PC R 95-1519RTSOI,UTION NO. 95-15�9
A RI:SOLUTION OT TIIC YLANNING COMMISSION Or
TI-I� CITY Or ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING 'I'II�
ARCIIIT�CTURAL RCVIL��V TOR I-IOLLYWOOD VID�O
LOCA'1'�D A1' 1GSU GRANll AVrNU�, PAll "B"
WIIEREAS, on June 6, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 95-537 for a shopping center located at 1650 Grand Avenue; and
W�IER�AS, said conditional use permit allowed construction of buildings on five pads
subject to tl�e conditions of tl�e conditional tise permit and subject to arctiitectural review of the
buildings to ensure compatibility witl� tl�e sl�opping center arcliitecture; and
WHEREAS, Hollywood Video (W. L. Butler, Inc.) has submitted an architectural
review application for Pad "B" of tl�e siiopping center; atid
WIIERCAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande lias considered the
arcliitectural review submitted by Hollywood Video; and
WHEREAS, tl�e Planning Commission has found tliat this project is consistent with the
General Plan and the Environmental docurnents associated tl�erewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-537 and the Environmental documents associated t}�erewith;
and
WHEREAS, tl�e Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
1. The proposal is consistent witl� the "General Architectural Review Guidelines" for the
City of Arroyo Grande and is consistent witli the approved architecture of tl�e sliopping
center at 1650 Grand Avenue.
2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande General Plan,
and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code.
3. The proposal will not be detrimental to tl�e health, safety, comfort and general welfare
of the persons working in the neighborhood of the proposed project.
4. Tl�e general appearance of tl�e proposal is in keeping with the cl�aracter of the
neighbor}�ood and ttie approved architecture of tlie sl�opping center.
5. The proposal is not detrirnental to tlie orderly and harmonious development of tt�e City.
6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the
neighborl�ood.
NOW, TI BE IT RrSOLVED that the Planning Cvmmission of the City
of Arroyo Grande hereby approves said architectural review, stibject to the standard conditions
of tlie City and those conditions listed below:
Resolution No. 95-1519
Associated Architectural Review
Hollywood Video (W.L. Butler, Inc.)
June 6, 1995
Page 2
General Conditions
1. The applicant sliall ascertain and comply witt� all State, Cour�ty and City requirements
as are applicable to t}�is project. �
2. This application shall autornatically expire on June 6, 1997 unless a building permit is
issued. Thirty (34� days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply
for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration.
3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the
Planning Commission at the meeting of June 6, 1995 and marked "Exhibit A", except
as modified by elimin�'ting the neon accents on either side of the main entryway and the
neon accents above tfie entryway but retaining the neon that is part of the front facia.
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at iiis/i�er sole expense any action brought against the
City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in
the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and att�orney's fees whicll the City,
its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations
under this condition.
5. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit
Case No. 95-537.
6. Prior to occupancy of the building, all public improvemec�ts and the drainage concept
(Attachment "B") shall be installed and operational.
Architectural Advisory Committee Conditions
7. The extra windows proposed by the applicant on the soutll elevation are approved, and
the Committee recommends that the applicant consider adding extra windows on the east
elevation.
8. The drop box may be allowed if colored similar to the building and screened with
landscaping where it will not interfere witli emptying the box.
Planning Depai-tment Conditions
9. Signs shall comply witl� Chapter 9-13 of the Development Code unless otherwise
approved.
10. The applicant sl�all submit necessary applications for the proposed signs.
11. The cornice detailing on the front facia shall be continued around tl�e back of the facia.
Resolution No. 95-1519
Associ�ted Architect.ur�l Revie�v
Hollywood Video (VV.L. Butler, Iuc.)
Jw�e 6, 1995
Page 3
Pvlice Dep�rtment Conditiox�s .
12. Submit an exterior lig}�ting plan for Police Department review prior to issuance of
building permits.
On motion of Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Carr, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Soto, Carr and Chairperson Keen
NOFS: Commissioners Deviny and Beck
ABSENT: Commissioner Hatcl�ett
the foregoing Resolution. was adopted this 6th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
Nanc , Commissi n Cle 0 Jo een, Chair n
�����