Agenda Packet 2001-07-10CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Michael A. Lady
Tony M. Ferrara
Thomas A. Runels
Jim Dickens
Sandy Lubin
Mayor �
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
�
' i i � i i �
Steven Adams City Manager
Timothy J. Carmel City Attorney
Kelly Wetmore Director, Administra6ve Services
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2001
7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. FLAG SALUTE:
4. INVOCATION:
7:00 P.M.
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
PASTOR PAUL JONES
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
5.a. Mavor's Commendation — In A�areciation of Cal Polv Citv and Re�ional
Plannina Deaartment for East Grand Avenue Master Plan Conc�uts
6. AGENDA REVIEW:
6a. Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only
and all further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY — JULY 10, 2001
PAGE 2
7. CITIZENS' INPUT, COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS:
Persons in the audience may discuss business not scheduled on this agenda
regarding any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Council
will listen to all communication; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, will
not take any action on items that are not on the agenda.
Upon completing your comments:
♦ You may be directed to staff for assistance;
♦ A Council Member may indicate an interest in discussing your issue
with you subsequent to the Council meeting;
♦ The Council may direct staff to research the issue and subsequently
report back to the Council (generally in the form of a memorandum or
staff report); or
♦ No action is required or taken.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a
group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Any Council Member
may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit
discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City Council may
approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratiflcation (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Approve the listing of cash disbursements for the period
June 16, 2001 through June 30� 2001.
8.b. Statement of Investment De�osits (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Receive and file the report of current investment
deposits as of June 30, 2001.
8.c. Aouroval of Minutes (WETMORE)
Recommended Action: Approve minutes as submitted for the Regular City
CounciVRedevelopment Agency meeting of June 26, 2001.
S.d. Ado�tion of Ordinance - Creek Dedications (MCCANTS)
Recommended Action: 1) Adopt Or�dinance No. 527 C.S. amending Ti�e 9,
Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code to expand the City's creek dedication
requirement for new discretionary projects to include the area 25 feet from the
top of �e stream bank for Arroyo Grande Creek and its tribut�aries and Meadow
Creek and its tributaries; and 2) Direct the Director of Administrative Services to
file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk-Recorder.
8.e. Authorization to Solicit Blds - Parks Division Vehicle (HERNANDEZ)
Recomme�ded Action: Authorize staff to solicit bids for a%rton regular cab pick
up truck for the Parks Division.
AGENDA SUMMARY — JULY 10, 2001
PAGE 3
8. CONSENT AGENDA (continuedl:
8.f. Authorization to Sollcit Bids - Public Works Vehicle (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Authorize staff to solicit bids for a%- ton pick up truck
for the Public Works Department.
8.g. Award of Contract for the Huasna Road Pavement Overlav Proiect. Citv
Proiect No. PW-2001-3 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Act�on: 1) Award a construction oontra�t to Madonna
Construction in the amount of $229,120; 2) Appropriate $23,235 of Traffic
Congestion Relief Funds for the project; 3) Authorize the City Manager to
approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $22,912 for use only if
needed for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project; and
4) Direct staff to issue the Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed with other
necessary contract documents.
9. PUBLIC HEARING
9.a.
(McCANTS)
Recommended Action: The Planning Commission recommends the City
Council adopt a Resolution denying Cond�ional Use Permit Case No. 99-013
and Variance Case No. 01-001.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS:
None.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
None.
12. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER I'FEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by a Council Member who would
like to receive feedback, direct staff to prepare information� and/or request a
formal agenda report be prepared and the item plac�d on a future agenda. No
fomnal action can be taken.
(a) Public Opinion Survey Regarding Growth (Ferrara).
AGENDA SUMMARY — JULY 10, 2001
PAGE 4
13. CITY MANAGER ITEMS:
The fotlowing item(s) are placed on the agenda by the City Manager in order to
receive feedback and/or request direction from the Council. No formal action can
be taken.
(a) Pilot Clty Council meeting broadcasts on cable television.
14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council.
15. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Manager.
16. ADJOURNMENT
* * * * * * *
Copies of the staff reports or other written materials relating to each item of business
referred to on this agenda are on file with the Director of Administrative Services and are
available for public inspection and reproduction at cost. If you have questions regarding
any agenda item, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-
5414.
* * * * * * *
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in a City meeting, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at
the number listed above at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable
arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* * * * * * *
Note: this agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time
set for the meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions, or
call the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-5414 for more information.
www.arrovogrande orq
��'l�lY��:��II�Z � = : � 1 _ - � : � � �
AB
ADA
AG
AGMC
AGPOA
APN
APCB
APCD
ARC
ASCE
ASD
AW WA
BD
CA
CC
CCC
CCCSIF
CD
CDBG
CE
CEC
CEOA
CIP
CIWMP
CM
CMC
CMP
COC
CPI
CUP
DARE
DC
DEA
E.C.
EDD
EDU
EIR
EIS
EOC
EVC
FAU
FD
FDAA
FEMA
FID
FPPC
FTA
FY
G.C.
GC
GF
GP
GPA
HCD
HOP
HUD
I
ISTEA
JPA
A�ricultural Preserve
Assembly Bill
Americans with Disabilities Act
General ApriCUUure
Amoyo Grande Municipal Code
Arroyo Grande Police OffiCers' Association
Assessor's Pa�cel Number
Air Pdlutlon Control Board
Afr Pdlutlon Confrol Dlstrict
Architectural Revlew Committee
American Sodely Gvil Engineers
Administrative Se►vioes DepaAment
American Water Wa�ks Association
Buildinp Divisio�
City Attomey
Ciry Councii
Califomia Conservatlon Corps
Central Coast Gtles Self-Insurance Fund
Corrununity Development
Corrvnunity Development Blodc Grant
Circulatlon Element
Califomia Energy Commission
Califomfa Environmental QuaUty Act
Capital Improvement Propram
Califomia integrated Waste Management Plan
Gty Mana�'s Office
Califomta Men's Colony
Conpestlon Management Plan
on
Certlfic,ate d Camptianoe
Consurner Price Index
Co�ditional Use Peimit
Drup Abuse Resistanoe Education
Development Code
Drup Enforce�nent Adrrdnistratio�
Eleciion Code
Eoonorrdc Development DeparVr�ent
rVr e
Equivalent Dwellinp Unit
Environmental Impact Report
Envircnmental Impact Statement
Et�onomic Opporhinity Commission
EoonarMc Vlfality Caporatlon
Federal Aid Utban
Fire Division
Federal Disaster Assisfanoe AdministraG�
FetJe►al Frnerpency Manapement Agency
Financial Servioes Departrr�ent
Fair Pditical Practloes Commission
Federal Transit Adminfstratlon
Fiscal Year
Govemment Code
General (:orr�tnercaal
rcJ
Generel Fund
General Plan
General Plan M�endment
CaNfomia Deparhr�ent of Housing and Community
Dev�eloprnertt
Flon�e Oocupancy Pertnit
Flousing and Urban Development Dept.
Industrial a�d Business Parlc
Intertnodai SuAaoe Tra�sportatlon
Joint Pow�ers Authority
LAFCO
LOCC
LLA
LUE
MER
MF
MFA
MHP
O
OCSD
OSCE
PC
PD
PF
PPR
PRD
PRE-APP
PSHHC
PSP
PUD
PW
RDA
RE
RFP
RFG1
RH
RHNP
RR
RS
RTA
RWQCB
SAC
SB
SCAT
SEIU
SF
SLO
SLOCOG
SLOHA
SLONTF
SLORTA
SIOWRAC
SR
SSLOCOWA
SSLOCSD
SRRE
SWRCD
TPM
n
TTAC
TUP
UBC
UFC
USA
VAR
VC
VCB
VSR
ZONE 3
Local Agency Fortnatbn Commission
League of Califomia Gtles
Lot Une AdJustrnent
Land Use Element
I..ot Merper
CondominiumlTownhouse
Etpartrnenb
Mobile Home Parks
Offioe Professfonel
Oceano Cortxnunity Servioes DisMd
Open Spacs and ConservaUon Element
Planninp Cortimission
Polioe Departrr�ent
PublicK�uasi Public
Plot Plan Review
Parks & RecreaUon Departrnent
Pre-appliqtlon
Peoples' Self-FiNp Housiny Corp.
Planned Siqn Propram
Planned Unit Development
Public Works DepaM�ent
Redevelopment Apency
Residentlal F_staEe
Request for Proposals
Requeat for flualilk�atlons
HiNside ResidenWl
Repional Flousfnp Weeds Plan
Rural ReskJenUal
Suburban Reaidentlal
Rev�e�sio� to Acxeape
Reaonal Watsr Ouality Control Board
Stafi Adviaory C.onxNtEee
Senate B�I
soufh Couny aea Transit
Service Empioy�ees Intematbnal Union
Slnple Family
San Luis Obhpo
San t.uis Obispo Coundl of Govamments
San Luis ObisPo Fiouekq Authority
San Luis Obispo Na►ooiks Task For�ce
San Luls Obiepo Repional Transit Aufhorfty
San L�s Obispo CouMy Water Resources Advisory
ComrMlEes
Senior Flousinp
South San Luis Obispo CouMy Water Association
South San Luis Obispo County Sanitadon DisMd
Souroe Reduc�o�► 8 Recyt�inp Ebment
StaEe Watsr Re�o�xoes Confrd Board
TentaUvs Paroel Map
Tentative Ttad Map
Transportatlon Technk;al Advisory Committee
Ternporary Use Pe�mit
Unii�orm Buildinp Code
Unitam Flro Code
Underpround SeMce Abrt
Va�ianoe
� ��
SLO CoixMy VhNors 3 Corderonoe Buresu
View Shed Revkw
San Luia Obiepo County Flood Control and Water
Conservatbn Distrid — Zone 3(Lopez Projed)
�
5.a.
r
/pRRO Y0\
��� c �
� INCORPOAATED 9 2
V T
�[ JULY /0. tY11 *
c4 ��FORN� P
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
8.a.
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES �d��
BY: JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR �
�
SUBJECT:
DATE:
CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION
JULY 10, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period June 16 — June 30, 2001.
FUNDING:
There is a$1,287,329.12 fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments.
ATTACHMENTS: �
ATTACHMENT 1— Cash Disbursement Listing
ATTACHMENT 2— June 22, 2001 Accounts Payable Check Register
ATTACHMENT 3— June 29, 2001 Accounts Payable Check Register (00-01)
ATTACHMENT 4— June 29, 2001 Accounts Payable Check Register (01-02)
ATTACHMENT 5— June 29, 2001 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS
For the Period of June 16 Through June 30, 2001
July 10, 2001
Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for
the period June 16 to June 30, 2001. Shown are cash disbursements by week of occurrence
and type of payment.
june 22, 2001
Accounts Payable Cks 101246-101340
June 29, 2001
Accounts Payable Cks (00-01)101341-101480
Less Payroll Cks included in previous
Attachment 6
Accounts Payable Cks (01-02)101481-101509
Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks
Two Week Total
2 191,499.38
3 265,305.57
4
5
(190,440.31)
791,321.86
229,642.62
1,095,829.74
$ �..287.329.12
CITY OFARROYO GRANDE
INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS
EDEN COMPiTTER SYSTEM
GINERAL FUND (010�
City Government (Fund 010)
40U1 - City Council
4002 - Administrative Services
4003 - City Attorney
4101 - City Manager
4102 - Printing/Duplicating
4120 - Financial Services
4121 - Taxes/ Insurance/ Bonds
4130 - Community Development
4131 - Community Building (CDBG)
4140 - Management Information System
4145 - Non Departmental
Public Safety (Fund O10)
4201 - Police
4211 - Fire
4212 - Building & Safety
Public Works (Fund 010)
4301 - Public Works-Admin & Engineering
4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance
4304 - Street Lighting
4305 - Automotive Shop
Parks & Recreation (Fund 010)
4420 - Parks
4421 - Recreation
4422 - General Recreation
4423 - Pre-School Program
4424 - Recreation-Special Programs
4425 - Children in Motion
4426 - Five Cities Youth Basketball
4430 - Soto Sport Complex
4213 - Government Buildings
4460 - Parkway Maintenance
Dept Index for Council.xls
SPEQAL REVINUE FUNDS
Park Development Fee Fund (Fund 213)
4550 - Park Development Fee
Traffic Signal Fund{Fund 222)
4501 - Traffic Fund
Transportation Fund (Fund 225)
4553 - Public Transit System
Construction Tax Fund {Fund 230)
4556 - Construction Tax
Police Grant Funds
4201 - Law Enforcement Equip. (Fd 272j
4202 - State AB3229 Cops Grant (Fd 271)
4203 - Federal Universal Hiring (Fd 274)
4208 = Federal Local L,aw Enforcmt (FD 279)
Redevelopment Agency (Fund 284)
4103 - Redevelopment Administration
EN'I'ERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Fund (Fund 612)
4610 - Sewer Maintenance
Water Fund (Fund 640)
4710 - Water Administration
4711 - Water Production
4712 - Water Distribution
Lopez Adminiatration (Fund 641)
4750 - Lopez Administration
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (Fund 350)
5501-5599 - Park Projects
5601-5699 - Streets Projects
5701-5799 - Drainage Projects
5801-5899 - Water/Sewer/Street Projects
5901-5999 - Water Projects
— —._ _ .. ._ . . . _ ....
ATTACHMENT 2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCH&R/
Cf�CK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUhIDBR DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NOMBfiR
395 06/19/O1 088218 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE POSTAGE-FfATER QUALITY LETTER 640.4710.5201
101246 06/22/O1 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST FA7C 010.4211.5403
101246 06/22/O1 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST.FAX 010.4211.5403
101247 06/22/O1 000585 AARDVARK TACTICAL, INC. CUSTOM NYLON L00 HOLSTER 010.4201.5272
101247 06/22/O1 000565 AARDVARK TACPICAL, INC. 40hA�I MULTI LAUNCHER 272.4201.6201
101248 06/22/O1 100584 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA COR OXY/ACET.GAS 640.4712.5610
101248 06/22/O1 100584 AIR LIQUID& AMERICA COR OXY/ACET.GAS 010.4305.5601
101249 06/22/Ol 102427 DEBRA ALARCON REF.O/PMT-951 CAMERON CT 640.0000.4751
101250 06/22/O1 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP SAFETY GLASSfiS/WORK GLOVES 640.4712.5255
101250 06/22/O1 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRZAL SUP FIRST AZD KIT SUPPLIES 640.4712.5255
101250 06/22/01 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES 220.4303.5255
101250 06/22/O1 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP TUBING CUTTER 640.4712:5273
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4001.5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4001.5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4001:5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CZTSt OF ARROYO GRANDE RETIREMENT SUPPLIES 010.4130:5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CZTY OF ARROYO GRANDE RETURN POSTAGE 010.4301.5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEV.FILM 010.4301.5255
101251 06/22/Ol 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CM MEETING 010.4101.5501
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE TOOLS 010.4301.5273
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE NEWSLETTER GIFT CERT. 010.4101.5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MISC.SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITSt OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4001.5504
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PARKING-MEETING 010.4212.5501
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CM MEETING 010.4101.5501
101251 06/22/O1 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FILM DEV 010.4130.5201
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE POSTAGE 010.4201.5201
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CDOA MEETING-HUL�C,AN 010.4201.5501
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PARKING FEES-CHIEF'S MEETINGS 010.4201.5501
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITSC OF ARROYO GRANDS PARENT PROJ/KITCf�N SUPPLIES 010.4201.5255
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AGHS YEARBOOK 010.4201.5255
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE NSIGHBORHOO� WATCH SUPPLIES 010.4201.5504
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE VOL.APPRfiC.DINNSR SUPPLIES 010.4201.5b04
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GAS-MOMAW-COMPUTSR INNEST 010.4201.5608
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE INK CARTRIDGfiS 272.4201.6101
101252 06/22/O1 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL SUPPLIES 010.4201.5255
101253 06/22/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW FATHER/DAUGHTER SUPPLIES 010.4424.5252
101253 06/22/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW PRESCHOOL GRD SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253
101254 06/22/O1 101810 HASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTION SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 640.4712.5274
101255 06/22/O1 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC REPR.FUEL PUMP/CRANE CONTROLS 010.4305.5601
PAGE 1
ITIIN CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
996.82 996.82
26.69
25.94 52.63
110.95
2,346.21 2,457.16
51.70
51.70 103.40
44.27 44.27
364.55
33.11
33.11
53.06
12.87
37.57
56.05
30.00
4.35
8.68
10.00
20.09
20.00
6.39
15.78
3.00
10.00
6.82
15.27
15.00
22.00
21.62
39.00
13.55
23.16
30.00
77.02
19.92
323.63
33.70
590.84
312.10
483.83
241.60
281.54
357.33
590.84
312.10
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 2
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK �/SDTDOR �7ENDOR ITEM
NOMBER DATE NOMBER NAME DfiSCRIPTION
101256 06/22/O1 101987 BfiRNARD'S H.D. SPECIALT REPR.OIL LEAK/BRAKE PADS
101256 06/22/O1 101987 BBRNARD'S H.D. SPECIALT REMOVE REAR TIRE/LUBE/ALIGN
101256 06/22/O1 101987 HERNARD'S H.D. SPECIAI,T REPR.ELECTRICAL CONNECfOR
101257 06/22/O1 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH
101257 06/22/O1 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH
101258 06/22/O1 012168 BOXX fiXPRESS SAIPPING CHARGfiS
101258 06/22/O1 012168 SOXX EXPRESS UPS SHIPPING-MAY
101259 06/22/O1 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER RANGE SUPPLIES
101260 06/22/O1 101431 BURDINE PRINTING COMMONITY PROFILE PRINTING
101261 06/22/O1 102434 JUAN CANTIJ RHF.C/B.DEPOSIT-CANT[T
101262 06/22/O1 102426 KEVIN CAVANAGH REF.O/PMT-200 NSLSON ST
101263 06/22/O1 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY GLOVES/T.PAPER/CLEANER
101264 06/22/O1 023322 CFIRISTIANSON CF�NKOLET BLADE
101264 06/22/O1 023322 CHItISTIANSON Cf�VROLET PERFORMANCE TEST/IGNITION
101265 06/22/O1 077376 SUSAN SAXE- CLIFFORD PSYCH-CABRIAISS
101266 06/22/O1 024832 CONA7f7NICATION SOLUTIONS REPR.LEVEL TRANSDUCER
101266 06/22/O1 024832 CObIlNUNICATION SOLUTIONS REPL.LIFT TRANSDUCER/FIAAT
101266 06/22/O1 024832 CON�IfJNICATION SOLUTIONS REPR.RADIO CONAlONICATOR
101266 06/22/O1 024832 CON�IUNICATION SOLUTIONS RfiPR.COMMUNICATOR
101267 06/22/O1 025428 CONSOLIDATED fiLECTRICAL PEDISTAL
101268 06/22/O1 101638. TYLER COON S/BALL LEAGUE SCORER-COON
101269 06/22/O1 102423 CRIMSON TRACE CORP 29 LASERGRIPS
101270 06/22/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLfiD WATER
101270 06/22/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER
1012'70 06/22/O1 026'I54 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER
101271 06/22/O1 027144 L.N CURTIS & SONS SUSPENDERS/KNEE BOOTS
101271 06/22/01 027144 L.N CURTIS & SONS COAT/PANTS/PATCHES
101272 06/22/O1 101716 JIM DECECCO S/BALL LEAGUE UMP-DECECCO
101273 06/22/O1 029484 DIfiSSLRO INC. WHEEL NUTS
101274 06/22/O1 101167 DTSC FEES FOR EPA
101275 06/22/01 030584 DEBI DYKZEUL S/HALL SCORER-DYKZfiUL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
640.4712.5603
010.4211.5201
010.4201.5201
010.4201.5605
284.4103.5505
010.0000.2206
640.0000.4751
010.4213.5604
010.4201.5601
010.4201.5601
010.4201.•5315
640.4712.5609
612.4610.5610
612.4610.5303
612.4610.5303
010.4213.5303
010.4424.5352
272.4201.6201
010.4421.5201
010.4301.5201
010.4420.5605
010.4211.5272
010.4211.52�2
010.4424.5352
640.4712.5603
220.4303.5613
010.4424.5352
ITEM
AMOUNT
693.20
356.73
47.00
102.00
100.00
6.38
84.38
463.57
430.27
250.00
4'7.88
877.9Z
10.21
364.14
325.00
534.50
328.02
332.50
142.50
431.21
22.50
6,866.05
60.00
35.00
15.00
342.40
3,950.48
48.00
51.85
200.00
15.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,096.93
202.00
90.76
463.57
430.27
250.00
47.88
877.97
374.35
325.00
1,337.52
431.21
22.50
6,866.05
110.00
4,292.88
48.00
51.85
200.00
15.00
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CI�CK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOIICHfiR/
CEIfiCK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
N[7MBER DATS NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NfJl�ffiER
101276 06/22/01 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN GRINDER WHfiELS 640.4712.5273
101276 06/22/O1 101379 FBRGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN CURB STOPS/ANGLfi STOPS 640.4712.56T0
101276 06/22/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISSS,IN METER BOXES 640.4712.5610
101276 06/22/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISfiS,IN SADDLES/FIRE HYDRANf/BOLTS 640.4712.5610
101276 06/22/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISfiS,IN BALL VALVES 640.4712.5610
101276 06/22/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN GATE VALVE 640.4712.5609
1012'76 06/22/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTfiRPRISES,IN CURH STOP/PVC PIPE 640.4712.5610
101277 06/22/O1 102431 TRACYE FRAGOSO REF.PARK DHPOSIT-FRAGOSO 010.0000.4354
101278 06/22/O1 035802 FRANK'S IACK & KEY INC REPL.IGNZTION CYLINDBR 010.4201.5601
101279 06/22/01 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH DOG OBfiDIENCE CLASSfiS 010.4424.5351
101280 06/22/O1 100547 HI-TfiCH EMERGENCY PRESSUREJRETURN HOSE 010.4211.5601
101281 06/22/O1 044496 ZNFORMATION SERVICES DP-ON-LINE TRANS-MAY 010.4201.5606
101282 06/22/O1 101848 INVENSYS METLRING SYSTE WATER METSR MEASURING CHAMHER 640.4712.5611
101283 06/22/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY CMC SUPPLIES 220.4303.5613
101283 06/22/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY KITCI�N SUPPLIES 010.4301:5201
101284 06/22/O1 055458 LAW OFFICES OF JONES.& PROF.LEGAL SVCS 010.4201.5303
101285 06/22/O1 101604 BARHIE JONfiS REIMB.SNACK SUPPLIES 010.4425.5259
101285 06/22/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES REINB.SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255
101285 06/22/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES REIFffi.TRAVEL-JONES 010.4425.5303
101286 06/22/O1 102428 JAMES KAPSALIS REF.O/PMT-128 IICEDA WAY 640.0000.4751
101287 06/22/O1 101529 LASER RECHARGE FACTORY PRINTER CARTRIDGE 284.4103.5201
101288 06/22/O1 100985 DOUG LINTNER S/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-LINTNER 010.4424.5352
101289 06/22/O1 101173 LONGS DRUCa STORE PHOTO PROCESSING 010.4201.5255
101290 06/22/O1 054482 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MEETING-JUNE 220.4303.5501
101291 06/22/O1 100879 MIDAS SHOP-SLO ALIGN/BRAKES/FILTfiRS 010.4201.5601
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ADAPTER/VALVES 640.4712.5610
101292 06/22/01 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE OIL 640.4712.5604
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PHONE CORDS/LIGHT FIXTURE 010.4201.5604
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE EYE STRAP/RATCH HOOK 010.4211.5601
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE HEX BUSHING 640.4712.5610
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE COUPLING/ADAPTER/BUSHING 640.4712.5610
101292 06/22/O1 d57096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ELBOW/NIPPLE 640.4712.5610
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC.SUILDZNG MATERIAL 010.4211.5255
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE NIPPLE 640.4712.5610
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE GLAV.CAPS 640.4712.5610
ITEM
PiMOL1NT
63.03
622.75
221.49
1,270.09
1,346.07
239.68
466.52
25.00
42.05
137.56
50.71
45.01
342.04
13.12
7.99
262.50
42.96
151.67
33.92
46.32
80.25
64.00
25.57
165.00
241.44
41.24
10.69
20.31
20.84
6.40
9.08
19.42
19.24
11.11
, 2.66
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,249.63
25.00
42.05
137.56
50.71
45.01
342.04
21.11
262.50
228.55
46.32
80.25
64.00
25.57
165.00
241.44
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CFIECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NOMBBR DATE Nf]MBfiR NAME aESCRIPTION
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HOSE MENDfiR
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE PLUNBING SUPPLIES
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINSR'S ACE HARDWARE RULE TAPfi
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACfi HARDWARE CLAMP
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINfiR'S ACE HARDWARE C HATTERY
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINT
101292 06/22/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARfi FILM
101293 06/22/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
101293 06/22/O1 057174 MISSZON OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
101293 06/22/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICfi PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
101293 06/22/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
101293 06/22/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLISS
101294 06/22/O1 058890 RICHARD MUNOZ S/BALL LEAGUE UMPIRfi-MUNOZ
101295 -06/22/O1 101803 THE MUSIC MACHINE MUSIC-FATHER/DAUGHTER NITE
101296 06/22/O1 102429 DAVID NACCARIATTI REINB.COFFEE MAKfiR
101296 06/22/O1 102429 DAVID NACCARIATTI REINID.COOKWARE
101297 06/22/O1 100095 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2 GORILLA RACKS
101297 06/22/O1 100095 NAPA AUTO PARTS ITYD FILTERS
101298 06/22/O1 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE TOOL KIT
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL RADIO 451-0183
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2174
101299 06/22/Ol 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2345
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 021-2713
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3953
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3956
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3959
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3960
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5400
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 271-7480
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BSLL PHONE 267-8633
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PAY PAONE 489-9816
101299 06/22/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL PAY PHONE 489-9867
101300 06/22/O1 102418 PACIFIC BfiLL 9 TELEPHONE SETS/VM LIGHTS
101301 06/22/O1 065714 PERVO PAINT C0. ROAD PAINT
101302 06/22/O1 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE S/BALL TROPHIES
101303 06/22/O1 102433 CASSIE PORRAZO REF.PARK DEPOSIT-PORRAZO
101304 06/22/O1 102237 PRIMARY CARE DOG & CAT RADIOGRAPH/T6STS-FANNI
101304 06/22/O1 102237 PRIMARY CARE DOG & CAT PHSCSICAL/EXAM FANNI
ACCOUNT
NpMBER
010.4420.5605
010.4211.5206
220.4303.5273
220.4303.5613
640.4712.5255
010.4211.5255
640.4712.5255
010.4130.5201
010.4130,5201
284.4103.5201
284.4103.5201
010.4130.5201
010.4424.5352
010.4424.5353
010.4211:5603
010.4211.5324
010.4213.5604
010.4211.5601
640.4712.5273
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4211.5403
220.4303.5403
640.4'710.5403
010.4211.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4145.5403
010.4201.5403
010.4201.5606
220.4303.5613
010.4424.5257
010.0000.4354
010.4201.5322
010.4201.5322
ITEM
AMOUNT
2.56
2.50
12.99
11.10
8.01
5.33
26.74
218.33
109.02
70.13
22.91
64.18
48.00
350.00
204.24
182.74
128.38
12.58
64.19
185.77
35.70
34.67
290.70
31.83
31.83
31.83
31.83
1,411.70
64.61
97.08
51.85
53.78
1,274.04
6,228.47
404.46
25.00
347.47
88.27
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
230.22
484.57
48.00
350.00
386.98
140.96
64.19
2,353.18
1,274.04
6,228.47
404.46
25.00
435.74
VOUCFII2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/20/01 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCFIER/ �
CFIECK CFIECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUhIDER DATE NOMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NOMBER
101305 06/22/O1 063180 MADDY QUAGLINO REF.CHILD IN MOTION-QUAGLINO 010.0000.4602
101306 06/22/O1 101216 JUDY REYES' REF.PARK DfiPOS2T-REYES 010.0000.4354
101307 06/22/Ol 071682 GREG ROSE S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-ROSE 010.4424.5352
101308 06/22/O1 075130 SAN LUIS OBISPO CNTY.NE SL1N�R 2001 ACITIVITS[ GUIDE 010.4421.5504
101309 06/22/O1 075660 SAN LUIS PAINTS PAINT/SUPFLIES 010.4213:5604
101309 06/22/O1 075660 SAN LUIS PAINTS PAINT 010.4213.5604
101309 06/22/O1 075660 SAN LUIS PAINTS FZELD MARKING PAINT 010.4430.5255
101310 06/22/O1 077024 ANN SARMIIIVTO S/BALL SCORER-SARMIENTO 010.4424.5352
101311 06/22/O1 077142 JOYCS SARUWATARI REIMB.GRAD SUPPLIES/CRAFT 010.4423.5254
101312 06/22/O1 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE/DIESEL 010.4211.5608
101313 06/22/Ol 100593 SHIFT CALENDARS,INC. 2002 SHIFT CALENDARS 010.4211.5201
101314 06/22/O1 102216 R. SIMONS COMPANY,INC. SCENIC CREEK #5 350.5607.7001
101314 06/22/O1 102216 R. SIMONS COMPANY,INC. SCENIC CREEK #5 350.5607.7201
101315 06/22/O1 075114 SIA CNTY GENERAL HOSPIT DOA-TACKITT/SRANIN 010.4201.5324
101316 06/22/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY VISRASEAL/ANTI SHIZfi/SILCONE 010.4211.5601
101316 06/22/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY JOBBfiR DRILL 010.4211.5601
101316 06/22/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY EXACT FIT WIPERS 010.4201.5601
101316 06/22/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY SRAKE/MASTER CYCLINDER 220.4303.5603
101316 06/22/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY LAMP FLASHER 612.4610.5601
101317 06/22/O1 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401
101317 06/22/O1 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNZA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401
101318 06/22/O1 082212 RANDY STEFFAN REIMB.DISHES-STEFFAN 010.4211.5255
101318 06/22/O1 082212 RANDY STEFFAN REIMB.KITCHEN TOOLS-STfiFFAN 010.4211.5255
101319 06/22/O1 082328 STERLING COhII+IUNICATIONS OfiS ENGINE RADIO 010.4211.5206
101319 06/22/O1 082328 STERLING CONII+IUNICATIONS REPR.WIG WAG/SLACKOUT LIGHT 010.4201.5601
101320 06/22/O1 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4201.5601
101320 06/22/O1 083226 SUNSST NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4305.5601
101321 06/22/O1 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER COPIER STAPLES 010.4130.5201
101322 06/22/O1 084084 TAYLOR'S TUNE-UP SHOP R/R HEADLAMP 010.4420.5601
101322 06/22/O1 084084 TAYLOR'S TUNE-UP SHOP SCOPE/FAN HELT 220.4303.5601
101323 06/22/O1 102318 DENNIS THURMAN S/BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL-THURMAN 010.4424.5352
101324 06/22/O1 102432 MARIA TOLEDO REF.PARK DEPOSIT-TOLEDO 010.0000.4354
ITEM
AMOUNT
22.25
25.00
32.00
2,343.33
43.83
33.16
191.92
75.00
55.51
243.73
173.99
90,912.64
9,348.30
34.00
29.92
27.40
13.44
90.10
25.07
57.22
83.11
104.33
114.15
482.57
107.03
334.95
103.14
56.07
163.34
102.90
48.00
25.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
22.25
25.00
32.00
2,343.33
268.91
75.00
55.51
243.73
173.99
100,260.94
34.00
185.93
140.33
218.48
589.60
438.09
56.07
266.24
48.00
25.00
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCf�'R/
CF�CK CI�CK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
101325 06/22/O1 101317 ROSEMARY TORRES REF.S/BALL LEAGUE REGIS-TORRES 010.0000.4608
101326 06/22/O1 086346 TROSSH READY MIX SLURRY
101326 06/22/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101326 06/22/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101326 06/22/O1 086346 TROSSH READY MIX SLURRY
101327 06/22/O1 086736 DOTTIE TRULQCK DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES
101328 06/22/O1 088062 UNION ASPHALT INC COLD MIX
101329 06/22/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. FOREMASTER REPAIR
101330 06/22/O1 088826 PEGGY VALKO ART CLASSES-VALKO
101331 06/22/O1 088842 VALLEY AUTO SERVICE MOUNT 4 TIRES
101332 .06/22/O1 102430 MARY VANDERVEEN REF.PARK DEPOSIT-VANDERVfiEN 010.0000.4354
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-FIRE CHIEF
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-WATER/SEWER
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-SHOP
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-STREETS
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS EXTRA CELL PHONE
101333 06/22/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-INSPECTOR
101334 06/22/O1 101866 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAG GOV.BUILDINGS PAGER SVCS
101335 06/22/O1 100517 LEONA WAHI, REF.SOCCER CAMP-WAHL
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. GENERAL CONSULIING SVCS 010.4301.5303
101336 06/22/Ol 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. CREEKSIDE PATFI 350.5607.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. OAK PARK BLVD.WIDENING 350.5609.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. PAVEMENT MANAGfiMENT SYSTSM 350.5613.7701
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. BRISCO/101 INTERCHANGE ALTS 350.5615.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. ROUTE 227 RELINQUISFIIdENT STUDY 350.5628.7701
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. TALLY HO RECON/227 TO LfiPOINT 350.5631.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. FAIR OAKS/VALLEY RD TRAFFIC 350.5636.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. BIKEWAY ONE/PHASES 11 & 111 350.5643.7301
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. HIKEWAY ONE/PHASES 11 & 111 350.5'643.7501
101336 06/22/Ol 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. TRABFIC WAY HRIDGE RAIL 350.5644.7501
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WAI,LACE & ASSOC. HUASNA RD ONERLAY 350.5645.7501
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACfi & ASSOC. NEWSOM SPRZNGS 350.5754.7501
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. GRAND RfiCON/PH3,ELM/OAK PARK 350.5812.7501
101336 06/2Z/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. SEWER MASTER PLAN 350.5814.7701
101336 06/22/Ol 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. RESERVOIR N0.1 DESIGN 350.5903.7501
101336 06/22/O1 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. LIERLY LN/MYRTLE WATER MP.IN 350.5906.7501
101337 06/22/O1 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/ROTATE 010.4201.5601
101337 06/22/O1 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE REPR.TIRE 220.4303.5603
�
101337 06/22/Ol 090980 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/FILTERS/WIPERS 010.4201.5601
PAGE 6
ITEM CHfiCK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
469.00 469.00
141.24
166.92
159.43
166.92 634.51
844.68 844.88
471.55 471.55
20.06 20.06
269.20 269.20
40.00 40.00
25.00 25.00
20.62
110.46
54.16
76.55
40.00
40.01 341.80
21.21 21.21
61.00 61.00
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
010.4424.5351
220.4303.5613
010.4420.5605
010.4424.5351
010.4212.5601
010.4212.5403
612.4610.5403
010.4305.5403
220.4303.5403
010.4301.5403
010.4301.5403
010.4213.5303
010.0000.4605
8,643.61
2,170.46
2,562.50
432.50
32.50
487.50
356.25
72.50
3,561.05
437.35
16.25
818.25
865.00
172.50
14,420.36
3,552.50
258.75
95.47
54.00
73.89
38,859.83
223.36
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 7
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CI�CK CFIIiCK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUNBER DATE IJOMBfiR NAME DESCRIPTION
101338 06/22/O1 091338 WESTERN FARM SERVICE, I CAL.HYPOCHIARITE
101338 06/22/01 091338 WESTERN FARM SERVICE, I CAL HYPOCHIARIDE
101339 06/22/O1 092430 JAMES WILLIAMS CA.ROBBERY ASSOC
101339 06/22/O1 092430 JAMES WILLIAMS GASOLINE
101340 06/22/O1 092586 LEE WIISON ELECTRIC COM MAY MAINT
TOTAL Cf�CKS
ACCOUNT
NOMBER
640.4712.5274
640.4712.52�4
010.4201.5503
010.4201.5608
010.4304.5303
ITEM
AMOLR�T
378.00
189.40
10.00
17.62
1,212.75
CHECK
AMOUNT
567.40
27.62
1,212.75
191,499.38
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 8
06/20/O1 10:39 VOUCHER/Cf�CK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
FUND TITLE
O10 GENERAL FUND
220 STREETS FUND
272 CA LAW ENFORCMT TCfII1LGY EQUIP
284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND
350 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
612 SEWER FUND
�
640 WATER FUND
TOTAL
; uf �':�Ii1�Y�l
33,760.26
7,490.72
9,289.28
603.56
130,477.16
938.55
8,939.85
191,499.38
ATTACHMENT 3
VOUCHRE2
06/27/O1 08:49
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMB£R DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NOf�ER
394 06/15/O1 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE - G.A.REIMB.6-7-01 P/R 011.0000.1015
394 06/15/O1 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REIMB.5-24-01 CORRECTION 011.0000.1015
101341 06/29/O1 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. MIS L/DIST 010.4140.5303
101341 06/29/O1 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST FAX-473-0386 010.4145.5403
101342 06/29/O1 001300 AGRI-TURF SUPPLIES,INC. DOLMARK LIME 010.4430.5605
101343 06/29/O1 102450 CHRISTINA ALCANTAR REF.PARK DEPOSIT-ALCANTAR 010.0000.4354
101344 06/29/O1 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-6/B 220.4303.5303
101344 06/29/O1 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS STEELE SVCS-6/8 010.4130.5303
101344 06/29/O1 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-6/20 220.4303.5303
101345 06/29/O1 102441 TANA ARANDA REPL.CUSHIONS 010.4211.5303
101346 06/29/O1 101038 ARROYO GRANDE LIONS FATHER/DAUGHTER DATE NIGHT 010.4424.5353
101347 06/29/O1 102050 AVAYA,INC. MERLIN PAONE AGREEMENT 010.4145.5403
101348 06/29/Ol 007800 AWARD CO. OF AMERICA AWARD PLAQUES/CERTIFICATES 010.4001.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4102.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER AMAZON.COM-BOOK 010.4101.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4002.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER MISC.SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4001.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER SHOE POLISHING SUPPLIES 01�.4211.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER NFPA CONF-FIBICH 010.4211.5501
101349 06/29/Ol 009008 BANKCARD CENTER WATER SUPPLY 0�0.4211.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LODGING-FIREWORKS CLASS 010.4211.5501
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER BLANKETS 010.4211.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER ' BIKE MEDIC EQUIP 010.4211.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LODGING-SHEELEY 284.4103.5501
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4301.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER MISC.TOYS/PLAYGROUND SPLYS 010.4425.5255
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER MISC.TOYS/PLAYGROUND SPLYS 010.4424.5252
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER MISC.TOYS/PLAYGROUND SPLYS 010.4422.5256
101349 06/29/Ol 009008 BANKCARD CENTER MISC.TOYS/PLAYGROUND SPLYS 010.4423.5253
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER COMPUTER DEMO-ROOM 010.4120.5501
101349 06/29/Ol 009008 BANKCARD CENTER COMPUTER DEMO-ROOM 010.4120.5501
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER FILM DEVE 010.4130.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201
. 101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201
101349 06/29/O1 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.6001
101349 06/29/01 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.6001
101350 06/29/O1 009438 BARKLOW'S FIRE TRUCK PA GAUGES/VALVES 010.4211.5324
101351 06/29/O1 009906 RITCHIE BARRETT FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
ITEM
AMOIJNT
191,440.31
1,000.00-
33.76
25.52
494.28
25.00
703.20
604.00
703.20
600.00
763.00
28.16
137.67
106.99
34.48
71.73
33.87
60.54
86.77
19.21
150.00
26.33
58.00
70.19
119.94
282.22
218.73
63.25
176.50
32.80
40.00
125.77
126.59
19.74
29.95
118.60
551.01
139.09
514.74
10.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNf
190,440.31
59.28
494.28
25.00
2,010.40
600.00
763.00
28.16
137.67
2,"762.30
514.74
10.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REZhffi.STAFF SUMMER TRAINING 010.4424.5353
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REIhID.PRESCfI00L SUPPLIES 010.4423.5254
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REINID.FATFIER-DAUGHTER FILM 010.4424.5252
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REINID.SNACK BAR/COMMpNICATION 010.4424.5353
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REIhID.CRAFT MATERIALS/GAMES 010.4422.5256
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW FILM DEV-FATHER/DAUGHTER 010.4424.5252
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REINIB.COhII+IUNICATION SPLYS 010.4424.5353
101352 06/29/O1 009750 BRENDA BARROW REINID.WALKIE TALKIE 010.4425.5255
' 101353 06/29/O1 101810 BASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTION SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 640.4712.5274
101354 06/29/O1 012480 CARL BRANDT FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101355 06/29/O1 100196 PETER BRINKERHOFF FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/�7UNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101356 06/29/O1 100921 JOSEPH E BUTTERS FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101357 06/29/O1 021940 C.COAST TAXI CAB SERVIC TAXI SVCS-JUNE 1-14 225.4553.5507
101358 06/29/Ol 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT CHECKS JULY 27-31 010.4201.5324
101359 06/29/Ol 101550 CCCICBO 2001 MENBERSHIP-SCHMIDT 010.4212.5501
101360 06/29/O1 101856 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS MIS CABLE MODEM CHARGES 010.4140.5303
101361 06/29/O1 023322 CHRISTZANSON CHEVROLET ENG.GAUGE 010.4211.5601
101361 06/29/Ol 023322 CFIl2ISTIANSON CHEVROLET COOLANT 010.4211.5601
101361 06/29/O1 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET GLASS CLEANER 010.4211.5601
101361 06/29/Ol 023322 C'HRISTIANSON CHEVROLET OIL FILTER 010.4211.5601
101361 06/29/O1 023322 CHI2ISTIANSON CHEVROLET PARTS 010.4211.5601
101362 06/29/O1 102282 CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL PHONE-MAY(CROCKETT) 010.4130.5201
101363 06/29/O1 023946 CLINICAL LAB.OF SAN HER WATER SAMPLES 640.4710.5310
101364 06/29/O1 024180 COAST NUT & BOLT BOLTS/NUTS 640.4712.5610
101365 06/29/O1 025428 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL BALLAST 010.4420.5605
101366 06/29/O1 026598 JOHN CROTTY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JL7NE 2001 010.4211.5145
101367 06/29/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C SOTTLED WATER 010.4130.5201
101367 06/29/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4101.5201
101367 06/29/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4120.5201
101367 06/29/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4001.5201
101367 06/29/O1 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4212.5201
101368 06/29/O1 101779 CTE COMPUTER TRAINING C EXCEL INTERMEDIATE-S.LINTNER 010.4140.5501
101368 06/29/O1 101779 CTE COMPUTER TRAINING C WORD INTERMEDIATE-O'DELL 010.4140.5501
101369 06/29/Ol 102435 LINDA DANIEL REF.WATER DfiP-115 S.ALPINE ST 640.0000.2302
