Loading...
PC Minutes 1996-07-021 ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 2, 1996 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairperson Keen presiding. Present were Commissioners Beck, Tappan, Deviny and Lubin. Community Development Director Doreen Liberto- Blanck, Associate Planner Lori Rosenstein, Public Works Director John Wallace and Parks and Recreation Director John Keisler were in attendance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - On motion by Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Deviny, and unanimously carried, the minutes of the special joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting of May 29, 1996 were approved as presented and the minutes of the special Planning Commission meeting of June 4, 1996 were approved as corrected: (page 6, paragraph 2: change pedestrian to fr) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None SELECTION OF CIAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON - On motion by Chairperson Keen, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and unanimously carried, Commissioner Tappan was selected Chairperson. Commissioner Deviny nominated Chairperson Keen for Vice Chairperson, he declined. On motion by Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and unanimously carried, Commissioner Deviny was selected Vice Chairperson. With unanimous consensus, it was determined that Chairperson Keen would conduct the current meeting and Chairperson Tappan would take the gavel at the next Planning Commission meeting. PUBLIC HEARING - COASTAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, APPLICANT; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 89 -459, AMENDMENT #1, TO ADD THREE 24' X 40' MODULAR BUILDINGS TO SERVE AS KINDERGARTEN AND HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOMS; 1220 FARROLL AVENUE Associate Planner Lori Rosenstein presented the staff report. She explained the background of the existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and discussed the reasons for the proposed amendment which would allow the consolidation of the school to one site. This is a temporary solution until the school moves to its proposed permanent campus in approximately five (5) years. Staff received one written response, after preparation of the staff report, from an adjoining property owner which was included in the packet. The letter addressed a concern regarding the fence along the boundary of the two properties. A letter from the applicant was also included in the packet which addresses their concerns with certain Conditions of Approval (COA) proposed for the project. The Park and Recreation Director and Public Works Director will discuss the COA's in question. Staff placed a modification to Condition #3 before the Commission this evening. The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) and the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) have reviewed the application and recommend approval based on the COA's. Commissioner Tappan questioned the fact that COA's approved in the original CUP have not yet been completed. Staff agreed and stated that proposed COA 17a and 17b have been included to address that concern. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission Page 2 July 2, 1996 Chairperson Keen opened the public hearing. Kevin Rachel, superintendent of Coastal Christian School - stated that he has been at the school for approximately one year and had been unable to receive clear direction regarding the easement that was required in the original CUP; stated that the school was attempting to consolidate their campus and would not exceed the number of students approved in the original CUP; suggested that since the school was a temporary use it would not be fair to subject the property owner to restrictive conditions; stated that they would restrict the students from approaching the fence that the neighbor was concerned about; and, questioned the need for a Landscape Architect to prepare a plan for the entire site but agreed with the need for landscaping along the 40' strip adjoining the parking lot. Kathy Spencer, 455 Golden West Place - stated that she had written the letter and expressed appreciation that the school was willing to address her concern. She stated that she had no objection to the increased use of the school, they have been good neighbors; expressed concern with the issue of security because her fence is 5' in height; and, expressed concern that exterior lighting might shine into her yard. Jackie Walker, 451 Golden West Place - stated that she had similar concerns as Ms. Spencer. Additionally, there is a tall tree that hangs over her fence and she was concerned that it would be easy for larger children to climb it and access her yard. With no further comments from the audience, Chairperson Keen closed the public hearing and requested John Wallace, Public Works Director to address the Commission. Mr. Wallace presented an overhead slide which identified the required right -of -way (ROW) for collector streets. The requested total ROW is 32' with an additional Public Utility Easement (PUE) of 6'. There was discussion about why the original COA was not enforced. Chairperson Keen invited John Keisler, Parks and Recreation Director to address the