CC 2021-11-09_08b Year End Financial Status Report_FY 2020-21MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
BY: NICOLE VALENTINE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 YEAR -END FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
D ATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2021
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Consider and file the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21 Year-End Financial Status Report.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
Preparation of the Fourth Quarter Financial Status Report requires staff time within the
existing work plan and budget for the Administrative Services Department. At year-end,
FY 2020-21 revenues for the General Fund were $19.1 million, or three percent (3%)
above the Adjusted Budget. Actual Expenditures were $16.9 million, and favorable to the
Adjusted Budget by $1.85 million (10%).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider, receive, and file the FY 2020-21 Year-
End Financial Status Report.
BACKGROUND:
Each fiscal year, the City Council adopts a budget, which commits government resources
and services to accomplish the City’s mission of making Arroyo Grande the best place
possible for everyone who lives, works, and visits here. The fiscal year-end financial
status report is, in essence, the City’s report card on its financial performance.
The purpose of the FY 2020-21 Year-End Financial Status Report is to:
•Compare revenues received and expenditures incurred to the budget to determine
the City’s financial performance;
•Provide explanations for key account variances and identify any potential trends
that might impact financial planning; and
•Provide other key information including headcount statistics, completed Capital
Improvement Projects, and completed Budget Adjustment Requests.
Item 8.b. - Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 YEAR -END FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
PAGE 2
For comparison purposes, the City’s actual results will be compared to the Adjusted
Budget. The Adjusted Budget is the City’s original Adopted Budget plus any Council-
approved adjustments made during the year.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
FY 2020-21 Revenue and Expenditures Compared to Prior Year
Adjusted Budget Compared to FY 2020-21 Actuals
The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and accounts for resources
and services traditionally associated with government. General Fund revenue at the end
of Fiscal Year 2020-21 was $498,575 higher than the Adjusted Budget. Expenditures
were $1,853,446 lower than the Adjusted Budget, both positive performance indicators.
A more thorough explanation of FY 2020-21 variances is set forth in the attached financial
report. The following is a summary of the variances between the Adjusted Budget and
Actuals.
Revenue ($498,575 higher)
Actual revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $498,575 for the year. The significant
revenue variances include:
• Property tax ended the year favorable by $241,572, or 4% above the Adjusted
Budget. Property tax collected grew 6% over the previous fiscal year, as the
housing market continues to rise. Property tax represents 31% of the City’s annual
revenue.
• Actual sales tax revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $47,547, or 1% above
the Adjusted Budget. Sales tax collected grew 7% over the previous fiscal year.
Certain business categories like building and construction, online shopping,
general consumer goods, and food and drugs continued to show strong sales tax
receipts during the pandemic and exceeded expectations. Whereas other
business categories like restaurants and hotels, auto and transportation were
significantly impacted by the economic decline (20% decline in sales tax), fuel and
service stations were impacted the most (50% > decline). Sales tax represents
23% of the City’s annual revenue.
• The FY 2020-21 budget took a cautious approach when estimating Transient
Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue and forecasted revenue to decrease by
approximately 40%. During April, May, and June, with the mask mandates being
FY 2020-21
Budget
FY 2020-21
Actuals Variance
Revenue 18,564,989$ 19,063,564$ 498,575$
Expenditures 18,773,844$ 16,920,398$ (1,853,446)$
General Fund
Item 8.b. - Page 2
CITY COUNCIL
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 YEAR -END FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
PAGE 3
lifted, the tourism industry began to see a large increase of travelers that helped
this revenue exceed the Adjusted Budget by $128,718.
• License and permit revenue fell short of the Target by $43,829. The majority of the
variance is due to fewer building permits being issued during the Fiscal Year.
