PC Minutes 1977-09-06Arroyo Grande Planning Commission
September 6, 1977
The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman
Gerrish presiding. Present are Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots and Ries.
Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer are absent. Also in attendance are Planning
Director Castro and Planner Sullivan.
MINUTE APPROVAL
Upon hearing no additions or corrections, the minutes of the regular meeting of
August 16, 1977 were approved by the Chairman as prepared.
REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTIONS - LOT SPLIT CASE N0. 77 -276 1134 AND 1146 ASH STREET
(LINDSEY ENTERPRISE). /
Planning Director Castro advised that the proposed split on Ash Street is the
last property to be developed in the area that is zoned "R -G ". He referred to the
"Minor Subdivision Committee Action" of August 31, 1977 recommending approval of the
project subject to the standard conditions. In his assessment of the Negative Dec-
laration, Mr. Castro advised where he had stated it would appear that the impact of
the noise level or dust problems would be minimal due to the fact that most of the
surrounding lands are still in large ownerships and development appears to be scat-
tered, another survey was made and there was more intensity in the immediate area,
however, he still felt there would not be a great effect. He further stated that
there are no development plans on file at this time for this project.
Committee action on Lot Split Case No. 77 -276 was approved and ordered filed by
the Chairman.
REQUEST FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION - LOT SPLIT CASE N0. 77 -276, 1134 AND 1146 ASH ST.
After a brief discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 77 -552 EIR
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
DECLARATION.
On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and by the follow-
ing roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977.
REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION - LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 77 -277, 246 ALDER ST. (CROW).
Planning Director Castro reviewed the ten conditions in the Lot Split Committee
Report dated August 31, 1977, stating that most of the conditions are pretty stand-
ard. He pointed out the intent of Conditions 2 and 3 is to not allow the sale of
any parcel of land or any part of that easement to go with it, and that basically,
the way it is worded is that the easement of Parcel A and Parcel B will overlap one
another so that there can be no sale of the easement that serves the parcel of land.
The easement is a road easement that will provide egress and ingress.
After discussion, the "Minor Subdivision Committee Action" dated August 31, 1977
was approved and ordered filed.
QUEST FOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION - LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 77 -277, 246 ALDER ST. (CROW).
Planning Director Castro referred to the Negative Declaration Assessment pre-
pared by the City Engineer and the Planning Department, and advised that the zoning
and future land use does conform with the General Plan. After discussion, the fol-
lowing action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 77 -553 EIR
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT DECLARATION.
397
398
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -6 -77
On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Hitchen, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977.
Page 2
REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE #77 -146 1220 FARROLL AVENUE,
(LANDMARK MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH).
Planner Sullivan reviewed that the Architectural Committee met and considered
the expansion of the Landmark Missionary Baptist Church. He referred to the site plan,
pointing out the main auditorium and new classroom facilities. Mr. Sullivan read the
conditions of the Architectural Committee Action, dated August 31, 1977, and advised
the parking meets the new standard of one space for every 25 square feet of the main
sanctuary area Planning Director Castro advised that members of the Church that
were present at the meeting requested deletion of the walk and landscape areas for
the purposes of saving money, and the Committee felt this was not a serious omission
from the plan, and recommended that a revised parking plan be submitted, subject to
the approval of the Planning Director.
After a brief discussion, Architectural Committee Action, dated August 31, 1977
was approved and ordered filed.
REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO 77 -147 ST. PATRICK'S CATHOLIC
CHURCH, FAIR OAKS AVENUE.
Planning Director Castro reviewed the revised plans for the new Catholic Church
on Fair Oaks Avenue, pointing out that the Sanctuary itself has been changed from the
original plans, however, the location of the Church site is the same as previously
approved by the Commission. He further advised that the total seating capacity will
be 543, which will require 181 parking spaces, and there are 213 parking spaces being
provided on site; the parking lot will be broken with landscaping; and the elevations
are of a simplified California Mission character. Mr. Castro pointed out that with
regard to the drainage, it has been verified that the old drainage plan will conform
to the new development so there is no need for re- submittal of a drainage plan.
After review, Architectural Committee Action, dated August 31, 1977, was approved and
ordered filed.
PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING CASE NO, 77 -107 155 SO. ALPINE ST. FROM "RA -B3" RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R -1" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (WALKER).
