Loading...
PC R 93-1443RESOLUTION NO. 93-1443 A RESOLUTION OT' TIiE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GItANDE GRANTING A VARIANCE, CASE NO. 93-151, APPLIED FOR BY THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., AT 1G50 GRAND AVENUE, VARIANCE TO ALLOW PORTIONS OF A BUILDING TO EXCEED TfIE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM I-IEIGI-IT STIPULATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT COD�; ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE D�CLARATION WIT��I MITIGATION MEASURES AND INSTRUCTION THAT TIIE SECRETARY FILE A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Variance Case No. 93-181, filed by The Vons Companies, Inc., to allow portions of a building to exceed the 30 foot maximum heigl�t stipulated by the Development Code Section 9-10.040; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on this application in accordance with the City Code; and WIIEREAS, tt�e Planning Commission has found that t}�is project is consistent witl� tl�e General Plan and tl�e environmental documents associated therewitl�; and WHER�AS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance wilh the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on the Expanded Initial Study I�as determined that a Negative Declaration can be adopted; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: 1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcernent of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary l�ards}�ip not otherwise shared by otliers in tlie surrounding area. Limiting the maximum height of the building to 30 feet woulci result in an architectural facade that lacks a height to width ratio that typically results in a pleasing arc}�itectural presentation. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circu►nstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended tise of the property t}iat do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zone. The size of the building is substantially greater than most buildings witl�in tliis zone. Wilh tl�is larger size, tlie widtli of tlie building is greater, tlius requiring an increase in tlie allowable heigl�t to allow tl�e same degree of articulation and variation of I�eigl�t and width typically found in smaller buildings. Resolution No. 93-1443 Variance Case No. 93-181 The Vons Companies, Inc. November 16, 1993 Page Two 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties classified in the same zone. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the height restriction would deprive the applicant of the ability to construct a building with the same architecturally pleasing qualities found in other smaller buildings in the same zone. 4. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with tlie limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. 5. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public l�ealth, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The height of the proposed store does not adversely affect views from surrounding properties. 6. The granting of a variance is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan and the intent of this title. Policy 6.2a states that in general building t�eights sf�ould � be within 30 feet. General Plan policy 6.2c requires buildings to be well articulated. For the most part, the proposed building is lower than 30 feet however, three architectural elements do exceed this general limit. The design approach is intended to provide building articulation. Considering the bulk of the building meets the height limit and that the taller elements provide articulation, the project is consistent with tlie intent of the General Plan. DepArtment of Fish and Game Required rindings of Exemption 1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of . the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for Variance Case No. 93-181. 2. Based on the initial study, a negative declaration drafted for review by the public and review and approval by the Planning Commission. 