January 31, 2001 and updated
April 16, 2001; reference Attachment A). The recently approved offices and health club facility
located at the site are included in the analysis. The traffic analysis estimates that the project
would generate 903 net new daily trips, with 61 net new AM peak hour trips and 92 trips for the
PM peak hour. The study considered impacts to five intersections: Oak Park/James way; Oak Park
/West Branch/NB 101 Ramp; Oak Park/EI Camino Real; Camino Mercado/West Branch/NB 1010
Ramps; and EI Camino Real/Brisco Road. The traffic analysis concludes that it is anticipated that
all five intersections would continue to operate at acceptable levels (LOS C or better) with the
addition of project traffic.
However, the project traffic would contribute to the cumulative negative impact on the backbone
circulation system. These long-range traffic impacts can be mitigated with implementation of the
following measures.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
14. The applicant shall pay the City's Transportation Facilities Impact fee prior to issuance
of building permit.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fees
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a building permit
15. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at Camino Mercado and West Branch Street.
The applicant and the City shall enter into a reimbursement agreement providing that
the City shall reimburse the applicant the difference in costs between the signal
installation and the project's Signalization Impact fee. The applicant may be
reimbursed for those costs to the extent that signalization impact fees area available
and programmed for the project. Should other projects in the development review
process be conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the same location, the first
project to obtain a building permit shall be required to construct the traffic signal
and enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City.
Monitoring: The applicant shall interconnect two signals and install
one traffic signal
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Th project lies on a 1.8-acre site west of and adjacent to Meadow Creek. A Biological Resources
Assessment was prepared for the project in January 2001 (Morro Group). The study identified no
-11-
sensitive species, however several sensitive wildlife species have the potential to occur within the
Meadow Creek corridor. The study included a wetland investigation that identified the presence of a.
0.09-acre, low value depressional wetland on the northeastern portion of the site. The study
classifies the riparian community of Meadow Creek as a Central Coast Arroyo Willow Riparian Forest
habitat.
According to the study, there is a potential direct impact to two sensitive plants that may occur
seasonally within the project area - the Pismo Clarkia and the San Luis mariposa lily.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated
Mitigation Measure:
16. Prior to site construction, on-site focused surveys for Pismo clarkia and San Luis
mariposa lily shall be conducted during their respective flowering periods. If these
species are found during the surveys, site work shall not proceed without direction
from the CDFG.
In addition, the study concludes that the project will affect an approximate 0.09-acre depressional
wetland which functions to detain storm water runoff and recharge groundwater. The project is
subject to Section 404 requirements under the Clean Water Act and is subject to regulations by the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and the US Corps of Engineers.
Potential impacts to wetland habitat and waters of the U.S. associated with the Meadow Creek
corridor could be avoided and/or minimized by implementation of proper erosion control methods
during site construction. Long-term indirect impacts can be addressed by engineering proper storm
water collection basins, and by carefully distributing collected storm water to the Meadow Creek
corridor. Storm water management requirements will also minimize potential impacts to sensitive
habitats and sensitive species of Meadow Creek.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated
Mitigation Measures:
17. A qualified biological monitor shall be retained to periodically review implementation of
agency conditions of approval. The frequency of such monitoring will be included in
the conditions of approval for the project.
18. Private and construction vehicle traffic shall be limited to those areas away from the
eastern edge of the Sheppel property to reduce the likelihood of bank failure and
subsequent sedimentation to Meadow Creek.
19. Siltation/sedimentation control measures shall be implemented along the entire
eastern property boundary prior to site construction. Such control measures shall
include sediment fences and/or hay bales placed into the hinge of the bank of
Meadow Creek. Erosion/sediment control barricades shall be placed around the
perimeter of each construction zone with the potential to drain to Meadow Creek.
20. To reduce surface water runoff and sedimentation into Meadow Creek, site earthwork
shall be limited to those months within the established dry season (April 15 through
October 15) unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works.
21. Soil shall not be stockpiled in areas located near the eastern property margin adjacent
to Meadow Creek, or in areas that have potential to drain to Meadow Creek.
-12-
Stockpiled soil should be properly covered at all times to avoid wind and water
erosion, and consequent siltation to Meadow Creek.
22. No heavy equipment shall be allowed within the Meadow Creek corridor.
Construction necessary within the Meadow Creek corridor near the bank hinge shall
be performed from the top of the bank and not from within the Creek corridor.
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site inspections
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
X. NOISE
The type and level of noise from the operation of an office facility is consistent with existing uses on
the site and with the zoning of the project site. Short-term noise increases will be caused by
construction of the facility. It is anticipated that these impacts could reach between 70 and 88
decibels. These impacts can be mitigated through limiting construction hours.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated
Mitigation Measures:
23. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained, functional mufflers
to limit noise.
24. All construction activities shall comply with the time limits specified by the Arroyo
Grande Municipal Code. �
25. . To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation should occur during the
middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring noise
sensitive uses. �
Monitoring: Notes shall be placed on the construction plans
referencing the above measures.
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: During construction
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed facility is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning for the site.
Adequate fire and police services exist in the community to serve the project, and the development
would generate tax revenues to contribute to the cost of ongoing public services. No housing is
associated with the project, and no impact on schools would be generated by the project.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The proposed project will not create a significant demand for new or altered power, gas,
communication systems, water treatment capacity or solid waste disposal. The project can tie into
the existing infrastructure for these systems to serve the site. The project is within the expected
demand for these systems based on the growth rate established in the General Plan.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact
-13-
XIII. AESTHETICS
The proposed facility would occupy a parcel that is currently vacant, and graded for development.
Zoning for the parcel is consistent with the proposed use, with the approval of a conditional use
permit.
Design and materials for the proposed structure would are compatible with the existing adjacent
office buildings. Proposed landscaping for the project would be coordinated with landscaping
approved and existing on site.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A Phase I Archaeological Survey of the project was conducted on October 9, 2000 (Heritage
Discoveries, Inc.). The survey produced negative results for the presence of cultural resources.
According to the study, no cultural materials were observed during the two meter transects made
across the property, and that since the site has been previously graded, the site area lacks original
ground surfaces and only sub-soils remain. Additionally, previous archaeological surveys of the
adjacent building areas also produced negative results.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact
-14-
ATTACHMENT A
SHEPPEL MEDICAL OFFICE 3
Traffic Analysis
April 16, 2001
Prepared By:
Penfield & Smith
Engineers, Surveyors, Planners
805.963.9532
W.O. 14,141.01
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Penfield & Smith Engineers (P&S) has prepared the following traffic impact analysis
for the proposed Sheppel Medical Office 3 project located in the City of Arroyo Grande.
This study has been completed in conjunction with the City's environmental review
process for this project. The traffic analysis includes an assessment of the existing
tr�c conditions within the study azea, determines the expected trip generation for
the project, evaluates the potential short and long-term traffic impacts associated with
the project, and provides several recommendations to mitigate the anticipated project
impacts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Sheppel 3 Medical Office project includes the construction of a 25,000 square foot
medical off`ice building located near the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and James
Way in the City of Arroyo Grande. Access to the site will be provided at an existing
driveway off of James Way, just east of Oak Park Boulevard. The project is proposing
to provide an additional 142 on-site parking spaces and is adjacent to an existing
7,560 square foot office building. In addition, two other projects on site were recently
approved by the City and are currently under construction. Those projects include a
19,000 sf fitness center (Kennedy Fitness) and an 11,335 sf office building. A vicinity
map and site plan are presented in Exhibits 1 and 2.
Penfield & Smith
0
�
V
7
�
a
�
W
�
0
�
W
��
Z Z
0 �
Um
W
W �
1- O
Z�
w
}a
i1J W
Yz
�
T
r
`_
�
�AK`�p'A'RK gLVD
Si
�1
�
�
y
�
�
�
d
�Y.�.
�
d
a
X
d
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
^
s�m.possv �'•vYV `s,ry •o t�u1s �� i ° 't� -
� • �
! `
,
W W CJ ��
� _ ������i °°� �_� ;s� � �°A - :
j �; �'-iiif =o� �W ' � �� • � �
•l i� 'n o�� !!� � 3 t s ���w
;� �i �t F � j 3 � ; 2
��
-- -----
- --- —_ — --�- — � __ — . --- -- — -
_, , —.� ___. --:, ------_
_
v
C
J
�.vr� s:wvr
V �
� �
U..
� m � �
� � N
w
�Q�b
W -J W �
�I (�� � ^
V! W Q -
Sheppe) Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
�
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Land Uses
The project site is located just east of the present City of Fismo Beach City Limits.
The land use to the south of the project is a hotel use with access to Oak Park
Boulevard provided through an existing parking lot on the Sheppel project site. A
vacant lot is located to the east of the site and a to the north lies the Four Square
Community Church. The church cunently provides daily day care and pre-school
services. The Church driveway is located approximately 30 feet to the east of the
project driveway.
Existing Roadways
The project site is directly served by Oak Park Boulevard and James Way. It is
anticipated that project traffic will utilize one or more of the following roadways to
access the regional road system:
Brisco Road: Brisco Road is a two-lane arterial-collector, e�ctending between Grand
Avenue on the south and West Branch Street.
James Wav: James Way travels in an east-west direction between the cities of Pismo
Beach and Arroyo Grande. James Way is constructed with one lane in each direction
and a center turn lane. Parking is permitted along various segments of James Way
and is striped to provide bike lanes on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit
on this roadway is 40 MPH.
El Caznino Real: El Camino Real is a two-lane roadway that parallels Highway 101. El
Camino Real extends between North 4� Street on the west (in the City of Pismo
Beach) and Grand Avenue on the east.
Oak Park Boulevard: Oak Park Boulevard is constructed as a north-south four lane
divided arterial between El Camino Real to the south and James Way to the north. In
this segment, the posted speed limit is 35 MPH. North of James Way the roadway
narrows to one lane in each direction with no left turn lanes. The posted speed limit
on this portion of Oak Park Boulevard is 45 MPH. Parking is generally prohibited
along the roadway.
West Branch Street: West Branch Street begins at the intersection of Grand Avenue
and East Branch Street and varies from three to five lanes. West Branch Street serves
as a frontage road to Highway 101 traveling north and terminates at Oak Park
Boulevard.
<
Pentield & Smith 4
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
Existing Intersection Operations
Based on discussions with the City of Arroyo Grande, five intersections have been
included as part of this analysis. This includes:
• Oak Park Boulevard at James Way
• Oak Park Boulevard at West Branch Street/ NB 101 Ramp
• Oak Park Boulevard at El Camino Real
• Camino Mercado at West Branch Street
• El Camino Real at Brisco Road
Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes for the intersections were obtained from the
Los Robles Del Mar Specific Plan (April 2000) and the Brisco Road-Halcyon Road
Project Study Report (May 2000). Once the volumes were identified, the operations of
the intersections were then calculated using the most cunent version of the Highway
Capacity software. The level of service worksheets are provided in the technical
appendix of this report and summarized in Table 1 below. The traffic volumes are
illustrated in Exhibit 3.
Table 1
PM Peak Hour Level of Service
Intersection
Oak Park Boulevazd at James Way
Oak Park Boulevard at West Branch St/ NB 101 Ramp
Oak Park Boulevard at El Camino Real
Camino Mercado at West Branch/ NB 101 Ramps
El Camino Real at Brisco Road
Delay/LOS
20.5 sec/veh- LOS C
18.0 sec/veh- LOS B
24.2 sec/yeh- LOS C
20.0 sec/veh- LOS C
14.9 sec/veh- LOS B
As shown in the table, all five of the study intersections presently operate at LOS C or
better during the PM peak hour.
Penfield & Smith 5
� � °r° \9
Jl� � �
ssz� s
szz—..
�� 1 t (�
Nn �
�
. •-
� o !_SS
�rn � .-186
\ , � r-151
��
�2� c ,
213" � � �' '
�
38 N �' � '
�� ,
�
�
. �
, ,
, ,
`. �
�, �
. �
. �
. v , �
. ,
.
. � �
.
.
� �
. i
.
, ,
.
.
.,
�
_
�
1
► �
� �I
�,,,�1
M � �0
� � 1 � r 288
�
o��S�r
� 22�' N M
25'i
_'- -- �
� n o t.-20
N 00 M r 315
�� J ! l� r -262
,
' 189-�
� 500
138�
�
�p� pqRK BLVD
,
;�
i
i�
0
- _ -- �� \
� � � � 559
,` � 1 � r68
i
98-� -� t r
599 ---' � � �
( 22� �i � M
��a
z�?
O
a
H=�
� Y °°
Z �U
va�
Z ao
H- a
� a
� W
� f�
MI
vi
�
z
�
� D
� O �
� W X
y� �
� ^
N �
�
�•
�
� W
� W p
� � �
aW �
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
PRO) ECT I M PACTS
The following section evaluates the potential impacts associated with the traffic
generated by the Sheppel Medical Office project, as well as any potential parking and
circulation impacts that may be associated with the project. In addition, as requested
by the City of Arroyo Grande, the recently approved office and health club facilities
located adjacent to the project have been discussed in this analysis.
Project Trip Generation
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Reference Manual,
Sixth Edition, 1997 was used to determine the potential traffic that would be generated
by the proposed land use. Based on the trip generation rate, the proposed project
would be expected to add 903 trips per day, with 61 trips occurring during the
morning peak hour and 92 trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour. Table 2
below summarizes the project trip generation.
Land Use
Sheppel Office 3
Table 2
Pro ect Traffic Generation Summa
Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code 'SF) � In Out Total In Out Total
720 � 25,000 � 903 � 49 � 12 � 61 � 25 � 67 � 92
Project Trip Distribution
The project traffic was assigned to the local and regional roadway system through
discussions with City staff, previous traffic reports and our knowledge of the
geographic location of possible origins and destinations in the Five Cities Area. The
distribution of project traffic is illustrated in E�ibit 4. In general, the project traffic
is distributed as follows:
North
on Oak Park Boulevard
on US Highway 101
South
on US Highway 101
on Oak Park Boulevard
East
on James Way
on West Branch Street
Total Project Traffic
5%
30%
25%
10%
10%
20%
100%
Penfield & Smith �
. `-�
'� o �
'� �
�, ��
�` 7
.`
U
_-- --' � �
G
H
�
W
�
�o
�z
O°
= J
�
Y °D
� w
U
a�
�
go
a�
W
a
a
w
_
�
�
:/`�
�
�
��
y
�
�
�
d
�
C
d
�
N
G
�
�
�
0
�
�
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic impact Analysis
Existing + Project Impact Analysis
Based on the project traffic distribution depicted in Exhibit 4, the project traffic was
added to the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes and the infersection analyses were
recalculated. The results of these calculations are summarized in Table 3.
�
Table 3
Coaditions
Intersection
Oak Park Boulevard at James Way
Oak Park Boulevard at
West Branch St/NB 101 Ramp
Oak Park Boulevard at El Camino Real
Camino Mercado at
West
101
El Camino Real at Brisco Road
PM Peak Hour Delay/ LOS
Existing LOS W/Project
20.5 sec/veh- LOS C 20.8 sec/veh- LOS C
18.0 sec/veh- LOS B 18.5 sec/veh- LOS B
24.2 sec/veh- LOS C 24.3 sec/veh- LOS C
20.0 sec/veh- LOS C 20.1 sec/veh- LOS C
14.9 sec/veh- LOS B 14.9 sec/veh- LOS B
As shown in Table 3, the intersection level of service does not change significantly
with the addition of the project traffic. Therefore, it is anticipated that all five study
intersections would continue to operate at acceptable levels with the addition of
project traffic.
Project Site Access Design
Based on the site plan as proposed and the projected future traffic volumes
(discussed in the next section), the frontage improvements along Oak Park Boulevard
and James Way were assessed. As the intersection is projected to operate at a very
good LOS C, no additional frontage improvements aze recommended.
The proposed site access on James Way is located at an adequate distance from the
Oak Park Boulevard intersection. The driveway to the Four Square Church is located
directly across from the proposed project access, and would operate adequately due to
the different peaking characteristics of the two land uses.
Parking
The Sheppel Medical Office 3 project is proposing to provide 142 parking spaces on-
site. This is in addition to the 108 spaces being provided for the health fitness center
and office building currently under construction. Therefore, at build-out a total � of
250 spaces will be provided on-site.
Based on the traffic study conducted for the health fitness center and office building
(Penfield & Smith, June 3, 1999) cunently under construction, it was determined that
approximately 134 spaces would be needed during the combined peak parking
demand for those uses. This peak parking demand would be expected to occur
around 12:00 PM.
Penfield & Smith 9
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
The Sheppel Office 3 project would be expected to have a parking demand of 103
spaces based on the parking generation data provided by ITE This peak parking
demand is reached in the mid-morning and mid-afternoon. Therefore, the 142 spaces
proposed to serve the medical office uses would be adequate to meet the peak parking
demand of the project. In total, the peak parking demand for the two buildings
under-construction and the proposed medical office could be as high as 237 spaces.
As the overall site would provide 250 parking spaces, sufficient parking would be
provided for the entire site.
CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS
This section includes an analysis of the future traffic conditions with and without the
project. To form a basis for the future traffic conditions, known, approved, and/or
pending developments in the area were researched. Once these projects were
identified, the project related traffic volumes that could be generated were
summarized to determine the cumulative effect on the road system. The cumulative
list of development projects is summarized in Table 4 and illustrated in Exhibit 5.
In total, the list of cumulative projects for the City of Arroyo Grande would add 58,948
daily trips to the area. During the PM peak hour, a total of 5,193 trips could be added
to the road system. The cumulative traffic volumes are illustrated in Exhibit 6.
Cumulative Intersection Operations
Using the cumulative traffic volumes, the intersection operations were recalculated.
The resulting levels of service are presented in Table 5. Based on the cumulative
traffic volumes, all of the study area intersections are planned to operate within
acceptable limits.
Table 5
Cumulative PM Peak Hour Level of Service
Intersection Delay/LOS
Oak Park Boulevard at James Way ' 20.5 sec/veh- LOS C
Oak Park Boulevard at West Branch St/NB 101 Ramp 18.5 sec/veh- LOS B
Oak Park Boulevard at El Camino Real 31.9 sec/veh- LOS C
Camino Mercado at West Branch/NB 101 Ramps 29.7 sec/veh- LOS C
El Camino Real at Brisco Road 17.3 sec/veh- LOS B
1 Parking Generation, August 1987, Institute of Transporation Engineers - Land use code 630
(Medical/Dental Clinic/Office), parking rate of 4.11 spaces per 1000 square feet.
Penfield & Smith 10
0 M
0
od, \
o
�>>
b
�
O
O M
�
N
O �
O r
y�
H
U
W
� W
O
��
o. N
�V
Q/
s\
�o-
Z Q '- �•Z
U
� � ���� �
N v��
�
3 O / �
�,�n
W 1- U� n LA
HWO�
' � J
���m
�a
� �U
t � � O
o J
W
a
a
w
_
�
OM
J
N W
� O
O ♦
O M
�
aa NO�I��dH
�
Q� o O
Od N N �
O �
d � �
� �
M ♦ C
1S Wl3 S �
N
�
O N
��o
N =
c�
�ibb'd 71d0
H
Z
= N
�
� O '0
� � X
W
y � �
�N �
�•
�
d�
� w
I■�w o
Cz �
d � �
O.W ^
'd
�
, 1� M �1
V v
� 0
� �
� t�.�
O
� �
U
` N V1 �/1 VJ d1 VJ N V) V1 VJ V1 W N V1 qJ Vl N
:....� ... 4. 4, L. t, 4, L. 4. ir �. L. 4. 4. L. t� F, �.
� � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
, , , , , , , , , � , , , , , , ,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- y o
0 0
' ° o � � o o � o 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 o M
��, � �
�F
�
:���[. �;� a� � a+ y � N . � � � � 4' .0 y � � � a.i �� a+
�; .� .� ... > > > > > O N .� ..„
• � • • O O O O O O O O O O
� � p�q p�q a a a a c. � �� o a a a p�q a p�q
�. a a a rs, a. � w c a a a
¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ � o a ¢ ¢ a ¢
U
�:�,
��''' � � i 0 � i
�^�' �t d ' � l� tn � Ol � tA O � .�-� .-
�'� 'rc � M
���
,, � � �
rl . a,� � � � � 00 � . � c'� •�-� M c'�� N N � N
O
O -`
N' �
� l� N O�
..+ .-i
� � � � � � �
'� . N O M � O �A � QO � c'N0.
a � .-� h N l� M N V
�i
�
Vl ,
1� � .-�-� ONp � .
� � � � � � � � M M � � N � � �
� . � . � N O tn � � � O
.
ir !
a
�
� ' � � L1 �' � m � � ti o � o �, ° o � "
N � �
.-�i .� � � � � � � � � � p � p � � O M � � �
� � � � �
�. � �� `O � O\ M � � N � N 0 N p� ''�,, a0 N M
C� °.
U:
'' �s �� �� �
G] A 'ca �� Ca G1 Ll � 0; G1 0» x 'co U c�i C] G] A
C�/� C� � �� C�/1 C� C� .� � C�/� � p, � � w � � GT
� �•� �, u � x � p a a v�
��� � � U w w �
�� � Q= O O =
'�� o0
W � � �
'� �
� a � � a� � � w � � �
° " � � a *� � x a " � .-,
y � T .[ � � � :3 .� a� u a�i � n M °o �
: , x � .� cs, 3 � a� U � ,on ': � U ,n � ,r� a� M M �n
a� pp �" pp N N l\
�� ;: _� W c� � � a� o �y �C � V °� c� � O� O� u O�
x , Y p7 � � y � � � ,ca � x �» a� ,.+ �+
�'�' , c v � �s p � c N i � � ' � a � o U a' � � v�i `�° w ,.�j
� , c� N� C!� � o � � = o � � y U� U F E- ..a
�,�, ,�` ' U � � � � p � � > fY. � � x
� �� ` �.�., � a' F' +-' � C t,. �'
�: ;-;� E" 4i � � a
� ,� F' GL F
:::.s .
a:�; .��.
, �N
,� ��' � CV M � tn �O l� 00 Q� � '" N M d' tA �O l� 00
�° �. .� r. .--� .r r. � .-. .r .�
�
E
N
�
�
w
C
CJ
�
'a
�
C�i
�'
� �+
� 0
� �
� yy
0
�
U
�. � �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, >, �,
►n �n �n u� �n u� ' �n �n �n �n '
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
s �.
. � �.
o �
�:-�: � �n � � o. o .�• o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � c�
r. �
�x rn
4."
� � � ir
� x '� a�i �. '� �. � � � v u � a�i v w�� C C � a�i
� r . � V > � V � V D > > r., > > � V > >
,�'a- �, : �p � O - Cy � Tf � O :� O O •� � O O b � %� %� O � O
�� ; a,� ¢, a,� a,� a C a a a a� � a n, a.
o ¢ � o o ¢ °`, Q ¢ � ¢ ¢ a o °`, a ¢ ¢
�,`� � � � U U . U U
�.,.
���
y':
�::-�
O [� O� lC � � .-i M � i N � � i .-r .--� � .-�
.-r .-�
rl ' � ('7 .-�-� .- � ,. C`1 .-� i � N .r .r .r .-i M i .-i
�
�
N
0�
3 3
a N d N � � t�0 M �t � � N N ~ �-+ N � � N
� 3 3
�
M
a
� N a' N O M �t N N � � � � � � .- M ' .
�
�
w
a
M ..�. a��+ a y� + � (A y y � f/1 V1 � pl t�. t.-. V1 N tn
�' � �
� � � � c ° ° � ° � � rn a o � o a ° o �
� n � � � rn � � M c� c� � � � � � � o �
� � � l� ln � N � N � � � N � ~ � � N N
�
U
� � o
.� �' Q �+ � .�'-'.
� � 0 � �.
a� a� �.o 'g o'� �'m G�� ia o•v, � p„ ° V v
L] U G1 G� � u Ll u q o w �1 0 � �
Li. fs, Gz. tz, � o �"',.' „ Gc. w � .Q „C � � � f�. V � V '� .� � 'O � b .� 'd
Cn C/� Cn V] � � Vl � CL .`�� � .� C/� a> y � y � y V�� �
x� �e U x ��c �;o x� O c, o
fz1 p„ W w ai a�i w � b V
w �. ¢ W
a� a� o
� � ° o v '�
s<� � � � � V U � �
� Cl� � � q
� � � �, � � [� � . p p � O C O V O � C •--� q p .,,��,, p � .-�. '� p ,
U c� � � � O O O O V O,� O� O O cd O y O y O� O� O�
��' � �� ,..,, .-• O� O� O� O� y O� O 4 O O� O� O 4 O� O O�
� v�1 ��„ � a, ..+ O� O� O� �1 V �'�, �� � �.� � F�., 0 , '�' �� 0 V 0 4
,���', � � � ,� � � a a. a. • a�a� � a o a oaV� +-a��.gt7
�r.. � �, � � � o„ � y av� � a ��.��� �'a °� "a
�� �:�
,� v -W � � E"' F" U U F U p, U� U � F U U� U � F� U F
.. .� y � �
����.�� U U � O � �
c� c�
V p " o
w w
��. .. F F �
�� � --� N M � tA �O [� 00 O� O r+ N ch � tn �O
>�x � � N CV CV C`1 CV N N N C�l CV c'� M M c'� M M M
'�'�,� '
x<
�
tn
�
�
C
�
a
O1 } y . V) fI1 V1 V1 �j �j V) pl
A T �, � � � � � � �+ � �, � �,
O O O O O O N � O O
rl
�
�
N
�
'� ..+
�a
� �
d' � �
M
a
� o �
td �
E+ t„ �o
o p;
�
�
� �
U;
,�
'�
i'i
U
�0000a0000000�
�
� � �° � b m
� � � � � � � � � � O � �
O O O � � � 'CJ 'O � 'C! � t1 .� � 'O
a a c a � � a�� � � a �
d ¢ ¢ d a a ¢ o a O Q a.
U
0
.-�
M
�
.. � r. i � O O � � � � � C�I tn
r, N ,..,
�
.-� �
.-, � .-i � N O O � � M N � � O
C C �
M c�
•-+ N 'O N � � O O o�0 M d ' .--� O � �
� � c� � cv
3 3
N
� � �
�v �o -� �o � r? M
�` � °` � a� o o �n rn �r `n "" .., �
� � ~ N � N � � M � N
o �
.� � r� �
(� Q (� (/1 � � � ~ � � W
� � � � �� � � � o � �
� � �, � ' a ' � �,, ' � � :..., � o z u u
N O M N � � � �� �} L� � ¢
� � rn � a
CA y a��+
. C � i O V � O O
0 � Ca A � � � � Q 0 Q � \ � C �
� � � � � .� .� � � •� � � � �
o � � � � a �
�
� � U
� vl O y�
� w
ct tn �O M C� � � � l� �O �� C v�j pp G� 0
.. O O -. �-+ �.� .+ q a� O O
� �y � � � O �i � � � �i � �i 0 �i � �i � c1 C1 U � � U
p� p� p� O;� O� O� O� O y O�+. � ' O U � a�i
¢-�¢ a� `�a wp�a ua�aza � � � � � a �
.`'.� .�a�� UFC�.� oc�.� UciF> a E v E
�o � �
� �
MIMIMI�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�
�
�
of
�•
�
W '� o
� o c
� �,
� w �
� � �
� ��
� o � :r
o a�i o
� � a�
U � �
� .� �
U F--
. �ls
�
�
�
a
c
a�
a
��� �
�1��8s�
OS
l9£ --!
l 9Z —►
g�-� �l t r
���,
N ^ �
��
0
�
M L
a �. � �--
- °D � � � 356
� � t �
l ��4
�o
r 50 -- � °
55
3
�
► ;
� �I
' � �171
� �-192
� � � � 260
99 � --� \ �
�
310 —' �, o � �
sa—� � `' �
�� ,
,
�
, �
, ,
, �
,
�
� �
�
��, N �
. �
. � �
, Q
•� �, �
,
,
��.
I➢
/�
OAK PARK BLVD
,
'.
,
,'
,'
� ---r
c•, v c� t._-32
N � � �-463
�1 l � � 300
2�2-�
594 --'
256�
W � t� c7
1=0��
g=3�
��
U
VaULL
��O
a� �
w
�— a
W
_
�
_-;,_- - �
-_- "��� !._33
��� a cA d' r 660
J � �- �
98��tr
�,z-- ���
( 278--i � � �
t0 I
�
�
z
N
i� 0 v
co
w X
y '� °'
��
�� �
�•
��
dW
� W p
= Z
(9 �
�w �
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
Cumulative + Project Impact Analysis
To estimate the project impact on the cumulative conditions, the project traffic was
added to the cumulative traffic volumes. The cumulative plus project intersection
operations are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6
Cumulative + Pro ect Conditions
Intersection PM Peak Hour
Dela / LOS
Base LOS W/Project
Oak Park Boulevard at James Way 20.5 sec/veh- LOS C 20.9 sec/veh- LOS C
Oak Park Boulevard at 18.5 sec/veh- LOS B 19.2 sec/veh- LOS B
West Branch St NB 101 Ram
Oak Park Boulevard at El Camino Real 31.9 sec/veh- LOS C 32.7 sec/veh- LOS C
Camino Mercado at 29.7 sec/veh- LOS C 30.0 sec/veh- LOS C
West Branch NB 101 Ram s
El Camino Real at Brisco Road 17.3 sec/veh- LOS B 17.3 sec/veh- LOS B
As seen in Table 6, during the PM peak hour all of the study area intersections
operate at LOS C or better under cumulative traffic conditions with and without the
addition of project traffic.
MITIGATION MEASURES
This section identifies a variety of ineasures that are proposed to mitigate the project
impacts.
Existing Conditions
All of the study area intersections presently operate and would continue to operate at
acceptable levels of service with the additional project traffic. Therefore, there are no
mitigation measures proposed for the e�sting conditions.
Cumulative Conditions
No additional roadway improvements would be required as all of the study area
intersections are projected to operate within acceptable limits.
The traffic signal planned to be constructed at the Camino Mercado and West Branch
Street intersection was assumed to be installed. The City has indicated that the
traff'ic signal should be installed at this intersection concurrently with the occupancy
of this project. The project applicant shall be reimbursed by the City by an amount
equal to the cost of the traffic signal (estimated $150,000) less the project's
contribution to the traffic signalization fee. Should other projects in the development
review process be conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the same location, the
first project to obtain a building permit shall be required to construct the traffic signal
Penfield & Smith 16
�
Sheppel Medical Office 3 Traffic Impact Analysis
and enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City. Otherwise, the project
would only be required to pay the tr�c signalization fee if another project has
entered into a reimbursement agreement.
SUMMARY
This analysis included an assessment of the existing traffic conditions within the
study area, determined the expected trip generation for the project, and evaluated the
potential traffic impacts associated with the project. Overall, the traffic impacts
associated with the proposed Sheppel Office project are considered to be less than
significant. The project is expected to generate 903 daily trips and 92 PM peak hour
trips. Based on the existing traffic volumes, the five study intersections will continue
to operate at LOS C or better with the added project tr�c. Under the cumulative
conditions, the study aze intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better.
It was also determined that the project could have a peak parking demand of 103
spaces. The cunent project site plan provides for 142 spaces and will therefore meet
the anticipated parking demand.
