Agenda Package - PC_Sep06_2022PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, September 6, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Hybrid City Council Chamber/Virtual Zoom Meeting
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
Please click the link below to join the Zoom Meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846
Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846
Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799
In compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the
Ralph M. Brown Act, this Planning Commission meeting is being conducted in a hybrid in-person/virtual format.
Meetings will be broadcast live on Channel 20 and streamed on the City’s website and www.slo-span.org.
Members of the public may participate and provide public comment on agenda items during the meeting by
joining the Zoom meeting or by submitting written public comments to the Clerk of the Commission at pc-
publiccomment@arroyogrande.org.
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
3.FLAG SALUTE
Commissioner Guthrie
4.AGENDA REVIEW
The Commission may revise the order of agenda items depending on public interest and/or special
presentations.
5.COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present issues,
thoughts, or suggestions on matters not scheduled on this agenda. Comments should be limited to
those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. Members of the public may
provide public comment remotely by joining the Zoom meeting utilizing one of the methods provided
below. Please use the “raise hand” feature to indicate your desire to provide public comment.
Click the link below to join the webinar:
• https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89129208197; Webinar ID: 891 2920 8197
• Or Telephone Attendee: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799; 1-253-215-8782; Press * 9 to “raise
hand” for public comment
The Brown Act restricts the Commission from taking formal action on matters not published on the
agenda. In response to your comments, the Chair or presiding official may:
• Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you.
• A Commissioner may state a desire to meet with you.
• It may be the desire of the Commission to place your issue or matter on a future agenda.
Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Commission:
• Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
• Your comments should be directed to the Commission as a whole and not directed to an individual
Commissioner.
• Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Commissioner or member of the audience
shall not be permitted.
6.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence or supplemental information for the Planning Commission received after Agenda
preparation. In compliance with the Brown Act, the Commission will not take action on
correspondence relating to items that are not listed on the Agenda, but may schedule such matters
for discussion or hearing as part of future agenda consideration.
7.CONSENT AGENDA
7.a.Approval of Minutes
(HOLUB)
Recommended Action:
Approve the Minutes of the August 16, 2022 Regular Meeting.
8.PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.a.Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22-003 Regarding a Permanent Parklet
Program
(HOLUB)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending the
City Council adopt an ordinance to implement the permanent parklet program.
9.NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None.
10.NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS SINCE AUGUST 16, 2022
ITEM NO. 1: Architectural Review 22-005; Façade Changes, New Signage and Awning and New
Paint Color for a New Business; Location – 203 East Branch St; Applicant – Michael Goodloe,
Spallino & Goodloe, LLC
After making the findings specified in Section 16.16.130 of the Municipal Code, the Community
Development Director approved the above referenced project for alterations to an existing
commercial tenant space in the Village Mixed-Use (VMU) zoning district. The deadline to appeal this
project is at 5:00 pm on September 7, 2022
ITEM NO. 2: Plot Plan Review 22-017; Construction of a Permanent Outdoor Dining Area;
Location – 307 East Branch Street; Applicant – Frank Schiro; Representative – Randy Russom,
RRM Design Group
After making the findings specified in Section 16.16.080 of the Municipal Code, the Community
Development Director approved the above referenced project for the construction of a permanent
outdoor dining area Village Core Downtown (VCD) zoning district. The deadline to appeal this
Page 2 of 53
project is at 5:00 pm on September 7, 2022.
ITEM NO. 3: Plot Plan Review 22-038; Establishment of A Homestay in A Single Family
Residence; Location – 205 South Mason Street; Applicant – Daneal Nally
After making the findings specified in Section 16.16.080 of the Municipal Code, the Community
Development Director approved the above referenced project for the establishment of a Vacation
Rental in the Village Mixed Use (VMU) zoning district. The deadline to appeal this project is at 5:00
pm on September 7, 2022.
ITEM NO. 4: Plot Plan Review 22-039; Establishment of A Vacation Rental in an Existing Single
Family Residence; Location – 517 Launa Lane; Applicant – Cody Portwood
After making the findings specified in Section 16.16.080 of the Municipal Code, the Community
Development Director approved the above referenced project for the establishment of a Vacation
Rental in the Single Family (SF) zoning district. The deadline to appeal this project is at 5:00 pm on
September 7, 2022.
ITEM NO. 5: Plot Plan Review 22-034; Establishment Of A Vacation Rental In An Existing Single
Family Residence; Location – 331 Garden Street; Applicant – Patricia Daniels
After making the findings specified in Section 16.16.080 of the Municipal Code, the Community
Development Director approved the above referenced project for the establishment of a Homestay in
the Single Family (SF) zoning district. The deadline to appeal this project is at 5:00 pm on
September 7, 2022.
11.COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the Planning Commission.
12.STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the Community Development Director
13.ADJOURNMENT
All staff reports or other written documentation, including any supplemental material distributed to a
majority of the Planning Commission within 72 hours of a regular meeting, relating to each item of
business on the agenda are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the City
Clerk’s office, 300 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande. If requested, the agenda shall be made
available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, contact
the Legislative and Information Services Department at 805-473-5400 as soon as possible and at
least 48 hours prior to the meeting date.
This agenda was prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 Agenda
reports can be accessed and downloaded from the City’s website at www.arroyogrande.org If you
would like to subscribe to receive email or text message notifications when agendas are posted, you
Page 3 of 53
can sign up online through the “Notify Me” feature.
Planning Commission Meetings are cablecast live and videotaped for replay on Arroyo Grande’s
Government Access Channel 20. The rebroadcast schedule is published at www.slo-span.org.
Page 4 of 53
1
ACTION MINUTES
MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
August 16, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Hybrid City Council Chamber/Virtual Zoom Meeting
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
Commission Members Present: Chair Glenn Martin, Vice Chair Jamie
Maraviglia, Commissioner Jim Guthrie, Kevin
Buchanan
Commission Members Absent: Commissioner Frank Schiro
Staff Present: Planning Manager Andrew Perez, Associate
Planner Patrick Holub, Community
Development Director Brian Pedrotti
Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M.
Brown Act, this meeting was held by teleconference.
_____________________________________________________________________
1.CALL TO ORDER
Chair Martin called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00pm.
2.ROLL CALL
Commissioner Schiro absent.
3.FLAG SALUTE
Vice Chair Maraviglia
4.AGENDA REVIEW
None.
5.COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
None.
6.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 5 of 53
2
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.a Approval of Minutes
(HOLUB)
Commissioner Guthrie abstained.
Moved by Chair Martin
Seconded by Vice Chair Maraviglia
Approve the Minutes of the June 7, 2022 Regular Meeting
Passed
7.b Approval of Minutes
(HOLUB)
Vice Chair Maraviglia abstained.
Moved by Chair Martin
Seconded by Commissioner Guthrie
Approve the Minutes of the August 2, 2022 Regular Meeting.
Passed
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.a Consideration Of Amendments To Title 16 Of The Arroyo Grande Municipal Code (AGMC)
Regarding Accessory Dwelling Units; Development Code Amendment 20-001; Location –
Citywide
(PEREZ)
Planning Manager Perez presented the staff report and responded to Commissioner questions
regarding: objective design standards; by-right ADU provisions; fee waivers; the affordable
housing trust fund; pre-approved ADU plans; parking and the definition of low income.
Community Development Director Pedrotti responded to Commissioner questions regarding
front yard ADUs and feasibility.
Chair Martin opened the public hearing. Hearing no public comment, Chair Martin closed the
public hearing.
