PC Minutes 2002-01-151
CALL TO ORDER
The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chair Costello
presiding. Present were Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, and Keen. Also in
attendance were Community Development Director Rob Strong, Associate Planners Kelly
Heffernon, Teresa McClish, and Public Works Engineering Assistant Rodger Olds.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There were no additions or corrections to the minutes of the regular meetings of November
6, 20, and December 4, 2002 /The minutes were approved as prepared on a motion by
Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously carried.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
The following action was taken:
MINUTES
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 15, 2002
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1 Correction to Exhibit 'A' for resolution 02 -1818 for the approved office building at
136 Bridge Street (Non - Public Hearing - Time Extension Case No. 01 -005).
2. Letter from Harry and Adeline Bottorff, 1218 Montego Street, referencing public
hearing agenda item II. C. for applicant Sprint PCS, Conditional Use Permit 01 -007.
3. Letter from Bill McCann, Chairman of "Citizens' Committee for the Conservation of
Local Agriculture" (CCCLA), referencing Arroyo Grande Citizens' Petition for
Referendum
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE NO. 01 -001; APPLICANT -
VILLAGE GLEN HOMES, LLC; LOCATION: TRACT 2265, JAMES WAY. Staff report -
Teresa McClish, Associate Planner
Ms. McClish said in December 1999 the Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 2265 and Planned Unit Development 96 -563 located north of James Way near
Mesquite Lane. Condition No. 88 requires that private pumping systems be required for
domestic and fire flows for Lot 41. The applicant is requesting to eliminate the condition
because it is not anticipated that the school will be built for another three years and
maintenance of the pumps during that time would serve no purpose. Staff has reviewed
the application and agree that as long as the applicant installs a pump for irrigation at the
school site, the pump system required for domestic and fire flows can be installed by the
school district when the site is developed.
Gary Young, Applicant, read a letter to the Planning Commission from Mike Sears, Deputy
Superintendent, Business, Lucia Mar School District:
A motion was made by Commissioner Keen, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to
approve the Amended Tentative Tract Map 2265 including Exhibit 'A' and the modification
to Condition of Approval No. 88, and adopt:
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -1817
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
AMENDMENT CASE NO. 01 -001, TRACT 2265, VILLAGE GLEN
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15` day of January 2002.
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01 -009; APPLICANT - TERRY
FOWLER; LOCATION: 212 MILLER WAY, (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 4,
2001 MEETING). Staff Report - Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner.
Ms. Heffernon spoke, saying as directed by the Planning Commission on December 4t the
applicant has submitted a revised site plan showing that the circular driveway can
accommodate the three additional guest parking spaces outside of the front setback area.
The spaces will be delineated with white striping and parking bumpers. Because of the safety
issues discussed during the previous public hearing, directional signage is also required for the
two driveway access points, with the northern access serving as an entrance only, and the
southern driveway limited as an exit only. Other than these amendments, the conditions of
approval remain unchanged from the Commission's previous review.
She further recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving
Conditional Use Permit 01 -009 subject to the revised conditions of approval.
Commissioner Guthrie commented that the driveway had three parking spaces with
bumpers, but that on the photographs showing the parking, there were four cars parked in
the driveway.
Ms. Heffernon said that the photograph was showing that four cars could be parked if
necessary, and that there was more than adequate room for a fourth car and maneuvering.
Commissioner Brown said for safety reasons he would like to see no parking on Miller Way
and he would like this to be a condition of approval.
Ms. Heffernon said a request for no parking on the street would have to go to the Traffic
Commission first.
Commissioner Brown said he could not approve this use without this condition.
Ms. Heffernon said the applicant only has to provide two parking spaces in the driveway,
but in fact has three parking spaces delineated.
Terry Fowler, the Applicant, spoke explaining the parking in more detail.
1
1
1
1
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
Page 3
Commissioner Keen thanked the applicant for returning to the Planning Commission with the
requested information and said that the revised site plan clarified the parking.
PUBLIC COMMENT
John McGrath, 227 Miller Way, spoke saying he had concerns with the steep grade of Miller
Way and thought there should be no parking on this street.
Doug LeSage, 297 Miller Way, spoke asking if this was the correct zoning for this type of a
business, and stating that he considers this road to be too narrow to have parking on both
sides of the street. In addition, he wanted to know if the room over the garage had a permit
for a second residential unit.