Penfield & Smith ��
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existing PM- Oak Park @ James Way hcs Pa e 1
Inter: Oak Park
Analyst: LMV
Date: 1/22/O1
3/W St: James Way
*To . Lanes
,GConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
:TOR Vo 1
Eas
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Blvd. @ James Way
L T
City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Proj #: 14,141.01
Period: Existing- PM Peak Hour
N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION St7NIlHARY
I Westbound I Northbound
R L T R L T R
1 1 1
L T R
127 152 197 ,
12.0 12.0 12.0
100
1 1 1
L T R
101 57 6 �
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 2 0
L TR
151 186 88
12.0 14.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
72 213 38
12.0 14.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
�hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A ' Right A A
Peds . X Peds X X
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds X Peds X
B Right EB Right A A
B Right WB Right
Green 11.0 10.5 9.5 2.5 ' 10.5
"ellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
�ane Group Flow Rate
1rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
�stbound
L 331 1805 0.43 0.183 22.6 C
" 332 1900 0.51 0.175 23.7 C 19.2 B
821 1615 0.13 0.508 7.8 A
Nestbound
� 331 1805 0.34 0.183 21.9 C
332 1900 0.19 0.175 21.4 C 21.7 C
� 283 1615 0.02 0.175 20.5 C
�Torthbound
_ 481 1805 0.35 0.267 18.2 B
:-. 794 3665 0.38 0.217 20.4 C 19.6 B
" �uthbound
. 286 1805 0.28 0.158 22.8 C
'R 659 3764 0.42 0.175 22.5 C 22.6 C
Intersection Delay = 20.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existin +proj- Oak Park @ James Way hcs PaQe 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
nter: Oak Park Blvd. Q James Way City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
r�nalyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Existing + Project
/W St: James Way N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
^To . Lanes
3Conf ig
volume
Lane Width
TOR Vol
Eastb
L T
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIMARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R � L T R
1 1 1
L T R
127 152 197
12.0 12.0 12.0
100
1 1 1 1 2 0
L T R L TR
158 57 9 151 186 109
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0
0 p
Southbound
L T R
� 1 2 0
L TR
72 213 38
12.0 14.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
zase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A ' Right A A
Peds ,X Peds X X
�TB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds X Peds X
3 Right EB Right A A
3 Right WB Right
sreen 11.0 10.5 9.5 2.5 �10.5
'�llow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
.1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
�ycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
�ane Group Flow Rate
Jrp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
:.stbound
� 331 1805 0.43 0.183 22.6 C
' 332 1900 0.51 0.175 23.7 C 19.2 B
821 1615 0.13 0.508 7.8 A
lestbound
- 331 1805 0.53 0.183 23.8 C
- 332 1900 0.19 0.175 21.4 C 23.1 C
: 283 1615 0.04 0.175 20.6 C
:orthbound
- 481 1805 0.35 0.267 18.2 B
�-. 788 3638 0.42 0.217 20.6 C 19.8 B
� uthbound
� 286 1805 0.28 0.158 22.8 C
'R 659 3764 0.42 0.175 22.5 C 22.6 C
Intersection Delay = 20.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existinq PM- Oak Park @ West Branch hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
'nter: Oak Park Blvd. @ West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
��nalyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Existing- PM Peak Hour
;/W St: West Branch St N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
Eastb
L T
No. Lanes
GConf ig
�olume
Lane width
TOR Vol
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
0 0 0 1 1 1
L LT R
350 82 227
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 �
l 2 1
L T R
262 315 203
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 i
Southbound
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
189 500 138
12.0 16.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left A A
Thru Thru A A
Right � Right A A
Peds Peds X X
�1B Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds X
- 3 Right A EB Right
3 Right WB Right
�reen 16.0 10.0 4.0 �18.0
'�llOw 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
L1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_ycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group AFproach
_�ne Group Flow Rate
�rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
istbound
�estbound
� 481
' 493
_ 431
:orthbound
542
1324
: 1130
- uthbound
301
'R 1188
1805
1848
1615
1805
3610
1615
1805
3959
0.57 0.267
0.42 0.267
0.58 0.267
0.54 0.300
0.26 0.367
0.20 0.700
0.70
0.60
Intersection Delay = 18.0
20.6 C
18.8 B
21.2 C
18.6 B
13 . 4 B
3.2 A
20.3 C
12.5 B
0.167 30.8 C �
0.300 18.7 B 21.5 C
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existing + Pro�- Oak Park @ West Branch hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Blvd. e West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Existing + Project PM
�/W St: West Branch St N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
No. Lanes
�GConf ig
�7olume
Lane Width
;TOR Vo 1
Eastb
L T
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIMARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
0 0 0
1 1 1
L LT R
350 93 227
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 I
1 2 1
L T R
262 326 203
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
202 524 138
12.0 16.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
'hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
E;B Left NB Left A A
Thru Thru A A
Right • Right A A
Peds Peds X X
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds X
'B Right A EB Right
B Right WB Right
lreen 16.0 10.0 4.0 18.0
�ellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
..ycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
r�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
ane Group Flow Rate
srp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
�stbound
�astbound
� 481
" 49a
. 431
lorthbound
542
1324
Z 1130
'�uthbound
301
.tt 1I89
1805
1851
1615
1805
3610
1615
1805
3964
0.57 0.267
0.45 0.267
0.58 0.267
0.54 0.300
0.27 0.367
0.20 0.700
0.74
0.62
20.6 C
19.0 B
21.2 C
18.6 B
13.5 B
3.2 P,
0.167 34.0
0.300 19.0
Intersection Delay = 18.5 (sec/veh)
20.3 C
12.5 B
C
B 22.5 C
Intersection LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existin PM- Oak Park @ E1 Camino Real hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park @ EL Camino Real City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Existing - PM Peak Hour
E/W St: E1 Camino Real N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
L T
No. Lanes
:,GConf ig
lolume
Lane Width
ZTOR Vo 1
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L LT R
412 49 367
12.0 12.0 12.0
175
0 1 1
LT R
47 18 64
12.0 12.0
30
1 2 0
L TR
68 559 33
12.0 14.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
I98 599 220
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
�B Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A � Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
"TB Right EB Right A
�B Right A WB Right A A
Green 20.0 5.5 8.0 4.5 � 35.0
�ellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
.11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
�ycle Length: 89.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
.ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
ane Group Flow Rate
�rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
astbound
L 398 1770 0.63 0.225 34.5 C
�•T 403 1792 0.65 0.225 34.9 C 31.8 C
a98 1583 0.43 0.315 24.7 C
,�estbound
r l�i
� a62
Vorthbound
159
� 1472
1798
1583
1770
3743
0.65 0.062 54.1 D 43.3
0.08 0.292 22.9 C
0.48 0.090 40.8 D
0.45 0.393 18.1 B 20.5
=�uthbound
328 1770 0.33 0.185 32.1
. 827 1863 0.81 0.444 24.2
Z 1129 1583 0.22 0.713 0.9
Intersection Delay = 24.2 (sec/veh)
C
C 19.5
A
Intersection
0
C
B
LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existin + Proj- Oak Park @ E1 Camino Real hcsPa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
:nter: Oak Park @ EL Camino Real City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
►nalyst: LMV . Proj #: 14,I41.01
Date: 1/22/Ol Period: Existing - PM Peak Hour
- :/W St: E1 Camino Real N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
Vo . Lanes
GConf ig
.olume
�ane Width
TOR Vol
Eastb
L T
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L LT R
420 49 367
12.0 12.0 12.0
175 I
0 1 1
LT R
47 18 64
12.0 12.0
30
1 2 0
L TR
68 562 33
12.0 14.0
0
D 43.3
C
D
B 20.5
�uration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
sB Le f t A NB Le f t A
Thru A Thru A
Right A � Right A
Peds Peds
dB Left A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
'9 Right EB Right A
B Right A WB Right A A
:reen 20.0 5.5 8.0 4.5 �35.0
'ellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.�cle Length: 89.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
�ne Group Flow Rate •
�rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
istbound
398 1770 0.65 0.225 35.0- C
T 402 1791 0.66 0.225 35.3 D 32.1 C
498 1583 0.43 0.315 24.7 C
astbound
' 111 1798 0.65 0.062 54.1
462 1583 0.08 0.292 22.9
orthbound
159 1770 0.48 0.090 40.8
. 1472 3743 0.45 0.393 18.2
^uthbound
328 1770 0.33 0.185 32.1
827 1863 0.81 0.444 24.8
1129 1583 0.23 0.713 1.0
Intersection Delay = 24.3 (sec/veh)
Southbound
L T R
� 1 1 1
L T R
98 606 237
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
�
C
C
C 19.6 B
A
Intersection LOS = C
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Stephen A. Orosz, P.E.
Penfield & Smith
P. O. Box 98
101 E. Victoria Street
Santa Barbara, CA
Phone: 805-963-9532 Fax: 805-966-9801
E-Mail: sao@penfieldsmith.com
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Intersection: West Branch At Camino Mercado
City/State: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: SAO
Project No.: 14141.01
Time period Analyzed: PM Peak Hour - Existing
Date: 4/16/2001
East/West Street: West Branch Street
North/South Street: Camino Mercado
Worksheet 2- Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
� Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
� L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
I I I I
Volume 124 395 0 1133 354 1 1288 0 11 10 22 25
$ ?'hrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration L TR L TR LT R LTR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate 24 395 133 355 288 11 47
$ Heavy Veh 0 2 0 2 2 0 0
No. Lanes 2 2 2 1
Opposing-Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting-lanes 2 2 2 2
Geometry group 5 5 5 4b
Duration, T 1.00 hrs.
Worksheet 3- Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane 24 395
Left-Turn 24 0
Right-Turn 0 0
Prop. Left-Turns 1.0 0.0
Prop. Right-,Turns 0.0 0.0
Prop. Heavy Vehic1e0.0 0.0
Geometry Group 5
133 355
133 0
0 1
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5
288 11
288 0
0 11
1.0 0.0
0.0 1.0
0.0 0.0
5
47
0
25
0.0
0.5
0.0
4b
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 -0.6 -0.3
Worksheet 4- Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow rate 24 395 133 355 288 11 47
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.02 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.04
hd, final value 6.67 6.50 6.60 6.43 7.22 6.38 7.46
x, final value 0.04 0.71 0.24 0.63 0.58 0.02 0.10
Move-up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Service Time 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1 5.2
Worksheet 5- Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rate 24 395 133 355 288 11 47
Service Time 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1 5.2
Utilization, x 0.04 0.71 0.24 0.63 0.58 0.02 0.10
Dep. headway, hd 6.67 6.50 6.60 6.43 7.22 6.38 7.46
Capacity 274 544 383 548 480 261 297
Delay 9.68 24.93 11.43 20.12 19.65 9.21 10.96
LOS A C B C C A B
Approach:
Delay 24.06 17.75 19.27 10.96
LOS C C C B
Intersection Delay 19.97 Intersection LOS C
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Stephen A. Orosz, P.E.
Penfield & Smith
P. 0. Box 98
101 E. Victoria Street
Santa Barbara, CA
Phone: 805-963-9532 Fax: 805-966-9801
E-Mail: sao@penfieldsmith.com
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Intersection: West Branch At Camino Mercado
City/State: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: SAO
Project No.: 14141.01
Time period Analyzed: PM Peak Hour - Ex. + Project
Date: 4/16/2001
East/West Street: West Branch Street
North/South Street: Camino Mercado
Worksheet 2- Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
� Eastbound � Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
� L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
I I I I
Volume 124 397 0 1133 354 1 1289 0 11 10 22 25
$ Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration L TR L TR LT R
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate 24 397 133 355 289 11
� Heavy Veh 0 2 0 2 2 0
No. Lanes 2 2 2
Opposing-Lanes 2 2 1
Conflicting-lanes 2 2 2
Geometry group 5 5 5
Duration, T 1.00 hrs.
Worksheet 3- Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane 24
Left-Turn 24
Right-Turn 0
Prop. Left-Turns 1.0
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0
Prop. Heavy Vehic1e0.0
Geometry Group
397
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
133 355
133 0
0 1
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5
289 11
289 0
0 11
1.0 0.0
0.0 1.0
0.0 0.0
5
Southbound
L1 L2
LTR
1.00
47
0
1
2
2
4b
Southbound
Ll L2
47
0
25
0.0
0.5
0.0
�
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 -0.6 -0.3
Worksheet 4- Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow rate 24 397 133 355 289 11 47
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.02 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.04
hd, final value 6.68 6.51 6.61 6.44 7.22 6.39 7.47
x, final value 0.04 0.72 0.24 0.64 0.58 0.02 0.10
Move-up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Service Time 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1 5.2
Worksheet 5- Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound . Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rate 24 397 133 355 289 11 47
Service Time 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1 5.2
Utilization, x 0.04 0.72 0.24 0.64 0.58 0.02 0.10
Dep. headway, hd 6.68 6.51 6.61 6.44 7.22 6.39 7.47
Capacity 274 544 383 547 479 261 297
Delay 9.69 25.28 11.45 20.19 19.77 9.22 10.98
LOS A D B C C A B
Approach: •
Delay 24.39 17.81 19.38 10.98
LOS C C C B
Intersection Delay 20.13 Intersection LOS C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existin PM- E1 Camino Real @ Brisco Rd hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
tnter: E1 Camino Real @ Brisco Road City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
�nalyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Existing PM Peak
F/W St: El Camino Real N/S St: Brisco Road
Eastb
L T
No. Lanes
",GConf ig
'olume
Lane Width
R.TOR Vol
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY
I westbound I Northbound
R L T R L T R
I 1 1 1
L T R ,
24 177 59
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
78 122 448
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 I
1 1 1
L T R
50 160 76
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
� 1 1 1
L T R
255 229 48
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
�uration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
B Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A • Right A
Peds � Peds
dB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds� Peds
JB Right EB Right A
B Right WB Right A
_reen 23.0 15.0 10.0
'ellow 4.0 4.0 4.0
11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0
�cle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
•�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
ine Group Flow Rate
7rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
istbound
. 478 1248 0.06 0.383 11.7 B
' 714 1863 0.28 0.383 13.0 B 11.0 B
976 1583 0.07 0.617 4.6 A
�stbound
442 1153
' 714 1863
1108 1583
orthbound
295 1770
311 1863
264 1583
outhbound
4a3 1770
?66 1863
396 1583
Intersection Delay
0.20 0.383 12.6 B
0.19 0.383 12.4 B 6.8
0.45 0.700 4.2 A
0.19 0.167 21.8 C
0.57 0.167 25.6 C 24.2
0.32 0.167 22.7 C
0.64 0.250 23.2
0.55 0.250 20.9
0.13 0.250 17.6
= 14.9 (sec/veh)
C
C 21.7
B
Intersection
f1
C
C
LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Existing + Pro'= E1 Camino Real @ Brisco Rd hcsPage 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
nter: El Camino Real Q Brisco Road City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
�alyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
)ate: 1/22/Ol Period: Existing + Project
�/W St: El Camino Real N/S St: Brisco Road
Eastb
L T
io. Lanes
3Conf ig
�lume
�ane Width
I'OR Vol
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L T R
24 177 59
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
78 122 448 �
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
50 160 76
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
255 229 48
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
uration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
iase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
i3 Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A '. Right A
Peds Peds
B Left � A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
'3 Right EB Right A
� Right WB Right A
reen 23.0 15.0 10.0
�llow 4.0 4.0 4.0
.1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0
rcle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
�pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
ne Group Flow Rate
=p Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
stbound
478 1248 0.06 0.383 11.7 B
714 1863 0.28 0.383 13.0 B 11.0 B
976 1583 0.07 0.617 4.6 A
:stbound
442 1153 0.20 0.383 12.6 B
714 1863 0.19 0.383 12.4 B 6.8 A
1108 1583 0.45 0.700 4.2 A
�rthbound
295 1770 0.19 0.167 21.8 C
311 1863 0.57 0.167 25.6 C 24.2 C
264 1583 0.32 0.167 22.7 C
»sthbound
443 1770 0.64 0.250 23.2 C
466 1863 0.55 0.250 20.9 C 21.7 C
396 1583 0.13 0.250 17.6 B
Intersection Delay = 14.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative PM- Oak Park @ James Way.hcs Page 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Blvd. Q James Way
Analyst: LMV
Date: 1/22/Ol
E/W St: James Way
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
Eastb
L T
City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Proj #: 14,141.01
Period: Cumulative- PM Peak Hour
N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
R I Westbound Northbound
L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L T R
139 170 273
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
161 80 11
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 2
L TR
260 192
12.0 14.0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations_
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left A NB Left
Thru A Thru
Right A Right
Peds X Peds
WB Left A SB Left
Thru A Thru
Right A Right
Peds X Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
5
A
�
ra
0
171
0
Southbound
L T R
1 2
L TR
99 310
12.0 14.0
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
X X
A
A
X
A
0
38
0
Green 12.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 10.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 361 1805 0.39 0.200 21.5 C
T 317 1900 0.54 0.167 24.7 C 16.7 B
R 808 1615 0.34 0.500 9.3 A
Westbound
L 361 1805 0.45 0.200 22.0 C
T 317 1900 0.25 0.167 22.2 C 22.0 C
R 269 1615 0.04 0.167 21.0 C
Northbound
L 481 1805 0.54 0.267 20.1 C
TR 716 3579 0.51 0.200 22.0 C 21.2 C
Southbound �
L 301 1805 0.33 0.167 22.7 C
TR 631 3788 0.55 0.167 24.0 C 23.7 C
Intersection Delay = 20.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative + Project PM- Oak Park @ James Way.hcsPa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Blvd. Q James Way City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Cumulative-+ Project PM Peak
E/W St: James Way N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
Eastb
L T
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
R L T R L T R
1 1 1
L T R
139 170 273
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
218 80 14
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 2 0
L TR
260 192 192
12.0 14.0
0
j Southbound
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
100 310 38
12.0 14.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A �
Right A Right A A
Peds X Peds X X
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds X Peds X
NB Right EB Right A A
SB Right WB Right
Green 12.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 10.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 361 1805 0.39 0.200 21.5 C
T 317 1900 0.54 0.167 24.7 C 16.7 B
R 808 1615 0.34 0.500 9.3 A
Westbound
L 361 1805 0.60 0.200 24.7 C
T 317 1900 0.25 0.167 22.2 C 23.9 C
R 269 1615 0.05 0.167 21.1 C
Northbound
L 481 1805 0.54 0.267 20.1 C
TR 712 3562 0.54 0.200 22.4 C 21.4 C
Southbound
L 301 1805 0.33 0.167 22.7 C
TR 631 3788 0.55 0.167 24.0 C 23.7 C
Intersection Delay = 20.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative PM- Oak Park @ West Branch.hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Blvd. � West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Cumulative- PM Peak Hour
E/W St: West Branch St N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
0 0 0
� 1 1 1
L LT R
432 174 282
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 2 1
L T R
300 463 325
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
212 594 256
12.0 16.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left A A
Thru Thru A A
Right Right A A
Peds Peds X X
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds X
NB Right A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.0 10.0 4.0 20.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 62.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
Westbound
L 466
LT 480
R 417
Northbound
L 524
T 1397
R 1146
Southbound
L 291
TR 1260
1805 0.65 0.258 23.7 C
1860 0.63 0.258 23.2 C
1615 0.68 0.258 25.1 C
1805 0.57 0.290 20.1 C
3610 0.33 0.387 12.3 B
1615 0.28 0.710 0.8 A
1805 0.73 0.161 34.1 C
3907 0.67 0.323 19.0 B
24.0 C
11.0 B
22.1 C
Intersection Delay = 18.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative + Project PM- Oak Park @ West Branch...PaQe 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Blvd. Q West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/Ol Period: Cumulative-+ Project PM Peak
E/W St: West Branch St N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
Eastb
L T
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
_SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Westbound Northbound
R L T R I L T R
0 0 0
1 1 1
L LT R
432 174 292
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 2 1
L T R
300 473 325
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 2 0
L TR
225 618 276
12.0 16.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left A A
Thru Thru A A
Right Right A A
Peds Peds X X
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds X
NB Right A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.0 10.0 4.0 20.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 62.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
Westbound
L 466
LT 480
R 417
Northbound
L 524
T 1397
R 1146
Southbound
L 291
TR 1259
1805 0.65 0.258 23.7 C
1860 0.63 0.258 23.2 C
1615 0.70 0.258 26.1 C
1805 0.57 0.290 20.1 C
3610 0.34 0.387 12.3 B
1615 0.28 0.710 0.8 A
1805 0.77 0.161 38.1 D
3902 0.71 0.323 19.8 B
24.3 C
11.0 B
23.5 C
Intersection Delay = 19.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative PM- Oak Park @ E1 Camino Real.hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Q EL Camino Real City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/01 Period: Cumulative- PM Peak Hour
E/W St: El Camino Real N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L LT R
619 49 417
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
0 1 1
LT R
47 18 64
12.0 12.0
0
1 2 0
L TR
91 660 33
12.0 14.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
98 712 278
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: Al1 other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right A
SB Right A WB Right A A
Green 21.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 30.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 83.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 448 1770 0.76 0.253 36.4 D
LT 452 1787 0.73 0.253 34.3 C 34.3 C
R 534 1583 0.78 0.337 32.5 C
Westbound
LT 108
R 458
Northbound
L 149
TR 1355
1798 0.60
1583 0.14
1770 0.61
3748 0.51
0.060 47.5 D
0.289 22.0 C
0.084 44.1 D
0.361 21.1 C
34.8 C
23.8 C
Southbound
L 320 1770 0.31 0.181 30.0 C
T 763 1863 0.93 0.410 47.9 D 35.2 D
R 1125 1583 0.25 0.711 4.3 A
Intersection Delay = 31.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative + Project PM- Oak Park @ E1 Camino R...Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Oak Park Q EL Camino Real
Analyst: LMV
Date: 1/22/O1
E/W St: E1 Camino Real
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
Eastb
L T
City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Proj #: 14,141.01
Period: Cumulative-+ Project PM Peak
N/S St: Oak Park Boulevard
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
R I Westbound NortYibound
L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L LT R
627 49 417
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
0 1 1
LT R
47 18 64
12.0 12.0
0
1 2 0
L TR
91 663 33
12.0 14.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
98 719 295
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right A
SB Right A WB Right A A
Green 21.0� 5.0 7.0 4.0 30.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 83.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 448 1770 0.77 0.253 37.2 D
LT 452 1787 0.73 0.253 34.7 C 34.6 C
R 534 1583 0.78 0.337 32.5 C
Westbound
LT 108
R 458
Northbound
L 149
TR 1355
1798
1583
1770
3748
0.60 0.060 47.5 D
0.14 0.289 22.0 C
0.61 0.084 44.1 D
0.51 0.361 21.1 C
34.8 C
23.8 C
Southbound �
L 320 1770 0.31 0.181 30.0 C
T 763 1863 0.94 0.410 51.3 D 36.9 D
R 1125 1583 0.26 0.711 4.4 A
Intersection Delay = 32.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative PM- Camino Mercado @ West Branch.hcsPa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado Q West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Cumulative PM Peak Hour
E/W St: West Branch N/S St: Camino Mercado/ NB 101 Ramps
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
Eastb
L T
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
R I Westbound Northbound
L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L T . R
42 506 0
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 0
L TR
133 465 89
12.0 16.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
356 10 11
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 0
, L TR
114 50 55
12.0 14.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A A SB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 3.0 1.0 21.0 17.0 7.0
Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 65.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 82 1770 0.51 0.046 35.8 D
T 602 1863 0.84 0.323 31.8 C 32.1 C
R 511 1583 0.00 0.323 14.9 B
Westbound
L 218 1770 0.61 0.123 32.0 C
TR 697 2060 0.79 0.338 26.1 C 27.3 C
Northbound
L 463
T 487
R 414
Southbound
L 191
TR 197
1770 0.77 0.262 30.3 C
1863 0.02 0.262 17.8 B
1583 0.03 0.262 17.9 B
1770 0.60 0.108 32.8 C
1831 0.53 0.108 30.3 C
29.6 C
31.6 C
Intersection Delay = 29.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative + Pro'ect PM- Camino Mercado @ West Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado @ West Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Cumulative + Project PM Peak
E/W St: West Branch N/S St: Camino Mercado/ NB 101 Ramps
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R I L T R
1 1 1
L T R
42 508 0
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
1 1 0
L TR
133 465 89
12.0 16.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
362 10 11
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A A SB Left
Thru A A Thru
Right A A Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 3.0 1.0 21.0 17.0
Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0
Al1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 65.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary_
Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Southbound
L T R
1 1 0
L TR
114 50 55
12.0 14.0
0
6 7 8
A
A
A
7.0
4.0
0.0
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 82 1770 0.51 0.046 35.8 D
T 602 1863 0.84 0.323 32.2 C 32.5 C
R 511 1583 0.00 0.323 14.9 B
Westbound
L 218 1770 0.61 0.123 32.0 C
TR 697 2060 0.79 0.338 26.1 C 27.3 C
Northbound
L 463
T 487
R 414
Southbound
L 191
TR 197
1770 0.78 0.262 31.3 C
1863 0.02 0.262 17.8 B
1583 0.03 0.262 17.9 B
1770 0.60 0.108 32.8 C
1831 0.53 0.108 30.3 C
30.5 C
31.6 C
Intersection Delay = 30.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative PM- E1 Camino Real @ Briseo Rd hcs Paqe 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: E1 Camino Real Q Brisco Road City/St: Arroyo Grande,
Analyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/Ol Period: Cumulative- PM
E/W St: El Camino Real N/S St: Brisco Road
No. Lanes
GGConfig
Jolume
Lane Width
ZTOR Vol
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
L T R L T R �L T R
24 177 59 78 122 525 50 198 76
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
� 0 0
CA
Peak
Sou
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
361 261 48
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g
�B Left A NB Left p,
Thru A Thru A
Right A . Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
*1B Right EB Right A
3B Right WB Right A
ureen 23.0 15.0 10.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0
ill Red 0.0 0.0 0.0
.:ycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
:ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
,ane Group Flow Rate
srp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
;astbound
� 485 1264 0.05 0.383 11.7 B
r 714 1863 0.25 0.383 12.8 B
976 1583 0.06 0.617 4.6 A
�estbound
� 460 1201
714 1863
1108 1583
Vorthbound
295 1770
311 1863
2 264 1583
=outhbound
443 1770
. 466 1863 '
? 396 1583
Intersection Delay
0.17 0.383
0.17 0.383
0.47 0.700
0.17 0.167
0.64 0.167
0.29 0.167
0.81
0.56
0.12
= 17.3
12.4 B
12.3 B
4.4 A
21.7 C
27.7 C
22.5 C
10.8 B
6.6 A
25.5 C
0.250 33.5 C
0.250 21.2 C 27.5
0.250 17.5 B
(sec/veh) Intersection
C
LOS = B
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cumulative + Project PM- El Camino Real @ Brisc Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Cnter: E1 Camino Real @ Brisco Road City/St: Arroyo Grande, CA
�n.alyst: LMV Proj #: 14,141.01
Date: 1/22/O1 Period: Cumulative + Project
�/W St: E1 Camino Real . N/S St: Brisco Road
�To . Lanes
,GConf ig
Jolume
Lane Width
:TOR Vol
s
L T
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIIKARY
Westbound Northbound
R I L T R I L T R
1 1 1 1 1 1
L T R L T R
24 177 59 78 122 525
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
0 p
1 1 1
L T R
50 198 76
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Southbound
L T R
1 1 1
L T R
361 261 48
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
�hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
�B Left A NB Left 1�
Thru A Thru A
Right A � Right A
Peds Peds
�1B Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A �
Right A Right A
Peds " Peds
B Right EB Right A
B Right WB Right A
Jreen 23.0 15.0 10.0
'ellow 4.0 4.0 4.0
11 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0
:ycle Length: 60.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
.ane Group Flow Rate
=rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
astbound
� 485 1264 0.05 0.383 11.7 B
' 714 1863 0.25 0.383 12.8 B 10.8 B
976 1583 0.06 0.617 4.6 A
iestbound
� 460 1201 0.17 0.383 12.4 B
714 1863 0.17 0.383 12.3 B 6.6 A
� 1108 1583 0.47 0.700 4.4 A
'orthbound
295 1770 0.17 0.167 21.7 C
311 1863 0.64 0.167 27.7 C 25.5 C�
264 1583 0.29 0.167 22.5 C
�uthbound
443 1770 0.81 0.250 33.5 C
466 1863 0.56 0.250 21.2 C 27.5 C
396 1583 0.12 0.250 17.5 B
Intersection Delay = 17.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
9.c.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing� will be held by the City Council of
the City of Arroyo Grande on the following item:
Applicant: City of Arroyo Grande
Location: Citywide
Proposal: An Urban Water Management Plan Update is being prepared by
the Public Works Department for the Califomia Department of
Water Resources. The update includes the City's Water
Facilities, Projected Water Supply, Projected Water Use, Water
Conservation Program, Water Shortage Contingency Analysis
and Recycled Water Opportunities.
Environmental
Determination:
Representative:
Section 15262 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act provides
that planning studies such as the Urban Water Management Plan
Update are exempt from the requirements to prepare
Environmental Impact Reports or Negative Declaration.
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Any person affected or concerned by this proposal may submit written comments to the �
Administrative Services Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard
in support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing. Any person interested in
the proposal may contact the Public Works Department, 208 East Branch Street, Arroyo
Grande, California, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), Monday through
Friday.
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY
THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE MEETING DESCRIBED IN
THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing:
Place of Hearing:
Tuesday, May 22, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, California
�"���
Kelly et ore, Director of Administrative Services/
Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1T, Friday, May 11, 2000
�� INCOFPORATED �
tJ �
� .x,t. �a. ,a„ ,�
c4 ��fORN� P
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL
DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
APPROVE THE URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Urban Water
Management Plan Update.
FUNDING:
Urban water suppliers need to adopt and submit to the Department of Water Resources
an Urban Water Management Plan to be eligible to receive drought assistance from the
State. Although a request to receive drought assistance from the State has never been
filed by the City, conditions may require use of these funds in the future.
DISCUSSION:
The Urban Water Management Planning Act states that Urban Water Management
Plans are to be submitted from urban water suppliers delivering more than 3,000 acre
feet of water or having more than 3,000 connections.
The draft plan was presented to the Council on December 12, 2000. After the public
hearing and discussion, the Council requested that staff modify the plan to include an
updated population and projected growth rate.
Population projections and growth rate information was provided by the City's General
Plan consultant. It was recommended that the official 2000 census population of 15,851
and an annual growth rate of 1 percent be used for engineering purposes in preparing
the City's Urban Water Management Plan update. Current development including
projects under construction is factored into the overall growth rate.
The City's plan contains information on water supply, water use, and existing
conservation programs. The water supply section of the plan focuses on ground water,
surface water, recycled water, supplemental water, and supply projections to the year
2020 including a 3-year worst case water supply estimate. The water use section
focuses on past, current, and projected water use to the year 2020. The water
conservation section focuses on the City's adherence to the 16 Best Management
Practices (BMP's) established by the Department of Water Resources. The draft plan
includes all information necessary to meet the requirements of the California Urban
Water Management Planning Act.
The City is required to update this plan every fve years. The existing plan was last
updated in 1990. The following key changes were made from the previous plan:
• document format including the addition of various tables
• addition of best management plan, including water conservation
• revision to the projected water demand based on projected build out
• revision to the projected water supply
The Department of Water Resources will review each plan in the order that they are
received from each urban water supplier.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendation and adopt the resolution;
- Do not approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments: Urban Water Management Plan
Council Agenda Memorandum dated December 12, 2000
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING AND DIRECTING THE FILING AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 797 (Water Code Section
10610 et. seq.), known as the Urban Water Management Planning Act, which mandates
that every urban supplier of water providing water for municipal purposes to more than
3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre feet. of water annually, prepare an
Urban Water Management Plan (sometimes herein "Plan"), the primary objective of which
is to plan for the conservation and efficient use of water; and
WHEREAS, AB 797 required that an initial Plan be adopted by December 31, 1985, after
public review and hearing, and filed with the California Department of Water Resources
within thirty days of adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande did prepare and file said Plan with the California
Department of Water Resources after adoption in December,1985 and updated the Plan in
1990; and
WHEREAS, AB 797 requires that said Plan be periodically reviewed at least once every
five years, and that the urban water supplier shall make any amendments or changes to its
plan which are indicated as necessary by the review; and
WHEREAS, the City is an urban supplier of water providing water to more than 5,600
customers, and has therefore prepared and advertised for public review a Urban Water
Management Plan Update, in compliance with the requirements of AB 797, and a properly
noticed public hearing regarding said Plan Update was held by the City Council on May 22,
2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
as follows:
1. The Urban Water Management Plan Update is hereby adopted and ordered filed
with the Director of Administrative Services;
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file the Plan Update with the
California Department of Water Resources within 30 days after the date set forth
below, in accordance with AB 797;
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to implement the programs as
detailed in the adopted Urban Water Management Plan Update, including
development of recommendations to the City Council regarding necessary
procedures, rules, and regulations to carry out effective and equitable water
conservation programs.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22" day of May, 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
Page 3
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
e�E� of
4� 'L'�O 0
�
zanc�E
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
MAY, 2001
2001 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I - Plan Adoption, Public Participation, and Planning Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
P1anAdoption ..........................................................1
Public Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Coordination Within the City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Interagency Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SECTION II - The City of Arroyo Grande - History and Water Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Climate................................................................2
Water Treatment and Distribution Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SECTION III - Past, Current, and Projected Water Supply 1980 - 2020 and Three-Year
Worst Case Supply Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
GroundWater ...........................................................3
Local Surface Water from Lopez Reservoir (Arroyo Grande Creek Watershed) ....... 4
RecycledWater .........................................................5
Three-Year Worst Case Water Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Supplemental Water Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
SECTION N - Past, Current, and Projected Water Use 1980 - 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ResidentialSector .......................................................8
Commercial Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
IndustrialSector .........................................................9
InstitutionaUGovernment Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Agricultural Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Supply and Demand Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
SECTION V - Water Conservation Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
BMP 1- Interior and Exterior Water Audits for Single Family and Multi Family
Customers......................................................12
BMP 2 - Plumbing Retrofit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
BMP 3- Distribution System Water Audits, Leak Detection, and Repair ........... 12
BMP 4 - Metering with Commodity Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
BMP 5 - Large Landscape Water Audits and Incentives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 6 - Landscape Water Conservation Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 7 - Public Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 8 - School Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 9 - Commercial and Industrial Water Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 10 - New Commercial and Industrial Water Use Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
BMP 11 - Conservation Pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
BMP 12 - Landscape Water Conservation for New and Existing Single Family Homes 14
BNIP 13 - Water Waste Prohibition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
BMP 14 - Water Conservation Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
BMP 15 - Financial Incentives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
BMP 16 - Ultra Low Flow Toilet Replacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
SECTION VI - Water Shortage Contingency Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
SECTION VII - Recycled Water Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
System Summary and Previous Reclamation Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
SSLOCSD Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Past Water Supply, 1980 - 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 2: Projected Water Supply, 2005 - 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 3: Three-Year Worst Case Water Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 4: Past Water Use, 1980 - 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 5: Projected Water Usage, 2005 - 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Adopting Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix B: List of Contact People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Appendix C: Excerpts from the Municipal Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
_
2001 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Section I
Plan Adoption, Public Participation, and Planning Coordination
Plan Adoption
The City of Arroyo Grande prepared this update of its Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
during the Spring of 2001. The updated plan will be adopted by the City Council in May, 2001
(see Appendix A) and will be submitted to the California Department of Water Resources
(DWR) within 30 days of Council approval. This plan includes all information necessary to
meet the requirements of the California Water Code, Division 6, Part 2.6 (Urban Water
Management Planning). Appendix B contains a list of people who were contacted in the
development of the plan.
Public Participation
The City has involved the public in the Conservation planning process since the development of
its first UWMP in 1985. As in past efforts, a public hearing was held at the regular City Council
meeting for the current UWMP. Legal public notices were published in the local press prior to
the hearing, and copies of the draft plan were made available at the City Hall.
Coordination Within the City
Coordination within the City of Arroyo Grande included valuable input from the Community
Development, Building and Public Works Deparhnents. The Community Development
Department assisted with long-range land use predictions and future service needs. The Public
Works department provided past and current water use data, billing structures, and lea.k audit
information.
Interagency Coordination
The City of Arroyo Grande receives a substantial amount of its water resources from the Lopez
Reservoir Project as described in Section II. A number of other agencies in south San Luis
Obispo County also receive water from the project. These agencies include the City of Pismo
Beach, the City of Grover Beach, Avila Beach, Port San Luis, and the Oceano Community
Services District. A technical advisory committee composed of a representative of each agency
advises the County Flood Control District in matters pertaining to the Lopez Project. During
preparation of the UWMP, the 3-year worst-case supply scenario was based in part on a draft
drought contingency analysis prepared by this committee. In addition, Grover Beach provided a
copy of its UWMP to City Staff for consideration of conservation planning efforts by a nearby
community. The Lopez Unified School District was also contacted regarding current education
curriculum relating to conservation.
-1-
Section II
The City of Arroyo Grande - History and Water Facilities
The City of Arroyo Grande is located in the Southern portion of San Luis Obispo County along
the banks of the Arroyo Grande Creek. The City, a general law entity, currently incorporates
5.45 square miles of land area with primarily residential and agricultural land uses. The City's
distinctive character derives from its traditional ties to agriculture, physical diversity, unique
village, small town atmosphere, and rural setting. The City currently serves a population of
15,851 residents through 5,713 metered connections. All connections to the City's water system
aze metered, and there are no agricultural or industrial connections. In 2000, the City produced a
total of 3,384 acre-feet of water. Water supply sources for the City are described below in
Section III - Past, Current, and Project Water Supply.
Climate
The City of Arroyo Grande has a Mediterranean coastal climate with mild, dry summers and cool
winters. The average annual precipitation is 16 inches.