Commission. Mr. Keisler clarified that the landscaping COA was for a 40' strip adjacent to the parking lot and a blank wall on the proposed modular buildings #2 & #3. There was discussion regarding standard landscaping COA's; the need for a plan by Landscape Architect; concern that the language of the COA was unclear; the tree referred to by Ms. Walker; and the requirement for a gate to allow access to Soto Sports Complex. After discussion by the Commission regarding the above issues, the following action was taken, to adopt: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, INSTRUCTING TILE SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 89 -459, AMENDMENT #1, APPLIED FOR BY COASTAL CHRISTIAN SCIIOOL AT 1220 FARROLL AVENUE tern orar inn a l nt may : not t e pernutteo ast JuI ycw s ry ti l t to r 1 Replace COA #3: Add COA /t"7a: RESOLUTION NO. 96 -1568 1 1 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission Page 3 July 2, 1996 ,}: i ;;;... {.. ' .`> i >:i:jt;:: Add COA #7b: • • It s . err[ . »lig r.ra :::slta : <:U.e >:c re Y � Modify COA #8: "Prior to issuance of building permit, a landscaping and irrigation plan • • Delete COA #11: the- appkeanl- shall- eens.der- the- installatien- emote- en4he- ner-tk- side -ef- the- preperty-- aleng- the-fericc te- allew- aeeess -lay- students-: On a motion by Commissioner Deviny, seconded by Commissioner Tappan, and by the following roll call, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Deviny, Tappan, Beck, Lubin and Keen NOES: None ABSENT: None Staff advised the public of the right to appeal this project decision. NON - PUBLIC HEARING - INTERPRETATION FOR FLAG POLES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES; VARIOUS LOCATIONS CITYWIDE Associate Planner Lori Rosenstein presented the staff report. Staff has recently received an inquiry from a property owner concerning the development regulations for the installation of a flag pole on commercial property. Staff researched and located an interpretation from 1979 which determined that flag poles in all commercial zones were subject to approval via the conditional use permit process. A more recent Planning Commission interpretation in January of 1992 allowed flag poles in residential neighborhoods by right. Staff requested that the Commission provide an interpretation that flag poles in commercial developments are subject to plot plan review by staff. Patrick Devaney, Sunset North Car Wash - stated that he contacted the cities of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Thousand Oaks and he felt "the rule of thumb" was a height limit of 50' when the flag did not block power lines or traffic. The Commission discussed cost of a Conditional Use Permit vs. Plot Plan Review Permit; height of flag poles in adjoining communities and their regulations; concept of limiting size of flag itself; height of flag pole along freeway as opposed to regular commercial development; need for setback requirement; and, type of flag that could be flown. After discussion by the Commission regarding the above issues, the following action was taken, to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 96 -1569 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PROVIDING AN INTERPRETATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR FLAG POLES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES Modify finding #3: Due to the unique nature of flag poles, plot plan review is necessary to insure the location of the flag pole ri ?S z `t f> bg d not impact public safety or conflict with existing development. Arroyo Grande Planning Conurnission Page 4 July 2, 1996 On a motion by Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and by the following roll call, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Beck, Deviny, Lubin and Keen NOES: None ABSENT: None NON - PUBLIC HEARING - REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RULES AND REGULATIONS Community Development Director Doreen Liberto - Blanck presented the staff report. Chairperson Keen indicated that he would prefer that the new Chairperson make the decisions regarding review of Rules and Regulations and suggested continuance of the item to the August 6 meeting. The Commission concurred with this action. PLANNING COMMISSION /COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ITEMS AND COMMENTS A. The GenCom, Inc. project will be presented to the City Council at the meeting of July 9, 1996. B. Conduct special Meeting on Thursday July 18, 1996 or Tuesday July 30, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. to discuss Long Range Traffic Study and Short Range Traffic Study; and a Special Meeting on Monday July 22, 1996 or Thursday July 25, 1996 with the City Council and Traffic Commission regarding a presentation on the "Great Street" Program WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Agenda Item No. 11. A., modification to Condition of Approval #3. 2. Handout on "Great Street" program ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, on a motion by Commissioner Deviny, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. to the next scheduled meeting on July 16, 1996. ATTEST: Luc lle Breese, Commission Clerk AS TO CONT NT: Doreen Libert■=13lanck, Community Development Director n Keen, Ch ' person 1