PC Minutes 1971-01-19326
Arroyo Grande Planning Commission
January 19, 1971
The Planning Commission met in regular session with Chairman Moss presiding.
Present are Commissioners Bowles, Nunes, St. Denis, Schultz and Strother. Commissioner
Porter is absent. Also in attendance are City Administrator Butch, Mayor Levine and
Planning Director Gallop.
MINUTE APPROVAL
On motion of Commissioner. St. Denis, seconded by Commissioner Nunes, and carried,
the minutes of the regular meeting of January 5, 197.1. were approved as prepared,
INTRODUCTION OF NEWLY APPOINTED PLANNING COMMISSIONER
Chairman Moss welcomed Orville Schultz back to the Planning Commission. Director
Gallop pointed out that Mr. Schultz has already put in six years on this Commission.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CALIFORNIA STATE BEACHES AND PARKS DUNES ACQUISITION
Director Gallop advised that last November or December an ad hoc committee was
formed to attempt to make a stand to at least stop, for the time being, the acquisitio
of some 1100 acres of dunes property by the State. The Commission met in northern
California and approved the purchase, supposedly after a public hearing, which, to
our knowledge, was not advertised in this particular area. The proposal is to purchas
land,primarily P. G. & E. property, which pays quite a large sum of taxes, and the pro-
posed purchase would take it off of the tax roll. Director Gallop pointed out that, by
the Department's own admission, they do not have any funds for development of these
properties which they have been purchasing. Director Gallop also pointed out that
industrial and recreation can and do "live" together to the advantage of local citizens
and the recreationists. He advised that the Committee is requesting the various
Commissions, Councils and other interested groups to adopt resolutions opposing the
proposed acquisition.
Commissioner Strother stated the original committee was concerned with the
P. G. & E. property. He also named other large parcels of property that have been
acquired, or are proposed for acquisition, by the State Beaches and Parks Commission,
and advised that parcels already purchased are not open to the public and are not
being developed. Commissioner Strother pointed out that one of the basis for the
opposition is the fact that there are only two areas zoned for heavy industrial use,
and one is in the South County, and acquisition of the proposed land would be 20%
of the entire zone. He stated it is unknown if such monies will be in the governor's
budget, but it is the feeling of the Committee that, under the circumstances, the
only way to stop it now would be to head off this appropriation.
After discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO, 71 -186
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PLANNING COMMISSION OPPOSING EXPANSION OF
STATE BEACHES AND PARKS LANDS IN SOUTH SAN
LUIS OBISPO COUNTY.
On motion of Commissioner Strother, seconded by Commissioner Bowles, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Bowles, Nunes, St. Denis, Schultz, Strother and
Chairman Moss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Porter
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 19th day of January, 1971.
PUBLIC HEARING - USE PERMIT CASE NO, 70 -166 MOBILE HOME PARK - VALLEY ROAD YOSEMITE
CONTRACTORS).
Director Gallop referred the Commission to their copy of the staff report,
dated January 18, 1971, and pointed out that the engineering involved in this
particular type of development is quite extensive, and the petitioner requested
consideration of granting a Use Permit, and the Planning Director recommended, if
granted, it be conditioned upon this Commission reviewing final plans for approval
prior to issuance of permits by the State.
1
1
1
Planning Commission, 1 -19 -7r eage
Director Gallop reviewed the preliminary recommendations of the Fire Department,
Director of Public Works and Planning Department, as listed in the staff report.
It was also suggested that if the development is built in increments that each
increment be subject to the city's final inspection for compliance with the Use
Permit prior to any occupancy.
Director Gallop also advised that, in discussing access to the park, it is
more desirable to have all of the access on one entrance rather than two, and the
staff recommended that a divided road be provided, and indicated that the engineer-
ing problems insofar as sewer, water and drainage, would have to be designed and
approved by the City; a grading plan will have to be submitted in conformance with
City Grading Ordinance, streets not to exceed 15 %; and an easement granted to the
City over all streets for fire, police and any other City service which might be
required.
