Loading...
PC Minutes 1977-06-07364 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission June 7, 1977 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Pope presiding. Present are Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen and Ries. Commissioner Moots is absent. One vacancy exists on the Commission. Also in attendance are City Administrator Butch, Planning Director Gallop and Planning Aide Sullivan. MINUTE APPROVAL The minutes of the regular meeting of May 3, 1977 were approved by the Chairman as prepared. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 77 -139, 410 BEDLOE LANE (STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY) Director Gallop advised that a small retail wholesale' building is proposed to be built on Bedloe Lane. The plans. have been reviewed by the Architectural -- Review Committee and approved with the recommendation that the fence be slatted and that the landscaping be maintained, and all utilities are to be placed under- ground. Commissioner Gerrish commented that the lot in question can barely be seen from Traffic Way and Fair Oaks Avenue. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE #77 -141, BRANCH STREET (VILLAGE WEST SHOPPING CENTER). Director Gallop stated this project is proposed on the old St. Patricks' property at Branch Street and Wesley, and that the proposal will eventually entail two, and perhaps three structures. He further advised that the preliminary plans for off- street parking,_ land- scaping, etc., meets the requirements of the Code, and that the plans were approved with the usual conditions such as automatic irrigation system on the landscaped areas, underground utilities, and development to be in keeping with the plans on file. Commissioner Hitchen stated he was quite impressed with the style and the architectural design and that it is in keeping with the rural setting. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 77 -142, 321 SO. HALCYON ROAD (FILER) Director Gallop reviewed that this property is where the old ambulance service was, and is adjacent to the condominiums previously approved, and that the lot coverage and number of units meet City Code. The development was approved with the usual conditions such as underground utilities, landscaping plan, automatic irrigation system, etc., and the development will require a subdivision map after the approval of the Use Permit. Director Gallop noted that there is a possibility the developers may petition for a zone change on the parcel to the rear of this property and, if so, would require a minor adjustment on the traffic way to accommodate it, but it would not adversely affect the design, coverage, etc. Commissioner Hitchen stated that this particular proposal had more discussion than any other that had been reviewed that day, and there was a concern over the possible rezoning of the land and the traffic flow to Alpine Street. He stated that Mr. Gallop had reviewed ways of controlling the traffic flow for the Com- mittee, as that seemed to be the common ingredient that people are concerned about, and that considerable thought and discussion went into this particular proposal. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE COUNTY -WIDE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AS A PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN. Director Gallop explained that the Plan is mandated by legislature that each County in the State adopt such a plan and, in order to implement it, each one of the cities within that County should also recognize it. The staff feels that in order to utilize the plan to its best effect that it should become a part of our General Plan as an amendment to our Public Services and Facilities Element. Planning Aide Sullivan reviewed that about two weeks ago he sent copies of a summary of the Plan to the Commissioners and, as Mr. Gallop pointed out, each of the cities that represent a majority of the population of the County have to adopt this Plan in order for the County to have an adopted plan. Mr. Sullivan advised that Burt Townsend was in the audience if there are any technical questions the Commission wishes to ask. Mt. Townsend urged that the Commission take some action on this. He stated that most cities have now reviewed it and he didn't think there was going to be any question about getting the number of cities approved that they wanted. He further explained that this is a County -wide plan covering a 25 year period and 1 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 Page 2 covers everything from storage, collection, transportation, processing resource re- covery and disposal of waste and, in his opinion,. the City of Arroyo Grande, as well as the other jurisdictions in the County will benefit from the plan. It does look into the .'future on what kind of needs and facility operations all jurisdictions are going to need, and that one of the most important things it does is establish within County government and on -going planning and-management. functions, and management for tho: few activities the public will be directly involved in. He stated the plan does pro - vide for all of the cities to have control of their own business,_ with chances for joining in joint operations with other jurisdictions where it is mutually - desirable. Mr. Sullivan advised the Commission that the financial impact is roughly $500.00 per year for the City of Arroyo Grande; and that it is no long term binding thing for the City to be concerned with. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for adoption of the County -Wide Solid Waste Management Plan had been duly advertised, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. Mrs. Peggy Langworthy, San Luis Obispo County,stated she was speaking on behalf of the League of Women Voters in favor of this move by the City of Arroyo Grande. She stated that the League has for three or four years now studied Solid Waste Management in the County and they have examined the Plan rather carefully. They feel that it is a good plan and hope that all of the cities will cooperate with the County on this at an early date. There being no further comment for or against the proposed Plan, Chairman Pope declared the hearing closed, and the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -519 G RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Gerrish, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th of June, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING CASE NO. 77 -103, GRANDE HIGHLANDS, FROM "A" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "P -D" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (E.