END OF PUBLIC COMMENT
Rob Strong clarified that the current General Plan classification is Low Density is Single
Family Residential and the Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use Permit can continue as a valid
use with a Home Occupation Permit.
Commissioner Brown said even though he had no problem with the concept of a bed and
breakfast he could not approve this project because he could not approve all of the findings,
referencing No. 5, that "the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity ".
Commissioner Fowler thought a bed and breakfast was a great use for this house, but she
did have some concerns about the on- street parking. However, she had spoken to a
neighbor of another local bed and breakfast and was told that there was less trouble with
the guests of the bed and breakfast, with regard to the parking, than there was with the
neighbor's parking.
Commission Keen commented if there was "no parking" how far should this be taken on
Miller Way, some of the residents may not want to have "no parking" on this street.
Commission Brown said he would leave that up to the discretion of Public Works.
Commissioner Guthrie spoke saying he thought that guests of the bed and breakfast would
not park on the street as they usually want to protect their car. He commented that a
Condition of Approval for parking cannot be made for a public street and it would have to go
to Traffic Commission.
Chair Costello said that the applicant had shown that there can be adequate parking to meet
the requirements. He had no objection to this project and he believed that all the findings
could be met.
Commissioner Guthrie asked if occupancy of the room over the garage was allowed under
the Conditions of Approval?
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
Page 4
Ms. Heffernon said at this time the Building Permit does not allow for occupancy of the room
above the garage. If the applicant wishes to have occupancy of this room they would have
to return for a secondary residence use permit.
Commission Guthrie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Keen, to approve the
Conditional Use Permit including Exhibits 'A' and 'B' as submitted, and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 01 -1812
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO.
01 -009, APPLIED FOR BY TERRY P. FOWLER
AYES: Commissioners Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: Commissioner Brown
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15 day of January 2002.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 01 -007; APPLICANT - SPRINT
PCS; LOCATION: 200 HILLCREST DRIVE (RESERVOIR NO. 2). Staff Report - Kelly
Heffernon, Associate Planner.
Ms. Heffernon said Sprint is proposing to install a telecommunications facility at City
Reservoir No. 2 located off Hillcrest Drive. The installation of this new facility will include
replacing the existing City -owned lattice structure with a 75 -foot tall monopole, relocate all
operating antennas from the lattice tower and water tank to the new monopole, and
placing two equipment cabinets all within a 288 square -foot lease area, enclosed with a 7-
foot tall masonry wall. The monopole would be camouflaged as a pine tree to blend in with
the existing mature pine trees surrounding the water tank.
The monopole facility will consist of six PCS panel antennas arranged in three sectors of
two panels each. The height of the monopole is necessary to receive and send signals at
the proper radio frequency without interference from the existing pine trees. The site is
highly visible from the Highway 101 corridor, from the surrounding residential
development, and the adjacent Elementary School.
Sprint originally proposed to co- locate its antennas onto the Nextel monopine, but because
of the visual impacts associated with siting a potentially 90 -foot tall facility, Sprint
resubmitted to show a separate pole on the west side of the water tank. Nextel is
expected to resubmit their project plans sometime within the next month or so. Both
projects will be conditioned to relocate the City's antennas onto the new facility, and the
project that is first issued a building permit will be responsible for the relocation of the
City's communication antennas.
Commissioner Guthrie commented that although they had been supplied with the color
photo simulations when he had visited the site it was difficult to get a point of reference to
judge the height of the monopole.
1
1
1
1
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
Chair Costello asked if the Telecommunication Facilities Siting and Permit Submittal
Requirements had been adopted and does Sprint need to meet these requirements.
Ms. Heffernon said they had been adopted by City Council November 27, 2001 after
Sprint had applied for their initial application and that they had met the requirements
requested.
Commissioner Fowler asked if additional trees would be requested?
Ms. Heffernon said that Parks and Recreation did not ask for any conditions. In addition,
the Telecommuncations Wireless Siting workshop clarified that tall trees are not desirable
as they may block the signals from the pole.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ms. Emerson replied that it was.
Page 5
Leah Emerson, representative with Tacit Communications, thanked staff for supplying
them with the Guidelines and then gave an update and the history of their application.
Commissioner Keen asked if Attachment No. 6 (an email) in the Staff Report was the
response to the requirement that "No monopole or towers shall be installed on top of an
exposed ridgeline or prominent slope when alternative sites are available ".