Moved by Chair Martin
Seconded by Kevin Buchanan
The Resolution was adopted with the following amendments:
1) Clarify the wording of item 6c;
2) Clarify that the fee waiver apply to family members and zero income renters
Page 6 of 53
3
Passed
8.b Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22-003 Regarding a Permanent Parklet
Program
(HOLUB)
Assistant Planner Holub asked the Commission to accept public comment and recommended
that the item be continued to a date certain of September 6th in order to allow staff additional
time to compile comments received from the Architectural Review Committee.
Chair Martin opened the public hearing. Hearing no public comment, Chair Martin closed the
public hearing.
Moved by Commissioner Guthrie
Seconded by Vice Chair Maraviglia
Passed
9. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None.
10. NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS SINCE AUGUST 2, 2022
Received.
Assistant Planner Holub answered Commissioner questions regarding the listed approvals on Ide
Street.
Chair Martin invited public comment.
Kevin McCarthy, Garden Street, spoke about issues related to vacation rentals and stated his concerns
for older homes becoming rental units.
Hearing no further public comment, Chair Martin closed the public comment period.
11. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
None.
12. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
The Meeting adjourned at 7:03pm.
_________________________
Glen Martin, Chair
Page 7 of 53
4
_________________________
Patrick Holub, Associate Planner
Page 8 of 53
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Brian Pedrotti, Community Development Director
BY: Patrick Holub, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22-003 Regarding a
Permanent Parklet Program
DATE: September 6, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Discuss and consider an Ordinance to establish a permanent parklet program and make
a recommendation to the City Council.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
Future staff costs will be involved for the procurement of new safety barriers and the
removal of the existing k-rail. No staff costs are anticipated as part of this review.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending the
City Council adopt an ordinance to implement the permanent parklet program
(Attachment 1).
BACKGROUND:
The COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2020 created a public health crisis and
unprecedented economic impacts throughout the country, State, and at the local level. In
the City of Arroyo Grande (City), local businesses have been economically impacted by
this public health emergency, especially restaurants, hotels, and retail establishments.
This created both a significant challenge for the City - with an urgent need to support both
public health and economic recovery of local businesses - as well as a unique opportunity
to re-imagine how the City’s public right-of-way can be utilized to improve long-term
community vibrancy and economic vitality. In response to the initial COVID-19 reopening
process, the City adopted Resolution 5007 on June 23, 2020, authorizing the Community
Development Director to waive application fees for encroachment permits and Minor Use
Permits/Temporary Use Permits for restaurants that were seeking additional ou tdoor
dining space (Attachment 2). Starting in July of 2020, the City facilitated the installation
of five temporary parklets for eight individual restaurant businesses in the Village. Al l of
Page 9 of 53
Planning Commission
Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22 -003 Regarding a Permanent
Parklet Program
September 6, 2022
Page 2
these parklets remain in use today. Eight other businesses, both in the Village and in
other City commercial areas, took advantage of the opportunity to expand outdoor dining
within private parking lots, including restaurants that utilized temporary b arricades
(concrete K-rail) provided by the City and installed at the City’s expense, in order to
remain in business outdoors. All of the temporary barriers used to provide outdoor dining
space in parking lots outside of the Village area have been removed. The only temporary
street closure that remains in effect is the closure of Short Street between Branch Street
and Olohan Alley. Council authorized the continued temporary closure of Short Street at
its meeting on May 10, 2022 to provide time to evaluate o ptions for a permanent closure
and redevelopment of the area as a pedestrian plaza and park.
Existing parklets within the Village displace a total of fourteen (14) parking spaces, which
include partial spaces that can only support smaller vehicles. There are a total of sixty-
one (61) on-street parking spaces along East and West Branch Streets in the Village. The
parking spaces lost to parklets currently account for approximately twenty -three percent
(23%) of the on-street parking in the Village. Attachment 3 includes a map of the locations
and photos of the existing parklets.
On November 23, 2021, the City Council held a study session on the status of the
temporary parklet program and discussed the potential for a permanent parklet program.
Council expressed concerns with various aspects of parklets, including the number, their
proximity to each other, the safety of users, the amount of staff time dedicated to a
permanent program, their consistency with the historic downtown, design of the parklets,
and costs. Council directed staff to return with the framework of a program that evaluated
and provided recommendations on the following issues:
1. Associated costs for application, rent, encroachment, and in-lieu parking;
2. Safety considerations;
3. Suggested design standards;
4. A cap on the number of parklets;
5. A proposed proximity between parklets;
6. Eligibility; and
7. Application and notification procedures
On April 12, 2022, the City Council considered the above points and directed staff to
return with a permanent parklet program and provided further recommendations
regarding each point. The City Council provided comments regarding each point and
asked that the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) help develop the objective design
standards for the parklets. On August 1, 2022, the ARC reviewed the proposed objective
design standards and made a number of recommendations. Minutes for each of these
meetings are included as Attachments 4, 5, and 6 to the staff report.
Page 10 of 53
Planning Commission
Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22 -003 Regarding a Permanent
Parklet Program
September 6, 2022
Page 3
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The City’s temporary parklet program included performance standards aimed at ensuring
compliance with ADA standards and safety for the parklet occupants. With the
consideration of a permanent parklet program, staff is proposing to implement a series of
performance standards, including ADA compliance and design standards, that would
address safety considerations and the aesthetic character of the parklets. If City Council
ultimately adopts a permanent parklet program, the ordinance will incorporate the
approved performance standards.
Staff also encourages the permanent parklet program to utilize a consistent looking
physical security barrier. The dimensions of the security barriers should all be uniform
throughout the City. Each of the security barriers will be purchased and owned by th e City
to ensure a uniform design, and leased to future applicants of permanent parklets.
Furthermore, staff recommends that no visual obstructions be placed on or above these
barriers to ensure a consistent appearance as well as to facilitate traffic and pedestrian
safety by removing visual distractions and obstructions. Each of these recommendations
is incorporated into the draft ordinance to implement the parklet program.
In addition to the size and location of the barriers, staff recommends that the materials
chosen for the interior of the parklets (e.g. decking, shade structures, etc.) are consistent
throughout the parklet program and consistent with the character of the Village. The
Village Design Guidelines specify that “all new projects shall use materials that fit within
the character of the Village. Using similar materials or replicating these materials on all
projects and restorations will extend the existing character extended throughout the
Village” (Attachment 7).
Based on these considerations, and after receiving feedback from the ARC, staff is
recommending the following performance standards, including parklet design, for
consideration and discussion by the Planning Commission:
Parklet Location
Performance standards for parklet location have been developed through meetings with
both the City Council and ARC. The standards included in the draft Ordinance, which is
provided as an Exhibit to the prepared Resolution, include requirements that parklets be
located only within existing on-street parking spaces, do not obstruct pedestrian or
vehicular traffic and are located a minimum distance from street intersections and
driveways to facilitate safety for all roadway users. Furthermore, parklets are prohibited
in no parking and disabled parking areas, as well as any parking zone that is time-limited
to less than thirty (30) minutes. Lastly, parklets shall be located in a manner that does not
prevent access to any utility equipment or other public infrastructure. Wherever possible,
the parklet shall not extend beyond the building frontage of the business utilizing the
parklet.
