Loading...
PC Minutes 1980-05-06ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION May 6, 1980 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Gorsline presiding. Present are Commissioners Cole, Carr, Fischer, Moots and Sebastian. Commissioner Simmons is absent. Planning Director Castro is also in attendance. MINUTE APPROVAL There being no additions or corrections, the minutes of the regular meeting of March 18, 1980 and the adjourned regular meeting of April 1, 1980 were approved on motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and unanimously carried. PRELIMINARY DRAFT - PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE Planning Director Castro suggested that the Commission review the draft of the proposed sign ordinance so that it can be discussed in detail at the next meeting. Chairman Gorsline inquired if the Commission would be interested in hav- ing a study session sometime before summer starts to discuss the proposed ordi- nance and perhaps some other issues that staff has in mind. The Commission indi- cated they would be interested in such a study session. 203 CONTINUATION - REZONING CASE NO. 79 -130, ZONE CHANGE FROM "A" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "P -D" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - KNOLLWOOD DEVELOPMENT. (URBAN SCIENCES, INC., AGENTS FOR BAMOD CO.) Planning Director Castro referred to the staff report, dated May 1, 1980 point - ing out that the Commission has concluded the review of the conditions of approval, however, since some Commissioners were absent, they might wigh to review the final draft. He further stated that the Commission is in a position to approve the pro- ject tonight if they want to do so. He pointed out, however, that in working with Bruce Dodson on the extension of Larchmont, there was no preciseness as to the align- ment and how it would tie in with the Woman's Club, and since that time the City has prepared final plans for an addition to the building and expansion of the existing parking for the Woman's Club. He stated that preliminary alignment was to utilize the road pattern . adjoining the water tank, but according to the survey by Gering and Taylor, there are some topography conditions that may prohibit that alignment. Mr. Castro further stated that in reviewing the matter with Paul Karp, the extension of Larchmont in the suggested alignment may not be feasible, therefore, other alter- natives will need to be explored such as taking the proposed alignment and working with the County property to intersect with Branch Street. If that alignment does not work, then we would like to reserve judgement on the density pattern that we have alloted in that area, or we may have to recommend extension of Hill Street to Miller Way. If the Commission is so disposed in going ahead with approval tonight, staff would like to have it conditioned so that we have the ability to go back and review the circulation pattern as well as the density pattern. Mr. Castro stated that in January 1980 he wrote a report to the Commission and, at that point in time, he indicated that the density range could be anywhere from 180 to 233, and he also made known to the Commission at that time that the figures were not fixed, but should remain flexible if and when we get to the final develop- ment plans. He stated those are his recommendations on the density at this point in time. With regard to the Conditions of Approval, Commissioner Sebastian stated that in reviewing them, he noted some errors that need to be corrected. The Commission proceeded to review the Conditions of Approval making additions and corrections as required. After the review, Planning Director Castro pointed out that each project phase will have to be reviewed by the staff, the Planning Com- mission and the City Council. He further stated that in lieu of the conceptual plan, in his opinion, the Commission should make a density recommendation to the City Coun- cil. Mr. Castro noted that on the circulation section, we will be adding the proper condition as it may relate to the alignment of Larchmont and the Woman's Club. Com- missioner Sebastian indicated his concern that this does not become an automatic triggering process by which Hill Street becomes connected, and being that Mr. Castro knows the Commission's feelings, he would be able to write up that kind of language . and add it as a condition to the Conditions of Approval. Planning Director Castro stated he would write a condition to that effect. 204. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page'2 With regard to the Environmental Impact Report, Commissioner Sebastian stated in his opinion, it would be appropriate to have Mr. Castro identify exactly what the Commission is approving, since we have the complexity that we have accepted the base data from the Halcyon Hills project and, beyond that, he didn't believe the.Commis- sion has ever voted to accept any addendum thereafter, therefore, he felt it would be appropriate to identify exactly what the Environmental Impact Report is beyond that base data. Several documents were received in the mail, but at no time did the Commission ever deal with the validity of the soundness of them. Possibly, the whole process that we have gone through, taking the base data and then taking the condit- ions and the things we have worked out in the Conditions is the Environmental Impact Report. Planning Director Castro pointed out that when Mr. Dodson made his original request to the Commission to utilize the Halcyon Hills report, he indicated to the Commission that he didn't foresee any problems with utilizing