Loading...
PC Minutes 1984-01-03ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION January 3, 1984 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Gerrish presiding. Present are Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Moore, Moots and Olsen. Commissioner Fischer is absent. Planning Director Eisner is also in attendance. MTNTITF APPROVJ The minutes of the regular meeting of December 6, 1983wete approved as prepared on motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and unanimously carried. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 83 -297 (RESUBMITTAL) - PARKING LOT EXPANSION, 345 SO. HALCYON ROAD, IN THE "P -C" DISTRICT. (ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL). Planning Director Eisner noted that this matter was reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 15, 1983 and, at that time, was denied without prejudice because of- design concerns. He advised that the resubmittal before the Commission tonight addresses those concerns and meets the criteria of the parking ordinance. Mr. Eisner briefly reviewed the changes as submitted in the revised plans. COMMISSIONER FISCHER ENTERED THE MEETING DURING THE ABOVE DISCUSSION Chairman Gerrish commented that the staff's concerns regarding circulation have been met, but the Commission's concern was the parking lot location in the front and this has not been changed in the resubmittal. Planning Director Eisner commented that it appears the hospital, sooner or later, is going to have to examine their needs for a new site and a new facility, however, what we have here is an existing facility with a parking problem, and they are proposing an interim solution, and it was on that basis that staff recommended approval. Commissioner Carr stated, in his opinion, the Commission has a committment to the hospital and the entire community and should try to keep some ._:;semblance of aesthetic values that we have in the community. He further stated it is his feeling that we have not looked at all of the options and he would like to see something other than eliminating that landscaped area in front of the hospital. Commissioner-Moots stated he would like to see a complete parking layout of the hospital and determine what kind of utility is being made of the parking lot that now exists. Mr. Rick Seidler, Arroyo Grande Community Hospital, advised what they are trying to do is meet the needs of the patients and answer the complaints about the parking problem. 47 Planning Director Eisner reviewed a colored rendering of the proposed parking lot, stating that the Commission's approval of the proposal could be conditioned on approval of landscaping materials by the Parks and Recreation Director. Commissioner Fischer commented she would not like to see the land- scaped area in front turned into a parking lot. After discussion, on motion by Commissioner Olsen, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and unanimously carried, Architectural Review Case No. 83 -297 was continued pend- ing receipt of an overall parking lot plan for the. hospital. Mr. Seidler requested that the rear parking lot for 23 spaces be approved and the front parking lot be considered separately. Commissioner Olsen amended her motion to approve the rear parking lot for. 23 spaces and continue the matter of the front parking lot pending receipt of an overall parking layout. Amendment to motion seconded by Commissioner Moots and unanimously carried. Planning Director advised the Commission that this matter would appear on the agenda for their meeting of January 17, 1984. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 83 -298, WOOD - VOAKES MORTUARY, FAIR OAKS AVENUE IN THE "P -C" PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Planning Director Eisner advised that a Use Permit has been granted for this use subject to architectural approval. The application has been reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and the Architectural Review Committee. Approval is recommended by both committees subject to the conditions that were included in the staff report dated December 27, 1983. Mr. Eisner noted that, in his discussions with the applicants, there was an issue made about the conflict between the mortuary activities and the activities of the parochial school nearby, and the applicants indicated they would have no problem with the activities of the mortuary being limited to specific hours. Commissioner Olsen asked if the Committee didn't stipulate that the applicants make arrangements with the Catholic Church for use 48 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 1 -3 -84 Page 2 of their parking lot for overflow parking. Mr. Eisner advised that the applicants have indicated they have already made those arrangements. Tony Orefice, Architect for the project, reviewed the colors and types of materials to be used for the structure, stating they will be similar to what is on St. Patrick's Hall. Commissioner Moore asked about the landfill that is going in on the property. Mr. Orefice advised that there was a grading permit issued by the Engineering Department, and there is probably 1 -1/2 ft. of fill overall. Commissioner Moore commented that this could be a problem in some places; it is in a place that is pretty flat, and the neighbors' land is flat also. Mr. Eisner advised that this matter was heard as a Use Permit and the issue of grading on the property was dealt with at that time, and the applicants have obtained a grading permit from the Public Works Department. Commissioner Carr suggested that the suggested mortuary activity times be included in the requirements as Condition No. 8. After discussion, on motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Olsen, Architectural Review Case No. 83 -298 was approved subject to the 7 conditions included in the staff report, dated December 27, 1983 and the addition of Condition No. 8 as follows: 8. Activities at the mortuary to take place after 10:00 A.M. and to be concluded prior to 2:15 P.M. . to avoid conflict between funeral oriented automobile traffic and children arriving and leaving St. Patrick's School. Motion carried with Commissioner Moore abstaining. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 83 -300, ADMINISTRATION FACILITY, BRANCH AND MASON STREETS IN 'T_.. "C -B -D" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. (PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOC.). - Planning Director Eisner advised that the Production Credit Association had previously submitted a plan for a structure on a single lot at the corner of Branch and Mason Streets in the Central Business District, however, since that time they have been able to acquire the adjacent lot and were able to resolve all of the questions that had been raised by both the Staff Advisory Committee and the Architectural Review Committee, including the question of providing adequate off - street parking. The matter was again reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee and Staff Advisory Committee and is being recommended to the Commission for approval. Commissioner Carr commented that when this matter was originally before the Commission, he was concerned about having the building placed back against the creek and the parking lot along Branch Street and, in his opinion, having the parking lot in the rear would not preclude landscaping and bank stabalization of the creek. Commissioner Moore commented that he has been involved in the beautification project behind City Hall; he knows what is involved and it is very expensive. He pointed out that the way this projectis set up the applicant has to put in the improvements. He further commented that this is just what we wanted all the way through the Arroyo Grande city limits; planting and stream bank stabalization After a brief discussion, Architectural Review Case No. 83 -300 was approved in accordance with the plans submitted, on motion by Commissioner Moore, seconded by Commissioner Benhardt, motion carried with Commissioners Carr and Fischer voting "no ". PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 83 -359, CHURCH OFFICE, STORAGE AND OCCASIONAL EVENING MEETINGS, 1542 W. BRANCH STREET (OAK PARK PLAZA), IN THE "C -N" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (CENTRAL COAST CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH). Planning Director Eisner advised that this matter is before the Commission because of the unusual circumstances of the Oak Park Plaza. He noted that the underlying zoning is "C -N" Neighborhood Commercial, however, the overlay for the entire Oak Park area is "P -D ", which requires Use Permit action by both the Planning Commission and the City Council. He advised that the "C -N" Zone does not specifically permit either as a permitted use or subject to Use Permit pro- cedure, a church or church related activities, however, in the "H -S" Zone, which is similar in nature in many respects, churches and church related activities are permitted subject to obtaining a Use Permit. He further advised that this matter has been reviewed by the Staff Advisory Committee and, in that review, the - Committee could find no conflict with the requested use. He referred to a draft resolution that was included with the agenda for the Commission's consideration. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 1 -3 -84 RESOLUTION NO. 84-966 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 83 -359 APPLIED FOR BY CENTRAL COAST CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH TO PERMIT A CHURCH OFFICE AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN THE "C -N" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Page 3 Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 83 -359 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Mr. Bob Zeilenga, 555 Le Point Street, spoke in favor of the Use Permit. He advised the request is for use of an existing building for church office, storage and occasional evening meetings. He noted they would not be having Sunday services at this location. He further advised that they are actively looking for land and are hoping to build a permanent facility as soon as possible. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Benhardt, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer, Moore, Moots, Olsen and Chairman Gerrish None ABSENT: None - the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of January 1984. PUBLIC HEARING .--TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, TRACT NO. 1168, A 20 UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION, 163 AND 167 BRISCO ROAD, IN THE "R -3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. (WM. IRVINE /K. GORDON). Planning Director Eisner advised that this matter has been before the Commission in terms of a Use Permit application and Architectural Review, both of which have been approved. The third aspect is the submission of a tentative map. He briefly reviewed the staff report dated December 27, 1983. He advised that the tentative map has been reviewed by both the Staff Advisory Committee and the Architectural Review Committee, and it is recommended that all previously established conditions be added to the tentative map as a part of the adoption resolution. Mr. Eisner noted that a letter had been received by the Lucia Mar Unified School District indicating the proposed project's impact on the schools. He stated that the City Council is in the process of dealing with an ordinance relating to this concern. Mr. Eisner pointed out that the project was originally submitted as a 22 unit and approved. After review of the tentative map and the survey, it was discovered there was a discrepancy between the survey and the tentative map. The applicants have resubmitted the project as a 20 Unit condominium subdivision. The reduction by two units does not change the architecture and staff deemed that it was a minor modification and, therefore, the matter was not referred back to the Architectural Review Committee. Upon being assured by Planning Director Eisner that public hearing for Tract No. 1168 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Terry Orton, Westland Engineering, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of the proposed subdivision. In answer to Chairman Gerrish's question if there was any problem with the recommended conditions, Mr. Orton stated there were no problems; there was a question regarding fire flow, however, they have talked with Public Works Director Karp and the concern has been resolved. Al Spierling, 299 Miller Way, spoke regarding Agenda Items 6 and 8, commenting that these two proposals add a total of 37 units to the City, which means that 18 children will be added to the School District; this means one -half of a classroom which the School District does not have for this area; the District does not have space for additional children in the Arroyo Grande attendance area. This Commission has indicated a number of conditions, and he suggested that one solution to help provide for adequate schooling for the children is to indicate that the terms of the proposed ordinance would apply to this development as soon as that 49 50 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 1 -3 -84 ordinance has been adopted. In the absence of doing that, Mr. that the Commission postpone action on this matter until after has been adopted to assure that space will be provided for the are going to live in these subdivisions. Kirby Gordon, 260 Coral Court, Pismo Beach, stated that their application process started before the School District came to the City for fees and, at this point, they are not willing to accept fees on it; they have not budgeted for school . fees on this project. He commented that in other projects they have had with the City, they have always met or exceed what has been required and, in,this case, they are not in a position to accept a retroactive fee when an ordinance is adopted. There being no further comments for or against the proposed tract, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. Planning