Water Treatment and Distribution Facilities
The City delivers potable water supplies through its pressurized distribution system. The
distribution system is composed of 65 miles of distribution mains, five storage reservoirs, and
four pumping stations. The City's well system consists of seven wells, chlorination facilities,
and a blending facility. Well No. 9 in the City system extracts water from the Pismo Formation,
a different aquifer from the other six wells. Raw water from Well No. 9 receives iron/manganese
filtration treatrnent prior to entering into the system. Lopez Proj ect water receives treatment at a
County-owned facility and enters the City's system at two metering stations. All City potable
water is treated to meet drinking water standards, regardless of the source of supply. Wastewater
treatment is conducted by the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) at
their Regional Treahnent Facility.
-2-
_ _ __ _ __._
Section III
Past, Current, and Projected Water Supply
1980-2020
and Three-Year Worst Case Supply Projections
The City of Arroyo Grande has a variety of water sources including ground water, local surface
water, and ponded storm water. The City has potential additional supplies from water transfer
agreements and sub-surface "banking" of surface water supplies.
Ground Water
Prior to 1966, the City's water supply was derived solely from groundwater pumping from the
Arroyo Grande Plain, Tri-Cities Mesa (AGP-TCM) groundwater sub-basin of the Santa Maria
Ground Water Basin. In 1966, the City entered into an agreement with the County of San Luis
Obispo Flood Control District to receive a yearly allocation of 2,290 acre-feet of additional water
from the Lopez Reservoir Project as described below. Since then, groundwater has been used as
a secondary source of supply, with an average yearly groundwater extraction of 437 AFY for the
time period of 1997 through 2000.
Four urban agencies currently extract water from the AGP-TCM basin including the City of
Arroyo Grande, the City of Grover Beach, the City of Pismo Beach, and the Oceano Community
Services District. Additional basin uses include agriculture and subsurface flow to the Pacific
Ocean. The above-referenced urban entities entered into an informal understanding in 1983
regarding safe well extractions from the basin. This understanding is often referred to as the
"Gentleman's Agreement" Each entity was allocated a yearly basin extraction based on a 1979
Groundwater Study performed by the Department of Water Resources and groundwater use
preceding the Lopez Project. The City's preliminary entitlement was established at 1,200 AFY.
The Department of Water Resources has prepared an updated groundwater study which possibly
could be used to refine safe entitlements.
Five of the City's wells (Well No.'s 1, 3, 4, 5, & 8) pump water from the Paso Robles Formation
of the AGP-TCM at a casing depth of 200 to 251 feet. Nitrate levels in the raw water from Well
No. 5 exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level. As a result, the raw water is blended with Lopez
Project water or other well water to dilute the nitrates. City Well No. 7(1,000 gpm) extracts
water from a casing depth of 580 feet and does not have high nitrate levels. In addition to the
water supply obtained from the Paso Robles Formation of the AGP-TCM, Well No. 9 within the
City system is capable of extracting approximately 100 AFY from a separate basin source - the
Pismo Formation. The casing depth for this well is 389 feet, and the well water receives
iron/manganese treatment prior to discharge into the system.
Water used for agriculture within the City limits is produced from privately-owned wells and
from riparian diversions. The City does not have any agricultural connections to the public water
system. The owners of these private agricultural water wells produce 80 to 90 percent of the
water extracted from the AGP-TCM sub-basin. The major diversions of surface water occur
during irrigation of lands adjoining Arroyo Grande Creek. The Lopez Project is obligated to
discharge up to 4,200 acre-feet of untreated surface water into Arroyo Grande Creek during non-
-3-
spill periods. The purpose of this release is to maintain groundwater levels in the wells
downstream of the dam and to satisfy downstream vested water rights. Agricultural groundwater
pumping rates are expected to remain relatively constant in the future.
The Lopez Project is currently in the process of amending the Water Rights Application with the
State Water Resources Control Board. In conjunction with this application amendment, a
Habitat Conservation Plan is currently in process to address concerns of how the Project manages
the dam releases. This plan is expected to be completed by the end of 2001.
Local Surface Water from Lopez Reservoir (Arroyo Grande Creek Watershed)
In 2000, the City entered into a new agreement with the County of San Luis Obispo Flood
Control District to receive a yearly allocation of 2,290 acre-feet of water from the Lopez
Reservoir Project. The City's allocation accounts for approximately 51% of the available
purchased water from Lopez. In addition to its yearly allocation, the City is also eligible for
surplus water from the project. Since that date, an average surplus of 580 acre-feet per year
(AFY) has been purchased. The minimum surplus available since 1986 occurred in 1991-92,
near the end of a period of drought, during which the available surplus was 247 acre-feet.
The Lopez Reservoir Project receives runoff from the Arroyo Grande Creek Watershed. The
capacity of the reservoir is 51,700 acre-feet, and 4,200 acre-feet of untreated surface water is
available for discharge into Arroyo Grande Creek as described previously. In a year of average
precipitation, the "normal" inflow into the reservoir is 10,730 acre-feet, evaporation is 2,000
acre-feet, and therefore safe yield is 8,730 AFY. During the drought years of 1986 through 1990,
the average yearly inflow was only 4,500 AFY. Using this information, the net yearly reduction
in reservoir storage can be calculated as follows:
SLrface Storm RLnoff into Reservoir:
"Normal" Inflow into Lopez Reservoir = 10,730 AFY
"Drought" Inflow into Lopez Reservoir (1986-90) = 4,500 AFY
Demands on L.onez Reservoir Water:
Evaporation = 2,000 AFY
Available downstream release = 4,200 AFY
Urban Users = 4,530 (the City of AG receives 50.5% or 2,290 AFY)
Total Yearly Demand = 10,730 AFY
► � � - �� - � � • �� � 11 1 1 � 1 :
The minimum pool for the reservoir is 4,000 acre-feet. If this minimum stage of the reservoir is
reached and a drought continues, the City of Arroyo Grande will not receive its fu112,290 AFY
entitlement, but will continue to receive 50.5% of the safe urban yield. The Lopez Reservoir is
currently at 72% of capacity, which equates to 37,400 acre-feet of storage. If an extended
drought begins this year, and it is assumed that all water recipients continue to use their full
entitlements, the reservoir will reach minimum pool after approximately 5 years of drought. The
County Flood Control District (Zone 3) is currently working on an Urban Management Plan to
-4-
implement drought-related demand reduction measures well in advance of the reservoir reaching
minimum pool. This plan should be available by the end of 2000.
Recycled Water
In addition to the domestic supply sources described above, the City operates the Soto Sports
Complex Storm Water Reclamation Project. The project includes a forty-acre joint use facility
which serves as a collection point for drainage from a third of the City's area. Storm water is
collected for the subsequent irrigation of a park and seven athletic fields. The estimated
irrigation capacity of the system is 100 AFY. The system includes drainage water sumps, an
irrigation well, one booster pump stations, and an irrigation system.
Wastewater from the City of Arroyo Grande is treated by the South San Luis Obispo County
Sanitation District Treatment Plant. Wastewater from several urban entities is treated by the
plant to a secondary-disinfected level and discharged to the Pacific Ocean. Several studies have
been conducted to examine the feasibility of reclamation, but recycled water has not been
deemed cost effective to date. This topic is covered in additional detail in Section VII, Recycled
Water Opportunities.
The following tables summarize the above-referenced water sources, examine past supply
amounts, and project water supply through to the year 2020:
Table 1: Past Water Supp1y,1980-2000
Past Water Supply by Year (acre-feet)
Sources of Supply
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Ground Water - AGP-TCM Sub-basin 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Ground Water - Pismo Formation (Well No. 9) 100 100
Lopez Reservoir Project Water Entitlement 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
Surplus Lopez Project Water 600 700 910 500
Soto Sports Complex Reclamation Project 100 100 100
Totals 3,490 4,090 4,390 4,600 4,190
-5-
Table 2: Projected Water Supply, 2005-2020
Future Projected Water Supply by
Sources of Supply Year (acre-feet)
2005 2010 2015 2020
Ground Water - AGP-TCM Sub-basin 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Ground Water - Pismo Formation (Well No. 9) 100 100 100 100
I;opez Reservoir Project Water Entitlement 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290
Surplus Lopez Project Water' 250 250 250 250
Soto Sports Complex Reclamation Project 100 100 �00 100
Totals 3,940 3,940 3,940 3,940
Notes: 1. Surplus water is projected conservatively based on the minimum available surplus
obtained from 1984 through 1996. The minimum surplus of 250 acre-feet was
obtained in 1991-92 at the end of a period of drought.
Three Year Worst Case Water Supply
In seasons of extended drought, the City of Axroyo Grande could receive a reduced surface water
allocation from the Lopez Project. However, current reservoir levels will allow the normal
allocation to be obtained over the next three years. For purposes of a worst case supply, it is
assumed that no surplus water will be available.
Table 3: Three-Year Worst Case Water Supply
Three-Year Worst-Case Supply
Sources of Supply Projections (acre-feet)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Ground Water - AGP-TCM Sub-basin 1,200 1,200 1,200
Ground Water - Pismo Formation (Well No. 9) 100 100 100
Lopez Reservoir Project Water Entitlement 2,290 2,290 2,290
Surplus Lopez Project Water 0 0 0
Soto Sports Complex Reclamation Project 50 50 50
Totals 3,640 3,640 3,640
�
Supplemental Water Supplies
In order to offset potential future water shortages due to drought or disaster, the City is
considering the following supplemental water supplies:
Water Transfers
Several entities in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties are contractors to the
Coastal Branch of the State Water Project. State water is delivered through the existing
Lopez Project pipeline which also serves the City of Arroyo Grande. State Water
Contractors may sell a portion of their water allocation for emergency or stand-by water.
In 1990, the people of Arroyo Grande passed Measure A which stipulates that final
decisions regarding State Water must be put to a general vote.
"Banking" of Surplus Lopez Water in the AGP-TCM Basin
In years with adequate precipitation, a significant amount of surplus Lopez water, even as
much as 1,000 acre-feet, is available for purchase by the City of Arroyo Grande. The
City has retrofitted one well within the City system to test the possibility of "banking"
surplus Lopez water in the AGP-TCM Basin for future shortfalls. If this program is
successful, it offers an opportunity to use the groundwater basin conjunctively with the
Lopez reservoir to increase the overall yield of the basin.
-7-
Section IV
Past, Current, and Projected Water Use
1980-2020
Residential Sector
In the City of Arroyo Grande, residential use accounts for nearly 80% of total water
consuxnption. In 1999, the average use for each single family residence was 400 gallons per day.
The average residential (single and multiple family) per capita use, excluding other water use
categories, has remained fairly constant over the last four years within a range of 137 to 167
gallons per capita per day (gpcd). Each multi-family water account typically represents more
than one dwelling unit. As a result, use per connection estimates in the multi-family category
provide limited information.
A discretionary water neutralization program has been employed by the City since 1991. The
Community Development Department conditions residential and commercial developers to
retrofit existing properties.to offset proposed water use. In accordance with the City's General
Plan Update, the population of the City is expected to increase from 15,851 to 20,000 over the
next twenty years - a growth rate of approximately 1.0%. When compared to the existing
residential areas, future development in the City is expected to consist of larger lots/homes with
proportionately more landscaping. As a result, even though conservation efforts aze expected to
reduce per capita usage over the next 20 years, these efforts will be partially offset by the larger
lots.
Commercial Sector
The City of Arroyo Grande has a variety of existing commercial land uses including the
following general areas:
The Arroyo Grande Village - The Village area has a small-town, rustic nature and
includes such commercial installations as antique and novelty shops, restaurants,
coffee houses, professional offices, and other small retail operations.
2. Highway 101 Corridor/Grand Avenue - This area includes larger retail
installations for general shopping and commercial needs.
3. Halcyon Road - Predominantly medical-related businesses due to the proximity to
Arroyo Grande Hospital.
4. Traffic Way - Mostly auto and auto-related commercial uses.
5. El Camino Real - Auto repair, miscellaneous fabrication and small production
facilities, and a hardware store.
:
6. Five Cities Center - This area includes large retail operations for general
shopping.
Industrial Sector
The City does not have any vacant land zoned for industrial use. There are currently no
industrial water connections in the City system.
InstitutionaVGovernment Sector
The City has a slowly growing institutionaUgovernmental sector, primarily local government, an
elementary school, and a performing arts center are expected to be constructed in the upcoming
years. Water use is estimated to increase at the rate of approximately 0.9% per year.
Agricultural Sector
All agricultural water within the City limits is provided by private wells. The City places a high
value on maintaining agricultural land uses within the City and as a result, it is expected that
agricultural ground water pumping will remain fairly constant over the next 20 years.
',�,'1'
_ _.__-
Table 4: Past Water Use,1980-2000
Past Water Use by Year (acre-feet)
Customer Sector
1980 1985' 1990 1995 2000
Residential - Single Family -- -- 2,066 1,887 2,375
Residential - Multi-Family -- -- 275 155 197
CommerciaUInstitutional -- -- 275 310 343
Governmental, System Maintenance -- -- 138 103.5 116
Landscape Irrigation -- -- N/A 129.2 200
Agricultural -- -- 0 0 0
Industrial -- -- 0 0 0
Unaccounted (losses) -- -- 168 43 153
Totals 1,942 2,683 2,922 2,628 3,384
Notes: 1. Prior to 1988, water use was not reported by customer sector.
2. Per-capita usage was lower in 1995 due to above average rainfall.
3. Per-capita usage was high in 2000 due to below average rainfall.
Table 5: Projected Water Usage, 2005-2020
Projected Water Use by Year (acre-feet)
Customer Sector
2005 2010 2015 2020
Residential - Single Family 2,350 2,470 2,590 2,720
Residential - Multi-Family 160 170 180 190
CommerciaUInstitutional 330 340 360 380
Governmental, System Maintenance 100 100 110 115
Landscape Irrigation 160 170 180 190
Agricultural 0 0 0 0
Industrial 0 0 0 0
Unaccounted for Losses (Assume 5%) 160 170 180 185
Totals 3,260 3,420 3,600 3,780
Note: �1'he pro�ected water use figures are based upon a 1% growth rate and a per-capita use of
175 gpd/person.
-10-
Supply and Demand Comparison
Tables 1 through 5 compare past, current, and project water supply and demand. These tables
indicate that the City should have adequate water supplies to meet its customers' needs through
2020. In summary, this estimate is based on the following assumptions:
Lopez Reservoir water will continue to be available at current levels. As described
previously, the reservoir has storage adequate to survive a 5-year-long drought condition
before minimum pool is reached, and demand reduction measure would be implemented
well before that point.
Ground water from the AGP-TCM Sub-basin will continue to be available in accordance
with the "Gentleman's Agreement." Ground water from the Pismo Formation will also
continue to be available at the current rate.
The City will continue to operate and maintain the Soto Sports Complex Storm Water
Reclamation Project.
-11-
Section V
Water Conservation Programs
BMP 1- Interior and Exterior Water Audits for Single Family and Multi-Family
Customers
Over the past 5 yeazs, the City has been engaged in a number of retrofit efforts. Retrofitting is
generally performed by developers in order to offset water use anticipated with new commercial
or residential construction. This "water neutralization" process is applied as a mitigation
measure during the planning process. In June 1997, the City was able to further its efforts
toward implementation of BMP 1 as a result of water neutralization for a 44-acre commercial
development. The mitigation measure for the project indicated that the developer must
implement a retrofit program to offset 48 AFY of water use. As part of this effort, the City
identified the top 20% of water users in the residential and commercial sectors. This
identification process was facilitated by a computer database containing categorized metered use
data. In the future, the City will continue to make retrofitting efforts through water neutralization
a priority as new development continues. The capabilities of the water use data base will allow
the City to update the list of top water users in conjunction with the retrofit process. The City
will continue to implement this BMP as a mitigation measure for new development.
BMP 2 - Plumbing Retrofit
The City has adopted the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) in connection with new construction.
As a result, the water-conserving provisions of the UPC, including low flow toilets, are
incorporated into new construction in the City. The City does not consider the retrofit portion of
this BMP to be separate from BMP 1.
BMP 3- Distribution System Water Audits, Leak Detection, and Repair
The Public Works Department carefully accounts for water production and use. The City
maintains an on-going program of ineter calibration and replacement that tracts the age and
calibration frequency of each city meter. Water for flushing operations and other maintenance
procedures is also measured and logged. These efforts have produced a system that is
consistently under 5% of total production in un-accounted-for water (UAV�. The City has also
implemented an on-going capital improvement program for the replacement of older water mains
and services. In the future, the City will continue to audit water use and production carefully in
order to maintain the current low levels of UAW.
BMP 4- Metering with Commodity Rates
All connections within the City are metered, and billing is proportional to volume of use. The
City will continue to implement this BMP in the future.
-12-
BMP 5- Large Landscape Water Audits and Incentives
Large landscape users within the City of Arroyo Grande include four parks, a sports complex,
and the Arroyo Grande District Cemetery. Following the 1985 UWMP, the City identified the
Soto Sports Complex as a significant irrigation water user and proceeded with a storm water
reclamation project for irrigation of the site as described in previous sections. Currently, the
cemetery is the largest irrigation user with an average consumption of approximately 20 acre-feet
per year for 1995 and 1996. As the City engages in additional retrofit programs in conjunction
with development, the cemetery and other large landscape sites will be identified as possible
sources of water neutralization.
BMP 6- Landscape Water Conservation Requirements
The City has not yet adopted a conservation landscape ordinance. However, new development
projects are often conditioned to provide drought resistant landscaping, install drip irrigation
systems, and limit use of landscaping using high water demand.
BMP 7 - Public Information
The City has a forum to promote water conservation in its newsletter entitled "The Stage Coach
Express." The newsletter provides opportunity to inform the public on conservation efforts,
retrofit opportunities, and new City conservation policies. Other opportunities for public
involvement will occur as an integral part of the Urban Management Plan preparation process.
The City will continue to implement this BMP to keep the public aware of the importance of
conservation.
BMP 8 - School Education
During the preparation of this UWMP, the City contacted the curriculum department of the Lucia
Mar School District. According the curriculum coordinator, water conservation education has
been incorporated into the various science programs. Implementation of this BMP is expected to
continue at its current level.
BMP 9- Commercial and Industrial Water Conservation
As described in BMP 1, the top 20% of commercial water users in Arroyo Grande have been
identified in conjunction with water neutralization for new development. The City will continue
to identify top commercial users to facilitate the meeting of retrofit requirements.
BMP 10 - New Commercial and Industrial Water Use Review
The last large vacant commercial property within the City has been developed. When preparing
the conditions of approval for this site, the City required water neutralization, conservation
landscaping, and other items consistent with this BMP. There are no industrial connections
within the City, and future commercial development will be primarily in-fill on small lots. New
commercial installations will be required to comply with UPC requirements for low flow
fixtures.
-13-
_ _ __ . _ _
-- --- --
BMP 11 - Conservation Pricing
As described in BMP 4, the City's water billing is by volume of use. A uniform rate (currently
90¢ per 100 cubic feet) is added to a moderate fixed charge and the Lopez charge to form the
total water charge. The sewer collection bill is also billed at a rate depending on the account type
of rate, currently ranging from 22¢ to 37¢ per hundred cubic feet.
BMP 12 - Landscape Water Conservation for New and Existing Single Family Homes
The City has generally not implemented this BMP for single family homes.
BMP 13 - Water Waste Prohibition
Currently Section 6-7.13 of the City's Municipal Code makes it unlawful for any person to
willfully or negligently waste water.
BMP 14 - Water Conservation Coordinator
Prior to 1991, the City employed a part time conservation coordinator. Due to budgetary
constraints, this position was eliminated and conservation duties have been absorbed by the
Public Works Department.
BMP 15- Financial Incentives
Financial incentives for conservation efforts are currently provided by individual developers
seeking to fulfill their respective neutralization requirement. These efforts are addressed in the
other BMP's.
BMP 16 - Ultra Low Flow Toilet Replacement
The City considers this BMP as an integral component of BMP 1.
-14-
Section VI
Water Shortage Contingency Analysis
As described in previous sections, Zone 3 of the County Flood Control District is also working
on an Urban Management plan that would address rationing of the City's surface water source.
In the event that the surface water source is unavailable for a significant period of time due to an
emergency or unprecedented drought, the City will be able to provide an average flow of 340
gallons per capita day from City well water. This figure exceeds the typical health standard of 50
gallons per capita day.
There currently exists Sections in the City Municipal Code which addresses water use
restrictions which may be implemented during critical water supply conditions. These Sections
of the Municipal Code are shown in Appendix C of this 2000 Urban Management Plan.
-15-
Section VII
Recycled Water Opportunities
As described in previous sections, the City of Arroyo Grande currently recycles storm water for
irrigation use at the Soto Sports Complex. This recycled water source is expected to continue as
described in Water Supply above. The following sections focus on the feasibility and
applicability of wastewater reclamation to Arroyo Grande.
System Summary and Previous Reclamation Studies
The South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) provides collection,
treatment, and disposal of wastewater for the communities of Arroyo Grande, Oceano, and
Grover Beach. The total population served is approximately 30,000 persons producing an
average daily flow of 2.8 million gallons per day. In 1982, and again in 1993, SSLOCSD hired a
consultant to study opportunities to provide recycled water to the surrounding communities.
Potential uses include agricultural and/or landscape irrigation, groundwater recharge, habitat
restoration, and industrial uses. Unfortunately, the SSLOCSD treatment plant is geographically
isolated from the potential reclamation customers. As a result, it was generally deternuned that
the scope of capital improvements necessary to treat the wastewater to the required level,
transport it to the potential use areas, and distribute it to the individual customers made the
project economically infeasible. In the future, SSLOCSD will continue to search for potential
reclaimed water users in closer proximity to the treatment plant.
SSLOCSD Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
The WWTP utilizes primary sedimentation followed by a conventional activated sludge system
to treat incoming wastewater to a secondary-disinfected level prior to discharge. The effluent is
then released to the Pacific Ocean through an outfall line and a diffusion structure.
Unfortunately, many of the agricultural and landscape irrigation opportunities for reclamation
require a tertiary effluent. For the WWTP to provide tertiary treatment, costly capital
improvements would be necessary to provide for filtration and additional disinfection.
-16-
RESOLUTION N
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING AND DIRECTING THE FILING AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE URBAN WATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bi11797 during the 1983-1984
Regular Session of the California Legislature (Water Code Section 10610 et. seq.), known as the
Urban Water Management Planning Act, which mandates that every urban supplier of water
providing water for municipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000
acre feet of water a.nnually, prepare an Urban Water Management Plan, the primary objective of
which is to plan for the conservation and efficient use of water; and
WHEREAS, AB 797 required that an initial Plan be adopted by December 31, 1985, after
public review and hearing, and filed with the California Deparhnent of Water Resources within thirty
days of adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande did prepare and file said Plan with the California
Department of Water Resources after adoption in December, 1985; and
WHEREAS, AB 797 requires that said Plan be periodically reviewed at least once every five
years, and that the urban water supplier shall make any amendments or changes to its plan which are
indicated by the review; and
WHEREAS, the City is an urban supplier of water providing water to more than 5,600
customers, and has therefore prepared and advertised for public review a draft Urban Water
Management Plan Update, in compliance with the requirements of AB 797, and a properly noticed
public hearing regarding said Draft Plan Update was held by the City Council on May 22, 2001, and
a Final Plan was ordered.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande as follows:
1. The Urban Water Management Plan Update is hereby adopted and ordered filed with the
City Clerk;
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file with Plan Update with the
California Department of Water Resources within 30 days after this date, in accordance with
AB 797;
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to implement the programs as detailed
in the adopted Urban Water Management Plan Update, including development of
recommendations to the City Council regarding necessary procedures, rules, and regulations
to carry out effective and equitable water conservation programs;
'�'.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22n day of May, 2001.
iG�
_
LIST OF PEOPLE CONTACTED DURING PREPARATION OF
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Don Spagnolo, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, City of Arroyo Grande, CA
Shane Taylor - Public Works Supervisor, City of Arroyo Grande, CA
Larry Schmidt, Chief Building Inspector, City of Arroyo Grande
Kerry McKants, Community Development Director, City of Arroyo Grande, CA
Dwayne Chisam, City of Santa Maria, Water Resources Director
Christine Ferrera, Zone 3 Contact for SLO Co.
Nancy DePue, Lucia Mar School District - Curriculum Coordinator
Rob Miller, Civil Engineer, John Wallace & Associates, San Luis Obispo, CA
Rusty Garing, Civil Engineer, Garing Taylor & Associates, Arroyo Grande, CA
Rocky Rogers, Utilities Supervisor, City of Pismo Beach, CA
-21-
n� •1� 1..♦�. 1 " "' � u'�"� �•r.�-
--=--- - - - - -��� '„
No person, except a duly authorized agent of the City, shall turn the water on or off from any
building or premises, and no person shall tap, cut, or move any water pipe laid in streets or alleys
unless permission to do so has been granted by the Water Deparirnent furnishing the water.
In case of fire and during a stated period of water shortage, no person shall take any water
from any fire hydrant or street sprinkling tank, and all irrigating faucets, hose sprinklers, and water
shall be immediately turned off upon an alarm of fire or water shortage and shall not be turned on
again until the fire or water shortage is known to be extinguished or terminated.
�� � i ,. t � . i• .. -
It shall be unlawful for any person to wilfully or negligently waste water.
- 23 -
�PRROr
o� �
� INCORYpAATEO Z
" "' MEMORANDUM
� JULY 10. 1911 *
c4 ��FORN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEEI��
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
UPDATE
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution approving the draft Urban
Water Management Plan Update.
FUNDING:
Urban water suppliers are required to adopt, and submit an Urban Water Management Plan
to the California Department of Water Resources to be eligible to receive drought
assistance. Although a request to receive drought assistance from the State has never
been filed, conditions may require use of these funds in the future.
DISCUSSION:
The Urban Water Management Planning Act states that Urban Water Management Plans
are to be submitted on December 31, 2000 from urban water supptiers delivering more than
3,000 acre feet of water or having more than 3,000 connections.
The City's plan contains information on water supply, water use, and existing conservation
programs. The water supply section of the plan focuses on ground water, surface water,
recycled water, supplemental water, and supply projections to the year 2015 including a 3-
year worst-case water supply estimate. The water use section focuses on past, current, and
projected water use to the year 2015. The water conservation section focuses on the City's
adherence to the 16 best management practices ("BMP's") established by the Department
of Water Resources. The draft plan includes all information necessary to meet the
requirements of the California Urban Water Management Planning Act.
The City is required to update this plan every five years. The existing plan was last updated
in 1990. The following key changes were made from the previous plan: �
• document format including the addition of various tables
• addition of best management plan, including water conservation
• revision to the project water demand based on projected build out
• revision to the projected water supply
_ _ ___ _
ALTERNATNES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve stafPs recommendation and adopt the resolution;
- Do not approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff s recommendation; or
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments: Resolution
Draft Urban Water Management Plan
o � pRROr� 10 a
C� ■ ■
� INCORPORA7ED �
V O
T
� .��r �o, �e>> ,w MEMORANDUM
C4 ��FOtsN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KERRY McCANTS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR �. ���
SUBJECT: VOTER APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND MAJOR
LAND USE CHANGES
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss the concept of requiring voter approval and/or a 4/5 vote of the City
Council for General Plan Amendments and major land use changes and provide
direction to staff.
FUNDING:
There is no fiscal impact at this time. In the event the Council decides to proceed
with any of the alternatives other than to table the matter, the cost to the General
Fund may be considerable; that is several tens of thousands of dollars.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council at it's meeting of March 27, 2001 considered a staff report
summarizing various aspects of the initiative process as it relates to the voter
approval of General Plan Amendments and major land use changes. Staff was
directed to return with additional information with respect to this and related
issues. This report provides additional information and expands on some of the
information provided in the March 27, 2001 report. Attachment 1 and 2 are
examples of land use initiatives approved by the cities of Monterey Park and Solana
Beach. Staff was not able to find an example of an initiative measure requiring a
4/5 vote of a city council. Attachments 3 and 4, are examples from the cities of
Encinitas and Claremont, of ineasures not adopted by initiative, which require a 4/5
vote.
SCOPE OF THE INITIATIVE POWER
The constitutional origin of the initiative power has important policy ramifications.
It limits the ability of the Council to change an initiative once it is proposed and to
amend the initiative once it has passed. When presented with a legally valid
initiative supported by the required number of signatures, the City Council must
either adopt it as proposed or place the measure on the ballot. The Council may
also request that staff prepare a report on the initiative's effects. Moreover, the
City has an obligation to defend an initiative or referendum if it is enacted,
regardless of whether the City Council supported the measure.
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 2
Initiatives are generally thought to be citizen-generated and authorized by the
California Constitution. However, the Legislature has also authorized initiatives in
other circumstances that are outside the scope of the constitutional power.
Supplementing the constitutional initiative power reserved to citizens, the
Legislature has granted city councils broad power to place measures on the ballot.
Most importantly, a city council may draft and place land use measures on a
general or special election ballot on their own motion, without need of a petition.
Careful consideration should be given to the cost and timing of placing a matter on
a special election ballot. Generally, election costs are substantially less in a special
election consolidated with the County and other local agencies.
The ability to place measures directly on the ballot provides a city council the
opportunity to present voters with a long-term land use policy that takes into
account competing interests, while responding to voters' concerns about local
development pressures, particular projects, or other matters.
TYPES OF LAND USE INITIATIVES
The range of potential controls that can be imposed through the initiative process is
very broad. It includes such matters as requiring a super majority (4/5) vote by the
Council and or Planning Commission, or requiring an election to approve certain
actions. The Council may choose to impose the same kind of controls through the
conventional legislative process.
General Plan Amendments
A widely used type of land use initiative is the General Plan Amendment. The
California Supreme Court expressly upheld this type of initiative in DeVita vs.
County of Napa, characterizing the measure before it as a"reasonable attempt to
...delineate[e] a long-range policy intended to guide the county's development, curb
haphazard growth, and promote desired land uses."
Typical General Plan Amendment initiatives include those that reaffirm or readopt
existing land use policies and those that set growth limits and protect open space.
In DeVita, for example, the Court upheld Measure J, a Napa County initiative that
sought to preserve agricultural lands by amending the land use element of the
county's general plan. Specifically, Measure J reaffirmed and readopted existing
portions of the land use element designating land for agriculture, watershed, and
open space uses policies regarding minimum parcel size and maximum building
densities.
Measure J also adopted a new land use policy providing that, during the same 30-
year period, the readopted policies could only be amended by a vote of the people,
except in certain limited exceptions. The exceptions allowed the board of
supervisors to amend the affected general plan designations and policies without a
vote of the people to, among other things, avoid an unconstitutional taking,
accommodate the siting of a solid waste disposal facility, or redesignate agricultural
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 3
land for other purposes, so long as Board made certain findings set forth in the
initiative.
Initiatives with similar provisions have also been used to amend coastal plans and
specific plans and such plans have also been subject to referendum. Although the
DeVita case only addressed the validity of amending a general plan's land use
element, it would presumably apply to an initiative attempting to amend other
general plan elements.
Zoning Ordinances
The adoption and amendment of zoning ordinances are considered legislative acts,
and therefore voters may use the initiative and referendum power to adopt or
amend a wide variety of zoning ordinances, such as rezonings of large and small
parcels, construction moratoriums, and building height limitations. Statutory
procedural requirements governing the adoption or amendment of zoning
ordinances do not apply to initiatives and referenda.
Zoning ordinances must be consistent with the general plan. A zoning ordinance
initiative that is inconsistent with the general plan is invalid, even where the
general plan is amended after the initiative qualifies for the ballot or is approved by
the voters. Likewise, a referendum on a zoning ordinance that is necessary to
ensure general plan consistency may be invalid. For this reason, zoning
amendments by initiative are not as common as general plan related initiatives.
LIMITATIONS ON INITIATIVE ACTS
Power Limited to Legislative Acts
Local land use initiatives and referenda are subject to the same guidelines that limit
the scope of local land use regulations. A city can not create by initiative
something that its legislative body could not undertake.
Initiatives and referenda are limited to the adoption of legislation. They may n.ot be
used to undertake or rescind administrative, adjudicative or quasi-adjudicative
actions. Legislative acts institute rules for the general regulation of future
government action, while administrative or adjudicative acts apply the law to
determine specific rights based on specific facts. A Mixed-Use zoning designation
would be an example of a legislative act, but determining whether a specific project
fit within the Mixed-Use designation would be an adjudicative act. Initiatives and
referenda cannot be used to approve or deny adjudicative acts. Legislation may,
however, include provisions that direct the legislative body to take further steps to
implement that legislation.
General Plan Consistency
Land use measures adopted through the initiative process must satisfy the same
statutory requirements applicable to actions by the local legislative body; they must
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 4
be consistent with the general plan. This means that the measure must
demonstrate
• Vertical Consistency. Vertical consistency requires that various land use
regulations and policies, such as a zoning ordinance must be "compatible
with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in
such a plan. Accordingly, the voters cannot by initiative or referendum,
cause a locality's zoning to become inconsistent with its general plan.
• Horizontal Consistency. General plans must also be internally, or
"horizontally," consistent. For example, the open space element should
not be at odds with the housing element. An initiative amending a
locality's general plan therefore may not itself be internally inconsistent,
nor cause the jurisdiction's general plan to become internally inconsistent.
If an initiative is passed that causes an inconsistency, the remedy may vary
depending upon the initiative. If an initiative merely amended the zoning ordinance,
the initiative would probably be held invalid. But if it amended the general plan in a
manner that created internal or horizontal inconsistency, the initiative would
probably not be held void at the time it was passed. Instead, the appropriate
remedy would be to seek amendment of the general plan to cure the inconsistency.
There is one final limitation imposed on initiatives by the general plan requirements;
that is an initiative amending the general plan may not cause the locality's general
plan to become insufficiently comprehensive, or to lack the required elements of
the general plan. An example would be an initiative was drafted so that it caused a
repeal of a city's housing element, which is a required element under state law.
State Housing Laws
California has a number of state laws intended to promote an adequate supply of
affordable housing. Initiatives that conflict with these statutes are invalid. The
following state housing requirements are the most likely to be affected by an
initiative or referenda:
• Adequate Sites For Housing. A general plan must include a housing
element that identifies "adequate sites for housing" and the manner in
which the local government anticipates accommodating its share of the
regional housing need.
• Sufficient Zoning. A local government should designate and zone
"sufficient land for residential use".
• No Discrimination. Local governments may not discriminate against a low
or moderate-income residential development.
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 5
• Density Bonuses. Local agencies must provide a 25-percent density
bonus to developers agreeing to designate a specified percentage of given
development for affordable housing.
