Loading...
PC R 97-1626RESOLUTION NO. 97-1626 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE INTERPRETING THAT EMPLOYEE'S RESIDENCE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Development Code was adopted by the City Council on May 14, 1991, and became effective on June 13, 1991; and WHEREAS, Section 9-01.110 (G) (3) of the Development Code provides the Planning Commission with the authority to clarify ambiguities in Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Deveiopment Code table 9-05.030-A indicates that employee's residence in the Agricultural District are conditionally permitted, subject to the second residential unit standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received a request for an interpretation to determine whether an employee's residence must be architecturally compatible with the primary residence in the Agricultural District; and .� � WHEREAS, because primary residences and metal accessory buildings require ministerial approvals, the City does not have the authority. to require architecturally compatible accessory structures in the Agricultural District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation, the following circumstances exist: 1. Table 9-05.030 (A) of the Arroyo Grande Development Code conditionally permits employee's residences in the Agricultural District subject to the second residential unit regulations. 2. Section 9-11.140 of the Arroyo Grande Development Code contains the regulations for development of second residential units. 3. The requirement that employee's residences must be architecturally compatible with the primary residence in the Agricultural District is not the intent of the Development Code because agricultural properties typically contain a variety of metal buildings that are not architectural compatible with single family residences. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby makes the interpretation that an employee's residence is not required to be architecturally compatible wi�h the primary residence in the Agricultural District. Resolution No. 97-1626 July 1, 1997 Page 2 On a motion by Commissioner Greene, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners NOES: None ABSENT: None Greene, 0"Donnell, Haney, Rondeau and Lubin The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 1 st day of July, 1997. ATTEST: a d