PC R 95-1513RTSOLUT'ION NO. 95-1513
A RrSOLU1'ION Or TI-IE PLANN.ING COMMISSION OF
TII� CITY OF ARROYO GRAND� R�COMMENDING AN
INTCRPRETATION TO TI-IC CITY COUNCIL 7'I-IAT
INSTALLATION OI�' R�LOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
REQUIR�S SUBMITTAL OT CONDITIONAL US� P�RMIT
AND ARCI REVIEW APPLICATIONS TOR
OAK PARK FOURSQUAR� CI�URCIi, 900 OAK PARK
BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, tt�e project is witl�in a Planned Development zoning; and
WHEREAS, tlie Planning Commission makes recommendations to the City Council on
issues within a Planned Development zone; and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit Case No. 84-368 and Architectural Review Case
No. 85-328 permitted development of a Church at 900 Oak Pack Boulevard; and
WHER�AS, The Church tias requested permission to install relocatable classrooms as
a cost efficient way of temporarily providing needed classroom space; and
WH�REAS, The Church has further requested that the City provide an interpretation
of whether the proposed relocatable classrooms could be constructed under the previously
approved Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Review; and
WI��REAS, the Platining Commission, after due researc}i and deliberation finds that:
1.
�
3.
The previous approvals did not consider, evaluate or analyze the effect of
installation of relocatable classrooms.
Relocatable classrooms need to be reviewed to address a variety of issues
including, but not limited to parking, aesthetics, fire protection, and site planning.
The City has consistently required approval of a conditional use permit piior to
installation of any similar relocatable building.
NOW, TH�REI�'ORE, B� IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Arroyo Grande hereby recvmrnends the City Co.uncil make the interpretation that installation
of relocatable classrooms is not permitted under Conditional Use Permit Case No. 84-368 and
Architectural Review Case No. 85-328. New applications fvr an Architectural Review and
Conditional Use Permit must first be reviewed and approved before relocatable classrooms are
installed.
Oti motion of Commissior�er Soto, seconded by Commissioner Deviny, and by the
following roll call vote; to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Soto, Carr, Deviny and Keen
NOES: Commissioner Beck
ABSENT: Commissioner Hatchett
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted tl�is 6th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
� /
�,/L.i�.��� � ! i> i��/" i
�- �
�• • � �
`i/„� �!�e
� • . •i �