Page 11 of 53
Planning Commission
Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22 -003 Regarding a Permanent
Parklet Program
September 6, 2022
Page 4
Parklet Design
Additional objective design standards have been developed to regulate design of the
permanent parklets. Included in the draft ordinance are regulations that have been
developed from meetings with the City Council and ARC. The proposed regulations
include provisions that parklets not occupy more than two parking spaces to promote
equity among businesses. Required safety barriers may not exceed forty-two inches (42”)
in height and at least eight feet (8’) of vertical clearance to ensure accessibility and
functionality of the parklet for users. Architectural elements associated with the parklet
shall not exceed the height of the first floor of the adjacent buildin g so views of Village
buildings are maintained to the greatest extent possible as to not diminish the feel of the
historic district. Parklets shall be located and designed to facilitate ADA compliance,
which includes a requirement that parklets incorporate a flush transition between the deck
of the parklet and the sidewalk. Reflective delineators are required to be provided to
signify the parklet envelope and increase its visibility for motorists. Parklets must be
designed to comply with the Village Design Guidelines with regards to materials and
colors to be consistent with the existing built environment. Finally, trash storage areas
must be screened from the public right of way, emptied regularly and kept in a generally
neat and sanitary order to ensure cleanliness.
Next Steps
If the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the draft ordinance, the next step
will be to introduce the draft ordinance to the City Council at a public hearing. That
introduction will be followed with an additional public hearing to officially adopt the draft
ordinance. If adopted, the ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from the date the City
Council adopts the ordinance.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt an Ordinance to
establish a permanent parklet program; or
2. Modify and approve the Resolution recommending the City Council adopt an
Ordinance to establish a permanent parklet program; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Recommendation of approval to the City Council will allow the City to adopt a permanent
parklet program incorporating the recommendations from the Architectural Review
Committee and Planning Commission.
DISADVANTAGES:
None identified.
Page 12 of 53
Planning Commission
Consideration of Development Code Amendment 22 -003 Regarding a Permanent
Parklet Program
September 6, 2022
Page 5
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Community
Development Department has determined that the adoption of an ordinance to implement
a permanent parklet program is consistent with the City’s General Plan, and theref ore is
statutorily exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15183.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Resolution with Draft Ordinance
2. Ordinance 5007
3. Parklet Map and Photos
4. November 23, 2021 City Council minutes
5. April 12, 2022 City Council minutes
6. August 1, 2022 Architectural Review Committee minutes
7. Village Design Guidelines
Page 13 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 22-
003 REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF A PERMANENT PARKLET
PROGRAM; CITYWIDE
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande (“City”) currently does not allow the placement of
permanent parklets within the right of way; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of these regulations is to ensure that parklets within the right of
way conform to the existing character of the area in which they are located and do not
create an adverse impact on adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that, unless properly regulated, parklets can
result in similar adverse impacts to adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Ordinance
approving Development Code Amendment 22-003 at a duly noticed public hearing on
September 6, 2022; and
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the proposed Ordinance to protect the public health,
safety, and welfare of residents within the City by establishing regulations for a permanent
parklet program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, that the proposed Ordinance will further promote the health, safety and welfare
of the community by establishing appropriate regulations for the operation of parklets
within the right of way of the City to ensure parklets to the existing character of the area
in which they are located and do not create an adverse impact on adjacent properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby recommends the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Development
Code Amendment No. 22-003, amending portions of Title 16 of the AGMC regarding
parklets, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit ‘A’ and incorporated herein by this
reference;
On a motion by Commissioner _______, seconded by Commissioner _______ and by the
following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of September 2022.
Page 14 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
ATTEST:
______________________________
PATRICK HOLUB
SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION
___________________________
GLENN MARTIN
CHAIR
AS TO CONTENT:
_____________________________
BRIAN PEDROTTI
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Page 15 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
EXHIBIT A
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande (“City”) currently does not allow the placement of
permanent parklets within the right of way; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of these regulations is to ensure that parklets within the right of
way conform to the existing character of the area in which they are located and do not
create an adverse impact on adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the proposed Ordinance to protect the public health,
safety, and welfare of residents within the City by establishing regulations for a permanent
parklet program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that, unless properly regulated, parklets can
result in similar adverse impacts to adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Ordinance
approving Development Code Amendment 22-003 at a duly noticed public hearing on
September 6, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2022, the Planning Commission of the Arroyo Grande
recommended to the City Council adding Section 16.52.250 to the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has, after giving notice thereof
as required by law, held a public hearing on __________, 2022, concerning proposed
addition of Section 16.52.250 to the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande, at its regularly scheduled public
meeting on __________, 2022 introduced this Ordinance to add Section 16.52.250 to
Title 16, Chapter 52 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered all pertinent testimony and the staff
report, its attachments and all supporting mate rials referenced therein or offered in the
matter as presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitals and findings are true and correct and incorporated herein
by this reference.
SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 16.52.250 is hereby added as
follows:
Page 16 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
SECTION 16.52.250 – PARKLETS
A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of these regulations is to ensure that
parklets located in the City conform to the existing character of the area in which
they are located and do not create an adverse impact on adjacent properties.
B. Application and Approval. Operators of parklets within the right of way are required
to obtain a Minor Use Permit – Plot Plan Review pursuant to AGMC 16.16.080,
and an Encroachment Permit pursuant to AGMC Section 13.26. The applicant
shall also enter into an Agreement with the City for the rent of City right-of-way,
and lease of City-owned protective barriers.
C. Performance Standards and Conditions.
Location
1. A parklet shall only be located in designated on-street parking areas.
2. A parklet shall not block sight distance at intersections or driveways. Accordingly,
a parklet shall not be located less than twenty-five feet (25’) from a roadway
intersection, adjacent driveway, or other points of off-street access which require
line of sight standards as required by the City’s Engineering Standards. The final
location of a parklet will vary based on the proposed parklet design, and shall be
subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director.
3. Parklets are prohibited in disabled parking zones, parking areas of thirty minutes
or less, and no-parking zones.
4. A parklet may not cover or impede access to any utility equipment, utility pole, fire
hydrant, parking permit kiosk, or utility access such as manhole covers, drainage
inlets, stormwater drainage flow lines and equipment shelters.
5. The parklet shall not extend beyond the building frontage of the business utilizing
the parklet, with the exception that the parklet may extend to a portion of a parking
space if written permission is granted by the adjacent building frontage owner.
Parklet Design
1. Parklets shall consist of no more than two parking spaces, or forty-feet (40’) in
length. Parklets exceeding forty-feet may be allowed if the parklet is intended for
the use of more than one eligible business.
2. A parklet’s walls or railing shall not have a continuous height that exceeds forty-
two inches (42”) and shall not block views in or out of the parklet. Columns or other
vertical framing for overhead elements are permitted. All elements of a parklet shall
have a maximum height limit no higher than th e first floor of the adjacent building.
All parklets shall maintain a vertical walkway clearance height of at least eight feet
(8’).
Page 17 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
3. The depth (dimension measured perpendicular to curb) of a parklet shall be no
less than the minimum dimension required to meet ADA accessibility
requirements. Portions of the required parklet depth may be located within an
existing sidewalk area as long as the sidewalk encroachment does not reduce the
pedestrian path of travel to a width of less than four and a half feet (4.5’) in the
public right of way.
4. A parklet shall utilize the leased City-owned barriers that ensures public between
moving vehicles and parklet users. These barriers shall either be well articulated
or allow for plants or vegetation for screening.
5. Parklets shall have a flush transition at the sidewalk and curb to permit easy access
and avoid tripping hazards.
6. A parklet shall comply with applicable Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
accessibility standards. Compliance with ADA standards is required with respect
to design elements of the parklet, as well as for adjacent areas that may be
impacted by the parklet. Parklets shall use a slip-resistant flooring material to
minimize hazards and shall be accessible to wheel-chair users.
7. The four corners of a parklet shall have a reflective element or other clearly visible
design feature, such as a soft-hit post, bollard, or raised pavement marker, to
illuminate the parklet at night and signify the parklet envelope.