ITEM
AMOUNT
138.73
33.16
19.99
254.41
125.31
23.86
121.18
85.99
429.70
30.00
20.00
30.00
1,419.25
32.00
60.00
227.90
16.69
77.04
39.16
4.82
322.45
32.67
731.00
105.29
20.79
30.00
38.34
38.32
38.34
15.00
30.00
169.00
169.00
180.00
PAGE 2
CH$CK
AMOUNT
602.63
429.70
30.00
20.00
30.00
1,419.25
32.00
60.00
227.90
460.16
32.67
731.00
105.29
20.79
30.00
160.00
336.00
VOUCHI2E2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NCIMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NOMBER
101369 06/29/O1 102435 LINDA DANIEL CLOSING BILL-115 S.ALPINE ST 640.0000.4751
101369 06/29/O1 102435 LINDA DANIEL PREVIOUS BALANCE-115 S.ALPINE 640.0000.4751
101370 06/29/O1 026548 DAYSTAR INDUSTRIES STREET SWEEPING 612.4610.5303
101371 06/29/O1 100197 JEREMY DENTON FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101372 06/29/Ol 016302 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIO CMC CREW-MAY 220.4303.5303
101373 06/29/O1 102113 NICHOLAS DEPEW FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101374 06/29/O1 029562 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY SUP4�IER SUPPLZES 010.4425.5255
101374 06/29/O1 029562 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY SUNA4ER PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 010.4422.5256
101374 06/29/O1 029562 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY TOYS/SUMMER SUPPLIES 010.4425.5255
101375 06/29/O1 102110 GABRIEL DONALD FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101376 06/29/Ol 102114 WAYNE DOOLEY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101377 06/29/O1 102449 GINA EARLEY REF.PARK DEPOSIT-EARLEY 010.0000.4354
101378 06/29/O1 032138 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SVCS. EMT REFRESHER 010.4211.5501
101379 06/29/Ol 102446 EQUAL SINGLES 60 PLUS REF.PARK DEPOSIT-EQUAL SINGLES 010.0000.4354
101380 06/29/O1 102442 EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT CO USED CHAZN 010.4211.5324
101381 06/29/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN CURS STOP 640.4712.5610
101381 06/29/O1 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN CURP STOP 640.4712.5610
101381 06/29/01 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN MISC.FITTINGS 640.4712.5610
101382 06/29/Ol 102440 LEO FERRZNI AGPD PATCH MAGNETS 278.4207.5255
101383 06/29/O1 102084 FIRE SERVICE SPECIFICAT FIRE HOSE 010.4211.6201
101384 06/29/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL #89590 010.4002.5301
101384 06/29/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL #90643 010.4002.5301
101384 06/29/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL #90785 010.4002.5301
101384 06/29/O1 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL #90786 010.4002.5301
101364 06/29/Ol 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL #91630 010.4002.5301
101385 06/29/Ol 035600 FRANK EASTERN C0. OFFICE CHP.IR 010.4120.6001
101386 06/29/O1 035602 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP KEYS 010.4101.5201
101387 06/29/Ol 100524 FREDERICK PUMP C0. SEALS/GASKETS 640.4711.5603
101388 06/29/O1 102438 LINDA FURNARI REF:SOCCER CAMP-FURNARI 010.0000.4605
101389 06/29/O1 037206 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRU LUBE/FILTER 010.4211.5601
ITEM
AMOUNT
24.07-
68.32-
5,658.14
30.00
3,838.38
30.00
500.11
157.57
74.64
30.00
25.00
25.00
258.00
25.00
325.79
164.79
72.76
217.48
939.98
3,214.28
265.00
49.50
31.50
55.50
45.00
393.30
9.63
792.56
48.00
34.10
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
87.61
5,658.14
30.00
3,838.38
30.00
732.52
30.00
25.00
25.00
258.00
25.00
325.79
455.03
939.98
3,214.28
346.50
393.30
9.63
792.56
48.00
34.10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12 ,
VOUCFIER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOLJNT
NUbffiER DATE NUhBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER
101390 06/29/O1 102115 DAVE GOSSMAN FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101391 06/29/Ol 101881 GREATAMERICAN LEASING C PANASONIC COPIER LEASE
010.413Q.5303
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES 010.4424.5351
101392 06/29/Ol 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-430 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30-01 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-438 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER SEACH SWR-440 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-446 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-451 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/Ul 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-454 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-459 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/Ol 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-462 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-467 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-470 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/Ol 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-475 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612:0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITSt OF GROVER BEACH SWR-478 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 .06/29/O1 039312 CZTY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-483 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-486 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-491 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/01 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-494 NOEL 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-448 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612:0000:4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-456 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-464 DZXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4'751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-472 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-480 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-488 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1371 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/Ol 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1374 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1375 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1378 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/01 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1379 DIXS 1/1/Ol-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1382 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101392 06/29/O1 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SWR-1386 DIXS 1/1/01-6/30/O1 612.0000.4751
101393 06/29/O1 039702 HACH COMPANY PH TESTER
101394 06/29/O1 100913 SEAN F HAGERTY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101395 06/29/O1 100914 CASEY L. HIDLE FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101396 06/29/O1 102451 JACQUELINE HINDS REF.PARK DEPOSIT-HINDS
101397 06/29/O1 042840 HOME APPLIANCE CENTER AM�NA REFRIGERATOR
101398 06/29/O1 044496 INFORMATION SERVICES MIS SYSTEM SUPPORT
101399 06/29/O1 045474 INT'L INSTIT.MUNI.CLERK MCEF MEhIDERSHIP-WETP70RE
101400 06/29/O1 101848 INVENSYS METERING SYSTE TURBO WATER METER
101400 06/29/O1 101848 INVENSYS METERING SYSTE TR WATER METERS
64�.4712.5274
010.4211.5145
010.4211.5145
010.0000.4354
010.4211.5255
010.4140.5303
010.4002.5503
640.4712.5207
640.4712.5207
PAGE 4
ITEM CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
30.00 30.00
319.07 319.07
25.80
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.�0
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.00
39.0-0
320.26
30.00
30.00
25.00
1,948.65
3,150.00
120.00
449.92
1,462.69
1,156.80
320.26
30.00
30.00
25.00
1,648.65
3,150.00
120.00
1,912.61
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIDER DATE N[7hBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
101401 06/29/O1 100915 PATRICK J. IREY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101402 06/29/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4001.5504
101402 06/29/O1 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY BLOOD DRIVE SUPPLIES 010.4211.5255
101403 06/29/O1 101137 JOE JENNINGS 5 CITIES B/BALL CAMP 010.4424.5351
101404 06/29/O1 102444 JOE JENNINGS REINID.T-SHIRTS 010.4424�5351
101405 06/29/O1 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhID.SNACK SUPPLIES 010.4425.5259
101405 06/29/Ol 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhID.SUPPL2E5 010.4425.5255
101406 06/29/O1 047736 JERRY KAUFMAN FIRE MIELAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101407 06/29/O1 048438 KEY TERMITE & PEST CONT MONTHLY PEST SVCS-AGPD 010.4213.5303
101408 06/29/O1 100916 GREG KLOSINSKI FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101409 06/29/Ol 102116 ROBBRT KRUSE FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101410 06/29/O1 102253 ICUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO AUTO CHARGER 010.4211.5603
101411 06/29/O1 049490 L& M DISTRIBUTION,INC. CAP/GEAR POST 010.4420.5605
101412 06/29/O1 050504 .LAUTZENHISER'S STATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4002.5201
101412 06/29/O1 050504 LAUTZENHISER'S STATION SHIPPING OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4002.5201
101413 06/29/O1 102448 JOYCE LEAVITT REF.PARK DEPOSIT-LEAVITT 010.0000.4354
101414 06/29/O1 052182 LIFE ASSIST,INC. REGULATOR 010.4211.5206
101415 06/29/01 054494 CATHY MALLORY REIMB.PRE-SCHOOL SUPPLIES 010.4423.5254
101416 06/29/O1 100917 RYAN S. MALONEY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101417 06/29/Ol 056580 MID STATE BANK ACfI DISTRIB-6/6/O1 010.4145.5555
101418 06/29/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA GASOLINE 010.4201.5608
101418 06/29/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA OCEAN VIEW DARE GRAD SUPPLIES 010.4201.5504
101418 06/29/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA TRAINING/MEETING EXPENSES 010.4201.5501
101418 06/29/O1 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA PERF PUBLICATION 010.4201.5255
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BROOM/PLUNGER/BATTERY 010.4430.5605
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINT/PAINTING SUPPLSES 220.4303.5613
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINTING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE MISC.SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE KITCHEN SIIPPLIES 010.4211.5255
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE CONCRETE/COUPLER 010.4420.5605
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BULB 640.4712.5604
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE UTILITY STRAP/MISC.SUPPLIES 010.4211.5603
101419 06/29/O1 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE E-Z PLUG/BATTERY 640.4712.5255
ITEM
AMOUNT
30.00
4.26
66.38
1,133.92
315.12
12.07
37.50
30.00
40.00
30.00
30.00
454.43
77.24
461.92
20.47
25.00
90.95
21.35
25.00
41.50
87.11
37.95
34.03
37.50
52.30
101.78
14.88
.98
10.21
9.79
3.41
5.34
4.26
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
30.00
70.64
1,133.92
315.12
49.57
30.00
40.00
30.00
30.00
454.43
77.24
482.39
25.00
90.95
21.35
25.00
41.50
196.59
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUhBER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER
101419 06/29/01 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE SLEDGE HANDLE/PAINTING SUPPLIE 640.4712.5273
101420 06/29/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4102.5255
101420 06/29/Ol 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4211.5201
101420 06/29/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4211.520i
101420 06/29/O1 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4211.5201
101420 06/29/Ol 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPFLIES 612.4610.5201
101420 06/29/Ol 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4102.5255
101421 06/29/O1 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4102.5255
101422 06/29/O1 058578 MULLAHEY FORD MIRROR SWITCH CONTROL 010.4211.5601
101423 06/29/O1 059436 DAVID NACCARATI FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101424 06/29/O1 102429 DAVID NACCARIATTI REIhID.PANASONIC MZCROWAVE 010.4211.5255
101425 06/29/O1 100095 NAPA AUTO PARTS ITYD.FILTEEt 010.4211.5601
101426 06/29/O1 060684 NAT'L PUB.SAFETY INFO.B 2001 NAT'L DIR.LAW ENFORCEMENT 010.4201.5255
101427 06/29/G1 102044 NOSSP,MAN,GUTHNER,KNC�X & PROF.SVCS-S.M. VALLEY WATER 640.4710.5575
101426 06/29/Ol 101750 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4212.5201
101429 06/29/O1 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HP.RDWARE GORILLA RACKS 010.4213.5604
101430 06/29/O1 100919 MATTHEW M OSBORNE FIRE MZLEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101431 06/29/O1 063258 RANDY OUIMETTE FZRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL MIS DATA LINE 473-0379 010.4140.5303
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFZC BELL L/DIST FAX 473-0386 010.4145.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 473-1935 640.4710.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC HELL ALARM 473-2041 010.4145.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL FAX 473-2198 010.4145.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL 473-5100 PHONE 010.4145.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL DATA LINE 473-5141 010.4145.5403
101432 06/29/O1 063960 PACIFIC BELL 489-6944 PHONE 010.4201.5403
101433 06/29/O1 100920 MATTHEW J PALM FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001 010.4211.5145
101434 06/29/O1 102445 MANDI PENNOCK REF.PARK DEPOSIT-PENNOCK 010.0000.4354
101435 06/29/O1 065714 PERVO PAINT C0. PAINT/GLASS BEADS 220.4303.5613
101436 06/29/O1 066924 PLAQAE SHAQLTE ENGRAVED SIGNS-LEWIS/IANNEO 010.4421.5201
101436 06/29/O1 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE ENGRAVED SIGNS-FELLOW 010.4130.5201
101436 06/29/O1 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE PLAQUE-MID-STATE BANK & TRUST 010.4001.5201
101437 06/29/O1 068200 PFI�C JACKETS/COLLARS 010.4211.5206
ITEM
AMOUNT
11.78
100.58
560.57
251.38
7.36
56.34
100.57
5.30
32.90
30.00
234.98
12.58
99.00
9,583.64
125.95
128.38
30.00
30.00
91.86
25.03
33.34
18.44
97.89
662.52
230.83
161.36
30.00
25.00
1,301.90
26.75
13.38
58.85
669.73
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
214.73
1,076.80
5.30
32.90
30.00
234.98
12.58
99.00
9,583.64
125.95
128.38
30.00
30.00
1,341.27
30.00
25.00
1,301.90
98.98
669.73
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CAECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CI�IECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUNIDER DATE Nt1MBER NAME DESCRIPTION
101438 06/29/O1 102243 PNEUMAX,INC. HYDRO.PRESSURE FILTER
101439 06/29/O1 100198 MATTHEW POLKOW FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101440 06/29/O1 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS BUDGET DIVIDERS
101440 06/29/O1 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS
101441 06/29/O1 067782 DENNIS PORTE PUPPY PLAY SCHOOL CLASSES
101442 06/29/O1 101046 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPP CLEANING SUPPLIES
101442 06/29/O1 101046 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPP CLEANING SUPPLIES
101443 06/29/O1 068874 PAUL QUINL�AN FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JLTNE 2001
101444 06/29/O1 102117 JESSE RIVERA FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101445 06/29/O1 102447 ROCGLO PROMOTIONS REF.PARK DEPOSIT-ROCGLO
101446 06/29/O1 071292 LARRY D. RODKEY FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101447 06/29/O1 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS SHOP TOWELS
101447 06/29/01 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS SHOP TOWELS
101448 06/29/O1 102118 JEROME SCHUI,TZ FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101449 06/29/O1 076156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE
101450 06/29/O1 079560 JEFF SILVA FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101451 06/29/O1 079638 JOE SILVA FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101452 06/29/O1 073944 SLO CO.ANIMAL REGULATIO ANIMAL SVCS-APRIL/JUNE
101453 06/29/O1 102443 SLO DOWNTOWN ASSOC STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN
101454 06/29/01 102436 LARRY SMITH REF.S/BALL-SMITH
101454 06/29/O1 102436 LARRY SMITH REF.S/BALL-2 OUT OF TOWN
101455 06/29/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY SWITCHES
101455 06/29/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY YELLOW WAX
101455 06/29/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY INF GAGE
101455 06/29/O1 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY YELLOW WAX
101455 06/29/O1 080866 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY ENGINE DEGREASER
101456 06/29/O1 102119 ANDREW SOWELL FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101457 06/29/O1 102437 STARVING ARTIST REF.SIGN PERMIT
101458 06/29/O1 082134 STATEWIDE SAFETY & SIGN TRAFFIC CONES
101458 06/29/O1 082134 STATEWIDE SAFETY & SIGN 1 HR PARKING SIGNS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
010.4211.5601
010.4211.5145
010.4102.5306
010.4102.5306
010.4424.5351
010.4213.5604
010.4213.5604
010.4211.5145
010.4211.5145
010.0000.4354
010.4211.5145
220.4303.5255
640.4712.5255
010.4211.5145
010.4201.5608
010.4211.5145
010.4211.5145
010.4201.5321
284.4103.5201
010.0000.4608
010.0000.4608
010.4211.5603
010.4211.5603
010.4211.5601
010.4211.5603
010.4211.5603
010.4211.5145
010.0000.4162
220.4303.5613
220.4303.5613
ITEM
AMOUNT
151.85
30.00
665.45
82.93
761.95
97.76
135.89
30.00
30.00
25.00
30.00
100.00
199.39
30.00
1,555.49
30.00
30.00
8,525.00
9.39
80.00
16.00-
67.35
27.03
39.58
42.95
24.50
30.00
68.00
454.75
25.40
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
151.85
30.00
748.38
761.95
233.65
30.00
30.00
25.00
30.00
299.39
30.00
1,555.49
30.00
30.00
8,525.00
9.39
64.00
201.41
30.00
68.00
480.15
_ _-
VOUCHItE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION
101459 06/29/O1 082212 RANDY STEFFAN REIhID.FORKS/SPOONS/MUGS
101460 06/29/O1 082836 STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY PZPE
101461 06/29/O1 082992 GREGORY STUMPH FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/�T�INE 2001
101462 06/29/Ol 102120 MITCH STUMPH FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000
101463 06/29/Ol 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER COMPUTER PRINTER CARTRIDGES
101463 06/29/Ol 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER REPL.SEPERATION PAD
101463 06/29/O1 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER REPL.HP COLOR PRINTER
101464 06/29/01 084162 ERIN TAYLOR REINID.TUITION/BOOKS-TAYLOR
101465 06/29/O1 100511 JASON TENYENHUIS FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101466 06/29/O1 102244 TITAN INDUSTRIAL SINUS CONGESTION TABLETS
101467 06/29/O1 101641 TOMARK SPORTS,INC HOMEPLATES
101468 06/29/O1 085878 TRANS-KING TRANSMISSZON TRANSMISSION SERVICE
101468 06/29/O1 065878 TRANS-KING TRANSMISSION TRANSMISSION SERVICE
101468 06/29/O1 085878 TRANS-KING TRANSMISSION TRANSMISSION SERVICE
101469 06/29/O1 102344 THE TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION-TT •
101469 06/29/01 102344 THE TRZBUNE TT SUBSCRIPTION
101470 06/29/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101470 06/29/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101470 06/29/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101470 06/29/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101470 06/29/O1 086346 TROESH READY MIX SLURRY
101471 06/29/O1 086736 DOTTIE TRULOCK DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES
101472 06/29/O1 086892 WINTON TULLIS FIRE MILEAGE-JAN/JUNE 2001
101473 06/29/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS
101473 06/29/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS
101473 06/29/O1 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS
101474 06/29/O1 087672 UNITED RENTALS CROWFOOT ADAPTER
101475 06/29/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS PD PATROL CELL PHONES
101475 06/29/O1 10200� VERIZON WIRELESS RDA CELL PHONE
101475 06/29/O1 102007 VERIZON WZRELESS CELL PHONE-C:M
101475 06/29/O1 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PORTABLE
101475 06/29/O1 102007 VERI20N WIRELESS CELL PHONE-ENG '
101476 06/29/O1 101866 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAG PAGER SVCS
ACCOUNT
NUNIDER
010.4211.5324
640.4712.5610
010.4211.5145
010.4211.5145
272.4201.6101
010.4211.5602
010.4201.5602
010.4201.5502
010.4211.5145
010.4420.5255
C10.4430.5605
010.4211.5601
010.4211.5601
010.4211:5601
010.4130.5503
010.4101.5503
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
640.4712.5610
010.4424.5351
010.4211.5145
010.4430.5605
010.4420.5605
010.4420.5605
220.4303.5603
010.4201.5403
284.4103.5403
010.4101.5403
010.4211.5403
010.4211.5403
O1Q.4211.5403
ITEM
AMOUNT
64.17
7.02
30.00
30.00
408.74
131.01
35.00
72.00
30.00
6.96
206.46
132.08
119.94
121.24
156.00
156.00
85.24
133.75
159.43
210.79
254.66
158.40
30.00
60.59
13.34
1.40
11.84
303.66
62.19
33.50
48.57
18.66
74.24
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
64.17
7.02
30.00
30.00
574.75
72.00
30.00
6.96
206.48
373.26
312.00
843.87
158.40
30.00
75.33
11.84
466.58
74.24
VOIICHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CF�CK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUNIDER DATE NOMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
101477 06/29/O1 091026 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. CA CODES-CD
101477 06/29/O1 091026 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. CA CODES ON CD
101476 06/29/O1 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER/ENNELOPES
101478 06/29/O1 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER/NCR/ENVELOPES
101478 06/29/O1 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER
101479 06/29/O1 092508 NANCY WILLIAMS REIMB.PRE-SCHOOL SUPPLIES
101480 06/29/O1 092864 SCOTT WIRZ FIRE MILEAGE=JAN/JUNE 2001
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
010.4003.5503
010.4003.5503
010.4102.5255
010.4102.5255
010.4102.5255
010.4423.5254
010.4211.5145
ITEM
AMOUNT
145.52
145.52
139.90
566.77
280.86
60.64
5.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
291.04
987.55
60.84
5.00
265,305.57
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 10
06/27/O1 08:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 12
FUND TITLE
O10 GENERAL FUND
O11 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND
220 STREETS FUND
225 TRANSPORTATION FUND
272 CA LAW ENFORCMT TCFIIVLGY EQUIP.
278 99-00 FED LOCAL LAW ENFORCE GT
284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND
612 SEWER FUND
640 WATER FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
42,136.79
190,440.31
7,240.45
1,419.25
408.74
939.98
353.80
6,845.48
15,520.77
265,305.57
ATTACHMENT 4
VOUCHI2E2
06/27/O1 10:23
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 14
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE Nf�IBER NAME DESCRZPTION NUDffiER
101481 07/O1/Ol 102453 14TH ANN.N.D.O.A.TRAINI REGIS-HULGAN/SOUZA/TAYLOR 010.4201.5501
101482 07/O1/O1 004680 STEVE ANDREWS RECRUITMENT SYMPOS-ANDREWS 010.4201.5501
101483 07/O1/O1 100995 ARROYO RANCH COMPANY RANGE RENTAL 010.4201.5553
101484 07/O1/O1 012792 FLOYD BRIDGE HIGH TECH.CRIME-BRIDGE 010.4201.5501
101485 07/O1/O1 023868 RICHARD CLEAVER LEAS-CLEAVER 010.4201.5501
101486 07/O1/O1 101241 ROHERT F. DRIVER CO,INC COhIl�RICAL FLOATER KG0002501 010.4145.5579
101487 07/01/O1 100310 EXECUTIVE CONA4UNICATION ANNUAL ENHANCE/SUPPORT NICEDLC 010.4201.5607
101468 07/O1/O1 102452 HTCIA REGIS-SARRY BRIDGE 010.4201.5501
101489 07/O1/O1 043290 CHERI H[JL�GAN CA.DARE CONF-HULGAN 010.4201.5501
101489 07/O1/Ol 043290 CHERZ HULGAN CDOA MEETING-HULGAN 010.4201.5501
101490 07/O1/O1 100869 KIS COMMUNICATIONS,INC QTLY WEBSITE HOSTING 010.4140.5303
101491 07/O1/O1 050154 LA SALLE NAT'L BANK SAFE WATER LOAN PAYAHLE-INTER 640.4710.5802
101491 07/O1/O1 050154 LA SALLE NAT'L BANK SAFE WATER LOAN PAYASLE-PRINC 640.4710.5801
101492 07/Ol/O1 100570 LASSEN COMMUNITY COLLEG REGIS-RICHARD CLEAVER 010.4201.5501
101493 07/O1/O1 101320 LEBARD'S MICROAGE PRINTER MAINT.AGREE-7/02 010.4140.5602
101494 07/O1/O1 100616 MARIN CONSULTING ASSOC REGIS-JEFFREY SOUZA 010.4201.5501
101495 07/O1/O1 066690 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE SCPS,E RENTAL 010.4101.5602
101495 07/O1/O1 066690 P27NEY BOWES POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 010.4101.5602
101495 07/O1/O1 066690 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL 010.4101.5602
101496 07/O1/O1 102454 REGAL BILTMORE HOTEL REGIS-JEFF SOIIZA 010.4201.5501
101497 07/O1/O1 102455 REGAL BILTMORE HOTEL REGIS-CHERI HULGAN 010.4201.5501
101498 07/O1/Ol 102456 REGAL BILTMORE HOTEL REGIS-ERIN TAYLOR 010.4201.5501
101499 07/O1/O1 076740 SANTA MARIA TIMES 5C TPR SUBSCR TO 7/O1/02 010.4120.5503
101499 07/O1/O1 076740 SANTA MARIA TIMES 5C TPR SUBSCR 010.4002.5503
101500 07/O1/O1 101176 SKILLPATH S&MINARS REGIS-SHAWN PRYOR 010.4201.5501
101501 07/O1/Ol 074100 SLO CNTY AUDITOR-CONTRO LAFCO FUNDING 010.4145.5503
101502 07/O1/O1 0'74412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS INTEREST PAYMENT 641.4750.5802
101502 07/01/O1 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS LOPE2 MAINT & OPERATION 641.4750.5612
101503 07/Ol/O1 081200 JEFF SOUZA ASSERTIVE SUPER-SOUZA 010.4201.5501
ITEM
AMOUNT
450.00
282.00
2,400.00
624.56
519.30
8,985.00
2,495.00
400.00
195.00
80.00
89.95
22,390.36
35,983.30
35.50
499.00
240.00
114.30
475.20
310.89
468.00
468.00
468.00
20.00
20.00
149.00
9,011.00
278,649.00
418,889.50
30.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
450.00
282.00
2,400.00
624.56
519.30
8,985.00
2,495.00
400.00
275.00
89.95
58,373.66
35.50
499.00
240.00
900.39
468.00
468.00
468.00
40.00
149.00
9,011.00
697,538.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
06/27/O1 10:23 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 14
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUhBER DATE NUMHER NAME DESCRIPTION
101503 07/O1/O1 081200 JEFF SOUZA CA/NAT'L DARE CONF-SOUZA
101504 07/O1/O1 082328 STERLING CONAlUNICATIONS JULY 2001 SERVICE AGREEMENT
101505 07/O1/O1 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER COPIER MAINT.AGREEMENT
101505 07/O1/O1 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER FAX MACHINE MAINT.AGREEMENT
101505 07/O1/O1 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER PANASONIC MAINT.AGREEMENT
101506 07/O1/O1 084162 ERIN TAYLOR CA/NAT'L DARE CONF-TAYLOR
101507 07/O1/O1 084708 RICK TERBORCH REINID.INT'L CHIEFS CONF
101508 07/O1/Ol 088218 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE P.O.HOX 550 RENTAL
101509 07/O1/O1 088296 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE POSTAGE
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUI�ER
010.4201.5501
010.4201.5606
010.4120.5602
Q10.4201.5602
010.4201.5602
010.4201.5501
010.4201.5501
010.4120.5201
010.4201.5201
STEM
AMOUNT
195.00
995.00
390.00
185.00
2,850.00
195.00
320.00
250.00
1,200.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
225.00
995_00
3,425.00
195.00
320.00
250.00
1,200.00
791,321.86
VOUCF�tE2
06/27/O1 10:23
FUND TITLE
O10 GENERAL FUND
640 WATER FUND
641 LOPEZ FUND
TOTAL
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 14
►�e[i�11
35,409.70
58,373.66
697,538.50
791,321.86
PAGE 3
__ _ . _.
ATTACHMENT 5
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD 6/08/01 TO 6/21/01
06/29/01
FUND 010
FUND 220
FUND 284
FUND 612
FUND 640
203,005.36
9,281.57
4,258.12
3,753.36
9,344.21
229,642.62
Salaries Full time
Salaries Part-Time
Salaries Over-Time
Holiday Pay
Sick Pay
Annual Leave Pay
Vacation Buyback
Sick Leave Buyback
Vacation Pay
Comp Pay
Annual Leave Pay
PERS Retirement
Social Securiry
PARS Retirement
State Disability Ins.
Health Insurance
Dental Insurar�ce
Vision Insurance
Life Insurance
Long Term Disability
Uniform Allowance
Car Allowance
Council Expense
Employee Assistance
Uniform Allowance
Motor Pay
Total:
142,847.39
27,771.11
12,011.44
1,021.84
2,321.64
7,02$.66
3, 559.03
3,775.49
14,497.55
13, 840.82
324.30
643.35
229,642.62
o � pRROYp v•
p
� INCORPOAATEO �Z
u °
MEMORANDUM
� .,�xY ,o. ,�„ ,�
c ���FORN� P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
BY: JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR ��
�
SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT DEPOSITS
DATE: JULY 10, 2001
Attached please find a report listing the current investment deposits of the City of Arroyo
Grande, as of June 30, 2001, as required by Government Code Section 53646 (b).
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT
As of June 30, 2001
July 10, 2001
This report presents the City's investments as of June 30, 2001. It includes all
investments managed by the City, the investment iristitution, type of investxnent,
maturity date, and rate of interest. As of June 30, 2001, the investment portfolio was in
compliance with all State iaws and the City's investment policy.
Current Investments:
The City is currently investing all short-term excess cash in the Loca� Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) administered by the State Treasurer. This is a very high
quality investment in terms of safety, liquidity, and yield. The City may readily
fransfer the LAIF funds to the City's checking account when funds are needed. At this
time, the City does not hold any other investments. The following is a comparison of
investments based on book values as of May 31, 2001 compared with the prior month
and the prior year.
Date:
Amount:
Interest Rate:
june 2001
$10,350,000
6.16%
May 2001
10,150,000
6.16%
june 2000
7,745,000
6.19%
8.c.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Lady called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City Council:
Redevelopment
Agency:
Council Members Runels, Dickens, Lubin, and Mayor Lady were
present. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara was absent.
Board Members Runels, Dickens. Lubin, and Chair Lady were
present. Vice-Chair Femara was absent.
City Staff Present: City Manager : Pkc�ams; City Attomey Carmel; Director of
Administrative : Service� Wetmore; Director of Public Wo�lcs
Spagnolo, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Hemandez;
Director of , Commuraity Development McCants; Director of
Economic Development Sheeley; and Assistant Planner Foster.
3. FLAG SALUTE
Membets of Boy Scout Troop 489 led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Reverend Dr. Norman Somes, St. Samabas Episcopal Church, Arroyo Grande,
delivered the invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
None.
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances;Re�d in Title Only
Council Member Runels moved, Council Member Dickens seconded� and the motion
passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall
be read in title only and all,further rea�ding be waived.
Patty Welch, 1151 Pradera Court, refened to the sound wall along a portion of Huasna
Road and inquired who was respon�ible for the care of the plants. She requested
additional planting along the wall to further address the noise.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 2
Jim Guthrie, 514 Starlight Lane, spoke regarding the issue of cetlular antenna sites and
suggested the Council agendize the issue in order to develop guidelines. He further
suggested the Council place a moratorium on the consideration of further applications
until some guidelines were in place. .
John Keen, 298 N. Elm Street, echoed Mr. Guthrie's comments and stated the City had
reviewed four projects for cellular sites in the last two months, which have been
considered on a case by case basis. He agreed that the City should create guidelines.
Tim Brown, 125 Allen, commented on Consent Agenda Item 8.i. and expressed his
appreciation for the City pursuing a settlement with Envicom.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Runels asked for clarification regarding Consent Agenda Item 8.g.
regarcling the relocation of an existing driveway and installation of a new utility pole at
the intersection limits of Fair Oaks Avenue and Valley Road.
Council Member Lubin moved and Council Member Runels seconded the motion to
approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.i., with the recommended courses of
action:
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratificatio�.
Action: Approved the listing of cash disbursements for the period May 1� 2001
through May 15, 2001. .
8.b. Cash Flow Analysls/Approval of Interfund Advance from the Water Facility
Fund.
Action: Received and filed May 2001 Cash Report and approve the interFund
advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other funds as of
May 31, 2001.
8.c. Consideration of Agreement with Economic Vitality Corporation of San
Luis Obispo County.
Action: Approved the Economic Vitality Corporation of San Luis Obispo County
Agreement.
S.d. Consideration of Agreement with San Luis Obispo County Vlsitors and
Confierence Bureau.
Action: Approved the San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau
Agreement.
8.e. Approval of Minutes.
Action: Approved minutes as submitted for the Special City Council Meeting of
June 12� 2001 and Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting of June
12, 2001.
S.f. Authorfzation of Payment for Scenic Creekside Walk Through tho Historic
Village of Arroyo Grande - Phase II, Progress Payment No. 6 and Notice of
Completion.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 3
Action: 1) Authorized progress payment in the amount of $2,008.57 to R.
Simons Company for work completed on the project; 2) Directed staff to file a
Notice of Completion; and 3) Authorized the release of the retention of
$23�638.30, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been
recorded, if no liens have been filed.
8.g. Authorization of Additional Funds for the Fair Oaks AvenueNalley Road
Traffic Signal, Project No. PW 2000-7.
Recommended Action: Appropriated $25�500 from the Traffic Signalization
Fund for the Fair Oaks AvenueNalley Road Traffic Signal project for
unanticipated additional work.
8.h. Authorization to Apply for Grant _Funds for Per Capita Grant Program of the
Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection
Bond Act of 2000.
Actlon: Adopted Resolution authorizing staff to apply for per capita grant funds
allocated to the City of Arroyo Grande by the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean
Water, Clear Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000.
8.i. Consideration of Settlement of Claims Against Envicom.
Actlon: Authorized the Mayor to execute a release settling the City's daims
against Envicom Corporation relating to rwork on the General Plan Update.
AYES: Lubin� Runels, Dickens, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: Ferrara
There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to be
passed.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9.a. Consideration of Proposed Ordina�ce to Expand the Clty': Creek
Dedication Requirement to Include Meadow Creek snd Its T�ibutaries.
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report, stating that the Council had
previously directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Development Code to revise
portions of the Municipal Code to establish a 25 foot creek dedication requirement from
the top of the stream bank for Amoyo Grande Creek and it tributa�es and Meadow
Creek and its tributaries.
Mayor Lady opened the public hearing.
Bob Brownson, Arroyo Grande resident, spoke in support of the proposed ordinance to
include Meadow Creek and its tributaries.
Malcolm McEwen, Watershed Coordinator, Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation
District, spoke in support of the proposed ondinance and strongly recommended the
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 4
Council adopt the amendment to expand the City's creek dedication requirement for all
creeks in Arroyo Grande. He submitted a letter for the record on behalf of the Board of
Directors of the Coastal San Luis Resource Consenration District in support of the
proposed Ordinance, and responded to questions from Council regarding the benefits of
increasing the creek setbacks.
Council Member Lubin asked for clarification about the issue of reduced sediment
loads.
Mr. Ewen responded that in an upstream situation if there were excessive sediment
loads and no filtering vegetation to prevent it from reaching the creek� it would settle in
the creek channel. He explained that all types of vegetation would help to stabilize the
banks and prevent sediment from entering the creeks.
Council Member Runels referred to the large portion of sedime�t going down to the
Equestrian Way crossing that comes from outside the City limits. He stated in the past,
there was a tremendous amount of erosion that washed out part of the County road.
flooding the culvert at Equestrian Way. He said there had been a problem getting
permits to clean it out. He spoke about maintenance issues and generally spoke in
opposition to the proposed ordinance.
Hearing no further public comments. Mayor Lady closed the public hearing.
Council Member Dickens moved to introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending
TiUe 9, Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code to expand the City's creek dedication
requirement for new discretionary projects to include the area 25 feet from the top of the
stream bank for Arroyo Grande Creek and its tributaries and Meadow Creek and its
tributaries. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call
vote, to wit:
AYES: Dickens, Lubin, Lady
NOES: Runels
ABSENT: Ferrara
There being 3 AYES, 1 NO, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to be
passed. .
9.b. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-021; Installation of
Cellular Communication Antennas on the Trader Joe's Building located at
937 Rancho Parkway in the Flve Cities Center.
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council
adopt a Resolution approving the installation of cellular oommunication antennas. flush
mounted on the existing Trader Joe's building located at 937 Rancho Parkway.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 5
Council Member Dickens asked for. clarification on the mitigation measure that requires
the applicant to perform a radio frequency study to determine possible conflicts with the
City's communication system.
Director McCants responded that the study would have to determine there would be no
interference with public safety equipment, such as police, fire, and ambutance radios.
Mayor Lady opened the public hearing.
Trey Sklar, JM Consulting, representing the applicant, Alpine PCS, gave a bri�f history
of the company, which is headquartered in San Luis Obispo Courrty and operates in
San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Monterey counties. He reviewed the location and
displayed the proposed equipment and cabinet material. Mr. Sklar answered questions
from Council regarding frequency ranges and interference.
Council Member Lubin inquired why other companies like Nextel were using seventy
foot poles if this technology was available.
Mr. Sklar responded that there were sites where Alpine would place a pole, depending
on what the coverage requirements were. He stated the equipment requirements vary
from site to site.
Jim Guthrie, 514 Starlight, stated the Planning Commission had discussed achieving
the same coverage with multiple sites. He recalled that this coverage also indudes a
tower to be located in Oceano in order to obtain equal coverage. He asked what the
height of that tower would be.
Mr. Sklar responded that tower would be eighty (80) feet located behind trees on S. 4"'
Street in an Industrial area. He stated equipment that provided the best ooverage was
used.
In response to the previous public comments for establishing uniform cell site
guidelines, Council Member Dickens asked what the City could expect in the next three
to five years with regard to this technology.
Mr. Sklar responded that as technology advances, the trend is toward identifying
smaller sites and the use of fewer towers.
Patty Welch, 1151 Pradera Court, commented that the Council should look at
precedence if the City was going to allow #his. She stated she would not want to see
fifteen of these proposed boxes on the Trader Joe's building.
Kurtis Femandez� 1619 Manhattan, Grover Beach, stated there were a lot of structures
already in the City to accommodate this technology.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 6
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing.
Councii Member Lubin expressed his support for the project as designed. He agreed
w�h the need to create guidelines but supported continuing to review projects on a
case-by-case basis until they were adopted.
Council Member Runels supported the project.
Council Member Dickens supported the project; however, reiterated his concems
regarding the establishment of uniform cell site guidelines within the City. He stated he
spoke with the City Manager and Economic Development Director about having a
consultant give the Council some professional feedback on this industry and the
possible impacts to the City. He stated this was a growing industry and was in favor of
providing good service coverage; however, he did not want towers to beoome a visual
blight. He applauded the applicant for addressing this issue in their proposal.
Mayor Lady supported the proposal and there was Council consensus to informally
direct staff to establish draft guidelines for the Council's review at a future date.
Council Member Lubin moved to approve Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-021 to
place a wireless antenna facility on the Trader Joe's building in the Five Cities Center
and adopt a Resolution adopting a mitigated negative declaration, instructing the
Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of Determination, ar� approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-021, located at 937 Rancho Parkway, Applied for by
Alpine PCS. Council Member Runels seconded the motion, and on the following roll-
call vote, to wit:
AYES: Lubin, Runels� Dickens, Lady
NOES: None
ABSENT: Ferrara
There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to be
passed.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
Council Member Dickens declared a conflict of interest in regar to dl�cussion
item #1 in the staff report, reserved his right to speak before �e Council on the
issue as a member of the public, and stepped down from the dais.
10.a. Conslderation of General Plan Update Follow-up Issues.
Rob Strong� General Plan Update and EIR Consultant presented the staff report and
explained that it had been determined that there was a map area that had not been
identified in the Land Use Study Areas that was previously reviewed by the Lor� Range
Planning Committee and City Council. First, he reviewed the area located along East
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 7
Myrtie and East Cherry Avenues currently classified as Rural Residential and stated
three property owners had requested reciass�cation to a Single Family Residential
(SFR) designation. He stated that SFR� designation has five different density categories
in the proposed General Plan ranging from Very-Low Density to Medium Density. He
explained that altematives were addressed in the draft Environmental Impact Report
ranging from the Low Density through the Low Moderate and Medium Density which
could be applied to this 21-acre area. He stated that Council adion was not necessary
on this issue tonight and that it would be identified as one of the areas of discussion at
the Planning Commission hearings in July.
