PC Minutes 2009-06-021
1
1
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 2009
6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER - The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session
with Chair Ray presiding; also present were Commissioner Barneich, Brown, Keen and
Ruth. Staff members in attendance were Acting Community Development Director,
Teresa McClish, Associate Planner, Jim Bergman and Public Works Engineer, Mike
Linn.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: Chair Ray asked for time to review items received after Agenda
preparation. The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m.
AGENDA REVIEW: No requested changes.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None.
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Nancy Castle, AGP Video, announced that on
Thursday, June 4' 2009, a special series of programs on drought tolerant landscaping
would be recorded and would be replayed on Channel 20.
B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS AFTER AGENDA PREPARATION:
1. Administrative Item, ARC Case No. 09 -001 located at 255 Larchmont Drive for a 73
sq. ft. addition to the front of a single family home in the D -2.4 Overlay District;
approved by the Acting Community Development Director, Teresa McClish.
2. Results of the canvass of all votes cast at the November 7, 2006 General Election,
requested by Commissioner Brown in respect to Advisory Measure N -06 (to fund
improvements to City facilities).
II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
A. VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 08 -006; APPLICANT - DENNIS
LOHOF; LOCATION - 202 TRAFFIC WAY
Associate Planner, Jim Bergman presented the staff report for consideration of an
application to subdivide a 10,500 square -foot property into two (2) parcels of 5,500 and
5,000 square -feet in the Village Mixed Use (VMU) district. In conclusion, Mr. Bergman
stated that staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving
the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map.
The Commission expressed concerns regarding parking, particularly if future plans
include more intense use and they were not in favor of tandem parking.
Chair Ray opened the Public Hearing for public comments.
Terry Orton, representative, spoke describing the project and addressed Commission
concerns related to parking.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2009
PAGE 2
Barneich:-
• She is okay with the lot split — it makes sense right now with just two residences;
it can be revisited later if the buildings convert to commercial.
Keen:
• He is also okay with the lot split.
Brown
• He is in agreement with the other Commissioner's concerns regarding future
parking; the residential parking spaces could be marked "residential parking
only "; (Kennedy Fitness solved their parking problem by putting up signage).
Ruth:
• She's in agreement with the lot split; she can make the findings as it is proposed
now. She requested Exhibit 'A' of the Resolution, Condition No. 20, to have
language modified to state: "The rear structure located on Parcel 2 "shall" will
need be converted....; and language added at the end of the Condition to state:
"...prior to filing the final parcel map" (to match the wording on Condition No. 6.).
Ray:
• She is also fine with the lot split; but if this project comes before them in the
future they will be looking at the parking.
Commissioner Brown made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Keen, to approve
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 08 -006 with modifications to the conditions of
approval as underlined above and requested by Commissioner Ruth, and adopt:
RESOLUTION 09 -2083
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 08 -006; APPLICANT — DENNIS LOHOF;
LOCATION — 202 TRAFFIC WAY
The motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Keen, Barneich, Ruth and Chair Ray
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 2nd day of June 2009.
III. NON - PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
A. PROPOSED 2009 -2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP), PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Teresa McClish, Acting Director, presented the staff report for review and consideration
of a recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed Capital Improvement
Program presented by the Public Works Department, to determine consistency with the
2001 General Plan. Ms. McClish then described some of the future projects included in
1
1
1
i
1
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2009
PAGE 3
the CIP. In conclusion, Ms. McClish stated that staff recommends the Planning
Commission recommend to the City Council that the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) and Budget is consistent with the General Plan.
Ms. McClish noted that City Manager, Steven Adams, was present to answer questions
on the CIP as was Public Work Engineer, Mike Linn.
In reply to questions from Commissioner Brown, Mr. Adams explained the Water Lopez
Feasibility Study; how sidewalk repair had been prioritized; the time frame on the
$50,000 to be used from annual local sales tax funding for the proposed City Hall
upgrade (based on a 40 -year period). Commissioner Brown then expressed concern as
to how this would appear to the public during budget deficit and the fact that public
facility upgrade was voted the lowest priority (in a City survey). Mr. Adams then
explained that the majority of the sales tax is being spent as promised; however, the
City building is structurally deficient (ADA) and we now have a one time opportunity to
trade some property and acquire /utilize an existing facility to bring down the cost of
upgrading facilities saving some millions of dollars; so we are meeting a need in the
most cost efficient way. Commissioner Brown concluded by stating that he would like to
see some public education pursued so that the citizens of Arroyo Grande would not get
the wrong impression.