Commissioner Keen stated that one of the examples in the attachment referring to the
facilities located on the roof of Trader Joe's was not a good example of height.
Commissioner Keen said that he thought the Fire Department also had a concern that the
signals might cause interference for them.
Rodger Olds, Public Works, said that it was the Nextel proposal that had been a concern.
Commissioner Keen asked if Sprint or Nextel would be bearing the cost of meeting the
required conditions?
Ms. Emerson said they would be working together with Nextel. In addition, they would be
happy to landscape around the site for screening.
Dr. Scott Adams, 1222 Montego Street, spoke saying he had concerns with the following:
• He lives closest to the site of the proposed monopole and is concerned about safety
and aesthetics.
• There is an Elementary school close by and children pass several times a day.
• There are no attennas that are attractive.
He went on to say that the demonstration balloon showed that the pole would be up above
the trees and that the slope does not diminish the height of the pole. He showed a
photograph he had taken of the balloon that had been previously placed at the site for
Nextel.
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
Commissioner Guthrie asked what choices were available for using another site?
Page 6
Benadene Duffin, 1398 Newport Avenue, had concerns with health and safety.
Wendy Beckham, 220 Hillcrest, spoke saying she had concerns with health and safety.
Carie Randolph, 1310 Sierra Drive had concerns with:
• Health and safety.
• Increase in traffic.
• Generator noise.
Commissioner Brown asked about the letter to the Planning Commission that had a
concern about the interference with TV reception.
Ms. Emerson said she could ensure that there would not be interference to TV reception
from their monopole because of the different frequency. With regard to traffic there would
only be routine maintenance vehicles visiting the site once or twice a month.
Ms. Emerson said they had done a lot of research and this was the best site. The
monopine would be 70 feet tall and located next to existing trees 69 feet in height.
Chair Costello spoke saying with respect to the Telecommunication Facilities Siting and
Permit Submittal Requirements-
• Were any other alternative sites, not listed in Attachment 6, considered and what were
the pros and cons. Do you have the coverage rings to demonstrate this?
• What is the foundation windload on your tower?
• What kind of services are being provided?
• Where are the habitable structures within 500 feet listed?
• What is the total antenna capacity for the proposed project?
Chair Costello said he could not see the answers to these requirements. Some of the
views shown in the pictures, showing the height of the pole are pleasing and some are not.
He said the information provided was inadequate for him to make a decision. Specifically
he would like to see what alternative sites were looked at and what makes them
inappropriate.
Ms. Emerson said the best thing they could do would be to come back to the Planning
Commission with more information.
Ronald Nishida, 122 Avenida de Diamante asked if the City water tanks effect the height
of the pole?
Ms. Emerson said the water tank has no effect on the radio transmission. Sprint RF
signals cannot go through foliage, which is why the proposed monopole height is required.
1
1
1
1
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
John Lange, 146 Avenida de Diamante spoke, saying that a survey showing all residences
within 500 feet of the proposed site should not be difficult to do, and existing aerial
photos could be used.
END OF PUBLIC COMMENT
Page 7
Commissioner Brown spoke saying there is probably not a site in Arroyo Grande that
everyone would agree to. This is a new area for us and we are in the middle of a learning
process. However, he believed that more information should be supplied to satisfy the
submittal requirements.
Commissioner Fowler also had concerns that the requirements had not been met, but
thought this was a good site for this monopole.
Commissioner Keen thought it was a good site also, but he had a problem with the height
of the knoll with the tower on top. He said the applicant needs to go through the
requirements and give the City all of the information.
Commissioner Guthrie spoke saying more information was required on alternative sites, the
survey, the capacity and the potential of co- location.
After some discussion the Planning Commission said they had concerns that the submittal
requirements had not been met and that the applicant had not supplied all of the required
information satisfactorily with respect to the adopted Telecommunication Facilities Siting
and Permit Submittal Requirements.
Rob Strong suggested the applicant supply an aerial photograph plus the requirements and
an analysis of the alternative sites considered.
The following action was taken:
Commissioner Guthrie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brown, requesting that
the applicant return to the Planning Commission with the required information and that the
Public Hearing for the project be re opened at the meeting of February 19, 2002. The
motion was approved with a unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARING - DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 01 -002; TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 01 -001; AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01 -001; APPLICANT - CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE; LOCATION: JAMES WAY AND COLLADO CORTE. Staff Report - Kelly
Heffernon, Associate Planner.