that report or any sup- plemental information that Mr. Dodson might want to introduce. The original report had mitigations based on the revised plan that he submitted. He stated, in his opin- ion, the reports are all one document addressing the Knollwood development, and from those reviews and comments that have been made, we have then come back through the conditioning process and are, to some degree, mitigating the concerns expressed in those reports. Commissioner Sebastian stated he concurs with the engineering reports, but what he cannot concur with are the written letters from BAMOD. Planning Director Castro stated he was not referring to those letters; he was referring to the three reports that we have received, the conditions of approval, and the public input. After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 80 -734 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Sebastian, and by the - following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Sebastian, Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Simmons. the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOLUTION NO. 80 -735 Z RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, ZONING, ARTICLE 32 OF SAID CODE. On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: Commissioners Sebastian, Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline None Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. Chairman Gorsline noted that staff has recommended that the Commission not re- quire a master conceptual plan at this time, but to identify the density for the City Council as a recommendation. Commissioner Sebastian requested that before a motion is made he would like for Mr. Castro to review briefly the conceptual plan that the_Commission looked at for the duplex units, the senior citizen housing and the attached housing units.. He re- called that the Commission did not take into consideration the parking for guests; the parking that was submitted under those conceptual plans was primarily limited to the parking for the residences, and since they incorporated private streets of 28 ft. widths, it was determined by staff that would not allow flow of emergency traffic if parking was on those private streets. Based upon that, Mr. Castro then worked out a percentage of land that would be required and came up with density spectrum of 180 that was consistent with the adjacent developments, and a maximum of 233, taking into consideration the needed space to work in that parking. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 3 Mr. Howard Anderson pointed out that the plan that Mr. Dodson submitted for the duplexes was not meant to be a specific plan, but was to give the Commission some kind of an idea about how that many duplexes could be layed. out on that much acreage. __ Hefurther noted that when the-Commission reviews each specific project, if it doesn't meet the requirements, then they would not be giving their approval. Commissioner Cole stated she has a problem because there is such a wide range from the 180 to 233, and she was concerned as to why we have to reach a density number because this is going to be a planned development and, in her opinion, that would control the density in each phase because of the limitations of what the de- veloper is working with, and in doing all the planning that is going on, they are going to do the best possible planning for the property and the Commission has the control over that. Planning Director Castro stated that his recommendation for the 180 stems from the other two adjoining projects and that he had advised the Commission that if they wanted to be consistent with previous density approvals they would need to recommend this project at 180. He further stated that his density recommendation stems from a comprehensive review of the property's environmental features and data input. Commissioner Carr pointed out that in designing and financing the project, the developers need to have a rough idea of what numbers they are going to be dealing with and, in his opinion, after all of the hearings and meetings the Commission has had on this matter, it is the Commission's responsibility to make a recommendation to the City Council on the density. Commissioner Sebastian stated he also feels it is the Commission's responsibility to make a recommendation,, and, in his opinion, it is actually a completion of the EIR process to take a stand on what the Commis- sion thinks a target density is, based on the review process. After further discussion, on motion by Commissioner Sebastian, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and unanimously carried, recommending to the City Council that the Knollwood Project have a target density for the conceptual plans of 233 units. CONTINUATION - PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 80 -292., RADIATOR COOLING SYSTEMS PARTS AND SERVICE IN THE PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, 406 E. BRANCH ST. (CHASTAIN). Planning Director Castro stated that, in accordance with the Commission's directive, he had met with Mr. Chastain to come up with•a revised plan for the prop- erty and also to preserve the trees if possible. He stated rather than a long lin- ear building, he had suggested an "L" shaped design set to the rear of the property. He further stated that in view of the fact that the building is now proposed for . the rear of the property and will be screened from visual view from Branch Street, he recommends leaving the design of the building as it is. He further stated he had talked to Mike Rhodes, Sewer Treatment Plant Operator, and Mr. Rhodes indicated