PC R 96-1596RESOLUTION NO. 96-1596
A RESOLUTION OF TFIE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOI��IlV�NDING THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
CASE NO. 87-392, AMENDMENT #4, LOCATED AT 360
MESQUITE LANE, APPLIED FOR BY MARK 1vICODEMUS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a public
meeting on Architectural Review Case No. 87-392, Amendment #4 accordance with City Code;
and
VVHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the
General Plan and the Environmental Documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WFIEREAS, said Lot Line Adjustment was refened to the Planning Commission, by the
Architectural Advisory Committee and the Staff Advisory Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The proposal is consistent with prior architectural approval of the Patio Homes in the
Royal Oaks Planned Development.
The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Anoyo Grande General Plan,
and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code.
The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general welfare
of the persons residing in the neighborhood of the proposed project.
The general appearance of the proposal is in keeping with the character of the
neighborhood.
The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City.
The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment in the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Anoyo Grande hereby recommends that the City Council approve Architectural Review Case
No. 87-392, Amendment #4 with the above findings and subject to the conditions set torth in
Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Resolution No. 96-1596
Architectural Review Case No. 87-392, Amendment #4
Mark Nicodemus
December 17, 199b
Page 2
On motion by Commissioner Titus, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and by the
following roll cal� vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Titus, Lubin, Deviny, Keen and Tappan
NOFS: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 17th day of December, 1996.
ATTEST:
Lucil Breese, ommission Clerk
TO COIVTEN�':
�
I
c �s���
William Tappa�,� Chair
Doreen Libezto-Blanck, Community Development Director
Resolution No. 96-1596
ATTACIiMENT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 85-392, AMENDMENT NO. 4
Mark Nicodemus
360 Mesquite Lane
GENERAL CONDITIONS
�
CONIlV�LTNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
This approval authorizes construction of a 200 square foot addition to one of the "patio homes"
in the Royal Oaks Planned Development.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. This application shall automatically expire on December 17, 1998 unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant
may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the
Planning Commission at the meeting of December 17, 1996 and marked Exhibit "A" .
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the
City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said
approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,
at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition.
DEVELOPMENT CODE
5. Development shall conform with the P.D. 1.3 zoning requirements except as otherwise
approved.
UBC/UFC
6. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State Fire and
Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of
Arroyo Grande.
7. All roofs shall be class "A" .
CONSTRUCTION TAX
S. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall pay a construction tax
pursuant to Article 5, Chapter 3, Title 3 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.