Loading...
PC Minutes 1984-02-07ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1984 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Gerrish presiding. Present are Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer and Moore. Commissioners Moots and Olsen are absent. Planning Director Eisner is also in attendance. MINUTE APPROVAL Upon hearing no additions or dorrections, the minutes of the regular meeting of January 17, 1984 were approved on motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and unanimously carried. CONTINUATION - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 83 -297 - PARKING LOT EXPANSION, 345 SO. HALCYON ROAD IN THE "P -C" PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL). Planning Director Eisner briefly reviewed the overall parking layout for the hospital and the landscape treatment, noting that the landscaping is does meet the basic guidelines of the ordinance. He has indicated there is a need and it is their intent to make this would not be for ambulatory or San Luis Obispo Santa Maria Paso Robles Arroyo Grande Atascadero 0')(4 Yes, we can do it. 5 43 -6844 92 8 -7334 23 8 -5763 48 9 -6844 46 6 -5533 FAX 543 -4532 FAX 922 -2631 FAX 238 -0248 FAX 489 -9008 FAX 466 -1090 _ The staff reviewed the matter and the permits were granted for this of the ordinance. Commission that second question He stated amount pion, the parking lot designated as the emergency facilities; also, be expanded a little to the north spaces than by putting the front Wed her feelings that the hospital loesn ° t think further expansion is !s is a terrible design and the Brea. that she recently had an occasion to utpatient for rehabilitation, and she ssible, even in the reserved areas. .g up their spaces for needed parking muented that one of the primary to provide access for the handicapped. s little bit of aesthetics, but on the Dmmunity needs. motion by Commissioner Fischer, imously carried, Architectural Review ;errish noted that approval of the ie Commission at a previous meeting. that they have the right to appeal :ouncil within 10 days. ING CLOSED) - CANYON WAY. (C. E. SCHAFER). that at the conclusion of the public , there were two questions that were left e allowing the second house on Lot 1. determined that at some transitional period house not in accordance with the provisions Mr. Eisner stated that all departments wish to assure the this circumstance will not be allowed to happen again. The the Commission had was about the amount of land coverage. that the total percentage land coverage is 33 %, which is under the required in the ordinance. After discussion, Lot Split Case No. 83 -388 was approved subject to Standard Conditions and the special conditions listed in the staff report dated January 12, 1984, on motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and unanimously carried. Planning Director Eisner advised that this matter is finaled with the Planning Commission unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days. 57 58 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 2 -7 -84 PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 84 -360, ADDITION OF FOUR CLASSROOMS TO EXISTING BUILDING, 244 OAK PARK BLVD., IN THE "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DISTRICT. (PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH). Planning Director Eisner advised that the application is a request for additional classrooms on an existing church and school site. He pointed out that the zoning is Highway Commercial, and the request is in conformance with the General Plan and Zoning. He stated at the present time there are 60 parking spaces and, on the basis of the classroom addition, 4 additional spaces will be required. He further stated that it is his understanding that the school facilities will not be overlapping with the activities of the church. Mr. Eisner commented that this application has been reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and the Architectural Review Committee; both have recommended approval subject to the four recommended conditions listed in the draft resolution. Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for Use Permit Case No 84 -360 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open Tony Orefice, representing the applicants, spoke in favor of the Use Permit being granted. He advised that his clients are in agreement with the recommended conditions. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. There being no further discussion, the following action was taken: AGENTS FOR J. E. FOREMASTER). RESOLUTION NO. 84 -971 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY =I ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 84 -360, APPLIED FOR BY PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR ADDITION OF FOUR CLASSROOMS AT 244 OAK PARK BOULEVARD IN THE "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DISTRICT. Page 2 On motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Moore, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer, Moore and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Moots and Olsen the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of February 1984. Planning Director Eisner advised that architectural review of the project would also be included in the foregoing action. Planning Director Eisner stated that this action is final with the Planning Commission unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days. PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 1158 "OAK PARK VILLAS ", LOT 7, TRACT 604, OAK PARK ACRES, A 70 