• Actual recreation fees revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $130,074, or
32%. With COVID-19 restrictions, many programs were modified this fiscal year to
adjust to the current guidelines, making FY 2020-21 budget assumptions
extremely conservative. The original budget anticipated a decrease in revenue of
approximately 40% year over year. Fortunately, the program decrease compared
to FY 2019-20 was only 9%. Adjustments to operations continue to help provide
recreation programs to the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Expenditures ($1.85 million lower)
Overall, expenditures were lower than the Adjusted Budget by 10% or $1.85 million. The
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Year-End Financial Status Report (Attachment 1) provides more
detailed explanations of the expenditure variances. The significant expenditure variances
include:
• The Administrative Services Department variance is attributed to salary savings of
approximately $34,300; lower-than-anticipated CalPERS Unfunded Actuarial
Liability (UAL) retirement payment of approximately $158,800; utilities savings
from electricity, gas and cable of approximately $68,300; and lower than
anticipated transfers to CIP projects of approximately $81,600.
• The Community Development Department variance is attributed to salary savings
of approximately $254,000 and contractual services savings of approximately
$269,400.
• The Police Department variance is attributed to salary savings of approximately
$543,300.
Fund Balance
The Fund Balance for the General Fund ended the year at $8.0 million. Fund Balance
increased this year from $5.9 million at Fiscal Year End 2019-20 because actual revenue
exceeded expenditures by approximately $2.1 million. The City’s auditors are working
with Staff to complete the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, which will confirm the
FY 20-21 year-end Fund Balance. When this report is finalized, staff will report the final
Fund Balance for the FY20-21 General Fund.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Year-End Financial Status Report; or
2. Provide other direction to staff regarding the FY 2020-21 Year-End Financial
Status Report; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
Item 8.b. - Page 3
CITY COUNCIL
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 YEAR -END FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
PAGE 4
ADVANTAGES:
The financial report presents an updated review of the City’s financial performance for FY
2020-21. Reporting on financial performance is one of the Top 10 Council priorities for
FY 2020-21.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachment:
1. Year-End Financial Status Report
Item 8.b. - Page 4
Page 1 of 10
City of Arroyo Grande
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Year-End Financial Status Report
INTRODUCTION
The following report is an overview of the City’s fiscal position at the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21. The
purpose of this report is to update the public and the City Council on the City’s financial position at year-
end and compare actual results to the Adjusted Budget to determine the City’s performance.
The report is organized in the following sections:
Section 1 – an overview of City’s financial position at the
end of the FY 2020-21. As part of the analysis, brief
explanations of significant revenue and expenditure
variances are included.
Section 2 – a listing of any personnel changes occurring
during the year and a summary of headcount by
department. This section also includes the City’s
calculated vacancy rate.
Section 3 – an update on the Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP) managed by the Public Works and
Community Development Departments. This section
includes CIP that were completed along with their final
cost.
Section 4 – a listing of Budget Amendment Requests
made throughout the 4th quarter of the fiscal year.
Attachment 1
Item 8.b. - Page 5
Page 2 of 10
SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL POSITION
CITY FUND STRUCTURE
The overall City budget is comprised of many individual funds, which are categorized below. This financial
report will focus on primarily the General Fund but will also report on all Governmental Funds.
General Fund – The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City, which accounts for resources
and services traditionally associated with government.
Special Revenue Funds – Special revenue funds are used to account and report the proceeds of specific
revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specified purposes other than debt
service or capital projects.
Debt Service Funds – This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of long-
term debt principal interest. This includes the USDA loan payable issued by the City to finance the
relocation of City Hall.
Enterprise Funds - An enterprise fund is a separate accounting and financial reporting mechanism for
which revenues and expenditures are segregated into a fund with financial statements separate from all
other governmental activities. These funds include Water and Sewer services provided to City residents.
Private Purpose Fund – The private-purpose fund was created to hold the assets of the former
redevelopment agency of the City of Arroyo Grande until they are distributed.
Agency Funds – Agency funds are funds that the City holds on behalf of another entity. Currently there
are two Agency funds. One is the Sanitation District fund, which accounts for the receipt and remittance
of wastewater processing fees on behalf of the South San Luis Obispo Sanitation District. The other is the
Downtown Parking Fund, which collects assessments from Arroyo Grande Village merchants for
maintenance of the Village parking lots.
The following chart below shows an overview of the City’s fund structure.