8. Parklets shall be consistent with the Village Design Guidelines
9. The primary materials shall be stone, brick, wood, decorative concrete or
composite wood. Wood materials such as lattice and T1 -11 plywood siding, are
prohibited.
10. Color schemes shall consist of one primary color and one secondar y color unless
natural wood is used.
11. Areas for the storage of trash, recycling, and green waste receptacles shall not be
visible from the public right of way and all waste receptacles shall be emptied and
maintained by the applicant in a neat and sanitary order.
SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 16.04.070 is hereby amended as
follows:
16.04.070 Definitions
“Parklet” means a small seating area created as a public amenity in a former roadside
parking space utilized by a food service business for outdoor dining.
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause of
this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful, such decision
Page 18 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 6
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one
or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause be declared
unconstitutional.
SECTION 5: Upon adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall file a Notice of
Exemption pursuant to 14 CCR § 15062.
SECTION 6: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published
and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to the City Council
meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full
text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk. Within
fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those
City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and
the City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance.
SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the
following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing Ordinance was adopted this 6th day of September 2022.
Page 19 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 7
___________________________________
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________________
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
___________________________________
WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 20 of 53
RESOLUTION NO. 5007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR TO WAIVE APPLICATION FEES FOR ENCROACHMENT
PERMITS AND MINOR USE PERMITS-TEMPORARY USE PERMITS
SUBMITTED BY RESTAURANTS SEEKING ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR
DINING SPACE DURING THE COVID-19 REOPENING PROCESS
WHEREAS, local restaurants have suffered during the shelter-at-home orders issued by
the State and County of San Luis Obispo in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and,
although the State has allowed restaurants to reopen, they are required to ensure
adequate physical distancing or protective measures installed between tables, resulting
in many restaurants being forced to significantly reduce the number of tables and seats
available in their existing spaces; and
WHEREAS, restaurants seeking additional outdoor dining area not already included in
the restaurant's existing land use entitlement are required to obtain a Minor Use Permit-
Temporary Use Permit in order to comply with the City of Arroyo Grande's Development
Code, and any proposed outdoor dining use of City right of way or other City-owned
property will also require an encroachment permit; and
WHEREAS, the current application fee for an encroachment permit is $57 and the
application fee for a Minor Use Permit-Temporary Use Permit is $294; and
WHEREAS, the City does not have an adopted procedure for requests for waivers of
application fees in this situation; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to support local restaurants in their efforts to recover and
reopen following the COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders and to comply with the State and
local physical distancing and other operational limitations by facilitating additional outdoor
dining space where otherwise appropriate under existing laws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
as follows:
1. The Community Development Director is authorized to waive application fees
for encroachment permits and Minor Use Permits-Temporary Use Permits for
restaurants seeking additional outdoor dining space during the COVID-10
reopening process.
2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a
certified copy to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.
On motion of Council Member Paulding, seconded by Council Member Storton, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Paulding, Storton, George, Barneich, and Mayor Ray Russom
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was approved this 23rd day of June, 2020.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 21 of 53
RESOLUTION NO.50O7
PAGE 2
rr i_
KEITH STORTON, MAYOR PRO TEM
ATTEST:
i o4eo/L
KELLY ET RE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
aede
BILL
ROBESfrelfi-
etINI
CTING CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4,7
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 22 of 53
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, KELLY WETMORE, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached
Resolution No. 5007 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Arroyo Grande on the 23rd day of June, 2020.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 25th day of
June, 2020.
KELLY W M RE, CITY CLERK
Page 23 of 53
ATTACHMENT 3Page 24 of 53
Parklet Photos
Rooster Creek
Café Andreini
Page 25 of 53
Villa Cantina
Humdinger/Village Café/Doc Bernstein
Page 26 of 53
Mule Bakery
Page 27 of 53
1
ACTION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
November 23, 2021, 6:00 p.m.
Zoom Virtual Meeting
Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846
ByTelephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799
Council Members Present: Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem
Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Storton, Council Member George
Staff Present: City Clerk Jessica Matson, City Attorney
Timothy Carmel, City Manager Whitney
McDonald, Assistant City Manager/Public
Works Director Bill Robeson, Administrative
Services Director Nicole Valentine,
Community Development Director Brian
Pedrotti, Utilities Manager Shane Taylor, City
Engineer Robin Dickerson
Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M.
Brown Act, this meeting was held by teleconference.
_____________________________________________________________________
1.CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Ray Russom called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL
City Clerk Matson performed roll call.
3.MOMENT OF REFLECTION
4.FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Ray Russom led the flag salute.
5.AGENDA REVIEW
5.a. Closed Session Announcements
ATTACHMENT 4
Page 28 of 53
2
City Attorney Carmel announced that the City Council discussed negotiations with real property
negotiators and the public employee performance evaluation of the City Attorney, and that there
was no reportable action.
5.b. Ordinances read in title only
None.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6.a. Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts
City Manager McDonald provided a brief update on COVID-19 statistics and rapid testing sites.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.b. City Manager Communications
City Manager McDonald provided information regarding concerns from the community as it
relates to water restrictions and new construction; announced that the holiday parade will be
held December 4th and Elegant Christmas in the Village will be held December 5th; and that the
City received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance
Officers Association for the Fiscal Years 2021-23 Biennial Budget. Utilities Manager Shane
Taylor responded to questions regarding percentage of indoor water usage verses outdoor.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.c. Honorary Proclamation Declaring December 10, 2021 as Human Rights Day
Mayor Ray Russom read the Honorary Proclamation Declaring December 10, 2021 as Human
Rights Day. Melih Dookie, accepted the proclamation.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Ray Russom asked the Council if there were any questions or any items to be pulled from the
consent agenda for further discussion.
In response to questions from Council regarding Item 8.g., staff provided a status update on the project.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Barneich
Page 29 of 53
3
Approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.i., with the recommended courses of action.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member
Storton, and Council Member George
Passed (5 to 0)
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification
Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period of November 1 through November 15,
2021.
8.b. Statement of Investment Deposits
Received and filed the report listing investment deposits of the City of Arroyo Grande as of
October 31, 2021, as required by Government Code Section 53646(b).
8.c. Approval of Minutes
Approved the minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings of November 9, 2021.
8.d. Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related to the
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC".
8.e. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of Remote Teleconference
Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54953(e)(3)
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCE
MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e)".
8.f. Adoption of a Resolution Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Determining to
Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts for the Storm Drain System at 251 East
Grand Avenue Project, PW 2021-12
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DETERMINING A NEED TO CONTINUE WORK UNDER EMERGENCY
CONTRACTS TO REPAIR THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AT 251 EAST GRAND AVENUE".
8.g. Adoption of a Resolution Accepting Easements and Public Improvements for the East
Cherry Avenue Specific Plan Project: Final Tract Map 3081 Constructed by Wathen
Castanos Homes
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
EAST CHERRY AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 15-
Page 30 of 53
4
001; SPECIFIC PLAN 15-001; FINAL TRACT MAP 3081 (VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
15-001); CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-004; AND PUD 15-001 CONSTRUCTED BY
WATHEN CASTANOS HOMES".
8.h. Approve an Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Budget for the
Castillo Del Mar Street Extension Project, PW 2020-05
Approved an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program budget to
transfer $20,000 of Local Sales Tax funds from fund balance to the subject project.
8.i. Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update
Received and filed the Monthly Water Supply and Demand Report.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
10. OLD BUSINESS
10.a. 2021 Water Supply Alternatives Study Update
Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director Robeson introduced the item, and JJ Reichmuth,
MKN Associates, provided a presentation regarding current water supply alternatives. Utilities
Manager Taylor discussed recommended alternatives and next steps. Staff responded to
questions from Council.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. Speaking from the public was Jeff Edwards. No
further public comments were received.