•E. GEARING). Chairman Pope reminded the Commission that there is a proposed annexation to the City, and it has come to his attention that there is an element in the community that is opposing the annexation at this time, and because the developer would be re- quired to enter into a contract with the City Council of Arroyo Grande and get an Environmental Impact Report prepared, which would run into several thousand dollars, he has been approached with the idea of having this matter postponed until after the town meetings with the City Council so that the citizens of the City that are op- posed to the annexation of this property would have a chance to make their feelings known. Director Gallop stated that the parcel of property outside the City is approxi- mately 47 1/2 acres and is a part of the total ownership. Development could take place on the property that is already within the City and they still would have a viable project. The developer would like to have the entire ownership considered and, they are going to have some water problems; they are going to have to help pay for tank and distribution facilities for this total area. He further stated that the parcel map has not been presented as yet. They had one, however, he requested that they withhold it until environmental considerations could be made. Director Gallop advised that depending on what the Commission wishes to do tonight will depend on what the status of the annexation will be and the parcel map consideration. If annexations were petitioned directly to LAFCO, which they 365 366 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 could do, that would proceed independent of the rest of it. If we the EIR and then considered zoning, then the Commission would have zoning of this property and pre- zoning of the annexation property, completion of annexation. City Administrator Butch pointed out that the City Council is holding a series of town meetings and growth is one of the major issues before the City Council. This would give the citizens an opportunity to speak to the City Council about the annexation and the development of that area. Mrs. Gearing, 255 Longden Drive, Arroyo Grande, was present representing her husband. She stated that they are prepared to go ahead with the study and that they are aware of the costs and the problems. Chairman Pope stated that the applicant has expressed their right and upon being assured by Planning Director Gallop that Rezoning Case No. 77 -103 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. Chairman Pope recommended that the Negative Declaration Statement be denied and that an EIR be prepared, and the matter of the public hearing be continued until after the Environmental Impact Report has been prepared. The following action was taken: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOLUTION N0. 77 -527 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION AND RE- QUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. Page 3 proceeded with to consider subject to On motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope None Commissioner Moots PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 77 -259, RECYCLING CENTER IN AN "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DISTRICT, 1200 GRAND AVE. (LARRABEE BROS..). Director Gallop stated the proposal is to bring a truck in two days a week for four hours. The equipment would consist of weighing equipment and a cash register to pay people who submit recycleable materials, and this would all be packed up in the truck and taken from the City, so there would be no permanent installation whatsoever. Our Highway Service code requires that any exterior operation such as this is permitted by Use Permit procedures. He advised the only thing that would be necessary, in his opinion, would be to recommend that the truck be lo- cated along the westerly property line of the parking lot so as to create the least interference with traffic patterns in the parking lot, both from Grand Avenue and from Brisco Road. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 77 -259 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. There being no comments for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Pope declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Gerrish stated he would like to see the case reviewed at the end of six months or so. Chairman Pope stated he would like to have a statement in- cluded in the permit that all debris is to be removed at the close of each business day. It was pointed out by Director Gallop that the recycling center would only be operated during the months of June, July,August and September. In answer to Commissioner Ries' question with regard to early morning hours of operation on Saturday and Sunday, Planning Director Gallop advised that the center would not work on Saturday and Sunday, but that it could be specified in the permit. that operation would be conducted Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 After Commission discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -520 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO 77 - 259. On motion by Commissioner Gerrish, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 77 -260, OUTSIDE STORAGE IN AN "H -S" HIGHWAY SERVICE DISTRICT, 410 BEDLOE LANE STREATOR Page 4 Director Gallop advised the request is for outside storage, and that,Bedloe Lane is a surfaced alley. The property is above the freeway and would not be seen by motorists; it is a relatively small parcel of property, and Architectural Approval has been granted. The .staff has no additional conditions to recommend, as they have been covered in the Architectural Approval consideration. Mr -. Jack Streator, the petitioner, was present and stated that outside storage was very critical for him, otherwise it would be very hard to develop this property because it is so small. He stated the building will be backed up next to the residential area so they will pretty well screen it off, and Mr.