Loading...
PC R 96-1596RESOLUTION NO. 96-1596 A RESOLUTION OF TFIE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOI��IlV�NDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 87-392, AMENDMENT #4, LOCATED AT 360 MESQUITE LANE, APPLIED FOR BY MARK 1vICODEMUS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a public meeting on Architectural Review Case No. 87-392, Amendment #4 accordance with City Code; and VVHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the Environmental Documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WFIEREAS, said Lot Line Adjustment was refened to the Planning Commission, by the Architectural Advisory Committee and the Staff Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The proposal is consistent with prior architectural approval of the Patio Homes in the Royal Oaks Planned Development. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Anoyo Grande General Plan, and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing in the neighborhood of the proposed project. The general appearance of the proposal is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Anoyo Grande hereby recommends that the City Council approve Architectural Review Case No. 87-392, Amendment #4 with the above findings and subject to the conditions set torth in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 96-1596 Architectural Review Case No. 87-392, Amendment #4 Mark Nicodemus December 17, 199b Page 2 On motion by Commissioner Titus, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and by the following roll cal� vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Titus, Lubin, Deviny, Keen and Tappan NOFS: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 17th day of December, 1996. ATTEST: Lucil Breese, ommission Clerk TO COIVTEN�': � I c �s��� William Tappa�,� Chair Doreen Libezto-Blanck, Community Development Director Resolution No. 96-1596 ATTACIiMENT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 85-392, AMENDMENT NO. 4 Mark Nicodemus 360 Mesquite Lane GENERAL CONDITIONS � CONIlV�LTNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT This approval authorizes construction of a 200 square foot addition to one of the "patio homes" in the Royal Oaks Planned Development. 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. This application shall automatically expire on December 17, 1998 unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting of December 17, 1996 and marked Exhibit "A" . 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. DEVELOPMENT CODE 5. Development shall conform with the P.D. 1.3 zoning requirements except as otherwise approved. UBC/UFC 6. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. 7. All roofs shall be class "A" . CONSTRUCTION TAX S. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall pay a construction tax pursuant to Article 5, Chapter 3, Title 3 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.