Legislative & Information Services Fire Protection Impact Fees City Hall Debt Service Sewer Successor Agency to RDA Downtown Parking
Administrative Services Public Access Television Sewer Facility Sanitation Distribution
Community Development Police Protection Impact Water
Police Department Park Development Water Facility
Recreation Services Park Improvement Lopez Water
Public Works Recreation Community Center
Grace Lane Assessment District
Parkside Assessment District
Street (Gas Tax)
Traffic Signalization
Traffic Circulation
Transportation Facility Impact
Transportation
In-Lieu Water Neutralization
In-Lieu Affordable Housing
Tourism Business Improvement Dist.
Water Availability
CDBG Grant Fund
State COPS Block Grant Agency FundsSpecial Revenue FundsFIDUCIARY FUNDSGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
ALL FUNDS
PROPRIETORY FUNDS
General FundDebt Service FundsEnterprise FundsPrivate Purpose FundItem 8.b. - Page 6
Page 3 of 10
CURRENT YEAR ACTUALS COMPARED TO PRIOR YEAR
Table 1 below reflects revenue and expenditure patterns of FY 2020-21 and compares results against the
prior year’s results for all Governmental Funds as well as the City’s General Fund. The calculated
percentages in the table reflect the actuals for both revenue and expenditures, divided by that fiscal year’s
annual budget. As Table 1 shows, actual revenues exceeded budget estimates and actual expenditures
were less than what was budgeted in both fiscal years for the General Fund and all other governmental
funds taken as a whole.
Table 1
GENERAL FUND IMPACTS
The following discussion focuses on the City’s General Fund performance. The Chart 1 starts off with a
simple overview of General Fund performance compared to the budget. Next are expenditures by
category (Table 2). This is followed by a summarized look at FY 2020-21 actual expenditures compared to
the budget (Table 3). Lastly, a discussion of General Fund revenue is included, which compares actual
results to the budget (Table 4).
Chart 1
Chart 1 shows a simple comparison of
actual revenue and expenditures to the
budget. The actual General Fund
revenue is more than the budget by
$500,000. The actual expenditures
totaled $16.9 million for the year, or 10%
less than the $18.8 million Adjusted
Budget. In total, actual expenditures
ended the year $1.9 million lower than
the Adjusted Budget. Additional
information on General Fund revenue
and expenditure variances are discussed
in more detail further within this report.
Actuals
FY 2020-21
Actuals
FY 2019-20 Variance
Revenue 104%105%-1%
Expenditures 75%76%-2%
Actuals
FY 2020-21
Actuals
FY 2019-20 Variance
Revenue 103%101%2%
Expenditures 90%90%0%
Governmental Funds
General Fund
Item 8.b. - Page 7
Page 4 of 10
Table 2
Table 2 reflects major cost categories
within the General Fund. This chart is
intended to explain where the City’s
resources are spent. With total
expenditures of $16.9 million, 60.6% of the
City’s cost is associated with personnel
costs, 35.7% with operating and
maintenance costs, 3.1% with transfers to
other funds (primarily transfers to CIP
Fund), 0.4% with debt service, and 0.1%
with capital outlays.
Table 3 reflects the year-end status of all General Fund operating departments. Some departments include
multiple divisions. The divisions are consolidated under their respective department, rather than reflected
individually within the table.
Table 3 – General Fund Expenditures by Department
Overall, expenditures were under the Adjusted Budget by 10% or $1.85 million. As was discussed, at the
onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the City took a proactive approach to conservative budgeting in an effort
to understand and address the financial impacts due to COVID-19. This played a significant role in the
overall expenditure savings for the year as all City departments were under their spending targets. A more
detailed explanation of key expenditure variances by individual department/division is provided below.