3. After liolding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering the record as a whole the Planning Commission adopted tlie negative declaration and found that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon whicl� the wildlife depends as a result of development of tliis project. Resolution No. 93-1443 Variance Case No. 93-181 The Vons Companies, Inc. Noveinber 16, 1993 Page Three NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RI:SOLV�D that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a Negative Declaration, instructs the Secretary to file a Notice of Determination; and approves said variance, subject to tl�e standard conditions of the City and those conditions listed below: General Conditions 1. Tl�e applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. This application shall automatically expire on November 16, 1995 unless a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, tlie applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 3. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to tl�e Planning Commission at the meeting of November 16, 1993 and marked "Exliibit A" except as specifically modified herein by the following conditions. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at l�is/her sole expense any action brougl�t against tfie City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or ernployees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's whicll the City, its agents, officers or e►nployees may be required by a court to pay as a result of sucl� action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in tlie deferise of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of liis/her obligations under this condition. 5. A negative declaration witli mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. Tlie mitigation measures attacl�ed hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Attacl�ment "A", shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall be monitored by tfie appropriate City department or otl�er responsible agency. Tl�e applic�nt sl�all be responsible for verific�tion in �vr iting by the rnoniloring dep�rtment oi• s�gency tl��t tf�e mit.igation measures l��ve been impleinented. 6. Building heights shall be as shown on Exhibit "A". Prior to issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the phase one improvements, tlie applicant sl�all provide certification by a licensed surveyor that tl�e building i�eights comply with Exl�ibit "A". Resolution No. 93-1443 Variance Case No. 93-181 The Vons Companies, Inc. November 16, 1993 PAge Four On motion of Commissioner Keen, seconded by Commissioner Tappan, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: � AYES: Cornmissioners Tappan, Reilly, Deviny, Keen and Cl�airman Carr NOES: None ABS�NT: Commissioners Soto and Hatchett the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of November, 1993. ATTEST: �v • . �� Nancy Brown ommission Clerk Robert W. Carr, Chairman ATTACI-IMENT "A" MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING I'ROGRAM 1. All earthwork and site development sl�all comply with the provisions of tl�e city's gradirig ordinance, the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and tiie recommendations contained in tlie "Soils Engirieering Report, Williams Brothers Shopping Center, Store No. 5.749", Marcli 16, 1993 prepared by Eartl� Systems Consultants. Said recommendations are incorporated herein by tliis reference and included within the Expanded Initial Study as Appendix F. In case of a conflict between the referenced documents, the Director of Building and Fire shall determine the applicable requirements. Monito�ing Prog�am: Grading and const�uction plans slrall Ge checked; field wo�k will be inspected for complia.nce. 7Fnte Fiame: Plari cltecking prior to issua�rce �f grading or building pe»nits; i�lspections during co�istruc�ion a�td prior to fina.l occupa�acy. Responsible Agency: 13uildi�rg a�zd Fire Departments. 2. The applicant sliall comply witl� tlie provisions of Section 7-1.13 of tl�e Municipal Code to prevent soil erosion. Moriito�ing P,�og�am: T�me Fiame: ResPonsible Agency Provisions shall be noted on grading and construc�ion pla�ts; practices will be monirored in field Gy Cic�� inspecto�s. Plan checking p�•io�� to issua�rce of gradi�zg or buildin.g �e�7nits; inspec�ions during co�zstruction. 13uildi�ig Deparmrent. 3. Recommenclations contained in tl�e "Seismicity Report, Williams Brotl�ers Shopping Center, Store No. 5.749", June 7, 1993, by Earth Systems Consultants are incorporated herein by tliis referenced and included witliin the Expanded Initial Study as Exl�ibit E, shall be implemented during all phases of construction. Monito�ing Pi�g�z�m: Recommenda�ions shall be inco�porated into grading and construccioii plans. Compliance will mo�tit.ored th�•ouglt field i�rspeccio�rs. T�ime Fiame: Pla�a claecking p� to issuance of gradi�tg or building pennits; inspec�ions during construction. Responsible Agency: Building Department. (1) 4. If the Uniform Building Code (1991 edition) is used for structural design considerations, the site shall be assigned a seismic zone factor of 0.40 and a site coefficient of 1.2 (Tables.23-I and 23-J respectively). 