- Gallop has re- commended to the Planning Commission that one fence be screened off, so we will be isolated completely from the residential -area. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 77 -260 had been duly posted, published and property owners notified, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. Mr. Mills, 123 Fair Oaks Avenue, was present and spoke in favor of the Use Permit being granted. There being no further discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Pope declared the hearing closed. After discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77521 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 77 -260. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Hitchen, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 77 -261, 5 UNIT APARTMENT STRUCTURE IN AN l 'R -G" GARDEN APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -, 379 ALDER ST. (GREEN). Director Gallop advised that this matter was before the Commission at a previous meeting for Architectural Approval; there were conditions imposed at that time, and the staff does not feel that additional conditions will be necessary if the Use Permit is granted. He stated the five unit apartment structure is to be built on the rear portion of the property; it has driveway access, and there are garages with each unit, and parking requirements are met within the structure. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 77 -261 had been duly posted, published and property owners notified, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. 367 368 Arroyo Grande Planning 0411 11 ssion, 6 -7 -77 Page 5 There being no discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Pope declared the hearing closed and, after discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -522 U RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 77 -261. On motion by Commissioner Gerrish, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 77 -262, 10 UNIT CONDOMINIUM IN A "P -C" PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 321 SO. HALCYON ROAD (FILER). DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, COMMISSIONER RIES HAS BEEN EXCUSED AND IS NOW ABSENT. Director Gallop advised that this development is proposed on the second parcel of land northerly of the hospital and immediately adjacent and north of the 20 unit condominiums approved several months ago. He stated the proposal does meet the requirements of the District and has received Architectural Approval. He advised that the developer still has to prepare a final subdivision map which has to come before the Commission. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit Case No. 77 -262 had been duly posted, published and property owners notified, Chairman Pope declared the hearing open. Mr. Nash Brown, Project Architect, explained the development is a 10 unit single family ownership, and that covered parking or garages have been provided for every unit; they also have provided patios, enclosed backyards for every unit, barbeque areas and a childrens' play area. He stated they felt it is a very handsome project and feel it is something the community could be well pleased with. There being no further discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Pope declared the hearing closed. After Commission discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 77 -262. On motion by Commissioner Hitchen, seconded by Commissioner Gerrish, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Gerrish, Hitchen and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Ries and Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. COMMISSIONER RIES IS NOW PRESENT REQUEST FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION - LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 77 -267, 1385 BRIGHTON AVE. (SEVERN FOR BADEN). DUE TO A POSSIBLE © ICT OF INTEREST, COEYIISSIONER GERRISH HAS BEEN EXCUSED AND IS NOW ABSENT. RESOLUTION NO. 77 -523 U Director Gallop reviewed that the lot split had been approved, but the Request for Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was not adopted because of a tie Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 Page 6 vote and, therefore, there has been no action because the lot split cannot be recorded until an environmental determination has been made. He advised the Commission that on last Wednesday a meeting was held in Mr. Butch's office, where Mrs. Jackson and her attorney, Mr. Severn and his engineer and attorney; Mr. Butch, the City Attorney, and himself were all present and discussed the matter to quite some length. He added -it was his impression after the discussion, that if alternate circulation could be provided from this area which is potentially developable in- cluding the condominiums to the west, the Baden property which is under preliminary subdivision design, and the other portion of Baden's property, that if some way we could provide for the development of Courtland and relieve this additional traffic into Brighton going east, that there would be consideration for a change of feeling on their part. Director.Gallop stated that in discussing the Tentative Tract #657, also lo- cated on;Brighton, the staff recommended that the subdivision pay $100.00 per unit towards the improvement of Courtland to a 24' blacktop drive from Brighton to Grand, and we would also recommend that this requirement be applied to both of these pieces of property, if approved, and to the proposed subdivision. The Director of Public Works and City Engineer have approved the proposal, and Mr. De Blauw has agreed to pay this money as a condition of his parcel map, which we will discuss a little bit later. The staff felt that by generating this money, this would then provide an easier access onto Grand Avenue. He stated we are still trying to get a resolution on the environmental matter of the lot split. nx F� 4 �keS Chairman Pope advised that at this time the environmental aspects of ''the lot split would be discussed, and called for comments from the audience with regards to Negative Declaration Statement in connection with Lot Split Case No•77 -267, Margaret Stone, Attorney with the office of Haynes and Olpin, stated that with regard to the meeting referred to by Mr. Gallop, there was a feeling that if the traffic element could be taken care of, opposition to this project on other areas might be eased, but the mere paving of Courtland is not a sufficient re- routing of traffic at this time for the citizens who signed the petition that was presented to the Commission earlier. In answer to Chairman Pope's question if Ms. Stone is representing all of the citizens who signed the petition, Ms. Stone stated she was representing Mrs. Jackson. Ms.