Ms. Heffernon spoke saying the proposed project consists of three separate applications.
The first is a Development Code Amendment to modify the Zoning Map from Public
Facilities to Residential Suburban (RS) for a 1 .40 -acre portion of the Park located on the
north side of Collado Corte. The second application is a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide
that 1.40 -acre property into three single - family residential lots. The third application is a
Conditional Use Permit to develop the remaining 8.6 acres of the property as a community
park.
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
The recent General Plan Update included a change in land use for this 1 .40 -acre property
from Public Facilities to Low- Medium Density Single - Family Residential. The environmental
impacts associated with this land use change were evaluated in the Program Environmental
Impact Report for the General Plan Update. Last Tuesday, the City Council approved a
Resolution to abandon the residential portion of the park in order to eventually sell the lots
and use that money for park construction. The park has been planned on this site for over
10 years but the City has lacked sufficient funding for park development.
The proposed subdivision would create three residential lots consisting of one .6 -acre
parcel, and two .4 -acre parcels. Changing the zoning designation from PF to RS is
consistent with the new Low- Medium land use designation, since the density for both is
2.5 dwelling units per acre, and the proposed density is 2.1 dwelling units per acre.
The Rancho Grande Park Development Plan integrates the amenities of a "passive park ".
Improvements include a main park access off of James Way with 61 parking spaces,
pedestrian walkways throughout the site, basketball and volleyball courts, baseball
diamond, playground area, horseshoe pits, picnic tables, barbeque areas, and restroom
facilities. Plans have been prepared for grading, drainage, utilities, lighting, landscaping and
irrigation. The project construction would be phased over a three to four year time period,
with construction bids tentatively scheduled to go out next month and construction to
begin sometime in the spring.
Because the property is actually not included as part of the Rancho Grande Planned
Development, the City Council is only required to take action on the Development Code
Amendment. The Development Code Amendment must first be approved before the Parcel
Map can be formally approved. Therefore, the Resolution approving the Tentative Parcel
Map is written such that any action taken by the Planning Commission tonight is
contingent upon future Council approval of the Development Code Amendment. The
Conditional Use Permit is final at the Planning Commission level.
In conclusion, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached three
Resolutions, thereby recommending approval of the Development Code Amendment to City
Council, and approving the Tentative Parcel Map and Development Plan for Rancho Grande
Park subject to the conditions of approval.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Page 8
Karen Lange, 146 Avenida de Diamante, said their property was located next to the
proposed subdivision and she was a concerned if the setbacks would be adequate to retain
their view. She requested a buffer zone of 20 -30 feet.
Ms. Heffernon said there is no buffer zone, but the setbacks are 20 feet.
Dan Hernandez, Parks and Recreation Director spoke, giving a brief overview of the
timeline for the park.
Jim Suovanen, 422 Collado Corte, real estate broker, spoke saying:
1
1
1
1
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
END OF PUBLIC COMMENT
area.
Page 9
• The concept of the program was excellent, but the lots should be very carefully
evaluated before being put on the market. Given the numerous amenities the lots
should get a good price.
• The original grading had damage to the black top. The street will need some
significant repair and who would be responsible for this.
Dean Coker, Castlerock Development, Staff Planner made some brief comments and gave
the Planning Commission a copy of a letter that listed the following main points on the
proposed residential subdivision:
• The object of sub - dividing and selling the residential lots is to finance the construction
of the remaining park land and the same location.
• Castlerock Development Owner, Darren Shetler, is interested in seeing the $25,000
donated by his company for constructing the park be applied to the park project to see
it to fruition.
• As confirmed in a letter from the Community Development Department, they have been
assured that the process in approving the three lot subdivision would not result in three
less lots appropriated to the Rancho Grande Development as outlined in the
Development Plan (Ordinance No. 186.C.S.).
• They would like to be kept informed as the project proceeds through its various steps
towards completion.
John Lange, 146 Avenida de Diamante, said he lived above the subdivision and wanted to
confirm where the site was on the site plan as shown on the projector. He said that it had
been negotiated that the actual line be moved so as not to block their view. In addition, he
wanted to ensure that the grade would not be elevated.