Council Member Runels stated there had been an ongoing drainage problem in this
area and it was his opinion that to do something now in the General Plan Update would
be advantageous to the City so that the drainage problem could be resolved. He stated
that if the zoning were changed to maximize the use of the land, it would be of benefit to
all the residents in the neighborhood.
Mayor Lady opened up the item for public comment.
Tim Brown� 125 Allen. asked for clarification that there had been no change in the draft
Land Use Element Map.
Consultant Strong clarified that the Map, the Draft EIR, and the General Plan policy
documents had been distributed and there had been no changes. He clarified that
altematives had been addressed in the Draft EIR.
J Johnson, 1208 Huasna Road, spoke on behalf of Grace Stilwell� who owns property
adjacent to Noguera Place. He stated she would like to have similar zoning as Nogueca
Place with Medium Density SFR.
Mr. Vandeveer, 756 Myrtle, stated three years ago he had filed an application for a
change to R-1 Single Family Residential zoning and he had not heard anything about it
since. He stated it was currently being used as R-1 and he would like to see it formally
changed to R-1.
Reuel Estes, 811 E. Cherry, agreed with Mr. Vandeveer's comments and stated he
would like to see better use of the land.
Mike Titus, 404 Lierly, stated he was concemed that other neighbors that �uld be
impacted by any possible decision were not notified, although he realized the Council
was not making final decisions. He stated that he had spoken to the Council in the past
on a number of issues; however, this issue was closer to home. He stated he lived in
the affected property and read into the record comments from a letter he had submitted
to Consultant Strong when the first map came out regarding the Newsom subdivision.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001 �
PAGE 8
Lany Tumer, 323 Noguera, read a letter into the record regarding the drainage issue
affecting the Noguera - Myrtie Street area� opposing any plan that called for an open
ditch to be oonstructed in the easement to solve the drainage problems in the area. Mr.
Tumer requested that no action be taken until there is an accepted drainage solution
that satisfies the 100-year storm requirement.
City Manager Adams clarified the status of resolving the drainage issue and highlighted
efforts that have been made regarding a design proposai that may resolve a large
portion of the drainage problem. He stated staff had met with Mr. Tumer and neighbors
to receive feedback, is addressing their concems and is exploring options.
Tim Brown� 125 Allen, stated that the City has had the ability to resolve this issue
whether or not the property is upzoned or not. He asked for an explanation of the
Council's position on how a change in zoning is going to help resolve the drain�ge
problem.
Mayor Lady responded that the largest issue was the financial resources needed to
construct the best project.
Jim Dickens, 769 Branch Mill Road, representing the Dixson Ranch Agriculture
Preserve, recommended maintaining the 21 acres along E. Myrtle and E. Cherry
Avenues as low-density single family residential. He stated only two of the twelve
property owners have requested a zoning upgrade; and the road infra�ructure is
inadequate to accommodate the increased residential density. He stated to put in
proper road infrastructure would significantly impact the agricultural operatbns. Mr.
Dickens stated the Ranch is moving forward with an agricultural preserve and it is their
intent to maintain the property in agriculture in perpetuity. He said increased residential
density within the area would further encroach upon their long-temn agricu�ural viability
of the property. He spoke on the impact to water resources, and that the solving of the
Newsom Springs drainage issue has no bearing on the zoning issue. He canmented
that Public Works has a project that would be brought to the C�ncil within the year.
Ed Harrison, property owner, expressed his concems that he was not no 'trf'ied of this
item of dis�ssion and had no information of what was being proposed.
Mr. Vandeveer� 756 Myrtle, responded to Mr. Dickens' comments and stated that Mr.
Dickens had written to the property owners requesting 100 feet of their property to
protect the agriculture.
Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady closed the public comment period.
Following Council discussion and comments, there was Council consensus to identify
this iterr� regarding the E. Myrtle and E. Cheny properties as a discussion item at the
Planning Commission hearings on the General Plan Update.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 9
Consultant Strong then reviewed item #2, stating that additional Sphere of Influence
(SOI) expansion altematives may be appropriate for General Plan Update discussion,
related to Land Use Study Area #8, Frederick/ALC and Williams Properties southeast of
the City Limits.
Mayor Lady opened the item for public comment and hearing none, brought the issue
back to the Council for discussion.
Council and staff discussion ensued regarding the parcels and which portions are
currenUy included within the Cit�r's Sphere of Influence; the potential for greenbelt
acquisition; protecting the City's boundaries; issues with the potential incorporation of
Nipomo; issues related to the Laetitia Winery; and what the benefits would be of
including the parcels with the City's Sphere of Influence.
Council Members Lubin, Runels, and Mayor Lady supported the inclusion of this area
within the City's Sphere of Influence.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Discussion Regarding Potential Tourism Business Improvement District.
[COUNCIVRDA]
Economic Development Director Sheeley presented the staff report and recommended
the Council/RDA provide direction to staff regarding the establishment of a Tourism
Business Improvement District.
Council/Board Member Runels asked if staff had any discussion regarding the issue
with any of the City's hotel owners or operators.
Director Sheeley responded no; however she had talked to Jonni Biaggini, Executive
Director of the San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau. She indicated
that Ms. Biaggini's expressed concem over the establishment of such a District due to
the recent increase in the City's Transient Occupancy Tax, the increase in energy costs
that the hotel operators are facing, and that the timing was not the .best for establishing
such a District.
Mayor/Chair Lady opened up the item for public comment.
Tim Brown, 125 Allen, asked what the revenue would be used for. He stated that the
hotel owners should know ahead of time how it would benefit them. He stated he saw
this as an increase in the bed tax.
Jim Guthrie, 514 Starlight, stated that the original Transient Occupancy Tax was
implemented to create and maintain convention centers and the tourism industry. He
said this proposal would be tough for Arroyo Grande, as it was not a true destination
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 10
City. He stated the Visitors and Conference Bureau does a good job of promoting
tourism.
Council/Board Members Lubin and Runels did not support the proposal.
Council/Board Member Dickens suggested making phone calls to the two largest hotels
in the City to see if the owners/operators were interested in the proposal and that there
was no need to come back to the Council unless there was a positive response.
Mayor/Chair Lady did not support the proposal; however, the Council/Board agreed by
consensus to direct staff to contact the two largest hotel/motels in the City to determine
if there was any interest in pursuing a tourism business improvement district. If there
were no interest expressed, the proposal would be dropped.
11.b. Consideration of Policy Modification for Development Impact Fees for
Projects Approved Prior to Adoption of New Impact Fees.
City Manager Adams presented the staff report and recommended the Council leave
intact the existing policy of assessing development impact fees based upon the fees in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Mayor Lady opened the item for public comment, and hearing none, brought the item
back to the Council for consideration.
There was unanimous consensus of the Council to leave intact the existing policy of
assessing development impact fees based upon the fees in effect at the time of building
permit issuance.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
a. MAYOR MICHAEL LADY
(1) South San Luls Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD).
Approved FY 2001-02 Annual Budget; Reviewed the County Airport Lease;
Reviewed personnel issues; Reported the District $9 million in reserves;
District is investigating ideas for future expansion.
(2) Other. None.
b. MAYOR PRO TEM TONY M. FERRARA
Mayor Lady acknowledged a written memorandum submitted by Mayor Pro Tem
which gave the following reports:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). Summer
executive meetings, as well as the July Board meeting. have been
canceled; Will be following-up with the multi-family recycling issue with Bill
Worrell.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 11
(2) Air Pollutlon Control District (APCD). Bob Carr, APCD Control Officer for
SLO County, is retiring. Wiil be working with County Supervisor Katcho
Achadjian to find a replacement.
(3) Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC). No report.
(4) Other. Attended the League of Cities Channel Counties meeting in Santa
Barbara; Attended the SLO County Mayor's lunch on behalf of Mayor Lady;
Both meetings held discussion on the League's proposed Grass Roots
Pro9ram.
c. COUNCIL MEMBER THOMAS A. RUNELS
(1) Zone 3 Advisory Board. No report. The Zone 3 Technical Committee met
and conducted an audit at the Water Treatment Plant. The County is
looking at ways to upgrade.
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRACj. No report.
(3) Other. The Lopez Dam remediation project is on schedule.
d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS
(1) San Luis Obispo Council of Govemments/San Lu�
Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). Reported on
streetscape projects.
(2) Community Recreation Center Subcommittee.
continuing to work with Cai Poly on the project.
s Obispo Ragional
potential funding for
Meets tomorrow;
(3) Economic Opportunity Commis�ion (EOC). Reported that EOC is
building its own site in San Luis Obispo which will be part of the Albertson's
shopping center.
(4) South County Youth Coalit�on. No report.
(5) Other. None.
e. COUNCIL MEMBER SANDY LUBIN
(1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). Reported that the transition station
had been moved from Ramona Avenue to the Train Station and that the City
of Grover Beach has issued a letter to SCAT requestinyg that the transition
station be removed from their City within six months. Also reported that
there have been issues with the contractor regarding the routes. The Board
approved a free shuttle program running from the end of Grand Avenue to
Lopez Lake during the summer months.
(2) Economlc Vitality Corporation. The Executive Director has resigned;
Interim Director is Ray Johnson from Atascadero; Meeting with City
Managers and City Council representatives on Thursday; Has been
appointed to the Strategic Planning . Committee; By-laws changed and
approved with potential need for further revisions; and the EVC has a new
web site.
(3) Other. None.
CITY COUNCIIJREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2001
PAGE 12
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
None.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
City Manager Adams reported that the San Luis Obispo Council of Govemments
(SLOCOG) would be making a presentation on the Regional Transportation Plan and
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process at the July 10"' City Council meeting.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
None.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lady adjoumed the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Adminlstrative Senrices/
Deputy City Clerk
. /pRROy�\
��� c �
� INCORPORATED �
f.l T
� ,ni�v �o, iei� ,f
c4 ��FORN� P
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
BY:
CITY COUNCIL
KERRY McCANTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
�RYAN FOSTER �/
ASSISTANT PLANNER
�
8.d.
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIYT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, TiTLE 14, SECTtQN 0601R)
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "CREEK DEDICATIONS"
DATE: JULY 10, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt by title only the proposed Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Title 9, Chapter 14 of the
Municipal Code to Expand the City's Creek Dedication Requirement for New
Discretionary Projects to Include the Area 25 Feet from the Top of the Stream
Bank for Arroyo Grande Creek and its Tributaries and Meadow Creek and its
Tributaries"; and
2. Direct the Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of Determination
with the County Recorder.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council, at its meeting of June 26, 2001, introduced for first reading, without
modification, proposed Ordinance No. 527 C.S. The Ordinance is now presented for
second reading with the recommendation for adoption.
City Council
July 10, 2001
Page 2 of 2
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:
- Adopt the Ordinance;
- Modify and adopt the Ordinance;
- Do not adopt the Ordinance;
- Provide direction to staff.
ORDINANCE NO. 527 C.S.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 14
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXPAND THE CITY'S
CREEK DEDICATION REQUIREMENT FOR NEW
DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS TO INCLUDE THE AREA 25
FEET FROM THE. TOP OF THE STREAM BANK FOR
ARROYO GRANDE CREEK AND ITS TRIBUTARIES AND
MEADOW CREEK AND ITS TRIBUTARIES
WHEREAS, Section 9-14.060(R) of the Municipal Code includes creek dedication
requirements for subdivisions and development projects that abut Arroyo Grande
Creek or its tributaries; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has determined that
expanding the creek dedication requirements to include Meadow Creek and its
tributaries is critical to the preservation and protection of riparian and biological
habitats and is in the best interests of the City of Arroyo Grande; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande has conducted an environmental review for
adoption of an ordinance expanding creek dedication requirements to other creeks
in Arroyo Grande and has found that it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed amendment to Section 9-14.060(R) of the Municipal
Code will have an effect on the environment and therefore is exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed and
considered the information in the proposed document and staff report, as well as
public testimony presented at the hearing and has made the following findings of
fact:
A. The proposed amendment to Section 9-14.060(R) of the Municipal Code is
consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and pragrams of the General
Plan, and is desirable in order to implement the provisions of the General
Plan.
B. The proposed amendment to Section 9-14.060(R) of the Municipal Code will
not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare.
C. The proposed amendment to Section 9-14.0601R) of the Municipal Code is
consistent with the purpose and intent of Tit1e 9.
ORDINANCE N0. 527 C.S.
PAGE 2 of 4
D. There is no possibility that the proposed amendment to Section 9-7.030 of
the Municipal Code will have a negative effect on the environment and
therefore is exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-14.0601R) is amended to
expand creek dedication requirements as follows:
R. Creek Dedications
For any subdivision or parcel map or development project requiring discretionary
review abutting Arroyo Grande Creek ef includina its tributaries (Tally Ho Creek,
Spring Creek, Newsom Sprin�s Creek and Los Berros Creekl, or Meadow Creek
including its tributaries, the subdivider or developer shall dedicate to the City all the
area that includes the stream bed and twenty-five (25) feet back of the stream
bank, areas that are designated as environmentally sensitive based on a biological
report prepared by a qualified biologist, or other appropriate a�eas mutually
acceptable for the purposes of "open space", flood control, or "green belt."
Exceptions to the requirements established in this subsection can be made only
upon a finding that its application would violate Federal or State law.
SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance
or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed
each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrases be declared unlawful.
SECTION 3: Within fifteen days after passage of this Ordinance, it shall be
published, together with the names of the Council Members voting thereon, in a
newspaper of general circulation within the City.
ORDINANCE NO. 527 C.S.
PAGE 3 of 4
SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date
of its adoption.
On motion of Council
Council Member
to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Member , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote,
the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this
2001.
day of ,
ORDINANCE N0. 527 C.S.
PAGE 4 of 4
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
8.e.
� �
�
� .�,t. ,o. ,o„ ,�
c �l�FORN� P MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DANIEL C. HERNANDEZ, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND�
FACILITIES
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS - PARKS DIVISION VEHICLE
DATE: JULY 10, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize staff to solicit bids for a'/2 ton regular cab
pickup truck.
FUNDWG:
The City Council authorized $25,000 in the adopted Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Recreation
Administration budget for replacement of Parks division vehicle P-28 (1978 ford 3 /< ton
truck).
DISCUSSION:
The current vehicle has required over $2,000 in repairs in the previous year and is
valued at less than $1,500. Replacement is consistent with Replacement of
Equipment/Machinery Policy C-007.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify staff's recommendation;
- Reject staff's recommendation;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments: Attachment 1 Policy #C-007
Attachment 2 Bid Notice
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADMINISTR.ATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDIIRES
POLICY #: _�-007
ISSIIED: �6/1/96
.EFFLCTIV£: 6/1/96
CANCELLATION DATB: N/A
SUPSRSLDES: NEW.
SUBJECT: EVALIIATION CRITERIA FOR
REPLACEMENT OF S.PECIALIZED
SQUIPMSN'r/MACHINERY
�.� _ _ �
Equipment is currently capitalized if the value of the item at the
time of purchase exceeds $500. Replacement of capital equipment
must be authorized by the City Council. Criteria for evaluating
when repiacement should occur is listed below. The recommendation
for replacement should be a composite evaluation utilizing the
ariteria listed coupled with the actual condition of the equipment.
GeneraT Criteria:
* Age of the equipment
* Maintenan.ce history of the equipmeat
* Condition of the equipment _
Specific criteria:
••- ._�.•__ ._ -. - _ -. - - _ . � •-.-�. �.
•� �t_- _.o ..-
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dump Truck - 15 years �
Service Truck (I Ton and 5 Ton) - 15 years
Backhoe - 10 years
Generator - 20 years
Portable Generator�-• 10 years
Trash Pump - 15 years ,
Vibrating Rammer - 10 �ears
Boring Machi.ne - 20 years
Valve Machine - 10 years
Tapping Machine - 20 years
Hydxaulic Breaker - 15 years
Hydraulic S�zmp Pump - 15 years
Bank Saw - 20 years
Cut Of f Saw - 7.0 years
Radial Axtn Saw - 20 years .
Chain Saw - 4 years
Concrete Saw - 10 years
Ta.ble Saw - 20 years
Lea]c Detector - 20 years
Hydraulic Hoist - 15 years
Pipe Locator - 15 years
Hydraulic Impact Wrench - 10 years
0
POLICY #:
PAGF; 2
*
*
*
*
. .*
_*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
- ��
Vactor Jet Rodder - l0 years
Gas Detector - 10 years
Concrete/Asphalt Grinder - 15 years
Walking Striper - 20"years
Pesticide Sprayer, mobile - 10 years
Paint Shaker - 20 years
Tamper - 7 years
Weed Bater/Brush Cutter - 4 years
Vibrating Roller - 15 years
Air Compressor mobile - 10 years ,
Jackhammer - 5.,years
Arc Welder - 20 years
Tire Cha,nger - 10 years
Whee1 Balancer - 15 years
1" Impact.Wrench - 10 years
Hydraulic Jack - 10 years
Front-end Loader - 15 years
Motor Grader - 20 years
Line Striper - 20 years
Vehicle and Equipment Trailer - 20 years
Crack Sealer - 15 year� .
Asphalt Spreader Box - 20 years
SmaZl Equipment Trailer - 15 years
Concrete Mixer - 20 years
Brush Chipper - 15 years
Drill Press - 20 years �
Hand-held Blower - 3 years
_� 't-_� - z .
*
*
Recommendation by maintenance personnel that equipment is not
economically repairable
Does not meet current safety needs
•�• .
*
*
*
*
Hazardous or dangerous for tihe employee,to use.
Broken parts that are not adequately repairable
Replacement parts not available
No longer able to function in accord with its intended use due
to damage, age, or altered requirements
)�� �
L�.! ��- . � L:C.t.��
ROBFRT L. HUNT
CITY MANAGER
__ _
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PARKS, RECREATION & FACILITIES DEPARTMENT
JULY 11, 2001
BID NOTICE
The City of Arroyo Grande Parks, Recreation and Facilities Department is requesting
bid proposals for one new 2001 '/Z ton regular cab pickup truck which meets the
following specifications:
SPECIFICATIONS:
1. Fuel injected V-8 engine, gasoline
2. 6400 GVWR minimum
3. 133" —139" wheel base
4. Automatic transmission
5. 8' cargo box
6. Fleet-side body
7. Tinted windshield
8. Front bumper wi#h license plate bracket
9. Back bumper with license plate bracket
10. Power steering
11. Power brakes
12. Bench seat, fabric
13. Cargo area lamp
14. Interior rearview mirror
15. Air conditioning
16. AM/FM radio
17. Sun visors
18. Volt meter, oil pressure gauge engine temp gauge, tachometer
19. Spare tire and wheel (steel)
2U � Exterior mirrors (driver and passenger side)
21. Intermittent windshield wiper system
22. Mechanical jack and wheel wrench
23. Paint color: white
24. Seat belts for three (3) passengers
25. Truck shall de delivered within sixty (60) days of order date
26. Extended warranty: 6 year/70,000 miles/bumper to bumper/$0.00 deductible
All prbposals shall include all applicable taxes and delivery charges. All proposals shall
be sealed and on company letterhead with the envelope marked "Pickup Truck".
Please submit your sealed bid to:
City of Arroyo Grande
Attn: Kelly Wetmore, Administrative Services Director
PO Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Bid proposals must be received by 2:00 p.m. on Friday, August 3, 2001. Bids will be
opened at that time at the Office of Administrative Services located at 214 E. Branch
Street, Arroyo Grande, California. The City of Arroyo Grande reserves the right to
accept or reject any or all bids upon recommendation of the City Manager.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Daniel Hernandez, Director of
Parks, Recreation and Facilities at (805) 473-5474.
e
TO: CITY COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
:
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR A PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE
DATE: JULY 10, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to solicit bids for the purchase of
a'/2-ton pick up truck as provided for in the FY 2001/02 budget.
FUNDING:
The approved FY 2001/02 budget includes funds for this vehicle in account 010-4301-
6301. The total estimated cost for this vehicle is $27,000.
DISCUSSION:
This truck will be replacing a 1987 4-wheel drive Blazer that is driven by the Streets
Supervisor in the Public Works Department. The City's adopted Vehicle Replacement
Policy C-006 calls for replacement of a light truck in five (5) years or 80,000 miles. The
existing vehicle is 14 years old and has 105,000 miles. The vehicle has exceeded the
criteria established in the City's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual and
requires maintenance beyond the value of the vehicle.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's request and authorize the solicitation of bids;
- Do not approve staff s request;
- Modify staff's request as appropriate and approve; or
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments: Administrative Policies and Procedures - Policy #C-006
Bid Notice and Specifications
Vehicle Bid List
Attachment 1
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURES
POLICY #: C-006
ISSUED: 04/01 /99
EFFECTIVE: 04/01/99
CANCELLATION DATE: N/A
SUPERSEDES: 09/01/97
SUBJECT: EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR
REPLACEMENT OF STANDARD
EQUIPMENT
'[ZI�C«I�
Equipment is currently capitalized if the value of the item at the time of purchase
exceeds $500. Replacement of capital equipment must be authorized by the City
Council. Criteria for evaluating when replacement should occur is listed below. The
recommendation for replacement should be a composite evaluation utilizing the
criteria listed coupled with the actual condition of the equipment.
•;�• � :-
i _ i � • i � � _ ' � _ � � � ' 1l _ ►
A.
':�
General criteria:
The following criteria will be used when requesting replacement of capital
equipment or other designated equipment.
1. Condition of the equipment
2. Age of equipment
3. Maintenance history of the equiprr�ent
Specific criteria:
�•- .1�_ � -• ��. -� � 1 1 II- -1 !'• l• •1
• .�� .�-
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
9•
Personal Computers — five years
Calculators — five years
Typewriters — eight years
Chairs — five years
Desks — fifteen years
Fax Machines — five years
Copiers — five years
Revlsed: April 1, 1999
POLICY #: C-006
PAGE 2
2.
h. Tables — fifteen years
i. Files Cabinets — fifteen years
j. Autos-Light Trucks — five years and/or 80,000 miles
k. Police Emergency (Patrol) Vehicies — three years and/or 100,000
miles
[� i -i- . •
a. Recommendafion
not economically
computers).
by maintenance personnel that equipment is
repairable or able to be updated (as in
�
__it!._•1
a. Hazardous or dangerous for the employee to use
b. Broken parts that are not adequately repairable
c. Chipped, marked, or damaged veneers, laminates, or exterior that
is not repairable
d. No longer able to function in accord with its intended use due to
damage, age, or altered requirements
I�L�a L. �`—�
ROBERT L. HUNT
CITY MANAGER
Attachment 2
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BID NOTICE
JULY 13. 2001
The City of Arroyo Grande Public Works Department is requesting bid proposals for a 1/2-ton,
pick-up truck, with finro-wheel drive, extended cab with hidden doors, with the following criteria.
1. V-8 engine;
2. 6,200 GVW;
3. 4-speed automatic transmission;
4. 4-wheel disc brakes;
5. Multi-leaf rear springs;
6. Cast aluminum wheels,
7. Tires - P235/75R16 (black walls);
8. Trailering wire harness;
9. Full size spare tire;
10. Rear bumper;
11. Chrome front bumper;
12. Battery run down protection;
13. Body side molding;
14. Air conditioning;
15. Dual power mirrors;
16. AM/FM stereo with C/D player;
17. Power locks and windows;
18. Tilt steering wheel;
19. Driver's side and passenger side air bags;
20. Cloth seats;
21. Deep tint glass
22. Blue paint
23. Extended Warranty
All proposals shall include applicable taxes and delivery charges. All proposals shall be sealed
and on company letterhead with the envelope marked Public Works "1/2-Ton Pick Up Truck".
Please submit your sealed bid to:
Kelly Wetmore
Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk
City of Arroyo Grande
P. O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, California 93421
Bid proposals must be received by 2:00 pm, July 24, 2001. Bids will be opened at that time at the
City of Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers, located at 215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande,
CA. The City of Arroyo Grande reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids upon
recommendation of the Public Works Director.
If you have any questions, contact Randy Robinson, Public Works Supervisor at 473-5466.
Attachment 3
VEHICLE BID LIST FOR A
2001 1/2-TON PICK UP TRUCK
1. Christianson Chevrolet
303 Traffic Way
P. O. Box 488
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
2. Mullahey Ford
330 Traffic Way
P. O. Box 578
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
3. Paso Robles GMC Truck
2345 Golden Hill Road
P. O. Box 1108
Paso Robles, CA 93447
4. Perry Ford
12200 Los Osos Valley Road
P. O. Box 3259
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
5. Rancho Grande Motors
1404 Auto Parkway
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
8.g.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE HUASNA ROAD PAVEMENT
OVERLAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. PW-2001-3
DATE: JULY 10, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
�
�
award a construction contract for the Huasna Road Pavement Overlay Project to
Madonna Construction in the amount of $229,120;
appropriate $23,235 of Traffic Congestion Relief Funds for the Huasna Road
Pavement Overlay project; and,
C. authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
of $22,912 for use only if needed for unanticipated costs during the construction
phase of the project (total construction costs =$229,120 +$22,912 =$252,032);
and,
D. direct staff to issue the Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed with other necessary
contract documents.
FUNDING:
The City received $237,725 from the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District in lieu of paving a portion of Huasna Road within the City as
mitigation for impacts from the Lopez Dam seismic retrofit project.
The City received $117,018 of Traffic Congestion Relief Funds made available through
Assembly Bill 2928 to be used for street and highway pavement maintenance,
rehabilitation, and reconstruction of necessary associated facilities, such as drainage and
traffic control devices.
DISCUSSION:
On May 22, 2001, the City Council � directed staff to
Pavement Overlay capital improvement project. On
publicly opened for the project. The apparent lo
submitted a base bid of $187,600. The bid packet
solicit bids for the Huasna Road
June 26, 2001, three bids were
w bidder, Madonna Construction,
also included three bid additives
HUASNA ROAD OVERLAY
JULY 10, 2001
PAGE 2
(pavement interlayer, pavement delineation, and AC patch repair). Because the bid prices
received were favorable, staff recommends that the construction contract include the
pavement interlayer (bid additive 1) and pavement delineation (bid additive 2). Madonna
Construction submitted the apparent low bid for the base bid and bid additives 1 and 2 with
a bid price of $229,120.
The bid has been verified for accuracy and found to be in compliance with the contract
specifications.
Staff recommends the following budget for the project:
• Construction
• Construction Contingencies
• Contract Admin and Inspection
• Design
Total
Project
Funds
$ 229,120
0
2,677
5.928
$ 237,725
Traffic Cong
Relief Funds
$ 0
22,912
323
0
$ 23,235
Total
$ 229,120
22,912
3,000
5.928
$ 260,960
The scope of the Huasna Road Pavement Overlay project includes grinding the existing
pavement along the curb line, applying a leveling course and a finishing course of asphalt
concrete pavement, and the placement of new pavement delineation. The replacement
of antiquated water services is being perFormed by City crews in advance of the proposed
project.
The contract time for this project has been estimated at 30 working days. Work is
expected to begin in July 2001 and be completed by the end of August 2001 as shown in
the attached project schedule.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
-Approve staff's recommendations;
-Reduce project cost with contingency to $219,560 by eliminating pavement interlayer
add on. Project would only include the base bid and bid additive 2.
-Do not approve staffs recommendations;
-Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendations; or
-Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Bid Opening Log Sheet
2. Project Schedule
� mNVn►yn/�ICY �
V r
* JULY /0, 1911 *
c4 ��FORN� P
BID OPENING LOG SHEET
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
BID OPENING: June 26, 2001
` Huasna Road Overlay Project
Engineer's Estimate - $201,000
BIDDER'S NAME. CITY
Madonna Construction
San Luis Obispo
Whitaker Contractors
Santa Margarita
R. Burke Corporation
San Luis Obispo
ATTACHMENT 1
TOTAL ALT 1 ALT 2 ALT 3
$187,600 $29,520 $12,000 $20,000
$202,815 $28,536 $14,700 $16,000
$201,400 $23,370 $12,900 $11,200
�.
'f,�4�----
Kelly etm re
Director of Administrative Services
c:
Director of Public Works
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 2
i �
� i- .� i i � i i�
�
Tentative Project Schedule
For
Huasna Road Pavement Overlay
(City Project No. PW-2001-3)
Authorization to Solicit Bids (at City Council meeting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 22, 2001
ls` Notice to Bidders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 25, 2001
2" Notice to Bidders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 1, 2001
Pre-Bid Conference/Job Walk (Thursday 2:00 p.m. City Council Chambers) .......... June 14, 2001
Bid Opening (Tuesday, 2:00 p.m. City Council Chambers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 26 , 2001
Award of Bid (at City Council meeting) . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 10, 2001
Notice of Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July I 1, 2001
Notice to Proceed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 23, 2001
Contract Completion (30 working days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 31, 2001
9.a.
/�, PRROYO
° ��
� MICORPORA7ED �
V �
�[ JULV 10. 1011 *
c, �/FeKN� P
TO:
MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KERRY McCANTS �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
��, KELLY HEFFERNON
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 99-013 TO
CONSTRUCT FIVE (5) PROF�SSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS,
AND VARIANCE CASE NO. 01-001 TO DEVIATE FRQM THE
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT REQUIREMENT; NO.RTMWEST
CORNER OF C¢I1A#1�,0 AND WEST BRANCH STREET;
STEPHEN COOL' �AIV �;A�` �I1rHITE
Jl1LY 10, 2Q01
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends tbe City Council adopt a resolution denying
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-01 �`a�nd Variance Case No. 01-001.
FUNDING: `
No fiscal impact.
_
BACKGROUND: , .-
,. �
The Planning Commission coi�sider.ec�, _t�is �tem on' April 3, 2001 and April 17,
2001. FoJlowing staff presentation and public hearing, the Planning Commission
recommended that tFie Council deny, tkie proposed, project based on the inability to
make th� necessary Conditional Use �err`nit�end �Yariance findings in an affirmative
manner (reference Attachments `�4 ` and � 5 for Planning Commission meeting
minutes).
Proiect Description:
The applicant seeks a Conditional � l�se Permit to eonstruct five {5) professional
office buildings totaling 24,300 square "#eet as shown in the table below. The
project site is 2.68 acres in size and is located on the northwest corner of West
Branch Street and Camino Mercado in the Highway Service District (H-S) of the
Oak Park Acres Planned Development '(PD 1.1). The property is currently vacant
and contains several mature Coast Live Oak trees.
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-001
Page 2 of 7
PROJECT SUMMARY
Building No. Stories Use Square Feet Special
Characteristics
1 1 Office/Retail 5,000 • 34' tall Clock
Tower
• Fountain
2 1 Office 2,000
3 Lower Office 1,000 • 35' tall Elevator
Main 4,000 Tower
Upper 3,000
4 Lower Office 900
Main 1,700
Upper 1,700
5 Lower Office 1,700
Main 3,300
Total: � 24,300
The proposed exterior materials include smooth finish cement plaster, clay tile
roofing and some metal accent roofing. Special features include a clock tower,
elevator tower, fountain, covered walkways, and several outdoor balconies.
The following table summarizes how the proposed project meets relevant PD 1.1
and Development Code standards:
PD 1.1 (H -S) AND DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
Parking Setbacks Height Lot Floor Area Landscaping
Covera e Ratio
Development Front: 3 ft.
Code 97 Side: none 35 ft. 50% max. 0.5 max. 5.0°�6 min.
Requirements spaces Rear: none max.
Proposed Front: 40
98 ft. 35 ft. 13.5% 0.2 21.6%
spaces Side: 30
ft.
Rear: 10
ft.
DISCUSSION:
Traffic, Circulation and Access
The traffic analysis prepared for the project (Penfield & Smith, September 18, 2000)
states that the current Level of Service for the West Branch Street/Camino Mercado
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-001
Page 3 of 7
intersection is LOS C, and concludes that this intersection will operate at an
unacceptable level of service at baseline plus project (LOS F), which is considered a
significant environmental impact (reference Tables 1 and 3 of Attachment A of the
Initial Study for the traffic analysis). As mitigation, the applicant is required to install
a signal at the intersection of Camino Mercado at West Branch Street subject to a
reimbursement agreement with the City (see CUP Draft Conditions of Approval No.
38 and 53). With the signal, the Level of Service of this intersection is expected to
operate at an LOS C or better. The applicant is also required to construct various
intersection improvements (see CUP Draft Condition of Approval No. 52). Access to
the project is from both Camino Mercado and West Branch Street. Movements are
restricted to a right turn only for entering and exiting from the West Branch Street
access.
Oak Trees
The applicant has submitted an arborist report dated December 1, 1998 concerning
the condition of existing oak trees on the property and recommended actions
regarding tree protection and removal (reference Attachment C of the Initial Study).
The report concludes that four (4) of the twelve (12) trees located on the project site
should be removed based on the individual tree's canopy density, vigor and overall
condition. The proposed project would remove five (5) of the twelve (12) trees,
requiring a minimum of fifteen (15), 15-gallon replacement trees planted on site. The
landscape plan identifies a total of twenty-three (23) replacement oak trees.
Variance
The project includes walls that exceed the six-foot (6') maximum height limit,
which requires an approved variance application. The City Council may approve a
variance only if all of the following six (6) findings specified in Section 9-03.110 of
the Development Code can be made in an affirmative manner.
1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship not otherwise shared
by others within the surrounding area.
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that
do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zone.
3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties classified in the same zone.
4. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in tMe same zone.
_- __
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-001
Page 4 of 7
5. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
6. That the granting of a variance is consistent with the objectives and policies of
the General Plan and the intent of the Development Code.
Under this variance application, the applicant is requesting relief from the six (6)
foot maximum wall height requirement to allow up to fourteen (14) foot high walls
for purposes of retaining the sloped property, screening and aesthetics. In
Attachment 9, the applicant offers a factual basis for the variance. Note that the
twelve (12) foot wall height request in the letter has been modified to fourteen (14)
feet to accommodate the two (2) foot grade decrease for building 3:
1. "The strict application of the City's 6' height maximum for retaining walls
would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary physical hardship not
otherwise shared by other properties within our zoning district. Our site
slopes considerably from east to west, and the 12' walls permit a more
orderly and aesthetically desirable arrangement and spacing of our
buildings, including the ability to retain existing oak trees on the site.
2. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions applicable to this site
and the intended use of the site that do not apply to other properties in
our zoning district, consisting of the sloping nature of the property. To
limit our retaining walls to 6' would require us to terrace, or 'step down',
our project from east to west in order to attain the building areas
otherwise allowed in that zoning category, which would create traffic and
circulation problems and would detract from the orderly layout of the
buildings, parking, landscaping and other amenities.
3. Strict application of the 6' retaining wall height maximum would deprive
our project of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the area. It
appears that both the E-Z 8 Motel above us, and the office project across
the street, have retaining or support walls exceeding that height."
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
In considering the proposed project, Council should determine if the design of the
commercial development is consistent with the following goals and policies of the
Land Use Element of the General Plan:
Goals
• Emphasize the unique characteristics of Arroyo Grande, maintaining a
rural, small town identity that is separate and distinct from surrounding
communities.
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-001
Page 5 of 7
• Achieve an overall design statement for the City of Arroyo Grande that
will establish a visually perceivable and unique rural, small town image
throughout the City.
Policies
6.0 Identify the components of "rural atmosphere" and "small town lifestyle,"
and ensure that these components are protected.
6.2 Design buildings to be compatible with Arroyo Grande's rural, small town
atmosphere.
6.2.c. Provide building elevations which are well articulated in order to break up
building bulk. Incorporate one-story elements in two-story structures.
6.2.g. Use appropriate and simple roof forms, including shed, gable, and hip
roofs, alone or in combination, to achieve a variety of rooflines along the
streetscape; avoid unarticulated flat roofs.
6.2.m. Incorporate variations in the setback and massing of the building bulk of
large structures along major streets to provide variety and visual interest
to the streetscape.
6.7.a. Utilize "street furniture" (planters, benches, drinking fountains,
newspaper racks, bike racks, trash receptacles) within commercial areas
to create and enhance urban open spaces within commercial areas and to
emphasize historical and rural architectural themes.
6.7.b. Commercial buildings and projects should be designed so as to have a
central plaza or main visual focus or feature.
6.7.c.
• Buildings should be designed and sited so as to present a human-scale
environment, including identifiable pedestrian spaces.
• Uses within pedestrian spaces should contribute to a varied and lively
streetscape.
• Buildings facing pedestrian ways and plazas should incorporate design
features that provide visual interest at the street level.
• Discourage wide expanses of parking lot between fhe sidewalk and
the front of commercial buildings or provide safe, easily identifiable
pedestrian access through the parking lot from multiple access points.
6.8.a. Require that landscaping integrate with, complement, and improve the
visual character of the natural environment of the area; require that
landscaping also relate to and complement the architecture of adjacent
structures.
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-007
Page 6 of 7
6.8.b. Emphasize urban planting schemes which minimize the use of water and
which incorporate natural looking drifts and clusters of plants rather than
highly structured, geometric schemes with trees and shrubs planted at
regular intervals.
6.8.c. Include in landscaped areas a combination of trees, shrubs, vines, ground
cover, flowers, and turf as appropriate and compatible with the
surrounding environment and project design theme.
7.0 Achieve a pattern of land use which protects the integrity of existing land
uses.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the
proposed project and a public notice was placed in the Times-Press-Recorder. To
date, staff has received two (2) letters from the owners of the adjacent E-Z 8 Motel
(now called the "Premier Inns") regarding visual impacts of the proposed project, two
(2) written responses from the applicant addressing those concerns, and six (6)
letters from local residents regarding oak tree impacts. Copies of these written
comments are included as Attachments 11 through 20.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Arroyo Grande Rules and
Procedures for Implementation of CEQA. Based on the review, staff does not
anticipate that this project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Therefore, staff has prepared a draft negative declaration with mitigation measures
for Council's consideration.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:
1. Take tentative action to deny the project and direct staff to return with a
supporting resolution at a later date;
2. Take tentative action to approve the project and direct staff to return with a
supporting resolution at a later date;
3. Provide direction to staff.
City Council
July 10, 2001
CUP 99-013; VAR 01-001
Page 7 of 7
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-013
Exhibits "B1 - B12": Project Plans
Exhibit "C": Lane Configuration Diagram (Penfield & Smith, January
26, 2001)
2. Draft Conditions of Approval for Variance Case No. 01-001
Exhibit "B": Wall Elevations
3. Location Map
4. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 3, 2001
5. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 17, 2001
6. SAC Meeting Notes of December 7, 1999
7. ARC Meeting Notes of December 6, 1999
8. ARC Meeting Notes of January 10, 2000
9. Letter from Applicant regarding the variance request
10. Memorandum from the Economic Development Director to the Planning
Commission
1 1. Letter from owners of the E-Z 8 Motel dated April 10, 2001
12. Letter from owners of the E-Z 8 Motel dated June 5, 2001
13. Letter from applicant dated April 16, 2001
14. Letter from applicant dated May 16, 2001
15. Letter from Mary Brooks dated May 7, 2001
16. Letter from Shirley Schaffer dated May 12, 2001
17. Letter from Carie Randolph dated May 22, 2001
18. Letter from Deborah Sidenberg dated` May 22, 2001
19. Letter from the Johnson Gallery Staff dated May 23, 2001
20. Letter from Mckinzie George received May 24, 2001
21. Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration
Attachment A: Traffic Analysis dated September 18, 2000
subsequent updates
Attachment B: Referral Letter from Caltrans dated December
2000
Attachment C: Arborist Report dated December 1, 1998
and
�
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 99-013
Stephen Cool and Gary White
Northwest Corner of Camino Mercado and West Branch Street
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENER�#L CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes the construction of five (5) professional office buildings
totaling approximately 24,300 square feet.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are applicable to this projeet.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 99-013.
3. This application shall automatically expire on unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of
expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented
to the City Council at the meeting of and marked Exhibits
"61 - B12".
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because
of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation
thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall
reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and
attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or ernployees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
DEVELOPMENT CODE
6. Development shall conform to the Highway Service (H-S) zoning requirements
of the Oak Parks Planned Development except as otherwise approved.
7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter 9-
13.
DRAFT
8. Setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratios shail be as shown on the
development plans except as specifically modified by these conditions.
NOISE
9. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday and between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturday or
Sunday.
WATER
10. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water
usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, low flow shower
heads, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating
systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final
occupancy.
SOLID WASTE
11. Solid waste pick-up location as identified is acceptable.
12. Trash enclosures shall be reserved exclusively for dumpster and recycling
container storage. Miscellaneous tires, auto parts, boxes, bins, racks, etc.,
will not be allowed within the enclosure.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
13. The applicant shall obtain a Variance permit approved by the City Council for
all proposed walls exceeding six (6) feet in height.
14. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect subject to review and approval by the Community Development
Department and Parks and Recreation Department. The landscaping plan shall
include the following:
a. Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail;
b. The use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical
equipment;
c. The required landscaping and improvements. This includes:
1. Deep root planters shall be included in areas where trees are within
five feet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs;
2. Water conservation practices including the use of low flow heads,
drip irrigation, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plant� and mulches
shall be incorporated into the landscaping plan; and
3. An automated irrigation system.
DRAFT
4. Trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 3:1 ratio with 15-gallon
size native trees.
