Loading...
PC R 93-1444RESOLUTION NO. 93-1444 A R�SOLUTION OT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE NO. 93-180, APPLIED FOR BY THE VONS COMPANIES, INC. AT 1650 GRAND AVENUE, VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIR�MENT FOR A 15 FOOT LANDSCAPED STREET SETBACK WHEREAS, tlle Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Variance Case No. 93-180, filed by The Vons Companies, Inc., to allow for a variance from the requirement for a 15 foot landscaped street setback; WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on tliis application in accordance with the City Code; and WHER�AS, the Planning Commission has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the Environmental documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based upon the Expanded Initial Study has determined that a Negative Declaration witli Mitigation Measures can be adopted; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: 1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship not ottierwise shared by otliers within the surrounding area. Requiring a uniform minimum 15 foot landscape setback presents a practical difficulty for construction on this property. Because the proposed supermarket requires a large gross square footage, the parking requirement is high. There is no practical way to meet safety and practical considerations for the parking lot and provide efficient and safe movement of vehicles witl�in the property without a reduction in the landscape setback requirements. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. Development of a facility of this type results in extraordinary construction circumstances. Site restraints on comparable properties in . the vicinity are generally less restrictive. Parcel configurations are generally more rectangular, parcel depths are generally not as great, and existing slopes are flatter. In general, a supermarket requires more parking for convenience and safety tfian other commercial uses. The parking area must be large to provide the flafter slopes required for safety and adherence to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the natural slope of the property creates a significant site constraint. In essence, a facility of this size, placed within surrounding grade that is rising more steeply than development standards allow, cannot accommodate these extraordinary circumstances without allowing some intrusion of parking and crib walls into the required landscape setback. �� � Resolution No. 93-1444 Variance Case No. 93-180 The Vons Companies, Inc. November 16, 1993 Page Two 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcernent of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of otl�er properties classified in the same zone. Strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of this landscape setback requirement denies this property owner the opportunity to develop tlie property in a manner enjoyed by otl�er property owners in the same zoning district. The applicant is, in effect, penalized for owning property tliat is more irregularly configured and steeply sloping than similarly zoned properties in tlie vicinity. In fact, similar reductions in landscape setbacks are common along Grand Avenue. 4. The granting of the variance will not constittite a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in tl�e same zoning district. Although there are few comparable situations, sirnilar uses in tl�e same zone have been permitted to reduce landscape setback requirements due to similar site constraints. 5. The granting of tt�e variance will not be detrimental to lhe public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Reduction of the required landscape setback would not be detrimental to tlie public health, safety, or welfare since visual screening of the parking lot will still be provided by tl�e proposed combination of extensive landscaping, berms and walls. 6. The granting of a variance is consistent with tl�e objectives and policies of the General Plan and tl�e intent of the Development Code. The granting of tl�e variance is consistent with ttie General Plan sand tlie intent of tl�e Development Code, as tlie variance would provide an acceptable alternative to tlie required landscape setbacks. Given tlie significant percentage of tl�e site devoted to landscaping, the aestl�etic value of the proposed retaining basins, and tlie extensive ]andscaping, berms and walls proposed for the landscape setbacks, the reduced landscape setbacks will not be visually prominent or attract adverse attention. . . Department of Fish and Game Required Findings of Exemption l. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for Variance Case No. 93-180. 2. Based on the initial study, a negative declaration drafted for review by lhe public and review and approval by the Planning Commission. Resolution No. 93-1444 Variance Case No. 93-180 The Vons Companies, Inc. November 16, 1993 Page Three � 3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering the record as a whole the Planning Commission adopted the negative declaration and found that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R�SOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures; instructs the Secretary to file a Notice of Determination and approves said variance, subject to the standard conditions of the City and those conditions and mitigations listed below: General Conditions 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. . 