Planning Director Castro advised that in reviewing the petition to rezone the
property on South Alpine Street, the only concern that the staff would have at this
time is that by proceeding with the "R -1" zoning on the subject property, it will
create a spot zoning issue with the property that lies directly north of Mr. Miller's
property which was recommended for "R -1" zoning recently by the Planning Commission.
He stated it is the staff's feeling that the whole matter should be continued and
that the Commission initiate a Resolution of Intention so that staff may proceed to
look at the entire Land Use and Circulation element. Basically, what the concern is,
is that by rezoning this parcel, it will be creating a landlocked situation until
such time as the extension of Valley Road is continued on to Grand Avenue._ In look-
ing at these properties, we feel that to allow the use to continue or remain in a
single family residential use, will be encouraging ingress and egress from a com-
mercial strip on to a residential area He advised that in order to resolve the
overall zoning pattern and circulation, the staff felt it necessary to review the
Miller property because that is the key property unless we are sure that the ex-
tension of Valley Road would go through in a few years from now, but that doesn't
look very likely.
Upon being assured by Planning Director Castro that public hearing for Rezoning
Case No. 77 -107 had been duly posted, published and property owners notified,
Chairman Gerrish declared the hearing open.
Chairman Gerrish stated he couldn't see how the rezoning request of Mr. Walker's
property affects any of the problems previously discussed The big problem is up
by the highway, and he didn't feel anything talked about on Mr. Miller's property
or the property above it is going to be affected by the request for "R -1" zoning.
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -6 -77 Page 3
Mr. LeRoy Sarwautari, 512 Launa Lane, stated he farms the east side of the property
to be rezoned and he has no objections to the "R -1" district if the drainage is done
properly, and stated he would prefer an 8 ft. masonary wall be constructed to protect
the farmland, and also to protect the residents from pesticides, dust, etc. Mr.
Sarwautari further stated he would like to see that wall continue on all future develop-
ments in that area. Commissioner Hitchen advised that the petitioner is not propos-
ing development at this time, but that when a map comes in on the property for develop-
ment, Mr. Sarwautari's requests would be considered at that time.
There being no further discussion for or against the proposed zone change, Chairman
Gerrish declared the hearing closed, and the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 77 -554 Z
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT
TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS
PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4 ZONING, ARTICLE 32 OF SAID CODE.
On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and by the follow-
ing roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977.
REQUEST FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION - REZONING CASE NO. 77 -107, 155 SO. ALPINE ST.,
FROM RA -B3" RES$DENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT T(Y 'TR -1'r SINGIXTAMILY
DISTRICT (WALKER).
Planning Director Castro advised the Commission that the reports from both the
Public Works Department and Planning Department had no objections to a negative
declaration being granted, and as far as zoning is concerned,- it does conform with
the General Plan. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 77 -555 EIR
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT DECLARATION.
On motion by Commissioner Hitchen, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977.
Chairman Gerrish stated he would like to have the staff alert the City Council of
the problems, and come up with some sort of recommendation with regard to the
problem of circulation to those parcels which would have access on to Grand Avenue,
and also the spot zoning issue on the property that lies directly north of Mr.
Miller's property. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries,
and unanimously carried, the staff was directed to study this area with regard to
the zoning and come up with a plan or ideas that would best fit the four parcels
as noted in memo from the Planning Director dated August 31, 1977.
PUBLIC HEARING USE PERMIT CASE NO 77- 266, 822 HUASNA ROAD, CONSTRUCTION OF A
SECOND HOUSE G1 ONE LOT IN AN "R -2" DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (OUARESMA).
Upon being assured by Planning Director Castro that Use Permit Case No. 77 -266
had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish
declared the hearing open.
Planner Sullivan advised the Commission that there is an access easement to
service an existing home on the back lot, and the request is to construct a second
home in an "R -2" District. Mr. Sullivan further advised that the recommended con-
ditions of approval would be: 1) that the flag drive be improved with a 2" A.C.
399
400
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -6 -77 Page 4
paving to Public Works Department approval; 2) that the existing house and the pro-
posed new house have individual water and sewer connections; 3) that the method of
drainage of the improvement water be to Public Works Department's approval; and 4)
that the site coverage shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area.
