PC R 93-1444RESOLUTION NO. 93-1444
A R�SOLUTION OT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A
VARIANCE, CASE NO. 93-180, APPLIED FOR BY THE
VONS COMPANIES, INC. AT 1650 GRAND AVENUE,
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIR�MENT FOR A 15 FOOT
LANDSCAPED STREET SETBACK
WHEREAS, tlle Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered
Variance Case No. 93-180, filed by The Vons Companies, Inc., to allow for a variance from
the requirement for a 15 foot landscaped street setback;
WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on tliis application in
accordance with the City Code; and
WHER�AS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the
General Plan and the Environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based upon the Expanded Initial Study has
determined that a Negative Declaration witli Mitigation Measures can be adopted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
hearing, the following circumstances exist:
1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship not ottierwise shared by otliers
within the surrounding area. Requiring a uniform minimum 15 foot landscape setback
presents a practical difficulty for construction on this property. Because the proposed
supermarket requires a large gross square footage, the parking requirement is high.
There is no practical way to meet safety and practical considerations for the parking lot
and provide efficient and safe movement of vehicles witl�in the property without a
reduction in the landscape setback requirements.
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to
other properties in the same zoning district. Development of a facility of this type results
in extraordinary construction circumstances. Site restraints on comparable properties in
. the vicinity are generally less restrictive. Parcel configurations are generally more
rectangular, parcel depths are generally not as great, and existing slopes are flatter. In
general, a supermarket requires more parking for convenience and safety tfian other
commercial uses. The parking area must be large to provide the flafter slopes required
for safety and adherence to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the natural slope
of the property creates a significant site constraint. In essence, a facility of this size,
placed within surrounding grade that is rising more steeply than development standards
allow, cannot accommodate these extraordinary circumstances without allowing some
intrusion of parking and crib walls into the required landscape setback.
��
�
Resolution No. 93-1444
Variance Case No. 93-180
The Vons Companies, Inc.
November 16, 1993
Page Two
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcernent of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of otl�er properties classified in the
same zone. Strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of this landscape setback
requirement denies this property owner the opportunity to develop tlie property in a
manner enjoyed by otl�er property owners in the same zoning district. The applicant is,
in effect, penalized for owning property tliat is more irregularly configured and steeply
sloping than similarly zoned properties in tlie vicinity. In fact, similar reductions in
landscape setbacks are common along Grand Avenue.
4. The granting of the variance will not constittite a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties in tl�e same zoning district. Although there are
few comparable situations, sirnilar uses in tl�e same zone have been permitted to reduce
landscape setback requirements due to similar site constraints.
5. The granting of tt�e variance will not be detrimental to lhe public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Reduction
of the required landscape setback would not be detrimental to tlie public health, safety,
or welfare since visual screening of the parking lot will still be provided by tl�e proposed
combination of extensive landscaping, berms and walls.
6. The granting of a variance is consistent with tl�e objectives and policies of the General
Plan and tl�e intent of the Development Code. The granting of tl�e variance is consistent
with ttie General Plan sand tlie intent of tl�e Development Code, as tlie variance would
provide an acceptable alternative to tlie required landscape setbacks. Given tlie
significant percentage of tl�e site devoted to landscaping, the aestl�etic value of the
proposed retaining basins, and tlie extensive ]andscaping, berms and walls proposed for
the landscape setbacks, the reduced landscape setbacks will not be visually prominent or
attract adverse attention. . .
Department of Fish and Game Required Findings of Exemption
l. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of
the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for Variance Case
No. 93-180.
2. Based on the initial study, a negative declaration drafted for review by lhe public and
review and approval by the Planning Commission.
Resolution No. 93-1444
Variance Case No. 93-180
The Vons Companies, Inc.
November 16, 1993
Page Three �
3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering the
record as a whole the Planning Commission adopted the negative declaration and found
that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually
or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game
Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R�SOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures; instructs the
Secretary to file a Notice of Determination and approves said variance, subject to the standard
conditions of the City and those conditions and mitigations listed below:
General Conditions
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements
as are applicable to this project. .