2. This application sliall automatically expire on November 16, 1995 unless a building permit is issued. Tl�irty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, tl�e applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 3. Landscaped setbacks shall be developed in substantial conformance with tlie plans presented to the Planning Commission at tl�e meeting of November 16, 1993 and marked "Exhibit A". 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the alternative, to relinquisl� such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's wl�ich tlle City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation sl�all not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. 5. A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. The mitigation measures attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment "A", shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or other responsible agency. Tl�e applicant sl�all be responsible for veriCc�tion i❑ writing by the monitoring department or agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented. Resolution No. 93-1444 Variance Case No. 93-180 The Vons Companies, Inc. November 16, 1993 Page Four � � � On motion of Commissioner Tappan, seconded by Commissioner Keen, a��d on tl�e following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Tappan, Reilly, Deviny, Keen and Chairman Carr NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Soto and Hatcl�ett the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted tt�is 16th day of November, 1993. ATT�ST: - ���il�C� Nancy Bro , Commission Clerk Robert W. Carr, Chairman ATTACHM�NT "A" MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING YROGRAM 1. All earthwork and site development shall comply with the provisions of the city's grading ordinance, the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the recommendations contained in the "Soils Engineering Report, Williams Brothers Sliopping Center, Store No. S.749", March 16, 1993 prepared by Earth Systems Consultants. Said recommendations are incorporated herein by this reference and included within the Expanded Initial Study as Appendix F. In case of a conflict between the referenced documents, the Director of Building and Fire sl�all determine the applicable requirements. Monitoring Program: Grading and construction pla�zs shall be checked; field wo�k will be iitspected for complia�ice. 7Fnte Fi�ame: Plan checking prior to issuan.ce of grading or bc�ilding • � pen��its; inspections during construction and prior to final occupancy. Responsible Age►tcy: Building a�ul Fire Deparmzents. 2. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 7-1.13 of the Municipal Code to prevent soil erosion. Monito�i,:g Prog��am: 7tme Frame: Responsible Agency: Provisions shall be �toted on grading and construction plaiis; practices will be monitored 111 field by Ciry inspectors. Plan checking prior to issuance of grndin.g or buildi�ig perniits; inspectio��s during constrirction. I3uilding Departn7e�at. 3. Recommendations contained in tl�e "Seismicity Report, Williams Brothers Shopping Center, Store No. 5.749", June 7, 1993, by Earth Systems Consultants are.incorporated herein by this referenced and included wilhin the Expanded Initial Study as Exhibit E, shall be implemented during all phases of construction. Alonitaing Prog�anc: Recomme�zdations shall be incorporated into grading and construction plans. Compliance will monuored tlu•ouglt field irtspections. 7Fme I%iame: Plan cltecki�ag prior to issc�ance of grading or building - permits; i�zspections during co�rstruction. � Responsible Agency: liuilding Department. (1) �i �J 4. If the Uiiiform Building Code (1991 edition) is used for structural design considerations, the site shall be assigned a seismic zone factor of 0.40 and a site coefficient of 1.2 (Tables 23-I and 23-J respectively). Monitoring Prog��tm: Use of the faccors shall Ge i�r.corporat.ed into construction pla�ns. 7�me Fir�nae: Pln�i checking Jn�ior t.o issu��rce of buildi�r.g pennits. Responsible Agency: Building Department.. 5 � The applicant shall maintain or accommodale existing historical drainage flows. Monitoring Program: Drainage plans shall demonstrate how historic flows will be maintained or accommodated; drainage improvements sliall be installed accordingly. Time Frame: Plan c}�ecking prior to issuance of grading or building permits; field ir�spections during construction and prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Building and Public Works Departments. Oil separation devices shall be installed on all drainage systems to prevent automotive pollutants from contaminating the drainage basins or downstream drainage facilities. Monito�ing Prog�rznt: Time Fi�ame: Resporisible Agency: Drainage plans shall include separatiora devices; said devices sl�all be i»stnlled by the develoPer. Plan dlecking prior to issuance of gradin.g or building pernrits; freld rnspections during construction n�id prior to f n�l occirpancy. Building Depa�7ment.. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit a construction and grading plan to tl�e APCD which identifies tt�e proposed amount of cut and fill, proposed grading equipment to be used and tl�e duration of use. APCD sl�all require appropriate measures to reduce pollutant emissions during construction to acceptable levels. Measures required by the APCD shall be noted on the grading and construction plans. Monito�zng Program: APCD measures shall be noted on grading and construction plans. Time Fiame: Plart dtecking prior to issunnce of grading or buildi�tg pennits. Responsible Agency: �3uilding Deparunent. 8. To enhance pedestrian accessibility, prior to completion of tl�e first pliase of construction, the applicant shall construct a sidewalk along the west side of Courtland Street between Grand Avenue and Brighton Avenue. (2) Monito»ing Progiam: Improventent pluns shall include t/ze subject sidewalk; installcrtio�: shall be inspected and approved before acceptance by [he Ciry. 71ime Frame: Plan checkin.g prior to issuance of building pe»nit; inspection a�id approval prior to final occa�pancy. Responsible Agency: Publie Works Departme�it. 9. To encourage public transit use, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the store, the applicant shall construct a transit (bus) turnout �s part of the ri�ht turn lane required on condition number 38, transit shelter, benches, a shopping cart storage area for transit users, and a walkway from the transit stop to the front of tl�e store. Monitoring Program: Said facilities shall be illu.strated on the improvement plaiis and in the site plan for c17e project; field inspeccions to monitor actual installation.. Tlime Frame: Pla�t checking prior to issuance of a bt�ilding permit; field inspections prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Building ancl Planning Departme�tts for on site facilities; Public Works for bus turnout and other facilities in the public right-of-►vay. 10. As part of the review of the final landscape and irrigation plans, t}ie Director of Parks and Recreation shall review the number, size and species of trees proposed in parking lot areas to maximize shading of cars and reduce heat soak and diurnal emissions. Moiiitoring Prog��am: Landscaping plan shall be reviewed for inclusion of these featceres; fiel�l inspections shall co� firm actual installation. 71ime F�ame: Plan cl�ecking prior to issuarice of a gr�di�ig or buildi�tg pe�mit; field inspectio�u prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Pa�ks and Recreation Department. 11. The applicant shall, on an ongoing basis, evaluate the feasibility of providing delivery service to surrounding residential areas. An initial feasibility study shall be presented to the Planning Department, in writing, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the store. Monitoizng Progiam: Feasibiliry study to be �•eviewed a�zd approved by the Ciry; ' City may require regular submission of said analyses. 7Fme Frame: Initial feasibiliry study to be submitted and approved prior frnal occupancy. Later studies may be required pursua�tt to a scliedule approved by the Planning Departme�it. Responsible Agency: Planniiag Department. 12. Prior to issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the store; the APCD shall review and approve an employee trip reduction plan submitted to tt�em by the applicant. The applicant shall implement the provisions of the approved plan on an ongoing basis. (3) Moniloiing Prog�am: Ti•ip redu'ction plait shall be submitted to the APCD. Periodic revie�vs of the provisions may be conducr.ed by tlre APCD. Time Piz�me: Review and approval of the plan prior to issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy; later reviews at tlte discretion of tlre APCD. Responsible Ageney: APCD. 13. Prior to issuance of demolition permits for existing structures, the applicant shall demonstrate exemption from or compliance with the Asbestos Notification Require►nents of Part 40 of the Code of Pederal Regulations (Part 61). Monito�ing P,•og��am: T�ime Fi�ame: Respor:sible Agency: 14. All construction shall utilize fixtures and designs which minimize water usage. Such fixtures and designs sl�all include, but are not limited to, low flow shower heads, water saving toilets, instant water lieaters or I�ot water recirculating systems, drip irrigation with drought tolerant landscaping and so forth. Said irrfo�mation sli.a.11 be submiued to the Ci .ry. Prior to issuance of dentolition perntits for exisr.ing structures. 13uilding Depa.rtment. Monito�ing Progi�am: Constrt�ction. and landscapin.g plans shall illustrate and/o�• othenvise note water-conserving featu�•es; field inspections shall co���n installation. TFme Frame: Plan d�ecking prior to issuance of buildin.g, pennits; field. inspections duri�ag constructio�t and prior to fi�ial occc�pancy. Responsible Agency: 13uildi�rg Depar�rnent. 15. Prior to final occupancy of any structure, all water conserving designs or fixtures shall be installed. Monitoring P�•og»am: See 14 above. 16. All landscaping shall be consistent witti water conservation practices including tl�e use of drip irrigation, mulch, gravel and bark. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized. Monilo�ing Program: Lmidscapirrg pla�is shall reflect these requiremencs; field inspections shall co�tfinn instnllation. 