City Manager McDonald commented on the need to evaluate staff capacity to put forward a
ballot measure.
Moved by Mayor Ray Russom
Seconded by Council Member Barneich
To direct staff to pursue the following short-term and long-term water supply alternatives to the
preliminary negotiation and agreement stage: a) Continue participation in CCB at the 25%
entitlement level; b) Partner with OCSD on a short-term water supply agreement; c) Pursue an
emergency connection with Golden State Water Company; add d) Pursue a State Water ballot
measure for 2022; and to approach potential agricultural customers to discuss exchange of
recycled water for reduced pumping (“Scalping Plant” Concept) and continue to engage with
County staff in case Nacimiento or State Water is available in future.
Mayor Ray Russom called for a brief break at 7:54 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:00 p.m.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Study Session on the City’s Temporary Parklet Program and Options for Potential
Permanent Parklet Programs
Page 31 of 53
5
Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director Robeson introduced the item and Community
Development Director Pedrotti provided a background on the parklet program and presented
options for a potential permanent parklet program. Staff responded to questions from Council.
Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Denise Andreini,
Henry Gonzalez, and Stephanie Burkard. No further public comments were received.
Council provided direction to staff to continue the existing Temporary Parklet Program; to
develop a long-term parklet program for Council consideration, including a proximity test,
developing the permit type, objective design guidelines, proposed fee schedules, and
amendments to the City Municipal Code required to continue with a permanent program; and to
conduct a detailed cost analysis for materials (barriers), installation, staff time, outside services
(trucking/delivery), ongoing maintenance, replacement of damaged barriers, etc.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
The City Council provided brief reports from the following committee, commission, board, or other
subcommittee meetings that they attended as the City’s appointed representative.
12.a. MAYOR RAY RUSSOM:
There is a citizen's initiative for all fee increases and public employee salary increases to go to
the people for a vote.
12.b. MAYOR PRO TEM PAULDING:
The Air Pollution Control District (APCD) met and reported that emissions are down.
12.c. COUNCIL MEMBER BARNEICH:
The Homeless Services Oversight Council met and reported receipt of approximately $2 million
for San Luis Obispo County in round 3 of the Housing Assistance Program Grant. The Zone 3
Water Advisory Board met and reported water levels at Lopez Lake are currently at 14,000 Acre
Feet and that cloud seeding could not take place during the last storm.
12.d. COUNCIL MEMBER STORTON:
The County is no longer a member of the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA),
cities are ratifying their membership, and the IWMA is working on a new Joint Powers
Agreement.
12.e. COUNCIL MEMBER GEORGE:
The Community Action Partnership SLO Board met and reported the need for an adult day
center in San Luis Obispo County. The Regional Water Initiatives Committee has not met in
three years and consideration should be given to removing it from the appointments list.
13. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Barneich commented on Adult Day Program options.
14. CLOSED SESSION
None.
Page 32 of 53
6
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Ray Russom adjourned the
meeting at 9:48 p.m. in honor of former Arroyo Grande Mayor, Sandy Lubin.
/s/Caren Ray Russom, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Jessica Matson, City Clerk
(Approved by CC 12-14-2021)
Page 33 of 53
1
ACTION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
April 12, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Hybrid City Council Chamber/Virtual Zoom Meeting
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
Council Members Present: Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George,
Council Member Barneich, Council Member
Paulding, Council Member Storton
Staff Present: City Attorney Timothy Carmel, City Manager
Whitney McDonald, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works Director Bill Robeson,
Administrative Services Director Nicole
Valentine, Assistant Planner Patrick Holub,
Community Development Director Brian
Pedrotti, Police Chief Michael Martinez, Police
Commander Zak Ayala, Police Commander
Shawn Cosgrove
Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M.
Brown Act, this meeting was conducted in a hybrid in-person/virtual format.
_____________________________________________________________________
1.CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pro Tem George called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL
Acting Clerk Holub performed roll call.
3.MOMENT OF REFLECTION
4.FLAG SALUTE
Rachel Cloud, Exchange Club of the Central Coast, led the flag salute.
5.AGENDA REVIEW
It was recommended to hear Item 9.a. after Item 11.a. The Council concurred.
5.a Closed Session Announcements
ATTACHMENT 5
Page 34 of 53
2
None.
5.b Ordinances read in title only
Mayor Pro Tem George moved, Council Member Barneich seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously by voice vote that all ordinances presented at the meeting be read by title only and
all further readings be waived.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6.a Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts
City Manager McDonald provided a brief update on COVID-19.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.b City Manager Communications
City Manager McDonald highlighted the Annual Egg Hunt and Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the
new basketball court at Strother Park; and upcoming items for Council consideration.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.c Honorary Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Sexual Assault Action
Month”
Mayor Pro Tem George read the Honorary Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as
"Sexual Assault Action Month". Shawn Freeman, Lumina Alliance, accepted the proclamation.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.d Honorary Proclamation Declaring April 29, 2022 as "Arbor Day"
Mayor Pro Tem George read the Honorary Proclamation Declaring April 29, 2022 as "Arbor
Day". Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director, accepted the proclamation.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem George asked the Council if there were any questions or any items to be pulled from
the consent agenda for further discussion.
Item 8.e. and 8.g. were pulled for separate vote.
Page 35 of 53
3
Council made comments on Items 8.c., and 8.e.
Council Member Barneich referred to Item 8.d. and requested staff look into the possibility of cancelling
the last City Council meeting in June rather than the first meeting in July so that it flows into the Fourth
of July holiday. Council Member Storton concurred.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Jim Guthrie and Gaea
Powell. No further public comments were received.
Moved by Council Member Paulding
Seconded by Council Member Storton
Approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.n., with the exception of Items 8.e. and 8.g., with the
recommended courses of action. City Attorney Carmel read the full title of the Ordinance in Item 8.j.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council Member
Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
8.a Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification
Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period of March 1 through March 15, 2022.
8.b Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits
Received and filed the report listing investment deposits of the City of Arroyo Grande as of
February 28, 2022, as required by Government Code Section 53646(b).
8.c Consideration of Acceptance of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Single
Audit, and Audit Report for the Transportation Development Act Transportation Fund
Reports
Received and filed the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), Single Audit, and Audit
Report for the Transportation Development Act Transportation Fund Reports for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2021.
8.d Consideration of Cancellation of July 12, 2022 City Council Meeting
Cancelled the regularly scheduled Council meeting of July 12, 2022.
8.f Consideration of Rotational Schedule for the South County Chambers of Commerce
Monthly Arroyo Grande Business Meeting
Considered and approved the list of City Council rotational assignments for attending the South
County Chambers of Commerce monthly Arroyo Grande Business Meeting.
8.h Approval of Minutes
Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of March 22, 2022, as submitted.
8.i Consideration to Declare Police and Public Works Surplus Property
Page 36 of 53
4
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS AND
AUTHORIZING THEIR SALE OR DISPOSAL".
8.j Consideration of Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance Establishing a Military Equipment
Use Policy in Accordance with the Requirements of AB 481
Adopted an Urgency Ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
POLICY AND DECLARING THE ORDINANCE TO BE AN URGENCY ORDINANCE TO TAKE
EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ADOPTION".
8.k Consider Approval of Amendment #3 to the Amended and Restated Solid Waste
Collection Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic
Materials Collection with South County Sanitary Services, Inc., to Comply with the
Requirement
Approved Amendment #3 to the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Collection Franchise
Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic Materials Collection with South
County Sanitary Services, Inc.