City Administration 1,122,300$ 1,072,096$ 50,204$ 4%
Legislative & Information Services 1,030,652 880,049 150,603 15%
Administration Services 6,106,913 5,719,362 387,551 6%
Community Development 1,990,866 1,452,993 537,873 27%
Police Department 5,666,843 5,089,736 577,107 10%
Recreation Services 961,620 880,918 80,702 8%
Public Works 1,894,650 1,825,245 69,405 4%
TOTAL EXPEDITURES 18,773,844 16,920,398 1,853,446 10%
%
Fav/(Unfav)
General Fund Department Variances - Year End
General Fund Department 2020-21 Adjusted
Budget
2020-21
Actuals
Dollar
Fav/(Unfav)
FY 2020-21 % of
Actuals Actuals
Personnel Costs 10,260,729$ 60.6%
Operating Costs 6,048,381 35.7%
Debt Service 60,300 0.4%
Capital Outlay 23,954 0.1%
Transfers Out 527,035 3.1%
Total 16,920,398$
Expenditure Category
Item 8.b. - Page 8
Page 5 of 10
KEY EXPENDITURE VARIANCES FOR INDIVIDUAL DIVISIONS/DEPARTMENTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
The Administrative Services Department includes the
City’s Fiscal as well as Human Resources functions. The
Division posted overall salary savings of $193,132 for
the year. The majority of the salary savings is attributed
to two factors:
• Salary savings resulting from the vacancy of the Administrative Services Director position for a
portion of the fiscal year $34,301.
• The annual CalPERS UAL retirement payment was budgeted at $1,394,500 but the actual
expenditure was $1,235,669, resulting in a favorable variance to the budget of $158,831.
Other significant variances include:
• A savings in the utilities line item of $68,255. This expenditure is associated with electricity, gas,
and cable costs.
• A savings in the transfer to CIP project costs of $81,581. This expenditure is associated with CIP
projects that are funded with the General Fund.
The Community Development Department includes the
functions of Planning, Engineering, and Building &
Safety Divisions. The majority of the favorable variance
in this department can be attributed to salary savings
and lower spending in contractual services. Salary savings within Community Development is attributed
to a number of staffing variances that occurred through the fiscal year and include:
• The Community Development Director position remained vacant for five months when the
former Community Development Director was appointed as the City Manager in early September
2020. The savings amounted to roughly $86,000 through February when the position was filled.
• One of the recommendations approved in the FY 2020-21 Adopted Budget was to delay the hiring
of the Permit Technician position through the first quarter. The vacancy of the Permit Technician
position in the Engineering division continued through the end of the second quarter resulting in
labor savings of approximately $55,000 compared to the Target. The Permit Technician position
was filled in early January 2021.
• The Engineering Division had a vacancy in the Program Analyst position the majority of the fiscal
year and the part-time Intern position remained vacant, saving approximately $113,000.
• Contractual services were budgeted for on-call engineering services totaling $95,600; however,
of the budgeted services only $49,410 were used, resulting in a favorable variance of $46,200.
Department: Administrative Services
Division: 4120-Administrative Services and
4145-Non Departmental
Issue: Overall savings in salaries and CalPERS
prepayment
Impact to General Fund: $387,551 savings
Department: Community Development
Division: Various (4301, 4130, 4212)
Issue: Savings in contractual services
Impact to General Fund: $537,873 savings
Item 8.b. - Page 9
Page 6 of 10
For simplicity, Police Services will be analyzed in total
rather than by individual divisions. The majority of the
Police Department’s favorable variance is attributed to
salary savings resulting from vacant permanent Police
Officer positions through the fiscal year. Some of the
more significant variances include:
• The Police Patrol Division experienced vacancies in three of its Police Officer positions. One of the
Police Officer positions was budgeted to remain vacant for the year, with the salary savings
designated to purchase new digital radios. The impact of the salary savings versus the budget was
$394,300.
• Other labor costs including health benefits and retirement costs were under the Target by $66,000
and $83,000 respectively.