- Stone referred to Negative Declaration Form B -3, stating they take issue in that, first, there will be effects on cultural resources, Page "r" of that form, Item #5. She stated her client feels that there will be such effects in that the project will overload schools, will cause sewage and drainage problems, and there would also be generated an increase in traffic, which is probably the major concern of these people. Secondly, on Page "q ", Appendix B, Item F, they take issue saying that there will be land affected which is not just residential and apartments; the adjoining land being residential. Item F states that the adjoining land is both apartment and residential, and Ms. Stone is saying there is an inaccuracy there. No. 3 on that same page - "do you feel that this. project is inconsistent with the Land Use Plan ? ", Ms, Stone stated that theory is based on the fact that the government code requires that the General Plan be consistent with the zoning. Further, she stated that the project will cause permanent an- noyance to neighboring communities in that there will be an increase in traffic and the unsolved sewage and drainage problems. She stated that at Page "s ", the form indicates that there is not a potential for a controversy to be generated by this project, but they submit that the fact they have been here meeting after meeting indicates that a real controversy has been generated and will continue. She further stated that this project places residential parking in a Commercial Neighborhood Zone without a zone change. This is, in effect, a zoning change without the formalities. Also, the Environmental Quality Act of California re- quires an EIR where there is a zone change, and since this is, in effect, a zoning change, the negative declaration cannot be accepted legally by the Commission. Mr. Douglas Hilton, Attorney representing Mr. Severn, stated that the real problem here is traffic, and maybe no one in the City likes traffic going by their door, but it is a fact of City life that there is going to be traffic and what we have to do is plan for it in the best way and make sure that it goes along streets that are designed for it safely and efficiently. He stated he didn't think there was any question that Brighton could handle that traffic; it is designed to handle it safely and efficiently. Also, if it is opened up, it provides fire and police'access to °Ledo Place and`surro m'g areas, which is beneficial. He stated it was his,(pinion that what they are really asking 369 370 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 Page 7 for in this is what amounts to preferential treatment; they want to close off the area so that what would be normal traffic patterns in the City through normal de- velopment will not go by their area through Brighton. He stated he didn't think it was fair to give preferential treatment to any section of a neighborhood, but to treat each section like any other section and not to just shunt traffic into one area to keep another area protected. Mr. Lou Caballero, San Luis Engineering, representing Mr. Severn, stated he would like to address Ms. Stone's statement that there was a sewage problem and a drainage problem. As far as the drainage problem is concerned, the property will have a retention basin designed to City standards, which will handle the water on the site. As far as the sewer, they are connecting to standard sewers, which are done throughout the City every day. Madeline Steel, 1590 Hillcrest, inquired as to the cost of improving Courtland. Director Gallop advised that probably close to $7,000 would be generated off of these four developments, and it was estimated the cost would probably run around•$8,000, and the difference would be picked up as a responsibility of the City. Director Gallop advised that the developer has also agreed to accept an 18' height limitation from Brighton Street curb grade elevation. In answer to Ms. Stone's question regarding installation of a traffic light at Courtland and Grand, Chairman Pope advised this matter would have to be taken up with City staff. Administrator Butch advised there will be a traffic light installed at Oak Park Boulevard and Grand Avenue. Mr. Tom Aiken, 183 Fair Drive with regard to speed, more problems. Mr. Douglas and he didn't think closing and those problems could be means. View Drive, commented on the traffic on Fair View and that opening to the other street would be creating Hilton stated the problem there is traffic control, off streets is an appropriate means of traffic control, solved either through the use of "Stop" signs or other Director Gallop advised that after the meeting the other day, he had discussed this matter with the City Engineer and the Public Works Director, and they were both very strongly opposed to any type of a break on Brighton Avenue by cul -de -sac or any other type of division. Director Gallop also stated that this Commission or staff has never hesitated in completing traffic flow patterns in any portion of the City, regardless of topography, because of necessity to serve the people who will be living in that area. Traffic circulation has to be served and a pattern has to be developed so that there is more than one route for