PC Minutes 1973-07-03Arroyo Grande Planning Commission
July 3, 1973
The Arroyo Grande Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman
Jones presiding. Present are Commissioners Goulart, Gullickson, Pope, Porter
and Spierling. Commissioner Calhoon is absent. Also in attendance are City
Administrator Butch and Planning Director Gallop.
MINUTE APPROVAL
On motion by Commissioner Goulart, seconded by Commissioner Porter, and
unanimously carried, approval of the minutes of June 19, 1973 was carried over
to the next meeting of July 17, 1973.
MODIFICATION OF LANDSCAPING PLANS - SHELL OIL CO. GRAND AVE. & HWY. 101
Director Gallop advised that when the Shell station was constructed, there
was quite a large triangular portion of property at the rear of the station, and
landscaping, irrigation and maintenance requirements were made of the company for
this area, and the installation was made. The company contracted to have the weeds
pulled and, as a result, the plantings, etc. were pulled out. He advised he has
been working with the company to come up with something which may be more desirable
than the original landscaping plan. Director Gallop referred to the original plant-
ing plan and irrigation system, and also the new alternate plan showing blacktop,
trees and picnic facilities for the use of the traveling public. He commented
that he felt it was an improvement upon the original plan, and the company is re-
questing permission to alter the original plan which was approved by the Archi-
tectural Committee.
Director Gallop stated he was concerned as to what kind of guarantee the
City would have on the maintenance of the area once it has been installed, and
that perhaps a verbal expression from the company might be in order as to what
can be anticipated. He pointed out that the area will consist of blacktop, trees,
and shrubs, and would require some alteration of the irrigation system. He
advised there is adequate parking on the service station site which would accom-
modate approximately 10 or 12 cars.
Mr. Walt Crane, District Field Engineer for Shell Oil Company, stated
the company recognized, after presenting the original plan, that it was a
mistake to expect a dealer to run a service station and maintain such a large
landscaped area and, therefore, they came up with this alternate solution
with the understanding that if it is approved, rather than depending on the
dealer to maintain the area,, the company would take 90% of the maintenance
responsibility on their own shoulders.
After discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 73 - 306
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING REVISED LANDSCAPING
PLANS.
On motion by Commissioner Spierling, seconded by Commissioner Porter,
and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Goulart, Gullickson, Pope, Porter,
Spierling and Chairman Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Calhoon
The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of July, 1973.
PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO. 73 -212 TEMPORARY MOBILEHOME SALES LOT
775 VALLEY ROAD
C-
ST
G
LENV
EW CONSTR. CO. - H. C. ELLIOTT. INC.
Director Gallop reviewed that at the last Planning Commission meeting a
request on behalf of Mr. Elliott was considered to use one -half of his C -N
zoning on Valley Road adjacent to the mobilehome park for a temporary mobile -
home sales lot. The Resolution adopted was that this would be a compatible use
under these particular conditions on a temporary basis, and a preliminary plan
is being presented for the southerly half of the commercial frontage.
13
14
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 7 - - Page 2
Director Gallop stated the plan indicates 16 mobilehome units which would
include an office, fire hydrant, three street lights and right-of-way dedication
to the City for street widening purposes. The plan indicates e planter aria
around the perimeter and a low three foot fence as a barrier. Director Gallop
stated, in his opinion, he felt that there were too many units indicated on the
parcel and the petitioner has agreed to reduce the number to 13 units. Director
Gallop recommended that if lighting is proposed, that it be oriented so as not
to reflect into the right =of =way or adjoining private property, that all utility
services be placed underground, and the final development plan be subject to his
approval including the landscaping plans. He also recommended that banners, flags,
etc. not be permitted.
Commissioner Pope stated perhaps it might be suitable for the ArchFtectural
Committee to review final development plans.
Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit
Case No. 73-212 had been duly published, posted and property owners notified,
Chairman Jones declared the hearing open.
Mrs. Elizabeth Jackson, 998 Sycamore Drive, was present and stated she
objected to the use being granted in that this Is mainly a residential and
farming area, and is adjacent to a landmark of the area. Chairman Jones pointed
out that the property in question is in a Commercial Zone now.
Mr. Harry Elliott, developer, presented a plot plan to the Commission,
and pointed out that the two acre commercial area is completely divorced from
the mobilehome area. He advised that around the perimeter of the lot, they
will have a split rail fence except in the area where the sales office will be,
and the only sign they will use is about a 3 x 4° sign indicating °,,°Saves Office
Sunrise Mobilehome Sales and the sign will not be illuminated and will be set
down low in front of the sales office. He further stated they are going to put
permanent landscaping in that will remain after the sales lot Is vacated.
No further discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman
Jones declared the hearing closed.
Commissioner Goulart stated that two years ago during the public hearing
for the original use permit, there were statements made that there would be no
trailers put in the Commercial Zone section until a segment of the park was
completed. He also mentioned the fact that trailer sales is a heavy use and
he didn't feel it should be permitted in a C -N District, and he didn't think
the use would be compatible.
Commissioner Pope stated he would be in favor of the use if the term
could be reduced to one year, and with a review of the final development plans
by the Architectural Review Committee.
After discussion, the following action was taken:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
RESOLUTION NO. 73 U
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 73 °212.
On motion by Commissioner Spierling, seconded by Commissioner and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
Commissioners Gullickson, Pope., Porter, Spierling and
Chairman Jones
Commissioner Goulart
Commissioner Calhoon
The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of July, 1973.
PUBLIC HEARING m USE PERMIT CASE NO. 73 °213. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE StiORAGE. 601
GRAND AVENUE, H ®S DISTRICT (DONALD G. PARKER).