7tme F»ame: Plan checking prior to issuance of building penni�; f eld inspections prior to final occupancy. Resportsible Agency: Parks arrd Recr•eatio» Departmen.t. (4) 17. The applicant sf�all provide for review and approval by tl�e City Council, an individual water program which will propose mitigating measures to neutralize projected water demand for the project. Projected water demand for this project is 12.63 acre-feet per year. As part of the water program, the City Council may adjust projected water demand based upon proposed water conservation measures or other factors that decrease use of city water supplies. The approved program must be implemented prior to issuance of building permits. Mo►titoring Progrm�:: Water "neutral" proposal slzall be submitted and approved by the City Council; implementa�ion shall be dernonstrated to the Ciry. 7Fme Finme: Prior to issuance of building pei�nit. Responsible Agency: City Council for program approval; Planning Department for implementation co��rnzation: 18. The developer shall plant at least two (2) 60-inch box live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) and at least four (4) 36-incli box live oaks on the site or equivalent as determined by tt�e Parks and Recreation Director. (Note: the current plan shows 13 36-inch box live oaks). The landscaping plan shall include notes on the proper planting and irrigation techniques, and shall indicate compatible species in the planter areas for the oak trees. The landscape plan and notes shall be subject lo the approval of the Recreation Direc[or or his designated representative. Monitoring Program: La�rdscaping plans slxall reflect this reqc�ireme�i.t and shall • � note planti�ig an�l irrigation methods; installation shall be confinnecl by field inspection. 7Yme Frame: Plan checki��g prior to issuance of buildi�ig pe�m�its; field inspections prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Parks and Recrecrtion Department. 19. To minimize noise conflicts between the store and surrounding residents, the store shall limit the hours of access to the loading dock area at the r�ortl� side of the store to between 6 am and $ 12 pm. The store shall provide facilities for loading from the front of the store if deliveries must be made during nighttime hours. If within one ear of ti�e store's o enin there are si nificant com laints re ardin noise, due to access to the loading, dock area a public hearin� shall be held before the Plannine Commission. The applicant shall pay for the cost of the public l�earin� If it is found that there are significant noise concerns, the Planning Commission rnay amend the hours of operation: require additional noise mitigation measures• and/or require an , additional noise study to be paid for by the ap�plicant This annual review may be � extended beyond one year. Monitoizng Progiam: Developer shall record an agreenie�2t or similar instrument and shall incorporate into any lease agreements these � limitations; evidence of tlais shall be submitted to the City. Failure to comply may be grounds for revocation of the use � pe�mit A public heari�ig mav be held i complaints are � received. (5) ' �� Monitoiing Program: Grnding pla�rs shall n.ote this requiremen.t o�r. ead7 page; City i�r,specto�s may enforce this requirernent duri�r.g usual field i�isits or on a contplaint Gasis. 7�me Fi�ame: Pla�t checking p� to issuance of grading peimit; field checks during gradin.g. (6) 20. 21 Time Finnce: I�iitial agreeme�it shall be suGmitted prior to fi�i.al occupancy; period insPeccior�s by the Cicy will be conducted on a comnlaint basis. Public heari�ag within one year of store's o�ening,. Responsible Agency: Planni�tg Department. Trash pick-up shall be limited to the hours between 6 am and 8 p►n. Monito�ing P�oginm: See 19 above. Parking lot sweeping si�all be liitiited to t}�e I�ours between 6 am and 8 pm in the truck turn-around area and loading docks at the rear of the store. Monilo�ing Program: See 19 above. 22. All sound walls and parapet walls shall be of impervious constructioc� that provides a surface density of 2.5 pounds per square foot or greater. Monilo�iizg Prog��am: Construction plans sltall meet this �•eqc�i�•ement; co�npliance shall be co� f nned by field inspection. Ttme I%rame: Plan checking Jn•ior to issuance of building pe�rnit; field i�tspectioii Prior to final occupartcy. Responsible Agency: Building Departnrent. 23. All construction equipment shall be provided with well maintained, functional mufllers to limit noise emissions. Monitoring Progiz�m: 7�me I�innte: Responsible Ageney: Equipmen.t may be inspected during construction either duriiig usual f eld visits by Ciry inspectors or on a contplain.t. basis. During gradi�tg and construction. 13uilding Departmerit. 24. All construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Saturday between ttie hours of 7 am and 8 pm. Monitoiiitg Progi�am: Ciry inspectors ma.y er force co�rr.pliance tl�.�•ough period field visits or on. a'conrplaint basis. 71ime Fi�ame: Duri�Tg grnding and construction. Responsible Agency: I3ccilding Department. 25. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of t1�e site bordering cleveloped areas should occur during the middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neigl�boring noise sensitive uses. Responsible Agency: Building Department. 