getting in and out of an area Mr. Gallop recommended that, in all fairness to Mrs. Jackson and her attorney, that if the Negative Statement is approved, the Commission should go back and amend the Architectural Approval of this development, putting the height limitation on each structure to 18° above the established curb grade on Brighton. Commissioner Cole commented that according to the recent Population Update, the number of persons per dwelling unit for 1977 is going down, and it seems the adult population is increasing; we are becoming an adult community, and so in relation to the stimulation of traffic here, of course everything that moves is going to have some traffic, but not to the extent that it is going to really dis- rupt everything. Commissioner Hitchen inquired regarding the comment on using the C -N Zone for parking. Director Gallop advised that on the C -N Zoning, which is Commercial Zoning and which requires a much higher percentage of parking than residential, if there is a problem with the Commission's feeling that this is not a legitimate use under our present code, this could be determined by a minute motion of the Commission saying that it is a legitimate use. He further stated that he feels it is and, in his opinion, it would be hard put to argue it otherwise. If you do not want to permit parking in the C -N Zone, then you are going to congest the development of the R -3 property because they would still be allowed the same number of units, but by putting units in R -3 and parking in the C -N, you are going to spread out the effect over a much larger area and make it much more pleasing and much more open. This is a determination the Commission will have to make when we talk about Architectural Review if the lot split is approved. Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 After further discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -524 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION, WITH AMENDMENTS. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Gerrish and Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. Director Gallop recommended that Architectural Review Case No. 77 -138, dated March 30, 1977 be amended to include that these structures not exceed 18' in height above the established curb grade on Brighton Avenue. After discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and unanimously carried, the Committee Action of Architectural Review Case No. 77 -138, dated March 30, 1977 be amended to include a requirement that the maximum height of structures will not exceed 18' above the Brighton Avenue curb grade, and that a $100.00 fee per dwelling unit be assessed to be used for construction of Conrtland Avenue. Director Gallop advised that in order to clarify the subject of fees, he referred the Commission to his memo dated June 1, 1977, and recommended that the memo be converted into a Resolution establishing the fees to be placed on the balance of Mr. Baden's property, and on the property across the street northerly, in the same manner that we have already assessed this portion of property and which, hopefully, we will do with the Subdivision Map for Tract No. 657. After discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -525 Page 8 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT FEES. BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE.,IMPROVEMENT OF COURTLAND STREET. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Hitchen, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ASSENT: Commissioners Gerrish and Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. SUBDIVISION REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 657, BUENA VISTA TERRACE, 1493 BRIGHTON AVE. (DE BLAUW) Director Gallop advised that this is the last step in the approval of the proposed condominium subdivision. The Architectural Approval and Use Permit have been granted; the structure is near completion; and the subdivision map, as required by State Law, must now be approved so that recordation can take place to permit sales. The only thing now which the owner has to provide to staff and for record is the Homeowners' Association paperwork. After discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 77 -528 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR TRACT NO. 657, BUENA VISTA TERRACE, AND REFERRAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. ONLY. 371 372 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 6 -7 -77 Page 9 On motion by Commissioner Hitchen, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Gerrish and Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. After a brief discussion regarding Negative Declaration Statement for Tentative Tract Map No. 657, the following action was taken: On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Hitchen, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Hitchen, Ries and Chairman Pope NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Gerrish and Moots the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7th day of June 1977. COMMISSIONER GERRISH IS NOW PRESENT. RESOLUTION NO. 77 -526 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DECLARATION. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION- LOT SPLIT CASE NO. 75 -226, 268 ALDER STREET (ROBERTSON). Director Gallop advised that through a misunderstanding in the off -site improvement requirements and their placement, Mr. Robertson is requesting a six month extension on the parcel map. After discussion, on motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and unanimously carried, approving a six month extension on Lot Split Case No. 75 -226. RESIGNATION OF CHAIRMAN POPE Chairman Pope advised that he will be out of town on vacation for the next meeting and, since his term expires at the end of June, he requested Administrator Butch to inform Mayor de Leon that he did not wish to be considered for re- appointment. Commissioner Cole expressed her thanks to Chairman Pope for his work with the Commission. Director Gallop presented Chairman Pope with his nameplate. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 10:03 P.M. ATTEST: ing Secretary 1 1