5. � Monitoring Progmm: Use of the factors shall be incorporate�l into co�zstruction plans. 7tme Frame: Plan checking prior to issuance of building pern�its. Responsible Age�zcy: Building Department. � The applicant shall maintain or accommodate existing histoiical drainage flows. Monitoring Program: Drainage plans shall demonstrate how historic flows will be maintained or accommodated; drainage improvements sliall be installed accordingly. Time Fi•ame: Plan checking prior to issuance of grading or building permits; field inspections during construction and prior to final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Building and Public Works Departments. Oil separation devices shall be installed on all drainage systems to prevent automotive pollutants from contaminating the drainage basins or downstream drainage facilities. Monitoring Prog�am: 71ime Fiame: Responsible Agency: Drainage pla�is shall include separation devices; said devices sliall be iitstalled by the developer. Pla�i checkin.g prior to issc�a�ace of gradiitg or building pe��r�its; field inspectiorts during constructio�i and.prior to final occupancy. Building Department. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant sliall submit a construction and grading plan to the APCD whicl� identifies the proposed amount of cut and fill, proposed grading equipment to be used and the duration of use. APCD shall require appropriate measures to reduce pollutant emissions during construction to acceptable levels. Measures required by tt�e APCD shall be noted on the grading and construction plans. �� Monito�ing Prog�arn: APCD measures shall be �ZOted on gr•ading a�id co��struction plans. 7tme Frame: � Plan cltecking prior to issu�nce of grading or building permits. Responsible Agency: 13uilding Department. To enl�ance pedestrian accessibility, prior to completion of tlle first phase of construction, the applicant sl�all construct a sidewalk along the west side of Courtland Street between Grand Avenue and Brigllton Avenue. �2) Monito�iirg Prog�am: Tlime Fi�ame: Respoitsible Age�tcy: Improveniertt pla�ts sh.all include the subject sidewalk; installation shnll be inspected and al�proved before acceptance by tlie City. Plan c%ecking prior to issuance O,f 1JULICIIl1g IJG'171111 inspection and npproval prior to final occupancy. Public Works Deparu�le�it. 9. To encourage public transit use, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for tt�e store, the applicant sliall construct a transit (bus) turnout as part of the rig,ht turn lane required on condition number 38, transit sl�elter, benches, a sl�opping cart storage area for transit users, and a waikway from the transit stop to the front of the store. Monitoring Program: Said facilities shall be illustrated on the improvemen.t plans and in che site plan for the project; field inspections co monitor actual. installation.. Time Frame: Pla�i clrecking prior to issuance of a building perniit; field i�lspections p� to final occupa�icy. Responsible Agency: B�cilding a»d Pla.nnin.g Depa� for on site facilities; Public Wor•ks for bus turnout. and otlr.er facilities in tlae public right-of-wa.y. 10. As part of t}�e review of the final landscape and irrigation plans, tl�e Director of Parks and Recreation shall review tl�e number, size and species of trees proposed in parking lot areas to maxi►nize shading of cars and reduce heat soak and diurnal emissions. Moreito�Tng Progi�ant: Landscnpi�r.g pla�i shall be reviewed for inclusio�a of these features; field inspeccions shall co� f nn actual ins�alla.tio�a. 7tme Fiame: Pla�t checking prior to issuance of a gradin.g or building pennil; field inspections prior t.o final occupancy. Responsible Agency: Parks and Recreatio�i Departmen.t. 11. The applicant shall, on an ongoing basis, evaluate the feasibility of providing delivery service to surrounding residential areas. An initial feasibility study shall be presented to the Planning Department, in writing, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the store. Monito�ing Prog��arn: Teasibiliry study to be reviewed and aPproved by the Ciry; Ci .ry ma.y require regc�la�• sccbmission of said anal.yses. 7tme Trame: Initia.l feasibili .ry study to be submitted a�id approved prior final occupancy. Later scudies m�y be required. pursuant to a schedule approved Iry tlre Planni�Tg Departmertt. Resportsible Ageney: Planni�ig Departrnent.. 