Commissioner Keen asked the question "should the City give away land that they have
acquired for park development "? He went on to say he hoped the owners of the new lots
would not complain about having a park in their back yard.
Chair Costello asked if adding the three houses would effect the number of houses allowed
in the Planned Development district.
Rob Strong said he had researched this and that these houses are in the PF zone so are not
included in the allowed units in the P.D. 1 .2 district.
Rob Strong said for the three residential lots the City will not grade the driveways and will
not be changing the Tots as they now exist. Repair to the sidewalks may be addressed,
and the City Design Review Consultant will review the proposed houses.
Dan Hernandez said with regard to the grading it is our intent to keep the concept of rolling
hills, and just try to level the park for the playing areas.
Commissioner Keen asked if the three Tots would be included in the Rancho Grande P.D.
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
Rob Strong said they are not included in the P.D. district.
Page 10
Dan Hernandez said City Council directed that these homes be consistent with the CC &R's
and they could be included as Conditions of Approval.
Commissioner Keen said he would like to see the Conditions of Approval be the same
standards for architectural compliance.
The Planning Commission took the following action:
Commissioner Fowler made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brown to recommend to
City Council to adopt the amended zoning map including Exhibit "A" as submitted:
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -1814
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND
THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE IN
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CASE NO, 01 -001, APPLIED FOR
BY THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15 day of January 2002.
Commissioner Guthrie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fowler to approve the
Vesting Tentative Tract Map, including Exhibit "A" and "B" and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -1815
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
CASE NO. 01 -001, LOCATED SOUTH OF JAMES WAY AND NORTH OF
COLLADO CORTE, APPLIED FOR BY THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15 day of January 2002.
Commissioner Brown made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Guthrie to adopt
Conditional Use Permit 02 -001, including Exhibit "A" as submitted.
1
1
1
1
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -1816
Page 11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
INSTRUCTING THE COMMISSION SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 02 -001, LOCATED SOUTH OF JAMES WAY AND NORTH OF
COLLARDO CORTE, APPLIED FOR BY THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15` day of January 2002.
NON - PUBLIC HEARING - TIME EXTENSION CASE NO. 01 -005; APPLICANT — RAYMOND
SMITH; LOCATION: 136 BRIDGE STREET. Staff Report - Teresa McClish.
Ms. McClish gave the staff report saying that the Planning Commission approved the
Conditional Use Permit 99 -004 on May 18, 1999 for construction of a 2,188 square foot
office building including a second floor apartment on a 6,325 square foot vacant lot in the
Village Commercial District. On January 4, 2000 the permit was amended to change the
use on the second floor from residential to office. The applicant just purchased the
property last month and requires time to build.
Commissioner Fowler asked if the applicant could apply for one more Time Extension.
Ms. McClish said they could.
The Planning Commission had no further concerns and the following action was taken:
Commission Keen made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brown, to approve the Time
Extension including Exhibit 'A' and 'B' as submitted, and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -1818
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99 -004 APPLIED FOR BY RAYMOND
SMITH
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Fowler, Guthrie, Keen and Chair Costello
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15` day of January 2002.
MINUTES
Planning Commission
January 15, 2002
DISCUSSION ITEMS
• American Planning Association (APA) Video: "Planning Tomorrow's Communities" - 10
minute video presentation - Unable to be show as no VCR was available in the Council
Chambers.
• Administrative Interpretation regarding Replacement of Rotating Public Art in the Village
Centre with permanent clock /bench and art feature - The Planning Commission agreed
that this would be a suitable replacement and they would like to be informed when the
next meeting of the Review Committee was going to be held.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENTS
The Planning Commission requested that a letter be submitted to the Traffic Commission
requesting that the traffic on Miller Way be looked at.
The Planning Commission made the following minute motion:
Commissioner Guthrie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brown that staff sends
a letter to the Traffic Commission requesting them to review the traffic on Miller Way. The
motion was passed with a unanimous voice vote.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW -UP REPORTS
Rob Strong said the East Grand Avenue Enhancement Plan is moving forward and Planning
Commission will be able to review this before it goes to City Council.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30
p.m. on a motion by Commissioner Brown seconded by Commissioner Guthrie, and
unanimously carried.
Lyn Reardon - Smith, Commission Clerk
AS TO CONTENT:
Rob trong,
Community Development Director
o eph Costello, Chair
Page 12
1