Loading...
PC Minutes 1984-09-18ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION September 18, 1984 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Gerrish presiding. . Present are Commissioners Carr, Fischer, Moore, Moots, Olsen and Soto. Planning Director Eisner is also in attendance. MINUTE APP„ OVAL Upon hearing no additions or corrections, the minutes of the regular meeting of September 4, 1984 were approved as prepared on motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Moore, and unanimously carried. ARCHITECTIIRAI. REVIEW NO. 84- 315,.6 UNI'i APARTMENT COMPLEX, 1162 ASH .TREET. _IN THE "R -G" DISTRICT. (GARY WHITE) Planning Director Eisner briefly reviewed the staff report, dated September 4, 1984, noting that the project meets the development standards of the City, and falls both within the requirements of the zoning and of the General Plan. He noted that the matter was set for discussion by the Architectural Review Committee, however, there was no quorum for that meeting, and the matter went to the Staff Advisory Committee, where it was reviewed and recommended for approval. Commissioner Fischer inquired if there will be fencing. Planning Director Eisner advised that there is no fencing shown on the site plan, however, it could be included as a part of the landscaping approval. In answer to Commissioner Fischer's question regarding the boundary line, Mr. White, applicant, advised there is a recorded easement for a common shared driveway. He commented that the lot adjoins the units just approved for Richard DeBlauw, and these units will look the same as Mr. DeBlauw's development. Commissioner Soto stated one of the things he has seen on that street is there are a lot of children and there are no places for them to play. He inquired if these were going to be family units. Chairman Gerrish stated that most of the multi - family units reviewed by the Commission recently have been condominiums and the Commission does require some type of recreational facilities in condo projects. Commissioner Soto questioned the size of the apartment units. Planning Director Eisner stated the proposed units are typical size units. Commissioner Fischer stated it seems to be the consensus of the Commission that the apartment buildings that have been reviewed have not been quality design projects and the Commission would like to see something more creative. Commissioner Carr stated, in his opinion, the Commission should go ahead and approve this project, however, put the people on notice that in the future the Commission is going to be looking for more amenities in these projects. Planning Director Eisner commented that the issues of concern here have nothing to do with densities and the requirements of open space; those are spelled out in the Zoning Ordinance. He recommended that perhaps staff should be directed to study the development standards and guidelines for architectural approval. After further discussion, Architectural Review Case No. 84- 315 was approved on motion by Commissioner Carr, seconded by Commissioner Fischer, and unanimously carried, subject to the following condition: 1. A detailed landscaping plan, to include fencing to City Standards, shall be submitted for approval of the Parks Director prior to issuance of a building permit. On motion by Commissioner Moots, seconded by Commissioner Olson and unanimously carried, staff was requested to review and upgrade standards for apartments and also the architectural review process. Planning Director Eisner suggested that a study session be scheduled at the end of October. Chairman Gerrish commented there have been several significant issues that staff has been asked to examine in the past six months, and he requested staff submit a List of those ite1us for purposes of `%3 ciuing priorities on those issues. 127 128 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -18 -84 Page 2 ' 1II3LIC HFA_R- N - iI F ,PERMIT CASE NO. 73, REVISED DEVELOPMENT BALL_ LIE DI ST CAAPGROLIN . 25Q. lifiaLLEX WAY fl TILE "P -D" PLANNED n •V • .OPM .NT ]?ISTRIC�� MNTTED �Hr^ DDIST. eHURCH) Planning Director Eisner advised that the Methodist Campground has been a part of this community for some time and is now operating under a Use Permit as a part of the "P -D" zoning district. He commented that the representatives have submitted a conceptual - plan for review and approval. It is the intention of the camp representatives to get approval at the conceptual level and then go back and work out a phased development plan on the overall development. He stated this is a workable procedure within our development ordinance and use permit procedures which has been followed in the past. Mr. Eisner stated that the Staff Advisory Committee had a number of concerns that were put into the conditions of approval. Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 84 -373 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Burt All, Pasadena, representing the Methodist Church, stated the improvements are necessary to upgrade the facility. He further stated they are in agreement with the conditions presented by staff. Mr. Edwin Nelson, 204 Larchmont, stated he is mainly concerned about the increase of traffic. Mr. All stated they now have 114 beds and the proposed development would increase the beds to approximately 135 to 140 beds, and he didn't feel there would be a major change in the traffic flow. There being no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Fischer questioned the wording in condition No. 1 regarding the "easterly" portion of the property, stating this should be changed to "southerly" portion. Planning Director Eisner commented that the condition as worded was perhaps not as clear as it might be; the agreed condition is that the trash, debris and dead brush is to be removed, however, it wouldn't be stripping of the brush.. Commissioner Carr stated he objects to the City requiring the use of ground sterilant on the property because, in his opinion, it is not a good idea and the City should perhaps require them to keep the weeds down and not specify the use of ground sterilant. Planning Director Eisner advised the concern was that the open area represents a fire break, however, if that condition is not acceptable, it could be reworded to require that "the perimeter of the property shall be maintained as a fire break ". After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 84 -1013 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 84 -373, APPLIED FOR BY PACIFIC AND SOUTHWEST ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FORA REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Olsen, and by the . following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Carr, Fischer, Moore, Moots, Olsen, Soto and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 18th day of September 1984. ARCIII=TaBALt RAW CASL N01. 