California Environmental Quality Act
Citizen-sponsored measures are not subject to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). However, under a recent California Supreme Court decision,
environmental review is required under CEQA when a public agency proposes a
ballot measure and places it on the ballot. Prior to this decision, the courts had
generally ruled that both citizen and agency sponsored ballot measures were
exempt from CEQA. Local agencies must complete some level of environmental
review — such as an environmental impact report, negative declaration or mitigated
negative declaration — before placing a measure on the ballot. One practical effect
of this distinction is that local agencies will be limited to the degree that they can
offer competing measures on any given ballot. Only those initiatives where review
can be completed on a short timeline should be eligible. Measures that are likely to
have a significant environmental impact, such as most general plan amendments,
may not be feasible for local agencies to place on the Ballot because of the cost of
the environmental review.
Preemption
Legislative decisions are presumed to be decisions that can be made by initiative or
rejected by referendum. The Legislature has intended to restrict the initiative
power by exclusively delegating the exercise of powe� over certain matters to the
local governing body. The exercise of the initiative and referendum power is also
precluded where it would impermissibly interfere with an essential governmental
function.
Local legislation, whether enacted by the legislative body or via initiative, is
preempted, if it conflicts with general State law. This means local legislation that
duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area fully occupied by general law, either
expressly or by legislative implication, is preempted.
Exclusive Delegation to Local Governing Body
Where the Legislature has not completely occupied a field, the initiative and
referendum power is presumed to apply to all legislative acts unless there is a clear
showing of legislative intent to delegate that authority:
• Statutory language, such as references to "legislative body," "governing
body" or "city council" and/or "board of supervisors" providing an
inference of intent to exclusively delegate,
• Whether the issue is a matter of "statewide concern" or "municipal
affair."
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 6
Because of the presumption that the local electorate can legistate by initiative on
any subject on which the local governing body can also legislate, any reasonable
doubt concerning legislative intent is resolved in favor of the use of the initiative
power.
INITIATIVE PROCESS
Options for the Local Legislative Body
After receiving a certified petition, the City Council has two options: (1) adopt the
measure as proposed; or (2) place the measure on the ballot for the next regular or
special election. The City Council may order a report on the effects of the
initiative. If it chooses to order the report, the City Council must receive the report
within 30 days, and either adopt the measure at that time or place the measure on
the ballot. The City Council has no discretion over its course of action. In the end,
the body must either adopt the measure as proposed or place it on the ballot.
Exhibit I shows the Initiative and Referendum Process
Adoption without Election
If a majority of its members support the measure, the City Council may adopt the
measure without an election. Where a measure has widespread popular support,
the City Council may consider this option even if they do not actively support the
measure, simply to avoid the expense of an election. This is particularly the case
when the measure qualifies for a special election or there is no other matter on the
ballot. If the Council decides to adopt the measure, the measure must be adopted
exactly as submitted. The City Council must introduce the measure at the regular
meeting at which it is presented and must adopt the ordinance within ten days.
The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply because State law
authorizes the legislative body to adopt a qualifying measure. It should be noted
that if the City Council adopts the measure without an election, it may only be
amended or repealed by a vote of the people, unless a provision is otherwise made
in the measure.
If the legislative body decides not to adopt the measure as proposed, it must be
placed on the ballot at a regular or special election. The type of election —
"special" or "regular" depends on the number of valid signatures collected and the
timing of the upcoming elections. The governing statute is complex. A careful
review of the relevant provisions is necessary to determine the appropriate date for
the election.
Signatures and Special Elections
In cities, if an initiative petition requests a special .election and contains the valid
signatures of at least fifteen (15%) percent of the registered voters, the city
council must call a special election. The special election must be held not fewer
than 88 or more than 103 days after the council's decision.
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 7
NOTICE OF INTENT
Filed by proponents
PUBLIC AGENCY
DRAFTS
IMPARTI L
� �
PUBLISH NOTICE
AND CIRCULATE
PETITION
(180 DAYS)
RFFERENDA
PETITION IS
CIRCULATED
(30 days)
PETITION FILED
Proponents hand in
petition to elections
official .
VERIFICATION
Elections Officer
verifies signatures
MEASURE FORWARDED
to legislative body
EXHIBIT I
IMPARTIAL REPORT
Local agency may
order impartial report
on measure
CERTIFICATION
Local agency certifies
Measure for ballot
ADOPT MEASURE
Local agency may
adopt measure in lieu
of election
BALLOT PREPARATION
Impartial Analysis,
Arguments, 10 day
review period
ELECTION
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 8
If a petition within a city contains the valid signatures of at least ten (10%) percent
of the registered voters, the City Council must place the measure on the ballot at
the next regular election held not fewer than 88 days after the council's decision.
Effect of Election
An initiative goes into effect 10 days after the election results are declared by the
City Council and may only be amended by popular vote unless the initiative states
otherwise. Initiatives that address the same subject cannot be voted upon at
special elections within 12 months of one another.
ALTERNATIVES:
The atternatives the Council may wish to consider include:
1. Table the matter.
2. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance requiring an election for the approval
of certain types of land use actions, and return with the ordinance for
consideration by the Council under the normal legislative process. This
alternative would require all the normal notice, hearing and environmental
review associated with any legislative act involving a land use matter.
Staff would request City Council to provide direction on the types of land
use actions to be included. Examples include General Plan Amendments
which change a land use designation to a more intense use or increase
residential density.
3. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance requiring a 4/5 vote of the Council for
the approval of certain types of land use actions, and return with the
ordinance for consideration by the Council under the normal legislative
process. This alternative would require all the normal notice, hearing and
environmental review associated with any legislative act involving a land
use matter. Staff would again request City Council to provide direction
on land use actions to be included.
4. Direct staff to prepare a measure for the Council to place on the ballot at
the next general election, which would require an election on certain
types of land use actions. This alternative would require the same
environmental review associated with a legislative act involving a land
use matter. Once again, staff would request City Council to provide
direction on land use actions to be included.
5. Direct staff to prepare a measure for the Council to place on the ballot at
the next general election, which would require a 4/5 vote of the Council
on certain types of land use actions. This alternative would �equire the
same environmental review associated with a legislative act involving a
2001 Voter Approval of General Plan Amendments
May 22, 2001
Page 9
land use matter. Once again, staff would request City Council to provide
direction on land use actions to be included.
Attachments:
ATTACHMENT 1- Monterey Park Ordinance
ATTACHMENT 2- Solana Beach Ordinance
ATTACHMENT 3- Encinitas General Plan Policy
ATTACHMENT 4- Claremont Ordinance Provision
FEB-28-61 05:36 PM MONT. PK COM DEV
3071482 qTTACHMENT 1
� (Monterey Park Ordinance)
VOTER APPROVAI.OF CHANOES
comaussion may file an appeal. �
LTpon che timely filing of ar� appeal, che ciry lerk
ahall immediately advise the sccretary of com-
aussion t�►ereof, who shall thercupon �an 't to the
ciry clerk the commission files in conn tion with
said matter. (Ord. 1409 $ 2(part), 197 psior codc
g 9295).
21.76.070 C1ty councll action. the case of an
appesl from a decision of the co 'ssion or upon
receipc by a ciry clerk of a co ssion t+ecommen-
dadon ia favor of an amcn nt, the clerk sha11
give the same type of notice heBring before th�
council, as is rcquired for h'ngs befon ttse plaa-
niag commissioa. 1he co il ahall conduct a de
novo hearing upon such er, and shall determine
whether such amend:aeat s required by the public
lnterest, tonvenience. an neccssiry. Thc action of
the city council to appro e such amendment shall be
made pursuant to the rovisions of Chapter 4 of
?ide 7 of the Califo ia C�overnment Code. (Ord.
1409 � 2(part), 197 : prior eode .� 9296).
21.76.080 Con doaal zontn�. Tho ciry council
may attach any o all of the following conditioas to
amendments:
(1) pny n irement necessary to protect the
health� aafety d welfare of the public;
(Z) priy uirem�ent necessary to mect public
aecvice dem ds occasioned by the proposed use of
iavolved;
y phasiag or timing control wluch may be
o assure that the purpose and interest of
ment will be observed;
y ncorded iastrument which may be nec-
assure that all interested parsoas will rc-
structive notice of the purpose and intent
ndment as it relates to specific properry.
19 � 2(part), 1976: prior code � 9297).
the pmpe
(3) Ati
necessary
the amen
(4) A�li
essary
ceive c n
of the
Cbapter 21.78
VOTER APPROVAL OF CHANGES
Secdons:
21.78.010 Voter appmval required.
21.78.020 Exceptions.
�1.75.010 Voter spprnval requlral. No amend-
ment of the laad usc element of the general plsa,
the zoning map and/or t�►e zoning code of the ciry
as heretofore amended or any other acdon of tha
city council by which then would be pamitted aaY
use of laad ocher than es presontly defined ia the
laad use element, zoning map �nd/or zoning code
of the ciry ahall be valid or effccti�e for aay pur- �
gose whatsoever unless and until �uch amendment
shall have been approved by a majoricy of those
voters of thc ciry vocing thereon at aay regutar or
special municipal electiot�; at�d the city council shall
refer any such amendmet►t approved by it to said
voters pursusnt w the provisions of Section 4017 of
the Eleccion Code of thc state. (Ord. 1578 � 1,
1982). �
21.78.020 Exceptivns• T'he provisions of this
chapter shall apply from the effecdve date to all
zoned areas of the city a� presendY described in the
laad use elemcnt of the genenl plan. zoninE map�
and/or zoning code of the ciry, but do not apply to
the following:
(1) Variances;
(2) Conditional use permits:
(3) Changes in uses aad :equirements witt►in
zones which do not �ncrase residential densiaes
(defiaed as total number of dwelliag units per 8ross
acre as prescribed by th� zoning code), or do not
change lot size or building height requirements in
the eommercial or manufacturing zones as cutrendy
defined by the zoning code;
(4) Rehabilitation and remodeling of existin8
developments;
(5) C3eneral plan andlor zone c�aages which do
not excad one acre of 14nd, exc�pt as set focth �n
subsection (6) below;
2?A-115
�r,c��.y r..r o.�
FEB-28 A5:31 PM MONT. PK COM DEV 3071482 P.03
voTER APPROVAi. O� CHANGES
(6) Gcneral plaa andJor zone chaages for proper-
ty zone multiple family (R-2 or R-3) chat are adja-
cent to cegional specialty (R-S) zone w�thin and
sdjoining the Notth Atlaatic specific plaa area. only
if:
(A) The tiry or redevelopment agency is a partic-
ipant In the developmeat of the subject properry by
way of developmeat agreement, dispositioa aad
development agreement, or owner participation
agreement, aad
(B) The general plan and/or zone change shall
requir� a twanry-5ve foot setback from any residen-
dal strcceeec/alley abutdng the former multiple family
zoaed property and said setback area s6all be laad-
acaped aad maiatained. Vehicular access shall be
permiticd withia said aetback �rea;
(7) Dwelliag imits oP any low or modcrata in-
tome arid senior citiun projects funded or subsi-
d'�zed pursuant to the pzovisions of applicable fcder-
at, state. or local laws or programs. (4rd• 1951 �$
2. 3. passed by the voters at the 3RJ99 etection;
Ord. 1578 § 2. 1982).
224-115.1
���y � t.�n
03/bl/2001 17:12
7921782
ATTACHMENT 2
(Solana Beach Ordinance)
SOLANA BEACH
ORDINANGE: NO. 266
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY OF SOLANA BEACH
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INITIATIVE MEASURE T4
REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL 1�0 CHANGE, .ALTER 4R
INCREASE GENERAL PIAN LAND USE CATEGORIES
(PFcOPOSITiON i ON THE NO'VEilABER 7, 2000 GtiVERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION)
The People of the City af Solana Beach do ord�ain as follows:
SECTION 1. Purpase and Findings.
1. The quality of life and the econamy of th�� City of Solana Beach are increasingly
threatened by mounting trafFc congestion 3nd related safety problems.
2. The City's General Pian is the constitutiun for land use planning and is designed to
avoid over-building the City and to foster a.healthy balance between residential
qualify of life and a sustainable local eco�amy.
3. I� �ecent years, the Solana Beach City C:ovncil has pursued development goals
that, if implemented, will degrade both the quality of life and the long-term viability of
Iocal businesses.
4. The City Council has repeatedly supported amendments to the General Plan to
allow increased densities and intensification of land uses. This has resulted in an
unprecedented number of successful re1'erendum petitions in recent years in which
the public has repeatedly supported maint�enance of the City's original General
Plan.
5. The Solana Beach General Plan is, by l��w�, an internally consistent and intemally
balanced guide to future development. Inconsistent amendments for special
interests threaten the integrity of the con,stitufion for our City.
6. lt is essential therefore that the citizens ��f Solana Beach be allawed to directly
participate in decisions changing the portions of the General Plan that materially
threaten the character of this commu�ity�.
SECTION II. Amendment of the General Plan
Section 4.3 0� page 10 of the General Plan Introduction, is hereby amended, in relevant
part, to read as follows (overstrike indicates de4etion, underline indicates addition):
a .,.,��. . �.:..�. .�.1 ,�+ .
.,.., ........ .. , `..� . ., .......�.._
. No
General Plan Amendment, includinq Specific Pla�� adoptions or chanqes, shall be adopted
which wou(d:
03/@1/2001 17:12 7921782 SOLANA BEACH PA6E 03
Ordinance No. 266 .
General Plan Inifiative Measure
December �, 2000 .
Page 2 of 4
1. chanqe, alter or increase the General Plan Residential Land Use Cate9ories; or
2. change any land use desi nation to anv oth� except chanc�es to land alreadv
desig,nated residentiai that clearlv result in a �eduction in intensily or density of said
land use designated as residenfial;
unless and until such action is aaproved bv a ma'orit of voters in the Ci .
This provision shall not apply to amendments �►hich are necessary to compty with state or
federal la.w or which are necessary to implement ��r obtain certification of the local coastal
program. �
Similarly, Section 2.2.b paragraph 3, on page 9 of the General Plan Land Use Element, is
hereby amended, in relevant part, to read as follows (overstrike i�dicates deletion,
underline indicates addition):
�ei.
, No
Genera! Plan Amendm includina S�ecific Plan adontions or�chanaes, shalf be adopted
which would:
1. chanae alter or increase the General Plan Residential Land Use Cateaories: or
2. change anY land use designation to anv otf�er exce t chan es ta lan alread
designated residential that clearlv result in <a reduction in intensitv or densitv of said
land use designated as residential
unless and until such action is approved bv a rna�ority of voters in the Cit�r.
This provision shall not apply to amendments which are necessary to comply with state or
federal law or which are necessary to implement or obtain certification of the (ocal coastal
prograrn.
SECTION III. Implementation.
A. Upon effective date of this initiative, the pravisions of this +nitiative are inserted into the
Solana 6each General Plan as amendments thereof, except that if the four
amendrnents permitted by State law for amr gi�en calendar year have already been
utili2ed for that year prior to the effective d�ite of this initiative, the Ge�eral Plan
amendments shall be the first inserted into the Solana Beach General Plan on January
1, the following year. At such time as the C�eneral Plan amendments are inse�ted in the
Solana Beach General Plan, any provision:� of City law inconsistent wi#h those
amendments shall be unenforceable to the e:ctent of such inconsistency.
_ __.._
63f�1/2001 17:12 7921782 SOLANA BEACH PAGE 04
�
Ordinance No. 266
General Plan Initiative Measure
December 5, 2000
Page 3 of 4
.
B. The Solana Beach General Plan in effect at the time of the Natice of Intent to propose
this initiative measure, comprises an integrate�l, internally consistent and compatible.
statement of policies for the City. To ensurF: that the Solana Beach General Plan
remains an integrated, intemally consistent ;�nd compatible statement of policies for the
City, the Genera! Plan provisions adopted b�y the initiative shall prevail over any
conflicting revisions to the General Plan adapted between May 27, 1998 and fhe date
the amendments adopted by this initiative m�easure are inserted into the General Plan.
C. This initiative measure shall not affect development projects that have received
discretionary approval prior to May 27, 199E;.
D. The City Council shall take all steps necess:ary to defend vigorously any challenge to
the validity or canstitutionality af this initiative.
E. In ths event that the City Council approves �� change, amendment or. other land use
decision which must, by the terms of this ini�tiative, be adopted by the voters of the City
in order to become effective, the City Counc:il shall set such matter for public vote.
F. The City Council shalf set any election required by this initiati�e to the next available
general municipal election at no cost to the proponent of the land use change, or set a
special election, the cost of which should bE: borne by the proponent.
SECTION IV. Canstruction.
Nothing contained in this initiative shall be con:,trued to make illegal any lawful use
presently being made of any property, or ta prahibit the further development of any .
property in accordance with that praperty's pre:sent zoning and general plan designation at
a density and intensity presently permitted by e:xisting zoning and general ptan standards.
Nothing contained in this initiative shall be con:>trued to require more than a simple
majority vote for the adoption of this initiative or f�r the approval of any future measure
required by this initi8tive. Nothing in this initiative shall be construed to:
a) Interfere with rights to obtain density bonuses; or other entitlements available under
affvrdable housing laws, or
b) Limit rights o� entitlements available under �3ffordable housing laws.
SECTION V. Severability.
The provisions of this initiative measure shall not apply to the extent that they violate state
or federal laws, If any word, sentence, paragr�ph, subparagraph, section or portion of this
initiative is declared invalid by a court, the rem,3ining words, sentences, paragraphs,
subparagraphs, sections and portions are to remain valid and enforceable.
SECTION VI. Amendment or Repeal.
__ .
03/81/2061 17:12 7921782 SOLANA BEACH � PAGE 05
�
Ordinance No. 266
General Plan lnitiative Measure
December 5, 2000
Page 4 of 4
This initiative may be amended or repealed only by the voters at a City election.
SECTION VII. Effective Date.
Pursuant to the State of Califomia Municipal Elections Code Section 9217, if a majority of
the voters voting on a proposed ordinance vote; in its favor� the ordinance shall become a
valid and binding ordinance of the city. The orciinance shall be�considered as adopted
upon the date that the vote is_declared by the l�:gislative body, and shal) go into effect 10
days after that date.
.._�ASSEQ,.APPROVED. AND.ADOPTED on thi:c 5��'..da.y of..December, 2Q00, and certified
by Resolution No. 2000- 90 , and adopted by th� voters of the City at the Ger�eral
Municipal Election, Proposition T� held on November 7, 2000.
ATTEST:
Kathryn A irk, City Cle
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Celia A. Brewer, City Attomey
'�"��'MAY 07 '01 12�04PM CITY OF ENCINITAS ATTACHMENT 3
. (Encinatas General Plan Policy)
POLICY 3.6: Except where overriding considerations are
� found to exist, property will not be designated so as to
allow or otherwise encourage commercial development alonq
circulation roads in a continuous or "strip" manner.
POLICY 3.7: With the exceptions described in Policy
3.12, once acknowledged as being consister�t t�ith the
General Plan and Local Coastal Program, the allowable
maximum density of any property d�signated for
residential use shall not be increased except by the
af f irmative vote of a maj ority of thos� voting in the
election approving the proposed increase.
Po2icy 3.8 Amended POLICY 3.8: with the exceptions described in Policy
12/4/91 3.12, once acknowledged as being consistent �rith the
General Plan and Local Coastal Program, property
designated/zoned for non-residential uses �hall not be
redesignated/re2oned to allow residential uses except by
the affirmative vote of a majority of those voting in the
election approvinq the proposed change.
Policy 3.9 Amended
Z2/4/9Z �
�
�
POLICY 3.9: With the exceptions described in Policy
3.12, once acknowledged as being consistent with the
General Plan and Local Coastal Program, property
designated/zoned for residential use shall not be
redesignated/rezoned to any non-residential usQ except by
the affirmative vote of a majority cf those voting fn the
election approving the proposed change.
POLICY 3.10: With the exceptions described in Policy
3.12, once acknowledqed as being consistent with the
General Plan arid Local coastal Program, property
designated/zoned for ron-residential use shall not be
redesignatedJrezoned to allo� inore aon-residential uses
or a greater intensity of use except by the affirmative
vote of four or more City Courlcil members based upon a
findinq that the proposed redesignation/rezoninq will not
substantially reduce revenues to the City and �rill not
substantially increase traffic burdens on roads and
highways.
POL�CY 3.11: In determining whether to approve a
proposed residential or commercial project and when to
allow proposed projects�to be constructed, the City shall
consider the extent to which the proposed project
complies with the goals and policies of this Element and
the implementing zoning regulations.
LU-9
__ _ __ .
. MAY 07 '01 12�04PM CITY OF ENCINITAS
PoZicy 3.12 Amended POLICY 3.12: The followinq may
12/4/91 exceptions to the requirements
speciPied general plan land'use
1.
P.5i7
be considered as
for vvt�r approval
map amenclments :
for�
Minor adjustments in land use boundarfes to
correctly reflect property or development site
boundaries, which adjustments do not cubstantially
change intended area development potential - as
approved by Council by unanimous vote.
2. Chariges to land use designations to correct (a) map
omissions and (b) mappinq etrors rrhich are clearly
demonstrated to be errors coatrary to the intent vf
the General Plan - as approved by a unanimous
Cour�cil vote. � �
3. A change from any land use desiqnation to the
Ecological Resource/Oper� space/Parks desiqnation,
when property has been purchased or la�d
develcpment rights have been secured for land for
open space or parks purposes - as approved by a
unanimous Council vote. .
4. Minor land use designation changes when approved by
affirmative vote of four or more City Council
members. For purposes of this paragtaph, Nminor"
is defined as changes fer which certified
environinental revieW per tlie Califoraia
Er�vireninental Quality Act has determined that there.�
will be no unmitigable significant r�eqative
e�vironmental impacts, and one of� the following
apply:
(a) xce ti for c ease ' Int 't ;
The chanqe is to a cateqory of lo�er land use
intensity. or density thar� the exi�tirlq
category that results in a reduotion f.n
intensity. For purpcses of this determination
the following hierarchy of categories, from
higher to lower, is established: Light
=ndustrial, General Commercial, Visitor-
Servinq Commercial, Transportatio� Corridor,
Local Commercial, Public/Semi-Publfc, Offfce
Professional, Residential 25, Residential 15,
Residential 11, Mobilehome Park, Resideiitial
8, Residential 5, Residential 3, Rttral
Residential 2, Rural Residential 1, Rural
Re�idential, Ecological Resource/Open
Space/Parks.
LII-10
�
y MAY 07 '01 12�05PM CITY OF ENCINITAS
�
(b) Excevtion for Residential Den��tv:
P.6i7
The change applies to 5 acres of land area ox
less, and is a change from a non-residential
to a residential category, or from a
residential to another higher-density
residential category, vhich would result in
the allowance of ten cr fe�ter additional
dwellinq units (prior to consideration of any
density bonus) for the 5 acre site. The
change shall also be datsrmin�a to be
compatible with, and geaerally not exceedir►g
the density of, surroundi�g planned land use
residential densities.
(c) Exception for Chanae Wi hin Land IIse Class:
The chanqe applies to 5 acres of land area or
less, and is a chanqe from one land use
cateqory to anvther when both are within the
same class of categorie�. Far purposes eg
this determination the �following classes of
categories are established: �
'
I�
1- Rural Residential� Rural Residential 1,
Rural Residential 2
2 - Residential . 3, Residential 5,
Resider�tial 8
3- Residential 11, Residential 15,
Residential 25 �
4- Offfce Professional, Local Commercial
5- visitor serving Commeraial, General
Commercial
5. Changes in land use designations when approved by
affirmative vote of four or more City Council
members, to allow projects that provide a
siqnificant public benefit. A"signifi�ant public
benefit�� shall be determined by the City Council.
LII-l0a
MAY 07 '01 12�05PM CITY OF ENCINITAS p,7
Po1fCy 3.,23 .
Amended 22/4/91 POLICY 3.13: The following establish exceptions to the�
fixed annual allotment of residential building permits
' established by this Element.
1. Vested Riahts
The fixed annual allotment as established in the
Land IIse Element shall app3y to all�prop�rties and
projects covered by its terms except it shall not
apply to any development project vhich has obtained
a vested right as of the effectiva date of this
Plan. For purposes of this provision, a vested
right shall have been obtained only if each and all
of the following criteria are me�:
a. The proposed project has received a buildinq
�permit or where no building permit is
required, final discretionary approval.
b. substantial expenditures or docwaented, non-
cancellable liabilities have been incuxred in
good faith reliance on the permit or final
discretionary approval. �
c. Substantial construction has baen performed in
geed faith reliance on the permit or Pinal �
discretionary approval.
LU-lOb
�
ATTACHMENT 4
(Claremont Ordinance Provision)
Chapter 6 Part 7 Genera/ Plan Amendments
CHAPTER 6 PART 7 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
670 ADOPTION PROCEDURE
The adoption of, or amendments to, elements of the General Plan and Specific Plans
shall be adopted pursuant to this Part. Whenever in this part, the term Land Use Element
of the General Plan is used, it shall also apply to other elements of the General Plan and
whenever the term General Plan is used, it shall also apply to Specific Plans.
671 INITIATION
An amendment to the General Plan relating to land use may be initiated by the City or by
any person owning or having an interest in land which would be affected by a change.
When initiated by any such person, the person shall file a petition with the City and pay a
filing fee as required in Section 677 of this Chapter.
672 CONTENTS OF PETITION
Any petition filed by a person owning or having an interest in land shall contain the
following information:
a. the name and address of the petitioner and all persons having an interest in
the land;
b. the legal description of the property owned by the petitioner and a street
designation thereof;
c. the change of land use classification requested;
d. such other information as the Director of Community Development may
require.
673 PUBLIC HEARING BY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing before approving any amendment
to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Notice of time and place of the hearing
shall be given at least ten (10) days before the hearing by publishing a notice thereof in
the Claremont Courier. The Planning Commission's report and recommendation shall be
completed not later than ninety (90) days after the referral of the proposed change.
6/7 - 1
Chapfer 6 Part 7 Genera/ P/an Amendments
674 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
After the public hearing on the proposed amendment to the. Land Use Element of the
General Plan, the Planning Commission shall adopt by resolution a recommendation
relating to the proposed amendment. An affirmative recommendation shall require the
affirmative vote of at least five (5) members of the Commission when six (6) or more
members are present and eligible to vote on the proposal. In the event that less than six
(6) members are present or eligible to vote on the proposed amendment, four (4)
affirmative votes shall be required to recommend a change. Any vote by the Commission
which is less than the required number set forth in this Section shall be considered a
negative recommendation of the Planning Commission.
675 PUBLIC HEARING BY COUNCIL
Before acting upon any proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan, the City Council shall hold a public hearing thereon. Notice of the time and place of
the hearing shall be given in the time and manner provided for in giving of notice of the
hearing by the Planning Commission in Section 673.
676 CITY COUNCIL ACTION
A. In the event that the recommendation from the Planning Commission has received
the affirmative votes required by Section 674, the City Council may approve the
proposed amendment by a majority vote of the Council.
B. The Council shall not make any change or addition to the proposed amendment
which has not been previously considered by the Planning Commission during its
hearings until the proposed change or addition has been referred to the Planning
Commission for a report and a copy of the report has been filed with the Council.
Failure of the Planning Commission to report within forty (40) days after the
reference, or such longer period as may be designated by the Council, shall be
deemed to be approval of the proposed change or addition. It shall not be
necessary for the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on such proposed
change or addition.
C. In the event the Council desires to effect any change contrary to the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, then any resolution affecting such
6/7 - 2
Chapter 6 Part 7 Genera/ Plan Amendments
change shall be adopted only by at least four (4) affirmative votes of the Council
except, after the referral set forth in Paragraph D, a majority vote of the Council will
be sufficient.
D. In the event that the majority of the Council does not agree with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, and in the further event that the
Council cannot obtain the vote of four (4) members of the Council for a change to
the recommendation, then the proposed change shall be referred to a Committee
composed of two (2) members of the Planning Commission and two (2) members
of the Council to further study the matter. This Committee shall make a written
report to the Council no later than 60 days from the date of referral.
After the receipt of this report, the City Council may approve the proposed
amendment by a majority vote of the Council.
677 FILING FEE FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
Fees shall be established by resolution of the City Council.
6R-3
10.b.
V T
►�` �"'�r'o.'°" * MEMORANDUM
�F
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGEI�:�
SUBJECT: BROADCASTING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON CABLE TELEVISION
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive information and provide direction to staff.
FUNDING:
The estimated cost of options for broadcasting City Council meetings ranges from
$10,000 to $20,000 annually and initial capital costs of $10,000 to $27,000, depending
on the option selected. One funding option presented and discussed at the March 27,
2001 meeting is to request the cable operator to institute a public, education and
government access fund ("PEG Fund"). The City's existing franchise agreement
requires the cable operator to establish a PEG Fund for use by the City to fund PEG
access equipment and facilities, which can be activated at any time upon written
request by the City. The PEG Fund would consist of 1% of the gross revenues of the
cable operator. It is estimated that this would result in approximately $25,000 annually.
The cable operator does have the right to pass-through the cost to the cable customer
and identify it as a specific line item on their monthly bills. At this time, the City of San
Luis Obispo and portions of the County unincorporated area are the only locations in the
County where such a fee has been activated. As a result, it would mean that rates in
Arroyo Grande would be slightly higher than those in other areas of the County.
The other issue regarding these funds is that there are some Federal law restrictions
regarding their use. While the regulations are not clear, they have traditionally been
used for capital equipment. However, a number of cities have now begun to utilize
them for operations. When used for ongoing operational costs, the primary risk involved
is that the cable operator could potentially request reimbursement for a portion of the
franchise fee revenue. Some jurisdictions have addressed this by incorporating wording
within the franchise agreement whereby the operator agrees not to request any such
reimbursement. In initial discussions with the Charter Communications, they have
indicated that they would be cooperative with the City on this issue. Therefore, if
directed by City Council, staff can propose to the cable operator an amendment to the
existing Agreement.
CITY COUNCIL
BROADCASTING OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON CABLE TELEVISION
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 2
DISCUSSION:
At the February 27, 2001 meeting, staff provided the City Council with a report with
information on what would be involved to broadcast City Council meetings on cable
television. As a result, staff was directed to develop more specific alternatives and cost
estimates.
In San Luis Obispo County, meetings are now televised by the County, the City of Morro
Bay, the City of San Luis Obispo, and the Los Osos Community Services District. The
City of Pismo Beach has also televised one meeting on a pilot basis and is researching
future plans to expand coverage.
As a result of the Council direction, staff further researched the issues involved in
cablecasting meetings and met with representatives of the finro primary firms providing
these services in the County. Five options have been developed for consideration.
Option 1: Channel 61/Manuallv Operated Cameras
The first option would be to use mobile cameras and to televise the programs on
Channel 61. This is the same channel used by the County to televise their meetings.
There would probably be finro to four cameras, which would be operated by staff of a
contract firm. At least one would be in the back of the Council Chambers and one on
the side. It may require some change in the setup of the staff tables in the Council
Chambers to better accommodate the necessary camera angles. The control
equipment would be located in a van or truck owned and operated outside by the
contract firm. Meetings would normally be telecast live and rebroadcast several times
during the week. The estimated annual cost of this option is about $10,000 -$20,000,
depending on the number of cameras, firm selected and length of the meetings.
Advantages of utilizing the mobile cameras are that it requires no up front capital costs
and provides more flexibility to move the cameras to photograph different activities
during a meeting. The primary disadvantage is that they are more likely to be disruptive
to the meeting.
The advantage of utilizing Channel 61 is that it also does not require up front capital
costs for equipment to rebroadcast meetings since the channel is already activated and
operated on a countywide basis. Disadvantages are that City meetings would be
preempted if a County meeting ran late or conflicted with our schedule and the meetings
would be broadcast to the entire County cable system.
One of the firms contacted has offered to tape and televise one meeting at no cost to
the City. If interested, this would allow the City Council to experience first hand what
the impacts of the camera equipment and operators may be on the meeting.
CITY COUNCIL
BROADCASTING OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON CABLE TELEVISION
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 3
Option 2: Channel 62/Manually Operated Cameras
The second option would be to broadcast the meetings with manned cameras, but
activate Channel 62, which would be dedicated for City programming. This would
require an additional up front capital cost of approximately $10,000. The equipment
would enable City staff to rebroadcast the meetings according to a schedule determined
and controlled by the City. When meetings are not being televised, a bulletin board
would be maintained that would broadcast City information and messages on an
ongoing basis.
Option 3: Channel 62/Mounted Remote Camera System
Option 3 would utilize cameras mounted on the walls or ceiling that would be operated
through robotics from the control equipment. The primary advantage of this system is
that it is much less intrusive and disruptive to the meeting. Disadvantages are the
capital cost of the equipment and less flexibility in changing camera angles since the
different camera shots are pre-established.
With regard to cost, one of the firms contacted proposed that if the City enters into a
three-year contract, they would provide the permanently mounted camera system. In
other words, they would purchase the equipment and recoup the cost through the long-
term ongoing contract payments. By enabling them to reduce the need for camera staff
assigned, the ongoing cost would be roughly the same as under the mobile camera
equipment proposal. They would still utilize their own control equipment, which would
greatly reduce initial capital costs from what would be required if the City were to install
the entire system itself.
As a result, the estimated annual cost would be approximately $20,000. This option
would also require the initial one-time $10,000 expenditure for the equipment to
broadcast on Channel 62.
Option 4: Purchase Cameras
The fourth option would be the same as Option 3, but the City could purchase the
camera equipment and reduce the ongoing costs. This could increase the start-up
investment to as much as $27,000. However, ongoing costs could then be lowered
from $20,000 to about $12,000 to $15,000. This option may be desirable if it is
determined that the PEG fee cannot be used for operations.
Option 5: Channel 62/Initial Manned Cameras/Future Remote Cameras
One additional alternative is to begin by contracting for cablecasting of ineetings with
mobile equipment. In the meantime, the PEG Fund could be activated and permanent
equipment could be installed once sufficient funds have accumulated.
CITY COUNCIL
BROADCASTING OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON CABLE TELEVISION
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 4
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Take no action at this time;
- Contract for broadcasting of ineetings on Channel 61 utilizing mobile cameras;
- Contract for broadcasting of ineetings on a dedicated City Channel 62 utilizing
mobile cameras;
- Contract on an extended basis for broadcasting of ineetings on Channel 62
utilizing mounted cameras;
- Purchase the mounted camera equipment and contract for operation and control
of the equipment.
- Begin by contracting for cablecasting of ineetings with mobile equipment until
sufficient funding is accumulated in the PEG fund to purchase capital equipment.
- Activate the PEG Fund, accumulate PEG revenue and defer action on the type of
broadcasting until enough funds are available to eliminate General Fund impacts.
- Provide direction to staff.