Upon being assured by Director Gallop that Public Hearing for Use Permit Case
No. 70-166, Mobile Home Park on Valley Road, had been duly published, posted and
property owners notified, Chairman Moss declared the hearing open.
Mr. Victor Kliewer, Oakhurst, California, the petitioner, was present and
advised that he has spent extensive time with the'Planning Director and the
Engineering Department of the City of Arroyo Grande, and that he concurs with the
recommendations of the City in all respects, and that when the final plans are
completed, they will be brought back to this Commission for final approval.
Mr. Matt Gallagher, 520 Leanna Drive, was present and inquired as to whether
the proposed development would be strictly an adult park; value of the mobile
homes; requirement for a contribution or dedication of land for parks. In answer
to Mr. Gallagher it was pointed out that when the Rezoning Case was before the
City Council, Mr. Kliewer had stated that he would be willing to make the develop-
ment an adult park if this were made a requirement; that there is no legal way
that this Commission can make a stipulation on square footage or value of mobile -
homes to be permitted in such a development; and that in the Subdivision Ordinance
there is a requirement that when land is broken up for sale as individual parcels,
the subdivider be required to contribute money and /or land for community park
purposes. The mobilehome park is not being broken up for purposes of sale, and
in lieu of contribution of monies and /or land, they must provide recreation areas
and open space within the development. The plan submitted in this case indicates
9 acres for open space and recreation facilities. With regard to Mr. Gallagher's
statement regarding inequities in taxes, Director Gallop advised that the City
Council has already taken steps to equalize these inequities that have existed up
to this time insofar as they can with regard to Lopez charges, sewer charges, water
and City Business License fees, and by supporting state legislation that we antici-
pate being introduced, and unless the state legislation is amended or changed,
there is nothing more we can do on a local level,
Mr. Bob Goulart, 801 Opal Drive, was present and stated that he felt we
are setting a precedent by allowing this park in as to the quality of future parks
considering what is being allowed. Mr. Goulart also expressed concern over the
number of retired people moving into the community because of the proposed mobile -
home park and other parks and subdivisions which have been approved. He further
stated that at the Council meeting of November 24th the Council recommended, on
the recommendation of the City Administrator, that an 80 -20 split be recommended
for this park; that is 80% adult and 20% family units. This means a good percent-
age of the 300 units will be retired couples. He stated if the proposed develop-
ment is going to cater to retiroI' people outside the area, he doesn't see how it
is oin to help our housin
0 g p g £fortage.
Mr. Robert Payne, 408 Leanna Drive, stated he was concerned about the traffic
situation on Valley Road, There are approximately 100 units on Valley Road now
and with the proposed 300 . units, it will increase the traffic problem three - fold.
He also inquired as to -what sort of plans are being made in terms of the flood
control. Director Gallop stated that this will be referred to the Zone 3 Flood
Control District for recommendation. Mr. Payne stated i't:was hi.s :feeling_.that
this location for a trailer park is very poor, and he had hoped that, through
;; l,nd, dedication, we would have a greenbelt around the old mansion.
With regard to Mr. Goulart's inquiry about this being a Five Star Rated Park,
Chairman Moss advised that the City cannot use Woodruff's ratings, and any con-
ditions would have to be controlled by the City and not by Woodruff. Director
Gallop advised that the City requires the features that are required for a five
star rating.
3 28
Page 3
Mr. Gallagher asked if something could be done to improve Valley Road prior to
the development of the park, or in conjunction with it. Director Gallop advised
that the largest percentage of Valley Road is in the County and he felt that the
City and /or County would not be in a position to upgrade the road until there is
more development in that area. He pointed out that road development and improvement
is based on need.