he had no problem with the coolants, etc. being that the discharged volume in the sewer is a low volume. He did suggest that a 55 gallon drum be used to allow the rust to settle before being discharged into the sewer system. Mr. Castro suggested that a condition be added perhaps the Treatment_ Plant Operator review the final plans. He further stated that he has discussed the matter with the Depart- ment of Fish and Game, and they indicated they have no problem with the review pro- cess. He noted that the final improvement plans will be referred to the Commission for their review, and that Mr. Chastain will have to get .a permit from the Depart- ment of Fish and Game. Chairman Gorsline inquired if there are any persons in the audience who have not had a chance to respond to the proposed use. Dr. M. J. Shower stated he owns a piece of property adjacent to the property in question and that metal buildings can be put up with a great deal of class and he would hope that Mr. Chastain would do something of that nature. He stated he is very happy to see that the Avocado and Persimmon trees will be preserved. There being no further comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chair - man Gorsline declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Carr commented he doesn't know how permanent the building is going to be, however, he didn't feel that a radiator shop in this area of Arroyo Grande is something the City needs. He also stated he did not agree with Mr. Castro's statement that because there is already marginal use in the area with re- gard to architectural design, that it is O.K..to. put in other marginal buildings. 205 Planning Director Castro stated that in his original report to the Commission he made reference to the fact that during the major "overhaul" of the Zoning and General Plan compliance, both the staff and Commission felt that the property should remain as "P -M ", and that the properties east of Tally Ho Creek on both sides of 206 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 4 Branch Street were not yet ready for change to an expansion of the Central Business District. It was felt that these properties would eventually increase in value to the extent that the "P -M" District may need to be studied and an alternative solu- tion may be necessary at some point in time. With regard to the Request for Negative Declaration, the following action was taken: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOLUTION NO. 80-736 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Moots and by the following roll call vote, to wit: Commissioners Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline. Commissioner Sebastian Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. After a brief discussion regarding a time period for review of the proposed use, the majority of the Commission indicated they would be in favor of a 5 year review period, and the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 80 -737 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 80 -292. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: Commissioners Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline Commissioner Sebastian Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. CONTINUATION - PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE CASE NO. 80 -65, APEX SAW SHOP, BELL ST. AND GRAND AVENUE, REQUEST TO WAIVE STANDARD PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DISTRICT. (PANNELLA CONSTR., AGENT FOR APPLICANT). Planning Director Castro advised that in reviewing the property, staff has de- termined that there are approximately 1100 ft. of floor area being used for the ex- isting shop. This represents a parking requirement of 5.5 spaces and with the addi- tion of 369 square feet, the parking requirements would increase to 7 spaces for the total development, therefore, the Variance being considered is actually 7 spaces all together, not 3. He stated he has looked at the property and there is parking available on Bell Street and some on Grand Avenue, and the only available parking would be on the street itself. The house provides no parking whatsoever, even though it is being rented. Mr. Castro stated °that if the Commission is in favor of granting the Variance, a time limit should be approved to enable the Commission to review the parking situ- ation. Chairman Gorsline advised the audience that anyone wishing to comment on the proposed Variance could do so at this time. Mr. Maksoudian, applicant for the Vari- ance, asked about the time limitation and what it would entail in this case if the Variance is granted. Planning Director Castro explained that the suggestion for the time limitation would be so that the Commission would have the ability to review the matter if the parking situation becomes a concern to the City or to the Circulation Element of the City, whether it be on Bell Street or on Grand Ave.; in other words, every business property needs to provide their own off - street parking and the fact that you don't provide any parking whatsoever, the Commission needs to protect the City's concerns for future off - street parking requirements in connection with the subject property. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 5 Planning Director Castro reviewed the proposed plan, noting that the only parking available will be in front, along the driveway, not including the driveway area, and the frontage area on Grand Avenue. He stated there are about 6 or 7 parking spaces on Grand Avenue and Bell Street,, which would satisfy the business use right now, but not the residential use. There being no further comments, Chairman Gorsline declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Sebastian stated he frequents this particular business quite often and it doesn't generate a lot of activity now. He further stated he personally would feel O.K. with waiving the parking requirements and granting the Variance to close in that particular area to help the business to continue to operate in that location. Commissioners Cole, Fischer and Moots indicated their concurrence with Commissioner Sebastian. Chairman Gorsline stated his concern would be if another of those residences tries to convert to a business, any future development will have to come up with the parking, and he would like to see some sort of review process on this matter because he feels in not too many years from now the use is going to change there and we need to make certain that the parking is being handled adequat- ely. Commissioner Cole stated she would not like to have a time stated because, in her opinion, comments from the public will bring a parking situation to light. She would like to make note of the necessary required parking being waived until such time that it becomes a problem. Planning Director Castro pointed out his concern that without a time limitation, the Commission may be faced with other properties doing the same thing. Commissioner Sebastian stated if the Commission considers a time limit for review, it is his feeling they take into consideration the situa- tion as it is now because it does not appear to be a problem and, they should also consider the amount of square footage that is being closed in, is very small. To allow for amortization of the investment, Commissioner Sebastian suggested a mini- mum of 5 years for review. Commissioner Moots stated he feels that 2 or 3 years would be fair and then at the end of that time, if nothing has transpired to alter the situation, it could be renewed for another 2 or 3 years. After discussion, the Commission agreed that the Variance be reviewed in 3 years, and the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 738 V RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE NO. 80 -65 On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Sebastian, Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Simmons 207 the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 80 -293, AUTO PAINT SHOP, 155 -A TRAFFIC WAY IN THE "C -B -D" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. (KOLIAS). - Planning Director Castro referred to the plot plan and advised that the build- ing is 40' x 23'. He stated the staff report recognizes the new C -B -D District and the fact that this is a non - conforming use; also we don't foresee the redevelop- ment of the downtown area taking place overnight. For that reason, staff feels that the Commission could grant the permit, subject to a time limitation for review and the conditions listed in the staff report, dated April 29, 1980. Upon being assured by Planning Director Castro that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. -293 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gorsline declared the hearing open. Mr. Peter Kolias, petitioner for the Use Permit, advised that he works for the Department of Correction and that the auto paint shop will probably not be a full time job, and there will not be any dismantled parts on the premises. He further advised there will be no major work there at all and that it will be mostly on an appointment basis. He noted there is no parking there to speak of, and all of the cars are kept within the building. There being no further comments for or against the proposed use, Chairman Gorsline declared the hearing closed. 208 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 6 Commissioner Carr advised that this type of facility required a permit from the Air Pollution Control District and he would like to see that the applicant apply for and receive the necessary permit prior to a construction permit being issued. He further stated that the normal controls for a paint spray booth like this does not adequately control the odors and fumes; they control the particulate matter but the solvents, etc. that escape are not adequately controlled. Planning Director Castro advised that this is one of the reasons for the review process so that the operation can be monitored. He stated he would also like to see the condition added that there shall be no collection of debris outside of the building. After discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 80 -739 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE EN- VIRONMENTAL IMPACT DECLARATION. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Fischer, and by.the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Sebastian, Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -740 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 80 -293. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Fischer, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Sebastian, Moots, Fischer, Carr, Cole and Chairman Gorsline NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1980. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE CASE NO. 80 -66, REQUESTING WAIVER OF OFF- STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 26, SEC. 9- 4.2601 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 320 E. BRANCH ST. IN THE "C -B -D" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. (SHOWER) • Planning Director Castro advised that the parking the Commission had previously approved was a driveway along the easterly side of the building extending along the creek side. He pointed out on the plan the area that is required to be paved, noting that is where Dr. Shower is proposing the redrock materials. He further advised that he had met with the Department of Public Works and they are non - supportive of the proposal. He stated he would concur with their reasons for denial of Dr. Shower's request, in that the material consistency is not adequate for a parking area, and also the fact that redrock breaks very easily and would be carried on to Branch St. Mr. Castro stated he also would like to see some variation in materials or colors for the downtown area, but he found the arguments of the Public Works Department pretty substantial as far as the material was concerned and the fact that there is no way that you can really compact it without deteriorating pretty fast', and the problems involved not only with the maintenance of it, but the street, etc. Commissioner Cole asked if any other materials were recommended. Planning Director Castro advised that there is.really nothing that is substantial enough for the parking improvements. Upon being assured by Planning Director Castro that public hearing for Vari- ance Case No. 80 -66 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gorsline declared the hearing open. Dr. Shower, applicant for the Variance, stated his motivation for the request was to maintain the integrity of the creek, it wasn't for- parking. He stated prob- ably what he should have done was to request relaxing the parking requirement for that particular end of town; there is nothing down there anyway except.for the Loomis people parking during the day and, in his opinion, if the two hour parking limit Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 7 209 were extended to include all of the Central Business District, that would make some 24 parking places available on the street anytime.during the day, then the integrity of the creek would not be infringed• upon with parking. He further advised that he could still, provide a surfaced area on the east side, which is partially paved al- ready, and he would complete the paving of that area. He also pointed out that there are three other large parcels between Mason Street and the Tally Ho Creek, which un- doubtedly will be developed either singularly or all together and he is concerned that if he puts parking back there, the next thing we know everybody'is going to be parking on the creek bank. There being no further comments either for or against the proposed Variance, Chairman Gorsline declared the hearing closed. Planning Director Castro stated that the only way to relax parking would be through the creation of a parking assessment district that would resolve the parking at some other strategical location and still serve that commercial area that is de- veloping. He stated that one of the issues that he tried to address to the City Council last year, and was denied, was a request for funds to address problems in terms of where we are going and how we are going to provide the downtown parking, and how we are going to protect the creek, etc., and, in his opinion, until we de- velop a "plan that addresses those issues, it is difficult to exempt any property right now from parking until we know what the solution might be. He pointed out that there are two different problems here, in that we have come to the point where we need not only a development plan, but we also need a parking plan and a circulation plan. He stated he agrees with Dr. Shower and he feels it is unfortunate that these properties without the parking plan•will have to absorb their own parking require- ments to the extent that the Ordinance requires. Commissioner Sebastian stated he doesn't think the Commission has to be too restrictive because the parking is going to be on private property and the mainten- ance is going to be the responsibility of the owner and, in his opinion, the Commis - sion would not be receptive to redrock, but may be receptive to some other treatment. He stated he feels that since the temporary power pole is still sitting there, that particular design should come back before the Commission based upon what type of use is going in there because it would be easier to evaluate how much impact is going to be utilized for that parking. . Planning Director Castro suggested that the matter be continued pending resub- mittal of another design. Commissioner Carr stated that since the Commission first acted on the develop- ment of this building he was concerned about the parking and the proximity to the creek and, in his opinion, both the Village portion of Arroyo Grande and our creeks are resources that can and should be developed and he doesn't think putting parking immediately along the edge is the way to do 'it. He stated he would prefer to see that space in the back of the building and, if passible, along the side to be left untouched. He further stated his feelings are that we might be able to push a little bit to get the parking circulation addressed for this area of the City, and he would favor making a recommendation to the City Council to that effect. He further suggested that possibly Dr. Shower might want to consider asking for a' Variance from the parking requirements and perhaps we could grant the Variance and put a time limit on it to see what progresses as far as parking is concerned downtown. Planning Director Castro stated, in his opinion, it would be difficult to'exempt the property from parking. He further stated that the property is under the Assess- ment District boundaries, and Dr. Shower has the option to pay the amount of fees that are required per parking stall and