KEY REVENUE VARIANCES BY ACCOUNT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
Table 4 – General Fund Revenue
Planning Contractual Services Budget Expenditures Balance
Housing Element Update 80,737 33,805 46,932
Circulation Element Update 87,557 87,107 450
East Grand Ave Master Plan 117,303 117,303
On-Call Environmental Review Services 50,000 20,949 29,052
On-Call Planning Services ad Misc. Planning Studies 30,000 575 29,425
365,597 142,436 223,161
Property Tax 5,614,864$ 5,856,436$ 241,572$ 4%
Sales Tax 4,401,649 4,449,196 47,547 1%
Transient Occ. Tax 900,000 1,028,718 128,718 14%
Property Tax in Lieu of VLF 1,822,740 1,822,740 - 0%
Franchise Fees 690,000 713,919 23,919 3%
License & Permit Fees 441,300 397,471 (43,829) -10%
User Fees 457,800 451,707 (6,093) -1%
Planning Fees 360,500 382,195 21,695 6%
Recreation Fees 410,700 540,774 130,074 32%
Transfers In 2,737,100 2,716,904 (20,196) -1%
Other Revenue 728,336 703,503 (24,833) -3%
TOTAL 18,564,989 19,063,564 498,575 3%
%
Fav/(Unfav)
General Fund Revenue Variances - Year End
REVENUE BY CATEGORY 2020-21 Adjusted
Budget
2020-21
Actuals
Dollar
(Unfav)/Fav
Department: Police Services
Division: Various (4201,4203,4204)
Issue: Overall savings in salaries and
benefits
Impact to General Fund: $577,107 savings
Item 8.b. - Page 10
Page 7 of 10
As reflected in Table 4, actual revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $498,575 for the year. The
Forecast developed at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic anticipated an overall shortfall in revenue by
fiscal year’s end. A more detailed discussion is included below to help explain actual revenue variances.
Property Tax – Property tax ended the year favorable by $241,572, or 4% above the Adjusted Budget.
Property tax collected grew 6% over the previous fiscal year, as the housing market continues to rise.
Property tax represents 31% of the City’s annual revenue.
Sales Tax – Actual sales tax revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $47,547, or 1% above the Adjusted
Budget. Sales tax collected grew 7% over the previous fiscal year. Certain business categories like building
and construction, online shopping, general consumer goods, and food and drugs continued to show strong
sales tax receipts during the pandemic and exceeded expectations. Whereas other business categories,
such as restaurants and hotels, auto and transportation, were significantly impacted by the economic
decline (20% decline in sales tax). Fuel and service stations were impacted the most (50% > decline). Sales
tax represents 23% of the City’s annual revenue.
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) –The FY 2020-21 budget took a cautious approach when estimating TOT
revenue and forecasted the revenue to decrease by approximately 40%. During April, May, and June, with
the mask mandates being lifted, the tourism industry began to see a large increase of travelers that helped
this revenue exceed the Adjusted Budget by $128,718.
License & Permit Fees – License and permit revenue fell short of the Target by $43,829. The majority of
the variance is due to fewer building permits being issued during the Fiscal Year.
Recreation Fees – Actual recreation fee revenue exceeded the Adjusted Budget by $130,074, or 32%.
With COVID-19 restrictions, many programs were modified this fiscal year to adjust to the current
guidelines, making FY 2020-21 budget assumptions extremely conservative. The original budget
anticipated a decrease in revenue of approximately 40% year over year. Fortunately, the program
decrease compared to FY 2019-20 was only 9%. Adjustments to operations continue to help provide
Recreation programs to the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.
FUND BALANCE
The actual Fund Balance for the General Fund ended the year at $8.0 million. Fund Balance increased this
year from $5.9 million at Fiscal Year End 2019-20 because actual revenue exceeded expenditures by
approximately $2.1 million. The City’s auditors are working with Staff to complete the Annual
Comprehensive Financial Report, which will confirm the Fiscal Year End 2020-21 Fund Balance. When this
report is finalized, staff will report the final Fund Balance for General Fund. At this time, the year-end
reserve fund balance is computed to be 47.7% and exceeds the City’s Fund Balance reserve goal of 20%.
Item 8.b. - Page 11
Page 8 of 10
SECTION 2: POSITION CHANGES AND HEADCOUNT NUMBERS
POSITION ALLOCATION CHANGES MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL (4th Quarter)
None made during this quarter.