12. Prior to issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the store, the APCD sliall review and approve an employee trip reduction plan submitted to them by tl�e applicant. The applicant shall implement the provisions of tl�e approved plan on an ongoing basis. (3) Monitoring Yrog�am: 7Fme Frame: Responsible Agency: Ti�ip reduction plan shall be submitted to the APCD. Periodic reviews of the provisions naay be conducted by the APCD. Review and approval of the plan prior to issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy; later reviews at the discretion of the APCD. APCD. 13. Prior to issuance of demolition permits for existing structures, the applicant shall demonstrate exemption from or compliance witl� the Asbestos Notification Require►nents of Part 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Part 61). Monitoring Progmn:: 7Yme Frame: Responsible Ageney: Said inforn2ation shall be submicted to the Ciry. Prior to issuance of demolition permits for existing structures. Building Departrnent. � 14. All construction shall utilize fixtures and designs which minimize water usage. Such fixtures and designs shall include, but are not limited to, low flow shower heads, water saving toilets, instant water l�eaters or hot water recirculating systems, drip irrigation with drought tolerant landscaping and so forth. Monitoring Program: Co��struction and landscapin.g plans shall illustra�e and/or othenvise note water-conservi�ig features; field inspections shall coi firni installation. Time Fiame: Plan checking prinr to issua�zce of building pennits; field i��spectio��s during construction and prior to final occupnncy. Responsible Agency: I3uildiir.g Department. 15. Prior to final occupancy of any structure, all water conserving designs or fixtures sl�all be installed. Monitoring Program: See 14 above. 16. All landscaping shall be consistent witli water conservation practices including the use of drip irrigation, mulch, gravel and bark. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation sl�all be minimized. Moitilo�iitg Progiant: La.ndscapirtg plans shall re,flect these requirements; field inspections shall co��rni instrrllation. 71ime Fiame: Plan checking prior to issuance of buildi�r.g pe»�tit; field ' inspections prior to final occupancy. � Responsible Agency: Parks and Recreation Department. (4) 17. Tlie applicant shall provide for review and approval by tl�e City Council, an individual water program which will propose mitigating measures to neutralize projected water demand for the project. Projected water dernand for this project is 12.63 acre-feet per year. As part of the water program, the City Council may adjust projected water demand based upon proposed water conservation ►neasures or other factors that decrease use of city water supplies. T1ie approved program must be implemented prior to issuance of building permits. Monitoring Progiant: Wa.ter °�zeutral" proposal slr.all be suGmitted ai�d approved ��y r.>>� c�cy cou» ��i inrplenrentation sliall be demo��strated to che Cir.y. 7'ime Tir�me: Prior �o issua».ce of building pe�7nit. Responsible Agei:cy: City Council for prog�•a»i aJ�p�•oval; Planning Depa�tme».t for im1�lementatiort co� f nnation. 18. The developer shall plant at least two (2) 60-incl� box live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) and at least four (4) 36-inch box live oaks on the site or equivalent as determined by the Parks and Recreation Director. (Note: tl�e current plan shows 13 36-inch box live oaks). The landscaping plan shall include notes on tl�e proper planting and irrigation tecl�niques, and shall indicate compatible species in the planter areas for the oak trees. The landscape plan and notes shall be subject to the approval of the Recreation Director or his designated representative. Moiaitoring Prog�am: Landscaping pla�rs shall reflect tlr.is requirement. and shall note planting and irrigation. metl7ods; installation shall be catfinned by field inspectio�i. Tinte Frame: Plan cl�ecking prior to issuance of building pe�7nits; field i�rspeclions prior to final