Loading...
PC Minutes 1975-05-06Arroyo Grande Planning Commission May 6, 1975 The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Calhoon presiding. Present are Commissioners Cole, Mathews, Miller, Moots, Ries, and Sandoval. Also in attendance are Councilmen Millis and de Leon, City Administrator Butch, and Planning Director Gallop. MINUTE APPROVAL Upon hearing no additions or corrections, the minutes of the regular meeting of April 15, 1975 were approved by Chairman Calhoon as prepared. CONTINUATION OF VARIANCE CASE NO. 75 -52, REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR CARPORT, 508 AND 512 LE POINT STREET (STICKLER). Director Gallop advised that this matter was before the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 1st and, at that time, the public hearing was closed and the matter continued pending further information. Director Gallop referred to a letter from Mr. Ben Maddalena, Civil Engineer with Central Coast Laboratories, which stated that, in Mr. Maddalena's opinion, it would not be advisable to move the rear wall of the existing carport back into the hill any further than it is without jeopardizing the existing structures. This was one of the potentials that possibly could have been con- sidered. He noted that a sketch was attached to the agenda material, and it appears there are only two alternatives left: (1) complete abandonment of the entire project and, (2) grant a variance based on the sketch. He advised that the City Engineer and Public Works Director have suggested that the sides of the existing block wall be opened up; and that the roof be either cantilevered or supported by a post at the end of the existing wall, and then the bank re- shaped in order to permit vision from the carport up and down the street. The dimensions, as noted, would be those which would be in effect if the variance were granted._ He further-advised the building would be an open .concrete block structure, and there would be no doors on the garage. City Engineer Garcia advised the front of the carport is on the back edge of the sidewalk area, if there were a sidewalk. After a.brief discussion by the Commission,.on motion by Commissioner Ries,,seconded by Commissioner Cole, and unanimously carried, that the public hearing,onthe variance be reopened. 133 A representative of Central Coast Laboratories, San Luis Obispo, advised that his firm had examined the site in its present constructed condition, and the process of moving_the walls back towards the rear retaining wall, just the fact of going in there and excavating those soils now could possibly trigger a small slide. He advised that the existing grade to either side of the carport area now pretty much toes out in line with the end of the carport, basically at a 1.5 to 1 slope to where it levels out. He stated that if we attempt to cut the slope steeper, basically moving the toe back, we are removing the buttress type affect that is tending to hold this. soil. Mr. Stickler, 770 Higuera St., owner of the structures, stated he had been advised by the engineers that it is almost impossible to enlarge the hole with- out a tremendous retaining wall; it has. already slid off the front of that property into that hole, and we were told by the engineers to fill it as soon as we possibly could. Mr. Stickler stated he had been working with the City Engineer and his engineers to arrive at a solution to the problem. Mr. Jack English, 521 Le Point, inquired as to how this problem ever came about. City Engineer Garcia advised that the original problem arose because of an approximate 3' error in finish grade placement of the houses with the street, which made it impossible to get a car into the carport under the houses. At that point, other means of remedying the situation were explored. After con- sideration, the Public Works Department issued a revokable encroachment permit which, in effect, says that if.for.any reason the City, at some future date, wishes to occupy its public right -of -way,. the structures have to be removed within 30 days. Mr. English advised he was still objecting to the Variance because of the safety aspects. Mrs. English stated the street is very busy and was also concerned about safety. 134 Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -75 Page 2 There being no further discussion for or against the proposed Variance, Chairman Calhoon declared the hearing closed. After discussion by the Planning Commission, it was suggested that the front of the garage be enclosed, making it a storage'structure instead of a garage. Director Gallop advised if this were done, a Variance would have to be granted for off - street parking requirements. On motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Miller, and unanimously carried, the matter was referred back to staff for further sug- gestions on methods along these lines. Chairman Calhoon advised the audience that this matter would be back before the Commission at their meeting of May 20, 1975. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING CASE NO. 75 -79, TRAFFIC WAY EXTENSION, "R- A -B -3" RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE DISTRICT TO "P -M" PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (LAWLER). Director Gallop advised that the parcel of property petitioned for re- zoning was the property south of Traffic Way Extension and Highway 101, and pointed out that this was the area discussed during the proposed revision of the Land Use Element. If the property is developed for industry, the City would see that the road is completed to provide through traffic for that type of use, and any development would require Architectural Approval, with front and side yard setback, landscaping, and compatibility to the surrounding resi- dential areas. Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Rezoning Case No. 75 -79 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman Calhoon declared the hearing open. Mr. Dean, 611 Traffic Way, stated he was concerned about some problems that might arise if the property is rezoned. He advised that the City street ends at his driveway, which means coming from a 35' city street to a 19' private road which is just wide enough for two cars, and further stated that his property runs to the middle of the road on the southwest side. Mr. Dean also expressed concern with regard to drainage, stating that it is now coming down the road and tearing up the road._ In answer to Mr. Dean's questions as to what Light Industrial would be, Director Gallop advised it could be food distribution, light warehousing, etc. Mr. Gallop read a paragraph from the staff report as follows: "If the zone change is approved, the petitioner should be made aware that the present private street must be deeded to the City and Improved to meet City standards, connection from the present public street on the south end of Traffic Way to an intersection with the frontage road and Highway 101, and that the development of this property must be done through subdivision provisions." Director Gallop stated that the drainage must be taken care of by the developer, and this is all done through Subdivision approval, and this is what the City would require on the development of this property. Director Gallop further advised that there won't be any road except within the ease- ment area; that the road will be placed on the surveyed center line and will not directly affect Mr. Dean's property. Mr. Jim Lawler, So. Traffic Way Extension, petitioner for the zone change, spoke in favor of the zone change being granted, and stated that everyone in that area owns property to the center of the road with a 15' deeded easement. There being no further discussion for or against the proposed zone change, Chairman Calhoon declared the hearing closed. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 75 -376 Z RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS BY CHAPTER 4, ZONING, ARTICLE 32, OF SAID CODE: Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 5 -6 -75 Page 3 On motion by Commissioner Sandoval, seconded by Commissioner Miller, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Mathews, Miller, Moots, Ries, Sandoval and Chairman Calhoon NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1975. REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTIONS - LOT SPLIT CASE NOS. 75 -215, 75 -216 and 75 -217. Director Gallop advised that copies of Committee reports on the subject Lot Splits were sent with the agenda material, and if there are no comments, additions or corrections that the Commission wishes to make, no further action would be required. NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - TRACT #555, "OAKCREST SUBDIVISION" Director Gallop advised that this subdivision has been approved in the tentative map stage by the Planning Commission, and the staff is recommending approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 75 -377 EIR RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GGRANDE ACCEPTING NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. On motion by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Ries, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Mathews, Miller, Moots, Ries, Sandoval and Chairman Calhoon NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1975:' 135 AMENDED SUBDIVISION REVIEW BOARD REPORT - TRACT #538, SECOND UNIT OF "TERRA DE ORO" Director Gallop advised that when the preliminary tentative map for Terra de Oro was presented, it provided a park. He pointed out that this land is rather difficult to chop up because it does have a telephone trunk cable through it, and the telephone company is very particular about what is done in the vicinity of such cables. The second unit was approved on the assumption that the park would be put in a location to serve both Units 1 and 2, now Unit 3 has come into being. The present engineers of the development have suggested that they be allowed to pay money in lieu of park land, however, there are still 4 + acres of park area in Unit 3 which is across the street from the original park site. When this original park was approved, we did not have Strother Community Park in the original plan, which will be a community park. The developers have asked that they be relieved of the park land-dedication pay $5,000 in lieu of this land. The Parks and Recreation Commission has considered this request at a joint meeting with the City Council, and the Commission did approve the request on a 4 to 1 vote with two conditions, i.e., (1) that the $5,000 be used for either land acquisition and /or development of the Strother Community Park, and (2) that park open space land in Unit 3 be dedicated to the City in con- nection with Unit 2 if Unit 3 was not simultaneously submitted for acceptance. Director Gallop pointed out that this makes a definite change in the tentative approval of Unit 2, and before the engineers can complete the map for recordation, it must be approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and by this Commission. It is the Parks and Recreation Commission's recom- mentation, and staff's recommendation, that the amended map be approved and the developer be required to pay $5,000 in lieu of park land. After Commission discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 75 3378 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING RESOLUTION NO. 74 -337 APPROVING THE REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR TRACT NO. 538, SECOND UNIT OF TRACT NO. 434, "TERRA DE ORO ". 136 On motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Sandoval, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1975. Mr. Paul Sturges, of Garing, Taylor and Associates, advised that the map has been amended as recommended by the City, which is an extension of the cul -de -sac and eliminating Lot 15. REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF USE Director Gallop referred to a request from Mr. Donald H.,Wood, asking for a determination of use, and advised the matter could be made an agenda item by a unanimous vote of the Commission. On motion by Commissioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Sandoval, and carried, approving consideration of the request. Director Gallop advised that the petitioner is interested in buying the property at 211 So. Halcyon Road, which is in -a P- C.zone and is adjacent to an H -S zone. The petitioner is interested in having a bicycle retail sales and service business at this. location. .Director Gallop read a list of uses permitted in the P -C District, and the uses permitted in the P -C District subject to.obtaining a Use Permit. COMMISSIONER RIES IS EXCUSED DUE TO A POSSIBLE m NFLICT OF INTEREST. After a brief discussion, the following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 75 -379 ATTEST: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Mathews, Miller, Moots, Ries, Sandoval and Chairman Calhoon - NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DETERMINING THAT A BICYCLE SALES AND SERVICE BUSINESS IS PERMISSIVE IN A P -C ZONED DISTRICT SUBJECT TO USE PERMIT PROCEDURE. On motion by Commissioner Sandoval, seconded by Commissioner Cole, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Cole, Mathews, Miller, Moots, Sandoval and Chairman Calhoon NOES: •None ABSENT: - Commissioner Ries The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of May 1975. COMMISSIONER RIES IS NOW PRESENT RESIGNATION OF COMMISSIONER MILLER Director Gallop advised that Reverend Miller has submitted his resig- nation from the•Commission, and tonight will be his last night of service. Director Gallop thanked Reverend Miller for his work on the Commission, and Chairman Calhoon presented Rev. Miller with his Commission nameplate. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, on motion by Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Mathews, and unanimously carried, the meeting adjourned at 9:03 P.M. h Secretary Chairman