8.l Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency
Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Authorizing the Continuance of Remote
Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54953(e)(3)
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF
REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e)".
8.m Consideration of Approval of Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with
GHD to Expand Scope of Services to allow for the Completion of the Halcyon Road
Complete Streets Plan
Approved and authorized the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Agreement for Consultant
Services with GHD for the completion of the Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan.
8.n Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving Fiscal Year 2023 Community
Project Funding Request for the Swinging Bridge Project
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 COMMUNITY PROJECT
FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE SWINGING BRIDGE PROJECT APPLICATION UNDER THE
FEDERAL COMMUNITY PROJECT AND/OR FEDERAL APPROPRIATION SUBCOMMITTEE
PROGRAMS", and designate the City Manager or her designee as the City’s signature
authority to take all actions necessary to seek and apply for the funding opportunities.
8.e Consideration of Appointments to the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement
Advisory Board
Page 37 of 53
5
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Paulding
Appoint Myraline Morris Whitaker to the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement District
Advisory Board.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
8.g Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.21 to Title 2 of the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code (AGMC) Establishing By-District Elections for Four Council Members,
Defining District Boundaries, and Scheduling the Order of Elections for Each District
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Barneich
Adopt an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, ADDING CHAPTER 2.21 TO TITLE 2 OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR FOUR
COUNCIL MEMBERS, DEFINING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AND SCHEDULING THE
ORDER OF ELECTION FOR EACH DISTRICT". City Attorney Carmel read the full title of the
Ordinance.
AYES (4): Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Paulding, and
Council Member Storton
NOES (1): Mayor Ray Russom
Passed (4 to 1)
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a Resolution Updating Operating Fees Set Forth in the Master Fee Schedule
Item 9.a. was heard after Item 11.a.
Administrative Services Director Valentine presented the staff report and recommended Council
adopt a Resolution updating operating fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule, effective June
13, 2022.
Mayor Pro Tem George opened the public hearing. Upon hearing no public comments, Mayor
Pro Tem George closed the public hearing.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Mayor Ray Russom
Adopt a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE UPDATING OPERATING FEES set forth IN THE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE".
Page 38 of 53
6
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
10. OLD BUSINESS
10.a Consider Potential Permanent Parklet Program
Item 10.a. was heard out of order.
Community Development Director Pedrotti presented the staff report and Assistant City
Manager/Public Works Director Robeson provided comments regarding safety as it relates to
traffic on East Branch Street and the use of parklets. Staff responded to questions from
Council.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Lee Samways,
Dr. Charles Chadwell, Jim Guthrie, Tammy Price, Denise Andreini, who also read a letter from
Amanda and Chandler Craner, and Pat Cusack, Henry Gonzalez, and Riley Taylor. Acting
Clerk Holub acknowledged supplemental information received and read into the record written
comments received from Alexandra Hagen, Lisa Portwood, Kristen Johnson, Aja Castilleja,
Stewart and Lori Morse, Aimee Armor-Avant, Heidi Ambrose, Rebecca Richards, Colleen
Tooley, Brenda Auer, Renee Westerhuis, and Toni Pelletier. No further public comments were
received.
Council provided direction to staff. No action was taken on this item.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a Consider Request from South County Sanitary Service for Integrated Solid Waste
Collection Rate Increase
Mayor Pro Tem George called for a brief break at 7:54 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:00
p.m.
Administrative Services Director Valentine introduced Bill Statler, Rate Review Consultant, who
spoke about the rate review process and findings and responded to questions from Council.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Jeff Clarin, Jim
Guthrie, and Jeff Stevens. No further public comments were received.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Paulding
1) Set a public hearing for June 14, 2022, to consider adjusting the waste collection services
rates for June 15, 2022, January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024; and 2) Direct staff to prepare
and distribute a Proposition 218 notice with a delayed implementation start date of May 1, 2022,
for the proposed waste collection services rate increases.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Page 39 of 53
7
Passed (5 to 0)
12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Ray Russom commented on design of directional signs. Staff commented that this will be
included in future reports to Council.
13. CLOSED SESSION
None.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem George adjourned the
meeting at 10:22 p.m.
_________________________
Caren Ray Russom, Mayor
_________________________
Jessica Matson, City Clerk
Page 40 of 53
1
ACTION MINUTES
MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITEE
August 1, 2022, 2:30 p.m.
Hybrid City Hall Conference Room/Virtual Zoom Meeting
300 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
Committee Members Present: Jon Couch, Lori Mainini Hall, Kristin Juette,
Warren Hoag, Bruce Berlin
Staff Present: Community Development Director Brian
Pedrotti, Planning Manager Andrew Perez,
Associate Planner Patrick Holub
Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M.
Brown Act, this meeting was held by teleconference.
_____________________________________________________________________
1.CALL TO ORDER
Chair Hoag called the Meeting to order at 2:50 pm.
2.ROLL CALL
Chair Hoag performed the roll call. Committee Member Couch was absent.
3.F LAG SALUTE
Committee Member Hall
4.AGENDA REVIEW
None.
5.COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
None.
6.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Chair Hoag acknowledged the distribution of Supplemental Memo No. 1 prior to the meeting.
7.CONSENT AGENDA
7.a Approval of Minutes
(PEREZ)
ATTACHMENT 6
Page 41 of 53
2
Moved by Bruce Berlin
Seconded by Lori Mainini Hall
Approve the Minutes of the June 20, 2022 Regular Meeting with the correction to Planning
Manager Perez's title.
AYES (3): Lori Mainini Hall, Warren Hoag, and Bruce Berlin
ABSTAINED (1): Kristin Juette
ABSENT (1): Jon Couch
Passed (3 to 0)
8. PROJECTS
8.a Consideration of Architectural Review 22-007; Exterior Alterations to an Existing
Residence; Location – 121 Nelson St; Applicant – Billy Kilmer; Representative – Jennifer
Martin
(PEREZ)
Planning Manager Perez presented the staff report and provided information about the project
location, details, materials, and colors. He also noted that the project was subject to the Village
Design Guidelines and which guidelines were specifically applicable to the proposal.
Jennifer Martin, project architect, and Billy Kilmer, property owner spoke in support of the
project and explained the purpose of the project. Ms. Martin presented a slightly different tone of
yellow, called Cachet Cream, as the proposed base color. The applicants also answered a
question about the future development potential of the site and landscaping.
Committee Member Couch joined the meeting at 2:57 pm.
The Committee spoke in support of the project and appreciated the rehabilitation of an existing
dwelling in the Village to help maintain the character of the neighborhood. The Committee found
the project details in conformance with the Design Guidelines and was supportive of the color
presented at the meeting.
Moved by Bruce Berlin
Seconded by Lori Mainini Hall
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) recommends that the Community Development
Director approve the project as submitted.
AYES (5): Jon Couch, Lori Mainini Hall, Kristin Juette, Warren Hoag, and Bruce Berlin
Passed (5 to 0)
Page 42 of 53
3
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS
9.a Review of Objective Design Guidelines for Permanent Parklet Program
(HOLUB)
Associate Planner Holub presented the staff report and explained the existing status of the
temporary parklet program and direction provided by City Council at its study session. Associate
Planner Holub also summarized the proposed design standards and the purpose for each of
those standards.
The Committee agreed with staff that safety is a priority when developing these standards. The
Committee spoke in support of the proposed standards and discussed height, width, colors, and
landscaping within parklets. The Committee also discussed a program in which the property
owner could install permanent street improvements such as curbing and bollards as a safety
element to develop a permanent outdoor dining area.