2. This application sliall automatically expire on November 16, 1995 unless a building
permit is issued. Tl�irty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, tl�e applicant
may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration.
3. Landscaped setbacks shall be developed in substantial conformance with tlie plans
presented to the Planning Commission at tl�e meeting of November 16, 1993 and marked
"Exhibit A".
4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the
City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in
the alternative, to relinquisl� such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's wl�ich tlle City,
its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of any such action but such participation sl�all not relieve applicant of his/her obligations
under this condition.
5. A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. The
mitigation measures attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment
"A", shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall be monitored by the
appropriate City department or other responsible agency. Tl�e applicant sl�all be
responsible for veriCc�tion i❑ writing by the monitoring department or agency that
the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Resolution No. 93-1444
Variance Case No. 93-180
The Vons Companies, Inc.
November 16, 1993
Page Four
�
�
�
On motion of Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Keen, a��d on tl�e following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Reilly, Deviny, Keen and Chairman Carr
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Soto and Hatcl�ett
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted tt�is 16th day of November, 1993.
ATT�ST:
- ���il�C�
Nancy Bro , Commission Clerk Robert W. Carr, Chairman
ATTACHM�NT "A"
MITIGATION MEASURES
AND MONITORING YROGRAM
1. All earthwork and site development shall comply with the provisions of the city's grading
ordinance, the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the recommendations contained in the
"Soils Engineering Report, Williams Brothers Sliopping Center, Store No. S.749",
March 16, 1993 prepared by Earth Systems Consultants. Said recommendations are
incorporated herein by this reference and included within the Expanded Initial Study as
Appendix F. In case of a conflict between the referenced documents, the Director of
Building and Fire sl�all determine the applicable requirements.
Monitoring Program: Grading and construction pla�zs shall be checked; field
wo�k will be iitspected for complia�ice.
7Fnte Fi�ame: Plan checking prior to issuan.ce of grading or bc�ilding
• � pen��its; inspections during construction and prior to final
occupancy.
Responsible Age►tcy: Building a�ul Fire Deparmzents.
2. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 7-1.13 of the Municipal Code
to prevent soil erosion.
Monito�i,:g Prog��am:
7tme Frame:
Responsible Agency:
Provisions shall be �toted on grading and construction
plaiis; practices will be monitored 111 field by Ciry
inspectors.
Plan checking prior to issuance of grndin.g or buildi�ig
perniits; inspectio��s during constrirction.
I3uilding Departn7e�at.
3. Recommendations contained in tl�e "Seismicity Report, Williams Brothers Shopping
Center, Store No. 5.749", June 7, 1993, by Earth Systems Consultants are.incorporated
herein by this referenced and included wilhin the Expanded Initial Study as Exhibit E,
shall be implemented during all phases of construction.
Alonitaing Prog�anc: Recomme�zdations shall be incorporated into grading and
construction plans. Compliance will monuored tlu•ouglt
field irtspections.
7Fme I%iame: Plan cltecki�ag prior to issc�ance of grading or building
- permits; i�zspections during co�rstruction. �
Responsible Agency: liuilding Department.
(1)
�i
�J
4. If the Uiiiform Building Code (1991 edition) is used for structural design considerations,
the site shall be assigned a seismic zone factor of 0.40 and a site coefficient of 1.2
(Tables 23-I and 23-J respectively).
Monitoring Prog��tm: Use of the faccors shall Ge i�r.corporat.ed into construction
pla�ns.
7�me Fir�nae: Pln�i checking Jn�ior t.o issu��rce of buildi�r.g pennits.
Responsible Agency: Building Department..
5
�
The applicant shall maintain or accommodale existing historical drainage flows.
Monitoring Program: Drainage plans shall demonstrate how historic flows will be
maintained or accommodated; drainage improvements sliall
be installed accordingly.
Time Frame: Plan c}�ecking prior to issuance of grading or building
permits; field ir�spections during construction and prior to
final occupancy.
Responsible Agency: Building and Public Works Departments.
Oil separation devices shall be installed on all drainage systems to prevent automotive
pollutants from contaminating the drainage basins or downstream drainage facilities.