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION UNDER OPTIONAL DESIGN STANDARDS IN THE "P -D" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. (SAN LUIS ENGINEERING, Planning Director Eisner advised this matter is a resubmission of Tract No. 689 originally submitted in 1978. The map has been reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and the Subdivision Review Board. Both groups recommend conditional approval; the condition being related to a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission on the requirement for dedication of a park site previously required. He pointed out that the subdivision as submitted, does not show the park, and both the Staff Advisory Committee and Subdivision Review Board have questioned whether or not that park is still desirable. After discussion by the Staff Committee, it was recommended that the Commission open the public hearing and refer the matter to the Parks and Recreation Commission as an item for their meeting of February 15, 1984, and continue the public hearing to the Planning Commission meeting of February 21, 1984. Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for Te.,t.ative Map Tract No. 1158 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 2 -7 -84 Page 3 Jim McGillis, Surveyor for San. Luis Engineering, advised that there were originally 96 duplex units approved, and the resubmission is for single family houses, many of them with very large yards which may eliminate the necessity for a park. He commented that, should the Parks and Recreation Commission want a park in that area, it could be done and the subdivision could stay as it is designed. With regard to Condition #7, Mr. McGillis stated this has been discussed with the City staff, and it was the feeling that a 10 ft. wide sidewalk along Oak Park Boulevard would be a pure waste of concrete, and that a narrow walkway with landscaping on both sides would be much more pleasing. Planning Director Eisner advised that this condition was discussed this afternoon and he would concede the point, from the staff's point of view, that the sidewalk dimension could be reduced from 10 ft. to 6 ft., however, in its place, staff would like to substitute the standard specification for a curvelinear 6 ft. sidewalk and accompanying landscapeway in that right of way to maintain landscape continuity all the way up Oak Park Boulevard. Commissioner Carr suggested that Condition #24 be reworded to read: "Lift station plans and capacity shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department ". Mr. McGillis pointed out that basically what the Public Works Director wants is a letter from a mechanical engineer stating what the capacity is. After further discussion, on motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and unanimously carried, public hearing on Tentative Subdivision Map of Tract No. 1158 was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 21, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, SECTION 9- 4.908(b) AND (c), "MINIMUM YARDS REQUIRED" IN THE "R -3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Planning Director Eisner reviewed that an inconsistency was found in the Zoning Ordinance during the review of the Ervin /Gordon matter on Brisco Road and, at that time, the Commission indicated they wanted the wording to be consistent between the "R -G" and the "R -3" District. He referred to the draft resolution included with the agenda packets recommending the matter to .:the City Council. Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for the proposed Ordinance amendment had been duly published and posted, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 84 -972 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 9- 4.908(b) AND (c), "MINIMUM YARDS REQUIRED" IN THE "R -3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer, Moore and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Moots and Olsen the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of February 1984. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 83 -357, 17 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 182 BRISCO ROAD IN THE "R -3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. (G. GOMES, AGENT FOR DENNIS LINTNER). Planning Director Eisner advised that staff has not yet received a resubmittal on this matter and, at the applicant's request, the matter is recommended for continuance. Chairman Gerrish noted that the policy of the Commission has been to carry items on the agenda only for a few meetings and if the submission is not ready for review at that time, that it be dropped from the agenda and re- advertised. After discussion, Use Permit Case No. 83 -357 was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 6, 1984, and if not heard at that time, it will be dropped from the agenda. 59 60 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 2 -7 -84 Page 4 REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION - TRACT NO. 1039, CANYON WAY (W. L. FRISBY). Planning Director Eisner stated that a request for a time extension has been received from Mr. Frisby on Tentative Tract Map No. 1039. He noted that there have been no changes in conditions, and staff recommends approval of an 18 month extension. There being no discussion, an 18 month extension was granted on Tentative Tract Map No. 1039 on motion By Chairman Gerrish, seconded by Commissioner Benhardt, and unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT There being, no further business before the Commission the meting was adjourned by Chairman Gerrish at 9:00 P.M. ATTEST: t 4 ), (2.4 Secretary hairman