Mr. Payne referred to the proposed storage area behind the Davis House. Mr,
Kliewer advised that the storage has to be on a flat area and they felt this was
the best layout for this piece of property. He pointed out that there will be a
six foot fence around this area. In answer to Mr. Payne's question on the flood
control question, Chairman Moss advised that drainage plans will have to comply
with City requirements. Director Gallop advised that on any drainage problem which
is within the flood control district, the County will also have to review and approve
the plans.
Mr. Goulart stated without final plans being submitted, he didn't see how this
Commission could make -a decision when they don't have enough information to work
with. Director Gallop advised that the final plans will be brought in for final
approval. There is no point in requiring a man to spend several thousands of dollars
to have the detail plans drawn up before he knows if the Use Permit is granted
subject to all conditions.
No further discussion for or against the proposed Use Permit, Chairman Moss
declared the hearing closed.
Director Gallop suggested that a statement be included in the Use Permit that
final plans be reviewed by the Commission as a part of the Use Permit prior to
applying for a State building permit, then the Commission can amend any conditions.
The State will have a copy of this Use Permit and they cannot approve it until all
conditions have been met.
Director Gallop discussed the landscaping requirements and pointed out that
without exception these parks, as a part of the lease, requires individuals to
landscape and maintain their own plot of land. He also advised that he has asked
Mr. Kliewer to submit a copy of their lease form.
Chairman Moss suggested that since the Davis House is an old landmark, it
would be nice to have some trees planted to separate the trailer and boat storage
area and the Davis House. Mr. Kliewer advised this could be done.
After further discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 71 U
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING,A USE PERMIT,
CASE NO. 70 -166.
On motion of Commissioner Bowles, seconded by Commissioner St. Denis, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Bowles, Nunes, St. Denis, Schultz, Strother and
Chairman Moss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Porter
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 19th day of January, 1971.
REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF A USE - AUCTION IN THE P -M DISTRICT
Director Gallop advised that at the last Planning Commission meeting there was
a request for consideration whether a public auction would be permissive in a P -M
District in connection with retail sales of used furniture and appliances, which
was referred to the City Attorney. It was the City Attorney's feeling an auction
would be permissive in the P -M District in conjunction with a retail business.
The Planning Director recommended that if the Commission wishes to consider allow-
ing a public auction in a P -M District in connection with a retail sales, that it
be done by Use Permit procedure. He further stated that the Ordinance requires
that all materials must be within the building, and the City Business License
Ordinance stipulates a fee of $10.00 for each day the auction is conducted. It
was pointed out to the Commission that the determination they make becomes a part
of that zoned district in the future.
1
1
Planning Commission, 1 -19 -71
After discussion, the following action was taken:
RESOLUTION NO. 71 -188
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DETERMINING THAT
A PUBLIC AUCTION IS A PERMISSIVE USE IN A
P -M DISTRICT SUBJECT TO USE PERMIT PROCEDURE.
On motion of Commissioner Strother, seconded by Commissioner Bowles, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Bowles, Nunes, St. Denis, Schultz, Strother and
Chairman Moss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Porter
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 19th day of January, 1971.
DISCUSSION RE: LETTER RECEIVED REGARDING PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON RECENT
REZONING CASE
A letter was received from an individual who lives in the Walnut Grove
property on Launa Lane questioning this Commission's action on a recent rezoning
recommendation and requesting that the Commission withdraw or recall their rezoning
recommendation to the City Council. It was pointed out that there are a couple of
statements in the letter that are inaccurate as to the basis of the decision of the
Commission. Mr. Gallop advised that the Public Hearing on the rezoning case was not
continued, but was closed and, therefore, only by unanimous approval of the Commission
could it be reopened. The City Attorney has been requested to review the letter and
the action, and give his opinion so that the City Council if, after they have held a
public hearing and if there has been additional new testimony introduced, can return
it to the Planning Commission of the Council feels it is not a reasonable recommendation.
The letter was considered by the Planning Commission and, after discussion,
no action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Commission, Chairman Moss declared
the meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M.
ATTEST:
Secretary Chairman
3 ?
Page 4