Monito�ing Prog�rznt:
Time Fi�ame:
Resporisible Agency:
Drainage plans shall include separatiora devices; said
devices sl�all be i»stnlled by the develoPer.
Plan dlecking prior to issuance of gradin.g or building
pernrits; freld rnspections during construction n�id prior to
f n�l occirpancy.
Building Depa�7ment..
7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit a
construction and grading plan to tl�e APCD which identifies tt�e proposed amount of cut
and fill, proposed grading equipment to be used and tl�e duration of use. APCD sl�all
require appropriate measures to reduce pollutant emissions during construction to
acceptable levels. Measures required by the APCD shall be noted on the grading and
construction plans.
Monito�zng Program: APCD measures shall be noted on grading and construction
plans.
Time Fiame: Plart dtecking prior to issunnce of grading or buildi�tg
pennits.
Responsible Agency: �3uilding Deparunent.
8. To enhance pedestrian accessibility, prior to completion of tl�e first pliase of construction,
the applicant shall construct a sidewalk along the west side of Courtland Street between
Grand Avenue and Brighton Avenue.
(2)
Monito»ing Progiam: Improventent pluns shall include t/ze subject sidewalk;
installcrtio�: shall be inspected and approved before
acceptance by [he Ciry.
71ime Frame: Plan checkin.g prior to issuance of building pe»nit;
inspection a�id approval prior to final occa�pancy.
Responsible Agency: Publie Works Departme�it.
9. To encourage public transit use, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the
store, the applicant shall construct a transit (bus) turnout �s part of the ri�ht turn lane
required on condition number 38, transit shelter, benches, a shopping cart storage area
for transit users, and a walkway from the transit stop to the front of tl�e store.
Monitoring Program: Said facilities shall be illu.strated on the improvement plaiis
and in the site plan for c17e project; field inspeccions to
monitor actual installation..
Tlime Frame: Pla�t checking prior to issuance of a bt�ilding permit; field
inspections prior to final occupancy.
Responsible Agency: Building ancl Planning Departme�tts for on site facilities;
Public Works for bus turnout and other facilities in the
public right-of-►vay.
10. As part of the review of the final landscape and irrigation plans, t}ie Director of Parks
and Recreation shall review the number, size and species of trees proposed in parking
lot areas to maximize shading of cars and reduce heat soak and diurnal emissions.
Moiiitoring Prog��am: Landscaping plan shall be reviewed for inclusion of these
featceres; fiel�l inspections shall co� firm actual installation.
71ime F�ame: Plan cl�ecking prior to issuarice of a gr�di�ig or buildi�tg
pe�mit; field inspectio�u prior to final occupancy.
Responsible Agency: Pa�ks and Recreation Department.
11. The applicant shall, on an ongoing basis, evaluate the feasibility of providing delivery
service to surrounding residential areas. An initial feasibility study shall be presented
to the Planning Department, in writing, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
for the store.
Monitoizng Progiam: Feasibiliry study to be �•eviewed a�zd approved by the Ciry;
' City may require regular submission of said analyses.
7Fme Frame: Initial feasibiliry study to be submitted and approved prior
frnal occupancy. Later studies may be required pursua�tt
to a scliedule approved by the Planning Departme�it.
Responsible Agency: Planniiag Department.
12. Prior to issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the store; the APCD shall
review and approve an employee trip reduction plan submitted to tt�em by the applicant.
The applicant shall implement the provisions of the approved plan on an ongoing basis.
(3)
Moniloiing Prog�am: Ti•ip redu'ction plait shall be submitted to the APCD.
Periodic revie�vs of the provisions may be conducr.ed by tlre
APCD.
Time Piz�me: Review and approval of the plan prior to issuance of a
permanent Certificate of Occupancy; later reviews at tlte
discretion of tlre APCD.
Responsible Ageney: APCD.
13. Prior to issuance of demolition permits for existing structures, the applicant shall
demonstrate exemption from or compliance with the Asbestos Notification Require►nents
of Part 40 of the Code of Pederal Regulations (Part 61).