5. Permeable paving shall be placed in the parking area under the
dripline of all existing oak trees to remain.
PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
15. Development shall comply with Development Code Sections 9-10.070,
"Fences, Walls and Hedges" (subject to approval of a Variance application); 9-
10.080, "Lighting"; 9-10.110, "Performance Standards"; and 9-10.120
"Screening Requirements".
ARCHITEC�URAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
16. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical equipment,
whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be screened from
public view with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure.
17. All electrical panel boxes shall be installed inside the building.
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
18. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance 431 C.S., the
Community Tree Ordinance.
19. Linear root barriers shall be used at the front of the project to protect the
sidewalks.
20. All street front trees shall be 24-inch box.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
21: The applicant shall install a burglary alarm system per Police Department
guidelines, and pay the Police Department alarm permit application fee.
BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENT
22. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State
Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by
the City of Arroyo Grande.
23. The project shall have a fire flow as determined by the Uniform Fire Code. The
duration shall depend on the construction type.
DRAFT
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
24. The applicant shall show proof of properly abandoning all non-conforming
items such as septic tanks, wells, underground piping and other undesirable
conditions.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
25. The applicant shall post designated fire lanes, per Section 22500.1 of the
California Vehicle Code.
26. Fire hydrant(s) shall be placed in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code
requirements.
27, The applicant must provide an approved "security key vault" per Building and
Fire Department guidelines.
28. The building must be fully sprinklered per Building and Fire guidelines.
29. An opticom traffic signal pre-emption device shall be installed that meets
Building and Fire Department requirements at the intersection of Camino
Mercado and West Branch Street.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
30. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the time they are
due.
31. Site maintenance - The developer shall be responsible during construction for
cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the
project site. The flushing of dirt or debris to storm drain or sanitary sewer
facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's
work or as directed by the Director of Public Works or the Community
Development Director.
32. Encroachment Permit - The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining an
encroachment permit for all work within a public right of way.
33. Grading - All grading shall be done in accordance with the City Grading
Ordinance.
CONDITIONS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT
34. Improvements required - All project improvements shall be designed and the
plans approved in accordance with the City of Arroyo Grande Standard Drawings
DRAFT
and Specifications, except as may be modified by these conditions of approval.
The following improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the Public Works Department:
a. Grading, drainage and erosion control.
b. Curb, gutter and sidewalk.
c. Public utilities.
d. Water and sewer.
e. Traffic Signal, Street Improvement for the intersection at Camino Mercado
and West Branch.
f. Signing and Stripping plan for the intersection at Camino Mercado and
West Branch.
35. Site Plan Requirements - The site plan shall include the.following:
a. The location and size of all water, sewer and storm water facilities within
the project site and abutting streets or alleys.
b. Location, quantity and size of all sewer laterals.
c. The location, size and orientation of all trash enclosures.
d. All parcel lines and easements related to the property.
e. The location and dimension of all paved areas.
f. The location of all public or private utilities.
36. TrafFic Signal Design - Prior to issuing building permit, all plans related to the
traffic signal at Camino Mercado and West Branch shall be completed, and
approval by the City and Caltrans shall be obtained.
37. Fee reimbursement — The developer shall implement the design and installation
of the Camino Mercado — West Branch Street signalization improvements, as
described in these conditions. The City will reimburse the developer for the
design and construction costs for the signalization improvements, if such funds
become available for the improvement project, and to the extent that such costs
exceed the developer's responsibility to pay traffic signaliza#ion fees. The
improvements that are included in the reimbursement are the signal installation,
related signage and striping, and island modification. The widening of West
Branch Street is not included.
38. Reimbursement Agreement — Prior to signal plan approval, the developer shall
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City. The reimbursement
agreement shall include the method to determine the amount of reimbursement.
Requirements will be set forth in the reimbursement agreement to ensure that
the installation of the signal, and execution of the signal contract, is consistent
with projects paid for by local public funds.
39. Drainage design - All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate a
100-year storm flow.
DRAFT
40. Sewer design — With plan submittals, the developer shall provide calculations
for anticipated wastewater flow from the project.
41. Parking lot design — The cross slope on parking lot driving lanes shal� not
exceed 5 percent.
42. Entrance design — The driveway entrances shall be designed with curb returns
having a minimum radius of 15 feet, and handicapped ramps.
43. Inspection agreement - Prior to approval of any imp�ovement plans, the
applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for inspection of the
required improvements.
44. Soils report - A preliminary soils report shall be prepared by a registered civil
engineer and supported by adequate test borings. All earthwork design and
grading shall be performed in accordance with the approved soils report.
45. Adjacent structures - The grading plan design shall include measures to
protect the adjacent structures from damage due to the construction.
46. Landscape approvals - Landscape and irrigation plans are required within the
public right of way, and shall be approved by the Community Development and
Parks and Recreation Departments, and Public Works Department.
47. Utility company review - All public improvement plans shall be submitted to the
public utility companies for review and comment. Utility comments shall be
forwarded to the Director of Public Works for approval.
48. Plan submittals - Upon approval of the improvement plans, the applicant shall
provide a reproducible mylar set and 3 sets of prints of the improvements for
inspection purposes. Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the applicant
shall provide reproducible mylars, and 2 sets of prints of the approved record
drawings (as builts).
49. Recorded documents - All easements, abandonments, or similar documents to
be recorded as a document separate from a map, shall be prepared by the
applicant on 8'/zx11 City standard forms, and shall inctude legal descriptions,
sketches, closure calculations, and a current preliminary title report. The
applicant shall be responsible for all required fees, including any additional
required City processing fees.
CONDITIONS REQUIRED PRIOR TO A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
50. Improvement bonding - All project improvements shall be constructed prior to
occupancy, except for non-essential improvements, which may be guaranteed
DRAFT
by an agreement, and financial securities as provided for in Section 9-15.070 of
the Development Code. The intersection improvements shall be considered an
essential improvement that must be constructed prior to occupancy.
51. Water Neutralization Program — Consistent with Mitigation Measure No. 1 of
the Initial Study, The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the
estimated increase in water demand created by the project by either:
Implement an individual water program consisting of retrofitting existing high-flow
plumbing fixtures with low flow devices. The calculations shall be submitted to
the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual
water program shall be submitted to the City Council for approval prior to
implementation; or,
Pay an in lieu fee of $2,200 per equivalent residential unit water usage.
52. Intersection improvements — The intersection and Camino Mercado and West
Branch shall be modified to provide for anticipated traffic conditions. The
modifications will include widening on West Branch (approximately 12 feet),
restriping, sidewalk, curb return, and island modifications and construction,
signal installation, and transitions. Tfie lane configuration shall be generally as
described for future traffic conditions in the January 26, 2001 letter and plan
prepared by Penfield and Smith (reference Exhibit C), subject to the approval of
the Director of Public Works. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an
encroachment permit from Caltrans. The pavement structural section shall be
based on a Traffic Index (TI) of 7.0.
53. Intersection Signalization — A traffic signal at Camino Mercado and West
Branch shall be installed and operational.
54. Right of way dedication — Right of way shall be dedicated for the widening of
Camino Mercada
55. Curb and sidewalk - Concrete curb, gutter and 6 feet wide concrete sidewalk
shall be constructed on West Branch along the property frontage. Any damaged
curb, gutter or sidewalk on Camino Mercado shall be removed and replaced.
56. Curb return — A new curb return, handicapped ramp, spandrel, and storm drain
drop inlet shall be constructed at Camino Mercado and West Branch Street.
57. Parking lot striping - The parking lot spaces shall utilize double line striping
58. Site Drainage — Roof drainage and parking lot drainage shall be collected in a
storm drain system. The majority of the site drainage shall be conveyed via
pipes to the public storm drain system in Camino Mercado. The design of the
DRAFT
site drainage shall include an evaluation of the capacity of the existing s#orm
drain to determine if any upgrades are required.
59. Storm Drains - The onsite storm drain system shall be private. The storm
drains in Camino Mercado and West Branch shall be public.
60. Onsite private fire lines - Private onsite fire sprinkler lines shall be connected to
the public water system with a backflow prevention assembly. The backflow
assembly shall be painted green. Fire department connections shall be painted
red and located per the Fire Department requirements.
61. Onsite public fire lines — A 15 feet wide easement shall be provided for public
waterlines serving onsite fire, as required by the Director of Public Works.
62. Water-sewer crossings - All sewer mains or laterals crossing or parallel to
public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Califomia State
Health Agency standards.
63. Water meters - Water meters shall be located in the public sidewalk or as
approved by the Director of Public Works. Separate meters may be used for
irrigation.
64. Sewer Connection — The onsite sewer system shall be private and shall
connect to the public sewer system in a single location. Sewer laterals larger
than 4 inches shall connect to the public system at a manhole.
65. Existing Services - Existing water and sewer services not used by the project
shall be abandoned per the requirements of the Director of Public Worlcs.
66. Undergrounding of utilities - All new public utilities shall be installed as
underground facilities except as noted. All existing overhead public utilities shall
be placed underground, including all overhead wires and service poles onsite,
along the frontage and within 6 feet of side and rear yard lines.
67. Utilities operational - Prior to approving any building permit within the project
for occupancy, all public utilities shall be operational.
MITIGATION MEASURES
A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project.
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval
and shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency.
The applicant shall be responsible for verification in writing by the monitoring
department or agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Mitigation Measures:
DRAFT
68. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in
water demand created by the project by either:
Implement an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and
designs that minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted
to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed
individual water program shall be submitted to the City for approval
prior to implementation; or, pay the in lieu fee.
Monitoring: Review of individual water program or
payment of the in lieu fee
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
69. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water
usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets,
instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving
designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
Monitoring: Review of building plans
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
70. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including
the use of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the
greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be
minimized.
Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
71. The applicant shall provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that
increased run-off can be aceommodated by existing facilities and/or provide
on-site retention basins to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Monitoring: Review of grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
72. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to. keep all
areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site.
At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later
morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds
15 miles per hour.
DRAFT
73. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated
with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
74. Permanent dust control measures identified in the revegetation and landscape
plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any
soil disturbing activities.
75. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than
one month after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native
grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.
76. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered
or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance
between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section
23114. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this
source by 7 - 14%).
77. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto
streets, or wash of� trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measure has
the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 40 - 70%).
78. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto
adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used
where feasible. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions
from this source by 25 - 60%).
For Mitigation Measures No. 5- 11:
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site
inspections
Responsible Depts: Public Works, Building & Fire Departments
shall inspect plans and spot check in the field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit and
during construction
79. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Camino Mercado
and West Branch Street. The applicant and the City shal! enter into a
reimbursement agreement providing that the City shall reimburse the applicant
the difference in costs between the signal installation and the project's
Signalization Impact fee. The applicant may be reimbursed for those costs to
the extent that signalization impact fees are available and programmed for this
project.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install the traffic signal
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
DRAFT
80. The applicant shall pay the City's Transportation Facilities Impact fee prior to
issuance of building permit.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fees
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance o# building permit
81. The applicant shall retain an arborist during the grading and construction
phases of the project to ensure tree protection measures are implemented.
The recommendations outlined in the arborist report prepared for the project
shall be followed.
Monitoring: Field Inspection
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation, Community Development
Departments
Timeframe: During grading and construction
82. Protective fencing shall be installed around each tree to remain at the dripline.
The fencing shall be installed prior to any site clearing, grading, or demolition
activities, and shall remain in place until construction is complete, including
landscaping. Weatherproof signs shall be permanently posted on the fences,
stating the #ollowing:
Tree Protection Zone
No aersonnel, e4uipment, materials, or vehicles are allowed
Do Not move or remove this fence �
[Name of arborist or consultant]
[Name and phone number of developer or general contractor]
Monitoring: Field inspection
Responsible Depts: Parks & Recreation, Community Development
Departments
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
83. All trees to be removed shall be marked with either colored ribbon or paint.
Monitoring: Field inspection •
Responsible Depts: Parks & Recreation, Community Development
� Departments
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
DRAFT
84. The applicant shall submit written reports prepared and signed by an arborist
stating that all tree protection measures have been met per International
Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Guidelines.
Monitoring: Review of reports
Responsible Depts: Parks & Recreation, Community Development
Departments
Timeframe: Reports filed on a monthly basis commencing
after issuance of grading permit
85. Removal of any oak trees shall be replaced in-kind at a 3:1 ratio with a
minimum size of 15-gallon and planted on-site.
Monitoring: Review landscape plans/Field inspection
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to occupancy
86. The following note shall be placed on the grading and improvement plans for
the project:
"In the event that during grading, construction or development of the
project, archeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be halted
until the significance of the resources are determined. If human remains
(burials) are encountered, the County Coroner (781-4513) shall be
contacted immediately. The applicant may be required to provide
archaeological studies and/or additional mitigation measures as required
by the California Environmental Quality Act if archaeological resources
are found on the site."
Monitoring: Review of grading plans and site visits by the
Public Works Inspector
Responsible Depts: Public Works, Building & Fire Departments
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit and
during site grading
� �, �
EXHIBIT B1
� an �, �
� �
----------- -�--�-------------------------- �
� i WE BR ANCH S REET �� —
- � -- --- - -
-- -......�,,..
! - �-� - � ��.,� --- --- '—�--..
� ��
! P1qECr tilONl' 0181fATO� --- yr ,> M r,..
- � � 1 " " " ' �_ — _ _—_ , " �
�_ _ mcne r
-i+�---- -- — -- �----- - —.....
R --- — ' _ _
n ' r R t
` ' . . r'
;I r I' '
� � ( �I I'� — — ---- ------ — __— — __ � �
� \ i i! � ` _ i --1 ._.- ------ __� __ '-
� � 1 a �� ' "a- 5 .-_ �
: i "'__ /
� , � � p =�r'=—=— :.�.______—
r�r � �'i ; c` ' 0 � '"--1
�� � � �� �
� i ���� �� � � � r ` � i
Z � ��3, ;z ; �I I�� ;�-_ - /
� ;.,� , ; � �� a:� � 1'�• _�" /
I i=I¢ !! � II� ; ��� ---- - I
' � I � � Y � _ i e � i s /
�I � � � , �
,=
� � �, ; i , _ ;:
,
� � � � r----- ----�-.--------= ' t� I
� I` Ai I � t II � 7 + ___ 0 1 / �
I .� I � � 1 �
i� I� � � t " r� `s � F tx / ��
i� I � � 6 0 __ —� �� 1 " ,1�,� / �
;� i; E � � �� � � �T � ; _ O �� .:� j - -
r� 6 �t r �
� ; ¢� �
I��I � k _,7 t� r� Y �.
9 • ;� � /
� ni I � _ '� � e ,� �
> � ���o; � I� I �_ �a , �
I � � �� II' ' 4 I 4 � � � � �`\ C �
I � 1 �` m �-" ' . " y t. .� ` `„4,.
I � � x �� r ,� �� `� \
_�
' ' --
�
I � E , � � �� .. ,
i � ; � , -- ----- � i � ` , — �...
�
, , . 0 1 , ' . _ , �..,, ,� �
; .
I - E ` •- \
, , � ; _ i _ � .
_ ; _, ` � .
� ; � _ . . .. . � '*S � �- 3
� .
� � � � : � . � � � t �
�
� � _.. � � g -
� ..�.� � # -'
� �� � �
� � s � l� i � . . e�- . t ....� � � . r4_ . .
� ' O � ' � • � � — \`� � '�t �
.
---
.
I � y . .. . ., �- _ \- O { � Py . -- . , �
� �
�� ; " �
--- --- -- -- - � ._� B �
/ � —� 000e , � �� �
_ , _ � ; �, �
r
� ■
' _;"' �
� 6 2 / + � / /,'
\ � -' � '"`� %
. _ _ ._ � �
O . � ��- � __ .j s� � ��, � b l
� , N • •'
� \ �Lt � " fi ~••I Y e
g '•� . fl� .�� [
. � I I . �
a �' � •� • � , r c �� � � FEEEE6i�8EB8� �
� � � � � �� �D �
° � � � _ � s � ������������� � �
� � �� $ { � � }� ��������� ��
m
� � ' � � ��� �
�����
�� � � � � � � � � � � • • - - o � 000000�0�00000�0000000000000000 0 �000000000
��� ����: � ���� �� � � ���8,���������4����°�������������#����d�����
:�� '��'�� � �eg� ���������� �����j�9������������E�����P4����;���g������
��� ��� � � - a °�°� �;����� � ��$ ��` � F���° ���� � � � �� �� �����
:s �� � � r �a� ��$����� �� ��t� �i� � � � �� ����� a �
� � � �� � �
'� '� � ����`D � �e 4 fA C r � 6
� y � _ ' aaaa� 7/5 � T � '� � � 9
����c�i g� � � � � � � u�i
� ' �
DX D�DD e� n ���a� �
� � � Ge �� � � ` " a � �
o�� a����� e�
EXHIBIT B2
�
�
�
�
Z
-----------------
--- --- WE3T BR/►NCH 3TREET ----- - - ..
� ;,
�
a
a
�v
000"O �0�������0�0��0������ ����� �
s=.E�+ i: 5 e yaa" G
�����a�������i� �
��,���� . ��7��a � �a �� �F
p � { � � � �!
� ��
EXHIBIT B3
�
P
�
n
�
�
�
n
v
z
�
�
a
z
0
B
a
s
�v
�o ��� ����� �•....... o 0 0 0 0� � �0���������0��� ���0���0� � ��������
� � � � � � ���avaa m t a s » • y 1 + 4
�< � � = Y� •������ �l��z������
�� � ���� g � � ������� E6 �������t� � ����Y P �A�'�( Q� �a{6 t �d1� �
;� �i� � � ' 1t � � � ��� � £ ��� ��� ����� ����� a�i°g� :��a�
:�� �� � � � j ,�s � � ����� �¢��� �� �#� � � �� � � � ��a��� �� �
o a s y g
� � � 0 � �eF €� � �� '� � 4 � � 9 � F �!
` ~ � � ��� ` a .r ° b � � I �g �
° �i � �� a � � a �
� DD� sg� p i�a � � � � r�
� � � _ �� �a� �� 8 �F � �
w� � _ .
EXHIBIT B4
�
� a
n m
� m
�
m
�
�
�
e
��
.,
1
�
�
�;� ��������
��� ���� �
� R � � �
-���� ��
Y y
c��
_�� ����°
i� _
_
�
� � i � �
v � v
�� i � � N
:� � ►
��
�
�
�
I
I
�
�
�
�� �
� �
i
�
— —�
,
(A
m
m
0
�
0
Z
�o
�
��
— –�- —
1
��e
i
���i���
�
�
,�
�
��
� b
I •
1
I �
,_
�
�
�
�
�
�,
9 �
� I �
y �
R �
I E
I s �E
I �
�
�
� a 3 ��
6 ?a
� yF
a
�
�
�
�.--,�
,--�
J ��
�
L--�---� ,
�
� � �
� � I
� m �
�
r� ;
� ' _
�
� ,
�
Z �'�
�,
v
D ��
D �i
i� i
i
�
�
�
i p Rp
I ���
I �
I
I
I
��'� �
��
�
,, � y�
�
�� � �� �,�;�.
. �� �,�.
� ' �'
�%L:�:
��
�s�
�
�
� ��
vv
� �
�t
EXHIBIT B5
� �
� � n ,
� �
D �
v �
> g
�
f�
�
<
�
Z
�
� � � . �
� � � ��
. ._
� ��; � �
g � �� �
g �d
� �°
� .
r
Y -0 e�
�� ��
� ; o� � .� :z
� - �
� � � ��
��
n�.� �� � ' i,
�i � � �•_ i
_�
� �.�� � ��
n�iirn�� ��
!1! 1!' _ 1:�. i
'iiii "' ,
�' :1! i�
■ ii�i� � i
,� ; t � I � �'
��, ili` i
�i �r
•+�••� nnt ��
"� •�I�ii�
. '� �
i��i ,i
t�r i i n u
j ������ �11�11�1���1�1
�i�ii�i� ��j
il jll' I jl
'iuni ■i
. ■
`- � �
II� "���:!ai■
• �
.•� '
: ,
.
� ��
a
� ��
�
�
�
°o� ��
��
Q� o ° o �
� �
! €�
�� �
i :i:i:�:i:i: il �,��
�f �+rn� �
_
v i:!_ �■
- 1�71[77�■
�' '�= IJV.I��■
Illt�\t!R
I �I .�l�Y�r
I�J ��CY
�i�i�i�i�i�i�l I
icw�sea
u: er��.l
ua�nm.
�xu�Q�r B6
a
a
a
�u
�� �
., � >
g � �
:�
r
�
3 �� �
� �
g� �
�
�� �
< �� �
P �
��
� �.
g�a
�
� io
3 u �
n��
C Q 9
o��
�Ra
p�
��a
2i�
3��
�¢�o
Oom
g�s
pRm
A
m�
��
m
��n
��:
m��
�g
aaO
�on
�
A q
_
g
0
� �� �; y 6� s 6 3 8� 8€ F F? S�' 3� 8
o � s " s " ���'�:;a a� °��:"" ° m �
� C� 6$ 3 � p' e o a� 9 �°� g$� 4 �
g Q � " 3 � - % � e q 3 � � � � s > "
o� m s _ 3 � a a�" � 3 a�
� ;"a ' ' . � 1 � 3 - rS� a
� ��� ��a��
� p� �� o_QQo�
� ° g• ?. ° ° 3 • 3 e = _ ^ S - - g o �
+� 4' 3 3 Q � S : q 3 o s 3' ' '�.
T n a C 7
e � a. < � + e 4
a z y. o S r 3 w o �. q
y o.o �a"S
� 3 o�u
3_
g �
o �
�
�
,;. �
�
-- -
-�
_�
�
___ �
-- �
■
.
--�
'��� �
--' ;I��'�
_
;
E..
�::
- :'�t�',11 =
� `_
' ��
: �
�. ..
.,.., . '
�� �
, ��I\ �
:r I ��
�i �� -
I;i� � w�■� r,�
i i r. � r��, . -� _ N ..
; _ _ [
; I������ --- �a II�.:
�;II � �. �� �! i-, -
.��
��;1i�■�I�I . �'� �.
� �, �,.
������■���� � � � ,. �, . �._ �.
� ;... ; «n,.
,
�' f■ 'I ► — f N r
.�-�' r ��.
.� �
'' � �� ,
I; I�■■ J� �,i ci i_
I��■ �� � : -
� �, r� �� c�� 7 f.i �►�
'- �:� ���
��� � ��� �. Irn
r� . ■Y
�i; l ��� � � 1 M 1
1I'- I�., '►t11
; I ■■� '► �� -
'► ° .. .
,� ���.
� I�� I,■■■ � ' � wi '►� �► ��.
'''I i � 't � , _ , . .
�1 �..::=� i�; . � � � �
i _,� : �� � _
_ � , �!�
I'.
�_
EXHIBIT B8
EXHIBIT B9
�
r
O
O
�
�
r
D
Z
0
m
��/
�
f���l
�
�
3
fi
� R � � L
� i
�v
::�
EXHIBIT B10
EXHIBIT B11
�
� C
C � o
r o
0 m
Z �^ O
� D
�
? O
2
�
r
O .
O
�
�
r
D
Z
N
�
m
r
i m
<
D
�
O
Z
N
�
�
�
m
r
m
<
D
�
O
Z
�v
I t
1
� ��� � ���
���.��� ����
,�% ,���
,�� 1��� �'�,i�.
�� '�■ ,l�t '�.�•.,
■■ ■■ ��
�� '�� ���� -i �
�'.
■■ Ii7il!'r.
■■ I.s�.�.�
�� �.�.��.i�,
�'.' �
�� :�
m
�
�
�
�
>
Z
m
D
�
�
m
r
m
<
D
-�
O
Z
N
7
a
O
O
�
�
D
2
� i�
i #
�
D
Z
m
�
v
D
Z
Z
°�
a
S
m
r
m
<
�
O
Z
� � �
�
i
i
4 (
# i
i
� � �
i
EXHIBIT B12
�
�
�
�
s
�
>
�
e
G
�
r
O
f
m
�
r
m
�
r
�
r
O
O
�
�
r
D �
O
�
r
O
O
�
�
r
D
Z
..
� � �
�
EXHI�T C
Penfield�Smith
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
101 EAST VICTORIA STREET
P.O. BOX 98
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93102
805-963-9532 • FAX 805-966-9801
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
2051 NORTH SOLAR DRIVE
SUITE 225
OXNARD, CALIfORNIA 93030
895-983-7499 • FAX 805-983-1826
W.0.13693.01
DATE: January 26, 2001
TO: Community Development Department � ECEIVED
City of Arroyo Grande
214 E. Branch Street ,1AN 2 9 2001
Arroyo Grande, Ca 93421 CITY 0� ARROYO GRANDE
ATTENTION: Ms. Kelly.Heffemon COMMUNITY DEVE�OrMENT DEPT.
SUBJECT: Camino Mercado OfFce Project, Arroyo Grande
BY HAND ❑
MAIL �
OTHER ❑
PENFIELD & SMITH
By ' • --- ^ �
Steve A. O sz
P�'S
WE ARE TRANSMITTING HEREWITH THE FOLLOWING:
- One (1) each Traffic Signal Installation W. Branch Street and Hwy 101 Ramps/Camino
Mercado Drawings; Attachments C and D.
PURPOSE: For your use.
� ������
��;.� �
r �� ,
�---���
■
�
(
�
� �
� %
�
�
1
Zp �
8 ,���,
o,� `.,
�4
. ' yA
p cc x��/�i�� y [.. x � q ` ""�
4�
v
� "" ^
.-� .. ^r
.- �
' +i''jo e ; i �S=_ _ - ' ; c ---- �
�� ' , ;� " � -_.. `' ' \
� � � 4
7 Q
�
�
� �
�
� q4
o � � D �'�9
A m�i
� 'S
>P� s
€� A
��H� _
�
,� = m
�c�� -Zi �
��/
A �'
�° ' •
z /
g ,��
9 � /
�� �L'� . ..°'
�
!
/
/
[i( �� ,pr. �� I i
�� I 1
� 4�,� 1
T•
I
/ ,
1
/ 1
1�
/ I I I I
I 1 ;i �
� I r
l � r i
„ �
� 4 1
`__ � ' ">:;
��_._--� � �y.. ____`�
�
�
� ��b�b�
E733Y' �
i G ��
1
�x�
. �
��
� �
p �.
� �
�� � f
I
- � � �.
�a
�
�
x �
�
� �
o ��
m� >
�i�� D
��_� _
�
�2�1 Z
��� 1
��� �
0
o :
f �. R�t/I1��� y 4. q� '�
��
v .. - ---------------�:
�.-"- ..
.-' � ^,'`
.- o•
' o, eN ' ,I�: -----------; ` —�
sr+�.l��K' '1'/'.._ _ ,_'\\
i
/
/
I
4 ������- b9� I �
�7 a , i
'�rr . �
" �'�,,,
�,� ��
G4ryvp ���
___`'__
- -`__'1__ �'
_ _--�____�
�
�
-- '
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VARIANCE CASE NO. 01-001
APPLIED FOR BY STEPHEN COOL AND GARY WHITE
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CAMINO MERCADO
AND WEST BRANCH STREET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
This approval authorizes a deviation from the 6' maximum wall height to allow up to
a 14' wall height for the wall located along the north (rear) property line and up to a
13'-6" wall height for the wall located along the south (front) property line.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and
City requirements as are_ applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 99-013 and Variance Case No. 01-001.
3. This application shall automatically expire on unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of
expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented
to the City Council at the meeting o# , and marked Exhibit "B".
5. The applicant shall, as a condition of approval of this variance application,
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Arroyo Grande, its present or
former agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City, its past or present agents, officers, or employees to attack,
set aside, void, or annul City's approval of this subdivision, which action is
brought within the time period provided for by law. This condition is subject
to the provisions of Government Code Section 66474.9, which are
incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.
Develoament Code
6. Development shall conform to the zoning requirements of the Highway Service
(H-S) District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) except as
otherwise approved.
7. The developer shall comply with Development Code Chapter 9-14,
"Dedications, Fees and Reservations."
Special Condition
8. Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the applicant shall submit wall elevations
identifying surface materials for review and approval by the Community
Development Director.
EXHIBIT B
a
r
t
�U
I �_ . ; €1
�, 7= � + �
,. .�� �
r� S° � �
�
!
� •••'•••'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'_'•'•'•'•'•'•'•''• .'. ��'• • ••��\�
J ., ' ' ' ' ' ' '•'.'.:•:•:•:.:.:.:•:•:•:•:.:.;.'' . . . � . �. '• . :•�•'•; • ATTACHMENT 3
� ::: :�� : • . : ' '����-:•:::::::::� • : : • �'� . . : . �*�' :� '• ' • .•.
� • •��.•:� . . :�w�*Y'�: .•. . : : .�.• .•. � � . '. • . • � . .�. ; .•.•.•.•,•.•.��� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.�
: ' . .' .' � �.' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' ' ' ' ' • • •'• .. . . .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.'.'.'.'.' ' .'�.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;._.:. . . .
' . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .'.'.'.'.'.' — .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� • � •�• •�•�•�•�•� � .Cl'U$HMl '��'DR.. . . . . .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.�.'.'.'.'.'.�.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' . .
� • . . . . . .. . . . , , ' '� .'.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.'.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'. . . . .'. . ' '.','.',•,',•,•,•,•'• •. .•. .•.•. .•.
� ' ' ' ' ' • • •••••••••• 6 � 0'Er ' . ' i .'.' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • •'•'•'•'•'•'•.•.•.•' .•.•.•' ' ' . . . . .
� p . .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' '.'.'.•.'
� . .'....' ' ' ' ','.'.'.'. ' '.'.' ' ' ' �� ' ' • ' '•'•'•'•'•• ••••••�•••••. ....'.'.'.'.' ' ' ' " ' ' ' • • •�• . • • • •'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•. .'.
� . . .' . . . ' ' :.:.'.'. . ' . . ' . .'.'. .'.'.'.'.'.': '.'. . .�.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.',',•. : . . . .'..'. . .' '.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.. "�. ,,�'
� •• . ...... ... ........ ....' . ......... ...... ...
� ' . . . ' . .�.'.�.'.'.'.�.'.'.�.'. . . ' '.'.�.'.'.'.'.'.'.�.'.'.'. . .'.'.'.�.'.'.'.'.'.' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • • • • • • .'.'.'.'. .. . .:.'.'.;� . .:. .:.:.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. .�.'. ,',', ,•.•,. . . . _
• :::.• • :::::::::::::.:::•:.::;:::::::.' : ' ',',',:,:.'.�. .'.'.'.�.�.'.�.�.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'. . .�. .'.•..�.,.,.,.,.,.�.....�.. '�'�' . .'.' ',',',',�.�.�..:.:.',••.•_• • • • •'•'•'•'.'•'.".' '
• . '../.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..'.' . . ... . . . . . . . . . .'... ' • �. . . . . .'..i � , . . .. •• . . . . • �
.•.•. . . .�.•.�.•.•.• •. IrR[).JECT S!7'E . .•.•.•.•.. . . . . . . . . . .�.�.... . .. .• . . . . � ��•-
_- -- �.'.�.�.•. . . . . . . :... : :... .... . _ .:.:.:_ : :.. .�.�.�.����� � � : :�:�•�:.�� •:�. : ��:� .•: .�.•. . . .
, � ` _ . . . . . •.`,�.•. - • -
=�_'_``----�;� : ! "-��..� :•f ��� . .•. . :...: : • . ...:... ..: : :�:4 . .. � �� . / • ' . . '•:
,.,``�_ ` i
�r� ��� ����T •e •�•' �•'•;•' •. . . , .'. . � Na . . .. . .. . . . •,•'• '.�. .'.� .:. . '. . .:. . .'..
. . . . . . . .. .. . .���•�� � .•.'.'." \. . .�. . . . .•.•.• .:::.:. . . .. . . . . . ' . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �
. . . . . '•�' �' • . . . • •,� . .'.'.'.'.•.•.. . . . .'. .'.'.'.'.'.�.�.•.•.�.'.'.'.'.'.'. . .:� �,wo:: ...•.•. .
. . . . • . , \ �`i`� .: •. .�. . . ��� •.•.•,•,•,•,•,•,•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•; :•:•:•:• :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: � ��•.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.•.�.-.•.�.•.•.•.•.•.•_•.-.•.•...•
.. .,�� �� ��. '.. ..::: ::: ::: ,,,.,��::.:. :::::::::::::::::
�
i � � . . `~ . .. ..................... r ...................... . .
• '.F�. �� ' ' . . . . .'.'.'.'.' '.' ' .� . .'.'.'.'.'.'.'. • ,• �• i
; ' . � , ` f Y�9,r,,,� � '•:•:•.•;• ..................�.�.�.�.� .�.�.�.�.•.•.•.•.•.•.•�•�•�•.•...•..........,.: �.
,� _. ��.�, Q `�,� . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . .�.�.-. . . . . . .� �
�� a . � � . .. .. .... ........ .......
� . � , � . . . . . . . . �-'� • . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i ! • . . . . . . . . . �. . .'.'. ".'.'.'.'.. . . . . . .
• o ' . .'.'. .'. . �':�'.
' ` • 4 � . . . . . . . . . . . . ''-'.'.'.'. . . '.' '.'.'.'.'.'.'.:,: . . . ..:.' .
, . �. �,� •• •.• �•�•F �C.l�•�•�1:.•rw��.•� . . .'.. . . . . . . .
� . % i / .1.� ` . . . \ . ..:.'- . -.-:..•.•.• •�•:•:•�•:• •:•:•:.:.'.' .'
�.s�- � . ` , � � y �.�. . ' �� •. . . .:.•.�' ..:..: . . . ....:..
� ' 0}' � � . ST q7�` i
� ` . 3�n � . ... . �.,.,. ..�.�.�.�.�.�.�.
� �Ra � `t . �' h,/ .';/'
I .� . , i •� . � �u; �� • • . . . '.' .'.'.'.•.•
�` � T � ` •� ' �S'i � � . . �•� _•,,. j" �-j ' : .'.'.'.'.'.', :.'�.\....
� i.. - �` �`� � . . . . ;_' . �` OJ ; .. , �,i�.' .. �t.>_'
j :-; . .�... . � � � :.:�
� J: . .
� • , . . . . • . �
I
� � I
' ... ., . � , � . . . _ . - ..�� �.�. � . . . .�� . . . . . �' � � � •• �•�. �
� I
�FwP . °..I f \
T - t , . - RF �
� •AYE. • , . _ / "qC �..�'�.
y . . . _ _, . . . \ . � , .
1 ., \� � - / f . . � �
z ` ( ( '.+ -."' .�. '. , . \���' � �� i
K / .. f
. C • � . . , . < \ � . �-- �!� . . . . � - . ��. . . j
� �- � , I � �
� _ . � - .-
. � ,
�_ � 6 . 4 . t ..� , ccE�N ��RY . C
.. . ,�=' . .. � . .i-.:. . . . � r
�. ...
, . . .� • . . . . . ENT /
_.....,. •� . .. . �Lch1
. . . . . � • �. SCH�7G!_ . � �
,� 9R1GH7QN.'.. .. . '
!�*�a�■ ... - � . . . .. � ;. . , �
.•' ' '. . . . ••••••� .•.•. . . . . . , � Z � . � . .•. . � �
.:�.'. . :.�, ',,, . . .� .. . .� : ��. A�F E
....... • ... ........ , � �_ .. .. :.. '�. �`�� \�� �.TSTI? �
•. . . . . . • .•. :•.• .•.'•• - •'. : • ' - - ,'. :�.'. ,�,'/',.:: .;.'.: _. .�' � . . �\ \ f
. . . .' � ': . .'.'.'.'. ' ' ' . . . . . . . ' . . . .' '� . '.%� �j ` . �
. . . . . •. ... : .'.'.'. .'. '.'.'.'.' . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . '.' . • '.'. . ' . . .• •� � . , .. �
, l . . . . : : . . : : . . . . . . . ..�R.i�ip.. . . . . . . . . . . . , �ve . , . .'.'. . . . '. � _ ' ' � . . . . . . . gEUr �
j � .'1�.'.'.'.':
j . . . � . ,;(: .', . .� .� ' �= � •.'. . � '�•� ' . _ . . . . •.'. . . ' . ,• ',•,•,• i
. .
• . .. .
.
. . .. .
..
. . . . . . .
..
.
..
. . . . ... . .. . ,
.
.. . .. . . .. ... . .
.
.
. •
I '
�
•...
.. ... •
..
..
. • �,..'.'%'�-- • • . . _ __
....... ..,. ,_ ." _ __ . . _ . ... J
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 3, 2001
PAGE 4
ATTACHMENT 4
Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0 with the
following_roll call vote:
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Brown
YES Commissioner Fowler �
YES Commissioner Guthrie
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Chair Costello
II. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 99-013; LOCATION - NORTHWEST CORNER
OF WEST BRANCH STREET AND CAMINO MERCADO; APPLICANT - STEPHEN COOL;
REPRESENTATIVE - GARY WHITE.
Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon, presented the staff report to the Planning Commission.
Ms. Heffernon stated that probably the largest issue that staff encountered while conducting
the environmental review for the project was traffic related impacts. Based on the traffic
study prepared for the project, a traffic signal is warranted at the West Branch
Street/Camino Mercado intersection. As mitigation, the applicant is required to install a
signal at this location subject to reimbursement from the City up to the amount of the
projecYs signalization impact fee.
Ms. Heffernon explained that although the project meets all other development standards
for setbacks, lot coverage, parking and landscaping, a Variance is required for all proposed
walls exceeding the 6-foot height limit. It appears that the walls located at the back of the
property adjacent to the Motel and sections along the frontage are 12 feet tall. A variance
application has been submitted, but to satisfy public hearing notification requirements, the
variance must be properly noticed prior to the Planning Commission taking formal action on
the project.
Ms. Heffernon stated that staff recommends that the Planning Commission first open the
public hearing for discussion of the proposed project and close the public hearing on all
matters except for the variance; and second, continue the item to the April 17` Planning
Commission meeting to consider the variance application and take formal action on the
project.
Chair Costello opened the public hearinq.
Steven Cool, applicant, spoke to the Planning Commission, giving them an overview of the
project.
Mike Obvashi, architect for the project, spoke briefly to the Planning Commission.
Randv Wilder, representing the adjacent motel, spoke to the Planning Commission and
expressed his concerns about the height of the buildings and the impact this would have
on the visibility of the motel.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 3, 2001
PAGE 5
Wendv Beckham, 220 Hillcrest, stated that she lives on the other side of the freeway and
is concerned about the view of the new buildings from her property because of the height
of the buildings.
Chair Costello closed the public hearing_
Commissioner Brown had the following issues/concerns and comments on the project:
• He would like Oak tree numbers 2, 9, and 12 saved.
• The retaining walls should be covered of cultured stone.
• Traffic is a major issue for him with this project. He feels that there are conflicts in the
Penfield & Smith study regarding the LOS at the Brisco Road interchange.
• The intensity of use of this project is not acceptable given the topography.
• The General Plan discourages high-rise buildings and encourages horizontal design. (Per
Land Use Element, Section 6.2)
• The cutting of 50% of the mature Oak trees on the property is not an act of
preservation as required by 4.1 A of the Open Space Element of the General Plan. The
mitigation measure of replacing mature trees 3 to 1 with young trees is a poor attempt
at restoration rather than preservation.
• Mr. Brown stated that he could not act on this project in its present form. However, if
all traffic mitigation is in place, and the intensity of use was greatly reduced, and a
majority of Oak trees were preserved he would consider a recommendation to Council.
Commissioner Fowler had the following comments on the project:
• She stated that the applicant should be complimented on several different aspects of
the project.
• She believes this is a great location for this project.
• She believes that this would be a good economic development for the area.
• The Development Code standards are very specific and in each case this project is in-
line with the standards.
• She believes that there should be a signal at the corner of Camino Mercado and West
Branch Street.
• With regards to the Oak trees, she does not believe in saving a diseased tree. If there
is any chance of someone being hurt because of unsafe trees, then they should be
removed. She believes there should be an up to date tree survey to determine which
trees are safe to leave.
• The view from the motel is not a concern for her. The motel has had the luxury of
advertising for several years because there has been nothing in front of them. She
stated that when she looked at it, she did not believe the view would be blocked from
the windows.
• She believes the City could use this project and it is a great area to build it in. She
supports the project.
Commissioner Keen had the following comments and concerns:
• Mr. Keen stated that he had a problem with the height of the back of the buildings.
• He finds that it is difficult to picture what the project will look like and would like the
applicant to have a model.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 3, 2001
PAGE 6
• One of the findings in the resolution states that the project should fit the "integrity and
character" of the district but he does not believe it does this. From the road the project
looks like one large building.
• Under the General Conditions, with regard to the Noise Element, he believes that 8:00
p.m. is too late for the operation of a business next to a motel.