83 - 280 (REVISION) KI.LLG �� BTAURANT 1.15i SiR M). AYEIga ._ f' „ AND. Sj OKEEFE) . Planning Director Eisner advised that the application is for a revision to a previously approved architectural review. The project is consistent with the previous construction and meets the development standards of the "H -S" zone. He further advised that the Staff Advisory Committee reviewed the revision and recommends approval, subject to the issuance of a revised building permit. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -18 -84 Page 3 After a brief discussion, the revision of Architectural Review Case No. 83 -280 was approved on motion by Commissioner Moots, seconded by Commissioner. Carr, and unanimouslycarried,.su.bject to issuance of a revised building permit. /ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW C'k 84- 316., 2 UTO PA._ TS STORE, 951. BRAND AVENUE (SERVICE AUTO PARTS) . Planning Director Eisner advised that the applicants have requested this item be continued to the next meeting of October 2, 1984. AR ± TTFCTURAT REVIEW CASE NO. 84 -317, ADDITION AND Emmaum Qg 1S.INGLL E.P_MTh.Y RESIDENCE, 1139 Ali ST ,F.T IN "R -G" DISTRICT, (MARK VA TFF7)� Planning Director Eisner advised this is a minor project that is a remodeling and addition to an existing residence. It is brought to the Commission simply because it is in the "R -G" District. He commented that the project has been reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and was found to be acceptable. Mr. Vasquez advised that he is asking for a second unit; and there will be one uncovered parking space and three covered parking spaces. There being no comments, on motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and unanimously carried, Architectural Review Case No. 84 -317 was approved subject to the Standard Conditions of the City. REQUEST FROM ARROYO GRANDE HALL ASSOCIATION IQ BUILD NEW BARBECUE AREA, 707 HUASNA ROAD, IN THE "RA -B3" DISTRICT. Planning Director Eisner referred to a letter, dated August 28, 1984 from the Arroyo Grande Hall Association requesting they be allowed to make improvements to the subject property. He stated they are proposing to build a new barbecue area, which would involve some moving of dirt, and remove the old barbecue area and *an old fence. Mr. Eisner noted that the Association Hall is a legal non - conforming use. The request was reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and in their discussion, the question was raised whether a new barbecue pit and the kind of improvements they are requesting would be interpreted as maintenance of an existing facility or expansion of anon-conforming use. Commissioner Fischer stated she has been contacted .by numerous people living adjacent to the hall complaining about some of the activities there. She .inquired if the improvements would increase the use of the hall. She further commented that some of the complaints she had heard related to the lack of restroom facilities. Mr. George Cecchetti, 120 Cecchetti Road, representing the Hall Association, stated he did not feel the improvements would increase the use of the facility. After a brief discussion, on motion by Commissioner Moore, second by Commissioner Soto, motion carried with one "no" vote, it was found that the requested improvements noted in Mr. Cecchetti's letter of August 28, 1984, constitutes maintenance of an existing facility, and not expansion of a non- conforming use. RTOUEc FOR mIliE EXTENSION _ HARRIS LOT lk, ADJUSTMENT. (LOT SPLIT QP_SE NO. 81-3631, Planning Director Eisner referred to a letter,, dated September 14, 1984 from San Luis Engineering, Inc., representing the applicant, requesting a one year time extension for the subject parcel map. He advised that the map was originally approved in 1981 and was approved for two years. The map was extended for one year, and that extension expires this month. They are entitled to one more extension which would expire on September 25, 1985. There being no discussion, the parcel map was granted a one year extension on motion by Commissioner Moore, seconded by Commissioner Fischer, and unanimously carried. 129 130 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -18 -84 hali1VT_C.ATT(m Planning Director Eisner commented with regard to the Commission's previous discussions relative to possible meetings with the Grover Ci -ty Planning Commission. He advised, in discussing the matter with Ton Sullivan of Grover City, he suggested that perhaps the Arroyo Grande Commission pick two members to serve as a sub - committee to meet with two members of the Grover City Commission to discuss the parameters of both cities and come up with some recommendations. After a brief discussion, Chairman Gerrish appointed Commissioners Carr and Moots to serve on the subcommittee, with Commissioner Fischer serving as alternate. COMI TTE u A 'OINTMEtQTS Commissioner Olsen advised she has had some physical problems and would be unable to attend the next Architectural Review /Lot Split Committee meeting, and she requested that the alternate member attend this meeting. Chairman Gerrish stated he has moved his offices to Arroyo Grande and it would now be convenient for him to serve on this Committee. After a brief discussion, staff was directed to delete Commissioner Olsen's name as representative to the Lot Split /Architectural Review Committee, and place the names of Commissioner Fischer and Chairman Gerrish as members, with Commissioners Moots and Moore as alternate members. bWOURNr Fit There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 9 :00 P.M. ATTEST: Secretary Page 4 i