Loading...
PC Minutes 1981-08-0448 ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION August 4, 1981 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Gerrish presiding. Present are Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari and Sebastian. One vacancy exists on the Commission. Also in attendance are Planning Director Hays and Public Works Director Karp. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA Planning Director Hays requested that Item #2 be deleted from the Agenda. He noted that the Zoning Ordinance makes no provision for obtaining a Use Permit for a radio tower; it is a permitted use. Stem Annexation. Mr. Hays advised the Commission that the Stem Annexation has been back and forth before the Commission and Council a number of times, and both the Planning Commission and City Council have agreed upon the "P -D" Zone. He further advised that upon the second reading of the Ordinance, it was pointed out that an environmental determination had not been made on this item. He stated that staff is recommending a Negative Declaration based on the fact that under the "P -D" Zone, each individual development would require a separate environmental determination based on what the proposal is. Upon hearing no public input and no further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -840 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Pilkington, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari and Sebastian NOES: None ABSTAIN: Chairman Gerrish ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 81 -324, REQUEST TO PLACE A RELOCATABLE TYPE STRUCTURE FOR USE AS A TEMPORARY CLASSROOM, 497 FAIR OAKS AVE. IN THE "A" AGRI- CULTURAL DISTRICT. (GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE AND LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL). Planning Director Hays reviewed that last year the Commission granted a Use Permit to the applicant to conduct a Christian School with an enrollment of 50 students at the Gospel_ Lighthouse Church. The applicant is now requesting that the enrollment of the school be increased by up to 30 students, and that they be allowed to install a temporary trailer to house the additional students. He advised that the applicant would also like the Commission's approval of the proposed addition to be constructed in two or three years. Mr. Hays commented that if the Commission approves the request, staff would recommend that the applicant remove the temporary structure upon completion of the addition. Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 81 -324 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Ben Miller, 1035 Sunset Drive, stated he is principal of the school and spoke in favor of the Use Permit being granted. He advised that it is necessary at this time for them to increase the number of students. He stated that the school, in its first year, was very successful and they are now in a position where additional students are desiring to attend the school. Mr. Miller referred to the proposed plans, noting that the area in the back of the structure is the permanent structure they hope to build within the next two or three years. He stated it will house approximately 100 students and then the temporary structure would be taken out when the permanent structure is ready. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit Chairman Gerrish.declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Sebastian stated when the request for the use first came up, there was quite a bit of concern from the farming community about creating another school. He commented that each of the other parochial schools that have been granted temporary approval have had plans and specifications, and he feels that in this case, the request is premature: He further stated he Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 Page 2 39 feels they should present some sort of master plan to the Commission to indicate what their intentions are and, in his opinion, 3 years is much too long for a temporary facility at this time. Commissioner Cole suggested that since it is going to be quite some time before they will be getting into a permanent build- ing, that the Use Permit be granted, with a yearly review, to make sure it is not something they are going to continue using without really being sincere about the addition. Commissioners Moots, Pilkington and Saruwatari indicated they would be in agreement with a review on an annual basis. After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -841 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 81 -324. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari and Chairman Gerrish NOES: Commissioner Sebastian ABSENT: None The. foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 944, "ARROYO DEL MAR ", A 27 UNIT AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, AND 1141 ASH AVE. (WILLIAMS). Planning Director Hays advised that the applicant has previously received a Use Permit and architectural approval for this project. He further,advised that this is a_one. lot subdivision and the Subdivision Review Board has reviewed this particular application and have recommended approval of the tentative map subject to the 10 listed conditions in their report, dated July 29, 1981. Upon being assured by. Planning Director'Hays that public hearing for Tentative Tract. No. 944 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish. declared the hearing open.. Elizabeth. Jackson, 208 Fair View Drive, stated she is opposed to approval of any additional units until the problems of this City are definitely solved one way or another. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Gerrish. declared the hearing closed.and, after a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO, 81 -842 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OR ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, TRACT NO. 944 "ARROYO DEL MAR', AND REFERRAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. On motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. Public Works Director Karp requested that Item #11 be added to the report dated July 29, 1981 as follows: "That the Planning Commission finds the sub , . division to be consistent with. the . General Plan and Zoning._" The following action was taken regarding the Request for Negative Declaration: RESOLUTION NO, 81 -843 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. ?50 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 Page 3 On motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 81 -322, 10 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT IN THE "R -G" GARDEN APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 1146 ASH ST. (LINDSEY). Planning Director Hays advised the Commission that the original submittal was for a 10 unit condominium project, however, after review by the Architectural Review Committee, the applicant needed to change the design of the project and, in doing so, one unit was added. He noted that the General Plan designates this site for Medium High Density Residential with 17 dwelling units per acre; and the applicant has a site of approximately .75 acres which produces a density of approximately 14.6 units. He further advised that the proposal meets the 40% open space requirement, the parking is provided with a two car garage with each unit and 5 on -site guest spaces, and the Architectural Review Committee is recommending approval of the project subject to the proposed conditions_ Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 81 -322 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Elizabeth Jackson, 208 Fair View Drive, stated she objected to granting of the Use Permit for the same reasons as mentioned during the previous public hearing. Louisa Smith, Cuyucos, designer for the project, spoke in favor of the Use Permit being granted. There being no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed and,.after a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -844 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 81 -322. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Sebastian, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Chairman Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. Architectural Review Case No. 81 -245. Planning Director Hays referred to the conditions noted in the report, dated July 29, 1981, noting that staff is requesting two additional items be added, as follows: 15. Connection to sewer will be granted in conformance with rules, regulations and policies in effect at time of application with the Sanitation District. 16. The Planning Commission finds the proposal to be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. After further discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Pilkington, and unanimously carried, Architectural Review Committee Action, dated July 29, 1981 was approved with the addition of Conditions 15 and 16 as noted above. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -845 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. On motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Gerrish NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981. 1 1 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81; Page 4 CONTINUATI.ON (PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED) - REZONING CASE NO. 81 -152, ZONE CHANGE FROM "RA -B3" RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R -1" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, "WALNUT VIEW ESTATES ', SO. OF CHERRY AVENUE. (KUDEN/ ELLSWORTH). Planning Director. Hays reviewed that at the last meeting the Commission conducted a public.hearing on this matter and considered testimony regarding the. drainage proposal.. At that time, the public hearing was closed and a -- decision was delayed until this meeting to further consider all of the infor- mation.presented He stated that the applicants have submitted an Agricultural Feasibility Study, which. was forwarded to the Commissioners in their packets. Ella Honeycutt, 560. Oak Hill Road, advised that the Natural Agricultural Land Study was completed this year, and that about four weeks ago•ABC had a special program on the matter and we are loosing 3 million acres a year of . our prime, farm land, They pointed out that all Federal agencies are going to coordinate the programs; together whereby cities and areas taking care of their farm land will be considered for various grants., Planning Director•Hays advised that he had received some comments on this matter from the. Bank, of Amexica regarding the•Dixson property and the letter, dated July 29_ 1981, had been forwarded to the.Commission for their information. Public •Works. Director Karp outlined the Public Works staff's feelings regarding the, drainage proposal.. He. further reviewed and commented regarding the concerns:. expressed at the.. last Planning Commission meeting_. He pointed out that one_of the'advantages to the City regarding. the proposal would be having a culvert whjch. can easily be. maintained. Commissioner. Sebastian stated, in his opinion, there is no question that if we. wanted to take care of the drainage_, probably we would send that water to the_ Arroyo Grande..Cre.ek. and get the. water to •the ocean as fast as possible, however,.by doing this, we deplete. our ground water basin. He further pointed out. that up to this; point we have. focused in on the drainage problem, however, most. of the people who spoke about density said they would like to see something less dens.e.there., -and he personally felt we should not be creating any more density there. and.the key issue. for his opinion is the water. Commissioner Saruwatari stated she. agrees with.. Commissioner Sebastian as far as the density is. concerned_. Chairman Gerrish stated he doesn't-zee this being a prime agricultural area, and as far as the density goes, he doesn't recall a lot of comments on density. He further stated, in his opinion, we should either make it agricul.tural,'or we. should have a residential subdivision. After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO, 81 -846 Z RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL. CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4 ZONING, ARTICLE 32 OF SAID CODE. On. motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES; Commissioners Cole, Moots and Sebastian NOES: Commissioner Pilkington and Chairman Gerrish ABSTAIN: Commissioner Saruwatari ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this. 4th day of August 1981. (Reasons for denial - Density, Drainage and the water situation). PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, A'ONE LOT SUBDIVISION, PROPOSED OFFICE BUIL DING, 1190. GRAND AVENUE IN THE "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DIST. (HARRIS /COCKS /HARRIS). Planning Director Hays advised that the Subdivision Review Board had reviewed and approved the tentative map, subject to the conditions listed in the report, dated July 15, 1981. He further suggested that two requirements be added to the list of conditions as follows: 61. Connection to sewer will be granted in conformance with rules, regulations and policies in effect at time of application with the Sanitation District. 