Monito�ing P,•og��am:
T�ime Fi�ame:
Respor:sible Agency:
14. All construction shall utilize fixtures and designs which minimize water usage. Such
fixtures and designs sl�all include, but are not limited to, low flow shower heads, water
saving toilets, instant water lieaters or I�ot water recirculating systems, drip irrigation
with drought tolerant landscaping and so forth.
Said irrfo�mation sli.a.11 be submiued to the Ci .ry.
Prior to issuance of dentolition perntits for exisr.ing
structures.
13uilding Depa.rtment.
Monito�ing Progi�am: Constrt�ction. and landscapin.g plans shall illustrate and/o�•
othenvise note water-conserving featu�•es; field inspections
shall co���n installation.
TFme Frame: Plan d�ecking prior to issuance of buildin.g, pennits; field.
inspections duri�ag constructio�t and prior to fi�ial
occc�pancy.
Responsible Agency: 13uildi�rg Depar�rnent.
15. Prior to final occupancy of any structure, all water conserving designs or fixtures shall
be installed.
Monitoring P�•og»am: See 14 above.
16. All landscaping shall be consistent witti water conservation practices including tl�e use
of drip irrigation, mulch, gravel and bark. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas
and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized.
Monilo�ing Program: Lmidscapirrg pla�is shall reflect these requiremencs; field
inspections shall co�tfinn instnllation.
7tme F»ame: Plan checking prior to issuance of building penni�; f eld
inspections prior to final occupancy.
Resportsible Agency: Parks arrd Recr•eatio» Departmen.t.
(4)
17. The applicant sf�all provide for review and approval by tl�e City Council, an individual
water program which will propose mitigating measures to neutralize projected water
demand for the project. Projected water demand for this project is 12.63 acre-feet per
year. As part of the water program, the City Council may adjust projected water
demand based upon proposed water conservation measures or other factors that decrease
use of city water supplies. The approved program must be implemented prior to issuance
of building permits.
Mo►titoring Progrm�:: Water "neutral" proposal slzall be submitted and approved
by the City Council; implementa�ion shall be dernonstrated
to the Ciry.
7Fme Finme: Prior to issuance of building pei�nit.
Responsible Agency: City Council for program approval; Planning Department
for implementation co��rnzation:
18. The developer shall plant at least two (2) 60-inch box live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) and
at least four (4) 36-incli box live oaks on the site or equivalent as determined by tt�e
Parks and Recreation Director. (Note: the current plan shows 13 36-inch box live
oaks). The landscaping plan shall include notes on the proper planting and irrigation
techniques, and shall indicate compatible species in the planter areas for the oak trees.
The landscape plan and notes shall be subject lo the approval of the Recreation Direc[or
or his designated representative.
Monitoring Program: La�rdscaping plans slxall reflect this reqc�ireme�i.t and shall
• � note planti�ig an�l irrigation methods; installation shall be
confinnecl by field inspection.
7Yme Frame: Plan checki��g prior to issuance of buildi�ig pe�m�its; field
inspections prior to final occupancy.
Responsible Agency: Parks and Recrecrtion Department.
19. To minimize noise conflicts between the store and surrounding residents, the store shall
limit the hours of access to the loading dock area at the r�ortl� side of the store to between
6 am and $ 12 pm. The store shall provide facilities for loading from the front of the
store if deliveries must be made during nighttime hours.
If within one ear of ti�e store's o enin there are si nificant com laints re ardin
noise, due to access to the loading, dock area a public hearin� shall be held before the
Plannine Commission. The applicant shall pay for the cost of the public l�earin� If it
is found that there are significant noise concerns, the Planning Commission rnay amend
the hours of operation: require additional noise mitigation measures• and/or require an ,
additional noise study to be paid for by the ap�plicant This annual review may be
� extended beyond one year.
Monitoizng Progiam: Developer shall record an agreenie�2t or similar instrument
and shall incorporate into any lease agreements these
� limitations; evidence of tlais shall be submitted to the City.
Failure to comply may be grounds for revocation of the use
� pe�mit A public heari�ig mav be held i complaints are
� received.
(5)
'
��
Monitoiing Program: Grnding pla�rs shall n.ote this requiremen.t o�r. ead7 page;
City i�r,specto�s may enforce this requirernent duri�r.g usual
field i�isits or on a contplaint Gasis.