� PRROYO \
° ��
� INCORPORATED 9 2
v m
* JULV 10 �e>> *
c4 ��FORN� P
��
FROM:
BY:
CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
KERRY McCANTS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
RYAN FOSTER, PLANNING INTERN
11.a.
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO WAIVE APPLICATION FEES FOR THE
LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL CHERRY SALE
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the request from Lighthouse
Christian School, (Attachment 1) to waive the fees for a Temporary Use Permit;
and if the Council so chooses, adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the waiver
of permit application fees for the Lighthouse Christian cherry sale.
FUNDING:
The applicant is requesting a waiver of the 5101.00 application fee for the
Temporary Use Permit.
DISCUSSION:
Temporary Use Permit 01-01 1 was issued to Lighthouse Christian School for the
sale of cherries at various locations throughout the City. The school has paid ,the
fee of S 101 for the Temporary Use Permit and has requested a waiver (refund) of
these fees. The school has stated that the fee of S 101 would severely impact any
revenue the school raises from the cherry sale.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
-Adopt the attached resolution;
-Modify and adopt the attached resolution;
-Reject the attached resolution;
-Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Request for fee waiver from applicant
2. Certification of Exemption/Non-Profit Organization
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE WAIVER OF PERMIT
APPLICATION FEES FOR THE LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
CHERRY SALE
WHEREAS, Lighthouse Christian School officials have requested a waiver of the
5101.00 fee for the Temporary Use Permit application required for a cherry sale.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande as follows:
1. Those fees for the Temporary Use Permit application for the
Lighthouse Christian School cherry sale are waived.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and
on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 22" day of May, 2001.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Lighthouse Independent Study Program
Lighthouse Christian School
497 Fair Oaks Ave • Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
:�
(805) 481 - HOPE
:�;.
::,:
'X
Community Development Department
214 E. Branch St.
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
To Whom It May Concem:
ATTACHMENT I
�
This letter is to request a waiver of the fees paid for tY�e temporary use permit we applied
for on this date. We are a non-profit organization applying for this permit in order to
raise fun�is for our schoot. Please take this irrto consideration at your ne� City Council
Meeting.
Th�nk you for your attenti n to this matter,
r
C(/`c.�J
. Shelly Ci a.n�
Bookkeeper
Lighthbuse Christian School
SG/kq
REC'�IVED
�r1AY 1 �'1 ?^; �
r �� �
��� � ° . .. ����.
ATTACHMENT 2
Office use only
Form Hb-2 6J00
CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION
NON-PROFIT ORGA1vIZATION
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to verify that the Lighthouse Christian School, Arroyo Grande, Califomia is
a recognized subordinate and is a qualified church controlled organization of the Gospel
Lighthouse Church, Arroyo Grande, Califomia under Group exemption (Gen#1411).
T'1�erefore, Lighthouse Ghristian School is exempt from Federal Income Tax under the
provisions of Section 501-C3 of the Internal Revenue code of 1954.
Should fiuther verification be needed, please feel free to contact our office at 805-481-
4673 E�rt. 11
� � �1 .
!Shelly D. iesmann
Church/Scha�l Bookkeeping
United Pentecostal Church
Gospel Lighthouse Church of Arroyo Grande
Church Seal
/ PRROYO
° ��
� INCORPORATED �
V T
�t JULV 10. 1011 *
c ���FO�N� P
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL
KERRY MCCANTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
v
TERESA MCCLISH, ASSOCIATE PLANNER �
TIME EXTENSION CASE NO. 01-001 FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT CASE NO. 98-570; QUARTERDECK RESTAURANT
EXPANSION; 1500 WEST BRANCH STREET
MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution approving a one year time extension for Conditional Use Permit Case No.
98-570.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No. 98-570 on May 11, 1999 to
expand the Quarterdeck Restaurant by constructing a 4,400 square foot outdoor
patio and a 126 square foot addition to the front entrance/waiting area. Also
approved was a stage for outdoor entertainment (Attachment 1).
The applicant has submitted a request for a time extension due to temporary financial
constraints (Attachment 2). This project is within the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development (PD 1.1) and approvals may only be extended by the City Council. On
May 15, 2001 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 01-1790,
recommending the City Council approve the proposed Time Extension (Attachment
3).
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The project was found to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 of the
CEQA Guidelines (new construction or conversion of small facilities). Staff has
determined that the time extension request presents no issues of environmental
impact, and is exempt from review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 based on
the determination that there is no possibility that the project will have a signi#icant
effect on the environment.
17.b.
City Council Staff Report
Time Extension 01-001 for Conditional Use Permit Case Number 98-570
auarterdeck Restaurant Expansion
May 22, 2001
Page 2
Attachments:
Resolution of Approval
Exhibit "A": Conditions of Approval
1. City Council Resolution No. 3362 approving CUP 98-570
2. . Letter from applicant, April 8, 2001
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-1790 approving TE 01-001
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TIME EXTENSION NO.
01-001 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-570,
APPLIED FOR BY CYNTHIA JONES, FOR THE
QUARTERDECK RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 1500 WEST
BRANCH STREET
WHEREAS, on May 1 1, 1999, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
approved Conditional Use Permit 98-570, filed by Anne Griffith & Cynthia Jones, to
construct a 4,400 square foot outdoor patio addition and expand the front
entrance/waiting area to an existing restaurant located at 1500 West Branch Street;
and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande
has approved PC Resolution No. 01-1790 recommending that the City Council
approve Time Extension No. 01-001 for Conditional Use Permit No. 98-570; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande considered Time Extension
01-001, filed by Cynthia Jones, for a one-year time extension for Conditional Use
Permit No. 98-570; and -
WHEREAS, the City Council finds after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the
following circumstance exists:
There have been no significant changes in the General Plan, Municipal Code, or
character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the
approved project to be injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Time Extension No. 01-001, with the above finding and
subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference. The expiration of approval for Conditional Use Permit No.
98-570 shall now be May 22, 2002.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 22nd day of May 2001.
ATTACHMENT I
RESOLUTION NO. 3362
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 98-570, APPLIED FOR BY ANNE GRIFFITH &
CYNTHIA JONES, LOCATED AT 1500 WEST BRANCH
STREET
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has approved PC
Resolution No. 99-1692 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use
Permit 98-570; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Conditional
Use Permit 98-570, filed by Anne Griffith & Cynthia Jones, to construct a 4,400
square foot outdoor patio addition and expand the front entrance/waiting area to an
existing restaurant located at 1500 West Branch Street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project to be consistent with the
General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is
categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the
following circumstances exist:
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the subject district pursuant to the
provisions of Section 9-03.050 of the Development Code, and complies with
all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of
the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards
of the City.
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in
which it is to be established or located.
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure the public health and safety.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity.
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TIME EXTENSION NO. 01-001 FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-570
QUARTERDECK RESTAURANT
1500 WEST BRANCH STREET
GENERAL CONDITIONS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
This approval authorizes a one-year time extension for the 4,400 square foot outdoor
patio addition and expansion of the front entrance/waiting area to the existing
Quarterdeck Restaurant located at 1500 West Branch Street;
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit 98-570.
3. The Conditional Use Permit shall automatically expire on May 22, 2002. Thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for
another one —year time extension.
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. 3362
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 98-570, with the above findings and
subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member Ferrara, seconded by Council Member Tolley, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council members Ferrara, Tolley, Runels, Dickens and Mayor Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 11 t day of May 1999.
RESOLUTION NO 3 3 6 2
PAGE 3 �
ATTEST:
KELLY W�TMO�'fE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOFi/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
� L. t
ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
� �
TI OTHY�. CAR�LIEL�CITY ATTORNEY
r�:t:ii:3��_�
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-570
ANNE GRIFFITH & CYNTHIA JONES
1500 WEST BRANCH STREET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes the construction of a 4,400 square foot outdoor patio
addition and 126 square foot expansion of the front entrance/waiting area to an
existing restaurant located at 1500 West Branch Street. This approval also
authorizes a 6.6% parking reduction in the common parking facility located at the
Oak Park Plaza Shopping Center.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional use
Permit Case No. 98-570.
3. This application shall automatically expire one year after City Council approval
unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of
the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the
original date of expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented
to the Planning Commission at the meeting of April 6, 1999 and marked
Exhibits "B-1 through B-4".
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
6. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday.
7. Development shall conform to P-D-1.1 (Oak Park Acres Planned Development)
zoning requirements except as otherwise approved.
8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a landscaping and irrigation plan shall be
prepared by a licensed landscape architect subject to approval by the
Community Development Director.
9. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission one
year after City Council approval to ensure that the project is being operated in
a manner consistent with these conditions of approval. Issues to be reviewed
include, but are not limited to, noise, hours of outdoor musical entertainment,
and exterior lighting.
BUILDING & FIRE DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
10. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State
Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by
the City of Arroyo Grande.
11. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced, per Police Department and Fire
Department guidelines.
12. Project shall have a fire flow of 1500 gallons per minute for a duration of two
(2) hours.
13. Prior to final inspection, applicant must provide an approved "security key
vault", per Building and Fire Department guidelines.
14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, County Health Department approval is
required for food service occupancy.
FEES TO BE PAID PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees, including the following:
15. Water Mitigation fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, involving water connection or enlargement of an
existing connection.
16. Water Distribution fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, in accordance with Municipal Code 6-7.22.
17. Water Service charge to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, in accordance with Municipal Code 6-7.22.
18. Water Supply charge, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, in accordance with Municipal Code 6-7.22.
19. Traffic Impact fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, in accordance with Ord. 461 C.S., Res. 3021.
20. Traffic Signalization fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time
of building permit issuance, in accordance with Ord. 346 C.S., Res. 1955.
21. Sewer Permit fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, in accordance with Municipal Code 6-6.405.
22. Construction Tax, the applicant shall pay a construction tax pursuant to
Section 3-3.501 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.
23. Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fee, to be based on codes and
rates in effect at the time of development in accordance with State mandate.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
24. Provide disabled access per State and Federal requirements.
25. Canopy covers shall have State Fire Marshal approval.
26. Provide all required exists per the Uniform Building Code.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
27. All project improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
the City of Arroyo Grande Standard Drawings and Specifications, except as may
be modified by these conditions of approval.
28. . Upon approval of the improvement plans, the applicant shall provide a
reproducible mylar set and 3 sets of prints of the improvements for inspection
purposes. Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the applicant shall provide
reproducible mylars, and 2 sets of prints of the approved record drawings (as
builts).
29. The developer shall be responsible during construction for cleaning city streets,
curbs, gutters and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the project site. The flushing of
dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer facilities shall not be permitted.
The cleaning shall be done after each day's work or as directed by the Director
of Public Works or the Community Development Director.
30. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining an encroachment permit for all
work within a public right of way. Any portion of the project encroaching into the
future public right of way shall be removed should road widening occur per the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
31. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the developer shall demonstrate
that the adjacent property owners have consented to the proposed offsite
construction.
32. All grading shall be done in accordance with the City Grading Ordinance.
33. The pipe outlet for the patio shall be designed to drain to an acceptable drainage
facility to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
34. All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate a 100-year storm flow.
35. All new public utilities shall be installed as underground facilities.
36. Prior to approving any building permit within the project for occupancy, all public
utilities shall be operational.
FEES AND BONDS FOR ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS
37. The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees. The City is currently studying all
development impact and processing fees. The City is also in the process of
developing a fire impact fee. Certain development impact fees are adjusted
annually. The developer shall pay the updated fees in effect at the time of
payment, except that the fees paid shall not exceed 150 percent of the fee in
effect at the time of this Conditional Use Permit approval.
0
>
x
.�
�
x
-o
�
��
�
'Q
s
' � � -� � _ .�
� 't._. —
. r t cj � . . -- � -
r �-�� .
� ` \' ` \\\. - .
����• ������ . �� �
i�ii���i..��� -�.��r.ii�
�� i,�iii - � i
�� ��
� . � ` �� �� ��� ������
� � �� �
� � �����������t����������
. !.c ... � ... � . � � _ �.���� t
. �-- //////�//�/�/�///./ /
.— _
� f� -f •/ / f
�. .
,�. (�\\} ����L� �\��\\ ��. 4�.
;, � �t\�\�\\\\�\ � � �
� , . �.
.� \ . .
�3 �� //////I!l////i / - � ...
' � \\\\\\\\\\�\\\`� ��`L.'�-�1..`Ll..�-�`�� L
' �5 = E_ _ _ . .. . —
�� '` � ` t � �� � �� ��c� � —
- � ( • f 1 � r 1 \� � `\���\ �• • �
' � ' �� { �.�a_r
" I (-1.f.11
- �� �
. � .�.�
_ � ` � � �
e , ` ` �_.
_ ° . 1
. j , . :l.�.�. �.� �.4 t.� , •� 1•�-► t�
r ---- ,,:.:.
. ,. 1 .
�
i
T
- .l�l
.��
�
�
CUP 98-570
EXHIBIT B-1
C �
�� _ ��r�
. .�L� j �L�s
� i �
►
-t l 1.3.! I �
.
I .�-
I
�
. I•
. I
�
I
I
�
i
�
. I
I
�
1
I
. I
I
0
CUP 98-570
EXHIBIT B-2
0
0
CUP 98-570
EXHIBiT B-3
�
�
CUP 98-570. .
EXHtBIT .B-4
�.
:t
3
]
�
i
►
Tl
<
r�
�f
0
z •
�
�
m
�
�
�
1 �
Q
m
r
<
>
-�
0
z
i;
�
z
� �
� ..
> �.
� �
r �
�
� � . �
a �
�n = , �
� �� .i
r� : �
< �
> �
a i i
z ,� �
.;
3
n
>
_
7
-1
0
�
r
m
<
�
0
�, s,
$ �
2
'� �
._
�
.;
. T
a
s .
f
�
�
f •
_�
fF
1
�
SEAFOAD 6ESTA�BANT, IMC.
ATTACHMENT 2
,soo w. Branc�, sc
Arroyo G�ande, CA 93420
♦
Phane (805) 4813474
Fax (805) 481-0899
Apri18, 2001
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to request an extension on'our permit (CUP 98-570) that will be expiring on
May 11, 2001. Due to financial reasons we aze putting the expansion on temporary hold but still
look forward to starting it in the near future.
Sincerely,
Cyntl�ia Jones
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION N0. 01-1790
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF� ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-570 AND
ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR
RESTAURANT EXPANSION LOCATED AT 1500 WEST
BRANCH STREET, APPLIED FOR BY THE CYNTHIA
JONES/THE QUARTERDECK RESTAURANT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City o# Arroyo Grande has considered a
request for a one year time extension for Conditional Use Permit 98-570, filed by the
Quarterdeck Restaurant to construct a 4,400 square foot outdoor patio addition and
expand the front entrance/waiting area to an existing restaurant located at 1500
West Branch Street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No. 98-570 on May
11, 1999 by adopting Resolution 3362; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the City Codes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with
the City's General Plan; and .�
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, that there have been no significant changes in the General Plan, Municipal
Code or character of the area within which the project is located that would cause
the approved projects to be injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby recommends that the City Council approve a one-year time
extension for Conditional Use Permit 98-570, with the above findings and subject to
the conditions as set forth in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Resolution No. 01-1790
Quarterdeck Restaurant
May 15, 2001
Page 2
On motion of Commissioner Keen , seconded by Commissioner Fowler , and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners, Keen, Fowler, Brown and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Guthrie
ABSTAIN: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 15th day of May 2001.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Fryer, Commission Clerk Joseph M. Costello, Chair
AS TO CONTENT:
Kerry McCants
Community Development Director
Resolution No. 01-1790
ATTACHMENT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-570 TIME EXTENSION
QUARTERDECK RESTAURANT
1500 WEST BRANCH STREET
GENERAL CONDITIONS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
This approval authorizes a one-year time extension for the 4,400 square foot outdoor
patio addition and expansion of the front entrance/waiting area to the existing
Quarterdeck Restaurant located at 1500 West Branch Street;
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permits 98-570. �
3. The Conditional Use Permit shall automatically expire on May 15, 2002. Thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for
another one —year time extension. �
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may; at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
� pRRO���
� INCORPORATE Z
� v
�,
� JUIY t0, 1911 �
c ���FORN� P
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES � 5�
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2000/01 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT
DATE: MAY 22, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council/Agency Board:
11.c.
• Approve detailed budget adjustments and recommendations as shown in Schedule B.
• Approve Schedules A through E included in the Mid-Year Budget Status Report.
• Approve (Deny) donation request from Ocean View Elementary School.
FUNDING:
The requested actions will impact several fund budgets as outlined in the Third Quarter
Budget Status Report and supporting schedules. The Generat Fund ending balance will be
impacted by the approval of the recommended revenue and appropriation adjustments as
follows:
Projected Fund Balance at Mid-Year Report
Additional Revenues
Transfer Changes
Approved Expenditure Adjustments
Proposed Expenditure Adjustments
Total Decrease to General Fund Balance
Adjusted Fund Balance 6/30/2001
$530, 500
293, 000
(16, 000)
(237,700)
5�1 ��)
(18.800)
511 700
A request for a donation from Ocean View Elementary School Destination Imagination
Team is presented in the Third Quarter Report. The Lucia Mar representative did not
request a specific donation amount. Should the City Council wish to make a contribution,
the donation may be between $500 to $1,000, may match the County contribution of
$1,500, or may match the City of Pismo Beach contribution of $2,500.
DISCUSSION:
Each year, the City Council adopts a budget, which commits resources to the
accomplishment of its policies. The Financial Services Department routinely prepares
quarterly budget updates for the City Council.
THIRD QUARTER REPORT
MAY 22, 2001
PAG E 2
The purpose of the City's Third Quarter budget review is to:
• Conduct a review of all City funds to recommend budgetary changes to address known
budget deficiencies.
• Identify budget changes that materially impact fund balances.
• Comment on the significant budget trends that will impact financial planning.
• Provide a link between the City budget, the financial records, and the independent
financial audit.
Each year, the City Council adopts a budget, which commits resources to the
accomplishment of its policies. The Financial Services Department routinely prepares
quarterly budget updates for the City Council.
SUMMARY OF KEY THIRD QUARTER POINTS:
• The projected "Budgeted" General Fund Balance for 2000/01, after proposed budget
adjustments, is approximately $511,700. This amount is different from the FY 2001-02
Preliminary Budget "Estimated Actual" budgeted fund balance, of approximately
$1,080,300. "Budgeted" figures represent the authorized maximum appropriations, while
"Estimated Actual" figures represent what the expected spending and revenues will be at
year-end. Therefore, given the expenditure containment shown by the departments, the
City expects to have a fund balance $568,600 more than the "Budgeted Fund Balance".
The 2000/01 projected $511,700 General Fund Balance is approximately $874,300 short
of reaching the City Council goal of a fund balance of 15% of appropriations ($1,386,000).
• A request for a donation from Ocean View Elementary School is presented for City
Council consideration.
• Comparative Third Quarter Revenues and Expenses for the General Fund, Sewer Fund,
and Water Fund are reported. The FY 2000-01 General Fund reports an approximate
$840,700 increase in revenues, and approximately $275,200 increase in expenditures.
This increase in revenues is from increases in property tax revenues ($225,800), sales
tax ($104,700), engineering inspection fees ($136,500), mitigation revenue from San Luis
Obispo County ($237,700), and an increase ($61,600) in motor vehicle license fees. The
increase in expenditures is primarily in the Public Safety departments from the increased
salary and benefit costs in the Police and Fire Departments.
Recommended Adjustments to the General Fund, reported on Schedule B, reports an
increase to estimated revenue of $293,000. The major portion of the increase is the result
of a mitigation payment ($237,700) from San Luis Obispo County for the use of Huasna
THIRD QUARTER REPORT
MAY 22, 2001
PAGE 3
Road during the remediation of Lopez Dam. The Transfers-In is reduced by $16,000 as a
result of a reassessment of expected revenues from the State COPS Block Grant. The
detail of these adjustments may be found beginning on Page 7 and Schedule B(page 23)
of the report.
The budget for Sewer Facility Fund transfers to the CIP Fund is being decreased by
slightly more than $701,700 to reflect the reduction of the contribution to the Grand
Avenue Phase 3 Project ($450,000), outside funding for the Newsom Springs Project
($251,600), and the closure of the Sewer/Water Rate Study ($100).
The budget for Water Fund transfers to the CIP Fund is being decreased by $412,800 to
reflect the reduction of the Water Fund contribution ($163,800) and the use of STIP
funding ($249,000) for the Grand Avenue Phase 3 Project. It is recommended that the
appropriations for claims and settlements be increased by ($76,000) for ongoing water
litigation.
Numerous changes and adjustments are recommended for the Capital Improvement
Program Fund (350). Adjustments are proposed to reflect the return of unused
appropriations to other City funds, such as the $613,800 returned to the Water and Sewer
Facility Funds for the Grand Avenue Phase 3 project; the transfer of General Fund
monies for the Huasna Road project ($237,700); and the completion of the Relocation of
the Santa Manuela School ($6,500).
Approve the following Schedules A through E, included in the Third Quarter Budget
Status report that summarizes budget adjustments.
A. Unreserved Fund Balance-Control.
B. Recommended Adjustments.
C. Adjustments to Fund Balance.
D. Unreserved Fund Balance-Third Quarter Changes.
E. Two Year Comparison of Third Quarter Revenues and Expenses.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
'N
U
O
�
O
�
�
-F+
�
�
�
-F+
�
�
a�
A
�
u
.�
�
�
�
�
.�
v
�
.�
w
�
�
O
�
w
�
�
�
�
�
N
C�
N
W
V
A
�
�
�
W
H
�
�
�
O�
A
�
�
x
�
!"'I
O
N
\
O
N
�
�
W
�
a
�
U
�
�
w
�
0
0
N
N
N
�
�
e-1
O
O
N
�
�
� �
e� p
� �
eL �
V �
�
� .,''
e� �
�
0 �
a
� �
�
� �
� �
0 �
`I`.�
� 'd
' N �
UH
�
�
�
�
0
V
�
r�
�
�
E"�
M di � C� O c� d� �.c�
� � � �
.�
�
O
v �
Q. �
x � rr
� � �
� � � �, �
� �; � o : :
�
� � � � � � �
.�
v �
�, v a�i x�" ° � �
� : � � w �• v r�
� ' � � � � � �
�, � w w w � '� w
� v .... � r. p � �
� ~ � v v � � v
� 'u
� � � � � �
� o c� c� c� � u c�
� � � �
0
�
�
. �
� �
� �
� �
�' o ,a��,
� ° �
� � a�
'° }' o O �
� � � �
� � � �
� � � �
�
O � cn �n
�--� c'n L� c� �
N N N c�i M
vi
v� �
'� v�
G
w x
..., w
�
v v
ao �
� � �
� � �
� . '
' �; �,
� ^d 'd +� G�
� ~ � � `� c�a
��., w � �
o��aa
o� ���
U � � H �
� �' � � o
� � � � �
0
� � � � �
� � � '� �
�w
w v �w �
� � ��U
v v a� � �
� � .� v �
� � � ��
� o •�, °�,' c
����3
����H
��ccUQW
�
�
cn
�,
�
0
O
N
�
�
�
�
V
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.�+ �
� �
°' 'o
� �
P� �
� x
�-+. O
� V
N •�
UH
� o
� v
V
•� �
��
� �
.�
�
v .�
��
�^ �
� �
v �
ao
� �
� �
�
o :�,
��
�
c�
�
0
�
O
N
0
w
V
�
�
�
PQ
�
w
�
�
a�
C7
�
�
�
�
� � �
� �
`� � w
� '�
W � �
� X �
GJ ,�
��c�
3 � �,
o ��
� �� �
0
o ° �' o
a, � �I
�� �
� � �
.� � �
� � V
� � �
.� �
� •� �
O �
� � �
� � �
v v �
� � �
�
� L"r �3
� `� �'
�" bA Q
v ;� �
�
�
�, � ...,
� �U
`� v ,�
� ��
�� �
v
p° � �
' ��
g � '+
� � �,
� ��
�, �
' �'" 3
� � o
� � �
� �
�
���,.
•� � 'v
o���
+� �
S�. v p �
c� � V �
�
W
�
.�
�
s�.
�
0
�
0
N
�
'�
0
�
�
� .,
'C
�
�
0
�
� �
��
'o
�. g
v�
� �?
�
0
�
b�A
�
U
U
�
�
�
°;
�
0
.�
�
g
n
�
�
�
.�
0
�
�
�
.�
u
� �
�
�
��
�
� �.
w �
� �
� :�
C� '�
g O
� �
. Q.
� �
� "�
0
� °
�
�
'o 0
� �
Q " V
o �
��
o�
0
N �
�
� �
�
�
0
�
�
a�
�
0
V
�
�
U
U
�.
0
�
�
�
�
�
.�
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
W
�
�
�
v
�
�
0
�
0
:�
�
0
�
�
�,
0
�
�
�
�
�
��
� ..., � �
����
QJ � � ,� �
�,'� � � �
�
�.g�,� v
vN �,�
� n � `� �
� -� �;
� �, ^ g '�
�
� � �� v
3 � � � �
o��,.�
� c� GJ � �
�c ,� � U v
�����
s. � � � '�
3 � 0 �'
c� � � � �
.� r
'� � � � '�
� �
W �
�� O � •
� � � v
�,
�
� � •� � �
C7 '� � � �
� � � �
�5��
o � � � v
w .� � ,�
v � v
� � �
v `� � � �
a� ��
W x •� � '.,
� � � � �
� ���H
`� g �
� u �
v � � M �
� ,� � �
G�J O � �
� �' � N�
GJ
cL' �i V w V
� �.� ��
w o
O � � �
�" �� �o
� � ,� o
�� � �
� ,� s" � • �
o���
� o v .�
o r �-' �° �
U I� GJ GJ �
v
.�
�
c�
0.
a�
Q
w
�
�
u
;�
�
�
.�
�
0
v
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
v
�.
�
.�
�
° � �, �
� o °,�
� � � �
^�" � c�
+
� $ �
�,��•a�
°' � � .�
� � � ,a
� �
� o `�
���v
V � �
� g ,� °'
��
� �' .� o
����
0. � v , C
�
����
� ���
� � a� �s
� � � �
c� ('
� � � �4
o � Q �
'C ets � �
� � a O O
a
°; � o U �'
a� � a � °'
- � .. � ,�
����°
� � � � �
� v � �
� � a, � a,
v•� ���
v �
0 '� '� � �
� � � � �
� O eC Uj
� o�� �
� � � � �
� �, � X �
� '� � °' �
�x o�,
� � o � �
0
� , �; � an
� �, .�
v
o�� �•�
�i � w � �
��
oA
� '�
� �
O �
g O
� �
�z
�
��
� o
a� �
� �
� �
��
� a�
� �
� �
O
N ^
�$
.
� � .� ^
b4
� � �
'� �
.� � �
M
'�
� �
w
� � �
� � �
�
o¢�
�� a
� � �
��(�
b � �
� o 0
� � �
w o
�� o
� �
V •�! Cl
w'��
� o�
� �
� o
� � �
�
�� �
���
� � �
���
M
e-1
0
0
N
�
�
0�
�
�
�
V
O
e�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�v
' !r1 • „�"�J"
UH
� �
� •,�
� ,�
� �
y � O
� ,^ �
� � �
� M �
�� �
� .�
� �, o
� � �
� � o
� � �
O � �
3.+ `
� �
N y �
�� �
�
,�w�
�
� �
� J[ V
� ...� .�
�
��Y3
°°�v
� �
� � �
� � h
� �
� � �
F� �
w
U � •--�
v a� �
� � �
O � w
��
���
� e�
,� � �
� o
� � �
w `� �
� � �
� � �
� .� �
w .� Qj
� �
� O �
v �
� � o
�w �
�
� � �
� � �
� � �
�
� v �
�
�
Q� O �
� � �
�°
��
� �' '�
w $ �
a
� � � o
�" O
�o�w�
� � �..�
r..
y � � O
�, o
v ���
O `° O cct
� � � �
�� ��
�� U v �
U ���
� o.��
w ° ° o
Q
�CJ � M p
O
��,�o
� ���
° �,��v
�, � � �
w
�
� � "� O
.� � � �
O C.� Q"
�� � ,� o
�
'� �" w '�
N
� � � �
b'°�wg
� v �
V O ,�i' ��
V �'y
O�jGi �
� o �'
�av�
�03'0
z �, � s�.
�
.�
a�
�
�
vi '� �'' �
� � bA � �
-� � '� ,� �
� v � .� �
� �
� � c� � � �
� �.
•� � � ,� � �°
� �
�� o �'o � �
v � � � � �
o � �
:� �
�
�.��'� ��p
� �.� � � �
Q., � v , t O
.'.,
O,w,� �,� �
�' .. �
c� � ' "C3
m v OU �,�
w � � ���
� .,� �+ � ."
v� � � cC >
���v��
�
°�� �� �.�
� � � x v �
v •�, .� � o
��'�r"��
��'�°��
�.
� •� � � w
p • � ��"�., ^� �1+ , �
� �
'� .� V ^� O '"
a� � o E-� � .�
�� H
GJ ;—" �" ,� Q., 0
O
��� v��
, � �,
U � � � �
p X" '� � �"�
s�,����w
.,
� U � � � �
� � �,� �. �
.� ° v a, �, �
���a��
� �
� � � � � �
v
� '� GJ � � }a
a��'r��
�" V
'L� t� � QJ w �
.� �' � "� "� �
� O
,
v� � � ° � o
�,°_� .�' � � ° o
U � � � � a�
� � o o � �
� � � � � w
E—� cC � e� �+. O
� � vi ,�
��3�0
� � � �
� v � O
O � � O Q
� � � v �
� � � � �
r �
� � � � �
3 � v ° o
v�,�
� o
G
� � � � �
�
� � � � v
'� •� O � �
� . � � � s
� � y � �
�� ���
� �� o�
� ^�
�����
�����
� � 3 �
•~ Cj � � �
w � ,�
° `"'�.� +°�
�� ��.�
� � � �+ O
`� � O � �r
r
�w `��.a+
" v� y �.
� o o'� �
v o o � � O�
� o � � ^�
+�N �„v.
� � O � �
• � H
oo�.fl�
� � � � �
v
� � `��,�
� � v v �,
`i' � � v v
H � � � �
��v�v
s,
� � � � G1
�
� � � v o
Cn � � E--� Q.
b�ip "� �
H �
.� '� o
v
'G � S�.
� •� �"
o �, �
Q„ � vi
3 �
���
�,
���
� �
� jy v
� � D
� � �
�� O
� �
v
� � �
� �
�
�
� � �
� � �
�o �
� o °' °
��
�
� � � a
,.� %� 'O
O �V � v�
O � ~ O
O �
i-+ V
0.0 v O
� .� � �
� � �
i�, �
v v �U
�
O �" � 'b
.�
�
� � �U
� a�
e� O �
w � � �
0
� a� � v
� v � v
;� +'� b `�
� � cC s�
cC 'L� �
v�
� � � o
� � � �
�� ��
� � � �
v� �
a� �
� �
� cn
� 'C
�
�w
G1 ,�
� �,
� v
�
� �
�
v o
� �
�
;��-+ �
c� �
� �
a
o �
v "�''
GJ v
��
� .�
��
�
��
o �,
� �
� �
� �
.� �
� �.
v�
� .�
�
Q °'
� �
�
� �
� .�
c,
� �
U �
,°i vi
�,
d �
� �
cn �s
�
r-1
O
O
N
W
�
�
�
V
0
e�
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
cn
�
�V
N •�
UH
�
c�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
�
�,
c�
a
�
�.
�
H
�
G
�
�
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
�,
cts
a
�
�
W
.v
�
�
cC
�
�
c�
�
e�
v
�
�
�
V
�
v
�
�
�
o �
� °'
��
o �
� .�
� v � � �
w N v� ctt �
,�� ��
� o ' O � `�
� V �„ � O
C� � � �" o
a� �
� � �~
��°:�
�, � � � :�
w '� � � �
O �
� V �� � �
�°�.��
��o��,
� �
� .� � � �
c� v� �• �,
� � � O ,�
v ���
�� �� �
� v � 3 �
C1 �
� � � � �
° � .� v �
N � � � �" �
� � � �� 3
w � .,.
� � � � � �n
� �v., � ^� S]" '�
O � p � � �
� o � o � �
� � � � �
,� �' v � w �
� � � �,� �
v c,� s" � c� �
� pq � � 3 X"
v
>, � , 4; F, � �
p c� o
� w+�3 s�� v�
� p �' � �
o � ¢.' ,� �+ 'rs
�
0 °H `�.�
.� � '�" v �
�, � .�' � � v
c,�u .o .� C7 �
u
� cCS � � aJ eC
��� ���
w w �; o °,�' o
..�� aJ `. �. � �
'b��.��°
n� c�i � �, a� �
v
C!� .'� �. �, v a"
� o v
� �� �
m
� "' � � O
�
� � � �
� � v �
�'�+'v
a� ^' o .�
H���S '
�; o �
�'� ���
�����
���,
�ov��
� � �
���o�
� � � �''" �
� � �° '� �
v•�•-" �.�
� � � � �
� � � � �
� �
�
� � '� � p
D G� `� � y
� � �'� v
.� � � � �'
�v���.�'
—+��. ��'�w
� � � •� �
�
��„ � � 'L5 •�
� � � � �
'CS
� �
Q, � U � �
� � � �
� �
� v v� �
Rt v � �
� � � � o
� � O �
v � .� � �
� v�w�a,
°� � c �
� � � � V
.� � � � �
�
� � �" � �
� � � � �
v v � o
�' � � °�' �
s�, o � � �
� v � � .�
°�•�'��
� s � .� °�
�
a�
�
�
a � ,
w
�
�
�
a�
D
�
�
w
0
�
a
�
.�
O
�
etY
�
O
H
�
•,�
�
�
�
�
v
�
>
a�
�
�
w
�
�
v
�
�
r-+
O
° o
N
�
d��+� o
O N M
� � �
�
o�0e�n
O � �
�O N M
�
° o
a�
�
�
�
�
�
�
w
�
�
a�
�
�
�
� O �
o � �
� �
�
�
� v
� �
� �
� H
�aa�
0
� � � �
�hH
�
� O�0 O�0
m�o
�
�
�,
� �
��
� y
�
� �
� E"'�
�aa�
0
� ,� ;� �
�H H
x
W
�
�
��
>
o� �
�
b
�°
�
��
�
�
a�
�
�
�
O
O
N
N
4�
�
�
�
V
0
�
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
cn
� V
N •�
UH
� � �
� �
� � �
o � �
o� �
.� � �
� � �
�w �
U`��
+� �
� b° �
� '� �
o� �
� �a"
� O �
b�A �
fsl
�
� � o
,� p� �
Cn 'C 'v�
� ��
� � o
�
O c `J a �
� �, 3
�; � o
�
�
� � �
� � �
� ��
�
� m �
�
� p�q O
� 4�
o
p^�' bAV
'� '� •� �
a�
� c`� � o
v o �
�+ � U �Q„
� �� �
� � �
bA W O O
� ,� N ,�
� ���
G! GJ � v�
� � � �
� �w�
� � � �
O � � ¢,
�
� ao �
� O„�,�
� � � �
O� a p �
0
� � � �
.�
H v, c� �
� ��w
O V � �"
� � � V
o �.
c� � � o
w �s °J v
� � � �
� v � � �
O i�-' � � �
�
� •�•i � p �
� "� O ''"' �
�o �?�
O +� � �
���� ��
rn� ��
� w ,-: ° o �
�' � w
��g,
.� �s �r � �
o��� v
w °; � � v
O v � �
� � � � v
� O '^ x +�.+
� N i.. c J O
� o °�' � '�
a,� � �
�
o��°�w
���O
� y ao 3
u � � �
v � � � v
�.°�' 0-
0
'� � g "�"-' o
� Rs oo . � �
.� � M � �
� � � � w
�
�'� � � �
� �
�i" v v � '—+
� � v •� �'
� � �, � �
v .� x � �
� � �
c� c�C •� � �i
� o �~
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � V � V
H °: .� � .�
O y � s `� - e� �
c� � � � � `�
���� � �
�
� � v � � �
� � `� ~ � �
,� '� v a� ,� �
O „� •..
