Loading...
PC R 96-1557RI',SOLUT.[ON NO. yG-1557 A R�SOLU'�'IQN OT TI-IC I'LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANllE APPROVING AMENDED ARCIiITFCTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 72-065; 1259 GRANU AVENUE (SALLY AND INGMAR LAURINGSOI� W1-I�REAS, on May 8, 1996 the Planning Commission held a non-public hearing ptirsi�ant to State Law and City Codes on Amended Arcliitectural Review Case No. 72-065; and WII�RrAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, after due study } and deliberation, f nds that the following circumstances exist: 1. The proposal is consistent with the "General Architectural Review Guidelines" for tlie City of Arroyo Grande. 2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code. 3. Tl�e proposal will not be detrimental to tl�e liealtli, safety, comfort and general welfare of the persons working or residing in the neighborhood of the proposed project. 4. The general appearance of lhe proposal is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. 5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City. 6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood. NOW 1'I1LRE�ORI;, BL .IT RrSO1.V�D that lhe Planning Commission of the Cily of Arroyo Grande hereby approves /lmended Archilectural Review Case No. 72-065 subject lo lhe following condilioiis: CONDITIONS OT APPROVAL Genex•�1 Co»ditio»s 1. Tl�e applicant sliall ascertain and coinply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to t1�is project. 2. Tl�is application sliall automatically exp.ire on May 7, 1998 unless a building permit is issued. Tl�ixty (30) days prior to lhe expiration of tl�e approval, tlie applicant may apply for an extension of oiie (1) year from tf�e original date of expiration. 3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presenled tv the Planning Commission at the meeting of May 7, 1996 and marked Exhibit °A". 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to tlie implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approvaL The applicanf shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any cvurt costs and attvrney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. Resolutio�i No. 96-1557 Amended Architect.ural Review Case No. 72-065 Sally �nd Ingmar L�uri»gson May 7, 1996 . Page 2 Commuuity Developmeut llepactment Conditions 5. Development shall conform with the General Commercial zoning requirements except as otherwise approved. 6. Signage shall be subject to tlie requirements of Development Code Chapter 9-13. Signs are not approved as part of this permit. 7. Prior to issuance of a Uuilding permit, a landscaping and irrigalion plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect subject to review and approval by the Community Development, and Parks and Recreation Departments. The landscaping plan shall include the following: a. 0 c. Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail; 0 Ttie use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical equipment; The required landscaping and improvements. This includes: 1) Deep root planters sf�all be included in areas where trees are within five feet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs; 2) Water conservation practices including the use of low f7ow heads, drip irrigalion, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plants and mulches shall be incorporated into the landscaping plan; anct 3) All slopes 2:1 or greater shall have jute mesl�, nylon mesl� or equivalent material. 4) An automated irrigation system. 8. Solid waste pick-up localion as identified is acceptaUle. The trash enclosure sliall be constructed pursuant to Development Code Section 9-10.120C and Figure 9-10.190-A. . Building �nd Fire Dep�rt�nent Conditions 9. Prior to issuauce of a building permit, the following additional materials will be requiied: a � Title 24 Energy Calculations (because oF added glass). County Healtl� Department plan approval. 10. Prior to issu�nce of � b��ildi��g permit., the Plans shall be revised lo include: a. An additional door out of the dough room (corridor too long). Itesolut.io» No. 9G-1557 � Amended Architect.ur�l Revie�v Case No. 72-065 Sally �nd Ingm�r L�uri��gson May 7, 1996 Pnge 3 � c. Hatldicapped access marking to builcling. Fire extinguisher(s) per fire code requirements. d. Hoad cletai(s. Pat•lcs �nd Recre�tion Uep�rf.ment Conditions 11. Prior to issu�nce of A building pet-�nit, the applicant shall provide a tree removal and preservation plan pursuant to Ordinance 431 C.S. and subject to review and approval of the Parks and Recreation Director. Acchitectur�l Advisory Committ.ee Condilions 12. Pc•ior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a plan for the transition from front parapet of the building to the sides, that carries through the design theme of the building, subject to review and approval of a representative. of the Architectural Advisory Committee. - On motion by Commissioner Deviny, seconded by Commissioner Lubin, and by the following roll call vote to wil: AYF.S: Deviny, Lubin, Carr, Soto, Beck and Keen NO�S: None ABS�NT: Commissioner Tappan � I I the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 7th day of May, 1996. ATTFST: tll IIreese, Commission Clerk Jv�t• een, CI ' erson AS TO CONT�NT: , _ �, Doreen Lib o-Blanck, Cornmunity velopir�ent Direclor