The following modifications to the standards were recommended by the ARC:
1) Limit parklet width to the width of the storefront in which it serve, but not more than 40 feet.
This may be flexible considering the parking spaces do not exactly align with each business
frontage
2) Allow more flexibility for colors by not requiring a primary and secondary color.
3) Limit height of parklets to the first floor to maintain view of Village buildings
4) Use traffic rated barriers that are either well articulated or allow for plants/vegetation
10. COMMITTEE COMMUNICATIONS
Committee Member Hall notified the Committee that she will be absent from the second regular
meeting in September through at least the first regular meeting in October.
11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Planning Manager Perez announced that the Planning Commission will consider amendments to the
short term rental ordinance at its meeting on August 2, 2022.
12. ADJOURNMENT
The Meeting adjourned at 4:56 pm.
_________________________
Warren Hoag, Chair
_________________________
Andrew Perez, Planning Manager
Page 43 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
This section provides examples of the most
commonly found building materials used in
the Village area of Arroyo Grande. There
are also examples of construction materials
under the Village Core and the Residential
sections specific to those areas.
All new projects shall use materials that fit
within the character of the Village (see
following examples). Using similar
materials or replicating these materials on
all projects and restorations will extend the
existing character extended throughout the
Village.
All restorations shall use materials that
match or complement the original structure
facilitating compatibility and preservation of
its character.
WEATHERBOARD OR CLAPBOARD
WOOD SIDING
Most of the original housing and a few of
the commercial buildings used horizontal
wood siding or vertical board and batten for
the exterior walls and trim of the buildings.
Wood siding gives the buildings a sense of
historic character, adding detail and texture.
CEMENT PLASTER
Cement plaster (including stucco) is not as
common as wood or brick, however some of
the commercial and residential buildings
within the Village have plaster exteriors.
Cement plaster buildings require detailing
that gives them a historic “Village” feel.
Buildings with plain plaster walls and no
ornamentation are not appropriate for The
Village.
YELLOW INDIGENOUS SANDSTONE
This type of stone is used on the old
I.O.O.F. Hall on Bridge Street and the Old
Brisco Hotel on East Branch Street. It is a
golden stone that is shaped in large irregular
chunks. The color of this natural stone adds
a warm variety and individuality to the area.
20
ATTACHMENT 7
Page 44 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
BRICK AND STONE BLOCK
Brick and stone blocks are most common on
commercial buildings in the Village. Brick
is an old construction material that was used
in the late 1800s and early 1900s when the
bulk of the historic commercial buildings in
Arroyo Grande Village were built. The use
of exposed plain concrete block is not
permitted in the Historic Village Core
District.
WINDOW SASHES AND DOOR FRAMES
Doors should be made of wood or a material
that resembles an older style wooden door.
For commercial areas, large industrial style
glass doors and windows with metal frames
are not appropriate. Doors with wood trim
and windows with wood framing should be
used. Aluminum and other frames that have
a modern metal look are not appropriate for
the Village.
21
Page 45 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
VILLAGE CORE DOWNTOWN
(VCD)
This section of the Guidelines and Standards
applies to all parcels in the Village Core
Downtown area and may also be applicable
within Community Facilities (including
Public Facilities and Parks), and Mixed Use
districts as shown on the Design Overlay
District Map.
An objective of the Village Core Downtown
area is to enhance and maintain a compact,
active street frontage with commercial uses
that attract pedestrians. A visual continuity
should be maintained through site design
and compatibility of scale and materials.
MIXED USES WITHIN THE DISTRICT
There are properties within the Village Core,
Mixed Use and Community Facilities
overlay districts that have residential
architectural styles, and are currently being
used as stores, shops, residences, or offices.
In order to preserve and enhance mixed use,
the character of any new building or
renovation shall be consistent with the
surrounding area.
EXISTING CHARACTER
Many of the Downtown district historic
commercial buildings were erected in the
period from 1885 to 1910, and represent a
variety of architectural styles. Although
building material and detail differ, there are
definite patterns that should be respected
and incorporated into new development and
renovation. Common elements of design
include façade height and structure, strong
pedestrian orientation, and attention to
ornamentation.
Similarity in Height, Mass and Scale
Most buildings are one or two stories high
and range from about eighteen to thirty feet
in height. The majority of the buildings in
the Village on Branch Street between Traffic
Way and Mason Street are also narrow as
well, which emphasizes their vertical
character.
The most common façade design is two
stories high, although some buildings use a
“false front” to achieve the impression of
height. This façade treatment, when used on
a relatively narrow building, stresses the
strong vertical elements in the structure and
creates an impressive image.
Buildings are also made to appear larger by
creating a series of attached facades, linking
several smaller structures to create the
appearance of one large building. These
techniques lead to a more impressive
appearance without losing pedestrian scale
or blocking views and light.
28
Page 46 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
Similarity of Material
Brick and stone masonry construction is
common, especially along Branch and
Bridge Streets. Although some exteriors
have been painted, such as the Olohan
Building, the buildings retain many
architectural details of “brick front”
construction. This was one of the most
popular storefront types of vernacular
design, and incorporated commercial
establishments on the ground floor with
storage, offices or living quarters on the
second level. An unusual vernacular style
that uses locally quarried yellow stone is
also found in the Village Downtown
district. The unifying element is the stone
itself, which calls for simplicity of
construction and ornamentation, but the
buildings using this material vary
significantly in design. Another common
material is wood siding, especially
clapboard or weatherboard.
Sense of Experimentation
Although similar architectural styles are
evident, and many elements are common,
there is no one predominant architectural
style, and elements are often combined in
creative ways. The historic character,
however, is maintained.
Pedestrian Orientation
Most commercial buildings have large
display windows and a main entrance that
faces the street, oriented to pedestrian
traffic. There is no setback from the
sidewalk, and buildings are generally
designed and detailed to human scale,
contributing to an atmosphere where
pedestrians feel comfortable.
Variety in Building Form
There is sufficient variety in height, mass,
scale and proportion to create visual interest
in the Village Core Downtown Area. There
is also a mixture of uses that includes retail
establishments, cafes, restaurants and
offices, often within the same block.
DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
Mixed Use Projects Within the Village
Core Downtown
Mixed use projects within the Village Core
Downtown shall be predominantly
commercial in character. Upper story
residential and office uses designed to be
compatible with ground floor retail uses are
appropriate. Design of mixed use projects
shall not impede pedestrian flow or disrupt
concentration of retail, cultural and
entertainment uses.
The following building elements shall
NEITHER overpower the project or
detract from the visual continuity of the
streetscape or neighborhood NOR
produce redundancy in feature or pattern
that is discordant with the historic
character of the district:
• Building scale
• Building form
• Building façade
• Building entrance
• Roofline
• Fencing, rails or trellis
• Archways, columns or towers
• Doors and windows
• Signage or feature designed for sign
placement
• Colors
29
Page 47 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
Site Design
1. All new projects or renovations shall
adhere to the site development standards
of the Development Code.
2. The existing front setbacks of zero to
fifteen feet (0’ to 15’) shall be required
with main entries facing the street. A
majority of the building frontage shall
face the street and incorporate design
features oriented to the pedestrian.
3. Streetscape improvements shall
complement the existing design
sidewalk paving, lighting schemes and
street furniture within the district.
4. All enclosures for service areas, trash or
recycling containers shall be designed as
part of the overall project or building.
Materials, textures and colors should be
consistent with those of the proposed
project and compatible with adjacent
buildings.