O �4'�H �
� �
� �
a, � o � � �
� *� �' �
.'., � gy � � �
a�
� � v' u � �
'� � C� v � . � f1' '�
� � ��'' O '� ^
� � v �
O QJ � ,•_� �,,' �
a
° o [-�� o � � v
�
�
N
�.
W � ��"' GJ
�,y}v.�>
'C5 r � � o
� � � � ��
o `� '� � •� y
S�, �
o � a� .�
a� Q � �, � �
�g����
..., v� s., •..
w� v�,� �
v��� � x
� � � � � �
� � O v •� U
�
� � �
� � � � � �
� � 3 � �
a. � � .� �.
xbo�}'�
GJ �O O � s� c�
� '�a' N v `� °; ° o
w�'�Q °'�'�
v
..., � ,� v .O � �
�,�,,, � ay O � +.+
� O � (� � p W
°�' �" � �" on �
�� �� �"w o
"" � .� N � O
��
� '" cG g � � N
� � �
.� p � N GJ � �F?
EF
H?
�
� � � � y
� w � ,� � � �
�; ��� � � �
� � � � � � o
� � V V � Q." Q"
H�.�.��v�
,� ;'' ' v, a� a
� � � H �
o Q., �' �
M � � � C�J
�Q��c �
G ...,
�, � � w �,
a
r � � �
�.� "��
�, o �, �
Q � � •� $
o � �; -� �;
� • i�'�' � � �
� �� � �
.� •� � ~ w
� t], �
� � � O
'� � , r� � o
0
� � � � N
��� �
��•..r,
�
� �
,�� °�w
� � � �
� v � � �
o � � � ^°�
N o � �, �
� V V +��+ �
M v � ,
� .�„ �,,,, O
�
��w v ,�'C
r ° o �
� ''� v �' ,�
� g � � �
Q� � � �.
�•��
v � :�'.� v i
a., �' U �' � >,
a� �� � O.�
cC
� � � �, Q y
Q �1 •� � �'�
��'� ��°
� � � � � h
�
��'o�'
o .� � � •� a.
U � � '� � �
� � ++ ~ � �
•� o �'� o �
������
•� � � � � �
� v v � GJ CJ
��Q3��
� �
'� e�s
�
o O
� �
°: �,
�
'C �
� �
��
x .�
a� �
� �
��
� �
�
� �
E-+
Fr
� b
� �
� �
v
� �,
w �
�
o �
o �
o �
0
N
v � �
�� �
w � �
o ��
� � �
v�o
� � v
� � e�
�: �
�
v �p'�
�� o
� �
� �� c� �
..�-i � �i
G1
`�p„ 'C t1,
bo � °
�
.,~ � �.
o� �
� bA
0
� � �
� 3 �,
0
o�c,�
� � .�
�
� � V
� ° .�
.
t-�
O
N
�
�
�
�
�
�
e�
O
�
�
�
�
�
.F+
�
..�.
� V
' A1 •�
UH
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
_
c
>
�
8
N
�
M
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
!�
�
�
�
a�
•C
�
pa
b
�
w
�
�
�
�
C�
� ---•- o � y
0 0 0 0 0 0
� O � O d�+ �
�� °ON m �
� � �
+, o
� �
�
��
� O
Ef
�
�
w
�
�
�
�.
H
�
v
�
�
�
�
�
�
���
�
�
v
h
c�
� �
� �
� �
� �
o v H
� � �
c�
� . Q" ..�'.
Owu
0
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
v
0.
x
W
�
0
H
0
0
�
�
v
V
�
ti
�
L�
�
�
�
w
�
.�
�
�
�
�
�
w
� O ,�
� H
� �
o � �
� Q., �
..� `� �
v �
�,� � �
����
����
r" v �
� � �
� �� �n
� �
. `�, � •.,
�
'� '� �. y
°�' o � �
i. � � •',
.'�, � C]. cC
� •.,
,_, " � O
�
N � �+�
� � � �
� � � �
O � O V
� � v �
,� � o �
v cn � °
� �;� �
� �`� o
� � � �
•3 0 . o v
V � y
�r � � �
� � O �
w .� �, �
� � � �
v� ��
v � ,� 't3
����
� � o a
� o �
,� v � cC
v �
� r
c�C ' � O ,�3
� o � �
� M � �
�� ��
� � � o
.�
o � � �
O '� M .��.
N ��...
� V �
����
�w��
a
�
�
�J
�
�
w
�
�
�
v
C�
� O �
� � +�
�
� � �
o �
,� a � o
� � '� o
. �,
����
o���
v ..
����
�
�� � �
�
� a �
����
� y'�'' � v
s.,
� � �"'O
� � w �
O �3" 'C W
�, �' � �
C1 y � F.
O � � �
�, [ �C7
� v o ,�
a�� ��
�' .� � c�,
o � � �
� � $ .�
�
e�
O � � �
a� � � .�
� � � �
�x o�
� � � �
`� �� � v
����
��~��
°:bd'�
.� � eo
� w �d 'cn
� ,..� GJ
� � � �;
.�
^� � � `w
� � � �
� �a, � .b
�
� G j •�
� � s.�, O
� � � �
,� � � -a
H.���
�
� �
0
� �
A �
� �
`� x
3
�o
� ��
��
b�
o �
U v
bA
O �
0
w o
G �
�
U '�
�
O
� �
� �
'~ �
a �
�
�
cn °1
i �
•�' o
v �
�
� �
�r U
v �
� �
��
0
��
Q� M
� �
�
O �
w �
� ''�''
� �
� v
� �
•
�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o c �6 � �d �ri � cri ri ., o
�
O
N
N
W
� N
li
�
V
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
u
cC
S�.
.�
:�
�
O
�
e�
�
.t y
v
�
0
�
�3
�
o „�
b�A �
� o
� �
y O
� �
�
O ~
�
�� v
� �
v �"
� v
� �
� .�
�
� �
�
�
�
^ � �
~ V
� .�
a�
O �
o v
� �
� �
�
°; w
� �
� �
•� c.7
'C O
� �''~ �
~ � � �
v
� � � �
�
0
� � � �
0
� � o �
c� �
V ,�
•X � eC �
O � � y
a���
� � ��
v
��� �
� vi � �
� v � �
o �� � •�
�' ��.c
y t� +.+ +.+
� � �
� � �
a�
`a �, � �
C�J �. �~ � �
q � �, �, o
N �-+
m
�
,x o v � �
i .., bA v O G1
� � O � '=
a� �
�°°�'��
� ° ao a. �
'� � � y c�i�
� � � � �
++ V
� .� � � �
� � � � �
y v � � �
����o
� w � � v
o 't� '''' `�
� � � � �
�
.� � � � �
w �' � � v
� �
� � � o v
a� � �' �'�
� ,� •., �
� � � � v
v, o �' v
���a��
w�'���
� � •
� l'�1 �
UH
v �
� �
�
O
V
� �
� �
�v
� �
x
O �
S �
n �
,�
� o
o �
a�
v
o � en
� +�; '�
a�
� �� �
�� o
'C
v
�
� � �
v
u � �
� � �
� � �
� O �
,� v ,—,
� � �
v � �"
Q ��
�
� v v
� � �
W � �
„� o O
� Q �
;� E �
� �
� X �
v '� �
�`�i �" �
vi O �
U
� ��
� � �
�, o
E �-�cnv
� O v
� o .�
�
:� `� 'y
��
o � �;
Q w c�
•
�n �
O �
� �
x
a�
� �
� °o
N �
N � j
� � �
W �
O � �
� � o
o a, �
� ¢,.�
o �" �
'� cn w
'�
�� a
�
v � �
� � �
� v
� o `�
� V V
�, � i..
v � 0.
� �
� � �
� t,�., O
Q �. �
� o
� � r
� O �
� Q �
� E"� cC
�
� � '�
O s,., �
� o *�
v �' ^�
� .� v
�
�
� � �
� 3 .�
v � t�
�
E-i �, �
a� �
�
� � �
�
o � �
Q O �
,� � o �
� � � �
�,
Q � � �
� �
�
� � v �
� y
� � �
.� ,� �
� ..
����
��'�v
`� � �
o � a �
bA ,� � a
�
.� � .�
�� ��
�5�. , bA *� E-�
� � � �
v o
O 41 N v
��� v
� �
v ,p�„ � �
�
Q� v �
�0 3 '"
�, o
� v �; �,
v � � �
� � � O
y � . •�
� � �
� � O �
S�, �n � �
�
cC
Q �'"��
� � � � �
w � � � �
� � � w �
F' ++ p ^� a�
�����
� �
�' a� � ��
�����
� �
� �, G� � w
� � 3 3 0
'a � v � ° v�'
� � ,� � �
°; �' � � v
fi, Q. � � , �
•
��
C�,
.�
� �
� �
°; v
0
p� O
O +�
M �
�
00
�,.�
� b°
� ,�
.� �
.
O �
a. �
0
� �
y `a
� �
��
e� �
� w
O �
�
"'C� �
�, o
� �
•� O
N Q "
� �
� v
G1 "
�. .�
� �
� '�
a1 �
� �
I ^„
w �
�
� �
�, o
� �
,� � g
��
.� � �
� �o
� �
W .a �
•
�
�
v
b4
'C
�
�
�
etT
v
i�
0
�
g
�c
�
�
�
°
�
.�
O
s�,
0.
�
°;
c�
�
� �
'C�
�
O �
�
� �
� o
�1 �
� O
� �
� �
i �
��
� �
:'C ,�
� �
�1 :�
� `�
��
CJ �
a�
�
� �
� `w
��
•
�
r-1
O
0
N
N
�
�
�
V
�
�
�
�
�
�7
ed
�
�
�
i�
�
\
� i'" �
� �
° ��'3°�
t1, o m
� � �
0
� �w
o �
V
O � �
� '� O
� O �
� v �
��
� � v
�� O
� � a
� � c�
X ,� �
° � x
� � �
G1 ,4;
� �, ces
.'" �
~ O
� � .�
v
� � �
�
� o Q•
v
� � � �
�', '^' "" .�'
�, 3 .� n
y � �
�
+� .b y cC
�.���
a? ,� . .�
�' � ° o �
O
N
o ° o
N p i�., ��..
w'� � �
,� Q" cG
a�
E"{ � � .�
� � a�
� v �
����
E-� >, �p .�
.� V � cC
cn � �C �
cn Q
� � '� �
0
��'��
�. � Q '" +.
°+�' v '� o
�
� � � �
�
�
.�
�
� � v v
� �. � �
c�
� �" � ,.�
�
o � � .� �
N v � p
� w ,�'�, c�n
O
Ef� O c� v
� � � v
� �'" `w�„ '�
� � y �'
�+'� v
�
.X �i v.. cC
O
O
� � m �
G, , D a�.+ �
cti v �, �
V � .,�
� � 3
O � s�-� �
� � �
�
� � � �
•��,� �;
� �' � �GJ
�, O +'�+ c*'C
,� O O �
O �
.� '�: ri �
CJ ° M �s v
��� � �
�
� �� � �
E� � + v �
����3
� � .� �'
v
� p � +� �
� �� � �
�� �
'� c�S w � �
� ~ O � �
.�
� � � ~ �
O ,_,
� �o �
�
' C i"" o v bvA
F,
� •`/� QJ "C�
� H � H �
-� � v
� 3 �
o � ,.n
� � '�
� �
� � �
w � o
w � t�
o �
'� � ""
.� ,� G �
O � � v
�" � �
� ~ �
t�i tC �
��,� O
� � �
c� � � �
w cn � +
.�
� O 'i"' y
� �
� � � �
;� � � �
� � � �
� � � �
bA
� v V 'C
o � '� -�
O
o �
.�
� oA ,o
v g � �
+�1 O � �
n �
c��i � „� m
cts �"' '�
��'Cfx
���.�
� � � a.
�
�'� � �
� � � O
W �� �
m � a .�,, y
� �� v
� v � x
a �,
V � � �
�QJ V CJ '�
� �� �
�
O G � Qj
O .� '� �
� � � c 1 �
�. � . . .
'� �
UH
� � �
�
� � � � �
� °A �w�
'� �'.� o � �
y � ¢„ c O +�.+ w
w � �
�
�
� v � � �
�, �; � �
�`� �'�'� + x' 1
v v � v � w
� � � � � �
� . .� �
� aJ w bA GJ '+
� � a� •� ,� �
� ,� � v o
� ,� p � � �
�
w � � � � �
� 00 �" p v �
� �t! � Q. r." . �
C� co � � x �
��wOH v
� � � � .�' GJ
.,.,
+ � � a GJ a�.+
G� �, � 0 bA
� � �Cl���
O ,� ^� r 'L3 ^�
� p s�-� X
...,
�
�� v � cn �'
V � O 41 +'' Q"
� � � u O O
� ,� � � � �
� � � v
c� c� y., +'� .�
.�^�3�5
o � � N � o
� '� g
+�.� � �M�
� w �� v �
� � �� °� o
� m '� O � '�
� � � � � �
� � � o � �
3 v � � a �
o v � � v �
o y �a � .� a�
N�" y c� F-r v�i
� �
M •� X � cC
�
� � � �' � ,�,�''
`-' U
� c � o � v
� � � s�, �+ H
� +� v
H � �
C1 �
� '+ o
�.,
cC
�
�, o �
� v
� w �
w '"� �,
•° o �
� N �
� w '~
+� �
�
, .��r • � cn
� � �
b0 bA
� � �j
� g '^'
� M G1
� � �
� � a�
� .� �
� � �
� � �
�,
+� .,,, G1
�o 0
O � �
� .� �
O � �
O � 'J,
N v �
�, �
W � u
�' o �
r ,�, v�
� v o
����
��Q.
o � �
v
cC���
� •��
.� � v
� �
o ��
" v
� � �
� � c�
O � �
� `�
v��,�
� � �. �
v •� o
,�: v v
� � � �
H+���
�
� � -�
Q" X `t'"
� � Ei
� �
v ��
� ° E-�
0
o �, �,
� � o
N � �
o � �
o`�`+�
�
� � +'�'J
c� �
�
� i,�., O
V .�.� �
� O
w .,.� •a
�° ^� �,
� ��
� � �
°: '� �a
� � �
., �
.�U °
� � �
°J U
*� � w
� O
� � �
� � +�+
� � �
y ��
� w '�
���
�
� � O
� �
(,7 V
v� v
� � �
� o +,
���
� o v
� � w
v� N a?
~ � .�
. �
� �v
�' v '"
0
x � �
0
r-1
O
O
N
N
N
�
�
� i�
�► O
� �
�
� �"
V �
�
O �'
��
�
0 �
b�
� �
�
� �
� �
� �
�
.`� 'r�
.� i�
UH
� �
� U
�
�, �,
� �
o �
� �
a� �
� v
a
�
o .�
a�
^� `�
a�
� �
CJ
� •�
.-�' �—�'i
� vi
� �
�
� �
� �
� �
GJ
�
� � O
� � �i
� � O
' � �
.�r y
�'-�,��
.t".� .bA ++
� •� �
'�
� w 0�1
�
y �'
,--�
G1
� � O
�
� .�' v
yU s
� � cCf
i� �
w�°;
�
�' � o
� � �
� ° v
� �
w � �
� �
X � t.�.,
E '' o �
�� 'o
� •� �
Q"' O O
�
V � �,
Oa�
� o 0 0 0 0 0 0
M O�n v� v'i O O�n
Cd [� �--� vl '-r � 00 N V'�
� �r" � '-: c•i � o � �n
� � o O� �O � .� � � N
�-+ N u `-'
�s
\° \° \° \° \° \° \°
� V'1 � I� �O M M M M
l` �O �O M [� �/'� �O [�
�, a
� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0�n o 0
� �r o �-+ �n o m �o
N d'+ 00 �D C� �--i M �
0�0 c�-+ � � N � � �
¢ � �
�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�o a� o 0 o t� o 00
0 0 0 0 0� o �n
O� N d'+ � O� O�O
� �r+ a� � m m c� ,-� �
N �
sH
�
� � � � � � �
� �i' � l� 00 v� N O� �
[� �O �O �O �O � v� v'�
�
a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 �n �., �n v, o �n
��n �n N O N oo r-
l� O� O� 00 N O oo l�
O ^ � V� � �N � � �-.
Q � �
�
N
�
U
�
w
�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�n �n o 0 0 0 0 0
r, rn� o 00 � o 0
c+i �O l� v'i O� oo O o0
00 N M t� O O O�O
� �O � oo N c� t+� �-+ N
N N
�
�
a�
w �
� H
� = U
� o �
� �-.a � ' o � s�.
�, � � �, �
� � � � � w �
� � ;,� °' � w .x O
� F" � a `—' a � c� �..�
°� � > � 4�„ ;� '� N
a� v V ' v�
°' o o .� �° � � �
H v� a`� �� U w a.� H
�
M
M
00
�
�
�
V
�
�
�t
N
�
�
0
0
0
�
M
�
�
0
�
V
0
v
�
N
�
'ct
�
0
0
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
H
�C
�
w
�
GJ
�
�
a..+
� �� �
� "C3 w
cn � � p
,� ,G w v�
� o v o
o � :p
o � �
H � � �
'� y al Q„
���w
v���
�
�� � �
�,���
� � � �
� �� �
W
� � V O
� �,
O � s�-� �
a,
� �;��
..
� '� "d '�
� � � � �
� � � � �
�
•.. v
aD � � W v
���'��
� � � � 3
"C � $ Uj o
O^� � ~
p�
��°��a,
v
^� \ 5 O G�1
p � � � o
�
o � `�,,, � �
�"� O r-�
��.+ ��-+ O D, `�
�s � .� ,� �
�
����v
., .0 p � ,�
� •� v '� CJ
a�,��a�
�'�5��
a� � � �
� v v � �~
�n +r
w � � � cv
� ¢' � � �
va�N
� �
�
�
C7 �� � �
,� °' E" �, �
O � � O X
� � � o �
E-� � � ° c�
0
�
,-,
O �n M O
0 • c� OA n� v�'� d'
N � � °� N � o
\ Q U
N
� o o � o
� � n � n
a
O
N
n
N
\°
�
� n n N ° o�o
.� �oo�, �
�� N N O �F O�
N � O � O M
o Q � M � �
�
� M O O l�
�' v'� � O � �O
ap o o t� c� vi
'O ^� O� �D o0 v�
� N � l� M �
� N � •r 00
�
� ��. 1
�
V
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
� �
�
N �¢
1 �
O U
�
� �
� �
� �
�
�
�
�
�
� �
' �1 �
UH Y
H.
0 0 � o
00 � � �
� n � �
M o0 O O
� � � rn
� O M N
�D M V'i .--�
� M �
� N � �
0o t� � �
O � � �
� � � �
N 'ct' �--�
0
.�
c
o � �
�� ��
N�3�
�����
����
¢��a
�
�
�
O
�
�n
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.�+'
U
�
a..+
Fr
�
�
�
�
h
RS
y
�
�
cC
�
t.
�
c�
�
.�
.�
�
�
.�
Q.,
�
�+
�
Q�
�
v �
'� 4J
� �,
� �
�
.� �.
a�
��
� �
$�, �
� �
•� �
��
� �
v ,�
�r �
0 �
� u
. �
� �
� �
H �
I �
'L�
�'+ � O
,� � Q.
� � �
v
.� `�"' b�A
�� U �
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
'�
�
�
�
�
�
0
U
�
�
w
O
�
0
v
�
O
:C
V
�
N
�
�
�
�
�
�r
�
�
x
v
�'
�
�
�
�
v�i .�;
� �
�
i�r �
, � .fl
o �
00
�
d `�
I �
v •�
'� �
U] �
.�
� �
� z"
.b �
�� �
��
¢�
.
w � � �
�
� � � �
� V ,�
� .� � �
s�. ...
V
� � � �
c�
�� � U
'�^� i g +
�
� a' � �
� � � �
�� � �
� ctS O
3 �,�"
y i� f�
� � �. .G
��..'~r
�n o U �
v v � �
� H � �
Q. O �
� � � � ^
O � � � �
r �
cn �" � C.J ��
�,,' i" y � f!-}
v •� �" (� ^�
`-�i
� •� � � O
o �o�,�
� o o -a
.� � �,
�
� v � o �
bA '�"' � �" V
Q, v � �" �
� �" f� � •�
� v x � �
� � �•� �
� o
� � U � U
� � � �'
�
� � � H 0.
� "� � y.y �
cn „� � � O
� � � •�
:C � � '� a
� o � U �
�'? �'ocn
�'" �p � w
`a" e-� � ^ �
� � y p ��
,_., M
+' y ��"',,, �• �
� � O � �
� � ...
� X '� � O
cC o � p c�
�����
�����
.
� �
�
e�
� �
3 �
c� U
cV �
E!? �
.� �
�
v �
� O
�, >,
a �
� O
.�
� a�
� �
Q" U
v y
�'r E,
Q�
�
� •�
Q
Q�
� �
b4
� �
�� �
o ,� °�'
�
�
Q`��
.� ,�
-�i V ��..
� �
� o •�
+� �
� �
U� °
� � �
� � �
H � �
� � �
c�
� � �
�
o �
v � �
� y �
Q 3 �
•� � �
� � �
� � v
U�vw
.
� �
�O
0
o �
�
�, �
�
� �
G1
'�
� �
a�
�' o
� �
� �
�
� �
. 0
o. �
��
� �
� �
� �
� �"
00 �
� �
� O
V
,� V
c�
� .�
��
�
o�
� �
Q O
� �
�
� �
�; v
� �
�
� �
�1 �
� �'
v �
�o
� �
cV
�
�
.� �
.-�.� ' 0
��
� � �
'+� ' �n
� .� �
����
�.
�
r-I
O
O
N
�
� N
l�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�F+
C/�
�v
'ti •�
UH
v �
O �
�
� .�
GJ
GJ �
� �
� •�
o '�
U �
u '�
•^y 'C
� �
oA'�'
•� �
� �M
��
� �
o .�
�
a�, �
� �
C. �
�
v �
c�
� �
c�
�-.� �
� v
.�
�s w
,o
� �
�
�
� �
e�
� �
� �
� �
� �
v
0 5�
� �O
N
� �
� �
�. �
�
� �
� � O
�
��
�r � �
.., � ...,
'� '�
�
cC
� O
o '�
� p
m y
4.�
� �
� a"
Ux��.
� �
fW
'�
O �
v �
� V
c� �
o °
o �
v
� �
.� 3
c�
,� r
��
O �
� �
w v
'C� �
aJ �
� �
� �
� �
� �
� Q,
� �
v
� � o
� v �
'^' V bA
F. �
� �
���
� �
,� � o
�
v � �
�� a
•� o ��
� �
� �
� � v
�
.., �
� O �C�.,
,��,
v
wl � o
� � � �
� •� � +�
� '� � �
~ �`�3
`� 'v� '� o
O � � +'
y Q. O
.��~ �
� �.��
•� ,� °' v
� � � �
� � o �
,+,., o � �
O ;, n '� �
� o� � o
°; v .� '�
� � � �
+J •�� W
� � � �
.,
�
� av
� � v �
.� .� Q �
�o,x v
•� `� o �
N � � �
� �•�.�
�, '� � �
� ��
O
� a1 ,� N
,� �" � �
� .�+
3���
W v
V � �
w
�U ° a�
��� o
�� � � �
o �� � a�i
u � �
'� ,� � 'G �
�H� ��
�
°��
� r °, o �
� � � � �
E-a �w�d�
, � � v �
� � � v �
� � � � �
v� `� •� v �: o
o � � v �, �
�.���
�����
� � � � � �
�� ��w �
�
� •
0
bA
�
:�
v
�,
�
V
�
�
�
� �
�: �
S �
� �
� Q
� �
0
o �
� .�
x �
.� �
U x�'
a�
��
O v
n �
� �
� ...
�
� �
� O
w �
��
� �
o �
�o
O �
O Nj
i �
v �
v�
��
H �
1 �
� �
�
�a
o � �
v
e� W �
v � �'
a� �
� � �
� �
�
�
���
O
�C.7W
�
C., .
O � v � o �
� c� � � �..�
��w
.� • ^i '�" cn
� � �,Q..�o
� � � � � n
GJ
� v o ..� � �
�
.�Hdw„��
�
��°'•���, °
� � � � � �
�
o � � y,�
µ., � , c� C� � bA
v` ��Cj �
+r �e v �e �,
� � CJ') w ,-� �.
V � �
� � y O � �
O' c�-�. �N�'v
� °; .� �, a �
F� � �, � �
+� .-. •r � ,-' �
� o � �-
v� o '� .� � �
� � � � � �
^C � � � � '�
��� �, �,o�n
� � � �
� �� �� �
� � � G1 ct� �
Q �
v � � o ° o�o �
pp� �Z`.
����o�
� v U � � �
c�C7 �.� �
u w p v � � c�„
v ,�' � a.+` 'f� �bA
'� 'y O � ,+„
v.oU v o 0
co � a
�� �'o ��
�vC� v�� u
� D bA
3 � ^� Q o �
o�� ��
o � � •�' o 0
,�,� V
� � ~ � G1 \ b�A
� � � � � n �
.��
�� ���
��� � �
pA � o v .� � ++
e� �., v � � G �
H � � cn °: b �
N
.--�
r'1
O
O
N
�
�
�
�
�
�
Q
�
�
�
�
�
.w+
G/�
e� �
'�i •�
UH
V
�i
'
Y ..
a
m �
� �
o �o
3 �
�
: q
� �
3
a
y �
d �
w �
a �
� �
� �
_
a �
c
0
�
G
E
�v
¢
m
�
�
GJ
Q
�
i�l
�
.�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
'�
O
GJ
GJ
�
O
�
�
U
�I
��
i�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
O �
w �
V
c� �
�" V
O �
,� o
. a+ U
� ,�'
�v
ir �
• � �i
O �
M �
� v
a,
w
O v
� �
O �
� �
•� �
O v
�
� �
� �
I �
��
v �
� �
� o
o �,
CJ ,�
Va
v v +r v� � �.
H � i.�+ i.�i i.�r �+"
� o � t�. a, Y3
�+" V �j
f!? � �+' � � �r
� O r, � �,
w � U v � �
�' � '� .� � �
~ y � V
U �4 ir � •�'"
� �
GJ
+ 'S� ,� '� Q" .� �
O � L3, +�.+ � O
W 1"i"� � Q � �
Q� � � V W
i� �
� E-+ G1 J� � �,
G�1 i, �
� � .� p �O �
s�.,.� � �,a� �
�o a�� �
� �" ' V � .�".r QJ
O � � � � �
c� � bp • RS �
G1
�, .� � � � ttS
� � � � � �
� ,� �' v cr
� � � �C ��, ,,, O
� •� � � � �
.� � �,.�'��
,� ai .�' U v
�v v�
� o �H� �
O � � G+
01 �
� °° ;� ,c � A
i.r �+ .� ir bD �
w � � a� � � a�
w o � � �
c/� '�" M � � • V V
.� � G� .� � G. �
� � ,� � � ..r
�r � � • � �
� � � � �',y � .�
� � � � � � ��
c� �� C'�bA�
� � a-�+ ti $ � 'CS
� ,� � � co � c�e
� � �N �
:� ,.�— �n � � �
i.a '� ~ N � � G�1
�������
b�A •� .� � � �
�`��°'���,
� � ,� v� x
�c vi cn � v 'C
�' a a� v a" r" �,
� �
U t�, Q, Q, .�.. � U
M
�
e o e a e
N Vi JI Y�
. � � n r � .. ..
�
O
0
N
�
�
�
�
O
e-�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
..
� V
'!�1 •�
UH
�
0
V
�
�i
�
'�
'�
�
� �
� �
i� �
,� X
�, W
��
��
e�
O 0
�
��
a �
��
� .�
� �
�
� �
�
� �
�
�.
o �
�
��
0
� �
�
O �
��
Q C�
��
.w+ �
�i W
� �
��
0
� �
A�
� ��
a�
�
,� �
�
c� �
> �
� 3
��
•'., .�
.� .�
� o
�
d �
��""
� g
''-'^'' i"" N
� � �
� ��
Ov � W
v O
� � �
O
� � �
O ^"
� � �
� O
�° a� �1'
�
�
Cn r ,�
� bA � �
� .� � �
� � 3
�
� �� �
����
�1 �' v �
� �, o
o � � v
w � Q" :�
� � v a
� � ��
o�+��'
N ° �°�i 0 w
p � �
�'���
� � .� �
�
� ,� +�+ O
� '� w v
�
a � ��
� w � �
� ...
� � � �
� � o
a,Sv�
a����
Q�•� �,
�o��
0
H � .� �
.�
� o �;�
� � o�
v
�� �s
Q '� � a
v o +�
� � v
� �
z���
0
•--� �
�. �
w" . �
O G�J
N �
� �
� �
� Q
v
V E.'�.,
�i •
� �
� G� cn
�
. �" � V
� o �
v �
� � �
� ��
� � �
� � �
w
y � O
� � o
v � �;
� ¢" �
� � +�
o �
y � �
� �
v
on � �
O
v � �
� � O
� � �'
"�, 3 �
x a �
� j O
..� �"
� � w
.-.
� ,v g
�� ,
C� Q, �
�
�
���
�
� ��
'�
� � �
o �
�. �
Q� �
� bA �
� .� �
O
� � �
v `� .�
� �
'� v °�'
� � �
�
..�
� � H
..
� �
.�
� � x
�, �
p., ,� U �
Q � O �
cn ,� � bA
�v���
�
'-' � � o
� o � �
���,
�U� �
v �' �
� U � v
� �
0
O � v �'
� vw v
a�.� o�
��v�
.'" �
3
����
�
� �;
��Qo
v � � �
L1..,,., •�,
�' '" � o
�°
� �' v �
,� '� '+�.�
� � O �
� � � �
o � '� '�
� � � �
�, o
�
����
�,o � ,
� �� �
a� v
.� � � �
� � o
�, o � . �
� � �' o
� ��� s�,
� � �
O Q " O v
C7 � 3 �
�
�
�
�
�
a�
�
.�
�
0
u
� � o
H � •�'
� �"
o y �
(� W • �r
� �
.,
.� � �
� � �
O v ,�
� � �
w
�
�
O
Q � O
O �U
���
cn �
� o
� +,
� � �
� ° �
� � �
W o 0
v ��
�� �
� o
�3°
O '� �
v� �
� O �
� � 3
° � o
v o �
��.�
� � '�
ti
� � O '�
� � � N
�• �" v �,
����
�~
�o
��v�
•� �
� U � N
�
`�U��
o � o 0
00 � � `�
� v
� v � �
� o o v
� o �
� ^�
o���
� v v �
.� E�-� � ^C
� � � o
� �
� � � �
CJ GJ Y� �
� � Y � �
G� F", .V 0
� � � �
+� �' C a �
� O � � �
v��� �
� � O �
��,��.�
0 w � � �
3
��H �
v
v �
,.� o , �
�'� � g ""
v .� � �n �
° � � � �
��o��,
� o � � �
�,�°'��
��'�03
a��,�v
o v� � 'v
� a�, ° � o
� � � O"
'
�����
����" �
.� � O �
� v ��
� O � ^" '.
� v���
� �
� ,� a � t�
�����
�03�0
•., � +� � �
�'� � o �
x +� � � O
�
��A o �
a o � U
��,.°� �v
v ��.��
a� '� �" •� �
S3, h ,�" � p �
��'' �. � y,�� O
G1 V �
H�a��
�
�
r-1
�
0
N
�
ti
�
V
�
�
O
�
�
�
A
�
�
�
�
GA
�
��
� �
UH
o � �.�
g �� v �
� o
� �
�i���'
�� � �
o v, �, �
.,�
� O �
� O .� � O
'C ,..,.�
� � � ° N
� �,,, � � .
° �a,,4?c
�� a�,� °'
� � � � �
(� p ,� � �
V � i�-� QJ
+'� � '� �.. �
�v��"�
� Q � � �
� �'�'C
� � '� '� �
� � � � �
°�� a,�
O
�3 t,�, � � .�.�+
� ����
g ���a�
�� a� �
o -� '� '�
� v �
�g���
� � O .� �
�o�a,�
� �
O O � C �
br0 � v � �
;� � �Q�
�s ° �' o �
v � v� �
� � H � �
O �
� � v � v
�, �+., � •v ,�
���� �
�°�,'��
V � � '" c N�
�" �
G � � � '�
U � � �
o .�
.� � � � ¢,
U;����;
° a .� o ,�
�
H��..,�
a�
V
�
te!
�
�
�
�
w
�
�
a,
c�
,� r.�. •� � O
� � U
�`���u
�
0 0 � �•�
���'� �
Rt � ' ^' �, • r+
F ,,, 'd '� � +'�
°� ���3
�
�
� �
���� � 3
•� � o
G. O � m bA
C .� Q" �'�"� *�
c� ° � 'v �
� � �
� � � � �
�.
�
� � � � �
y e� �
w �„ �. �1 �
� � •� V �
� � � � �
•� � � o
O � O N �
�
� v `� °�' �
°�� v �
bA � u +, .,..