26. Property line sound walls should be erected as early as possible in the overall construction of the project to reduce tl�e noise impact of subsequent construction activity on neighboring uses. Monitoring Program: Building plans sl�all include a note tivith this directive; City : i��rpectors may check for compliance during early field visits. 7Fme Frame: Plan checking prior to issuance of buildin.g pennit; field checks during conscruction. Respo�csible Agency: Buildi�ig Departrnent. 27. The developer shall pay traffic impact fees of $2,656 per peak hour trip on tl�e back bone system, or such other fee as may be adopted by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. Tlie cost of constructin� additional lanes and related construction costs in Oak Park Boulevard and Grand Avenue shall be credited a�ainst any traffic impact fees that ma, by e imposed. Monitoring Program: 7Yme Fi�ame: Respo�:srble Agency: Fees shall be paid. Prior to issuance of building permits. Plaiuiing and 13uilding Departments. 28. The developer shall offer to dedicate land along the western property line to accommodate future widening of Oak Park Boulevard; the widtll of said dedication shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer, and the form of tlle dedication offer approved by the City Attorney. Maiitoring Prog�nm: Of�`'er of dedication shall be submitted, npproved and recorded; imProvement pla�ts and site pinns sl�all reflect the dedicatio�t o„8`'er. 7Yme Fir�me: Plan checking prior to issuance of building permit; approval a�u1 reco�datio�t of o,fJ`er prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Planning and Public Workr for review of site pla.n and . improvement pinns, respectively; Ciry Attorir.ey for form of recorded o,f�`'er. ��— �R �ia�-he�ele�e-��e-set�t-�i � -te e-€a�s �y�-ae�ess-�Ha�-st�ee*; •�'�°�nec��esigfl-e€ t�# �l-�e-st�b,}e�-�e-�P��-E�e-�Ey�g�n� �.�;=��e�s�t�-p�-s�a� �e-stt�� �� �«��s-��e��-i-�tg-Bepa�e�ie�--fe-a����ie -ba��r�j-� ���e _o e,, ;,,. o_... , ���e�-at���i�g -�et-�a�e�essa�-�-Ee-�e�e�ce t�-�s-e�t�ge: . , a � : : : : . , � �; � '' : : : :. : �7� 29. The applicant and the Director of Public Works shall request of Grover Beacti and work with Grover Beach to red curb tl�e property north of Ramona Avenue on tlie west side of Oak Park Boulevard. Public Works staff shall report back to the Planning Commission with the results of said work. Monilo�ing Prog�nm: Applica�ct a�rd Director of Public Wo�ks to tivo�k tivitla Grover 13each to red curb said propertv Ttrne Fi�ame: Prior to issuance o,��nal Certi tcat.e o Occupan.c�, Responsible Agency_ Public Works Departments. �n rr�.s ao.,ot,,.,e� �ti„�� �-9�-Si-H'li�-H�SEE��--fl�p�9�2�-�+—�ie-�t�` .,�. z.,� ��6fFie'�t ��tL� �i1-8H ��' � �� "'' ��°` ��e°�,°�T�st�e�e�: �14e�t�t-et�t�g-P�eg���=n�td-eg�eet�et��-s�}�e-�p�ev�ed-�a��eee�ed : �ir�te-�t�t�te: "_ �espe�sib�e-�g � r-t�;--��tt�i-trg-�ep�et�tt-fts-Ee p�l�r��::::G�:'�<::P�anr�n;>::::'�o eer��e�: n... ���fss�or� ..................:::>:<�':.>:::;::::.;::<.;::::.::.:�»>: >:;;::.:::::::::::::::.::.:.� 31. Fire Department Impact Fees of $18,550 or other such fees as may be adopted by tlie City Council prior to issuance of building permits, sl�all be paid prior to final inspection of the store. (Fee does not include Pad "B".) Monitori�ig Progr�ant: Fe.es slra.11 be paid. 7�me I'iz�me: Prioi• to fi�ral occuparacy. Respo�tsible Agertcy: Fire Departmerit.. 32. The landscaping plan shall be modifed to reduce the number of large trees on the northern and western property lines above tlie supermarket. Species w}�icli grow to maximum heigl�ts of about 10 to 20 feet shall be substituted. Tl�e revised landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning at�d Parks and Recreation Departments. Monitoizng Program: Revised landscaping plai� slr.all reflect �his requirement; field inspections sJ7all co� f�yn installation. 71ime I%iante: Plart. clreckin.g prior to issua�i.ce of building pennit; field inspection prior to fin.al occupancy. Resporzsible Agency: Planning and Parks and Recreation Departnrents. 33. Tl�e treatment of roof top equipment shall be subject to City design review. Strategies to reduce tfie prominence of such equip►nent may include use of low scale screens or enclosures and painting tlie equipment the same color as tl�e roof. � Monilo�ing Prog��am: Ti•eat»r.ent of roof top equipme�u shall be submitted to Cir.y .f��' aPProval.; feld inspections slrall conf rm canpliance. (g) � 7Yme Fiame: Approval of treatment prior to issuance of building pe��iit; field inspectioic prior to final occupa�:cy. Responsible Agency: Planning and Building Deparnnents. 34. In the event that during grading, construction or development of the project, any archaeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be lialted until the city has reviewed the resources for their significance. If liuman burials are encountered, the County Coroner (781-4513) shall be contacted immediately: The applicant may be required to provide archaeological studies and/or mitigation measures. All grading and improvement plans shall be noted to reflect this mitigation. Monitoring Pmgram: All plans witli subsu�face construction or grading shall note this requirement on each page. Time Frame: Plan checking for �aote prior to issuance of grading or improvement pla�rs. Responsible Agency: Building Department. I �� (9)