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) STAFFING BY DEPARTMENT – PERMANENT STAFF
ONLY
The following table reflects FTE staffing by department. The table only includes permanent staff and does
not include part-time or temporary staffing. While departments may hire part-time staff on a regular or
seasonal basis, they are not included in the analysis below.
Department Adopted
Budget
Headcount
(FTE’s)
Vacancies
(4th Qtr)
% of Total
Staffing
Vacant Positions
City Manager 1.00 0.00 6.4%
Administrative Services 6.00 1.00 7.7% Accounting Manager
Community Development 10.00 2.00 12.8% Permit Tech, Program Analyst
Legislative & Info Services 4.00 0.00 5.1%
Police Services 29.00 3.00 37.2% Police Officers (3)
Public Works 21.00 1.00 27.0% Maintenance Worker I
Recreation Services 3.00 0.00 3.8%
Total 74.00 7.00 100%
EMPLOYEE VACANCY RATE
The City’s employee vacancy rate at the end of FY 2020-21 was 9.5%. This equates to seven (7) vacant
positions. The vacancy rate tracks the number of permanent vacant positions at the end of the quarter in
comparison to the total number of permanent positions available. Unlike a turnover rate, which tracks
employees that separated during the period, the vacancy rate only looks at vacancies at the end of period.
The costs associated with turnover includes the cost of advertising new positions, training, overtime,
lowered productivity, and workload balance. In the FY 2020-21 Budget, it was agreed that the City
Manager, Permit Tech, and Maintenance Worker positions were to remain vacant until after the first
quarter. These positions, other than the City Manager position which was appointed prior to the end of
the first quarter, remained vacant through the full year. In addition, a Police Officer position was to remain
vacant for the full year. The higher-than-normal vacancy rate can be attributed to the delay in hiring these
positions.
Item 8.b. - Page 12
Page 9 of 10
SECTION 3: UPDATE ON COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS
This information is provided to keep the Council apprised of the status of the City’s Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP). The projects listed below represent projects that were completed in the fourth quarter of
FY 2020-21.
Project Title Comments
Total Amount
Budgeted for
Project
Total Final
Project Costs % Expended Funding
Sources
PD Evidence Room Secondary
Access
Construction of a secondary/emergency
exit from the police station property
and evidence room
18,579 16,890 91%Police Impact
Fees
Replace Radio Receivers
Replace and upgrade the Police
Department analog radio system to
migrate to a digital platform.
174,000 127,602 73%General Fund &
COPS Fund
Network Storage Expansion –
PD
Replacement of existing primary
network storage system located at the
Police Department data center.
80,000 74,012 93%Sales Tax
Various Park Improvements Turf and infield renovations at Soto
Sports Complex 30,000 22,275 74%Park
Improvement
Soto Sports Complex ADA
Bleachers
Replace current bleachers with new
ADA complaint bleachers 5,000 5,388 108%Park
Improvement
Soto Sports Complex Fencing
Repairs
Replace segments of broken chain-
link/barbed wire fencing throughout
the Soto Sports Complex
15,000 14,258 95%Park
Improvement
Barrier Removal Project at
Ikeda Field
Provide ADA ramp from the Soto Sports
Complex parking lot to Ikeda Field
bleachers
176,673 168,802 96%CDBG
Citywide Trash/Recycle
Receptacle Replacement
Replace outdated broken trash/recycle
receptacles throughout the City 6,000 6,000 100%Park
Improvement
FY 2020-21 Fourth Quarter - Completed Capital Improvement Projects
Item 8.b. - Page 13
Page 10 of 10
SECTION 4: APPROPRIATION TRANSFERS AND BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
The following fourth quarter budget adjustments were previously approved by Council or are classified as
administrative and not requiring Council approval.
$0 Community Development Department: Reallocated $5,030 of budgeted expenditures within the
General Fund from the Community Development Department Engineering Contractual Services account
to authorize the additional Local Roads Safety Program (LRSP) amendment for additional data updates.
Approved on 06/22/2021 Council meeting, item 8.i.
No other adjustments are required at this time.
Item 8.b. - Page 14