occttpancy. Responsible Age►tcy: Pm•ks crnd Recreatio�z Depart.men.t. 19. To minimize noise conflicts between the store and surrounding residents, the store shall limit the hours of access to the loading dock area at the north side of the store to between 6 am and $ 12 pm. The store shall provide facilities for loading from tl�e front of tlie store if deliveries must be made during nighttime liours. If witliin one year of tl�e store's opening tl�ere are signifcant complaints re arding noise. due to access to the loadin� dock area a public hearin� sl�all be held before tl�e Plannin� Commission The applicant shall pav for the cost of tlie �ublic l�earin� If it is found that there are significant noise concerns. the Planning Commission mav amend the hours of operation: require additional noise miti�ation measures• and/or require an additional noise study to be paid for b t�he applicant This annual review cnav be extended beyond one ,Year. Monito�ing Program: Developer sl7all reco�d a�l agreeme�tt. or similcrr instru�nent and shall incorporar.e into any lease agreements these linritat,ions; evidence of this shall be subnziued to the Ciry. Failure to comply may Ge growtds for revocation of [lr.e use pennit. �ublic lt.eari�t& mav be held i complaurts are recei ved. (5) 7Yme Fiante: � 21. Respa:sible Agency: lititial �greement s/�all be submiued prior to final occupancy; period inspections by the Ciry will be conducted on a complaint basis. Public hearing wit)rin o�r.e vear o�' store's o.pening_ Planni�tg Department. � Trash pick-up shall be limited to the hours between 6 am and 8 pm. Monitoiing Program: See 19 above. Parking lot sweeping shall be limited to the hours between 6 am and 8 pm in the truck turn-around area and loading docks at the rear of the store. Monitoring Program: See 19 above. 22. All sound walls and parapet walls shall be of impervious construction that provides a surface density of 2.5 pounds per square foot or greater. Monitoring Progmm: Consn�uction plans shall meet this requirement; compliance shall be confirmed by field inspection. 7tme Frame: Plan checking prior to issuance of building perniit; field inspection prior to final occup�rncy. Responsible Ageizcy: Building Department. 23. All construction equipment sl�all be provided with well maintained, functional mufflers to limit noise emissions. Monitoring Program: 7�me Fiame: Responsible Agency: Equipment may be inspected during construction eitlzer during usual fteld visits by City ir�spectors or on a compla.int basis. During grading and construction. Building Department. 24. All construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Saturday between the hours of 7 am and 8 pm. Monitoring Progrant: City i�tspectors may enforce compliance tli.rouglz period � field visits or on a complai�tt bnsis. . 7Yme Fiame: Duriitg grading and construction. Responsible Agency: Building Department. 25. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of the site bordering developed areas si�ould occur during the middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring noise sensitive uses. Monitoring Prograrn: Grading plans shall note this �•equi� on each page; Ciry inspectors may enforce this requirement during usual field visits or on a complaint basis. 7Fme I�'rame Plan checking prior to issuance of grnding pennit; field checks during gradin.g. (6). Responsible Agency: Buildirr.g Department. 26. Property line sound walls should be erected as early as possible in the overall construction of the project to reduce tl�e noise impact of subsequent construction activity on neigl�boring uses. Monitoring Progrr�m: 13uildi�ig plans shall include a itot.e with this directive; Ci .ry inspecto�s may d7.eck for compliance durin.g early field visits. � 7Yme Frame: Plan checking prior to issleance of buil.diri.g per��iit; field cl�ecks during consn•uction. Responsible Ageitey: 13uilding Depar�ment. 27. The developer shall pay traffic impact fees of $2,656 per peak hour trip on tl�e back bone system, or such other fee as may be adopted by tl�e City prior to issuance of a building permit. Tlie cost of constructin� additional lanes and related conslruction costs in Oak Park Boulevard and Grand Avenue shall be credited a�ainst anv traffic impact fees tliat may be imposed. Monitoring Pibg�am: 7Fme Finnte: Responsible Agency: Fees shall be paid. Prior to issr�arice of buildi�rg pen�iits. Pla�ani�7g a�rd 13uildi�i.g Deparunents. 