351 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 Page 5 7. The Planning Commission finds the proposal to be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that public hearing for Tentative Subdivision Map for a condominium office project had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Upon hearing no comments for or against the proposed sub- division, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: On motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning two parcels. 12 -1/2 ft. in age for this the required AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -847 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION, AND REFERRAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Chairman Gerrish None None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION - VARIANCE CASE NO. 81 --78, VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LOT WIDTH AND FOR A 15 FT. ACCESS FLAG IN THE "R -1" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 338 WALNUT ST. (JOHNSON). Director Hays reviewed the proposal by the applicant is to create A requirement of the lot split was to provide a flag access of width, and since the flag is less that the 60 ft. required front - zoning district, the applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce front yard from a minimum size of 60 ft. to approximately 58.35 ft Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that Variance Case No. 81 -78 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Wes Johnson, 246 Alder St., applicant, spoke in favor of the Variance being granted. He stated that the lots around the general area have been split with flags. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the Variance, Chairman Gerrish. declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Sebastian commented that what we are looking at is a 12 -1/2 ft. access, which is adequate, and we are also looking at a minimal change from the standard minimum of 60. ft. frontage. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -848 V RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE NO. 81 -78. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Pilkington, and by the. following roll call vote, to wit: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari, Sebastian and Chairman Gerrish None None The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of August 1981, PUBLIC HEARING - LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 81- 360., 338 WALNUT ST. (JOHNSON)_. Planning Director Hays reviewed the Minor Subdivision Review Committees action of July 1, 1981, and recommended approval with the 13 conditions listed on said report.• Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that public hearing for Lot Split Case. No.. 81 -360 had been duly published, posted and property owners noti- fied, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open.. Hearing no comments for or against the proposed lot split, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed., Planning Director Hays requested that a 14th. condition be added as follows: "Connection to sewer will be granted in conformance with rules, regulations and policies in effect at time of application with. the. Sanitation District." After discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Saruwatari, and unanimously carried, the lot split was approved subject to the conditions noted on report.dated July 1, 1981, and the additional condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 Page 6 PUBLIC, HEARING CONTINUATION - REZONING CASE NO. 81 -156, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, AGRICULTURAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION, HUASNA ROAD. (IKEDA BROS.). Planning Director Hays reviewed that at the meeting of May 19, 1981, the Commission conducted a public hearing on the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning application of the applicant, and the matter was continued pending a response from the Corps of Engineers relative to the potential flooding of this property during a severe storm. He stated that the letter from the Corps of Engineers, dated July 18, 1981, indicates that after the property is filled as proposed, it will not be subject to flooding. Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that public hearing for Rezoning Case. No. 81 -156, General Plan Amendment, had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Jim McGillis, Project Engineer for the applicant, gave a brief presentation with.regard to the proposed amendment. He referred to the Agricultural Analysis of the Proposed Subdivision on Tract No. 984, pointing out that the small size of this parcel; its Class III and IV soils, and the lack of proven water source make profitable agricultural production very difficult, if not impossible. Ella Horceycut;, 5.60. Oak Hill Road, referred to the recent ABC news special on. prime. agricultural land, pointing out that there is some prime land here and the_City has not taken any steps to maintain our prime agricultural land. She stated that this: valley has been very good to Mr. Ikeda and, in her opinion, he. is one farmer that would work for a program to save the farm land. Mrs. Honeycut : urged the Planning Commission to come to grips with this problem before they make any changes. She stated, with regard to this piece of land, she was not arguing if it is farmable or not. She further stated that an Open Space amendment to the General Plan would be necessary. Upon hearing no further comments, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Saruwatari commented that if there hadn't been a pre- determination to have s.oxne. growth. in that area, in her opinion, the park should not have been placed out there. Commissioner Pilkington stated, in his opinion, it would be a very difficult expensive piece of land to