• He would like to see Condition #13 changed to six (6) feet.
• He was concerned about the wording in 14. C-4 which says "significant trees"; he
feels that all trees are significant.
• The last sentence of Condition # 36 says, "widening of West Branch Street is not
included in the reimbursements". However, Condition #51 says that modifications will
include widening of West Branch Street. This does not seem consistent to him.
• Condition #50 — water neutralization — should the wording of the Condition be changed
in order to include "in-lieu fees"?
• He felt that the applicant should have a Traffic Engineer at the next meeting.
• Mr. Keen had some questions about comments by the Economic Development Director
concerning light manufacturing in this area.
Commissioner Guthrie had the following comments, concerns and issues:
• He has a concern about the traffic, and questions whether the installation of the light
will be enough to cover this project. However, he also has a concern that the
installation of this light is also part of the mitigation of other projects that have already
been approved. It is the cumulative effect that he is concerned about.
• He does not believe that this intersection is an LOS A as the traffic study indicates.
• He is conce�ned about the massing of the buildings and how they will look on the site.
He does believe that the three buildings together will look like one from the street. He
also believes that where it is located on the lot, the fact that it is very high bisects the
ridgeline and this will have a big impact.
• He is also concerned about the water entitlement and that the water fees are collected
for this project.
Chair Costello had the following comments, concerns, and issues:
• He finds inconsistencies with the Penfield & Smith study and would like to see the
traffic study revisited.
• There are more traffic impacts coming with the Five Cities Center as the rest of the
buildings are leased, and also from the residents that are moving in off of James Way,
etc. He believes the intersections are functioning at a LOS of C or worse.
• He has a concern about the freeway off-ramp and the stacking of traffic with the light.
• He likes the project in general. The illustration of the project does not do it justice
because it shows so much black pavement. The applicant might want to change this
to better reflect the 25% of landscaping they are proposing.
• He is concerned about the western border of the project, where it meets West Branch
Street, and what it will look like and if there wi�l be a very high wall there.
• What will the visual impact to the motel be and how will this affect the motel
economically?
� There was a concern that the motel sign might be raised higher but will this be possible
within the standards of the Development Code?
• Is light manufacturing allowed within the Highway Services District?
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 3, 2001
PAGE 7
• This is a good location fo� professional/office. It will minimize the traffic impacts and
circulation impacts.
• When the Planning Commission examines the project it will look at whether or not the
project meets the findings for a Conditional Use Permit. He feels that there may be
some problems with findings 2, 3, 4, and 5.
The Planning Commission voted to continue the project to the April 17, 2001 Planning
Commission meeting.
ITEM III. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
ITEM. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission asked staff to try and schedule April 30,
2001 for the Joint Planning Commission/ARC meeting to discuss the Village Design
Guidelines.
ITEM. V. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENT
Commissioner Keen asked that staff review the City ordinance that deals with grading. He
feels that too often the Planning Commission will approve a project only to have the
grading changed afterwards and a project that is not what the Commission would have
approved.
ITEM. VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP
REPORTS
Mr. McCants and the Commission discussed the on-going process of the East Grand
Avenue Master Plan. Mr. McCants also briefed the Planning Commission on the General
Plan update.
ITEM. VII. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Keen, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:00 p.m. to the next scheduled meeting on April 17, 2001.
ATTEST:
Kathleen Fryer, Commission Clerk
Joseph M. Costelle, Chair
AS TO CONTENT:
Kerry McCants
Community Development Director
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 5
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 3
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Brown
YES Commissioner Fowler
YES Commissioner Guthrie
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Chair Costello
II. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 99-013 AND VARIANCE CASE NO. 01-001;
LOCATION - NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST BRANCH STREET AND CAMINO MERCADO;
APPLICANT - STEPHEN COOL; REPRESENTATIVE - GARY WHITE (Continued from April 3,
2001)
Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon, presented the staff report stating that the Planning
Commission had reviewed this project at its April 3, 2001 meeting and in �esponse to the
Planning Commission's concerns the applicant has submitted a revised grading plan that
shows building No. 3 two (2) feet lower, and a revised landscape plan to clarify tree
impacts and correlate tree identifications with the arborist's tree report. Ms. Heffernon
stated that additional plans had also been submitted detailing wall elevations and
modifications to the exterior wall materials such as cultured stone as a veneer over the
block walls. Ms. Heffernon further explained that because the project included walls that
exceeded the six (6) foot maximum height limit, the applicant has submitted a Variance.
The applicant is requesting walls that are 14-feet in height with the primary purpose of
retaining the sloped property. Ms. Heffernon explained the 6 findings that must be made
to approve the Variance.
Ms. Heffernon stated that the project had been property noticed and that the Community
Development Department had received a letter from Premier Inns expressing their concerns
of the proposed project.
Chair Costello opened the public hearing.
Steven Cool, applicant for the project, stated that the architect for the project had not yet
arrived and asked if the Planning Commission would agree to a brief recess.
Chair Costello stated that the Planning Commission would take a ten (10) minute break.
Chair Costello called the meeting to order.
Steve Orosz, Traffic Engineer, spoke to the Planning Commission about the traffic study he
had prepared for the project.
Commissioner Brown stated that he believed that there was a con#radiction in the traffic
study regarding the LOS at the Brisco Road interchange. Mr. Brown pointed out that on
Page 3 of the report it stated that the intersection operated at LOS A during peak periods,
then later the report states that it operates at LOS C during weekday aftemoons.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 4
Ms. Orosz explained this difference in the report. He then explained how the traffic report
was prepared and how the traffic engineer had arrived at the conclusions for the study.
The Planning Commission and Mr. Orosz then discussed the traffic study and its
conclusions.
Les Crouch, owner of Premier Inns, spoke to the Planning Commission of his concerns
about the project and its potential impact on the motel. He stated that he � was not
opposed to this project, rather, he stated that he felt the new project would block the view
of the motel from the .freeway because of its excessive height.
The Planning Commission and Mr. Crouch discussed his concerns and how the motel was
seen from the freeway. Mr. Crouch stated that he did not feel there had been enough of a
study done on the impact to the property and he suggested that the applicant stake the
property with poles, which would help determine just what the impact on the motel would
be.
Mr. Couch also stated that he was not concerned about the Variance, however, he was
concerned that there would a 14-foot cut in the hillside and only a ten (10) foot setback
from the wall in the motel parking lot. He felt that this may be a serious engineering
problem.
Terrv Randall, was concerned about the number of Oak trees that would be removed. She
did not feel that tree numbers two and three needed to be removed even though the
arborist's report stated that these trees were not healthy. She also stated that she was
concerned about the amount of traffic this project would create.
Peg,qv Harmet, spoke to the Planning Commission stating that she was concerned about
the oak trees that were being removed and about the traffic. She stated that she felt that
the traffic should be taken care of first and then the project could be approved.
Steven Cool, applicant for the project, commented on some of the issues that had been
raised at tonight's meeting. He stated that he had signed an agreement to install a signal
at Camino Mercado and West Branch Street. Although he agreed that the project would
cause some additional traffic, however, the City had to allow some use of the properties
within the City. To say that he could not use the property because it causes traffic, then
the City's answer should be to condemn the property and turn it into a park. He felt that
the proposed use of this property would be less intense because of the hours of operation
this type of project would offer. Mr. Cool stated that he was not insensitive to the
concerns of the E-Z Eight Motel owners, he has walked and, driven around the site and he
was convinced that this project would not significantly block views of the Motel. He did
not feel that tree Number 2 could be saved and still have a workable project.
Commissioner Brown stated that he felt that the structures for this project were too tall.
He asked Mr. Cool if there was any way the project could be changed and still keep the
same square footage? He did not want to see the project show above the ridgeline.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 5
Mr. Cool stated that they would prefer to leave the elevations where they were because
there was a view of the ocean from the upper floors, which is a valuable amenity for the
project.
Chair Costello stated that the arborist's report was two years old. He asked if the report
would show anything different if it were updated?
Mr. Cool stated that he felt it would be the same.
Chair Costello asked Economic Development Director Diane Sheeley if there was a way to
verify the economic impact to the motel?
Diane Sheeley, Economic Development Director, stated that she had not had time to
review the project so that she could not address this issue tonight, however, she could
possibly have an answer by next meeting.
The Planning Commission and Ms. Sheeley discussed this project and the Economic
Development Strategy.
Commissioner Keen stated that when he reviewed the amount of bed tax that was
collected from the motel, he did not believe it was an economically sound idea to
jeopardize the motel to gain office space.
Chair Costello closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Brown stated that he would reiterate for the record the comments he had
concerning the project at the previous meeting. However, first he wanted to say that he
would like Ms. Sheeley to come up with some type of figures on the possible impacts on
the motel. His comments were:
1. He felt that the project could be approved if Buildings Nos. 3 and 4 were dealt with
and the circulation on the property was changed in such a way to accommodate the
square footage.
2. He would like to see the building height kept below the ridgeline. This goes beyond
his concern for the economic impact to the motel but addresses the standards in
the General Plan.
3. He still felt that there were contradictions in the Traffic Study and he does not feel
that the cumulative impacts of traffic are really known.
4. The intensity of use for this project, while well within the Development Code
standards, is not acceptable given the topography.
5. The General Plan discourages high-rise construction and encourages horizontal
designs.
6. He felt that cutting 50% of the mature Oak trees and replanting them with younger
trees was not an act of preservation. He would like to see trees 2, 9 and 12 saved.
7. The project falls short in three (3) of the five (5) findings. Findings one (1►, two (2)
and three (3) cannot be met.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 6
He stated that currently he could not support this project, however if all traffic mitigations
were done prior to a building permit, if the intensity of use was greatly reduced, some of
the trees were not removed, and some of the concerns of the motel were dealt with, he
could support the project.
Commissioner Fowler stated that:
1. The signage for the motel, to make this business viable, is very important.
2. A traffic light is needed at the corner of Camino Mercado and West Branch.
Other than these issues, Ms. Fowler stated that the project met the Development Code
standards and economically the City needs this project.
Commissioner Keen commented that:
1. He did have a problem with the height of the buildings.
2. He would like to have wording in the Conditions of Approval that spell out
specifically what kind of surface will be used on the retaining walls.
3. He did not want any free standing electrical switch gears standing outside of the
buildings.
4. There needs to be a signal at the corner of Camino Mercado and West Branch.
Commissioner Gutherie stated the following:
1. Because of the "massing" of the three buildings together on the property, it is
perceived as a single building and he also feels that this breaks up the ridgeline.
2. He cannot approve the project with the building located where it is at this point.
3. He was not convinced that that the circulation was developed correctly.
4. He felt that, because of the massing of the buildings on the property, it would
obscure the moteL
5. He also has a problem with the amount of traffic that will be generated and how it
is being dealt with.
Chair Costello stated the following:
1. He has a problem with the traffic and circulation.
2. He is concerned that the new project will block the view of the motel and kill that
business. He would like a definitive answer about what may happen with this. He
is concerned that this business may be eliminated which would be a detriment to
the owner and the City.
3. He stated that he felt there was a question whether Finding No. 2 could be met if
there was some reconfiguration pf the buildings.
4. Finding No. 3 is acceptable to him.
5. With Finding No. 5, he feels that the if project were changed, it could possibly meet
this finding.
The Planning Commission discussed if this project should be continued. Commissioner
Gutherie stated that he felt the Planning Commission should move this project forward to
the City CounciL
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 7
Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-1783
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
INSTRUCT THE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TO
FILE A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION, AND APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 99-013, LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CAMINO MERCADO AND WEST
BRANCH STREET, APPLIED FOR BY STEPHEN COOL AND
GARY WHITE
In cludinq Exhib A Commissioner Fowler seconded the motion. The motion was defeated
y the following roll call vote:
ROLL CALL
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
VOTE
Commissioner Brown
Commissioner Fowler
Commissioner Guthrie
Commissioner Keen
Chair Costello
Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-1785
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
VARIANCE CASE NO. 01-001, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF CAMINO MERCADO AND WEST BRANCH STREET, APPLIED FOR BY
STEPHEN CO�L AND GARY WHITE
Including Exhibits A and B with the added lan�uage that the Planninq Commission adopt
the recommendation of the ARC with regards to the facings on the retaininq walls.
Commissioner Fowler seconded the motion The motion was defeated bv the followina roll
call vote:
ROLL CALL
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
VOTE
Commissioner Brown
Commissioner Fowler
Commissioner Guthrie
Commissioner Keen
Chair Costello
_
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 2001
PAGE 8
Commissioner Brown wanted to note for the record that the Variance did not meet Finding
No. 2.
Commissioner Gutherie moved that the Planning Commission recommend denial of this
proiect to the Citv Council based on the fact that the project does not meet Findings No. 2,
"the aroqosed will not impair the integritv and character of the dist�ict"; No. 5,"the
proaosed use will not be detrimental to the public health and safetv".
Commissioner Brown amended the motion statina the proiect did not meet Findinq No. 1,
because "the qroiect does not meet the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan and
development policies of the Citv".
C ommissioner Gutherie sta ted that he acceated the amendment to the motion.
Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. The motion was aqproved bv the followina roll
call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Brown
YES Commissioner Fowler
YES Commissioner Guthrie
NO Commissione�r Keen
YES Chair Costello
ITEM III.
None
ITEM. IV.
None
ITEM. V.
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
DISCUSSION ITEMS
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENT
Commissioner Keen asked when the Planning Commission would receive the draft General
Plan for review.
Mr. McCants stated that the Planning Commission would get the documents when they
were ready to be released to the public.
The Planning Commission discussed the dates the Commission members would be gone on
vacation during the summer.
ITEM. VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP
REPORTS
None
ITEM. VII. ADJOURNMENT
SAC Meeting Notes ATTACHMENT 6
December 7, 1999
Page 3
the he will be more than 150 feet from the street. He also asked that the submitted
maps have t ack lines shown on them in dotted lines.
The curb, gutters and sidewalks to be replaced. The drainage was discussed, also
where the sewer tie in would be and if an ea t was needed.
Ms. Heffernon reminded the applicants that what they have bee d to do was to:
■ Revise the map showing a plot plan with guest parking , set ba ires to be
put underground, existing features like the driveway.
C.
1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Case Number:
4. Proposal:
5. Location:
6. Staff Contact:
Zaddie Bunker Trust
Gary White
Conditional Use Permit 99-013
The applicant proposes to construct five professional office
buildings on a 2.68-acre parcel.
West Branch Street and Camino Mercado
Kelly Heffemon
Kelly Heffernon, Community Development, stated that based on suggestions from pre-applications
hearings the applicant had revised his original project to have 5 buildings instead of 6 with
approximately 4,000 sq. ft. less. The project has been moved back off of West Branch to allow for
the widening of West Branch.
Larry Schmidt stated that the site needs to be: .
■ sprinkled because the Fire Chief stated that he could not get into the site easily. This will
give the applicant a credit on the amount of fire flow that will be needed.
■ A"KNOX" box needs to be installed on each building.
■ He suggested that the applicant's architect study very closely the handicapped
accessibility issues for the buildings.
Kim Romano, Public Works, had the following issues:
■ Curb, gutters and sidewalks will need to be installed on West Branch Street.
■ Moving the handicap ramps to sidewalks on West Branch.
■ Drainage — may need drop inlet. �
• Public Works needs the drainage calculations.
■ May need a Cal Trans encroachment permit if there is any work done because of drainage
at the intersection of Camino and West Branch. The water from drainage will eventually
end up in the Cal Trans right-of-way.
■ The drainage cannot all be directed in one way towards Carl's Jr.
■ All the traffic issues with this project were discussed. There will be some kind of traffic
mitigation required. A traffic study will be required. Cal Trans would be open to putting a
traffic signal at Camino Mercado and West Branch.
■ One suggestion would be to do a joint traffic study with the Kolbo project.
■ It was suggested that the applicant do a traffic study first before moving forward.
■ Eliminate left turns from the exit driveway/ right turns only.
■ Discussion of design of curb cuts.
3
ARC Meeting Notes
December 6, 1999
Page 3 of 9
ATTACHMENT 7
The ARC ha detailed discussion on this item and it was concluded to allow
the homeowners to have t fence as requested.
Larrv Schmidt: He would direct the developer to put�'in icket fence all the way
around the corner, including where the homeowner has already pu nce.
C. Applicant: Gary White
Representative: Gary White
Case Number: Conditional Use Permit 99-013
Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct five (5)
professional office buildings on a 2.68-acre parcel.
Location: Northwest corner of West Branch Street and
Camino Mercado.
Kellv Heffernon said that this project first came in as a Pre-application that went to
the Planning Commission. It has been revised from 6 to 5 professional office
buildings, with one of the buildings being retail. It has already been modified
because of Public Works issues and has been reduced by approximately 4,000
square feet. This is a highly visible property that has been previously looked at
very seriously by the ARC.
Garv White: Handed out computer generated colored renderings (3 different views)
of the project. He told the Committee that the colors were not true on all three,
but the lighter shade was indicative of the true color, basically a tan color.
Warren Hoaq: Asked the applicant if he was going to use a variety of shades?
Garv White said they had not made that decision yet, but it could be all the same
color.
Warren Hoa� suggested that the window insets be a accented with a darker tan.
He noticed on the old plan it showed a straight end driveway down to Branch
Street, but because of the grade it now wrapped a�ound up the slope, and the
planter element has a fairly high retaining wall and will be quite prominent.
Kelfv Heffernon: The Planning Commission had suggested that it be tiered off even
more, a 5 foot retaining wall closer in, and then another 5 foot retaining wall. She
asked the applicant if they had considered this?
Garv White: In this case it will probably not be possible to do because of the
driveway. If we didn't have to give up the 20 feet for future street widening then
we probably could do another tier.
ARC Meeting Notes
December 6, 1999
Page 4 of 9
Kellv Heffernon told the applicant that it would be good, especially for the Planning
Commission, if they show all the retaining walls, how high they will be, and exactly
what they will look like. A variance will be required for wall height.
Warren HoaA asked if the retaining walls would be split-faced masonry?
Garv White: The retaining walls will be split-faced or slump stone.
Warren HoaA: The ARC does not like to see machine finished block unless it's
plastered or stuccoed.
Garv White: There are a couple of different landscape or architectural walks on the
market now that create a crib-wall, or softer effect, that we might look into, but
these are typically terraced and slanted for retaining purposes and we may not
have the flexibility here to do this.
Warren Hoaq: Until I got the landscaping plan I was confused about where the 5`
and 6th Oak tree were (that were to be removed). The plan had the note for being
retained, but it didn't have the symbol for being retained. The tree in Building 4
does not show up on this plan at all, but there is a note on the landscaping plan. In
addition, tree #9 (on the front side plan) has a note that says it is going to be
retained, but the symbol is for removing the tree. I think it is critical to correctly
show and call out the Oak trees, whether they are being removed or retained, as
this has always been a key issue in this City.
David Sachson: The Chairman of the Planning Commission had suggested that the
applicant make a 3-D model and he thought this was a wonderful idea, as this is a
difficult project to comprehend with the slopes. A white block model that shows
the ups and downs, relative position of the elevation of Hwy 101, and where the
motel above is, would go a Iong way to clarifying what this project is going to look
like.
Garv White asked if the computer model would give the
elaborated on it to show the outlying areas? He said they
computer model in place of the 3-D model, and thought this
high tech with colors etc. being easier to see.
same idea if they
had produced the
was basically more
David Sachson said he could not read the computer-generated model as being a
multi-level computation.
David Sachson then went on to say that he really liked the project, but there
seemed to have been some confusion between the areas on the drawings and the
areas in the analysis. In addition, he had made notations of items he thought
needed more elaboration or correction on the plans. He suggested that Mike
ARC Meeting Notes
December 6, 1999
Page 5 of 9
Obayashi, the architect, take notes of his comments and make the changes to the
plans where necessary. Some of the main comments were:
1. The project needed another trash enclosure.
2. The applicant should show the ARC at least a couple of site sections
(there's a big drainage swale that runs right through the middle of the
site and it looks like that's all being filled).
3. Suggested they not have ice plants at the bottom of the stairs.
4. Trash enclosure left off landscape plan.
5. Material finish shows smooth finish cement plaster. Suggest you put
in horizontal expansion ---? so every lift line does not show.
6. Show some indication about irrigation on the planting.
7. Clarify what the signage will say.
David Sachson asked if there was a fountain on the plan?
Garv White: We are not putting the fountains in because of liability and
maintenance. Maybe they would put in a planter instead.
Kellv Heffernon said she was disappointed, as she liked the fountains. She told the
applicant that the plans should be revised to show this change.
David Sachson: In San Francisco he had seen a big fountain that had nylon mesh
about an inch under the surface of the water, which stopped the birds and kids
from having a bath in it.
Joe Tavlor: He saw the grading plans as approaching working drawing stage, but
was having difficulty when he compared the finished floors of various buildings
with the Branch Street elevation. He said he found some of the elevations in
places where they don't look like they belong.
Mike Hvashi said he changed the driveway so everything else changed, and he
didn't go back and make those corrections.
Joe Tavlor felt that the design was very acceptable and appropriate, but hadn't
gone into the details as he thought they would appear later. He would prefer to see
proposed contours as this would be more helpful to him.
Warren HoaA said he liked the feel of the project. Site and sectional drawings
would have helped. Computer prospectives don't convey the rise in the back of the
property. He liked the details on Buildings 1, 2, & 5. He liked the porticos and
covered archways and thought they gave the project more of a town and country
feel. Buildings 3 and 4 are going to be more significant because they are stepped
up the hill and viewed from street level. The ARC needs to know the details and
ARC Meeting Notes
December 6, 1999
Page 6 of 9
exactly how this project will look. This is a critical project because of where it is
located, and I think the ARC really needs to see a color board.
Joe Tavlor: On the exterior, are the paving areas going to be concrete? He would
like to see color samples of these types of things.
Garv White said this had not been discussed yet.
Warren Hoa�: There are key building locations that are natural connections across
the parking lot for pedestrian interaction and he suggested they be highlighted with
textured or stained pavers, or concrete. This would not only look good, but would
guide pedestrians in the right direction.
Warren Hoa�: The applicant should make the requested ARC changes on the two-
dimensional plan by the next ARC meeting. He then asked if the colored renderings
could be shaded and expanded to make it easier to see the elevation changes? He
suggested they show the renderings looking from Branch, Mercado, or from the
freeway, and maybe one from EI Camino.
There was a consensus by the ARC to continue this item to the next ARC meeting
on January 3, 2000.
E. Applicant: Burrito Loco
Representative: Gene Laird, Santa Maria Neon
Case Number: Administrative Sign Permit 99-023
oposal: The applicant wishes to erect one 24 square foot
wall sign on building "G" of the Five Cities
Shopping Center.
Location: Five Cities Shopping Center, 922 Rancho Parkway
Kelly Heffernon: This proposed ' n is adjacent to Star Bucks and is to be centered
above the columns. The applicant revised some of the wording on the sign, as
shown on the copy provided to the AR .
David Sachson asked the applicant if this wa a"canned" sign and if this was
allowed in the 5 Cities Center? �
Kellv Heffernon said this was a cabinet or logo box like S ucks, and she would
check on the 5 Cities Sign Program to make sure this was allo
David Sachson suggested that the applicant center the sign (vertic ) between the
horizontal band projection and the netting.
David Sachson made a motion, seconded by Joe Taylor, to approve�
Administrative Sign Permit as submitted on the drawings at today's meeti
ATTACHMENT 8
NOTES
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE -- - -
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC)
MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 2000
e meeting of the City of Arroyo Grande, Architectural Review Committee, was
cal to order at 3:15 p.m.
ROLL CAL • Present were Committee members Chet Kielan, Jamie Ohler, Joseph
Taylor, and en Hoag, Chair. Also present were staff inembers Kerry McCants,
Kelly Heffernon, a Lyn Reardon-Smith.
Warren Hoag informed th Committee that David Sachson had resigned due to the
fact that he had moved out o e City of Arroyo Grande.
APPROVAL OF NOTES: The Commi e approved the notes of the December 16
meeting. They also approved the notes ecember 6 meeting with the following
changes.
1. Page 4, paragraph 6, change the word /ks to blocks.
2. Page 5, first paragraph, #5, add the d joints after the word
expansion.
3. Page 8, second paragraph, change the name Long o Rite Aid
I. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR: After a short discussion the AR nominated
Chet Kielan to be the new Vice Chair.
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
II1. PROJECTS
A. APPLICANT GARY WHITE/STEPHEN N. COOL, CASE NUMBER CUP 99-
013. The applicant proposes to construct five (5) professional office
buildings on a 2.68-acre parcel at the Northwest Corner of West Branch
Street and Camino Mercado.
Kellv Heffernon said the ARC had requested the applicant come back with some
revisions to the site plans, specifically showing changes in elevation of the
property, the structures, and show the retaining walls that are being proposed.
Garv White, the applicant, showed the Committee a color board and colored
renderings showing two views of the project. The colored renderings enabled the
ARC to see the slope more clearly.
Warren Hoaq commented that he liked where the applicant had put the pedestrian
crossing using the apache colored pavers.
�
Notes
ARC Meeting
January 10,, 2000
Page 2 of 5
Mike Obayashi, the Architect, said the trees in the front would hide the cribwall in
the back.
The Committee had several questions regarding the changes/differences between
the previous and current set of plans and the applicant answered these
satisfactorily.
The Committee commented that some of the columns in the elevations were round
and some square.
Mike Obavashi confirmed that all the columns would be single square columns.
The buildings would be sprinkled, and the color of the building would be a standard
cream color, lighter than the Taco Bell/Midstate Bank buildings.
Joe Taylor made a motion, seconded by Chet Kielan to recommend approval of the
project to the Planning Commission as represented by the revised plans, with minor
architectural corrections as discussed.
The motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES 4
NOES: 0
PRESENT: 4
B. APPLICANT, EDDIE EL-HELOU, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-011. The
\ applicant is proposing an amendment to CUP 99-011, located at 121
Yast Branch Street.
Kellv Heffernon s' the Planning Commission had already approved this project,
but due to circumstan s the applicant has decided to make the building 3-foot
narrower in order to ret ' the 3-foot wide pedestrian mall easement. The
applicant is proposing to chang he faux balcony (that faces East) to a functional
balcony. The balcony would be 3 wider and extend along the full width of the
building.
The Architect (representative from LGA► said y had tried to keep the same
proportions and appearance of the previous buildin . He said the materials and
colors would remain the same.
Warren Hoa� asked the applicant to highlight the door located he rear of the
building (main entrance to the upstairs) as previously requested.
ATTACHMENT 9
Community Development
City of Arroyo Grande
ATT: KELLY HEFFERNON
RE: CUP 99-013 (Camino Mercado and West Branch Street)
Enclosed please find a variance application form, in connection with the above use permit. Our
variance request is to permit 12' retaining wa11s along the east side of the project. The bases for
this request are as follows:
l. The strict application of the City's 6' height maximum for retaining walls would result
in practical difficulty and unnecessary physical hazdship not otherwise shared by other properties
within our zoning district. Our site slopes considerably from east to west, and the 12' walls
pernut a more orderly and aesthetically desirable arrangement and spacing of our buildings,
including the ability to retain existing oak trees on the site.
2. There are exceptional circumstances and condirions applicable to this site and the
intended use of the site that do not apply to other properties in our zoning district, consisting of
the sloping nature of the property. To limit our retaining walls to 6'�would require us to terrace,
or "step down", our project from east to west in order to attain the building azeas otherwise
allowed in that zoning cat�gory, which would create traffic and circulation problems and would
detract from the orderly layout of the buildings, parking, landscaping and other amenities.
3. Strict application of the 6' retaining wall height maximum would deprive our project of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the area. It appears that both the EZ 8 Motel above us,
and the office project across the street, have retaining or support walls exceeding that height.
Submitted,
co-applicant
RECEIVED
MAR � 0 2001
COMM NITY DE ELOPMENT DEPT.
/pRR O y��
/�� c
� JNCOflPOAATE Z
V - T
� JUl.Y 10. 1�1/ �
`P/
C4 � � f ORN/
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTACHMENT 10
DIANE SHEELEY, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DS
SUBJECT: WEST BRANCH STREET/CAMINO MERCADO PROJECT
DATE: APRIL 3, 2001
I have reviewed the CUP 99-013 for Stephen Cool and Gary White's proposed 24,300
square foot project on the corner of West Branch Street and Camino Mercado, located
within the Highway Service District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development, for
consistency with the Economic Development Strategy.
The introduction to the chapter identified as "Light Manufacturing" in the Economic
Development Strategy reads as follows: �
"Often exisfing businesses are taken for granted and nof inclr�ded as part of an
economic development sfrafegy. Nonetheless, hisforically, the most cost
effective and realistic form of economic development is realiied through a sound
business refenfion and expansion program. The existing job base needs to be
nurtured and profected on an ongoing basis.
The City of Arroyo Grande needs to provide additional "base leve!" jobs for our
residents, keeping in mind that the companies wou/d need to� meef our
community needs. When we find a good �t, we need to be proactive in securing
the business.
We must recognize the difference between "base level" jobs and "support leve!"
jobs. Base level jobs bring dollars into our area, while support level jobs circulate
the dollars already here and keep fhem �here longer. Base level jobs "import"
dollars into our economy while support level jobs keep those dol/ars from being
"exported." A balance of both types of jobs is an essentia! element of prosperify.
The City's Genera! Plan represenfs a commitment to provide future
and services to businesses. The City should support businesses
appropriafe projects within the scope of the General P/an."
resources
proposing
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEST BRANCH STREET/CAMINO MERCADO PROJECT
APRIL 3, 2001
PAGE 2
An appticable goal within the "Light Manufacturing" section of the Economic
Development Strategy is "to enhance business retention and expansion consistent with
the General Plan and Land Use Policies." Furthermore, a related implementation
measure is to "assist the City's small business community in retaining and expanding
businesses."
Additionally, in speaking with #he applicants of the project; I am aware`-that the law office
of Stephen Cool will be moving into the new project, thus retaining :three (3) full-time
employees. In looking at the potential job retention and creation �at 100% occupancy, it
appears as though approximately 36 jobs could be retained and created. This rough
calculation is based on 1'/z people occupying 1000 square feet. Additionally, many of
these positions may be "base Jevel" positions as defined above. For example, two (2)
of the three (3) positions being retained by the law o�ce of Stephen Cool are
professional positions.
Should you have questions, please contact me �t your earliest convenience at ext.
5486.
PlanningCommission/caminomercado. doc
ATTACHMENT 11
E-Z
8 �Il�atels,
��c.
2484 HOTEL CIRCLE PLACE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108-2869
April 10, 2001
Mr. Kerry L. McCants
Community Development Director
City of Arroyo Crrande
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Sent Via Federal Express
PHONE (619) 291-4824
FAX (619) 291-6130
RE: Conditional Use Permit 99-013, Proposed construction project Northwest corner
of West Branch Street and Camino Mercado
Dear Mr. McCants,
We are the owners of the Premier Inn motel located at 555 Camino Mercado, Arroyo Grande,
CA. Our property is immediately east and adjacent to the proposed office/retail project. If
constructed as submitted the proposed project would have a devastating negative impact on the
motel's business and accordingly substantially reduce the Transit Occupancy T� (T01� paid by
the motel to the City.
We respectfully oppose this project for the following reasons:
1. Excessive Density. Impact on Visibility, Need for Greater Set-backs.
The proposed buildings are excessively dense. Applicant, in attempting to
construct the absolute maximum amount of office/retail space that can physically
be placed on the property, is proposing a project, which would create the
appeazance of a metropolitan area rather than the open space feeling of the
remainder of Arroyo Grande. The proposed buildings are not only excessively
massive, but they are excessively tall. In fact, the proposed buildings would be as
high as our Premier Inn motel constructed above the proposed project.
This is best illustrated by comparing the total height (the final grade elevation
plus building height) for each building in the proposed project and those of our
three motel buildings and sign.
Mr. Kerry L. McCants
April 10, 2001
Page 2.
Proposed Project
E-Z 8 Motel
Building # 1
Grade Level:
Building Height:
Total Height:
Buildin�
Crrade Level:
Building Height:
Total Height:
Building #5
Grade Level:
Building Height:
Total Height:
2-Storv North Building
Grade Level: 176.00'
Building Height: 27.00'
Total Height: 203.00'
2-Storv West Building
Grade Level: 176.00'
Building Height: 27.00'
Total Height: 203.00'
Buildin�
147.50' Grade Level
34.00' Building Height
181.50' Total Height:
155.50'
45.00'
�00.50'
155.00'
32.00'
187.00'
147.00'
21.00'
168.00'
Building #4
Grade Level 165.00'
Sign Height 3&.75'
Total Height: 203.75'
S�
Grade Level 176.00'
Top of Sign Height 14.00'
Total Height: 190.00'
1-Story Motel Lobby/Office
Grade Level 176.00'
Top of Sign Height 13.00'
Total Height: 189.00'
This illustration shows that Building #3 and Building #4 will be as high (or
higher) as our existing motel buildings and as much as 10 feet higher than our
sign. The existing views to motel buildings and sign will be completely blocked
and overshadowed by these towering structures.
Looking up to the motel property from Highway 101 (or from Branch Street) this
fact will be even more pronounced. As a result of the steep angle, the motel will
be completely blocked by a"wall" of buildings. Please refer to the Applicants
Branch Street elevation (sheet number A-2.0 of the preliminary elevations) to see
this view.
The applicants proposed project is just too close to our property and requires
greater setbacks to mitigate their obstructions to our visibility and for safety
concems.
Mr. Kerry L. McCants
April 10, 2001
Page 3.
When we constructed the Premier Inn motel 17 years ago, we did not attempt to
maximize the density of the project. In order to maintain the open feeling of
Arroyo Grande, we constructed one and two story buildings instead of the more
dense three story buildings. Although three story buildings would have
substantially reduced construction costs and would ha.ve allowed us to increase
the number of rentable rooms; we believed the one and two story buildings to be
more consistent with the design characteristics of the city. Further, we
constructed the motel sign at a height of only 14 feet above our grade level. We
attempted to keep the sign at the absolute minimum height necessary for visibility
from Highway 101. As a matter of fact, as part of our recent remodeling project
(which is discussed in more detail later) we recently spent $20,000.00 to improve
our sign and increase its visibility. This was all done, however, and still maintain
the original height. While we have always attempted taminimize th�e�visual
density of the motel, the applicant is conversely attempting-to absolutely
maximize the density of his project both in square footage; minimal property
setbacks and in height.
IF APPLICANT IS ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT THE:PROJECT AS
PROPOSED, NO ONE TRAVELING HIGHWAY 101 WILL BE ABLE TO
SEE THE MOTEL OR OUR SIGN OR �EVEN KNOW THE MOTEL
EXISTS.
2. Economic Impact on the Motel Property and City TOT Tag.
The loss of visibility of the motel property and sign from Highway 101 will have
a devastating impact on the occupancy and revenues of the motel. The vast
majority of motel guests are attracted to the property through visibility of the
motel and sign while driving on Highway 101. They will have no way of
knowing the motel even exists and they will probably go to other motels in the
surrounding areas such as Pismo Beach.
In 2000, the motel had revenues of approximately $975,000. The motel has
recently struggled in part because its visibility and access aze already less than
best. In order to bolster our recent lackluster occupancies, the owners just
recently completed a major renovation to the property that included changing the
name from E-Z 8 to Premier Inns. This remodeling and renovation has been very
successful at 6 similar properties owned by the General Partners. Based on the
results, which occurred after the remodels of the other 6 properties, we aze
projecting revenues in excess of $1,200,000 this year. This would result in
$120,000 of Transit Occupancy Tax revenue for the city. This could all be lost.
If the motel loses the revenue from the drive-by guest, its revenue will be
substantially decreased and we will have a great feaz that we will no longer be
able to stay in business. Our property may cease to be a viable motel location.
Mr. Kerry L. McCants
April 10, 2001
Page 4.
3. Egtensive Grading to Close to our Propertv.
In order to make this project as dense as physically possible, the applicant is
proposing to do extensive grading and excavation to the pazcel. Unfortunately,
most of the excavation is occurring immediately adjacent to our property line.
The applicant is proposing excavation, which will lower the origi�nai:grade by 10
feet. This drastic change occurs within 5 feet of the motel's driveway and parking
lot.
This is a severe change to the natural grade and it occurs to close to our property
line and parking lot. There is no doubt.that such an extreme change in grade
presents an extreme hazard to our buildings, pazking lot and motel guests.
If the applicant is allowed to construct the project as proposed we will be forced
to shut down our driveway serving the westem edge of our property during the
construction period because of safety concerns further increasing our economic
loss.
In summary, when we purchased this property and built the motel ov+erl:7 yeazs=ago, we realized
this lot would eventually be developed. Well-planned development.is generally:beneficial to the
surrounding local businesses. However, this project is not consistent with its surroundings and
will create a devastating negative economic consequence to the motel property. Additionally,
there aze many unanswered questions regazding the safety of both the motel property and its
guests from the proposed excavation and grading being so close to our property.
We would like to propose this matter be continued and applicant be required to:
1. Stake the property and place range poles showing the location and height of the
proposed buildings. We could then meet with applicant and staff to discuss what
could be done to resolve the issues of excessive density, the impact on our
visibility and the need for greater setbacks..
2. Require applicant to provide engineering and geology reports detailing how the
proposed excavation and grading will be completed in a manner which eliminates
the potential for damage to the motel property and its guests. This will also serve
to negate any liability the City might incur if they approve this project without
such protections.
Respectfully,
�
Leslie M. Crouch
General Partner
/,
� --_—
William S. Bannasch
General Partner
E-Z
s �Il�atels, ��c.
2484 HOTEL CIRCLE PLACE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108-2869
June 5, 2001
The Honorable Michael A. Lady
Mayor, City of Arroyo Grande
214 E. Branch St.
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
ATTACHMENT 12
PHONE (619) 291-4824
FAX (619) 291-6130
RE: Public Hearing on June 12, 2001 regazding Conditional Use Permit No.
99-013 to construct 5 office buildings totaling 24,300 sq. ft. at the
Northwest corner of Camino Mercado and West Branch St.
Dear Mayor Lady,
I will be speaking in objection to the above referenced project at the Public
Hearing portion of the City Council meeting scheduled on June 12th. In prepazation of
the meeting, I have enclosed a copy of our original letter of objection, which was
submitted to the Planning Commission, and a recently prepared visual analysis that
depicts the proposed project's impact on our motel property.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, I can be
reached at (619) 291-4824 ext. 103.
Sincerel ,
�` �
Michael S. Mo s
General Partner
�� .
�.'
�,
� k;
i� T ;
,
,,
�
1 ,;'
',� 1
_,
:�
� . �
-7 l
•r,
,l:
•• f
•
� ~ '..l
✓ ,
Y
�
., 4
; . �
y '�
.�
. /
• ^ •
-+1" �'11 --- ! j �� nr',� �,:
�� ,
,�+�{,
�
{ '� � �
� 'r �,' ; �,
:
, �,
_ y �� . � .
s V�`� •�' a \ ,y�
� �� tlt �v _ %. , , �9
1
, :�;�,��- '�'A �..,��
,��� ,', -! .�'
� � � � �i
� ' :t ,.
, �. '��; .
� �,' � � i�� � ri r
�. �� � � ' ,,
_ ; -� �,� ` ' w .,
� �'���;! f Y �� �,
-i � �- �
� ,;�. � � �'!j
. � � � �. ���:�,: � �.
' 4 tj y � �`'�
' ^ �� � � ..
r ��� r � �
,
� �� � �. z � -� �'
� �� �, � � `� �'.,. � � �
_ _ , ' �, �, ` ,
���
. �.'k;;+t `.
_f :.��� '�
� � �i�4 }� ��(R
w Y � ,,, "� !.' ,� +w�
' A4�:s "� "'� t
+ �'x,i:a .t�,� .
.
— ,� �
: w� -- � �. �..
� p
� `
t � � .: .
T ' n 4' , t
< h �. �
. �� . . ':�� �:�j,/
. � � . J �' L �:r " , ,�
. , U �
7 ,�
� '�:
r `1 ..�.i � � .
4i •
� � �
>� 4_r .. �, ��,r
; :� .
i,<�' .
� l
�� � �� �
{� S . Y!
+. . '! � '.�4
; 't
� t . 4 j � Y
( ;N <
��� ��
y' � � �
' ,q� , '.� ��, t.
��
m �
0
�o
d
n N
�..