not provide any parking on the property. Dr. Shower stated he would like to have this matter continued for a couple of weeks to think it over and that he,certainly would be open to any alternative other than paving. Chairman Gorsline advised that Variance Case No. 80 -66 would be continued for two weeks. REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTIONS: LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 80 -329, 227 E. CHERRY AVENUE, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. (ROD GIBSON) Planning. Director Castro referred to the plan identifying the location of the building in relation to the easement that is being requested by Mr. and Mrs. Gibson. He stated that staff found no problems with the approval, and the only recommenda- tion is the standard requirement that a mylar copy of the recorded map be furnished to the City. Commissioner Sebastian pointed out that the purpose of the lot line ad- justment is to give more relief to the adjoining property structure. 210 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -80 Page 8 On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Sebastian, and unani- mously carried, Lot Split Case No. 80 -329 was approved subject to the condition noted in Minor Subdivision Committee Action, dated April 30, 1980. REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTIONS: LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 80 -330, CORNER OF COURTLAND AND GRAND AVE., LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. (J.L.BOWSER SURVEYS, AGENT FOR WILLIAM GERRISH) Planning Director Castro referred to the development plan that had been approved by the Commission several months ago. He stated that some issues were brought up at the Subdivision Review Committee meeting by Mr. Baden regarding property lines and, after reviewing those concerns, the City Engineer recommended that the final map shall show all existing easements and guaranteed title to owner prior to recordation. What is intended by that requirement is that the Title Company should guarantee that the survey or documents reviewed are proper and adequate. Mr. Castro reviewed the conditions noting that a title report addressing Parcel F is also being required be- cause again there is a question as to whether the property line is 5 ft. over easterly or westerly. He stated that some of the residents on Fair View Drive indicate dif- ferently than what the survey indicates, so the Title Company will have to research this and provide us with the answer. After considerable discussion pertaining to drainage, Item ¥4 of Subdivision Committee Action, dated April 30 , 1980, was changed to read: "Resolution of drain - age prior to recordation of map as schematically shown in the adopted drainage plan ". After considerable discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Com- missioner Carr, and unanimously carried, Minor Subdivision Committee Action, dated April 30, 1980 was approved as amended by deleting the last sentence of Condition No.4. REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTIONS - LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 80 -331, FAIR OAKS AVE. - LOT LINE AD- JUSTMENT (ACROSS FROM CATHOLIC CHURCH). (GARING, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, AGENTS FOR SARUWATARI AND GRIEB), Planning Director Castro reviewed Minor Subdivision Committee Action, dated April 30, 1980, advising that the property owners involved are merely straightening out the property line, and the only condition is the requirement that a mylar copy of the recorded map be furnished to the City. After a brief discussion, on motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commis- sioner Moots, and unanimously carried, Minor Subdivision Committee Action, dated April 30, 1980, was approved. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Carr suggested that a recommendation be made to the City Council on circulation, parking and possibly drainage for the Village area. He stated he would like for Mr. Castro to develop what he feels is an appropriate recommendation for the Commission to send to the City Council. The Commission indicated concurrence with Commissioner Carr's suggestion, and Planning Director Castro stated he would take a look at it and submit a recommendation for the next regular meeting of the Commission. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Planning Director Castro referred to a letter received from Mr. Ron Bennett, this date, requesting permission to erect two project identification signs. He is proposing the size of the signs to be approximately 20 ftx8 ft. in size. He stated he advised Mr. Bennett that the signs he is requesting would normally require a Use Permit. After a brief discussion, the agreed that the Use Permit procedure would be the proper route for the approval of the requested signs. Planning Director Castro advised that Mr. Leonard, who lives on Creekside Drive, is requesting permission to increase the height of approximately a 5 or 6 ft. section of his fence to 7 or 8 ft. in order to provide privacy of his patio area from a home that is being built in back of him. He stated there is approximately a 10 ft. dif- ferential in grade between the two properties. After discussion, the Commission sug- gested that Mr. Castro talk to the adjacent affected property owners and if there is no conflict, that the matter be handled administratively. However, if there appears to be a conflict, then the matter should be brought back for a public hearing. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and unanimously carried, he meeting was adjourned at 10 :50 P.M.