5. Landscaping shall retain existing trees
and plants as much as possible. Street
trees and sidewalk planters shall be
incorporated where feasible and
pedestrian circulation will not be
obstructed. (Streetscape elements
within the public right-of-way, require
an Encroachment Permit from the Public
Works Department.) Landscaping in
parking areas shall conform to the
requirements of Title 16 of the
Municipal Code (Development Code).
Building Design
1. The height of new buildings shall not
exceed development standards allowed
in Title 16 of the Municipal Code. Scale
and massing of any building within this
area shall be consistent with that of the
neighboring buildings, as described
above in “Similarity in Height, Scale
and Massing”.
2. The existing pattern of building façades
shall be incorporated into new
development projects. Dominant façade
designs incorporate either brick front
elements or parapet features. Roof
patterns generally associated with
residential buildings such as gable, hip
or gambrel are generally not appropriate
for commercial building frontages in the
Village Core Downtown District.
3. For retail commercial buildings, display
windows should complement the design
of surrounding historic buildings and
shall be oriented to pedestrian traffic.
4. Transoms are common over display
windows, and were used for light and
ventilation. When possible, transoms
should be incorporated into new
building design, and existing transoms
should be used in building renovations.
5. New construction should include
elements such as cladding, roof structure
and ornamentation common to the
district. All new projects shall use
materials – including roof materials –
that fit within the character of the
Village Core Downtown district. By
using similar materials or replicating
these materials on all projects and
restorations, the existing character will
be reinforced and extended.
6. Decorative fixtures, including awnings,
signs, and lighting, shall be integrated
with other design elements of the
structures.
Construction Materials
1. Brick and stone masonry are the most
common façade materials used on
historic character structures in the
Village Core Downtown district, and are
acceptable façade materials. Some
brickwork has been painted, and this is
consistent with design style of the 1870-
1939 period.
30
Page 48 of 53
C ITY OF A RROYO G RANDE GUIDELINES & S TANDARDS FOR H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS
Other acceptable façade materials
include yellow sandstone (such as that
on the I.O.O.F. building), and wood
cladding. Wood cladding shall be of
painted clapboard, painted
weatherboard, or board and batten
styles.
Materials of similar design, color and
texture may be considered. Smooth
plywood panels are not appropriate
unless detailed for the historic period.
2. Window sashes shall be of wood or
painted steel, and consistent with the
historic period. Materials that
approximate the appearance of original
materials may be substituted subject to
the approval of the Architectural Review
Committee, but unfinished aluminum is
not allowed.
3. Door materials were traditionally wood
panel and glass, either single or double.
New or replacement doors shall be
wood or an approved substitute material
that approximates the appearance of
original materials. Aluminum entry
doors with large glass panels are
inappropriate for the Village Core
Downtown District.
4. Original decorative details should be
retained during renovation. If the
original materials have deteriorated and
must be removed, they shall be replaced
with materials that match as closely as
possible the original in design, color,
and texture.
5. Reflective glass is not appropriate in the
Village Core Downtown District.
Stained glass may be used as an accent
material if it is consistent with the
historic period of the building.
Building colors
1. The number of colors used on a building
should be kept to a minimum.
2. While bright colors may be used for
limited accent, their use is subject to
review by the Architectural Review
Committee (ARC).
3. Color samples shall be submitted as part
of Plot Plan Review or Conditional Use
Permit process.
4. The use of fluorescent, “neon” or “day-
glo” colors on building facades is not
appropriate, historic base colors should
be used instead.
5. Accent colors used for ornamentation,
awnings, dentils, friezes or other details
shall harmonize with the predominant
building color.
6. Color palettes shall complement the
majority of the neighboring buildings
and be consistent with the historic
period.
31
Page 49 of 53
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
PLANNING COMMISSION
PATRICK HOLUB, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR AGENDA ITEM 10 –
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 6, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
Attached are comments received after agenda preparation regarding agenda
item 10.
Page 50 of 53
From:
To:
Heidi Ambrose
public comment
Subject:Concern Regarding Airbnb Request in my Neighborhood (331 Garden St)
Date:Friday, September 2, 2022 1:58:52 PM
To the City of Arroyo Grande or Whom it may Concern,
We were notified this week that our next-door neighbor is trying to turn her home into an
Airbnb and we would like to voice our concern about this happening.
We were blessed to be able to move into the Village of Arroyo Grande about 4 years ago.
Both my husband and I grew up in Arroyo Grande. We moved away for college and were
thrilled when we were finally able to move back. Living on the Central Coast is expensive
but we find it worth it to live in such a wonderful, lovely small town/community. A place that
has been home to us for most of our lives. We have children and we greatly appreciate
living in a safe neighborhood where we are able to get to know our neighbors. A
neighborhood where neighbors look out for each other. It is not easy for us to afford living
here but it is worth the sacrifice and hard work. We understand that our neighbor wants to
make her home an Airbnb that is rented out for 30 days or less. This will mean that
strangers will be coming and going from the home all the time. When we moved here we
were not expecting to live next door to a hotel type situation. We do not feel comfortable
with a constant turnover of guests coming and going with no host on site to monitor what’s
going on. In fact the person she has listed as an emergency contact for the Airbnb doesn't
even live in the city. We believe they live more than 15 minutes away and the regulations
state that they are supposed to be within 15 minutes of the property.
We also know that there is an Airbnb directly across the street from us. The one across the
street is maintained by onsite owners. We were under the understanding that the city did
not allow Airbnbs to be within 300 feet of each other. Apparently there is a loophole that
doesn't seem to make much sense regarding whether or not the host is on sight. Because
these are two different types of Airbnbs the distance suddenly doesn't matter? We are
also aware of an Airbnb on the street directly behind us and around both corners. It feels
like there are no regulations about how many can be in the neighborhood at all. It seems
like the city is ok with turning our neighborhood into a vacation rental zone rather than a
small town neighborhood.
We understand that tourism is a big part of this area but this is also our home. We support
local businesses and always recommend places to eat and visit to our own out of town
guests. Adding so many vacation rentals in such a small zone compromises the integrity of
the Village. We all moved into a neighborhood in a small town for a reason. And the city is
slowly and without concern for its loyal residents changing the dynamic of the
neighborhood. We all pay a lot to live here and we do not wish to become a hotel hotspot.
I have seen this city fight to keep the integrity of the Village businesses and the quaint small
Page 51 of 53
town feel. Where is the commitment when it comes to the families who call this town home
and have done so for generations?
We also find it very disappointing and discouraging that we were only given a week's notice
to appeal this request. The fact that we would be charged $500 just to fill out the form to
appeal is absurd! We are all hard working families just trying to make it here, not to
mention in the current financial climate. We do not have $500 extra just to have our
appeal, probably not even matter! And a week is hardly enough time to get the funds
necessary just to have our voices heard. I have lived in the Village most of my life and I
absolutely love this town but right now I feel very disappointed.
Thank you for taking the time to read and consider our concerns, we greatly appreciate it!
Heidi and Josh Ambrose
Page 52 of 53
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
mallen kelley
public comment
Plot plan review 331 Garden St.
Friday, September 2, 2022 5:30:46 PM
I object to the proposed vacation rental at 331 Garden St.
We own the house next door which we bought for the specific purpose of
providing a safe community for our family and grandchildren to grow up.
Having unknown individuals using the house next door jeopardizes their
safety and the family's peace of mind. We specifically bought a home in a
single family residential zone not next door to a motel. The home on
Noguera place immediately behind this house has small children and the
house on the south east corner has small children. This request is not
within the character and purpose of the neighborhood.
The contact individual lives in San Luis Obispo and cannot meet the
response time as specified in the ordnance.
Sincerly,
Michael and Lynnette Kelley
Page 53 of 53