��
N �
_. �
a a'
�' �
m �
��
m m
c �
.� O
� �
N Z
�, �
�s
m �
a=
��
oa
��
�s
__. �
a�
�
� �
y O
-i �
�
N
�
N
�
N
N
N
�
�
N
(D
�
N
7
O
�
�
n
�
�
N
<
lD
�
O
�
N
X
N
7
tG
�
O
N
y
Q
�
N
a
� i e;i�
y� i
!`.
i�1
r�
�'�1
� � . �..:...� f...:.;:
� �;,
r�
� �
` . +�,
� a
� , i:
r. � � 3�
f � '�T.�
� �s
rH :i
i � -�
3�
i r
�'��
fF��
� . ��� � , #
i ,
�I
LAW OFFICE
STEPHEN N. COOL
1577 EL CAMINO REAL
AHAOYO CiRANDE, CALIFOBNIA 93420
T E LE P M O N E: (805) 489-8433
STEPMEN N. GOOL
ATTORNEY AT LAW
BOBBIE L. COLESON
LCGAL ASSISTANT
April 16, 2001
ATTACHMENT 13
E-MAIL: COOIQN/'?QGOI.COT
FAX: (805) 489-6702
�`��'���
APR 1. � 2001
CITY GF;�si�sUYi.� Ur��.ANDE
COMMUP�lTY GL'l�i.�3t P��:�JT DEPT.
Honorable Planning Commission
City of Arroyo Grande
City Hall
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
RE: CUP 99-013/WEST BRANC�I AND CAMINO MERCADO
Letter from E-Z 8 Motels, Inc.
Dear Commissioners:
_By this letter we wish to respond to the comments in the letter of April l Oth from E-Z 8 Motels,
Inc. regarding the above project:
l. Density and Impact on Visibility
The E-Z 8letter contends that our project is too dense and massive. Nothing could be further
from the truth. The permitted floor area density for our 2.6 acre site is 50%, which means that
we could have had 57,400 square feet of floor area. Our project has 24,500 squaze feet of floor
area, which equals a 21% density. We divided the project into five separate buildings in order to
reduce the visual impact, maintain an open space feeling, and preserve the oak trees on the
property.
Our individual buildings are not massive or overly tall. Buildings one and two are single story.
Buildings three, four and five are two-story, as is the motel. Our largest building, building three,
has a floor area of 8,000 square feet, which is approximately twice the total floor area footage of
many homes in the Rancho Grande area.
We do not agree that our project will cause undue blockage of the motel, or of views from the
motel. Views from the motel are not impacted, 3s the rooms face either north or south of our
project. The motel will be clearly visible to travelers either northbound or southbound on 101. It
is true that our building number three will block the motel sign for traffic narthbound on 101.
However, it is our understanding that the sign can be raised under the city's zoning ordinance so
that it will be visible.
Honorable Planning Commission
April 16, 2001
Page Two
2. Economic Impact on th Motel:
As stated, we disagree that our project impacts the visibility of the motel to the traveling public;
we also disagree that our project will in any way be detrimental to the financial viability of the
motel. In fact, our project could be very beneficial to them. For example, if my law firm, or an
accounting or financial investment firm located in our project, is expecting out-of-town visitors
to their businesses, we obviously will recommerid our neighboring motel to them for their
convenience, and employee and customer traffic to and from our project will create a greater
awareness of the motel's existence. All in all, otxr high end professional business occupancy and
the motel should benefit each other.
3. Extensive Grading
We do not understand.exactly what it is about our grading that the motel objects to. It is true that
we will be grading near the property line with the motel in order to even the slope, and will be
placing a retaining wall near that line. The area above the retaining wall will be landscaped and
quite attractive when viewed from the motel. Having the retaining wall permits us to move
buildings four and five further away from the property line, thereby lessening the visual impact
from the motel as to those buildings.
While the motel expresses concern over the potential effect of our grading on their driveway and
parking lot, we wiil of course provide assurance to the city that our grading will be planned and
engineered so that neither the driveway nor the parking at the motel will be affected. We are
well aware of our duty not to remove the lateral support to the motel property, and will comply
with that duty.
Respe lly submitted, ��� "�
= , -_.__.._ : � �' .
. .: ,
. � .
.._ :
� _/ ... . _ ..
__ ; -
�
' STEPHEN N. COOL,
Applicant
SNC:bIc
ATTACHMENT 14
LAW OFFICE
STEPHEN N. COOL
1577 El CAMINO REAL
ARROYO C3EANDE, CALIFOBNIA 93420
TELEPHONE: (805) 4B9-8433
STEPMEN N. COOL
ATTORNEY AT LAW
BOBBIE L. COLESON
IEGAI ASSISTANT
May 16, 2001
Honorable City Council
City of Arroyo Grande
City Hall
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
RE: CUP 99-013/WEST BRANCH AND CAMINO MERCADO
Letter from EZ-8 Motels, Inc.
Dear Council Members:
�
The undersigned is one of the applicants for the above referenced conditional use permit. In a
letter dated April l Oth from the San Diego office of EZ-8 Motels, Inc., which raised concems
regarding the relative height of our project and the existing EZ-8 Motel above us, a number of
figures regaxding building heights were set forth. Because of the short time between when we
received a copy of this letter and the Planning Commission hearing on our project, we did not
have time to go out and check this information.
We have now had an opportunity to recheck both the heights of the buildings to be built in our
project, and also the heights of the buildings at the EZ-8 Motel, and have determined that
virtually all of the figures in the EZ-8letter were erroneous. Set forth below are the height
figures indicated in the EZ-8 Motel letter, and the actual figures.
Proposed Office Project
Building No.
Building #1
ra e eve
Building Height
Total Height
Building #2
ra e eve
Building Height
Total Height .
* Only the tower is 34 feet.
EZ-8 Letter
147.5 feet
34 feet
181.5 feet
147 feet
21 feet
168 feet
f�C4Lt 7 �.:.
n � ��� ., r r' � 1� (Z t ., r, ^�. a .�... .
'•, � i 1 � �' i h�, i f� l: 1�,i ��_ . �..,_
0 I��`i�al' l 8 F; � 3� 28
E-MAIL: COOIHW2Q801.001'f1
FAX: (805) 489-6702
Actual
147 feet
23 feet *
170 feet
144 feet
20.5 feet
164.5 feet
. �
Honorable City Council
May 16, 2001
Page Two
Building No.
Building #3
ra e eve
Building Height
Total Height
Building #4
ra e eve
Building Height
Total Height
Building #5
ra e eve
Building Height
Total Height
Actual
153 feet
43 feet
(45 foot tower)
196 feet
(198 foot tower)
153 feet
37.75 feet
190.75 feet
155 feet
30.5 feet
185.5 feet
EZ-8 Letter
155,5 feet
45 �eet
200.5 feet
165 feet
38.75 feet
203.75 feet
155 feet
32 feet
187 feet
EZ-8 Mote
One-Story Motel Lobby/Office
ra e eve 176 feet 180.38 feet
Top of Sign Height 13 feet 13 feet
Total Height 189 feet 193.38 feet
Two-Story North and West
ui gs . .
ra e evel 176 feet 183.9 feet
Building Height 27 feet 26.5 feet
Total Height 203 feet 210.4 feet
Motel Sign
ra e evel 176 feet ' 181.5 feet
Top of Sign Height 14 feet 14 feet
Total Height 190 feet 195.5 feet
These figures confirm two very significant facts in connection with the motel's objections to our
office project:
4
Honorable City Council
May 16, 2001
Page Three
1. That our buildings #'s 4 and 5 cannot possibly obscure views from the second story of the
motel, since the second story of the motel is higher than either of those buildings.
2. That our building #1 (at the corner of West Branch and Camino Mercado) will not
interfere with a view of the motel from the freeway, inasmuch as the height of building #1 is 170
feet and the height of the two-story portion of the motel is 210 feet - 40 feet higher than building
#1.
submitted,
- --�"`� `
STEPHEN N. COOL,
Applicant
SNC:bIc
0
Mary C. Brooks
1875 Calle Laguna
Arroyo Grande, California, 93420
Home Phone 805-481-3102
Email MCCBROOKS@AOL
May 07, 2001
�i'�q�vr1FIF�k� ��
Arroyo Grande City Council
Arroyo Grande, California
Dear Mr. Mayor,
ATTACHMENT 15
��TY ���l��ROYO� ,:,, :
,✓ � ` ~' '
01 kir�lY -7 A�� 9: 17
I attended the Planning Commission meeting on April 17, 2001. I'm interested in the
project on the'northwes��corneF of west branch and Camino Mercado (permit case no.
99-013). I was very pleased to hear the planning commission had a lot of the same
concerns I have regarding this project. At this point, it has has been placed in your
hands. The Planning Commission has voiced concerns about the building height, loss
of ridge line, and traffic considerations. These items fall under standards of the general
plan that are in place. The one item dear to my heart is the oak trees on the property.
Mr. Stephen Cool addressed this, stating that the project is preserving sixty percent of
existing oaks, thus following standards set by the city. Mr. Cool also stated that if there
was any way to preserve more of the oaks within this project, he would be open to it.
There is a great opportunity at this time . In order for this project to break ground, there
has to be a lot of changes in the existing plans. This is the time to consider where to
place driveways, parking areas, and foundations. The oak trees on this lot have been
there for finro hundred years. Some of them are in bad shape and should be removed.
There are two trees on the corner of the property ( tree numbers two and three), that
are scheduled to be removed. Although the tree report states one tree is diseased and
had partially fallen in the past, (the study is finro years old), the tree has made a
remarkable recovery and is thriving. The preservation of these old oaks would
enhance the property, and elevate the visual appeal of the area. Preservation of these
trees would not interfere with the ocean view wi#hin any of the buildings. Adjustments
in the driveway would have to take place.
I plead with you to please consider this when you are reviewing this project. The public
in general never get upset until the bulldozers show up. At that point, it is too late. The
permits have been issued. This is the time to suggest to the developer to save those
trees. As the Planning Commission stated, "Preservation is always better than
restoration".
Sincerely,
M� ��.
`Srooks
e: �
_
, . _F.�. ,
P��;2��=�
��
5($l0�
ATTACHMENT 16
�3�s �. ���� -'� � 7
�
�. • �� ��0
i;ECEIyEp , , .
�� ��D / C;{i`f ;����;��� r , .. - --
/ ���
_" 01 f��Y 18 P��i �: 28
al �- �.
,�- �3 ���
�� �
i
-
' � i / � � f � ' ' � j �
.
/ �
/� � � / /
i �i / �i :,�, %) ,
/
/ , , � �. / , . � i. ,i ,/
/
� / /
i
� I � ; � � � � � , � �
/ �
/
�' � . / � � � � � �
� � / � �
�/ �� � � � �
�j � i _ i , / � ,
�. � !� �, � � � �� � / /
/ �� i I � � � i
/ /.
/�� / , ���� � � ,,�, � �
/ '
I / /: � i � / � i � '�� �I i � �
i / l / � I � �
/ � r
, � i
/ � , // � �� ' � . � ♦
i
.
/ i � - '� � / , /. .i , � , / '
� � /
� 1 ' � / i , ' , !�
` � � �
�
� � �, -� I � / � �
/ ' �� i ' � � /
/ � /, /� � �� �� � � '
r r � � / � / �
j � � � ' �i / /
� �, , I �
' / , / , / � , ' � /� � .i �� . �
� � /� � / / , / /
I j � � � � � � � � � �
� �
/) i ' � /
/ � � � ��
��/�.
:��� ; � / �
. , .,
, , , � � i ,
� (
ATTACHMENT 17
;�"C:.1`,(C� _
, „ ,, .- ` �. �� �, �, ; �
Carie Randolph -� � T � `�� r ; ; � i 0 f �_ � .
1310 SierraDrive d! �����! �2 0;; 2: �g
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
805-481-4825
May 22, 2001
Mayor Mike Lady
Arroyo Grande City Council
Arroyo Crrande, CA 93420
Dear Mr. Mayor,
I am writing to you to voice my interest in the project on the northwest corner of West Branch
and Camino Mercado (permit case #99-013). I attended the Planning Commission meetings with
regards to this project and voiced my concerns to the commission at those meetings. The
commission also had many of the same concerns I had, particularly with respect to building
height, lose of ridge line, traffic considerations, and the cutting down of old established coastal
live oak trees on the property. Each concern has merit and I hope that each will be fully
addressed and considered by the Council before this project is approved. The last issue of the
oak trees is of particular interest to me and is the reason for my vvriting to you.
I obtained a copy of the arborist report regarding the health of the twelve oak trees on the
property. I then walked the property to view the trees myself to determine whether the report
seemed valid. Given that it was written two years ago, in the month of December when coastal
live oaks are somewhat in a dormant state, I questioned the results, especially with regazds to the
recommendation that tree #2, the oldest and largest tree at the front corner of the property is
diseased. This tree, at this time, appears to be very healthy, and is a beautiful specimen with
visual appeal which is an asset to the property and our community. Tree #3 is smaller, and is also
healthy, but because of it's location on the property, is scheduled for removal to make way for
driveways and retaining walls. Mr. Stephen Cool, who presented the project to the Commission,
stated that he would be amenable to trying to save these trees if that were the recommendation of
the Council.
I urge the Council to consider preservation of these oaks, #2 , in addition to the other oaks
already considered salvageable. Our community has a special resource of beauty, the coastallive
oak. It is much more prudent for us to preserve this historic and valuable resource, rather than
destroy what takes years to grow, only to replace with non-native trees in an effort of restoration.
Sincerely,
�,.�-�"„ �dk`' �` r�'
Carie Randolph
�•, C4 M c��La. e�
ATTACHMENT 18
K�C�1'JED
���� �`- �f� ' ,
��. � f i:,;�' �fi�;� . << � , . _ �.
O i Fir�Y 2 5 P'r �r �� 8
May 22, 2001
Atroyo Grande City Council : �
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA. 93420
Re: Corner of West Branch and Camino Mercado
Dear Council Members:
Please carefully consider and reconsider any proposed construction project that involves
the removal of long standing oaks. While I realize that the above referenced lot is virtually
dotted with trees I really wish that there were some alternative to the removat of nearly
half of them.
I can't help but remember that old immense oak tree that used to grace the weed forsaken,
broken bottle and trash infested lot on Grand Avenue next to the new Rite Aid. To add
insult to injury that project never came to fruition, leaving a wasteland that thousands(?)
of motorists pass by each year.
While I am sure that this new project will not suffer the same fate, I feel that I must
reiterate my concern for the fate of so many of the oaks on that highly visible parcel.
Sincerely,
.
Deborah Sidenberg
Arroyo Grande
�
2 �� -��� G�.��.�:�v.
��
�� ���
G ; �,��,,,� N(an�er
Johnson Gallery
f�FRAMING STUDIO
547 MARSH STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
805.541.6600 fax:805.541.6839
May 23, 2001
Arroyo Grande City Council
214 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Dear City Council Members,
ATTACHMENT 19
��TY w� �.Rf�GYO ^��;?:�w`�
01 �i��' 25 Pn �� 48
This letter is being written in regards to the development plans at the
corner of West Branch Street and Camino Mercado, next to Levitz. W e
understand that you are considering allowing the developer to remove five
200 year old oak trees. W e are writing to strongly urge you to preserve these
beautiful trees, not to destroy them to make room for more concrete.
Our beautiful Central Coast is rapidly being paved over by. developers. If
we do not learn lessons from California's recent past, soon our magnificent
local towns will begin to resemble Orange County and Los Angeles.
W e encourage you to do the right thing. Please preserve our Oaks.
Sincerely,
. `� V '
�{var�J .
The johnson Gallery Staff
��
� : �� 1� Gt.ti�.,as� e..�
�
ATTACHMENT 20
3335 Broad Street
San Luis Obispo
Ca, 93401
Arroyo Grande City Council
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande CA,
i�� 7 CJ
1i� i� ri �1t\i:�`'� (;.',:�';1—
Q� �i�Y 2�+ Fi! �2: L
Dear Arroyo Grande City Council,
My name is Mckinzie George and I am writing on behalf of the twelve oak trees
that stand on the corner of West Branch Street and Camino Mercado Street. These trees
have been on this city for over two hundred years! How dare you even think about
ripping them out and taking them from their home just to make room for a project?
Where are the priorities of the community? I guess building another project is more
important than the environment. I will do all that is in my power to prevent elected
officials from destroying any more of the environment. Please do your part to protect the
animals and trees that do not have voices in this earth. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Mckinzie George
student
MG
, '� ^ _
P �� �
� �
Proud SLpporter ofThe Humane Sx(ery of rhe United Stmcs
M. George
3335 Broctd St Apt 18 "
Sn Luis Obis p, CA 93401
(`, � �� �n-��9��✓
..J
�nt.rvt.� ��! �` re c�
ATTACHMENT 21
O � P�tROY
c�
� INCORPORATED 9 Z
C� T
� ,K,�� ,o. ,o„ ,�
c4 ��FORN� P
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
INITIAL STUDY AND
DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Project Title:
2. Lead Agency Name & Address:
3. Contact Person & Phone #:
4. Project Location:
5. Project Sponsor's Name & Address:
6. General Plan Designation:
7. Zoning:
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-013
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550/214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Kelly Heffernon
(805) 473-5420
Northwest corner of the West Branch Street/Camino
Mercado intersection
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Stephen N. Cool / Gary White
1577 EI Camino Real
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1)
Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1)
8. Description of Project: (Describe the who% action invo/ved, inc/uding but not /imited to /eter phases of
the pioject, and any secondary, support, oi off-site featuies necessary foi its impAementation. Attach
� additiona/ sheets if necessary.l
The proposed project is. to construct five (5) professional office buildings totaling 24,300 square feet on a
2.68-acre parcel. The property is located on the northwest corner of West Branch Street and Camino
Mercado and is currently vacant. The development will require grading, street improvements, tree
removal and utility construction to serve the commercial project.
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (and permits needed):
None
1
DETERMINATION.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
X
I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effectls) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the
effect is a"potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated". An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addre sed.
3//z��l
Signatur Date
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a
"POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT" or "POTENTIALLY IS SIGNIFICANT UNLESS MITIGATED", as indicated by the checklist on
the following pages.
O Land Use and Planning
O Population and Housing
❑ Geophysical
■ Water
■ Air Quality
■ Transportation/Circulation
■ Biological Resources
❑ Energy and Mineral Resources
❑ Hazards
❑ Noise
❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
❑ Public Services
❑ Utilities and Service Systems
� Aesthetics
■ Cultural Resources
❑ Recreation
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief exp/anation is required for al/ answers except "No lmpact" answers ihai are adequately supported by the info�mation
sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses fol%wing each question. A"No Impact" question is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project
falls outside a fault rupture zonel. A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it- is based on project specific factors as
well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis►.
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-
level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operations impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or is the lead agency lacks
information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from
"Potentially Significant Impact" to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures
and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier
Analyses", may be cross referenced.)
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 150631c113►IDI. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section
XVII at the end of the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g.,
general plans, zoning ordinancesl. A Source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals should be cited in the
discussion. •
2
Pofeniia//y
Potev»tia//y Significant Less Than
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Sig�cant Un/ess Signil�cant No
/mpact Mitigated �mpact /mpact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the pioposa/.•
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
Isource #(s): 1,2,3,4) X
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
(source #Is►: 1,6,7) X
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
usesl? (source #Is1: 9, 11) X
d1 Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority communityl? (source #Is): 2,4,11) X
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections? (source #Is1: 1,5,9) X
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructurel? X
Isource #Is1: 9,101
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(source #Is1: 9,10,11) X
III. GEOPHYSICAL: Wou/d the pioposa/ resu/t in or e�rpose
I�P� to pot�t� impacts fnvo/ving:
a) Seismicity: fault rupture? (source #(s1: 5,6) X
b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction?
Isource #(sl: 5,61 X
c) Seismicity: seiche or tsunami? Isource #Is1: 5,6) X
d) Landslides or mudslides? (source #Is): 5,6) X
e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soils
conditions from excavation, grading or fill?
Isource #Is►: 10) X
f) Subsidence of land? (source #�s1: 5,6) X
g) Expansive soils? (source #Is►: 5,6) X
h) Unique geologic or physical features? (source #�sl:
5, 6,10,11) X
IV. WATER: Would the propos� iesu/f in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (source #�s1: 10) X
b) Exposure to people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (source #Is►: 8) X
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? (source #Is1: 9) X
3
Potentia//y
Potentia//y Signi�icant Less Than
Issues (�d Supporting Information Sourcesl: Significant l/n/ess �e��t No
/mpact Mitigated /mpact lmpact
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (source #Is1: 9, 10) X
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (source #Is): 9, 10) X
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(source #Is1: 9, 10) X
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(source #Is1: 9, 10) X
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (source #Is1: 9,10) X
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies? (source #Is1: 6)
X
V. AIR aUALITY: Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
(source #�s►: 7, 13)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (source #Is):
10, 11)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (source #Is1: 9) •
d) Create objectionable odors? (source #Is1: 9,10)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal
resu/t in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (source
#Is1: 131 ,
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment►? (source #Isl: 9, 10)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby sites?
Isource #Is1: 9, 10)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (source
#Isl: 3, 9, 101
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (source
#(s): 9, 10)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racksl?
(source #Is1: 9, 10)
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposa/ result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (source #Isl: 6)
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees►?
(source #Is1: 10, 11)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest,
coastal habitatl? (source #Is1: 10, 11)
4
X
X
X
X
X
�
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pool►?
(source #Is1: 9, 11 �
e► Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
(source #(s1: 11)
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the proposal.•
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Isource #Is►: 1, 61
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (source #Isl: 9, 10)
IX. HAZARDS. Would ihe proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation? (source #Is): 9)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (source #Is): 9, 10)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? (sou�ce #Isl: 9, 10)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (source #Isl: 9,10,11)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (source #Is►: 10, 11)
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (source #Is1: 1, 9)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(source #Is1: 9, 10)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Wou/d the proposal have an effect
upon, or iesu/t in a need for new or a/tered governmenf
services in any of fhe fo/%wing areas:
a) Fire Protection? (source #Is1: 61
b) Police Protection? (source #Is1: 6)
c) Schools? (source #Is): 6)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
(source #Is1: 6)
e) Other governmental services? (source #Isl: 6)
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal
resu/t in a need fo� new systems, or substantial alterations
to the fo/%wing uti/ities:
a) Power or natural gas? (source #Is1: 9, 10)
b) Communications systems? (source #Is1: 9, 10)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? Isource #Is►: 61
d) Storm water drainage? (source #Is): 6)
e) Solid waste disposal? (source #Is1: 6)
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposah.
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
(source #Is1: 1, 10, 11)
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
(source #Is1: 9, 10, 11)
c) Create light or glare? Isource #(s1: 9,10)
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (source #Is1: 6, 11)
b) Disturb archaeological resources (source #Isl: 6, 11)
c) Affect historical resources? (source #Isl: 6, 11)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (source #Is►:
11)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (source #Is): 10, 11)
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposaL•
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks
, or other recreational facilities? (source #Is): 1, 3)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Isource #Is1: 1, 5)
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant o� animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.l
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1:/
X
11
XVII. EARUER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 150631c11311D1. In this case, a discussion should
identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed by earlier documents.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated",
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
�
SOURCE LIST:
1. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan
2. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Map
3. City of Arroyo Grande Development Code
4. City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Map
5. City of Arroyo Grande Existing Setting and Community Issues Report
6. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan EIR
7. Air Pollution Control District Clean Air Plan
8. FEMA - Flood Insurance Rate Map
9. Project Description
10. Project Plans
11. Site Inspection
12. Ordinance 431 C. S.
13. Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The project site is approximately 2.68 acres in size and is located on the northwest corner of the West Branch
Street and Camino Mercado intersection in the Highway Service District of the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development (PD1.1). The intersection is controlled by a four-way stop and is located at the northbound Highway
101 Oak Park Blvd. off-ramp. The site is highly visible from Highway 101 and West Branch Street, sloping steeply up
from West Branch Street and then becoming relatively flat. The property is currently vacant and contains twelve
(12) mature Coast Live Oak trees, six (6) of which are proposed to be removed. The project site is not located
near a known cultural resource area.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project evaluated by this initial study is to construct five (5) professional office buildings totaling 24,300 square
feet with 98 parking spaces as shown in the table below.
Buildin No. Stories Use S uare Feet S ecial Characteristics
1 1 Office/Retail 5,000 • 34' tall Clock Tower
• Fountain
2 1 Office 2,000
3 Lower Office 1,000 • 35' tall Elevator
Main 4,000 Tower
Upper 3,000
4 Lower Office 900
Main 1,700
Upper 1, 700
5 Lower Office 1,700
Main 3,300
Total: 24,300
On-site drainage will b
sources. The project
groundwater resources,
e accomplished by a drainage system that will convey runoff from both on-site and off-site
will be served by a public water system, and thus will have no direct or indirect impact on
7
EXPLANATIONS TO INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST:
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING
The property is located in the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1►, and is subject to the site
development standards for the Highway Services (H-S) zoning designation of PD 1.1, and other ordinances of
the City of Arroyo Grande. Construction of professional offices is consistent with the General Plan and zoning
for the site, and no impacts in land use and planning would result.
The proposed project does not pose conflicts with existing environmental plans and/or policies, and there are
no agricultural operations in the vicinity of the project site.
Analysis of Significance: No impact.
11. POPULATION & HOUSING
The project would provide professional office facilities. No new housing would be associated with the
proposed project, and no significant increase in demand for housing would be created by the project.
Analysis of Significance: No impact.
III. GEOPHYSICAL
Although the proposed project design generally follows the natural topography of the site, the project will
involve a considerable amount of construction grading and soil compaction. Standard erosion control
measures would address on-site construction period erosion by wind or water. Long-term erosion potential
would be addressed through installation of landscaping and storm drainage facilities, both of which would be
designed to meet applicable regulations.
Based on the General Plan and review of the Alquist-Priolo Zone Fault maps, the proposed project is not
located on a known earthquake fault subject to rupture. The proposed project will be subject to the effects of
periodic seismic events in the region, including ground shaking. However, exposure of people to these events
can generally be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk by following Uniform Building Code development
standards.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
IV. WATER/DRAINAGE
Water. Development of the proposed project would require water for both domestic use and landscape
irrigation. Projected water demand is approximately 2.45 acre-feet of water per year. The water consumption
by this project would further reduce the City's supply of available water. This impact could be mitigated using
water-conserving designs, fixtures and landscaping.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
1. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water demand
created by the project by either: �
Implementing an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and designs that minimize
water usage. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review
and approval. The proposed individual water program shall be submitted to the City for
approval prior to implementation; or,
�
Payment of an in lieu fee.
Monitoring: Review of individual water program or payment of the in
lieu fee
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
2. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. Such fixtures
shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water
recirculating systems. Water . conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final
occupancy.
Monitoring: Review of building plans
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
3. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including the use of drought
tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and
areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized.
Monitoring: Review of .landscaping and irrigation plans
Responsible Department: Parks and Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of, building permit
Drainas�e. Development of the site will increase impervious surfaces, which in turn will change absorption
rates and increase the amount of runoff. The site would drain onto Camino Mercado and existing drainage
facilities would accommodate the increased flows. Detailed drainage calculations would be reviewed as part
of the plan check process.
Analysis of Significance:
Mitigation Measure:
Potentially significant unless mitigated.
4. The applicant shall provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that increased run-off can be
accommodated by existing facilities and/or provide on-site retention basins to the satisfaction of
the Director of Public Works.
Monitoring: Review. of grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
V. AIR Q.UALITY
Development of the site will involve grading and other activities that will produce emissions for which the
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) has established impact thresholds. Grading in
excess of four (4) acres will generate emissions that exceed the District's threshold for respirable
particulate matter (PM, The project site is 2.68 acres in size, which falls under the threshold for
significance. However, construction activities would generate dust, which could cause potentially
significant short-term environmental impacts. The project will also contribute emissions to the air basin,
which is already a non-attainment area for the State ozone standard. Emissions generated by this project,
together with emissions generated by reasonably foreseeable new development, will result in a cumulative
adverse impact on air quality unless all reasonably available mitigations are included in the design of the
project.
�
� Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust
on the site. The dust control measures listed below shall be followed during construction of the
project, and shall be shown on grading and building plans:
5. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle
movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include
wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and
whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
6. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to
prevent dust generation.
7. Permanent dust control measures identified in the revegetation and landscape plans should be
implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
8. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after
initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until
vegetation is established.
9. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at
least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in
accordance with CVC Section 23114. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions
from this source by 7— 14%).
10. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off
trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM� emissions
from this source by 40 — 70%).
11. Sweep streets at the end of each day if� visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads.
Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. (This measure has the
potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 25 — 60%).
For Mitigation Measures No. 5— 11:
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site inspections
Responsible Department: The Public Works and Building and Fire Departments shall
inspect plans and spot check in the field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit and during construction
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Access to the project site is from both West Branch Street and Camino Mercado. West Branch Street is
classified in the Circulation Element as a minor arterial street with an 80-foot wide right-of-way. Camino
Mercado is classified as a collector street having a 63-foot right-of-way.
Based on the traffic analysis prepared for the project (Penfield & Smith, dated 9/18/00 — reference
Attachment A), the development is estimated to generate 486 daily trips, with 63 trips du�ing the PM peak
hour at the project driveways. The analysis concludes that the West Branch Street/Camino Mercado
intersection will operate at an unacceptable level of service at baseline plus project, and a signal is therefore
warranted at this intersection. Further analysis was conducted to determine what roadway improvements
would be required with the installation of a traffic signal at this location. Based on the forecast future
10
� _ _ _ --- _ _ _ _ ___ - _ _ _
volumes (volumes associated with pending projects and other projects planned to occur beyond a 10-year
period of time), the portion of West Branch north-west of Camino Mercado (project frontage) will need to be
widened by 12 feet to provide two travel lanes west bound. The Conditions of Approval for the project
require that these improvements be implemented.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
12. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Camino Mercado and West
Branch Street. The applicant and the City shall enter into a reimbursement agreement
providing that the City shall reimburse the applicant the difference in costs between the signal
installation and the projecYs Signalization Impact fee. The applicant may be reimbursed for
those costs to the extent that signalization impact fees are available and programmed for this
project.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install the traffic signal
Responsible Dept./Agency: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
13. The applicant shall pay the City's Transportation Facilities Impact fee prior to issuance ot
building permit.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fees
Responsible Dept./Agency: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
A total of 12 Coast Live Oak trees and 2 saplings exist on the project site having varying degrees of health
and vigor. There are no wetlands on the property. The proposed project would remove 6 of the 12 oak trees.
Native oaks are a protected tree species in the City of Arroyo Grande and any removal must be mitigated per
the City's Community Tree Ordinance No. 431 C.S.
Per the arborist report prepared by Dave's Tree Service for the project dated December 1, 1998 (reference
Attachment �, the majority of the trees proposed for removal are either in poor health or have questionable
structural integrity. The table below summarizes the findings of the arborist report.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT TREE CONDITIONS
Tree# TRUNK Height CANOPY VIGOR CONDITION ARBORIST PROJECT
DIAMETER DENSITY RECOMMENDATION PROPOSAL
1 14.7" 20'-25' 75% Fair Good Save Save
2 38.2" 50' + 25%-30% Good Poor Remove Remove
3 24.2" 20'-25' 80% Good Good Save Save
4 32.0" 20'+ 75% Fair Poor Remove Remove
5 23.5" 15'-18' 15°6 Poor Poor Remove Remove
6 4.0", 5.2", 15' 90%-95% Good Poor Remove Remove
6.0", 8.4"
7 11.2" 16'-18' 90%-95% Good Good Save Save
8 15.4" 20' 75%+ Fair Good Save Save
9 10.5", 10.8", 20' 6096 Poor Poor Possibly Remove Remove
13.0"
10 14.4", 14.5" 25' + 7596 Good Good Save Save
11 11.0" 20' 80% Good Good Save Save
12 4.4", 4.9", 10' 100% Good Good Save Remove
5.8", 6.0"
11
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
14. The applicant shall retain an arborist during the grading and construction phases of the project
to ensure tree protection measures are implemented. The recommendations outlined in the
arborist report prepared for the project shall be followed.
Monitoring: Field inspection
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation, Community Development Departments
Timeframe: � During grading and construction
15. Protective fencing shall be installed around each tree to remain at the dripline, or as directed in
the field by the arborist. The fencing shall be installed prior to any site clearing or grading
activities, and shall remain in place until construction is complete, including landscaping. The
fence shall be a minimum of 4' tall and supported by stakes at least every 10' on center.
Weatherproof signs shall be permanently posted on the fences, stating the following:
Tree Protection Zone
No personnel, equipment, materials, or vehicles are allowed
Do Not move or remove this fence
[Name of arborist or consultant]
[Name and phone number of developer or general contractor]
16.
The Arborist of Record shall inspect the site prior to the start of any construction activities to
determine that adequate tree protection measures have been implemented.
Monitoring: Field inspection
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation, Community Development Departments
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
The arborist shall mark all trees to be removed with either colored ribbon or paint.
Monitoring:
Responsible Department:
Timeframe:
Field inspection
Parks & Recreation, Community Development Departments
Prior to issuance of grading permit
17
18
The applicant shall submit written reports prepared and signed by the arborist stating that all
tree protection measures have been met per the International Society of Arboriculture (1SA)
Guidelines.
Monitoring: Review of reports
Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation, Community Development Departments
Timeframe: Reports filed on a monthly basis commencing after issuance of
grading permit
Removal of the oak trees shall be replaced in-kind at a 3:1 ratio with a minimum size of 15-
gallon and planted on-site.
12
_ _ _ __ . __- -
_ __._�
Monitoring:
Responsible Department:
Timeframe:
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Development of the site with an office complex will not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans or
result in the wasteful use of non-renewable resources.
Analysis of Significance: No impact.
IX.
HAZARDS
The project does not pose an undue risk to project occupants or occupants of surrounding properties.
Analysis of Significance: No impact.
X
NOISE
The project is adjacent to an arterial street and there are no sensitive land uses within approximately 500 feet
of the project site. Therefore, operations are not expected to significantly increase ambient noise levels for
sensitive land uses. However, all operations shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Residual impacts
are )ess than significant, and no mitigation measures are required.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
XI.
PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed office development is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning for the site.
Adequate fire and police services exist in the community to serve the project. No housing is associated with
the project, and therefore no impact on schools would be generated by the project.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
XII.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The proposed project will not create a significant demand for new or altered power, gas, communication
systems, water treatment capacity or solid waste disposal. The project can tie into the existing infrastructure
for these systems to serve the site. The project is within the expected demand for these systems based on
the growth rate established in the General Plan.
Review landscape plans/Field inspection
Parks & Recreation Department
Prior to occupancy
Analysis of Signi�cance: Less than significant impact.
XIII. AESTHETICS
The project site is vacant and is highly visible from the Highway 101 corridor. The site contains several large
oak trees, but has not , been identified as a scenic resource within the community. The applicant has
submitted plans and elevations to the City for the purpose of design and architectural review. The
Architectural Review Committee (ARC) considered the project plans and determined that the proposed
architecture and selected colors and materials are acceptable.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
13
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A phase one archaeological surface survey was conducted on the site by Archaeologist Robert Gibson, and no
significant historic or prehistoric archaeological materials were found. Based on the survey, the proposed
project would not have a significant adverse impact on any known cultural resources.
However, if during construction excavation, any buried or isolated prehistoric cultural materials or historic
features are unearthed, work in that area shall halt until they can be examined by a qualified archaeologist and
appropriate recommendations made as outlined in CEaA. In such an event, Robert Gibson should be
contacted at (805) 238-5411, or the Community Development Department of the �ity of Arroyo Grande.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measure:
19. The following note shall be placed on the grading and improvement plans for the project:
"In the event that during grading, construction or development of the project, and
archeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be halted until the City has reviewed the
resources for their significance. If human remains (burials) are encountered, the County
Coroner (781-4513) shall be contacted immediately. The applicant may be required to provide
archaeological studies and/or mitigation measures."
Monitoring: Construction plans shall be reviewed prior to issuance of a
grading permit to ensure the note is in place.
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
XV. RECREATION
The proposed commercial development would not increase the demand for additional recreation facilities, and
therefore the project would not have an impact on recreational opportunities or resources.
Analysis of Significance: No impact.
14
ATTACHMENT A
Penfield � Smith
ENG�NEERS • SURVEYORS
101 EAST VICTORIA STREET
P.O. BOX 98
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93102
805-963-9532 � FAX 805-966-9801
2051 NORTH SOIAR DRIVE
SUITE 225
OXNARD. CALIFORNIA 93030
805-983-7499 • FAX 805-983-1826
W.O. 13,693.01
September 18, 2000
Mr. Gary White
Zaddie R. Bunker Trust
515 Windemere Lane
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
RECEI���
JAN 2 6 �001
CITY OF ARROYQ'�j'.Q'��r
COMMUNITY DEVELGNiviEi�T i;EPT.
SUBJECT: Camino Mercado Office Project, Arroyo Grande
Revised Traffic Analysis per City Comments August 15, 2000
Dear Mr. White:
Penfield & Smith (P&S) is pleased to submit this revised letter report to you for the
subject project. It is our understanding that you are planning to develop a property at
the intersection of Camino Mercado and West Branch Street in the City of Arroyo
Grande. The project consists of a 24,300 square foot professional �f.fice building. The
cunent site plan is presented in Exhibit 1.
Based on your discussions with City Staff, our task would be to conduct level of
service analyses for the four intersections identified by City staff, estimate the trip
generation for the project and assign the project trips to the local street system. The
following letter report and exhibits have been prepared to summarize our analysis and
findings with respect to these three items. The comments identified in the August 1 S,
20001etter from the City have been incorporated into this report.
COMMENTS ADDRE.SSED
The following information has been provided to address the timeframe for the base
traffic count data. The traffic count data used for the Camino Mercado Road
intersection with the NB Highway 101 ramps was collected in March 2000. The traffic
count data for the Brisco Road intersection was taken from counts collected in July of
1999. Adjustments to the cumulative project traffic generation were made to reflect
the dates for the base data. The portion of the development not occupied in the Five
Cities Center was added to the base data to account for the future traffic volumes for
both intersections. Upon closer review, the cumulative traffic volumes at the Camino
Mercado intersection were not reduced to reflect the development occupied since July
of 1999. The intersection levels of service represented in this report have been
updated. As a result of the reduced cumulative traffic volumes, no significant changes
in the cumulative intersection levels of service were found.
P�S
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 2
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
For signalized intersections, the unit of ineasurement for LOS is seconds of delay. This
delay measurement is summarized as an intersection average. The Highway Capacity
Manual (HCM-97) is used in the transportation profession to determine the
intersection operation and to compare future scenarios to existing conditions. The
following is a summary of the various levels of service and representative delay ranges
documented in the HCM-9'7 and used in this traffic analysis.
Level of Service Delay Ranges
LOS A
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
LOS F
0- 10 seconds per vehicle
10.1 - 20 seconds per vehicle
20.1 - 35 seconds per vehicle
35.1- 55 seconds per vehicle
55.1 - 80 seconds per vehicle
80.1 or more seconds per vehicle
Level of Senrice S'tandard
The City of Arroyo Grande minimum level of service (LOS) standard is LOS C, with
LOS D acceptable on a short-term basis provided that there is a funded and sched�led
improvement identified that will provide a minimum of LOS C when implemented.
Impact Significance Thresholds
The City of Arroyo Grande has adopted thresholds to assist in the determination of
when an impact is to be considered signif cant. For signalized intersections, the
following thresholds have been set.
- S�gaaiized Thresholds of Signficance
For Traffic Impact Studies
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
The focus of the intersection level of service analysis for this project is the Camino
Mercado/W,est Branch intersection and the.Brisco Road - Highway 101 interchange,
P �� S
�
For unsignalized intersections, a significant impact can be determined when the
additional project or project plus cumulative traffic decreases the intersection level of
service to D or below.
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 3
which consists of three signalized intersections functioning as one intersection. The
three intersections at the Highway 101 interchange include Brisco Road at West --
Branch, the Northbound 101 Ramps, and El Camuzo Real. The existing intersection
level of service for the Camino Mercado/West Branch intersection is based on traffic
counts collected in March of 2000. The traffc volumes for the Brisco Road and
Highway 101 interchange (shown in Table 1) were obtained from traf�c counts
collected in July 1999 with the traffic signal control and peak summer tr�c
conditions. The most recent PM peak hour traffic volumes for these intersections are
depicted on Exhibit 2.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), a nationally accepted guide for analysis and
capacity determination of intersections and other roadway features, was used to
analyze the operation of these signalized intersections. In this manual, the cancept of
delay at signalized intersections became the recommended measure of the
effectiveness of the operation of a traffic signal. This procedure provides a clear and
measurable picture of the actual operation at an intersection. The City has required
this intersection analysis procedure to be used in all traffic impact studies.
In addition due to the close spacing of the Brisco Road interchange traffic signals, a
traffic signal coordination program (Synchro 4.0) was used to evaluate the combined
operation of the three traffic signals. The resulting corridor operation showed that the
Brisco Road Interchange operates at LOS A during the PM peak hour.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
For the majority of the project, the land use code in the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Reference, 6� Edition, that most closely matches is
the General Office Building code. However, due to the size of the proposed office
building the ITE data would not reflect the conect trip making characteristics. The
ITE reference provides reasonable trip estimates for office buildings of less than
10,000 square feet and more than 100,000 square feet. For office buildings between
10,000 and 100,000 square feet the ITE data does not provide reasonable trip
generation data. The alternative trip generation source is the San Diego Tr�c
Generators published in July 1998. The ITE and San Diego tr�c generation
references both provide�good estimates of typical office trip making characteristics
depending on the size of the building. These characteristics include limited use of
alternative transportation modes, 8 AM - 5 PM work days, etc. For this project, the
P :o S
Table 1
Intersection Levels of Service
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 4
San Diego reference does provide a more reasonable estimate of the trip generation for
office buildings within this size range.