Director Gallop advised that the property in question is immediately
adjacent to, and east of, the San Ramon Restaurant which was formerly a used
car lot. He suggested that in addition to the staff recommendations, that the
old pipe framing in front be removed. He pointed out that the present building
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 7 °3°73 Page 3
sets back approximately 70' from the right-of-way, and the petitioner has indicated
that he is going to refurbish the building, and all of the stored vehicles would
be to the rear or south of the existing office building. The staff has recommended
that a penetrating seal coat be put on between the office building and the sidewalk
to help control dust and dirt.
Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Use Permit
Case No. 73-213 had been duly published, posted and property owners notrfied,
Chairman Jones declared the hearing open.
M.r. Don Parker, the petitioner, stated he would like to be permitted to have
some type of sign. Director Gallop stated that if there is to be a lighted sign,
it would fall under the free standing sign category and would require a public
hearing. He further advised that the present sign could be retained, providing
it is not enlarged and providing it does not encroach into the public right-of-way.
There being no further discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit,
Chairman Jones declared the hearing closed.
Commissioner Pope commented that he felt a requirement for the did abandoned
automobiles to be removed should be included in the Use Permit. He further stated
he felt the Fire Marshall should review the use as to possible fire hazard because
of the propane and gasoline tanks. •
After discussion, the following action was taken;
On motion by Commissioner Goulart, seconded by Commissioner Spierling, and
on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Goulart, Gull°dckson, Pope, Porter, Spierling
and Chairman Jones
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Calhoon
The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 3rd day of July, 1973.
PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING CASE NO. 73 HWY. 101 DOKO PROPERTY m "A AGRI.
DIST. TO "P-M" PLANNED IND. DIST. (CO. OF SAN LUGS OBISPO. ENG. DEPT.
Director Gallop stated the property involved is approximately 7 acres in
size and has frontage on Highway 101. He recommended that the request not be
granted on the basis it would constitute spot zoning, industrial use of this area
is not indicated on the Land Use Plan, and use is heavier than Commercial use, and
the entire area of some 1,000 acres surrounds this 7 acres.
RESOLUTION NO. 73-308 U
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE GOANTBNG A USE PERMIT, CASE NO. 73 °213.
Director Gallop advised that the present County corporate yard is in a
residential area, and the City has been interested in seeing that the County
move the yard, but he didn't feel that moving it from its present location to
the proposed location would be the solution. He stated that this hearing is
not a question of the use of the land; it is a question of the rezoning.
Upon being assured by Director Gallop that public hearing for Rezoning
Case No. 73 had been duly published and property owners notified, Chairman
Jones declared the hearing open.
Mr. George Protopapas, County Engineer, spoke in favor of the proposed
rezoning. He stated that the existing maintenance section yard is located in
the heart of the City, and this yard is responsible for maintenance of approxi-
mately 250 miles of road. He advised that for many years the County has re-
ceived complaints with regard to the location of the yard, and that the Board
of Supervisors realize that this is no place for a maintenance yard, and last
year funds were budgeted for a maintenance yard. He pointed out that the prom
posed. location was centrally located and on a major arterial road. He stated
the proposed site fits all of the requirements, with good accessibility to the
freeway; the property is graded and has been used for a corporate yard before;
it has a gravel base, and it has the necessary utilities available. He further
15
16
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, 7 -3 -73 Page 4
advised that they intend to make the facility an asset to the community. Mr.
Protopapas showed the Commission a plot plan of the proposed faciUaty and ad-
vised that approximately 41 acres would be used by the County. He indicated
they would construct a non -see through fence and would adequately landscape
the front; also, they proposed to improve the slopes on the back side of the
property and put in some planting. He further advised that the request is for rezoning
the entire 7 acres.
Mr. Albert Browne, 1190 Highway 101, requested that the petition to re-
zone the Doko property be denied on the basis that (1) zoning would be non-
conforming; (2) would constitute spot zoning, and (3) request for rezoning of
this same parcel for commercial use was denied by this Commission some months
ago.
No furthea` discussion for or against the proposed rezoning, Chairman
Jones declared the hearing closed.
Commissioner Goulart stated he felt this would be a good use of the
property, however, he thought that the rezoning should be only on the 42 acres
that the County is intending to develop. He further stated that he didn't
think the site would be disturbing to any future development of surrounding
areas.
Chairman Jones commented he was in favor of removal of the yard from
its present location, but he didn't feel this is the type of improvement for
the proposed area. Commissioner Pope stated that in consideration of the over-
all plan, this would constitute spot zoning, and the Commission would have to
resolve whether they are going to change the concept of the entire area. He
stated, in his opinion, there is a higher and better use for this property than
a corporate yard. Commissioner Gullickson indicated he was in agreement with
Commissioner Pope.
Commissioner Spierling agreed that this would be spot zoning and stated
he felt there was a need to re-examine that one area as part of the Commission's
review of the General Plan. He felt that the future use of this particular
parcel would be better in the County's hands as a maintenance yard than anything
else. Commissioner Porter maintained that this would constitute spot zoning.
Mr. Doko stated he would like to have the 8.8 acres rezoned to industrial
use so that he could sell part of the property to the County and part of it to
Bob Baker.
After discussion, the following action was taken:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 73 -309 Z
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL
CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS PROVIDED BY
CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 21, OF SAID CODE.
On motion by Commissioner Goulart, seconded by Commissioner Pope, and
by the following roll call vote,to wit:
Commissioners Goulart and Spierling
Commissioners Gullickson, Pope, Porter and Chairman Jones
Commissioner Calhoon
The foregoing Resolution was defeated this 3rd day of July, 1973.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Director Gallop advised that election of officers for the following year
will take place at the next regular Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Commission, on motion by
Commissioner Gullickson, seconded by Commission •: ter, and unanimously
carried, t meeting was ad'ourned at 9:20 P