Director Eisner advised that Mr. Spierling's proposal to the Commission has been considered by the City Council on other projects and has been reviewed by the City -"Attorney. The City Attorney's opinion is that the Subdivision Map Act speaks to the point at hand and says that unless there is an enabling ordinance adopted requiring the establishment of those fees and the ordinance has been in effect for 30 days at the time the tentative tract map is submitted for review and deemed complete, then there is no basis for charging those fees. He commented that as far as postponing the application until the ordinance is adopted, the State law says that action must be taken within 50 days of the issuance of Notice of Completeness or it will be deemed approved unless waived by the appli- cant. After further discussion, the following action was taken: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: RESOLUTION NO. 84 -96:7 Spierling asked the Ordinance children that A E.SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1168, AND REFERRAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Page 4 On Motion by Commissioner Benhardt, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and by the following roll call. vote, to wit: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr and Chairman Gerrish Commissioners Fischer, Moots and Olsen Commissioner Moore None the foregoing Resolution was denied this 3rd day of January 1984. Commissioner Fischer stated she voted "no" in this matter because of the school conditions. Commissioner Moots advised he voted "no" because he didn't like the five ft. rear yard, and Commissioner Olsen stated she voted "no" because of the school situation and the five ft. rear yard. CONTINUATION (PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED) - PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT DELETING ARTICLES 36 AND 37 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ADOPTION OF A NEW ARTICLE 36 ENTITLED "FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION DISTRICT OR "F - DISTRICT (FLOOD HAZARD) Planning Director Eisner advised this is a continued action, and the public hearing has been closed on this matter. The proposed ordinance was discussed at the last meeting with Public Works Director Karp, and was continued to allow Commissioners more time to review the ordinance. 1 Commissioner Moore stated he disagrees with some of the classifications on the map and is going to be specific: On Wilma Dixon's farm, the map shows a portion of the flat land out of the flood zone and he knows for sure that it gets more than a foot of water; and this happens very often. Right next door is the Hilo Fuchiwaki farm which has the same problem. Also, the south side of Cherry Street; he has pictures to prove that it has had over a foot of water on it. The Arroyo Grande High School campus and around the buildings and playing fields, and the yard area of the Orchard Street Campus; also John Taylor's land definetely gets more than 1 ft. of water on it almost every year. He stated he has been studying that map for a month now, and this has been his business for 35 years and he still doesn't understand all of it. If there is a flooding problem, let's face it. At the Arroyo Grande High School and Orchard School; what were he and Joe Anderson doing out there putting sand bags around what is now the administrative offices; and other places such as Greenwood. He commented he thinks so seriously about this problem that he would like to recommend a study session between this Commission and the City Council to study the problem. He noted that on Christmas Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 1 -3 -84 Eve there were some people by the name of Robert and Barbara Weinold that got 8" of water in their house around their Christmas tree out on Highway 227, our Planning Commission at some time approved the project,and he doesn't think we want that to happen all of the time. He stated he believes we have a responsibility to take a hard look at these maps; they are a good tool to work with, but they are not accurate. He further commented that the instructions from the Corps of Engineers was if we find something in the map that is not accurate, make the changes and get it back to them. If we don't get the ordinance on the way, then our flood insurance eventually would be no good at all. Commissioner Moore moved that the Planning Commission request a joint study session with the City Council to study the flood map. Motion seconded by Commissioner Olsen, and unanimously carried. Chairman Gerrish directed Planning Director Eisner to write a memo to the City Council requesting the study session. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - "R -3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Planning Director Eisner stated that a discrepancy has been found in the Ordinance between the "R -3" and "R -G" District relative to side yards when a project is oriented so that the side :yard becomes the rear yard of the unit. He requested that the Commission adopt a Resolution of Intention to prepare an ordinance amendment to correct the discrepancy, and set the matter for public hearing for the first meeting in February. There being no discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 84 -968 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE INDICATING ITS INTENTION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING SECTION 9- 4.908(b) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. - On- - -by Commissioner Moots, seconded„by Commissioner Olsen, and by - the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer, Moore, Moots, Olsen and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of January 1984. RESOLUTION NO. 84-969 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE INDICATING ITS INTENTION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING SECTION 3 -1.418 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. Page 5 51 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3- 1.418, "SOLICITORS, PEDDLERS AND ITINERANT VENDORS ". Planning Director Eisner commented some difficulties that were experienced during the Christmas season, particularly in the Central Business District and Highway Service District, relative to Solicitors, peddlers and vendors. He requested that the Commission adopt a Resolution of Intention to examine that section of the ordinance and the accompanying zoning provisions to see if there is something that might be done to tighten it up. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: 52 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 1 -3 -84 On motion by Commissioner Moots, seconded by Commissioner Benhardt, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: ATTEST: AYES: Commissioners Benhardt, Carr, Fischer, Moore, Moots, Olsen and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of January 1984. . ADJOURNMENT. • Thereibeing no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 9:40 P.M. Page 6