�����
rr a
,� °�' '� �v o
�a����
�����
' �., � �
m
vi a.+
w � � 'v �
�
� � i.� .� '�
i"" � � u G
� � � �
� 'G � v v
�w�� ��
� �
�� v
� �.x.�'�'o
�����
� C� � � :�
�
� � � o �
� � � � �
ca ... � ,.� .�'
� U � � U
� � � � �
E- t�, +, v
U � .� V �
° o � � '� C�
'� � � ,� s.�. O
U�o�� �,
v M � � � o
H�°���
� '� 'B
� �
� � �
� ��
�
���
� O �
� � �
� ��
��
w
� � O
� o 0
v a �
� � �
� � v
� � v
� � �
� y
� � �
� � �
� �
� � o
� o �
�
� .�
� � �
� F" o
� u
�oU
� N �
�°�
�
.� � c�
�-,
� O ,V
�
� � �
�
^�f � V
�
��U
°�' o �'
..
cA � U
� w �
� O �
,� v �
� �
w � '+-�
p � O
� � � �
�.� � �
�
..., � g .v
.i.� y M �
� V � V
� 'o � �
� �..� .�
+� � w v � .�
� � � � �
a +� y N `�
;� � � .� � '�
� � � v a� �
� � � � +"�7 ++
bA +'� � G� v� �
'~ ��� ��
�
� ��g� �
. �r �
;•�Q,���
°�'"' �:�•��
o o���v
� ��H �,�
��•T3� � �
� c� � � �
o ��� �
Q ��•�``�''."
e� z.; �, Ef3 � 'C
c�
O ,��, N ,� O �
o y,� �
� i � o `� � `�
^' V
� G1 N �
'� � w � � �
cA �, � a,
� '� � c�� v
� �,
� � � � � �
��go��
,� ° r�i' v .� �
e� � � V �
E�3 �
'C
�-vv���
,� 3 'p � +
v� 0 � � W �
v � � ba
� � � � � �
�
o�����'
'~� �
�� � �
�
� � �D� G. v
�
a�
�
� � � �" � G�
.a�-�` "�
'� � � � � ,a
� c� '"
c�
� � c� � u � vi
,� �„ ,_,,, "p � � c�
�, � � � ,� �
� � 3 w '� � ,�
O +� v � � � �
� � � �
���
� u� ..C� N � c� �
� �
� � �
� ��
� � �
v
Q � �
�� �
�
o � '�
� a�, .�
�
���
�
'C3 '� �
� �"
� •� o
� � v
O • "��' �
� � v
� �
O
� � ''"
� �
� y
•a CJ �.,
� � O
.� '� �,
a�
�� �
� v w
� � �1
� ��
'O �
�� �
�
'�
�
� v e�
O �'' �
ta y
� � �
c�
� O �
� � �
° '� o
v
o �
.a � �
� �� .� �s
� �
� � �.y o
^' .,� U
� � �
� v �
� �
O�J � .�'�'
b4 � �
"C9 t�., O
� � �
� ��
H � �
�
.�
0
O
N
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.w+
�
� V
ti �
UH
� � v
''" � o �
� � ?, o
+� W c �" G �• J
�
�� O �
� ° v `�
�° � a a
�' :� � v
� � � �
•..� G1 � �
� � � w
^." �'" 'C
� � .� �
�'''' O �„ �
,� °' � �
.� �a, � �
� � a �
3`�-�0
��� �
� �
a� �
� Vj Q1
�i C.J � '�
e� �
� � � �
.C] �
a�
� � v �
�
� v � v
� � � �
� � �;
'� � � ay
y o � �
� � � �
� � O �
. �l �,
� ,4; � ,��.,
� � � v
����
¢, w "" �
�
� � � �
y � � s"
� � CO 'C
v[��
� o � �
��.��
����
�
� � � �
'� ,��i � .C��.
��5��
� � .� .�
a � � o
a� o � �,
V
H � � �"
C!�
z
w
W
H
�
C
w
�
�
�
�
U
� �
� �
'o�^� -�
� 'L3
� ~
U �
•�' on
U �
v �
� .�
•.. bA
y •'.
o �
� �
� �
� o
�. �
� °°
�
� �
� �
'�" V
w °J
V �
O O
� �
� �
a� �
� o
�, ,�
� �
� O
�1. �
U �
� �o �
� � .�
v
w o �
O
W
O O �
� � O
� •� �
v � �
� � v
w �
� O �
� v '�
w y
� �
� � �
'C � �
� � v
��
�o�
v ��
Cn cC cC
�+o��n�n
� �--� N M
o rn � �
t���rim�
N N
�
�
v
�
�
�
� �
C� �
O bA O
.� � u
� �
�n � �
� �
;� � o
a�
� � �
�+.., � m
o � �
v
� � u v
� � � �
� u U �
W � o Q
w� �
bp O �
m +, �
�
�� �.��
O o � � �
'C3
> > � � �
oo ��,�
�' > �
� �a°'� �
Q '� bA
v �v � �
G f., � ,��i -�
�
�UU°� �w
.° � ,�..'' rn � �
�
�VU��c�n
�
Q
�oo �
� �n � g �5 � .o z5 �+
� � � n o rn
� N N �+
... `. .... �..
'�
�
w
�
�
'� o
w >
v
� Q
� �
v �
O �
.+-' U
v �°-�
�o °
��
� O
��
�
� �
� �
� �
��
� �
� �
g u
� o
v
��
�
�
w
w
O
�
�
0
+
t�
.�
��
�w
�
v '"
a
� �
w. 3
�
O �
cn
� �
a�
a� �
>�
� y
.� Q
��
� �
�.
w C7
�
� 'r�
�i. w '�
.°r � ^�
� .� � �
O � � fi"
w •� �
o '� � �
3 u• "
�
�� �w
�.
o >, � c�i
� � o �
Cn � ' � C�
� � O �
c� � �'' e�
����
°„'
��.��
��� �
� 't1 v 9
� � �Q
����
� 3 v �
C7 c�i z C�
O
�
�
�
°;
v
•C
v
Q
R.,
�
�'
�
i
O
V
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
0
Nx
O �,
�
�� �
� F"
�
�
N
N
�
v
'o
�
v
v
�
�.,
Cl.
�
.--�
�
.�
�
v
�
�
t�r
Q
v
z
�
�
O
0
N
N
N
�
�
�
V
O
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
� V
� �
UH
� ���
�
�
� O � �
a� aD � �
� � •�-'.,'' °
� � a�
� o��
� � .� o
� � � o
� � cr� O
o �Vo
�
r
U °��°
� �, �
U '� "�" �.
e�
�
C1 c� �. ++
+�+ � O �
O � � �
�s a� � •�
� � � �
��� �
v
�; � ,� o
a, � � �
O
3� ��
w
����
o � 3 �
�
c� C� V '�
'� � w G�
����
� � V
���.�
o ,�
�
� �, v �
o„� o 0
v � � U
�' o �
� � �
� O �
V
,� � V
� � ��
O � �
� �
� �;, �
�
� 01 0
�
H � �
u
�
O
�
0
:C
�
�
�
v
�
0
�
Fr
�w
��
�
� �
� �
v
� �
��
.� �
a �
�~
a,
O �
v�
0.
� �
� �
� �
�� �
o �
�U
� �'
�U
�:
p a�
O +��' M
� �' N
n � �
� v M
� � �
� G. O
� �o
� v N
.:� 3 �
o �
°�,' �
a'-� � r
� � �
� w
�r � ',�
a� ,� '�
or�
� � �
°' � s�
� v �
o � �3
� �
O -� • v
,�w�
�
z. �" �
g v �
a�i a
c�i C� �
� � �
�
� V y
�
`� � s �,
� ��
' � �,
w � �
C',
�
�
�
w
�
a�
�
�
�,
�
�
�
V
u]
w
�
0
�
0
0
0
N
�
�
w
O
'r
�
a�
a�
�
�
�
�"�
���
�� �
v
� � �
GJ
v � ��„
� o �
.�' ;, �'
3 . a �
�
cC w �'
o ��
as
� � �
� �
� �
� v o
� � v
o ,� .�
G, � V
� � �
� � �
� �
� �
� �
'�
���a
O � � "CS
��
� w
o �
a� �
V V
v
� O
� �
�
� `�
� �
c� �
� .�
,� ,�
O �
bA
v o
v H
O
Q, c r^,
� m
"" v
��
� �
� �
wQ
� v
�
� �
O v
� .�
� o
O �
� �
� �
.S�
� �
u �
�
� �
��
� �
� �
O .�
� �
O �
�
��
� �
� �
� o
�x
�
�,
�, �
�
vi
�,
�
v
�
�
X
�
�
�
bA
�
.�
�
'�
'�
�
v
'r
.�
�
0
v
�.
N
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
�,
�
v
�
v
�
ti
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
v
��v�o
� �
�-� � a,v
V
� � � V �
O
�
�
W
�
w
�
a�
�
F+
�3a °JV�cs��a�
���
�
° •�' � � � � � �," �
� � � � �, �� � �
a� ,s� '� c�i �
��;���
� a� �e �. v +r '� o�o
���ga ;,,v�"�
� � ,� ,�r, �' o � a s�,
� y3 � v �
� o �"a� �g•�
�
Q, `�-� � o � � cy �
�
U �" � � '� 3 °�' °� ao
� �U �'� `+�`�� �
+' � � 'b � � ��„ '+�• ��
o .b '� � � • a�, v o •^"
� � o v+
�, � � g ¢, E � � , '��"
��v��
� O � M � � G�J � v.,
� � � � � � � � �
� � � � O 0 � � O
a�� �,:����s v
� � �r � V � +�' � �
�
V
�bA � V � � � � ^� �GJ
� Q "�� o `� e, �Ts
o�� ��,���
'� �a � � '� `� o � .�
� � � � � � � � �
o�� �.�° ���
$'" G� O cn � '� s, ��„
� ��' �
� w °: 3 v °�' � '� b
� � � � � 'o u g . y
O �
G. � �'3 Rs Rs �1, ��-' � �
� � � � � � � � v
� � � ,L�, �i "" RS Efl •..
v��b>,�
.� � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � �
.,
�
�� °���ao.� �
� � � ,+� v � i � p � �
�
�� � e �"+�/ �+ � S].G�
r ,�
�, a � `� a� Q � � � �
.,.., � � � S ++
v
� 3 y � ° ^� � �
� � o �
� g�M'�,.�w
�" � tA a0 bA `� �,
�� � [� O� ` a '
3.�0°��`�°'3
v .., �•
v � � � �z
Hw-� o�� 3 �,�
�
�
�
O
0
N
�
�
e�
�
V
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
cI�
� v
N �
UH
�
�
� �
a�
� �
a� �
� �
�. a
a� �"
v �
� �
O �"
x�
CJ
�
� �
'^� O
V �
� �
a�
o �
� �
� �
� .�
� �
� �
O v
� �
� �
�, y
�1 �
v �
o v
� `"
.,..i +.+
�--� G�1
t�"``+
v �
O pq
.� �
�
�i GJ
� �
��
�
ow
� `'
3 �
��
� T
v� y
�x
H�
*d
�
�
�
�
� �
� v
w �
� �
� �
� �
0
� �
� �
� �
O�
'C w
� �
� �
c�
� �
O �
:C �.,,
�
� �
� �
��
� �
�
cn �
�� z
� �
� ��
� �
� '�
�
w �
� �
��
U �ri
v �
�� �
,� � O
� ��
� � �
� � �
O �
� � V
V �
.� �" �
� O �
�U �
,�'�
�U �
v
��'�s
o� �
0.� �
� ~
,���
�
� .� �
� � bA
�
� U �
�o�
Cn � V
v
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
0
�
�,
�
�
w
O
�
.�
�
�
�
�
'�
�,
w
0
�
�
�
bA
�
.�
.�
.�
�r
.�
'r
�
�
�
�
.�
�
a
�
w
O
.�'
0
. �,
�
�
.�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
E-i
�
�
�
�
.�
;�
�
�
�
v
�
�
0
�
�
N
�
'C3
�
w
+�
v �
�". (�
��
v �"
� o
v�
v �
� �
� �
� �
`+ o
w �
� �
�
� ...
� �
� �
� .�
.fl cr�
vti
� �
�
Q, v
� �
CJ `�"
O
� V
� �
;�, v
� �
v �
� o
� �
�
� �
� �
�� �
U �
��
H �
� �
'o �
� X
o v
� o
��
•� �
0
s�, �
� V
O �
� �
C�,
� ��
� �
� v
�, �
o y '�
��
� �
��
� .� .�
�., ,� v
� o .o
� � �,
� '—' .i�.+
.� � 'a
� c�n u
�
O v O
� � ��
� �
� � �
�
v °J �
V .�
V � �
O
� ��
�
v o �
� � a�
'� �
aJ aJ �r
�
� v O
,� � �.
� O w
cA �
U � v
�
� w �
�
� v v
�� �
� � �
.�
� � �
� �
� �
� �
0
� s�"
� ,�
� o
� �
�
� �
�
.� o
� �
., :--�
� �
'C3 �
� �
� �
� �
�" w
v o
a
o �
ao �
'o �
��
�
O �
� ��
� � �
��
� 'r�
o � �'
� .t', V
� �w
o � �
v
�o �
� �3
� �� �
� �
v � �
o + w
.�
� ~ �
Q N r ;
� � U
�
v ��
�`�3
� °J cn
� � �
� � �
�w w
� ��
�
v �
3�c�
°� �
� �
3�
��
o �
� �
�
� 3
�
'� o
� ^�
� �
� �
� �
� O
v
o �
� o
o Q "
v v
� �
��
:C7 �
� v
��
cC O
w �
O �
� ..,
� �
v �
� ��
� v
� �
� � a.
'. � � C � ..,
o .� v
v
c� O ^
, � . V
� �
.�" V C�1
���
+�+ • � O
� � �
o � '3
�� �
� ; O
•� u �
GJ � U
H � �
00
.-r
�
0
0
N
N
�
�
�
�
O
!� J
�
�
�
�
�
.w+
�
e� �
� �
UH
�
�
�
�
'C
�
bA
'�
�
�
.�.�+
a�
�
�
0
�
�
a
�
++
�.
O
�,
�
�
�
�
�
v
00
�
�
�
�.
�
�,
�
�
a
�,
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
w
�
bA
�
O
.t�'�
.1�
�
GJ
�
'�
�
cn
�
0
�.
�
�
�
H
�
0
�
�
�
.�
�
F--�1
�
0
:D
c�
�
:G
�
Q
O
O
.S�
�
�'
�
v
�
�
W
�
�
�
�
O
�
0
�
0
�
�
.�
�
0
V
�
�.
w
�
v
�
�
F�
c�
�
�
v
Q
v
�
0
�.
a
�
�
a�
�
�
�
�
v
�
�
�
v
�
�
V
�
v
w
O
�
�
O
Q.,
�.,
�
f�,
'�
w
O
�,
v
�
�
°�'
v
�
�
�.
�°
�
0
�
v
'�
.�
0
�
�
�
.'.,
�
v
�
�
�
V
'�
v
�
V
�+
�
�
�
w
O
v
v
a
0
�
v
.�
.�
�
� �
v �
.�
� �
u °'"
0
v
� �
O
� �
v �
� v
� v
� �"
� �
� '�
� �
i "" O
O �
� �
+� ~
�
O '�
� u
�
.� U
o �
�c U
a� �
��
'� �
o �,
��
�
��
� �
a o
��
� �
cA
m .�
H �
o°
b o
�" O
O N
v �
� �
� N
� �
�
� �
� o
�
� � a
� � �
� �, .n
�
� '�
��
� v
� �
'� o
� �"
v �
�. �
o �'
� �
�' O
VU
�
� (�
� �
O
�� �
� �
� �
� �
•--� a,
� �"
.�
�
O �'
� o
� �5
��
��
��
�.
v
'� �
� �
� �
�
°1 ,�
� �
��
��
y �
� v
G� �" �
x �
�
'CS � �
'.
� � �
� � �
� o �
� °J
o °n �
�
v � .�
� '� �
�
.� •�
�
v
�.�
� �
v �
w �
o �,
��
�
�
� �
'C
� �
•� �
O p
� �
� �
O cC
V V
w �
� O
�U
� �
�
�U
� v
o �
v '�
0 0
� �.
�
.� �
� >'
� �
� �
.� 'S
u
� �
��
�v
�,
�
� �
�
.� '�
� �
� �
� �
w �
.O C''
• v
� �
� °J
� �
v
� � �
� � R,
� °: °;
�
�
�
�
�
�
'C
.%
�
�
'�
�
�
O
�
.�
O
�
'�
�
'�
.�
O
�
Q
�
.r,
v
�
�
�
v
�
�
�
H
�
a�
�
�
�
U
�.
� v
a �
�
�
��
H �
G� .�
V �
� �
f�
� �
C1� �
w
� �
w
v
a �
��
� �
� �
�
� �
Q
�
v
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
O
0
0
N
w
�
i�r
�
4
O
u
O
'C
�
'�
.�
O
�
.�
v
�
�
�
� v
� �
��
w
H�
v
��
a v
w �'
0
�� �
��
�
��
d �
� '�
1 �
�
� �
•a U
(� S�.'
�
� �
o `�
F� �
w
rn
�
__
rN
�
�1
V
1
�
V
�
rl
1�1
�
�
w
�
�
�
W
�
W
�
�
Q
+� v
��
'� �a,
�
� �
� �
..� p
� � a
y �„� � N
Q. � �--�
O v �
fA Q� ""
� �
�
wo
.� \
Q1 O
N
'�7
'C V '�"
F�+ � � N
a
� o °� � m
y �' � � v
W � � ^
a:
� �
�
� ��
>
�
� �
>.
� �
�
� �
ti
s�.. y
O �"
H
�
C.
>
d
�
� � m m � � rn S � � � � rn � � o � � � � � � � �
� ER � (V � ,- l� . � � u m � � m � M ~ � p N �
�o �o m
� ,.'' v N
�
O ��O O O O�� O O O� O O o O O O� O O O O� O �
��
� m � N m � �
� � �
V-?
00 � M m o0 �� O o �� O� d O O n N����� O
� � � M �O � � OO O � � O � Kl � �D r+ O� N N �
�D (�
� ~ � �
�Q � O O O�� O�� O O O O O O O Q O O O� O �
o �
� � CO N O O� � N p
N� ('�l N N ��y�
Ef3
�o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o g
� � �
� � vi
� N �
� �°s�ggg�gg���oo�$000$g�
� � � m � C�O � N � � N Cn tA N � �
� �
� � � O ('�n � m Q� 0 n� N G� t�i'� �f O d� � O O������ O a0
�p � L� cr� lri �O lri �O fn N �A O O� N c+� �--i O N 1ri p�
��., ,� � � �l3 � N 00 �A 00 C� iA N o0 .-+ �O '. t+� � N � O
'CS O � m.-� d�' '� �M K� � � e� i O K I
� � C � '� ~ `~'' �
� w ^
-o
�
w
�°
v
v
C�
0
0
� � �
� `o 0 0
',�, v � `���
N � R V � F. � W� ,C
v w Q � a, C� � 3 3 3 „�
w � � v � � ,G..� � � � � � w
o, � v " � � G w�� i i i V a y Q �
� � y '� � ` y '� X � � .� W = ' O F O �O � y ;
-� -� .-7 cn
c .° � '� �� c� � ;a F �' " � � � �a �u �c G � °'
�� a o o;g c�� i m �> a� v a, °' v �"
�' i� a� c� v •�
�
o a �� �U o o z� o C� O�� w w w o o�
�- v Ca v�, � ,�. ,�. °, a �. � � N U 3 � rn � g � � �n
� �
°��' o � � � :°, :� � ,��, R o �� $. � °� � ^o � � � ^o �o �
i� e. �, .� �n F F- F- H 3 U C]. U c�n U w" , � � rx c� E
ocvm � oc �`c3n` r i NN ° mmv��i ����°�°��
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
� N
� y
� °u
�a
�
ry
�
�
�
V
i �
r.+ , y
� �b
� � �
� �
� �
~ G �
� y �
� y �, n � N
� � � �
�.. � d �
i�l v� GL �-'
w ��
¢
wo
W � O
!� N
r
�
�
�
�
�
�
'� U ~
�
R � � N
� � � � O
E" � '� m e,
W � � �
�
�
'd
d
R�
X
W
�
� �
o �
H �
�
CO O
R v
p. G
o �
H
.� �
d
�'. �
O s"
F
�
�
�
>
�
N
� ���
� � � � cv
'CI p � � ,-:
Q; � C � �
a w �
� �
M m
rn rn
m m
N � e �
� �3
M r��
O� Q�
� �
��
� �
� �
� �
��
� �
� �
� �
� °�
^C m
w �
� w
� ,�
� a
> �,
0
a �
� U
� '�
U F
0
�
m
CO cn r. c'n �O O�
� o � � m p � �
� n n � O� ��-+
� �D N M M
cri `� r: �
i o°ggo 0
n
ao r. ao t�
� � N N
� L� o r.
� �
� � � N � �
d� O h � M �
O n \O ,- [V . O\ O
m� � � ao cn �
�r r. �
O O g
d' 00 n O
O � O O �
� �n d� ,-• m
�
g o g o o g
�r m �
� � N
� �
°$888 �
� N O N � t
� '-+ oo ao ch
� �
oo�S� u`�
� ��o���
co ,-� cgi m
c� � �
� �
p 'c
.^° 7
� w
Q .�
�' . y :�' c�.
ww �r� y
a�i a", y� y u�
�. ;°
cn cn � .° 3 F
� � � � �
� �
�3 �
° o g
n n
� �
'. �-.
N N
� �
O �
��
� °�
88
N N
� �
� �
n n
N N
��
'�
�
w
-C °D �
� � o0
� � �
w � �
C
y O �
Q a �
� G� F
� r ,
m �
�
�,
E�
O
.�.
�
N
�
�
N
�
N
�
E!3
n
�
W
N
f�
�
n
�
�
�
n
�
�
� e �
M
�
�
�
N
�
�
�
^o
�
w
�
Q
�
E
�
�
C7
y N
� N
v �
.a '�
o a
�
��� �
�s �s � • o0 00 � � w �
��� � ���� v �� .� � '�� �
.� . � ° ° a .S � y �. � � • R � � '� � � '3 '� •a, •a, ,�
ca co �'O 'Cf �i' ar �� a.� O �'. G G C. C
� o o ^ u 'u ye C a�i a�i ~ `" y m � 17 � v a v v v �� �a
� � � � m cn � � o � � 3 a � � � " t7 oc p � � � � � � ,� �
C Ga GU a, o �� o o a�� p V v, ��
F'+ v�, v�i � ,G ,� C4 "-� � � � � ?' ?" � u r, (� '� A A A .a A u v � '�1,"
p 7 7� a� a�i �� G x x���� b v� c0 � .� .p ¢ a� C c l
( J x.x g'C 'Lf � ar �.. r. r s, O O R , � y„ � ar ar �� �� �� .�+ S 00
�0 �c W PL w w w w� n `� Or ar � O:� P4 0.�. C4 CC. LY. x
> > � a� �e �a ;'� c� c� '�„�" �a al al al GJ a� � a! a! �
a a � a ._ � a � � � � o o A ;n ;n � a > d � d � � eo ao 00 '�
t�. w�„ o 0 0� o 0 0 o Ll Ll �°°� Q i� i.�, i:. is, i�. �'� Ts •� C
m m v �.� �' w R R R m,-. .-, .., ��" L� o 0 o g � o c n ���� b
�-• '• o w �n > a G G G G 'C 'tf 'tS 'i3 'ti p • > �,' '*�
m m U E`"- F o � Q O � � Q Q Q Q Q c'". � Q¢ Q Q Q Q C7 Q Q��
8
�
�
�
0
�
V N N d� S O o o ���� 8 8 8 8 88 O o0 �N u1 h 8 8 88 N c e
C. [� [� � v�' ��� N N O O v O O o0 N O� M M� O�O l� M O c� n u� u�
� � � m O� � N v�� H� N ul ���O v M � N CA � C� �O [� v� fA fA
(V
.~-. .�.i .�... ~ v ~
� �
� `r
'�
w
�
��
�
W
�
�
�
�
� g
� [p N
'� "N G�
� N
� �
o � ��
o���
�" � � w�'
� N
o ' � � �
� � �
u � ��
ar �
�
W
�
�
O
V
�
�
C!J �
C �
(C t"
ti. w
� �
H
C �
� �
w w
O `*�°
F
�
�.
,
�
4
�
�I
�
z
"C3
G
�
w
N �
� ?%
N
N
n
N
fn
8 S � S N O S O O o0 N
V O� N � � N�i M�A
H �
� � N O
C� N �--i r :
�8� ��� �
.. � � L� N �
N � N � p 8 f�i
T M K� l� <r»
�O c`i � f� �D
N
n
�O
N
Vf
�
r
�
N
O
�
�
�i o0
O��D .� `� , O H
> � � � °' a °J i � a�i
'�
� o� � a, a, � v '� o� 8 `�
� d � � � � � V G � >" > .� y R � � y � 'a
� � � a a � °" � a a � v �" � �' ° .� � R " �, �° ��°" ¢
O w w O F" � � O O;� y��.� �� d v[� 7, ��� C. a�+
s tn s. tC N. � O�
o � � � � a, � a a a •� > � U F- � w �^ � � ° x � �
w .. N � o � `� � J, v � � � � °�' ° � a`� a�'' � � '� ,°', �
� E- E� �� �� o� o v o v cn v� �� a u a C o oG
C���' Q R: �'' R'� R G. � O. �.`' 'i b` `��° W a �� O b� �1 ��
a', R R v a a'� o•� � c. � a:.: .� ,� a�� a, :� d, d, c'So � p�
R
xUUxxwwLl�Qcn�mO>cnU �Owv��wwU 3a���
v v v v v v v v v`v :° ° V �,-. c� c� cn m w ui ui in �n u� �. o0 0o a.:
`"' . .'�.i .. .'�.. .'�.. .`�.i v � .1""ii ..~.. � ..~.. .~... v .�i .
a� m,-• � r•rn�ns�rn� ,-�nmu�,NCf,or.cv�nmca�
o� ���n o� p o 0 0�n o�n c� o o p t� o� m�. o 0 C
� O� O� M IA 00 O 00 �O 00 N c0 N IA � C� l!'� O� W L� 00 �� K� L� N
�n �n �n �n � .o q� �n � �n � �n �n � �n �n �n � q� � � �n �n �n .o �n
� ��,-: cndoo d+o �c5,-.,��n�n d ��� o�
� � � � � � � � S � o � g � � � � 0 25 � � � � vry � � g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
s
�
� �
�
4�
F
�
�
� �
� �
H �
� �
R
U
.N_.
�
�
M
N
�
��
� �
� a
�
A 1� 1 1
W
�
�
�
�^�
� Q
� [p N
� ♦+ N
� N
� � R
� � ��
o ���
a 'd � °'
�i
� � r �
u [� � �,
� ��
� �. r
i�l
�
�
�
�
V
�
�
G
�
�
U
v
G
ro
�
00
'O
G
�
Ct.
� O
� `
4
(� �
S.n
O �
E"
:� �
� W
�' ro
O �
H
N
.'7
G
>
�
�
U
d
�
�
O
.*�
w
O
U
� �
�
� �
�
�3
�
F
v (.
�
'�
W �
R
� �
F-
5 �
_,� Ey
V
v
�M
U
a
�
m
a
N
m
0 0
rnrn
� �
�
� �
� �
�
�T
�
v
�
'i7
W �
�r
R
�a
E-
R �
U
�-' tV
A N
� v 'V O�
� � �.
Z �,, W
N
� R �
� = a
` w ' � _ �
0 q � � N
0., = r. R [�
�
� V� O �M
v
C. � N � N
� � �
Cc, F• F�
G
C7
0
Q
R
>
¢
�
� �
V�
O O
� �
� fn
�
s�
� �
� �
�
a
7 �
� �
y �
d a
.f. .N.
� w'
E• `�
�
a
� �
p, E�
O
N � � � v
R R w R[= E= y en �� y
0.. C. Q ty j� j� y y�
a a w o �. U 300�'00� ��� 5; f� a
a o o�������������� �
� � U : °. `'"° .°'. w r�. w .°'.
SS. G. � G. O. 00 00 OA 00 00 O �
Q¢ _o'"ri ��•�.�.� •� •�.�ww�
2 � a � � � � � � � � � p r� � �
� � � �. 's '6' '�' 'E 'E o. v� �n �
UU �C] R � �c'",a".e.c �Q�� �
R C. C. O O O O ��`1
d 7 �-+
<r m
� w� M C� .�l", V v�i U U��J U M.`� �-'�- `J
g g� � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
��
��
� �
8 a0 � O O n�6 O �A ��-' `-' ���� O o� N
� � � � �m � � `-� `�-' � N N �D N�
� N fV � v v~ fH
� �
� � �� o��� �
� ���� ���
L� O� v �O �--i 1A � n
N � v v ~ d9
E� Q S �D � N
ri �i � � ri
� N v N
vf
�+
b
� o o � � �
� ° � � 8 � � G F
a a� � � y� �� b a a
Q, � R �' G`��r G GVJ � �" (1i � '�f � �
� ai G � C4 °J p a�'i G L •�
Gv �� Q W � i. ar ar R� �'i + �'� � ar Q
�(f' 3y p V Q� fA f/ �" q�� lE � � Vi Vi
.� � � ,� G. 0 L`�. L'�. � � j � � p � .�G � � y .�
,--' lJ
o a�i � DO a�>> C`n� Q �^ `�° � c+ >>
� .� �,aayzs o3 &�aa .�
� � � �° c � G � � �� � '� 3 � � � � �
O�� a U x C� t� �°; `w� � c�i 6� Z C7 C7
v y N N
F v
c
v
�
d
� ,o 0 0
� C � �
W
� a � �
� ^ n �
N � N N
��.. � .. ��.. . . .. . v . � O O O
`_' �. � �
7 � � � � � � � a � 7 7 7 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.� .� .� .� . .� .� .� .� .� .� .� .� .
N tC tQ fC eE f6 IC e6 tC R tQ
� 7 7 7 7 7 7 > > > > , , �
c� N 1A N N 0� l� N U�1 11f '� N N
p � � � 1� � � � � � � � � �
11'1 ll� ll� � l� 1� 1� 1� l� t� 1� t� !� 11�
m m m m M M M M Kl M M M M cn
�
� N
00
� R"
m
N�
.�.+
�
�
�
GA
�
�
� g
� (Y� N
� � d
� N
c� � '6 �
� �
o � � �,
" *� � �
w ���.r � �
�, �+�1 � '�
u L� � �
'� � �
a� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
A V '
W
�
�
�
G
V
v
�
�
'CY
G
�
t:.
Q
bA �
� O
� �
a.
� �
E ^
1�i �
� w
s. �
Q. G
� �
E-�
d
�
G
>
�
� 'o
� 0. d
a
y � a
� 3 �
� M
�z�
� oc ,�
� �
3 � '�
>
�j w Q
� � �
o w
U O C�
� � � �
u` �i o
N � �
�
� � � �
''' c: o r:
. ..�.. �
�
�
R
O
E
�
�
7
'�
Q
w w w +�+
�G�
F E'= E= "
5 � � �
u�c��
w
F �
jp v �
� '� b
Q � R
� c'i D
�
� `� y
� � R
w ; 3
� Q co
� � 'o
� A o0
V C7�
g o �5 g � p
N e-+ � ch
fA ffl
� �
� �
� �
�
$ � o
�
� f+i N
�D e
� `~-� V-J
�
�
�
O
F-'
v
� �
y .�
'Cf
d Q
d d � d
N
c � � R
`° " y d
F F .� ,�
� � � �
c� c� � �
`�n
�
O
�
Vi
�
r.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
N
�
N
�
�
� �^� O O N O �D
� �"' v v `-' .'"i_. .''"�...
z �
�
� �
�
�' w ��� °����
o �n �n �n °� �i �
L1. ,V O O O = O O O 0
� � � � � �w � � F
.� y��� a. o 0 0 0
� 3 �o �o .o � � � � �
w m" 3 U
�
a N
� �
��
�
���
� W �O � �O
� V l� � � M �
.�i ' V� � � � 11}
^� Ef3
w �
�
� ��
� V � �
a � �
G �SQ
� �-
w
�
�,
O �
�
.�
R �
.� � �
a � �
� � �" 0
V Q
�
t� �
1�1 O � �
R
V w � V
[ G �
� � v Q
E�
w
o �
� g G
. C�/�] V c.i w � N
N
'� � � (V � y i � .
F�
� ��� ��o
�,� �
�
r+
O � � ° a,�
" � ��
O � R y � � � �
� �
�.�, �" t�3 � N 7.�, t"
e-1 � �, • > V °
U � � w �'� Q
O �
O
O
N
c�
v
�
�
�
V
y
.�
w
���
�; � �
� � �
��
�rn
O n N
� rn �
� v
O N Q�
N � C�
W W �
� �
�
���
� � V
�
��
coo�
� � N
�
� ��
.-�-� �O n W W a�0 00
� C� ('n M � ff-1
g��N �
���� �
� �
� O O
�
�
�
�
� �
W
�oo
g oo
r
N
�
L� L� N Q O O N i1f
u ��W NS
� n n � � � �pp n
� �--� r-+ �--i �-r � [n C�
FA
����� �
� N v � fA
� �
� O O O�O' O O
Ki Efl
t� o i�f1 O t� ���O ��
00 00 N(V v � N
� � � �f
s°s �000� �o
N N
Cfl EA
g°8 8°�°
N � � n
� �
U
� N
'�O p d p
� �
� �
�. �, g
S O O O O O N S
� N � N � � N �
O N O N O O N O
� �R � tG � � Q ��R �
y � y U y �� V y U u N y U y � U
R d� O Q�' t6 � V� 0�' tC � O t��C � � p y t�"O � � t�'C
� w�� iC ^� v �.. � iQ U � RS U w N G fC �^ U N c�
R 7! y CO M R GJ y CG � CG � q� yS CC CQ
•� c � ^p e�l .fl � 'C � '6 ^� � � 'p � � � 'C
� ' ^ � �
� � �Qw v� >dw � Rw �� � �Q � ,�,� � �
c o ^o •o a+ a o^o ^o � �v � a o ��a C"+ o�o
a Z� a, a ar � Z a, a, � � a, � z� a, v �� z a,
w � �o ^O u. ^a ^o w .n ^o � w � ,a b b w 2s
� v � w v v *�+ a � a� a v w a '� a � w a� a� w b � a�
s� ���� �� ��� o� �� w� ���� :�� ��
���v��vv �vv��� �.���� �.��,��� �.���o
�-a �'° �xx o �a �'°�� ^c �Nx �a �'° Nxx �TS �'°a
W � � Q 'ts a�i °: d j � Q °: a; A ] � v a; � � � ¢ �o a °: � � y Q °
�"� 'O -� i. ¢ t�"C �C CJ 'C -� i. R tQ �'t7 'C Q R �'O b i. Q ' t t V'LJ Tj i.. t0
�.. C/ � tC � . N R 7� w � G7 �� V+ G1 � R V � d�
y > � v�a Q >�,aa � > va � o�,a�� � o�,�
R a. a � '° � '� R a � -a -a � � � � v � R � ?' ^v ^c � �a .. �a
a a. � c c. � � a•.. i; q a ;a . � a".