28. The developer sl�all offer to dedicate land along the weslern property line to accommodate future wideniiig of Oak Park Boulevard; the widt}� of said dedication sl�all be subject to approval of the City Engineer, and the form of the dedication offer approved by the City Attorney. Monito�ing Prog�r�m: Of�j`'ei• of dedication sliall be subn�itted., apProved and reco�ded; irnProvement plans and site pla»s shall reflect the dedication of�"er. 7Fme Finme: Plan checking prior to issuance of building pern�it; app�•oval and reco�ciation of of�j`er prior to f nal occupa�icy. Responsible Agency: Planni�tg and Public Works for review of site plan and improvement plans, respectively; Ciry Attorney fo�� forni of reco� cted o,/� j`'er. . „ n„�. n.,..�. n„��.,� � n,,,,�..,, a�� ..�..,>> �.e--�e�ee�e�-f9-��e-Setttlt �e ' e -�#e--lee�erj--�-�es�gr�-e€ o n:�., �.,.,;., o.. o..;�oa �i��$� -'°°a---@cr. � ����e��p�9-ft�g�f -tl�e--�ttt��g-�('fi�i� s#jewi�g�-�#� °a : ^+���tr�a�ie��g-�e�eeessa�}�fe—ec-Een��te�ate �g� �14e�etzrtg� P-reg��:�: --�� . . �--r�eef-���a��ge�: �-�'`funce`: n1 t -�'f?�ft�N�6�-{ �j ��rE��9f�� �ti4�-�6� 9�if�Rfi�1��-�&7?��7� ���er�'ar--er�fe-E�a�ge��-�B--f�te��i Ng`--le� (�) 29. The annlicant and the Director of Public Works shall request of Grover Beach and work with Grover Beach to red curb the propertv north of Ramona Avenue on the west side of Oak Park Boulevard. Public Works staff shall report back to the Plannin� Commission with the results of said work. Monitoring Prog��am: Applicant and Director oP Public Works to work witla Grover Beach to red curb said �ropertv 7Yme Fiame: Prior to issuance o� iaal Certiftcate of Occupa.rtc,� Responsible Agenc� Public Woiks Departments. 3o—�T�e-�e�e�e�e�-s �^�,����-i-�st-��e��-a�pra�e�-b�#e-�i-E� �A�e�e�+-v�� � i.�-.ett}y�-�t�e�-etr�e�se�-e�r-�}�o ..,,,� a;.,,,,.,..:,,ff.e€-E�e-EiE�:—�€-�l�e-�t�►-�ees--re�r��e ��" .•4 ♦4.n4 4im�-'r'v-ii�i-v��33-fP'�Vi��--3�e iiv..v� �ua. Y �Ti . �9t3t�6�`tR�9�r���s� flE� �tfl3�fi� . �cCS�36HSl��C-r'�g�l fij tifi}�}£ttTfl ('Aifi�f1� �?��G i�(�'��?:"':;..,..,...>::>:::.:>::: :::,:,.>:,.<;'.: �:;:<»<,;;:«, ;>;>::>:;<;<<>. ...............:::::>.:::�':.: �'�az�r��n� 31. Fire Department Impact Fees of $18,550 or other such fees as may be adopted by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits, shall be paid prior to final inspection of the store. (Fee does not include Pad "B".) Monitoring Prog�am: Fees sliall be paid. 71ime Frante: Prior to ftnal occupa�tcy. Responsible Agency: Fire Depa�•tment. 32. The landscaping plan shall be modified to reduce the number of large trees on tt�e northern and western property lines above the supermarket. Species whicl� grow to maximum heights of about 10 to 20 feet shall be substituted. The revised landscaping plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments. Monito,ing P��ogram: Revised landscaping plan shall re,flect this requirement; field i��rpections shall conftrnt installation. Time Frame: Plan diecking prior to issuance of building permit; field inspection prior to final occcrpancy. Responsible Agency: Planning and Parks and Recreation Departme��ts. 33. The treatment of roof top equipment shall be subject to City design review. Strategies to reduce the prominence of such equipment may include use of low scale screens or enclosures and painting the equipment the same color as the roof. Monito�ing Prog�am: Treatment of roof top equipment shall be submitted to City for approval; field i�ispections shall confinn compliance. �g) I I � TYme Fiame: Approval of trentment pr•ior to issuaiice of building per7�iit; field ir�spection prior to final occupancy. Respoitsible Age�tcy: Plan�ii�i.g and licrilding Depa� 34. In tlie event that during grading, construction or development of the project, any archaeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be halted until the city has reviewed the resources for their significance. If human burials are encountered, the County Coroner (781-4513) st�all be contacted immediately. The applicant may be required to provide arcl�aeological studies and/or mitigation measures. All grading and improvement plans shall be noted to reflect this mitigation. Monito�ing Program: All plans with subsu�face const.ruction or gradin.g shall note this requirement on eadi page. 71ime Finrne: Plan d7ecking for note prior to issuance of grading or � iinprovement plans. Responsible Agency: I3uilding De.par�ment. (9)