farm. Commissioner Sebastian pointed out that by its very soil classification, it is not prime land, and he would be. in . favor of putting the land into a low density residential designation, however, he is not in favor of jumping all the way to a recommendation of "R -1" zoning.. He. stated he. would like to go ahead and deal with the General Plan amend- ment now and then request an EIR that would deal with alternatives of the develop- ment.. Chairman Gerrish commented that the park that is out there was put there to serve the people in the Pearwood and Rosewood development and the Stagecoach Road development. He further stated that at some point in time there was a feeling established on the Commission that that road divided the agricultural area from the residential area, and what we are asking for here is to come across that road, and now the creek becomes the division. It was his opinion that in the General Plan amendment a few years ago that those flower fields at one time were designated high density residential and they were changed back to agricultural, and he sees this as a movement across the road. He further stated he is con- cerned with_ the encroachment into a primarily agricultural area and, in his opinion, the_proposed development encroaches into that area. After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -849 GP RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. On motion. by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Pilkington, and by the following roll call vote, to wit; AYES: Commissioners Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Saruwatari and Sebastian NOES: Chairman Gerrish. ABSENT; None the_foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th. day of August 1981. 353 3 Li Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 Page 7 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION = REZONING CASE NO. 81 -157; ZONE CHANGE FROM "A" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R =1" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; HUASNA ROAD. • (XKEDA 'BROS. ) Upon being assured by Planning Director Hays that Rezoning Case No. 81 -157 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open. Mr. Jim McGillis, Project Engineer, spoke in favor of the rezoning. He pointed out that there is an "R -1" subdivision across the street and another "R -1" subdivision up the road, and in today's economy, it is no longer feasible to continue the present marginal agricultural operation. Ella Honeycutt, Oak Hill Road, reiterated her previous comments with regard to prime agricultural land and suggested that the Planning Department write to ABC to get the transcript of their news special on Prime Agricultural land. Upon hearing no further comments for or against the proposed zone change, Chairman Gerrish_ declared the hearing closed. Chairman Gerrish_noted that the staff report recommends that due to potential environmental concerns relative to the use of this land for residential purposes, that a focus EIR be prepared as a minimum requirement. Planning Director Hays stated that upon further review of the concerns in- dicated in his initial environmental review with. Mr. McGillis, he feels that there are. sufficient engineering solutions to those concerns, however,he stated he. still has some concerns regarding the soils on site. After further discussion, on motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Cole., motion carried with. one "no" vote, Rezoning Case No. 81 -153 was continued to the next meeting to give staff time to present the resources document and to review the soils aspect.. COMMUNICATIONS Planning Director Hays referred to a letter from Mr. Bill Lackey, dated July 14, 1981, requesting a reduction in the width of his private drive on Printz Road from 28 -ft. to 24 ft. Mr. Hays advised that a condition of the Parcel Map was that Mr. Lackey improve a road to a width of 28 ft., which will ultimately be used by 11 or 12 residences under the existing zoning,. and Mr. Lackey is requesting that the condition be modified. He further advised that staff has no problem with the proposal. Mr. Lackey stated that what he has envisioned on this is something like Montego, and he would like to cut the drive down to 20 ft. Public Works Director Karp stated he would have a problem with cutting the road down to 20 ft. After a brief discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Pilkington, and unanimously carried, approval was granted to modify the condition of the Parcel Map from a road width of 28 ft. to 24 ft. Planning Director Hays advised that the County Planning Department is requesting the Planning Commission's recommendation in attempting to resolve a problem with the Huasna Road /Lopez Drive street name.. Mr. Larry Kelly, County Planning Department, addressed the Commission and briefly reviewed the problem of two different street names on a continuous road. He referred to a letter, dated July 23, 1981 from the County Planning Department, listing two alternatives to solve the problem. After a brief discussion, on motion Commissioner Moots, and carried with one proposal as Alternate #1 that the street changed from Huasna Road to Lopez Drive, appropriate action. by Commissioner Cole, seconded by abstintion, to accept the County's name within the City Limits be and that staff be directed to take There was a brief discussion regarding rear yard setbacks relating to air space condominium projects., Commissioner Sebastian noted that recently we had a situation during a subdivision review whereby going from an "R -G" to an air space condominium use permit; since an air space condominium is a single lot subdivision, the backyard of the units can be 5 ft. from the fence or the wall, because of the fact that the street becomes the front yard, which is in violation of the actual concept of the setbacks and, in his opinion, it is in violation of the actual intent. Planning.Director Hays stated that probably an amendment to the Ordinance would take care of the problem so that any back yard has to have a 10 ft. setback, regardless of the configuration._ Chairman Gerrish. requested that staff draft an ordinance change to correct this problem. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 8 -4 -81 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 10:50 P.M. ATTEST: Secretary / Chairman Page 8 355