7�me Fi�ame: Pla�t checking p� to issuance of grading peimit; field
checks during gradin.g.
(6)
20.
21
Time Finnce: I�iitial agreeme�it shall be suGmitted prior to fi�i.al
occupancy; period insPeccior�s by the Cicy will be conducted
on a comnlaint basis. Public heari�ag within one year of
store's o�ening,.
Responsible Agency: Planni�tg Department.
Trash pick-up shall be limited to the hours between 6 am and 8 p►n.
Monito�ing P�oginm: See 19 above.
Parking lot sweeping si�all be liitiited to t}�e I�ours between 6 am and 8 pm in the truck
turn-around area and loading docks at the rear of the store.
Monilo�ing Program: See 19 above.
22. All sound walls and parapet walls shall be of impervious constructioc� that provides a
surface density of 2.5 pounds per square foot or greater.
Monilo�iizg Prog��am: Construction plans sltall meet this �•eqc�i�•ement; co�npliance
shall be co� f nned by field inspection.
Ttme I%rame: Plan checking Jn•ior to issuance of building pe�rnit; field
i�tspectioii Prior to final occupartcy.
Responsible Agency: Building Departnrent.
23. All construction equipment shall be provided with well maintained, functional mufllers
to limit noise emissions.
Monitoring Progiz�m:
7�me I�innte:
Responsible Ageney:
Equipmen.t may be inspected during construction either
duriiig usual f eld visits by Ciry inspectors or on a
contplain.t. basis.
During gradi�tg and construction.
13uilding Departmerit.
24. All construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Saturday between ttie hours
of 7 am and 8 pm.
Monitoiiitg Progi�am: Ciry inspectors ma.y er force co�rr.pliance tl�.�•ough period
field visits or on. a'conrplaint basis.
71ime Fi�ame: Duri�Tg grnding and construction.
Responsible Agency: I3ccilding Department.
25. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of t1�e
site bordering cleveloped areas should occur during the middle of the day to minimize the
potential for disturbance of neigl�boring noise sensitive uses.
Responsible Agency: Building Department.
26. Property line sound walls should be erected as early as possible in the overall
construction of the project to reduce tl�e noise impact of subsequent construction activity
on neighboring uses.
Monitoring Program: Building plans sl�all include a note tivith this directive; City
: i��rpectors may check for compliance during early field
visits.
7Fme Frame: Plan checking prior to issuance of buildin.g pennit; field
checks during conscruction.
Respo�csible Agency: Buildi�ig Departrnent.
27. The developer shall pay traffic impact fees of $2,656 per peak hour trip on tl�e back bone
system, or such other fee as may be adopted by the City prior to issuance of a building
permit. Tlie cost of constructin� additional lanes and related construction costs in Oak
Park Boulevard and Grand Avenue shall be credited a�ainst any traffic impact fees that
ma, by e imposed.
Monitoring Program:
7Yme Fi�ame:
Respo�:srble Agency:
Fees shall be paid.
Prior to issuance of building permits.
Plaiuiing and 13uilding Departments.
28. The developer shall offer to dedicate land along the western property line to
accommodate future widening of Oak Park Boulevard; the widtll of said dedication shall
be subject to approval of the City Engineer, and the form of tlle dedication offer
approved by the City Attorney.
Maiitoring Prog�nm: Of�`'er of dedication shall be submitted, npproved and
recorded; imProvement pla�ts and site pinns sl�all reflect the
dedicatio�t o„8`'er.
7Yme Fir�me: Plan checking prior to issuance of building permit;
approval a�u1 reco�datio�t of o,fJ`er prior to final occupancy.
Responsible Agency: Planning and Public Workr for review of site pla.n and
. improvement pinns, respectively; Ciry Attorir.ey for form of
recorded o,f�`'er.