Based on the trip generation rates described by the San Diego reference, the project
would be expected to generate 486 daily trips, with 63 PM peak hour trips at the
project driveways. During the PM peak hour, 13 trips would be oriented toward the
site, with 50 trips leaving the site.
Although the proposed project is a professional office building, a portion of the
building located directly at the corner of Camino Mercado and West-Branch Street will
be used for light retail directed towazd the project itself (i.e. a snack bar, lunchroom,
etc.) This retail use is viewed as an accessory use to the office project and not as a
separate use. However it should be noted that if the retail space were viewed as a
separate use, the trip generation rate for the PM peak hour for both a commercial and
retail space is_the_same for a project of this size.
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBIITION
The primary interchange for project traffic to access the regional road system is the
Camino Mercado/W. Branch Street/Highway 101 rarnps for northbound traffic. The
primary interchange for southbound traffic would be the Oak Park Boulevard and
Brisco Road ramps. Based our experience in the City of Arroyo Grande, the. project
traffic was assigned to the local road system in the following manner. The project trips
are graphically depicted on Exhibit 3. .
• 40% northwest on US 101, using Camino Mercado and Oak Park Ramps
• 20% southeast on US 101, using Camino Mercado, Oak Park and El Camino Real Ramps
• 15% south on Oak Park Boulevard
• 15% north on Rancho Parkway
• 10% south on West Branch Street
For small projects, it is difficult to estimate the travel patterns (trip distribution with
less than 5 peak hour trips). Distribution of traffic flows at that level (less than 5
trips) cannot be reliably made with. certainty and is beyond that which is reasonable
traffic engineering practice. For this project, the number of PM peak hour trips
expected to be generated by this project would fall within this unreliable tr�c
assignment range at a concentration of 13% or less of the project office traffic. Based
on the small amount of retail trips, all of the retail project traffic falls within this area
of uncertainty. Therefore for this project, the assignment of ineasurable project traffic
beyond the West Branch Street intersections at Oak Park Boulevard and Brisco Road
is not technically reliable. With respect to the Brisco Road interchange, the project
has the potential to contribute traffic during some peak hours, on some days.
However, the amount of traffic that could potentially use the Brisco Road interchange
is technically immeasurable and would not regularly occur on a daily basis. The
Brisco Road interchange currently operates at LOS C or better during the weekday PM
peak hour.
�
P��D�S
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 5
The majority of the freeway oriented traffic for this project is assumed to use the
Camino Mercado/W. Branch Street/Highway 101 ramps or the 0ak Park Boulevard/
Highway 101 ramps. In general, the road system has sufficient capacity to absorb the
added traffic from the proposed project.
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT IN�ACTS
As requested by the City, an estimate of the potential impacts that the project may
have on the existing environment was performed. The project traffic was
superimposed on the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes and .the intersection level
of service/delays were recalculated. The results of this analysis are summarized in
Table 2.
��
As shown in Table 2, the addition of project traffic does not exceed the thresholds of
significance set by the City of Arroyo Grande. The Brisco Road interchange as a
system would continue to operate at LOS A with the addition of project related traffic.
BASELINE (2005) TRAFFIC VOLUMFS � "
As requested by the City, additional analysis of the project intersections was
performed using Baseline traffic volumes. Baseline traffic conditions forrn the basis
for assessing project specific intersection impacts. In this case, Baseline conditions
for this impact assessment were created by adding in the trip generation from the
approved and proposed projects identified by the City of Arroyo Grande that could be
constructed within the next five years. This list of projects is summarized in
Attachment A.
The trip generation for all of the project descriptions were calculated based on the
current ITE Trip Generation Reference, 6� Edition. In total, cumulative development
in the area expected to occur over the next five yeazs could add about 22,143 trips per
day including 2,093 trips during the PM peak hour to area roadways.
With the cumulative project traffic list, the intersection Level of Service calculations
were performed at the Camino Mercado/ West Branch intersection and the Brisco
Road Interchange. The intersection level of service worksheets area attached to this
report and are summariaed in Table 3. The Brisco Road interchange intersections will
continue to operate at LOS C or better. The level of service at the unsignalized
intersection Camino Mercado Road with West Branch is forecast to operate at LOS F.
P �� S
Table 2
Existiag Plus Project Levels of Service
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 6
Baseline Plus Proiect Traffic Volumes
PM peak hour intersection level of service at the Camino Mercado/ West Branch
intersection and the Brisco Road - Highway 101 interchange were calculated with the
addition of project traffic� to Baseline traffic conditions. The resulting plus project PM
peak hour level of service are summarized in Table 3. The cumulative level of service
remains at an acceptable level of service (LOS C or better) for each individual
intersection at the Brisco Road Interchange. The coordinated traffic signal system at
the Brisco Road interchange would continue to operate at LOS A during the PM peak
hour.
The operation of the unsignalized intersection at West Branch Street and Camino
Mercado is at LOS F with and without the project traffic. The additional project traffic
at the Camino Mercado intersection would result in a significant.impact. The
intersection level of service worksheets are attached to this report.
2020 CUMiJLATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMFS
To.deternrine the potential impact of ttie project at build out, the potential long term
development within the City of Arroyo Grande was estimated. The City of Arroyo
Grande provided a list of projects that are known that could be constructed within the
next 20 years. To account for the background growth and other projects not known, a
one percent per year growth factor was applied to the 2005 traffic volumes including
the project traffic. The list of projects that are expected to be developed over the nelct
20 years is summarized in Attachment B. The Arroyo Linda Crossroads project was
not included in this analysis due to it's size and separate environmental review.
The only roadway improvements assumed to occur at this time was the signalization
and minor roadway widening at the Camino Mercado/West Branch Street intersection
necessary to improve the 2005 Baseline traffic volume conditions to 1�OS C or better.
The resulting build out PM peak hour level of service for the both the Camino
Mercado/ West Branch intersection, as well as the Brisco Road - Highway 101
interchange are summarized in Table 4. The cumulative level of service remains at
acceptable levels on an average for the interchange and at all individuai intersections,
including the Camino Mercado/West Branch intersection.
P�S
_ __ -----
-- �- _ _
Table 3
Baseline (2005) Iatersectioa Levels of 3ervice
Mr. Gary White
September 18, 2000
Page 7
Table 4
Intersectioa Levels of Service
2020 Cumulative Trafflc Conditions
CONCLUSION
The Camino Mercado Office Project could generate up to 486 daily trips, including 63
during the PM peak hour. The project does not create any signficant impacts under
the existing plus project or cumulative (2020) plus project conditions. However, as the
intersection level of service analysis indicates, the Camino Mercado intersection at
West Branch Street will require signalization and minor roadway widening.
The following mitigation measures would reduce the project significant impacts to a
less than signif'icant level.
1. Payment of the Traffic Signalization Fees. The intersection of Canuno Mercado and
West Branch/NB 101 ramps is on the list of future signalized intersections for
which these fees are being collected.
2. Contribute a fairshare to the signalization and roadway widening at the Camino
Mercado and West Branch Street intersection. Based on the Baseline (2005) tr�c
volumes, the project would contribute 4% to the future traffic volumes at this
intersection. Based on a typical traf�c signal installation and roadway widenign
cost of $150,000, the project should contribute $6,000 toward the intersection
improvements.
If you have any further questions or need any additional information, please feel free
to contact me at (805) 963-9532.
Very truly yours,
PENFIELD & SMITH
Step e A. osz, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Principal Traffic Engineer
Attachments
�Rp��SS/p�
�Q�'�Q�`� N A � � o ��
a
y ti N C i
� "' No.12d9 r ' �
� �p, 3D �4 �
f �`� F �
_D� CA�.��
P�DS
The addition of project traffic at the four study area intersections does not change the
intersection levels of service nor create any significant impacts. The Brisco Road
coordinated traffic signal system would operate at LOS B conditions with and without
the project traffic under cumulative conditions during the PM peak hour.
1
! � f
, w i { 1 i
f.. ! I � a
Q ! � ! f ' � . 1
Z ; � ; : ; � a�.e ,:
W �� • , �
� 2 �� t }� ; • � ; j� � S t i} � � f i i
� Q �:`�� lt;��: �� �� �::. ��..} �� !; :'
i W : ' ! ! � �3 �! t t � S � : . ' t � •� � I t t l ; j : ; ; : i
�
� W . fl �.�i� 3 te;::�•_i;i+����
� �it ;�il�tii t:�:E:i
►f �' { _sii
� ��..�1 1 t A1 jv 't �1 t s t I:: • 1� � J �11��•��iJ1 1�11 P'�� ttl� f 17 Ill �� �s�
��!�� �u� � ���C-��ii�i:��C�G��i����::������� ��E����:���i�CC_�
�.
' ttR2:t
x �;L;�
? Q i:ii3
� � ;.�.�:ait.°�3�
. � ��
� �' ' ;`s;iiia3�
� � .:?�73�7a
�•
:
' y C � I =.
� �; * ��. O O �
3 t�:�'� 1 . 3 y� ��
C i '
�. ; �' . �/ � t Gl i { '�I � 1
.� . i �:•;f ' ' D � � �e I T. s�'
; � ri: �o u,
�
i;� �4 1}iS�� iO �. x' =
�•ee i t V �
� ��_ ,,, — p 1: � ) S � I i $ �. �-� _=�
..i...t. r
__ . _ .__�! '
;.,: ..�` _= ` ,_ �; -�;._--
. ���..:c;'•�' �i'�' '"+!
.^�::�`; ���.
%' � ��
. '. `• \ a�� \ �itt' ~�
,� . . ��Y� � �
.• " `� -�-� I �� .
� � �� �.�\��-���
. .. � .\�'\`�\�` '��\\��,�,
' `..'�:�.`.�'�>`\� .�
� . �' .\�` \�"
.''+'' 4 �� �`
" '� . �.` : �� ;;`..•'�. L
� �`. `�.\\ l i �`
.' \ �
:: ,�� �:\\� �-
— `�' ;�``'�\\_.\\�� • --
i '< � � � ; '•. `;\\. , \'�r
�� . i, �\`' .
i a ' �� I 1
� � I � _ /' i � � � � � � } '�-�., ^"
'�� �!I ; /' � f ;�. .
���� n !� , `I;I� I -`�;,
'I '
l i I ' ,1: f �.rF—�-�•
\ `.,, . 1 r -+
., ` —
� � : � '"
_ ... •.% i'�� ,( 4 �\ �
. ,� ' ' j 1 �' _�•., ,
' . il , I � � t j ,�
� i
I'y' � ��
. , /� � � .-:-�-�
, I:! ..:;
, '; , � r `-! �= �� \_
, _.�`��--
��_:�_�
�
_ '�
N •'• ; � :t � S � , � i
z�'�3� ��,'}$�
a t� � ',;F .
��_ , ` ': 3
I �f
�I
�
�
s� „�
:; ��t
:�. _:
lll r ^
Q = :
G ' j s �+,
W A � °
<�: �
V � � � Y
tI7 S g
i _ 7 �$
�?'
-��ir
A�3�
� i .. � �
6 � A
lL i 'I � i
�
' - -------�-�---- � ---------------�•----- -----•-��--;:= _.:.:_.:::-.
�; -
' � e �
r e O
` � � � ��5� T
1 I �i�� l Q
i�o , .� _. ,�
�� i ��
� =_ ��
; s� R �: I
�� 3 3 � y� ;�
�� � . �;� !i
'• Y �� < 7�' .
i�
; �t Y�� 3� ; g ;i :.f
` j . i � w, 'I
�
M�
�� � ��
'�• •+
.� x:'1 ► �
�
S I i;
i� A �
�
I
� �.
�� �� ��
i, ., i �i
� '%_ � �
� � �` i
�
�
'�i
�
�
Q
J
�
C!3
�
a
c�7
r
a
�
�
a
�
�
�
/
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ms. Kelly Heffernon, City of Arroyo Grande
RECEIV�D
JAN 2 6 2001
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
Steve Orosz, Penfield & Smith
Traffic Signal Warrants — Camino Mercado at W. Branch Street
DATE: October 17, 2000 W.O. 13,693.01
We have completed the Caltrans Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for-the subject intersection.
The Caltrans Warrants evaluate 11 criteria when the installation of a traffic signal is being
considered. The satisfaction of ineeting a warrant is not necessarily the main reason for
installing a traffic signal. Other operational factors should be considered with these
warrants. The some of the warrants utilized traffic volume data over an eight-hour period.
At this time, four hours of data was available. Further, traffic accident data for the
intersection was not available at this time. The following are the results:of the preliminary
traffic signal warrant analysis.
Existing Existing + Future Future +
Proiect Proiect
Warrant 1— Minimum Vehicle Volume No No No No
Warrant 2— Interruption of Continuous Traffic No No No No
Warrant 3— Minimum Pedestrian Volume No No No No
Warrant 4— School Area No No . No No
Warrant 5— Progressive Movement Yes Yes Yes Yes
Warrant 6- Accident Experience No No No No
Warrant 7— Systems Warrant No No No No
Warrant 8— Combination of Warrants No No No No
Warrant 9— Four Hour Volume No No No No
Warrant 10 — Peak Hour Delay No No Yes Yes
Warrant 11 — Peak Hour Volume Yes Yes Yes Yes
1
P� S
Caltrans also offers guidance in areas when complete traffic volume data is not available.
The traffic signal warrants are based on estimated traffic volumes. A traffic signal could be
considered when all of these warrants are met.
ESTIMATED VOLUME WARRANTS
Existing Existing + Future Future +
Proiect Proiect
Warrant 1— Minimum Vehicle Volume
Warrant 2— Interruption of�Continuous Traffic
Warrant 3— Combination of Warrants
Yes Yes
No No
No No
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Based on this analysis, a traffic signal is not technically warranted until the traffic volumes
represented by the future (existing + approved project) traffic volumes exist on the road
system. As these projects are approved, the installation of the traffic signal should be
seriously considered at this point in time.
2 P�S
Penfield �Smith
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
101 EAST VICTORIA STREET
P.O. BOX 98
SANTA BARBARA, CA�IFORNIA 93102
805-963-9532 • FAX 805-966-9801
2051 NORTH SOLAR DRIVE
SUITE 225
OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030
805-983-7499 • FAX 805-983-1826
W.O. 13,693.01
January 24, 2001
RECElVED
Ms. Kelly Heffernon JAN 2 6 2001
Community Development Department
City of Arroyo Grande COMMUNIIY DEVE 0 MENT DEPT.
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Subject: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-013, Camino Mercado at West
Branch Street, City of Arroyo Grande
Dear Ms. Heffernon:
Penfield & Smith (P8aS) is pleased to submit this letter summarizing the information
requested for the traffic signal to be located at the intersection of Camino Mercado and
West Branch Street.
The City has asked us to determine what, if any, roadway improvements would be
required with the installation of a traffic signal at this location. Previously, we had
prepared a traffic study that indicated that due to projects that have been approved by
the City and assumed to be constxucted within a 5-year period of tin�e, this
intersection would operate at an unacceptable level of service. The additional traffic
associated with the proposed project does not change the need for signalization or
additional roadway improvements.
Attached to this letter is the previous tr�c study dated September 18, 2000 and the
traff'ic signal warrant analysis dated October 17, 2000. Subsequently, we have
obtained and field verified the roadway geometrics for the intersection and evaluated
the intersection operation. We found that based on the traffic volumes generated by
the cunently approved projects within the City and the proposed project, the operation
of the intersection as presently configured (no roadway widening) will operate within
acceptable limits with a traffic signal. Refer to Attachment C and the level of service
worksheet.
F�irther, we evaluated the effect of the future traffic volumes (volumes associated with
pending projects and other projects planned to occur beyond a 10-year period of time).
Based on the forecast future volumes, the portion of West Branch north-west of
Camino Mercado (project frontage) will need to be widened by 12 feet to provide two
travel lanes westbound. Refer to Attachment D and level of service worksheet.
P�S
Ms. Kelly Heffernon
January 24, 2001
Page 2
Based on this analysis, a traff'ic signal can be installed at the intersection of Camino
Mercado and West Branch Street and will operate efficiently (within acceptable levels
of service) for approximately 5-8 years. At some point in time beyond that, the traffic
signal operation would require minor modification and roadway widening as shown in
Attachment D.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly.
Very truly yours,
PENFIELD & SMITH
�ti� .
Step en A. Orosz, P.E.
Principal Traffic Engineer
Enclosures
cf. Mr. Gary White
Mr. Stephen Cool
Q �pFESSip
Q �i� ��N A. � ��
� � Q 9 �N y 2
C� No. RCE 36995 m
� ����� �
s�. c�vt� 0 ��,�Q
�F CA��F
,
� �.� ► OQ� ► �N A. p, 9 �
��,, �� �,
� "' No.1209 r `
W .. /� . �� �,
CZ �,M I'•' O
i'•�.r.'�
�AaFF��
P� S
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Camino Mercado-W Branch 5c + P.hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado at W. Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO Proj #: 13693.01
Date: 7/6/2000 Period: 5-Year Cumulative + Project
E/W St: W.Branch Street N/S St: Camino Mercado
SI(
Eastbound
L T R
3NALIZED INTERSE(
Westbound
L T R
;TION SUMMARY
Northbound
L T R
Southbound
L� T R
No . Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
LGConfig L TR L TR L T R L TR
Volume 27 689 0 283 679 1 334 80 62 15 66 26
Lane Width 12.0 16.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 0 0 � 0 0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A A
Thru A A Thru A A
Right A A Right A A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.0 19.0 14.0 3.5 10.5 6.5
�Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 73.5 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 96 1770 0.28 0.054 35.0- C
TR 775 2111 0.89 0.367 34.6 C 34.6 C
Westbound
L 337
TR 1694
Northbound_
L 433
T 431
R 668
Southbound
L 86
TR 158
1770 0.84 0.190 48.3 D
3774 0.40 0.449 11.6 B
1770 0.77 0.245 34.7 C
1863 0.19 0.231 22.9 C
1583 0.09 0.422 12.8 B
22.4 C
29.8 C
1805 0.17 0.048 34.6 C
1784 b.58 0.088 37.7 D 37.3 D
Intersection Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Camino Mercado-W Branch 2020 + Pro'ect.hcs Pa e 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado at W. Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO Proj #: 13693.01
Date: 7/6/2000 Period: 2020 Base + Project
E/W St: W.Branch Street N/S St: Camino Mercado
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R I L T R
1 1 0
L TR
' 30 695 0
12.0 16.0
0
1 2 0
L TR
325 680 5
12.0 14.0
0
1 1 1
L LT Et
385 95 70
12.0 12.0 12.0
0
I Southbound
' L T R
1 1 0
L TR
15 75 30
12.0 12.0
0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations .
Phase Combination 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A A SB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right A A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 3.0 7.5 24.5 13.0 6.0
Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Al1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 70.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
1787 0.88 0.207 52.4 D
3771 0.40 0.457 10.6 B
1770 0.76 0.186 37.6 D
1817 0.68 0.186 32.3 C
1583 0.11 0.393 13.6 B
Eastbound
L 77 1787 0.39 0.043 35.9 D
TR 739 2111 0.94 0.350 48.5 D 48.0 D
Westbound
L 370
TR 1724
Northbound.
L 329
LT 337
R 622
Southbound
L 155
TR 154
Approach
Delay LOS
24.0 C
32.3 C
1805 0.10 0.086 29.8 C
1801 0.68 0.086 43.4 D 41.7 D
Intersection Delay = 34.0 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = C
Penf"ield �Smith
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
101 EAST VICTORIA STREET
P.O. BOX 98
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93102
805-963-9532 • FAX 805-966-9801
W.O. 13,693.01
January 24, 2001
2051 NORTH SOLAR DRIVE
SUITE 225
OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030
805-983-7499 • FAX 805-983-1826
RECEIVED
Ms. Kelly Heffernon JAN 2 6 2001
Community Development Department CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
City of Arroyo Grande COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Subject: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-013, Gamino Mercado at West
Branch Street, City of Arroyo Grande
Dear Ms. Heffernon:
Penfield & Smith (P&S) is pleased to submit this letter summarizing the information
requested for the tr�c signal to be located at the intersection of Camino Mercado and
West Branch Street.
The City has asked us to determine what, if any, roadway improvements would be
required with the installation of a traffic signal at this location. Previously, we had
prepared a traffic study that indicated that due to projects that have been approved by
the City and assumed to be constructed within a 5-year period of tirne, this
intersection would operate at an unacceptable level of service. The additional traffic
associated with the proposed project does not change the need for signalization or
additional roadway improvements.
Attached to this letter is the previous traffic study dated September 18, 2000 and the
traffic signal warrant analysis dated October 17, 2000. Subsequently, we have
obtained and field verified the roadway geometrics for the intersection and evaluated
the intersection operation. We found that based on the tr�c volumes generated by
the currently approved projects within the City and the proposed project, the operation
of the intersection as presently configured (no roadway widening) will operate within
acceptable limits with a traffic signal. Refer to Attachment C and the level of service
worksheet.
�.irther, we evaluated the effect of the future traffic volumes (volumes associated with
pending projects and other projects planned to occur beyond a 10-year period of time).
Based on the forecast future volumes, the portion of West Branch north-west of
Camino Mercado (project frontage) will need to be widened by 12 feet to provide two
travel lanes westbound. Refer to Attachment D and level of service worksheet.
P '�'S
Ms. Kelly Heffernon
January 24, 2001
Page 2
Based on this analysis, a tr�c signal can be installed at the intersection of Camino
Mercado and West Branch Street and will operate efficiently (within acce�table levels
of service) for approximately 5-8 years. At some point in time beyond that, the traffic
signal operation would require minor modification and roadway widening as shown in
Attachment D.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly.
Very truly yours,
PENFIELD 8v SMITH
'!��
Step en A. Orosz, P.E.
Principal Traffic Engineer
Enclosures
cf. Mr. Gary White
Mr. Stephen Cool
Q �QFESS/p 'Y
� Q ,�tiN A• �q �`y
y �� �� �i
C7 � Nn. RCE 36995 N m
� E� `��� �
* �
s�. Civ«, o ��,�Q
�F CA�\F
( h •� h� �\
y
� �' No.1209 r'
W �/
GC � f(•
fqaFF�a
�
HCS-Signals 3.2 File :Cami__� Mercado-W Branch 5c + P.hc� Page 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado at W. Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO Proj #: 13693.01
Date: 7/6/2000 Period: 5-Year Cumulative + Project
E/W St: W.Branch Street N/S St: Camino Mercado
No. Lanes
LGConf ig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
L T R
1 1 0
L TR
27 689 0
12.0 16.0
0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound Northbound
L T R I L T R
1 2 0
L TR
283 679 1
12.0 14.0
0
1 1 1
L T R
334 80 62
12.0 12.0 12.0
� 0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A A Thru
Right A A Right
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A A Thru
Right A A Right
Peds Peds
NB Right A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
1770 0.84 0.190 48.3 D
3774 0.40 0.449 11.6 B
1770 0.77 0.245 34.7 C
1863 0.19 0.231 22.9 C
1583 0.09 0.422 12.8 B
Green 4.0 19.0 14.0 3.5 10.5 6.5
Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 73.5 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 96 1770 0.28 0.054 35.0- C
TR 775 2111 0.89 0.367 34.6 C 34.6 C
Westbound
L 337
TR 1694
Northbound
L 433
T 431
R 668
Southbound
L 86
TR 158
Southbound
L T R
1 1 0
L TR
15 66 26
12.0 12.0
0
6 7 8
A
A A
A . A
A
A
22.4 C
29.8 C
1805 0.17 0.048 34.6 C
1784 0.58 0.088 37.7 D 37.3 D
Intersection Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = C
HCS-Signals 3.2 File:Cami..o Mercado-W Branch 2020 + Pr��ect.hcs Page 1
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: Camino Mercado at W. Branch City/St: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO Proj #: 13693.01
Date: 7/6/2000 Period: 2020 Base + Project
E/W St: W.Branch Street N/S St: Camino Mercado
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbour
L T R L T R L T R L T
No . Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
LGConfig L TR L TR L LT R L TR
Volume 30 695 0 325 680 5 385 95 70 15 75 30
Lane Width 12.0 16.0 12.0 14.0 12.0.12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0
Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations •
Phase eombination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A A SB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right A A EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 3.0 7.5 24.5 13.0 6.0
Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Al1 Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 70.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 77 1787 0.39 0.043 35.9 D
TR 739 2111 0.94 0.3�50 48.5 D 48.0 D
Westbound
L 370 1787 0.88
TR 1724 3771 0.40
Northbound
L 329 1770 0.76
LT 337 1817 0.68
R 622 1583 0.11
Southbound
L 155 1805 0.10
TR 154 1801 0.68
Intersection Delay = 34.0
0.207 52.4 D
0.457 10.6 B 24.0 C
0.186 37.6 D �
0.186 32.3 C 32.3 C
0.393 13.6 B
0.086 29.8 C
0.086 43.4 D 41.7 D
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
0
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Ms. Kelly Heffernan, City of Arroyo Grande
Steve Orosz, Penfield & Smith
JAN 2 6 2001
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Warrants — Camino Mercado at W. Branch Street
DATE: October 17, 2000 W.O. 13,693.01
We have completed the Caltrans Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: for fhe:.subject.inter.section.
The Caltrans Warrants evaluate 11 criteria when the installation of a'tra�c signal is being
considered. The satisfaction of ineeting a warrant is not necessarily the main reason for
installing a traffic signal. Other operational factors should be considered with these
warrants. The some of the warrants utilized traffic volume data over an eight-hour period.
At this time, four hours of data was available. Further, traffic accident data for the
intersection was not available at this time., The following are the� results of:the pceliminary
traffic signal warrant analysis.
Existing Existing + Future Future +
Proiect Proiect
Warrant 1— Minimum Vehicle Volume No No No No
Warrant 2— Interruption of Continuous Traffic No No No No
Warrant 3— Minimum Pedestrian Volume No No No No
Warrant 4— School Area No No . No No
Warrant 5— Progressive Movement Yes Yes Yes Yes
Warrant 6- Accident Experience No No No No
Warrant 7— Systems Warrant No No No No
Warrant 8— Combination of Warrants No No No No
Warrant 9— Four Hour Volume No No No No
Warrant 10 — Peak Hour Delay No No Yes Yes
Warrant 11 — Peak Hour Volume Yes Yes Yes Yes
1
P� S
Caltrans also offers guidance in areas when complete traffic volume data is not a�ailable.
The traffic signal warrants are based on estimated traffic volumes. A traffic signal could be
considered when all of these warrants are met.
ESTIMATED VOLUME WARRANTS
Existing Existing + Future Future +
Proiect Proiect
Warrant 1— Minimum Vehicle Volume Yes Yes Yes Yes
Warrant 2— Interruption of Continuous Traffic No No Yes Yes
Warrant 3— Combination of Warrants No No Yes Yes
Based on this analysis, a traffic signal is not technically warranted until the traffic volumes
represented by the future (existing + approved project) traffic volumes.exist on the road
system. As these projects are approved, the installation of #he traffic signal should be
seriously considered at this point in time.
2 P �� S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Kelly Heffernon, City of Arroyo Grande
FROM: Steve Orosz, Penfield & Smith V'
SUBJECT: Traffic Study — Camino Mercado at W. Branch Street
DATE: November 10, 2000
W.O. 13,363.01
We have received your letter dated October 27, 2000 and need=to point ;o�t some errors in
your letter.
The technical level of service calculations are correct. The traffic volumes depicted on
Exhibit 2 in the traffic study for the Camino Mercado intersection were rotated by mistake.
(A corrected copy is attached.) The attached intersection level of secvice sheets show the
latest values for the intersection operating conditions for existing and :existing plus project
analysis scenarios. The results indicate that the project does not significantly impact this
intersection under the existing conditions analysis scenario.
We have made finro requests of Craig Campbell to provide the existing base maps or as-
builts for the Camino Mercado/US 101 northbound ramp intersection: Once we obtain
these maps, we can address the specific details associated with the traffic signal
installation.
cf. Stephen Cool, Project Coordinator
Gary White, Project Applicant
�.
� ;i11,-�.• �.7 .ii l�l
�
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Stephen A. Orosz, P.E.
Penfield & Smith
101 E. Victoria Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Phone: 805-963-9532 Fax: 805-966-9801
E-Mail: sao@penfieldsmith.com
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Intersection: Camino Mercado At W. Branch St
City/State: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO
Project No.: 13693.01
Time period Analyzed: PM Peak
Date: Existing Conditions
East/West Street: W. Branch Street
North/South Street: Camino Mercado/NB 101 Ramp
Worksheet 2- Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
� Eastbound � Westbound � Northbound � Southbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R � L T R
I I I I
Volume 124 395 �133 354 1 1288 0 11 10 22 25
$ Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
0
Configuration L T L TR L TR
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate 24 395 133 355 288 11
$ Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 2 2 2
Opposing-Lanes 2 2 2
Conflicting-lanes 2 2 2
Geometry group 5 5 5
Duration, T 1.00 hrs.
Worksheet 3- Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane 24 395
Left-Turn 24 0
Right-Turn 0 0
Prop. Left-Turns 1.0 0.0
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0
Prop. Heavy Vehic1e0.0 0.0
Geometry Group . 5
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 0.0
133
133
0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
355
0
1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
0.2
-0.6
1.7
-0.0
288
288
0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
LT
1.00
22
0
R
1.00
25
0
2
2
2
5
Southbound
L1 L2
11 22 25
0 0 0
11 0 25
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
5 5
0.2 0.2
-0.6 -0.6
1.7 1.7
-0.6 0.0 -0.6
Worksheet 4- Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow rate 24 395 133 355 288 11
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.02 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.26 0.01
hd, final value 6.65 6.45 6.58 6.37 7.16 6.36
x, final value 0.04 0.71 0.24 0.63 0.57 0.02
Move-up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3
Service Time 4.3 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1
Worksheet 5- Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rate 24 395 133 355 288 11
Service Time 4.3 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.9 4.1
Utilization, x 0.04 0.71 0.24 0.63 0.57 0.02
Dep. headway, hd 6.65 6.45 6.58 6.37 7.16 6.36
Capacity 274• 549 383 553 483 261
Delay 9.65 24.28 11.38 19.69 19.37 9.19
LOS A C B C C A
Approach:
Delay 23.44
LOS C
Intersection Delay 19.55
17.43 18.99
C C
Intersection LOS C
Southbound
Ll L2 ,
22 25
3.20 3.20
0.02 0.02
7.63 7.03
0.05 0.05
2.3
5.3 4.7
Southbound
L1 L2
22 25
5.3 4.7
0.05 0.05
7.63 7.03
272 275
10.71 10.09
B B
10.38
B
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Stephen A. Orosz, P.E.
Penfield & Smith
101 E. Victoria Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Phone: 805-963-9532 Fax: 805-966-9801
E-Mail: sao@penfieldsmith.com
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Intersection: Camino Mercado At W. Branch St
City/State: Arroyo Grande
Analyst: SAO
Project No.: 13693.01
Time period Analyzed: PM Peak
Date: Existing Conditions + Project
East/West Street: W. Branch Street
North/South Street: Camino Mercado/NB 101 Ramp
Worksheet 2-.Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
� Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
Volume J25 395 (133 355 1 128$ 2 11 115 42 25 I
$ Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Configuration L T L TR L TR LT R
PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flow Rate 25 395 133 356 288 13 57 25
$ Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Opposing-Lanes 2 2 2 2
Conflicting-lanes 2 2 2 2
Geometry group 5 5 5 5
Duration, T 1.00 hrs.
Worksheet 3- Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane 25 395
Left-Turn 25 0
Right-Turn 0 0
Prop. Left-Turns 1.0 0.0
Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0
Prop. Heavy Vehic1e0.0 0.0
Geometry Group 5
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 0.0
133 356
133 0
0 1
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
5
0.2
-0.6
1.7
0.2 -0.0
288 13
288 0
0 11
1.0 0.0
0.0 0.8
0.0 0.0
5
0.2
-0.6
1.7
0.2 -0.5
57 25
15 0
0 25
0.3 0.0
0.0 1.0
0.0 0.0
5
0.2
-0.6
1.7
0.1 -0.6
WorksheeL 4- Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow rate 25 395 133 356 288 13
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
x, initial 0.02 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.26 0.01
hd, final value 6.83 6.63 6.77 6.57 7.32 6.62
x, final value 0.05 0.73 0.25 0.65 0.59 0.02
Move-up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3
Service Time 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.3 5.0 4.3
Worksheet 5- Capacity and Level of Service
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
Flow Rate 25 395 133 356 288 13
Service Time 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.3 5.0 4.3
Utilization, x 0.05 0.73 0.25 0.65 0.59 0.02
Dep. headway, hd 6.83 6.63 6.77 6.57 7.32 6.62
Capacity 275 533 383 537 473 263
Delay 9.87 26.47 11.72 21.21 20.25 9.48
LOS A D B C C A
Approach:
Delay 25.48 18.63 19.78
LOS D C C
Intersection Delay 20.65 Intersection LOS C
Southbound
L1 L2
57 25
3.20 3.20
0.05 0.02
7.78 7.12
0.12 0.05
2.3
5.5 4.8
Southbound
L1 L2
57 25
5.5 4.8
0.12 0.05
7.7$ 7.12
307 275
11.57 10.19
B B
11.15
B
Z�
Z =
�
A�
'a
N��y
A ��
<
0 � A
�
ELM ST
c�
�
0
/ �a �
' �9 �v � r
�� �\ 9 ``
s > �'y �� 1 � r�i o
b `,� �
�
•� �
�
� 3
�
` 0 2
�
� �
.` � `
� . �O ,�
�
� ` �O �
..
z
�
\
ST
/
����1
.
.F � � e<
�
�'---- ------------- ---'
� � �
� 9 ,�
`�
�
� Q�
O y �
7C � A�♦ � ` �
� � � �` ���
ti � ` �
♦
♦
Q ♦
♦
♦`
, `♦
.
�
.,
,,
,
.�
0
D
�
Z
O
�
m
�
O
D
v
0
0
0
s
�
m
�
A
� 'p
0�3
�n�
�o��
�mci
N -�v�7DQ
b \ fJ� ,N
� �
� St
'-zz
w w� �/`
r
\<�� a�'
� �*�!�
. /�
w� �o v
> ,� �I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTPT�ON AND HOUSING AGENCY
ATTACHMENT B
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REC�IVED
50 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-5415
TELEPHONE: (805) 549-3111
TDD (805) 549-3259
http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist05
December 6, 2000
Ms. Kelly Heffernon
City of Arroyo Grande Planning Department
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Dear Ms. Heffernon:
DEC 0 7 2000
��� � A �RaYO GRANDE
COMMUNiI'Y DEVELppMENT DEPT.
5-SLO-101-13.0/ 14.0
Branch/Camino Mercado
Cond. Use Permit #99-013
Caltrans District 5 staff has reviewed the above-referenced document. The
following comments were generated as a result of the review:
1. Based on ramp volumes alone from 1996 and 1999 (attached) for the State
Route 101 ramps at West Branch Street, these facilities would meet
warrants for signalization. Given these volumes, it is highly unlikely that the
adjacent City Street (West Branch) would not also meet warrants. Therefore,
the City should collect fair share traffic impact fees from all developments
that will impact this intersection. _ These fees should be earmarked for the
eventual installation of signals. The City should also be advised that
because the need for signalization is development driven, Caltrans would not
participate in funding their installation.
2. It is unclear what roadway modifications, if any will be needed with the
installation of signals at this location. This issue can be examined more
closely when the signals are in the design phase. AddYtionally, it is unclear
at this time, what actions will take place at the Brisco Road/Route 101
Interchange. One option currently being discussed includes the closing of
both northbound off and on ramps. District staff believes this modification
would divert a substantial amount of traffic to the West Branch/Camino
Mercado/ 101 intersection. This diversion would be a factor to consider
when evaluating the need for roadway modifications.
Kelly Heffernon
December 6, 2000
Page 2
I hope this letter gives your agency a better understanding of Caltrans concerns
with this development. Please contact me at 549-3683 if you have questions or
comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincere ,
Newland, AICP
District 5
Intergovernmental Review Coordinator
A��a.cr,rr�ent:
r
0
�
a
ct
N-
O
.'7
H
ro
m
�
y x ro y
n a n n
m � o a
� q} rn �'
a �- �'
�, r-
(D n
�
ft
a
rr
r•
O
�
C'�l H C�1 C'�7
x p x x
� � � �
N � N r
�. p. �. �..
N N (D N
0 0 � �
�' `� �' w
rt �
C) �
O O O
x
p o G
�' ` m
�
�n
x
ro
th
k
N
� W �
W �
O N
.a
x
w
r
m
w
o z� ro
� �
� �
H �
o �
l0 O
� �
w o
o r
� �
t--� t-+
�o �
l0 l0
J 01
�
ro
0
H
H
H
H
r
C�J
v
m
rt
a
F�-
N
�
N
r
C
(D
�
N-
C�
N
(D
x
O
G
H
N
�
�
0
G
p
f'h
x
�
ro
0
�
H
0
H
3
w
N
cn
N
O
c�
�
r
H
�
z
�
H
�
"�J
�l
H
(7
c
0
r
C
3
['�]
�
3��� d N N N N F-� F-' , ' F-� F-� F-' F-� F-` I--� t0 OD �l 61 U'i J� W N H �"'' �C
a W N I--� O l0 ao �. Al U'i � W N F+ O I I I 1 I I I 1 I ��
ro ro ro ro � I 1 1 I t I I I i I I I I I I� �O Oo J 61 (n � W N F-� ��
m N m m NNNN [v�r-�r��ri--��ro
w a a a y � W N I� O �D 00 J dl Cn a W N F-�
x x x x a
ya�yx w �
a G a � ~'
rn fi rn ri
M M
N- r-
(� C�
f..+ F.�+ N r F� N N N N N k-' F-' F-` �
J I-` �I 1--� W ao �] Cn Oo Oo W(n F� F-' l0 O� W� H
�J ( �, � � OD W J 61 W(,Jt CJ� lp N Cn N�P 00 00 O O O O O O.O O O O �
Ul OD OD N rU � � � Y � � � Y � � � � � � ' O � .
N ' O
r p ap i--� N N N N N N h-• f--� h-� i--� f--� N r (7
v ap N N W�1 O�P H` 00 (J� O O 01 l0 �1 N 61 O� 61 N y
N 1 N 1 W F'' 00 a1 W F'' O N(!� N I--� (n � l0 J J N O(Ji Ol 41 W�l �1 61 y
N OD N lfl � � y � � � � � � � � � � � � ,T� � � � � � � � � � OD (�p
N O
f, p pp F-� F-� N N N N N I--� F-� F-+ F' F-+ N H' � (�
J OD �p N�A �l O W I-' � 61 � W F-� aD OD �l (1� �l F-� �P �I F-' F-� H
N I N I N � W a1 N 61 N N O W(n I--� F-� �a OD (T� I--� 0� F-' (n (Jt Cn �] �l I--� $
N OD F-+ l0 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ',T� � � � � � � � � � t0 Q.
�, N p h+ N N N[v N N N F--� N h-� � N r �
�l F-' N F-' W�I O 61 1-' U� W N N OD l0 l0 W�P 61 �P 61 N H
N I F-� I �P J l0 O��] N l0 O�A W F-� W N O Cn lfl W(n J� �1 �P J a1 00 H
lD W N N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � O G
F+ r � F-' I--' N N N N N N N I--` F-` F-' F-' F--' O
O� F-' �] �P �n OD F--` ��l 61 N�l F-' O F-` J U'� W�l N 01 F-' H
N I I-� 1 01 W W U7 Cn l0 �l 01 61 N O l0 N Ol F' N W 01 �l QO N �P U'� �l 00 rr�
� � o�iN � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � y � � � � � � � � � � N-
N O
N �..� J F-' h-' N N N N N N N N I--� F-� 1--` (�
N N (� N 01 OD O W O N N N W W W O(J� N O OD W F--` 1--' F-' N y
N 1 N 1 OD ��-' Ol l� O N N CTt �P �P Ut 00 �P O O� O N W N�l a0 O�P �
0� W iA N � � � � � � � � � � � � Y Y Y ,� � � Y � � � � � � N ft
N O
� � tv �� iv r i--� i--� � r�►-� � r-� C]
J I--� �A F� W Cn �l N 61 O lD lD �A 00 �l �] �l N N W 1-� F-� H
N I F-� I l0 61 �i F-` 61 �O F-' F�' l0 O Ol 00 N l0 61 I--� OD 61 dD l0 O 1-� Cn OD (I� (/�
�a � Y�������������y���������W �
F-' I--� 01 I--� F-� N N N F--� F-� N F-' F' F-� F-� F-' . O
�l F' l0 N Ol l0 N Ol �1 �P O l0 �] F-' 0� Ol fJ� 61 O 61 N h-' y �
N I t-+ I a� l0 �l W J� l0 01 � lfl I--� Cn O 01 l� l0 �I 61 CJ� a. (n O�A l0 O
Ol OD Ol N CT1 � � � � Y � � � � � � � � � �`J � � r b � � � � � � � �
. � -. � : � = � � � � ` N
�'S�("NS`�N NNN NNN
C7
F+�
fi
m
n
rt
N•
0
�
0
Fi�
C�
O
G
�
�
z
O
fi
f"f
�
� z W O
O�
�a
"h rt
N-
H O
o�
��
� �
n
ft
(�'i7
x �r
� �•
c� o
��
z
O
o p
Cn F'-
�
�
fi
�-
n
rt
� �
�
rt
�
� �
0 0
�'' G
rt
�
ro
�
m
M
r•
x
�' O
� �
. �
N �
ap f+.