There being no discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman
Gerrish declared the hearing closed, and the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 77 -557 U
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO.
77 -266.
On motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the follow-
ing roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE CASE N0, 77 -56, 204 ASPEN STREET, REDUCTION OF PARKING
REQUIREMENTS IN AN' "R -G" GARDEN APARTMENT DISTRICT (PACE). -
Planning Director Castro advised that this request for a variance stems from a
misleading dimension regarding the development plans. During the Architectural
Review of the apartment project, it was noted that the property dimensions from the
front to the rear property line was 291 ft. long, and it was assumed that this
dimension was from the front property line and not from the center line of the street.
It was only after the construction of the apartment units that it was discovered that
the property was short by 25 feet, which required elimination of the proposed tennis
court and part of the parking area; the buildings have not been changed at all from
the original intent. There have been some administrative changes in the parking and
in the preservation of an old oak tree, and the location of a laundry facility; and
these modifications were approved by Mro Gallop. There was no laundry facility
noted on the plan but they have constructed one in the revised plan.
Mr. Castro stated the question regarding the open space parking is the issue
that needs to be resolved, and also the parking stalls of 9' x 20' are not in con-
formance with the Ordinance.
Mr. Castro pointed out that the Ordinance requires a total of 35 parking spaces,
both covered and uncovered, and the plan modifications that the staff has come up
with can only accommodate 32 spaces, which means that we are short three spaces.
He further stated that it was his feeling the parking ratio of 1.7 per dwelling
unit and the parking size stalls of 9' x 20 would be a- reasonable solution, and
that the only other alternative would be to remove one of the apartment buildings.
Upon being assured by Planning Director Castro that Variance Case No. 77 -56
had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Gerrish
declared the hearing open.
Don Bowman, 181 Aspen Street, inquired as to how many cars were going to be
parked out on the street? Planning Director Castro stated that they would be
three parking spaces short, however, it is difficult to respond to how many cars
are going to be parked on the street. Mrs. Elizabeth Jackson, 208 Fair View Drive,
stated her concern in cutting down on the parking could be setting a precedent for
other developers. Planning Director Castro advised that the Planning Department
will be instituting a different procedure revising the communication between the
Planning Department and the Building Department and provide more of these site plan
proposals so they know exactly what is going on; what the Architectural Review Com
mittee has approved, and what the Planning Commission has reviewed. Madeline
Steele, 1598 Hillcrest Drive, referred to the errors in building the garages on
LePoint Street, and now the Commission is asked to O.K. something else that is
not according to the rules and, this being the case, there should be some changes
in the procedures. Mr. Paul Porter, 1220 Cedar Street, inquired if they are try-
ing to shorten the parking spaces. Planning Director Castro advised the staff is
suggesting that 9' x 20' parking stalls be approved instead of 10' x 20'. He
further stated he felt the parking ratio of 1.7 is within reason; they have
covered parking far all apartment units, but they are short 3 spaces of the open
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -6 -77 Page 5
space parking. Fusa Yamaguchi, 1215 Cedar Street, stated in the original plans they
proposed story units with two occupants per unit Planner Sullivan advised
the original plans that were submitted were for one story row type apartments, and
two weeks after those plans had gone to the Planning Commission for approval, Mr. Pace
again resubmitted a totally different project and it went through the Architectural
Review Committee and through this Commission. Mr. Bill McCann, 428 Tanner Lane,
stated he hated to see situations where we start compromising with our City ordi-
nance and he. hoped, as Mr. Castro stated, that this will be taken care of in the
future. Mr. McCann further stated that maybe in this particular case we are better
off to have a few less parking spaces and retain some of the green area Mt. Al
Jackson, 208 Fair View Drive, stated he would like to know why it is that people
can construct something and their plans are not firm to begin with; he inquired if
the slip up is the City or the builder.
There being no further discussion for or against the proposed Variance, Chairman
Gerrish declared the hearing closed.
Commissioner Ries commented that he gives up his time to sit on the Architectural
Review Board and if there is a change, why aren't they consulted? Mr. Castro stated
he agreed with Commissioner Ries, that if any modifications should occur, it should
come back to the Committee.
Planning Director Castro noted the four conditions recommended by staff if the
Variance is approved. After discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO 77 -557 V
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE NO
77 -56.
On motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the follow-
ing roll call vote, to wit:.
AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Moots, Ries and Chairman Gerrish
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Harris and Vandeveer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 1977,
PRESENTATION BY SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE LAND USE
ELEMENT' OF THE' COUNTY'S GENERAL PLAN.
Mr. Bryce Tingle,, Senior Planner from the San Luis Obispo County Planning De-
partment, advised that the County Planning Department is presently engaged in a
comprehensive revision to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which will
affect all areas of the County, and the Zoning Ordinance is being revised into
a Development Code which will implement the Land Use Element. A slide presentation
was made by Mr. Tingle. Chairman Gerrish thanked Mr. Tingle for his presentation
and stated he anticipated that the City staff, Ag Land Committee, and this Com-
mission would have some input for the County.
WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE
Planning Director Castro advised he had received a referral from the City
Council with regard to the Tree Ordinance, and that staff will be reviewing it
and report back to this Commission, as well as to the Parks and Recreation Com-
mission.
Mr. Castro further advised that a communication was received from Mrs. Carlson
registering some concern with regard to the Crown Hill -Area, and she requested
that a General Plan amendment take place. He advised he had met with Mr.- Butch
and responded to her concerns and it was his feeling there isn't really much that
can be done because, in reality, most of the land has already been planned..
With regard to the EIR on the Al Browne property, Mr. Castro advised the matter
will be scheduled for the latter part of October or first part of November. Planner
Sullivan pointed out that with regard to the EIR, after the Commission has had a
chance to review it, Mro Browne has indicated he will take two Commissioners at a
time and give them a tour of the property.
401
402
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 9 -6 -77
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Commiss;•n, Chairm-'- Gerrish de-
clared the meeting adjourned at 10:26 P.M.
ATTEST:
Page 6
Chairman
1
1
Chairman Moore asked the audience if they would like to address the
Commission now before the Commission moved on to other items. Geegee Soto
addressed the Commission and asked for further explanation on the develop -
ment of Encinas Bonitas Park baseball field development. After a general
discussion the Chairman appointed a: Sports Complex Committee with Jim McGillis,
D. G. Porter, Commissioners Runels and Bentley, Geegee Soto, Velma Blankenberg
and Bob Gallop.
BOB GROSENBACH OF BABE RUTH. ENTERED DURING THE ABOVE DISCUSSION.
SELECTION OF A NAME FOR THE NEW RECREATION BUILDING
The Commission decided that the best name for the Recreation Building
at this time would simply be Recreation Department.
DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE FUTURE EXPANSION OF RECREATION .ESUIPMENT RENTALS
After same discussion the Commission decided that the Recreation
Department should limit rentals to the camping gear budgeted for 1977-78.
It was recommended that the Recreation Department continue to . study the
interest in rentals or loans of other recreation equipment' (Volleyballs
and nets, softballs, etc.)
COMMUNICATIONS
The Junior Chamber of Commerce project plans for'the Encinas Bonitas
Park were discussed and it was suggested by - Parks Consultant Gallop that
the restroom facilities be 'expanded; that the concession stand be inside
the building to minimize corners and cut down on vandalism, that the
building be built of concrete block instead of steel and that the block
be surfaced with a sealant for vandal - proofing and minimizing labor.
The Junior Chamber of.Commerce has $8,000.00 to $10,000.00 for this
project and will build with free labor. It was brought out that the city
will run water and sewer and electricity to the facilities at the park.
There .was a brief discussion about the Women's Club having:a one time
only`Bingo Night at the Women's Community Building. Commissioner Runels
motioned for approval. and Commissioner Blankenberg seconded the motion
and unanimously carried.
D. G. PORTER MEMBER OF THE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ENTERED HERE
Discussion of Tree Ordinance was put on the agenda for the next
meeting. It was suggested that there be a tour of the parks in the
area and setting a date for the parks field trip will be on the agenda for
the next meeting.
After a brief discussion on the continued use of the Recreation
Building as a meeting place it was decided that the Commission would
continue to meet in Council Chambers.
ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Chairman Moore, seconded by Vice - Chairman Blankenberg
and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 to'September 28,
1977 at 7:30 P.M.
ATTEST:
Joe L. Moore, Chairman
4
Rage -2 ..