C�a¢w��� a�¢w�� u����� H]¢ ���� E-�aa ��
m m � �
� rnwo,-.
V n O � c�+
i'. �" u7 l � � e�
w'� ����
m
� V � N Q� L� �
y N O� �
��w� �N
�
G""S(]
�
w
� o� o 0
O �
� � �
� �
a V U
a�o
a
V a
� �
� O a� � ��o
� � � � o��
��� ��
u V
� y � y
� � v Q
w
o g c �oo
� (� `� v ,� °�
. j � '� c ,�,��„ y �
c� � v co C � �i
� � � � � � Q
� v H
�
� �
O � � &
¢ ^$� goo
O v e"a a ��`�' � N
y � C � �
�" R ,f N i.�. �" �
U '�"'� � � w � S a
\ �
�
�
�
N
�
�
�
�
�
V
CA
.,..�
� � �
�M �t
8�
�o a
��
o� c
�_
�_
° o �
� �
�
0 0 �
W rn u�'�
� ~
O (�
�
o� o 0
°�
�
�
�
�oo
o °
0
0
�
� � m m m
� � �n �n �n
<rrn000 �-.
O O V v t�'1 �
� FA
���� g
�
EH � N e �
�
� o o � o
�$o� o
� �
� �
�oo� o
Q o c,Z
� 25
g
w o
� �o ° o 0 o s
� e- N N � '- �
�"' O O O O O
T
� l� O� l� n n n
�i w O� ^ w w � w
w y �N �' U �(� y U � N U y N V N y U
V u ��� v u O � u � p R u � p� (�J u p �
O O O
R! � y CA C� W � y CA � �� CC b� G PG
� ���.. yy ia � � � � �C r ' � � � r " K �C �i ''"' � .7 � ~ �
'O � Q Gi � 'O R W 'd � � W 'O � R W ^� 'G � W
�+ C � 'd ^O ~ � � v Q � z � v ��!I � z � d 1��y � � v
� W � 'C '6 �i k. � 'C �7 w y � 'C ('7 W � .O 'C W W .0 'C
v� � a a�'i °'� w a�i �'° � F" a� �:'d w a� a+ ' w a�
+' � ^� °% J
�� ��� �� v � �� ��� �� ��� ����
'.L�' ^� � '° � � ,��,+ � � � rx � �c" � '° � r� � �v � '� � � o � � a
�a �'ti d .. .. � �c � o � v d � „ w �-� Q � „ `++ c � „
'�''i]m ", � � d]w°�° � v�m �-a �+ y ] w � y'a °„' 'a]'� °„'
o�c .c � R�a z T� v� R �'� �c � d R bA'� -o � d a '� � a
y .� ; ��� � a �;��� �y �"��
a
� � � � -o r � ° >" -o � '� ° � . .� � o � �• ,ti ; j '� >• , o
c a � . � c� a - o c o� � -o � � � a � �v . � � :v �
H�¢w�� 3�a� � u�¢w�� �1�¢w�� �..�a��
U
� N
'ti p�p
c'J
C,
�
O� O� O� O� � O�
� �D <M � �
G �" t � � � �
a �
w �
V Q q
00 O
'� m c`�'a � � N
al Cl. y�., � �
� � � �]
�
W
�' o� o
G
O �
� � �
� �
.� � �
� V �
� a '�
V ¢
�
�
� o� o
� o � �
� ���
� w ~ V
� G �
� � � Q
E�
w
o g � �o
V� U N rA � �
d �
.� � � N ,,,�, � L
� � �� � G Q
� � � � H
� y
O � � fy
� �°� g�
o ''� � « � � � � °° .-'
� � � � ��., � � y � N
i � � ' V �
� �
U � w � G G]
O �, , �.
O �
O
O
N
�
�
�
.—a
�
d�lY)
�
�i�
� O �I�II � � �I�II � N N I�� � O I�I I
��
u
�°� $ 0
N N �
� �
� o � �
� �
� � �
� �»- �
�
�
�
��
g��
� `-' ESj
� �I
o� o
�°� �N
�
��
�
�°� ��
� �I�� �
EA � � �
� N
� �
� �
a
„
tA N N
. �..� [� .�.
w � � �-
o �.
s g � N �s g �g
0 0 o T �o o �o
� � � � .� � Q � 5� d � 5�
o a o0 0�� c, � 0 25 v �0 25 a � 025
t�6 r . C c�a N c�a N C C (� R N Y • � R N V � � N
v ° o � v � � v °� � `° v � ^.° N v :� � �i a �
V N �6 U � V ��. i6 � U cC �i U r.. � � V t,„
� Ki � � � °; N � .�' � � d � � � *� � .�' � p � ,�' ?;
^ � a, � m � �a `'� � a�, 'd � F'' � a�, � �, � a� � W c�c a �
� . 0 R w p ^ - > ca *' �y > Q w .w+ ^a > w �h b > w b > �a
� .� O PO �� O'C '4 L � O. V O � O W
��z� �,�z�,v a� za �
'� cr" � � `� FT- « 7 C' w � C C � w y 'C � u" � 'd i"� � «t �
q v N a "C5 a� w ��a, � v a y y � a� •� '� ��1 '� '� � w
w� �� ���� ����� o� �� x� �� ����
.°.o �' o Lz, .�o m m .,,, �o �' o o v,,, �o N c q o a. v, a�
. .t��.' �i � � a�i *' � v :o W � :9 �i a�i �. v v ;� °' y �' °' ;v �' ^'" �+ � �
b u: � v -o � r� W v � rx ��c �' a4 Rs
� c � � .. �¢¢ c/� �d .. .. ��od „ 0 q�cd ., � q¢Q
���¢" '"�yy �"���� 3] �y� u��y� �si�ya
W „ O -� .. R R � b .� ,. �a ,� �o .� .. A a, � .. �
v"�`° v"� vy"�� ayv�� �y�R� w w��
v�
a,� °?"-� a�o ;�a ���'bb `� � ��'� a� o� ��;�x�
� Q. � � R �, � � � y � .. � R �. y � � � o, -� , �
oca•�•~ ��� *�c,� �+aa� a��n. c,
��Q�� �ww cn�i��� U�du,� W �d �� b�i�ww
N �
N �
G � �
� �
w �
V a �
", V y v�
� �
-o�`"�'
V
� �"i � G Q
7 �
w
�
O
� �
.� � �
.� � �
a � �
� a` Q
v a
� �
M � O a� y
F+�I y�, �C y
A.il '�" u" V
�i ��Q
� H
w
o �
.� g �
V� V N J� � v�i
d �
'� rr � cV w � V
RS � � �C C � N
�" � � ,�" z�., �-" Q
C7 � H "
.w+
� �
o � �$
~ � O (yi
Q ' ^ c � � '� y �
o� R Y °� a�' a
>, � � � � y � ��„
�' V
� � .��' w��Q
�
0
0
0
N
�
�
�
�
t�
V
�
. �..�
w
� � EA � � H3 � �O N
O N N V�
V
� O �l�
� r �
���
N N Efl � l�f>
r. � '-. c r Z
O O � N
�� �
� � �
�
� O �N,
� I
O O
�,
� �
��ooc� �o
O
�orn�n
t� v r. �o
� ~ �
0
�
�
°I°
a
�
�i
�° g°° °°
m g cn
N �O 11')
� �
�� �oo� �o
��
� g o
�
N N
�
g
�
� O O O O
� O O O
� � � N
�. c*Z
� N � N
� f� �D
��
�000
���
� o �
N
rn n �
�D O �
� ~
� � �
N N N
... .� ....
.+�+ .r+ w '„
� � p � p p p S
�� S �h O �h � O O O N
\.� � \./ � lJ r . � � N N
y n y� n y h n O ��Q n Q n �
� rn "' y m� u � v m N u y � N u .� y � � u
R ca � ca ,-• m ,-• � '� ta � u O� R '-' q�
�i �� �i v r" ia �" v o � .-. v '" o ia �"" u '-•'� t 7 u '" g� Ta
� ., � r. 0 N F. N "� r. v r, N
w� v w� v co c�,, � c G c, m � ao a ao
.�,� .`� �' � p �° .n , ryy � `° Ki ca � � a ni -o W `° .°� -o R7 : ° � cri �' �a
W r a v � W m v � W m � m `-' � v a, � � � a�, � � � � ~ '� �
-o > �a -c > w t R �o D+ �a > R w .. �c > w � � > '►�' d w
� �2� � �2� � � � � � � z � � � z� � � Z ��a,
�- �' � �- = � ��aw yw �,a [ �w �,�c �u, �, v�c-�
� y c w � �, � v � y � a � v � w v a a �r a� � a �� a� a�
o c � v O � � � o � � c � � � � � +�. � � � � � � � �
,,d eo � y a a,o � o ,.a eo a a p �°' o �°c y o >�b �, �
a � y � v v � � v � � � �i a+ v a, � �i Q ��' a, � � � �
� �dd � �¢� � � � o � [^c¢ �� � �^cd� �+��d �r�:o4
d � ., ., Gr � .. a� � � �C y ¢+ � � .. 'C a� � ] � w a; � 5 � � 'G :: :�
'L� °1 ;; 'C ;+ ., "C d a; ' o m ;; ¢ „ O p ;; � �--� F° :: d .. ..
w a R c�a w a c�a `� w� c�e R v a� m� R ���� R � y� R� A m
� ;�� g �a� S �rr ,� � ���� „� ; aa� �'� o�Y���
� � �, �, �a �, � �a -c -c R a � � � A rs. -� R a y ;o
�ww ��w� �a�� �i �dw�� -N-i ad �� V �dii���
U
�"�
a
d R
J N �
�
� � � �
.� � � � � ei
G �
w �
V � � �
� V � �
� °.'= u
V
G'""S�
�
w
�
.� � �, � � �
� � N
�o, °: � �
y a
V Q
r � :.j y � g o 0
/ �� y V� � � � d�
F+V �"' � y N
� ,,��, F, V �
� � � Q
E'^
w
o g c g oo
� � N � � � O
.� r '^J N , a; � � �,
'r�' � v �y G � N
� �� ��Q
� � � �
�
o � � $,
� � $ � o 0 0
Q '^ c � � "C y •-•
0 � � y � � � � �
� � �
� �i � a � a�i � � �
g � U
U �..� fO p� j- ' a�i G Q
� 'w�� b W � ~
� �
0
�
N
�
�
�
�
�
v
�
.,..,
w o 0
s o ° o ° s s
� � N � N � �
O O N O N O O
l� Q L� Q r n Q � L� n
y [V U y ry y U r/� "� � U y U y V
t0 � � R R � � � � R ,� O � � t6 � � �C p e� �
V r, N� V r. N F R v �, N F R U N �6 U N q
C', y C� C. � W G y CO G f� �r LO
_iO, � ni � R � � � ti � S] Ki � -o ` cri � ,�° cri �
R �., '"" ,f, R .�.• T C F .�. � ,f„ t6 "' � af � �
.�
^� > F" W � ' j �" � Q c.� � > � d w .�-. � � u, � b �" w
� 2� � v :fl � Z � v v � Z � v v � � � v � � � a
y �� a�i �� � w a� a�i � �� a� a�i � y � a � y w a�
� ^ C �'i .�
� � � � � W � � a�, V � eM � � � o o w � � o u " �o � o
� v � v �a �' ��va `�
"��-od a� ��-od ��� "t3'°-cd ��� d'�-o �� �'��c �
� a .. .. C. .. ., c .. .. *+ .�i .. � f: ..
� � +. �c a; v � � .. �a a; a; � � � +. �c a; a; � ] 7 �a a � � � '� ;;
F�,'�-�o � d R �i,'�-�o �- R R �'�� � a R 3�ob¢ a w^obd R
��a'� �� �:� >�,a�� �:� >�,v�� N:� > a� �:� > a�
� ° �" �c a ° ?' �c �o °.�' � ° ?' -� v °J a ° �" ^o °�+' � ° ?' �v
a a ��a oca:° n��ab
m���.�� cn�¢�.��� ��¢�.��� a�d�� ��d��
M c� 00 N
O O O �
� � � �
O O u'l
W � T
��
o� o 0 0
S � g �
O O � L�
o�000
� v �
�000
g o 0 0
o ° o
N �
�
� � h N N N [� �
.`�o�o��m S
o �� m n n rn�
c. .o .o �o rn rn e� v
� Cn N N N �
O�D V 00 N 0
i 00 �' c�i c�i m
�� Mr. �
�v �
o � �
� v�
�
N �
g '+
ti�
ffl
8
rn
�
g o � � o
�
� n
O O
� �
O M O Q� O O
0�0 O� OS O� n
o � 0
� w o �
� V � �
Vi
�aoo� �o
� �
0 0 o o
� rn
W O
�
�N
g
N
�
O O
tf�
��
g
T
�
U
� M
'�C p
� �
0.
�!
v
�
�
�
�
�
�
w
o �
�
� U r+
a
'� � � c�v
� Gj x a a,
�
(� �i �,' b
.�.+
o � � �y
w � 8 v
Q' � ^� N LY.
w
O � � �
M
a.d �"' fQ
U � � �r
�w�
�
0
�
N
�
v
�
,-�
�
V
tA
w
U
"� .�.
�. �
w �
V
� V �
� � V
G �S
�
w
�
G
O ,..� N
.� � N
c� �
O 5F"j V
d
a `��' Q
¢
�
0 �
���
� i" V
w V
C G �
� � Q
F-+
G
a� y
w y ,�
c �
� �
E�
� � �
� C �
j U
� � �
�
���
���
N [� c�
� �
00 � M
� N t�'Z
W � N
EA �-+ V�
. N_ .
� ��p N 00
N O 00 �
� � rn rn
�n �r.�
� v�
�
�� � ��
�� � ��
� "�
� �
� � ° � °�
�n oo �+
� � �
� N
�
�
�
�
8
�
O
n
O N
�
R �
� m
'CS
.--. p�p �
� -� w
" w -C
.� � a�',
y
� �
� � o
v v
� � � �
� � «
m
� v � �
� >
� o
O � � �
Q � d �
g
N
e�-+
C.
�.
�
�
m
'C
d
>
O
a
a
d
a
�
0
?,
U
�
o�o r.
� �
v; �o
�-.
�
N '..�
r .
V� p
� N O
� ~ N
R T
z��
vy
� w
C
N .��.,
� `.
N �
7 � � y
d � d °�'
v � � �
� Q R �
����
�,v�° R
�
w��H
�.
::
�
�
�
0�0
v
m
�
�
�
�
�
d
°1 m
^C 01
N R
� �
� d � g � � m � � � � o � � � � o g � o 0 0 � o 0 0 0 � � �
i � � N � � O L� ('�j O� Kl ('n 00 N(rl r-� I�A N �D
�0 � }" � � d3 � N 00 �D � � i1 i �O �O `-' 00 � (� fr� �
°�' m �
�' F• ;; C � '" � �
w � w �,
T O O O � O O O p O O O O O�� N O� N N� O O O�
O FR O� O �� O �O �-+ �O i�n �O
� m �A N � �-�. � ~ � �- O N
N tn �--i �--� N r +
� �
�
W
�
��.
�1
V
�
�
�
�
�
�
� •1�1
c� �.y
� L '
� 1
O �
Q V
w �
O
+.+ �
U �
�1
�
w
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Q p ~
r..� ,N N
�A �
� � N
PQ ti] R
G d �
.�+ � d
'�
d � �
O � '�
tA C. �,
� � i
w��,
0
Q � � � G
N t"'
�
� �
�
H �
7
�
.� O
w
i�.� W
O L �
C�
0�0 � M N CO �� O o�.-�-� � O� d� � d� O N �� N� L� � M
� .-� O O O� O� M N 00 u'i ch r. �O d� O .-+ O ch � m �
� ER c' � m � � � � CO �O �D � 00 � � � � r r ' r 'r N
�
� ~ � �
° °°� °��,000� o00 0�0000 0
cv og�n�orn��o �r� � m c'�'i �
� o,-: co ��6 �o o� o� �o ,-: c�i Q: �
`� `° '" m `~ N v � ,-+ ao c+� � �
1"�
�
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O T O O O�
� � � � � c�i, n
yy N N r+ �O
� y �? N � A
� � y M
O H .�
�a
�
� ��g�s�g����
� � � � m � 0 � 0 � N � c+i N o'~0 N � 00 O M � � �-�+ �
cn
>
y � �
�
� �g m omrn w��°o�`��n'v�i��� o�o�c"3o' �
y > RS O ;� e-+ [� c'� tn �O �A �O c'� N N O O� N Kl e-� O N l!') O�
. � 47 c6 N r„ V-? � N c0 d' c'� �f'` �f i N CO � �O � rn � O N O
� H ��~ � ~ cn � �
�
� w ^
'O
�
w
�
�
c
�
C7
0
0
� � y
� � � �
�� � � L ����� � .�
: � �
� w C] � Q., .$ (� � 3 3 3 3 ��
u" � a`�, � � � � .?� .S `� `� `� `� v � w
� s1� w � �' � � °�� ia ia ia i � Q a
0. � '
� � � � o w 'N � � � � � W � `�d ` � _O Q � �
O u Ly � ^' p � ,p tC � V�.�i' PO � � G) OJ Ol O! � � �
y � O � � � �+ � p � w :� � � � ' "d 'C 'C T5 � � R
o� a�, ca �U o oz " oo�¢ww0 3��� 7 '�
'- Q � � � � o, a. � � m a U c � �o � g � � �n
,��, o � � ,��, c�a c�a R R ia o � '-� o p � � d � � � � �a, �a, o
i:. � R. `.� cn E- E- E- E- � U C� �...] U v� U w, , , c� cL cL F
o c� cn � o cv ��r �n �o cFi m c�'n ��i � n � �� � c o� o'
�--� � N.-� N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�
�1J
�
�
U
�
v
�
V' (7 �-+
� y � �
�
-� � �°N
� � � R
c�H ���
O 1 � � d
/�� � o
i� W �
Q V � ..I ��04
w i�y v� � �
� � �
O '� � ;;
�. r� � Q' R
u M � wo�
1�1 Q � '�
� N �
1�1
�
w
� w1
W
M
C�
�
�
�
�
'�
"O U '�
. > � N
�i' O � � �j
N � G � �
W � w �
.� �
� �R
7
�
.� o
s�. w
� �
.� �
�
�
� �
� �
�
�
>
N
�
d
v � � g
� � y m
� o ,�
a�- ��,�
a � � �
�T �
N N
� �
� �
N N
ri ri
Ff3 Ef3
N N
� �
N N
� �}
��
m m
rn rn
� �
00
� �
n n
� �
��
� �
��
��
-� �
�� �
[ w
� ,v
v O
9 C',�,
a ;a
�U
U E-
�
m
N N N N Q d�
O N M N�M n
EA �e� n � O �
�O O� v d� W
N �-+ eM
Ef-?
n � � � � �
d� �--� <M
� � � �
N� 00 O N
e� N
�3
� �
N �
N O O 0 L� pp��
tn � W GO � �
� (rj � �
o��°°�
���� �
o��o �
N� N O � �O
� �
0 g
� m �.
» ~ �
���m8 �
0o m � ,- p . o0
O�i m N O O �
� oo rn ,-. m
� �
oomr.�o �
r . t1'� N O �
�O O �O O N
� � o rn o m
m � �
� �
�
m �
�; fs,
Q
�
.�
; �v ;; :� Q-
� •v
� � m �� °'
u..w�u. �
� � y �y L
�n�n3 °3 �°
�����
� �
ri ri
� �
O O
� �
��
N N
� �
��
��
°� °�
88
N N
� �
n n
� �
�
�
�
w
v
'CS �
� ,'y�4 o
Q
w � �
�
� o �
� C� E�^
��
��
�
�
F�
�
�
�
�
T
W
O�
�
�}
�
N
d'
ri
�
�
0
V-}
�
0
M
�
�
0
�
N
O�
�
N
�
�
r.
�
-a
�
�
�
F
�v
�
A �
� M
N �
�a
�
�
"C �
G �
� y ,�
r„� O
d i.
� �
�
w
O
y �
.--�
d �
U
W �"� �y �
� M
� �
�
� �
W � � .y �
u (6 U
�f/ � Q•
� �
� w
� o
� � N
� � "�3
G� W Po
�� �
� a8
d }� -" N
��'�
��
� ��� o
p �
� � N � O V �
'q � N s.
O � � d � � �
O � � a U
M
� � ~ jy �
U O � � � �
� � � V
O w � ¢
•� �
� w
� r S p �
M O� �
� � W
U
�
a�
�
�
�
O l�! � N N� W T M N � O� ��� N o M ��e� N n �15 a0 �p
V� O N c� �--� t+'Z �--� �O tn N �O ln T ln [� �D N t� �O L� O l� L� �D
v� p p
m W N �O � � 00 �--� O � ~ � N � ~ ` N � � e- � N N
� �
� � � � � � �
� � � ��,+ � n �
� n � n � � O
� �
M v�,�
n n
�
�
O
n
� � � � � � � � �
O O� �O N O e-� tn O
L� �! M CO �A 00 O h N
W n � � � � � � n
� � �
N � �
n � n
N � � O N � � � N
�������� �
N M 6 � � � � W � N
00 N L� �D N O� �9
� �
0000e�or.�n �n
Q� N o�0 O c�0 N� n �
O� � O � 00 N � � �
� M� O CO N N L�
� � �
0
� � � �! O � � N N c��)
� � � � n � � � n �
� ,-. c. m p � � o ,-� � O � u,
O� N n Q� � c+Z n O n
� O � � � S � M T
� � �
� N �
s��g�s�� N
tl� � N r L L� O N �
T n N�� tn N W � O
O� �.� r+ Q� l� N tn �O N
� � �
W �N � m � n � U
00 N[� 00 00 O � Ifi
N �9 N � �O �O � [� N
� � � N � N M � �
O O O q� N �[� N
� n h c�� N � L�� L�
� O W fn � N O N
tfl � � M M �O �
� � � � � � � � �
O r+ O� M� O eM M Q�
�O �O � �-. h N V� �-+ �!
n � � � n � n N �
� O � � � � � � OI�
.-� �O c�'� N � 00 � N
�O 00 00 L� N� � �Q L� N
� N O\ � M N C n �t, '�O� �G
8 ° 8 � S� � �
�-+ l� � N ln L� '�M ln
� O N�-i cri N O L�
Efl � � N � M � �
� V
U
� C
u
N
� �
� V�
� W
m
� � � 2E W
O O � � v M
� � n n �GJ R
� �
� � � �
� � � O
N Cri
o���
�p O cn O
00 � O� Q�
M � ~ �
y �
v ] � �
z
� � > w �' � °
v � W � W � � R
> y (1,' Z, �
� � � Q ��v � c� `� �' � `� � y
'� „ E� � a � v� a� ° a
�, .� � � k�„ � F" � i� �.�, Q A R W
� e � O W v � [ m A� �:°. � R �>' �� m � ro
> °� � � � � � � � �' � � � ° c�a eo � y v � a 1.'` eo ` v
W � � p � e °' o U" W v v , ' �` U d� S� � R p � y c� .
� R � � v :a � y w � j v�i c y .� ?, � .S � o � o � � o � � a
W F- :...t i�, � d U O� F � ,Z '£ U d U U c w U� Z R • C, w m �
� o Q�¢ H o', H
H �
i, m �n rn cn cv rn o cn c+� m .o o c� oo �
-O c�C � `�,-.' � �u ����t°. c��i���� ° u �° i
ti� � l� �D � T N N �O C' C� �� 00 N � N
i"� �
� ��
� �
� � �� � � �
8 � "� N O � l� ��
(/� N N C� �O M n a0 �O
� M �
��.. �
i�l y v„
� �
� �����
X � � �'����
W � Q
� �
y �
,,�� w
pr p � � O u �
A; QQQ � 00 tfl GO d�
� C`� `� � ~ O � �
'�
� W
� �
r+
� � g
.� � '" N
C �"� R
w�
� o � � .� $
O N °;
t�". � t0 y N
¢.�8� �
w �
0 � � � �
y � ~ � �
v � � � �
� � �
� '�^� �"
�� N
i'J" w
ca g
PI Q�
� �
U
�
v
�
0
E�
O N 2� 3e 3� 3Q
�'O ��o, rn rn t i
� W a�0 � n
� �
e-� �D e-� N
� rn o �
� ° "� r �
V � ~
Q
�
�r
n
O
0
�
� p p o
O O O N O
� � � � �
ln '-+ L�
� � � � � � � � �
O 00 00 �� � O N L�
� N O� �! h� N O 00
n � n � � � � n �
� O� N �O O� v� M o0 L�
� n a0 W W N C� ��
e� �O 00 L� O N�D N N
m L� l77 N l77 N�� O
� � � �
� W � O
n n � n
rn n � �
N � � �
� � v �
rn o�
� rn
(� �
�I �
� N'
� �'
p O L� r ui u'� O N O� O�
O u7 00 M N � O �O 6� �O
O N�O L� �O � N O� ��
� M p O o0 �O �O 6� 00 00
� 00 � l� O V� . �M - N�
����� ����
N N W u�'� N��0, g o�0, �D
n n n n u�'� o�o � n�
O� 00 � � � � cn � O
� � � '. r. �n c+Z e� �
� M �O h� L� N Q. 6�
O lf7 N d� N.-� O� �
�� �� �� o �I �
� p0
g�°ggo �
�+ ���� N M� N M tn
�
�
v o .fl � �
�. v = �
.� ,��, � °o y v�
a ' � � � � co ° � � Q z
� o ,� 5 0„� o y o"'� u ] �y
° v .� `�° L = � °= ° � � ° U m � .-� F-
'� v o o Q � c. o � Y ��.a Q � �!
4p y'� �pp .•�• � • j0 0 Cli p� y' �„� � R Ri F fJ1
W
3 ��.� �s v N�.�� `'U �'"Y z � 7..
� � � � a � R v a�, � ¢. � � � o a � � a
�� cn in d R L c.cr✓C7�cn UwcRC�^, ¢ F"' �
a � a H o .�
�- �
w �
� y
W z
> a
� �
W
� �
'� O�A
� �
�.
�,
Ol �
G �
� �
� ,O
� �
w
O ,.,
d
8
U �
� N � �
� a
� �
�r �
� �
X � �
W (p U
� � �
� N
� w
� r
� o
� $ "
� N
GJ W Po
�� �
� �8
d � _" N
� � �
H q
� � � � O
� � � � � '�
� b � ��
O � C � N � �1
ed � ry` �
¢ �g m
w
o��y �
y H ~ �, �
' O � � � �
� �� � a
o� �
•� �
�'�' w
� �
�
O � �
V
�
v
�
0
�
E�
N � c� � ` �n ` �
�D
c"� n�c�vn m
v� F» `-' �
� � � � � �
� m m rn � rn
� � � � � �
� ���� �
t. n n ,� ° c� o
0o ni c� � �n �r
c+�Z � N m �
� � � � �
h N c. L� 6�
ui d� N M N
� � ° � m
r. N�
� � � � � �.
O� n o � � M '.
� ���� �
� �°�� �!
� N � N N 0�0 �
� � �i
o m �n g
o .-� � �
� N � �
e --� �i?
Efl
�.
z
w
�
�
Q c
W o
Ll ;� c o �
Y� � ° �� ..
cn �'� ya ;'
� y � o � �
W w d�. C] F
> a
� �
W
� �
b�
� R
L`.
�
R�������
TO ..........................CITYMANAGEROFARROYOGRANDE�"� �` �"����� �`�
01 ��R 20 P�9 2� 52
CONCERNING....PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL � �
,
�
FROM .................... MIKE LIEBO
I am the coordinator of a program for the Lucia Mar School District cailed
Destination Imagination. This is the largest problem solving competition in the world.
On March 31, two team from our county, Ocean View in Arroyo Grande and Judkins in
Pismo Beach, won in their respective divisions. Each team will represent our state at
the University of Tennessee from May 23 to May 26.
Like the Olympics, teams are responsible to come up with the funding for a
"world class" team. It costs about $8000 a team. Since two teams won, we need to
come up with $16000 to cover basic expenses (dorms, food and airline tickets.) There
are other costs, transportation and shipping props, for example. Hence, we need
about $18000 to field two teams.
The Lucia Mar School District will cover about half of the expenses, we need to
raise the rest. We believe the city of Pismo Beach will help us, the County Board of
Supervisors, and I am hoping the city of Arroyo Grande would consider offering us
financial aid to support our team from Arroyo Grande.
Our students would be happy to pertorm part, or all of their pertormance. The
pertormance takes about eight minutes. You will be amazed at t(ie talent, creativity,
and enthusiasm of our students. If it is possible, we would be honored to come to your
next meeting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mike Liebo 489-1702 (home) 473-4130 (Judkins)
� ,�
r• �
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Destination ImagiNationT"' d2k.1 Global Finals
University of Tennessee — Knoxville, Tennessee
Monday, May 21 — Sunday, May 27, 2001
Mondav. Mav 21: EVENT LOCATION
3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m Registration and Housing Check-In Ray Meazs Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
Tuesda Ma 22:
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Passageways Travel & Tours Ray Mears Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
10:00 a.m. to Midnight Registration and Housing Check-In Ray Mears Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
Wednesday. Mav 23:
8:00 am. to 10:00 p.m.
8:30 a.m. to Midnight
1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
3:30 p.m. to 530 p.m.
7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
Passageways Travel & Tours
Registration and Housing Check-In
d2k.1 Sponsor EXPO
Team Mangers' Meeting w/ICMs
Opening Ceremony
Ray Mears Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
Ray Meazs Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
UT Conference Center
Stokley Athletic Center
Thompson-Boling Arena
Thursdav. Mav 24:
730 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
9:00 a.m to 4:00 p.m.
9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
Fridav. May 25:
7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 Noon
730 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
Saturdav. Mav 26:
7:30 am. to 5:00 p.m.
8:00 a.m. to 330 p.m.
7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
9:30 p.m. to Midnight
9:30 p.m. to 12:30 a.m.
9:30 p.m. to 1230 am.
9:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.
Sunday. May 2T:
6:00 am. to 11:00 am.
8:00 am. to 2:00 p.m.
Passageways Travel & Tours
*Registration and Housing Check-In
d2k.1 Sponsor EXPO
d2k.1 Competition (All Levels)
Late Registration and Housing Check-In
Christian Davis Concert
Passageways Travel & Tours
d2k.1 Competition (All Levels)
d2k.1 Sponsor EXPO
Graduation Ceremony
Team Managers' and Officials' Competition
Alumni Recruiting Meeting
Passageways Travel & Tours
d2k.1 Comperition (All Levels)
Awazds Ceremony
Pre-Teen Party
Teen Party
Collegiate Party
Team Managers' and Officials' Recovery Party
Housing Check-Out
Lost & Found & Passageways
University Center
Ray Mears Room, Thompson-Boling Arena
UT Conference Center
UT Campus
DI Information at the University Center
Thompson-Boling Arena
University Center
UT Campus
UT Conference Center
UT Conference Center/Hermitage
KCEC Exhibit Hall
University Center/Executive Dining Room
University Center
UT Campus
Thompson-Boling Arena
Thompson-Boling Staff23 Lot
Thompson-Boling Staff 9 Lot
Residence Hall
KCEC Exhibit Hails
University Center
The Information Booth will be located in the University Center. A U S Post Office will be located in the University
Center where a special d2k.1 cancellation stamp is available. Sowenir Sales will be located in the University Center.
*Thursday registrants arriving after 11:00 a.m. may pick up their registration packets starting at 12:00 Noon in the University
Center at the Destination ImagiNationT"' Information Booth located on the second floor.
Check the Destination ImagiNationTM homepage http•//www.destinationimagination.orQ for updates.
Dear d2k.1 Global Finalist Team,
Congratulations! You have earned the right to participate in the d2k.1 Global Finals at the University of Tennessee,
in Knoxville, Tennessee, May 23 thru May 26, 2001. This is a four day event and all teams, Team Managers and supporters
aze asked to be there through the entire event. Opening Ceremonies will be held at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 23�.
Enclosed you will find a Tentative Schedule of Events, forms for team registration/room and boazd reservations,
travel and tour information from Passageways Travel and other pertinent information. Prop Shipment and other event
information is detailed in the enclosed letter from our hosts. Be sure to bring the completed Medical and Media Release
Forms (duplicate for each team member) with you.
Please pay close attention to due dates, deadlines and to whom you must retarn all forms. You may fax the
required forms to the intended recipients. However, remember that many of the forms are twasided. (Always keep a copy
for yourself.) Payment (via purchase order, check, money order, wire transfer or credit cazd) for all packages mnst be in our
office by May 5'�. However, in order to facilitate room assignments and scheduling, we need to know within a week of your
Affiliation Finals if your team plans on participating and how many participants, support personnel and parents are in your
group.
Travel reservations for you or your supporters can be secured by contacting Passageways Travel at 800-628-9670,
x2208 (be sure to ask for the d2k.1 Global Finals desk).
There will be a meeting for ALL Team Managers with the International Challenge Masters at 3:30 p.m. on
Wednesday aftemoon (before Opening Ceremonies). It is important that you have an adult representative (preferably a Team
Manager) attend this meeting. All d2k.l Global Finals Team Managers and Officials are invited to compete in the Team
Managers' and O�cials' Competition on Friday evening, May 25. Also, students, Team Managers, and Officials who will
miss a school graduation because of attendance at the Global Finals are invited to register for the d2k.1 Graduation Ceremony
on Friday evening, May 25'", and to bring their caps and gowns to wear at this ceremony.
You will be given information conceming the days and times you compete from your Affiliate Director. Please
remember that any competitor overheard revealing the Instant Challenge given in competition will subject his/her team to
a score deduction or disqualification. In addition, should a competitor hear the Instant Challenge before competing,
adjustments may be made in scores or scores eliminated to overcome this advance knowledge. Also note that team members
cannot practice team solutions on the actual competition site. Practice facilities will not be provided. .
We hope you aze looking forward to your participation. We, and the University of Tennessee, aze looking forward
to hosting you. Best of luck!
Sincerely,
, �� ��
���� ���
Robert T. Purifico
Executive Director
Destination ImagiNation, Inc., P.O. Box 547, Glassboro, NJ 08028-0547
Phone: (856) 88 I- I 603 Fax: (856) 881-3596 www.destinationimagination.org