��
m
� �
w
�a a o n
m m a H,
tn rt M
n .. N . r .
O O n
t�. �
fD iA
•• H rt
� ft
(D F'•
•• O
�
7d
A�
�
ro
n
O
�
�
(D
C�
rt
N-
0
�
ro
N
�
N
�
N
�1 O C
�
� � �
N � �
O F+ �
� � �
N O f't
� � .0
.. �
(n N '
cn o
0
0
v
fD
rt
a
~� n
N !�y
� y
N � F-�
c
m �'
�' y
�• �
C�
F- ' Ky
fD ray
x '-'
o �
G C
n O
� r
`C C
n �
O �
G �
�
rr
�
(D
ro
O
fi
rt
� 3�� d N� N N N F-� 1--' ' F-� F--� F-� F� h-' F� l0 40 �l 61 (I� �P W N F' F �
W N F--� O l0 00 61 (It � W N F-� O 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 ��
ro ro �'0 h7 � I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I F-' lfl 0� �l 61 (Jt �P W N F� � �
(D (D fD (D N N N N N 1--� F-� F-� F-� I--� F-' F-+ F-� I--� O
a a a a ,� �wcv�o�000�rnu,aw�v�
x� 7r 7c 7r o
H x H pC a
W G N G ~
M �"S �h fi
H� M
N• r-
� �
N O
N p pp F--` F-� � N N N N N I--` I-'- F-' I--` 1--� F+ � I-� n
J OO J� N W J O� F-� OD (I� O O 61 l0 J�P �l l0 �P 01 N I--' I--� H
N I F-' I iP I--' 00 61 W F+ O N Ut N F-� (I� �P 61 �P N W�] N�P CJ� O 00 �P 1--� H]
N OD W l0 (7 (7 (7 C� (7 (7 n C� (7 (7 C� C7 C7 � � Y � � � � � � � � � (T� N
�, . ;: � � � � � : � N
t�+��' � N•NNN � NN
d
N•
rt
m
n
�+
r-
O
�
O
M
n
0
G
p
�
z
O
�i
rt
�
�ODO
�w
� rr
r-
H O
O�
E �
a7 tn
� �
z �-
(7 'i7
x �+
� �-
��
z
O
O �J'
Cn h+-
�
ft
n
r-
Q
rt
� n
O G
�
rr
�
� �
o p
i'_' G
rt
(D
ro
n
m
�n
N•
x
ro
� o
,� �
• ,-r
� g
0o N.
� r
N
� r
m
w
r r r �
a w o �
� � C� I
m �n a i
� � �
c� •• r• i
0 0 �
�. �
m �
•• H i
� f
'� i
� I
`�
W
�
ro
�
0
�
�
m
�
rt
N-
0
�
�P W N I--�
�' Q. p. rt i •
d
a
�
H
O �
~ rt I
N F'' O W
o � �
d ro
a �
N . n
�, �.
� O
�.
N �j �
� c
� �
rn y
a
�
N
/ � � � � � � �
�'�] N ct cn o rt
�] rr � a cn C
F�• I�- ' �
H O n Cn N
O � rt cn o
O
Ev o
m
m u, cn c�
�ro o rt
x rr �
� F�-
� � O �
O
� ~ rt
N
ro
n
m
rn
N•
�
ro
� o
��
r
rt
0o N.
��
m
h7 �
W
r r r y
� � ° a a
m m a rn
cn rr rn
n •• N • N -
O o C�
a �
m cn
•• H rt
�c a
ro rt
m w
•• o
�
z
a
�
'�
�
0
�
�
m
n
rt
r•
0
�
0
m
rr
a
r• n
� �
y r
N y
r�
c z
m �'
]' y
N �
n
� �
m ,.�
� H
O �
G C
� O
�' r
'� c
��
o �
� �
�
rt
z
m
ro
0
n
rt
ro
a
w
m
�
�
���� d N N N N I--� F-� ' f-' F-� I--� I-� F-' f-� lD OD �l 61 (fl J� W N F �"'' �
p, w n� � o �o ao � s cn a w n� N o i � i i i i i i i �o m
ro ro ro ro � 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I F-' l4 00 �] Ol (J� �P W N!-� � �,a�
(D (D fD (D N N N N N 1-� 1--' I--' F� F� F-' F� F-' H' O
a w a a ,� �wn��o�oo�rncn�wcv�
7r7rxx o
•axyx a
a � a � ~'
M �"i i �
M M
F�• F'-
O Q
�
r-� r tv n
p� N �..� f-' F-� N N W N F-� H` N I--' y
� � ap � F-' W l0 � l0 �l O N F-' W� 00 N lD O O O O O O O O O O O '�
F� �l lD N rU � � � � � � � � � � � � � O �
O
J N N N F-� 1--� N W F-� W N N N N F-� � N H
1 I N �' � N� N lp W�] N�(Ii W I--� l0 l0 00 O J N O O O O F-� y
wm�t � ��Jy���3y�Y����9yy���������a�o c
0
~ � W 1-' i-� N N� N N W N N I--� F-� F-� N N H
Cn J N
I 1 OD � O(J� �1 O F� W�A l0 l0 ��a � OD Q1 W N l0 Ol F-� O W O O O �"
W I--� N O
l� 41 lD 00 � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � � � � � � � � t� Q,
0
� o w n
F-� f' N N W I--' W N N N I--� I--� F-� F-� N H�
�j � j N a Cn W O1 W W� J�t F-� O W W O F-� N N�P N O O O F-' I--' y
�rnn � ���Y������ Jy�����Y�������o �
0
~ O � 1-+ F-� � N N�P N W N N N N I� F-� N F--� F-� H
OD l0 W
I I O �� N N W l0 �l l0 �l W N l0 6l 00 O W 61 �.1 O O O O I-+ N ray
�A 1--� N F-'
l0 l0 O O � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ,b � � � � .b � � � � F-' N.
0
,.._, ,._, ,p n
00 F-' 61 N N(J� W W 61 N W I--' W W I--� F-' I--' F--' F--' H
� � ,p 40 N l0 Cn �l 00 Cn O�� H' 00 0� I--' F-' N �P O O F-' O O N�P (/�
00 l0 O� N � � � � � � � � � Y � � � � � 'fJ � � � � � � � � � N f1'
O
� � � n
Ol O O N F--� N W N� N N N N N W I--� F-' �-' H
I I (n �l 00 �] Cn N 01 l0 Cn W(n OD 00 l0 � Cn W N Cn I--� O O N Y� O (/�
(J7 �l �P 1--� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � W �
O
� o w n
cn � � � � w W [v a � � � r � i--� � � H
i I �o ►-���cn�oaar-��rnrn�o���cn��iv000w� �
� rn � w t� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � y � � � � � � � � � � p
v
r•
fi
m
n .
rt
w
0
�
O
M
C�
O
G
�
rt
z
O
n
rt
7
�o
za
ft
:h O
��
OD N
� �
Zn
x 'i3
� rt
C'� N-
� O
�
H
z
O
o t7
cn W
�
rr
h
r•
n
rt
� n
O G
�
rt
�
r �
o p
� �
rt
N
ro
n
m
M
W
k
�-' O
� �
rt
W
O �-
��
m
z �
w
� r r y
� � Cl W
� m a rn
tn rt rn
� •• r • N •
� o �
. �
� �
y rt
�t a
� ('f
fD F'•
.. �
�
a
�
b
�
O
�
�
fD
C)
rt
F�•
O
�
o � _o
lp N rt
. �
N O �'F
�P U'� L'
. �
Ut N •
cn o
0
0
0
N
�
a
"' c�
r �
N y
N �
c
m �'
�' y
�• �
n
N �
N rr�
� H
o �
G C
� O
�r
`< c
��
O �
G �
�
rt
�
m
ro
0
ri
rt
ro
a
W
�
�
U'i
���� � N N N N I--' F-' �. .' H' 1--' I-� I--� F-' F-� l0 OD J 01 U7 �P W N H lp �
p, w�v�o�ow rncn�w�v�o i i i i i i��� �o w
ro ro ro ro K i i i i i i i i i i i i i i�� w � rn cn ,� w�v � rn �
fD (D (D fD N N N N N I--� 1--� I--' I--� I--� I--� 1--� 1--� I--� O �
a a a a y � w tv � o� oo � rn cn a w n> �
7�' i�' 7C 7C o
y x y x �
N G N � ~
rh n rh ft
M M
N- r-
� �
O
� o w c�
� oo � f-' F-' i--� �' w t-' w N N tv ���� r H
1 I W I OD Cn 61 N l0 W�l N� U'i W�� 01 �I O� �l N 1--� O O W F y
W o0 �l l4 (� (� (� C] (� C] C] C� C� (� C� C� C� Y � y�� ������ Y Cn (�p
O
r•
h
m
C�
rr
N-
O
�
O
M
c�
0
G
�
rt
z
O
n
rt
�
zr
zw
f'f
:h O
E�
U� N
� �
O
zn
xro
� rt
c� �•
� o
�
H
z
0
o p�
cn �-
�
rt
�
r-
n
rt
�
O G
�
rt
�C
� �
O p
� �
rr
m
ro
n
m
rn
�•
x
ro
r p
�
w
rr
o �.
��
m
z �
w
r r r y
� � c a
(D (D W M
UJ r+ M
n .. f+. N.
O O (�
a �
m tn
•• H t"t
�t a
ro rt
co N-
•• o
�
z
w
�
�
c�
0
�
�
m
�
�
N-
0
�
O N 'O
���
cn o r-r
�P U'I rC
. �
Cn N �
Cn O
0
O
v
m
�
w
�' c�
� �
y r
N y
� �
c
m �'
� y
�• �
n
F-� rrf
fD r�
� H
o �
G C
� O
�r
'< c
� �
o �
G �
�
rt
z
m
�
0
n
rt
ro
a
�
m
�
rn
a W N F-�
� p. p. rt i
v
a
�
H
O �
rr
�
cNn w' � a
O y �
x
o ro
a �
N- n
�, �.
� o
Q.
� N
W c
rn �p
� n
a
W
m
�" z r
b7 O
za
rr
'''�l F'•
�1 O
�
�
. d
b7 N
� �
zn
xro
��
c� N-
� o
�
H
z
O
o c7
cn F�•
�
rt
ri
F�-
C�
rt
t'' O
� G
�
rt
�
N �
O p
� �
rr
fD
ro
n
m
�n
�
� o
� �
ct
W
o N-
,p N
(�
z �
w
r r r y�
� � � a
m m w �n
cn rr fn
n •• N • N -
O O C]
C�. �
N V]
.. �-3 rt
� a
b rr
co �•
•• O
�
:�
a
�
ro
c�
0
�
�
m
�
rr
N-
O
�
o r
l� N rt
cn � ��
ort
� u� .c
.. �.
Cn N
cn o
0
0
v
m
rt
w
N- �
N �
y r
N y
r �
c
� �
�' y
N �
O
N �
(D �
� H
o �
G C
� O
�' r
'� c
n 3
o �
G �
�
rr
�
lD
�U
0
n
rr
ro
a
�
m
�
�
r
0
n
N
rt
I�-
O
�
H
�
�
y z ro `3
n a n n
m � o °'
� ro M �^
�, F.,. M
� N.
(D `�
�
rt
a
rt
N•
O
�
�1 H Cr1 C�J
Q C� Q (�
� r ►-� r
m m m m
O
f�D
fi
o �,
0 o N• �
cn cn cn W
rt �
� � O '
0 0 '
�
p o G
~ ~ fD
�
rn
x
ro
M
x
N
� W �
W �
O N
a
x
�
r
m
w
y � b
o :v
o �
� �
H � Ch
o �
�o 0
� �
w o
o �
� �
N F'
o �o
O l�
o �
�
ro
O
H
H
H
H
r
�
C7
(D
rt
a
F�•
N
�
�
F-'
C
(D
�
N-
�
�
N
x
O
G
fi
F-'
�
C�
0
G
�
rr
�
ro
O
H
s
0
y
3
w
N
�
N
O
n
�
r
H
�
z
m
H
�
�7
h]
H
(7
O
r
c
3
�
�
�Z ��� � N N N N F--' I--' F .� F' F-� F-' F-' F-' F-' l0 00 �l 61 U7 �P W N 1- �"' K
p� W N I-� O tD aD �I 6l Ui � W N I--� O I I I I 1 1 I I 1 i� ��
ro nr ro ro .� i i i i i i i i i i i i i i��o ao � rn cn � w�v ���
(D (D � fD (D N N N N N F--� F-� I--' 1-� F--� F--� I-� F-+ F-+ O
a a a w i ..j � W N I� O l0 a0 �l Ol (P � W N I-�
7C 7C 7C 7C p
H x H pC a
W G N � ~
M fi M fi
rn �-n
N• r-
� �
N
J N W N� l0 W Cn �A O Ui �l �A N� O
W I N I 01 O 61 N O OD W�l N I�-� (n a�P �ti
�J OD �P N rU � � � � � � � � � � � � �
O
n
H
�"
1 (p
W ¢
w o
� p W F-' N N N N N N N I--� I--� F� N N (']
�I 00 �1 N Cn lfl l0 01 � l0 (n �l 01 �a W l0 61 �1 �A. O OD N F-� F-� I-� H
N I N I l0 Ol 61 N lD F-+ 61 Oo l0 (n O N 6l lD N W W O F-' F-� ��l Cn �P O y
a � �������Jy�Jy����y���������� G
w o
N p p� F-� F-� 1-� N W W N N N N N F-� F-' N N 1-' (7
�.1 QD OJ W OD O F-� �l �P ��A N l0 OD' 61 �P F-� 00 �l I--� O I--� I--� N F-� H
W I N 1 (It N J Cn 6l O F' Cn O F-� 0� O W Cn �l l0 OD (I� F-� l0 l0 � N 00 O rr�
�a r r o
cn0000�o � �����������v���y���v����Y�cn N.
W F-+ N N N N N N N N I--` !--' F--' O
W F� � �P Ol OD l0 6l J� W W� N 01 � N�l (T N�] W Y-' F-� 1--� 1--� F-� N H
N � N I � O N��7a W�P O l0 �l � O CT� W O 6� W I-' 01 -.] � O l0 Cl� W V]
O �e. W N � � � y � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Ol rt'
� N � I--� F-� F-+ N N N N N N F-+ N F--' F-' O
d1 o Ol I W 61 0�P �] F� N O o I--� F-� l0 o U'� �� W I-' F-� F--� N H
N t N I 01 U7 lD l0 F-' �P �] l0 F' 61 I--� F-� F-' �P F-' �] O F-' �P I--' 01 (Il (T7 l0 l0 (A
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
W I--� N N N N N N F' N F-� F-` N F-' O
N O N
J 00 W F-' � 00 l0 (Ti F-� QO �l �l 01 W 00 O 01 61 F-+ l0 l0 N F-� F-' H
N 1 N� I N � N t0 W O U'� O 01 Ol W 0� l0 N W W N l0 h-' Ol O 00 0� (T� Ol ",�
O Oo N l0 � Y � � � � � � �� � � � � � � �`J � � � � rb � � � � OD �
W F-' F-' N W N N. N N N N F� F-' N N F-' O
J � � N� OD O� N N 00 l0 W W 1--� O 0� U'i F� N O N N 1--� H
W 1 N I N O J dD J Q1 (Ji N F--' 61 O O O J tp �i W F-� W N Ol F-' OD. Ol J y
N 00 I-� OD � � � � � � � � � � � � � Y � �`J � � � � � � � � � l0 (D
N �';;, ='�'�;'_^`'
cV t,,� 1�, �.1 �w � N N N N N �"
W I-� 1--� N W N N N N N N I-� F-� N N I--� �
I--� O Cn
�l 0� N F-' �A aD O 61 J N l0 01 �P I--� � N l0 00 Ut F' O I--' h� F-' H
W I N I W 11'i W J J lp N W N Cn Ol l0 O O l0 aD N 00 F-+ 01 l0 01 W 61 J ^y
W OD N l0 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Y ,T� � � � � � � � � � O ¢
� � � � � � � � � � : � :� N
r' �" N� r' N � �,, N�,a (`� c� N
C7
W
H
m
C)
rt
W
O
�
O
hi1
c�
0
�
�
rr
z
O
Fi
rt
�
W O
oa
iTJ rt
H O
O�
� �
� �
n
z �-
x�
� F�•
� �
�
O
OC1 �~�
Cn 1-'• � � �
�' wort
rt �o u,_�
� • \
F'� a N
n l0 O
�' o
0
O G
�
rt
�
F-� �
o p
N �
rt
m
ro
n
m
�n
N-
x
�" O
� �
rt
� �
0o N.
� N
m
�1 ki
m
w
r r t"' H'
W N O �
(D (D W M
�n rr rn
� .. N . N .
O O n
a a
m m
•• H r+
ro rt
(D W
•• O
�
�
a
�
ro
C�
O
�
�
N
n
rt
1�-
O
�
\ �
� 0 �
�
� �.
N�
',,� ��� d N N N N I--� 1--` � -' I-� F-� I--� !-� F-+ 1�-' l0 0� �] 01 U'i � W N F- l� (D
p, wiv�o�oao�rncn,pwiv�o i i i � i������o a
ro ro ro ro � i i i i i � i i � i i i i i�� ao � rn cn ,p w�v �� rs
fD fD fD (p N N N N N F-� F-` F-� F-' F--' F--' N F-+ F' O
a a a a ,� �wivro�oo��rncn�wn�r-�
7C 7s' 7C 7C p
y x y x a
a G a c . �'
M �'i i r'S
ri, rn
F�• I�-
� �
r o
J �
W 1 N I
�r�o
N OD W l0
� o
v �
W I N I
r� � cn o
����
w �
,p F-' F-' N W N N N N I-� !-' F-' I--' N N (7
� cn �p � rn rn r � � w a�o 00 � ao a� �o � tv r y
p l0 � l0 W Cn O N 00 l0 a0 N�l �l �l N W�• l0 l0 O(I� N lfl �l y
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F-' �
1 � 1 �\ \ \ \ � � � � �
�' N n+ (V (v N{v (.1 N N N^� N
�,,, O
� F-' I--' F-' F-' N W N N N N N N 1--� F-� N N F-' C7
�p � O O H' Ut h-' �P lD �l OD O� (J� N J�l (lt N O N 1--� I--` 1-` F-' y
u, rn rn� w�� �O � cn �o ao �p F-+ ao .o r� �v w r o cn . o �v o r.y
,'r� Y���J��Y�������,TJ���������N N•
w F-� 1--` N N N N N N N N I--� F-� I--� O
N 1--' �1 �P 00 00 N 61 ��� Ol Ut Cn Ol �1 I--� J�P N�l �A 1--' I--' F-' F-' N y
N I N I p1 O N F-' 0� J O a0 Cft N F-' 01 � 61 F-' (J� l0 N 01 01 OD lD l0 N l0 (p
a W 61 N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � y � W ft
N F-� F-' I--' N F', I--' N N I--� N F-' F-` O
r � cn [v w cn oo a a � �--� � ao w n� ao ��� a n> N�� w►3
w o cn
N I N I �P N W 00 O O1 U7 J N t0 � O dl U7 �l W U'i �1 �1 OD �l N J 01 W (/)
o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3y � � � � � � � � �
�,a O
F-� O N F� N N N N N N F-' N I--� I--� N N C]
J 0� Cn I�-� � Oo tfl Cn F--� 00 �t �] O\ W OD O�l- 00 I--� O l� N 1--� H
N ( N I �O � N lD W O CJt O Ol 61 W OD l� N W F--' O Ui 01 � N 61 �l 00 01 �
00 F-' 1--� O
O OD O l0 C� (� C] (� C� C) (� C� C] C] C� f� (� C� � � � � � � � � � � � (J'i �
O ��
N•
n
m
()
�
W
0
�
0
M
C�
0
C
�
�
z
0
fi
rt
�
zr
O c�i
�a
�rt
H O
o�
��
CO tn
� �
z �•
�ro
� �•
�o
�
z
O
o v�
cn N•
�
rr
n
F�•
n
rt
O G
�
�
�
� �
o p
�' G
�
N
ro
fi
N
rn
r•
k
t O
� �
rr
N �
op N.
� N
m
nr7 N
�
�a a o n
N N SL M
(A �t fh
A .. F+. N.
O O C�
C1. p
N Cn
•• H rt
� rt
(D F'•
.. �
7d
a
�
ro
�
0
�
�
m
�
rt
N•
0
�
O ►� p
�oNrt
• � �
w o ct
� �n'C
, �.
� N
� o
0
0
v
m
rr
a
�'� C:
N �
N ~
N �
C Z
m V '
� �:
F'• �
C�
F-' �
(D rr,
x �
O �
G C
n �
~' r
� C
n 3
o �
G �'
�
�
�
lD
'O
O
f'S
ft
ro
�
�
m
�
w
�P W N F�
�Q.Q.rt i
0
w
�
H
O �
rt �
� � � a
� H ''C
x
v ro
a �
f .,. n
�, �.
� �
�.
u , �, m
N C
rn �p
� n
w
w
m
zr oo O1- 'p
w o cn r- 1° N rt
o � u� • �
�] a rr w o .rr
�J rt �.� � u' -C
N• N• • �
H O n � N
O p r r �o 0
0
�� o
m
b7 N fA (']
� �• O f��t
x� �
� r•
c� o
� p o 'U
� � G
o �r
m
ro
n
m
�n
N•
x
ro
� o
��
�
rt
� �.
��
m
� �
�
--�
r r t' H
� � ° o w
m m a �n
cn rt rn
n •• N • N •
0 0 �
a �
m cn
•• �-3 rt
� �
rt
cu N-
•• o
�
�
a
�
ro
c�
0
�
�
m
0
rt
N•
0
�
t�
m
rr
a
F'- n
N �
y r
�, ` 3
��
cz
m �'
�" y
r• �
a
� �
m ,�
x H
o �
G C
n O
�r
''< C
��
o �
� �
�
rt
x
m
'O
O
n
fi
ro
a
w
�
�
�
� � � �
ro ro ro ro
m m m m
a a a w
x x 7r �c
H ]C H �C
n o n o
a a a c
M �"t i �'i
M M
�- �-
� n
N N N N F-' !-' F r!--` F-� I--� F--` F-' F' l0 00 J 61 (J't �P W N F- ~ �
� ", W N r O lD Do �l Ol tn �P W N r O I I I I I I I I I � � w
,,� 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 F--' tD 00 J O� Cn � W N F-� ��
N N N N N I-� I--' 1--` F' F-' F-' I--` F� I--' O
y �P W N F-' O l0 00 J 61 (.Jt �P W N F-�
0
rr
w
N
F-' 1--� � F-' Ol Ol �l I--' l0 OD �A OD �] 01 OD , O
(J� 1-' J
1--� I I W 61 01 Cn O W F-' Oo �A N J� ao Oo Oo •
�a r m � �--' N
N 61 dD N "0 � � � .b � � � � � � � � � � ' w (],
t--� � N N��� i--� O
Cn O 61 F-� 61 �a Ol o o F-' w O lD �O 61 Oo Cn W�P 1--� F-' H
I-' I I �P �� W 01 � O�A �P Cn 61 W W�D � F--� Ol � t0 w I-� N O O�P y
U� Ol �P F� � � � � � � .� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
F-� � ,
F F--` �P F� I 1 F� F h F n
N N �p W W O 6l � J N N F-� 61 O l0 0� O Ut (J� �P U'i N F-' H
F-` 1 1--� I W (Jl N OD Ut F� OD F-� Ol 00 61 �l 00 �A 1--� OD U'� Cn N W N F-� O O�l ray
OD Ol �P N � � � � � � � Y � � � � � � � � � � � � .b � � � � (.f� N.
� o
� � � � �������� �
OD F-� N W W O t0 l0 00 W�a 61 �a W N O N�P (I� I--� F-' N H
N I F-' I N � �� W���"' � N O(n O F�' N�l N�1 O�l N O N N N (p
���N � ��J������J�� �J��Y��Y�1������rn rt
�.., O
� � � ������� �
Cn F-+ o F o� a�] N F-� a�l w N N ao 0o w w F� N H
N � � �p O l0 N�A F-� O� OO O�l O 01 0� �P 1--� W�P F-' 00 N N N O O I--' �
�rn�N � ���J������� ��� Yy���Y���;��� �
� a
� � N ��� �
61 I-� 1-` ��a �l l0 F--� N N �O 6\ t0 �] �I Cn � �A N I--� H
r i i w woo�w�cn�cnao�o�oo �
c � � N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Y � � � � � � Y � � � a�o �
i ..� O
� N W N t-� �� C�
(T� � 1-' w I--� (n �P 61 o w l0 61 W�l lD Oo 61 W 61 (Jt N I-� . H
F-+ 1 1 N W J W N lp U'� �� O O1 O 01 J 00 l0 W O 1--� W O H' O�P �l y
O 01 �1 N � � � � � � � � Y � � Y � � � � � � � � � � � � � l0 (D
i ...� O
r � W � � C�
Cn H' W F' �l Ut 61 l0 F--' l0 J lD l0 OD 0� O� Ut Ol �A. N F-` H
!--' I 1 �P � W 6l Cn O W l0 F' O� 1-' �] p1 Cn �l 01 ao O O N I-' O N�A �"
O Ol Ol N � � � y � � � � � � � � � � � ,'L � � � � � � � � � O Q,
v
r-
fi
m
C�
f"f
r•
O
�
0
M
�
0
G
�
rr
O I
rt �i
� I
W O
za
f'I'
"�1 F'-
;U O
�
�
. d
0o m
� �
zn
n N•
xro
�rt
C7 I�•
� O
�
H
z
O
o v ° ~ o
Cn F-'- l0 N rt
� � � �
rt w o ,rr
�,,,� l0 Cn .Q
F'• � �
� � N •
rt � o
0
0
�
O G
�
rt
�
� �
O p
�'' G
rt
N
b
fi
fD
M
N•
x
F-' Q
�P U�
. �}
W �
O ►�•
� N
�
z r
m
w
a a o n
� � � a
m co a rn
�n c-r rn
n .. N . N .
0 0 �
R. �
m cn
• • �-3 rr
ro �
m r-
•• O
�
�
w
�
ro
�
O
�
�
m
�
rr
N-
0
� �
ro ro F , ,�
3 3 �� � N N N N F-' F-' F r� I-' I-` F-' F-` F-` F-' l0 0� �l O1 U7 �P W N H l0 (D
w W N N O �O 00 �I 61 Cn a W N F-+ O 1 I I I I I I I I 1 � a
ro ro ro ro � i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i--� � oo � rn cn �a w�v � �o n
(D lD fD (D N N N N N I--� .I--� F-� I-� I--� I--� F-� I--� F-� O
a a a a y � W N I--� O l0 OD �l 61 CTi � W N F+
x Dr pc pc- o
•3x►ax w
N G N G ~
M �"'1 M 1-i •
� M
�• w
� n
F-' O
� i--� w � � � � c�
(n I--� o �-+ Cn Cn oo r w I--` w oo �l �i oo Cn (n 01 (n F-� I--' H
I--' 1 1 lO lD lD �O 61 F-' � W 00 U� O 00 W�l Ol O 01 61 00 O N N O O�l y
Ut 61 � N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �`J � � � � � � � � � I �
r O
� � cn r N�� i--� � i-+ C�
U'� F-� F-� I--� N O�l 6l N N W� N F� l0 l0 00� �c. Cn Cn F-� F-� H
F� 1 I l0 l0 W 61 I--� OD O� W CJl W W CT� F--� Ol l0 l0 �] OD 61 W W I--� W W rr�
Cn61F�N � Y��Y����Y���YY,b������Y��N N•
� o
� r � � i--� � � � f-+ � ►-� � C]
N N � N N N�l l0 Cn Cn �e. l4 J N N O ao (n � F-� F-' H
F-� I I--� 1 �l �l (Jl N Cn Cn Ol �l O Cn N l0 � 41 N W O l� l0 Ol W F-� O W OD �
(n Ol 6l N � y � � � � � � � � � � � � � y' � � � y � � � � � W ('t
� � W � � � � � � r O
F , � j p�p a W I-�-� � O(n O Cn o W 01 Ol l0 �l �P Oo O 01 O o o W F-' O y V1
o rn � N � Jy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Y � � � � � Y � � � �
I--� F-' N �A �P �l l0 I--' N 1-` l0 01 l0 J Ol J(Jl (Il N O
rn � �
N I 1 (Jt W OO t0 W F-+ Cn �l Cn 00 l0 l0 O J t0 N N F-' 1--� CJ� N O F-� N p1 "�
N F-� �I F-'
U7 J J N C� C7 (� (7 C7 C7 (7 C7 (7 (7 (7 (7 C� C� � � � � � � � Y Y � � CT� �
C7
W
ft
m
�
rt
N•
0
�
O
�
n
0
G
�
rr
z
O
n
ft
�
� bU O
za
f"h
7d O
��
by (�D
� �
zn
xro
�rt
c� r-
� o
�
H
z
0
O C7
CJ7 F'•
�
rt
f'{
N-
n
rt
� n
O G
�
rt
�
� �
o p
� C
rr
�
ro
n
m
�n
N-
�
F-� Q
a �
rt
w�
o r•
� �
m
z �
m
a a o n
m m a r
�n rr rn
n.. N. N.
0 o n
Q. �
m cn
•• y rt
� a
rt
m r-
•• O
�
�
w
�
ro
�
0
�
�
m
�
rr
r-
0
�
o � n
l0 N ct
' � �
w o ,rt
� � �C
�P N �
�o 0
0
0
ty
m
rt
w
F'� C�
F � - ' �
F�-� `
r �
c z
m u '
�' y
N �
n
I--' 'TJ
fD �
x ~
o �
G C
� O
�' r
� C
n 3
O �
G �
p
rt
x
m
�
0
n
rt
ro
a
w
m
�
rn
� W N I-�
� p. p. r�r i
C7
a
�
H
O
rt
� w
� �
rn
J
v
a
N-
�
�
N �
W G
� �
cn �
a
w
m
J
z �
z �
H `C
x
ro
m
n
N-
O
�
�
zr
07 O
on
zw
rr
;0 O
�
�
. d
bd m
� �
zn
(� N-
x �
��
c� r-
� o
�
H
z
0
0 0
cn N-
�
rr
rt
F'•
n
rt
� n
O G
�
rt
�
N �
O p
� �
rt
m
ro
n
m
rn
F'•
�C
ro
� o
��
w
rt
o N.
��
m
z �
w
� r r y
� � c a
D (D W M
tn �t rh
� .. N . r .
� o �
i �
D (A
• H �'
� a
rt
co N-
•• o
�
z
a
�
ro
c�
0
�
�
m
�
rt
N-
0
�
o N�o
l0 N rr
•• \ �
w o �rt
�o cn Q
. �
� N "
lfl O
0
0
v
(D
ft
W
~- n
� �
y r
N y
��
c
m v '
�' y
r• �
�
� �
m ,�
x ~
o �
� c
n o
�r
� �
��
o �
G �
�
rt
x
(D
ro
0
n
rr
ro
a
w
m
�
�
ATTACHMENT C
Dave's Tree Service
625 Jameson Ct.
Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420
(805)481-1038
December 1, 1998
Project Site
Corner West Branch and Camino Mercado
Arroyo Grande
This report only addresses the Coast Live Oaks, Quercus •
agrifolia, on this site. There are 12 oaks and 2 saplings.
The .12 trees are all numbered. The metal tags�are
approximately 1"x3". They are located on the�north side of
the tree at 4'-6� above grade. •
The 2 saplings are located at the eastern edge of the
canopy on trees #5 and #7.
Measurements taken on the trees give a picture in ti.me of
the size and condition of the trees. These can be
referenced at a later date to evaluate the trees progress.
The dbh, diameter at breast height, is given. Dbh is 4.5'
above grade unless otherwise noted.
Approximate height and spread are given.
Leaf color, vigor and canopy density are listed. These
factors are indicators of tree health.
Many of the trees have Western Sycamore Borer activity.
This is a Clear-Winged Moth. The larvae feed in the bark.
Their presence usually indicate a stressed tree. Probably
drought with these oaks. Minor Western Sycamore Borer
activity is not a cause for concern.
Some of the trees have included bark. This is a structural
defect and is usually genetic. There is bark included in
the crotch. Pruning can be used to lighten the weight on
the affected branches.
Trees may be healthy but have poor structure. Condition
takes into consideration the health and structure of the
trees.
The presence of decay can weaken the structure of the tree
depending on its location. The presence of old wounds
generally indicate decay even if they are closed.
The amount and degree of decay present and its affect on
the structure of the tree (roots, trunk and limbs) is
difficult to assess.
This report does not necessarily contain all the problems
(decay, broken or cracked limbs, insect infestations, etc.)
associated with the oaks on this lot. These trees were
examined visually from the ground. Many defects may be �
internal, on the top of li.mbs, high in the canopy and
otherwise undetectable. �
Trees #2,#4,#5 and #6 are reconunended for removal. They
will all be hazardous once there is pedestrian and
vehicular traffic around then. Tree �9 is a possible
candidate for removal.
All the trees will need some pruning for aesthetics and
clearance.
Tree #1
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
14.65"
20'-25'
21'x25'
Good
75�
Fair
Good
There is frass (fecal pellets) from the Western Sycamore
Borer on the lower trunk. There are some old wounds at the
base along with several suckers.
Many of the branch tips are dead. The leaves are still
attached on many of these. I would suspect Cryptocline, a
fungus which attacks stressed trees. The stress is probably
drought related. Cryptocline is generally not lethal.
_ : :�.-;- ° ,�, R .:�
Tree #2
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
vigor
Condition
38.2" @ 6.5' *
50'+
45'x60'
Fair
25�-30�
Good �
PooZ'
This tree fell over many years ago. The primary scaffold
branches are poorly spaced and many have included bark.
They appear to be suckers arising from old pruning cuts.
There is a cavity at the central cluster of primary
branches that extends 2�+ down into the trunk.
There is a cavity at the base of the trunk. There is fresh
frass from the western Sycamore Borer and extensive mining
(old damage)in the bark of the trunk. Many of the small
branch tips are dead.
This tree is in poor condition evidenced by the thin
canopy, leaf color and dead branch tips. The structure of
the tree is compromised by the poor spacing and included
bark in the primary scaffold branches and the two cavities.
I recommend the removal of this tree.
* DBH was measured at 6.5' because the first primaty limbs
arose at 4.5' and the trunk was buried below.
Tree #3
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
24.2"
20'-25'
36'x36'
Good
80�
Good
Good
This tzee fell over many years ago. There is a cavity at
the end of the trunk at an old pruning cut which extends 1'±
into the trunk.
There is some evidence of Western Syca.more Borer. The 2
upright primary scaffold branches to the south have several
old wounds. The end weight needs to be reduced on these 2
limbs .
_
Tree #4
DBH 32"
Height 20�+
Spread 20�x25�
Leaf Color Fair
Canopy Density 75�
vigor Fair
Condition Poor
There is some evidence of Western Sycamore Borer. The 2
main horizontal limbs have broken off. A cavity extends
into the main trunk at least 4'-5'. There are several dead
branches in the canopy.
This tree has extensive internal decay. I recommend the
removal of this tree.
Tree #5
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
23.5"
15'-18'
25'x25'
PooZ
15�
Poor
Poor
There is some evidence of Western Sycamore Borer. The
lowest limb has broken off and decay extends into the mai.n
trunk. Tissue around the majority of the circumference of
this tree is dead.
This tree is in extremely poor condition. I recommend its
removal.
Tree #6
DBH 4",5.2",6",8.4
Height 15'
Spread 20'x20'
Leaf Color Good
Canopy Density 90�-95�
vigor . Good
Condition Poor
The canopy of this tree consists of suckers growing off an
old rotten stump. The eastern half of the stump�canopy
could be broken off by hand.
I recommend the removal of this tree.
__ --- _
Tree #7
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
vigor
Condition
11.2"
16'-18'
18'x24'
Fair
90$-95�
Good
Good
The western 1/2 of the canopy is comp=ised of 2 suckers
with included bark. The canopy should be thinned to reduce
the sail (affect of the wind pushing against the tree).
There are 3 small pruning wounds at the base of the tree.
Tree #8
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
15.4"
20'
25'x25'
Fair
75�+
Fair
Good
There is an old wound at the base which has closed.
Tree #9
DBH �
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
10.5",10.8",13"
20'
18 "x2 8 ,•
PooZ'
60$
Poor
Po.or
This tree has 3 trunks. There are many dead branches and
branch tips throughout the canopy. The trunks are covered
with suckers.
This tree is struggling. It is in poor condition and would
not respond well to the effects of construction. It could
be removed.
_ _ ___ �
Tree #10
DBH
Height
spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Conclition
14.4",14.5"
25'+
24'x30'
Good
75�
Good
Good
This tree has 2 trunks. There are small areas on both
trunks which are weeping.
Tree #11
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
vigor
Condition
11"
20' .
15'x20'
Good
80�
Good
Good
This tree is leaning at approximately 45°. There are several.
suckers on the stump and trunk. -
Tree #12
DBH
Height
Spread
Leaf Color
Canopy Density
Vigor
Condition
4.35",4.9",5.8",6"
10'
10'x12 �
Good
100$
Good
Good
This tree is comprised of several suckers arising off the
stump. The tree was probably cut back several ti_mes during
weed abatement.
Tree Protection Measures �
All trees shall be fenced prior to any construction
activities. The fence should be placed at the dripline+. It
should extend 5�-10' beyond the dripline where possible.
The fence shall be a mini.mum of 4' tall and supported by
stakes at least every 10' on center.
The Arborist of Record should inspect the site prior to the
start of any construction activities to determine that
adequate tree protection measures have been implemented.
Encroachment within the dripline shall be kept to a
minimum. Grubbing within the dripline shall be done
by hand. There should be no grade changes within the
dripline.
Any pruning must be supervised by an ISA Certified
Arborist. ISA Pruning standards shall be followed.
Utility trenches should be located at least 5' out from
the dripline. '
Trenches within the dripline shall be hand dug. Roots 2" in
diameter and over should be left intact unless approved for
removal by the Arborist of Record. No trenching shall occur
within 10' of a trunk.
Drainage off any hardscape such as the parking lot and
roofs shaTl be directed away from the oaks.
No soil sterilants shall be used within 50'+ of the
dripline of any oaks.
Landscaping within the dripline shall be drought tolerant.
Plant material should survive on a watering cycle of once
a month or less once they are established. Drip irrigation
shall be used. Trenching for irrigation lines within the
dripline plus 5' shall be hand dug.
ave Raga
d-.-
ISA Certified orist #345
i
�
�
Kelly:
��' ,�,.
��� �4 r ..
�� ; ��
a �,� �.
v;� , .,.
��.
..
,
STEPHEN N. COOL
ATTORNEY p7� Lqyy
1977 EL CAMINO REqL
ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420
TELEPHONE: (805) 489.8433
FAX: (805) 489_g7O2
July 10, 2001
�
r; � ,� �, �w�tC�'I!1E�?
� `
�51�� 3r � i� � °. �{•^
:.._,. ze .., "
0 d.1'�� l��i� 3: t� �.
Please make certain that the enclosed letter is made part of the record
on the Camino Mercado office project, and that the Council members are
- OYO G E VALLEY
C�iAMBER OF C011✓IMERCE
Mission Statement:
The M:ission of the Arroyo Grande Valtey Chamber of Commerce is to promote a
positive, balanced, vital economy and preserve the unique quatities of
Arroyo Grande.
The Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors has reviewed the
proposed professional office building project in the area of West Branch Street and
Camino Mercado and is submitting the following comments:
The Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors su orts the use of this
�rofessional ot�ice devetonment on the following basis
l. Within Arroyo Grande there is a demand for professional office space which this
development will provide.
2. The proposed project complies with current zoning and would provide a similar use
with existing businesses in the immediate area.
3. Overall, this appears to be a project that would benefit the business community.
The Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce was established in 1961 for promoting
business interests in our community. With over 350 businesses represented,
the Chamber of Commerce is plea.sed to work cooperatively with elected officials, loca.l
governments and business leaders to encourage a balance between economic prosperity
and quality of life.
8OO WESr $�CH S�� • AxxpyO Gx�rmE, CA 93�2Q
805-�89-1�88 • FAx 805-�89-��39 • e-mail agcoc@arroyograndecc.com