In reply to questions from Commissioner Keen, Mr. Adams confirmed that the excess
sales tax is still somewhat above what the City originally projected even with the drop in
sales tax; the Farm Credit building (proposed new City facility) may need some minor
structural work for ADA compliance before utilizing it (probably a maximum of
$200,000).
In reply to a question from Commissioner Barneich, Mr. Adams stated that the
landscaping for the Car Corral would come for review to the Planning Commission.
In reply to questions from Commissioner Keen, Mr. Adams stated that the cost for the
Lopez Lake Study is preliminary and that the overall study cost may be higher, but there
will be cost sharing with other jurisdictions; regarding developer fees, he explained that
the City receives fees from developers for development projects so just the City's share
is shown in the CIP.
Commissioner Comments:
Brown:
• He has serious concerns regarding the City Hall upgrade process; it has to be a
public process and the public has to buy into it.
Barneich:
• She (and the Tree Guild) would like to have input on the landscaping at the
proposed bus turnout.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2009
AYES: Chair Ray, Commissioners Keen, Barneich, Brown and Ruth
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PAGE 4
• She is glad to see the proposed sidewalks, especially on Tally Ho Street and that
Via la Barranca Street the drainage problem will be fixed next year.
• She agrees with the concerns of Commissioner Brown regarding the City Hall
upgrade; however, she does understand the cost savings that would be realized
as its right in the Village and it will not be expensive to make the required
modifications.
Keen:
• The City Council just approved spending another $33,000 for an architectural
design for the proposed Police Station, but no studies have come forward to any
Committee (normally be done before the decision to build). Mr. Adams explained
that the City Council approved this work to enable some `value engineering" in
an effort to get the cost down otherwise it may not be a funded project; the
Redevelopment Agency can help fund Police buildings so we will be channeling
some funds from this budget also.
• He would like to see a report/budget for the Redevelopment Agency as he has
never seen one. Mr. Adams explained that the City is required to do an
implementation plan every five years and then a mid -term which is a public
hearing and all the projects are included in the CIP. He then described the
proposed spending for future projects from the Redevelopment Agency funds.
Ruth:
• At first she had the same concerns as other Commissioners regarding the City
Hall upgrade, but after listening to the discussion she now believed that this was
a good business decision.
Ray:
• It is the Planning Commission's job to decide whether or not the CIP document
meets with the General Plan; the City Council will go through the detail line by
line. She does not see anything in the CIP that does not meet with the General
Plan.
• Regarding the City Hall Facility upgrade, from her experience with the school
district, facility upgrade rarely gets approved by the voters so it's important to put
this into a larger perspective and provide the appropriate explanation of why the
City is doing this and how far we have gone to mitigate the costs and move
forward with it.
Chair Ray made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Keen, approving recommending
to City Council the 2009/2014 Capital Improvement Program as it meets the General
Plan.
1
1
1
1
PLANNING COMMISSION .
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2009
I.V. NOTICES OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS: SINCE MAY 19, 2009:
No.
1. ARC 09 -001.
pp;
W. & C. Cook
ddress
255 Larchmont Dr.
!escriptio
For a 73 sq. ft. addition to the front
of a single family home in D -2.4
Overlay District
Act of n
A.
Planner "*
J. Bergman
Ms. McClish explained that this item was approved by the ARC just this week, but due
to the next meeting being cancelled we wanted to bring it forward now. The
Commission had no concerns regarding the administrative item.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS: None.
IV. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENTS: None.
VII. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW -UP:
Ms. McClish stated the June 16, 2009 meeting would be cancelled due to lack of a
quorum; the next regular meeting would be July 7, 2009.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. on a motion by Chair Ray, seconded by
Commissioner Brown.
ATTEST:
LYN REARDON- SMITH,
SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION
AS TO C
NTENT
ROB STRONG,
COMMUNITY DEVELO MENT
(Approved at the July 7, 2009 meeting)
PAGE 5