��— �R �ia�-he�ele�e-��e-set�t-�i � -te
e-€a�s �y�-ae�ess-�Ha�-st�ee*; •�'�°�nec��esigfl-e€
t�# �l-�e-st�b,}e�-�e-�P��-E�e-�Ey�g�n� �.�;=��e�s�t�-p�-s�a�
�e-stt�� �� �«��s-��e��-i-�tg-Bepa�e�ie�--fe-a����ie -ba��r�j-�
���e _o e,, ;,,. o_... , ���e�-at���i�g -�et-�a�e�essa�-�-Ee-�e�e�ce
t�-�s-e�t�ge:
. ,
a � : : : :
. , � �; �
'' : : : :. :
�7�
29. The applicant and the Director of Public Works shall request of Grover Beacti and work
with Grover Beach to red curb tl�e property north of Ramona Avenue on tlie west side
of Oak Park Boulevard. Public Works staff shall report back to the Planning
Commission with the results of said work.
Monilo�ing Prog�nm: Applica�ct a�rd Director of Public Wo�ks to tivo�k tivitla
Grover 13each to red curb said propertv
Ttrne Fi�ame: Prior to issuance o,��nal Certi tcat.e o Occupan.c�,
Responsible Agency_ Public Works Departments.
�n rr�.s ao.,ot,,.,e� �ti„�� �-9�-Si-H'li�-H�SEE��--fl�p�9�2�-�+—�ie-�t�`
.,�. z.,�
��6fFie'�t ��tL�
�i1-8H ��' � ��
"'' ��°`
��e°�,°�T�st�e�e�:
�14e�t�t-et�t�g-P�eg���=n�td-eg�eet�et��-s�}�e-�p�ev�ed-�a��eee�ed :
�ir�te-�t�t�te: "_
�espe�sib�e-�g � r-t�;--��tt�i-trg-�ep�et�tt-fts-Ee
p�l�r��::::G�:'�<::P�anr�n;>::::'�o
eer��e�:
n... ���fss�or�
..................:::>:<�':.>:::;::::.;::<.;::::.::.:�»>: >:;;::.:::::::::::::::.::.:.�
31. Fire Department Impact Fees of $18,550 or other such fees as may be adopted by tlie
City Council prior to issuance of building permits, sl�all be paid prior to final inspection
of the store. (Fee does not include Pad "B".)
Monitori�ig Progr�ant: Fe.es slra.11 be paid.
7�me I'iz�me: Prioi• to fi�ral occuparacy.
Respo�tsible Agertcy: Fire Departmerit..
32. The landscaping plan shall be modifed to reduce the number of large trees on the
northern and western property lines above tlie supermarket. Species w}�icli grow to
maximum heigl�ts of about 10 to 20 feet shall be substituted. Tl�e revised landscaping
plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning at�d Parks and Recreation
Departments.
Monitoizng Program: Revised landscaping plai� slr.all reflect �his requirement;
field inspections sJ7all co� f�yn installation.
71ime I%iante: Plart. clreckin.g prior to issua�i.ce of building pennit; field
inspection prior to fin.al occupancy.
Resporzsible Agency: Planning and Parks and Recreation Departnrents.
33. Tl�e treatment of roof top equipment shall be subject to City design review. Strategies
to reduce tfie prominence of such equip►nent may include use of low scale screens or
enclosures and painting tlie equipment the same color as tl�e roof. �
Monilo�ing Prog��am: Ti•eat»r.ent of roof top equipme�u shall be submitted to Cir.y
.f��' aPProval.; feld inspections slrall conf rm canpliance.
(g)
�
7Yme Fiame: Approval of treatment prior to issuance of building pe��iit;
field inspectioic prior to final occupa�:cy.
Responsible Agency: Planning and Building Deparnnents.
34. In the event that during grading, construction or development of the project, any
archaeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be lialted until the city has
reviewed the resources for their significance. If liuman burials are encountered, the
County Coroner (781-4513) shall be contacted immediately: The applicant may be
required to provide archaeological studies and/or mitigation measures. All grading and
improvement plans shall be noted to reflect this mitigation.
Monitoring Pmgram: All plans witli subsu�face construction or grading shall note
this requirement on each page.
Time Frame: Plan checking for �aote prior to issuance of grading or
improvement pla�rs.
Responsible Agency: Building Department.
I ��
(9)