PC R 96-1557RI',SOLUT.[ON NO. yG-1557
A R�SOLU'�'IQN OT TI-IC I'LANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANllE APPROVING AMENDED
ARCIiITFCTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 72-065; 1259
GRANU AVENUE (SALLY AND INGMAR LAURINGSOI�
W1-I�REAS, on May 8, 1996 the Planning Commission held a non-public hearing
ptirsi�ant to State Law and City Codes on Amended Arcliitectural Review Case No. 72-065; and
WII�RrAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, after due study
} and deliberation, f nds that the following circumstances exist:
1. The proposal is consistent with the "General Architectural Review Guidelines" for tlie
City of Arroyo Grande.
2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande General Plan,
and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code.
3. Tl�e proposal will not be detrimental to tl�e liealtli, safety, comfort and general welfare
of the persons working or residing in the neighborhood of the proposed project.
4. The general appearance of lhe proposal is in keeping with the character of the
neighborhood.
5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City.
6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the
neighborhood.
NOW 1'I1LRE�ORI;, BL .IT RrSO1.V�D that lhe Planning Commission of the Cily of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves /lmended Archilectural Review Case No. 72-065 subject lo lhe
following condilioiis:
CONDITIONS OT APPROVAL
Genex•�1 Co»ditio»s
1. Tl�e applicant sliall ascertain and coinply with all Federal, State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to t1�is project.
2. Tl�is application sliall automatically exp.ire on May 7, 1998 unless a building permit is
issued. Tl�ixty (30) days prior to lhe expiration of tl�e approval, tlie applicant may apply
for an extension of oiie (1) year from tf�e original date of expiration.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presenled tv the
Planning Commission at the meeting of May 7, 1996 and marked Exhibit °A".
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the
City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said
approval, or in anyway relating to tlie implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approvaL The applicanf shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any cvurt costs and attvrney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers
or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City
may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such
action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this
condition.
Resolutio�i No. 96-1557
Amended Architect.ural Review Case No. 72-065
Sally �nd Ingmar L�uri»gson
May 7, 1996 .
Page 2
Commuuity Developmeut llepactment Conditions
5. Development shall conform with the General Commercial zoning requirements except as
otherwise approved.
6. Signage shall be subject to tlie requirements of Development Code Chapter 9-13. Signs
are not approved as part of this permit.
7. Prior to issuance of a Uuilding permit, a landscaping and irrigalion plan shall be
prepared by a licensed landscape architect subject to review and approval by the
Community Development, and Parks and Recreation Departments. The landscaping plan
shall include the following:
a.
0
c.
Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail;
0
Ttie use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical
equipment;
The required landscaping and improvements. This includes:
1) Deep root planters sf�all be included in areas where trees are within five
feet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs;
2) Water conservation practices including the use of low f7ow heads, drip
irrigalion, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plants and mulches shall be
incorporated into the landscaping plan; anct
3)
All slopes 2:1 or greater shall have jute mesl�, nylon mesl� or equivalent
material.
4)
An automated irrigation system.
8. Solid waste pick-up localion as identified is acceptaUle. The trash enclosure sliall be
constructed pursuant to Development Code Section 9-10.120C and Figure 9-10.190-A. .
Building �nd Fire Dep�rt�nent Conditions
9. Prior to issuauce of a building permit, the following additional materials will be
requiied:
a
�
Title 24 Energy Calculations (because oF added glass).
County Healtl� Department plan approval.
10. Prior to issu�nce of � b��ildi��g permit., the Plans shall be revised lo include:
a. An additional door out of the dough room (corridor too long).
Itesolut.io» No. 9G-1557 �
Amended Architect.ur�l Revie�v Case No. 72-065
Sally �nd Ingm�r L�uri��gson
May 7, 1996
Pnge 3
�
c.
Hatldicapped access marking to builcling.
Fire extinguisher(s) per fire code requirements.
d. Hoad cletai(s.
Pat•lcs �nd Recre�tion Uep�rf.ment Conditions
11. Prior to issu�nce of A building pet-�nit, the applicant shall provide a tree removal and
preservation plan pursuant to Ordinance 431 C.S. and subject to review and approval of
the Parks and Recreation Director.
Acchitectur�l Advisory Committ.ee Condilions
12. Pc•ior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a plan for the
transition from front parapet of the building to the sides, that carries through the design
theme of the building, subject to review and approval of a representative. of the
Architectural Advisory Committee. -
On motion by Commissioner Deviny, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and by the
following roll call vote to wil:
AYF.S: Deviny, Lubin, Carr, Soto, Beck and Keen
NO�S: None
ABS�NT: Commissioner Tappan
�
I
I
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 7th day of May, 1996.
ATTFST:
tll IIreese, Commission Clerk Jv�t• een, CI ' erson
AS TO CONT�NT:
,
_ �,
Doreen Lib o-Blanck, Cornmunity
velopir�ent Direclor